Bug#995587: transition: ruby3.0-add
Hi, On Sat, 2 Oct 2021 15:14:39 -0300 Antonio Terceiro wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: transition > > We would like to add support for ruby3.0 in ruby-defaults. This can now be closed. There are 4 unfixed packages in the tracker, but they are all out of testing. Some of them probably need to be removed from the archive entirely, but we will look at them later and give someone who cares a chance to fix them before that. signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#995587: transition: ruby3.0-add
On Sat, Oct 30, 2021 at 11:43:35AM +0200, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > Those have been scheduled. Note that a bunch of them have only built and > installed the extension for the default ruby version, e.g., > ruby-debug-inspector and libprelude. Yes. Please amend the ben file like this: is_affected = (.depends ~ /ruby2.7/ | .depends ~ /ruby3.0/) & ! .source ~ /^(ruby2\.7|ruby3\.0|ruby-defaults|dislocker|epic5|graphviz|hivex|kamailio|klayout|kross-interpreters|libprelude|marisa|ngraph-gtk|notmuch|obexftp|redland-bindings|rubyluabridge|ruby-standalone|subtle|subversion|uwsgi|vim-command-t|weechat|robot-testing-framework|treil|vim|nbdkit)$/ signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#995587: transition: ruby3.0-add
On 2021-10-29 10:36:25 -0300, Lucas Kanashiro wrote: > On Thu, 28 Oct 2021 23:34:28 +0200 Sebastian Ramacher > wrote: > > Yes, please go ahead > > I just uploaded ruby-defaults/1:2.7.6 to unstable adding ruby3.0 as an > alternative interpreter, it should be available soon. Below you can find a > list of binNMUs for the dependency level 1: > > dislocker > epic5 > graphviz > hivex > kamailio > klayout > kross-interpreters > libprelude > libselinux > marisa > mecab > ngraph-gtk > notmuch > protobuf > qdbm > raspell > redland-bindings > remctl > rrdtool > ruby-atomic > ruby-augeas > ruby-bcrypt > ruby-bcrypt-pbkdf > ruby-bert > ruby-bindex > ruby-binding-ninja > ruby-cairo > ruby-cbor > ruby-character-set > ruby-charlock-holmes > ruby-concurrent > ruby-cool.io > ruby-curb > ruby-curses > ruby-damerau-levenshtein > ruby-dataobjects-postgres > ruby-dataobjects-sqlite3 > ruby-debian > ruby-debug-inspector > ruby-eb > ruby-ed25519 > ruby-enumerable-statistics > ruby-escape-utils > ruby-eventmachine > ruby-exif > ruby-fast-blank > ruby-fast-stemmer > ruby-fast-xs > ruby-fcgi > ruby-ffi > ruby-ffi-yajl > ruby-filesystem > ruby-fusefs > ruby-gitlab-pg-query > ruby-god > ruby-gpgme > ruby-hiredis > ruby-hitimes > ruby-jaro-winkler > ruby-kgio > ruby-ldap > ruby-levenshtein > ruby-libxml > ruby-liquid-c > ruby-murmurhash3 > ruby-mysql2 > ruby-narray > ruby-ncurses > ruby-nfc > ruby-nio4r > ruby-nokogiri > ruby-odbc > ruby-oily-png > ruby-oj > ruby-ox > ruby-pcaprub > ruby-pg > ruby-posix-spawn > ruby-prof > ruby-prometheus-client-mmap > ruby-rblineprof > ruby-rbtree > ruby-rdiscount > ruby-re2 > ruby-redcarpet > ruby-redcloth > ruby-regexp-property-values > ruby-rinku > ruby-rjb > ruby-rmagick > ruby-rpam-ruby19 > ruby-rpatricia > ruby-rugged > ruby-sdl > ruby-sequel-pg > ruby-serialport > ruby-shadow > ruby-stackprof > ruby-strptime > ruby-termios > ruby-thrift > ruby-timfel-krb5-auth > ruby-tioga > ruby-tokyocabinet > ruby-uconv > ruby-unf-ext > ruby-unicode > ruby-version-sorter > ruby-vmstat > ruby-websocket-driver > ruby-xmlhash > ruby-xmlparser > ruby-yajl > ruby-zoom > spglib > stfl > subtle > subversion > uwsgi > vim-command-t > weechat > xapian-bindings Those have been scheduled. Note that a bunch of them have only built and installed the extension for the default ruby version, e.g., ruby-debug-inspector and libprelude. > > > The following packages are also part of the dependency level 1 but they are > still FTBFSes, let's skip them for now. > > obexftp > ruby-byebug > ruby-ferret > ruby-dataobjects-mysql > ruby-gd > ruby-json > ruby-kyotocabinet > ruby-libvirt > ruby-mmap2 > ruby-psych > ruby-ruby-magic-static > ruby-sigar > > -- > Lucas Kanashiro > -- Sebastian Ramacher signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#995587: transition: ruby3.0-add
On Thu, 28 Oct 2021 23:34:28 +0200 Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > Yes, please go ahead I just uploaded ruby-defaults/1:2.7.6 to unstable adding ruby3.0 as an alternative interpreter, it should be available soon. Below you can find a list of binNMUs for the dependency level 1: dislocker epic5 graphviz hivex kamailio klayout kross-interpreters libprelude libselinux marisa mecab ngraph-gtk notmuch protobuf qdbm raspell redland-bindings remctl rrdtool ruby-atomic ruby-augeas ruby-bcrypt ruby-bcrypt-pbkdf ruby-bert ruby-bindex ruby-binding-ninja ruby-cairo ruby-cbor ruby-character-set ruby-charlock-holmes ruby-concurrent ruby-cool.io ruby-curb ruby-curses ruby-damerau-levenshtein ruby-dataobjects-postgres ruby-dataobjects-sqlite3 ruby-debian ruby-debug-inspector ruby-eb ruby-ed25519 ruby-enumerable-statistics ruby-escape-utils ruby-eventmachine ruby-exif ruby-fast-blank ruby-fast-stemmer ruby-fast-xs ruby-fcgi ruby-ffi ruby-ffi-yajl ruby-filesystem ruby-fusefs ruby-gitlab-pg-query ruby-god ruby-gpgme ruby-hiredis ruby-hitimes ruby-jaro-winkler ruby-kgio ruby-ldap ruby-levenshtein ruby-libxml ruby-liquid-c ruby-murmurhash3 ruby-mysql2 ruby-narray ruby-ncurses ruby-nfc ruby-nio4r ruby-nokogiri ruby-odbc ruby-oily-png ruby-oj ruby-ox ruby-pcaprub ruby-pg ruby-posix-spawn ruby-prof ruby-prometheus-client-mmap ruby-rblineprof ruby-rbtree ruby-rdiscount ruby-re2 ruby-redcarpet ruby-redcloth ruby-regexp-property-values ruby-rinku ruby-rjb ruby-rmagick ruby-rpam-ruby19 ruby-rpatricia ruby-rugged ruby-sdl ruby-sequel-pg ruby-serialport ruby-shadow ruby-stackprof ruby-strptime ruby-termios ruby-thrift ruby-timfel-krb5-auth ruby-tioga ruby-tokyocabinet ruby-uconv ruby-unf-ext ruby-unicode ruby-version-sorter ruby-vmstat ruby-websocket-driver ruby-xmlhash ruby-xmlparser ruby-yajl ruby-zoom spglib stfl subtle subversion uwsgi vim-command-t weechat xapian-bindings The following packages are also part of the dependency level 1 but they are still FTBFSes, let's skip them for now. obexftp ruby-byebug ruby-ferret ruby-dataobjects-mysql ruby-gd ruby-json ruby-kyotocabinet ruby-libvirt ruby-mmap2 ruby-psych ruby-ruby-magic-static ruby-sigar -- Lucas Kanashiro
Bug#995587: transition: ruby3.0-add
On Thu, Oct 28, 2021 at 11:34:28PM +0200, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > Control: tags -1 confirmed > > On 2021-10-20 09:45:10 -0300, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > > Control: tag -1 - moreinfo > > > > On Sat, Oct 16, 2021 at 03:46:11PM +0200, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > > > Control: tags -1 moreinfo > > > > > > On 2021-10-15 06:44:36 -0300, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > On Sat, Oct 02, 2021 at 03:14:39PM -0300, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > > > > > Package: release.debian.org > > > > > Severity: normal > > > > > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > > > > > Usertags: transition > > > > > > > > > > We would like to add support for ruby3.0 in ruby-defaults. > > > > > > > > > > Ben file: > > > > > > > > > > title = "ruby3.0-add"; > > > > > is_affected = (.depends ~ /ruby2.7 | .depends ~ /ruby3.0/) & !.source > > > > > ~ /^(ruby2.7|ruby3.0|ruby-defaults)$/); > > > > > is_good = .depends ~ /ruby3.0/; > > > > > is_bad = .depends ~ /ruby2.7/ & !.depends ~ /ruby3.0/; > > > > > > > > > > We already did a mass rebuild some time ago, and the results don't > > > > > look > > > > > bad. We should be doing a new one soon, and will come up with a list > > > > > of > > > > > binNMUs > > > > > > > > This is a friendly ping. We would like to make the switch in unstable > > > > soon and start doing binNMUs. > > > > > > > > We have these bugs related to this transition: > > > > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=ruby3.0;users=debian-r...@lists.debian.org > > > > > > > > Most of those bugs are for leaf libraries. We already started fixing the > > > > ones that block a lof of other (e.g. the ones with C extensions that > > > > FTBFS with ruby3.0) so they are ready to be binNMUed. > > > > > > ruby3.0 isn't in testing yet - it currently fails to build on ppc64el. > > > So let's at least wait until it migrated. > > > > ruby3.0 is now in testing. Can we go ahead with this? > > Yes, please go ahead Thanks, we will upload ruby-defaults shortly. Note that we do not necessarily want/need to block involved packages from migrating, as adding ruby3.0 support does not break anything since the default is still unchanged. signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#995587: transition: ruby3.0-add
Control: tags -1 confirmed On 2021-10-20 09:45:10 -0300, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > Control: tag -1 - moreinfo > > On Sat, Oct 16, 2021 at 03:46:11PM +0200, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > > Control: tags -1 moreinfo > > > > On 2021-10-15 06:44:36 -0300, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > On Sat, Oct 02, 2021 at 03:14:39PM -0300, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > > > > Package: release.debian.org > > > > Severity: normal > > > > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > > > > Usertags: transition > > > > > > > > We would like to add support for ruby3.0 in ruby-defaults. > > > > > > > > Ben file: > > > > > > > > title = "ruby3.0-add"; > > > > is_affected = (.depends ~ /ruby2.7 | .depends ~ /ruby3.0/) & !.source ~ > > > > /^(ruby2.7|ruby3.0|ruby-defaults)$/); > > > > is_good = .depends ~ /ruby3.0/; > > > > is_bad = .depends ~ /ruby2.7/ & !.depends ~ /ruby3.0/; > > > > > > > > We already did a mass rebuild some time ago, and the results don't look > > > > bad. We should be doing a new one soon, and will come up with a list of > > > > binNMUs > > > > > > This is a friendly ping. We would like to make the switch in unstable > > > soon and start doing binNMUs. > > > > > > We have these bugs related to this transition: > > > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=ruby3.0;users=debian-r...@lists.debian.org > > > > > > Most of those bugs are for leaf libraries. We already started fixing the > > > ones that block a lof of other (e.g. the ones with C extensions that > > > FTBFS with ruby3.0) so they are ready to be binNMUed. > > > > ruby3.0 isn't in testing yet - it currently fails to build on ppc64el. > > So let's at least wait until it migrated. > > ruby3.0 is now in testing. Can we go ahead with this? Yes, please go ahead Cheers -- Sebastian Ramacher signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#995587: transition: ruby3.0-add
On Wed, Oct 20, 2021 at 03:12:17PM +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: > On 10/20/21 2:45 PM, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > > On Sat, Oct 16, 2021 at 03:46:11PM +0200, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > >> On 2021-10-15 06:44:36 -0300, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > >>> On Sat, Oct 02, 2021 at 03:14:39PM -0300, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: transition > > We would like to add support for ruby3.0 in ruby-defaults. > > Ben file: > > title = "ruby3.0-add"; > is_affected = (.depends ~ /ruby2.7 | .depends ~ /ruby3.0/) & !.source ~ > /^(ruby2.7|ruby3.0|ruby-defaults)$/); > is_good = .depends ~ /ruby3.0/; > is_bad = .depends ~ /ruby2.7/ & !.depends ~ /ruby3.0/; > > We already did a mass rebuild some time ago, and the results don't look > bad. We should be doing a new one soon, and will come up with a list of > binNMUs > >>> > >>> This is a friendly ping. We would like to make the switch in unstable > >>> soon and start doing binNMUs. > >>> > >>> We have these bugs related to this transition: > >>> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=ruby3.0;users=debian-r...@lists.debian.org > >>> > >>> Most of those bugs are for leaf libraries. We already started fixing the > >>> ones that block a lof of other (e.g. the ones with C extensions that > >>> FTBFS with ruby3.0) so they are ready to be binNMUed. > >> > >> ruby3.0 isn't in testing yet - it currently fails to build on ppc64el. > >> So let's at least wait until it migrated. > > > > ruby3.0 is now in testing. Can we go ahead with this? > > There are 169 packages affected by the transition according to the > tracker, the ruby3.0 usertag has 152 unresolved ftbfs bugreports. > > Does it really make sense to start this transition when most rdeps fail > to build? Yes. Those two sets of packages are more or less distinct. The only intersection is of packages that have C extensions (and thus a dependency on the specific ruby versions it was build against) *and* to build against ruby3.0. Most of the FTBFS bugs are against pure-Ruby packages that fail against ruby3.0, and are not even listed in the transition tracker. A good part of the packages that *are* listed in the transition will be good after a binNMU. To fix those we need to have ruby3.0 as a supported version in unstable in the first place. Also as we are "just" adding ruby3.0 support, this has little effect on users since ruby2.7 is still the default. signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#995587: transition: ruby3.0-add
On 10/20/21 2:45 PM, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > On Sat, Oct 16, 2021 at 03:46:11PM +0200, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: >> On 2021-10-15 06:44:36 -0300, Antonio Terceiro wrote: >>> On Sat, Oct 02, 2021 at 03:14:39PM -0300, Antonio Terceiro wrote: Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition We would like to add support for ruby3.0 in ruby-defaults. Ben file: title = "ruby3.0-add"; is_affected = (.depends ~ /ruby2.7 | .depends ~ /ruby3.0/) & !.source ~ /^(ruby2.7|ruby3.0|ruby-defaults)$/); is_good = .depends ~ /ruby3.0/; is_bad = .depends ~ /ruby2.7/ & !.depends ~ /ruby3.0/; We already did a mass rebuild some time ago, and the results don't look bad. We should be doing a new one soon, and will come up with a list of binNMUs >>> >>> This is a friendly ping. We would like to make the switch in unstable >>> soon and start doing binNMUs. >>> >>> We have these bugs related to this transition: >>> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=ruby3.0;users=debian-r...@lists.debian.org >>> >>> Most of those bugs are for leaf libraries. We already started fixing the >>> ones that block a lof of other (e.g. the ones with C extensions that >>> FTBFS with ruby3.0) so they are ready to be binNMUed. >> >> ruby3.0 isn't in testing yet - it currently fails to build on ppc64el. >> So let's at least wait until it migrated. > > ruby3.0 is now in testing. Can we go ahead with this? There are 169 packages affected by the transition according to the tracker, the ruby3.0 usertag has 152 unresolved ftbfs bugreports. Does it really make sense to start this transition when most rdeps fail to build? Kind Regards, Bas -- GPG Key ID: 4096R/6750F10AE88D4AF1 Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146 50D1 6750 F10A E88D 4AF1
Bug#995587: transition: ruby3.0-add
Control: tag -1 - moreinfo On Sat, Oct 16, 2021 at 03:46:11PM +0200, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > Control: tags -1 moreinfo > > On 2021-10-15 06:44:36 -0300, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Sat, Oct 02, 2021 at 03:14:39PM -0300, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > > > Package: release.debian.org > > > Severity: normal > > > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > > > Usertags: transition > > > > > > We would like to add support for ruby3.0 in ruby-defaults. > > > > > > Ben file: > > > > > > title = "ruby3.0-add"; > > > is_affected = (.depends ~ /ruby2.7 | .depends ~ /ruby3.0/) & !.source ~ > > > /^(ruby2.7|ruby3.0|ruby-defaults)$/); > > > is_good = .depends ~ /ruby3.0/; > > > is_bad = .depends ~ /ruby2.7/ & !.depends ~ /ruby3.0/; > > > > > > We already did a mass rebuild some time ago, and the results don't look > > > bad. We should be doing a new one soon, and will come up with a list of > > > binNMUs > > > > This is a friendly ping. We would like to make the switch in unstable > > soon and start doing binNMUs. > > > > We have these bugs related to this transition: > > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=ruby3.0;users=debian-r...@lists.debian.org > > > > Most of those bugs are for leaf libraries. We already started fixing the > > ones that block a lof of other (e.g. the ones with C extensions that > > FTBFS with ruby3.0) so they are ready to be binNMUed. > > ruby3.0 isn't in testing yet - it currently fails to build on ppc64el. > So let's at least wait until it migrated. ruby3.0 is now in testing. Can we go ahead with this? signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#995587: transition: ruby3.0-add
Control: tags -1 moreinfo On 2021-10-15 06:44:36 -0300, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > Hi, > > On Sat, Oct 02, 2021 at 03:14:39PM -0300, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > > Package: release.debian.org > > Severity: normal > > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > > Usertags: transition > > > > We would like to add support for ruby3.0 in ruby-defaults. > > > > Ben file: > > > > title = "ruby3.0-add"; > > is_affected = (.depends ~ /ruby2.7 | .depends ~ /ruby3.0/) & !.source ~ > > /^(ruby2.7|ruby3.0|ruby-defaults)$/); > > is_good = .depends ~ /ruby3.0/; > > is_bad = .depends ~ /ruby2.7/ & !.depends ~ /ruby3.0/; > > > > We already did a mass rebuild some time ago, and the results don't look > > bad. We should be doing a new one soon, and will come up with a list of > > binNMUs > > This is a friendly ping. We would like to make the switch in unstable > soon and start doing binNMUs. > > We have these bugs related to this transition: > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=ruby3.0;users=debian-r...@lists.debian.org > > Most of those bugs are for leaf libraries. We already started fixing the > ones that block a lof of other (e.g. the ones with C extensions that > FTBFS with ruby3.0) so they are ready to be binNMUed. ruby3.0 isn't in testing yet - it currently fails to build on ppc64el. So let's at least wait until it migrated. Cheers -- Sebastian Ramacher signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#995587: transition: ruby3.0-add
Hi, On Sat, Oct 02, 2021 at 03:14:39PM -0300, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: transition > > We would like to add support for ruby3.0 in ruby-defaults. > > Ben file: > > title = "ruby3.0-add"; > is_affected = (.depends ~ /ruby2.7 | .depends ~ /ruby3.0/) & !.source ~ > /^(ruby2.7|ruby3.0|ruby-defaults)$/); > is_good = .depends ~ /ruby3.0/; > is_bad = .depends ~ /ruby2.7/ & !.depends ~ /ruby3.0/; > > We already did a mass rebuild some time ago, and the results don't look > bad. We should be doing a new one soon, and will come up with a list of > binNMUs This is a friendly ping. We would like to make the switch in unstable soon and start doing binNMUs. We have these bugs related to this transition: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=ruby3.0;users=debian-r...@lists.debian.org Most of those bugs are for leaf libraries. We already started fixing the ones that block a lof of other (e.g. the ones with C extensions that FTBFS with ruby3.0) so they are ready to be binNMUed. signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#995587: transition: ruby3.0-add
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition We would like to add support for ruby3.0 in ruby-defaults. Ben file: title = "ruby3.0-add"; is_affected = (.depends ~ /ruby2.7 | .depends ~ /ruby3.0/) & !.source ~ /^(ruby2.7|ruby3.0|ruby-defaults)$/); is_good = .depends ~ /ruby3.0/; is_bad = .depends ~ /ruby2.7/ & !.depends ~ /ruby3.0/; We already did a mass rebuild some time ago, and the results don't look bad. We should be doing a new one soon, and will come up with a list of binNMUs signature.asc Description: PGP signature
