Bug#973480: transition: llvm-defaults
Hello, Le 04/12/2020 à 18:44, Sebastian Ramacher a écrit : Control: tags -1 + confirmed On 2020-10-31 14:35:36 +0100, Sylvestre Ledru wrote: Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Hello, One more time, it is time to have upgrade llvm. I would like to ship bullseye with 11 and skip -10 (it had some performance regression in the binary generated). I am building a version with the ppc64el fix. llvm-defaults has been pointing to 11 in experimental for quite sometime. Happy to upload it in unstable when you give me the go. Rust already relies on -11 in experimental. Please go ahead. Thanks! Gianfranco uploaded it in unstable! Thanks S
Bug#973480: transition: llvm-defaults
Control: tags -1 + confirmed On 2020-10-31 14:35:36 +0100, Sylvestre Ledru wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: transition > > Hello, > > One more time, it is time to have upgrade llvm. > I would like to ship bullseye with 11 and skip -10 (it had some performance > regression in the > binary generated). > > I am building a version with the ppc64el fix. > llvm-defaults has been pointing to 11 in experimental for quite sometime. > Happy to upload it in unstable when you give me the go. > > Rust already relies on -11 in experimental. Please go ahead. Cheers -- Sebastian Ramacher signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#973480: transition: llvm-defaults
On Wed, Nov 11, 2020 at 04:36:06PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Sat, Oct 31, 2020 at 03:18:52PM +0100, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > >... > > I'm not sure what .depends ~ "~" is supposed to catch here and it causes > > a parser failure. So I've merged this ben file with the one from the > > llvm-defaults 9 transition. Once the tracker is available, please check > > if that looks sane. > > Please remove the second part from the Affected, these packages are not > part of the llvm-defaults transition. I've rebuilt the 13 bad packages from the ben file below: ccls OK clazy OK codelite OK faust OK ghdl FTBFS #976233 ldc OK libclang-perl OK qttools-opensource-src OK sparse OK ycmd OK kdevelop OK qtcreator OK gnome-builder OK This is not a normal transition where old package(s) disappear from testing since both LLVM 9 and LLVM 11 are already in testing and will stay in testing after this transition. This means rebuilds could be scheduled at any time after an llvm-defaults upload without actual conflict with other transitions. Removal of LLVM 9 and/or LLVM 10 from bullseye are topics unrelated to this llvm-defaults transition. cu Adrian title = "llvm-defaults 11"; is_affected = .build-depends ~ /\b(libclang|liblldb|llvm)-dev\b/; is_good = .depends ~ /\b(lib|)(clang|lldb|llvm)1?-?11\b/; is_bad = .depends ~ /\b(lib|)(clang|lldb|llvm)1?-?9\b/;
Bug#973480: transition: llvm-defaults
On Sat, Oct 31, 2020 at 03:18:52PM +0100, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: >... > I'm not sure what .depends ~ "~" is supposed to catch here and it causes > a parser failure. So I've merged this ben file with the one from the > llvm-defaults 9 transition. Once the tracker is available, please check > if that looks sane. Please remove the second part from the Affected, these packages are not part of the llvm-defaults transition. > Cheers Thanks Adrian
Bug#973480: transition: llvm-defaults
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo Control: block -1 by 971415 On 2020-10-31 14:35:36 +0100, Sylvestre Ledru wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: transition > > Hello, > > One more time, it is time to have upgrade llvm. > I would like to ship bullseye with 11 and skip -10 (it had some performance > regression in the > binary generated). > > I am building a version with the ppc64el fix. > > llvm-defaults has been pointing to 11 in experimental for quite sometime. > Happy to upload it in unstable when you give me the go. This transition is at least blocked by the ocaml transition as that needs to finish before llvm-toolchain-11 can migrate. > Rust already relies on -11 in experimental. What about the other reverse dependencies? Do they all build fine with llvm-toolchain-11? > > Thanks > Sylvestre > > Ben file: > > title = "llvm-defaults"; > is_affected = .depends ~ "~" | .depends ~ /(clang|llvm)1?-(?[3456789]|?10)/ | > .depends ~ "~" | .depends ~ /(clang|llvm)1?-?[11]/; > is_good = .depends ~ "~" | .depends ~ /(clang|llvm)1?-?[11]/; > is_bad = .depends ~ "~" | .depends ~ /(clang|llvm)1?-(?[3456789]|?10)/; I'm not sure what .depends ~ "~" is supposed to catch here and it causes a parser failure. So I've merged this ben file with the one from the llvm-defaults 9 transition. Once the tracker is available, please check if that looks sane. Cheers > > > (not certain about the is_bad regexp :/) > > > -- System Information: > Debian Release: bullseye/sid > APT prefers testing > APT policy: (900, 'testing'), (600, 'unstable'), (500, 'oldstable'), (300, > 'experimental') > Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) > Foreign Architectures: i386 > > Kernel: Linux 5.4.0-4-amd64 (SMP w/28 CPU threads) > Kernel taint flags: TAINT_PROPRIETARY_MODULE, TAINT_OOT_MODULE, > TAINT_UNSIGNED_MODULE > Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE not > set > Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash > Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) > -- Sebastian Ramacher signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#973480: transition: llvm-defaults
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Hello, One more time, it is time to have upgrade llvm. I would like to ship bullseye with 11 and skip -10 (it had some performance regression in the binary generated). I am building a version with the ppc64el fix. llvm-defaults has been pointing to 11 in experimental for quite sometime. Happy to upload it in unstable when you give me the go. Rust already relies on -11 in experimental. Thanks Sylvestre Ben file: title = "llvm-defaults"; is_affected = .depends ~ "~" | .depends ~ /(clang|llvm)1?-(?[3456789]|?10)/ | .depends ~ "~" | .depends ~ /(clang|llvm)1?-?[11]/; is_good = .depends ~ "~" | .depends ~ /(clang|llvm)1?-?[11]/; is_bad = .depends ~ "~" | .depends ~ /(clang|llvm)1?-(?[3456789]|?10)/; (not certain about the is_bad regexp :/) -- System Information: Debian Release: bullseye/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (900, 'testing'), (600, 'unstable'), (500, 'oldstable'), (300, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 5.4.0-4-amd64 (SMP w/28 CPU threads) Kernel taint flags: TAINT_PROPRIETARY_MODULE, TAINT_OOT_MODULE, TAINT_UNSIGNED_MODULE Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE not set Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
