Processed: blah
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: merge 294832 294896 Bug#294832: FWD: insecure temporary file creation in kdelibs 3.3.2 Bug#294896: CAN-2005-0365: insecure temporary file creation in kdelibs 3.3.2 Merged 294832 294896. thanks dude Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#294488: CVE ids
Use CAN-2005-0362 for fixing *plugin* variables Use CAN-2005-0363 for fixing the config variable Regards, Joey -- If you come from outside of Finland, you live in wrong country. -- motd of irc.funet.fi Please always Cc to me when replying to me on the lists. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#294865: coq-doc: The documentation for coq is non-free (this issue is being solved)
Steve Langasek wrote: I'm dealing this issue with upstream (it should be released under GPL) but it should not be released with sarge if this issue has been solved in the meantime which is why I'm filling this RC bug. Do you mean that the package should not be released with sarge if the issue has *not* been solved? Yes, of course, sorry... -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#294901: glade-2: [arm] FTBFS: missing X11 library path.
Package: glade-2 Version: 2.9.0-1 Severity: serious glade-2 build failed by missing X11 library path on arm buildd (and maybe on other archs). gcc -g -O2 -o glade-2 debug.o editor.o gb.o gbwidget.o glade_widget_data.o gbsource.o glade.o glade_atk.o glade_clipboard.o glade_gnome.o glade_gnomelib.o glade_gnomedblib.o glade_gtk12lib.o glade_keys_dialog.o glade_menu_editor.o glade_palette.o glade-parser.o glade_plugin.o glade_project.o glade_project_options.o glade_project_view.o glade_project_window.o keys.o load.o main.o named_icons.o palette.o property.o save.o source.o source_os2.o styles.o tree.o utils.o -Wl,--export-dynamic gbwidgets/libgbwidgets.a /usr/lib/libxml2.so -lpthread -lz /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so /usr/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.so /usr/lib/libatk-1.0.so /usr/lib/libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so /usr/lib/libpangoxft-1.0.so /usr/lib/libpangox-1.0.so /usr/lib/libpango-1.0.so -lm /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so /usr/lib/libgmodule-2.0.so -ldl /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so -lX11 /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lX11 collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make[5]: *** [glade-2] Error 1 make[5]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/glade-2-2.9.0/glade' You can see full log from http://experimental.ftbfs.de/fetch.php?pkg=glade-2ver=2.9.0-1arch=armstamp=1108198995file=logas=raw -- Kenshi Muto [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#294902: FTBFS in experimental
Package: glade-2 Version: 2.9.0-1 Severity: serious Tags: experimental Hi, please see http://experimental.ftbfs.de/build.php?arch=pkg=glade-2 for the full build log Cheers, Andi Automatic build of glade-2_2.9.0-1 on odin by sbuild/sparc 1.170.5 Build started at 20050212-0907 ** [...] Checking correctness of source dependencies... Toolchain package versions: libc6-dev_2.3.2.ds1-20 linux-kernel-headers_2.5.999-test7-bk-17 gcc-3.3_1:3.3.5-8 g++-3.3_1:3.3.5-6 binutils_2.15-5 libstdc++5_1:3.3.5-6 libstdc++5-3.3-dev_1:3.3.5-6 -- [...] /bin/sh ../libtool --mode=link --tag=CC gcc -g -O2 -o glade-2 debug.o editor.o gb.o gbwidget.o glade_widget_data.o gbsource.o glade.o glade_atk.o glade_clipboard.o glade_gnome.o glade_gnomelib.o glade_gnomedblib.o glade_gtk12lib.o glade_keys_dialog.o glade_menu_editor.o glade_palette.o glade-parser.o glade_plugin.o glade_project.o glade_project_options.o glade_project_view.o glade_project_window.o keys.o load.o main.o named_icons.o palette.o property.o save.o source.o source_os2.o styles.o tree.o utils.o gbwidgets/libgbwidgets.a -Wl,--export-dynamic -lxml2 -lpthread -lz -lgtk-x11-2.0 -lgdk-x11-2.0 -latk-1.0 -lgdk_pixbuf-2.0 -lm -lpangoxft-1.0 -lpangox-1.0 -lpango-1.0 -lgobject-2.0 -lgmodule-2.0 -ldl -lglib-2.0 -lX11 mkdir .libs gcc -g -O2 -o glade-2 debug.o editor.o gb.o gbwidget.o glade_widget_data.o gbsource.o glade.o glade_atk.o glade_clipboard.o glade_gnome.o glade_gnomelib.o glade_gnomedblib.o glade_gtk12lib.o glade_keys_dialog.o glade_menu_editor.o glade_palette.o glade-parser.o glade_plugin.o glade_project.o glade_project_options.o glade_project_view.o glade_project_window.o keys.o load.o main.o named_icons.o palette.o property.o save.o source.o source_os2.o styles.o tree.o utils.o -Wl,--export-dynamic gbwidgets/libgbwidgets.a /usr/lib/libxml2.so -lpthread -lz /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so /usr/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.so /usr/lib/libatk-1.0.so /usr/lib/libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so /usr/lib/libpangoxft-1.0.so /usr/lib/libpangox-1.0.so /usr/lib/libpango-1.0.so -lm /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so /usr/lib/libgmodule-2.0.so -ldl /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so -lX11 /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lX11 collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make[5]: *** [glade-2] Error 1 make[5]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/glade-2-2.9.0/glade' make[4]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[4]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/glade-2-2.9.0/glade' make[3]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[3]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/glade-2-2.9.0' make[2]: *** [all] Error 2 make[2]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/glade-2-2.9.0' make[1]: *** [build-gtk-stamp] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/glade-2-2.9.0' make: *** [install] Error 2 ** Build finished at 20050212-0917 FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Bug#294901: glade-2: [arm] FTBFS: missing X11 library path.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 294901 + experimental Bug#294901: glade-2: [arm] FTBFS: missing X11 library path. There were no tags set. Tags added: experimental thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#294901: glade-2: [arm] FTBFS: missing X11 library path.
At Sat, 12 Feb 2005 11:46:11 +0100, Loïc Minier wrote: Kenshi Muto [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Sat, Feb 12, 2005: glade-2 build failed by missing X11 library path on arm buildd (and maybe on other archs). This is in experimental, tagging experimental. Oh, I forgot to append it, thanks :-) Thanks, -- Kenshi Muto [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#294901: glade-2: [arm] FTBFS: missing X11 library path.
tags 294901 + experimental thanks Hi, Kenshi Muto [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Sat, Feb 12, 2005: glade-2 build failed by missing X11 library path on arm buildd (and maybe on other archs). You can see full log from http://experimental.ftbfs.de/fetch.php?pkg=glade-2ver=2.9.0-1arch=armstamp=1108198995file=logas=raw This is in experimental, tagging experimental. -- Loïc Minier [EMAIL PROTECTED] Neutral President: I have no strong feelings one way or the other.
Bug#290619: marked as done (xvfb: xvfb-run doesn't correctly quote arguments)
Your message dated Sat, 12 Feb 2005 06:03:51 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#286181: fixed in xfree86 4.3.0.dfsg.1-11 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Jan 2005 11:33:05 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jan 15 03:33:05 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.17.13] (root) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1CpmAz-0005AO-00; Sat, 15 Jan 2005 03:33:05 -0800 Received: from mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [130.149.17.13]) by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3p2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA11519 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 15 Jan 2005 12:33:03 +0100 (MET) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7ED6FF216 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 15 Jan 2005 12:33:02 +0100 (MET) Received: from mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (bueno [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10224) with ESMTP id 04663-49 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 15 Jan 2005 12:33:02 +0100 (MET) Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.19.1]) by mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de (Postfix) with ESMTP for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 15 Jan 2005 12:33:02 +0100 (MET) Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.8/Submit) id j0FBX1Wp022106; Sat, 15 Jan 2005 12:33:01 +0100 (MET) From: Matthias Klose [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2005 12:33:01 +0100 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: xvfb-run doesn't correctly quote arguments X-Mailer: VM 7.03 under 21.4 (patch 6) Common Lisp XEmacs Lucid X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at cs.tu-berlin.de Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: xvfb Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-10 Severity: serious Tags: patch xvfb-run calls XAUTHORITY=$AUTHFILE Xvfb :$SERVERNUM $XVFBARGS $LISTENTCP $ERRORFILE leading to: Unrecognized option: -screen 0 640x480x8 The $XVFBARGS $LISTENTCP variables must not be quoted. Causes build failures for all packages build-depending on xvfb, therefore severity serious. --- Received: (at 286181-close) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Feb 2005 11:08:06 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Feb 12 03:08:06 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Czv89-0002hC-00; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 03:08:05 -0800 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Czv43-0005NQ-00; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 06:03:51 -0500 From: Branden Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $ Subject: Bug#286181: fixed in xfree86 4.3.0.dfsg.1-11 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2005 06:03:51 -0500 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.7 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER, ORDER_NOW autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 21 Source: xfree86 Source-Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-11 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of xfree86, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: lbxproxy_4.3.0.dfsg.1-11_powerpc.deb to pool/main/x/xfree86/lbxproxy_4.3.0.dfsg.1-11_powerpc.deb libdps-dev_4.3.0.dfsg.1-11_powerpc.deb to pool/main/x/xfree86/libdps-dev_4.3.0.dfsg.1-11_powerpc.deb libdps1-dbg_4.3.0.dfsg.1-11_powerpc.deb to pool/main/x/xfree86/libdps1-dbg_4.3.0.dfsg.1-11_powerpc.deb libdps1_4.3.0.dfsg.1-11_powerpc.deb to pool/main/x/xfree86/libdps1_4.3.0.dfsg.1-11_powerpc.deb libice-dev_4.3.0.dfsg.1-11_powerpc.deb to pool/main/x/xfree86/libice-dev_4.3.0.dfsg.1-11_powerpc.deb libice6-dbg_4.3.0.dfsg.1-11_powerpc.deb to pool/main/x/xfree86/libice6-dbg_4.3.0.dfsg.1-11_powerpc.deb libice6_4.3.0.dfsg.1-11_powerpc.deb to
Bug#290238: marked as done (xvfb: overquoting in xvfb-run)
Your message dated Sat, 12 Feb 2005 06:03:51 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#286181: fixed in xfree86 4.3.0.dfsg.1-11 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Jan 2005 04:11:07 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jan 12 20:11:07 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from ixion.tartarus.org [62.197.40.170] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1CowKA-0003pp-00; Wed, 12 Jan 2005 20:11:07 -0800 Received: from olly by ixion.tartarus.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) for [EMAIL PROTECTED] id 1CowK8-0006TA-00; Thu, 13 Jan 2005 04:11:04 + Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2005 04:11:01 + From: Olly Betts [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Overquoting in xvfb-run Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: xvfb Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-10 xvfb-run no longer works correctly. Looking at the code and the changelog, it appears it's been pretty much unusable since 4.3.0.dfsg.1-9 was uploaded on 9th December 2004, so I guess it's not a particular popular utility. But I find it very useful, so I tracked down what's going wrong. The problem is quoting of the arguments passed to Xvfb - both $XVFBARGS and $LISTENTCP are quoted, so each is passed as a single argument and Xvfb fails to understand them. Removing the double quotes allows the shell to split them into several arguments to Xvfb, and xvfb-run works once again. Here's a patch: --- /usr/bin/xvfb-run 2004-12-15 19:15:49.0 + +++ xvfb-run2005-01-13 03:48:02.0 + @@ -140,7 +140,7 @@ MCOOKIE=$(mcookie) XAUTHORITY=$AUTHFILE xauth add :$SERVERNUM $XAUTHPROTO $MCOOKIE \ $ERRORFILE 21 -XAUTHORITY=$AUTHFILE Xvfb :$SERVERNUM $XVFBARGS $LISTENTCP $ERRORFILE \ +XAUTHORITY=$AUTHFILE Xvfb :$SERVERNUM $XVFBARGS $LISTENTCP $ERRORFILE \ 21 XVFBPID=$! sleep $STARTWAIT Incidentally, I noticed that the changelog.Debian currently contains what appears to be some leftovers from a CVS conflict: .working -- Fabio M. Di Nitto [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu, 09 Dec 2004 17:14:45 +0100 === -- Fabio M. Di Nitto [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu, 9 Dec 2004 17:14:45 +0100 .merge-right.r2073 Cheers, Olly --- Received: (at 286181-close) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Feb 2005 11:08:06 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Feb 12 03:08:06 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Czv89-0002hC-00; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 03:08:05 -0800 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Czv43-0005NQ-00; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 06:03:51 -0500 From: Branden Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $ Subject: Bug#286181: fixed in xfree86 4.3.0.dfsg.1-11 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2005 06:03:51 -0500 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.7 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER, ORDER_NOW autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 21 Source: xfree86 Source-Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-11 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of xfree86, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: lbxproxy_4.3.0.dfsg.1-11_powerpc.deb to pool/main/x/xfree86/lbxproxy_4.3.0.dfsg.1-11_powerpc.deb libdps-dev_4.3.0.dfsg.1-11_powerpc.deb to pool/main/x/xfree86/libdps-dev_4.3.0.dfsg.1-11_powerpc.deb libdps1-dbg_4.3.0.dfsg.1-11_powerpc.deb to pool/main/x/xfree86/libdps1-dbg_4.3.0.dfsg.1-11_powerpc.deb libdps1_4.3.0.dfsg.1-11_powerpc.deb to pool/main/x/xfree86/libdps1_4.3.0.dfsg.1-11_powerpc.deb libice-dev_4.3.0.dfsg.1-11_powerpc.deb to pool/main/x/xfree86/libice-dev_4.3.0.dfsg.1-11_powerpc.deb libice6-dbg_4.3.0.dfsg.1-11_powerpc.deb to
Bug#287612: marked as done (xfree86: OSMesa library needs tight versioned dependency on Mesa GL library)
Your message dated Sat, 12 Feb 2005 06:03:51 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#287612: fixed in xfree86 4.3.0.dfsg.1-11
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Dec 2004 04:36:01 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 28 20:36:01 2004
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from pop.gmx.de (mail.gmx.net) [213.165.64.20]
by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CjVZ3-0001u5-00; Tue, 28 Dec 2004 20:36:01 -0800
Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 29 Dec 2004 04:35:29 -
Received: from heredia-a471.racsa.co.cr (EHLO jacinta.casa) (196.40.93.97)
by mail.gmx.net (mp018) with SMTP; 29 Dec 2004 05:35:29 +0100
X-Authenticated: #20727617
Received: from marcelo by jacinta.casa with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1CjUFr-0006mK-00; Tue, 28 Dec 2004 21:12:07 -0600
Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2004 21:12:07 -0600
From: Marcelo E. Magallon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: xlibosmesa4 must depend on xlibmesa-gl
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Reportbug-Version: 3.4
X-Operating-System: Linux jacinta 2.6.10-rc3
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
Sender: Marcelo E. Magallon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
Package: xlibosmesa4
Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-10
Severity: grave
File: /usr/X11R6/lib/libOSMesa.so.4
Justification: renders package unusable
Hi,
perhaps serious is more appropriate, since it's the dependencies that
are wrong.
$ objdump -T /usr/X11R6/lib/libOSMesa.so.4.0 | grep UND | grep -v GLIBC | grep _
DO *UND* 0004 _glapi_Dispatch
DF *UND* 0125 _glapi_add_entrypoint
DF *UND* 0040 _glapi_get_context
DF *UND* 001e _glapi_get_dispatch_table_size
DF *UND* 0079 _glapi_check_multithread
DF *UND* 005a _glapi_set_context
DF *UND* 00b3 _glapi_set_dispatch
DF *UND* 0019 _glapi_noop_enable_warnings
DO *UND* 0004 _glapi_Context
w D *UND* _Jv_RegisterClasses
w D *UND* __gmon_start__
those symbols are internal to Mesa. By not depending on xlibmesa-gl
you can have pacakges which are installable but don't run, e.g. sppc on
my machine. IOW, this is wrong:
Depends: libc6 (= 2.3.2.ds1-4), xlibmesa-gl | libgl1
It should be xlibmesa-gl (= ${Source-Version})
Marcelo
---
Received: (at 287612-close) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Feb 2005 11:09:55 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Feb 12 03:09:55 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Czv9u-00030m-00; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 03:09:54 -0800
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Czv43-0005Nb-00; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 06:03:51 -0500
From: Branden Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $
Subject: Bug#287612: fixed in xfree86 4.3.0.dfsg.1-11
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2005 06:03:51 -0500
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.7 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER,
ORDER_NOW autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 24
Source: xfree86
Source-Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-11
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
xfree86, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
lbxproxy_4.3.0.dfsg.1-11_powerpc.deb
to pool/main/x/xfree86/lbxproxy_4.3.0.dfsg.1-11_powerpc.deb
libdps-dev_4.3.0.dfsg.1-11_powerpc.deb
to pool/main/x/xfree86/libdps-dev_4.3.0.dfsg.1-11_powerpc.deb
Processed: two bugs for the same problem
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: merge 294902 294901 Bug#294901: glade-2: [arm] FTBFS: missing X11 library path. Bug#294902: FTBFS in experimental Merged 294901 294902. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#293813: bug 293813, no en locale
Em Sb, 2005-02-12 s 01:17 -0500, Kevin Mark escreveu: Saw new info on gnomedesktop.org. Downloaded debian package. found errors. noticed LOCALE error. found NO en locale file. did: LC_ALL es_ES gazpacho still didnt run but the LOCALE error was gone. so, i guess it needs a en locale for us en-speaking folks. Hey, The problem to which you are replying was actually fixed in the last upload. You may have found a different problem. Would you mind sending the exact error message, please, just to check? Thanks, -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Gustavo Noronha http://couve.no-ip.org/~kov/ Debian: http://www.debian.org/ * http://www.debian-br.org/
Processed: Fixed in upload of snort 2.3.0-3 to experimental
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 294755 + fixed-in-experimental Bug#294755: FTBFS in experimental Tags were: experimental Tags added: fixed-in-experimental quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#188448: Suggest to reupload with 32bit archs
Hello, given that the last email is from 24 Sep 2004 and that abuse-sdl seems to be fundamentally broken on 64bit archs I suggest removing abuse-sdl from sarge and re-uploading with only the 32bit archs Debian supports. Then this bug can be downgraded to important and the 32bit archs will re-enjoy abuse (well, since I've never been able to play it, I hope ...) Then, probably post-Sarge, you can find all those 32bit assumptions, fix them and re-enable the 64bit archs. The other option would be to uploaded the fixed package ASAP, if you already did correct the errounous 32bit assumptions ... What do you think? Greetings Helge -- Dr. Helge Kreutzmann, Dipl.-Phys. [EMAIL PROTECTED] gpg signed mail preferred 64bit GNU powered http://www.itp.uni-hannover.de/~kreutzm Help keep free software libre: http://www.freepatents.org/ pgpetPb2YTnwi.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#275668: Suggest to remove from Sarge
Hello, given that this package is currently not able to install the non-free ccc compiler, that gcc is available and improving while ccc is essentially dead upstream and that the number of people doing serious number crunching on alpha is (unfortunately) strongly decreasing I suggest removing this package from sarge. Further the maintainer has not yet even acknowledged this bug (MIA?). If you (the maintainer) already have a fix in your pipeline, please upload it ASAP (and in the meantime, tag this bug pending). Greetings Helge -- Dr. Helge Kreutzmann, Dipl.-Phys. [EMAIL PROTECTED] gpg signed mail preferred 64bit GNU powered http://www.itp.uni-hannover.de/~kreutzm Help keep free software libre: http://www.freepatents.org/ pgpZxbxRCyan8.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#294404: more details
See this LKML thread: http://groups.google.com/groups?threadm=1VPLh-6f9-11%40gated-at.bofh.it . -- ciao, Marco -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#294946: therion in sarge lacks a dependency on tetex-extra
Package: therion Version: 0.3.3-1 Severity: grave Tags: sarge therion in sarge lacks a dependency on tetex-extra. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#292290: XFS corruption under 2.6.8
I installed a system on XFS deciding to try the new shiny efficient filesystem now availible in DI. I started having issues where the system would no longer be able to exec programms but all running programs would work fine So I'd reboot peek at the logs which didn't have anything useful. and go about doing my normal computing stuff until it happened again rinse repeat until today about a fortnight after I install when XFS decices it can't repair the filesystem and prints gobs and gobs into my kernel log. so. I now have to re-install and then install a new kernel-image. :( -- Grant Diffey aka nevyn http://www.computerbank.org.au/ http://melbourne.wireless.org.au/ pgpyzsohjh02B.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#293207: bogofilter: last two versions caused db errors
Well, normally there is http://www.backports.org/debian/dists/woody/bogofilter/binary-i386/ but, it doesn't have any other versions. Based on past reports, I would say that using any bogofilter debs from backports.org is a surefire way to introduce corruption. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: pstats.py also missing
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reopen 294522 Bug#294522: linda: missing depends on new (and non-free) python-profile Bug reopened, originator not changed. tags 294522 - patch Bug#294522: linda: missing depends on new (and non-free) python-profile Tags were: patch sid Tags removed: patch stop Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#294953: partimage - refuses to restore image on i386 which is created on s390
Package: partimage Version: 0.6.4-10.1 Severity: grave partimage refuses on i386 to restore an image which is created on s390 with the following error: | There was an error while | restoring partition: | CRC64 are differents, the | imagefile was damaged: | Original CRC64:.0 | Current CRC64:..0 Bastian -- No one may kill a man. Not for any purpose. It cannot be condoned. -- Kirk, Spock's Brain, stardate 5431.6 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#294956: kernel-package: Fails to build x86 2.6 kernels, missing rule for conf.vars
Package: kernel-package Version: 8.120 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Attempting to build a kernel from kernel-source-2.6.10 on and for x86 results in the following message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~/extra/sources/kernel-source-2.6.10 $ fakeroot make-kpkg kernel_image make: *** No rule to make target `conf.vars', needed by `stamp-configure'. Stop. This is simular to bug #294751 -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.9-teb13 Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages kernel-package depends on: ii bcc [c-compiler] 0.16.14-1.2 16-bit x86 C compiler ii dpkg 1.10.27 Package maintenance system for Deb ii dpkg-dev 1.10.27 Package building tools for Debian ii gcc [c-compiler] 4:3.3.5-1 The GNU C compiler ii gcc-2.95 [c-compiler]1:2.95.4-22 The GNU C compiler ii gcc-3.2 [c-compiler] 1:3.2.3-9 The GNU C compiler ii gcc-3.3 [c-compiler] 1:3.3.5-8 The GNU C compiler ii gcc-3.4 [c-compiler] 3.4.3-9 The GNU C compiler ii make 3.80-9 The GNU version of the make util ii perl 5.8.4-6 Larry Wall's Practical Extraction -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Bug#294431: Installation error on machines lacking a FQDN
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 294431 normal Bug#294431: Installation error on machines lacking a FQDN Severity set to `normal'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#294431: Installation error on machines lacking a FQDN
severity 294431 normal thanks I'm reducing severity of this bug since a small change in configration file (changing configuration file is expected for a service like squid) is sufficient to fix it. On the other hand we should gracefully handle first time installation and I'm going to investigate this bug further, altought there's no easy way to fix already installed configuration files. Regards, -- Luigi Gangitano -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/924C0C26: 12F8 9C03 89D3 DB4A 9972 C24A F19B A618 924C 0C26 signature.asc Description: Questa parte del messaggio =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=E8?= firmata
Bug#294960: wacom-tools_0.6.6-6(ia64/unstable): FTBFS: missing build-depends
Package: wacom-tools Version: 0.6.6-6 Severity: serious There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: Automatic build of wacom-tools_0.6.6-6 on caballero by sbuild/ia64 1.170.5 Build started at 20050212-1345 [...] ** Using build dependencies supplied by package: Build-Depends: debhelper (= 4.1.16), po-debconf, libxt-dev, libncurses5-dev [...] In file included from ../../src/wacomcfg.c:26: ../../src/wacomcfg.h:25:22: X11/Xlib.h: No such file or directory In file included from ../../src/wacomcfg.c:26: ../../src/wacomcfg.h:55: error: syntax error before '*' token ../../src/wacomcfg.c:44:22: X11/Xlib.h: No such file or directory ../../src/wacomcfg.c:45:35: X11/extensions/XInput.h: No such file or directory ../../src/wacomcfg.c:46:36: X11/extensions/XIproto.h: No such file or directory A full build log can be found at: http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?arch=ia64pkg=wacom-toolsver=0.6.6-6 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#293989: marked as done (improper use of duplicate named templates)
Your message dated Sat, 12 Feb 2005 12:47:04 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#293989: fixed in db2latex-xsl 0.8pre1-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Feb 2005 11:33:49 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Feb 07 03:33:49 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from home.wiggy.net (typhoon) [194.109.254.66] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Cy79I-0007cz-00; Mon, 07 Feb 2005 03:33:48 -0800 Received: from wichert by typhoon with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1Cy79G-000211-00; Mon, 07 Feb 2005 12:33:46 +0100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Wichert Akkerman [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: xsl stylesheet does not work anymore X-Mailer: reportbug 3.7.1 Date: Mon, 07 Feb 2005 12:33:46 +0100 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: db2latex-xsl Version: 0.8pre1-2 Severity: grave I am suddenly getting this on every run: [typhoon;..nTest/trunk/newdoc]-100 make manual.tex xsltproc --output manual.tex manual.xsl manual.xml compilation error: file file:///usr/share/xml/docbook/stylesheet/db2latex/latex/qandaset.mod.xsl line 366 element template xsl:template: error duplicate name 'question.answer.label' make: *** [manual.tex] Error 5 zsh: exit 2 make manual.tex Wichert. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.9 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 293989-close) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Feb 2005 17:53:15 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Feb 12 09:53:15 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D01SE-0007oh-00; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 09:53:14 -0800 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D01MG-0002T4-00; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 12:47:04 -0500 From: Ardo van Rangelrooij [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $ Subject: Bug#293989: fixed in db2latex-xsl 0.8pre1-3 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2005 12:47:04 -0500 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Source: db2latex-xsl Source-Version: 0.8pre1-3 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of db2latex-xsl, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: db2latex-xsl-doc_0.8pre1-3_all.deb to pool/main/d/db2latex-xsl/db2latex-xsl-doc_0.8pre1-3_all.deb db2latex-xsl_0.8pre1-3.diff.gz to pool/main/d/db2latex-xsl/db2latex-xsl_0.8pre1-3.diff.gz db2latex-xsl_0.8pre1-3.dsc to pool/main/d/db2latex-xsl/db2latex-xsl_0.8pre1-3.dsc db2latex-xsl_0.8pre1-3_all.deb to pool/main/d/db2latex-xsl/db2latex-xsl_0.8pre1-3_all.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Ardo van Rangelrooij [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated db2latex-xsl package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2005 11:24:37 -0600 Source: db2latex-xsl Binary: db2latex-xsl-doc db2latex-xsl Architecture: source all Version: 0.8pre1-3 Distribution: unstable Urgency: high Maintainer: Debian XML/SGML Group [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#294956: marked as done (kernel-package: Fails to build x86 2.6 kernels, missing rule for conf.vars)
Your message dated Sat, 12 Feb 2005 11:54:41 -0600 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line This has been fixed by a new upload has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Feb 2005 17:18:13 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Feb 12 09:18:13 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from outmail1.freedom2surf.net (outmail.freedom2surf.net) [194.106.33.237] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D00uK-0005Cw-00; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 09:18:12 -0800 Received: from bfg.majoroak.f2s.com (i-195-137-1-136.freedom2surf.net [195.137.1.136]) by outmail.freedom2surf.net (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j1CHHenG001652 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 12 Feb 2005 17:17:41 GMT Received: from tim by bfg.majoroak.f2s.com with local (Exim 4.44) id 1D00tn-0002BZ-HU; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 17:17:39 + Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Timothy Baldwin [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: kernel-package: Fails to build x86 2.6 kernels, missing rule for conf.vars X-Mailer: reportbug 3.7.1 Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2005 17:17:39 + Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.8 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS, HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: kernel-package Version: 8.120 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Attempting to build a kernel from kernel-source-2.6.10 on and for x86 results in the following message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~/extra/sources/kernel-source-2.6.10 $ fakeroot make-kpkg kernel_image make: *** No rule to make target `conf.vars', needed by `stamp-configure'. Stop. This is simular to bug #294751 -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.9-teb13 Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages kernel-package depends on: ii bcc [c-compiler] 0.16.14-1.2 16-bit x86 C compiler ii dpkg 1.10.27 Package maintenance system for Deb ii dpkg-dev 1.10.27 Package building tools for Debian ii gcc [c-compiler] 4:3.3.5-1 The GNU C compiler ii gcc-2.95 [c-compiler]1:2.95.4-22 The GNU C compiler ii gcc-3.2 [c-compiler] 1:3.2.3-9 The GNU C compiler ii gcc-3.3 [c-compiler] 1:3.3.5-8 The GNU C compiler ii gcc-3.4 [c-compiler] 3.4.3-9 The GNU C compiler ii make 3.80-9 The GNU version of the make util ii perl 5.8.4-6 Larry Wall's Practical Extraction -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 294956-done) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Feb 2005 18:00:32 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Feb 12 10:00:32 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from host-12-107-230-171.dtccom.net (glaurung.internal.golden-gryphon.com) [12.107.230.171] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D01ZC-0001n7-00; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 10:00:28 -0800 Received: from glaurung.internal.golden-gryphon.com ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [127.0.0.1]) by glaurung.internal.golden-gryphon.com (8.13.3/8.13.3/Debian-6) with ESMTP id j1CHsfL5013092 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 11:54:41 -0600 Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by glaurung.internal.golden-gryphon.com (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id j1CHsfpZ013091; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 11:54:41 -0600 X-Authentication-Warning: glaurung.internal.golden-gryphon.com: srivasta set sender to srivasta(va, manoj)@debian.org using -f From: Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED] (va, manoj) To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: This has been fixed by a new upload Organization: The Debian Project User-Agent: Gnus/5.110003 (No Gnus v0.3) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux) (i686-pc-linux-gnu) X-URL: http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/ Mail-Copies-To: nobody X-Face: [EMAIL PROTECTED]/;Y^gTjR\T^B'fbeuVGiyKrvbfKJl!^e|e:iu(kJ6c|QYB57LP*|t YlP~HF/=h:[EMAIL
Bug#294964: does not work at all
Package: odot Version: 1.0.0-1 Severity: grave When you use the program the first time, and enter a to-do item, it disappears. It doesn't save properly to ~/.odot as indicated in the man page. It produces the following output: Use of uninitialized value in string ne at /usr/bin/odot line 1963. *** unhandled exception in callback: *** Gtk-ERROR **: file gtktreestore.c: line 581 (gtk_tree_store_get_path): assertion failed: (G_NODE (iter-user_data)-parent != NULL) at /usr/bin/odot line 1975. *** ignoring at /usr/bin/odot line 1358. Use of uninitialized value in concatenation (.) or string at /usr/bin/odot line 2758. Use of uninitialized value in concatenation (.) or string at /usr/bin/odot line 2758. Use of uninitialized value in string ne at /usr/bin/odot line 1963. (process:22589): Gtk-ERROR (recursed) **: file gtktreestore.c: line 581 (gtk_tree_store_get_path): assertion failed: (G_NODE (iter-user_data)-parent != NULL) aborting... Aborted thanks, Alex -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.10-1-686 Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages odot depends on: ii libdatetime-perl 1:0.22-1 perl DateTime - Reference implemen ii libgtk2-perl 1:1.062-1 Perl interface to the 2.x series o ii libgtk2.0-0 2.6.2-2The GTK+ graphical user interface ii libxml-parser-perl2.34-4 Perl module for parsing XML files ii perl 5.8.4-6Larry Wall's Practical Extraction -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#294966: clamav-daemon: Segmentation fault on startup
Package: clamav-daemon Version: 0.81-2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable While installation I see the following: The following NEW packages will be installed: clamav-daemon 0 upgraded, 1 newly installed, 0 to remove and 2 not upgraded. Need to get 0B/71.7kB of archives. After unpacking 328kB of additional disk space will be used. Preconfiguring packages ... Selecting previously deselected package clamav-daemon. (Reading database ... 32187 files and directories currently installed.) Unpacking clamav-daemon (from .../clamav-daemon_0.81-2_i386.deb) ... Setting up clamav-daemon (0.81-2) ... Starting ClamAV daemon: /etc/init.d/clamav-daemon: line 110: 28940 Segmentation fault start-stop-daemon --oknodo -S -x $DAEMON invoke-rc.d: initscript clamav-daemon, action start failed. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.4.26-1um Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Versions of packages clamav-daemon depends on: ii clamav-base 0.81-2 base package for clamav, an anti-v ii clamav-freshclam [clamav-da 0.81-2 downloads clamav virus databases f ii debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.4.30.11Debian configuration management sy ii libbz2-1.0 1.0.2-1 A high-quality block-sorting file ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-20 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libclamav1 0.81-2 virus scanner library ii libcurl37.12.3-2 Multi-protocol file transfer libra ii libgmp3 4.1.4-5 Multiprecision arithmetic library ii libidn110.5.2-3 GNU libidn library, implementation ii libssl0.9.7 0.9.7e-2 SSL shared libraries ii logrotate 3.7-2Log rotation utility ii ucf 1.13 Update Configuration File: preserv ii zlib1g 1:1.2.2-3compression library - runtime -- debconf information: clamav-daemon/debconf: true clamav-daemon/FixStaleSocket: true clamav-daemon/User: clamav clamav-daemon/numinfo: clamav-daemon/MaxDirectoryRecursion: 0 clamav-daemon/socket-note: clamav-daemon/MaxThreads: 12 clamav-daemon/FollowDirectorySymlinks: false clamav-daemon/StreamMaxLength: 0 clamav-daemon/ArchiveMaxRecursion: 5 clamav-daemon/ReadTimeout: 180 clamav-daemon/MaxConnectionQueueLength: 15 clamav-daemon/FollowFileSymlinks: false clamav-daemon/TCPSocket: 3310 clamav-daemon/TCPAddr: any clamav-daemon/SelfCheck: 3600 clamav-daemon/LocalSocket: /var/run/clamav/clamd.ctl clamav-daemon/LogFile: /var/log/clamav/clamav.log clamav-daemon/ScanMail: true clamav-daemon/ArchiveMaxFileSize: 10 clamav-daemon/ScanRAR: false clamav-daemon/LogTime: true clamav-daemon/TcpOrLocal: UNIX clamav-daemon/LogSyslog: false clamav-daemon/AddGroups: clamav-daemon/ArchiveMaxFiles: 1000 clamav-daemon/ScanArchive: true -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#294499: swig1.3: ftbfs [sparc] too few arguments to function `zend_rsrc_list_get_rsrc_type'
On Wed, Feb 09, 2005 at 04:24:44PM -0800, Blars Blarson wrote: swig1.3 fails to build from source on sparc, duplicated on sparc pbuilder. gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../Source/Include -I/usr/include/php4 -I/usr/include/php4/main -I/usr/include/php4/Zend -I/usr/include/php4/TSRM -D_REENTRANT -D_GNU_SOURCE -DTHREADS_HAVE_PIDS -DDEBIAN -fno-strict-aliasing -I/usr/local/include -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -MT libswigphp4_la-libphp4.lo -MD -MP -MF .deps/libswigphp4_la-libphp4.Tpo -c libphp4.c -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/libswigphp4_la-libphp4.o libphp4.c: In function `SWIG_ZTS_ConvertResourcePtr': libphp4.c:535: error: too few arguments to function `zend_rsrc_list_get_rsrc_type' Okay, that was part of the runtime libraries. They are gone (replaced) in swig 1.3.24 which is already packaged but I am waiting for dependent packages to repair the no-runtime-anymore breakage. Should be a non-issue mid of next week. Greetings Torsten signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Processed: severity of 294575 is grave, merging 294575 294575
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10 severity 294575 grave Bug#294575: udev: fails to install (install due to gnome-volume-manager) Severity set to `grave'. merge 294575 294575 Bug#294575: udev: fails to install (install due to gnome-volume-manager) Merged 294575. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#294966: clamav-daemon: Segmentation fault on startup
This one time, at band camp, Thilo Pfennig said: While installation I see the following: The following NEW packages will be installed: clamav-daemon 0 upgraded, 1 newly installed, 0 to remove and 2 not upgraded. Need to get 0B/71.7kB of archives. After unpacking 328kB of additional disk space will be used. Preconfiguring packages ... Selecting previously deselected package clamav-daemon. (Reading database ... 32187 files and directories currently installed.) Unpacking clamav-daemon (from .../clamav-daemon_0.81-2_i386.deb) ... Setting up clamav-daemon (0.81-2) ... Starting ClamAV daemon: /etc/init.d/clamav-daemon: line 110: 28940 Segmentation fault start-stop-daemon --oknodo -S -x $DAEMON invoke-rc.d: initscript clamav-daemon, action start failed. Totally unreproducable here. Do you have some strange problem on your system (non-standard glibc, no disk space, hardware problems) causing this? It appears to me that start-stop-daemon has segfaulted, rather than clamd, but I would apprecaite it if you could do the following: (as root) strace -f start-stop-daemon --oknodo -S -x /usr/sbin/clamd strace.out 21 (that is all one line, if it wraps in your mua) Then mail me strace.out. Thanks, -- - | ,''`.Stephen Gran | | : :' :[EMAIL PROTECTED] | | `. `'Debian user, admin, and developer | |`- http://www.debian.org | - pgp2QZtJKDZjP.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#294575: marked as done (udev: fails to install (install due to gnome-volume-manager))
Your message dated Sat, 12 Feb 2005 14:47:07 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#294575: fixed in udev 0.053-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Feb 2005 14:36:18 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Feb 10 06:36:18 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from europa.hardworx-online.net [213.146.112.242] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1CzFQX-000696-00; Thu, 10 Feb 2005 06:36:17 -0800 Received: from amalthea.tcw ([192.168.0.58] helo=amalthea) by europa.hardworx-online.net with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1CzFQV-5B-00; Thu, 10 Feb 2005 15:36:15 +0100 Received: from mschmitt by amalthea with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1CzFQT-00019h-00; Thu, 10 Feb 2005 15:36:13 +0100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Michael Schmitt [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: udev: fails to install (install due to gnome-volume-manager) X-Mailer: reportbug 3.2 Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 15:36:13 +0100 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Michael Schmitt [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: udev Version: 0.050-6 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable I tried to install gnome-volume-manager and it depends on udev but udev did not install correctly. Here's the exact output. It may help to understand what I did and maybe what I did wrong ;) Anyway if I did miss something, the package should inform me of that. I am completely new to udev, just as a hint. Building Dependency Tree... Done The following extra packages will be installed: dbus-glib-1 hal libhal-storage0 libsysfs1 pmount udev Suggested packages: hal-device-manager The following packages will be REMOVED: magicdev The following NEW packages will be installed: dbus-glib-1 gnome-volume-manager hal libhal-storage0 libsysfs1 pmount udev 0 upgraded, 7 newly installed, 1 to remove and 0 not upgraded. Need to get 0B/838kB of archives. After unpacking 2544kB of additional disk space will be used. Do you want to continue? [Y/n] y dpkg: magicdev: dependency problems, but removing anyway as you request: gnome-desktop-environment depends on gnome-volume-manager (= 1.1.2-3) | magicdev; however: Package gnome-volume-manager is not installed. Package magicdev is to be removed. (Reading database ... 106677 files and directories currently installed.) Removing magicdev ... Selecting previously deselected package dbus-glib-1. (Reading database ... 106621 files and directories currently installed.) Unpacking dbus-glib-1 (from .../dbus-glib-1_0.23-1_i386.deb) ... Selecting previously deselected package libhal-storage0. Unpacking libhal-storage0 (from .../libhal-storage0_0.4.7-1_i386.deb) ... Selecting previously deselected package udev. Unpacking udev (from .../archives/udev_0.050-6_i386.deb) ... Selecting previously deselected package hal. Unpacking hal (from .../archives/hal_0.4.7-1_i386.deb) ... Selecting previously deselected package libsysfs1. Unpacking libsysfs1 (from .../libsysfs1_1.2.0-4_i386.deb) ... Selecting previously deselected package pmount. Unpacking pmount (from .../pmount_0.5.1-1_i386.deb) ... Selecting previously deselected package gnome-volume-manager. Unpacking gnome-volume-manager (from .../gnome-volume-manager_1.1.2-5_i386.deb) ... Setting up dbus-glib-1 (0.23-1) ... Setting up libhal-storage0 (0.4.7-1) ... Setting up udev (0.050-6) ... mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on none, or too many mounted file systems dpkg: error processing udev (--configure): subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 32 dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of hal: hal depends on udev; however: Package udev is not configured yet. dpkg: error processing hal (--configure): dependency problems - leaving unconfigured Setting up libsysfs1 (1.2.0-4) ... Setting up pmount (0.5.1-1) ... addgroup: The group `plugdev' already exists. addgroup: The group `plugdev' already exists. dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of gnome-volume-manager:
Bug#294985: boot: Bootup on Latop Acer Extensa3000 stops
Package: boot Severity: critical Justification: breaks the whole system while booting knoppix 3.7 with standard or 2.6 kernel. It hangs after showing eth0 on Screen. System is a Laptop Acer Extensa 3000 with intrernal ethernet. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.4.27 Locale: LANG=de_DE.ISO-8859-15, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.ISO-8859-15 (charmap=ISO-8859-15) (ignored: LC_ALL set to [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#294986: php4-recode: php4 segfault when using recode() function
Package: php4-recode Version: 4:4.3.10-4 Severity: grave Justification: causes non-serious data loss -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.10-grsec Locale: LANG=fr_FR, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Versions of packages php4-recode depends on: ii debconf [debco 1.4.45Debian configuration management sy ii libapache2-mod 4:4.3.10-4server-side, HTML-embedded scripti ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-20.0.0.1.pure64 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii librecode0 3.6-10Shared library on which recode is ii php4-cgi [phpa 4:4.3.10-4server-side, HTML-embedded scripti ii php4-cli [phpa 4:4.3.10-4command-line interpreter for the p ii php4-common4:4.3.10-4Common files for packages built fr -- debconf information: php4/extension_recode_apache: true php4/add_extension: true php4/extension_recode_cgi: true php4/remove_extension: true php4/extension_recode_apache2: true php4/extension_recode_cli: true when I do $ /usr/bin/php4 -c php.ini -q ./recode.php Erreur de segmentation (core dumped) here is php.ini : [PHP] extension=recode.so and recode.php : ? echo recode_string(utf-8..html_4.0,Hello, World !); ? it also segfault with other charsets I've also tried with register_globals = Off WRT bug #213557 here is the backtrace with gdb : $ gdb -c core /usr/bin/php4 GNU gdb 6.3-debian Copyright 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc. GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you are welcome to change it and/or distribute copies of it under certain conditions. Type show copying to see the conditions. There is absolutely no warranty for GDB. Type show warranty for details. This GDB was configured as x86_64-linux...(no debugging symbols found) Using host libthread_db library /lib/libthread_db.so.1. Core was generated by `/usr/bin/php4 -c php.ini -q ./recode.php'. Program terminated with signal 11, Segmentation fault. Reading symbols from /lib/libcrypt.so.1...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /lib/libcrypt.so.1 Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libzzip-0.so.12...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libzzip-0.so.12 Reading symbols from /lib/libnsl.so.1...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /lib/libnsl.so.1 Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libexpat.so.1...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libexpat.so.1 Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libpcre.so.3... (no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libpcre.so.3 Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libpanel.so.5...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libpanel.so.5 Reading symbols from /lib/libncurses.so.5...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /lib/libncurses.so.5 Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libdb-4.2.so...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libdb-4.2.so Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libbz2.so.1.0... (no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libbz2.so.1.0 Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libz.so.1...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libz.so.1 Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libssl.so.0.9.7...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libssl.so.0.9.7 Reading symbols from /lib/libresolv.so.2...done. Loaded symbols for /lib/libresolv.so.2 Reading symbols from /lib/libm.so.6...done. Loaded symbols for /lib/libm.so.6 Reading symbols from /lib/libdl.so.2...done. Loaded symbols for /lib/libdl.so.2 Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libgssapi_krb5.so.2...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libgssapi_krb5.so.2 Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libkrb5.so.3...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libkrb5.so.3 Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libk5crypto.so.3...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libk5crypto.so.3 Reading symbols from /lib/libcom_err.so.2...done. Loaded symbols for /lib/libcom_err.so.2 Reading symbols from /lib/libpthread.so.0...done. Loaded symbols for /lib/libpthread.so.0 Reading symbols from /lib/libc.so.6...done. Loaded symbols for /lib/libc.so.6 Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libcrypto.so.0.9.7...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libcrypto.so.0.9.7 Reading symbols from /lib/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2...done. Loaded symbols for /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 Reading symbols from /lib/libnss_files.so.2...done. Loaded symbols for /lib/libnss_files.so.2 Reading symbols from /usr/lib/php4/20020429-zts/recode.so...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/php4/20020429-zts/recode.so Reading symbols from /usr/lib/librecode.so.0...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/librecode.so.0 #0 0x002a976766d2 in delmodule_flat () from /usr/lib/librecode.so.0 (gdb) bt #0 0x002a976766d2 in delmodule_flat () from /usr/lib/librecode.so.0 #1 0x002a9766803a in transform_byte_to_variable () from /usr/lib/librecode.so.0 #2 0x002a97668a68 in recode_perform_task () from
Bug#293413: marked as done (ftbfs [sparc] cannot stat `/build/buildd/rox-2.2.0/ROX-Filer/Linux-ix86/ROX-Filer')
Your message dated Sat, 12 Feb 2005 15:48:34 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#293413: fixed in rox 2.2.0-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Feb 2005 05:43:42 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Feb 02 21:43:42 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from blars.org (renig.nat.blars.org) [64.81.35.59] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1CwZmH-0004Tw-00; Wed, 02 Feb 2005 21:43:41 -0800 Received: from renig.nat.blars.org (plergb.nat.blars.org [172.16.1.1]) by renig.nat.blars.org (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian-7.1) with ESMTP id j135hbXE006832 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Wed, 2 Feb 2005 21:43:37 -0800 Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by renig.nat.blars.org (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian-7.1) id j135hbqM006830; Wed, 2 Feb 2005 21:43:37 -0800 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Blars Blarson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: ftbfs [sparc] cannot stat `/build/buildd/rox-2.2.0/ROX-Filer/Linux-ix86/ROX-Filer' X-Mailer: reportbug 1.50 Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2005 21:43:37 -0800 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: rox Version: 2.2.0-1 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source rox fails to build from source on sparc and other buildds, duplicated on sparc pbuilder: dh_installdirs cp -r /build/buildd/rox-2.2.0/Choices /build/buildd/rox-2.2.0/debian/rox-filer/usr/share/rox rm -rf /build/buildd/rox-2.2.0/debian/rox-filer/usr/share/rox/Choices/MIME-info/ cp /build/buildd/rox-2.2.0/ROX-Filer/*.xml /build/buildd/rox-2.2.0/debian/rox-filer/usr/share/rox cp /build/buildd/rox-2.2.0/ROX-Filer/Help/Changes /build/buildd/rox-2.2.0/debian/rox-filer/usr/share/doc/rox-filer/changelog cp /build/buildd/rox-2.2.0/ROX-Filer/Help/*html /build/buildd/rox-2.2.0/debian/rox-filer/usr/share/doc/rox-filer/html/. cp /build/buildd/rox-2.2.0/ROX-Filer/style.css /build/buildd/rox-2.2.0/debian/rox-filer/usr/share/doc/rox-filer/html/. cp -r /build/buildd/rox-2.2.0/ROX-Filer/images /build/buildd/rox-2.2.0/debian/rox-filer/usr/share/rox cp -r /build/buildd/rox-2.2.0/ROX-Filer/ROX /build/buildd/rox-2.2.0/debian/rox-filer/usr/share/rox cp /build/buildd/rox-2.2.0/ROX-Filer/Linux-ix86/ROX-Filer /build/buildd/rox-2.2.0/debian/rox-filer/usr/bin/rox cp: cannot stat `/build/buildd/rox-2.2.0/ROX-Filer/Linux-ix86/ROX-Filer': No such file or directory make: *** [install] Error 1 --- Received: (at 293413-close) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Feb 2005 20:53:17 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Feb 12 12:53:17 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D04GT-0002Tk-00; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 12:53:17 -0800 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D04Bu-hy-00; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 15:48:34 -0500 From: Francesco Paolo Lovergine [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $ Subject: Bug#293413: fixed in rox 2.2.0-2 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2005 15:48:34 -0500 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Source: rox Source-Version: 2.2.0-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of rox, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: rox-filer_2.2.0-2_i386.deb to pool/main/r/rox/rox-filer_2.2.0-2_i386.deb rox_2.2.0-2.diff.gz to pool/main/r/rox/rox_2.2.0-2.diff.gz rox_2.2.0-2.dsc to pool/main/r/rox/rox_2.2.0-2.dsc A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if
Bug#245855: Package fails to build on x86_64 kernel.
On Saturday 12 February 2005 12:18 pm, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: 64bit kernel for i386 are included in sarge which makes this an RC bug. A newer version should be propagated to sarge or the sarge source should be patched. Oh, that's unfortunate -- I thought it was fixed :(. Could you give me a log of where the build of 1.2.5-4 fails? Thanks, Daniel -- /--- Daniel Burrows [EMAIL PROTECTED] --\ | He had a terrible memory. He remembered everything.| \-- (if (not (understand-this)) (go-to http://www.schemers.org)) ---/ pgpNdATIOuNzZ.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#294993: yacas: #276782 is still present in sarge
Package: yacas Version: 1.0.55-6 Severity: grave Tags: sarge This is a reminder that the archived bug #276782 (yacas: Doesn't run) is still present in sarge. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#291254: marked as done (Doesn't work with the latest kernel-source-2.6.8)
Your message dated Sat, 12 Feb 2005 13:18:10 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Doesn't work with the latest kernel-source-2.6.8 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Jan 2005 17:37:55 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jan 19 09:37:55 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from farad.aurel32.net [82.232.2.251] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1CrJmF-d4-00; Wed, 19 Jan 2005 09:37:55 -0800 Received: from norton.aurel32.net ([2001:618:400:6439:a00:9ff:fe93:c494]) by farad.aurel32.net with esmtp (TLS-1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA:16) (Exim 4.34) id 1CrJmD-000626-I3; Wed, 19 Jan 2005 18:37:53 +0100 Received: from aurel32 by norton.aurel32.net with local (Exim 4.34) id 1CrCWb-0006Ay-JA; Wed, 19 Jan 2005 10:53:17 +0100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Aurelien Jarno [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Doesn't work with the latest kernel-source-2.6.8 X-Mailer: reportbug 3.2 Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2005 10:53:16 +0100 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Aurelien Jarno [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.8 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS, HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: kernel-patch-2.6.8-hppa Version: 2.6.8-4 Severity: serious It seems that kernel-patch-2.6.8-hppa doesn't work with kernel-source-2.6.8 (ie version 2.6.8-12), so it is simply unuseable: START applying hppa_2_6_8 patch (hppa architecture) Testing whether hppa architecture patch for 2.6.8 applies (dry run): 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file drivers/serial/8250.c.rej hppa architecture patch for 2.6.8 does not apply cleanly Patch /usr/src/kernel-patches/hppa/apply/hppa_2_6_8 failed. Seems to be due to the following change in kernel-source-2.6.8 version 2.6-8-9: * Adding drivers-serial-8250-ioremap-fix.dpatch: a patch from Alex Williamson that prevents setserial from crashing the kernel. See: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernelm=109913237604338w=2 (Dann Frazier) -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable') Architecture: hppa (parisc) Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-1-32 Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages kernel-patch-2.6.8-hppa depends on: ii bash 2.05b-24 The GNU Bourne Again SHell ii grep-dctrl2.1.8 Grep Debian package information ii patch 2.5.9-2Apply a diff file to an original -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 291254-done) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Feb 2005 21:18:13 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Feb 12 13:18:13 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from dsl093-039-086.pdx1.dsl.speakeasy.net (localhost.localdomain) [66.93.39.86] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D04eb-0007bc-00; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 13:18:13 -0800 Received: by localhost.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000) id F2ECB1723E0; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 13:18:10 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2005 13:18:10 -0800 From: Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Doesn't work with the latest kernel-source-2.6.8 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=XOIedfhf+7KOe/yw Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: --XOIedfhf+7KOe/yw Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable This bug is fixed with the latest upload of kernel-patch-2.6.8-hppa. Thanks, --=20 Steve Langasek postmodern programmer --XOIedfhf+7KOe/yw Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Bug#294985: marked as done (boot: Bootup on Latop Acer Extensa3000 stops)
Your message dated Sat, 12 Feb 2005 15:18:19 -0600 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#294985: boot: Bootup on Latop Acer Extensa3000 stops has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Feb 2005 20:31:03 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Feb 12 12:31:03 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mxout04.versatel.de [212.7.152.118] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D03ux-00073v-00; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 12:31:03 -0800 Received: from mx01.versatel.de (mx01.versatel.de [212.7.146.1]) by mxout04.versatel.de (8.12.11/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j1CKV1iJ028493; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 21:31:01 +0100 Received: from hwldev.dyndns.org (i538782FD.versanet.de [83.135.130.253]) by mx01.versatel.de (MOS 3.5.5-GR) with ESMTP id CPE57103; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 21:30:45 +0100 (CET) Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([192.168.0.100]) by hwldev.dyndns.org (8.12.6/8.12.6/SuSE Linux 0.6) with ESMTP id j1CKUnAJ004660; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 21:30:49 +0100 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Thorsten Claus [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: boot: Bootup on Latop Acer Extensa3000 stops X-Mailer: reportbug 3.2 Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2005 21:30:47 +0100 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: boot Severity: critical Justification: breaks the whole system while booting knoppix 3.7 with standard or 2.6 kernel. It hangs after showing eth0 on Screen. System is a Laptop Acer Extensa 3000 with intrernal ethernet. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.4.27 Locale: LANG=de_DE.ISO-8859-15, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.ISO-8859-15 (charmap=ISO-8859-15) (ignored: LC_ALL set to [EMAIL PROTECTED]) --- Received: (at 294985-done) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Feb 2005 21:19:05 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Feb 12 13:19:04 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from sccrmhc12.comcast.net [204.127.202.56] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D04fQ-0007gA-00; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 13:19:04 -0800 Received: from basebud.nulle.part (c-24-14-160-2.client.comcast.net[24.14.160.2]) by comcast.net (sccrmhc12) with ESMTP id 2005021221182001200p3391e; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 21:18:34 + Received: from edd by basebud.nulle.part with local (Exim 4.34) id 1D04eh-0003XS-8N; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 15:18:19 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2005 15:18:19 -0600 To: Thorsten Claus [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: debian-curiosa@lists.debian.org, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Bug#294985: boot: Bootup on Latop Acer Extensa3000 stops In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] References: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Mailer: VM 7.19 under Emacs 21.3.1 From: Dirk Eddelbuettel [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Thorsten, On 12 February 2005 at 21:30, Thorsten Claus wrote: | Package: boot | Severity: critical | Justification: breaks the whole system You are barking at the wrong tree; boot is a statistical package for the R system and is named after the bootstrapping / resampling statistics it provides. | while booting knoppix 3.7 with standard or 2.6 kernel. It hangs after Knoppix, as you may know, is not actually created by the Debian Project. So you also got the wrong bug tracking system. I will therefore close the bug report, but cc the message to the main Knoppix list. | showing eth0 on Screen. | System is a Laptop Acer Extensa 3000 with intrernal ethernet. There are various documents suggesting cheatcodes to try to get more verbose and
Processed: Fixed in NMU of gnofin 0.8.4-2.2
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 258799 + fixed Bug#258799: gnofin: FTBFS with gcc-3.4: label at end of compound statement Tags were: patch Tags added: fixed tag 293638 + fixed Bug#293638: gnofin_0.8.4-2.1(mipsel/unstable): configure built with broken libtool.m4 There were no tags set. Tags added: fixed quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: xwhois: tags 294621 sid
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: package xwhois Ignoring bugs not assigned to: xwhois tags 294621 sid Bug#294621: xwhois: server file is not found, program won't start (same problem as in bug #43467) There were no tags set. Tags added: sid thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: your mail
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 293865 + patch Bug#293865: libxml2 2.6.16 does not work with DCGUI-QT There were no tags set. Tags added: patch End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#293932: [Python-Dev] license issues with profiler.py and md5.h/md5c.c
On Tue, 8 Feb 2005 15:52:29 -0500, Jeremy Hylton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Maybe some ambitious PSF activitst could contact Roskind and Steve Kirsch and see if they know who at Disney to talk to... Or maybe the Disney guys who were at PyCon last year could help. I contacted Jim. His response follows: --- I'm a strong supporter of Opensource software, but I'm probably not going to be able to help you very much. I could be much more helpful with understanding the code or its use ;-). To summarize what I'll say: I don't own the rights to this stuff. ... but I don't believe there are any patents that I was ever involved with that might encumber this work. I would note that my profiler code is really very rarely used in commercial products, and it is much more typically used by developers (I guess a developer toolkit, if sold, would use it). I'm pretty delighted that the code has found so much use by developers over the years. As I noted in the intro to the documentation, I had only been coding in Python for 3 weeks when I wrote it. On the positive side, it exposed many weaknesses in many developer's code (including our own at InfoSeek), as well as in core Python code (subtle bugs in the interpreter) that surely helped everyone. Even though I was a newbie, It was VERY carefully crafted,, and I'd expect that it would take a fair amount of effort to reproduce it (and that is is probably why it has not been changed much... or at least no one told me when they changed/fixed it ;-) ). With regard to why I probably can't help much. First off, InfoSeek (holder of the copyright) was bought by Disney, and I don't know what if anything has eventually become of the tradename. There is a chance that Disney owns the rights... and I have no idea who to ask there :-/. Second, I took a look at the Copyright, and it sure seems pretty permissive. I'm amazed if folks want something more permissive. This is what I found on the web for it: Copyright © 1994, by InfoSeek Corporation, all rights reserved. Written by James Roskind.10.1 Permission to use, copy, modify, and distribute this Python software and its associated documentation for any purpose (subject to the restriction in the following sentence) without fee is hereby granted, provided that the above copyright notice appears in all copies, and that both that copyright notice and this permission notice appear in supporting documentation, and that the name of InfoSeek not be used in advertising or publicity pertaining to distribution of the software without specific, written prior permission. This permission is explicitly restricted to the copying and modification of the software to remain in Python, compiled Python, or other languages (such as C) wherein the modified or derived code is exclusively imported into a Python module. INFOSEEK CORPORATION DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES WITH REGARD TO THIS SOFTWARE, INCLUDING ALL IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS. IN NO EVENT SHALL INFOSEEK CORPORATION BE LIABLE FOR ANY SPECIAL, INDIRECT OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES OR ANY DAMAGES WHATSOEVER RESULTING FROM LOSS OF USE, DATA OR PROFITS, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, NEGLIGENCE OR OTHER TORTIOUS ACTION, ARISING OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE USE OR PERFORMANCE OF THIS SOFTWARE. As I recall, I probably personally created the terms of the above license. I used a similar license on my C/C++ grammar, and Infoseek just added a bunch of wording to be sure that they were not at risk, and that their name would not be used in vain (or in advertising material). I think they were also interested in limiting its use to Python but I don't think that is a concern that would bother you. I read the link you directed me to, and its primary focus seemed ot be on patents for related or included technology. I don't believe that infoseek applied for or got any patents in this area (and certainly if they did so without my name, it would probably invalidate the patent), and I'm sure I didn't get any patents in this area at Netscape/AOL. In fact I don't think I got any patents back in 1994 or 1995. My only prior patent dated back to about 1983 (a hardware patent) that has since expired. I have some patents since (roughly) 1995, and even though I don't think any of them relate to profiling (though some did relate to languages, or more specifically, security in languages), I wouldn't want to mess with assigning rights to any of those patents, as they belong to AOL/Netscape. Here again, to my knowledge, none of my patents relate in any way to this area (profiling). Sadly, if they did, I would not have the right to assign them. I'm sure you're just doing your job, and following through by dotting all the I's and crossing all T's. My suggestion is to (as you said) work around the issue. You could always re-write the code from scratch, as the approaches are not rocket science and are pretty thoroughly explained. I wouldn't suggest it unless
Bug#293865: libxml2 2.6.16 does not work with DCGUI-QT
Package: dcgui-qt Version: 0.3.2-2 Followup-For: Bug #293865 Hi, the bug is actually in libdc0. I've used the patch at http://people.freebsd.org/~markus/stuff/patch-dclib-core-cxml.cpp_2 for the last few days, it seems to fix the problem. I can also confirm that the broken package leaves unusable configuration files. Since libxml2 is on its way to sarge, should this maybe be fasttracked in some way? Patch is attached. --- dclib/core/cxml.cpp.origThu Aug 12 10:32:06 2004 +++ dclib/core/cxml.cpp Thu Dec 2 01:08:00 2004 @@ -145,12 +145,12 @@ res = UTF8Toisolat1( b, outlen, (unsigned char*)s, inlen ); - if ( res == -2 ) + if ( res = 0 ) + r = (char*)b; + else if ( res == -2 ) printf(UTF8Toisolat1 transcoding fail: '%s'\n,s); else if ( res == -1 ) printf(UTF8Toisolat1 fail: '%s'\n,s); - else if ( res == 0 ) - r = (char*)b; else printf(CXml::xml_UTF8Toisolat1 error %d\n,res); @@ -178,10 +178,12 @@ res = isolat1ToUTF8( b, outlen, (unsigned char*)s, inlen ); - if ( res == -1 ) + if ( res = 0 ) + r = (char*)b; + else if ( res == -1 ) printf(isolat1ToUTF8 fail: '%s'\n,s); - else if ( res == 0 ) - r = (char*)b; + else + printf(CXml::xml_isolat1ToUTF8 error %d\n,res); free(b);
Bug#294831: marked as done (piwi: FTBFS: chmod: cannot access `/etc/piwi/config.pl': No such file or directory)
Your message dated Sat, 12 Feb 2005 03:32:13 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#294831: fixed in piwi 0.8+20041206-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Feb 2005 20:29:24 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Feb 11 12:29:24 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from adicia.telenet-ops.be [195.130.132.56] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1CzhPo-00018V-00; Fri, 11 Feb 2005 12:29:24 -0800 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by adicia.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with SMTP id 6B01644AC8 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 11 Feb 2005 21:29:23 +0100 (MET) Received: from Q.roeckx.be (dD5775FD9.access.telenet.be [213.119.95.217]) by adicia.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C98E449A4 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 11 Feb 2005 21:29:23 +0100 (MET) Received: by Q.roeckx.be (Postfix, from userid 501) id 12EAD26136; Fri, 11 Feb 2005 21:29:23 +0100 (CET) Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2005 21:29:23 +0100 From: Kurt Roeckx [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: piwi: FTBFS: chmod: cannot access `/etc/piwi/config.pl': No such file or directory Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: piwi Version: 0.8+20041206-1 Severity: serious Hi, Your package is failing to build with the following error: install -m644 debian/httpd.conf /usr/src/piwi-0.8+20041206/debian/piwi/etc/piwi/ chown -R www-data:www-data /usr/src/piwi-0.8+20041206/debian/piwi/var/cache/piwi/generated chmod 600 /etc/piwi/config.pl chmod: cannot access `/etc/piwi/config.pl': No such file or directory Kurt --- Received: (at 294831-close) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Feb 2005 08:38:06 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Feb 12 00:38:06 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Czsn0-0008Bu-00; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 00:38:06 -0800 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1CzshJ-0003Vn-00; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 03:32:13 -0500 From: Mickael Profeta [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $ Subject: Bug#294831: fixed in piwi 0.8+20041206-2 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2005 03:32:13 -0500 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Source: piwi Source-Version: 0.8+20041206-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of piwi, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: piwi_0.8+20041206-2.diff.gz to pool/main/p/piwi/piwi_0.8+20041206-2.diff.gz piwi_0.8+20041206-2.dsc to pool/main/p/piwi/piwi_0.8+20041206-2.dsc piwi_0.8+20041206-2_all.deb to pool/main/p/piwi/piwi_0.8+20041206-2_all.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Mickael Profeta [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated piwi package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2005 09:17:15 +0100 Source: piwi Binary: piwi Architecture: source all Version: 0.8+20041206-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Mickael Profeta [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Mickael Profeta [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: piwi - P(erl|relude) IDS Web Interface - A frontend
Bug#294522: marked as done (linda: missing depends on new (and non-free) python-profile)
Your message dated Sun, 13 Feb 2005 09:46:21 +1100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#294522: pstats.py also missing has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Feb 2005 06:41:45 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Feb 09 22:41:45 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from master.debian.org [146.82.138.7] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Cz81J-00041a-00; Wed, 09 Feb 2005 22:41:45 -0800 Received: from rcm-200-220-132-60.nipnet.net.br (khazad-dum.debian.net) [200.220.132.60] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Cz81I-0003S2-00; Thu, 10 Feb 2005 00:41:45 -0600 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.khazad-dum.debian.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FA47201484; Thu, 10 Feb 2005 04:41:39 -0200 (BRST) Received: from khazad-dum.debian.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (khazad-dum [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 01344-01-2; Thu, 10 Feb 2005 04:41:37 -0200 (BRST) Received: by khazad-dum.debian.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id EB2F22014DA; Thu, 10 Feb 2005 04:41:37 -0200 (BRST) Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 04:41:37 -0200 From: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: linda: missing depends on new (and non-free) python-profile Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Reportbug-Version: 3.7.1 X-Debbugs-Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-GPG-Fingerprint: 1024D/1CDB0FE3 5422 5C61 F6B7 06FB 7E04 3738 EE25 DE3F 1CDB 0FE3 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at khazad-dum.debian.net Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE, X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: linda Version: 0.3.8 Severity: grave Tags: sid Justification: renders package unusable The python packages moved the profile module (due to non-freeness) to non-free. This breaks linda, since it does not depend on the new non-free packages (and linda will have to move to contrib, unless it drops whatever need it has for the profile module). Currently, linda won't run, thus the severity. Original remove profile module bug CC'd in quiet mode. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (990, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.10-debian5+libata9dev1+bluesmoke Locale: LANG=pt_BR.ISO-8859-1, LC_CTYPE=pt_BR.ISO-8859-1 (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Versions of packages linda depends on: ii binutils 2.15-5 The GNU assembler, linker and bina ii dash 0.5.2-1The Debian Almquist Shell ii file 4.12-1 Determines file type using magic ii man-db2.4.2-21 The on-line manual pager ii python2.3.4-6An interactive high-level object-o -- no debconf information -- One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond where the shadows lie. -- The Silicon Valley Tarot Henrique Holschuh --- Received: (at 294522-done) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Feb 2005 22:46:26 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Feb 12 14:46:25 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from 14.5.233.220.exetel.com.au (crippled.wedontsleep.org) [220.233.5.14] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D061x-0001Ip-00; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 14:46:25 -0800 Received: from enervated.inside.wedontsleep.org ([192.168.7.5]) by crippled.wedontsleep.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1D061v-0002od-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 13 Feb 2005 09:46:23 +1100 Received: from broken.inside.wedontsleep.org ([192.168.7.2]) by enervated.inside.wedontsleep.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1D061u-0001Wj-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 13 Feb 2005 09:46:22 +1100 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=broken.inside.wedontsleep.org) by broken.inside.wedontsleep.org with esmtp (Exim 4.44) id
Bug#254400: Xfce4-goodies packages
On 12/02/2005 at 17:38 Michael Ablassmeier wrote... hi Rudy, *, Hi, I've updated xfce4-diskperf-plugin to the latest upstream version, changelog looks like this: xfce4-diskperf-plugin (1.5-1) unstable; urgency=low . * QA Upload * New upstream version (Closes: #254400) * Lower first capital letter in short package description. * Remove `Uploaders:' field in debian/control since package is orphaned. * Update libtool to latest version (Closes: #239469) Thanks for you work, almost all current -goodies are updated on our svn repository [0] now, and we'll appreciate as much as testing on them so they get uploaded asap. however, i dont have access to a arm machine, so wasnt able to test if #239469 is still present with this revision. Signed package source is up on mentors.debian.net, sponsor needed. Thanks again. If you are interested on help Xfce packaging please join the group. -Rudy 0- svn.debian.org/svn/pkg-xfce -- Rudy Godoy | 0x3433BD21 | http://stone-head.org ,''`. http://www.apesol.org - http://www.debian.org : :' : GPG FP: 0D12 8537 607E 2DF5 4EFB 35A7 550F 1A00 3433 BD21 `. `' `- signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#293815: libimlib2 version 1.2.0 breaks libimage-imlib2-perl
I am uploading a 0-day NMU for this bug, based on Don Armstrong's patch. Please find the final diffset attached. -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer diff -u imlib2-1.2.0/src/modules/loaders/Makefile.in imlib2-1.2.0/src/modules/loaders/Makefile.in --- imlib2-1.2.0/src/modules/loaders/Makefile.in +++ imlib2-1.2.0/src/modules/loaders/Makefile.in @@ -276,41 +276,41 @@ lbm.la jpeg_la_SOURCES = loader_jpeg.c -jpeg_la_LDFLAGS = -module -avoid-version -jpeg_la_LIBADD = @JPEGLIBS@ +jpeg_la_LDFLAGS = -module -avoid-version -L$(top_builddir)/src/lib/ +jpeg_la_LIBADD = @JPEGLIBS@ -lImlib2 png_la_SOURCES = loader_png.c -png_la_LDFLAGS = -module -avoid-version -png_la_LIBADD = @PNGLIBS@ +png_la_LDFLAGS = -module -avoid-version -L$(top_builddir)/src/lib/ +png_la_LIBADD = @PNGLIBS@ -lImlib2 tiff_la_SOURCES = loader_tiff.c -tiff_la_LDFLAGS = -module -avoid-version -tiff_la_LIBADD = @TIFFLIBS@ +tiff_la_LDFLAGS = -module -avoid-version -L$(top_builddir)/src/lib/ +tiff_la_LIBADD = @TIFFLIBS@ -lImlib2 gif_la_SOURCES = loader_gif.c -gif_la_LDFLAGS = -module -avoid-version -gif_la_LIBADD = @GIFLIBS@ +gif_la_LDFLAGS = -module -avoid-version -L$(top_builddir)/src/lib/ +gif_la_LIBADD = @GIFLIBS@ -lImlib2 zlib_la_SOURCES = loader_zlib.c -zlib_la_LDFLAGS = -module -avoid-version -zlib_la_LIBADD = @ZLIBLIBS@ +zlib_la_LDFLAGS = -module -avoid-version -L$(top_builddir)/src/lib/ +zlib_la_LIBADD = @ZLIBLIBS@ -lImlib2 bz2_la_SOURCES = loader_bz2.c -bz2_la_LDFLAGS = -module -avoid-version -bz2_la_LIBADD = @BZ2LIBS@ +bz2_la_LDFLAGS = -module -avoid-version -L$(top_builddir)/src/lib/ +bz2_la_LIBADD = @BZ2LIBS@ -lImlib2 pnm_la_SOURCES = loader_pnm.c -pnm_la_LDFLAGS = -module -avoid-version -pnm_la_LIBADD = +pnm_la_LDFLAGS = -module -avoid-version -L$(top_builddir)/src/lib/ +pnm_la_LIBADD = -lImlib2 argb_la_SOURCES = loader_argb.c -argb_la_LDFLAGS = -module -avoid-version -argb_la_LIBADD = +argb_la_LDFLAGS = -module -avoid-version -L$(top_builddir)/src/lib/ +argb_la_LIBADD = -lImlib2 bmp_la_SOURCES = loader_bmp.c -bmp_la_LDFLAGS = -module -avoid-version -bmp_la_LIBADD = +bmp_la_LDFLAGS = -module -avoid-version -L$(top_builddir)/src/lib/ +bmp_la_LIBADD = -lImlib2 xpm_la_SOURCES = loader_xpm.c -xpm_la_LDFLAGS = -module -avoid-version -xpm_la_LIBADD = +xpm_la_LDFLAGS = -module -avoid-version -L$(top_builddir)/src/lib/ +xpm_la_LIBADD = -lImlib2 tga_la_SOURCES = loader_tga.c -tga_la_LDFLAGS = -module -avoid-version -tga_la_LIBADD = +tga_la_LDFLAGS = -module -avoid-version -L$(top_builddir)/src/lib/ +tga_la_LIBADD = -lImlib2 lbm_la_SOURCES = loader_lbm.c -lbm_la_LDFLAGS = -module -avoid-version -lbm_la_LIBADD = +lbm_la_LDFLAGS = -module -avoid-version -L$(top_builddir)/src/lib/ +lbm_la_LIBADD = -lImlib2 all: all-am .SUFFIXES: diff -u imlib2-1.2.0/debian/changelog imlib2-1.2.0/debian/changelog --- imlib2-1.2.0/debian/changelog +++ imlib2-1.2.0/debian/changelog @@ -1,3 +1,14 @@ +imlib2 (1.2.0-1.1) unstable; urgency=high + + * Non-maintainer upload. + * High-urgency upload for sarge-targetted RC bugfix + * Fix regression in the linkage of the loader modules which resulted +in undefined symbols, making libimlib2 unusable when being +dlopen()ed by an application; thanks to Don Armstrong for the patch. +Closes: #293815. + + -- Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat, 12 Feb 2005 15:19:12 -0800 + imlib2 (1.2.0-1) unstable; urgency=low * New upstream version only in patch2: unchanged: --- imlib2-1.2.0.orig/src/modules/loaders/Makefile.am +++ imlib2-1.2.0/src/modules/loaders/Makefile.am @@ -43,49 +43,49 @@ lbm.la jpeg_la_SOURCES = loader_jpeg.c -jpeg_la_LDFLAGS = -module -avoid-version -jpeg_la_LIBADD = @JPEGLIBS@ +jpeg_la_LDFLAGS = -module -avoid-version -L$(top_builddir)/src/lib/ +jpeg_la_LIBADD = @JPEGLIBS@ -lImlib2 png_la_SOURCES = loader_png.c -png_la_LDFLAGS = -module -avoid-version -png_la_LIBADD= @PNGLIBS@ +png_la_LDFLAGS = -module -avoid-version -L$(top_builddir)/src/lib/ +png_la_LIBADD= @PNGLIBS@ -lImlib2 tiff_la_SOURCES = loader_tiff.c -tiff_la_LDFLAGS = -module -avoid-version -tiff_la_LIBADD = @TIFFLIBS@ +tiff_la_LDFLAGS = -module -avoid-version -L$(top_builddir)/src/lib/ +tiff_la_LIBADD = @TIFFLIBS@ -lImlib2 gif_la_SOURCES = loader_gif.c -gif_la_LDFLAGS = -module -avoid-version -gif_la_LIBADD= @GIFLIBS@ +gif_la_LDFLAGS = -module -avoid-version -L$(top_builddir)/src/lib/ +gif_la_LIBADD= @GIFLIBS@ -lImlib2 zlib_la_SOURCES = loader_zlib.c -zlib_la_LDFLAGS = -module -avoid-version -zlib_la_LIBADD = @ZLIBLIBS@ +zlib_la_LDFLAGS = -module -avoid-version -L$(top_builddir)/src/lib/ +zlib_la_LIBADD = @ZLIBLIBS@ -lImlib2 bz2_la_SOURCES = loader_bz2.c -bz2_la_LDFLAGS = -module -avoid-version -bz2_la_LIBADD= @BZ2LIBS@ +bz2_la_LDFLAGS = -module -avoid-version -L$(top_builddir)/src/lib/
Bug#293815: libimlib2 version 1.2.0 breaks libimage-imlib2-perl
Hmm, the last patch was not final after all -- a last review before upload showed that the filters had thee same problem as the loaders. Attached is an updated patch that fixes both sets of plugins. Thanks, -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer diff -u imlib2-1.2.0/src/modules/loaders/Makefile.in imlib2-1.2.0/src/modules/loaders/Makefile.in --- imlib2-1.2.0/src/modules/loaders/Makefile.in +++ imlib2-1.2.0/src/modules/loaders/Makefile.in @@ -276,41 +276,41 @@ lbm.la jpeg_la_SOURCES = loader_jpeg.c -jpeg_la_LDFLAGS = -module -avoid-version -jpeg_la_LIBADD = @JPEGLIBS@ +jpeg_la_LDFLAGS = -module -avoid-version -L$(top_builddir)/src/lib/ +jpeg_la_LIBADD = @JPEGLIBS@ -lImlib2 png_la_SOURCES = loader_png.c -png_la_LDFLAGS = -module -avoid-version -png_la_LIBADD = @PNGLIBS@ +png_la_LDFLAGS = -module -avoid-version -L$(top_builddir)/src/lib/ +png_la_LIBADD = @PNGLIBS@ -lImlib2 tiff_la_SOURCES = loader_tiff.c -tiff_la_LDFLAGS = -module -avoid-version -tiff_la_LIBADD = @TIFFLIBS@ +tiff_la_LDFLAGS = -module -avoid-version -L$(top_builddir)/src/lib/ +tiff_la_LIBADD = @TIFFLIBS@ -lImlib2 gif_la_SOURCES = loader_gif.c -gif_la_LDFLAGS = -module -avoid-version -gif_la_LIBADD = @GIFLIBS@ +gif_la_LDFLAGS = -module -avoid-version -L$(top_builddir)/src/lib/ +gif_la_LIBADD = @GIFLIBS@ -lImlib2 zlib_la_SOURCES = loader_zlib.c -zlib_la_LDFLAGS = -module -avoid-version -zlib_la_LIBADD = @ZLIBLIBS@ +zlib_la_LDFLAGS = -module -avoid-version -L$(top_builddir)/src/lib/ +zlib_la_LIBADD = @ZLIBLIBS@ -lImlib2 bz2_la_SOURCES = loader_bz2.c -bz2_la_LDFLAGS = -module -avoid-version -bz2_la_LIBADD = @BZ2LIBS@ +bz2_la_LDFLAGS = -module -avoid-version -L$(top_builddir)/src/lib/ +bz2_la_LIBADD = @BZ2LIBS@ -lImlib2 pnm_la_SOURCES = loader_pnm.c -pnm_la_LDFLAGS = -module -avoid-version -pnm_la_LIBADD = +pnm_la_LDFLAGS = -module -avoid-version -L$(top_builddir)/src/lib/ +pnm_la_LIBADD = -lImlib2 argb_la_SOURCES = loader_argb.c -argb_la_LDFLAGS = -module -avoid-version -argb_la_LIBADD = +argb_la_LDFLAGS = -module -avoid-version -L$(top_builddir)/src/lib/ +argb_la_LIBADD = -lImlib2 bmp_la_SOURCES = loader_bmp.c -bmp_la_LDFLAGS = -module -avoid-version -bmp_la_LIBADD = +bmp_la_LDFLAGS = -module -avoid-version -L$(top_builddir)/src/lib/ +bmp_la_LIBADD = -lImlib2 xpm_la_SOURCES = loader_xpm.c -xpm_la_LDFLAGS = -module -avoid-version -xpm_la_LIBADD = +xpm_la_LDFLAGS = -module -avoid-version -L$(top_builddir)/src/lib/ +xpm_la_LIBADD = -lImlib2 tga_la_SOURCES = loader_tga.c -tga_la_LDFLAGS = -module -avoid-version -tga_la_LIBADD = +tga_la_LDFLAGS = -module -avoid-version -L$(top_builddir)/src/lib/ +tga_la_LIBADD = -lImlib2 lbm_la_SOURCES = loader_lbm.c -lbm_la_LDFLAGS = -module -avoid-version -lbm_la_LIBADD = +lbm_la_LDFLAGS = -module -avoid-version -L$(top_builddir)/src/lib/ +lbm_la_LIBADD = -lImlib2 all: all-am .SUFFIXES: diff -u imlib2-1.2.0/src/modules/filters/Makefile.in imlib2-1.2.0/src/modules/filters/Makefile.in --- imlib2-1.2.0/src/modules/filters/Makefile.in +++ imlib2-1.2.0/src/modules/filters/Makefile.in @@ -57,13 +57,13 @@ am__installdirs = $(DESTDIR)$(pkgdir) pkgLTLIBRARIES_INSTALL = $(INSTALL) LTLIBRARIES = $(pkg_LTLIBRARIES) -bumpmap_la_LIBADD = +bumpmap_la_DEPENDENCIES = am_bumpmap_la_OBJECTS = filter_bumpmap.lo bumpmap_la_OBJECTS = $(am_bumpmap_la_OBJECTS) -colormod_la_LIBADD = +colormod_la_DEPENDENCIES = am_colormod_la_OBJECTS = filter_colormod.lo colormod_la_OBJECTS = $(am_colormod_la_OBJECTS) -testfilter_la_LIBADD = +testfilter_la_DEPENDENCIES = am_testfilter_la_OBJECTS = filter_test.lo testfilter_la_OBJECTS = $(am_testfilter_la_OBJECTS) DEFAULT_INCLUDES = -I. -I$(srcdir) -I$(top_builddir) @@ -220,11 +220,14 @@ pkgdir = $(libdir)/imlib2/filters pkg_LTLIBRARIES = testfilter.la bumpmap.la colormod.la testfilter_la_SOURCES = filter_test.c -testfilter_la_LDFLAGS = -module -avoid-version +testfilter_la_LDFLAGS = -module -avoid-version -L$(top_builddir)/src/lib/ +testfilter_la_LIBADD = -lImlib2 bumpmap_la_SOURCES = filter_bumpmap.c -bumpmap_la_LDFLAGS = -module -avoid-version +bumpmap_la_LDFLAGS = -module -avoid-version -L$(top_builddir)/src/lib/ +bumpmap_la_LIBADD = -lImlib2 colormod_la_SOURCES = filter_colormod.c -colormod_la_LDFLAGS = -module -avoid-version +colormod_la_LDFLAGS = -module -avoid-version -L$(top_builddir)/src/lib/ +colormod_la_LIBADD = -lImlib2 all: all-am .SUFFIXES: diff -u imlib2-1.2.0/debian/changelog imlib2-1.2.0/debian/changelog --- imlib2-1.2.0/debian/changelog +++ imlib2-1.2.0/debian/changelog @@ -1,3 +1,14 @@ +imlib2 (1.2.0-1.1) unstable; urgency=high + + * Non-maintainer upload. + * High-urgency upload for sarge-targetted RC bugfix + * Fix regression in the linkage of the loader modules which resulted +in undefined symbols, making libimlib2 unusable when being +dlopen()ed by an application; thanks to Don Armstrong for the patch. +Closes: #293815. + + -- Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat, 12 Feb 2005 15:19:12 -0800 + imlib2 (1.2.0-1)
Bug#294960: marked as done (wacom-tools_0.6.6-6(ia64/unstable): FTBFS: missing build-depends)
Your message dated Sat, 12 Feb 2005 19:47:22 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#294960: fixed in wacom-tools 0.6.6-7 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Feb 2005 17:53:39 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Feb 12 09:53:38 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mmjgroup.com [192.34.35.33] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D01Sc-00086A-00; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 09:53:38 -0800 Received: from mix.mmjgroup.com (mix.mmjgroup.com [192.34.35.16]) by mmjgroup.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A039C16EDF for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 10:53:35 -0700 (MST) Received: by mix.mmjgroup.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 83FB88F2D9; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 10:53:35 -0700 (MST) Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2005 10:53:35 -0700 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: wacom-tools_0.6.6-6(ia64/unstable): FTBFS: missing build-depends Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.4 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE, NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: wacom-tools Version: 0.6.6-6 Severity: serious There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: Automatic build of wacom-tools_0.6.6-6 on caballero by sbuild/ia64 1.170.5 Build started at 20050212-1345 [...] ** Using build dependencies supplied by package: Build-Depends: debhelper (= 4.1.16), po-debconf, libxt-dev, libncurses5-dev [...] In file included from ../../src/wacomcfg.c:26: ../../src/wacomcfg.h:25:22: X11/Xlib.h: No such file or directory In file included from ../../src/wacomcfg.c:26: ../../src/wacomcfg.h:55: error: syntax error before '*' token ../../src/wacomcfg.c:44:22: X11/Xlib.h: No such file or directory ../../src/wacomcfg.c:45:35: X11/extensions/XInput.h: No such file or directory ../../src/wacomcfg.c:46:36: X11/extensions/XIproto.h: No such file or directory A full build log can be found at: http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?arch=ia64pkg=wacom-toolsver=0.6.6-6 --- Received: (at 294960-close) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Feb 2005 00:53:13 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Feb 12 16:53:13 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D080e-0007eU-00; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 16:53:12 -0800 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D07v0-0006Oh-00; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 19:47:22 -0500 From: Ron Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $ Subject: Bug#294960: fixed in wacom-tools 0.6.6-7 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2005 19:47:22 -0500 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Source: wacom-tools Source-Version: 0.6.6-7 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of wacom-tools, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: wacom-kernel-source_0.6.6-7_all.deb to pool/main/w/wacom-tools/wacom-kernel-source_0.6.6-7_all.deb wacom-tools_0.6.6-7.diff.gz to pool/main/w/wacom-tools/wacom-tools_0.6.6-7.diff.gz wacom-tools_0.6.6-7.dsc to pool/main/w/wacom-tools/wacom-tools_0.6.6-7.dsc wacom-tools_0.6.6-7_i386.deb to pool/main/w/wacom-tools/wacom-tools_0.6.6-7_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Ron Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated wacom-tools package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
Processed: Re: xwhois: server file is not found, program won't start
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 294621 patch Bug#294621: xwhois: server file is not found, program won't start (same problem as in bug #43467) Tags were: sid Tags added: patch thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#294621: xwhois: server file is not found, program won't start
tag 294621 patch thanks An earlier maintainer of this package overrode the default location of xwhois.servers, defined by the XWHOIS_SERVERS macro, by editing the confgiure script. Re-running autoconf erased that change, since configure.in had the original default. I think a reasonable way to override XWHOIS_SERVERS would be to make this change to debian/rules: --- xwhois-0.4.2/debian/rules~ 2005-02-13 01:04:45.0 + +++ xwhois-0.4.2/debian/rules 2005-02-13 01:04:45.0 + @@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ build: test -f config.cache || ./configure --prefix=/usr - $(MAKE) + $(MAKE) XWHOIS_SERVERS=/etc/X11/xwhois/servers touch stamp-build clean: debclean -- Ben Hutchings Theory and practice are closer in theory than in practice. - John Levine, moderator of comp.compilers -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Bug#294964: does not work at all
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 294964 + confirmed upstream Bug#294964: does not work at all There were no tags set. Tags added: confirmed, upstream forwarded 294964 Torsten Schoenfeld [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug#294964: does not work at all Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to Torsten Schoenfeld [EMAIL PROTECTED]. thank you, wonderful Debian BTS! Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#293932: OpenSSL sha module / license issues with md5.h/md5c.c
I've created an OpenSSL version of the sha module. trivial to modify to be a md5 module. Its a first version with cleanup to be done and such. being managed in the SF patch manager: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailaid=1121611group_id=5470atid=305470 enjoy. i'll do more cleanup and work on it soon. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#294719: No need for libproplist0-dev?
Hi, I just tried to compile the wdm source package in Sarge, and it seems to compile fine _without_ libproplist0-dev (which I can't install, indeed). Is libproplist0-dev really needed? According to packages.d.o, the contents of libproplist0-dev are: usr/include/proplist.h usr/lib/libPropList.a usr/lib/libPropList.la usr/lib/libPropList.so usr/share/doc/libproplist0-dev/README.gz usr/share/doc/libproplist0-dev/changelog.Debian.gz libdevel/libproplist0-dev usr/share/doc/libproplist0-dev/changelog.gz usr/share/doc/libproplist0-dev/copyright Of which supposedly proplist.h should be referenced by some source file in wdm, but: 8 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/src/debian/wdm/wdm-1.27$ egrep -r proplist . ./ChangeLog:wdmPrefs will support only proplist format configs. ./ChangeLog:available in proplist config. (geometry, aafonts, ./ChangeLog:resource. PLAccess specifies file inproplist format. If ./INSTALL:3. wdmLogin program uses separate configuration file in proplist format. ./src/libwdm/plcheckers.c: * plcheckers.c: some functions to check correctness of proplist ./debian/changelog: * Rebuild with new libproplist ./debian/control:Build-Depends: debhelper (= 4.1.16), libjpeg62-dev, libpam0g-dev, libwings-dev, libpng12-dev, libproplist0-dev, libungif4-dev, libwraster3-dev, libxpm-dev, zlib1g-dev, xlibs-dev, libxft-dev ./debian/wdmlogin.conf.5:uses the somewhat ill-documented libproplist file format. The file [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/src/debian/wdm/wdm-1.27$ egrep -r proplist.h . [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/src/debian/wdm/wdm-1.27$ 8 The only source file with the string proplist in it is plcheckers.c, which includes it inside a comment... Hmmm -- Esteban Manchado Velázquez [EMAIL PROTECTED] EuropeSwPatentFree - http://EuropeSwPatentFree.hispalinux.es Help spread it through the Net in signatures, webpages, whatever!
Processed: un-fix 292777
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 292777 -fixed Bug#292777: Allows arbitrary command execution from filenames Tags were: fixed patch security Tags removed: fixed thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#287651: [GRASS5] [bug #2877] (grass) Insecure tempfile
Note new experimental grass packages by Steve Halasz can be found at: http://pkg-grass.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?DebianGisRepository Currently at GRASS version 6.0.0beta2 (which among other things fixes this bug). This should be ready for unstable soon. thanks to the folks at the Debian GIS Project, Hamish -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: severity of 206467 is serious
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 206467 serious Bug#206467: libavifile-0.7c102: do not compile on power pc Severity set to `serious'. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
