Bug#971594: RFS: asciidoc/9.0.2-1 [ITA] -- Highly configurable text format for writing documentation
Am 28.10.21 um 14:26 schrieb Leon Marz: On 10/27/21 9:38 PM, Bastian Germann wrote: Hi Leon, The package seems to be okay except for the debian/copyright file. Just by looking at the debdiff (excluding the unchanged upstream sources) I can identify several files with additional copyright holders. Also, some files are GPL-2-only, which are not okay to publish under the general GPL-2+ that is assumed for *. Quick Question: How can I determine if a file is GPL-2-only or GPL-2+? Is it the phrase "Free use of this software is granted under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 (GPLv2)."? That is correct. If there is a license header in a file with the GPL version specified and it does not say "or later" or has a plus (+) after the GPL version then one has to assume that only that specific version applies.
Bug#971594: RFS: asciidoc/9.0.2-1 [ITA] -- Highly configurable text format for writing documentation
Control: tags -1 moreinfo On Wed, 18 Aug 2021 15:12:44 +0200 Leon Marz wrote: Hi tobi, Thanks for helping me adopting this package. First I'm sorry that I haven't answered before. For some reason I didn't receive any of your emails. Hopefully that is now fixed. On Wed, 09 Jun 2021 16:50:47 +0200 Tobias Frost wrote:> What I can see from the diff is that the only package dropped is vim-ascidoc. > This looks sane to me, and due to the fact that vim depends on vim-runtime > on any vim flavour != tiny, people possibly have already vim-runtime installed. In the previous discussion I have stated that I also want to remove asciidoc-base. During the freeze period I've decided that I want to keep this binary package because it reduces the amount of dependencies for smaller use cases like generating man pages. Sorry if that caused some confusion. > However -- as popcon of the package is rather high -- I would put up some > NEWS.Debian file saying that this is dropped in favour of vim-runtime; > This is especially useful, if (I did not check if that is the case!) the > user needs to do someting to switch to the vim-runtime provided thingy. > What do you think? Sounds good. I have written something in the NEWS file in the newest upload. The user doesn't have to change their configuration. It should work out of the box. - Leon Hi Leon, The package seems to be okay except for the debian/copyright file. Just by looking at the debdiff (excluding the unchanged upstream sources) I can identify several files with additional copyright holders. Also, some files are GPL-2-only, which are not okay to publish under the general GPL-2+ that is assumed for *. The MIT license is no longer unspecified but is the Expat license. Please copy the license text and use that name. The GFDL-1.3 license boilerplate is actually GFDL-NIV-1.3, which is important for the package residing in main. Non-NIV is non-free. So please change the shortname. Again, please untag moreinfo for the next review to happen. Cheers, Bastian
Bug#971594: RFS: asciidoc/9.0.2-1 [ITA] -- Highly configurable text format for writing documentation
Hi tobi, Thanks for helping me adopting this package. First I'm sorry that I haven't answered before. For some reason I didn't receive any of your emails. Hopefully that is now fixed. On Wed, 09 Jun 2021 16:50:47 +0200 Tobias Frost wrote:> What I can see from the diff is that the only package dropped is vim-ascidoc. > This looks sane to me, and due to the fact that vim depends on vim-runtime > on any vim flavour != tiny, people possibly have already vim-runtime > installed. In the previous discussion I have stated that I also want to remove asciidoc-base. During the freeze period I've decided that I want to keep this binary package because it reduces the amount of dependencies for smaller use cases like generating man pages. Sorry if that caused some confusion. > However -- as popcon of the package is rather high -- I would put up some > NEWS.Debian file saying that this is dropped in favour of vim-runtime; > This is especially useful, if (I did not check if that is the case!) the > user needs to do someting to switch to the vim-runtime provided thingy. > What do you think? Sounds good. I have written something in the NEWS file in the newest upload. The user doesn't have to change their configuration. It should work out of the box. - Leon OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#971594: RFS: asciidoc/9.0.2-1 [ITA] -- Highly configurable text format for writing documentation
Hi Leon, now that bullseye is released, we could tackle asciidoc... What do you think? -- tobi
Bug#971594: RFS: asciidoc/9.0.2-1 [ITA] -- Highly configurable text format for writing documentation
The bug in nanoc has been fixed. I uploaded a new version of the package that doesn't include asciidoc-base. - Leon
Bug#971594: RFS: asciidoc/9.0.2-1 [ITA] -- Highly configurable text format for writing documentation
> Please also file a bug on nanoc so that you can eventually drop the > asciidoc-base transitional package. > > I also suggest removing the suggests/recommends from asciidoc-base > since it is a transitional package containing nothing. Ok. The Bug is #971653. The new version is also already uploaded. - Leon signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#971594: RFS: asciidoc/9.0.2-1 [ITA] -- Highly configurable text format for writing documentation
On Sat, 2020-10-03 at 10:11 +0200, Leon Marz wrote: > Ok, no problem. asciidoc-base is now a metapackage, which depends on > asciidoc. Please also file a bug on nanoc so that you can eventually drop the asciidoc-base transitional package. I also suggest removing the suggests/recommends from asciidoc-base since it is a transitional package containing nothing. -- bye, pabs https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#971594: RFS: asciidoc/9.0.2-1 [ITA] -- Highly configurable text format for writing documentation
> I would instead suggest either keeping it as it was before, getting > nanoc fixed before removing asciidoc-base or making asciidoc-base into > a transitional package depending on asciidoc. Ok, no problem. asciidoc-base is now a metapackage, which depends on asciidoc. - Leon
Bug#971594: RFS: asciidoc/9.0.2-1 [ITA] -- Highly configurable text format for writing documentation
On Fri, 2020-10-02 at 16:13 +0200, Leon Marz wrote: > I have uploaded a new version of the package with asciidoc-base back > included, but as a duplicate of asciidoc. I hope this is alright. I don't think it is appropriate to duplicate the package like that. I would instead suggest either keeping it as it was before, getting nanoc fixed before removing asciidoc-base or making asciidoc-base into a transitional package depending on asciidoc. -- bye, pabs https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#971594: RFS: asciidoc/9.0.2-1 [ITA] -- Highly configurable text format for writing documentation
Thank you for the quick response. I have uploaded a new version of the package with asciidoc-base back included, but as a duplicate of asciidoc. I hope this is alright. - Leon
Bug#971594: RFS: asciidoc/9.0.2-1 [ITA] -- Highly configurable text format for writing documentation
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "asciidoc": * Package name: asciidoc Version : 9.0.2-1 Upstream Author : AsciiDoc Contributors https://groups.google.com/group/asciidoc * URL : http://www.asciidoc.org * License : MIT, GPL-2+, GFDL-1.3 * Vcs : https://salsa.debian.org/debian/asciidoc Section : text It builds those binary packages: asciidoc-tests - Test framework for asciidoc asciidoc-fop - Asciidoc package including fop dependencies asciidoc-dblatex - Asciidoc package including dblatex dependencies asciidoc-common - Basic data and configuration files for asciidoc asciidoc - Highly configurable text format for writing documentation To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/asciidoc/ Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/a/asciidoc/asciidoc_9.0.2-1.dsc Changes since the last upload: asciidoc (9.0.2-1) unstable; urgency=medium . * New Maintainer (Closes: #934015) * Remove vim-asciidoc (Closes: #954780) * Remove asciidoc-base as it is unnecessary * Put files from asciidoc-base to asciidoc * Remove asciidoc-doc as there are no real docs * Bump debhelper-compat version to 13 * Drop almost all patches * Refresh testasciidoc_usage.patch * d/rules: remove some overrides and clean dh_install * d/copyright: Add Upstream-Contact Regards, -- Leon Marz
