Bug#297796: emacs21: FTBFS: timestamp skew issues.
Quoting Kurt Roeckx [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
The problem is this line in your rules file:
debian/autofiles.diff: debian/patches/*.dpatch
${update_debian_autofiles_diff}
This causes timestamp skew issues because the
debian/autofiles.diff file is in the
emacs21_21.3+1-9.diff.gz before the debian/patches/*
so it thinks it needs to rebuild those.
In the emacs21_21.3+1-8.diff.gz file the order of the
files was different so it did not show that problem.
Rob, do you have any idea about how to fix this?
--
Jérôme Marant
Bug#291500: marked as done (cryptsetup_20050111-2(arm): FTBS)
Your message dated Tue, 8 Mar 2005 00:21:42 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line cryptsetup_20050111-2(arm): FTBS has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Jan 2005 06:30:13 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jan 20 22:30:12 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mail.riseup.net [69.90.134.155] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1CrsJA-0005QP-00; Thu, 20 Jan 2005 22:30:12 -0800 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26AD1A2D13; Thu, 20 Jan 2005 22:30:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.riseup.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (buffy [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 20338-31; Thu, 20 Jan 2005 22:30:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from pond (adsl-68-78-127-43.dsl.emhril.ameritech.net [68.78.127.43]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCC80A2CD2; Thu, 20 Jan 2005 22:30:07 -0800 (PST) Received: by pond (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 761CC3A810; Fri, 21 Jan 2005 00:30:27 -0600 (CST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Micah Anderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: cryptsetup_20050111-2(arm): FTBS X-Mailer: reportbug 3.2 Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2005 00:30:27 -0600 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at riseup.net Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: cryptsetup Version: 20050111-2 Severity: important Tags: sid cryptsetup fails to build from source, this is preventing it from moving into testing it appears. Here are the key pieces from the arm buildd log: | Automatic build of cryptsetup_20050111-2 on europa by sbuild/arm 1.170.5 | Build started at 20050112-1038 | ** [...] | ** Using build dependencies supplied by package: | Build-Depends: debhelper (= 4.0.0), libgcrypt11-dev, libdevmapper-dev, libpopt-dev, docbook-to-man, gettext, libtool, autoconf, automake1.8, cvs [...] | Checking correctness of source dependencies... | Toolchain package versions: libc6-dev_2.3.2.ds1-20 linux-kernel-headers_2.5.999-test7-bk-17 gcc-3.3_1:3.3.5-5 g++-3.3_1:3.3.5-5 binutils_2.15-5 libstdc++5_1:3.3.5-5 libstdc++5-3.3-dev_1:3.3.5-5 | -- [...] | Running libtoolize... | You should add the contents of /usr/share/aclocal/libtool.m4' to | aclocal.m4'. | Running aclocal ... | Running autoheader... | Running automake --gnu ... | automake: configure.in: installing ./install-sh' | automake: configure.in: installing ./missing' | automake: Makefile.am: installing ./INSTALL' | automake: Makefile.am: installing ./COPYING' | configure.in: 5: required file ./config.h.in]' not found | Makefile.am:1: AM_GNU_GETTEXT in configure.in' but intl' not in SUBDIRS | automake: Makefile.am: AM_GNU_GETTEXT in configure.in' but | ALL_LINGUAS' not defined | lib/Makefile.am:4: bad macro name _LIBDEVMAPPER_LIBADD' | lib/Makefile.am:5: bad macro name _LIBDEVMAPPER_SOURCES' | lib/Makefile.am:6: bad macro name _LIBDEVMAPPER_CFLAGS' | lib/Makefile.am:12: bad macro name _LIBDEVMAPPER_SHLIB' | lib/Makefile.am:16: bad macro name _LIBGCRYPT_LIBADD' | lib/Makefile.am:17: bad macro name _LIBGCRYPT_SOURCES' | lib/Makefile.am:18: bad macro name _LIBGCRYPT_CFLAGS' | lib/Makefile.am:24: bad macro name _LIBGCRYPT_SHLIB' | lib/Makefile.am:50: bad macro name _STATIC_LIBRARY' | lib/Makefile.am:16: invalid unused variable name: _LIBGCRYPT_LIBADD' | lib/Makefile.am:5: invalid unused variable name: _LIBDEVMAPPER_SOURCES' | lib/Makefile.am:17: invalid unused variable name: _LIBGCRYPT_SOURCES' | lib/Makefile.am:4: invalid unused variable name: _LIBDEVMAPPER_LIBADD' [...] | /usr/bin/make | make[1]: Entering directory /build/buildd/cryptsetup-20050111' | make[2]: Entering directory /build/buildd/cryptsetup-20050111' | cd . autoheader | make[2]: Leaving directory
Processed: This bug provided a patch
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 298114 patch Bug#298114: Nvi: Improved init.d recover file that fixes security bugs Tags were: sarge woody security Tags added: patch thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Fixed in NMU of susv3 6.1
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 279483 + fixed Bug#279483: susv3: unpacks permissions from tarball There were no tags set. Tags added: fixed quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Fix and NMU
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 279483 patch pending Bug#279483: susv3: unpacks permissions from tarball Tags were: fixed Tags added: patch, pending thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: mkfs.vfat doesn't work on dm-crypt devices
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 286219 important Bug#286219: mkfs.vfat doesn't work on dm-crypt devices Severity set to `important'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Patch for this bug (temporary)
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 296311 serious Bug#296311: Unable to update to the latest version Severity set to `serious'. merge 292176 296311 Bug#292176: knetfilter: icons in wrong directory Bug#296311: Unable to update to the latest version Merged 292176 296311. tags 292176 patch Bug#292176: knetfilter: icons in wrong directory Tags were: sid Bug#296311: Unable to update to the latest version Tags added: patch thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#286219: mkfs.vfat doesn't work on dm-crypt devices
severity 286219 important thanks Hi Bas, I'm upgrading the severity of this bug, as this should be fixed for sarge. I'm re-downgrading this bug, as I don't see anything release-critical about being unable to support legacy filesystems on Linux-specific devices (such as LVM or dm-crypt). If you re-upgrade the bug, please explain why it is not acceptable to release sarge without this functionality (which, AIUI, has never existed before). Cheers, -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#279483: Fix and NMU
tags 279483 patch pending thanks The attached patch should fix this, I'm making a NMU upload as this RC bug has been over 4 months unanswered. Regards Javier diff -Nru susv3-6/debian/changelog susv3-6.1/debian/changelog --- susv3-6/debian/changelog2004-10-26 23:57:11.0 +0200 +++ susv3-6.1/debian/changelog 2005-03-08 09:48:58.0 +0100 @@ -1,3 +1,13 @@ +susv3 (6.1) unstable; urgency=low + + * NMU. 0-day as this is a rather easy fix and there has been no response +from the maintainer since this was brought up 4 months ago. + * Do not preserve ownership or users when untarring the downloaded files +by using --no-same-owner --no-same-permissions +(Closes: #279483) + + -- Javier Fernandez-Sanguino Pen~a [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue, 8 Mar 2005 09:47:32 +0100 + susv3 (6) unstable; urgency=low * Initial release (Closes: #274957) diff -Nru susv3-6/debian/postinst susv3-6.1/debian/postinst --- susv3-6/debian/postinst 2003-12-18 16:57:04.0 +0100 +++ susv3-6.1/debian/postinst 2005-03-08 09:47:28.0 +0100 @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ echo Fetching file... wget -P $TMPDIR http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/007904975/download/susv3.tar.bz2 echo Untaring... -bunzip2 -cd $TMPDIR/susv3.tar.bz2 | tar xf - -C /usr/share/doc/susv3 +bunzip2 -cd $TMPDIR/susv3.tar.bz2 | tar xf - -C /usr/share/doc/susv3 --no-same-permissions --no-same-owner rm -rf $TMPDIR signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Processed: tagging 298517
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10 tags 298517 sid Bug#298517: new version depends on experimental versions of libraries There were no tags set. Tags added: sid End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#290398: Additional information on oom_killer debacle
You are completely right, Matt; sorry for the trouble caused. I realized yesterday, after sending the report, that I was doing something terribly wrong :( Anyway, thanks for the prompt response. It's always reassuring to see that response is so great in Debian support :) Alex. On Mon, 07 Mar 2005 11:40:31 -0800, Matt Taggart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Matt Taggart writes... Alex Fernandez writes... USB memory stick was mounted as ramfs, since vfat was not working. Relevant line from /etc/fstab: /dev/sda/mnt/usbkey ramfs rw,user,noauto 0 0 That's your problem then. ramfs is, like the name suggests, a filesystem that resides in memory. mount will ignore the /dev/sda you specified and just create a ramfs instance at /mnt/usbkey. Try umounting it and remounting it an d you'll see that the contents disappear. If you specify ramfs without any options the default behavior is to create a ramfs with a maximum size of one half of physical memory. Oops, I think I'm confusing ramfs with tmpfs here but the problem is still similar, you're using ram and not the flash device. -- Matt Taggart [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Fixed in NMU of knetfilter 3.3.1-1.1
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 292176 + fixed Bug#292176: knetfilter: icons in wrong directory Tags were: patch sid Bug#296311: Unable to update to the latest version Tags added: fixed tag 296311 + fixed Bug#296311: Unable to update to the latest version Tags were: fixed patch sid Bug#292176: knetfilter: icons in wrong directory Tags added: fixed quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#298517: new version depends on experimental versions of libraries
Joshua Kwan wrote: Package: libgtkmm-2.4-1 Version: 2.6.0-1 Severity: serious Hello, Eager to make sure some of my work didn't somehow regress in the transition from gtkmm 2.4 to 2.6, I tried to install the new libraries out of incoming: dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of libgtkmm-2.4-1: libgtkmm-2.4-1 depends on libatk1.0-0 (= 1.9.0); however: Version of libatk1.0-0 on system is 1.8.0-4. dpkg: error processing libgtkmm-2.4-1 (--install): dependency problems - leaving unconfigured dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of libgtkmm-2.4-dev: libgtkmm-2.4-dev depends on libgtkmm-2.4-1 (= 2.6.0-1); however: Package libgtkmm-2.4-1 is not configured yet. dpkg: error processing libgtkmm-2.4-dev (--install): dependency problems - leaving unconfigured Errors were encountered while processing: libgtkmm-2.4-1 libgtkmm-2.4-dev If I install libatk1.0-0 out of experimental, things seem to work. Can this version be built with the one in unstable, 1.8.0? Huh, how did I not notice that? According to the configure script, 1.9.0 is required. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#298351: udev: Bad permissions for all devices render system unusable or mostly so
On Mar 08, Pierre THIERRY [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In developer's documentation, or in the users' one? I didn't find the info (and it should really be visible, as it can break everything). In udev(8) and README.Debian, at least. -- ciao, Marco signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Processed: severity of 284736 is important
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10 severity 284736 important Bug#284736: install: Installer overwrites user data without warning Severity set to `important'. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: your mail
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 297810 important Bug#297810: plone: Install products in an unusable directory Severity set to `important'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: This is not a 'grave' bug, adjusting
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 298072 wishlist Bug#298072: does not contain any examples, tutorials and documentation Severity set to `wishlist'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#297810: (no subject)
severity 297810 important thanks I agree that this is a bug, but it's no more than an important bug because it does not render the package unusable to everyone, just those using Zope2.7. In fact, I am not even sure whether this isn't just a plain wishlist bug. Anyway, my suggested fix would be to install Plone products to /usr/share/plone/Products, and then to symlink them individually to the two Zope hierarchies. However, this fails when the two Zope instances use different Python versions (which they do), because of pre-compiled modules. Thus, short of installing plone twice, I do not see an easy way out. Maybe then it would be possible to filter out common stuff into plone-common. Note that I copied the Debian Zope developers list. I hope they have already worked out a policy for this. Otherwise we will need to get thinking about one soon! -- .''`. martin f. krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED] : :' :proud Debian developer, admin, user, and author `. `'` `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system Invalid/expired PGP subkeys? Use subkeys.pgp.net as keyserver! signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#298558: perl: FTBFS: Errno architecture does not match executable architecture
Package: perl Version: 5.8.4-7 Severity: serious perl will suffer FTBFS if the kernel revision at build-time of the previously installed perl does not match the current one. Log from a pbuilder: sh mv-if-diff configpm.tmp lib/Config.pm ./miniperl -Ilib lib/lib_pm.PL Extracting lib.pm (with variable substitutions) AutoSplitting perl library ./miniperl -Ilib -e 'use AutoSplit; \ autosplit_lib_modules(@ARGV)' lib/*.pm Errno architecture (i386-linux-thread-multi-2.4.27-ti1211) does not match executable architecture (i386-linux-thread-multi-2.6.10) at /usr/lib/perl/5.8/Errno.pm line 11. Compilation failed in require at lib/File/Path.pm line 166. BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at lib/File/Path.pm line 166. Compilation failed in require at lib/AutoSplit.pm line 8. BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at lib/AutoSplit.pm line 8. Compilation failed in require at -e line 1. BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at -e line 1. make[1]: *** [preplibrary] Error 9 make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/perl-5.8.4' make: *** [perl.static] Error 2 Thus, during build-time, /usr/lib/perl/5.8/Errno.pm is probed, and if the kernel revision doesn't match the current one, it fails. I have verified that this happens on i386, alpha and amd64. It _appears_ that something applied in patch set 10 introduces this. Reversing it by 'patch -R -p1 debian/patches/10_fix_file_path' before build avoids the above issue. But I really have no clue what's going on here. -ukh -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#279483: Fix and NMU
On Tue, Mar 08, 2005 at 10:22:54AM +0100, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote: tags 279483 patch pending thanks The attached patch should fix this, I'm making a NMU upload as this RC bug has been over 4 months unanswered. Same as #279484 (susv2). Are you planning on NMU that too? BTW; I talked to the maintainer Jan 13, 2005, and he indicated that he hoped to upload shortly (but appears to have been bitten by Real Life). Justin References [0] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=279484
Bug#298469: php4-gd2: uninstalled when upgrading php4 from 4.3.10-2 to -8, not able to reinstall
On Mon, Mar 07, 2005 at 07:10:56PM +0100, Stefan Sontheimer wrote: Package: php4-gd2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable I upgraded php4 from 4.3.10-2 to 4.3.10-8 last week. Unfortunately this removed php4-gd2 from my system. Today I realized I need this package for an application we're running. Trying to reinstall it fails, so does php4-gd2/unstable because it's not available?!? php4-gd ist not an option because we need version 2. In the interest of making your setup work again, php4-gd2 is still available in stable: http://packages.debian.org/cgi-bin/search_packages.pl?searchon=namesversion=allexact=1keywords=php4-gd2 Justin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: severity of 298556 is grave
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10 severity 298556 grave Bug#298556: libgnupg-perl: Can not decrypt with gnupg 1.2.5 (changed gpg API) Severity set to `grave'. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Bug#298556: libgnupg-perl: Can not decrypt with gnupg 1.2.5 (changed gpg API)
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 298556 patch Bug#298556: libgnupg-perl: Can not decrypt with gnupg 1.2.5 (changed gpg API) There were no tags set. Tags added: patch thanks for all the fish Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: patch
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 294746 +patch Bug#294746: libantlr-dev is empty Tags were: sid Tags added: patch The line that does the actual building for libantlr-dev was commented Unknown command or malformed arguments to command. out in debian/rules. Unknown command or malformed arguments to command. Here is a patch which fixes this: Unknown command or malformed arguments to command. --- rules 2005-03-08 09:07:39.0 -0500 Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#294746: patch
tags 294746 +patch The line that does the actual building for libantlr-dev was commented out in debian/rules. Here is a patch which fixes this: --- rules 2005-03-08 09:07:39.0 -0500 +++ rules.fixed 2005-03-08 09:08:46.0 -0500 @@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ dh_testroot dh_clean -k dh_installdirs -# cd lib/cpp; $(MAKE) install prefix=`pwd`/../../debian/libantlr-dev/usr + cd lib/cpp; $(MAKE) install prefix=`pwd`/../../debian/libantlr-dev/usr install -m755 cantlr debian/cantlr/usr/bin # Build architecture-independent files here. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#298257: tetex-bin: [ARM] FTBFS on experimental?
Kenshi Muto [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: Package: tetex-bin Version: 2.99.12.20050203-beta-1 Severity: serious Tags: experimental I put tetex-bin 2.99.12.20050203-beta-1 to my arm buildd queue. As you mentioned ago, I installed tetex-base 2.99.9.20050111-beta-2. Unfortunatelly build process looked go infinite loop. I'm currently preparing an upload that should fix this. Hmm, Is this buildd's time problem? buildd is working with UTC clock. No, it was a real bug in the Makefile. It just happened that my machine had the right timing to never trigger it - some sleeps at the right places, and it could be reproduced here. Regards, Frank -- Frank Küster Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich Debian Developer
Bug#289182: kino endianness issues on powerpc
On Mon, Feb 14, 2005 at 05:41:26PM +0100, Michael Schmitz wrote:
I can confirm the XV problem is the same old problem that a patch had
been posted for in http://jira.schirmacher.de/jira-kino/browse/KINO-76.
I've added some #ifdef __BIG_ENDIAN__ around that, the following patch
should finally fix the display issue:
Err, this patch did fix the display problems for you!? It does not touch
a single line of code that was executed in the Debian build that uses
libdv to do the decoding. (Actually, this is no longer true as of today.
Now with ffmpeg in main, I've uploaded a new version that uses
libavcodec instead of libdv for the decoding part.) Furthermore, it
looks obviously buggy. Eg. the little-endian version of the first loop
uses values Y[0] and Y[1], while the big-endian variant reuses Y[0]
twice. And I can't make sense of the other array indices, either. I was
expecting something like dest_big_endian = bswap_32(dest_little_endian);
maybe that's what was intended, and the current version of the patch
makes little difference with smooth input data? Anyway, what I remember
from years ago, Xv did expect image data in host-endian format with DRI
turned off, and in PCI-endian (little-endian) format with DRI turned on.
I'd be very interested to know whether this still holds true. (Cc'ing
debian-powerpc, hoping someone there might be able to help.)
--- src/frame.cc.org 2005-02-14 16:59:13.798585200 +0100
+++ src/frame.cc 2005-02-14 17:14:01.196680184 +0100
@@ -1052,7 +1052,11 @@
for ( int x = 0; x width; x += 2 )
{
+#if defined __BIG_ENDIAN__ || defined _BIG_ENDIAN
+ *reinterpret_castuint32_t*( dest ) = Cr[ 0 ]
+ ( Y[ 0 ] 8 ) + ( Cb[ 1 ] 16 ) + ( Y[ 0 ] 24 );
+#else
*reinterpret_castuint32_t*( dest ) = Y[ 0 ] +
( Cb[ 0 ] 8 ) + ( Y[ 1 ] 16 ) + ( Cr[ 0 ] 24 );
+#endif
dest += 4;
Y += 2;
@@ -1071,8 +1075,13 @@
for ( int x = 0; x width; x += 4 )
{
+#if defined __BIG_ENDIAN__ || defined _BIG_ENDIAN
+ *reinterpret_castuint32_t*( dest ) = Cr[ 0 ]
+ ( Y[ 0 ] 8 ) + ( Cb[ 1 ] 16 ) + ( Y[ 0 ] 24 );
+ *reinterpret_castuint32_t*( dest + 4 ) = Cr[
2 ] + ( Y[ 0 ] 8 ) + ( Cb[ 3 ] 16 ) + ( Y[ 0 ] 24 );
+#else
*reinterpret_castuint32_t*( dest ) = Y[ 0 ] +
( Cb[ 0 ] 8 ) + ( Y[ 1 ] 16 ) + ( Cr[ 0 ] 24 );
*reinterpret_castuint32_t*( dest + 4 ) = Y[ 2
] + ( Cb[ 0 ] 8 ) + ( Y[ 3 ] 16 ) + ( Cr[ 0 ] 24 );
+#endif
dest += 8;
Y += 4;
Waiting for your audio export fix now :-)
I've uploaded kino 0.75-5 that should make the archive by today's
dinstall run. It includes a comprehensive patch that might fix the
endianness problems with audio. Alas, I had to do some guessing on the
endianness of the input data, so it might actually do worse than before,
but in any case the framework is now in place to fix this with a few
keypresses. The second change in 0.75-5 related to this bug was the
mentioned switch from libdv to libavcodec for video decoding. There's a
small chance that it fixes the display problem out of the box already.
Otherwise, I'll have to apply a cleaned up version of the cited patch.
In any case, this move should significantly boost decoding performance
on non-x86 and bring us a bit closer to getting kino usable on ppc and
friends as well.
Regards,
Daniel.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#298469: php4-gd2: uninstalled when upgrading php4 from 4.3.10-2 to -8, not able to reinstall
Justin Pryzby schrieb: In the interest of making your setup work again, php4-gd2 is still available in stable: http://packages.debian.org/cgi-bin/search_packages.pl?searchon=namesversion=allexact=1keywords=php4-gd2 Hallo Justin, thank you for your answer. On my system (testing) this doesn't work: # apt-get --simulate install php4-gd2/stable Reading Package Lists... Done Building Dependency Tree... Done Selected version 3:4.1.2-2 (Debian:3.0r4/stable) for php4-gd2 Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable distribution that some required packages have not yet been created or been moved out of Incoming. Since you only requested a single operation it is extremely likely that the package is simply not installable and a bug report against that package should be filed. The following information may help to resolve the situation: The following packages have unmet dependencies: php4-gd2: Depends: zendapi-20010901 E: Broken packages And going back to php4-*, version 4.1.2, in stable is impossible, because the application needs PHP = 4.3.x. Stefan Sontheimer -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#286186: marked as done (libfox1.2: package overwrite with op-calculator-fb)
Your message dated Tue, 8 Mar 2005 15:39:53 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Fixed in 1.2.4-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Dec 2004 07:50:13 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Dec 17 23:50:13 2004 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from bal.lis.inpg.fr [195.220.21.15] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1CfZLw-0003P6-00; Fri, 17 Dec 2004 23:50:13 -0800 Received: from smtpc.lis.inpg.Fr (smtpc.lis.inpg.fr [195.220.21.17]) by bal.lis.inpg.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8AD63067C2; Sat, 18 Dec 2004 08:49:38 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtpc.lis.inpg.Fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA1AE2C80F9; Sat, 18 Dec 2004 08:49:41 +0100 (CET) Received: from smtpc.lis.inpg.Fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtpc.lis.inpg.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 27826-04; Sat, 18 Dec 2004 08:49:38 +0100 (CET) Received: from irancy.lis.inpg.fr (irancy.lis.inpg.fr [195.220.21.167]) by smtpc.lis.inpg.Fr (Postfix) with SMTP id 506412C80F4; Sat, 18 Dec 2004 08:49:38 +0100 (CET) Received: by irancy.lis.inpg.fr (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Sat, 18 Dec 2004 08:49:38 +0100 From: Laurent Bonnaud [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: libfox1.2: package overwrite with op-calculator-fb X-Mailer: reportbug 3.4 Date: Sat, 18 Dec 2004 08:49:38 +0100 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at lis.inpg.fr Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Package: libfox1.2 Version: 1.2.4-1 Severity: serious Tags: experimental Justification: Policy 1.2.3 Hi, here is the problem: Unpacking libfox1.2 (from .../libfox1.2_1.2.4-1_i386.deb) ... dpkg - warning, overriding problem because --force enabled: trying to overwrite `/usr/bin/calculator', which is also in package op-calculator-fb -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.9-1-686 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) Versions of packages libfox1.2 depends on: ii libbz2-1.0 1.0.2-2 high-quality block-sorting file co ii libc62.3.2.ds1-19GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libcupsys2-gnutls10 1.1.22-1Common UNIX Printing System(tm) - ii libgcc1 1:4.0-0pre2 GCC support library ii libjpeg626b-9The Independent JPEG Group's JPEG ii libpng12-0 1.2.8rel-1 PNG library - runtime ii libstdc++5 1:3.3.5-4 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 ii libtiff4 3.7.0-1 Tag Image File Format library ii libx11-6 6.8.1-1ubuntu5 X Window System protocol client li ii libxcursor1 1.1.3-1 X cursor management library ii libxext6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-10 X Window System miscellaneous exte ii libxrender1 0.8.3-7 X Rendering Extension client libra ii xlibmesa-gl [libgl1] 6.8.1-1ubuntu5 Mesa 3D graphics library [X.Org] ii xlibmesa-glu [libglu1] 6.8.1-1ubuntu5 Mesa OpenGL utility library [X.Org ii xlibs4.3.0.dfsg.1-10 X Keyboard Extension (XKB) configu ii zlib1g 1:1.2.2-4 compression library - runtime -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 286186-done) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Mar 2005 14:40:26 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 08 06:40:26 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from tms.rz.uni-kiel.de [134.245.11.89] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D8fsn-kf-00; Tue, 08 Mar 2005 06:40:25 -0800 Received: from amavis by tms.rz.uni-kiel.de with scanned-ok (Exim 4.34) id 1D8fsR-0002mD-6r for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 08 Mar 2005 15:40:03 +0100 Received: from zaphod.gpi.uni-kiel.de ([134.245.120.1]) by tms.rz.uni-kiel.de
Processed: Patch for this bug
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 295554 patch Bug#295554: can't remove the package There were no tags set. Tags added: patch thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Bug#298041: i2c: use a different ABI than the kernel one
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 298041 i2c Bug#298041: i2c-2.4.27-2-k6: When installing i2c modules, headers are not set acccordingly ! Bug reassigned from package `i2c-2.4.27-2-k6' to `i2c'. retitle 298041 i2c: use a different ABI than the kernel one Bug#298041: i2c-2.4.27-2-k6: When installing i2c modules, headers are not set acccordingly ! Changed Bug title. severity 298041 grave Bug#298041: i2c: use a different ABI than the kernel one Severity set to `grave'. tag 298041 + sarge Bug#298041: i2c: use a different ABI than the kernel one There were no tags set. Tags added: sarge tag 298041 + sid Bug#298041: i2c: use a different ABI than the kernel one Tags were: sarge Tags added: sid thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#295554: Patch for this bug
tags 295554 patch thanks If I've understood the issue correctly the attached patch fixes this issue. Regards Javier diff -Nru xinetd-2.3.13.old/debian/changelog xinetd-2.3.13/debian/changelog --- xinetd-2.3.13.old/debian/changelog 2005-03-08 15:42:26.0 +0100 +++ xinetd-2.3.13/debian/changelog 2005-03-08 15:43:29.0 +0100 @@ -1,3 +1,10 @@ +xinetd (1:2.3.13-3) unstable; urgency=low + + * NMU + * Only act on dpkg --diversions if /etc/init.d/inetd exists (Closes: #295554) + + -- Javier Fernandez-Sanguino Pen~a [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue, 8 Mar 2005 15:42:45 +0100 + xinetd (1:2.3.13-2) unstable; urgency=low * We now start xinetd with -stayalive by default to keep it diff -Nru xinetd-2.3.13.old/debian/xinetd.postinst xinetd-2.3.13/debian/xinetd.postinst --- xinetd-2.3.13.old/debian/xinetd.postinst2005-03-08 15:42:26.0 +0100 +++ xinetd-2.3.13/debian/xinetd.postinst2005-03-08 15:37:25.0 +0100 @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@ fi # divert inetd's init script +if [ -e /etc/init.d/inetd ] ; then dpkg-divert --package xinetd --add --rename \ --divert /etc/init.d/inetd.real /etc/init.d/inetd 2 @@ -35,4 +36,6 @@ %EOF% chmod 755 /etc/init.d/inetd +fi + #DEBHELPER# diff -Nru xinetd-2.3.13.old/debian/xinetd.postrm xinetd-2.3.13/debian/xinetd.postrm --- xinetd-2.3.13.old/debian/xinetd.postrm 2005-03-08 15:42:26.0 +0100 +++ xinetd-2.3.13/debian/xinetd.postrm 2005-03-08 15:39:27.0 +0100 @@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ rm -f /etc/init.d/inetd dpkg-divert --package xinetd --remove --rename --divert \ /etc/init.d/inetd.real /etc/init.d/inetd -/etc/init.d/inetd start +[ -x /etc/init.d/inetd] /etc/init.d/inetd start ;; purge) rm -f /etc/xinetd.conf* signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Processed: Fixed in NMU of susv2 1.1
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 279484 + fixed Bug#279484: susv2: unpacks permissions from tarball There were no tags set. Tags added: fixed quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#289182: kino endianness issues on powerpc
On Tue, 2005-03-08 at 15:39 +0100, Daniel Kobras wrote: Anyway, what I remember from years ago, Xv did expect image data in host-endian format with DRI turned off, and in PCI-endian (little-endian) format with DRI turned on. The expected byte order should be well-defined regardless of whether the DRI is enabled or not. If it isn't, that's probably a driver bug. -- Earthling Michel Dnzer | Debian (powerpc), X and DRI developer Libre software enthusiast| http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=daenzer
Bug#298568: debian/copyright doesn't include the complete license text / installation overwrites dhelp index file
Package: python-gtk2-doc Severity: serious Tags: patch Please find a patch for both problems at http://patches.ubuntu.com/patches/python-gtk2-doc.diff -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#279484: Bug#279483: Fix and NMU
On Tue, Mar 08, 2005 at 09:00:34AM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote: On Tue, Mar 08, 2005 at 10:22:54AM +0100, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote: tags 279483 patch pending thanks The attached patch should fix this, I'm making a NMU upload as this RC bug has been over 4 months unanswered. Same as #279484 (susv2). Are you planning on NMU that too? BTW; I talked to the maintainer Jan 13, 2005, and he indicated that he hoped to upload shortly (but appears to have been bitten by Real Life). I was not aware of it, but now that I see it I will fix with the attached patch. Regards Javier diff -Nru susv2-1/debian/changelog susv2-1.1/debian/changelog --- susv2-1/debian/changelog2004-10-26 23:55:44.0 +0200 +++ susv2-1.1/debian/changelog 2005-03-08 16:19:55.0 +0100 @@ -1,3 +1,13 @@ +susv2 (1.1) unstable; urgency=low + + * NMU. 0-day as this is a rather easy fix and there has been no response +from the maintainer since this was brought up 4 months ago. + * Do not preserve ownership or users when untarring the downloaded files +by using --no-same-owner --no-same-permissions + (Closes: #279484) + + -- Javier Fernandez-Sanguino Pen~a [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue, 8 Mar 2005 16:19:20 +0100 + susv2 (1) unstable; urgency=low * Initial release (Closes: #274956) diff -Nru susv2-1/debian/files susv2-1.1/debian/files --- susv2-1/debian/files1970-01-01 01:00:00.0 +0100 +++ susv2-1.1/debian/files 2005-03-08 16:22:04.0 +0100 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +susv2_1.1_all.deb contrib/doc extra diff -Nru susv2-1/debian/postinst susv2-1.1/debian/postinst --- susv2-1/debian/postinst 2003-12-18 17:02:25.0 +0100 +++ susv2-1.1/debian/postinst 2005-03-08 16:21:58.0 +0100 @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ echo Fetching file... wget -P $TMPDIR http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/007908799/download/susv2.tar.bz2 echo Untaring... -bunzip2 -cd $TMPDIR/susv2.tar.bz2 | tar xf - -C /usr/share/doc/susv2 +bunzip2 -cd $TMPDIR/susv2.tar.bz2 | tar xf - -C /usr/share/doc/susv2 --no-same-permissions --no-same-owner rm -rf $TMPDIR diff -Nru susv2-1/debian/susv2/DEBIAN/control susv2-1.1/debian/susv2/DEBIAN/control --- susv2-1/debian/susv2/DEBIAN/control 1970-01-01 01:00:00.0 +0100 +++ susv2-1.1/debian/susv2/DEBIAN/control 2005-03-08 16:22:04.0 +0100 @@ -0,0 +1,12 @@ +Package: susv2 +Version: 1.1 +Section: contrib/doc +Priority: extra +Architecture: all +Depends: wget, bzip2 +Installed-Size: 48 +Maintainer: Jeff Bailey [EMAIL PROTECTED] +Description: Fetch and install SUSv2 documentation + The Single Unix Specifications are not permitted to be generally + redistributed, so this is an installer that fetches them and installs + them in a Debian appropriate way. diff -Nru susv2-1/debian/susv2/DEBIAN/md5sums susv2-1.1/debian/susv2/DEBIAN/md5sums --- susv2-1/debian/susv2/DEBIAN/md5sums 1970-01-01 01:00:00.0 +0100 +++ susv2-1.1/debian/susv2/DEBIAN/md5sums 2005-03-08 16:22:04.0 +0100 @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +44a0ac8bc9ebad239546f5135ee7baae usr/share/doc/susv2/copyright +ba3166e16ff3fb8f5ffafa16f5c4639f usr/share/doc/susv2/changelog.gz +21eff40c006987ecaf747ddff5430d46 usr/share/doc-base/susv2 diff -Nru susv2-1/debian/susv2/DEBIAN/postinst susv2-1.1/debian/susv2/DEBIAN/postinst --- susv2-1/debian/susv2/DEBIAN/postinst1970-01-01 01:00:00.0 +0100 +++ susv2-1.1/debian/susv2/DEBIAN/postinst 2005-03-08 16:22:04.0 +0100 @@ -0,0 +1,22 @@ +#!/bin/sh + +set -e + +TMPDIR=$(mktemp -td) || exit 1 + +echo Fetching file... +wget -P $TMPDIR http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/007908799/download/susv2.tar.bz2 +echo Untaring... +bunzip2 -cd $TMPDIR/susv2.tar.bz2 | tar xf - -C /usr/share/doc/susv2 --no-same-permissions --no-same-owner + +rm -rf $TMPDIR + +## Note: Keep debhelper token after so that files exist when they're being +## registered. + +# Automatically added by dh_installdocs +if [ $1 = configure ] which install-docs /dev/null 21; then + install-docs -i /usr/share/doc-base/susv2 +fi +# End automatically added section + diff -Nru susv2-1/debian/susv2/DEBIAN/prerm susv2-1.1/debian/susv2/DEBIAN/prerm --- susv2-1/debian/susv2/DEBIAN/prerm 1970-01-01 01:00:00.0 +0100 +++ susv2-1.1/debian/susv2/DEBIAN/prerm 2005-03-08 16:22:04.0 +0100 @@ -0,0 +1,18 @@ +#!/bin/sh + +set -e + +# Automatically added by dh_installdocs +if [ $1 = remove ] || [ $1 = upgrade ] \ + which install-docs /dev/null 21; then + install-docs -r susv2 +fi +# End automatically added section + + +## Note: Keep debhelper token before so that this package behaves +## like other packages - The files should still exist when the debhelper +## bits runs. + +rm -rf /usr/share/doc/susv2/susv2 + Los ficheros binarios susv2-1/debian/susv2/usr/share/doc/susv2/changelog.gz y susv2-1.1/debian/susv2/usr/share/doc/susv2/changelog.gz son distintos diff -Nru susv2-1/debian/susv2/usr/share/doc/susv2/copyright
Bug#297796: emacs21: FTBFS: timestamp skew issues.
Jérôme Marant [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Quoting Kurt Roeckx [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
The problem is this line in your rules file:
debian/autofiles.diff: debian/patches/*.dpatch
${update_debian_autofiles_diff}
This causes timestamp skew issues because the
debian/autofiles.diff file is in the
emacs21_21.3+1-9.diff.gz before the debian/patches/*
so it thinks it needs to rebuild those.
In the emacs21_21.3+1-8.diff.gz file the order of the
files was different so it did not show that problem.
Rob, do you have any idea about how to fix this?
The only thing I've thought of so far is to change debian/rules to not
rely on timestamps for this file. Instead keep a file of the md5sums
of the *.dpatch files and use that and cmp to determine when to
re-generate. i.e. (in psudeo-make code):
define update_autofiles_diff_if_needed
md5sum debian/*.dpatch debian/tmp-dpatch.md5
if ! cmp debian/dpatch.md5 debian/tmp-dpatch.md5; \
then \
$(update_debian_autofiles_diff); \
md5sum debian/*.dpatch debian/dpatch.md5; \
fi
endef
Then I'd just have to arrange for this action to be taken at all the
appropriate times. A bit ugly perhaps, but it looks like it might
work.
--
Rob Browning
rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org; previously @cs.utexas.edu
GPG starting 2002-11-03 = 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4
Bug#279484: Bug#279483: Fix and NMU
On Tue, Mar 08, 2005 at 04:25:09PM +0100, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote: On Tue, Mar 08, 2005 at 09:00:34AM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote: On Tue, Mar 08, 2005 at 10:22:54AM +0100, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote: tags 279483 patch pending thanks The attached patch should fix this, I'm making a NMU upload as this RC bug has been over 4 months unanswered. Same as #279484 (susv2). Are you planning on NMU that too? BTW; I talked to the maintainer Jan 13, 2005, and he indicated that he hoped to upload shortly (but appears to have been bitten by Real Life). I was not aware of it, but now that I see it I will fix with the attached patch. Okay. FYI it appears that dh_clean was not called, as your patch includes things I would not expect (and which were not present in the other patch), such as DEBIAN/ and debian/files. I'm not familiar with cdbs, so I'm not going to try to debug it. Justin
Bug#298478: nicotine hangs with libgtk2.0-0 2.6.2-4
Well it's really weird, but after i received your reply this morning i did a 'apt-get dist-upgrade' just to upgrade libgtk2.0-0 to 2.6.2-4 and from that moment i had no freeze in nicotine. In the latest days it used to freeze as soon as it got connected to the slsk server. You can safely close this bug. sorry for wasting your time.. hehe :) Andrea -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#297796: emacs21: FTBFS: timestamp skew issues.
Quoting Rob Browning [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Rob, do you have any idea about how to fix this? The only thing I've thought of so far is to change debian/rules to not rely on timestamps for this file. Instead keep a file of the md5sums of the *.dpatch files and use that and cmp to determine when to re-generate. i.e. (in psudeo-make code): define update_autofiles_diff_if_needed md5sum debian/*.dpatch debian/tmp-dpatch.md5 if ! cmp debian/dpatch.md5 debian/tmp-dpatch.md5; \ then \ $(update_debian_autofiles_diff); \ md5sum debian/*.dpatch debian/dpatch.md5; \ fi endef Then I'd just have to arrange for this action to be taken at all the appropriate times. A bit ugly perhaps, but it looks like it might work. To my mind, we should avoid to do this automatically from the makefile and generate a dpatch manually every we have to regenerate the configure script. Currently, the only file which is modified when changing configure.in is configure, so this should be straightforward. Cheers, -- Jérôme Marant
Bug#298478: marked as done (nicotine hangs with libgtk2.0-0 2.6.2-4)
Your message dated Tue, 08 Mar 2005 17:39:43 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#298478: nicotine hangs with libgtk2.0-0 2.6.2-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Mar 2005 19:51:57 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Mar 07 11:51:57 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from master.debian.org [146.82.138.7] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D8OGj-00080p-00; Mon, 07 Mar 2005 11:51:57 -0800 Received: from 83-103-88-75.fastres.net ([192.168.1.6]) [83.103.88.75] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D8OGi-0001YS-00; Mon, 07 Mar 2005 13:51:56 -0600 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Andrea Cavaliero [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: nicotine hangs with libgtk2.0-0 2.6.2-4 X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8 Date: Mon, 07 Mar 2005 20:53:04 +0100 X-Debbugs-Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-9.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE, OUR_MTA_MSGID,X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: nicotine Version: 1.0.8rc1-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Nicotine Hangs with libgtk2.0-0 2.6.2-4. Downgrading to 2.6.2-3 solves the problem. I don't know if this bug belongs to nicotine or gtk, so feel free to reassign it. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.11 Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Versions of packages nicotine depends on: ii python2.3.5-1An interactive high-level object-o ii python-gtk2 2.4.1-2Python bindings for the GTK+ widge -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 298478-done) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Mar 2005 16:37:47 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 08 08:37:47 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from heavensgate.debian.net [213.41.173.23] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D8hiN-0001HK-00; Tue, 08 Mar 2005 08:37:47 -0800 Received: from silicium.ccc.cea.fr ([132.165.91.101]) by heavensgate.debian.net with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1D8hgc-0006Kj-8b for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 08 Mar 2005 17:35:58 +0100 Subject: Re: Bug#298478: nicotine hangs with libgtk2.0-0 2.6.2-4 From: Josselin Mouette [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] References: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2005 17:39:43 +0100 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Le mardi 08 mars 2005 =E0 17:06 +0100, Andrea Cavaliero a =E9crit : Well it's really weird, but after i received your reply this morning i did a 'apt-get dist-upgrade' just to upgrade libgtk2.0-0 to 2.6.2-4 and from that moment i had no freeze in nicotine. In the latest days it used to freeze as soon as it got connected to the slsk server. You can safely close this bug.=20 sorry for wasting your time.. hehe :) Well, the problem was most probably caused by issues with the slsk server. Regards, --=20 .''`. Josselin Mouette/\./\ : :' : [EMAIL PROTECTED] `. `'[EMAIL PROTECTED] `- Debian GNU/Linux -- The power of freedom -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#298469: php4-gd2: uninstalled when upgrading php4 from 4.3.10-2 to -8, not able to reinstall
Adam Conrad schrieb: php4-gd2 is no longer in the archive, as it has been replaced by php4-gd, which is the version 2 that you need. The only difference between them was what library they were linked against (libgd1 versus libgd2), and php4-gd has now been linked for libgd2 for ages. Adam, thank you, this solved my problem. But... as far as I know, my predecessor took php4-gd2 not only because of the gd-version 2 needed (php4-gd*2* for the naiv one, see below), but also because of the information given in /var/lib/dpkg/available: Package: php4-gd2 Version: 3:4.3.2+rc3-2 Replaces: php4-gd ! Description: GD module (with GD2) for php4 ^^^ This package provides a module for handling graphics directly from PHP scripts. It supports the PNG, JPEG, XPM and ttf fonts. It is compiled with libgd2, so it has more functions, but it may happen, ^^ As others may be confused as well, is there a way to explain the situation you discribed in the package information of php4-gd2? Hmmm, reading php4-gd: Package: php4-gd ... Replaces: php4-cgi-gd, php4-gd2 Provides: php4-gd2 ...Ok... Description: GD module for php4 This package provides a module for handling graphics directly from PHP scripts. It supports the PNG, JPEG, XPM and ttf fonts. ... As long as php4-gd2 also exists, wouldn't it be a good idea to explicitly write that this is linked against libgd2? Once more: thank you. The application is running again just fine! Stefan Sontheimer -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#297796: emacs21: FTBFS: timestamp skew issues.
Jérôme Marant [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: To my mind, we should avoid to do this automatically from the makefile and generate a dpatch manually every we have to regenerate the configure script. We certainly could generate the patch manually, and that would be simpler, but it would also leave a lot of room for mistakes, especially when someone else wants to hack on the package. They won't know that they (may) need to regenerate the autofiles.diff after they add a new patch or change an existing one. Whatever we do, we'll still need to make sure the autofiles patch is the final patch, since any of the other patches might make changes that affect the autotools behavior. Currently, the only file which is modified when changing configure.in is configure, so this should be straightforward. True, though there's no guarantee of that. Some newer version of autoconf or aclocal could create extra files or pay attention to source tree elements that older versions didn't. That's the reason for the current approach: - apply all the other patches to a temp tree - run the appropriate autofoo on the temp tree - diff the temp tree and the original tree More generally, even though the current autofiles.diff patch for emacs21 only contains changes to configure, I was hoping to create a solution that was as automatic as possible, one that could work on any package using the autotools. A key presumption was that there's no way to predict what changes a given version of the autotools might make to the source tree (especially in cases where additional autotools like automake and libtool are involved). -- Rob Browning rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org; previously @cs.utexas.edu GPG starting 2002-11-03 = 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4
Bug#279484: Bug#279483: Fix and NMU
On Tue, Mar 08, 2005 at 11:06:28AM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote: Okay. FYI it appears that dh_clean was not called, as your patch includes things I would not expect (and which were not present in the other patch), such as DEBIAN/ and debian/files. I'm not familiar with cdbs, so I'm not going to try to debug it. Don't try, it's actually because I run the diff while the package was building. The attached diff is the correct one. Regards Javier diff -Nru susv2-1/debian/changelog susv2-1.1/debian/changelog --- susv2-1/debian/changelog2004-10-26 23:55:44.0 +0200 +++ susv2-1.1/debian/changelog 2005-03-08 16:19:55.0 +0100 @@ -1,3 +1,13 @@ +susv2 (1.1) unstable; urgency=low + + * NMU. 0-day as this is a rather easy fix and there has been no response +from the maintainer since this was brought up 4 months ago. + * Do not preserve ownership or users when untarring the downloaded files +by using --no-same-owner --no-same-permissions + (Closes: #279484) + + -- Javier Fernandez-Sanguino Pen~a [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue, 8 Mar 2005 16:19:20 +0100 + susv2 (1) unstable; urgency=low * Initial release (Closes: #274956) diff -Nru susv2-1/debian/postinst susv2-1.1/debian/postinst --- susv2-1/debian/postinst 2003-12-18 17:02:25.0 +0100 +++ susv2-1.1/debian/postinst 2005-03-08 16:21:58.0 +0100 @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ echo Fetching file... wget -P $TMPDIR http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/007908799/download/susv2.tar.bz2 echo Untaring... -bunzip2 -cd $TMPDIR/susv2.tar.bz2 | tar xf - -C /usr/share/doc/susv2 +bunzip2 -cd $TMPDIR/susv2.tar.bz2 | tar xf - -C /usr/share/doc/susv2 --no-same-permissions --no-same-owner rm -rf $TMPDIR signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Processed: tagging 298039
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 298039 + pending Bug#298039: xli: Multiple security problems in xli Tags were: security Tags added: pending End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#289182: kino endianness issues on powerpc
On Mon, Feb 14, 2005 at 05:41:26PM +0100, Michael Schmitz wrote: I can confirm the XV problem is the same old problem that a patch had been posted for in http://jira.schirmacher.de/jira-kino/browse/KINO-76. I've added some #ifdef __BIG_ENDIAN__ around that, the following patch should finally fix the display issue: Err, this patch did fix the display problems for you!? It does not touch a single line of code that was executed in the Debian build that uses libdv to do the decoding. (Actually, this is no longer true as of today. It did fix the xv problems for me - not sure what libdv version I was using at that time. 0.103-2 is what I find in the package cache. My guess is I didn't use libavcodec at first - preview speed was abysmal and is quite decent now that I built against libdv4 plus libavcodec-cvs. The patch is still required to fix byte ordering with libavcodec, however. Now with ffmpeg in main, I've uploaded a new version that uses libavcodec instead of libdv for the decoding part.) Furthermore, it looks obviously buggy. Eg. the little-endian version of the first loop uses values Y[0] and Y[1], while the big-endian variant reuses Y[0] twice. And I can't make sense of the other array indices, either. I was expecting something like dest_big_endian = bswap_32(dest_little_endian); maybe that's what was intended, and the current version of the patch I took the patch from a URL mentioned in one of the comments in the BTS. I had established that yuv byte ordering was broken by experimenting with byteswappig schemes in displayer.cc but that, naturally, would not fix export issues. makes little difference with smooth input data? Anyway, what I remember from years ago, Xv did expect image data in host-endian format with DRI turned off, and in PCI-endian (little-endian) format with DRI turned on. DRI is off in my case IIRC (I need to use UseFBDev in the server). I'd be very interested to know whether this still holds true. (Cc'ing debian-powerpc, hoping someone there might be able to help.) Just saw a message by Michel Dänzer arrive in my inbox, seems he knew something. I've uploaded kino 0.75-5 that should make the archive by today's dinstall run. It includes a comprehensive patch that might fix the endianness problems with audio. Alas, I had to do some guessing on the endianness of the input data, so it might actually do worse than before, but in any case the framework is now in place to fix this with a few keypresses. The second change in 0.75-5 related to this bug was the mentioned switch from libdv to libavcodec for video decoding. There's a small chance that it fixes the display problem out of the box already. I'll test that ASAP. Otherwise, I'll have to apply a cleaned up version of the cited patch. In any case, this move should significantly boost decoding performance on non-x86 and bring us a bit closer to getting kino usable on ppc and friends as well. You bet - I was quite happy with ffmpeg (hacked to assume BE audio) as export pipe plus libavcodec for decoding. Michael
Bug#298325: marked as done (cryptsetup FTBFS)
Your message dated Tue, 08 Mar 2005 12:17:14 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#298325: fixed in cryptsetup 20050111-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Mar 2005 19:03:16 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Mar 06 11:03:16 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mx02.qsc.de [213.148.130.14] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D8124-0004Ob-00; Sun, 06 Mar 2005 11:03:16 -0800 Received: from port-195-158-169-103.dynamic.qsc.de ([195.158.169.103] helo=hattusa.textio) by mx02.qsc.de with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 1D811X-rf-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 06 Mar 2005 20:02:43 +0100 Received: from ths by hattusa.textio with local (Exim 4.50) id 1D81QN-0004Am-St for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 06 Mar 2005 20:28:23 +0100 Date: Sun, 6 Mar 2005 20:28:23 +0100 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: cryptsetup FTBFS Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i From: Thiemo Seufer [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.4 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE, UPPERCASE_25_50 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: cryptsetup Version: 20050111-2.1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Cryptsetup fails to build (tested on mipsel), caused by a follow-on error to: configure.in: 5: required file ./config.h.in]' not found Makefile.am:1: AM_GNU_GETTEXT in configure.in' but intl' not in SUBDIRS automake: Makefile.am: AM_GNU_GETTEXT in configure.in' but ALL_LINGUAS' not defined lib/Makefile.am:4: bad macro name _LIBDEVMAPPER_LIBADD' lib/Makefile.am:5: bad macro name _LIBDEVMAPPER_SOURCES' lib/Makefile.am:6: bad macro name _LIBDEVMAPPER_CFLAGS' lib/Makefile.am:12: bad macro name _LIBDEVMAPPER_SHLIB' lib/Makefile.am:16: bad macro name _LIBGCRYPT_LIBADD' lib/Makefile.am:17: bad macro name _LIBGCRYPT_SOURCES' lib/Makefile.am:18: bad macro name _LIBGCRYPT_CFLAGS' lib/Makefile.am:24: bad macro name _LIBGCRYPT_SHLIB' lib/Makefile.am:50: bad macro name _STATIC_LIBRARY' lib/Makefile.am:16: invalid unused variable name: _LIBGCRYPT_LIBADD' lib/Makefile.am:5: invalid unused variable name: _LIBDEVMAPPER_SOURCES' lib/Makefile.am:17: invalid unused variable name: _LIBGCRYPT_SOURCES' lib/Makefile.am:4: invalid unused variable name: _LIBDEVMAPPER_LIBADD' This is apparently caused by invoking automake instead of automake-1.8, which can break depending on the local installation. The build system should explicitly invoke automake-1.8, which corresponds to the requirement of automake1.8 in the build-dependencies. Thiemo --- Received: (at 298325-close) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Mar 2005 17:23:05 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 08 09:23:05 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D8iQD-00084y-00; Tue, 08 Mar 2005 09:23:05 -0800 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D8iKY-0004bO-00; Tue, 08 Mar 2005 12:17:14 -0500 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Wesley W. Terpstra (Debian)) To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $ Subject: Bug#298325: fixed in cryptsetup 20050111-3 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2005 12:17:14 -0500 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 3 Source: cryptsetup Source-Version: 20050111-3 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of cryptsetup, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: cryptsetup_20050111-3.diff.gz to pool/main/c/cryptsetup/cryptsetup_20050111-3.diff.gz cryptsetup_20050111-3.dsc to pool/main/c/cryptsetup/cryptsetup_20050111-3.dsc cryptsetup_20050111-3_i386.deb to pool/main/c/cryptsetup/cryptsetup_20050111-3_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this
Bug#296006: marked as done (Cryptsetup not installable on sid - missing dependency)
Your message dated Tue, 08 Mar 2005 12:17:14 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#296006: fixed in cryptsetup 20050111-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Feb 2005 16:49:24 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Feb 19 08:49:24 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from fed1rmmtao04.cox.net [68.230.241.35] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D2XnI-00041y-00; Sat, 19 Feb 2005 08:49:24 -0800 Received: from yahoo.com ([68.228.32.67]) by fed1rmmtao04.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.04.00 201-2131-117-20041022) with ESMTP id [EMAIL PROTECTED] for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 19 Feb 2005 11:48:52 -0500 Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2005 09:48:08 -0700 (MST) From: James Blanford [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Cryptsetup not installable on sid - missing dependency To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/plain; charset=us-ascii Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.9 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_20,FAKE_HELO_YAHOO, FORGED_YAHOO_RCVD,HAS_PACKAGE,RCVD_FAKE_HELO_DOTCOM autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: * Package: cryptsetup Version: 20050111-2 Severity: serious Cryptsetup depends on libdevmapper1.00, which is no longer available in sid. Looks like cryptsetup needs to be rebuilt against libdevmapper1.01. --- Received: (at 296006-close) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Mar 2005 17:23:03 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 08 09:23:03 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D8iQA-00084M-00; Tue, 08 Mar 2005 09:23:03 -0800 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D8iKY-0004bM-00; Tue, 08 Mar 2005 12:17:14 -0500 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Wesley W. Terpstra (Debian)) To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $ Subject: Bug#296006: fixed in cryptsetup 20050111-3 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2005 12:17:14 -0500 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2 Source: cryptsetup Source-Version: 20050111-3 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of cryptsetup, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: cryptsetup_20050111-3.diff.gz to pool/main/c/cryptsetup/cryptsetup_20050111-3.diff.gz cryptsetup_20050111-3.dsc to pool/main/c/cryptsetup/cryptsetup_20050111-3.dsc cryptsetup_20050111-3_i386.deb to pool/main/c/cryptsetup/cryptsetup_20050111-3_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Wesley W. Terpstra (Debian) [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated cryptsetup package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2005 17:11:42 +0100 Source: cryptsetup Binary: cryptsetup Architecture: source i386 Version: 20050111-3 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Wesley W. Terpstra (Debian) [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Wesley W. Terpstra (Debian) [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: cryptsetup - configures encrypted block devices Closes: 291500 296006 298325 Changes: cryptsetup (20050111-3) unstable; urgency=low . * Switch to using automake-1.8 (closes: #298325, #291500) * Rebuilt again against newest libdevmapper (closes: #296006) * Applied patch from Christian Reitwiessner to add 'tmp' option Files: 6a3e0254596bc26f1c57b472a9a3c5c5 725 admin optional
Bug#297504: avr-libc: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends
On Mon, 28 Feb 2005, Daniel Schepler wrote: Package: avr-libc Severity: serious Version: 1:1.2.3-1 From my build log (reproduced with pbuilder in an i386 chroot): ... fig2dev -L eps demo.fig demo.eps fig2dev -L png demo.fig demo.png sh: gs: command not found fig2dev: broken pipe (GhostScript aborted?) command was: gs -q -dSAFER -sDEVICE=png16m -r80 -g566x284 -sOutputFile=demo.png - make[3]: *** [demo.png] Error 1 make[3]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/avr-libc-1.2.3/doc/examples/demo' make[2]: *** [demo] Error 2 make[2]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/avr-libc-1.2.3/build/doc/api' make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/avr-libc-1.2.3/build/doc' make: *** [build] Error 2 Release 1:1.2.3-2 adds gs to the build-depends, but it does not seem to be enough. This is from my build log, using sbuild in a i386 chroot: [...] for png in *.png; do \ echo Fixing transparency for $png; \ cat $png tmp.pnm; \ cat -transparent white tmp.pnm $png rm tmp.pnm; \ done Fixing transparency for demo.png cat: invalid option -- a Try `cat --help' for more information. [...] make[2]: *** [fix_png] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/avr-libc-1.2.3/build/doc/api' make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/avr-libc-1.2.3/build/doc' make: *** [build] Error 2 I think netpbm is the missing package now, but I'm not sure that it will be enough to fix the FTBFS. Please use a chroot before making a new upload. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#297010: marked as done (libc6-dev - O_NOATIME needed for lvm)
Your message dated Tue, 08 Mar 2005 13:02:24 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#297010: fixed in lvm2 2.01.04-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Feb 2005 13:44:25 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Feb 26 05:44:24 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mx4.informatik.uni-tuebingen.de [134.2.12.29] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D52F6-0007jB-00; Sat, 26 Feb 2005 05:44:24 -0800 Received: from localhost (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by mx4.informatik.uni-tuebingen.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2448F123C for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 26 Feb 2005 14:43:53 +0100 (NFT) Received: from mx4.informatik.uni-tuebingen.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mx4 [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 38892-04 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 26 Feb 2005 14:43:52 +0100 (NFT) Received: from localhost.localdomain (semeai.Informatik.Uni-Tuebingen.De [134.2.15.66]) by mx4.informatik.uni-tuebingen.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3DB111DC for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 26 Feb 2005 14:43:52 +0100 (NFT) Received: from mrvn by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.44) id 1D52BN-0003WC-Dx for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 26 Feb 2005 14:40:33 +0100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Goswin Brederlow [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: linux-kernel-header: O_NOATIME needed for lvm X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8 Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2005 14:40:33 +0100 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: linux-kernel-headers Version: 2.5.999-test7-bk-17 Severity: critical File: linux-kernel-header Justification: breaks the whole system Hi, when one tries to run pvmove or lvsnapshot on / the lvm will deadlock itself due to atime updates on /dev/ being blocked while the LVM is locked. Sine any read/write access to / will be blocked the system breaks. To prevent this lvm uses O_NOATIME where available, which is still not the case in current linux-kernel-headers. On closing this bug please reassign it to lvm instead because it needs to Build-Depend on new enough headers and recompile. MfG Goswin -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-frosties-1 Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1) -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 297010-close) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Mar 2005 18:09:57 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 08 10:09:57 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D8j9Z-00059b-00; Tue, 08 Mar 2005 10:09:57 -0800 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D8j2G-0007GZ-00; Tue, 08 Mar 2005 13:02:24 -0500 From: Bastian Blank [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $ Subject: Bug#297010: fixed in lvm2 2.01.04-3 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2005 13:02:24 -0500 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Source: lvm2 Source-Version: 2.01.04-3 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of lvm2, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: clvm_2.01.04-3_i386.deb to pool/main/l/lvm2/clvm_2.01.04-3_i386.deb lvm2-udeb_2.01.04-3_i386.udeb to pool/main/l/lvm2/lvm2-udeb_2.01.04-3_i386.udeb lvm2_2.01.04-3.diff.gz to pool/main/l/lvm2/lvm2_2.01.04-3.diff.gz lvm2_2.01.04-3.dsc to pool/main/l/lvm2/lvm2_2.01.04-3.dsc lvm2_2.01.04-3_i386.deb to pool/main/l/lvm2/lvm2_2.01.04-3_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have
Bug#284971: marked as done (DOS due to SIGPIPE (CAN-2004-1014))
Your message dated Tue, 8 Mar 2005 13:32:07 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Ack NMU has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Dec 2004 21:29:29 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Dec 09 13:29:29 2004 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from kitenet.net [64.62.161.42] (postfix) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1CcVqq-0002Wf-00; Thu, 09 Dec 2004 13:29:28 -0800 Received: from dragon.kitenet.net (unknown [66.168.94.144]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN Joey Hess, Issuer Joey Hess (verified OK)) by kitenet.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08DE917FE7 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 9 Dec 2004 21:29:24 + (GMT) Received: by dragon.kitenet.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id F10B26E08E; Thu, 9 Dec 2004 16:30:29 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2004 16:30:29 -0500 From: Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: DOS due to SIGPIPE (CAN-2004-1014) Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=fUYQa+Pmc3FrFX/N Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: --fUYQa+Pmc3FrFX/N Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Package: nfs-utils Version: 1:1.0.6-3 Tags: patch, security Severity: grave As noted in CAN-2004-1014 and DSA-606-1, there's a denial of service security hole in nfs-utils: statd in nfs-utils 1.257 and earlier does not ignore the SIGPIPE signal, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (server process crash) via a TCP connection that is prematurely terminated. There's a simple patch in upstream cvs, which can be seen here: http://cvs.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.py/nfs/nfs-utils/utils/statd/statd.c?r1= =3D1.17r2=3D1.18diff_format=3Du --=20 see shy jo --fUYQa+Pmc3FrFX/N Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFBuMP1d8HHehbQuO8RAtlZAJ4pdGo8F4xrF0H+fld8ItQt7c5WlQCfTjYa USxsocxL4R9cGCHWDBDKikY= =sSV1 -END PGP SIGNATURE- --fUYQa+Pmc3FrFX/N-- --- Received: (at 284971-done) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Mar 2005 18:32:15 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 08 10:32:15 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from perlsupport.com (mail.perlsupport.com) [66.180.163.120] (66bf47edb70e3cd7ca0a4676409ac0fa) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D8jV9-0007X0-00; Tue, 08 Mar 2005 10:32:15 -0800 Received: from [67.132.206.254] (helo=tytlal) by mail.perlsupport.com (Exim 4) with esmtpsa (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) id 1D8jV8-79-BG for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 08 Mar 2005 13:32:14 -0500 Received: from chip by tytlal with local (Exim 4.50) id 1D8jV1-0004fK-Md for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 08 Mar 2005 13:32:07 -0500 Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2005 13:32:07 -0500 From: Chip Salzenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Ack NMU Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Thanks for the NMU. The NMU has been superseded; I forgot to ack it in the changelog, apparently, so here 'tis. -- Chip Salzenberg- a.k.a. -[EMAIL PROTECTED] Open Source is not an excuse to write fun code then leave the actual work to others. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#298568: debian/copyright doesn't include the complete license text / installation overwrites dhelp index file
Hi, Matthias Klose wrote: Package: python-gtk2-doc Severity: serious Tags: patch Please find a patch for both problems at http://patches.ubuntu.com/patches/python-gtk2-doc.diff I agree that debian/copyright isn't in the right shape, I'll fix this ASAP. However, I don't understand what you mean by installation overwrites dhelp index file -- I'm just doing what the dhelp_parse man page suggests to do, i.e. register the package in postinst and unregister it in the prerm. I can add the doc-base file to make doc-base users happy, but I don't see why the dhelp stuff should be removed. After all, it was added after a wishlist bug was filed[0]. Cheers, Igor [0]: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=272682archive=yes -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#298558: marked as done (perl: FTBFS: Errno architecture does not match executable architecture)
Your message dated Wed, 9 Mar 2005 06:07:17 +1100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#298558: perl: FTBFS: Errno architecture does not match executable architecture has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Mar 2005 13:47:44 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 08 05:47:43 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mailhub.id.cbs.dk [130.226.47.91] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D8f3n-0002ZN-00; Tue, 08 Mar 2005 05:47:43 -0800 Received: from mail.id.cbs.dk ([172.16.14.53] ident=mail) by mailhub.id.cbs.dk with esmtp (Cipher TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1D8f3c-0005bc-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 08 Mar 2005 14:47:32 +0100 Received: from deskpro02.id.cbs.dk ([130.226.34.10]) by mail.id.cbs.dk with esmtp (Cipher TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1D8f3c-0006L9-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 08 Mar 2005 14:47:32 +0100 Received: from ukh by deskpro02.id.cbs.dk with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1D8f38-Ek-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 08 Mar 2005 14:47:02 +0100 Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2005 14:47:01 +0100 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: perl: FTBFS: Errno architecture does not match executable architecture Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i From: Kaare Hviid [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Scanner: exiscan *1D8f3c-0005bc-00*ukFaGsbsjp2* Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: perl Version: 5.8.4-7 Severity: serious perl will suffer FTBFS if the kernel revision at build-time of the previously installed perl does not match the current one. Log from a pbuilder: sh mv-if-diff configpm.tmp lib/Config.pm ./miniperl -Ilib lib/lib_pm.PL Extracting lib.pm (with variable substitutions) AutoSplitting perl library ./miniperl -Ilib -e 'use AutoSplit; \ autosplit_lib_modules(@ARGV)' lib/*.pm Errno architecture (i386-linux-thread-multi-2.4.27-ti1211) does not match executable architecture (i386-linux-thread-multi-2.6.10) at /usr/lib/perl/5.8/Errno.pm line 11. Compilation failed in require at lib/File/Path.pm line 166. BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at lib/File/Path.pm line 166. Compilation failed in require at lib/AutoSplit.pm line 8. BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at lib/AutoSplit.pm line 8. Compilation failed in require at -e line 1. BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at -e line 1. make[1]: *** [preplibrary] Error 9 make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/perl-5.8.4' make: *** [perl.static] Error 2 Thus, during build-time, /usr/lib/perl/5.8/Errno.pm is probed, and if the kernel revision doesn't match the current one, it fails. I have verified that this happens on i386, alpha and amd64. It _appears_ that something applied in patch set 10 introduces this. Reversing it by 'patch -R -p1 debian/patches/10_fix_file_path' before build avoids the above issue. But I really have no clue what's going on here. -ukh --- Received: (at 298558-done) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Mar 2005 19:07:46 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 08 11:07:46 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from londo.c47.org [198.142.1.20] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D8k3V-0005rh-00; Tue, 08 Mar 2005 11:07:46 -0800 Received: from bod by londo.c47.org with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1D8k33-0005I9-00; Wed, 09 Mar 2005 06:07:17 +1100 Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2005 06:07:17 +1100 From: Brendan O'Dea [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Kaare Hviid [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Bug#298558: perl: FTBFS: Errno architecture does not match executable architecture Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] References: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0
Bug#298181: marked as done (balsa: FTBFS: Failed to write cache file: Permission denied)
Your message dated Tue, 08 Mar 2005 14:02:21 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#298181: fixed in balsa 2.3.0-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Mar 2005 14:08:58 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Mar 05 06:08:58 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from astra.telenet-ops.be [195.130.132.58] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D7Zxi-0007tv-00; Sat, 05 Mar 2005 06:08:58 -0800 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by astra.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with SMTP id 8DDB93282E0 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 5 Mar 2005 15:08:57 +0100 (MET) Received: from Q.roeckx.be (dD5775FD9.access.telenet.be [213.119.95.217]) by astra.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72D073282AC for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 5 Mar 2005 15:08:57 +0100 (MET) Received: by Q.roeckx.be (Postfix, from userid 501) id 4E25526136; Sat, 05 Mar 2005 15:08:57 +0100 (CET) Date: Sat, 5 Mar 2005 15:08:57 +0100 From: Kurt Roeckx [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: balsa: FTBFS: Failed to write cache file: Permission denied Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: balsa Version: 2.3.0-1 Severity: serious Hi, Your package is failing to build on most arches with the following error: make install-data-hook make[5]: Entering directory `/build/buildd/balsa-2.3.0/images' if test -n /usr/bin/gtk-update-icon-cache ; then\ /usr/bin/gtk-update-icon-cache /usr/share/balsa/hicolor ; \ /usr/bin/gtk-update-icon-cache /usr/share/icons/hicolor ; \ fi Failed to write cache file: Permission denied make[5]: *** [install-data-hook] Error 1 Obviously, you can't do that as non-root. This is probably something you should to in the postinst and postrm script instead. PS: Maybe a debhelper script for that would be useful, I guess you're not the only one who has to do that. Kurt --- Received: (at 298181-close) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Mar 2005 19:08:03 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 08 11:08:03 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D8k3n-0005sq-00; Tue, 08 Mar 2005 11:08:03 -0800 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D8jyH-0002jT-00; Tue, 08 Mar 2005 14:02:21 -0500 From: Andrew Lau [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $ Subject: Bug#298181: fixed in balsa 2.3.0-2 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2005 14:02:21 -0500 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Source: balsa Source-Version: 2.3.0-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of balsa, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: balsa_2.3.0-2.diff.gz to pool/main/b/balsa/balsa_2.3.0-2.diff.gz balsa_2.3.0-2.dsc to pool/main/b/balsa/balsa_2.3.0-2.dsc balsa_2.3.0-2_i386.deb to pool/main/b/balsa/balsa_2.3.0-2_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Andrew Lau [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated balsa package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2005 02:36:14
Bug#298600: copyright file refers to LGPL 2.1, but points to LGPL-2 file
Package: bzflag Version: 2.0.0.20050118 Severity: serious From the copyright file: It may be redistributed under the terms of the GNU LGPL, Version 2.1 found on Debian systems in the file /usr/share/common-licenses/LGPL-2. The upstream license is the LGPL 2.1, so the reference to the common-licenses file should refer to /usr/share/common-licenses/LGPL-2.1 . Or if upstream uses or any later version, it should refer to /usr/share/common-licenses/LGPL, which is a symlink to the latest version. - Josh Triplett signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#298568: marked as done (debian/copyright doesn't include the complete license text / installation overwrites dhelp index file)
Your message dated Tue, 08 Mar 2005 14:47:27 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#298568: fixed in python-gtk2-doc 2.5.2-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Mar 2005 15:05:22 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 08 07:05:22 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from einhorn.in-berlin.de [192.109.42.8] (root) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D8gGv-0004aC-00; Tue, 08 Mar 2005 07:05:21 -0800 X-Envelope-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Envelope-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from cachaca.net.local (dsl-082-082-189-223.arcor-ip.net [82.82.189.223]) (authenticated bits=0) by einhorn.in-berlin.de (8.12.10/8.12.10/Debian-4) with ESMTP id j28F5J7A010757 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 8 Mar 2005 16:05:19 +0100 Received: from salz.net.local ([192.168.42.9]) by cachaca.net.local with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1D8gGd-0004Os-0B for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 08 Mar 2005 16:05:03 +0100 Subject: debian/copyright doesn't include the complete license text / installation overwrites dhelp index file From: Matthias Klose [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: text/plain Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2005 16:13:53 +0100 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.1.6 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-mysite-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-MailScanner-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Score: (-1.363) AWL,BAYES_00,FORGED_RCVD_HELO X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang_at_IN-Berlin_e.V. on 192.109.42.8 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: python-gtk2-doc Severity: serious Tags: patch Please find a patch for both problems at http://patches.ubuntu.com/patches/python-gtk2-doc.diff --- Received: (at 298568-close) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Mar 2005 19:53:09 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 08 11:53:09 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D8klR-0004ow-00; Tue, 08 Mar 2005 11:53:09 -0800 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D8kfv-0005Gb-00; Tue, 08 Mar 2005 14:47:27 -0500 From: Igor Stroh [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $ Subject: Bug#298568: fixed in python-gtk2-doc 2.5.2-1 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2005 14:47:27 -0500 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Source: python-gtk2-doc Source-Version: 2.5.2-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of python-gtk2-doc, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: python-gtk2-doc_2.5.2-1.diff.gz to pool/main/p/python-gtk2-doc/python-gtk2-doc_2.5.2-1.diff.gz python-gtk2-doc_2.5.2-1.dsc to pool/main/p/python-gtk2-doc/python-gtk2-doc_2.5.2-1.dsc python-gtk2-doc_2.5.2-1_all.deb to pool/main/p/python-gtk2-doc/python-gtk2-doc_2.5.2-1_all.deb python-gtk2-doc_2.5.2.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/p/python-gtk2-doc/python-gtk2-doc_2.5.2.orig.tar.gz A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Igor Stroh [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated python-gtk2-doc package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2005 20:09:11 +0100 Source: python-gtk2-doc Binary: python-gtk2-doc Architecture:
Processed: tagging 298556
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10 tags 298556 + pending Bug#298556: libgnupg-perl: Can not decrypt with gnupg 1.2.5 (changed gpg API) Tags were: patch Tags added: pending End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#297131: marked as done (hylafax-server - is not upgradable)
Your message dated Tue, 08 Mar 2005 15:47:34 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#297131: fixed in hylafax 1:4.2.1-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Feb 2005 10:23:29 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Feb 27 02:23:29 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from wavehammer.waldi.eu.org [82.139.196.55] (postfix) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D5LaD-0003R0-00; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 02:23:29 -0800 Received: by wavehammer.waldi.eu.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id BF2813C017; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 11:23:26 +0100 (CET) Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 11:23:26 +0100 From: Bastian Blank [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: hylafax-server - is not upgradable Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=0F1p//8PRICkK4MW Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: --0F1p//8PRICkK4MW Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Package: hylafax-server Version: 1:4.2.1-2 Severity: grave hylafax-server is not upgradable: | # apt-get dist-upgrade -u | Reading Package Lists... Done | Building Dependency Tree... Done | Calculating Upgrade... Done | The following NEW packages will be installed: | gs gs-gpl | The following packages will be upgraded: | hylafax-client hylafax-server | 2 upgraded, 2 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. | Need to get 0B/3633kB of archives. | After unpacking 8057kB of additional disk space will be used. | Do you want to continue? [Y/n] | E: Couldn't configure pre-depend gs-aladdin for hylafax-server, probably = a dependency cycle. Also the pre-dependency lacks a consensus from debian-devel. Bastian --=20 Four thousand throats may be cut in one night by a running man. -- Klingon Soldier, Day of the Dove, stardate unknown --0F1p//8PRICkK4MW Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkIhn54ACgkQnw66O/MvCNEEXQCgj4FU45C/Zi9YwzqOoa/We8+T CT4AnRwcEJrjgqsMoEhD0q7NXv5ql9tt =OkkC -END PGP SIGNATURE- --0F1p//8PRICkK4MW-- --- Received: (at 297131-close) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Mar 2005 20:53:29 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 08 12:53:29 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D8lhp-0007mM-00; Tue, 08 Mar 2005 12:53:29 -0800 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D8lc6-0002Ow-00; Tue, 08 Mar 2005 15:47:34 -0500 From: Giuseppe Sacco [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $ Subject: Bug#297131: fixed in hylafax 1:4.2.1-4 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2005 15:47:34 -0500 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2 Source: hylafax Source-Version: 1:4.2.1-4 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of hylafax, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: hylafax-client_4.2.1-4_powerpc.deb to pool/main/h/hylafax/hylafax-client_4.2.1-4_powerpc.deb hylafax-doc_4.2.1-4_all.deb to pool/main/h/hylafax/hylafax-doc_4.2.1-4_all.deb hylafax-server_4.2.1-4_powerpc.deb to pool/main/h/hylafax/hylafax-server_4.2.1-4_powerpc.deb hylafax_4.2.1-4.diff.gz to pool/main/h/hylafax/hylafax_4.2.1-4.diff.gz hylafax_4.2.1-4.dsc to pool/main/h/hylafax/hylafax_4.2.1-4.dsc A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will
Bug#297134: marked as done (hylafax-server - default faxrcvd uses bashisms)
Your message dated Tue, 08 Mar 2005 15:47:34 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#297134: fixed in hylafax 1:4.2.1-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Feb 2005 11:14:25 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Feb 27 03:14:25 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from wavehammer.waldi.eu.org [82.139.196.55] (postfix) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D5MNV-0001jb-00; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 03:14:25 -0800 Received: by wavehammer.waldi.eu.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 25FC53C017; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 12:14:23 +0100 (CET) Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 12:14:23 +0100 From: Bastian Blank [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: hylafax-server - default faxrcvd uses bashisms Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=fUYQa+Pmc3FrFX/N Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: --fUYQa+Pmc3FrFX/N Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Package: hylafax-server Version: 1:4.2.1-2 Severity: grave Default faxrcvd uses the -a parameter of [, this is a bashism, but use /bin/sh, not /bin/bash. Bastian --=20 Our way is peace. -- Septimus, the Son Worshiper, Bread and Circuses, stardate 4040.7. --fUYQa+Pmc3FrFX/N Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkIhq48ACgkQnw66O/MvCNEo4ACgl7HVWiRB3g1+2npMKK9nFjyd DTEAnRP3w7jijoknqFVfGHHBKMhBVBE0 =numN -END PGP SIGNATURE- --fUYQa+Pmc3FrFX/N-- --- Received: (at 297134-close) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Mar 2005 20:53:10 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 08 12:53:10 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D8lhV-0007kv-00; Tue, 08 Mar 2005 12:53:09 -0800 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D8lc6-0002Oy-00; Tue, 08 Mar 2005 15:47:34 -0500 From: Giuseppe Sacco [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $ Subject: Bug#297134: fixed in hylafax 1:4.2.1-4 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2005 15:47:34 -0500 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 3 Source: hylafax Source-Version: 1:4.2.1-4 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of hylafax, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: hylafax-client_4.2.1-4_powerpc.deb to pool/main/h/hylafax/hylafax-client_4.2.1-4_powerpc.deb hylafax-doc_4.2.1-4_all.deb to pool/main/h/hylafax/hylafax-doc_4.2.1-4_all.deb hylafax-server_4.2.1-4_powerpc.deb to pool/main/h/hylafax/hylafax-server_4.2.1-4_powerpc.deb hylafax_4.2.1-4.diff.gz to pool/main/h/hylafax/hylafax_4.2.1-4.diff.gz hylafax_4.2.1-4.dsc to pool/main/h/hylafax/hylafax_4.2.1-4.dsc A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Giuseppe Sacco [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated hylafax package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2005 20:39:08 +0100 Source: hylafax
Bug#298556: marked as done (libgnupg-perl: Can not decrypt with gnupg 1.2.5 (changed gpg API))
Your message dated Tue, 08 Mar 2005 15:47:41 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#298556: fixed in libgnupg-perl 0.9-6 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Mar 2005 13:35:31 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 08 05:35:31 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from przedm-out.contium.pl (unity3.prod.id.pl) [193.178.214.19] by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D8ery-S0-00; Tue, 08 Mar 2005 05:35:30 -0800 Received: (qmail 25913 invoked by uid 1002); 8 Mar 2005 13:41:39 - Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: libgnupg-perl: Can not decrypt with gnupg 1.2.5 (changed gpg API) X-Mailer: reportbug 2.61 Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2005 14:41:39 +0100 X-BadReturnPath: [EMAIL PROTECTED] rewritten as [EMAIL PROTECTED] using From header Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.4 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE, NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: libgnupg-perl Version: 0.9-5 Severity: normal When I upgrade gnupg to newest available in sarge version, I cannot decrypt files using GnuPG. ## GnuPG: got from status fd: [GNUPG:] BEGIN_DECRYPTION GnuPG: reading from status fd 3 GnuPG: got from status fd: [GNUPG:] PLAINTEXT 62 1110287649 GnuPG: closing status fd 3 gpg: some signal caught ... exiting protocol error: expected DECRYPTION_OKAY got PLAINTEXT: at ./gpgtest.pl line 50 ## IMO the problem is an effect of change in upstream version somewhen between 1.2.4 and 1.2.5. Here is the corresponding entry (from gnupg's upstream changelog): 2004-06-18 David Shaw [EMAIL PROTECTED] * status.h, status.c (get_status_string), plaintext.c (handle_plaintext): New status tags PLAINTEXT and PLAINTEXT_LENGTH. So, current version of libgnupg-perl should have Depends: gnupg (1.2.5) Of course, it will make it uninstallable in sarge, so an upstream change is necessary, I'm affraid. Richard. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.7 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C Versions of packages libgnupg-perl depends on: ii gnupg 1.2.4-4GNU privacy guard - a free PGP rep -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 298556-close) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Mar 2005 20:53:09 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 08 12:53:09 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D8lhV-0007kg-00; Tue, 08 Mar 2005 12:53:09 -0800 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D8lcD-0002PS-00; Tue, 08 Mar 2005 15:47:41 -0500 From: Peter Palfrader [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $ Subject: Bug#298556: fixed in libgnupg-perl 0.9-6 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2005 15:47:41 -0500 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Source: libgnupg-perl Source-Version: 0.9-6 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of libgnupg-perl, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: libgnupg-perl_0.9-6.diff.gz to pool/main/libg/libgnupg-perl/libgnupg-perl_0.9-6.diff.gz libgnupg-perl_0.9-6.dsc to pool/main/libg/libgnupg-perl/libgnupg-perl_0.9-6.dsc libgnupg-perl_0.9-6_all.deb to pool/main/libg/libgnupg-perl/libgnupg-perl_0.9-6_all.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution
Bug#271922: marked as done (FTBFS / missing dependency?)
Your message dated Tue, 8 Mar 2005 22:00:34 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line fixed in experimental has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Sep 2004 07:04:08 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Sep 16 00:04:08 2004 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mail-out.m-online.net [212.18.0.9] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1C7qJL-0003o9-00; Thu, 16 Sep 2004 00:04:07 -0700 Received: from mail.m-online.net (svr14.m-online.net [192.168.3.144]) by svr8.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A6566A7B4 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 16 Sep 2004 09:04:06 +0200 (CEST) Received: from sol.so.argh.org (ppp-82-135-9-69.mnet-online.de [82.135.9.69]) by mail.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BE1212733A for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 16 Sep 2004 09:04:04 +0200 (CEST) Received: from aba by sol.so.argh.org with local (Exim 4.22 #1 (Debian) [+prerelease]) id 1C7qJH-0007DX-9n for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 16 Sep 2004 09:04:03 +0200 Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2004 09:04:03 +0200 From: Andreas Barth [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: FTBFS / missing dependency? Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i X-Editor: Vim http://www.vim.org/ Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Package: mixminion Version: 0.0.7.1-1 Tags: experimental Severity: serious Automatic build of mixminion_0.0.7.1-1 on freyja by sbuild/alpha 1.170.5 Build started at 20040915-1641 ** Checking available source versions... Fetching source files... Reading Package Lists... Building Dependency Tree... Need to get 440kB of source archives. Get:1 ftp://linux.mathematik.tu-darmstadt.de experimental/main mixminion 0.0.7.1-1 (dsc) [634B] Get:2 ftp://linux.mathematik.tu-darmstadt.de experimental/main mixminion 0.0.7.1-1 (tar) [438kB] Get:3 ftp://linux.mathematik.tu-darmstadt.de experimental/main mixminion 0.0.7.1-1 (diff) [1750B] Fetched 440kB in 0s (839kB/s) Download complete and in download only mode ** Using build dependencies supplied by package: Build-Depends: debhelper (= 4.1.65), libssl-dev (=0.9.7), python2.3, python2.3-dev, dpatch Checking for already installed source dependencies... debhelper: missing libssl-dev: missing python2.3: missing python2.3-dev: missing dpatch: missing Checking for source dependency conflicts... /usr/bin/sudo /usr/bin/apt-get --purge $CHROOT_OPTIONS -q -y install debhelper libssl-dev python2.3 python2.3-dev dpatch Reading Package Lists... Building Dependency Tree... The following extra packages will be installed: debconf debconf-i18n debconf-utils file gettext gettext-base html2text intltool-debian libbz2-1.0 liblocale-gettext-perl libmagic1 libreadline4 libssl0.9.7 libtext-charwidth-perl libtext-iconv-perl libtext-wrapi18n-perl po-debconf The following NEW packages will be installed: debconf debconf-i18n debconf-utils debhelper dpatch file gettext gettext-base html2text intltool-debian libbz2-1.0 liblocale-gettext-perl libmagic1 libreadline4 libssl-dev libssl0.9.7 libtext-charwidth-perl libtext-iconv-perl libtext-wrapi18n-perl po-debconf python2.3 python2.3-dev 0 packages upgraded, 22 newly installed, 0 to remove and 9 not upgraded. Need to get 0B/13.6MB of archives. After unpacking 48.0MB will be used. Selecting previously deselected package liblocale-gettext-perl. (Reading database ... 7434 files and directories currently installed.) Unpacking liblocale-gettext-perl (from .../liblocale-gettext-perl_1.01-17_alpha.deb) ... Selecting previously deselected package libtext-iconv-perl. Unpacking libtext-iconv-perl (from .../libtext-iconv-perl_1.2-3_alpha.deb) ... Selecting previously deselected package libtext-charwidth-perl. Unpacking libtext-charwidth-perl (from .../libtext-charwidth-perl_0.04-1_alpha.deb) ... Selecting previously deselected package libtext-wrapi18n-perl. Unpacking libtext-wrapi18n-perl (from .../libtext-wrapi18n-perl_0.06-1_all.deb) ... Selecting previously deselected package debconf-i18n. Unpacking
Bug#271202: marked as done (FTBFS: Add Build-Depend on python.)
Your message dated Tue, 8 Mar 2005 22:00:34 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line fixed in experimental has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Sep 2004 20:35:03 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Sep 11 13:35:03 2004 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from nowwhat.lateralis.org (tortoise.fousse.info) [81.56.190.81] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1C6EaN-0003ma-00; Sat, 11 Sep 2004 13:35:03 -0700 Received: from laurent by tortoise with local (Exim 4.34) id 1C6EaJ-0001Gb-W8; Sat, 11 Sep 2004 22:35:00 +0200 Date: Sat, 11 Sep 2004 22:34:59 +0200 From: Laurent Fousse [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: FTBFS: Add Build-Depend on python. Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=fdj2RfSjLxBAspz7 Content-Disposition: inline X-Reportbug-Version: 2.64 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040818i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: --fdj2RfSjLxBAspz7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Package: mixminion Version: 0.0.7.1-1 Severity: serious Tags: experimental patch Hi Peter, You need to build-depend on python because you call dh_python in the build script. Cheers, Laurent. --fdj2RfSjLxBAspz7 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFBQ2FzTUld8sb4OVwRAi3sAKCWpJlgQLerT19OgpuGyFAOzHiKoQCfRpia c9zrPw9JRUb+URwXFaS0l6E= =sFRl -END PGP SIGNATURE- --fdj2RfSjLxBAspz7-- --- Received: (at 271202-done) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Mar 2005 21:00:35 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 08 13:00:35 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from opium.multi24.com [213.239.202.166] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D8log-0008NI-00; Tue, 08 Mar 2005 13:00:34 -0800 Received: by opium.multi24.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 0DC4F40017D; Tue, 8 Mar 2005 22:00:34 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2005 22:00:34 +0100 From: Peter Palfrader [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: fixed in experimental Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Disposition: inline X-PGP: 1024D/94C09C7F 5B00 C96D 5D54 AEE1 206B AF84 DE7A AF6E 94C0 9C7F X-Request-PGP: http://www.palfrader.org/keys/94C09C7F.asc X-Accept-Language: de, en User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: This was fixed in experimental with the last upload. Since mixminion is currently only in experimental, I close these bugs. -- PGP signed and encrypted | .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** messages preferred.| : :' : The universal | `. `' Operating System http://www.palfrader.org/ | `-http://www.debian.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#298614: Upgrading from woody to 2.2.23-0.pre4 fails
Package: slapd Version: 2.2.23-0.pre4 Tags: experimental Severity: grave Upgrading from woody fails because of at least two problems: - The shell function move_old_database_directory_away is not found in postinst - An old slapd.conf is incorrect because attribute=... is used instead of attrs=... Torsten signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#298615: kdelibs/mipsel built with a broken g++ (3.3_3.3.5-9) compiler
Package: kdelibs Version: 4:3.3.2-3 Severity: grave Tags: sid kdelibs/mipsel built with a broken g++ (3.3_3.3.5-9) compiler. It has to rebuilt with an older or a newer (-10) version. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#298617: glibmm2.4/mipsel built with a broken g++ (3.3_3.3.5-9) compiler
Package: glibmm2.4 Version: 2.6.1-1 Severity: grave Tags: sid glibmm2.4/mipsel built with a broken g++ (3.3_3.3.5-9) compiler. It has to rebuilt with an older or a newer (-10) version. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#281548: marked as done (FTBFS in experimental)
Your message dated Tue, 8 Mar 2005 22:00:34 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line fixed in experimental has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Nov 2004 16:23:58 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Nov 16 08:23:58 2004 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mail-out.m-online.net [212.18.0.9] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1CU67Z-bC-00; Tue, 16 Nov 2004 08:23:57 -0800 Received: from mail.m-online.net (svr8.m-online.net [192.168.3.138]) by mail-out.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40C682E6D for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 16 Nov 2004 17:23:55 +0100 (CET) Received: from sol.so.argh.org (ppp-62-245-160-155.mnet-online.de [62.245.160.155]) by mail.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 16 Nov 2004 17:23:54 +0100 (CET) Received: from aba by sol.so.argh.org with local (Exim 4.22 #1 (Debian) [+prerelease]) id 1CU67U-0002Rk-Ik for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 16 Nov 2004 17:23:52 +0100 Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2004 17:23:52 +0100 From: Andreas Barth [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: FTBFS in experimental Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Editor: Vim http://www.vim.org/ User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Package: mixminion Version: 0.0.7.1-1 Severity: serious Tags: experimental Automatic build of mixminion_0.0.7.1-1 on swawa by sbuild/hppa 1.170.5 Build started at 20041116-1630 ** Checking available source versions... Fetching source files... Reading Package Lists... Building Dependency Tree... Need to get 440kB of source archives. Get:1 ftp://linux.mathematik.tu-darmstadt.de experimental/main mixminion 0.0.7.1-1 (dsc) [634B] Get:2 ftp://linux.mathematik.tu-darmstadt.de experimental/main mixminion 0.0.7.1-1 (tar) [438kB] Get:3 ftp://linux.mathematik.tu-darmstadt.de experimental/main mixminion 0.0.7.1-1 (diff) [1750B] Fetched 440kB in 0s (725kB/s) Download complete and in download only mode ** Using build dependencies supplied by package: Build-Depends: debhelper (= 4.1.65), libssl-dev (=0.9.7), python2.3, python2.3-dev, dpatch Checking for already installed source dependencies... debhelper: missing libssl-dev: missing python2.3: missing python2.3-dev: missing dpatch: missing Checking for source dependency conflicts... /usr/bin/sudo /usr/bin/apt-get --purge $CHROOT_OPTIONS -q -y install debhelper libssl-dev python2.3 python2.3-dev dpatch Reading Package Lists... Building Dependency Tree... The following extra packages will be installed: debconf-utils file gettext gettext-base html2text intltool-debian libbz2-1.0 libmagic1 libreadline4 libssl0.9.7 po-debconf The following NEW packages will be installed: debconf-utils debhelper dpatch file gettext gettext-base html2text intltool-debian libbz2-1.0 libmagic1 libreadline4 libssl-dev libssl0.9.7 po-debconf python2.3 python2.3-dev 0 packages upgraded, 16 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. Need to get 0B/11.5MB of archives. After unpacking 35.5MB will be used. Selecting previously deselected package libmagic1. (Reading database ... 7963 files and directories currently installed.) Unpacking libmagic1 (from .../libmagic1_4.10-3_hppa.deb) ... Selecting previously deselected package file. Unpacking file (from .../archives/file_4.10-3_hppa.deb) ... Selecting previously deselected package gettext-base. Unpacking gettext-base (from .../gettext-base_0.14.1-6_hppa.deb) ... Selecting previously deselected package libbz2-1.0. Unpacking libbz2-1.0 (from .../libbz2-1.0_1.0.2-1_hppa.deb) ... Selecting previously deselected package libreadline4. Unpacking libreadline4 (from .../libreadline4_4.3-15_hppa.deb) ... Selecting previously deselected package libssl0.9.7. Unpacking libssl0.9.7 (from .../libssl0.9.7_0.9.7e-1_hppa.deb) ... Selecting previously deselected package python2.3. Unpacking python2.3 (from .../python2.3_2.3.4-16_hppa.deb) ... Selecting previously deselected package debconf-utils. Unpacking debconf-utils (from
Bug#298621: Critical Buffer Overflow in mlterm
Package: mlterm Version: 2.8.0.cvs20040403-2 Severity: grave Tags: security Justification: user security hole According to Secunia the version of mlterm which is currently in testing and unstable has a serious buffer overflow. See http://secunia.com/advisories/14509/ for details. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i586) Kernel: Linux 2.6.10-1-386 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) (ignored: LC_ALL set to C) Versions of packages mlterm depends on: ii libc62.3.2.ds1-20GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libfontconfig1 2.2.3-4 generic font configuration library ii libfreetype6 2.1.7-2.3 FreeType 2 font engine, shared lib ii libfribidi0 0.10.4-6Free Implementation of the Unicode ii libglib2.0-0 2.6.2-1 The GLib library of C routines ii libgtk2.0-0 2.6.2-3 The GTK+ graphical user interface ii libice6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-10 Inter-Client Exchange library ii libsm6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-10 X Window System Session Management ii libx11-6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-10 X Window System protocol client li ii libxft2 2.1.2-6 FreeType-based font drawing librar ii libxrender1 0.8.3-7 X Rendering Extension client libra ii mlterm-common2.8.0.cvs20040403-2 MultiLingual TERMinal, common file ii xlibs4.3.0.dfsg.1-10 X Keyboard Extension (XKB) configu ii zlib1g 1:1.2.2-3 compression library - runtime -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: merge bugs: Mozilla #295133 -- libflash #283408
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 295133 grave Bug#295133: Weirdness: Page opens from command line, but sometimes hangs FF if opened from 'Go' menu. Severity set to `grave'. merge 295133 283408 Bug#283408: libflash: crashes on epiphany for many sites including blockbuster.com Bug#295133: Weirdness: Page opens from command line, but sometimes hangs FF if opened from 'Go' menu. Mismatch - only Bugs in same state can be merged: Values for `package' don't match: #283408 has `libflash-mozplugin'; #295133 has `mozilla-firefox' thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#298183: improved patch (from ubuntu)
Ubuntu backported a fix for this hole to lesstif1. From their changelog: * SECURITY UPDATE: More Xpm vulnerabilities. * lib/Xm-2.1/Xpmcreate.c, lib/Xm-2.1/Xpmscan.c: Applied patch from freedesktop.org to avoid integer overflows. * lib/Xm/LTXpm.c: Backported patch to old lesstif1. * References: CAN-2005-0605 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1920 https://bugzilla.ubuntulinux.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7210 I'm not going to try to islate the patch from their diff, as previous changes in their diff make that difficult: * SECURITY UDPATE: Fix multiple Xpm vulnerabilities. * lib/Xm-2.1/Xpm.c: Split into several files (as upstream did for easier patching), applied fixes pulled from new upstream version. References: - CAN-2004-0914 - Ubuntu #6273 - Debian #294099 * Added CAN numbers to previous changelog. * SECURITY: apply Xpm security fixes. (Closes: #1821) * CAN-2004-0687, CAN-2004-0688 Their diff is here: http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/main/l/lesstif1-1/lesstif1-1_0.93.94-4ubuntu1.3.diff.gz -- see shy jo signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#295310: Patch: gnome-cups-manager: Cannot add a new printer
Hello,
I'm afraid my corrected patch got lost in the mail, as it didn't make it
to the web interface. I'm resending it just in case. Sorry if you
receive it twice.
BC
--- gnome-cups-manager-0.25.orig/libgnomecups/gnome-cups-permission.c
2004-08-24 08:39:23.0 +0200
+++ gnome-cups-manager-0.25/libgnomecups/gnome-cups-permission.c
2005-03-07 14:47:43.0 +0100
@@ -76,20 +76,28 @@
gboolean force_admin, GtkWidget *toplevel)
{
static char const *su_app[] = {
- gnomesu
+ gksu
};
char const **args = g_new0 (char const *, argc + G_N_ELEMENTS (su_app) +
1 /* app */ + 1 /* null */);
unsigned offset, i = 0;
GError *err = NULL;
- if (force_admin !gnome_cups_can_admin ())
+ if (force_admin !gnome_cups_can_admin ()){
for (i = 0 ; i G_N_ELEMENTS (su_app) ; i++)
args [i] = (char *)su_app [i];
- offset = i;
- app = args [offset++] = gnome_cups_execname (app);
- for (i = 0 ; i argc ; i++)
- args [i + offset] = argv [i];
+ offset = i;
+ app = gnome_cups_execname (app);
+ for (i = 0 ; i argc ; i++)
+ app = (char *)g_strjoin((gchar *) , (gchar *)app,
(gchar *)argv [i], NULL);
+ args [offset++] = app;
+ }
+ else {
+ offset = i;
+ app = args [offset++] = gnome_cups_execname (app);
+ for (i = 0 ; i argc ; i++)
+ args [i + offset] = argv [i];
+ }
g_spawn_async (NULL, (char **)args, NULL, G_SPAWN_SEARCH_PATH,
NULL, NULL, NULL, err);
Bug#294404: mdadm: some additionnal informations ...
Package: mdadm Version: 1.9.0-1 Followup-For: Bug #294404 hi, I have the same bug and I solved it with changing the priority in rcS.d ( and runlevel.conf when I use file-rc ). if mdadm-raid is before udev ( so lesser than 04 ), the system create md* without udev and when udev start the good md* are recreated. in another way, when udev is started before, mdadm -E -s creates temporary devices with the name /dev/.tmp.md[0-9]* . so if mdadm-raid can do a mdadm -E -s and concatenate the result to mdadm.conf if wanted and/or necessary . so mdadm -A -s can assemble well detected md* ( like the .tmp.md[0-9]* ). if mdadm -E -s create good /dev/md* ( I don't know how it create the .tmp.md* ), udev will handle them correctly with a restart; I don't know how but maybe mdadm must send a signal to hotplug/udev to create the good device. Amicalement, Samuel. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-686-smp Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) Versions of packages mdadm depends on: ii debconf 1.4.30.11Debian configuration management sy ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-20 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii makedev 2.3.1-75 Creates device files in /dev -- debconf information: mdadm/autostart: true mdadm/mail_to: root mdadm/warning: mdadm/start_daemon: true -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Fixed in upload of tetex-bin 3.0-1 to experimental
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 298257 + fixed-in-experimental Bug#298257: tetex-bin: [ARM] FTBFS on experimental? Tags were: experimental Tags added: fixed-in-experimental tag 298315 + fixed-in-experimental Bug#298315: tetex-bin: Fails to install Tags were: experimental Tags added: fixed-in-experimental quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: please check if these apply to zmailer
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 152181 zmailer Bug#152181: bad .forward file results in flood of errors to postmaster Bug reassigned from package `zmailer-ssl' to `zmailer'. reassign 188642 zmailer Bug#188642: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: 2.99.55 caused DoS attack] Bug reassigned from package `zmailer-ssl' to `zmailer'. reassign 225061 zmailer Bug#225061: zmailer-ssl: can't start router process Bug reassigned from package `zmailer-ssl' to `zmailer'. severity 225061 important Bug#225061: zmailer-ssl: can't start router process Severity set to `important'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#195168: marked as done (siege-ssl: FTBFS: Cannot find openssl/e_os.h)
Your message dated Wed, 9 Mar 2005 09:03:02 +0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line fixed in siege has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 29 May 2003 00:38:29 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed May 28 19:38:28 2003 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from blount.mail.mindspring.net [207.69.200.226] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 19LBR6-00077i-00; Wed, 28 May 2003 19:38:28 -0500 Received: from user-119bq03.biz.mindspring.com ([66.149.232.3]) by blount.mail.mindspring.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 19LBR5-0007PK-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 28 May 2003 20:38:27 -0400 Received: from daniel by user-119bq03.biz.mindspring.com with local (Exim 4.20) id 19LBQv-0002qP-Ql for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 28 May 2003 17:38:17 -0700 To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: siege-ssl: FTBFS: Cannot find openssl/e_os.h From: Daniel Schepler [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 28 May 2003 17:38:14 -0700 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: Daniel Schepler [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_01,HAS_PACKAGE version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_05_24 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_05_24 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp) Package: siege-ssl Version: 2.55-1 Severity: serious From my build log: ... gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../include -I/usr/include/openssl -I/usr/include -D_REENTRANT -D_POSIX_PTHREAD_SEMANTICS -c `test -f main.c || echo './'`main.c In file included from main.c:44: ssl.h:33:27: openssl/e_os.h: No such file or directory make[2]: *** [main.o] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/siege-ssl-2.55/src' make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/siege-ssl-2.55' make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2 -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux frobnitz 2.4.21-pre5 #1 Sat Mar 1 09:01:10 PST 2003 i686 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C -- Daniel Schepler Please don't disillusion me. I [EMAIL PROTECTED]haven't had breakfast yet. -- Orson Scott Card --- Received: (at 195168-done) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Mar 2005 01:03:39 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 08 17:03:39 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from sorrow.cyrius.com [65.19.161.204] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D8pbv-DK-00; Tue, 08 Mar 2005 17:03:39 -0800 Received: by sorrow.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 10) id D719464D45; Wed, 9 Mar 2005 01:03:34 + (UTC) Received: by deprecation.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 877024EDA4; Wed, 9 Mar 2005 09:03:02 +0800 (CST) Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2005 09:03:02 +0800 From: Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: fixed in siege Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: siege-ssl has been removed from the archive now. This bug has been fixed in siege in main. -- Martin Michlmayr http://www.cyrius.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#297796: emacs21: FTBFS: timestamp skew issues.
Jérôme Marant [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I don't agree. It only has to be documented. Let's be frank: I personaly don't like the idea of the voodoo magic which acts in the shadow and breaks unexpectedly some random day. By voodoo magic do you mean the old approach, the possible md5 approach, or both? If you mean the old approach, then I obviously don't see it to be as cut and dry as you do. To be fair, the only reason the current code broke is because the relative timestamps for files in the debian diff are unpredictable, and I didn't think about that. Of course, that means that *any* files mentioned in the debian patch are potentially trouble as far as make is concerned. Without this problem, it would have been quite correct to have autofiles.diff depend on the files that may influence its contents (i.e. the *.dpatch files). Of course if you just mean that the .md5 approach would be voodoo magic, then I'll agree that it's not completely straightforward. Though to the extent I've thought it through so far, I haven't come up with any problems. In any case, even if we go with the only update when requested dpatch-edit-patch approach that I think you're advocating, I'd still want a target for it so we can just invoke that when needed, i.e. something (only very roughly) like this: update-autofiles-diff: # rm aclocal.m4 so it doesn't confuse newer autoconfs, but touch it # so ./Makefile won't be upset if it's not recreated (b/c not needed). (dpatch-edit-patch ... autofiles.dpatch cd DPATCHDIR \ rm -f aclocal.m4 \ touch aclocal.m4 \ aclocal \ autoconf exit) (...which is really not that much different than what we're already doing, but I'll agree that handling everything with dpatch would be a bit cleaner, and if it works right, then I'm fine with that.) So it seems like the *only* thing we're in potential disagreement about is whether we should automatically invoke this target *iff* there's a solid way to automatically determine when doing so would be appropriate. IMO, creating a whole copy of the tree and diffing at build-time is not worth the effort. You have the final word, anyway :P It's not only not worth the effort, but it should never have happened under normal circumstances. As I mentioned, the only reason it did in this case was because I didn't consider the problem presented by the timestamps of files in the debian diff and so came up with a broken solution. The way things were intended to work, the autofiles.diff should only have been re-built if you changed a relevant file (i.e. *.dpatch), or if you manually requested a rebuild during prepare-release. -- Rob Browning rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org; previously @cs.utexas.edu GPG starting 2002-11-03 = 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4
Bug#169333: marked as done (nrpe plugin it's not installable with nagios (new netsaint))
Your message dated Wed, 9 Mar 2005 09:05:16 +0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line netsaint-nrpe removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Nov 2002 11:46:41 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Nov 16 05:46:41 2002 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from lisa.lombardiacom.it (mail2.elitel.it) [212.34.224.193] by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 18D1PM-0007Ad-00; Sat, 16 Nov 2002 05:46:41 -0600 Received: (qmail 21515 invoked from network); 16 Nov 2002 11:46:09 - Received: from unknown (HELO dialup-1-0626.elitel.biz) (212.183.170.114) by lisa.lombardiacom.it with SMTP; 16 Nov 2002 11:46:08 - Subject: nrpe plugin it's not installable with nagios (new netsaint) From: Roberto Sebastiano [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.0 Date: 16 Nov 2002 12:46:29 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01 version=2.41 X-Spam-Level: Package: netsaint-nrpe Severity: wishlist Netsaint-nrpe-plugin is not installable with nagios, but netsaint-plugins are. Any chance of getting netsaint-nrpe working with nagios ? Cheers, -- Roberto Sebastiano [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Received: (at 169333-done) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Mar 2005 01:05:46 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 08 17:05:46 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from sorrow.cyrius.com [65.19.161.204] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D8pdx-Nk-00; Tue, 08 Mar 2005 17:05:45 -0800 Received: by sorrow.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 10) id 4FC7364D40; Wed, 9 Mar 2005 01:05:43 + (UTC) Received: by deprecation.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 420034EDA4; Wed, 9 Mar 2005 09:05:16 +0800 (CST) Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2005 09:05:16 +0800 From: Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: netsaint-nrpe removed Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: The netsaint-nrpe* packages have been removed from Debian. This is because netsaint-nrpe-plugin is not installable with nagios, but netsaint-plugins are. -- Martin Michlmayr http://www.cyrius.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#199609: marked as done (zmailer-ssl: FTBFS: Broken Build-Depends on libgdbmg1-dev)
Your message dated Wed, 9 Mar 2005 09:07:39 +0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line fixed in zmailer has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at maintonly) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Jul 2003 21:32:18 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jul 01 16:32:07 2003 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from hall.mail.mindspring.net [207.69.200.60] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 19XSjN-0005eb-00; Tue, 01 Jul 2003 16:32:05 -0500 Received: from user-119bq03.biz.mindspring.com ([66.149.232.3]) by hall.mail.mindspring.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 19XSjN-0005cS-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 01 Jul 2003 17:32:05 -0400 Received: from daniel by user-119bq03.biz.mindspring.com with local (Exim 4.20) id 19XSjN-0002pi-4E for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 01 Jul 2003 14:32:05 -0700 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: zmailer-ssl: FTBFS: Broken Build-Depends on libgdbmg1-dev From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Daniel Schepler [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 01 Jul 2003 14:32:05 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_20,HAS_PACKAGE,NO_REAL_NAME version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_06_27 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_06_27 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp) Package: zmailer-ssl Version: 2.99.55-3 Severity: serious The source package zmailer-ssl currently cannot be built from source in unstable because it Build-Depends on libgdbmg1-dev. This package no longer exists, nor is it a virtual package provided by any package in unstable. Please update this to libgdbm-dev. -- Daniel Schepler Please don't disillusion me. I [EMAIL PROTECTED]haven't had breakfast yet. -- Orson Scott Card --- Received: (at 199609-done) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Mar 2005 01:07:49 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 08 17:07:49 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from sorrow.cyrius.com [65.19.161.204] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D8pfx-jX-00; Tue, 08 Mar 2005 17:07:49 -0800 Received: by sorrow.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 10) id 4CC4164D45; Wed, 9 Mar 2005 01:07:49 + (UTC) Received: by deprecation.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 1B93B4EDA4; Wed, 9 Mar 2005 09:07:39 +0800 (CST) Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2005 09:07:39 +0800 From: Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: fixed in zmailer Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: zmailer-ssl has been removed from non-US; these bugs are fixed in zmailer in main. -- Martin Michlmayr http://www.cyrius.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#232215: ¢³øL¦@ÅVDVDîñI}jAü¯ºlDÝIàen[hIwRAV[YVOL.1x
(B[EMAIL PROTECTED]@i®ïÐIIj (BóMðÛ·éêÍ»Ì|[EMAIL PROTECTED] (BÈPðy[Whttp://www.freewebs.com/stopdvd98s/ÜÅ (B[EMAIL PROTECTED]://www.freewebs.com/syououdvd98s/ (B (B¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ (B[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED] A_gcucEObYÀµâ® [EMAIL (BPROTECTED]@ [EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@@ (B[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL (BPROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@w (B9800~lbg x[EMAIL PROTECTED]@| RAÁW |@ (B¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ (B (B[EMAIL PROTECTED] (B[EMAIL PROTECTED] (B[EMAIL PROTECTED],560ø«ÌjiÌÅ·ÌÅXµ¨è¢µÜ·B(_ _)@ (B (B[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL (BPROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL (BPROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL (BPROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@ (B[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED] X ü × I w R A V [ Y VOL (B.1 x [EMAIL PROTECTED]@®@ (B[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED] À À è ¿ i I ½ Æ I \25,560ø« (BI ¡@ [EMAIL PROTECTED]@ (B (B[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@ (B[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@@ @ [EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL (BPROTECTED]@DwI@ (B[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@@ [EMAIL PROTECTED] (B[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@ @ (B@ [EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@rIçÊöóI (B[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@@ (B[EMAIL PROTECTED]@ [EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@@ (B~~~ (B (B[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (B[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL (BPROTECTED]@ (B[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (B[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL (BPROTECTED]@³¿Å²Äàð·µã°Ü·Ìű¿çÖǤ¼II (B[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL (BPROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL (BPROTECTED]@@ [EMAIL PROTECTED]@¤ (B[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@ (Bhttp://www.freewebs.com/syousaidvd98s/ (B (B[EMAIL PROTECTED] (B [EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL (BPROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL (BPROTECTED]@yahoo.co.jp (B (B¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ (B[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL (BPROTECTED]@DVDArfIAA_gObYiål̨à¿ájÈçRRI@ (B[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL (BPROTECTED]@üè¢ïÈAÈA_g¤ið9.800~ÏêÅI [EMAIL PROTECTED]@@ (B@ [EMAIL PROTECTED]@ [EMAIL (BPROTECTED]@ [EMAIL (BPROTECTED]@@ (B[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL (BPROTECTED]@\QSÔÈàzVXeÅ·®É¨Í¯I\@ [EMAIL PROTECTED]@ (B[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL (BPROTECTED]@w 9800~lbg [EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@ (B¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ (B (B (B-- (BTo UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bwith a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#295344: gxine: segfault at startup if LANG=de_DE
merge 289412 295344 thanks This is fixed in 0.4.2. I added some code to tell gettext to use UTF-8. This has the side-effect of causing some UTF-8 output on non-UTF-8 terminals (in locales where non-ASCII characters are normally used), but I consider that to be a minor problem. -- | Darren Salt | linux (or ds) at | nr. Ashington, | woody, sarge, | youmustbejoking | Northumberland | RISC OS | demon co uk | Toon Army | I don't ask for much, just untold riches... Arguments are to be avoided; they are always vulgar and often convincing. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Bug#298052: libapache2-mod-php4: apache2/php.ini : invalid memory_limit
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 298052 normal Bug#298052: libapache2-mod-php4: apache2/php.ini : invalid memory_limit Severity set to `normal'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: doomlegacy-sdl: combines incompatible, non-dfsg licences
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: owner 264816 ! Bug#264816: doomlegacy-sdl: combines incompatible, non-dfsg licences Owner recorded as Lucas Wall [EMAIL PROTECTED]. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#290983: marked as done (tclmagick_0.44-1(hppa/unstable): FTBFS: cannot find install-sh)
Your message dated Wed, 09 Mar 2005 06:38:41 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line tclmagick_0.44-1(hppa/unstable): FTBFS: cannot find install-sh has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Jan 2005 02:00:22 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jan 17 18:00:22 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mmjgroup.com [192.34.35.33] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1CqifO-00019Y-00; Mon, 17 Jan 2005 18:00:22 -0800 Received: from mix.mmjgroup.com (mix.mmjgroup.com [192.34.35.16]) by mmjgroup.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1ECA717042 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 17 Jan 2005 19:00:21 -0700 (MST) Received: by mix.mmjgroup.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id A6B6E8F30B; Mon, 17 Jan 2005 19:00:21 -0700 (MST) Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2005 19:00:21 -0700 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: tclmagick_0.44-1(hppa/unstable): FTBFS: cannot find install-sh Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.4 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE, NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: tclmagick Version: 0.44-1 Severity: serious There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: Automatic build of tclmagick_0.44-1 on sarti by sbuild/hppa 1.170.5 Build started at 20050118-0009 [...] ** Using build dependencies supplied by package: Build-Depends: debhelper (= 4.0.0), libmagick6-dev, tcl8.4-dev, tk8.4-dev [...] rm -f *.lo make[2]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/tclmagick-0.44/generic' Making clean in . make[2]: Entering directory `/build/buildd/tclmagick-0.44' rm -rf .libs _libs rm -f *.lo make[2]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/tclmagick-0.44' make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/tclmagick-0.44' dh_clean debian/rules build dh_testdir # Add here commands to configure the package. ./configure --with-tcl=/usr/lib/tcl8.4/ --with-tk=/usr/lib/tk8.4/ --with-magick=/usr/bin/Wand-config --enable-threads --with-tclinclude=/usr/include/tcl8.4/ configure: error: cannot find install-sh or install.sh in . ./.. ./../.. make: *** [configure-stamp] Error 1 A full build log can be found at: http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?arch=hppapkg=tclmagickver=0.44-1 --- Received: (at 290983-done) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Mar 2005 04:38:44 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 08 20:38:44 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from ip212-226-168-228.adsl.kpnqwest.fi (esme.liw.iki.fi) [212.226.168.228] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D8sy4-r3-00; Tue, 08 Mar 2005 20:38:44 -0800 Received: by esme.liw.iki.fi (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 2D80B284694; Wed, 9 Mar 2005 06:38:42 +0200 (EET) Subject: Re: tclmagick_0.44-1(hppa/unstable): FTBFS: cannot find install-sh From: Lars Wirzenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2005 06:38:41 +0200 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.4 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: It seems clear to me that this bug can be closed. 0.44-1 failed to build on hppa, but 0.45-1 has been built on hppa and 0.44-1 seems to not be in Debian anymore. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#298621: marked as done (Critical Buffer Overflow in mlterm)
Your message dated Wed, 09 Mar 2005 14:09:53 +0900 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Critical Buffer Overflow in mlterm has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Mar 2005 21:38:48 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 08 13:38:48 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from cm181-223.liwest.at (mail.nadev.net) [81.10.181.223] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D8mPf-0005Cz-00; Tue, 08 Mar 2005 13:38:48 -0800 Received: from Cardassia.nadev.net (cardassia.nadev.net [:::192.168.0.66]) by mail.nadev.net with esmtp; Tue, 08 Mar 2005 22:38:15 +0100 id E48E.422E1B48.71AB Received: by Cardassia.nadev.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Tue, 8 Mar 2005 22:38:15 +0100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Thomas Prokosch [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Critical Buffer Overflow in mlterm X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8 Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2005 22:38:15 +0100 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.8 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS, FROM_HAS_MIXED_NUMS,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: mlterm Version: 2.8.0.cvs20040403-2 Severity: grave Tags: security Justification: user security hole According to Secunia the version of mlterm which is currently in testing and unstable has a serious buffer overflow. See http://secunia.com/advisories/14509/ for details. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i586) Kernel: Linux 2.6.10-1-386 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) (ignored: LC_ALL set to C) Versions of packages mlterm depends on: ii libc62.3.2.ds1-20GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libfontconfig1 2.2.3-4 generic font configuration library ii libfreetype6 2.1.7-2.3 FreeType 2 font engine, shared lib ii libfribidi0 0.10.4-6Free Implementation of the Unicode ii libglib2.0-0 2.6.2-1 The GLib library of C routines ii libgtk2.0-0 2.6.2-3 The GTK+ graphical user interface ii libice6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-10 Inter-Client Exchange library ii libsm6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-10 X Window System Session Management ii libx11-6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-10 X Window System protocol client li ii libxft2 2.1.2-6 FreeType-based font drawing librar ii libxrender1 0.8.3-7 X Rendering Extension client libra ii mlterm-common2.8.0.cvs20040403-2 MultiLingual TERMinal, common file ii xlibs4.3.0.dfsg.1-10 X Keyboard Extension (XKB) configu ii zlib1g 1:1.2.2-3 compression library - runtime -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 298621-done) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Mar 2005 05:09:54 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 08 21:09:54 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from orochi.topstudio.co.jp (mail.topstudio.co.jp) [202.224.239.193] (postfix) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D8tSE-0005fX-00; Tue, 08 Mar 2005 21:09:54 -0800 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.topstudio.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86C88223104 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 9 Mar 2005 14:09:53 +0900 (JST) Received: from mail.topstudio.co.jp ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (hydra [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 05601-08 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 9 Mar 2005 14:09:53 +0900 (JST) Received: from cyclopus.topstudio-unet.ocn.ne.jp.topstudio.co.jp (cyclopus.topstudio-unet.ocn.ne.jp [192.168.1.3]) by mail.topstudio.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CDE3223101 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 9 Mar 2005 14:09:53 +0900 (JST) Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2005 14:09:53 +0900 From: Kenshi Muto [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Critical Buffer Overflow in mlterm User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.11.30 (Wonderwall) SEMI/1.14.6 (Maruoka) FLIM/1.14.6 (Marutamachi) APEL/10.6 MULE
Bug#267181: scsi-idle: ftbfs [sparc] nonexistant build-dependancy kernel-headers-2.4
Seems to me that this package has built: http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?pkg=scsi-idlever=2.4.23-5arch=sparcstamp=1093601546file=logas=raw Package kernel-headers-2.4 is a virtual package provided by: kernel-headers-2.4.27-1-sparc64-smp 2.4.27-1 kernel-headers-2.4.27-1-sparc32-smp 2.4.27-1 kernel-headers-2.4.27-1 2.4.27-1 kernel-headers-2.4.27-1-sparc64 2.4.27-1 kernel-headers-2.4.27-1-sparc32 2.4.27-1 You should explicitly select one to install. E: Package kernel-headers-2.4 has no installation candidate kernel-headers-2.4 is a virtual package provided by: kernel-headers-2.4.27-1-sparc64-smp kernel-headers-2.4.27-1-sparc32-smp kernel-headers-2.4.27-1 kernel-headers-2.4.27-1-sparc64 kernel-headers-2.4.27-1-sparc32 Using kernel-headers-2.4.27-1-sparc64-smp (no default, using first one) The Debian archive also has a sparc binary package for 2.4.23-5. So I assume the bug can be closed, yes? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#297796: emacs21: FTBFS: timestamp skew issues.
Rob Browning [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: So it seems like the *only* thing we're in potential disagreement about is whether we should automatically invoke this target *iff* there's a solid way to automatically determine when doing so would be appropriate. Hmm. As a less automagic alternative, perhaps I could just arrange it so that we just detect when the debian/autofiles.dpatch is out of date and then print a suitable error message, rather than trying to update it, i.e. $ fakeroot debian/rules binary ... ERROR: debian/patches/autofiles.dpatch out of date with respect to other patches. Please update it via debian/rules update-autofiles-dpatch and try again. $ The test would be handled via md5sum as previously described. -- Rob Browning rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org; previously @cs.utexas.edu GPG starting 2002-11-03 = 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Bug#297010 acknowledged by developer (Bug#297010: fixed in lvm2 2.01.04-3)
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reopen 297010 Bug#297010: libc6-dev - O_NOATIME needed for lvm Bug reopened, originator not changed. retitle 297010 libc6-dev: O_NOATIME documented but missing from headers Bug#297010: libc6-dev - O_NOATIME needed for lvm Changed Bug title. severity 297010 wishlist Bug#297010: libc6-dev: O_NOATIME documented but missing from headers Severity set to `wishlist'. reassign 297010 libc6-dev Bug#297010: libc6-dev: O_NOATIME documented but missing from headers Bug reassigned from package `lvm2' to `libc6-dev'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#297010: acknowledged by developer (Bug#297010: fixed in lvm2 2.01.04-3)
reopen 297010 retitle 297010 libc6-dev: O_NOATIME documented but missing from headers severity 297010 wishlist reassign 297010 libc6-dev thanks Changes: lvm2 (2.01.04-3) unstable; urgency=high . * Workaround missing O_NOATIME. (closes: #297010) The bug still remains but with lvm2 working around it it becomes wishlist. I still think this should be fixed for sarge so documentation and implementation are in sync for stable. Thanks for the workaround upload. MfG Goswin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#298183: lesstif1-1: Further unfixed XPM buffer overflows (CAN-2005-0605)
Hi!
Ubuntu backported a fix for this hole to lesstif1. From their changelog:
* SECURITY UPDATE: More Xpm vulnerabilities.
* lib/Xm-2.1/Xpmcreate.c, lib/Xm-2.1/Xpmscan.c: Applied patch from
freedesktop.org to avoid integer overflows.
* lib/Xm/LTXpm.c: Backported patch to old lesstif1.
* References:
CAN-2005-0605
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D1920
https://bugzilla.ubuntulinux.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D7210
The change for lesstif1 was rather trivial since the variables
are declared correctly already. So the patch for the old lesstif1
reduces to
--- lesstif1-1-0.93.94.orig/lib/Xm/LTXpm.c
+++ lesstif1-1-0.93.94/lib/Xm/LTXpm.c
@@ -6305,6 +6305,9 @@
ibpp = image-bits_per_pixel;
offset = image-xoffset;
+if (image-bitmap_unit 0)
+ return (_LtXpmNoMemory);
+
if ((image-bits_per_pixel | image-depth) == 1) {
ibu = image-bitmap_unit;
for (y = 0; y height; y++)
Regards,
Martin
--
Martin Pitt http://www.piware.de
Ubuntu Developerhttp://www.ubuntulinux.org
Debian GNU/Linux Developer http://www.debian.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Processed: Re: Processed: cloning 297010, reassign 297010 to lvm2, reassign -1 to libc6-dev
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 298488 normal Bug#298488: libc6-dev - O_NOATIME needed for lvm Severity set to `normal'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#298488: Bug#297010: linux-kernel-header: O_NOATIME needed for lvm
At Wed, 02 Mar 2005 19:50:19 +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: Can your problem be fixed to define O_NOATIME in lvm2 or linux-kernel-headers package? Regards, -- gotom I assigned the bug is to both. The headers because they have the bug and lvm because it can work around it (thereby reducing its severity to normal). OK. Bastian separated this bug report into #297010 and #298488. If you don't think l-k-h oder libc6-dev should implement the O_NOATIME it documents then please reassign it to lvm2 alone with an explanation. That is your perogative as maintainer but I stand by my decision that it is a critical bug and both packages are involved. I don't think it should be assigned only to lvm2. Glibc should also be fixed. However I downgrade #298488 into normal because lvm has the actual critical bug, and if lvm needs to use kernel headers, lvm should have such header definition itself. Regards, -- gotom -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
