Bug#984093: libcifpp_1.0.1-4_amd64.changes REJECTED

2021-10-29 Thread Andreas Tille 
Am Fri, Oct 29, 2021 at 08:06:07AM +0200 schrieb Maarten L. Hekkelman:
> See: https://www.wwpdb.org/about/usage-policies
> 
> Now, if you look at the text of this license, it is huge. Should that really
> go into the debian/copyright file?

Yes, the length of the text does not matter.  If you find it on some web page
something like

   lynx -dump > copyright.tmp
   vi copyright.tmp
remove some lines
:s/^/ /
:s/^[[:space:]]*$/ ./

comes very handy to bring the text into the required shape.

Kind regards

  Andreas. 

-- 
http://fam-tille.de

Bug#984093: libcifpp_1.0.1-4_amd64.changes REJECTED

2021-10-26 Thread Étienne Mollier 
Hi Thorsten, Hi Maarten,

Thorsten Alteholz, on 2021-10-26:
> please update the links in the PDB license block in your debian/copyright. 
> They don't seem to be valid anymore.
> 
> This is one of the reasons why all license information should be added to the 
> package.

Thanks Thorsten for your review!  Indeed the links are broken.
If I trust the Usage & Privacy page of RCSB Protein Data
Bank [1] (may this URL last a few years):
>> The wwPDB policy states that data files contained in the PDB
>> archive are available under the CC0 1.0 Universal (CC0 1.0)
>> Public Domain Dedication.
So this won't be a blocker in upcoming uploads with updated
copyright files hopefully.

[1]: https://www.rcsb.org/pages/policies

Maarten, I'm sorry that the round trip to NEW I contributed to
trigger stalled your package to not make it in the end.  On the
good news side, now that the package cleared NEW, you should
have free hands to move further on libcifpp 2 at your
convenience.

I cc'ed #984093 to postpone autoremoval of libcifpp and reduce
the time pressure.

Have a nice day,  :)
-- 
Étienne Mollier 
Fingerprint:  8f91 b227 c7d6 f2b1 948c  8236 793c f67e 8f0d 11da
Sent from /dev/pts/2, please excuse my verbosity.


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature