Bug#294525: marked as done (kwave_0.7.2-3_arm: FTBFS: build-depends on automake1.7 but calls aclocal)
Your message dated Thu, 10 Feb 2005 03:02:16 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#294525: fixed in kwave 0.7.2-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Feb 2005 06:56:36 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Feb 09 22:56:36 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from dsl093-039-038.pdx1.dsl.speakeasy.net (quetzlcoatl.dodds.net) [66.93.39.38] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Cz8Fg-0005NP-00; Wed, 09 Feb 2005 22:56:36 -0800 Received: by quetzlcoatl.dodds.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 40B8A3AE0; Wed, 9 Feb 2005 22:56:35 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2005 22:56:34 -0800 From: Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: kwave_0.7.2-3_arm: FTBFS: build-depends on automake1.7 but calls aclocal Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=a8Wt8u1KmwUX3Y2C Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: --a8Wt8u1KmwUX3Y2C Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Package: kwave Version: 0.7.2-3 Severity: serious Tags: sid The current version of kwave failed to build on arm with the following error: [...] configure.in:11: error: possibly undefined macro: AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE If this token and others are legitimate, please use m4_pattern_allow. See the Autoconf documentation. configure.in:17: error: possibly undefined macro: AM_CONFIG_HEADER configure.in:21: error: possibly undefined macro: AC_CHECK_COMPILERS configure.in:22: error: possibly undefined macro: AM_PROG_AS configure.in:23: error: possibly undefined macro: AM_ENABLE_SHARED configure.in:24: error: possibly undefined macro: AM_ENABLE_STATIC configure.in:26: error: possibly undefined macro: AC_LIBTOOL_DLOPEN configure.in:46: error: possibly undefined macro: AC_MSG_ERROR configure.in:134: error: possibly undefined macro: AC_PATH_KDE configure.in:158: error: possibly undefined macro: AC_CHECK_BOOL configure.in:160: error: possibly undefined macro: AC_CHECK_GNU_EXTENSIONS configure.in:265: error: possibly undefined macro: AM_PATH_GSL configure.in:381: error: possibly undefined macro: AM_PATH_LIBFLAC configure.in:387: error: possibly undefined macro: AM_PATH_LIBFLACPP configure.in:557: error: possibly undefined macro: AM_CONDITIONAL [...] checking target system type... arm-unknown-linux-gnu =2E/configure: line 1434: syntax error near unexpected token `kwave,0.7.2' =2E/configure: line 1434: ` AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE(kwave,0.7.2)' make[2]: *** [logged] Error 2 [...] Full log available at http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?pkg=3Dkwavever=3D0.7.2-3arch=3Darms= tamp=3D1107842819file=3Dlogas=3Draw. The problem is that kwave build-depends on automake1.7, but invokes aclocal from Makefile.dist. Having automake1.7 installed does not guarantee that the aclocal command is the version from automake1.7. Please update this Makefile.dist to call aclocal by the correct name for Debian systems, aclocal-1.7. This package is likely to be the last blocker for the transition to libflac6 in sarge, and we probably won't wait for it to be ready before transitioning the remaining packages; the sooner someone uploads a fix for this, the sooner kwave will get back into sarge. Thanks, --=20 Steve Langasek postmodern programmer --a8Wt8u1KmwUX3Y2C Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFCCwWfKN6ufymYLloRAk4CAJ9ob4oqTALBXc3catcUJe5hInGQvACfTDHu sI2+y9+orRCSgRgJWBZ6tEI= =T96k -END PGP SIGNATURE- --a8Wt8u1KmwUX3Y2C-- --- Received: (at 294525-close) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Feb 2005 08:08:02 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Feb 10 00:08:02 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Cz9Mo-jN-00; Thu, 10 Feb 2005 00:08:02
Bug#285737: marked as done (libmultisync-plugin-evolution: Multisync Evolution plugin does not recognise Evolution 1.4.6 cal/abook/tasks DB)
Your message dated Thu, 10 Feb 2005 09:10:00 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line NMU acknowledged has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Dec 2004 09:08:22 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Dec 15 01:08:22 2004 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from ingchim.ing.uniroma1.it [151.100.89.20] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1CeV8w-0002aj-00; Wed, 15 Dec 2004 01:08:22 -0800 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (bravi.ing.uniroma1.it [151.100.89.104]) by ingchim.ing.uniroma1.it (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id iBF97jQ28423; Wed, 15 Dec 2004 10:07:45 +0100 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Marco Bravi [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: libmultisync-plugin-evolution: Multisync Evolution plugin does not recognise Evolution 1.4.6 cal/abook/tasks DB X-Mailer: reportbug 3.2 Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2004 10:11:06 +0100 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Package: libmultisync-plugin-evolution Version: 0.82-3.1 Severity: important I am a Debian testing user which has used Multisync Evolution plugin and IRMC plugin to sync everything between Evolution and cellphone. Testing has still Evo 1.4.6 while the latest version of the Evolution plugin in Debian testing is for Evolution 2. Unfortunately this version mismatch completely prevents the plugin from recognising Evolution Calendar, Addressbook and Tasks databases (plugin says I have no calendar, no addressbook and no tasks and the selector does not make any alternative label available), so that my sync needs (Evo - cellphone is completely broken now. I even have missed meetings before realizing my sync (on which I had established a remarkable reliance) had _completely_ stopped. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.9 Locale: LANG=it_IT, LC_CTYPE=it_IT (charmap=ISO-8859-15) (ignored: LC_ALL set to [EMAIL PROTECTED]) Versions of packages libmultisync-plugin-evolution depends on: ii libart-2.0-2 2.3.16-6 Library of functions for 2D graphi ii libatk1.0-0 1.8.0-3The ATK accessibility toolkit ii libbonobo2-0 2.8.0-3Bonobo CORBA interfaces library ii libbonoboui2-02.8.0-2The Bonobo UI library ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-18 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libebook8 1.0.2-3Client library for evolution addre ii libecal6 1.0.2-3Client library for evolution calen ii libedata-book11.0.2-3Backend library for evolution addr ii libedata-cal5 1.0.2-3Backend library for evolution cale ii libedataserver3 1.0.2-3Utily library for evolution data s ii libgconf2-4 2.8.1-4GNOME configuration database syste ii libglib2.0-0 2.4.8-1The GLib library of C routines ii libgnome2-0 2.8.0-6The GNOME 2 library - runtime file ii libgnomecanvas2-0 2.8.0-1A powerful object-oriented display ii libgnomeui-0 2.8.0-3The GNOME 2 libraries (User Interf ii libgnomevfs2-02.8.3-6The GNOME virtual file-system libr ii libgtk2.0-0 2.4.13-1 The GTK+ graphical user interface ii libice6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-8 Inter-Client Exchange library ii liborbit2 1:2.10.2-1.1 libraries for ORBit2 - a CORBA ORB ii libpango1.0-0 1.6.0-3Layout and rendering of internatio ii libpopt0 1.7-5 lib for parsing cmdline parameters ii libsm64.3.0.dfsg.1-8 X Window System Session Management ii libxml2 2.6.11-5 GNOME XML library ii multisync 0.82-3.1 A program to synchronize PIM data ii xlibs 4.3.0.dfsg.1-8 X Window System client libraries m ii zlib1g1:1.2.2-3 compression library -
Bug#284097: marked as done (libmultisync-plugin-evolution always crashes while synchronizing with evolution-2.0 calendar)
Your message dated Thu, 10 Feb 2005 09:10:00 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line NMU acknowledged has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Dec 2004 16:13:14 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Dec 03 08:13:14 2004 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from smtp.cs.aau.dk [130.225.194.6] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1CaG3W-0008Mm-00; Fri, 03 Dec 2004 08:13:14 -0800 Received: from localhost.localdomain (scenic33.e.cs.auc.dk [130.225.195.33]) by smtp.cs.aau.dk (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id iB3GDBon011629; Fri, 3 Dec 2004 17:13:11 +0100 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Marius Mikucionis [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: libmultisync-plugin-evolution always crashes while synchronizing with evolution-2.0 calendar X-Mailer: reportbug 3.2 Date: Fri, 03 Dec 2004 17:14:56 +0100 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.44 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Package: libmultisync-plugin-evolution Version: 0.82-3.1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable I could not get Evolution-2.0 calendar synchronized with any other plugin, namely with libmultisync-plugin-irmc-bluetooth nor with libmultisync-plugin-backup. If I try to set personal calendar -- synchronizations gives unknown error, if I try to synchronize with birthday or No calendar calendar -- it crashed with segfault. Moreover, synchronization of contacts results in creation of multiple copies of contacts, where evolution-2.0 does not show some of the phone numbers.. Here I suspect that Evolution has problems displaying contacts correctly or incapable of correctly communicating to evolution-data-server. If you are using Evolution calendar, I advise not to install Evolution-2.0 yet. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.9-1-686 Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages libmultisync-plugin-evolution depends on: ii libart-2.0-2 2.3.16-6 Library of functions for 2D graphi ii libatk1.0-0 1.8.0-3The ATK accessibility toolkit ii libbonobo2-0 2.8.0-3Bonobo CORBA interfaces library ii libbonoboui2-02.8.0-2The Bonobo UI library ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-18 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libebook8 1.0.2-3Client library for evolution addre ii libecal6 1.0.2-3Client library for evolution calen ii libedata-book11.0.2-3Backend library for evolution addr ii libedata-cal5 1.0.2-3Backend library for evolution cale ii libedataserver3 1.0.2-3Utily library for evolution data s ii libgconf2-4 2.8.1-4GNOME configuration database syste ii libglib2.0-0 2.4.7-1The GLib library of C routines ii libgnome2-0 2.8.0-5The GNOME 2 library - runtime file ii libgnomecanvas2-0 2.8.0-1A powerful object-oriented display ii libgnomeui-0 2.8.0-3The GNOME 2 libraries (User Interf ii libgnomevfs2-02.8.3-6The GNOME virtual file-system libr ii libgtk2.0-0 2.4.13-1 The GTK+ graphical user interface ii libice6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-8 Inter-Client Exchange library ii liborbit2 1:2.10.2-1.1 libraries for ORBit2 - a CORBA ORB ii libpango1.0-0 1.6.0-3Layout and rendering of internatio ii libpopt0 1.7-5 lib for parsing cmdline parameters ii libsm64.3.0.dfsg.1-8 X Window System Session Management ii libxml2 2.6.11-5 GNOME XML library ii multisync 0.82-3.1 A program to synchronize PIM data ii xlibs 4.3.0.dfsg.1-8 X Window System client libraries m ii zlib1g1:1.2.2-3
Bug#285282: marked as done (Missing evolution1 plugin in sarge)
Your message dated Thu, 10 Feb 2005 09:10:00 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line NMU acknowledged has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Dec 2004 09:38:20 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Dec 12 01:38:20 2004 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from ravenfly.de (trill.ravenfly.net) [82.139.237.69] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1CdQBH-0008Ub-00; Sun, 12 Dec 2004 01:38:19 -0800 Received: from helva.ravenfly.net ([192.168.0.128]) by trill.ravenfly.net with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CdQAI-y8-Rg for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 12 Dec 2004 10:37:19 +0100 Received: from joe by helva.ravenfly.net with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1CcrPn-00024U-00; Fri, 10 Dec 2004 21:30:59 +0100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Joe Sollich [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: multisync: Multisync crashes at startup X-Mailer: reportbug 3.2 Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2004 21:30:59 +0100 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Joe Sollich [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-BadReturnPath: [EMAIL PROTECTED] rewritten as [EMAIL PROTECTED] using From header Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Package: multisync Version: 0.82-3.1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable When I start multisync in crashes immediately. This is what I get from the terminal: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ multisync plugin_API_version short_name long_name plugin_init -- here starts bug-buddy [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ my Kernel is the standart-kernel from Kernel.org with the bluez-kernel-patch mh4. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.9-mh4 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) (ignored: LC_ALL set to [EMAIL PROTECTED]) Versions of packages multisync depends on: ii libart-2.0-2 2.3.16-6 Library of functions for 2D graphi ii libatk1.0-0 1.8.0-3The ATK accessibility toolkit ii libbonobo2-0 2.8.0-3Bonobo CORBA interfaces library ii libbonoboui2-02.8.0-2The Bonobo UI library ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-18 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libgconf2-4 2.8.1-4GNOME configuration database syste ii libglib2.0-0 2.4.7-1The GLib library of C routines ii libgnome2-0 2.8.0-5The GNOME 2 library - runtime file ii libgnomecanvas2-0 2.8.0-1A powerful object-oriented display ii libgnomeui-0 2.8.0-3The GNOME 2 libraries (User Interf ii libgnomevfs2-02.8.3-6The GNOME virtual file-system libr ii libgtk2.0-0 2.4.13-1 The GTK+ graphical user interface ii libice6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-8 Inter-Client Exchange library ii liborbit2 1:2.10.2-1.1 libraries for ORBit2 - a CORBA ORB ii libpango1.0-0 1.6.0-3Layout and rendering of internatio ii libpopt0 1.7-5 lib for parsing cmdline parameters ii libsm64.3.0.dfsg.1-8 X Window System Session Management ii libx11-6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-8 X Window System protocol client li ii libxml2 2.6.11-5 GNOME XML library ii xlibs 4.3.0.dfsg.1-8 X Window System client libraries m ii zlib1g1:1.2.2-3 compression library - runtime -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 285113-done) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Feb 2005 08:10:02 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Feb 10 00:10:02 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from slider2.rack66.net (slider2.rack66.com) [212.3.252.150] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Cz9Ok-000101-00; Thu, 10 Feb 2005 00:10:02 -0800 Received: by slider2.rack66.com (Postfix, from userid 1005) id 06B9273C83; Thu, 10 Feb 2005 09:10:00 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 09:10:00 +0100 From: Filip Van
Bug#294454: gnupg 1.4.0 does not work
On 09.02.05 Nico Golde ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Hi, the new gnupg package for version 1.4.0 doesn't work on my system. With mutt gpg is not able to decrypt messages. But if I try to enrypt a local file gpg hangs after decryption with this message: gpg: checking the trustdb gpg: waiting for lock (held by 5163 - probably dead) ... gpg: waiting for lock (held by 5163 - probably dead) ... but the process 5163 is not running. this makes gpg unusable for me. Is this a know issue? Just have a look at the look at ~/.gnupg . Is there still a trustdb.gpg.lock from a further gnupg --check-trustdb run, which has been died without removing it's lock file, or another gnupg running in parallel? H. -- sigmentation fault pgpA8xf4VHPXB.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#294405: tetex-base: unable to process even a sample file
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Janusz S. Bien) schrieb: On Wed, 09 Feb 2005 19:20:25 +0100 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Frank Küster) writes: [...] You could have done this yourself, by sending your answer to [EMAIL PROTECTED], Sorry, I didn't know. No need to apologize. It didn't cause any inconvenience to me, it's just two customized keypresses away. I just wanted to tell you. Do you mean that the cjk-latex Debian package is broken? Then please file a bug against it, with an appropriate severity (if it's really unusable, I'd say grave). We do not want to release sarge with a broken package. My bug report #169286 is 2 years and 86 days old, Sorry, I missed it, because I had expected an important or grave bug if you said that it is broken. although the problem perhaps has been solved already. It seems so, since the version in sarge and sid contains a file called CJKulem.sty, and the bug is tagged woody. The example quoted there fails now now for a different reason, described in bug report #165350, which is 2 years and 115 days old. It seems the cjk-latex maintainer isn't the most active one. If I find time, I'll have a look into this. Regards, Frank -- Frank Küster Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich Debian Developer
Bug#294405: tetex-base: unable to process even a sample file
On 09.02.05 Janusz S. Bien ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Frank Küster) writes: Hi, Do you mean that the cjk-latex Debian package is broken? Then please file a bug against it, with an appropriate severity (if it's really unusable, I'd say grave). We do not want to release sarge with a broken package. My bug report #169286 is 2 years and 86 days old, although the problem perhaps has been solved already. Has actually the tag woody. Dunno, why the bug was not closed if there is a fixed version in unstable/testing. The example quoted there fails now now for a different reason, described in bug report #165350, which is 2 years and 115 days old. Please also note that the bug #285198 reported by Hilmar Preusse is still open. Well, it just came to my attention by chance. Well in summary: 10 bugs. That is not that much in comparison to tetex-* ;-). H. -- sigmentation fault -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#294544: sfs-server: enables any user to manipulate any file exported from the server, ignoring permissions
Package: sfs-server Version: 1:0.8-0+pre20041016.1-1 Severity: grave Tags: security Justification: user security hole I created a file owned by root on the sfs server, permissions rw-r--r--. Ran sfskey login to my non-root server account, I was able to remove the file. Tested this for non-root users as well: any user can remove any other users file. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.4.27-2-686-smp Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Versions of packages sfs-server depends on: ii libc62.3.2.ds1-20GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libdb4.2 4.2.52-17 Berkeley v4.2 Database Libraries [ ii libgcc1 1:3.4.3-6 GCC support library ii libgmp3 4.1.4-5 Multiprecision arithmetic library ii libpam0g 0.76-22 Pluggable Authentication Modules l ii libsfs0 1:0.8-0+pre20041016.1-1 Self-Certifying File System shared ii libstdc++5 1:3.3.5-5 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 ii nfs-kernel-serve 1:1.0.7-1 Kernel NFS server support ii sfs-common 1:0.8-0+pre20041016.1-1 Self-Certifying File System common -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#294546: offlineimap: Needs to depend on python2.x-profile
Package: offlineimap Version: 4.0.8 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Traceback (most recent call last): File /usr/bin/offlineimap, line 20, in ? from offlineimap import init File /usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/offlineimap/init.py, line 19, in ? from offlineimap import imaplib, imapserver, repository, folder, mbnames, threadutil, version, syncmaster, accounts File /usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/offlineimap/imaplib.py, line 25, in ? from offlineimap.ui import UIBase File /usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/offlineimap/ui/__init__.py, line 20, in ? import UIBase, Blinkenlights File /usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/offlineimap/ui/Blinkenlights.py, line 22, in ? from offlineimap.threadutil import MultiLock File /usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/offlineimap/threadutil.py, line 21, in ? import sys, traceback, thread, profile ImportError: No module named profile From the python2.3 changelog: python2.3 (2.3.5-1) unstable; urgency=medium * Remove the profile.py and pstats.py modules from the source package, not having a DFSG conforming license. The modules can be found in the python2.x-profile package in the non-free section. Closes: #293932. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.10-1-686 Locale: LANG=en_AU, LC_CTYPE=en_AU (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Versions of packages offlineimap depends on: ii python2.3 2.3.5-1An interactive high-level object-o -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#284097: acknowledged by developer (NMU acknowledged)
From: Filip Van Raemdonck [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: NMU acknowledged There've been two uploads by the maintainer since the NMUs which fixed these bugs, including the bugfixes: multisync (0.82-4) unstable; urgency=medium * [...] Michael and Wouther, thanks for the NMU's Thanks, contact synchronization got significantly improved in 0..82-5. But I still cannot re-synchronize (synchronize 1 times) evolution calendar with any other plugin. Multisync crashes even if I try to change Data type to synchronize on the sync pair options sheet. Also I noticed that after unsuccessful synchronization I need to click close window button twice or more times (a thread leak??). marius -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#294501: php4-pgsql: php4-psql causes apache to segfault upon startup
On Wed, 2005-02-09 at 23:36 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: Yes indeed, since php4-imap is the traditional home for this particular bug, I'm reassigning. Can you send version/dependency information for the php4-imap package you have installed, and if appropriate, upgrade those packages as well to see if that changes the symptoms? xenon:/etc/php4/apache# dpkg -s php4-imap Package: php4-imap Status: install ok installed Priority: optional Section: web Installed-Size: 111 Maintainer: Adam Conrad [EMAIL PROTECTED] Architecture: i386 Source: php4 Version: 4:4.3.10-2 Replaces: php4-cgi-imap Depends: libc-client2002edebian, libc6 (= 2.3.2.ds1-4), libcomerr2 (= 1.33-3), libkrb53 (= 1.3.2), libpam0g (= 0.76), libssl0.9.7, debconf (= 0.5) | debconf-2.0, phpapi-20020918, php4-common (= 4:4.3.10-2) I just apt-get dist-upgrade'd my system, and symptoms are still exactly the same. I've included versions of the dependencies listed above for your reference ii libc-client2002edebian 2002edebian1-6 UW c-client library for mail protocols ii libc62.3.2.ds1-20 GNU C Library: Shared libraries and Timezone data ii libcomerr2 1.35-6 The Common Error Description library ii libkrb53 1.3.6-1 MIT Kerberos runtime libraries ii libpam0g 0.76-22 Pluggable Authentication Modules library ii libssl0.9.7 0.9.7e-2 SSL shared libraries After reading back through the numerous other similar archived reports for php4-imap, I installed libapache-mod-ssl to see what effect that would have. Surprise surprise, if I load mod_ssl (even if it's not being used), apache doesn't segfault, even with the imap and pgsql modules enabled. Regards -- Matt Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mob +64 275 611 544 www.mattb.net.nz -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Not reproducible on a fresh install
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 294223 minor Bug#294223: xemacs21: Security-Update for Woody fails to install (on alpha) Severity set to `minor'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#294501: php4: More information, similar crash
Package: php4
Version: 4:4.3.10-3
Followup-For: Bug #294501
I have an almost identical crash which has started happening as of an update a
few days ago. I've removed both php4-pgsql and php4-imap, but the crash
remains. I've found that it will crash if I just run the CLI version of php4,
as well as apache crashing if I have the mod_php4.so module installed.
Here's the 'where' from gdb:
#0 0x081a14cc in zend_register_functions ()
#1 0x081a15e0 in zend_register_module ()
#2 0x0810162d in php_dl ()
#3 0x0816e2c6 in display_ini_entries ()
#4 0x081974cd in zend_llist_apply ()
#5 0x0816e992 in php_ini_delayed_modules_startup ()
#6 0x08168a94 in php_module_startup ()
#7 0x081c1e75 in main ()
Attached is my strace of running 'php4':
execve(/usr/bin/php4, [php4], [/* 17 vars */]) = 0
uname({sys=Linux, node=earl, ...}) = 0
brk(0) = 0x8356000
old_mmap(NULL, 4096, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0) =
0xb7fe9000
access(/etc/ld.so.nohwcap, F_OK) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
open(/etc/ld.so.preload, O_RDONLY)= -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
open(/etc/ld.so.cache, O_RDONLY) = 3
fstat64(3, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=29062, ...}) = 0
old_mmap(NULL, 29062, PROT_READ, MAP_PRIVATE, 3, 0) = 0xb7fe1000
close(3)= 0
access(/etc/ld.so.nohwcap, F_OK) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
open(/lib/tls/libcrypt.so.1, O_RDONLY) = 3
read(3, \177ELF\1\1\1\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\3\0\3\0\1\0\0\0\360\t\0..., 512) = 512
fstat64(3, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=18876, ...}) = 0
old_mmap(NULL, 181692, PROT_READ|PROT_EXEC, MAP_PRIVATE, 3, 0) = 0xb7fb4000
old_mmap(0xb7fb9000, 4096, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED, 3,
0x4000) = 0xb7fb9000
old_mmap(0xb7fba000, 157116, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE,
MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0) = 0xb7fba000
close(3)= 0
access(/etc/ld.so.nohwcap, F_OK) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
open(/usr/lib/libzzip-0.so.12, O_RDONLY) = 3
read(3, \177ELF\1\1\1\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\3\0\3\0\1\0\0\0\0\32\0..., 512) = 512
fstat64(3, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=20276, ...}) = 0
old_mmap(NULL, 4096, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0) =
0xb7fb3000
old_mmap(NULL, 23336, PROT_READ|PROT_EXEC, MAP_PRIVATE, 3, 0) = 0xb7fad000
old_mmap(0xb7fb2000, 4096, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED, 3,
0x4000) = 0xb7fb2000
close(3)= 0
access(/etc/ld.so.nohwcap, F_OK) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
open(/lib/tls/libnsl.so.1, O_RDONLY) = 3
read(3, \177ELF\1\1\1\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\3\0\3\0\1\0\0\0 \0\000..., 512) = 512
fstat64(3, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=73304, ...}) = 0
old_mmap(NULL, 80544, PROT_READ|PROT_EXEC, MAP_PRIVATE, 3, 0) = 0xb7f99000
old_mmap(0xb7faa000, 4096, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED, 3,
0x11000) = 0xb7faa000
old_mmap(0xb7fab000, 6816, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE,
MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0) = 0xb7fab000
close(3)= 0
access(/etc/ld.so.nohwcap, F_OK) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
open(/usr/lib/libexpat.so.1, O_RDONLY) = 3
read(3, \177ELF\1\1\1\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\3\0\3\0\1\0\0\0\260\\0..., 512) = 512
fstat64(3, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=129972, ...}) = 0
old_mmap(NULL, 128880, PROT_READ|PROT_EXEC, MAP_PRIVATE, 3, 0) = 0xb7f79000
old_mmap(0xb7f96000, 12288, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED, 3,
0x1d000) = 0xb7f96000
close(3)= 0
access(/etc/ld.so.nohwcap, F_OK) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
open(/usr/lib/libpcre.so.3, O_RDONLY) = 3
read(3, \177ELF\1\1\1\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\3\0\3\0\1\0\0\0\20\r\0..., 512) = 512
fstat64(3, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=63992, ...}) = 0
old_mmap(NULL, 62960, PROT_READ|PROT_EXEC, MAP_PRIVATE, 3, 0) = 0xb7f69000
old_mmap(0xb7f78000, 4096, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED, 3,
0xf000) = 0xb7f78000
close(3)= 0
access(/etc/ld.so.nohwcap, F_OK) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
open(/usr/lib/libpanel.so.5, O_RDONLY) = 3
read(3, \177ELF\1\1\1\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\3\0\3\0\1\0\0\0\320\t\0..., 512) = 512
fstat64(3, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=11600, ...}) = 0
old_mmap(NULL, 14708, PROT_READ|PROT_EXEC, MAP_PRIVATE, 3, 0) = 0xb7f65000
old_mmap(0xb7f68000, 4096, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED, 3,
0x2000) = 0xb7f68000
close(3)= 0
access(/etc/ld.so.nohwcap, F_OK) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
open(/lib/libncurses.so.5, O_RDONLY) = 3
read(3, \177ELF\1\1\1\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\3\0\3\0\1\0\0\0\220\342..., 512) = 512
fstat64(3, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=252592, ...}) = 0
old_mmap(NULL, 257868, PROT_READ|PROT_EXEC, MAP_PRIVATE, 3, 0) = 0xb7f26000
old_mmap(0xb7f5c000, 36864, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED, 3,
0x35000) = 0xb7f5c000
close(3)= 0
Bug#288882: blender: FTBFS when using sudo
Dear Hatta-san,
I'd really really like to see blender 2.35 (and possibly later 2.36)
get into Sarge, but the build failures on mips and mipsel so far
prevent this, as addressed in Bug#22.
I've prepared the attached interdiff, partially following Frank's
proposal, which according to my local tests solves that problem.
Please give your blessing to a NMU.
Also find attached the debdiff output between 2.35-1 from the archive
and the version I prepared, 2.35-1.1. Additionally both debs give the
same result on a lintian run, so IMHO there won't be any regressions.
Furthermore the new diff.gz seems to apply cleanly to upstream's 2.36,
so perhaps I could upload a 2.36-0.1 once 2.35 reaches Sarge, please
see Bug#23 for my rationale...
What do you think about those two NMU proposals?
Cheers,
Flo
File lists identical (after any substitutions)
The following lines in the control files differ (wdiff output format):
--
Version: [-2.35-1-] {+2.35-1.1+}
Depends: libc6 (= 2.3.2.ds1-4), libfreetype6 (= 2.1.5-1), libgcc1 (=
1:3.4.1-3), libgettextpo0, {+libgl1,+} libglu1-mesa | libglu1, libjpeg62,
libopenal0, libpng12-0 (= 1.2.8rel), libsdl1.2debian ( [-1.2.7-0),-]
{+1.2.7+1.2.8),+} libstdc++5 (= 1:3.3.4-1), libx11-6 | xlibs ( 4.1.0),
python2.3 (= 2.3), [-xlibmesa-gl | libgl1,-] zlib1g (= 1:1.2.1), gettext (=
0.14.1)
diff -u blender-2.35/debian/patches/01_SConstruct_debian.dpatch
blender-2.35/debian/patches/01_SConstruct_debian.dpatch
--- blender-2.35/debian/patches/01_SConstruct_debian.dpatch
+++ blender-2.35/debian/patches/01_SConstruct_debian.dpatch
@@ -22,15 +22,6 @@
diff -urN blender-2.35.orig/SConstruct blender-2.35/SConstruct
--- blender-2.35.orig/SConstruct 2004-11-15 05:37:32.0 +0900
+++ blender-2.35/SConstruct2004-12-09 07:15:42.0 +0900
-@@ -31,7 +31,7 @@
- playername = 'blenderplayer$PROGSUFFIX'
-
- # Build directory.
--# root_build_dir = '..' + os.sep + 'build' + os.sep + sys.platform + os.sep
-+root_build_dir = '.' + os.sep + 'build' + os.sep + sys.platform + os.sep
-
- bs_config.parseOpts()
-
@@ -52,9 +52,9 @@
env = Environment ()
diff -u blender-2.35/debian/changelog blender-2.35/debian/changelog
--- blender-2.35/debian/changelog
+++ blender-2.35/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+blender (2.35-1.1) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+ * Split out parts of 01_SConstruct_debian.dpatch: root_build_dir
+needs to get adjusted before the clean target runs - closes: #22
+
+ -- Florian Ernst [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu, 10 Feb 2005 02:45:38 +0100
+
blender (2.35-1) unstable; urgency=low
* The Brief Return From The Hell, Pt. 2 release.
only in patch2:
unchanged:
--- blender-2.35.orig/SConstruct
+++ blender-2.35/SConstruct
@@ -35,6 +35,10 @@
bs_config.parseOpts()
+# Setting build directory here so blender won't touch anything outside
+# its build environment, see Bug#22. Thanks Frank!
+bs_globals.root_build_dir = '.' + os.sep + 'build' + os.sep + sys.platform +
os.sep
+
# Create the build directory. SCons does this automatically, but since we
# don't want to put scons-generated .sconsign files in the source tree, but in
# the root_build_dir, we have to create that dir ourselves before SCons tries
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Bug#294501: php4: even more info, sorry
Package: php4 Version: 4:4.3.10-3 Followup-For: Bug #294501 Apologies, I've just dug around a bit more, and I've found by disabling the line 'extension=pam_auth.so' from my php4.ini the crash goes away; this may well be a novel bug and not related to this one! -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#262925: progress information
On Thu, Feb 10, 2005 at 09:54:08AM +0100, Geert Stappers wrote: Where to look for information about progress on this bug? My usual approach to find upstream didn't work :-( This bug prevents gfs from entering testing, you have to use unstable. Bastian -- Oblivion together does not frighten me, beloved. -- Thalassa (in Anne Mulhall's body), Return to Tomorrow, stardate 4770.3. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#294142: No conditional inclusion?
Hello, wouldn't it be possible to include the freepats config only if it exists? Greetings Helge -- Dr. Helge Kreutzmann, Dipl.-Phys. [EMAIL PROTECTED] gpg signed mail preferred 64bit GNU powered http://www.itp.uni-hannover.de/~kreutzm Help keep free software libre: http://www.freepatents.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#291289: marked as done (mailman: need versioned build-depends on dpatch)
Your message dated Thu, 10 Feb 2005 06:47:31 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#291289: fixed in mailman 2.1.5-6 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Jan 2005 21:23:18 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jan 19 13:23:17 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from howard.indypgh.org [128.2.97.176] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1CrNIL-Cc-00; Wed, 19 Jan 2005 13:23:17 -0800 Received: from toups by howard.indypgh.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1CrNHb-G2-00; Wed, 19 Jan 2005 16:22:31 -0500 From: m. toups [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: mailman: need versioned build-depends on dpatch To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Mailer: bug 3.3.10.1 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: m. toups [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2005 16:22:31 -0500 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: mailman Version: 2.1.5-5 Severity: normal currently (2.1.5-5) mailman's Build-Depends line is as follows: Build-Depends: debhelper (= 4.1.16), autoconf, python-dev, dpatch however trying to build mailman from source with dpatch 2.0.2 yielded: applying patch 02_CAN-2004-1177_driver_css to ./ .../usr/share/dpatch/dpatch-run: /usr/share/dpatch/dpatch-run: No such file or directory it looks like dpatch-run wasn't added until dpatch 2.0.9 upgrading to dpatch 2.0.10 solved this problem for me, but technically there should be a versioned build-depends there -matt -- System Information Debian Release: 3.0 Kernel Version: Linux howard 2.2.26 #8 SMP Tue Mar 16 18:35:14 EST 2004 sparc unknown --- Received: (at 291289-close) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Feb 2005 11:54:58 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Feb 10 03:54:58 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1CzCuQ-0007LE-00; Thu, 10 Feb 2005 03:54:58 -0800 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1CzCnD-0007UO-00; Thu, 10 Feb 2005 06:47:31 -0500 From: Tollef Fog Heen [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $ Subject: Bug#291289: fixed in mailman 2.1.5-6 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 06:47:31 -0500 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2 Source: mailman Source-Version: 2.1.5-6 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of mailman, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: mailman_2.1.5-6.diff.gz to pool/main/m/mailman/mailman_2.1.5-6.diff.gz mailman_2.1.5-6.dsc to pool/main/m/mailman/mailman_2.1.5-6.dsc mailman_2.1.5-6_i386.deb to pool/main/m/mailman/mailman_2.1.5-6_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Tollef Fog Heen [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated mailman package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 12:10:42 +0100 Source: mailman Binary: mailman Architecture: source i386 Version: 2.1.5-6 Distribution: unstable Urgency: high Maintainer: Tollef Fog Heen [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Tollef Fog Heen [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: mailman- Powerful, web-based mailing list manager Closes: 283973 291289 293002 294467 Changes: mailman (2.1.5-6) unstable; urgency=high . * SECURITY UPDATE: fix information disclosure * Added
Bug#294467: marked as done (mailman: (CAN-2005-0202) directory traversal vulnerability)
Your message dated Thu, 10 Feb 2005 06:47:31 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#294467: fixed in mailman 2.1.5-6 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Feb 2005 20:46:10 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Feb 09 12:46:10 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mail.enyo.de [212.9.189.167] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Cyyiw-0008WO-00; Wed, 09 Feb 2005 12:46:10 -0800 Received: from deneb.enyo.de ([212.9.189.171]) by albireo.enyo.de with esmtp id 1Cyyiv-0004dX-54 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 09 Feb 2005 21:46:09 +0100 Received: from fw by deneb.enyo.de with local (Exim 4.43) id 1Cyyit-0002DF-3o; Wed, 09 Feb 2005 21:46:07 +0100 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary1997112492== MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Florian Weimer [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: mailman: (CAN-2005-0202) directory traversal vulnerability X-Mailer: reportbug 3.5 Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2005 21:46:07 +0100 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: This is a multi-part MIME message sent by reportbug. --===1997112492== Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Package: mailman Version: 2.1.5-5 Severity: grave Tags: security Justification: user security hole See: http://lists.netsys.com/pipermail/full-disclosure/2005-February/031562.html The attached patch fixes this hole. The list expression works on Python 2.1.3. --===1997112492== Content-Type: application/x-shellscript MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=40_can-2005-0202.dpatch IyEgL2Jpbi9zaCAvdXNyL3NoYXJlL2RwYXRjaC9kcGF0Y2gtcnVuCiMjIDQwX2Nhbi0yMDA1LTAy MDIuZHBhdGNoIGJ5ICA8ZndAZGVuZWIuZW55by5kZT4KIyMKIyMgQWxsIGxpbmVzIGJlZ2lubmlu ZyB3aXRoIGAjIyBEUDonIGFyZSBhIGRlc2NyaXB0aW9uIG9mIHRoZSBwYXRjaC4KIyMgRFA6IEZp eCBkaXJlY3RvcnkgdHJhdmVyc2FsIHNlY3VyaXR5IGJ1ZyBDQU4tMjAwNS0wMjAyLgoKQERQQVRD SEAKZGlmZiAtdXJOYWQgbWFpbG1hbi0yLjEuNS9NYWlsbWFuL0NnaS9wcml2YXRlLnB5IC90bXAv ZHBlcC4xczMzRmUvbWFpbG1hbi0yLjEuNS9NYWlsbWFuL0NnaS9wcml2YXRlLnB5Ci0tLSBtYWls bWFuLTIuMS41L01haWxtYW4vQ2dpL3ByaXZhdGUucHkJMjAwMy0wMi0wOCAwODoxMzo1MC4wMDAw MDAwMDAgKzAxMDAKKysrIC90bXAvZHBlcC4xczMzRmUvbWFpbG1hbi0yLjEuNS9NYWlsbWFuL0Nn aS9wcml2YXRlLnB5CTIwMDUtMDItMDkgMjE6MDA6MzYuMDAwMDAwMDAwICswMTAwCkBAIC0zNywx MSArMzcsMTIgQEAKIAogCiAMCitTTEFTSCA9ICcvJworCiBkZWYgdHJ1ZV9wYXRoKHBhdGgpOgog ICAgICJFbnN1cmUgdGhhdCB0aGUgcGF0aCBpcyBzYWZlIGJ5IHJlbW92aW5nIC4uIgotICAgIHBh dGggPSBwYXRoLnJlcGxhY2UoJy4uLycsICcnKQotICAgIHBhdGggPSBwYXRoLnJlcGxhY2UoJy4v JywgJycpCi0gICAgcmV0dXJuIHBhdGhbMTpdCisgICAgcGFydHMgPSBbeCBmb3IgeCBpbiBwYXRo LnNwbGl0KFNMQVNIKSBpZiB4IG5vdCBpbiAoJy4nLCAnLi4nKV0KKyAgICByZXR1cm4gU0xBU0gu am9pbihwYXJ0cylbMTpdCiAKIAogDAo= --===1997112492==-- --- Received: (at 294467-close) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Feb 2005 11:53:02 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Feb 10 03:53:02 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1CzCsY-0006iI-00; Thu, 10 Feb 2005 03:53:02 -0800 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1CzCnD-0007US-00; Thu, 10 Feb 2005 06:47:31 -0500 From: Tollef Fog Heen [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $ Subject: Bug#294467: fixed in mailman 2.1.5-6 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 06:47:31 -0500 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 4 Source: mailman Source-Version: 2.1.5-6 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of mailman, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
Bug#293125: marked as done (postgresql: LOAD security issue)
Your message dated Thu, 10 Feb 2005 13:07:52 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Woody update was published has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Feb 2005 09:44:17 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Feb 01 01:44:17 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mail.enyo.de [212.9.189.167] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Cvua1-0008E9-00; Tue, 01 Feb 2005 01:44:17 -0800 Received: from deneb.enyo.de ([212.9.189.171]) by albireo.enyo.de with esmtp id 1CvuZz-0001OH-WE for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 01 Feb 2005 10:44:16 +0100 Received: from fw by deneb.enyo.de with local (Exim 4.43) id 1CvuZz-0001MC-Qe; Tue, 01 Feb 2005 10:44:15 +0100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Florian Weimer [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: postgresql: LOAD security issue X-Mailer: reportbug 3.5 Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2005 10:44:15 +0100 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: postgresql Version: 7.4.6-7 Severity: grave Tags: security Justification: user security hole Upstream has released new versions because of the LOAD security hole: http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-bugs/2005-01/msg00269.php http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-announce/2005-02/msg0.php -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (800, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.11-rc1fw Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages postgresql depends on: ii adduser 3.59Add and remove users and groups ii debconf [debconf 1.4.42 Debian configuration management sy ii debianutils 2.11.2 Miscellaneous utilities specific t ii libc62.3.2.ds1-20GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libcomerr2 1.36rc2-1 common error description library ii libkrb53 1.3.6-1 MIT Kerberos runtime libraries ii libpam0g 0.76-22 Pluggable Authentication Modules l ii libperl5.8 5.8.4-5 Shared Perl library ii libpq3 7.4.6-6 PostgreSQL C client library ii libreadline4 4.3-15 GNU readline and history libraries ii libssl0.9.7 0.9.7e-3SSL shared libraries ii mailx1:8.1.2-0.20040524cvs-4 A simple mail user agent pn postgresql-clien Not found. ii procps 1:3.2.4-1 The /proc file system utilities ii python2.32.3.4-19An interactive high-level object-o ii ucf 1.13Update Configuration File: preserv ii zlib1g 1:1.2.2-4 compression library - runtime --- Received: (at 293125-done) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Feb 2005 12:08:23 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Feb 10 04:08:23 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from box79162.elkhouse.de [213.9.79.162] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1CzD7P-0004uT-00; Thu, 10 Feb 2005 04:08:23 -0800 Received: from martin by box79162.elkhouse.de with local (Exim 4.34) id 1CzD6u-0005dm-6i for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 10 Feb 2005 13:07:52 +0100 Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 13:07:52 +0100 From: Martin Pitt [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Woody update was published Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=3MwIy2ne0vdjdPXF Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: --3MwIy2ne0vdjdPXF Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition:
Bug#294493: marked as done (python2.3-twisted: twistd imports removed profile module)
Your message dated Thu, 10 Feb 2005 07:47:30 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#294493: fixed in twisted 1.3.0-7 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Feb 2005 23:52:26 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Feb 09 15:52:26 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mx02.qsc.de [213.148.130.14] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Cz1dC-00072H-00; Wed, 09 Feb 2005 15:52:26 -0800 Received: from port-212-202-71-46.dynamic.qsc.de ([212.202.71.46] helo=treasure.calvinsplayground.de) by mx02.qsc.de with smtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 1Cz1ch-000660-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 10 Feb 2005 00:51:55 +0100 Received: (qmail 6201 invoked by uid 1000); 9 Feb 2005 23:51:55 - Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Bastian Kleineidam [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: python2.3-twisted: twistd imports removed profile module X-Mailer: reportbug 3.7.1 Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 00:51:54 +0100 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: python2.3-twisted Version: 1.3.0-6 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Hi, the profile.py module has been removed from the python2.3 = 2.3.5-1 since it is non-free. Now I get errors starting apps using twistd: $ /etc/init.d/apt-proxy start Starting apt-proxyTraceback (most recent call last): File /usr/bin/twistd, line 34, in ? from twisted.scripts.twistd import run File /usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/twisted/scripts/twistd.py, line 26, in ? from twisted.application import app, service File /usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/twisted/application/app.py, line 21, in ? import sys, os, pdb, profile, getpass, traceback, signal ImportError: No module named profile I suggest disabling the profile import in twistd. Regards, Bastian -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.10-treasure5 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) Versions of packages python2.3-twisted depends on: ii python2.3 2.3.5-1An interactive high-level object-o ii python2.3-twisted-bin 1.3.0-6Event-based framework for internet -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 294493-close) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Feb 2005 12:53:02 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Feb 10 04:53:02 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1CzDoc-00049r-00; Thu, 10 Feb 2005 04:53:02 -0800 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1CzDjG-0002Iu-00; Thu, 10 Feb 2005 07:47:30 -0500 From: Matthias Klose [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $ Subject: Bug#294493: fixed in twisted 1.3.0-7 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 07:47:30 -0500 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2 Source: twisted Source-Version: 1.3.0-7 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of twisted, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: python-twisted-conch_1.3.0-7_all.deb to pool/main/t/twisted/python-twisted-conch_1.3.0-7_all.deb python-twisted_1.3.0-7_all.deb to pool/main/t/twisted/python-twisted_1.3.0-7_all.deb python2.2-twisted-bin_1.3.0-7_i386.deb to pool/main/t/twisted/python2.2-twisted-bin_1.3.0-7_i386.deb python2.2-twisted-conch_1.3.0-7_all.deb to pool/main/t/twisted/python2.2-twisted-conch_1.3.0-7_all.deb python2.2-twisted_1.3.0-7_all.deb to pool/main/t/twisted/python2.2-twisted_1.3.0-7_all.deb
Bug#294406: marked as done (multiple buffer overflows in gram.y (CAN-2005-0247))
Your message dated Thu, 10 Feb 2005 08:02:38 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#294406: fixed in postgresql 7.4.7-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Feb 2005 16:30:32 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Feb 09 08:30:32 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from kitenet.net [64.62.161.42] (postfix) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1CyujY-00025z-00; Wed, 09 Feb 2005 08:30:32 -0800 Received: from dragon.kitenet.net (unknown [66.168.94.144]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN Joey Hess, Issuer Joey Hess (verified OK)) by kitenet.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1B6017F13 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 9 Feb 2005 16:29:11 + (GMT) Received: by dragon.kitenet.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 27CE26E20E; Wed, 9 Feb 2005 11:30:54 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2005 11:30:54 -0500 From: Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: multiple buffer overflows in gram.y (CAN-2005-0247) Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=8t9RHnE3ZwKMSgU+ Content-Disposition: inline X-Reportbug-Version: 3.7.1 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: --8t9RHnE3ZwKMSgU+ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Package: postgresql Version: 7.4.7-1 Severity: grave Tags: security patch Multiple buffer overflows in gram.y for PostgreSQL 8.0.1 and earlier may al= low attackers to execute arbitrary code via (1) a large number of variables in a SQL statement being handled by the read_sql_construct function, (2) a large number of INTO variables in a SELECT statement being handled by the make_select_stmt function, (4) a large number of arbitrary variables in a SELECT statement being handled by the make_select_stmt function, and (4) a large number of INTO variables in a FETCH statement being handled by the make_fetch_stmt function, a different set of vulnerabilities than CAN-2005-0245. This is fixed in cvs for version 7.4 here: http://developer.postgresql.org/cvsweb.cgi/pgsql/src/pl/plpgsql/src/gram.y.= diff?r1=3D1.48.2.1;r2=3D1.48.2.2 --=20 see shy jo --8t9RHnE3ZwKMSgU+ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFCCjq+d8HHehbQuO8RAvtnAKCwNUGr5/jOAqDwg5azkjoQgr5/JgCdEfpl cqj1fn3zhindk84c02Pt80g= =rbMu -END PGP SIGNATURE- --8t9RHnE3ZwKMSgU+-- --- Received: (at 294406-close) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Feb 2005 13:08:02 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Feb 10 05:08:02 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1CzE37-0007jK-00; Thu, 10 Feb 2005 05:08:01 -0800 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1CzDxu-0003QV-00; Thu, 10 Feb 2005 08:02:38 -0500 From: Martin Pitt [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $ Subject: Bug#294406: fixed in postgresql 7.4.7-2 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 08:02:38 -0500 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Source: postgresql Source-Version: 7.4.7-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of postgresql, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: libecpg-dev_7.4.7-2_i386.deb to pool/main/p/postgresql/libecpg-dev_7.4.7-2_i386.deb libecpg4_7.4.7-2_i386.deb to pool/main/p/postgresql/libecpg4_7.4.7-2_i386.deb libpgtcl-dev_7.4.7-2_i386.deb to
Processed: patch available
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 294522 + patch Bug#294522: linda: missing depends on new (and non-free) python-profile Tags were: sid Tags added: patch thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#294522: patch available
tags 294522 + patch thanks https://bugzilla.ubuntu.com/show_bug.cgi?id=6401 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#294454: gnupg 1.4.0 does not work
Hello Hilmar, * Hilmar Preusse [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-02-10 14:07]: On 09.02.05 Nico Golde ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: the new gnupg package for version 1.4.0 doesn't work on my system. With mutt gpg is not able to decrypt messages. But if I try to enrypt a local file gpg hangs after decryption with this message: gpg: checking the trustdb gpg: waiting for lock (held by 5163 - probably dead) ... gpg: waiting for lock (held by 5163 - probably dead) ... but the process 5163 is not running. this makes gpg unusable for me. Is this a know issue? Just have a look at the look at ~/.gnupg . Is there still a trustdb.gpg.lock from a further gnupg --check-trustdb run, which has been died without removing it's lock file, or another gnupg running in parallel? of fcuk the lock file was the problem. so sorry for the noise and feel free to close the bug. regards nico -- Nico Golde - [EMAIL PROTECTED] | GPG: 1024D/73647CFF ,'`. [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.ngolde.de ( grml.org VIM has two modes - the one in which it beeps`._,' and the one in which it doesn't -- encrypted mail preferred pgpeqI2TGtufR.pgp Description: PGP signature
Processed: Re: Bug#294406: multiple buffer overflows in gram.y (CAN-2005-0247)
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reopen 294406 Bug#294406: multiple buffer overflows in gram.y (CAN-2005-0247) Bug reopened, originator not changed. tag 294406 woody sarge Bug#294406: multiple buffer overflows in gram.y (CAN-2005-0247) Tags were: patch security Tags added: woody, sarge thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#294406: multiple buffer overflows in gram.y (CAN-2005-0247)
reopen 294406 tag 294406 woody sarge thanks Sid is now fixed, but Sarge and Woody still need the fix(es). Martin -- Martin Pitt http://www.piware.de Ubuntu Developerhttp://www.ubuntulinux.org Debian GNU/Linux Developer http://www.debian.org signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#293698: marked as done (missing build-depends)
Your message dated Thu, 10 Feb 2005 09:02:22 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#293698: fixed in pearpc 0.3.1-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Feb 2005 04:34:53 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Feb 04 20:34:53 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from 174.red-62-57-140.user.auna.net (khazad.dyndns.org) [62.57.140.174] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1CxHem-0006e7-00; Fri, 04 Feb 2005 20:34:53 -0800 Received: from rmh by khazad.dyndns.org with local (Exim 4.34) id 1CxHYk-000IZG-U0; Sat, 05 Feb 2005 05:28:38 +0100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Robert Millan [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: missing build-depends X-Mailer: reportbug 3.5 Date: Sat, 05 Feb 2005 05:28:38 +0100 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: pearpc Version: 0.3.1-3 Severity: serious The package build-depends on library runtime packages (containing shared objects only) instead of library development packages (containing static objects and headers). For example: aalib1, libxext6, libx11-6, etc.. Instead of: aalib1-dev, libxext-dev, libx11-dev, etc.. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: kfreebsd-i386 (i386) Kernel: GNU/kFreeBSD 5.3-2 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) (ignored: LC_ALL set to C) Versions of packages pearpc depends on: ii libc0.1 2.3-1+kbsd.8 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libgcc1 1:3.4.1-5+kbsd GCC support library ii libsdl1.2debi 1.2.7+1.2.8cvs20041007-4.1 Simple DirectMedia Layer ii libstdc++51:3.3.5-4+kbsd The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 293698-close) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Feb 2005 14:08:02 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Feb 10 06:08:02 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1CzEzC-WU-00; Thu, 10 Feb 2005 06:08:02 -0800 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1CzEti-0007Kt-00; Thu, 10 Feb 2005 09:02:22 -0500 From: Leo Costela [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $ Subject: Bug#293698: fixed in pearpc 0.3.1-4 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 09:02:22 -0500 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Source: pearpc Source-Version: 0.3.1-4 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of pearpc, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: pearpc_0.3.1-4.diff.gz to pool/main/p/pearpc/pearpc_0.3.1-4.diff.gz pearpc_0.3.1-4.dsc to pool/main/p/pearpc/pearpc_0.3.1-4.dsc pearpc_0.3.1-4_i386.deb to pool/main/p/pearpc/pearpc_0.3.1-4_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Leo Costela [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated pearpc package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 08:50:49 -0300 Source: pearpc Binary: pearpc Architecture: source i386 Version: 0.3.1-4 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Leo Costela [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Leo Costela [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#294546: marked as done (offlineimap: Needs to depend on python2.x-profile)
Your message dated Thu, 10 Feb 2005 08:24:47 -0600 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#294546: offlineimap: Needs to depend on python2.x-profile has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Feb 2005 09:40:39 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Feb 10 01:40:39 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from pushme-pullyou.brong.net [203.30.75.3] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1CzAoQ-DB-00; Thu, 10 Feb 2005 01:40:39 -0800 Received: from vetra.brong.net (vetra.brong.net [192.168.203.4]) by pushme-pullyou.brong.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64D7928ED42; Thu, 10 Feb 2005 20:40:36 +1100 (EST) Received: by vetra.brong.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 616DD3B61A; Thu, 10 Feb 2005 20:40:34 +1100 (EST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Bron Gondwana [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: offlineimap: Needs to depend on python2.x-profile X-Mailer: reportbug 3.7.1 Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 20:40:34 +1100 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: offlineimap Version: 4.0.8 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Traceback (most recent call last): File /usr/bin/offlineimap, line 20, in ? from offlineimap import init File /usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/offlineimap/init.py, line 19, in ? from offlineimap import imaplib, imapserver, repository, folder, mbnames, threadutil, version, syncmaster, accounts File /usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/offlineimap/imaplib.py, line 25, in ? from offlineimap.ui import UIBase File /usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/offlineimap/ui/__init__.py, line 20, in ? import UIBase, Blinkenlights File /usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/offlineimap/ui/Blinkenlights.py, line 22, in ? from offlineimap.threadutil import MultiLock File /usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/offlineimap/threadutil.py, line 21, in ? import sys, traceback, thread, profile ImportError: No module named profile From the python2.3 changelog: python2.3 (2.3.5-1) unstable; urgency=medium * Remove the profile.py and pstats.py modules from the source package, not having a DFSG conforming license. The modules can be found in the python2.x-profile package in the non-free section. Closes: #293932. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.10-1-686 Locale: LANG=en_AU, LC_CTYPE=en_AU (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Versions of packages offlineimap depends on: ii python2.3 2.3.5-1An interactive high-level object-o -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 294546-done) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Feb 2005 14:25:24 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Feb 10 06:25:24 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from gatekeeper.excelhustler.com (gatekeeper.elmer.external.excelhustler.com) [68.99.114.105] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1CzFG0-00044j-00; Thu, 10 Feb 2005 06:25:24 -0800 Received: from chatterbox.elmer.internal.excelhustler.com (unknown [192.168.0.12]) (using TLSv1 with cipher EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA (168/168 bits)) (Client CN chatterbox.elmer.internal.excelhustler.com, Issuer excelhustler.com (not verified)) by gatekeeper.elmer.external.excelhustler.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AE06FD792; Thu, 10 Feb 2005 08:24:54 -0600 (CST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by chatterbox.elmer.internal.excelhustler.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04A7FFD4A9; Thu, 10 Feb 2005 08:24:54 -0600 (CST) Received: from chatterbox.elmer.internal.excelhustler.com ([192.168.0.12]) by localhost (chatterbox [192.168.0.12]) (amavisd-new, port 10025) with ESMTP id 24824-07; Thu, 10 Feb 2005 08:24:52 -0600 (CST) Received: from wile.internal.excelhustler.com (wile.internal.excelhustler.com [192.168.1.34]) by chatterbox.elmer.internal.excelhustler.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 635B0BB02D; Thu, 10 Feb 2005
Processed: Re: Bug#294142: No conditional inclusion?
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: clone 294142 -1 Bug#294142: timidity can't play anything due to config file Bug 294142 cloned as bug 294578. reopen -1 Helge Kreutzmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug#294578: timidity can't play anything due to config file Bug reopened, originator set to Helge Kreutzmann [EMAIL PROTECTED]. tags -1 - sarge Bug#294578: timidity can't play anything due to config file Tags were: sarge Tags removed: sarge tags -1 + upstream Bug#294578: timidity can't play anything due to config file There were no tags set. Tags added: upstream retitle -1 Please add optional include functionality to timidity Bug#294578: timidity can't play anything due to config file Changed Bug title. severity -1 wishlist Bug#294578: Please add optional include functionality to timidity Severity set to `wishlist'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: your mail
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: close 294581 Bug#294581: please fix offlineimap wrt the non-free profile.py in python2.3 'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing. Bug closed, send any further explanations to martin f krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED] merge 294479 294581 Bug#294479: ImportError: No module named profile Bug#294581: please fix offlineimap wrt the non-free profile.py in python2.3 Merged 294479 294581. merge 294546 294581 Bug#294546: offlineimap: Needs to depend on python2.x-profile Bug#294581: please fix offlineimap wrt the non-free profile.py in python2.3 Bug#294479: ImportError: No module named profile Merged 294479 294546 294581. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#294575: udev: fails to install (install due to gnome-volume-manager)
Hi Michael, I'm not the udev maintainer, but I can try to help. Can you add set -x as the second line of /var/lib/dpkg/info/udev.postinst, and retry configuration of that package, and send us the output? Thanks, Justin On Thu, Feb 10, 2005 at 03:36:13PM +0100, Michael Schmitt wrote: Package: udev Version: 0.050-6 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#294271: IDN support allows domain name spoofing
Here is a test which shows the evidence of the problem : http://secunia.com/multiple_browsers_idn_spoofing_test/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: your mail
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 282274 patch Bug#282274: phpdoc: FTBFS: openjade keeps running. There were no tags set. Tags added: patch thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#294581: your mail
Note that offlineimap still thinks its 4.0.8, even though the package is 4.0.9. -- .''`. martin f. krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED] : :' :proud Debian developer, admin, user, and author `. `'` `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system Invalid/expired PGP subkeys? Use subkeys.pgp.net as keyserver! signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#294454: marked as done (gnupg 1.4.0 does not work)
Your message dated Thu, 10 Feb 2005 16:41:44 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line gnupg 1.4.0 does not work has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Feb 2005 20:02:38 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Feb 09 12:02:38 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from natjimbo.rzone.de [81.169.145.162] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Cyy2n-0007um-00; Wed, 09 Feb 2005 12:02:38 -0800 Received: from ngolde.de (pD9E74BA0.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [217.231.75.160]) by post.webmailer.de (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j19K2Y23026663; Wed, 9 Feb 2005 21:02:35 +0100 (MET) Received: by ngolde.de (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 90FFD530058; Wed, 9 Feb 2005 21:02:03 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2005 21:02:03 +0100 From: Nico Golde [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: gnupg 1.4.0 does not work Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=h31gzZEtNLTqOjlF Content-Disposition: inline X-Reportbug-Version: 3.7.1 X-Editor: Vim 6.3 http://www.vim.org/ X-Mailer: Mutt 1.5.6i http://www.mutt.org/ X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux 2.6.10-nion http://www.debian.org/ X-My-Homepage: http://www.ngolde.de User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: --h31gzZEtNLTqOjlF Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Package: gnupg Version: 1.4.0-2 Severity: grave Hi, the new gnupg package for version 1.4.0 doesn't work on my system. With mutt gpg is not able to decrypt messages. But if I try to enrypt a local file gpg hangs after decryption with this message: gpg: checking the trustdb gpg: waiting for lock (held by 5163 - probably dead) ... gpg: waiting for lock (held by 5163 - probably dead) ... but the process 5163 is not running. this makes gpg unusable for me. Is this a know issue? Regards Nico -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.10-nion Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=3DISO-8859-15) (i= gnored: LC_ALL set to [EMAIL PROTECTED]) Versions of packages gnupg depends on: ii libbz2-1.0 1.0.2-4 high-quality block-sorting fil= e co ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-20 GNU C Library: Shared librarie= s an ii libldap22.1.30-3 OpenLDAP libraries ii libreadline55.0-10 GNU readline and history libra= ries ii libusb-0.1-41:0.1.9-1userspace USB programming libr= ary ii makedev 2.3.1-75 Creates device files in /dev ii zlib1g 1:1.2.2-4compression library - runtime -- no debconf information --=20 Nico Golde - [EMAIL PROTECTED] | GPG: 1024D/73647CFF ,'`. [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.ngolde.de ( grml.org VIM has two modes - the one in which it beeps`._,' =20 and the one in which it doesn't -- encrypted mail preferred --h31gzZEtNLTqOjlF Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux) iD4DBQFCCmw7HYflSXNkfP8RAgFaAKCxasbVgNoqTm6LPpmhbYS8WpkB9QCY2M6Q RpbEVQeTvXzjELfQEHez/A== =PXjP -END PGP SIGNATURE- --h31gzZEtNLTqOjlF-- --- Received: (at 294454-done) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Feb 2005 15:42:17 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Feb 10 07:42:16 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from smtp07.web.de [217.72.192.225] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1CzGSO-0006Ej-00; Thu, 10 Feb 2005 07:42:16 -0800 Received: from [212.14.71.206] (helo=preusse.amasol.de) by smtp07.web.de with asmtp (WEB.DE 4.103 #192) id 1CzGRt-0003wh-00; Thu, 10 Feb 2005 16:41:45 +0100 Received: by preusse.amasol.de (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Thu, 10 Feb 2005 16:41:45 +0100 Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 16:41:44 +0100 From:
Bug#294581: your mail
On Thu, Feb 10, 2005 at 04:32:05PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote: Note that offlineimap still thinks its 4.0.8, even though the package is 4.0.9. Oops. I forgot to bump its version number. Thanks. -- John -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#294522: A conditional linda profile patch
Hi,
I'd rather see that linda stays in main. I have included a patch
that makes the usage of the profiler optional.
Regards,
Bastian
--
,''`. Bastian Kleineidam
: :' :GnuPG Schlüssel
`. `'gpg --keyserver wwwkeys.pgp.net --recv-keys 32EC6F3E
`-
--- /usr/bin/linda 2004-12-08 02:50:27.0 +0100
+++ linda 2005-02-10 16:48:40.0 +0100
@@ -34,7 +34,7 @@
gettext.textdomain('linda')
_ = gettext.gettext
try:
-import os, pwd, gettext, locale, linda, profile, pstats
+import os, pwd, gettext, locale, linda, pstats
from linda import clparser, root
from linda.debug import dprint, vprint
from linda.checker import Checker, CheckerException
@@ -45,6 +45,12 @@
traceback.print_exc(file=sys.stdout)
sys.exit(6)
+try:
+import profile
+has_profile = True
+except ImportError:
+has_profile = False
+
class Linda:
def __init__(self):
self.check_sanity()
@@ -87,9 +93,13 @@
try:
main = Linda()
if clparser['profiling']:
-profile.run('main.run()', '/tmp/linda.prof')
-p = pstats.Stats('/tmp/linda.prof')
-p.sort_stats('cumulative').print_stats(20)
+if has_profile:
+profile.run('main.run()', '/tmp/linda.prof')
+p = pstats.Stats('/tmp/linda.prof')
+p.sort_stats('cumulative').print_stats(20)
+else:
+print _(Not profiling, please install the python-profiler
package.)
+main.run()
else:
main.run()
except KeyboardInterrupt:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Bug#294406: Updated woody packages available
Martin Pitt wrote: Hi Joey! I prepared new PostgreSQL woody packages to fix CAN-2005-024[57], here is the interdiff: Thanks. Regards, Joey -- GNU GPL: The source will be with you... always. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#293207: bogofilter: last two versions caused db errors
Can you provide the configuration you use with exim to plug bogofilter in? I am particularly interested because version 4.34-10 of exim depends on libdb3 and exim 4.44-2 depends on libdb4.2 so I am curious to know if exim uses libdb to interface with bogofilter in any way. micah I can use libdb - but I'm not using any db lists. That's an interesting question; maybe you should try the exim in project/experimental, which is linked against libdb4.2. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Bug#294575: udev: fails to install (install due to gnome-volume-manager)
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 294575 normal Bug#294575: udev: fails to install (install due to gnome-volume-manager) Severity set to `normal'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#294575: udev: fails to install (install due to gnome-volume-manager)
severity 294575 normal thanks On Feb 10, Michael Schmitt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I tried to install gnome-volume-manager and it depends on udev but udev did not install correctly. Your kernel lacks tmpfs support, but apparently does not behaves like older kernels. Please run these commands and report what happens: mkdir /tmp/test1 mount -n -o size=5M,mode=0755 -t ramfs none /tmp/test1 mkdir /tmp/test2 mount -n -o size=5M,mode=0755 -t tmpfs none /tmp/test2 cp /etc/group /tmp/test/file Please also send the .config file of the running kernel and the content of /proc/filesystems . -- ciao, Marco signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#294598: php4: compilation problem related to apache2 header
Package: php4 Severity: serious Justification: no longer builds from source A dpkg-buildpackage failed with the following message : In file included from /usr/include/apache2/util_filter.h:23, from /usr/local/src/php-mnogo/php4-4.3.10/sapi/apache2handler/mod_php4.c:40: /usr/include/apache2/httpd.h:1506: error: syntax error before '*' token /usr/include/apache2/httpd.h:1507: warning: type defaults to `int' in declaration of `ap_pregcomp' /usr/include/apache2/httpd.h:1507: warning: data definition has no type or storage class /usr/include/apache2/httpd.h:1514: error: syntax error before ap_regex_t /usr/include/apache2/httpd.h:1528: error: syntax error before '*' token /usr/include/apache2/httpd.h:1538: warning: type defaults to `int' in declaration of `ap_regex_t' /usr/include/apache2/httpd.h:1538: error: syntax error before '*' token /usr/include/apache3/httpd.h:1553: error: syntax error before ap_regmatch_t The bug is related to the use in php4 of _PCREPOSIX_H in the file main/php_regex.h which prevent the evaluation of /usr/include/apache2/pcreposix.h. This cause the parsing of httpd.h to failed. I've modify pcreposix.h to evaluate the necessary structure, but this is ugly : --- /usr/include/apache2/pcreposix.h2005-02-08 23:34:37.0 +0100 +++ pcreposix.h 2005-02-10 18:05:23.26282 +0100 @@ -56,6 +56,11 @@ REG_NOMATCH /* match failed */ }; +#endif /* End of pcreposix.h */ + + +#ifndef _STRUCT_PCREPOSIX_H +#define _STRUCT_PCREPOSIX_H /* The structure representing a compiled regular expression. */ @@ -85,4 +90,4 @@ } /* extern C */ #endif -#endif /* End of pcreposix.h */ +#endif /* End struct_pcreposix.h */ -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.10 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#294598: marked as done (php4: compilation problem related to apache2 header)
Your message dated Thu, 10 Feb 2005 09:46:30 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#294598: php4: compilation problem related to apache2 header has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Feb 2005 17:27:34 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Feb 10 09:27:33 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from (hebus.inl.fr) [195.101.59.116] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1CzI6H-pU-00; Thu, 10 Feb 2005 09:27:33 -0800 Received: from eric by hebus.inl.fr with local (Exim 4.44) id 1CzI5k-00046w-Gh; Thu, 10 Feb 2005 18:27:00 +0100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Regit [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: php4: compilation problem related to apache2 header X-Mailer: reportbug 3.7.1 Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 18:27:00 +0100 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: php4 Severity: serious Justification: no longer builds from source A dpkg-buildpackage failed with the following message : In file included from /usr/include/apache2/util_filter.h:23, from /usr/local/src/php-mnogo/php4-4.3.10/sapi/apache2handler/mod_php4.c:40: /usr/include/apache2/httpd.h:1506: error: syntax error before '*' token /usr/include/apache2/httpd.h:1507: warning: type defaults to `int' in declaration of `ap_pregcomp' /usr/include/apache2/httpd.h:1507: warning: data definition has no type or storage class /usr/include/apache2/httpd.h:1514: error: syntax error before ap_regex_t /usr/include/apache2/httpd.h:1528: error: syntax error before '*' token /usr/include/apache2/httpd.h:1538: warning: type defaults to `int' in declaration of `ap_regex_t' /usr/include/apache2/httpd.h:1538: error: syntax error before '*' token /usr/include/apache3/httpd.h:1553: error: syntax error before ap_regmatch_t The bug is related to the use in php4 of _PCREPOSIX_H in the file main/php_regex.h which prevent the evaluation of /usr/include/apache2/pcreposix.h. This cause the parsing of httpd.h to failed. I've modify pcreposix.h to evaluate the necessary structure, but this is ugly : --- /usr/include/apache2/pcreposix.h2005-02-08 23:34:37.0 +0100 +++ pcreposix.h 2005-02-10 18:05:23.26282 +0100 @@ -56,6 +56,11 @@ REG_NOMATCH /* match failed */ }; +#endif /* End of pcreposix.h */ + + +#ifndef _STRUCT_PCREPOSIX_H +#define _STRUCT_PCREPOSIX_H /* The structure representing a compiled regular expression. */ @@ -85,4 +90,4 @@ } /* extern C */ #endif -#endif /* End of pcreposix.h */ +#endif /* End struct_pcreposix.h */ -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.10 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) --- Received: (at 294598-done) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Feb 2005 17:46:31 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Feb 10 09:46:31 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from dsl093-039-038.pdx1.dsl.speakeasy.net (quetzlcoatl.dodds.net) [66.93.39.38] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1CzIOd-0002j8-00; Thu, 10 Feb 2005 09:46:31 -0800 Received: by quetzlcoatl.dodds.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 9E7CC3AE0; Thu, 10 Feb 2005 09:46:30 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 09:46:30 -0800 From: Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Regit [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Bug#294598: php4: compilation problem related to apache2 header Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] References: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=0F1p//8PRICkK4MW Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: --0F1p//8PRICkK4MW Content-Type:
Bug#294526: simpletal: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'python-dev'
Hi, Andreas Jochens wrote: Package: simpletal Severity: serious Tags: patch When building 'simpletal' in a clean chroot, I get the following error: cd . python setup.py build --build-base=./build /bin/sh: python: command not found make: *** [common-build-impl] Error 127 Please add the missing Build-Depends on 'python-dev' to debian/control. Uh, thanks, haven't built the package in a chroot yet so I didn't realize that cdbs is running any python commands (without explicit python version appended). Cheers, Igor -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#294621: xwhois: server file is not found, program won't start (same problem as in bug #43467)
Package: xwhois Version: 0.4.2-6 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable # apt-get install xwhois $ xwhois Could not open xwhois server file '/usr/share/xwhois/xwhois.servers'! $ echo this did not work $ cp /etc/X11/xwhois/servers ~/.xwhois.servers $ xwhois $ echo Now it works! -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.10 Locale: LANG=sv_SE, LC_CTYPE=sv_SE (charmap=ISO-8859-1) (ignored: LC_ALL set to sv_SE) Versions of packages xwhois depends on: ii libc62.3.2.ds1-20GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libglib1.2 1.2.10-9The GLib library of C routines ii libgtk1.21.2.10-17 The GIMP Toolkit set of widgets fo ii libx11-6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-10 X Window System protocol client li ii libxext6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-10 X Window System miscellaneous exte ii libxi6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-10 X Window System Input extension li ii xlibs4.3.0.dfsg.1-10 X Keyboard Extension (XKB) configu signature.asc Description: Detta =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=E4r?= en digitalt signerad meddelandedel
Bug#294627: debconf: syntax error in dpkg-preconfigure
Package: debconf Version: 1.4.43 Severity: critical Justification: breaks unrelated software On an upgrade just now... Reading changelogs... Done apt-listchanges: Do you want to continue? [Y/n]? y String found where operator expected at /usr/sbin/dpkg-preconfigure line 96, near die sprintf(gettext( (Might be a runaway multi-line string starting on line 94) (Missing semicolon on previous line?) Bareword found where operator expected at /usr/sbin/dpkg-preconfigure line 96, near die sprintf(gettext(debconf (Do you need to predeclare die?) Unquoted string debconf may clash with future reserved word at /usr/sbin/dpkg-preconfigure line 96. String found where operator expected at /usr/sbin/dpkg-preconfigure line 103, near gettext( (Might be a runaway multi-line string starting on line 96) (Missing semicolon on previous line?) Bareword found where operator expected at /usr/sbin/dpkg-preconfigure line 104,near $package, $confmodule (Might be a runaway multi-line ff string starting on line 103) (Missing operator before dule?) Unquoted string dule may clash with future reserved word at /usr/sbin/dpkg-preconfigure line 104. syntax error at /usr/sbin/dpkg-preconfigure line 96, near die sprintf(gettext( Unmatched right curly bracket at /usr/sbin/dpkg-preconfigure line 108, at end of line syntax error at /usr/sbin/dpkg-preconfigure line 108, near } Execution of /usr/sbin/dpkg-preconfigure aborted due to compilation errors. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-k7 Locale: LANG=C, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) Versions of packages debconf depends on: ii debconf-i18n 1.4.43 full internationalization support ii perl-base 5.8.4-6The Pathologically Eclectic Rubbis -- debconf information: * debconf/priority: medium * debconf/frontend: Dialog -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#294628: openoffice.org: impress crashes when trying to modify style of a text box
Package: openoffice.org Version: 1.1.3-3 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable impress crashes when in an empty presentation, with a layout including a text box, you try to 'modify style...' and then change the 'font style' or 'font size' (btw, writer works fine) it saves all data correctly, but you cannot compose any document at all -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.10 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) Versions of packages openoffice.org depends on: ii dictionaries-common [openoffi 0.24.1 Common utilities for spelling dict ii openoffice.org-bin1.1.3-3OpenOffice.org office suite binary ii openoffice.org-debian-files 1.1.3-3+1 Debian specific parts of OpenOffic ii openoffice.org-l10n-ca [openo 1.1.3-3Catalan language package for OpenO ii openoffice.org-l10n-en [openo 1.1.3-3English (US) language package for ii ttf-opensymbol1.1.3-3The OpenSymbol TrueType font -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: duplicate bug
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 294607 libwvstreams4.0-extras Bug#294607: =?iso-8859-15?q?Hi=2E_After_I_upgraded_to_wvdial_1=2E54_I_get_=22Cannot_s?= =?iso-8859-15?q?et_information_for_serial_port=22_=0D=0Awhen_I_connect_via_g?= =?iso-8859-15?q?prs_on_my_usb_Motorola_phone=2E_No_problem_if_I=0D=0Adowngra?= =?iso-8859-15?q?de_to_wvdial_1=2E53_from_stable_distribution?= Bug reassigned from package `wvdial' to `libwvstreams4.0-extras'. merge 294607 292618 Bug#292618: wvdial: doesn't initialize serial port correctly since last update Bug#294607: =?iso-8859-15?q?Hi=2E_After_I_upgraded_to_wvdial_1=2E54_I_get_=22Cannot_s?= =?iso-8859-15?q?et_information_for_serial_port=22_=0D=0Awhen_I_connect_via_g?= =?iso-8859-15?q?prs_on_my_usb_Motorola_phone=2E_No_problem_if_I=0D=0Adowngra?= =?iso-8859-15?q?de_to_wvdial_1=2E53_from_stable_distribution?= Merged 292618 294607. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#294121: Dependencies on libdiscover2 and discover-date missing
On Tue, 08 Feb 2005 15:04:15 -0500, Jeff Licquia [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ... This is already fixed in Subversion. I'm going to wait another day to see if there are other problems before uploading. A small one. /etc/discover.conf.d/00discover is in libdiscover2. So the behaviour of discover (and discover-modprobe) is very different if libdiscover2 is installed or not. Rafael -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#294526: marked as done (simpletal: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'python-dev')
Your message dated Thu, 10 Feb 2005 17:17:27 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#294526: fixed in simpletal 3.11-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Feb 2005 06:57:32 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Feb 09 22:57:32 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from c129064.adsl.hansenet.de (localhost.localdomain) [213.39.129.64] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Cz8Ga-0005aQ-00; Wed, 09 Feb 2005 22:57:32 -0800 Received: from aj by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.34) id 1Cz8GW-000330-9J; Thu, 10 Feb 2005 07:57:28 +0100 To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Andreas Jochens [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: simpletal: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'python-dev' Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 07:57:28 +0100 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: simpletal Severity: serious Tags: patch When building 'simpletal' in a clean chroot, I get the following error: cd . python setup.py build --build-base=./build /bin/sh: python: command not found make: *** [common-build-impl] Error 127 Please add the missing Build-Depends on 'python-dev' to debian/control. Regards Andreas Jochens diff -urN ../tmp-orig/simpletal-3.11/debian/control ./debian/control --- ../tmp-orig/simpletal-3.11/debian/control 2005-02-10 07:47:20.163795507 +0100 +++ ./debian/control2005-02-10 07:47:16.274561672 +0100 @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ Source: simpletal Section: python Priority: optional -Build-Depends-Indep: python2.2-dev, python2.3-dev, cdbs ( 0.4.8), debhelper (= 4.1.60) +Build-Depends-Indep: python-dev, python2.2-dev, python2.3-dev, cdbs ( 0.4.8), debhelper (= 4.1.60) Maintainer: Igor Stroh [EMAIL PROTECTED] Standards-Version: 3.6.1 --- Received: (at 294526-close) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Feb 2005 22:23:02 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Feb 10 14:23:02 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1CzMiD-0004tt-00; Thu, 10 Feb 2005 14:23:01 -0800 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1CzMcp-0006Et-00; Thu, 10 Feb 2005 17:17:27 -0500 From: Igor Stroh [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $ Subject: Bug#294526: fixed in simpletal 3.11-2 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 17:17:27 -0500 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Source: simpletal Source-Version: 3.11-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of simpletal, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: python-simpletal_3.11-2_all.deb to pool/main/s/simpletal/python-simpletal_3.11-2_all.deb python2.2-simpletal_3.11-2_all.deb to pool/main/s/simpletal/python2.2-simpletal_3.11-2_all.deb python2.3-simpletal_3.11-2_all.deb to pool/main/s/simpletal/python2.3-simpletal_3.11-2_all.deb simpletal_3.11-2.diff.gz to pool/main/s/simpletal/simpletal_3.11-2.diff.gz simpletal_3.11-2.dsc to pool/main/s/simpletal/simpletal_3.11-2.dsc A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Igor Stroh [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated simpletal package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 19:29:08 +0100 Source: simpletal Binary: python-simpletal python2.3-simpletal
Bug#278315: marked as done (patch for /etc/cron.weekly/htdig)
Your message dated Thu, 10 Feb 2005 19:32:19 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#268870: fixed in htdig 1:3.1.6-11
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Oct 2004 03:07:29 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Oct 25 20:07:29 2004
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from vscan02.westnet.com.au [203.10.1.132]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CMHgH-0002rU-00; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 20:07:29 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP id 959BBCC4C
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 26 Oct 2004 11:06:57 +0800 (WST)
Received: from vscan02.westnet.com.au ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (vscan02.westnet.com.au [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id 18305-15 for [EMAIL PROTECTED];
Tue, 26 Oct 2004 11:06:57 +0800 (WST)
Received: from fw.computerdatasafe.com.au (dip-220-235-32-93.wa.westnet.com.au
[220.235.32.93])
by vscan02.westnet.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id D41E7CD9F
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 26 Oct 2004 11:06:56 +0800 (WST)
Received: from Glider.demo.room (Glider.demo.room [192.168.9.121])
by fw.computerdatasafe.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 546861AC5A; Sun, 24 Oct 2004 07:34:09 +0800 (WST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: John Summerfield [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Patch for htdig
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.63
Date: Sun, 24 Oct 2004 07:35:00 +0800
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
Package: htdig
Version: 1:3.1.6-10.1
Severity: important
Tags: patch
I think this is clear enough.
--- /etc/cron.weekly/htdig~ 2004-09-01 14:17:44.0 +0800
+++ /etc/cron.weekly/htdig 2004-10-24 07:27:59.0 +0800
@@ -20,7 +20,7 @@
if [ -r $FILEREF ]; then
RUN=$(awk '/^run_htnotify/ {print $3}' $FILEREF)
if [ $RUN=true ]; then
- if [-d $LIBDIR ]; then
+ if [ -d $LIBDIR ]; then
if [ ! -f $REFRESH ]; then
touch $REFRESH
fi
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (990, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.27-1-386
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C
Versions of packages htdig depends on:
ii debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.4.30.5 Debian configuration management sy
ii gawk 1:3.1.4-1 GNU awk, a pattern scanning and pr
ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-16 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libdb2 2:2.7.7.0-9 The Berkeley database routines (ru
ii libgcc11:3.4.1-4sarge1 GCC support library
ii libstdc++5 1:3.3.4-6sarge1.2 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3
ii lockfile-progs 0.1.10Programs for locking and unlocking
ii perl 5.8.4-2.2 Larry Wall's Practical Extraction
ii zlib1g 1:1.2.1.1-7 compression library - runtime
-- debconf information:
htdig/keep-databases:
htdig/generate-databases: false
htdig/dblocation-changed:
* htdig/announce_package_split:
htdig/run-htnotify: false
---
Received: (at 268870-close) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Feb 2005 00:38:13 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Feb 10 16:38:13 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CzOp3-0003Ss-00; Thu, 10 Feb 2005 16:38:13 -0800
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CzOjL-0004a0-00; Thu, 10 Feb 2005 19:32:19 -0500
From: Robert Ribnitz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $
Subject: Bug#268870: fixed in htdig 1:3.1.6-11
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 19:32:19 -0500
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin
Bug#268793: marked as done (/etc/cron.weekly/htdig script is broken)
Your message dated Thu, 10 Feb 2005 19:32:19 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#268870: fixed in htdig 1:3.1.6-11
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Aug 2004 07:48:29 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Aug 29 00:48:29 2004
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.176]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1C1KQP-0008T4-00; Sun, 29 Aug 2004 00:48:29 -0700
Received: from [212.227.126.161] (helo=mrelayng.kundenserver.de)
by moutng.kundenserver.de with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1)
id 1C1KQO-0005tN-00
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 29 Aug 2004 09:48:28 +0200
Received: from [217.93.172.107] (helo=mail.robgri.de)
by mrelayng.kundenserver.de with asmtp (Exim 3.35 #1)
id 1C1KQN-0002Qo-00
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 29 Aug 2004 09:48:28 +0200
Received: from woody.lan.robgri.de (woody.lan.robgri.de [192.168.6.4])
by mail.robgri.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9CD1523;
Sun, 29 Aug 2004 09:48:23 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Robert Grimm [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: /etc/cron.weekly/htdig script is broken
Reply-To: Robert Grimm [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.63
Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2004 09:48:20 +0200
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Provags-ID: kundenserver.de [EMAIL PROTECTED]
auth:6e19912473b0deedb12c26c6d7df67f8
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
Package: htdig
Version: 1:3.1.6-10
Severity: important
Tags: patch
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I get a mail with the errormessage:
/etc/cron.weekly/htdig: line 23: [-d: command not found
when cron runs /etc/cron.weekly/htdig.
patch:
- --- htdig.new 2004-08-29 09:30:36.0 +0200
+++ htdig 2004-08-29 09:31:28.0 +0200
@@ -20,7 +20,7 @@
if [ -r $FILEREF ]; then
RUN=$(awk '/^run_htnotify/ {print $3}' $FILEREF)
if [ $RUN=true ]; then
- - if [-d $LIBDIR ]; then
+ if [ -d $LIBDIR ]; then
if [ ! -f $REFRESH ]; then
touch $REFRESH
fi
Thank You,
Rob
- -- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (400, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.7
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Versions of packages htdig depends on:
ii debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.4.30.2 Debian configuration management sy
ii gawk 1:3.1.4-1 GNU awk, a pattern scanning and pr
ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-13 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libdb2 2:2.7.7.0-9 The Berkeley database routines (ru
ii libgcc11:3.4.1-4sarge1 GCC support library
ii libstdc++5 1:3.3.4-6sarge1.1 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3
ii lockfile-progs 0.1.10Programs for locking and unlocking
ii perl 5.8.4-2 Larry Wall's Practical Extraction
ii zlib1g 1:1.2.1.1-5 compression library - runtime
- -- debconf information:
* htdig/run-htnotify: true
* htdig/keep-databases:
* htdig/generate-databases: true
htdig/dblocation-changed:
* htdig/announce_package_split:
htdig/remove-databases: false
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iQCVAwUBQTGKRHIUbvcnxoXJAQK6YAP+M2CQaHy8rjqq1xgk3ayjHUc8FyybA4e7
/jY9Vg3QAkZInWReDR3WmoyPaIHbHCrVXhycpun+Ck8ijyB34G1MnZraZlRpoQvi
uPtxMj+1Btl/I/kbFiUFZci3J7ne8tlXHZG3/kInJ0azIPfFNmsHvkEExWfIm6gS
0daF3msFdC0=
=yt7e
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
---
Received: (at 268870-close) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Feb 2005 00:38:13 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Feb 10 16:38:13 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CzOp3-0003Ss-00; Thu, 10 Feb 2005 16:38:13 -0800
Received: from katie
Bug#269080: marked as done (htdig: cron scripts are broken)
Your message dated Thu, 10 Feb 2005 19:32:19 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#268870: fixed in htdig 1:3.1.6-11
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Aug 2004 18:10:45 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Aug 30 11:10:45 2004
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from port-212-202-201-1.dynamic.qsc.de (mr-data.weltall.local)
[212.202.201.1]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1C1qc9-0003lF-00; Mon, 30 Aug 2004 11:10:45 -0700
Received: by mr-data.weltall.local (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id EECDE8EC6A; Mon, 30 Aug 2004 20:10:42 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Carsten Luedtke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: htdig: cron scripts are broken
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.63
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2004 20:10:42 +0200
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-BadReturnPath: [EMAIL PROTECTED] rewritten as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
using From header
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
Package: htdig
Version: 1:3.1.6-10
Severity: important
Tags: patch
Both cron scripts are broken in 1.3.6-10 on sarge . The weekly script has 3
typos
which breaking the script. The daily script has one typo which leads to the
sitution
that the condition to run the script can be never true. The second fail is that
the
$RUNSCRIPT $PARAM instruction is in the wrong place (IMHO). This leads to the
situation
(in the case run_htnotify is set to false) that the script runs but don't
executes
rundig.
But I'm not very familiar with shell scrpiting, please confirm this.
patch for /etc/cron.daily/htdig:
--- cron.daily_htdig.original 2004-08-30 19:30:14.0 +0200
+++ cron.daily_htdig.new2004-08-30 19:41:00.0 +0200
@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@
REFRESH=$LIBDIR/full_refresh_needed
if [ -x $RUNSCRIPT ]; then
if [ -r $FILEREF ]; then
- RUN= $(awk '/^run_htnotify/ {print $3}' $FILEREF)
+ RUN=$(awk '/^run_htnotify/ {print $3}' $FILEREF)
if [ $RUN = true ]; then
PARAM=
if [ -d $LIBDIR ]; then
@@ -25,9 +25,10 @@
rm -f $REFRESH
fi
fi
- PARAM=$PARAM -a
- $RUNSCRIPT $PARAM /dev/null
- fi
+
+ fi
+ PARAM=$PARAM -a
+ $RUNSCRIPT $PARAM /dev/null
fi
fi
patch for /etc/cron.weekly/htdig:
--- cron.weekly_htdig.original 2004-08-30 19:33:10.0 +0200
+++ cron.weekly_htdig.new 2004-08-30 19:32:20.0 +0200
@@ -11,16 +11,16 @@
# Save the PID of the lockfile-touch process
BADGER=$!
-RUSCRIPT=/usr/bin/rundig
+RUNSCRIPT=/usr/bin/rundig
FILEREF=/etc/default/htdig
REFRESH=/var/lib/htdig/full_refresh_needed
LIBDIR=/var/lib/htdig
-if [ -x $RUNSCRIPT]; then
+if [ -x $RUNSCRIPT ]; then
if [ -r $FILEREF ]; then
RUN=$(awk '/^run_htnotify/ {print $3}' $FILEREF)
if [ $RUN=true ]; then
- if [-d $LIBDIR ]; then
+ if [ -d $LIBDIR ]; then
if [ ! -f $REFRESH ]; then
touch $REFRESH
fi
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8.1
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Versions of packages htdig depends on:
ii debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.4.30.2 Debian configuration management sy
ii gawk 1:3.1.4-1 GNU awk, a pattern scanning and pr
ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-13 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libdb2 2:2.7.7.0-9 The Berkeley database routines (ru
ii libgcc11:3.4.1-4sarge1 GCC support library
ii libstdc++5 1:3.3.4-6sarge1.2 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3
ii lockfile-progs 0.1.10Programs for
Bug#271971: marked as done (htdig with bad cronfiles)
Your message dated Thu, 10 Feb 2005 19:32:19 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#268870: fixed in htdig 1:3.1.6-11
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Sep 2004 14:39:59 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Sep 16 07:39:59 2004
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from zux165-121.adsl.green.ch (mail.tr51.org) [80.254.165.121]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1C7xQV-ga-00; Thu, 16 Sep 2004 07:39:59 -0700
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2004 16:38:50 +0200
From: Michael Schnyder [EMAIL PROTECTED]
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7.1 (X11/20040626)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: htdig with bad cronfiles
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS snapshot-20020222
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
Package: htdig
Version: 3.1.6-10.1
As I'v seen in the bug-report list, there is already an annouce for
this problem. The cron-files (daily and weekly) are not working. here a
detailed information for you with correcting details:
/etc/cron.daily/htdig :
bad: Line 20:RUN=$(awk '/^run_htnotify/ {print $3}' $FILEREF)
ok: Line 20:RUN=$(awk '/^run_htnotify/ {print $3}' $FILEREF) #put
the awk-command between !
/etc/cron.weekly/htdig:
bad: Line 24:if [-d $LIBDIR ]; then
ok: Line 24:if [ -d $LIBDIR ]; then #needs a space between '[' and '-d'!
I'm using Debian GNU/Linux sarge with kernel 2.4.27-1-686
---
Received: (at 268870-close) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Feb 2005 00:38:13 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Feb 10 16:38:13 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CzOp3-0003Ss-00; Thu, 10 Feb 2005 16:38:13 -0800
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CzOjL-0004a0-00; Thu, 10 Feb 2005 19:32:19 -0500
From: Robert Ribnitz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $
Subject: Bug#268870: fixed in htdig 1:3.1.6-11
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 19:32:19 -0500
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 3
Source: htdig
Source-Version: 1:3.1.6-11
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
htdig, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
htdig-doc_3.1.6-11_all.deb
to pool/main/h/htdig/htdig-doc_3.1.6-11_all.deb
htdig_3.1.6-11.diff.gz
to pool/main/h/htdig/htdig_3.1.6-11.diff.gz
htdig_3.1.6-11.dsc
to pool/main/h/htdig/htdig_3.1.6-11.dsc
htdig_3.1.6-11_i386.deb
to pool/main/h/htdig/htdig_3.1.6-11_i386.deb
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Robert Ribnitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated htdig package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 23:58:28 +0100
Source: htdig
Binary: htdig htdig-doc
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 1:3.1.6-11
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Robert Ribnitz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Robert Ribnitz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description:
htdig - WWW search system for an intranet or small internet
htdig-doc - Documentation for the htdig package
Closes: 260380 266577 268870 269080 269330 271461 271971
Bug#269330: marked as done (htdig: description contains tabs)
Your message dated Thu, 10 Feb 2005 19:32:19 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#269330: fixed in htdig 1:3.1.6-11 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 31 Aug 2004 22:28:02 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Aug 31 15:28:02 2004 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from emailhub.stusta.mhn.de (mailout.stusta.mhn.de) [141.84.69.5] by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1C2H6g-0005DB-00; Tue, 31 Aug 2004 15:28:02 -0700 Received: (qmail 18966 invoked from network); 31 Aug 2004 22:28:00 - Received: from r063144.stusta.swh.mhn.de (10.150.63.144) by mailhub.stusta.mhn.de with SMTP; 31 Aug 2004 22:28:00 - Received: from bunk by r063144.stusta.swh.mhn.de with local (Exim 4.34) id 1C2H69-0006d2-Qh; Wed, 01 Sep 2004 00:27:29 +0200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: htdig: description contains tabs X-Mailer: reportbug 2.63 Date: Wed, 01 Sep 2004 00:27:29 +0200 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Package: htdig Version: 1:3.1.6-10 Severity: serious The package description contains tabs, which are explicitely forbidden by section 5.6.12. of your policy: Do not use tab characters. Their effect is not predictable. BTW: lintian gives an error for this bug. --- Received: (at 269330-close) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Feb 2005 00:38:14 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Feb 10 16:38:14 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1CzOp4-0003TU-00; Thu, 10 Feb 2005 16:38:14 -0800 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1CzOjL-0004a4-00; Thu, 10 Feb 2005 19:32:19 -0500 From: Robert Ribnitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $ Subject: Bug#269330: fixed in htdig 1:3.1.6-11 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 19:32:19 -0500 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 5 Source: htdig Source-Version: 1:3.1.6-11 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of htdig, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: htdig-doc_3.1.6-11_all.deb to pool/main/h/htdig/htdig-doc_3.1.6-11_all.deb htdig_3.1.6-11.diff.gz to pool/main/h/htdig/htdig_3.1.6-11.diff.gz htdig_3.1.6-11.dsc to pool/main/h/htdig/htdig_3.1.6-11.dsc htdig_3.1.6-11_i386.deb to pool/main/h/htdig/htdig_3.1.6-11_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Robert Ribnitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated htdig package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 23:58:28 +0100 Source: htdig Binary: htdig htdig-doc Architecture: source i386 all Version: 1:3.1.6-11 Distribution: unstable Urgency: high Maintainer: Robert Ribnitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Robert Ribnitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: htdig - WWW search system for an intranet or small internet htdig-doc - Documentation for the htdig package Closes: 260380 266577 268870 269080 269330 271461 271971 275290 276398 278315 281152 281822 286418 290840 Changes: htdig (1:3.1.6-11) unstable; urgency=high . * Applied patch by
Bug#293932: [Python-Dev] license issues with profiler.py and md5.h/md5c.c
On Tue, 2005-02-08 at 11:52 -0800, Gregory P. Smith wrote: The md5.h/md5c.c files allow copy and use, but no modification of the files. There are some alternative implementations, i.e. in glibc, openssl, so a replacement should be sage. Any other requirements when considering a replacement? One thing to consider is degree of difficulty :-) Matthias I believe the plan for md5 and sha1 and such is to use the much faster openssl versions in the future (based on a long thread debating future interfaces to such things on python-dev last summer). That'll sidestep any tedious license issue and give a better implementation at the same time. i don't believe anyone has taken the time to make such a patch yet. I wasn't around for that discussion. There are two viable replacements for the RSA implementation currently used; libmd http://www.penguin.cz/~mhi/libmd/ openssl http://www.openssl.org/. The libmd implementation is by Colin Plumb and has the licence; This code is in the public domain; do with it what you wish. The API is identical to the RSA implementation and BSD world's libmd and hence is a drop in replacement. This implementation is faster than the RSA implementation. The openssl implementation has an apache style license. The API is almost the same but slightly different to the RSA API, so it would require a little bit of work to make it fit. This implementation is the fastest currently available, as it includes many platform specific optimisations for a large range of platforms. Currently md5c.c is included in the python sources. The libmd implementation has a drop in replacement for md5c.c. The openssl implementation is a complicated tangle of Makefile expanded template code that would be harder to include in the Python sources. In the Linux world, openssl is starting to become ubiquitous, so not including it and statically or even dynamically linking against it is feasible. However, using Python in other lands will probably require something to be included. Long term, I think openssl is the way to go. Short term, libmd is a painless replacement that gets around the licencing issues. I have been using the libmd API stuff for md4 in librsync, and am looking at migrating to the openssl API. If people hassle me, I could probably do the openssl API migration for Python, but I'm not sure what the best approach would be to including the source in Python sources. FWIW, I also have an md4sum module and md4c.c implementation that I'm happy to contribute to Python (done for pysysnc). -- Donovan Baarda [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://minkirri.apana.org.au/~abo/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#293932: [Python-Dev] license issues with profiler.py and md5.h/md5c.c
On Thu, 2005-02-10 at 21:30 -0500, Bob Ippolito wrote: On Feb 10, 2005, at 9:15 PM, Donovan Baarda wrote: On Tue, 2005-02-08 at 11:52 -0800, Gregory P. Smith wrote: [...] One possible alternative would be to bring in something like PyOpenSSL http://pyopenssl.sourceforge.net/ and just rewrite the md5 (and sha?) extensions as Python modules that use that API. Only problem with this, is pyopenssl doesn't yet include any mdX or sha modules. -- Donovan Baarda [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://minkirri.apana.org.au/~abo/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#293932: [Python-Dev] license issues with profiler.py and md5.h/md5c.c
On Feb 10, 2005, at 9:50 PM, Donovan Baarda wrote: On Thu, 2005-02-10 at 21:30 -0500, Bob Ippolito wrote: On Feb 10, 2005, at 9:15 PM, Donovan Baarda wrote: On Tue, 2005-02-08 at 11:52 -0800, Gregory P. Smith wrote: [...] One possible alternative would be to bring in something like PyOpenSSL http://pyopenssl.sourceforge.net/ and just rewrite the md5 (and sha?) extensions as Python modules that use that API. Only problem with this, is pyopenssl doesn't yet include any mdX or sha modules. My bad, how about M2Crypto http://sandbox.rulemaker.net/ngps/m2/ then? This one supports message digests and is more license compatible with Python to boot. -bob -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#104394: Better prices for your Software than going to your local Software store.
Enjoy our selected Software in stock Check the site for OEM software that provides the same function and reliability the retail version provides. Don't want to pay high price for the package and manual? Sure. We provide quality along with great prices! http://www.forurprivacy.com/oe/ Why not get your Software in our inventory at a low possible prices. this guy is, Stoute yelled. We cannot f this up. We have to fight for this deal. the essays, with scores from 0, for a blank sheet of paper or an essay that has nothing to -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#294688: CAN-2005-0299: Directory traversal in GForge
Package: gforge Version: 3.1-26 Severity: grave Tags: security sarge sid patch The sid/sarge version seems to be vulnerable to this. Please correct it. The correction should be in the GForge CVS, otherwise sanitising the dir should be easy (i.e. recursively strip ../). Candidate: CAN-2005-0299 URL: http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CAN-2005-0299 Reference: BUGTRAQ:20050120 STG Security Advisory: [SSA-20050120-24] GForge 3.x directory Reference: URL:http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=bugtraqm=110627132209963w=2 Reference: BID:12318 Reference: URL:http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/12318 Reference: XF:gforge-dir-dirname-directory-traversal(18988) Reference: URL:http://xforce.iss.net/xforce/xfdb/18988 Directory traversal vulnerability in GForge 3.3 and earlier allows remote attackers to read arbitrary files via a .. (dot dot) in the (1) dir parameter to controller.php or (2) dir_name parameter to controlleroo.php. Regards, Joey -- The good thing about standards is that there are so many to choose from. -- Andrew S. Tanenbaum Please always Cc to me when replying to me on the lists. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#293932: [Python-Dev] license issues with profiler.py and md5.h/md5c.c
On Thu, 2005-02-10 at 23:13 -0500, Bob Ippolito wrote: On Feb 10, 2005, at 9:50 PM, Donovan Baarda wrote: On Thu, 2005-02-10 at 21:30 -0500, Bob Ippolito wrote: [...] Only problem with this, is pyopenssl doesn't yet include any mdX or sha modules. My bad, how about M2Crypto http://sandbox.rulemaker.net/ngps/m2/ then? This one supports message digests and is more license compatible with Python to boot. [...] This one does have md5 support, but the Python API is rather different from the current python md5sum API. It hooks into the slightly higher level MVP openssl layer, rather than the lower level md5 layer. Hooking into the MVP layer pretty much requires including all the openssl message digest implementations (which may or may not be a good idea). It also uses SWIG to generate the extension module. I don't think anything else in Python itself uses SWIG, so starting to use it would introduce a Build Dependency. I think it would be cleaner and simpler to modify the existing md5module.c to use the openssl md5 layer API (this is just a search/replace to change the function names). The bigger problem is deciding what/how/whether to include the openssl md5 implementation sources so that win32 can use them. -- Donovan Baarda [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://minkirri.apana.org.au/~abo/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#293932: [Python-Dev] license issues with profiler.py and md5.h/md5c.c
On Fri, 2005-02-11 at 17:15 +1100, Donovan Baarda wrote: [...] I think it would be cleaner and simpler to modify the existing md5module.c to use the openssl md5 layer API (this is just a search/replace to change the function names). The bigger problem is deciding what/how/whether to include the openssl md5 implementation sources so that win32 can use them. Thinking about it, probably the best way is to include the libmd md5c.c modified to use the openssl API, and then use configure to check for and use openssl if it is available. That way win32 could use the provided md5c.c, and other platforms could use the faster openssl. -- Donovan Baarda [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://minkirri.apana.org.au/~abo/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
