Bug#234863: evolution: Problem also exists on testing
Package: evolution Version: 2.0.3-1.2 Followup-For: Bug #234863 I solely use IMAP (with a large number of folders and mail), and find memory usage to still be an issue: %CPU %MEM VSZ RSS TTY STAT START TIME COMMAND 0.2 22.9 368620 207944 ? SMar06 2:36 evolution Evolution has been running for less than 24 hours. After shutting evolution down and starting it back up again, memory usage is as follows: %CPU %MEM VSZ RSS TTY STAT START TIME COMMAND 2.7 5.7 123664 51840 ? S09:00 0:02 evolution -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.8 Locale: LANG=en_GB, LC_CTYPE=en_GB (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Versions of packages evolution depends on: ii evolution-data-server1.0.3-2 evolution database backend server ii gconf2 2.8.1-4 GNOME configuration database syste ii gnome-icon-theme 2.8.0-1 GNOME Desktop icon theme ii gtkhtml3.2 3.2.4-1 HTML rendering/editing library - b ii libart-2.0-2 2.3.17-1Library of functions for 2D graphi ii libatk1.0-0 1.8.0-4 The ATK accessibility toolkit ii libaudiofile00.2.6-5 Open-source version of SGI's audio ii libbonobo2-0 2.8.1-2 Bonobo CORBA interfaces library ii libbonoboui2-0 2.8.1-1 The Bonobo UI library ii libc62.3.2.ds1-20GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libcompfaceg11989.11.11-24 Compress/decompress images for mai ii libdb4.2 4.2.52-18 Berkeley v4.2 Database Libraries [ ii libebook81.0.3-2 Client library for evolution addre ii libecal6 1.0.3-2 Client library for evolution calen ii libedataserver3 1.0.3-2 Utily library for evolution data s ii libegroupwise6 1.0.3-2 Client library for accessing group ii libesd0 0.2.35-2Enlightened Sound Daemon - Shared ii libfontconfig1 2.2.3-4 generic font configuration library ii libfreetype6 2.1.7-2.3 FreeType 2 font engine, shared lib ii libgail-common 1.8.2-1 GNOME Accessibility Implementation ii libgail171.8.2-1 GNOME Accessibility Implementation ii libgal2.2-1 2.2.4-1 G App Libs (run time library) ii libgal2.2-common 2.2.4-1 G App Libs (common files) ii libgconf2-4 2.8.1-4 GNOME configuration database syste ii libgcrypt11 1.2.0-4 LGPL Crypto library - runtime libr ii libglade2-0 1:2.4.2-1 library to load .glade files at ru ii libglib2.0-0 2.6.2-1 The GLib library of C routines ii libgnome-keyring00.4.1-1 GNOME keyring services library ii libgnome-pilot2 2.0.12-1.1 Support libraries for gnome-pilot ii libgnome2-0 2.8.0-6 The GNOME 2 library - runtime file ii libgnomecanvas2-02.8.0-1 A powerful object-oriented display ii libgnomeprint2.2-0 2.8.2-1 The GNOME 2.2 print architecture - ii libgnomeprintui2.2-0 2.8.2-2 GNOME 2.2 print architecture User ii libgnomeui-0 2.8.0-3 The GNOME 2 libraries (User Interf ii libgnomevfs2-0 2.8.3-11The GNOME virtual file-system libr ii libgnutls11 1.0.16-9GNU TLS library - runtime library ii libgpg-error01.0-1 library for common error values an ii libgtk2.0-0 2.6.2-3 The GTK+ graphical user interface ii libgtkhtml3.2-11 3.2.4-1 HTML rendering/editing library - r ii libhowl0 0.9.8-2 Library for Zeroconf service disco ii libice6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-10 Inter-Client Exchange library ii libjpeg626b-9The Independent JPEG Group's JPEG ii libldap2 2.1.30-3OpenLDAP libraries ii libnspr4 2:1.7.5-1 Netscape Portable Runtime Library ii libnss3 2:1.7.5-1 Network Security Service Libraries ii liborbit21:2.10.5-0.1libraries for ORBit2 - a CORBA ORB ii libpango1.0-01.8.0-3 Layout and rendering of internatio ii libpisock8 0.11.8-10 Library for communicating with a P ii libpisync0 0.11.8-10 Synchronization library for PalmOS ii libpopt0 1.7-5 lib for parsing cmdline parameters ii libsm6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-10 X Window System Session Management ii libsoup2.2-7 2.2.2-1 an HTTP library implementation in ii libtasn1-2 0.2.10-3Manage ASN.1 structures (runtime) ii libx11-6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-10 X Window
Bug#298351: udev: Bad permissions for all devices render system unusable or mostly so
severity 298351 normal tag 298351 unreproducible moreinfo thanks On Mar 07, Pierre THIERRY [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Please report the content of /etc/udev/udev.rules of the /etc/udev/ directory. I attach a bzipped tarball of /etc/udev. Your configuration is correct, and I do not believe that it can cause what you reported. Please test again udev. -- ciao, Marco signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#298396: new phpapi need php4-spplus source to be corrected
Package: php4-spplus
Version: 1.0-4
Severity: grave
Tags: sid patch
Justification: renders package unusable
Hi,
our web agency use the php_spplus module in debian testing...
Last week, we made an update/upgrade of : php* and apache* packages
(with the classic apt-get upgrade)...
All seems to work right, but not php_spplus.
The payment page, which calls spplus functions (calculhmac, ...) and the
page is not displayed, and apache logs (error.log) contain this :
[Fri Mar 4 11:14:17 2005] [notice] child pid 11375 exit signal
Segmentation fault (11)
[Fri Mar 4 11:14:17 2005] [notice] child pid 11366 exit signal
Segmentation fault (11)
[Fri Mar 4 11:14:17 2005] [notice] child pid 11365 exit signal
Segmentation fault (11)
Well, it doesn't work anymore.
I searched during 3 hours without any succes. I used sources, patched
with debian source patch, recompiled... nothing better.
...
I searched a little bit more, and i think i found the problem...
The zend_parse_parameters function used in php_spplus.c need (now ?) a
different parameter in first argument.
So, the first parameter of each function 'zend_parse_parameters' must
be: ZEND_NUM_ARGS() TSRMLS_CC
So, the 'Segmentation fault' probably came from the
'zend_parse_parameters' function which crashes...
See, in attachment, my diff file between php_spplus.c ORIGINAL file and
php_spplus.c file corrected by me.
I made a quick test with our paiement page, and it works.
Thanks.
-
--- spplus-1.0.orig/php_spplus.c2004-01-19 10:50:55.0
+0100
+++ spplus-1.0/php_spplus.c 2005-03-04 12:19:04.0 +0100
@@ -80,7 +80,7 @@
int iclent_len, icodesiret_len, imontant_len, ireference_len,
ivalidite_len, itaxe_len, idevise_len, ilangue_len;
char *result;
- if (zend_parse_parameters(8, , iclent, iclent_len,
icodesiret, icodesiret_len, ireference, ireference_len, ilangue,
ilangue_len, idevise, idevise_len, imontant, imontant_len, itaxe,
itaxe_len, ivalidite, ivalidite_len) == FAILURE) {
+ if (zend_parse_parameters(ZEND_NUM_ARGS() TSRMLS_CC, ,
iclent, iclent_len, icodesiret, icodesiret_len, ireference,
ireference_len, ilangue, ilangue_len, idevise, idevise_len, imontant,
imontant_len, itaxe, itaxe_len, ivalidite, ivalidite_len) == FAILURE) {
WRONG_PARAM_COUNT;
}
@@ -97,7 +97,7 @@
int iclent_len, idata_len;
char *result;
- if (zend_parse_parameters(2, ss, iclent, iclent_len, idata,
idata_len) == FAILURE) {
+ if (zend_parse_parameters(ZEND_NUM_ARGS() TSRMLS_CC, ss, iclent,
iclent_len, idata, idata_len) == FAILURE) {
WRONG_PARAM_COUNT;
}
@@ -114,7 +114,7 @@
int iclent_len, idata_len;
char *result;
- if (zend_parse_parameters(2, ss, iclent, iclent_len, idata,
idata_len) == FAILURE) {
+ if (zend_parse_parameters(ZEND_NUM_ARGS() TSRMLS_CC, ss, iclent,
iclent_len, idata, idata_len) == FAILURE) {
WRONG_PARAM_COUNT;
}
@@ -131,7 +131,7 @@
int iclent_len, idata_len;
char *result;
- if (zend_parse_parameters(2, ss, iclent, iclent_len, idata,
idata_len) == FAILURE) {
+ if (zend_parse_parameters(ZEND_NUM_ARGS() TSRMLS_CC, ss, iclent,
iclent_len, idata, idata_len) == FAILURE) {
WRONG_PARAM_COUNT;
}
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.26-intelliance
Locale: LANG=fr_FR, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR (charmap=ISO-8859-1)
Versions of packages php4-spplus depends on:
ii libapache-mod-php4 [phpapi- 4:4.3.10-8 server-side, HTML-embedded scripti
ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-20 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii php4-cgi [phpapi-20020918-z 4:4.3.10-8 server-side, HTML-embedded scripti
ii php4-cli [phpapi-20020918-z 4:4.3.10-8 command-line interpreter for the p
-- no debconf information
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#298294: non-free icons
José Luis Tallón wrote: From what i read in icons/readme.copyright, they are licensed under a *perfectly DFSG-compliant* BSD-style license. No. If it would be perfect, it would not have *two* licensing paragraphs. (c) 2004 ONExige.com. All rights reserved. Distribution with open source and noncommercial projects is explicitly granted by including this copyright notice with the copyrighted source code. -this does not allow commercial redistribution, ergo it is non-free. Please clear this up with upstream. Best would be if the whole first parapgraph can be removed. -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#295877: gauche-gtk: FTBFS: /bin/sh: m: command not found
On Mon, 07 Mar 2005 04:49:33 +0200 Lars Wirzenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: With regard to bug #295877: gauche-gtk is missing versioned build dependencies on gauche-dev (= 0.8.3-1) and possibly on gauche (= 0.8.3-1). gauche has been split into several packages and is waiting for NEW package processing (see http://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html). I've verified that those two packages are sufficient to get gauche-gtk to build (but since I don't know the package, I can't test they work). gauche-gtk's control file must be updated to add those build dependencies, and a new package uploaded. Preferably this should be done, I think, before gauche gets out from the NEW queue so that buildds can rebuild gauche-gtk as soon as things are ready. Thanks for your suggestion. Adding the dependency of gauche-dev (= 0.8.3-1), I've prepared gauche-gtk and gauche-gl at: http://www.gniibe.org/oitoite/debian/20050307/ Dependency to gauche-dev is enough, as gauche-dev depends on gauche. This message is Cc:-ed to my sponsor, Takeshi Yaegashi. -- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#298351: udev: Bad permissions for all devices render system unusable or mostly so
Your configuration is correct, and I do not believe that it can cause what you reported. Please test again udev. I did it. The exact problem appeared after the two last bootups. What con I do to give you more details? Reproducibly, Nowhere man -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] OpenPGP 0xD9D50D8A signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#298239: atlas2-base-dev: ..one of you guys need to move `/usr/lib/libcblas.so'...
reassign 298239 k3d-dev thanks Greetings! atlas and blas clearly have precedence over this particular namespace. Take care, Arnt Karlsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Package: atlas2-base-dev Version: 3.2.1ln-15 Severity: critical Justification: breaks unrelated software apt-get install k3d k3d-dev Reading Package Lists... Done Building Dependency Tree... Done The following NEW packages will be installed: k3d k3d-dev 0 upgraded, 2 newly installed, 0 to remove and 4 not upgraded. Need to get 11.7MB of archives. After unpacking 52.9MB of additional disk space will be used. Get:1 http://192.168.2.222 unstable/main k3d 0.4.5.0-2 [10.5MB] Get:2 http://192.168.2.222 unstable/main k3d-dev 0.4.5.0-2 [1175kB] Fetched 11.7MB in 5s (2050kB/s) Reading package fields... Done Reading package status... Done Retrieving bug reports... Done - Sourcerer Apt Watcher - Configure: k3d grep: *.conf: No such file or directory Configure: k3d-dev grep: *.conf: No such file or directory - (Reading database ... 418765 files and directories currently installed.) Unpacking k3d (from .../k3d_0.4.5.0-2_i386.deb) ... dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/k3d_0.4.5.0-2_i386.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite `/usr/lib/libcblas.so', which is also in package atlas2-base-dev Selecting previously deselected package k3d-dev. Unpacking k3d-dev (from .../k3d-dev_0.4.5.0-2_i386.deb) ... Errors were encountered while processing: /var/cache/apt/archives/k3d_0.4.5.0-2_i386.deb E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) ...also see #295663 on k3d (and #296412 on apt-listbugs). -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i586) Kernel: Linux 2.6.10-1-386 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Versions of packages atlas2-base-dev depends on: ii atlas2-base 3.2.1ln-15 Automatically Tuned Linear Algebra ii atlas2-headers3.2.1ln-15 Automatically Tuned Linear Algebra ii libg2c0-dev 1:3.3.5-9 GNU Fortran 77 library development -- no debconf information -- Camm Maguire[EMAIL PROTECTED] == The earth is but one country, and mankind its citizens. -- Baha'u'llah -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Not (yet) fixed in woody and sarge
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reopen 298114 Bug#298114: Nvi: Improved init.d recover file that fixes security bugs Bug reopened, originator not changed. tags 298114 = security, woody, sarge Bug#298114: Nvi: Improved init.d recover file that fixes security bugs Tags were: patch security sid woody Tags set to: security, woody, sarge thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: reopen 298267
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reopen 298267 Bug#298267: foomatic-gui: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends Bug reopened, originator not changed. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#298267: foomatic-gui: still FTBFS
Still suffers FBTFS in pbuilder: dh_python: Python is not installed, aborting. (Probably forgot to Build-Depend on python.) make: *** [binary-indep] Error 1 pbuilder: Failed autobuilding of package Adding python to the Build-Depends-Indep seems to do the trick. -ukh -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Bug#298387: exits without an explanation
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 298387 +sarge Bug#298387: exits without an explanation There were no tags set. Tags added: sarge severity 298387 grave Bug#298387: exits without an explanation Severity set to `grave'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#297725: marked as done (phpmyadmin: cannot load mysql extension)
Your message dated Mon, 07 Mar 2005 08:02:05 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#297725: fixed in phpmyadmin 3:2.6.1-pl3-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Mar 2005 15:03:50 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Mar 02 07:03:50 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from adsl104-static-gw1.access.acn.gr (mail.tzanidakis.gr) [213.5.16.104] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D6VNz-0002jj-00; Wed, 02 Mar 2005 07:03:40 -0800 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail.tzanidakis.gr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 000B8AE5B4 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 2 Mar 2005 17:03:14 +0200 (EET) Received: from mail.tzanidakis.gr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (hermes [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 19972-03 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 2 Mar 2005 17:03:14 +0200 (EET) Received: by mail.tzanidakis.gr (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 2D6F9AE5B5; Wed, 2 Mar 2005 17:03:14 +0200 (EET) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Manolis Tzanidakis [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: phpmyadmin: cannot load mysql extension Reply-To: Manolis Tzanidakis [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8 Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2005 17:03:13 +0200 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Virus-Scanned: by amavis at tzanidakis.gr Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: phpmyadmin Version: 3:2.6.1-pl2-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable After upgrading to current version I get the following msg while browsing the phpadmin/ dir: cannot load mysql extension, please check PHP Configuration followed by a link to the documentation about phpMyAdmin tried to load the extension but failed. I 'apt-get remove --purge' it re-installed clean but it does exactly the same. php mysql work on my box, since it also runs squirrelmail... -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.4.29-grsec Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=el_GR (charmap=ISO-8859-7) Versions of packages phpmyadmin depends on: ii apache [httpd]1.3.33-4 versatile, high-performance HTTP s ii apache-ssl [httpd]1.3.33-4 versatile, high-performance HTTP s ii debconf 1.4.30.11 Debian configuration management sy ii php4-cgi 4:4.3.10-8 server-side, HTML-embedded scripti ii php4-mysql4:4.3.10-8 MySQL module for php4 ii ucf 1.14 Update Configuration File: preserv -- debconf information: * phpmyadmin/reconfigure-webserver: apache * phpmyadmin/restart-webserver: true --- Received: (at 297725-close) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Mar 2005 13:08:04 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Mar 07 05:08:04 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D8Hxs-0003Eo-00; Mon, 07 Mar 2005 05:08:04 -0800 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D8Hs5-00076Z-00; Mon, 07 Mar 2005 08:02:05 -0500 From: Piotr Roszatycki [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $ Subject: Bug#297725: fixed in phpmyadmin 3:2.6.1-pl3-1 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 07 Mar 2005 08:02:05 -0500 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2 Source: phpmyadmin Source-Version: 3:2.6.1-pl3-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of phpmyadmin, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: phpmyadmin_2.6.1-pl3-1.diff.gz to pool/main/p/phpmyadmin/phpmyadmin_2.6.1-pl3-1.diff.gz
Bug#298423: cheops: FTBFS: missing Build-Depends
Package: cheops Version: 0.61-11 Severity: serious FTBFS in pbuilder and apparently all buildds: gcc -g -O2 -Wall -DDEFAULT_PATH=\/usr/share/cheops\ -DLIB_PATH=\/usr/lib/cheops\ -I/usr/include/gtk-1.2 -I/usr/include/glib-1.2 -I/usr/lib/glib/include -DINET6 -O2 -D_REENTRANT -Dlinux -I. -I/usr/include -DSNMP -DHAS_GMODULE -DINET6 -O2 -D_REENTRANT -Dlinux -I. -I/usr/include -c -o nmap-mod.o nmap-mod.c nmap-mod.c:48:18: pcap.h: No such file or directory Adding libpcap0.8-dev to Build-Depends appears to do the trick. -ukh -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#291700: Proposing stable PostgreSQL bugfixes
Steve Langasek wrote: On Sun, Feb 27, 2005 at 10:28:27PM +0100, Martin Pitt wrote: In the light of #291700 I prepared a new PostgreSQL stable upload. It fixes a grave misbehaviour if a database is called peer, and fixes the calling of dpkg --compare-versions which caused the help screen to be printed when installing the package from scratch. Would you accept the following debdiff for stable-proposed-updates? This needs to be approved by the Stable Release Manager, Joey Schulze. I don't know if Joey follows this list. I do. I am not convinced though that this update has to go into the stable release since it's just a normal bug. If you consider it severe enough, please get robster to add a note to the release notes for woody about not naming tables peer. Regards, Joey -- If nothing changes, everything will remain the same. -- Barne's Law -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#298435: maps Courier to invisible (sero-sized?) font
Package: fontconfig Version: 2.2.3-4 Severity: grave Hello, when I configure fontconfig to not use bitmap fonts, I get invisible fonts using any xft application (gvim, flash plugin, firefox) when Courier is beeing requested. It is even worse: urxvt -fn xft:Courier Floating point exception strace shows me that it happens directly after some font providing courier is beeing accessed, eg. /usr/share/fonts/truetype/ms/coue1257.fon Even if I remove one of the courier providers, it crashes on another one. If I enable bitmap fonts, I get some ugly fonts in Xft using applications (except of urxvt, this one still crashes). I cannot explain that. Courier New looks fine, and fonts.conf contains alias familyCourier/family acceptfamilyCourier New/family/accept /alias I have only my truetype fonts from windows, bitstream-vera-sans and few others. root @debian:/usr/share/fonts/truetype$ ls arhangai dustin kochi ttf-bitstream-vera arphicfonts.cache-1 ms ttf-xfree86-nonfree baekmuk freefont openoffice ttf-xfree86-nonfree-syriac My fc-list output: Dustismo:style=Regular Luxi Serif:style=Regular SylfaenARM:style=Regular 8514oem:style=Regular Nimbus Sans L:style=Regular Italic Free Helvetian Condensed:style=Oblique Marked Fool:style=Regular Bitstream Vera Sans Mono:style=Bold Arial:style=Regular Gautami:style=Regular Webdings:style=Regular Verdana:style=Bold Italic Trebuchet MS:style=Bold Italic Serto Malankara:style=Regular Free Schoolbook:style=Bold Italic Dustismo:style= Bold URW Palladio L:style=Roman Century Schoolbook L:style=Bold Italic Luxi Serif:style=Bold AR PL SungtiL GB:style=Regular Free Helvetian Condensed:style=Regular Free Bookman:style=Demi Italic Latha:style=Regular Serto Mardin:style=Regular Kochi Mincho:style=Regular FreeMono:style=BoldOblique Trebuchet MS:style=Italic Bitstream Vera Sans:style=Oblique Domestic Manners:style=Regular Estrangelo Edessa:style=Regular Serto Kharput:style=Regular Wine Marlett:style=Regular Comic Sans MS:style=Bold Nimbus Sans L:style=Bold Microsoft Sans Serif:style=Regular OpenSymbol:style=Regular Luxi Mono:style=Bold Estrangelo Nisibin:style=Regular WST_Czec:style=Regular FreeSans:style=Medium WST_Swed:style=Regular URW Chancery L:style=Medium Italic Arhangai:style=Regular Bitstream Vera Sans:style=Roman Bitstream Charter:style=Bold Italic Luxi Sans:style=Bold Trebuchet MS:style=Regular Serto Batnan:style=Bold Free Paladin:style=Bold Italic Free Schoolbook:style=Italic Tunga:style=Regular Times New Roman:style=Bold Italic Lucida Console:style=Regular Free Courier:style=Regular Free Helvetian Condensed:style=Bold Oblique Nimbus Roman No9 L:style=Regular Arial Black:style=Regular Impact:style=Regular Times New Roman:style=Bold Century Schoolbook L:style=Bold Century Schoolbook L:style=Italic Small Fonts:style=Regular Estrangelo Midyat:style=Regular Verdana:style=Bold Estrangelo Talada:style=Regular Luxi Sans:style=Regular Free Avant Garde:style=Demi Oblique MS Sans Serif:style=Regular Palatino Linotype:style=Italic Free Bookman:style=Demi Nimbus Sans L:style=Regular Franklin Gothic Medium:style=Italic Courier:style=Regular URW Palladio L:style=Italic WST_Span:style=Regular Cursor:style=Regular FreeSerif:style=BoldItalic Penguin Attack:style=Regular Arial:style=Bold Italic Georgia:style=Bold Nimbus Sans L:style=Bold Condensed Estrangelo Quenneshrin:style=Regular Free Helvetian:style=Bold Courier New:style=Regular Palatino Linotype:style=Bold Shruti:style=Regular URW Gothic L:style=Demi Serto Jerusalem:style=Regular East Syriac Ctesiphon:style=Regular MS Serif:style=Regular Nimbus Roman No9 L:style=Medium Italic Free Avant Garde:style=Demi Bitstream Charter:style=Regular Times New Roman:style=Italic Free Chancery:style=Italic Wine System:style=Regular Nimbus Mono L:style=Bold Oblique Vrinda:style=Regular FreeMono:style=Oblique Dingbats:style=Regular Serto Jerusalem Outline:style=Regular FreeSerif:style=Italic Kochi Gothic:style=Regular Baekmuk Batang:style=Regular Trebuchet MS:style=Bold Wine Sans Serif:style=Regular Free Times:style=Bold Bitstream Vera Sans Mono:style=Oblique Nimbus Roman No9 L:style=Medium Terminal Greek 737 (437G):style=Regular WST_Ital:style=Regular Free Courier:style=Bold Nimbus Sans L:style=Bold Italic Swift:style=Regular Courier 10 Pitch:style=Bold Italic Luxi Mono:style=Regular Estrangelo Antioch:style=Regular Dustismo Roman:style=Regular Nimbus Mono L:style=Regular Wingdings:style=Regular Junkyard:style=Regular Dustismo:style= Bold Italic Free Avant Garde:style=Book Oblique Bitstream Charter:style=Italic Serto Urhoy:style=Bold URW Gothic L:style=Book System:style=Regular Tahoma:style=Regular Free Helvetian:style=Bold Oblique Bitstream Vera Sans:style=Bold FreeSans:style=Oblique Courier New:style=Bold Italic Georgia:style=Italic FreeSans:style=BoldOblique FreeMono:style=Medium Free Paladin:style=Roman FreeSerif:style=Bold Marlett:style=Regular flatline:style=Regular Courier 10 Pitch:style=Italic
Bug#295774: daapd: Build-depends on libhowl-dev, which will become non-free or removed
Michael A. Dickerson wrote: I would much rather have the daapd package follow libhowl and mdnsresponder to non-free, if that is really necessary, than leave it in main with the zeroconf support hacked out. I know it is technically possible to run daapd and publish the service yourself without zeroconf, but it's far less useful that way. But, I am not a Debian developer yet and I don't know how to do this. Should I just ask my sponsor to upload the next revision to non-free? I would sponsor your upload to non-free if your original DD doesn't want to. As I use libhowl extensively I think it's a bit of a shame of not having it within main[1]. The technology works flawlessly and it is a nice way to discover network services. Porchdog Software might want to rewrite mDNSresponder in a BSD'ed fashion, instead of using Apple's code for Posix systems. Kind regards, Philipp Kern Debian Developer [1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=289856 PGP.sig Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#298218: marked as done (nut: FTBFS: Missing build dependency.)
Your message dated Mon, 07 Mar 2005 10:47:17 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#298218: fixed in nut 2.0.1-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Mar 2005 18:17:43 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Mar 05 10:17:43 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from astra.telenet-ops.be [195.130.132.58] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D7dqR-0004VO-00; Sat, 05 Mar 2005 10:17:43 -0800 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by astra.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with SMTP id 01859328500 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 5 Mar 2005 19:17:43 +0100 (MET) Received: from Q.roeckx.be (dD5775FD9.access.telenet.be [213.119.95.217]) by astra.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE8EE3284FD for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 5 Mar 2005 19:17:42 +0100 (MET) Received: by Q.roeckx.be (Postfix, from userid 501) id A98C526136; Sat, 05 Mar 2005 19:17:42 +0100 (CET) Date: Sat, 5 Mar 2005 19:17:42 +0100 From: Kurt Roeckx [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: nut: FTBFS: Missing build dependency. Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: nut Version: 2.0.1-1 Severity: serious Hi, Your package is failing to build because you didn't build depend on dpatch. This results in the following error: dpatch deapply-all make: dpatch: Command not found make: *** [unpatch] Error 127 Kurt --- Received: (at 298218-close) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Mar 2005 15:53:05 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Mar 07 07:53:05 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D8KXZ-0003RD-00; Mon, 07 Mar 2005 07:53:05 -0800 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D8KRx-0001gm-00; Mon, 07 Mar 2005 10:47:17 -0500 From: Arnaud Quette [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $ Subject: Bug#298218: fixed in nut 2.0.1-2 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 07 Mar 2005 10:47:17 -0500 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Source: nut Source-Version: 2.0.1-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of nut, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: nut-cgi_2.0.1-2_i386.deb to pool/main/n/nut/nut-cgi_2.0.1-2_i386.deb nut-dev_2.0.1-2_i386.deb to pool/main/n/nut/nut-dev_2.0.1-2_i386.deb nut-snmp_2.0.1-2_i386.deb to pool/main/n/nut/nut-snmp_2.0.1-2_i386.deb nut-usb_2.0.1-2_i386.deb to pool/main/n/nut/nut-usb_2.0.1-2_i386.deb nut_2.0.1-2.diff.gz to pool/main/n/nut/nut_2.0.1-2.diff.gz nut_2.0.1-2.dsc to pool/main/n/nut/nut_2.0.1-2.dsc nut_2.0.1-2_i386.deb to pool/main/n/nut/nut_2.0.1-2_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Arnaud Quette [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated nut package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Mon, 07 Mar 2005 16:29:32 +0100 Source: nut Binary: nut nut-usb nut-dev nut-snmp nut-cgi Architecture: source i386 Version: 2.0.1-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Arnaud Quette [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Arnaud Quette [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: nut- The core
Bug#297743: downgrading
severity 297743 important thanks Hi, since it's not reproducible here and doesn't happen for everyone I am downgrading this to important to let OOo 1.1.3-x go into testing once kdelibs/aspell are ready. Regards, Rene -- .''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/ `. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] | GnuPG-Key ID: 248AEB73 `- Fingerprint: 41FA F208 28D4 7CA5 19BB 7AD9 F859 90B0 248A EB73
Bug#298423: cheops: FTBFS: missing Build-Depends
On Mon, Mar 07, 2005 at 02:26:07PM +0100, Kaare Hviid wrote: Package: cheops Version: 0.61-11 Severity: serious FTBFS in pbuilder and apparently all buildds: gcc -g -O2 -Wall -DDEFAULT_PATH=\/usr/share/cheops\ -DLIB_PATH=\/usr/lib/cheops\ -I/usr/include/gtk-1.2 -I/usr/include/glib-1.2 -I/usr/lib/glib/include -DINET6 -O2 -D_REENTRANT -Dlinux -I. -I/usr/include -DSNMP -DHAS_GMODULE -DINET6 -O2 -D_REENTRANT -Dlinux -I. -I/usr/include -c -o nmap-mod.o nmap-mod.c nmap-mod.c:48:18: pcap.h: No such file or directory Adding libpcap0.8-dev to Build-Depends appears to do the trick. Actually I fixed that already (by removing the pcap include). See 0.61-12, uploaded this morning. But thanks for noticing. Regards Javier signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#298457: kernel-patch-grsecurity2: Security flaw found in grsecurity
Package: kernel-patch-grsecurity2 Severity: critical Tags: security Justification: root security hole Hi, There is a security bug found in grsecurity. The author has released a new version of the grsecurity patch. See: http://grsecurity.net/pipermail/grsecurity/2005-March/000287.html Please upgrade Regards, Matthijs Mohlmann -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.8 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#272206: apt-proxy - supports keep-alive on http 1.0 requests
severity 272206 normal retitle 272206 apt-proxy - keep-alive behaviour broken if pipeling is enabled tags 272206 + confirmed thanks On Saturday 18 Sep 2004 11:27, Bastian Blank wrote: Package: apt-proxy Version: 1.9.18 Severity: important apt-proxy uses keep-alive on http 1.0 requests if it get the not specified Connection: Keep-Alive header but responds in a way which is not understood by the broken clients which sends this header. pipelining is disabled by default as of 1.9.19, and with 1.9.27 I can only reproduce this when I have pipelining enabled. So I am downgrading the report since I think we no longer need to regard it as release critical. Steps to reproduce: 1. add or uncomment in apt-proxy.conf: disable_pipelining=0 2. run: wget -S http://localhost:/debian/dists/sid/Release \ http://localhost:/debian/dists/testing/Release 3. Examine Keep-Alive headers and wget behaviour Thanks a lot for your report Chris -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#249748: marked as done (FTBFS: Missing user in pbuilder chroot)
Your message dated Mon, 07 Mar 2005 18:26:06 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Closing fixed bug has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 19 May 2004 00:27:38 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue May 18 17:27:38 2004 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from zoot.lafn.org [206.117.18.6] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BQEvp-00023a-00; Tue, 18 May 2004 17:27:37 -0700 Received: from localhost (host-66-81-192-63.rev.o1.com [66.81.192.63]) by zoot.lafn.org (8.12.3p3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id i4J0RUxF064196 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 18 May 2004 17:27:36 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) Received: from kraai by localhost with local (Exim 4.32) id 1BQDZq-HU-Qu for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 18 May 2004 16:00:50 -0700 Date: Tue, 18 May 2004 16:00:50 -0700 From: Matt Kraai [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: FTBFS: Missing user in pbuilder chroot Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary=IJpNTDwzlM2Ie8A6 Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i Sender: Matt Kraai [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Virus-Scanned: clamd / ClamAV version 0.70, clamav-milter version 0.70j Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: --IJpNTDwzlM2Ie8A6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Package: smail Version: 3.2.0.115-5 Severity: serious Tags: patch This package fails to build from source: ... debian/fix_sudo chown: `kraai': invalid user make: *** [clean] Error 123 pbuilder: Failed autobuilding of package ... It fails because I don't exist in the pbuilder chroot (it's a much nicer place). The attached patch fixes the build. -- Matt Kraai[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://ftbfs.org/ --IJpNTDwzlM2Ie8A6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=patch diff -Nru smail-3.2.0.115-old/debian/fix_sudo smail-3.2.0.115/debian/fix_sudo --- smail-3.2.0.115-old/debian/fix_sudo 2004-05-18 15:17:59.0 -0700 +++ smail-3.2.0.115/debian/fix_sudo 2004-05-18 15:18:28.0 -0700 @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ #!/bin/sh -if [ `env | grep SUDO_USER | wc -l` -eq 1 ] +if [ `env | grep SUDO_USER | wc -l` -eq 1 ] id $SUDO_USER /dev/null 21 then find . -name 'defs.*' | xargs chown $SUDO_USER fi --IJpNTDwzlM2Ie8A6-- --- Received: (at 249748-done) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Mar 2005 17:26:13 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Mar 07 09:26:13 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from 228.red-217-127-205.pooles.rima-tde.net (correo.serman.com) [217.127.205.228] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D8Lzg-0005w3-00; Mon, 07 Mar 2005 09:26:13 -0800 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by correo.serman.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AF71FF9B; Mon, 7 Mar 2005 18:29:35 +0100 (CET) Received: from correo.serman.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (serman_mta [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with SMTP id 19565-04; Mon, 7 Mar 2005 18:29:32 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.100.39] (unknown [192.168.100.1]) by correo.serman.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD78BFF77; Mon, 7 Mar 2005 18:29:31 +0100 (CET) Subject: Closing fixed bug From: Hector Garcia Alvarez [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Date: Mon, 07 Mar 2005 18:26:06 +0100 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.1.5 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p5 (Debian) at serman.com Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2 This bug was already fixed on a NMU Regards and thanks for reporting bugs. H=C3=A9ctor -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Bug#297798: valgrind test case
Have you tried to construct a minimal test case?
I tried to reproduce the problem with a trivial program, included.
Let me know if I'm missing something already known.
Thanks,
Justin
References
[0] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=297798
#include dlfcn.h
#include stdio.h
print(char *s)
{
fprintf(stderr, %s\n, s);
}
int main()
{
void *v=dlopen(/, RTLD_LAZY);
print(dlerror());
//void *dlsym(void *handle, const char *symbol);
//int dlclose(void *handle);
return 0;
}
Bug#298094: marked as done (FTBFS in experimental)
Your message dated Mon, 7 Mar 2005 12:29:26 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line fixed version was uploaded to sid has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Mar 2005 17:06:24 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Mar 04 09:06:24 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mail-out.m-online.net [212.18.0.9] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D7GFr-00066f-00; Fri, 04 Mar 2005 09:06:24 -0800 Received: from mail.m-online.net (svr20.m-online.net [192.168.3.148]) by mail-out.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 852BE7434 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 4 Mar 2005 18:06:22 +0100 (CET) Received: from sol.so.argh.org (ppp-82-135-1-20.mnet-online.de [82.135.1.20]) by mail.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DD2D59E91 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 4 Mar 2005 18:06:22 +0100 (CET) Received: from aba by sol.so.argh.org with local (Exim 4.22 #1 (Debian) [+prerelease]) id 1D7GFP-0005sl-Jp for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 04 Mar 2005 18:05:55 +0100 Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2005 18:05:55 +0100 From: Andreas Barth [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: FTBFS in experimental Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Editor: Vim http://www.vim.org/ User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: cacti-cactid Version: 0.8.6d-1 Severity: serious Tags: experimental Hi, there seems to be a build dependency missing. please see http://experimental.ftbfs.de/build.php?arch=pkg=cacti-cactid for the full build log Cheers, Andi Automatic build of cacti-cactid_0.8.6d-1 on odin by sbuild/sparc 1.170.5 Build started at 20050304-1026 ** [...] Checking correctness of source dependencies... Toolchain package versions: libc6-dev_2.3.2.ds1-20 linux-kernel-headers_2.5.999-test7-bk-17 gcc-3.3_1:3.3.5-8 g++-3.3_1:3.3.5-8 binutils_2.15-5 libstdc++5_1:3.3.5-8 libstdc++5-3.3-dev_1:3.3.5-8 -- dpkg-source: extracting cacti-cactid in cacti-cactid-0.8.6d su: Authentication service cannot retrieve authentication info. (Ignored) dpkg-buildpackage: source package is cacti-cactid dpkg-buildpackage: source version is 0.8.6d-1 dpkg-buildpackage: host architecture is sparc /usr/bin/fakeroot debian/rules clean dpatch deapply-all make: dpatch: Command not found make: *** [unpatch] Error 127 ** Build finished at 20050304-1026 FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died] --- Received: (at 298094-close) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Mar 2005 17:29:59 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Mar 07 09:29:58 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from dsl092-235-113.phl1.dsl.speakeasy.net (sativa.seanius.net) [66.92.235.113] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D8M3K-0006Gr-00; Mon, 07 Mar 2005 09:29:58 -0800 Received: by sativa.seanius.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id C5A5F15829; Mon, 7 Mar 2005 12:29:26 -0500 (EST) Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2005 12:29:26 -0500 From: sean finney [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: fixed version was uploaded to sid Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=AhhlLboLdkugWU4S Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: --AhhlLboLdkugWU4S Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable forgot to close this one, i guess. sean --=20 --AhhlLboLdkugWU4S Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Digital signature
Bug#267880: Shouldn't be included on sarge
On Tuesday 24 Aug 2004 22:01, Otavio Salvador wrote: Package: apt-proxy Version: 1.9.17 Severity: serious This package is really usable for most users but have a lot of already know and serious bugs so I think is better leave it out of sarge. Well, I think we are ready to remove this now. If version 1.3 had been allowed into sarge I would not be saying this, but I think apt-proxy v2 is now stable enough to include in sarge now without being regarded as completely broken. I am still aware of some fairly serious problems, which are top priority for the bugfixing effort now: 1. huge virtual memory usage. Maybe in the Packages databases, since this only happens after a while. PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEMTIME+ COMMAND 5775 aptproxy 16 0 151m 130m 4356 S 0.0 13.4 0:30.56 twistd 2. apt-proxy-import seems to be broken. What do you think Otavio? Chris -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#298464: libexif10: Vulnerable to buffer overflows
Package: libexif10 Severity: grave Tags: security patch Justification: user security hole Hi! libexif is vulnerable against some buffer overflows. Please see https://bugzilla.ubuntulinux.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7152 for details. You can get the Ubuntu patch at http://patches.ubuntu.com/patches/libexif.security.diff Thanks, Martin -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.11 Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages libexif10 depends on: ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-20 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an -- Martin Pitt http://www.piware.de Ubuntu Developerhttp://www.ubuntulinux.org Debian GNU/Linux Developer http://www.debian.org signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#245391: marked as done (smail: Purging package does not remove log files.)
Your message dated Mon, 07 Mar 2005 18:26:06 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Closing fixed bug has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Apr 2004 21:46:39 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 22 14:46:39 2004 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from dsl254-027-160.sea1.dsl.speakeasy.net (tara) [216.254.27.160] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BGm1n-0002pf-00; Thu, 22 Apr 2004 14:46:39 -0700 Received: by tara (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 73A393685; Thu, 22 Apr 2004 14:46:40 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Scott Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: smail: Purging package does not remove log files. X-Mailer: reportbug 2.56 Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2004 14:46:40 -0700 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-BadReturnPath: [EMAIL PROTECTED] rewritten as [EMAIL PROTECTED] using From header Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 1 Package: smail Version: 3.2.0.115-5 Severity: serious Justification: http://people.debian.org/~ajt/sarge_rc_policy.txt 5.j Purging the smail package causes a prompting for manual removal of its log files. This is a serious bug, as per sarge_rc_policy.txt. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ [0] su -c dpkg --purge smail Password: (Reading database ... 70670 files and directories currently installed.) Removing smail ... Purging configuration files for smail ... Please remove /var/log/smail/* by hand. dpkg - warning: while removing smail, directory /var/log/smail' not empty so not removed. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.5-1-k7 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C --- Received: (at 245391-done) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Mar 2005 17:26:13 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Mar 07 09:26:13 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from 228.red-217-127-205.pooles.rima-tde.net (correo.serman.com) [217.127.205.228] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D8Lzg-0005w3-00; Mon, 07 Mar 2005 09:26:13 -0800 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by correo.serman.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AF71FF9B; Mon, 7 Mar 2005 18:29:35 +0100 (CET) Received: from correo.serman.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (serman_mta [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with SMTP id 19565-04; Mon, 7 Mar 2005 18:29:32 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.100.39] (unknown [192.168.100.1]) by correo.serman.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD78BFF77; Mon, 7 Mar 2005 18:29:31 +0100 (CET) Subject: Closing fixed bug From: Hector Garcia Alvarez [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Date: Mon, 07 Mar 2005 18:26:06 +0100 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.1.5 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p5 (Debian) at serman.com Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: This bug was already fixed on a NMU Regards and thanks for reporting bugs. H=C3=A9ctor -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#290398: kernel-image-2.6.8-2-686: USB memory starts oom_killer, then hangs the machine
My reportbug message was rejected by incorrect mail configuration; copy-pasted here. Package: kernel-image-2.6.8-2-686 Version: 2.6.8-13 Followup-For: Bug #290398 I have plugged my new toy, a 1 GB USB memory stick, into a couple of Debian testing boxes. When I try to copy a file bigger than the amount of RAM available to the system, 512 MB in both cases, available memory (as reported by ksysguard) starts to shrink, while memory used for buffers grows; after a while, all memory is used up for buffers, the oom_killer starts randomly killing processes, and everything slows to a crawl. Copying with rcp and limiting the bandwidth to, say, 1 MB/s only slows the process, with the same result. Once I could kill the copying process, and the system recovered after a while. Usually I have to hard-boot the machine, since not even the console nor ssh is responding. It would seem that the oom_killer is killing something which is then reloaded from disk, leaving the machine in an unusable state. In short, the problem happens in Debian testing when copying files bigger than the amount of RAM to a USB stick. Let me know if you need any further info. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-686 Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Versions of packages kernel-image-2.6.8-2-686 depends on: ii coreutils [fileutils] 5.2.1-2The GNU core utilities ii initrd-tools 0.1.77 tools to create initrd image for p ii module-init-tools 3.2-pre1-2 tools for managing Linux kernel mo -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#298469: php4-gd2: uninstalled when upgrading php4 from 4.3.10-2 to -8, not able to reinstall
Package: php4-gd2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable I upgraded php4 from 4.3.10-2 to 4.3.10-8 last week. Unfortunately this removed php4-gd2 from my system. Today I realized I need this package for an application we're running. Trying to reinstall it fails, so does php4-gd2/unstable because it's not available?!? php4-gd ist not an option because we need version 2. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (50, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.3 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Versions of packages php4-gd2 depends on: ii debconf 1.4.30.11 Debian configuration management sy ii libc62.3.2.ds1-20GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libfreetype6 2.1.7-2.3 FreeType 2 font engine, shared lib ii libgd2-xpm 2.0.33-1.1 GD Graphics Library version 2 ii libjpeg626b-9The Independent JPEG Group's JPEG ii libpng12-0 1.2.8rel-1 PNG library - runtime pn phpapi-20020918 Not found. ii t1lib1 1.3.1-9 Type 1 font rasterizer library - r ii xlibs4.3.0.dfsg.1-10 X Keyboard Extension (XKB) configu ii zlib1g 1:1.2.2-3 compression library - runtime -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: downgrading
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 297743 important Bug#297743: openoffice.org: oowriter crashes short after startup Severity set to `important'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#298464: marked as done (libexif10: Vulnerable to buffer overflows)
Your message dated Mon, 07 Mar 2005 13:17:17 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#298464: fixed in libexif 0.6.9-5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Mar 2005 17:27:05 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Mar 07 09:27:05 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from box79162.elkhouse.de [213.9.79.162] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D8M0X-000606-00; Mon, 07 Mar 2005 09:27:05 -0800 Received: from martin by box79162.elkhouse.de with local (Exim 4.44) id 1D8M01-0005yc-1g for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 07 Mar 2005 18:26:33 +0100 Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2005 18:26:32 +0100 From: Martin Pitt [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: libexif10: Vulnerable to buffer overflows Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=k+w/mQv8wyuph6w0 Content-Disposition: inline X-Reportbug-Version: 3.8 X-Debbugs-Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE, X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: --k+w/mQv8wyuph6w0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Package: libexif10 Severity: grave Tags: security patch Justification: user security hole Hi! libexif is vulnerable against some buffer overflows. Please see https://bugzilla.ubuntulinux.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D7152 for details. You can get the Ubuntu patch at http://patches.ubuntu.com/patches/libexif.security.diff Thanks, Martin -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.11 Locale: LANG=3Dde_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=3Dde_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=3DUTF-8) Versions of packages libexif10 depends on: ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-20 GNU C Library: Shared librarie= s an --=20 Martin Pitt http://www.piware.de Ubuntu Developerhttp://www.ubuntulinux.org Debian GNU/Linux Developer http://www.debian.org --k+w/mQv8wyuph6w0 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFCLI7IDecnbV4Fd/IRAvl2AKDX3CCVgLs2tlo6Jfe7pEDzVM0ojgCg778i L7IgeMWVEfyMuZ3hCOholAw= =1UbC -END PGP SIGNATURE- --k+w/mQv8wyuph6w0-- --- Received: (at 298464-close) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Mar 2005 18:23:08 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Mar 07 10:23:07 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D8Msl-0005ef-00; Mon, 07 Mar 2005 10:23:07 -0800 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D8Mn7-00043h-00; Mon, 07 Mar 2005 13:17:17 -0500 From: Frederic Peters [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $ Subject: Bug#298464: fixed in libexif 0.6.9-5 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 07 Mar 2005 13:17:17 -0500 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Source: libexif Source-Version: 0.6.9-5 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of libexif, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: libexif-dev_0.6.9-5_i386.deb to pool/main/libe/libexif/libexif-dev_0.6.9-5_i386.deb libexif10_0.6.9-5_i386.deb to pool/main/libe/libexif/libexif10_0.6.9-5_i386.deb libexif_0.6.9-5.diff.gz to pool/main/libe/libexif/libexif_0.6.9-5.diff.gz libexif_0.6.9-5.dsc to pool/main/libe/libexif/libexif_0.6.9-5.dsc A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
Bug#290398: Additional information on oom_killer debacle
USB memory stick was mounted as ramfs, since vfat was not working. Relevant line from /etc/fstab: /dev/sda/mnt/usbkey ramfs rw,user,noauto 0 0 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#267880: Shouldn't be included on sarge
|| On Mon, 7 Mar 2005 17:20:44 + || Chris Halls [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ch On Tuesday 24 Aug 2004 22:01, Otavio Salvador wrote: Package: apt-proxy Version: 1.9.17 Severity: serious This package is really usable for most users but have a lot of already know and serious bugs so I think is better leave it out of sarge. ch Well, I think we are ready to remove this now. If version 1.3 had been ch allowed into sarge I would not be saying this, but I think apt-proxy v2 is ch now stable enough to include in sarge now without being regarded as ch completely broken. ch I am still aware of some fairly serious problems, which are top priority for ch the bugfixing effort now: ch 1. huge virtual memory usage. Maybe in the Packages databases, since this ch only happens after a while. ch PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEMTIME+ COMMAND ch 5775 aptproxy 16 0 151m 130m 4356 S 0.0 13.4 0:30.56 twistd ch 2. apt-proxy-import seems to be broken. ch What do you think Otavio? Ok for me. -- O T A V I OS A L V A D O R - E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] UIN: 5906116 GNU/Linux User: 239058 GPG ID: 49A5F855 Home Page: http://www.freedom.ind.br/otavio - Microsoft gives you Windows ... Linux gives you the whole house. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#290398: Additional information on oom_killer debacle
Alex Fernandez writes... USB memory stick was mounted as ramfs, since vfat was not working. Relevant line from /etc/fstab: /dev/sda/mnt/usbkey ramfs rw,user,noauto 0 0 That's your problem then. ramfs is, like the name suggests, a filesystem that resides in memory. mount will ignore the /dev/sda you specified and just create a ramfs instance at /mnt/usbkey. Try umounting it and remounting it and you'll see that the contents disappear. If you specify ramfs without any options the default behavior is to create a ramfs with a maximum size of one half of physical memory. ramfs only consumes memory for what you're using, so when you started copying stuff in there it started to grow and apparently the rest of the system was already using more that half of the memory so once the ramfs got big enough it triggered the OOM. I think this bug can be closed, ok Alex? -- Matt Taggart [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: severity of 297315 is normal, tagging 297315 ...
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10 severity 297315 normal Bug#297315: libX11-6: missing links Severity set to `normal'. tags 297315 + wontfix Bug#297315: libX11-6: missing links Tags were: patch Tags added: wontfix retitle 297315 libx11-6: doesn't ship the .so symlink that libx11-dev ships Bug#297315: libX11-6: missing links Changed Bug title. (By the way, that Bug is currently marked as done.) End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: clone
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: clone 296935 -1 Bug#296935: Setting up of webcalendar fails Bug 296935 cloned as bug 298475. clone 296935 -2 Bug#296935: Setting up of webcalendar fails Bug 296935 cloned as bug 298476. retitle -1 The DB password should be of debconf type password, not string Bug#298475: Setting up of webcalendar fails Changed Bug title. severity -1 important Bug#298475: The DB password should be of debconf type password, not string Severity set to `important'. retitle -2 /etc/webcalendar/settings.php is not removed on purge Bug#298476: Setting up of webcalendar fails Changed Bug title. severity -2 normal Bug#298476: /etc/webcalendar/settings.php is not removed on purge Severity set to `normal'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#267880: marked as done (Shouldn't be included on sarge)
Your message dated Mon, 7 Mar 2005 19:20:46 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#267880: Shouldn't be included on sarge has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Aug 2004 21:01:42 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Aug 24 14:01:42 2004 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from aveiro.procergs.com.br [200.198.128.211] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BziQI-0002up-00; Tue, 24 Aug 2004 14:01:42 -0700 Received: from localhost (200-203-056-015.pltce7001.dsl.brasiltelecom.net.br [200.203.56.15]) by aveiro.procergs.com.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id 112FA5015849; Tue, 24 Aug 2004 18:01:05 -0300 (BRT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64FCF1C0B670; Tue, 24 Aug 2004 18:01:44 -0300 (BRT) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (nurf.casa [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 04529-03; Tue, 24 Aug 2004 18:01:39 -0300 (BRT) Received: by localhost (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 1B7761C0B667; Tue, 24 Aug 2004 18:01:39 -0300 (BRT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Otavio Salvador [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Shouldn't be included on sarge X-Mailer: reportbug 2.64 Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2004 18:01:39 -0300 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at localhost Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Package: apt-proxy Version: 1.9.17 Severity: serious This package is really usable for most users but have a lot of already know and serious bugs so I think is better leave it out of sarge. A possibility is after this bugs are solved we maintain an official backport for it or something like that. Thanks, Otavio Salvador -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (800, 'unstable'), (700, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.7-1-k7 Locale: LANG=pt_BR, LC_CTYPE=pt_BR Versions of packages apt-proxy depends on: ii bzip2 1.0.2-1A high-quality block-sorting file ii debconf 1.4.32 Debian configuration management sy ii python2.3.4-3sid An interactive high-level object-o ii python-apt0.5.10 Python interface to libapt-pkg ii python-twisted1.3.0-2Event-based framework for internet -- debconf information excluded --- Received: (at 267880-close) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Mar 2005 19:20:52 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Mar 07 11:20:51 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.191] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D8Nmd-00051K-00; Mon, 07 Mar 2005 11:20:51 -0800 Received: from [212.227.126.208] (helo=mrelayng.kundenserver.de) by moutng.kundenserver.de with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 1D8Nmc-0007gC-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 07 Mar 2005 20:20:50 +0100 Received: from [83.67.20.196] (helo=feathers.thehalls.de) by mrelayng.kundenserver.de with asmtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 1D8Nmc-00076J-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 07 Mar 2005 20:20:50 +0100 Received: by feathers.thehalls.de (Postfix, from userid 1050) id DEFB08008; Mon, 7 Mar 2005 19:20:47 + (GMT) From: Chris Halls [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Bug#267880: Shouldn't be included on sarge Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2005 19:20:46 + User-Agent: KMail/1.7.2 References: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Provags-ID: kundenserver.de [EMAIL PROTECTED] auth:b46e2b357ea7d4f6cadf4c99fb902606 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0
Bug#298351: udev: Bad permissions for all devices render system unusable or mostly so
On Mar 07, Pierre THIERRY [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I did it. The exact problem appeared after the two last bootups. What con I do to give you more details? Let's start from upgrading to 0.054-2. -- ciao, Marco signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#298473: fwanalog violates debconf specification
Package: fwanalog Version: 0.6.4-4 Severity: serious fwanalog fails to preconfigure during a fresh installation with the following error message. Preconfiguring packages ... /tmp/fwanalog.config.37833: line 10: /etc/fwanalog/debian_config: No such file or directory fwanalog failed to preconfigure, with exit status 1 A quick look at the config script shows that it is attempting to write configuration data to the file /etc/fwanalog/debian_config. However, this is the job of the postinst script, not the config script. All the config script is meant to do is ask the questions for the postinst to act upon. Please see debconf-devel(7) for more information. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: mipsel (mips) Kernel: Linux 2.4.27 Locale: LANG=en_GB, LC_CTYPE=en_GB (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Versions of packages fwanalog depends on: ii analog 2:5.32-12 analyzes logfiles from web servers ii coreutils5.2.1-2 The GNU core utilities ii debconf 1.4.30.11 Debian configuration management sy ii grep 2.5.1.ds1-4 GNU grep, egrep and fgrep ii gzip 1.3.5-9 The GNU compression utility ii mailx1:8.1.2-0.20040524cvs-4 A simple mail user agent ii perl 5.8.4-6 Larry Wall's Practical Extraction -- debconf information: * fwanalog/cron: true * fwanalog/language: us * fwanalog/mailto: root -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#297149: aspell-bn: FTBFS: Cannot find is13194-bn.cset
On Mon, 2005-03-07 at 01:45 +0200, Lars Wirzenius wrote: jaldhar: I'm cc'ing you since you've made the last couple of versions/uploads and might have a clue about finding the missing is13194-bn.cset file. Not knowing any Bengali whatsoever, I don't know if this is helpful, but ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/aspell/dict/bn/ has a tarball that contains u-beng.cmap and u-beng.cset that can be copied to the aspell-bn source directory as is13194-bn.cmap and is13194-bn.cset (the latter may need to be edited to contain = is13194-bn instead of = u-beng at the top). With these files, the package will build, but I don't know if it works. (Hoping to be helpful here, sorry if I'm on a wild goose chase.) Posted a mail to Ankur Core mailing list. Hope to dort out the matter in a few days Thanks -- Soumyadip Modak [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://soumyadip.blogspot.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#290398: Additional information on oom_killer debacle
Matt Taggart writes... Alex Fernandez writes... USB memory stick was mounted as ramfs, since vfat was not working. Relevant line from /etc/fstab: /dev/sda/mnt/usbkey ramfs rw,user,noauto 0 0 That's your problem then. ramfs is, like the name suggests, a filesystem that resides in memory. mount will ignore the /dev/sda you specified and just create a ramfs instance at /mnt/usbkey. Try umounting it and remounting it an d you'll see that the contents disappear. If you specify ramfs without any options the default behavior is to create a ramfs with a maximum size of one half of physical memory. Oops, I think I'm confusing ramfs with tmpfs here but the problem is still similar, you're using ram and not the flash device. -- Matt Taggart [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#298296: sysfsutils bug
Hi, You recently reported a bug [0] in Debian's sysfsutils package. I tested the init script, and it appears to work as intended. I added this line to /etc/sysfs.conf: devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/scaling_governor = ondemand and added two lines to /etc/init.d/sysfsutils: while read key val; do + echo setting $key = $val; + continue; if [ $key -a $val ]; then Now, running /etc/init.d/sysfsutils start yields: $ sudo /etc/init.d/sysfsutils start Setting sysfs variables...setting devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/scaling_governor = ondemand done. So, it may not be functioning as desired, but it is not failing for the reason you gave. The variables are visible within the while loop (but not outside it, I guess). (Well, this is true for me, at least:) Can you confirm that there is a newline at the end of /etc/sysfs.conf? The final line will not be `read` if there is none. Justin References [0] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=298296 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#298478: nicotine hangs with libgtk2.0-0 2.6.2-4
Package: nicotine Version: 1.0.8rc1-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Nicotine Hangs with libgtk2.0-0 2.6.2-4. Downgrading to 2.6.2-3 solves the problem. I don't know if this bug belongs to nicotine or gtk, so feel free to reassign it. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.11 Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Versions of packages nicotine depends on: ii python2.3.5-1An interactive high-level object-o ii python-gtk2 2.4.1-2Python bindings for the GTK+ widge -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Bug#298473: fwanalog violates debconf specification
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 298473 pending Bug#298473: fwanalog violates debconf specification There were no tags set. Tags added: pending thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#298473: fwanalog violates debconf specification
tag 298473 pending thanks * [ 07-03-05 - 20:04 ] Chris Butler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: fwanalog fails to preconfigure during a fresh installation with the following error message. Yes, this problem is fixed in the new version we're planning to upload since a lot of time, but mainly for lack of time we actually didn't updated fwanalog yet. Updated deb available here: http://people.debian.org/~ema/packages/ Testing and feedbacks are welcome. As soon as I'll have some free time to test the new revision as needed I'll upload it. Thanks. ciao, ema signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#298026: marked as done (hyperspec: duplicated subdirectories)
Your message dated Mon, 07 Mar 2005 15:47:22 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#298026: fixed in hyperspec 1.16 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Mar 2005 07:02:01 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Mar 03 23:02:01 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from ip202-36-23-202.ip.splice.net.nz (ip202.36.23.202.ip.win.co.nz) [202.36.23.202] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D76oz-0003lp-00; Thu, 03 Mar 2005 23:02:01 -0800 Received: from ip202-36-23-202.ip.splice.net.nz [202.36.23.202]; Fri, 04 Mar 2005 20:01:55 +1300 Subject: hyperspec: duplicated subdirectories From: Adam Warner [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian BTS [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: text/plain Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2005 20:01:57 +1300 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_10,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: hyperspec Version: 1.15 Severity: serious Severity level chosen to keep this version of the package out of testing. When upgrading the hyperspec package I noticed some unusual error messages: Setting up hyperspec (1.15) ... mv: cannot overwrite directory `./Body' mv: cannot overwrite directory `./Data' mv: cannot overwrite directory `./Front' mv: cannot overwrite directory `./Graphics' mv: cannot overwrite directory `./Issues' Upon checking /usr/share/doc/hyperspec I discovered this subdirectory layout: 11M ./HyperSpec/Body 204K./HyperSpec/Data 1.2M./HyperSpec/Front 80K ./HyperSpec/Graphics 5.9M./HyperSpec/Issues 18M ./HyperSpec 11M ./Body 204K./Data 1.2M./Front 80K ./Graphics 5.9M./Issues 36M . Regards, Adam --- Received: (at 298026-close) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Mar 2005 20:53:18 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Mar 07 12:53:18 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D8PE6-0006GQ-00; Mon, 07 Mar 2005 12:53:18 -0800 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D8P8M-0006Qa-00; Mon, 07 Mar 2005 15:47:22 -0500 From: Peter Van Eynde [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $ Subject: Bug#298026: fixed in hyperspec 1.16 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 07 Mar 2005 15:47:22 -0500 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Source: hyperspec Source-Version: 1.16 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of hyperspec, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: hyperspec_1.16.dsc to pool/contrib/h/hyperspec/hyperspec_1.16.dsc hyperspec_1.16.tar.gz to pool/contrib/h/hyperspec/hyperspec_1.16.tar.gz hyperspec_1.16_all.deb to pool/contrib/h/hyperspec/hyperspec_1.16_all.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Peter Van Eynde [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated hyperspec package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2005 15:58:35 +0100 Source: hyperspec Binary: hyperspec Architecture: source all Version: 1.16 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Peter Van Eynde [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Peter Van Eynde [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: hyperspec - The Common Lisp ANSI-standard Hyperspec Closes: 298026 Changes: hyperspec (1.16) unstable; urgency=low .
Bug#298478: nicotine hangs with libgtk2.0-0 2.6.2-4
Le lundi 07 mars 2005 20:53 +0100, Andrea Cavaliero a crit : Package: nicotine Version: 1.0.8rc1-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Nicotine Hangs with libgtk2.0-0 2.6.2-4. Downgrading to 2.6.2-3 solves the problem. I don't know if this bug belongs to nicotine or gtk, so feel free to reassign it. Well, I'm the one who built GTK+ 2.6.2-4, on this machine, and nicotine is running right now without a problem. Could you tell me how it hangs, and what happens if you run it in a terminal? If it hangs, please hit control-C and send me the output. Regards, -- .''`. Josselin Mouette/\./\ : :' : [EMAIL PROTECTED] `. `'[EMAIL PROTECTED] `- Debian GNU/Linux -- The power of freedom signature.asc Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=
Bug#298351: udev: Bad permissions for all devices render system unusable or mostly so
Let's start from upgrading to 0.054-2. Didn't correct anything. I started udev and it created nodes with the same owner, group and perms as previously. Quickly, Nowhere man -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] OpenPGP 0xD9D50D8A signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#298457: marked as done (kernel-patch-grsecurity2: Security flaw found in grsecurity)
Your message dated Mon, 07 Mar 2005 17:17:18 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#298457: fixed in kernel-patch-grsecurity2 2.1.3-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Mar 2005 16:46:55 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Mar 07 08:46:55 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from openbsd.xs4all.nl (router.cacholong.nl) [80.126.240.96] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D8LNf-00015T-00; Mon, 07 Mar 2005 08:46:55 -0800 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by router.cacholong.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5256CB6A6 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 7 Mar 2005 17:46:51 +0100 (CET) Received: from router.cacholong.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (jgc.homeip.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 15838-08; Mon, 7 Mar 2005 17:46:43 +0100 (CET) Received: from monster.cacholong.nl (unknown [192.168.20.6]) by router.cacholong.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5708C978; Mon, 7 Mar 2005 17:46:43 +0100 (CET) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Matthijs Mohlmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: kernel-patch-grsecurity2: Security flaw found in grsecurity X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8 Date: Mon, 07 Mar 2005 17:46:42 +0100 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at jgc.homeip.net Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: kernel-patch-grsecurity2 Severity: critical Tags: security Justification: root security hole Hi, There is a security bug found in grsecurity. The author has released a new version of the grsecurity patch. See: http://grsecurity.net/pipermail/grsecurity/2005-March/000287.html Please upgrade Regards, Matthijs Mohlmann -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.8 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) --- Received: (at 298457-close) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Mar 2005 22:23:08 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Mar 07 14:23:08 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D8Qd2-00014d-00; Mon, 07 Mar 2005 14:23:08 -0800 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D8QXO-0005SP-00; Mon, 07 Mar 2005 17:17:18 -0500 From: Laszlo Boszormenyi (GCS) [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $ Subject: Bug#298457: fixed in kernel-patch-grsecurity2 2.1.3-1 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 07 Mar 2005 17:17:18 -0500 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Source: kernel-patch-grsecurity2 Source-Version: 2.1.3-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of kernel-patch-grsecurity2, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: kernel-patch-grsecurity2_2.1.3-1.diff.gz to pool/main/k/kernel-patch-grsecurity2/kernel-patch-grsecurity2_2.1.3-1.diff.gz kernel-patch-grsecurity2_2.1.3-1.dsc to pool/main/k/kernel-patch-grsecurity2/kernel-patch-grsecurity2_2.1.3-1.dsc kernel-patch-grsecurity2_2.1.3-1_all.deb to pool/main/k/kernel-patch-grsecurity2/kernel-patch-grsecurity2_2.1.3-1_all.deb kernel-patch-grsecurity2_2.1.3.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/k/kernel-patch-grsecurity2/kernel-patch-grsecurity2_2.1.3.orig.tar.gz A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Laszlo Boszormenyi (GCS) [EMAIL
Bug#298500: libusb-0.1-4: bashism in config
Package: libusb-0.1-4 Version: 2:0.1.10a-5 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 10.4 The config scripts uses '==' for string comparison instead of '=' in one place. This is an unnecessary bashism, and the script is declared as a /bin/sh script. -- Micha Politowski Talking has been known to lead to communication if practised carelessly. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#297918: marked as done (openam: FTBFS: lpc10codec.h: No such file or directory)
Your message dated Mon, 07 Mar 2005 17:47:24 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#297918: fixed in openam 1.1.18+20050304-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Mar 2005 14:47:43 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Mar 03 06:47:43 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from c223012.adsl.hansenet.de (localhost.localdomain) [213.39.223.12] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D6rc7-00061o-00; Thu, 03 Mar 2005 06:47:43 -0800 Received: from aj by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.44) id 1D6sYR-6e-FP; Thu, 03 Mar 2005 16:47:59 +0100 To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Andreas Jochens [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: openam: FTBFS: lpc10codec.h: No such file or directory Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2005 16:47:59 +0100 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: openam Severity: serious Tags: patch When trying to build 'openam', I get the following error: g++ -D_REENTRANT -fno-exceptions -Wall -DP_64BIT -I/usr/share/pwlib/include -DPTRACING -I/usr/share/openh323/include -DHAS_OSS -Os -felide-constructors -x c++ -c main.cxx -o obj_linux_x86_64_r/main.o main.cxx:329:24: error: lpc10codec.h: No such file or directory main.cxx:330:24: error: speexcodec.h: No such file or directory main.cxx:332:22: error: mscodecs.h: No such file or directory In file included from main.cxx:334: main.h:163:22: error: gsmcodec.h: No such file or directory Regards Andreas Jochens --- Received: (at 297918-close) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Mar 2005 22:58:31 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Mar 07 14:58:31 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D8RBH-0006r6-00; Mon, 07 Mar 2005 14:58:31 -0800 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D8R0W-000672-00; Mon, 07 Mar 2005 17:47:24 -0500 From: Kilian Krause [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $ Subject: Bug#297918: fixed in openam 1.1.18+20050304-1 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 07 Mar 2005 17:47:24 -0500 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Source: openam Source-Version: 1.1.18+20050304-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of openam, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: openam_1.1.18+20050304-1.diff.gz to pool/main/o/openam/openam_1.1.18+20050304-1.diff.gz openam_1.1.18+20050304-1.dsc to pool/main/o/openam/openam_1.1.18+20050304-1.dsc openam_1.1.18+20050304-1_i386.deb to pool/main/o/openam/openam_1.1.18+20050304-1_i386.deb openam_1.1.18+20050304.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/o/openam/openam_1.1.18+20050304.orig.tar.gz A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Kilian Krause [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated openam package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2005 01:25:48 +0100 Source: openam Binary: openam Architecture: source i386 Version: 1.1.18+20050304-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian VoIP Team [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Kilian Krause [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: openam - H.323 answering machine Closes: 297918 Changes: openam (1.1.18+20050304-1) unstable; urgency=low . * Updated to Mimas_rc2 codebase.
Bug#297798: valgrind test case
On Monday 07 March 2005 18:15, Justin Pryzby wrote:
Have you tried to construct a minimal test case?
I tried to reproduce the problem with a trivial program, included.
Let me know if I'm missing something already known.
Thanks,
Justin
References
[0] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=297798
It seems the problem only occurs when the library has a missing symbol and not
when it is not found.
I have changed the vg.c as such ...
#include dlfcn.h
#include stdio.h
print(char *s)
{
fprintf(stderr, %s\n, s);
}
int main()
{
void*v=dlopen(xyz.so, RTLD_NOW);
printf(%s\n, dlerror());
//void *dlsym(void *handle, const char *symbol);
//int dlclose(void *handle);
return 0;
}
where xyz.so is an existing library with a missing symbol
I tried with one of my own libs (which I molested a bit) and got the following
valgrind error
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:.../tmp$ val ./vg
==19655== Memcheck, a memory error detector for x86-linux.
==19655== Copyright (C) 2002-2004, and GNU GPL'd, by Julian Seward et al.
==19655== Using valgrind-2.2.0, a program supervision framework for x86-linux.
==19655== Copyright (C) 2000-2004, and GNU GPL'd, by Julian Seward et al.
==19655== For more details, rerun with: -v
==19655==
==19655== Invalid read of size 1
==19655==at 0x1B90C2E7: dlerror (dlerror.c:78)
==19655==by 0x80484E3: main (in /tmp/vg)
==19655== Address 0x0 is not stack'd, malloc'd or (recently) free'd
==19655==
==19655== Attach to debugger ? --- [Return/N/n/Y/y/C/c] qc
==19655==
==19655== Process terminating with default action of signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
==19655== Access not within mapped region at address 0x0
==19655==at 0x1B90C2E7: dlerror (dlerror.c:78)
==19655==by 0x80484E3: main (in /tmp/vg)
==19655==
==19655== ERROR SUMMARY: 1 errors from 1 contexts (suppressed: 23 from 1)
==19655== malloc/free: in use at exit: 964 bytes in 5 blocks.
==19655== malloc/free: 17 allocs, 12 frees, 3374 bytes allocated.
==19655== For a detailed leak analysis, rerun with: --leak-check=yes
==19655== For counts of detected errors, rerun with: -v
running without val yields ... (long path is what I used for xxx.so ... don't
let the pex extension fool you)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:.../tmp$ ./vg
/mnt/buro/fs.permanent/home/u19809/projects/AP/MSP/Server/parcels/MSPApplication.par/i686_Linux__Gnu.arch/debugthreaded_gcc3/MSPApplication_TS.pex:
undefined symbol: AC_d_sprintf
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#298506: libwxgtk2.4-python: Package uses libtiff3 instead of libtiff4
Package: libwxgtk2.4-python Version: 2.4.2.6 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable The wxc.so file (incorrectly) depends on libtiff.so.3: ldd /usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/wxPython/wxc.so libwx_gtk-2.4.so.0 = /opt/lib/libwx_gtk-2.4.so.0 (0x4024b000) libstdc++.so.5 = /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.5 (0x4073) libm.so.6 = /lib/tls/libm.so.6 (0x407ea000) libgcc_s.so.1 = /lib/libgcc_s.so.1 (0x4080c000) libpthread.so.0 = /lib/tls/libpthread.so.0 (0x40815000) libc.so.6 = /lib/tls/libc.so.6 (0x40824000) libgtk-1.2.so.0 = /usr/lib/libgtk-1.2.so.0 (0x40958000) libgdk-1.2.so.0 = /usr/lib/libgdk-1.2.so.0 (0x40aa1000) libgmodule-1.2.so.0 = /usr/lib/libgmodule-1.2.so.0 (0x40ad9000) libgthread-1.2.so.0 = /usr/lib/libgthread-1.2.so.0 (0x40adc000) libglib-1.2.so.0 = /usr/lib/libglib-1.2.so.0 (0x40adf000) libdl.so.2 = /lib/tls/libdl.so.2 (0x40b0) libXi.so.6 = /usr/X11R6/lib/libXi.so.6 (0x40b03000) libXext.so.6 = /usr/X11R6/lib/libXext.so.6 (0x40b0c000) libX11.so.6 = /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.so.6 (0x40b1a000) libpng.so.2 = /usr/lib/libpng.so.2 (0x40be1000) libjpeg.so.62 = /usr/lib/libjpeg.so.62 (0x40c04000) /lib/ld-linux.so.2 = /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x8000) libtiff.so.3 = not found libstdc++-libc6.2-2.so.3 = not found libz.so.1 = /usr/lib/libz.so.1 (0x40c23000) This package depends on libwxgtk2.4 which itself depends on libtiff4, so wxc.so should be linked against libtiff.so.4. This makes wxpython unusable on my system. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-1-686-smp Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C Versions of packages libwxgtk2.4-python depends on: ii libc62.3.2.ds1-20GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libgcc1 1:3.4.1-4sarge1 GCC support library ii libstdc++5 1:3.3.5-8 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 ii libwxgtk2.4 2.4.2.6 wxWindows Cross-platform C++ GUI t ii python2.32.3.4-13An interactive high-level object-o ii xlibmesa-gl [libgl1] 4.3.0.dfsg.1-8 Mesa 3D graphics library [XFree86] ii xlibmesa-glu [libglu1] 4.3.0.dfsg.1-8 Mesa OpenGL utility library [XFree -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: tagging 292777
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10 tags 292777 - patch Bug#292777: Allows arbitrary command execution from filenames Tags were: patch security Tags removed: patch End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#298510: python-gd: adventure.ttf probably not distributable
Package: python-gd Version: 0.52-0.1 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 2.2.1 Adventure.ttf's metadata simply says (c)2000 Neale Davidson and does not include a license. debian/copyright also doesn't talk about the font. Neale Davidson's website, www.protoformproject.com, is down, but according to the archive.org[1] it used to say: These fonts are released as freeware. They may not be sold, manipulated, edited, or redistributed without direct written consent by Neale Davidson. They may be used without royalties for any reasonable purpose. So adventure.ttf should be removed from the package. [1] http://web.archive.org/web/*/http://www.protoformproject.com/Fonts/Catalog_A.htm -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.9 Locale: LANG=nl_BE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=nl_BE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages python-gd depends on: ii libc62.3.2.ds1-20GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libfreetype6 2.1.7-2.3 FreeType 2 font engine, shared lib ii libgd2-noxpm 2.0.33-1.1 GD Graphics Library version 2 (wit ii libjpeg626b-10 The Independent JPEG Group's JPEG ii libpng12-0 1.2.8rel-1 PNG library - runtime ii libx11-6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-12.0.1 X Window System protocol client li ii libxpm4 4.3.0.dfsg.1-12.0.1 X pixmap library ii python 2.3.5-1 An interactive high-level object-o ii xlibs4.3.0.dfsg.1-12 X Keyboard Extension (XKB) configu ii zlib1g 1:1.2.2-4 compression library - runtime -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#298296: marked as done (sysfsutils script unusable (do nothing))
Your message dated Mon, 7 Mar 2005 22:28:19 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#298296: sysfsutils bug has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Mar 2005 13:34:08 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Mar 06 05:34:08 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from postfix3-1.free.fr [213.228.0.44] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D7vtY-Y6-00; Sun, 06 Mar 2005 05:34:08 -0800 Received: from electron.openics.org (aqu33-1-82-233-52-94.fbx.proxad.net [82.233.52.94]) by postfix3-1.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CA431734B4; Sun, 6 Mar 2005 14:34:07 +0100 (CET) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Emmanuel Bouthenot [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: sysfsutils script unusable (do nothing) X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8 Date: Sun, 06 Mar 2005 14:34:56 +0100 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: sysfsutils Version: 1.2.0-5 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable my /etc/sysfs.conf is like : # # /etc/sysfs.conf - Configuration file for setting sysfs attributes. # # The sysfs mount directory is automatically prepended to the attribute # paths. # # Examples: # # Always use the powersave CPU frequency governor # devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/scaling_governor=powersave # # Use userspace CPU frequency governor and set initial speed # devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/scaling_governor = userspace # devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/scaling_setspeed = 60 devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/scaling_governor = ondemand but the script doesn't affect any file in sys, a proof : i've had 'set -x' in the script and the result of /etc/init.d/sysfsutils start is the following : [EMAIL PROTECTED]:26] [/home/manu] /etc/init.d/sysfsutils start + CONFFILE=/etc/sysfs.conf ++ /usr/bin/systool -m + MNTPATH=/sys + '[' -r /etc/sysfs.conf ']' + case $1 in + echo -n 'Setting sysfs variables...' Setting sysfs variables...+ sed 's/#.*$//; /^[[:space:]]*$/d; s/^[[:space:]]*\([^[:space:]]*\)[[:space:]]*=[[:space:]]*\(.*\)/\1 \2/' /etc/sysfs.conf + read key val + echo done. done. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:26] [/home/manu] it seems that the problem comes from this kind of operation : [EMAIL PROTECTED]:26] [/home/manu] echo test | read line ; echo $line [EMAIL PROTECTED]:28] [/home/manu] dash # echo test | read line ; echo $line # [EMAIL PROTECTED]:29] [/home/manu] i've tried with bash and dash and the problem is the same ! it seems to be a well known problem see E4 question and answer in : http://www.faqs.org/faqs/unix-faq/shell/bash/ M. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.11-openics2-k7 Locale: LANG=fr_FR, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Versions of packages sysfsutils depends on: ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-20 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libsysfs1 1.2.0-5 interface library to sysfs -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 298296-done) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Mar 2005 01:35:06 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Mar 07 17:35:05 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from ms-smtp-01.nyroc.rr.com [24.24.2.55] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D8Tcn-hZ-00; Mon, 07 Mar 2005 17:35:05 -0800 Received: from andromeda (cpe-24-59-54-124.twcny.res.rr.com [24.59.54.124]) by ms-smtp-01.nyroc.rr.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j281YtK3014249 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 7 Mar 2005 20:34:56 -0500 (EST) Received: from pryzbyj by andromeda with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1D8Tcc-00024E-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 07 Mar 2005 20:34:54 -0500 Resent-From: [EMAIL
Bug#298296: sysfsutils bug
Le Lundi 7 Mars 2005 20:40, Justin Pryzby a écrit : Hi, Hi, So, it may not be functioning as desired, but it is not failing for the reason you gave. The variables are visible within the while loop (but not outside it, I guess). (Well, this is true for me, at least:) that's true, sorry. Can you confirm that there is a newline at the end of /etc/sysfs.conf? The final line will not be `read` if there is none. there was no new line at the end of /etc/sysfs.conf, now it works perfectly. Thanks a lot, i think you can close the reportbug. Justin M. -- Emmanuel Bouthenot (aka Kolter) MAIL : free.fr / kolter (at) GPG : 0x414EC36E WWW : http://kolter.free.fr JABBER : amessage.de / kolter (at)
Processed: tagging 298167
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10 tags 298167 patch Bug#298167: blender: insecure writing to /tmp/quit.blender Tags were: security Tags added: patch End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#298469: marked as done (php4-gd2: uninstalled when upgrading php4 from 4.3.10-2 to -8, not able to reinstall)
Your message dated Tue, 8 Mar 2005 13:10:16 +1100 (EST) with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#298469: php4-gd2: uninstalled when upgrading php4 from 4.3.10-2 to -8, not able to reinstall has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Mar 2005 18:11:03 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Mar 07 10:11:03 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mail.fht-esslingen.de [134.108.32.78] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D8Mh4-0003tV-00; Mon, 07 Mar 2005 10:11:03 -0800 Received: from localhost (mail.fht-esslingen.de [134.108.32.78]) by mail.fht-esslingen.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B14913E4B for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 7 Mar 2005 19:10:58 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail.fht-esslingen.de ([134.108.32.78]) by localhost (rslx211 [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 04776-09 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 7 Mar 2005 19:10:57 +0100 (CET) Received: from bwlx130.fht-esslingen.de (bwlx130.fht-esslingen.de [134.108.33.130]) by mail.fht-esslingen.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EE8213E2B for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 7 Mar 2005 19:10:57 +0100 (CET) Received: from sontheim by bwlx130.fht-esslingen.de with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1D8Mgy-0002pm-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 07 Mar 2005 19:10:56 +0100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Stefan Sontheimer [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: php4-gd2: uninstalled when upgrading php4 from 4.3.10-2 to -8, not able to reinstall X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8 Date: Mon, 07 Mar 2005 19:10:56 +0100 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Stefan Sontheimer [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at fht-esslingen.de Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: php4-gd2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable I upgraded php4 from 4.3.10-2 to 4.3.10-8 last week. Unfortunately this removed php4-gd2 from my system. Today I realized I need this package for an application we're running. Trying to reinstall it fails, so does php4-gd2/unstable because it's not available?!? php4-gd ist not an option because we need version 2. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (50, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.3 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Versions of packages php4-gd2 depends on: ii debconf 1.4.30.11 Debian configuration management sy ii libc62.3.2.ds1-20GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libfreetype6 2.1.7-2.3 FreeType 2 font engine, shared lib ii libgd2-xpm 2.0.33-1.1 GD Graphics Library version 2 ii libjpeg626b-9The Independent JPEG Group's JPEG ii libpng12-0 1.2.8rel-1 PNG library - runtime pn phpapi-20020918 Not found. ii t1lib1 1.3.1-9 Type 1 font rasterizer library - r ii xlibs4.3.0.dfsg.1-10 X Keyboard Extension (XKB) configu ii zlib1g 1:1.2.2-3 compression library - runtime --- Received: (at 298469-done) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Mar 2005 02:10:47 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Mar 07 18:10:47 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from loki.0c3.net [69.0.240.48] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D8UBL-00088g-00; Mon, 07 Mar 2005 18:10:47 -0800 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=mail.0c3.net ident=www-data) by loki.0c3.net with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1D8UAq-0005iy-Jq; Mon, 07 Mar 2005 19:10:16 -0700 Received: from 144.134.49.192 (SquirrelMail authenticated user adconrad) by mail.0c3.net with HTTP; Tue, 8 Mar 2005 13:10:16 +1100 (EST) Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] References: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2005 13:10:16 +1100 (EST) Subject: Re: Bug#298469: php4-gd2: uninstalled when
Bug#298506: marked as done (libwxgtk2.4-python: Package uses libtiff3 instead of libtiff4)
Your message dated Tue, 8 Mar 2005 13:19:18 +1030 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#298506: libwxgtk2.4-python: Package uses libtiff3 instead of libtiff4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Mar 2005 23:44:04 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Mar 07 15:44:04 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from anumail3.anu.edu.au (anu.edu.au) [150.203.2.43] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D8RtM-uD-00; Mon, 07 Mar 2005 15:44:04 -0800 Received: from rsc.anu.edu.au (rsc.anu.edu.au [150.203.34.4]) by anu.edu.au (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j27Ni0wR027604; Tue, 8 Mar 2005 10:44:01 +1100 (EST) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rsc.anu.edu.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C9201BDFC; Tue, 8 Mar 2005 10:44:01 +1100 (EST) Received: from rsc.anu.edu.au ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rsc [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 03951-18; Tue, 8 Mar 2005 10:43:58 +1100 (EST) Received: from [192.168.0.201] (rsctrw5.anu.edu.au [150.203.34.75]) by rsc.anu.edu.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1A691BDE8; Tue, 8 Mar 2005 10:43:58 +1100 (EST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Aidan Heerdegen [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: libwxgtk2.4-python: Package uses libtiff3 instead of libtiff4 X-Mailer: reportbug 2.63 Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2005 10:43:57 +1100 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at rsc.anu.edu.au Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: libwxgtk2.4-python Version: 2.4.2.6 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable The wxc.so file (incorrectly) depends on libtiff.so.3: ldd /usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/wxPython/wxc.so libwx_gtk-2.4.so.0 = /opt/lib/libwx_gtk-2.4.so.0 (0x4024b000) libstdc++.so.5 = /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.5 (0x4073) libm.so.6 = /lib/tls/libm.so.6 (0x407ea000) libgcc_s.so.1 = /lib/libgcc_s.so.1 (0x4080c000) libpthread.so.0 = /lib/tls/libpthread.so.0 (0x40815000) libc.so.6 = /lib/tls/libc.so.6 (0x40824000) libgtk-1.2.so.0 = /usr/lib/libgtk-1.2.so.0 (0x40958000) libgdk-1.2.so.0 = /usr/lib/libgdk-1.2.so.0 (0x40aa1000) libgmodule-1.2.so.0 = /usr/lib/libgmodule-1.2.so.0 (0x40ad9000) libgthread-1.2.so.0 = /usr/lib/libgthread-1.2.so.0 (0x40adc000) libglib-1.2.so.0 = /usr/lib/libglib-1.2.so.0 (0x40adf000) libdl.so.2 = /lib/tls/libdl.so.2 (0x40b0) libXi.so.6 = /usr/X11R6/lib/libXi.so.6 (0x40b03000) libXext.so.6 = /usr/X11R6/lib/libXext.so.6 (0x40b0c000) libX11.so.6 = /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.so.6 (0x40b1a000) libpng.so.2 = /usr/lib/libpng.so.2 (0x40be1000) libjpeg.so.62 = /usr/lib/libjpeg.so.62 (0x40c04000) /lib/ld-linux.so.2 = /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x8000) libtiff.so.3 = not found libstdc++-libc6.2-2.so.3 = not found libz.so.1 = /usr/lib/libz.so.1 (0x40c23000) This package depends on libwxgtk2.4 which itself depends on libtiff4, so wxc.so should be linked against libtiff.so.4. This makes wxpython unusable on my system. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-1-686-smp Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C Versions of packages libwxgtk2.4-python depends on: ii libc62.3.2.ds1-20GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libgcc1 1:3.4.1-4sarge1 GCC support library ii libstdc++5 1:3.3.5-8 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 ii libwxgtk2.4 2.4.2.6 wxWindows Cross-platform C++ GUI t ii python2.32.3.4-13An interactive high-level object-o ii xlibmesa-gl [libgl1] 4.3.0.dfsg.1-8 Mesa 3D graphics library [XFree86] ii xlibmesa-glu [libglu1] 4.3.0.dfsg.1-8 Mesa OpenGL utility library [XFree -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 298506-done) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Mar 2005
Bug#289838: Thread-safe postgres?
I notice the installation instructions for bacula say Note, if you already have a running MySQL or PostgreSQL on your system, you can skip this phase provided that you have built the thread safe libraries. I don't see anything definitive in the postgresql README.Debian about whether this option was enabled (or other places I checked). Anybody know if this is OK? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#298053: marked as done (Race condition related to Set-Cookie header (CAN-2005-0626))
Your message dated Mon, 07 Mar 2005 23:17:15 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#298053: fixed in squid 2.5.9-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Mar 2005 10:51:21 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Mar 04 02:51:21 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from kitenet.net [64.62.161.42] (postfix) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D7AOu-0002tV-00; Fri, 04 Mar 2005 02:51:21 -0800 Received: from dragon.kitenet.net (24-158-104-74.chartertn.net [24.158.104.74]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN Joey Hess, Issuer Joey Hess (verified OK)) by kitenet.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4219217FE7 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 4 Mar 2005 10:51:20 + (GMT) Received: by dragon.kitenet.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 4BFB66EEBE; Fri, 4 Mar 2005 05:53:54 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2005 05:53:54 -0500 From: Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Race condition related to Set-Cookie header (CAN-2005-0626) Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=WIyZ46R2i8wDzkSu Content-Disposition: inline X-Reportbug-Version: 3.8 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: --WIyZ46R2i8wDzkSu Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Package: squid Version: 2.5.9-1 Severity: serious Tags: patch Please see http://www.squid-cache.org/Versions/v2/2.5/bugs/#squid-2.5.STABLE9-setcookie A race window has been discovered where Set-Cookie headers may leak to an= other users if the requested server relies on the now (since 1997) obsolete Net= scape Set-Cookie specifications in how caches should handle the Set-Cookie head= er on otherwise cacheable content. The patch does not seem to be applied in 2.5.9. --=20 see shy jo --WIyZ46R2i8wDzkSu Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFCKD5Cd8HHehbQuO8RAn/OAJ9jjsAKz54n3o9XfFy3mEp4RaCpwQCgl7// P/+GmjpbJBxOSNc9YCmaA7E= =EYcd -END PGP SIGNATURE- --WIyZ46R2i8wDzkSu-- --- Received: (at 298053-close) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Mar 2005 04:23:09 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Mar 07 20:23:09 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D8WFR-00014T-00; Mon, 07 Mar 2005 20:23:09 -0800 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D8W9j-Rn-00; Mon, 07 Mar 2005 23:17:15 -0500 From: Luigi Gangitano [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $ Subject: Bug#298053: fixed in squid 2.5.9-2 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 07 Mar 2005 23:17:15 -0500 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Source: squid Source-Version: 2.5.9-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of squid, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: squid-cgi_2.5.9-2_i386.deb to pool/main/s/squid/squid-cgi_2.5.9-2_i386.deb squid-common_2.5.9-2_all.deb to pool/main/s/squid/squid-common_2.5.9-2_all.deb squid_2.5.9-2.diff.gz to pool/main/s/squid/squid_2.5.9-2.diff.gz squid_2.5.9-2.dsc to pool/main/s/squid/squid_2.5.9-2.dsc squid_2.5.9-2_i386.deb to pool/main/s/squid/squid_2.5.9-2_i386.deb squidclient_2.5.9-2_i386.deb to pool/main/s/squid/squidclient_2.5.9-2_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which
Processed: retitle #283408 libflash: crashes on epipany for many sites including blockbuster.com
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: retitle #283408 libflash: crashes on epiphany for many sites including blockbuster.com Bug#283408: libflash: crashes on epipany for many sites including blockbuster.com Changed Bug title. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#298517: new version depends on experimental versions of libraries
Package: libgtkmm-2.4-1 Version: 2.6.0-1 Severity: serious Hello, Eager to make sure some of my work didn't somehow regress in the transition from gtkmm 2.4 to 2.6, I tried to install the new libraries out of incoming: dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of libgtkmm-2.4-1: libgtkmm-2.4-1 depends on libatk1.0-0 (= 1.9.0); however: Version of libatk1.0-0 on system is 1.8.0-4. dpkg: error processing libgtkmm-2.4-1 (--install): dependency problems - leaving unconfigured dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of libgtkmm-2.4-dev: libgtkmm-2.4-dev depends on libgtkmm-2.4-1 (= 2.6.0-1); however: Package libgtkmm-2.4-1 is not configured yet. dpkg: error processing libgtkmm-2.4-dev (--install): dependency problems - leaving unconfigured Errors were encountered while processing: libgtkmm-2.4-1 libgtkmm-2.4-dev If I install libatk1.0-0 out of experimental, things seem to work. Can this version be built with the one in unstable, 1.8.0? Josh -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (499, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.9 Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to en_US.UTF-8) Versions of packages libgtkmm-2.4-1 depends on: ii libatk1.0-0 1.9.0-1 The ATK accessibility toolkit ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-20 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libgcc1 1:3.4.3-11 GCC support library ii libglib2.0-02.6.3-1 The GLib library of C routines ii libglibmm-2.4-1 2.6.1-1 C++ wrapper for the GLib toolkit ( ii libgtk2.0-0 2.6.2-4 The GTK+ graphical user interface ii libpango1.0-0 1.8.1-1 Layout and rendering of internatio ii libsigc++-2.0-0 2.0.10-1 type-safe Signal Framework for C++ ii libstdc++5 1:3.3.5-9The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#298267: marked as done (foomatic-gui: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends)
Your message dated Tue, 08 Mar 2005 00:32:15 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#298267: fixed in foomatic-gui 0.7.4.8 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Mar 2005 08:00:38 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Mar 06 00:00:38 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from blount.mail.mindspring.net [207.69.200.226] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D7qgo-0007v9-00; Sun, 06 Mar 2005 00:00:38 -0800 Received: from user-119bq03.biz.mindspring.com ([66.149.232.3] helo=frobnitz.homelinux.net) by blount.mail.mindspring.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 1D7qgn-0003yS-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 06 Mar 2005 03:00:37 -0500 Received: from daniel by frobnitz.homelinux.net with local (Exim 4.50) id 1D7qgn-0003tE-Bb for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 06 Mar 2005 00:00:37 -0800 To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: foomatic-gui: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends From: Daniel Schepler [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sun, 06 Mar 2005 00:00:37 -0800 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: foomatic-gui Severity: serious Version: 0.7.4.6 From my build log, using pbuilder in an i386 chroot: ... fakeroot debian/rules clean dh_testdir dh_testroot rm -f build-stamp configure-stamp #rm -rf build # Add here commands to clean up after the build process. rm -f `find -name '*.py[co]' -o -name '*~'` ./setup.py clean -a /usr/bin/env: python: No such file or directory make: *** [clean] Error 127 -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.9-9-amd64-k8 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to en_US.UTF-8) -- Daniel Schepler Please don't disillusion me. I [EMAIL PROTECTED]haven't had breakfast yet. -- Orson Scott Card --- Received: (at 298267-close) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Mar 2005 05:38:03 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Mar 07 21:38:03 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D8XPv-00082b-00; Mon, 07 Mar 2005 21:38:03 -0800 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D8XKJ-0003mm-00; Tue, 08 Mar 2005 00:32:15 -0500 From: Chris Lawrence [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $ Subject: Bug#298267: fixed in foomatic-gui 0.7.4.8 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2005 00:32:15 -0500 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Source: foomatic-gui Source-Version: 0.7.4.8 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of foomatic-gui, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: foomatic-gui_0.7.4.8.dsc to pool/main/f/foomatic-gui/foomatic-gui_0.7.4.8.dsc foomatic-gui_0.7.4.8.tar.gz to pool/main/f/foomatic-gui/foomatic-gui_0.7.4.8.tar.gz foomatic-gui_0.7.4.8_all.deb to pool/main/f/foomatic-gui/foomatic-gui_0.7.4.8_all.deb printconf_0.7.4.8_all.deb to pool/main/f/foomatic-gui/printconf_0.7.4.8_all.deb python-foomatic_0.7.4.8_all.deb to pool/main/f/foomatic-gui/python-foomatic_0.7.4.8_all.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Chris Lawrence [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated foomatic-gui package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
Bug#298500: marked as done (libusb-0.1-4: bashism in config)
Your message dated Tue, 08 Mar 2005 01:32:25 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#298500: fixed in libusb 2:0.1.10a-6 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Mar 2005 22:41:18 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Mar 07 14:41:18 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from dkg211.neoplus.adsl.tpnet.pl (mp.pl.eu.org) [83.24.10.211] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D8Qub-00040K-00; Mon, 07 Mar 2005 14:41:18 -0800 Received: from mike by mp.pl.eu.org with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1D8Qu2-0002SJ-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 07 Mar 2005 23:40:42 +0100 Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2005 23:40:42 +0100 From: Michal Politowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: libusb-0.1-4: bashism in config Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=ReaqsoxgOBHFXBhH Content-Disposition: inline X-Reportbug-Version: 3.8 X-PGP: 1024D/6B757C5B; 1C98 622F 6A6D 822D 3E95 2626 14EB 98C1 6B75 7C5B; 2004-02-29 -- 2006-02-28 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i Sender: Michal Politowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: --ReaqsoxgOBHFXBhH Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Package: libusb-0.1-4 Version: 2:0.1.10a-5 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 10.4 The config scripts uses '=3D=3D' for string comparison instead of '=3D' in one place. This is an unnecessary bashism, and the script is declared as a /bin/sh script. --=20 Micha=B3 Politowski Talking has been known to lead to communication if practised carelessly. --ReaqsoxgOBHFXBhH Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFCLNhqFOuYwWt1fFsRArxKAJ9FDD+Ojdz1dw7bvWVCet2woLitsACfcZcv IaOpINR7rdEkoj2XMfyHeEU= =vJHZ -END PGP SIGNATURE- --ReaqsoxgOBHFXBhH-- --- Received: (at 298500-close) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Mar 2005 06:38:22 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Mar 07 22:38:22 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D8YMI-000629-00; Mon, 07 Mar 2005 22:38:22 -0800 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D8YGX-0007Ji-00; Tue, 08 Mar 2005 01:32:25 -0500 From: Aurelien Jarno [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $ Subject: Bug#298500: fixed in libusb 2:0.1.10a-6 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2005 01:32:25 -0500 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.8 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS, HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2 Source: libusb Source-Version: 2:0.1.10a-6 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of libusb, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: libusb-0.1-4_0.1.10a-6_sparc.deb to pool/main/libu/libusb/libusb-0.1-4_0.1.10a-6_sparc.deb libusb-dev_0.1.10a-6_sparc.deb to pool/main/libu/libusb/libusb-dev_0.1.10a-6_sparc.deb libusb_0.1.10a-6.diff.gz to pool/main/libu/libusb/libusb_0.1.10a-6.diff.gz libusb_0.1.10a-6.dsc to pool/main/libu/libusb/libusb_0.1.10a-6.dsc A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Aurelien Jarno [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated libusb package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
Bug#295817: marked as done (turck-mmcache: is not loaded - config files are wrong)
Your message dated Tue, 08 Mar 2005 01:47:14 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#295817: fixed in turck-mmcache 2.4.6-10 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Feb 2005 10:21:31 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Feb 18 02:21:31 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from postfix4-2.free.fr [213.228.0.176] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D25GN-0007cw-00; Fri, 18 Feb 2005 02:21:31 -0800 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (michelet-12-82-227-94-173.fbx.proxad.net [82.227.94.173]) by postfix4-2.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CB622BECAF; Fri, 18 Feb 2005 11:21:29 +0100 (CET) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Raphael Fairise [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: turck-mmcache: is not loaded - config files are wrong X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8 Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2005 11:21:25 +0100 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: turck-mmcache Version: 2.4.6-9 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Hello ! 3 problems with newest package: - postinst script tests and writes wrong mmcache.so paths It writes /usr/lib/php4/20020429/mmcache.so instead of /usr/lib/php4/20020429-zts/mmcache.so = it should be based on /usr/bin/php-config --extension-dir as written in a comment at the beginning. - even with the correct path, zend_extension option doesn't work at all. I changed it to a simple PHP extension i.e. extension=mmcache.so, and it works. And now, no more problem with the real path of the .so file. (so, first problem also gone away :-) - postinst writes config in /etc/php4/apache and /etc/php4/cgi but it exists also client line PHP which uses /etc/php4/cli (not cgi) and apache2 which uses /etc/php4/apache2. (I think you should really write a separate file -or a variable?- with mmcache config lines to append it easily to all /etc/php4 config files) And obviously, many thanks for the work! Raph -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.9-2-686 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) Versions of packages turck-mmcache depends on: ii libapache-mod-php4 [phpapi- 4:4.3.10-7 server-side, HTML-embedded scripti ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-20 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii php44:4.3.10-7 server-side, HTML-embedded scripti ii php4-cgi [phpapi-20020918-z 4:4.3.10-7 server-side, HTML-embedded scripti ii php4-cli [phpapi-20020918-z 4:4.3.10-7 command-line interpreter for the p --- Received: (at 295817-close) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Mar 2005 06:53:11 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Mar 07 22:53:11 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D8Yac-0007nx-00; Mon, 07 Mar 2005 22:53:10 -0800 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D8YUs-0007ZM-00; Tue, 08 Mar 2005 01:47:14 -0500 From: Jonathan Oxer [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $ Subject: Bug#295817: fixed in turck-mmcache 2.4.6-10 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2005 01:47:14 -0500 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Source: turck-mmcache Source-Version: 2.4.6-10 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of turck-mmcache, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: turck-mmcache_2.4.6-10.diff.gz to pool/main/t/turck-mmcache/turck-mmcache_2.4.6-10.diff.gz turck-mmcache_2.4.6-10.dsc to pool/main/t/turck-mmcache/turck-mmcache_2.4.6-10.dsc
