Bug#980134: Keep shaarli (and dependencies) out of Bullseye? (Was: Bug#980134: shaarli: Missing minified js and css for frontend)
Hi David, On 2/3/21 2:46 PM, David Prévot wrote: > Hi James, > > Le Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 07:05:21PM -0500, James Valleroy a écrit : > […] >> While the packaged shaarli is technically usable, it is missing both >> functionality and styling that would be expected by users. Therefore >> it should be kept out of stable releases until this issue is fixed. > > Given the above (and the freeze schedule), it looks like shaarli won’t > be part of Bullseye. Do you intend to also request the removal of its > (build-)dependencies (e.g., via such kind of RC-bug), or do you intend > to maintain them all during the Bullseye lifetime (wrt security issues)? I agree with keeping the dependencies out of Bullseye also. I will try to start filing bugs this weekend. Regards, James OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#980134: Keep shaarli (and dependencies) out of Bullseye? (Was: Bug#980134: shaarli: Missing minified js and css for frontend)
Hi James, Le Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 07:05:21PM -0500, James Valleroy a écrit : […] > While the packaged shaarli is technically usable, it is missing both > functionality and styling that would be expected by users. Therefore > it should be kept out of stable releases until this issue is fixed. Given the above (and the freeze schedule), it looks like shaarli won’t be part of Bullseye. Do you intend to also request the removal of its (build-)dependencies (e.g., via such kind of RC-bug), or do you intend to maintain them all during the Bullseye lifetime (wrt security issues)? Regards David signature.asc Description: PGP signature
