Bug#987554: wine-development should be replaced with wine in experimental+backports

2021-04-25 Thread Phil Morrell
On Sun, Apr 25, 2021 at 06:17:22PM +0200, Jens Reyer wrote:
> On 25.04.21 16:27, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > bullseye users would also benefit more from wine 6.0 in
> > bullseye-backports
> 
> I maintained the wine backports in the past, but stepped down
> (https://lists.debian.org/debian-wine/2020/09/msg7.html).

I plan to take on backports for wine-related packages post-bullseye, but
of course anyone else's interest in helping out is appreciated,
particularly for upload sponsorship.

https://lists.debian.org/debian-wine/2021/03/msg00011.html


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Bug#987554: wine-development should be replaced with wine in experimental+backports

2021-04-25 Thread Phil Morrell
On Sun, Apr 25, 2021 at 06:17:22PM +0200, Jens Reyer wrote:
> On 25.04.21 16:27, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > bullseye users would also benefit more from wine 6.0 in
> > bullseye-backports
> 
> I maintained the wine backports in the past, but stepped down
> (https://lists.debian.org/debian-wine/2020/09/msg7.html).

I plan to take on backports for wine-related packages post-bullseye, but
of course anyone else's interest in helping out is appreciated,
particularly for upload sponsorship.

https://lists.debian.org/debian-wine/2021/03/msg00011.html



Bug#987554: wine-development should be replaced with wine in experimental+backports

2021-04-25 Thread Jens Reyer
Hi

On 25.04.21 16:27, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> bullseye users would also benefit more from wine 6.0 in
> bullseye-backports

[not commenting on the whole issue]

I maintained the wine backports in the past, but stepped down
(https://lists.debian.org/debian-wine/2020/09/msg7.html).

But I agree that having them is very valuable.  So this is a call for
new wine backporters!

Greets
jre



Bug#987554: wine-development should be replaced with wine in experimental+backports

2021-04-25 Thread Adrian Bunk
Source: wine-development
Version: 5.6-2
Severity: serious

wine-development has already missed the deadline for bullseye,
but IMHO this is a good thing and it should be removed from Debian.

There is only limited value in having the ancient development
release 4.2 in buster today, users would have benefitted more
from wine 5.0 in buster-backports when it entered testing
in January 2020.

bullseye users would also benefit more from wine 6.0 in
bullseye-backports than they would have from
wine-development 5.5 or 5.6 in bullseye.

For development purposes the normal way to maintain development
releases would be a version of wine in experimental.