Bug#298824: raidtools2: raidreconf broken for disks with different size
Package: raidtools2 Version: 1.00.3-17 Severity: critical Justification: causes serious data loss Running raidreconf to add another disk to a RAID-5 aborts when almost being done with error message: raid5_map_global_to_local: disk 4 block out of range: 488098 (487840) gblock = 1464296 This happens if the disks are not 100% the same size. Due to differences in disk geometry even drives of the same size have different amounts of blocks. The array being modified with all data on it is lost. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.7-1-686 Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (ignored: LC_ALL set to de_DE.UTF -8) Versions of packages raidtools2 depends on: ii debconf 1.4.30.10Debian configuration management sy ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-18 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii makedev 2.3.1-75 Creates device files in /dev -- debconf information excluded -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#298688: CAN-2005-0683: Disclosure of installation path
For the record: ; Print out errors (as a part of the output). For production web sites, ; you're strongly encouraged to turn this feature off, and use error logging ; instead (see below). Keeping display_errors enabled on a production web site ; may reveal security information to end users, such as file paths on your Web ; server, your database schema or other information. display_errors = On So it does, what is your personal view about this ? As a php developper i would say that default should not be the debug mode, would you reassign it to php ? Regards Alban -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#298257: marked as done (tetex-bin: [ARM] FTBFS on experimental?)
Your message dated Thu, 10 Mar 2005 09:50:39 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Processed: Fixed in upload of tetex-bin 3.0-1 to experimental has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Mar 2005 03:20:14 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Mar 05 19:20:13 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from orochi.topstudio.co.jp (mail.topstudio.co.jp) [202.224.239.193] (postfix) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D7mJR-000842-00; Sat, 05 Mar 2005 19:20:13 -0800 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.topstudio.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62248223041 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 6 Mar 2005 12:20:12 +0900 (JST) Received: from mail.topstudio.co.jp ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (hydra [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 15706-04 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 6 Mar 2005 12:20:12 +0900 (JST) Received: from localhost.localdomain (unicorn.kmuto.org [192.168.0.15]) by mail.topstudio.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id D08F322303F for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 6 Mar 2005 12:20:11 +0900 (JST) Received: by localhost.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000) id A83672AF1FC; Sun, 6 Mar 2005 12:20:11 +0900 (JST) From: Kenshi Muto [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: tetex-bin: [ARM] FTBFS on experimental? X-Debbugs-CC: Kenshi Muto [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: SEMI/1.14.6 (Maruoka) FLIM/1.14.6 (Marutamachi) APEL/10.6 MULE XEmacs/21.4 (patch 17) (Jumbo Shrimp) (i386-debian-linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - Maruoka) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sun, 6 Mar 2005 12:20:11 +0900 (JST) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at topstudio.co.jp X-BadReturnPath: [EMAIL PROTECTED] rewritten as [EMAIL PROTECTED] using From header Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE, X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: tetex-bin Version: 2.99.12.20050203-beta-1 Severity: serious Tags: experimental I put tetex-bin 2.99.12.20050203-beta-1 to my arm buildd queue. As you mentioned ago, I installed tetex-base 2.99.9.20050111-beta-2. Unfortunatelly build process looked go infinite loop. test -e ../../tetex-common/common.variables \ test ../../tetex-common/common.variables -nt debian/common.variables \ touch -t `ls -l --time-style=+%Y%m%d%H%M.%S ../../tetex-common/common.variables | \ sed -e '[EMAIL PROTECTED]:alpha:]]*[[:space:]]*[[:digit:]] \([[:digit:].]*\) \.\./[EMAIL PROTECTED]@'` debian/common.variables_newer || true test -e ../../tetex-common/common.functions.in \ test ../../tetex-common/common.functions.in -nt debian/common.functions.in \ touch -t `ls -l --time-style=+%Y%m%d%H%M.%S ../../tetex-common/common.functions.in | \ sed -e '[EMAIL PROTECTED]:alpha:]]*[[:space:]]*[[:digit:]] \([[:digit:].]*\) \.\./[EMAIL PROTECTED]@'` debian/common.functions_newer || true eperl -P -o debian/rules debian/rules.in test -e ../../tetex-common/common.variables \ test ../../tetex-common/common.variables -nt debian/common.variables \ touch -t `ls -l --time-style=+%Y%m%d%H%M.%S ../../tetex-common/common.variables | \ sed -e '[EMAIL PROTECTED]:alpha:]]*[[:space:]]*[[:digit:]] \([[:digit:].]*\) \.\./[EMAIL PROTECTED]@'` debian/common.variables_newer || true test -e ../../tetex-common/common.functions.in \ test ../../tetex-common/common.functions.in -nt debian/common.functions.in \ touch -t `ls -l --time-style=+%Y%m%d%H%M.%S ../../tetex-common/common.functions.in | \ sed -e '[EMAIL PROTECTED]:alpha:]]*[[:space:]]*[[:digit:]] \([[:digit:].]*\) \.\./[EMAIL PROTECTED]@'` debian/common.functions_newer || true eperl -P -o debian/rules debian/rules.in ... Full log (before I killed) is: http://experimental.ftbfs.de/fetch.php?pkg=tetex-binver=2.99.12.20050203-beta-1arch=armstamp=1110038196file=logas=raw Hmm, Is this buildd's time problem? buildd is working with UTC clock. Thanks, -- Kenshi Muto [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Received: (at 298257-done) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Mar 2005 08:50:43 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Mar 10
Bug#298771: marked as done (buffer overflow in dissect_a11_radius() (CAN-2005-0699))
Your message dated Thu, 10 Mar 2005 05:02:12 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#298771: fixed in ethereal 0.10.9-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Mar 2005 21:48:03 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Mar 09 13:48:03 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from kitenet.net [64.62.161.42] (postfix) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D992B-0002dF-00; Wed, 09 Mar 2005 13:48:03 -0800 Received: from dragon.kitenet.net (unknown [66.168.94.177]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN Joey Hess, Issuer Joey Hess (verified OK)) by kitenet.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92A4918064 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 9 Mar 2005 21:48:02 + (GMT) Received: by dragon.kitenet.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id A576A6E352; Wed, 9 Mar 2005 16:50:58 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2005 16:50:57 -0500 From: Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: buffer overflow in dissect_a11_radius() (CAN-2005-0699) Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=LQksG6bCIzRHxTLp Content-Disposition: inline X-Reportbug-Version: 3.8 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: --LQksG6bCIzRHxTLp Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Package: ethereal Version: 0.10.9-1 Severity: grave Tags: security There is remote buffer overflow vulnerability in Ethereal dissector for= =20 CDMA2000 A11 packets. Vulnerability is located in dissect_a11_radius() fu= nction=20 in packet-3g-a11.c used for RADIUS authentication dissection. Number of b= ytes=20 that will be copied from packet to buffer in stack is taken from packet i= tself.=20 16 bytes are reserved for that buffer, and string length can be up to 256= bytes=20 (unsigned char), so is possible to overflow local variables and return ad= dress.=20 http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/392659 A fixed version should be released upstream on March 10th. I think a fix is already available in upstream svn, based on this page: http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/12759/solution/ --=20 see shy jo --LQksG6bCIzRHxTLp Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFCL2/Bd8HHehbQuO8RAjb+AJ9GMaxXOOCNclJnQKJDxhN8qZHoWACeO5tf y4cJyiVDbMXLoDli2KCplsI= =jmnb -END PGP SIGNATURE- --LQksG6bCIzRHxTLp-- --- Received: (at 298771-close) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Mar 2005 10:08:03 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Mar 10 02:08:03 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D9KaJ-0005IR-00; Thu, 10 Mar 2005 02:08:03 -0800 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D9KUe-0003Kd-00; Thu, 10 Mar 2005 05:02:12 -0500 From: Frederic Peters [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $ Subject: Bug#298771: fixed in ethereal 0.10.9-2 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 05:02:12 -0500 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Source: ethereal Source-Version: 0.10.9-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of ethereal, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: ethereal-common_0.10.9-2_i386.deb to pool/main/e/ethereal/ethereal-common_0.10.9-2_i386.deb ethereal-dev_0.10.9-2_i386.deb to pool/main/e/ethereal/ethereal-dev_0.10.9-2_i386.deb ethereal_0.10.9-2.diff.gz to
Bug#298844: path to the kernel not passed to configure
Package: fuse-source Version: 2.2-2 Severity: grave Tags: patch Hello, the configure call for the modules build is missing an important option. Please add: --with-kernel=$(KSRC) \ If you cannot reproduce it, move your kernel to a non-standard location and you will see what I mean. Regards, Eduard. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.11-rc5 Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages fuse-source depends on: ii bzip2 1.0.2-5high-quality block-sorting file co ii gcc [c-compiler] 4:3.3.5-1 The GNU C compiler ii gcc-3.3 [c-compiler] 1:3.3.5-10 The GNU C compiler ii gcc-3.4 [c-compiler] 3.4.3-11 The GNU C compiler ii make 3.80-9 The GNU version of the make util -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#295554: marked as done (can't remove the package)
Your message dated Thu, 10 Mar 2005 06:17:16 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#295554: fixed in xinetd 1:2.3.13-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Feb 2005 17:28:23 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Feb 16 09:28:23 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from 137.red-62-57-138.user.auna.net (khazad.dyndns.org) [62.57.138.137] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D1SyN-0005n1-00; Wed, 16 Feb 2005 09:28:23 -0800 Received: from rmh by khazad.dyndns.org with local (Exim 4.34) id 1D1SsM-0004Mu-5g; Wed, 16 Feb 2005 18:22:10 +0100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Robert Millan [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: can't remove the package X-Mailer: reportbug 3.7.1 Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2005 18:22:10 +0100 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: xinetd Version: 1:2.3.13-2+cfg Severity: serious When purging xinetd: Removing xinetd ... Note: all inetd services have been terminated. WARNING: you don't have an init script for the original inetd anymore! You may need to reinstall the netkit-inetd package to get it back. Removing `diversion of /etc/init.d/inetd to /etc/init.d/inetd.real by xinetd' /var/lib/dpkg/info/xinetd.postrm: line 16: /etc/init.d/inetd: No such file or directory dpkg: error processing xinetd (--purge): subprocess post-removal script returned error exit status 1 line 16 attempts to run /etc/init.d/inetd, but as the warning indicates we're not sure if that file exists. postrm should only attempt to run this script if it exists. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: kfreebsd-i386 (i686) Kernel: GNU/kFreeBSD 5.3-3 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) (ignored: LC_ALL set to C) Versions of packages xinetd depends on: ii libc0.1 2.3-1+kbsd.8 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libwrap07.6.dbs-6Wietse Venema's TCP wrappers libra ii netbase 4.20 Basic TCP/IP networking system -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 295554-close) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Mar 2005 11:23:10 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Mar 10 03:23:10 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D9Lkz-00016Q-00; Thu, 10 Mar 2005 03:23:09 -0800 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D9LfI-9w-00; Thu, 10 Mar 2005 06:17:16 -0500 From: Thomas Seyrat [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $ Subject: Bug#295554: fixed in xinetd 1:2.3.13-3 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 06:17:16 -0500 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 6 Source: xinetd Source-Version: 1:2.3.13-3 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of xinetd, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: xinetd_2.3.13-3.diff.gz to pool/main/x/xinetd/xinetd_2.3.13-3.diff.gz xinetd_2.3.13-3.dsc to pool/main/x/xinetd/xinetd_2.3.13-3.dsc xinetd_2.3.13-3_powerpc.deb to pool/main/x/xinetd/xinetd_2.3.13-3_powerpc.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Thomas Seyrat [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated xinetd package) (This message was generated
Bug#298846: rebuild without libhowl0 dep
Package: gdesklets Severity: grave Justification: libhowl0 moving to non-free (on behalf on RM Steve Langasek) Please rebuild gdesklets without the libhowl0 dependency since it's moving to non-free. Only a recompile is required, but it's required on multiple architectures, so there should be a sourceful upload. Thanks. -- off the chain like a rebellious guanine nucleotide -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#298847: rebuild without libhowl0 dep
Package: gnome-gv Severity: grave Justification: libhowl0 moving to non-free (on behalf on RM Steve Langasek) Please rebuild gnome-gv without the libhowl0 dependency since it's moving to non-free. Only a recompile is required, but it's required on multiple architectures, so there should be a sourceful upload. Thanks. -- off the chain like a rebellious guanine nucleotide -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#298815: libsem-dev: trying to overwrite `/usr/include/semaphore.h', which is also in package libc6-dev
On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 04:39:22AM +0100, Andreas Mueller wrote: Package: libsem-dev Version: error processing libsem-dev Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable FYI, installed a fresh chroot and got the following error: (Reading database ... 18003 files and directories currently installed.) Unpacking libsem-dev (from .../libsem-dev_0.0.1-2_powerpc.deb) ... dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/libsem-dev_0.0.1-2_powerpc.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite `/usr/include/semaphore.h', which is also in package libc6-dev Errors were encountered while processing: /var/cache/apt/archives/libsem-dev_0.0.1-2_powerpc.deb E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) libsem-dev doesn't support linux-gnu. Who built this package? I can't find the changes file in merkel's queue/accepted. -- .''`. Proudly running Debian GNU/kFreeBSD unstable/unreleased (on UFS2+S) : :' : `. `'http://www.debian.org/ports/kfreebsd-gnu `- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#298854: rebuild without libhowl0 dep
Package: gtodo-applet Severity: grave Justification: libhowl0 moving to non-free (on behalf of RM Steve Langasek) Please rebuild gtodo-applet without the libhowl0 dependency since it's moving to non-free. Only a recompile is required, but it's required on multiple architectures, so there should be a sourceful upload. Thanks. -- off the chain like a rebellious guanine nucleotide -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#298851: rebuild without libhowl0 dep
Package: gnotime Severity: grave Justification: libhowl0 moving to non-free (on behalf on RM Steve Langasek) Please rebuild gnotime without the libhowl0 dependency since it's moving to non-free. Only a recompile is required, but it's required on multiple architectures, so there should be a sourceful upload. Thanks. -- off the chain like a rebellious guanine nucleotide -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#298850: rebuild without libhowl0 dep
Package: gnome-terminal Severity: grave Justification: libhowl0 moving to non-free (on behalf on RM Steve Langasek) Please rebuild gnome-terminal without the libhowl0 dependency since it's moving to non-free. Only a recompile is required, but it's required on multiple architectures, so there should be a sourceful upload. Thanks. -- off the chain like a rebellious guanine nucleotide -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#298852: rebuild without libhowl0 dep
Package: goobox Severity: grave Justification: libhowl0 moving to non-free (on behalf of RM Steve Langasek) Please rebuild goobox without the libhowl0 dependency since it's moving to non-free. Only a recompile is required, but it's required on multiple architectures, so there should be a sourceful upload. Thanks. -- off the chain like a rebellious guanine nucleotide -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#298853: rebuild without libhowl0 dep
Package: gswitchit Severity: grave Justification: libhowl0 moving to non-free (on behalf of RM Steve Langasek) Please rebuild gswitchit without the libhowl0 dependency since it's moving to non-free. Only a recompile is required, but it's required on multiple architectures, so there should be a sourceful upload. Thanks. -- off the chain like a rebellious guanine nucleotide -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#298847: rebuild without libhowl0 dep
Hello Erinn On 2005-03-10 Erinn Clark wrote: (on behalf on RM Steve Langasek) Please rebuild gnome-gv without the libhowl0 dependency since it's moving to non-free. Only a recompile is required, but it's required on multiple architectures, so there should be a sourceful upload. Ok, I'll do it in the next days. bye, -christian- pgpTK7la4lZRu.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#298861: rebuild without libhowl0 dep
Package: libgnomesu Severity: grave Justification: libhowl0 moving to non-free (on behalf of RM Steve Langasek) Please rebuild libgnomesu without the libhowl0 dependency since it's moving to non-free. Only a recompile is required, but it's required on multiple architectures, so there should be a sourceful upload. Thanks. -- off the chain like a rebellious guanine nucleotide -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#292243: marked as done (manpage looks not distributeable, as license not adhered)
Your message dated Thu, 10 Mar 2005 13:44:51 +0100
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Acknowledgement
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at maintonly) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Jan 2005 20:49:19 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jan 25 12:49:19 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from pcpool00.mathematik.uni-freiburg.de [132.230.30.150]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CtXck-0002g6-00; Tue, 25 Jan 2005 12:49:19 -0800
Received: from pcpool08.mathematik.uni-freiburg.de ([132.230.30.158])
by pcpool00.mathematik.uni-freiburg.de with asmtp (Exim 3.35 #1
(Debian))
id 1CtXcm-00023G-00
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 25 Jan 2005 21:49:20 +0100
Received: from brl by pcpool08.mathematik.uni-freiburg.de with local (Exim 3.35
#1 (Debian))
id 1CtXcm-8v-00
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 25 Jan 2005 21:49:20 +0100
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2005 21:49:20 +0100
From: Bernhard R. Link [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: manpage looks not distributeable, as license not adhered
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
Sender: Bernhard R. Link [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Package: xbvl
Version: 2.2-4
Severity: serious
The following manpages say they are only distributeable under
the GFDL, but do not include the license text required by this
license:
xbvl.1.gz
This mass-filing of bugs was announced 2005-01-09 in my mail to
debian-devel and debian-legal:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2005/01/msg00499.html
http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2005/01/msg00262.html
Hochachtungsvoll,
Bernhard R. Link
---
Received: (at 292243-done) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Mar 2005 12:44:09 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Mar 10 04:44:09 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from maileuz.sivit.org [194.146.224.64]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1D9N1N-0005S0-00; Thu, 10 Mar 2005 04:44:09 -0800
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by maileuz.sivit.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7656D4010
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 10 Mar 2005 13:44:44 +0100 (CET)
Received: from maileuz.sivit.org ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (maileuz.sivit.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id 28254-64 for [EMAIL PROTECTED];
Thu, 10 Mar 2005 13:44:39 +0100 (CET)
Received: from hebus.dyndns.org (ATuileries-151-1-28-65.w82-123.abo.wanadoo.fr
[82.123.206.65])
by maileuz.sivit.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 235C53FF7
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 10 Mar 2005 13:44:38 +0100 (CET)
Received: from benj by hebus.dyndns.org with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1D9N26-0001d2-00
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 10 Mar 2005 13:44:54 +0100
From: Benjamin Drieu [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Acknowledgement
Organization: Debian - http://www.debian.org/
X-Face: [EMAIL PROTECTED]|NZ\/;)nH`Ie?W,[EMAIL PROTECTED];d,3]Qa'qt3[`_D@
BZgsuv|[EMAIL PROTECTED]Rn')V7mG\?E,ejoiLT)$(pFml1'[EMAIL
PROTECTED]Bn`('jHOpTl7618jRM'plV%e
Sl6q
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 13:44:51 +0100
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary==-=-=;
micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol=application/pgp-signature
Sender: Benjamin Drieu [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavis at maileuz.sivit.org
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.4 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_01,ONEWORD,OPT_HEADER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: *
--=-=-=
Thanks for this NMU, I acknowledge it.
Cheers,
Benjamin
--
.''`.
; ;' ; Debian GNU/Linux | Benjamin Drieu
`. `'http://www.debian.org/ | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
`-
--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFCMEFGnDLqtZBL50ERAha7AJ9UNZyVB8nVgvzyg3eJmB3OlhGapQCglRdn
Bug#298870: rebuild without libhowl0 dep
Package: rhythmbox Severity: grave Justification: libhowl0 moving to non-free (on behalf of RM Steve Langasek) Please rebuild rhythmbox without the libhowl0 dependency since it's moving to non-free. Only a recompile is required, but it's required on multiple architectures, so there should be a sourceful upload. Thanks. -- off the chain like a rebellious guanine nucleotide -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#298869: rebuild without libhowl0 dep
Package: planner Severity: grave Justification: libhowl0 moving to non-free (on behalf of RM Steve Langasek) Please rebuild planner without the libhowl0 dependency since it's moving to non-free. Only a recompile is required, but it's required on multiple architectures, so there should be a sourceful upload. Thanks. -- off the chain like a rebellious guanine nucleotide -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#298868: rebuild without libhowl0 dep
Package: nautilus-cd-burner Severity: grave Justification: libhowl0 moving to non-free (on behalf of RM Steve Langasek) Please rebuild nautilus-cd-burner without the libhowl0 dependency since it's moving to non-free. Only a recompile is required, but it's required on multiple architectures, so there should be a sourceful upload. Thanks. -- off the chain like a rebellious guanine nucleotide -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#298867: rebuild without libhowl0 dep
Package: mozilla-bonobo Severity: grave Justification: libhowl0 moving to non-free (on behalf of RM Steve Langasek) Please rebuild mozilla-bonobo without the libhowl0 dependency since it's moving to non-free. Only a recompile is required, but it's required on multiple architectures, so there should be a sourceful upload. Thanks. -- off the chain like a rebellious guanine nucleotide -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#298872: rebuild without libhowl0 dep
Package: totem Severity: grave Justification: libhowl0 moving to non-free (on behalf of RM Steve Langasek) Please rebuild totem without the libhowl0 dependency since it's moving to non-free. Only a recompile is required, but it's required on multiple architectures, so there should be a sourceful upload. Thanks. -- off the chain like a rebellious guanine nucleotide -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#298809: rebuild without libhowl0 dep
I forgot to add: Only a recompile is required, but it's required on multiple architectures, so there should be a sourceful upload. -- off the chain like a rebellious guanine nucleotide -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#298815: libsem-dev: trying to overwrite `/usr/include/semaphore.h', which is also in package libc6-dev
On Thursday, 10. March 2005 12:25, Robert Millan wrote: On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 04:39:22AM +0100, Andreas Mueller wrote: Package: libsem-dev Version: error processing libsem-dev Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable FYI, installed a fresh chroot and got the following error: (Reading database ... 18003 files and directories currently installed.) Unpacking libsem-dev (from .../libsem-dev_0.0.1-2_powerpc.deb) ... dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/libsem-dev_0.0.1-2_powerpc.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite `/usr/include/semaphore.h', which is also in package libc6-dev Errors were encountered while processing: /var/cache/apt/archives/libsem-dev_0.0.1-2_powerpc.deb E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) libsem-dev doesn't support linux-gnu. Who built this package? I can't find the changes file in merkel's queue/accepted. probably buildd builded it, if you didnt. Cheers, amu pgpN2sU9Cb84e.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#298805: forgot to add...
Only a recompile is required, but it's required on multiple architectures, so there should be a sourceful upload. -- off the chain like a rebellious guanine nucleotide -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#298804: forgot to add..
Only a recompile is required, but it's required on multiple architectures, so there should be a sourceful upload. -- off the chain like a rebellious guanine nucleotide -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#298806: forgot to add
Only a recompile is required, but it's required on multiple architectures, so there should be a sourceful upload. -- off the chain like a rebellious guanine nucleotide -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#297855: marked as done (drip: FTBFS: .../config.guess and .../config.guess are the same file)
Your message dated Thu, 10 Mar 2005 08:17:24 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#297855: fixed in cdbs 0.4.27-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Mar 2005 09:31:31 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Mar 03 01:31:31 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from blount.mail.mindspring.net [207.69.200.226] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D6mg7-0005RN-00; Thu, 03 Mar 2005 01:31:31 -0800 Received: from user-119bq03.biz.mindspring.com ([66.149.232.3] helo=frobnitz.homelinux.net) by blount.mail.mindspring.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 1D6mg6-0008Fu-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 03 Mar 2005 04:31:31 -0500 Received: from daniel by frobnitz.homelinux.net with local (Exim 4.50) id 1D6mg6-0003U4-01 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 03 Mar 2005 01:31:30 -0800 To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: drip: FTBFS: .../config.guess and .../config.guess are the same file From: Daniel Schepler [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2005 01:31:29 -0800 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: drip Severity: serious Version: 0.8.3.2+0.9.0-rc3-5 From my build log, using pbuilder in an i386 chroot: ... tar -C build-tree -xzf drip-0.9.0rc3.tar.gz touch debian/stamp-drip-0.9.0rc3.tar.gz if test -e /usr/share/misc/config.guess ; then \ for i in drip-0.9.0rc3/config.guess ; do \ cp -f /usr/share/misc/config.guess \ build-tree/$i ; \ done ; \ fi cp: `/usr/share/misc/config.guess' and `build-tree/drip-0.9.0rc3/config.guess' are the same file make: *** [pre-build] Error 1 -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.9-9-amd64-k8 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to en_US.UTF-8) -- Daniel Schepler Please don't disillusion me. I [EMAIL PROTECTED]haven't had breakfast yet. -- Orson Scott Card --- Received: (at 297855-close) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Mar 2005 13:23:11 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Mar 10 05:23:11 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D9Nd9-000895-00; Thu, 10 Mar 2005 05:23:11 -0800 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D9NXY-0007j1-00; Thu, 10 Mar 2005 08:17:24 -0500 From: Robert Millan [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $ Subject: Bug#297855: fixed in cdbs 0.4.27-3 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 08:17:24 -0500 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Source: cdbs Source-Version: 0.4.27-3 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of cdbs, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: cdbs_0.4.27-3.dsc to pool/main/c/cdbs/cdbs_0.4.27-3.dsc cdbs_0.4.27-3.tar.gz to pool/main/c/cdbs/cdbs_0.4.27-3.tar.gz cdbs_0.4.27-3_all.deb to pool/main/c/cdbs/cdbs_0.4.27-3_all.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Robert Millan [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated cdbs package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005
Bug#298688: CAN-2005-0683: Disclosure of installation path
On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 09:33:19AM +0100, Alban browaeys wrote: For the record: ; Print out errors (as a part of the output). For production web sites, ; you're strongly encouraged to turn this feature off, and use error logging ; instead (see below). Keeping display_errors enabled on a production web site ; may reveal security information to end users, such as file paths on your Web ; server, your database schema or other information. display_errors = On So it does, what is your personal view about this ? I accept that someone else has made the decision to set display_errors = On by default. I imagine that this has been discussed, but I'm not sure where (there's no php list that I can see). As a php developper i would say that default should not be the debug mode, would you reassign it to php ? Presumably, over the course of developing a PHP application on Debian, a developer would get at least one error, which would alert them to the fact that this is set as such. I think it is fair to assume that php developers and webserver admins should both be aware of the existence of this option. However, one could argue that J. User is neither of the above, and may well install one of Debian's php applications (say, phpbb2) without being aware of it. Justin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#294717: gpsbabel build problems: at least partly due to rounding errors
On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 06:06:13AM +0200, Lars Wirzenius wrote: Since the errors seem to be rounding errors, and as such almost inevitable unless extreme care is taken, it might be worthwhile to punt on the issue and just disable the make check in debian/rules. This Sound advice. Actually, I think I'll just mark that line so that a failure is not an error, so we still get logs of it in the buildd logs in case a discrepancy is eventually reported. Thank you for your assistance. -- John -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#298234: marked as done (grisbi: FTBFS on mipsel)
Your message dated Thu, 10 Mar 2005 09:17:13 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#298234: fixed in grisbi 0.5.5-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Mar 2005 22:03:55 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Mar 05 14:03:55 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from vp085189.reshsg.uci.edu (becket.becket.net) [128.195.85.189] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D7hNL-0007kX-00; Sat, 05 Mar 2005 14:03:55 -0800 Received: from tb by becket.becket.net with local (Exim 4.44) id 1D7hNL-00042z-7b for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 05 Mar 2005 14:03:55 -0800 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: grisbi: FTBFS on mipsel X-Reply-Permission: Posted or emailed replies to this message constitute permission for an emailed response. X-PGP-Fingerprint: 1F0A1E51 63 28 EB DA E6 44 E5 5E EC F3 04 26 4E BF 1A 92 X-Windows: Complex nonsolutions to simple nonproblems. From: Thomas Bushnell BSG [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: 05 Mar 2005 14:03:55 -0800 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Lines: 48 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: grisbi Severity: serious As can be seen from http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?pkg=grisbiver=0.5.5-1arch=mipselstamp=1107431070file=logas=raw, grisbi builds are now failing on mipsel. The fix should be trivial, as indicated in the build log itself: checking build system type... ./config.guess: unable to guess system type This script, last modified 2001-09-04, has failed to recognize the operating system you are using. It is advised that you download the most up to date version of the config scripts from ftp://ftp.gnu.org/pub/gnu/config/ If the version you run (./config.guess) is already up to date, please send the following data and any information you think might be pertinent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] in order to provide the needed information to handle your system. config.guess timestamp = 2001-09-04 uname -m = mips uname -r = 2.4.27-sb1-swarm-bn uname -s = Linux uname -v = #2 SMP Sun Aug 29 22:17:57 BST 2004 /usr/bin/uname -p = /bin/uname -X = hostinfo = /bin/universe = /usr/bin/arch -k = /bin/arch = mips /usr/bin/oslevel = /usr/convex/getsysinfo = UNAME_MACHINE = mips UNAME_RELEASE = 2.4.27-sb1-swarm-bn UNAME_SYSTEM = Linux UNAME_VERSION = #2 SMP Sun Aug 29 22:17:57 BST 2004 configure: error: cannot guess build type; you must specify one make: *** [configure-stamp] Error 1 --- Received: (at 298234-close) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Mar 2005 14:23:03 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Mar 10 06:23:03 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D9OZ5-00039F-00; Thu, 10 Mar 2005 06:23:03 -0800 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D9OTR-0002XF-00; Thu, 10 Mar 2005 09:17:13 -0500 From: Benjamin Drieu [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $ Subject: Bug#298234: fixed in grisbi 0.5.5-2 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 09:17:13 -0500 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Source: grisbi Source-Version: 0.5.5-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of grisbi, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: grisbi_0.5.5-2.diff.gz to pool/main/g/grisbi/grisbi_0.5.5-2.diff.gz grisbi_0.5.5-2.dsc to pool/main/g/grisbi/grisbi_0.5.5-2.dsc grisbi_0.5.5-2_i386.deb to pool/main/g/grisbi/grisbi_0.5.5-2_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.
Bug#298054: Test: ( Â 134559456 3326 % )
Am 2005-03-10 14:10:59, schrieb Michelle Konzack: This message will test the Subject for ( %c %i %o %t ) So we have: ( Â 134559456 3326 % ) Which mean: %c is droped %i 134559456serialdate ? (1974-04-07 10:37:36) %o 3326 ??? %t is mangled I check the sending of the file with strace and will put the output into http://michelle.konzack.home.tamay-dogan.homelinux.net/ssmtp/ Unfortunatly 'strace' crashs while ssmtp do autenticates-smtp Greetings Michelle Greetings Michelle -- Linux-User #280138 with the Linux Counter, http://counter.li.org/ Michelle Konzack Apt. 917 ICQ #328449886 50, rue de Soultz MSM LinuxMichi 0033/3/8845235667100 Strasbourg/France IRC #Debian (irc.icq.com) signature.pgp Description: Digital signature
Bug#298847: marked as done (rebuild without libhowl0 dep)
Your message dated Thu, 10 Mar 2005 11:32:17 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#298847: fixed in gnome-gv 1:2.8.2-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Mar 2005 11:42:18 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Mar 10 03:42:18 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from imf22aec.mail.bellsouth.net [205.152.59.70] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D9M3W-0003X3-00; Thu, 10 Mar 2005 03:42:18 -0800 Received: from double-helix.org ([68.154.213.225]) by imf22aec.mail.bellsouth.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.11 201-253-122-130-111-20040605) with ESMTP id [EMAIL PROTECTED] for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 10 Mar 2005 06:41:48 -0500 Received: by anemone (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 6B281C6AD; Thu, 10 Mar 2005 06:39:23 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 06:39:23 -0500 From: Erinn Clark [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: rebuild without libhowl0 dep Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux X-GPG-Key-Server: pgp.mit.edu User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_20,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: gnome-gv Severity: grave Justification: libhowl0 moving to non-free (on behalf on RM Steve Langasek) Please rebuild gnome-gv without the libhowl0 dependency since it's moving to non-free. Only a recompile is required, but it's required on multiple architectures, so there should be a sourceful upload. Thanks. -- off the chain like a rebellious guanine nucleotide --- Received: (at 298847-close) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Mar 2005 16:38:02 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Mar 10 08:38:02 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D9Qfi-00042z-00; Thu, 10 Mar 2005 08:38:02 -0800 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D9Qa9-0001BQ-00; Thu, 10 Mar 2005 11:32:17 -0500 From: Christian Hammers [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $ Subject: Bug#298847: fixed in gnome-gv 1:2.8.2-3 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 11:32:17 -0500 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Source: gnome-gv Source-Version: 1:2.8.2-3 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of gnome-gv, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: gnome-gv_2.8.2-3.diff.gz to pool/main/g/gnome-gv/gnome-gv_2.8.2-3.diff.gz gnome-gv_2.8.2-3.dsc to pool/main/g/gnome-gv/gnome-gv_2.8.2-3.dsc gnome-gv_2.8.2-3_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gnome-gv/gnome-gv_2.8.2-3_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Christian Hammers [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated gnome-gv package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 13:10:55 +0100 Source: gnome-gv Binary: gnome-gv Architecture: source i386 Version: 1:2.8.2-3 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Christian Hammers [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Christian Hammers [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: gnome-gv - GNOME PostScript viewer Closes: 298847 Changes: gnome-gv (1:2.8.2-3) unstable; urgency=medium . * Rebuild without libhowl0 which moves to non-free (thanks to Erinn
Bug#288009: batik 1.5.1 would break fop
Hi, I prepared a package for the batik 1.5.1 upstream release. However during testing the package I realized that batik 1.5.1 breaks fop ! As far as I see no other packages depend on libbatik-java. fop is currently not in testing although a valid candidate. A solution to the problem would be to upgrade batik to 1.5.1 and also to upload a new fop package with an embedded batik library in the current version (with the affected Squiggle class files removed from the library). What do you think ? Wolfgang -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: prozilla
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 296925 pending Bug#296925: remote shell via format string vulnerability (CAN-2005-0523) There were no tags set. Tags added: pending End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#288882: marked as done (blender: FTBFS when using sudo)
Your message dated Thu, 10 Mar 2005 12:47:18 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#22: fixed in blender 2.36-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Jan 2005 02:36:04 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jan 05 18:36:04 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from relay2.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.210.211]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CmNVM-0008AU-00; Wed, 05 Jan 2005 18:36:04 -0800
Received: from ix.urz.uni-heidelberg.de (popix.urz.uni-heidelberg.de
[129.206.119.235])
by relay2.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id
j062a4bY012936
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 03:36:04 +0100 (MET)
Received: from extmail.urz.uni-heidelberg.de (extmail.urz.uni-heidelberg.de
[129.206.100.140])
by ix.urz.uni-heidelberg.de (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id DAA3481782
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 03:36:01 +0100
Received: (qmail 13378 invoked by uid 0); 6 Jan 2005 02:36:00 -
Received: from ?80.137.20.193? (HELO live) (80.137.20.193)
by extmail.urz.uni-heidelberg.de with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 6 Jan 2005
02:36:00 -
Received: from fernst by live with local (Exim 4.34)
id 1CmNVE-0001nZ-2J
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 06 Jan 2005 03:35:56 +0100
Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 03:35:55 +0100
From: Florian Ernst [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: blender: FTBFS when using sudo
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=2B/JsCI69OhZNC5r
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Reportbug-Version: 3.2
X-GPG-Key: http://ernst.uni-hd.de/pubkey.asc
X-GPG-Fingerprint: 34F8 7997 8BC1 03F0 9C43 F3D7 B375 3E4D 514B 3E7C
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
Sender: Florian Ernst [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
--2B/JsCI69OhZNC5r
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary=AhhlLboLdkugWU4S
Content-Disposition: inline
--AhhlLboLdkugWU4S
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Package: blender
Version: 2.35-1
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
Justification: http://release.debian.org/sarge_rc_policy.txt section 4
Hello,
blender FTBFS when using sudo. As mips{,el} can't use fakeroot the
error triggers there, please see the build logs, but it is not limited
to those archs.
This is due to scons creating the build dir with 755 permissions
during the clean target of debian/rules, thus preventing the user to
write to it during the build target. The attached patch sort of fixes
this problem.
Actually 01_SConstruct_debian.dpatch is supposed to correct the
temporary build dir, yet somehow this doesn't work, but I don't know
enough about scons to provide any details...
Cheers,
Flo
--AhhlLboLdkugWU4S
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=blender_FTBFS_sudo.diff
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
diff -u blender-2.35/debian/rules blender-2.35/debian/rules
--- blender-2.35/debian/rules
+++ blender-2.35/debian/rules
@@ -66,7 +66,7 @@
# Clean plugins
-$(MAKE) -C $(CURDIR)/release/plugins clean
rm -rf $(CURDIR)/release/plugins/include
- rm -rf $(CURDIR)/build
+ rm -rf $(CURDIR)/../build
=20
rm -f $(CURDIR)/config.opts
=20
--AhhlLboLdkugWU4S--
--2B/JsCI69OhZNC5r
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFB3KQLs3U+TVFLPnwRAk8WAJ9cRNydxKgn62uLAxHSdp2T+UOnpgCeKhPC
rjWwB4XXMAzQfcirtuqxx0w=
=iuu9
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
--2B/JsCI69OhZNC5r--
---
Received: (at 22-close) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Mar 2005 17:53:04 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Mar 10 09:53:04 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1D9RqK-00040f-00; Thu, 10 Mar 2005 09:53:04 -0800
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
Bug#298167: marked as done (blender: insecure writing to /tmp/quit.blender)
Your message dated Thu, 10 Mar 2005 12:47:18 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#298167: fixed in blender 2.36-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Mar 2005 10:11:25 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Mar 05 02:11:25 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from lns-vlq-7-lil-82-254-199-25.adsl.proxad.net (yellowpig.yi.org)
[82.254.199.25] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1D7WFo-0008Dc-00; Sat, 05 Mar 2005 02:11:24 -0800
Received: from bill by yellowpig.yi.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 1D7WFf-0005Oh-00
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 05 Mar 2005 11:11:15 +0100
Date: Sat, 5 Mar 2005 11:11:13 +0100
From: Bill Allombert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: blender: insecure writing to /tmp/quit.blender
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
X-Reportbug-Version: 3.8
Sender: Bill Allombert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Package: blender
Version: 2.35-1.1
Severity: serious
Tags: security
Hello Masayuki,
It seems there is a trivially exploitable symlink attack in blender:
To reproduce:
1) ln -s $HOME/foo /tmp/quit.blend
2) run blender
3) Create some objects
4) quit blender
5) blender output:
Saved session recovery to /tmp/quit.blend
Blender quit
6) Now $HOME/foo has been written to.
Looking at the code:
./source/blender/blenkernel/intern/blender.c line 666 (no joke):
/* no undo state to save */
if(undobase.first==undobase.last) return;
BLI_make_file_string(/, str, U.tempdir, quit.blend);
file = open(str,O_BINARY+O_WRONLY+O_CREAT+O_TRUNC, 0666);
if(file == -1) {
printf(Unable to save %s\n, str);
return;
}
blender needs to also set O_EXCL when opening the file to prevent
the symlink attack. However it seems a better fix to save this file
in $HOME/.blender: if several users run blender on the same machine,
only the first one will benefit of the /tmp/quit.blend.
Cheers,
--
Bill. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Imagine a large red swirl here.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.27
Locale: LANG=fr_FR, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR (charmap=ISO-8859-1)
Versions of packages blender depends on:
ii gettext 0.14.1-10 GNU Internationalization utilities
ii gettext-base 0.14.1-10 GNU Internationalization utilities
ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-20 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libfreetype6 2.1.7-2.3 FreeType 2 font engine, shared lib
ii libgcc1 1:3.4.3-9 GCC support library
ii libjpeg62 6b-10 The Independent JPEG Group's JPEG
ii libopenal00.2004090900-1.1 OpenAL is a portable library for 3
ii libpng12-01.2.8rel-1 PNG library - runtime
ii libsdl1.2debi 1.2.7+1.2.8cvs20041007-4.1 Simple DirectMedia Layer
ii libstdc++51:3.3.5-8 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3
ii libx11-6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-12.0.1X Window System protocol client li
ii python2.3 2.3.5-1An interactive high-level object-o
ii xlibmesa-gl [ 4.3.0.dfsg.1-12.0.1Mesa 3D graphics library [XFree86]
ii xlibmesa-glu 4.3.0.dfsg.1-12.0.1Mesa OpenGL utility library [XFree
ii xlibs 4.3.0.dfsg.1-12X Keyboard Extension (XKB) configu
ii zlib1g1:1.2.2-4 compression library - runtime
-- no debconf information
---
Received: (at 298167-close) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Mar 2005 17:53:09 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Mar 10 09:53:09 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1D9RqP-00044S-00; Thu, 10 Mar 2005 09:53:09 -0800
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id
Bug#298922: mesa: FTBFS: /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lGL
Package: mesa version: 6.2.1-1 Severity: serious Hi, Your package is failing to build on all arches with the following error: CC=cc CXX=c++ ../../../bin/mklib -o GLU -major 1 \ -minor 3 -patch 060201 \ -cplusplus -install ../../../lib \ -L../../../lib -lGL -lm libutil/error.o libutil/glue.o libutil/mipmap.olibutil/project.o libutil/quad.o libutil/registry.o libtess/dict.o libtess/geom.o libtess/memalloc.o libtess/mesh.o libtess/normal.o libtess/priorityq.o libtess/render.o libtess/sweep.o libtess/tess.o libtess/tessmono.o libnurbs/interface/bezierEval.o libnurbs/interface/bezierPatch.o libnurbs/interface/bezierPatchMesh.o libnurbs/interface/glcurveval.o libnurbs/interface/glinterface.o libnurbs/interface/glrenderer.o libnurbs/interface/glsurfeval.o libnurbs/interface/incurveeval.o libnurbs/interface/insurfeval.o libnurbs/internals/arc.o libnurbs/internals/arcsorter.o libnurbs/internals/arctess.o libnurbs/internals/backend.o libnurbs/internals/basiccrveval.o libnurbs/internals/basicsurfeval.o libnurbs/internals/bin.o libnurbs/internals/bufpool.o libnurbs/internals/cachingeval.o libnurbs/internals/ccw.o libnurbs/internals/coveandtiler.o libnurbs/internals/curve.o libnurbs/internals/curvelist.o libnurbs/internals/curvesub.o libnurbs/internals/dataTransform.o libnurbs/internals/displaylist.o libnurbs/internals/flist.o libnurbs/internals/flistsorter.o libnurbs/internals/hull.o libnurbs/internals/intersect.o libnurbs/internals/knotvector.o libnurbs/internals/mapdesc.o libnurbs/internals/mapdescv.o libnurbs/internals/maplist.o libnurbs/internals/mesher.o libnurbs/internals/monoTriangulationBackend.o libnurbs/internals/monotonizer.o libnurbs/internals/mycode.o libnurbs/internals/nurbsinterfac.o libnurbs/internals/nurbstess.o libnurbs/internals/patch.o libnurbs/internals/patchlist.o libnurbs/internals/quilt.o libnurbs/internals/reader.o libnurbs/internals/renderhints.o libnurbs/internals/slicer.o libnurbs/internals/sorter.o libnurbs/internals/splitarcs.o libnurbs/internals/subdivider.o libnurbs/internals/tobezier.o libnurbs/internals/trimline.o libnurbs/internals/trimregion.o libnurbs/internals/trimvertpool.o libnurbs/internals/uarray.o libnurbs/internals/varray.o libnurbs/nurbtess/directedLine.o libnurbs/nurbtess/gridWrap.o libnurbs/nurbtess/monoChain.o libnurbs/nurbtess/monoPolyPart.o libnurbs/nurbtess/monoTriangulation.o libnurbs/nurbtess/partitionX.o libnurbs/nurbtess/partitionY.o libnurbs/nurbtess/polyDBG.o libnurbs/nurbtess/polyUtil.o libnurbs/nurbtess/primitiveStream.o libnurbs/nurbtess/quicksort.o libnurbs/nurbtess/rectBlock.o libnurbs/nurbtess/sampleComp.o libnurbs/nurbtess/sampleCompBot.o libnurbs/nurbtess/sampleCompRight.o libnurbs/nurbtess/sampleCompTop.o libnurbs/nurbtess/sampleMonoPoly.o libnurbs/nurbtess/sampledLine.o libnurbs/nurbtess/searchTree.o mklib: Making Linux shared library: libGLU.so.1.3.060201 /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lGL collect2: ld returned 1 exit status mklib: Installing libGLU.so.1.3.060201 libGLU.so.1 libGLU.so in ../../../lib mv: cannot stat `libGLU.so.1.3.060201': No such file or directory make[3]: *** [../../../lib/libGLU.so] Error 1 Kurt
Bug#298924: gwc: FTBFS: cc1: error: invalid option `arch=$arch`
Package: gwc Version: 0.20.10-1 Severity: serious Hi, Your package is failing to build on most arches because it's trying to set the -mcpu and -march to the architecture. This does not work at all in most cases. It failed on all buildd builds so far. Why is it trying to set that option in the first place? Kurt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#296925: marked as done (remote shell via format string vulnerability (CAN-2005-0523))
Your message dated Thu, 10 Mar 2005 13:17:08 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#296925: fixed in prozilla 1:1.3.7.4-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Feb 2005 19:40:56 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Feb 25 11:40:56 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from kitenet.net [64.62.161.42] (postfix)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1D4lKa-0003sY-00; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 11:40:56 -0800
Received: from dragon.kitenet.net (unknown [66.168.94.144])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(Client CN Joey Hess, Issuer Joey Hess (verified OK))
by kitenet.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C222E17DC6
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 19:40:55 + (GMT)
Received: by dragon.kitenet.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 6AEAC6F031; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 14:43:23 -0500 (EST)
Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 14:43:23 -0500
From: Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: remote shell via format string vulnerability (CAN-2005-0523)
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=5mCyUwZo2JvN/JJP
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Reportbug-Version: 3.8
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
--5mCyUwZo2JvN/JJP
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Package: prozilla
Version: 1:1.3.7.3-1
Severity: grave
prozilla has another security hole. A format string vulnerability allows
remote code execution. I've not verified this, but here's the exploit:
http://downloads.securityfocus.com/vulnerabilities/exploits/prozillaFormatS=
tring.c
Based on info at the end of this gentoo bug repprt, the format string
problem involves a double expansion of a string from the server between
message() and curses_message().
In message(), we have:
va_start(vp, args);
vsnprintf(p, sizeof(p), args, vp);
va_end(vp);
switch (rt.display_mode)
{
case DISPLAY_CURSES:
curses_message(p);
The above vsnprintf is vulnerable to a format string attack.
In curses_message(), we have:
va_start(vp, args);
vsnprintf(p, sizeof(p), args, vp);
va_end(vp);
Also vulnerable.
There may be others. Upstream is apparently aware of this vulnerability.
--=20
see shy jo
--5mCyUwZo2JvN/JJP
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFCH3/ad8HHehbQuO8RAj8gAKDk9yZNwiM0PSZK+Vzh+728VNzRQwCglWT4
yH+3VzW5sAGILRa8WzzBnmE=
=gVOb
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
--5mCyUwZo2JvN/JJP--
---
Received: (at 296925-close) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Mar 2005 18:23:04 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Mar 10 10:23:03 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1D9SJL-0002RR-00; Thu, 10 Mar 2005 10:23:03 -0800
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1D9SDc-0007r6-00; Thu, 10 Mar 2005 13:17:08 -0500
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Guilherme de S. Pastore)
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $
Subject: Bug#296925: fixed in prozilla 1:1.3.7.4-1
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 13:17:08 -0500
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Source: prozilla
Source-Version: 1:1.3.7.4-1
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
prozilla, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
prozilla_1.3.7.4-1.diff.gz
to pool/main/p/prozilla/prozilla_1.3.7.4-1.diff.gz
prozilla_1.3.7.4-1.dsc
to
Bug#298929: Security problem in distcc
Package: distcc Version: 2.18.1-5 Severity: grave Tags: sarge sid security Saw this on bugtraq: XCode ships with version 2.0.1 of distcc. We also tried updating to 2.18.3 and had similar issues with that version as well. Apple was not contacted prior to this release because the exploit for distccd is already known and in the wild. Users of the distributed compiling system in XCode should disable this feature until both Apple and Samba can take proper action to protect its users. Exploit: There are a few known exploits for distcc. By using a common method provided by metasploit (http://metasploit.com/projects/Framework/ exploits.html#distcc_exec), I was given full access to the remote users home folder via telnet. Proposed Solution: Samba needs to work on proper directory jailing and remote code execution with their distcc product. Apple needs to at least ship with the latest version of distcc, which supports an Allow List of people that are allowed to connect to the distcc daemon. This would minimize the damage caused by running this service on a machine. This document and follow up information can be found at http://dev.sdf1.net/archives/003082.html Regards, Joey -- MIME - broken solution for a broken design. -- Ralf Baechle Please always Cc to me when replying to me on the lists. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#298930: tulip: contains non-free fonts
Package: tulip Severity: serious Justification: Policy 2.2.1 Tulip contains two non-free fonts, Luxi Sans Regular and Luxi Sans Bold: tulip-2.0.0/library/tulip-ogl/bitmaps/font.ttf tulip-2.0.0/library/tulip-ogl/bitmaps/fontb.ttf These fonts should be removed. To get replacement fonts, you can depend on ttf-bitstream-vera, ttf-freefont, or one of the other font packages in Debian. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.9 Locale: LANG=nl_BE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=nl_BE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#298872: marked as done (rebuild without libhowl0 dep)
Your message dated Thu, 10 Mar 2005 13:50:59 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#298872: fixed in totem 0.100-5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Mar 2005 12:54:19 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Mar 10 04:54:19 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from imf17aec.mail.bellsouth.net [205.152.59.65] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D9NBD-0006v4-00; Thu, 10 Mar 2005 04:54:19 -0800 Received: from double-helix.org ([68.154.213.225]) by imf17aec.mail.bellsouth.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.11 201-253-122-130-111-20040605) with ESMTP id [EMAIL PROTECTED] for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 10 Mar 2005 07:53:49 -0500 Received: by anemone (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 00704C6AD; Thu, 10 Mar 2005 07:51:23 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 07:51:23 -0500 From: Erinn Clark [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: rebuild without libhowl0 dep Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux X-GPG-Key-Server: pgp.mit.edu User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_20,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: totem Severity: grave Justification: libhowl0 moving to non-free (on behalf of RM Steve Langasek) Please rebuild totem without the libhowl0 dependency since it's moving to non-free. Only a recompile is required, but it's required on multiple architectures, so there should be a sourceful upload. Thanks. -- off the chain like a rebellious guanine nucleotide --- Received: (at 298872-close) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Mar 2005 18:55:31 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Mar 10 10:55:31 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D9Sol-0006TX-00; Thu, 10 Mar 2005 10:55:31 -0800 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D9SkN-0001Gb-00; Thu, 10 Mar 2005 13:50:59 -0500 From: Sebastien Bacher [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $ Subject: Bug#298872: fixed in totem 0.100-5 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 13:50:59 -0500 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.8 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS, HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Source: totem Source-Version: 0.100-5 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of totem, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: totem-gstreamer_0.100-5_i386.deb to pool/main/t/totem/totem-gstreamer_0.100-5_i386.deb totem-xine_0.100-5_i386.deb to pool/main/t/totem/totem-xine_0.100-5_i386.deb totem_0.100-5.diff.gz to pool/main/t/totem/totem_0.100-5.diff.gz totem_0.100-5.dsc to pool/main/t/totem/totem_0.100-5.dsc totem_0.100-5_all.deb to pool/main/t/totem/totem_0.100-5_all.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Sebastien Bacher [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated totem package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 19:14:51 +0100 Source: totem Binary: totem-gstreamer totem-xine totem Architecture: source all i386 Version: 0.100-5 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Sebastien Bacher [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Sebastien Bacher [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: totem - A simple media player for the
Bug#298932: scorched3d-data: contains non-free fonts
Package: scorched3d-data Severity: serious Justification: Policy 2.2.1 Scorched3d contains Courier New and Arial Black, which are non-free fonts: scorched3d-38.1/data/fonts/courier.ttf scorched3d-38.1/data/fonts/test.ttf scorched3d-38.1/data/fonts/testout.ttf These fonts should be removed. To get replacement fonts, you can depend on ttf-bitstream-vera, ttf-freefont, or one of the other free fonts packaged in Debian. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.9 Locale: LANG=nl_BE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=nl_BE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#298934: roxen3: contains non-free fonts
Package: roxen3 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 2.2.1 The nfonts directory contains many non-free Truetype fonts. These should be removed. I'm not sure what these fonts are used for, but if replacements are needed you can depend on ttf-bitstream-vera, ttf-freefont and/or one of the other free fonts packaged in Debian. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.9 Locale: LANG=nl_BE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=nl_BE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#298937: phluid: contains non-free font
Package: phluid Version: 0.0.3.2+cvs.20020210-2 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 2.2.1 phluid contains the non-free font National First Font, which contains the following copyright statement: Freeware - Copyright [c] - Roger White - 1994 - All Rights Reserved. Without license this font Debian is not allowed to distribute this font, and thus it should be removed. To get a replacement, you can depend on ttf-bitstream-vera, ttf-freefont, or one of the other free fonts packaged in Debian. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.9 Locale: LANG=nl_BE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=nl_BE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages phluid depends on: ii aewm 1.2.5-2 a minimalist window manager for X1 ii libc62.3.2.ds1-20GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libimlib21.2.0-2.1 powerful image loading and renderi ii libttf2 1.4pre.20030402-1.1 FreeType 1, The FREE TrueType Font ii xlibs4.3.0.dfsg.1-12 X Keyboard Extension (XKB) configu -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#268490: marked as done (efibootmgr: base package added dependency during freeze)
Your message dated Thu, 10 Mar 2005 11:48:32 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line fixed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Aug 2004 01:52:10 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Aug 27 18:52:10 2004 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from atlrel9.hp.com [156.153.255.214] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1C0sO2-0003zS-00; Fri, 27 Aug 2004 18:52:10 -0700 Received: from smtp1.fc.hp.com (smtp.fc.hp.com [15.11.136.119]) by atlrel9.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 263C9C272 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 27 Aug 2004 21:52:09 -0400 (EDT) Received: from ldl.fc.hp.com (ldl.fc.hp.com [15.11.146.30]) by smtp1.fc.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EE193822F; Fri, 27 Aug 2004 19:52:03 -0600 (MDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ldl.fc.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 698161340F2; Fri, 27 Aug 2004 19:52:03 -0600 (MDT) Received: from ldl.fc.hp.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (ldl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 07855-01; Fri, 27 Aug 2004 19:52:02 -0600 (MDT) Received: from krebs (krebs.dannf [10.8.0.7]) by ldl.fc.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 275591340D4; Fri, 27 Aug 2004 19:52:02 -0600 (MDT) Received: by krebs (Postfix, from userid 20800) id C90E93B7186; Fri, 27 Aug 2004 19:52:54 -0600 (MDT) Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary1400580822197704898== MIME-Version: 1.0 From: dann frazier [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: efibootmgr: base package added dependency during freeze X-Mailer: reportbug 2.64 Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2004 19:52:54 -0600 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at ldl.fc.hp.com Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: This is a multi-part MIME message sent by reportbug. --===1400580822197704898== Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Package: efibootmgr Version: 0.4.9-1 Severity: grave Tags: patch efibootmgr was updated during the freeze so we can support a linux-2.6 d-i flavor. However, the new release we moved to added a dependency on pciutils. Base Package + New Dependency + Freeze == Bad This patch backs out the code that pulls in the pciutils dependency, but leaves in the sysfs support. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: ia64 Kernel: Linux 2.6.7-1-mckinley Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C Versions of packages efibootmgr depends on: ii libc6.1 2.3.2.ds1-16 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii pciutils1:2.1.11-15 Linux PCI Utilities -- no debconf information --===1400580822197704898== Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=rm-pciutils-dep.patch diff -urN efibootmgr-0.4.9/AUTHORS efibootmgr-0.5.0-test3+readbootorderfix/AUTHORS --- efibootmgr-0.4.9/AUTHORS2004-06-09 15:39:43.0 -0600 +++ efibootmgr-0.5.0-test3+readbootorderfix/AUTHORS 2003-07-31 09:12:59.0 -0600 @@ -13,6 +13,3 @@ - Patches to efibootmgr.c - network boot entry creation in efi.c -Joshua Giles [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- walk the PCI path inserting parent bridge device path components for - network boot and EDD30 entries. diff -urN efibootmgr-0.4.9/Makefile efibootmgr-0.5.0-test3+readbootorderfix/Makefile --- efibootmgr-0.4.9/Makefile 2004-06-09 15:46:18.0 -0600 +++ efibootmgr-0.5.0-test3+readbootorderfix/Makefile2004-04-24 09:17:09.0 -0600 @@ -1,10 +1,10 @@ default: all - RELEASE_DATE := 09-Jun-2004 + RELEASE_DATE := 24-Feb-2004 RELEASE_MAJOR := 0 RELEASE_MINOR := 5 RELEASE_SUBLEVEL := 0 - RELEASE_EXTRALEVEL := -test4 + RELEASE_EXTRALEVEL := -test3 RELEASE_NAME := efibootmgr RELEASE_STRING := $(RELEASE_NAME)-$(RELEASE_MAJOR).$(RELEASE_MINOR).$(RELEASE_SUBLEVEL)$(RELEASE_EXTRALEVEL) diff -urN efibootmgr-0.4.9/debian/changelog
Bug#298846: marked as done (rebuild without libhowl0 dep)
Your message dated Thu, 10 Mar 2005 13:48:35 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#298846: fixed in gdesklets 0.33.1-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Mar 2005 11:41:15 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Mar 10 03:41:15 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from imf22aec.mail.bellsouth.net [205.152.59.70] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D9M2V-0003KE-00; Thu, 10 Mar 2005 03:41:15 -0800 Received: from double-helix.org ([68.154.213.225]) by imf22aec.mail.bellsouth.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.11 201-253-122-130-111-20040605) with ESMTP id [EMAIL PROTECTED] for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 10 Mar 2005 06:40:44 -0500 Received: by anemone (Postfix, from userid 1001) id EB03BC6AD; Thu, 10 Mar 2005 06:38:19 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 06:38:19 -0500 From: Erinn Clark [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: rebuild without libhowl0 dep Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux X-GPG-Key-Server: pgp.mit.edu User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_20,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: gdesklets Severity: grave Justification: libhowl0 moving to non-free (on behalf on RM Steve Langasek) Please rebuild gdesklets without the libhowl0 dependency since it's moving to non-free. Only a recompile is required, but it's required on multiple architectures, so there should be a sourceful upload. Thanks. -- off the chain like a rebellious guanine nucleotide --- Received: (at 298846-close) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Mar 2005 18:54:01 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Mar 10 10:54:01 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D9SnI-0006Mp-00; Thu, 10 Mar 2005 10:54:00 -0800 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D9Si3-00011u-00; Thu, 10 Mar 2005 13:48:35 -0500 From: Sebastien Bacher [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $ Subject: Bug#298846: fixed in gdesklets 0.33.1-2 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 13:48:35 -0500 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.8 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS, HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Source: gdesklets Source-Version: 0.33.1-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of gdesklets, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: gdesklets_0.33.1-2.diff.gz to pool/main/g/gdesklets/gdesklets_0.33.1-2.diff.gz gdesklets_0.33.1-2.dsc to pool/main/g/gdesklets/gdesklets_0.33.1-2.dsc gdesklets_0.33.1-2_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gdesklets/gdesklets_0.33.1-2_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Sebastien Bacher [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated gdesklets package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 19:29:31 +0100 Source: gdesklets Binary: gdesklets Architecture: source i386 Version: 0.33.1-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Sebastien Bacher [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Sebastien Bacher [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: gdesklets - an advanced architecture for desktop applets Closes: 298846 Changes: gdesklets (0.33.1-2) unstable; urgency=low . * Rebuilt for the libhowl
Bug#298807: marked as done (rebuild without libhowl0 dep)
Your message dated Thu, 10 Mar 2005 14:02:59 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#298807: fixed in evince 0.1.5-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Mar 2005 01:49:35 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Mar 09 17:49:35 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from imf25aec.mail.bellsouth.net [205.152.59.73] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D9Cnu-00040T-00; Wed, 09 Mar 2005 17:49:34 -0800 Received: from double-helix.org ([68.154.213.225]) by imf25aec.mail.bellsouth.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.11 201-253-122-130-111-20040605) with ESMTP id [EMAIL PROTECTED] for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 9 Mar 2005 20:49:04 -0500 Received: by anemone (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 1759FC6AD; Wed, 9 Mar 2005 20:46:43 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2005 20:46:43 -0500 From: Erinn Clark [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: rebuild without libhowl0 dep Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux X-GPG-Key-Server: pgp.mit.edu User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_20,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: evince Severity: grave Justification: libhowl0 moving to non-free (on behalf on RM Steve Langasek) Please rebuild evince without the libhowl0 dependency since it's moving to non-free. Thanks. -- off the chain like a rebellious guanine nucleotide --- Received: (at 298807-close) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Mar 2005 19:08:32 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Mar 10 11:08:32 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D9T1L-Wy-00; Thu, 10 Mar 2005 11:08:32 -0800 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D9Svz-0002pX-00; Thu, 10 Mar 2005 14:02:59 -0500 From: Sebastien Bacher [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $ Subject: Bug#298807: fixed in evince 0.1.5-2 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 14:02:59 -0500 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.8 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS, HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Source: evince Source-Version: 0.1.5-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of evince, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: evince_0.1.5-2.diff.gz to pool/main/e/evince/evince_0.1.5-2.diff.gz evince_0.1.5-2.dsc to pool/main/e/evince/evince_0.1.5-2.dsc evince_0.1.5-2_i386.deb to pool/main/e/evince/evince_0.1.5-2_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Sebastien Bacher [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated evince package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 19:44:16 +0100 Source: evince Binary: evince Architecture: source i386 Version: 0.1.5-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Sebastien Bacher [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Sebastien Bacher [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: evince - Document (postscript, pdf) viewer Closes: 298807 Changes: evince (0.1.5-2) unstable; urgency=low . * Rebuilt for the libhowl transition (Closes: #298807). * debian/control.in: - updated the gnome-vfs requirements. Files: 18ac27e3c94c4e3f55feffbfe4c791c9 1614 gnome optional evince_0.1.5-2.dsc
Bug#298943: langband-data: contains non-free fonts
Package: langband-data Severity: serious Justification: Policy 2.2.1 This package contains several non-free fonts: - augie.ttf (http://www.speakeasy.org/~ecf/augie.txt) - luximb.ttf (from ttf-xfree86-nonfree) - lettergo.ttf and nova.ttf (no copyright information, no license) These fonts should be removed. To get replacement fonts, you can depend on ttf-bitstream-vera, ttf-freefont, or one of the other free fonts packaged in Debian. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.9 Locale: LANG=nl_BE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=nl_BE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#298938: moodle: contains non-free fonts
Package: moodle Severity: serious Justification: Policy 2.2.1 Moodle contains two non-free fonts: Arial Narrow in: /usr/share/moodle/lang/cs/fonts/default.ttf /usr/share/moodle/lang/en/fonts/default.ttf /usr/share/moodle/lang/sq/fonts/default.ttf and Optima in: /usr/share/moodle/lang/ru/fonts/default.ttf /usr/share/moodle/lang/uk/fonts/default.ttf These fonts should be removed. To get replacement fonts, you can depend on ttf-bitstream-vera, ttf-freefont, or one of the other free fonts packaged in Debian. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.9 Locale: LANG=nl_BE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=nl_BE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#298939: libxpm4: new buffer overflow security hole (CAN-2005-0605)
Package: libxpm4 Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-12 Severity: grave Tags: security, upstream, fixed-upstream, patch CAN-2005-0605 indicates that scan.c for LibXPM may allow attackers to execute arbitrary code via a negative bitmap_unit value that leads to a buffer overflow. Patch is here: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=1909 Description is here: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1920 Gentoo issued an advisory about this on 4 March. Ubuntu issued an advisory about this on 7 March. I learned about this from Linux Weekly News. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing') Architecture: powerpc (ppc) Kernel: Linux 2.6.9-powerpc-smp Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages libxpm4 depends on: ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-20 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#298942: luola-data: contains non-free font
Package: luola-data Severity: serious Justification: Policy 2.2.1 This package contains the font bluebold.ttf, which is one of Ray Larabie's fonts and non-free. This font should be removed. To get a replacement, you can depend on ttf-bitstream-vera, ttf-freefont, or one of the other free fonts packaged in Debian. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.9 Locale: LANG=nl_BE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=nl_BE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#298946: icewm-themes: contains non-free font
Package: icewm-themes Severity: serious Justification: Policy 2.2.1 This package contains the non-free font Chicago, which includes the following copyright notice: 1990-91 Apple Computer Inc. 1990-91 Type Solutions Inc. 1990-91 The Font Bureau Inc. This font should be removed. If a replacement font is needed, you can depend on ttf-bitstream-vera, ttf-freefont, or one of the other free fonts packaged in Debian. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.9 Locale: LANG=nl_BE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=nl_BE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages icewm-themes depends on: pn icewm-common Not found.
Bug#298861: marked as done (rebuild without libhowl0 dep)
Your message dated Thu, 10 Mar 2005 14:03:44 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#298861: fixed in libgnomesu 0.9.5-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Mar 2005 12:19:50 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Mar 10 04:19:50 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from imf17aec.mail.bellsouth.net [205.152.59.65] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D9Mdq-0001na-00; Thu, 10 Mar 2005 04:19:50 -0800 Received: from double-helix.org ([68.154.213.225]) by imf17aec.mail.bellsouth.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.11 201-253-122-130-111-20040605) with ESMTP id [EMAIL PROTECTED] for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 10 Mar 2005 07:19:06 -0500 Received: by anemone (Postfix, from userid 1001) id C6A0EC6AD; Thu, 10 Mar 2005 07:16:41 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 07:16:41 -0500 From: Erinn Clark [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: rebuild without libhowl0 dep Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux X-GPG-Key-Server: pgp.mit.edu User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_20,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: libgnomesu Severity: grave Justification: libhowl0 moving to non-free (on behalf of RM Steve Langasek) Please rebuild libgnomesu without the libhowl0 dependency since it's moving to non-free. Only a recompile is required, but it's required on multiple architectures, so there should be a sourceful upload. Thanks. -- off the chain like a rebellious guanine nucleotide --- Received: (at 298861-close) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Mar 2005 19:08:56 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Mar 10 11:08:55 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D9T1j-ZR-00; Thu, 10 Mar 2005 11:08:55 -0800 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D9Swi-0003BY-00; Thu, 10 Mar 2005 14:03:44 -0500 From: Sebastien Bacher [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $ Subject: Bug#298861: fixed in libgnomesu 0.9.5-2 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 14:03:44 -0500 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.8 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS, HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Source: libgnomesu Source-Version: 0.9.5-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of libgnomesu, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: libgnomesu-common_0.9.5-2_all.deb to pool/main/libg/libgnomesu/libgnomesu-common_0.9.5-2_all.deb libgnomesu-dev_0.9.5-2_i386.deb to pool/main/libg/libgnomesu/libgnomesu-dev_0.9.5-2_i386.deb libgnomesu0_0.9.5-2_i386.deb to pool/main/libg/libgnomesu/libgnomesu0_0.9.5-2_i386.deb libgnomesu_0.9.5-2.diff.gz to pool/main/libg/libgnomesu/libgnomesu_0.9.5-2.diff.gz libgnomesu_0.9.5-2.dsc to pool/main/libg/libgnomesu/libgnomesu_0.9.5-2.dsc A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Sebastien Bacher [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated libgnomesu package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 19:39:49 +0100 Source: libgnomesu Binary: libgnomesu-common libgnomesu-dev libgnomesu0 Architecture: source i386 all Version: 0.9.5-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer:
Bug#298808: marked as done (rebuild without libhowl0 dep)
Your message dated Thu, 10 Mar 2005 14:17:15 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#298808: fixed in file-roller 2.8.4-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Mar 2005 01:51:11 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Mar 09 17:51:11 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from imf25aec.mail.bellsouth.net [205.152.59.73] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D9Cok-00042q-00; Wed, 09 Mar 2005 17:50:31 -0800 Received: from double-helix.org ([68.154.213.225]) by imf25aec.mail.bellsouth.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.11 201-253-122-130-111-20040605) with ESMTP id [EMAIL PROTECTED] for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 9 Mar 2005 20:49:55 -0500 Received: by anemone (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 89E10C6AD; Wed, 9 Mar 2005 20:47:34 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2005 20:47:34 -0500 From: Erinn Clark [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: rebuild without libhowl0 dep Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux X-GPG-Key-Server: pgp.mit.edu User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_10,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: file-roller Severity: grave Justification: libhowl0 moving to non-free (on behalf on RM Steve Langasek) Please rebuild file-roller without the libhowl0 dependency since it's moving to non-free. Thanks. -- off the chain like a rebellious guanine nucleotide --- Received: (at 298808-close) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Mar 2005 19:23:02 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Mar 10 11:23:01 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D9TFN-000243-00; Thu, 10 Mar 2005 11:23:01 -0800 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D9T9n-0004fM-00; Thu, 10 Mar 2005 14:17:15 -0500 From: Sebastien Bacher [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $ Subject: Bug#298808: fixed in file-roller 2.8.4-2 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 14:17:15 -0500 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.8 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS, HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Source: file-roller Source-Version: 2.8.4-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of file-roller, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: file-roller_2.8.4-2.diff.gz to pool/main/f/file-roller/file-roller_2.8.4-2.diff.gz file-roller_2.8.4-2.dsc to pool/main/f/file-roller/file-roller_2.8.4-2.dsc file-roller_2.8.4-2_i386.deb to pool/main/f/file-roller/file-roller_2.8.4-2_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Sebastien Bacher [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated file-roller package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 19:57:16 +0100 Source: file-roller Binary: file-roller Architecture: source i386 Version: 2.8.4-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Sebastien Bacher [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Sebastien Bacher [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: file-roller - an archive manager for GNOME Closes: 298808 Changes: file-roller (2.8.4-2) unstable; urgency=low . * Rebuilt for the libhowl transition (Closes: #298808). Files: dfe952813154b38f5b7b1c69780d71e3 1602 gnome optional
Bug#298948: gozer: contains non-free font
Package: gozer Severity: serious Justification: Policy 2.2.1 This package contains the non-free font helmetr.ttf. I know this is rather painful, as I read in the changelog that this font was used to replace several other non-free fonts to begin with. But it seems that helmetr.ttf's inclusion in OpenOffice was a mistake, and that the font was never free: http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2002/08/msg00897.html To get a replacement, you can depend on ttf-bitstream-vera, ttf-freefont, or one of the other free fonts packaged in Debian. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.9 Locale: LANG=nl_BE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=nl_BE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages gozer depends on: ii giblib1 1.2.4-2 wrapper library for imlib2, and ot ii libc62.3.2.ds1-20GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libimlib21.2.0-2.1 powerful image loading and renderi ii libttf2 1.4pre.20030402-1.1 FreeType 1, The FREE TrueType Font ii xlibs4.3.0.dfsg.1-12 X Keyboard Extension (XKB) configu -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#298949: golem: contains non-free font
Package: golem Severity: serious Justification: Policy 2.2.1 This package contains the font vixar.ttf, which includes the following copyright statement: Copyright (c) 1995 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved. Without a free license Debian cannot distribute this font, and thus it should be removed. If a replacement font is needed, you can depend on ttf-bitstream-vera, ttf-freefont, or one of the other free fonts packaged in Debian. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.9 Locale: LANG=nl_BE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=nl_BE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#298960: freewrl: contains non-free fonts
Package: freewrl Severity: serious Justification: Policy 2.2.1 This package contains many Bitstream fonts. The README file does not include a license, instead it states they were copied from Red Hat 7.2. I downloaded that distribution, but could find no trace of the fonts. Without a free license Debian cannot distribute thess fonts, and therefore they should be removed. To get replacement fonts, you can depend on ttf-bitstream-vera, ttf-freefont, or one of the other free fonts packaged in Debian. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.9 Locale: LANG=nl_BE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=nl_BE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages freewrl depends on: ii libc62.3.2.ds1-20GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libjpeg626b-10 The Independent JPEG Group's JPEG pn libpng2 Not found. ii libttf2 1.4pre.20030402-1.1 FreeType 1, The FREE TrueType Font ii libwww-perl 5.803-4 WWW client/server library for Perl ii perl 5.8.4-8 Larry Wall's Practical Extraction pn perlapi-5.6.1Not found. ii xlibmesa-gl [libgl1] 4.3.0.dfsg.1-12.0.1 Mesa 3D graphics library [XFree86] ii xlibs4.3.0.dfsg.1-12 X Keyboard Extension (XKB) configu ii zlib1g 1:1.2.2-4 compression library - runtime -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#298957: gem: contains non-free fonts
Package: gem Severity: serious Justification: Policy 2.2.1 Gem contains the non-free fonts Arial, Courier New and Times New Roman. Without a free license Debian cannot distribute these fonts, and therefore they should be removed. To get replacement fonts, you can depend on ttf-bitstream-vera, ttf-freefont, or one of the other free fonts packaged in Debian. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.9 Locale: LANG=nl_BE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=nl_BE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#298955: gnurobbo: contains non-free font
Package: gnurobbo Severity: serious Justification: Policy 2.2.1 This package contains the font robbo.ttf, which includes the following copyright statement: Copyright 1990-1996 Bitstream Inc. All rights reserved. Without a free license Debian cannot distribute this font, and thus it should be removed. To get a replacement font, you can depend on ttf-bitstream-vera, ttf-freefont, or one of the other free fonts packaged in Debian. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.9 Locale: LANG=nl_BE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=nl_BE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#297980: Bug#297985: xserver-xfree86: X server crashes when compiling a program from gnat-gps
(CC'ing Helge Lenz the original reporter) I have been able to create a core file with the debugging version of the X server by using kill -SEGV, as Branden Robinson described. Then I tried to reproduce the problem with gnat-gps, and no core file is created. The X server exits as though gnat-gps were sending a Ctrl+Alt+Backspace to it. This then sends a SIGPIPE to gnat-gps, which crashes. Is it possible for a client program to cause the X server to shut down? If so, what kind of X request should I look for in gnat-gps? Here is additional information on how to debug gnat-gps. Switch to a text console (e.g. VT1), login as yourself, and do: $ apt-get install gnat-gdb $ apt-get source gnat-gps $ cd gnat-gps-2.1.0 $ dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot (takes ~1h on my Pentium III 900 MHz) $ cd glide/obj $ gnatgdb gnat-gps (gdb) set env DISPLAY=:0 (gdb) break commands-builder.adb:207 (gdb) run Swith to the X console (VT7 by default). After loading sdc.gpr, press F4. Switch back to VT1 where GDB is running, and take it from there. At one point, the X server exits but gnat-gps keeps on running in GDB. In my previous experience, this happens while gnat-gps is in one of the GNAT.Expect.Expect procedures. Later on, gnat-gps receives SIGPIPE because the X server is down. Also, it is possible to attach GDB to the X server itself. In a text console, login as root and: # ps -u root | grep XFree86-debug (look at the PID of the X server) # gdb /usr/bin/XFree86-debug (gdb) attach pid-of-X-server I have not yet had time to go further than this. I would need to install the sources to the X server, possibly rebuild it, and try to find the exit point, i.e. what was XFree86 thinking when it shut down? -- Ludovic Brenta. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#298963: caudium: contains non-free fonts
Package: caudium Severity: serious Justification: Policy 2.2.1 This package contains three non-free fonts: - fontrstc.ttf: 1998 utopiafonts. [EMAIL PROTECTED], see also the readme in [1]. - lucida_unicode.ttf and verdana.ttf: two Microsoft fonts. Without a free license Debian cannot distribute these fonts, and therefore they should be removed. If replacement fonts are needed, you can depend on ttf-bitstream-vera, ttf-freefont, or one of the other free fonts packaged in Debian. [1] http://www.reflectingarea.com/styling/fonts/creators/UtopiaFonts/FontRedSuit.zip -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.9 Locale: LANG=nl_BE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=nl_BE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages caudium depends on: pn caudium-modules Not found. ii debconf 1.4.46 Debian configuration management sy ii logrotate 3.7-2 Log rotation utility pn pike7Not found. pn pike7-crypto | pike7-lobotomiNot found. pn pike7-gz Not found. pn pike7-image Not found.
Bug#298965: afterstep: contains non-free font
Package: afterstep Severity: serious Justification: Policy 2.2.1 This package contains the font: afterstep-2.00.03/libAfterImage/apps/test.ttf No copyright or license for this font is included. Unless this font has been released in the public domain, Debian cannot distribute it, and therefore it should be removed. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.9 Locale: LANG=nl_BE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=nl_BE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages afterstep depends on: ii imagemagick 6:6.0.6.2-2.2 Image manipulation programs ii libc62.3.2.ds1-20GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libjpeg626b-10 The Independent JPEG Group's JPEG pn libpng2 Not found. pn librplay3Not found. ii menu 2.1.22 provides update-menus functions fo ii perl 5.8.4-8 Larry Wall's Practical Extraction ii xlibs4.3.0.dfsg.1-12 X Keyboard Extension (XKB) configu ii zlib1g 1:1.2.2-4 compression library - runtime -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#298964: atris: contains non-free fonts
Package: atris Severity: serious Justification: Policy 2.2.1 This package contains the font NewMediumNormal.ttf, which includes the following copyright statement: Copyright 1998 by Matthew Welch. All Rights Reserved. The license on the author's web page[1] is non-free, and the atris package contains no license at all. Without a free license Debian cannot distribute this font, and therefore it should be removed. To get a replacement font, you can depend on ttf-bitstream-vera, ttf-freefont, or one of the other free fonts packaged in Debian. [1] http://www.squaregear.net/fonts/ -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.9 Locale: LANG=nl_BE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=nl_BE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Bug#298967: bglibs-doc: contains non-free font
Package: bglibs-doc Version: 1.019-1 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 2.2.1 This package contains the Arial font in the file Helvetica.ttf. No license is included for this font. Without a free license Debian cannot distribute this font, and therefore it should be removed. As far as I can see, this font is not used at all, so this should cause no problems. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.9 Locale: LANG=nl_BE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=nl_BE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: changin severity for technical reasons
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 297283 normal Bug#297283: mysql-server: mysql don't start after an upgrade Severity set to `normal'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#298974: bittorrent-gui: btdownloadgui fails to launch
Package: bittorrent-gui Version: 3.4.2-3 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable I get this error when launching btdownloadgui Gdk-ERROR **: BadValue (integer parameter out of range for operation) serial 185 error_code 2 request_code 45 minor_code 0 and then it returns back to the command line -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-686 Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Versions of packages bittorrent-gui depends on: ii bittorrent3.4.2-3Scatter-gather network file transf ii libwxgtk2.4-python2.4.2.6wxWindows Cross-platform C++ GUI t ii python2.3.5-1An interactive high-level object-o -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#298815: libsem-dev: trying to overwrite `/usr/include/semaphore.h', which is also in package libc6-dev
On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 02:08:22PM +0100, Andreas Mueller wrote: On Thursday, 10. March 2005 12:25, Robert Millan wrote: On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 04:39:22AM +0100, Andreas Mueller wrote: Package: libsem-dev Version: error processing libsem-dev Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable FYI, installed a fresh chroot and got the following error: (Reading database ... 18003 files and directories currently installed.) Unpacking libsem-dev (from .../libsem-dev_0.0.1-2_powerpc.deb) ... dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/libsem-dev_0.0.1-2_powerpc.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite `/usr/include/semaphore.h', which is also in package libc6-dev Errors were encountered while processing: /var/cache/apt/archives/libsem-dev_0.0.1-2_powerpc.deb E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) libsem-dev doesn't support linux-gnu. Who built this package? I can't find the changes file in merkel's queue/accepted. probably buildd builded it, if you didnt. I've read the buildd log, and still can't understand what happened. There are no linux architectures listed in debian/control. -- .''`. Proudly running Debian GNU/kFreeBSD unstable/unreleased (on UFS2+S) : :' : `. `'http://www.debian.org/ports/kfreebsd-gnu `- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#288009: batik 1.5.1 would break fop
On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 06:22:19PM +0100, Wolfgang Baer wrote: I prepared a package for the batik 1.5.1 upstream release. However during testing the package I realized that batik 1.5.1 breaks fop ! As far as I see no other packages depend on libbatik-java. fop is currently not in testing although a valid candidate. A solution to the problem would be to upgrade batik to 1.5.1 and also to upload a new fop package with an embedded batik library in the current version (with the affected Squiggle class files removed from the library). fop is not really a valid candidate, although it appears to be in grep-excuses. Both libfop-java and libfop-java-doc are uninstallable on their own right in unstable, because libfop-java depends on fop and fop conflicts with libfop-java. You can safely ignore this package for the time being... -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#298849: marked as done (rebuild without libhowl0 dep)
Your message dated Thu, 10 Mar 2005 16:32:13 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#298849: fixed in gnome-session 2.8.1-6 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Mar 2005 11:45:07 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Mar 10 03:45:07 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from imf22aec.mail.bellsouth.net [205.152.59.70] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D9M6F-00046d-00; Thu, 10 Mar 2005 03:45:07 -0800 Received: from double-helix.org ([68.154.213.225]) by imf22aec.mail.bellsouth.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.11 201-253-122-130-111-20040605) with ESMTP id [EMAIL PROTECTED] for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 10 Mar 2005 06:44:36 -0500 Received: by anemone (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 1E0BDC6AD; Thu, 10 Mar 2005 06:42:12 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 06:42:12 -0500 From: Erinn Clark [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: rebuild without libhowl0 dep Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux X-GPG-Key-Server: pgp.mit.edu User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_10,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: gnome-session Severity: grave Justification: libhowl0 moving to non-free (on behalf on RM Steve Langasek) Please rebuild gnome-session without the libhowl0 dependency since it's moving to non-free. Only a recompile is required, but it's required on multiple architectures, so there should be a sourceful upload. Thanks. -- off the chain like a rebellious guanine nucleotide --- Received: (at 298849-close) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Mar 2005 21:38:26 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Mar 10 13:38:26 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D9VMQ-0006Mz-00; Thu, 10 Mar 2005 13:38:26 -0800 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D9VGP-0005fz-00; Thu, 10 Mar 2005 16:32:13 -0500 From: Josselin Mouette [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $ Subject: Bug#298849: fixed in gnome-session 2.8.1-6 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 16:32:13 -0500 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2 Source: gnome-session Source-Version: 2.8.1-6 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of gnome-session, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: gnome-session_2.8.1-6.diff.gz to pool/main/g/gnome-session/gnome-session_2.8.1-6.diff.gz gnome-session_2.8.1-6.dsc to pool/main/g/gnome-session/gnome-session_2.8.1-6.dsc gnome-session_2.8.1-6_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gnome-session/gnome-session_2.8.1-6_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Josselin Mouette [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated gnome-session package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 21:44:15 +0100 Source: gnome-session Binary: gnome-session Architecture: source i386 Version: 2.8.1-6 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Josselin Mouette [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Josselin Mouette [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: gnome-session - The GNOME 2 Session Manager Closes: 289969 298849 Changes:
Bug#298183: NMU diff
It turns out that the older version of lesstif2 we have also had the
variables defined as signed ints, so the patch to fix CAN-2005-0605 in
lesstif2 is shorter than the fixes needed for newer versions of the
library. I combined this fix with the fix for lesstif1 that Martin Pitt
was kind enough to send and the result is the attached NMU diff.
Note that I haven't NMUed it yet, I'm still looking at the other open
security holes.
--
see shy jo
diff -ur old/lesstif1-1-0.93.94/debian/changelog
lesstif1-1-0.93.94/debian/changelog
--- old/lesstif1-1-0.93.94/debian/changelog 2005-03-10 16:49:01.0
-0500
+++ lesstif1-1-0.93.94/debian/changelog 2005-03-10 16:48:31.0 -0500
@@ -1,3 +1,12 @@
+lesstif1-1 (1:0.93.94-11.1) unstable; urgency=HIGH
+
+ * NMU
+ * Apply fix for newest libXpm buffer overflows in lesstif1, involving a
+negative bitmap_unit value. Fixed both lesstif1 and lesstif2.
+Closes: #298939 (CAN-2005-0605)
+
+ -- Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu, 10 Mar 2005 16:34:21 -0500
+
lesstif1-1 (1:0.93.94-11) unstable; urgency=low
* Mention CAN-2004-0688 in the 1:0.93.94-9 changelog.
diff -ur old/lesstif1-1-0.93.94/lib/Xm/LTXpm.c lesstif1-1-0.93.94/lib/Xm/LTXpm.c
--- old/lesstif1-1-0.93.94/lib/Xm/LTXpm.c 2005-03-10 16:49:00.0
-0500
+++ lesstif1-1-0.93.94/lib/Xm/LTXpm.c 2005-03-10 16:36:47.0 -0500
@@ -6395,6 +6395,9 @@
ibpp = image-bits_per_pixel;
offset = image-xoffset;
+if (image-bitmap_unit 0)
+return (_LtXpmNoMemory);
+
if ((image-bits_per_pixel | image-depth) == 1) {
ibu = image-bitmap_unit;
for (y = 0; y height; y++)
diff -ur old/lesstif1-1-0.93.94/lib/Xm-2.1/Xpm.c
lesstif1-1-0.93.94/lib/Xm-2.1/Xpm.c
--- old/lesstif1-1-0.93.94/lib/Xm-2.1/Xpm.c 2005-03-10 16:49:01.0
-0500
+++ lesstif1-1-0.93.94/lib/Xm-2.1/Xpm.c 2005-03-10 16:46:14.0 -0500
@@ -6373,6 +6373,9 @@
ibpp = image-bits_per_pixel;
offset = image-xoffset;
+if (image-bitmap_unit 0)
+return (XpmNoMemory);
+
if ((image-bits_per_pixel | image-depth) == 1) {
ibu = image-bitmap_unit;
for (y = 0; y height; y++)
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Bug#298980: Culmus: not installable after upgrading to fontconfig 2.3.1-1
Package: culmus Version: 0.101-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Hi Baruch, I upgraded to fontconfig 2.3.1-1 and saw it overwrites the previous conf. I guessed that culmus add stuff to /etc/fonts/local.conf and decided to reinstall the package. Fontconfig new version had a change: usage of /etc/fonts/conf.d instead of /etc/fonts/local.conf. Thus make culmus uninstallable send the installtions scrpits fail and leave the package in Failconfig status. It seems that the sulution shold be very easy. Some log from my machine: laptop:~# apt-get --reinstall install culmus Reading Package Lists... Done Building Dependency Tree... Done 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 1 reinstalled, 0 to remove and 2 not upgraded. Need to get 1051kB of archives. After unpacking 0B of additional disk space will be used. Do you want to continue? [Y/n] Get:1 http://mirror.hamakor.org.il unstable/main culmus 0.101-1 [1051kB] Fetched 1051kB in 3m45s (4659B/s) Preconfiguring packages ... grep: /etc/fonts/local.conf: No such file or directory (Reading database ... 51579 files and directories currently installed.) Preparing to replace culmus 0.101-1 (using .../culmus_0.101-1_all.deb) ... Unpacking replacement culmus ... grep: /etc/fonts/local.conf: No such file or directory Setting up culmus (0.101-1) ... grep: /etc/fonts/local.conf: No such file or directory grep: /etc/fonts/local.conf: No such file or directory grep: /etc/fonts/local.conf: No such file or directory sed: can't read /etc/fonts/local.conf: No such file or directory dpkg: error processing culmus (--configure): subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 2 Errors were encountered while processing: culmus E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) laptop:~# dpkg -l fontconfig Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold | Status=Not/Installed/Config-files/Unpacked/Failed-config/Half-installed |/ Err?=(none)/Hold/Reinst-required/X=both-problems (Status,Err: uppercase=bad) ||/ Name VersionDescription +++-==-==- ii fontconfig 2.3.1-1generic font configuration library laptop:~# dpkg -l culmus Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold | Status=Not/Installed/Config-files/Unpacked/Failed-config/Half-installed |/ Err?=(none)/Hold/Reinst-required/X=both-problems (Status,Err: uppercase=bad) ||/ Name VersionDescription +++-==-==- iF culmus 0.101-1Type1 Hebrew Fonts for X11 -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-686-smp Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages culmus depends on: ii debconf [debconf-2.0 1.4.46 Debian configuration management sy ii xutils 4.3.0.dfsg.1-12.0.1 X Window System utility programs -- debconf information excluded -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#288009: batik 1.5.1 would break fop
Steve Langasek wrote: On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 06:22:19PM +0100, Wolfgang Baer wrote: fop is currently not in testing although a valid candidate. A solution to the problem would be to upgrade batik to 1.5.1 and also to upload a new fop package with an embedded batik library in the current version (with the affected Squiggle class files removed from the library). fop is not really a valid candidate, although it appears to be in grep-excuses. Both libfop-java and libfop-java-doc are uninstallable on their own right in unstable, because libfop-java depends on fop and fop conflicts with libfop-java. You can safely ignore this package for the time being... There was a small discussion on debian-java the last minutes. I will prepare a patched fop release which should compile against batik 1.5.1 Should therefore the libfop-java and libfop-java-doc binary packages removed in the new package ? I think they are transitional packages not needed anymore as fop is not in testing at all. Am I right ? (I CC debian-java for this binary package removal question) Regards, Wolfgang -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#298850: marked as done (rebuild without libhowl0 dep)
Your message dated Thu, 10 Mar 2005 17:17:36 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#298850: fixed in gnome-terminal 2.8.2-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Mar 2005 11:45:49 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Mar 10 03:45:49 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from imf22aec.mail.bellsouth.net [205.152.59.70] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D9M6u-0004Et-00; Thu, 10 Mar 2005 03:45:48 -0800 Received: from double-helix.org ([68.154.213.225]) by imf22aec.mail.bellsouth.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.11 201-253-122-130-111-20040605) with ESMTP id [EMAIL PROTECTED] for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 10 Mar 2005 06:45:18 -0500 Received: by anemone (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 95871C6AD; Thu, 10 Mar 2005 06:42:53 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 06:42:53 -0500 From: Erinn Clark [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: rebuild without libhowl0 dep Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux X-GPG-Key-Server: pgp.mit.edu User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_20,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: gnome-terminal Severity: grave Justification: libhowl0 moving to non-free (on behalf on RM Steve Langasek) Please rebuild gnome-terminal without the libhowl0 dependency since it's moving to non-free. Only a recompile is required, but it's required on multiple architectures, so there should be a sourceful upload. Thanks. -- off the chain like a rebellious guanine nucleotide --- Received: (at 298850-close) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Mar 2005 22:24:19 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Mar 10 14:24:18 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D9W4o-0005Dt-00; Thu, 10 Mar 2005 14:24:18 -0800 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D9VyK-dD-00; Thu, 10 Mar 2005 17:17:36 -0500 From: Josselin Mouette [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $ Subject: Bug#298850: fixed in gnome-terminal 2.8.2-2 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 17:17:36 -0500 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Source: gnome-terminal Source-Version: 2.8.2-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of gnome-terminal, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: gnome-terminal_2.8.2-2.diff.gz to pool/main/g/gnome-terminal/gnome-terminal_2.8.2-2.diff.gz gnome-terminal_2.8.2-2.dsc to pool/main/g/gnome-terminal/gnome-terminal_2.8.2-2.dsc gnome-terminal_2.8.2-2_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gnome-terminal/gnome-terminal_2.8.2-2_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Josselin Mouette [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated gnome-terminal package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 22:50:38 +0100 Source: gnome-terminal Binary: gnome-terminal Architecture: source i386 Version: 2.8.2-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Arnaud Patard [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Josselin Mouette [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: gnome-terminal - The GNOME 2 terminal emulator application Closes: 298850 Changes:
Bug#298868: marked as done (rebuild without libhowl0 dep)
Your message dated Thu, 10 Mar 2005 17:47:35 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#298868: fixed in nautilus-cd-burner 2.8.7-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Mar 2005 12:41:02 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Mar 10 04:41:02 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from imf19aec.mail.bellsouth.net [205.152.59.67] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D9MyL-0004vI-00; Thu, 10 Mar 2005 04:41:01 -0800 Received: from double-helix.org ([68.154.213.225]) by imf19aec.mail.bellsouth.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.11 201-253-122-130-111-20040605) with ESMTP id [EMAIL PROTECTED] for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 10 Mar 2005 07:40:31 -0500 Received: by anemone (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 602DFC6AD; Thu, 10 Mar 2005 07:38:06 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 07:38:06 -0500 From: Erinn Clark [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: rebuild without libhowl0 dep Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux X-GPG-Key-Server: pgp.mit.edu User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_20,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: nautilus-cd-burner Severity: grave Justification: libhowl0 moving to non-free (on behalf of RM Steve Langasek) Please rebuild nautilus-cd-burner without the libhowl0 dependency since it's moving to non-free. Only a recompile is required, but it's required on multiple architectures, so there should be a sourceful upload. Thanks. -- off the chain like a rebellious guanine nucleotide --- Received: (at 298868-close) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Mar 2005 22:53:03 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Mar 10 14:53:02 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D9WWc-0002Eb-00; Thu, 10 Mar 2005 14:53:02 -0800 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D9WRL-0001M8-00; Thu, 10 Mar 2005 17:47:35 -0500 From: Josselin Mouette [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $ Subject: Bug#298868: fixed in nautilus-cd-burner 2.8.7-3 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 17:47:35 -0500 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Source: nautilus-cd-burner Source-Version: 2.8.7-3 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of nautilus-cd-burner, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: libnautilus-burn-dev_2.8.7-3_i386.deb to pool/main/n/nautilus-cd-burner/libnautilus-burn-dev_2.8.7-3_i386.deb libnautilus-burn0_2.8.7-3_i386.deb to pool/main/n/nautilus-cd-burner/libnautilus-burn0_2.8.7-3_i386.deb nautilus-cd-burner_2.8.7-3.diff.gz to pool/main/n/nautilus-cd-burner/nautilus-cd-burner_2.8.7-3.diff.gz nautilus-cd-burner_2.8.7-3.dsc to pool/main/n/nautilus-cd-burner/nautilus-cd-burner_2.8.7-3.dsc nautilus-cd-burner_2.8.7-3_i386.deb to pool/main/n/nautilus-cd-burner/nautilus-cd-burner_2.8.7-3_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Josselin Mouette [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated nautilus-cd-burner package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 23:18:49 +0100 Source: nautilus-cd-burner Binary:
Bug#288009: batik 1.5.1 would break fop
On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 11:12:35PM +0100, Wolfgang Baer wrote: Steve Langasek wrote: On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 06:22:19PM +0100, Wolfgang Baer wrote: fop is currently not in testing although a valid candidate. A solution to the problem would be to upgrade batik to 1.5.1 and also to upload a new fop package with an embedded batik library in the current version (with the affected Squiggle class files removed from the library). fop is not really a valid candidate, although it appears to be in grep-excuses. Both libfop-java and libfop-java-doc are uninstallable on their own right in unstable, because libfop-java depends on fop and fop conflicts with libfop-java. You can safely ignore this package for the time being... There was a small discussion on debian-java the last minutes. I will prepare a patched fop release which should compile against batik 1.5.1 Should therefore the libfop-java and libfop-java-doc binary packages removed in the new package ? I think they are transitional packages not needed anymore as fop is not in testing at all. Am I right ? I don't think there's any reason for transitional packages for a package that's only in unstable. It's the maintainer's call whether to have a transitional package, but this is *not* the way to do it: uninstallable packages are not allowed. -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#292228: marked as done (manpage looks not distributeable, as license not adhered)
Your message dated Fri, 11 Mar 2005 00:43:32 +0100
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Acknowledging this NMU
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at maintonly) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Jan 2005 20:47:34 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jan 25 12:47:34 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from pcpool00.mathematik.uni-freiburg.de [132.230.30.150]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CtXb4-0002UQ-00; Tue, 25 Jan 2005 12:47:34 -0800
Received: from pcpool08.mathematik.uni-freiburg.de ([132.230.30.158])
by pcpool00.mathematik.uni-freiburg.de with asmtp (Exim 3.35 #1
(Debian))
id 1CtXb6-00022e-00
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 25 Jan 2005 21:47:36 +0100
Received: from brl by pcpool08.mathematik.uni-freiburg.de with local (Exim 3.35
#1 (Debian))
id 1CtXb6-5x-00
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 25 Jan 2005 21:47:36 +0100
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2005 21:47:36 +0100
From: Bernhard R. Link [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: manpage looks not distributeable, as license not adhered
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
Sender: Bernhard R. Link [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Package: gnuserv
Version: 3.12.6-1
Severity: serious
The following manpages say they are only distributeable under
the GFDL, but do not include the license text required by this
license:
dtemacs.1.gz
This mass-filing of bugs was announced 2005-01-09 in my mail to
debian-devel and debian-legal:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2005/01/msg00499.html
http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2005/01/msg00262.html
Hochachtungsvoll,
Bernhard R. Link
---
Received: (at 292228-done) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Mar 2005 23:42:47 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Mar 10 15:42:47 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from maileuz.sivit.org [194.146.224.64]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1D9XIk-0002kn-00; Thu, 10 Mar 2005 15:42:47 -0800
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by maileuz.sivit.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED8DE3F95
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 11 Mar 2005 00:43:24 +0100 (CET)
Received: from maileuz.sivit.org ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (maileuz.sivit.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id 30134-39 for [EMAIL PROTECTED];
Fri, 11 Mar 2005 00:43:19 +0100 (CET)
Received: from hebus.dyndns.org (ATuileries-151-1-14-23.w82-123.abo.wanadoo.fr
[82.123.76.23])
by maileuz.sivit.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A09073FAC
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 11 Mar 2005 00:43:19 +0100 (CET)
Received: from benj by hebus.dyndns.org with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1D9XJU-0001Wg-00
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 11 Mar 2005 00:43:32 +0100
From: Benjamin Drieu [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Acknowledging this NMU
Organization: APRIL - http://www.april.org/
X-Face: [EMAIL PROTECTED]|NZ\/;)nH`Ie?W,[EMAIL PROTECTED];d,3]Qa'qt3[`_D@
BZgsuv|[EMAIL PROTECTED]Rn')V7mG\?E,ejoiLT)$(pFml1'[EMAIL
PROTECTED]Bn`('jHOpTl7618jRM'plV%e
Sl6q
Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2005 00:43:32 +0100
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary==-=-=;
micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol=application/pgp-signature
Sender: Benjamin Drieu [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavis at maileuz.sivit.org
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.6 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,OPT_HEADER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
--=-=-=
I hereby acknowledge this NMU, thanks !
Cheers,
Benjamin
--
o Benjamin Drieu: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
o APRIL:http://www.april.org/
o Grisbi: http://www.grisbi.org/
--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)
Processed: alleged hppa bug
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 294163 normal Bug#294163: libdb4.3: build failed on hppa Severity set to `normal'. quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: FWD: downgrade
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 298051 important Bug#298051: imagemagick: information disclosure from exif thumbnails Severity set to `important'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#298051: downgrade
severity 298051 important thanks Discussion with the RMs decided that these exif leakage bugs are not RC. -- see shy jo signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Processed: Fixed in NMU of lesstif1-1 1:0.93.94-11.1
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 298939 + fixed Bug#298939: libxpm4: new buffer overflow security hole (CAN-2005-0605) Tags were: fixed-upstream patch security upstream Tags added: fixed quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#291709: marked as done (asterisk-chan-misdn_0.0.3rc2-4(ia64/unstable): FTBFS: non-PIC in shared library)
Your message dated Thu, 10 Mar 2005 21:32:12 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#291709: fixed in asterisk-chan-misdn 0.0.3rc6-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Jan 2005 16:43:13 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jan 22 08:43:13 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mmjgroup.com [192.34.35.33] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1CsOLx-0005iE-00; Sat, 22 Jan 2005 08:43:13 -0800 Received: from mix.mmjgroup.com (mix.mmjgroup.com [192.34.35.16]) by mmjgroup.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C57E316DE8 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 22 Jan 2005 09:43:11 -0700 (MST) Received: by mix.mmjgroup.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id E50908F30B; Sat, 22 Jan 2005 09:43:12 -0700 (MST) Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2005 09:43:12 -0700 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: asterisk-chan-misdn_0.0.3rc2-4(ia64/unstable): FTBFS: non-PIC in shared library Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.4 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE, NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: asterisk-chan-misdn Version: 0.0.3rc2-4 Severity: serious There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: Automatic build of asterisk-chan-misdn_0.0.3rc2-4 on caballero by sbuild/ia64 1.170.5 Build started at 20050122-1629 [...] ** Using build dependencies supplied by package: Build-Depends: debhelper (= 4.0.0), asterisk-dev, libmisdn-dev, libisdnnet-dev (= 0.0.0+cvs20041018-4) [...] /usr/include/isdn_net.h: At top level: te_lib.c:53: warning: `entity_nt' defined but not used cc -shared -Xlinker -x -o chan_misdn.so chan_misdn.o te_lib.o -lisdnnet -lmISDN /usr/bin/ld: /usr/lib/gcc-lib/ia64-linux/3.3.5/../../../libmISDN.a(device.o): @gprel relocation against dynamic symbol devlist /usr/bin/ld: /usr/lib/gcc-lib/ia64-linux/3.3.5/../../../libmISDN.a(device.o): @gprel relocation against dynamic symbol devlist /usr/bin/ld: /usr/lib/gcc-lib/ia64-linux/3.3.5/../../../libmISDN.a(device.o): @gprel relocation against dynamic symbol devlist /usr/bin/ld: /usr/lib/gcc-lib/ia64-linux/3.3.5/../../../libmISDN.a(device.o): @gprel relocation against dynamic symbol devlist /usr/bin/ld: /usr/lib/gcc-lib/ia64-linux/3.3.5/../../../libmISDN.a(device.o): @gprel relocation against dynamic symbol devlist /usr/bin/ld: /usr/lib/gcc-lib/ia64-linux/3.3.5/../../../libmISDN.a(device.o): @gprel relocation against dynamic symbol devlist /usr/bin/ld: /usr/lib/gcc-lib/ia64-linux/3.3.5/../../../libmISDN.a(device.o): @gprel relocation against dynamic symbol devlist /usr/bin/ld: /usr/lib/gcc-lib/ia64-linux/3.3.5/../../../libmISDN.a(device.o): @gprel relocation against dynamic symbol devlist collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make[1]: *** [chan_misdn.so] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/asterisk-chan-misdn-0.0.3rc2' make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2 A full build log can be found at: http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?arch=ia64pkg=asterisk-chan-misdnver=0.0.3rc2-4 Shared libraries must be built using only -fPIC code. lamont --- Received: (at 291709-close) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Mar 2005 02:38:21 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Mar 10 18:38:20 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D9a2e-00039V-00; Thu, 10 Mar 2005 18:38:20 -0800 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D9Zwi-00084h-00; Thu, 10 Mar 2005 21:32:12 -0500 From: Simon Richter [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $ Subject: Bug#291709: fixed in asterisk-chan-misdn 0.0.3rc6-1 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 21:32:12 -0500 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no
Bug#299007: base-files: Insecure PATH in /root/.profile
Package: base-files
Version: 3.0.2
Severity: critical
Tags: patch security
Justification: root security hole
I recently noticed that /usr/local and /usr/local/{bin,sbin} are
group-writable and owned by root:staff. This is wrong: those directories
are in the default PATH for root. They (and files within) should be
root-owned: group staff users or become-any-user-but-root bugs should not
be able to trojan and thus get root.
The Debian Policy Manual [1] says:
... /usr/local take precedence over the equivalents in /usr.
... should have permissions 2775 and be owned by root.staff.
but it [2] also says:
... make sure that [it] is secure ...
Files should be owned by root.root ... mode 644 or 755.
Directories should be mode 755 or 2775 ... owned by the group that needs
write access to it.
The Debian Reference [3] and Securing Debian Manual [4], [5] say
[group] staff is ... for helpdesk types or junior sysadmins ... to do
things in /usr/local and to create directories in /home.
[group] staff: Allows users to add local modifications to the system
(/usr/local, /home) without needing root privileges.
The 'staff' group are usually help-desk/junior sysadmins, allowing them
to work in /usr/local and create directories in /home.
(This is surely wrong, seems a SysV left-over: you need root privileges to
chown user directories in /home or in fact to create users in /etc/passwd.)
Junior sysadmins should not be able or encouraged to trojan root, even if
you trust them with the root password or give them sudo privileges.
Become-any-user-but-root and become-any-group-but-root bugs are quite
common. When a group of machines share user home directories via NFS
exported from somewhere with default root-squash, getting root on one
machine gives precisely that on all others of the group. There have been
genuine such bugs also e.g. in sendmail [6].
This security lapse has been discussed before [7], [8].
The solution is to remove /usr/local things from the default PATH in
/root/.profile (i.e. in /usr/share/base-files/dot.profile), leaving a
warning comment instead.
It would also be good to re-word the confused policy, and to make
/usr/local root-owned. (Maybe /usr/local/sbin could then be used again.)
Discuss on debian-policy@lists.debian.org, or reportbug debian-policy?
References:
[1] http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-opersys.html#s9.1.2
[2] http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-files.html#s10.9
[3] http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/reference/ch-tune.en.html#s9.2.3
[4]
http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/securing-debian-howto/ch11.en.html#s11.1.12.1
[5]
http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/securing-debian-howto/ch11.en.html#s11.1.12.2
[6] http://hackersplayground.org/papers/sendmailholes.txt
[7] http://lists.debian.org/debian-doc/2001/08/msg00041.html
[8] http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2003/12/msg02057.html
Cheers,
Paul Szabo [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.maths.usyd.edu.au/u/psz/
School of Mathematics and Statistics University of SydneyAustralia
-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux pisa.maths.usyd.edu.au 2.4.22-smssvr1.5.3 #1 SMP Wed Jun 23
13:01:39 EST 2004 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C
Versions of packages base-files depends on:
ii base-passwd 3.4.1 Debian Base System Password/Group
ii gawk [awk]1:3.1.0-3 GNU awk, a pattern scanning and pr
ii mawk [awk]1.3.3-8a pattern scanning and text proces
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#299013: libdevmapper1.01 initscript should be in rcS.d, not rc2.d
Package: libdevmapper1.01 Version: 2:1.01.00-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable # ls -l /etc/rc2.d/S20libdevmapper1.01 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 26 Mar 7 20:59 /etc/rc2.d/S20libdevmapper1.01 - ../init.d/libdevmapper1.01 this used to reside in rcS.d, not rc2.d. I'm pretty sure this could wreak havoc with a lot of lvm2 setups out there. And furthermore, the change does not seem to be noted in the changelog. 05:36 trippeh devmapper 1.00 - 1.01 transition is acting up here 05:36 trippeh /etc/rcS.d symlink fuckage 05:43 trippeh hm. 05:43 trippeh wonders why libdevmapper1.01 moved from rcS.d to rc2.d 05:44 dilinger ... 05:45 trippeh doesnt seem to mentioned in the changelog either. 05:45 dilinger looks at waldi 05:45 dilinger update-rc.d libdevmapper1.01 defaults /dev/null 05:46 dilinger trippeh: please file a bug or ask waldi about it 05:47 dilinger that's certainly not right, as lvm-common is still in rcS.d 05:48 dilinger and it depends upon libdevmapper1.* :-) -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (900, 'testing'), (800, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.10-s2-up Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Versions of packages libdevmapper1.01 depends on: ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-20 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: [CAN-2004-0957] i believe this patch should do it...
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 285276 patch Bug#285276: mysql: vulnerability issue (CAN-2004-0956 and CAN-2004-0957) Tags were: security woody Bug#296674: mysql-server: Security bug in MySQL in woody (CAN-2004-0957) Tags added: patch tags 296674 patch Bug#296674: mysql-server: Security bug in MySQL in woody (CAN-2004-0957) Tags were: patch security woody Bug#285276: mysql: vulnerability issue (CAN-2004-0956 and CAN-2004-0957) Tags added: patch thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#296674: [CAN-2004-0957] i believe this patch should do it...
tags 285276 patch
tags 296674 patch
thanks
hi,
i believe the attached patch fixes the vulnerability. i took the redhat
src rpm patch mysql-3.23.58-security.patch, removed the parts of the
patch that are already addressed by other DSA's, adjusted some line
numbers, and did a little extra massaging to get it to fit.
the patch cleanly applies, the package builds and installs, mysql starts
up, and i can connect to the database all without problems. however,
this is all in my virgin woody-i386 chroot on an unstable amd64 box, and
i haven't tested that the vulnerability is actually gone. could someone
more familiar with the vulnerability try a before and after to see if
the problem is resolved?
sean
--
diff -Naur mysql-3.23.58-orig/include/my_sys.h mysql-3.23.58/include/my_sys.h
--- mysql-3.23.58-orig/include/my_sys.h 2003-09-11 07:49:20.0 -0400
+++ mysql-3.23.58/include/my_sys.h 2004-10-12 13:27:15.380784008 -0400
@@ -476,7 +476,7 @@
const char *own_pathname_part);
extern my_string my_load_path(my_string to, const char *path,
const char *own_path_prefix);
-extern int wild_compare(const char *str,const char *wildstr);
+extern int wild_compare(const char *str,const char *wildstr,pbool
str_is_pattern);
extern my_string my_strcasestr(const char *src,const char *suffix);
extern int my_strcasecmp(const char *s,const char *t);
extern int my_strsortcmp(const char *s,const char *t);
diff -Naur mysql-3.23.58-orig/mysys/mf_wcomp.c mysql-3.23.58/mysys/mf_wcomp.c
--- mysql-3.23.58-orig/mysys/mf_wcomp.c 2003-09-11 07:49:19.0 -0400
+++ mysql-3.23.58/mysys/mf_wcomp.c 2004-10-12 13:27:15.382783734 -0400
@@ -24,11 +24,12 @@
char wild_many='*';
char wild_one='?';
-char wild_prefix=0;
+char wild_prefix=0; /* QQ this can potentially cause a SIGSEGV */
-int wild_compare(register const char *str, register const char *wildstr)
+int wild_compare(register const char *str, register const char *wildstr,
+ pbool str_is_pattern)
{
- reg3 int flag;
+ char cmp;
DBUG_ENTER(wild_compare);
while (*wildstr)
@@ -36,33 +37,55 @@
while (*wildstr *wildstr != wild_many *wildstr != wild_one)
{
if (*wildstr == wild_prefix wildstr[1])
+ {
wildstr++;
- if (*wildstr++ != *str++) DBUG_RETURN(1);
+if (str_is_pattern *str++ != wild_prefix)
+ DBUG_RETURN(1);
+ }
+ if (*wildstr++ != *str++)
+DBUG_RETURN(1);
}
-if (! *wildstr ) DBUG_RETURN (*str != 0);
+if (! *wildstr )
+ DBUG_RETURN(*str != 0);
if (*wildstr++ == wild_one)
{
- if (! *str++) DBUG_RETURN (1); /* One char; skipp */
+ if (! *str || (str_is_pattern *str == wild_many))
+DBUG_RETURN(1); /* One char; skip */
+ if (*str++ == wild_prefix str_is_pattern *str)
+str++;
}
else
{ /* Found '*' */
- if (!*wildstr) DBUG_RETURN(0); /* '*' as last char: OK */
- flag=(*wildstr != wild_many *wildstr != wild_one);
- do
+ while (str_is_pattern *str == wild_many)
+str++;
+ for (; *wildstr == wild_many || *wildstr == wild_one; wildstr++)
+if (*wildstr == wild_many)
+{
+ while (str_is_pattern *str == wild_many)
+str++;
+}
+else
+{
+ if (str_is_pattern *str == wild_prefix str[1])
+str+=2;
+ else if (! *str++)
+DBUG_RETURN (1);
+}
+ if (!*wildstr)
+DBUG_RETURN(0);/* '*' as last char: OK */
+ if ((cmp= *wildstr) == wild_prefix wildstr[1] !str_is_pattern)
+cmp=wildstr[1];
+ for (;;str++)
{
- if (flag)
- {
- char cmp;
- if ((cmp= *wildstr) == wild_prefix wildstr[1])
- cmp=wildstr[1];
- while (*str *str != cmp)
- str++;
- if (!*str) DBUG_RETURN (1);
- }
- if (wild_compare(str,wildstr) == 0) DBUG_RETURN (0);
- } while (*str++ wildstr[0] != wild_many);
- DBUG_RETURN(1);
+while (*str *str != cmp)
+ str++;
+if (!*str)
+ DBUG_RETURN (1);
+ if (wild_compare(str,wildstr,str_is_pattern) == 0)
+ DBUG_RETURN (0);
+ }
+ /* We will never come here */
}
}
- DBUG_RETURN (*str != '\0');
+ DBUG_RETURN (*str != 0);
} /* wild_compare */
diff -Naur mysql-3.23.58-orig/mysys/mf_wfile.c mysql-3.23.58/mysys/mf_wfile.c
--- mysql-3.23.58-orig/mysys/mf_wfile.c 2003-09-11 07:49:20.0 -0400
+++ mysql-3.23.58/mysys/mf_wfile.c 2004-10-12 13:27:15.383783596 -0400
@@ -107,7 +107,7 @@
not_pos=wf_pack-not_pos;
for (i=0 ; i not_pos; i++)
-if (wild_compare(name,wf_pack-wild[i]) == 0)
+if (wild_compare(name,wf_pack-wild[i],0) == 0)
goto found;
if (i)
DBUG_RETURN(1);/* No-match */
@@
Bug#295488: marked as done ([sparc64] [atyfb] No display after boot; monitor is suspended)
Your message dated Fri, 11 Mar 2005 01:17:36 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#295488: fixed in kernel-source-2.6.10 2.6.10-6 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Feb 2005 03:50:17 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Feb 15 19:50:16 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from smtp-b2c.tiscali.nl (ha-smtp2.tiscali.nl) [195.241.80.19] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D1GCe-0003yn-00; Tue, 15 Feb 2005 19:50:16 -0800 Received: from strider.fjphome.nl (195-240-184-66-mx.xdsl.tiscali.nl [195.240.184.66]) by ha-smtp2.tiscali.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BFE750D072 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 16 Feb 2005 04:49:45 +0100 (CET) From: Frans Pop [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [sparc64] [atyfb] No display after boot; monitor is suspended Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2005 04:49:58 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Multipart/Mixed; boundary=Boundary-00=_mLsECAuweWUkDN9 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: --Boundary-00=_mLsECAuweWUkDN9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Package: kernel-source-2.6.10 Severity: serious Justification: Serious regression from 2.6.8 Tags: patch As a result of the discussion on switching to 2.6.10 for Sarge, I have tested 2.6.10 on my Sparc Ultra 10. Result was that I discovered a serious regression for the atyfb (Mach64) framebuffer driver since upstream 2.6.10-rc2. I've managed to trace the problem and solve it with the help from upstream. Please apply the attached patch that was prepared by David S. Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] and will also be pushed in the upstream kernel. For the complete history of this patch, see [1]. [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-sparc/2005/02/msg00043.html Cheers, FJP --Boundary-00=_mLsECAuweWUkDN9 Content-Type: text/x-diff; charset=us-ascii; name=sparc_atyfb.patch Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=sparc_atyfb.patch = drivers/video/aty/atyfb_base.c 1.82 vs edited = --- 1.82/drivers/video/aty/atyfb_base.c 2005-01-04 18:48:32 -08:00 +++ edited/drivers/video/aty/atyfb_base.c 2005-02-15 08:19:00 -08:00 @@ -2511,7 +2511,15 @@ } } else #endif /* !CONFIG_PPC */ - if (!fb_find_mode(var, info, mode, NULL, 0, defmode, 8)) + if ( +#if defined(CONFIG_SPARC32) || defined(CONFIG_SPARC64) + /* On Sparc, unless the user gave a specific mode + * specification, use the PROM probed values in + * default_var. + */ + !mode || +#endif + !fb_find_mode(var, info, mode, NULL, 0, defmode, 8)) var = default_var; if (noaccel) --Boundary-00=_mLsECAuweWUkDN9-- --- Received: (at 295488-close) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Mar 2005 06:23:08 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Mar 10 22:23:08 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D9dYC-00084j-00; Thu, 10 Mar 2005 22:23:08 -0800 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D9dSq-0004g1-00; Fri, 11 Mar 2005 01:17:36 -0500 From: Andres Salomon [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $ Subject: Bug#295488: fixed in kernel-source-2.6.10 2.6.10-6 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2005 01:17:36 -0500 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Source: kernel-source-2.6.10 Source-Version: 2.6.10-6 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of kernel-source-2.6.10, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: kernel-doc-2.6.10_2.6.10-6_all.deb to
Bug#295628: marked as done (nis kills sparc64)
Your message dated Fri, 11 Mar 2005 01:17:36 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#295628: fixed in kernel-source-2.6.10 2.6.10-6 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Jan 2005 09:57:17 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jan 02 01:57:17 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from tershal.beezly.org.uk [213.177.254.57] (Debian-exim) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Cl2U9-0002hs-00; Sun, 02 Jan 2005 01:57:17 -0800 Received: from [10.0.0.212] (helo=[10.0.0.212]) by tershal.beezly.org.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Cl2U6-0003iz-8j for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 02 Jan 2005 09:57:14 + Subject: nis kills sparc64 From: Beezly [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: text/plain Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2005 09:57:26 + Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.1.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Package: nis Version: 3.12-3 Severity: critical Installing the nis package on my E4500 kills the machine. It seems to stop the machine creating new processes althought it's difficult for me to tell as I have limited physical access to the machine. Doing apt-get install nis produces the following... gold:/usr/sbin# apt-get install nis Reading Package Lists... Done Building Dependency Tree... Done The following NEW packages will be installed: nis 0 upgraded, 1 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. Need to get 235kB of archives. After unpacking 844kB of additional disk space will be used. Get:1 http://mirrors.shef.ac.uk testing/main nis 3.12-3 [235kB] Fetched 235kB in 4s (53.7kB/s) Preconfiguring packages ... Selecting previously deselected package nis. (Reading database ... 29539 files and directories currently installed.) Unpacking nis (from .../archives/nis_3.12-3_sparc.deb) ... Setting up nis (3.12-3) ... Setting NIS domainname to: beezly.org.uk Starting NIS services: ypbind The machine becomes inaccessible after loading ypbind and you cannot interrupt the terminal, however it IS still possible to ping the machine. ssh to the machine gets as far as opening a connection, but no further. Marked critical as it flattens my machine, every application and makes it unusable. Anything you want me to try out, please let me know although it can take me a while to get back to you... I have to drive over two hills to get to the machine! Cheers, Andrew --- Received: (at 295628-close) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Mar 2005 06:23:02 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Mar 10 22:23:02 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D9dY6-00083v-00; Thu, 10 Mar 2005 22:23:02 -0800 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D9dSq-0004g3-00; Fri, 11 Mar 2005 01:17:36 -0500 From: Andres Salomon [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $ Subject: Bug#295628: fixed in kernel-source-2.6.10 2.6.10-6 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2005 01:17:36 -0500 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2 Source: kernel-source-2.6.10 Source-Version: 2.6.10-6 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of kernel-source-2.6.10, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: kernel-doc-2.6.10_2.6.10-6_all.deb to pool/main/k/kernel-source-2.6.10/kernel-doc-2.6.10_2.6.10-6_all.deb kernel-patch-debian-2.6.10_2.6.10-6_all.deb to pool/main/k/kernel-source-2.6.10/kernel-patch-debian-2.6.10_2.6.10-6_all.deb kernel-source-2.6.10_2.6.10-6.diff.gz to pool/main/k/kernel-source-2.6.10/kernel-source-2.6.10_2.6.10-6.diff.gz kernel-source-2.6.10_2.6.10-6.dsc to
