Bug#992399: debianutils: removes interface from essential package without proper transition
On Wed, Aug 18, 2021 at 03:25:22PM +, Clint Adams wrote: On Wed, Aug 18, 2021 at 11:22:53AM -0400, Michael Stone wrote: apologies, box I checked was buster and not bullseye No problem, it seems evident that it did little good anyway. well, the note is for users, most of whom aren't running bullseye yet. I obviously haven't upgraded all of mine, myself. :-D
Bug#992399: debianutils: removes interface from essential package without proper transition
On Wed, Aug 18, 2021 at 03:06:07PM +, Clint Adams wrote: On Wed, Aug 18, 2021 at 10:53:45AM -0400, Michael Stone wrote: Adding a message to stderr telling people to use mktemp may be a reasonable step. You mean the thing it does in our stable release? apologies, box I checked was buster and not bullseye
Bug#992399: debianutils: removes interface from essential package without proper transition
On Wed, Aug 18, 2021 at 11:22:53AM -0400, Michael Stone wrote: > apologies, box I checked was buster and not bullseye No problem, it seems evident that it did little good anyway.
Bug#992399: debianutils: removes interface from essential package without proper transition
On Wed, Aug 18, 2021 at 10:53:45AM -0400, Michael Stone wrote: > Adding a message to stderr telling people to use mktemp may be a reasonable > step. You mean the thing it does in our stable release?
Bug#992399: debianutils: removes interface from essential package without proper transition
Adding a message to stderr telling people to use mktemp may be a reasonable step.
