Bug#976735: spyder needs source upload for Python 3.9 transition
On Mon, Feb 01, 2021 at 09:45:24PM +0530, Nilesh Patra wrote: > Hi Julian > I read through the rest of the thread. > > On Mon, 1 Feb, 2021, 6:31 pm Julian Gilbey, wrote: > > I have a package of Spyder 4 waiting to upload, but it requires five > packages to be accepted into unstable from NEW first (pyls-server, > pyls-black, pyls-spyder, abydos, textdistance); once that happens, the > rest of the packages are almost ready to > > go. > > I requested on IRC (probably again after you) to process these ASAP, however I > don't see pyls-server in NEW or at the archive yet. > Has this been rejected, or am I missing something? > Nilesh It seems like you might have done some magic - they've now all been accepted! I should have a new version of spyder uploaded within a couple of days. Best wishes, Julian
Bug#976735: spyder needs source upload for Python 3.9 transition
On Mon, Feb 01, 2021 at 09:45:24PM +0530, Nilesh Patra wrote: > Hi Julian > I read through the rest of the thread. > > On Mon, 1 Feb, 2021, 6:31 pm Julian Gilbey, wrote: > > I have a package of Spyder 4 waiting to upload, but it requires five > packages to be accepted into unstable from NEW first (pyls-server, > pyls-black, pyls-spyder, abydos, textdistance); once that happens, the > rest of the packages are almost ready to > > go. > > I requested on IRC (probably again after you) to process these ASAP, however I > don't see pyls-server in NEW or at the archive yet. > Has this been rejected, or am I missing something? > Nilesh Aww, thanks!! My mistake (I was typing from memory in a rush); here is the correct list of source packages: euler:~ $ rmadison python-language-server pyls-black pyls-spyder abydos textdistance abydos | 0.5.0+git20201231.344346a-1 | new| source pyls-black | 0.4.6-1 | new| source pyls-spyder| 0.3.0-1 | new| source python-language-server | 0.36.2-1| new| source textdistance | 4.2.0-1 | new| source Best wishes, Julian
Bug#976735: spyder needs source upload for Python 3.9 transition
Hi Julian I read through the rest of the thread. On Mon, 1 Feb, 2021, 6:31 pm Julian Gilbey, wrote: > I have a package of Spyder 4 waiting to upload, but it requires five > packages to be accepted into unstable from NEW first (pyls-server, > pyls-black, pyls-spyder, abydos, textdistance); once that happens, the > rest of the packages are almost ready to go. I requested on IRC (probably again after you) to process these ASAP, however I don't see pyls-server in NEW or at the archive yet. Has this been rejected, or am I missing something? Nilesh > >
Bug#976735: spyder needs source upload for Python 3.9 transition
> Strangely enough, I've already done that ;-) my bad. Cheers Fred
Bug#976735: spyder needs source upload for Python 3.9 transition
On Mon, Feb 01, 2021 at 01:34:46PM +, PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel wrote: > > I have a package of Spyder 4 waiting to upload, but it requires five > > packages to be accepted into unstable from NEW first (pyls-server, > > pyls-black, pyls-spyder, abydos, textdistance); once that happens, the > > rest of the packages are almost ready to go. > > Maybe you can contact the ftpmaster team and request a review of these > packages. > > In order to avoid the spyder removal. > > Cheers Strangely enough, I've already done that ;-) Julian
Bug#976735: spyder needs source upload for Python 3.9 transition
> I have a package of Spyder 4 waiting to upload, but it requires five > packages to be accepted into unstable from NEW first (pyls-server, > pyls-black, pyls-spyder, abydos, textdistance); once that happens, the > rest of the packages are almost ready to go. Maybe you can contact the ftpmaster team and request a review of these packages. In order to avoid the spyder removal. Cheers
Bug#976735: spyder needs source upload for Python 3.9 transition
On Mon, Feb 01, 2021 at 04:21:15PM +0530, Nilesh Patra wrote:
> Hi Julian,
>
> On Sun, 13 Dec 2020 06:58:29 + Julian Gilbey wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 07, 2020 at 05:38:26PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > > Package: spyder
> > > Version: 3.3.6+dfsg1-5
> > > Severity: serious
> > >
> > > Since binNMUs are not possible for binary-all packages,
> > > a source upload is needed for the Python 3.9 transition.
> > >
> > > In a more general note, does /usr/bin/spyder3 have to use
> > > the versioned interpreter instead of python3?
> >
> > The versioned interpreter can be avoided by removing '{interpreter} '
> > from the definition of PYBUILD_AFTER_INSTALL in debian/rules.
>
> Please consider to apply the fix if it works, also for #976966
> Since freeze is near, it would be unfortunate to loose spyder and spyder-*
> packages in bullseye.
>
> Nilesh
Hi Nilesh,
I tried it, but it turns out that the problem is much more serious
than this: all that this patch did was to highlight the other issues.
(See the other bug reports on python3-spyder.)
I have a package of Spyder 4 waiting to upload, but it requires five
packages to be accepted into unstable from NEW first (pyls-server,
pyls-black, pyls-spyder, abydos, textdistance); once that happens, the
rest of the packages are almost ready to go.
I, too, hope that we can get them in before the freeze.
Best wishes,
Julian
Bug#976735: spyder needs source upload for Python 3.9 transition
Hi Julian,
On Sun, 13 Dec 2020 06:58:29 + Julian Gilbey wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 07, 2020 at 05:38:26PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > Package: spyder
> > Version: 3.3.6+dfsg1-5
> > Severity: serious
> >
> > Since binNMUs are not possible for binary-all packages,
> > a source upload is needed for the Python 3.9 transition.
> >
> > In a more general note, does /usr/bin/spyder3 have to use
> > the versioned interpreter instead of python3?
>
> The versioned interpreter can be avoided by removing '{interpreter} '
> from the definition of PYBUILD_AFTER_INSTALL in debian/rules.
Please consider to apply the fix if it works, also for #976966
Since freeze is near, it would be unfortunate to loose spyder and spyder-*
packages in bullseye.
Nilesh
Bug#976735: spyder needs source upload for Python 3.9 transition
Hi Julian,
On Sun, 13 Dec 2020 06:58:29 + Julian Gilbey wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 07, 2020 at 05:38:26PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > Package: spyder
> > Version: 3.3.6+dfsg1-5
> > Severity: serious
> >
> > Since binNMUs are not possible for binary-all packages,
> > a source upload is needed for the Python 3.9 transition.
> >
> > In a more general note, does /usr/bin/spyder3 have to use
> > the versioned interpreter instead of python3?
>
> The versioned interpreter can be avoided by removing '{interpreter} '
> from the definition of PYBUILD_AFTER_INSTALL in debian/rules.
Please consider to apply the fix if it works, also for #976966
Since freeze is near, it would be unfortunate to loose spyder and spyder-*
packages in bullseye.
Nilesh
Bug#976735: spyder needs source upload for Python 3.9 transition
On Mon, Dec 07, 2020 at 05:38:26PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> Package: spyder
> Version: 3.3.6+dfsg1-5
> Severity: serious
>
> Since binNMUs are not possible for binary-all packages,
> a source upload is needed for the Python 3.9 transition.
>
> In a more general note, does /usr/bin/spyder3 have to use
> the versioned interpreter instead of python3?
The versioned interpreter can be avoided by removing '{interpreter} '
from the definition of PYBUILD_AFTER_INSTALL in debian/rules.
Best wishes,
Julian
Bug#976735: spyder needs source upload for Python 3.9 transition
Package: spyder Version: 3.3.6+dfsg1-5 Severity: serious Since binNMUs are not possible for binary-all packages, a source upload is needed for the Python 3.9 transition. In a more general note, does /usr/bin/spyder3 have to use the versioned interpreter instead of python3?
