Bug#99870: dpkg: Hits me when installing fglx-driver...

2006-04-28 Thread Nicolas François
Hello,

On Thu, Mar 23, 2006 at 12:20:35PM +0100, Jürgen A. Erhard wrote:
 
 Wasn't there a pretty simple patch for this somewhere?

Maybe you're thinking about the patch for #102144, also fixing an Invalid
cross-device link error (in dpkg-divert).

I don't think it is the same issue. (First, #102144 is about dpkg-divert,
not update-alternative; second update-alternative already use rename_mv).


Anyway, I'm willing to write a patch for this bug, and I'm looking for a
package to reproduce it.

You mentioned fglx-driver, but I can't find this package. Can you send a
pointer to its source?

Kind Regards,
-- 
Nekral



Bug#99870: dpkg: Hits me when installing fglx-driver...

2006-03-23 Thread Jürgen A . Erhard
Package: dpkg
Version: 1.13.16
Followup-For: Bug #99870

Wasn't there a pretty simple patch for this somewhere?

Even if not, it doesn't seem too complicated to fix, so why has there
be *no* action in 4+ years?

Sometimes, Debian starts to drive me nuts...

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.15-sanctum
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

Versions of packages dpkg depends on:
ii  coreutils [textutils] 5.93-5 The GNU core utilities
ii  libc6 2.3.6-3GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  textutils 5.94-1 The GNU text file processing utili

dpkg recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information

-- 
Jürgen A. Erhard
 My WebHome: http://jerhard.org
Yesterday's the past and tomorrow's the future.
Today is a gift --  which is why they call it the present. -- Butterfly


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#99870: dpkg: Hits me when installing fglx-driver...

2006-03-23 Thread Guillem Jover
On Thu, Mar 23, 2006 at 12:20:35PM +0100, Jürgen A.Erhard wrote:
 Package: dpkg
 Version: 1.13.16
 Followup-For: Bug #99870
 
 Wasn't there a pretty simple patch for this somewhere?

If there is, it's not in the bug report.

 Even if not, it doesn't seem too complicated to fix, so why has there
 be *no* action in 4+ years?

Probably because dpkg has a huge amount of bugs, 500+- right now. And
priorities vary from developer to developer. Patches welcome though.

regards,
guillem


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]