Bug#994575: dipy: autopkgtest idea
On Fri, 24 Dec 2021 19:15:51 +0530 Nilesh Patra wrote: > On checking, it stems from the fact that fury (python module) that dipy needs > is not in (test-)depends, and neither is it in the > archive. > Probably other tests also are missing some or the other module. I also see a > couple of circular imports that we need to fix. > > This is my understanding ^^ so maybe packaging fury will help. Hi, examples consume a awful lot of resources since they download * heaps * of data and process it. I do not think it would be very suitable for our runners; hence for now I am disabling this test. However the pytest during autopkgtest test works and should do the job for "autopkgtest for dipy", IMO. I will be closing this bug in the next upload. Regards, Nilesh signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#994575: dipy: autopkgtest idea
On Fri, 17 Dec 2021 16:34:02 +0100 Andreas Tille wrote: > Am Thu, Dec 16, 2021 at 09:10:45PM +0100 schrieb Andreas Tille: > > Hi Étienne, > > > > Am Fri, Sep 17, 2021 at 11:11:03PM +0200 schrieb Étienne Mollier: > > > While working on #983840, I needed to do some testing of the > > > package, and notice examples in doc/examples/. Maybe they could > > > be a source of inspiration for building an autopkgtest test > > > suite? > > > > I think the idea itself is good but the realisation has some flaws. > > I've commited some code implementing the idea to Git but it seems we > > need to exclude lots of those examples as you can see for instance here > > in the Salsa CI > > > >https://salsa.debian.org/med-team/dipy/-/jobs/2285615 > > > > May be running the build-time nosetest is the easier approach to an > > autopkgtest. > > Thanks for porting to pytest. I've added the pytest test to autopkgtest > but all tests are failing: > > https://salsa.debian.org/med-team/dipy/-/pipelines/328590 > > Any idea what might be wrong here? I ran it locally, for me it chokes with: | autopkgtest [18:58:22]: test command1: xvfb-run --auto-servernum --server-num=20 -s "-screen 0 1024x768x24 -ac +extension GLX +render -noreset" sh debian/tests/run-unit-test | autopkgtest [18:58:22]: test command1: [--- | Skip quick_start.py | Run brain_extraction_dwi.py | 100%|██| 589/589 [00:52<00:00, 11.30 MB/s] | Skip reconst_csa_parallel.py | Skip reconst_csa.py | Skip reconst_csd_parallel.py | Skip reconst_csd.py | Run reconst_forecast.py | /usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/dipy/viz/__init__.py:31: UserWarning: You do not have FURY installed. Some visualization functions might not work for you. For installation instructions, please visit: https://fury.gl/ | warnings.warn( | Traceback (most recent call last): | File "/tmp/autopkgtest.QurZey/autopkgtest_tmp/examples/reconst_forecast.py", line 16, in | from dipy.viz import actor, window | ImportError: cannot import name 'actor' from 'dipy.viz' (/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/dipy/viz/__init__.py) On checking, it stems from the fact that fury (python module) that dipy needs is not in (test-)depends, and neither is it in the archive. Probably other tests also are missing some or the other module. I also see a couple of circular imports that we need to fix. This is my understanding ^^ so maybe packaging fury will help. Regards, Nilesh signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#994575: dipy: autopkgtest idea
Am Thu, Dec 16, 2021 at 09:10:45PM +0100 schrieb Andreas Tille: > Hi Étienne, > > Am Fri, Sep 17, 2021 at 11:11:03PM +0200 schrieb Étienne Mollier: > > While working on #983840, I needed to do some testing of the > > package, and notice examples in doc/examples/. Maybe they could > > be a source of inspiration for building an autopkgtest test > > suite? > > I think the idea itself is good but the realisation has some flaws. > I've commited some code implementing the idea to Git but it seems we > need to exclude lots of those examples as you can see for instance here > in the Salsa CI > >https://salsa.debian.org/med-team/dipy/-/jobs/2285615 > > May be running the build-time nosetest is the easier approach to an > autopkgtest. Thanks for porting to pytest. I've added the pytest test to autopkgtest but all tests are failing: https://salsa.debian.org/med-team/dipy/-/pipelines/328590 Any idea what might be wrong here? Kind regards Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de
Bug#994575: dipy: autopkgtest idea
Hi Étienne, Am Fri, Sep 17, 2021 at 11:11:03PM +0200 schrieb Étienne Mollier: > While working on #983840, I needed to do some testing of the > package, and notice examples in doc/examples/. Maybe they could > be a source of inspiration for building an autopkgtest test > suite? I think the idea itself is good but the realisation has some flaws. I've commited some code implementing the idea to Git but it seems we need to exclude lots of those examples as you can see for instance here in the Salsa CI https://salsa.debian.org/med-team/dipy/-/jobs/2285615 May be running the build-time nosetest is the easier approach to an autopkgtest. Kind regards Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de
Bug#994575: dipy: autopkgtest idea
Source: dipy Version: 1.3.0-3 Severity: wishlist Tags: newcomer Dear Maintainer, While working on #983840, I needed to do some testing of the package, and notice examples in doc/examples/. Maybe they could be a source of inspiration for building an autopkgtest test suite? Have a nice day, :) -- Étienne Mollier Fingerprint: 8f91 b227 c7d6 f2b1 948c 8236 793c f67e 8f0d 11da Sent from /dev/pts/7, please excuse my verbosity. signature.asc Description: PGP signature
