Bug#987397: [Pkg-tcltk-devel] Bug#987397: tcltls: build conflict with openssl requires removal of too many packages
Hi, On Fri, 23 Apr 2021, at 12:25, Sergei Golovan wrote: > It's not necessary. I've just pushed the fix to Salsa. Can you ask the > release team for the freeze exception? Why are you so quick? :) Anyway, I guess you can post the updated debdiff this time around, the difference between yours and mine is pretty minimal. -- Cheers, Andrej
Bug#987397: [Pkg-tcltk-devel] Bug#987397: tcltls: build conflict with openssl requires removal of too many packages
Hi Andrej, On Fri, Apr 23, 2021 at 1:20 PM Andrej Shadura wrote: > > Hi again, > > On Fri, 23 Apr 2021, at 12:16, Andrej Shadura wrote: > > On Fri, 23 Apr 2021, at 12:13, Sergei Golovan wrote: > > > No, it wouldn't. The point is that there's no need of any patch. An > > > extra option in debian/rules should be sufficient. I'll try it today > > > and commit the fix to salsa if it'll work. Or if it won't then I'll > > > accept your patch. > > I’ve just checked the code and you’re right, it skips directly to the > fallback. I’ll revise the merge request. It's not necessary. I've just pushed the fix to Salsa. Can you ask the release team for the freeze exception? -- Sergei Golovan
Bug#987397: [Pkg-tcltk-devel] Bug#987397: tcltls: build conflict with openssl requires removal of too many packages
Hi again, On Fri, 23 Apr 2021, at 12:16, Andrej Shadura wrote: > On Fri, 23 Apr 2021, at 12:13, Sergei Golovan wrote: > > No, it wouldn't. The point is that there's no need of any patch. An > > extra option in debian/rules should be sufficient. I'll try it today > > and commit the fix to salsa if it'll work. Or if it won't then I'll > > accept your patch. I’ve just checked the code and you’re right, it skips directly to the fallback. I’ll revise the merge request. -- Cheers, Andrej
Bug#987397: [Pkg-tcltk-devel] Bug#987397: tcltls: build conflict with openssl requires removal of too many packages
Hi, On Fri, 23 Apr 2021, at 12:13, Sergei Golovan wrote: > On Fri, Apr 23, 2021 at 1:07 PM Andrej Shadura wrote: > > > Currently, tcltls conflicts with openssl because it tries to generate > > > DH pair on the fly, > > > which sometimes fails due to lack of entropy on buildds. Though it > > > looks like the > > > newest tcltls allows one to supply option --enable-deterministic and > > > get the same result. > > > > > > I'll fix this bug after the bullseye's release. Thank you for pointing it > > > out. > > > > Thanks. Would you be okay if I went ahead with a team upload with the patch > > I attached if the release team grant me an unblock? > No, it wouldn't. The point is that there's no need of any patch. An > extra option in debian/rules should be sufficient. I'll try it today > and commit the fix to salsa if it'll work. Or if it won't then I'll > accept your patch. The question is whether the release team will be willing to unblock. Graham Inggs mentioned on IRC that if the fix doesn't change the binary packages, it should be unblockable, but I’m not sure about a bigger change. -- Cheers, Andrej
Bug#987397: [Pkg-tcltk-devel] Bug#987397: tcltls: build conflict with openssl requires removal of too many packages
Hi Andrej, On Fri, Apr 23, 2021 at 1:07 PM Andrej Shadura wrote: > > Hi, > > On Fri, 23 Apr 2021, at 11:21, Sergei Golovan wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 23, 2021 at 11:27 AM Andrej Shadura wrote: > > > While trying to build your package from the source in quite a minimal > > > container, the Build-Conflicts requirement forced the following packages > > > out: > > > > > > > ca-certificates devscripts git-buildpackage libconfig-model-dpkg-perl > > > > liblwp-protocol-https-perl libsoap-lite-perl libwww-perl > > > > libxml-parser-perl > > > > libxml-sax-expat-perl libxmlrpc-lite-perl openssl osc osc-plugin-dput > > > > osc-plugins-dput python3-certifi python3-requests > > > > > > On my normal system, it forces the removal of 358 packages including a > > > huge number of my development tools, the editor and parts of the desktop > > > environment. > > > > > > Please implement what this requirement was supposed to accomplish in a > > > different way not requiring removing openssl. > > > > Currently, tcltls conflicts with openssl because it tries to generate > > DH pair on the fly, > > which sometimes fails due to lack of entropy on buildds. Though it > > looks like the > > newest tcltls allows one to supply option --enable-deterministic and > > get the same result. > > > > I'll fix this bug after the bullseye's release. Thank you for pointing it > > out. > > Thanks. Would you be okay if I went ahead with a team upload with the patch I > attached if the release team grant me an unblock? No, it wouldn't. The point is that there's no need of any patch. An extra option in debian/rules should be sufficient. I'll try it today and commit the fix to salsa if it'll work. Or if it won't then I'll accept your patch. -- Sergei Golovan
Bug#987397: [Pkg-tcltk-devel] Bug#987397: tcltls: build conflict with openssl requires removal of too many packages
Hi, On Fri, 23 Apr 2021, at 11:21, Sergei Golovan wrote: > On Fri, Apr 23, 2021 at 11:27 AM Andrej Shadura wrote: > > While trying to build your package from the source in quite a minimal > > container, the Build-Conflicts requirement forced the following packages > > out: > > > > > ca-certificates devscripts git-buildpackage libconfig-model-dpkg-perl > > > liblwp-protocol-https-perl libsoap-lite-perl libwww-perl > > > libxml-parser-perl > > > libxml-sax-expat-perl libxmlrpc-lite-perl openssl osc osc-plugin-dput > > > osc-plugins-dput python3-certifi python3-requests > > > > On my normal system, it forces the removal of 358 packages including a > > huge number of my development tools, the editor and parts of the desktop > > environment. > > > > Please implement what this requirement was supposed to accomplish in a > > different way not requiring removing openssl. > > Currently, tcltls conflicts with openssl because it tries to generate > DH pair on the fly, > which sometimes fails due to lack of entropy on buildds. Though it > looks like the > newest tcltls allows one to supply option --enable-deterministic and > get the same result. > > I'll fix this bug after the bullseye's release. Thank you for pointing it out. Thanks. Would you be okay if I went ahead with a team upload with the patch I attached if the release team grant me an unblock? -- Cheers, Andrej
Bug#987397: [Pkg-tcltk-devel] Bug#987397: tcltls: build conflict with openssl requires removal of too many packages
Hi Andrej, On Fri, Apr 23, 2021 at 11:27 AM Andrej Shadura wrote: > > Dear Maintainer, > > While trying to build your package from the source in quite a minimal > container, the Build-Conflicts requirement forced the following packages > out: > > > ca-certificates devscripts git-buildpackage libconfig-model-dpkg-perl > > liblwp-protocol-https-perl libsoap-lite-perl libwww-perl libxml-parser-perl > > libxml-sax-expat-perl libxmlrpc-lite-perl openssl osc osc-plugin-dput > > osc-plugins-dput python3-certifi python3-requests > > On my normal system, it forces the removal of 358 packages including a > huge number of my development tools, the editor and parts of the desktop > environment. > > Please implement what this requirement was supposed to accomplish in a > different way not requiring removing openssl. Currently, tcltls conflicts with openssl because it tries to generate DH pair on the fly, which sometimes fails due to lack of entropy on buildds. Though it looks like the newest tcltls allows one to supply option --enable-deterministic and get the same result. I'll fix this bug after the bullseye's release. Thank you for pointing it out. Cheers! -- Sergei Golovan
