Bug#299018: antlr: No rule to make target `/skole/tjener/home0/pere/src/debian/java/antlr-2.7.5/scripts/../lib/cpp/Makefile.in'
Package: antlr Version: 2.7.5-2 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Automatic build of antlr_2.7.5-2 on aahz by sbuild/m68k 1.170.5 [...] ** Using build dependencies supplied by package: Build-Depends: debhelper (= 4), kaffe, fastjar, classpath, jikes-classpath (= 1.18), autotools-dev, gcj, libgcj4-dev [...] cd lib/cpp; /usr/bin/make install prefix=`pwd`/../../debian/libantlr-dev/usr make[1]: Entering directory `/build/buildd/antlr-2.7.5/lib/cpp' make[1]: *** No rule to make target `/skole/tjener/home0/pere/src/debian/java/antlr-2.7.5/scripts/../lib/cpp/Makefile.in', needed by `Makefile'. Stop. make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/antlr-2.7.5/lib/cpp' make: *** [install] Error 2 There is no /skole directory on my buildd, and it is not immediately obvious from the build-depends that there should be one. This fails to build everywhere. Christian -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Bug#298804: pending
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 298804 + pending Bug#298804: rebuild without libhowl0 dep Tags were: confirmed Tags added: pending thanks mate Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#299018: antlr: No rule to make target `/skole/tjener/home0/pere/src/debian/java/antlr-2.7.5/scripts/../lib/cpp/Makefile.in'
On Fri, Mar 11, 2005 at 09:05:37AM +0100, Christian T. Steigies wrote: Package: antlr Version: 2.7.5-2 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Automatic build of antlr_2.7.5-2 on aahz by sbuild/m68k 1.170.5 [...] ** Using build dependencies supplied by package: Build-Depends: debhelper (= 4), kaffe, fastjar, classpath, jikes-classpath (= 1.18), autotools-dev, gcj, libgcj4-dev [...] cd lib/cpp; /usr/bin/make install prefix=`pwd`/../../debian/libantlr-dev/usr make[1]: Entering directory `/build/buildd/antlr-2.7.5/lib/cpp' make[1]: *** No rule to make target `/skole/tjener/home0/pere/src/debian/java/antlr-2.7.5/scripts/../lib/cpp/Makefile.in', needed by `Makefile'. Stop. make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/antlr-2.7.5/lib/cpp' make: *** [install] Error 2 There is no /skole directory on my buildd, and it is not immediately obvious from the build-depends that there should be one. This fails to build everywhere. That is strange as this package uses always local paths. It should replace this with paths on the autobuilder. Can you try to find out why it doesn't for you ? It worked for several people before uploading. Michael -- Java Trap: http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/java-trap.html -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#299028: distcc: FTBFS: alpha and amd64
Package: distcc Version: 2.18.3-1 Severity: serious Tags: patch distcc suffers FTBFS on alpha and amd64: x86_64-linux-gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -D_GNU_SOURCE -I./src -DSYSCONFDIR=\/etc\ -DPKGDATADIR=\/usr/share/distcc\ -Isrc -I./lzo -g -O2 -W -Wall -Wimplicit -Wshadow -Wpointer-arith -Wcast-align -Wwrite-strings -Waggregate-return -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wnested-externs -Wconversion -Wpointer-arith -Wmissing-declarations -o src/rpc.o -c src/rpc.c src/rpc.c: In function `dcc_x_token_int': src/rpc.c:78: warning: passing arg 3 of `memcpy' with different width due to prototype src/rpc.c:91: warning: passing arg 3 of `dcc_writex' with different width due to prototype src/rpc.c: In function `dcc_r_token': src/rpc.c:113: warning: passing arg 3 of `dcc_readx' with different width due to prototype src/rpc.c: In function `dcc_r_token_int': src/rpc.c:174: warning: passing arg 3 of `dcc_readx' with different width due to prototype src/rpc.c:180: warning: passing arg 3 of `memcmp' with different width due to prototype src/rpc.c:182: warning: passing arg 2 of `dcc_explain_mismatch' with different width due to prototype src/rpc.c:192: warning: passing arg 2 of `dcc_explain_mismatch' with different width due to prototype src/rpc.c: At top level: src/rpc.c:207: error: conflicting types for `dcc_r_str_alloc' src/distcc.h:268: error: previous declaration of `dcc_r_str_alloc' src/rpc.c: In function `dcc_r_token_string': src/rpc.c:263: warning: passing arg 2 of `dcc_r_str_alloc' with different width due to prototype make[1]: *** [src/rpc.o] Error 1 Fast fix: diff -Naur distcc-2.18.3/src/distcc.h distcc-2.18.3.fixed/src/distcc.h --- distcc-2.18.3/src/distcc.h 2004-11-21 19:36:30.0 +0100 +++ distcc-2.18.3.fixed/src/distcc.h2005-03-11 09:00:43.071459437 +0100 @@ -265,7 +265,7 @@ int dcc_readx(int fd, void *buf, size_t len); int dcc_pump_sendfile(int ofd, int ifd, size_t n); -int dcc_r_str_alloc(int fd, unsigned len, char **buf); +int dcc_r_str_alloc(int fd, size_t len, char **buf); int tcp_cork_sock(int fd, int corked); int dcc_close(int fd); -ukh -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#299029: Mysql insecure temporary file creation with CREATE TEMPORARY TABLE privilege escalation
Package: mysql-dfsg Version: unavailable; reported 2005-03-11 Severity: grave Tags: security Stefano Di Paola discovered that MySQL is vulnerable to a symlink attack if an authenticated user has CREATE TEMPORARY TABLE privileges on any existent database. There does not seem to be a CVE assignment yet. The full advisory can be found at: http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/vulnwatch/2005-q1/0082.html The advisory claims that MySQL has released a fix, and new upstream releases (4.0.24 and 4.1.10a), which haven't appeared on mysql.com yet. Cheers, Moritz -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.0 Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux anton 2.4.29-univention.1 #1 SMP Thu Jan 27 17:08:46 CET 2005 i686 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#299030: Mysql CREATE FUNCTION mysql.func table arbitrary library injection
Package: mysql-dfsg Version: 4.0.23-10 Severity: grave Tags: security Stefano Di Paola discovered that it's possible to use a library located in an arbitrary directory, if an authenticated user has INSERT and DELETE privileges on the 'mysql' administrative database. There does not seem to be a CVE assignment yet. The full advisory can be found at: http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/vulnwatch/2005-q1/0083.html The advisory claims that MySQL has released a fix, and new upstream releases (4.0.24 and 4.1.10a), which haven't appeared on mysql.com yet. Cheers, Moritz -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.0 Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux anton 2.4.29-univention.1 #1 SMP Thu Jan 27 17:08:46 CET 2005 i686 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#298934: roxen3: contains non-free fonts
Quoting Peter De Wachter [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Package: roxen3 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 2.2.1 The nfonts directory contains many non-free Truetype fonts. These should be removed. I'm not sure what these fonts are used for, but if replacements are needed you can depend on ttf-bitstream-vera, ttf-freefont and/or one of the other free fonts packaged in Debian. Which ones and 'what?'. If I'm not misstaken, this was discussed YEARS ago (can even remember the year) and the conclusions was that the fonts was ok... Please explain... -- SDI domestic disruption NSA BATF Legion of Doom killed Mossad FSF kibo Serbian assassination jihad Kennedy Soviet Albanian [See http://www.aclu.org/echelonwatch/index.html for more about this] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: greylistd: fails to install
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 296266 patch Bug#296266: greylistd: fails to install There were no tags set. Tags added: patch thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#296266: greylistd: fails to install
tag 296266 patch
thanks
Hi,
* Steve Langasek [2005-02-26]:
Negative return values are not POSIX.
Trivial (and tested) patch attached.
diff -ru orig.greylistd-0.8.2/debian/changelog greylistd-0.8.2/debian/changelog
--- orig.greylistd-0.8.2/debian/changelog 2005-02-06 14:25:39.0
+0100
+++ greylistd-0.8.2/debian/changelog2005-03-11 11:13:23.0 +0100
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+greylistd (0.8.2-0.1) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * NMU
+ * Change value of false to 1 in debconf module. Closes: #296266.
+
+ -- Laurent Fousse [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri, 11 Mar 2005 10:59:26 +0100
+
greylistd (0.8.2) unstable; urgency=low
* Added French translation by Jean-Luc Coulon. Closes: #292881.
diff -ru orig.greylistd-0.8.2/debian/config greylistd-0.8.2/debian/config
--- orig.greylistd-0.8.2/debian/config 2005-01-18 01:17:02.0 +0100
+++ greylistd-0.8.2/debian/config 2005-03-11 10:59:25.0 +0100
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
priorversion=$2
true=0
-false=-1
+false=1
running_exim4()
{
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Processed: Re: Bug#299007: base-files: Insecure PATH in /root/.profile
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 299007 wishlist Bug#299007: base-files: Insecure PATH in /root/.profile Severity set to `wishlist'. reassign 299007 debian-policy Bug#299007: base-files: Insecure PATH in /root/.profile Bug reassigned from package `base-files' to `debian-policy'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#299018: antlr: No rule to make target `/skole/tjener/home0/pere/src/debian/java/antlr-2.7.5/scripts/../lib/cpp/Makefile.in'
On Fri, Mar 11, 2005 at 09:58:04AM +0100, Michael Koch wrote: On Fri, Mar 11, 2005 at 09:05:37AM +0100, Christian T. Steigies wrote: Package: antlr Version: 2.7.5-2 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Automatic build of antlr_2.7.5-2 on aahz by sbuild/m68k 1.170.5 [...] ** Using build dependencies supplied by package: Build-Depends: debhelper (= 4), kaffe, fastjar, classpath, jikes-classpath (= 1.18), autotools-dev, gcj, libgcj4-dev [...] cd lib/cpp; /usr/bin/make install prefix=`pwd`/../../debian/libantlr-dev/usr make[1]: Entering directory `/build/buildd/antlr-2.7.5/lib/cpp' make[1]: *** No rule to make target `/skole/tjener/home0/pere/src/debian/java/antlr-2.7.5/scripts/../lib/cpp/Makefile.in', needed by `Makefile'. Stop. make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/antlr-2.7.5/lib/cpp' make: *** [install] Error 2 There is no /skole directory on my buildd, and it is not immediately obvious from the build-depends that there should be one. This fails to build everywhere. That is strange as this package uses always local paths. It should replace this with paths on the autobuilder. Can you try to find out why it doesn't for you ? It worked for several people before uploading. According to http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?pkg=antlr it hasn't worked for any autobuilder, unlike previous versions. I've just built it manually on my athlon, and it built fine. Then I built it in an unstable chroot on the same machine, and it failed with the same error. Should't all packages be tested by building in a chroot before upload ;-) When I build only binary packages however, ie with debuild -B, it also fails to build outside the chroot. The paths in the Makefile are still all wrong. When I build with sbuild, inside the chroot, and also have it build binary-all packages, the build succeeds. So I guess you are doing something in binary-all, like adapting the paths, recreating Makefile.in (it is deleted in dh_clean?), that is also needed for binary-arch. Christian -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#299007: base-files: Insecure PATH in /root/.profile
severity 299007 wishlist
reassign 299007 debian-policy
thanks
On Fri, 11 Mar 2005, Paul Szabo wrote:
Package: base-files
Version: 3.0.2
Severity: critical
Tags: patch security
Justification: root security hole
I recently noticed that /usr/local and /usr/local/{bin,sbin} are
group-writable and owned by root:staff. This is wrong: those directories
are in the default PATH for root. They (and files within) should be
root-owned: group staff users or become-any-user-but-root bugs should not
be able to trojan and thus get root.
[...]
This is not a bug. base-files follows policy. If you don't like
current policy, amend it. For your benefit, I'm doing a reassign.
Now you have to make a policy proposal. This is explained in the
debian-policy package.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#298965: marked as forwarded (afterstep: contains non-free font)
Your message dated Fri, 11 Mar 2005 12:01:26 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] has caused the Debian Bug report #298965, regarding afterstep: contains non-free font to be marked as having been forwarded to the upstream software author(s) Sasha Vasko [EMAIL PROTECTED]. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) --- Received: (at 298965-forwarded) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Mar 2005 11:00:51 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Mar 11 03:00:51 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from www.sawan.com.pl [62.29.161.123] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D9hsw-0004jl-00; Fri, 11 Mar 2005 03:00:50 -0800 Received: from ROB (gate.sawan.com.pl [62.29.161.98]) by www.sawan.com.pl (8.12.11/8.12.9) with ESMTP id j2BB0gk1004535; Fri, 11 Mar 2005 12:00:43 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) From: Robert Luberda [EMAIL PROTECTED] Organization: Debian To: Sasha Vasko [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2005 12:01:26 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: (Fwd) Bug#298965: afterstep: contains non-free font CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Priority: normal X-Best-Team: Mutt VIM Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-description: Mail message body X-RAVMilter-Version: 8.4.3(snapshot 20030217) (www.sawan.com.pl) Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER, HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Hi, I've received the following bug report. Could you please tell me what is the licence the test.ttf font, converted from F:\WINDOWS\TTFONTS\BLACKCHA.TF1? If the font isn't free, could it be removed from the afterstep sources? It doesn't seem to be needed as all. Regards, robert --- Forwarded message follows --- Subject:Bug#298965: afterstep: contains non-free font From: Peter De Wachter [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date sent: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 21:06:22 +0100 Package: afterstep Severity: serious Justification: Policy 2.2.1 This package contains the font: afterstep-2.00.03/libAfterImage/apps/test.ttf No copyright or license for this font is included. Unless this font has been released in the public domain, Debian cannot distribute it, and therefore it should be removed. --- End of forwarded message --- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#299018: antlr: No rule to make target `/skole/tjener/home0/pere/src/debian/java/antlr-2.7.5/scripts/../lib/cpp/Makefile.in'
On Fri, Mar 11, 2005 at 11:56:30AM +0100, Christian T. Steigies wrote: On Fri, Mar 11, 2005 at 09:58:04AM +0100, Michael Koch wrote: On Fri, Mar 11, 2005 at 09:05:37AM +0100, Christian T. Steigies wrote: Package: antlr Version: 2.7.5-2 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Automatic build of antlr_2.7.5-2 on aahz by sbuild/m68k 1.170.5 [...] ** Using build dependencies supplied by package: Build-Depends: debhelper (= 4), kaffe, fastjar, classpath, jikes-classpath (= 1.18), autotools-dev, gcj, libgcj4-dev [...] cd lib/cpp; /usr/bin/make install prefix=`pwd`/../../debian/libantlr-dev/usr make[1]: Entering directory `/build/buildd/antlr-2.7.5/lib/cpp' make[1]: *** No rule to make target `/skole/tjener/home0/pere/src/debian/java/antlr-2.7.5/scripts/../lib/cpp/Makefile.in', needed by `Makefile'. Stop. make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/antlr-2.7.5/lib/cpp' make: *** [install] Error 2 There is no /skole directory on my buildd, and it is not immediately obvious from the build-depends that there should be one. This fails to build everywhere. That is strange as this package uses always local paths. It should replace this with paths on the autobuilder. Can you try to find out why it doesn't for you ? It worked for several people before uploading. According to http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?pkg=antlr it hasn't worked for any autobuilder, unlike previous versions. I've just built it manually on my athlon, and it built fine. Then I built it in an unstable chroot on the same machine, and it failed with the same error. Should't all packages be tested by building in a chroot before upload ;-) When I build only binary packages however, ie with debuild -B, it also fails to build outside the chroot. The paths in the Makefile are still all wrong. When I build with sbuild, inside the chroot, and also have it build binary-all packages, the build succeeds. So I guess you are doing something in binary-all, like adapting the paths, recreating Makefile.in (it is deleted in dh_clean?), that is also needed for binary-arch. Hmmm, I built it in a chroot ... I will prepare a new upload. Michael -- Java Trap: http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/java-trap.html -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: retitle 294895 to [DPKG] emacsen-common package not configured before a2ps despite Depends ... ...
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.6 retitle 294895 [DPKG] emacsen-common package not configured before a2ps despite Depends Bug#294895: dpkg: Tries to configure in the wrong order Changed Bug title. tags 294895 - unreproducible Bug#294895: [DPKG] emacsen-common package not configured before a2ps despite Depends Tags were: unreproducible Tags removed: unreproducible severity 294895 serious Bug#294895: [DPKG] emacsen-common package not configured before a2ps despite Depends Severity set to `serious'. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#298942: luola-data: contains non-free font
On Fri, Mar 11, 2005 at 12:40:03PM +0100, Christian T. Steigies wrote: On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 08:06:16PM +0100, Peter De Wachter wrote: This package contains the font bluebold.ttf, which is one of Ray Larabie's fonts and non-free. This font should be removed. To get a replacement, you can depend on ttf-bitstream-vera, ttf-freefont, or one of the other free fonts packaged in Debian. Thanks for your report. As it turns out, the font is not needed at all, it just looks nicer than the standard font. I found one in ttf-bitstream-vera which looks ok to me, but I am waiting for feedback from the author. So it is no problem to remove bluebold.ttf from the package, but I guess I will also have to remove it from the source package? I hope upstream will remove it, if not, I wil have to recreate the source package with the font removed. Is there any procedure for that? Not really. Untar the orig.tar.gz, remove the file and repack it with a different name (i.e. you need to change the upstream version). Suffixes like .dfsg or .deb are often used for this but there is no rule about that. (for some naming examples see xfree86, mozilla-firefox and openoffice.org) Gruesse, -- Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED] www: http://www.djpig.de/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: tag upstream
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 298949 upstream pending Bug#298949: golem: contains non-free font There were no tags set. Tags added: upstream, pending End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#298942: luola-data: contains non-free font
On Fri, Mar 11, 2005 at 12:40:03PM +0100, Christian T. Steigies wrote: On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 08:06:16PM +0100, Peter De Wachter wrote: Package: luola-data Severity: serious Justification: Policy 2.2.1 This package contains the font bluebold.ttf, which is one of Ray Larabie's fonts and non-free. This font should be removed. To get a replacement, you can depend on ttf-bitstream-vera, ttf-freefont, or one of the other free fonts packaged in Debian. Thanks for your report. As it turns out, the font is not needed at all, it just looks nicer than the standard font. I found one in ttf-bitstream-vera which looks ok to me, but I am waiting for feedback from the author. So it is no problem to remove bluebold.ttf from the package, but I guess I will also have to remove it from the source package? I hope upstream will remove it, if not, I wil have to recreate the source package with the font removed. Is there any procedure for that? http://www.nl.debian.org/doc/developers-reference/ch-best-pkging-practices.en.html#s-bpp-origtargz Justin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#296674: [CAN-2004-0957] i believe this patch should do it...
On Fri, Mar 11, 2005 at 09:39:10AM +0100, Christian Hammers wrote: Wasn't it the one where a privilege granted to table_name also grants rights on tableXname, tableYname as '_' was considered as something like a dot in a RegEx? This should be fairly easy to test. i knew it had something to do with underscores, but wasn't completely sure. i'll try this on the patched and unpatched version tonight. sean -- signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#299063: Non-free code present in lsof source tarball
Package: lsof Version: 4.71-1 Severity: serious Justification: violates dfsg [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ apt-get source lsof dpkg-source: extracting lsof in lsof-4.71 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ grep -r UNPUBL lsof-4.71 lsof-4.71/dialects/sun/include/sys/auxv.h:/*THIS IS UNPUBLISHED PROPRIETARY SOURCE CODE OF ATT */ lsof-4.71/dialects/uw/uw21/fs/proc/prdata.h:/* THIS IS UNPUBLISHED PROPRIETARY SOURCE CODE OF ATT */ lsof-4.71/dialects/uw/uw21/sys/fs/fifonode.h:/* THIS IS UNPUBLISHED PROPRIETARY SOURCE CODE OF Novell Inc. */ lsof-4.71/dialects/uw/uw21/sys/fs/namenode.h:/* THIS IS UNPUBLISHED PROPRIETARY SOURCE CODE OF Novell Inc. */ lsof-4.71/dialects/uw/uw7/sys/fs/namenode.h: *THIS IS UNPUBLISHED PROPRIETARY SOURCE CODE OF THE lsof-4.71/dialects/uw/uw7/sys/fs/fifonode.h: *THIS IS UNPUBLISHED PROPRIETARY SOURCE CODE OF THE lsof-4.71/dialects/ou/ou8/sys/fs/namenode.h: *THIS IS UNPUBLISHED PROPRIETARY SOURCE CODE OF THE lsof-4.71/dialects/ou/ou8/sys/fs/fifonode.h: *THIS IS UNPUBLISHED PROPRIETARY SOURCE CODE OF THE lsof-4.71/dialects/ou/ou8/sys/fs/memfs_mnode.h: *THIS IS UNPUBLISHED PROPRIETARY SOURCE CODE OF Please remove the code as soon as possible, it's not relevant for any of the Debian supported systems/platforms. Thanks. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (50, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.10-1-k7 Locale: LANG=sk_SK.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=sk_SK.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages lsof depends on: ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-20 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#298938: moodle: contains non-free fonts
On Friday, 11 de March de 2005 16:32, you wrote: I tried it, but sorry, it doesn't work. Different encoding perhaps. We use UTF-8 AFAIK pgpA6SVakiUBH.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#299065: MySQL Privilege Escalation and Command Execution Vulnerabilities
Hi Ruben! On 2005-03-11 Ruben Puettmann wrote: Several vulnerabilities were identified in MySQL, which may be exploited by local attackers to execute arbitrary commands or obtain elevated privileges. Thanks, were already filed as 299029..299031. Will hopefully be fixed during the weekend. bye, -christian- pgpqU9aDACxEU.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#298938: moodle: contains non-free fonts
On Friday, 11 de March de 2005 16:12, Martin Dougiamas wrote: For Moodle 1.5: I've just fixed the Arial fonts in en, cs and sq (now using VeraSans) but I can't find a replacement yet that can replace Optima in ru and uk. Hi, Martin. We use Bepa-Roman for that languages in Wesnoth. You can have a look at it at Wesnoth CVS: http://savannah.nongnu.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs/wesnoth/wesnoth/fonts/ Best regards pgpx4qkvn5o9V.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#297181: [Jean-Jacques Rétorré] Re: Bug#297181: auctex dont't install
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2005 00:28:33 +0100 From: Jean-Jacques Rétorré [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20050116) X-Accept-Language: fr, en To: Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Bug#297181: auctex dont't install References: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-SpamScore: 0.000 Lines: 59 Xref: alhambra.kuesterei.ch mail.misc:29750 Frank Küster a écrit : Jean-Jacques Rétorré [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: Frank Küster a écrit : Jean-Jacques Rétorré [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: [snip] There must always be that 50auctex.el in that directory when auctex is installed, just its contents vary. it is not ! Could you please try dpkg-reconfigure auctex zoe:~# dpkg-reconfigure auctex /usr/sbin/dpkg-reconfigure: auctex is broken or not fully installed Oh, sorry, okay. Please try the following instead dpkg --audit dpkg --configure -a zoe:~# dpkg --audit The following packages are only half configured, probably due to problems configuring them the first time. The configuration should be retried using dpkg --configure package or the configure menu option in dselect: auctex An integrated environment for writing TeX/LaTeX documents zoe:~# dpkg --configure a dpkg: error processing a (--configure): no package named `a' is installed, cannot configure Errors were encountered while processing: a zoe:~# dpkg --configure auctex Setting up auctex (11.55-1) ... install/auctex: Setting up for emacs21... emacs-package-install: /usr/lib/emacsen-common/packages/install/auctex emacs21 emacs21 failed at /usr/lib/emacsen-common/emacs-package-install line 30, TSORT line 1. dpkg: error processing auctex (--configure): subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 2 Errors were encountered while processing: auctex zoe:~# regards Jean-Jacques -- Frank Küster Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich Debian Developer
Bug#297181: auctex dont't install
Bonjour Jean-Jacques,
sorry for not replying so long. I assume you still have this problem?
Jean-Jacques Rétorré [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Additionally, please try, as root
sh -x /var/lib/dpkg/info/auctex.postinst configure 21 | tee auctex.lg
and send us the resulting file auctex.lg
zoe:~# sh -x /var/lib/dpkg/info/auctex.postinst configure 21 | tee
auctex.lg
+ set -o posix
+ source /usr/share/debconf/confmodule
++ '[' '!' '' ']'
++ PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1
++ export PERL_DL_NONLAZY
++ exec /usr/share/debconf/frontend /var/lib/dpkg/info/auctex.postinst
configure
install/auctex: Setting up for emacs21... emacs-package-install:
/usr/lib/emacsen-common/packages/install/auctex emacs21 emacs21 failed
at /usr/lib/emacsen-common/emacs-package-install line 30, TSORT line
1
Oh, I should have known that this does not give much additional
information. In case you still get the error, please do the following:
Open the file /usr/lib/emacsen-common/packages/install/auctex in a text
editor. It starts with a couple of comment lines, then comes some
code. The 8th line of code is a single line surrounded by empty lines,
which reads:
FLAVOR=${1}
Please insert the following statement in the empty line before it:
set -x
After this, execute
dpkg --reconfigure auctex 21 | tee auctex-install.lg
and send us the file auctex-install.lg
Thank you in advance,
Frank
--
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer
Bug#298938: moodle: contains non-free fonts
Isaac Clerencia wrote: On Friday, 11 de March de 2005 16:12, Martin Dougiamas wrote: For Moodle 1.5: I've just fixed the Arial fonts in en, cs and sq (now using VeraSans) but I can't find a replacement yet that can replace Optima in ru and uk. Hi, Martin. We use Bepa-Roman for that languages in Wesnoth. You can have a look at it at Wesnoth CVS: http://savannah.nongnu.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs/wesnoth/wesnoth/fonts/ Hi! I tried it, but sorry, it doesn't work. Different encoding perhaps. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#297181: [Jean-Jacques Rétorré] Re: Bug#297181: auctex dont't install
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2005 11:57:50 +0100 From: Jean-Jacques Rétorré [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20050116) X-Accept-Language: fr, en To: Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Bug#297181: auctex dont't install References: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-SpamScore: 0.000 Lines: 28 Xref: alhambra.kuesterei.ch mail.misc:29686 Frank Küster a écrit : Jean-Jacques Rétorré [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: [snip] There must always be that 50auctex.el in that directory when auctex is installed, just its contents vary. it is not ! Could you please try dpkg-reconfigure auctex zoe:~# dpkg-reconfigure auctex /usr/sbin/dpkg-reconfigure: auctex is broken or not fully installed (just give the same answers as before; in particular, say yes to should AUCTeX be loaded by default at your site). Does this work without problems? If not, please look again into that directory whether there is a file 50auctex.el in there. It doesn't ask me any question. Regards, Frank -- Frank Küster Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich Debian Developer
Processed: retitle 298163 to causes FTBFS for fontconfig
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10 retitle 298163 causes FTBFS for fontconfig Bug#298163: FTBFS in experimental Changed Bug title. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: severity of 296977 is important
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10 # not unusable for everyone severity 296977 important Bug#296977: gworkspace.app: GWorkspace doesn't start on a VNC 8bit display Severity set to `important'. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: owner 241497
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10 owner 241497 ! Bug#241497: need upgrade directories for hppa64, sparc sun4m and 80386 Owner recorded as Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#298965: afterstep: contains non-free font
tags 298965 sarge sid fixed-upstream severity298965 important thanks On 10 Mar 2005 at 21:06, Peter De Wachter wrote: No copyright or license for this font is included. Unless this font has been released in the public domain, Debian cannot distribute it, and therefore it should be removed. You're right, the font isn't free. The issue has been just fixed in by the upstream and afterstep 2.0.4 which won't have this problem should be released next week. Then I will close this bug. But for now I'm lowering *temporarily* its priority to have afterstep 2.0.3 propagated into testing. Best Regards, robert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: (Fwd) Bug#298965: afterstep: contains non-free font
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 298965 important Bug#298965: afterstep: contains non-free font Severity set to `important'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: tagging 298854
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10 tags 298854 pending Bug#298854: rebuild without libhowl0 dep There were no tags set. Tags added: pending End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: tagging 296494
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10 tags 296494 patch Bug#296494: webmin-ldap-useradmin cannot create new user(no structural object class) There were no tags set. Tags added: patch End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#298844: marked as done (path to the kernel not passed to configure)
Your message dated Fri, 11 Mar 2005 13:17:16 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#298844: fixed in fuse 2.2-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Mar 2005 11:21:18 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Mar 10 03:21:18 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mailgate1.uni-kl.de [131.246.120.5] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D9LjB-Qx-00; Thu, 10 Mar 2005 03:21:17 -0800 Received: from debian.localnet (rotes255.wohnheim.uni-kl.de [131.246.178.65]) by mailgate1.uni-kl.de (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j2ABL4CO005675 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 10 Mar 2005 12:21:04 +0100 Received: from inet by debian.localnet with local (Exim 4.50) id 1D9Liy-gd-D3 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 10 Mar 2005 12:21:04 +0100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Eduard Bloch [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: path to the kernel not passed to configure X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8 Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 12:21:04 +0100 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: fuse-source Version: 2.2-2 Severity: grave Tags: patch Hello, the configure call for the modules build is missing an important option. Please add: --with-kernel=$(KSRC) \ If you cannot reproduce it, move your kernel to a non-standard location and you will see what I mean. Regards, Eduard. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.11-rc5 Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages fuse-source depends on: ii bzip2 1.0.2-5high-quality block-sorting file co ii gcc [c-compiler] 4:3.3.5-1 The GNU C compiler ii gcc-3.3 [c-compiler] 1:3.3.5-10 The GNU C compiler ii gcc-3.4 [c-compiler] 3.4.3-11 The GNU C compiler ii make 3.80-9 The GNU version of the make util -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 298844-close) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Mar 2005 18:23:22 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Mar 11 10:23:22 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D9onB-00017a-00; Fri, 11 Mar 2005 10:23:22 -0800 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D9ohI-0002U8-00; Fri, 11 Mar 2005 13:17:16 -0500 From: Bartosz Fenski [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $ Subject: Bug#298844: fixed in fuse 2.2-3 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2005 13:17:16 -0500 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Source: fuse Source-Version: 2.2-3 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of fuse, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: fuse-source_2.2-3_all.deb to pool/main/f/fuse/fuse-source_2.2-3_all.deb fuse-utils_2.2-3_i386.deb to pool/main/f/fuse/fuse-utils_2.2-3_i386.deb fuse_2.2-3.diff.gz to pool/main/f/fuse/fuse_2.2-3.diff.gz fuse_2.2-3.dsc to pool/main/f/fuse/fuse_2.2-3.dsc libfuse-dev_2.2-3_i386.deb to pool/main/f/fuse/libfuse-dev_2.2-3_i386.deb libfuse2_2.2-3_i386.deb to pool/main/f/fuse/libfuse2_2.2-3_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Bartosz Fenski [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated fuse
Bug#299098: gmime2: FTBFS: failed to make docs.
Package: gmime2 Version: 2.0.14-2 Severity: serious Hi, Your package is failing to build it's documentation. Here is an extract from the log: touch sgml-build.stamp *** Building HTML *** rm -rf ./html mkdir ./html cd ./html gtkdoc-mkhtml gmime ../gmime-docs.sgml /usr/bin/jade:../sgml/gmime.sgml:18:46:E: character : is not allowed in the value of attribute LINKEND /usr/bin/jade:../sgml/gmime.sgml:19:47:E: character : is not allowed in the value of attribute LINKEND [...] /usr/bin/jade:../sgml/gmime-cipher-context.sgml:144:147:E: character : is not allowed in the value of attribute LINKEND make[4]: *** [html-build.stamp] Error 1 Kurt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#299105: links to wrong library
Package: stunnel Version: 2:3.26-2 Severity: grave Hi, stunnel doesn't work at all here. After setting it up (with this parameter line): stunnel -D debug -p [...] -T -d nntps -l /usr/lib/users/nnrpd -s news -g news a try to connect to it ends with: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ telnet-ssl -z ssl localhost nntps Trying [...]... Connected to [...]. Escape character is '^]'. nnrpd: error while loading shared libraries: /usr/lib/stunnel.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory Connection closed by foreign host. After creating the symbolic link from /usr/lib/libstunnel.so to /usr/lib/stunnel.so it works. This seems to indicate that the program has just a wrong link inside. Thanks for your work with this package. Cheers, Andi -- http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/ PGP 1024/89FB5CE5 DC F1 85 6D A6 45 9C 0F 3B BE F1 D0 C5 D1 D9 0C -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#298942: marked as done (luola-data: contains non-free font)
Your message dated Fri, 11 Mar 2005 15:47:16 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#298942: fixed in luola 1.2.6.dfsg-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Mar 2005 19:06:49 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Mar 10 11:06:49 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mailhost.vub.ac.be (dorado.vub.ac.be) [134.184.129.10] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D9Szg-0007Vf-00; Thu, 10 Mar 2005 11:06:49 -0800 Received: from igwe.vub.ac.be (igwe1.vub.ac.be [134.184.49.1]) by dorado.vub.ac.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FEEC11C for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 10 Mar 2005 20:06:18 +0100 (CET) Received: from caladan.rave.org ([134.184.49.23]) by igwe.vub.ac.be with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.44) id 1D9Sze-0005Lq-Od for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 10 Mar 2005 20:06:46 +0100 Received: from pdewacht by caladan.rave.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1D9SzB-Pn-8x for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 10 Mar 2005 20:06:17 +0100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Peter De Wachter [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: luola-data: contains non-free font X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8 Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 20:06:16 +0100 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: luola-data Severity: serious Justification: Policy 2.2.1 This package contains the font bluebold.ttf, which is one of Ray Larabie's fonts and non-free. This font should be removed. To get a replacement, you can depend on ttf-bitstream-vera, ttf-freefont, or one of the other free fonts packaged in Debian. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.9 Locale: LANG=nl_BE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=nl_BE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) --- Received: (at 298942-close) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Mar 2005 20:53:22 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Mar 11 12:53:22 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D9r8L-0003p0-00; Fri, 11 Mar 2005 12:53:21 -0800 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D9r2S-00062C-00; Fri, 11 Mar 2005 15:47:16 -0500 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Christian T. Steigies) To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $ Subject: Bug#298942: fixed in luola 1.2.6.dfsg-1 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2005 15:47:16 -0500 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Source: luola Source-Version: 1.2.6.dfsg-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of luola, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: luola-data_1.2.6.dfsg-1_all.deb to pool/main/l/luola/luola-data_1.2.6.dfsg-1_all.deb luola_1.2.6.dfsg-1.diff.gz to pool/main/l/luola/luola_1.2.6.dfsg-1.diff.gz luola_1.2.6.dfsg-1.dsc to pool/main/l/luola/luola_1.2.6.dfsg-1.dsc luola_1.2.6.dfsg-1_i386.deb to pool/main/l/luola/luola_1.2.6.dfsg-1_i386.deb luola_1.2.6.dfsg.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/l/luola/luola_1.2.6.dfsg.orig.tar.gz A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Christian T. Steigies [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated luola package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Bug#299080: marked as done (henplus: FTBFS)
Your message dated Fri, 11 Mar 2005 15:47:12 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#299080: fixed in henplus 0.9.5-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Mar 2005 16:25:52 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Mar 11 08:25:51 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mail-out.m-online.net [212.18.0.9] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D9mxT-0003ol-00; Fri, 11 Mar 2005 08:25:51 -0800 Received: from mail.m-online.net (svr20.m-online.net [192.168.3.148]) by mail-out.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D13CF777F; Fri, 11 Mar 2005 17:25:49 +0100 (CET) Received: from atari.stigge.org (ppp-82-135-6-11.mnet-online.de [82.135.6.11]) by mail.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9278B5C694; Fri, 11 Mar 2005 17:25:13 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.5.99] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by atari.stigge.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09AE7100442A0; Fri, 11 Mar 2005 17:25:12 +0100 (CET) From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: henplus: FTBFS Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2005 17:25:12 +0100 (CET) Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.4 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE, NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: henplus Version: 0.9.5-1 Severity: serious Hi, building the package henplus in a clean build environment (with pbuilder) on i386 results in: = [...] touch debian/build-arch-stamp yada patch debian/patches/*.patch touch debian/build-indep-stamp yada patch debian/patches/*.patch export JAVA_HOME=/usr/lib/sablevm export JAVA=/usr/bin/java-sablevm export JAVAC=/usr/bin/jikes-sablevm export JAVACMD=$JAVA export JARS=/usr/share/java export ANT_HOME=/usr/share/ant1.6 export CLASSPATH=\ $JARS/xerces.jar:\ $ANT_HOME/lib/ant.jar:\ $ANT_HOME/lib/ant-launcher.jar:\ $JARS/libreadline-java.jar ANT_OPTS=-Dbuild.compiler=jikes -Dant.home=$ANT_HOME ANT=$JAVACMD -classpath $CLASSPATH org.apache.tools.ant.Main $ANT_OPTS $ANT jar Buildfile: build.xml prepare: BUILD FAILED /tmp/buildd/henplus-0.9.5/build.xml:19: java.lang.NullPointerException Total time: 0 seconds make: *** [debian/build-stamp] Error 1 = Thanks for considering. -- DARTS - Debian Archive Regression Test Suite --- Received: (at 299080-close) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Mar 2005 20:53:52 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Mar 11 12:53:52 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D9r8p-0003tD-00; Fri, 11 Mar 2005 12:53:52 -0800 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D9r2O-00061D-00; Fri, 11 Mar 2005 15:47:12 -0500 From: Piotr Roszatycki [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $ Subject: Bug#299080: fixed in henplus 0.9.5-2 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2005 15:47:12 -0500 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Source: henplus Source-Version: 0.9.5-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of henplus, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: henplus_0.9.5-2.diff.gz to pool/main/h/henplus/henplus_0.9.5-2.diff.gz henplus_0.9.5-2.dsc to pool/main/h/henplus/henplus_0.9.5-2.dsc henplus_0.9.5-2_all.deb to pool/main/h/henplus/henplus_0.9.5-2_all.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Piotr Roszatycki [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated henplus package)
Processed: Re: Bug#299110: architecture-independent package using Architecture: any
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 299110 normal Bug#299110: architecture-independent package using Architecture: any Severity set to `normal'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#299110: architecture-independent package using Architecture: any
severity 299110 normal thanks On Fri, Mar 11, 2005 at 06:17:34PM -0300, Guilherme de S. Pastore wrote: The ewiki package violates Debian Policy, section 5.6.7[0]. As it's not architecture specific after the package build, it should be 'Architecture: any' (insted of 'all'). By using 'any', you've used up much more mirror space than you would have needed, used buildd time for no reason, etc =) Hope this helps =) This is neither a policy must, nor an RC requirement for sarge, and is therefore not a 'serious' bug. -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#299114: libxbase2.0-dev: xbase/xbase.h includes iostream.h, which is not a dependency
Package: libxbase2.0-dev Version: 2.0.0-4 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable After installing libxbase2.0-dev with apt-get, sources using xbase cannot be compiled, with the following error: # gcc -o copy-new-serv copy-new-serv.cpp -lxbase In file included from /usr/include/xbase/xdate.h:68, from /usr/include/xbase/xbase.h:108, from copy-new-serv.cpp:4: /usr/include/xbase/xbstring.h:59: iostream.h: No such file or directory In file included from /usr/include/xbase/xbase.h:170, from copy-new-serv.cpp:4: /usr/include/xbase/dbf.h:68: iostream.h: No such file or directory In my particular setup it was fixed by installing the libstdc++2.10-dev package Thanks -- System Information Debian Release: 3.0 Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux aqualipus 2.4.27-1-686 #1 Wed Dec 1 19:57:47 JST 2004 i686 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C Versions of packages libxbase2.0-dev depends on: ii libc6-dev 2.3.2.ds1-20 GNU C Library: Development Librari ii libxbase2.0-0 2.0.0-4 xbase compatible C++ class library -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Add patch tag to #294720
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 294720 +patch Bug#294720: lirc-modules-source: module fails to load (unknown symbols) There were no tags set. Tags added: patch -- Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#294720: lirc_dev is not in the generated package
The attached patch will install the lirc_dev module also in the resulting package. (With this patch lirc-modules-source has been usable for me the first time since ages - i used the normal lirc cvs since kernel 2.6 is out.) ;-) Regards, Thomas -- Thomas Schmidt :wq diff -Nurd lirc-0.7.1pre2/debian/modules-source/Makefile lirc-0.7.1pre2.new/debian/modules-source/Makefile --- lirc-0.7.1pre2/debian/modules-source/Makefile 2005-03-11 23:28:33.286320104 +0100 +++ lirc-0.7.1pre2.new/debian/modules-source/Makefile 2005-03-11 23:23:28.0 +0100 @@ -118,6 +118,8 @@ serial: DEFS += $(SERIAL_CFLAGS) serial: modules sanity-check $(MAKE) -C drivers SUBDIRS=lirc_serial lirc_dev DEFS=$(DEFS) + mv drivers/lirc_dev/lirc_dev.$(KEXT) modules + @echo $(KVERS) $(KSRC) modules/lirc_dev.$(KEXT).KVERS mv drivers/lirc_serial/lirc_serial.$(KEXT) modules @echo $(KVERS) $(KSRC) modules/lirc_serial.$(KEXT).KVERS signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#299125: libcommons-jexl-java: FTBFS: java.lang.NullPointerException
Package: libcommons-jexl-java Version: 1.0-1 Severity: serious Hi, building the package libcommons-jexl-java in a clean build environment (with pbuilder) on i386 results in: = [...] patches: debian/patches/01_jar_without_tests.patch Trying patch debian/patches/01_jar_without_tests.patch at level 0...success. if [ debian/stamp-patched = debian/stamp-patched ] ; then touch debian/stamp-patched ; \ elif [ debian/stamp-patched = reverse-patches ] ; then rm -f debian/stamp-patch* ; \ fi /usr/bin/make -f debian/rules update-config dpkg-parsechangelog: warning: no utmp entry available and LOGNAME not defined; using uid of process (1001) debian: warning: no utmp entry available and LOGNAME not defined; using uid of process (1001) dpkg-parsechangelog: warning: no utmp entry available and LOGNAME not defined; using uid of process (1001) debian: warning: no utmp entry available and LOGNAME not defined; using uid of process (1001) make[1]: Entering directory `/tmp/buildd/libcommons-jexl-java-1.0' make[1]: Nothing to be done for `update-config'. make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/libcommons-jexl-java-1.0' cd . /usr/bin/java-sablevm -classpath /usr/share/ant1.6/lib/ant.jar:/usr/share/java/junit.jar:/usr/share/java/commons-logging.jar:/usr/share/java/gnujaxp.jar:/usr/share/ant1.6/lib/ant-launcher.jar: -Dant.home=/usr/share/ant1.6 org.apache.tools.ant.Main -Dcompile.debug=true -Dcompile.optimize=true -Dbuild.compiler=jikes -propertyfile /tmp/buildd/libcommons-jexl-java-1.0/debian/ant.properties jar Buildfile: build.xml init: [mkdir] Created dir: /tmp/buildd/libcommons-jexl-java-1.0/target/lib get-deps: compile: [mkdir] Created dir: /tmp/buildd/libcommons-jexl-java-1.0/target/classes [javac] Compiling 82 source files to /tmp/buildd/libcommons-jexl-java-1.0/target/classes BUILD FAILED /tmp/buildd/libcommons-jexl-java-1.0/build.xml:46: java.lang.NullPointerException Total time: 1 second make: *** [debian/stamp-ant-build] Error 1 = Thanks for considering. -- DARTS - Debian Archive Regression Test Suite -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#299123: haskell-hsql: FTBFS
Package: haskell-hsql Version: 1.4-2 Severity: serious Hi, building the package haskell-hsql in a clean build environment (with pbuilder) on i386 results in: = [...] from /usr/lib/ghc-6.2.2/template-hsc.h:4, from btree/Database/HSQL/PostgreSQL_hsc_make.c:1: /usr/lib/ghc-6.2.2/include/config.h:1047:1: warning: this is the location of the previous definition touch build-stamp fakeroot debian/rules binary dh_testdir dh_testroot dh_clean -k dh_installdirs -a # Add here commands to install the package into debian/tmp #/usr/bin/make install prefix=/tmp/buildd/haskell-hsql-1.4/debian/tmp/usr dh_haskell -a Generating meta-information... ghc-6.2.2 /usr/lib/haskell-packages/ghc6/lib/hsql-1.4 hsql 1.4 Building setup... Running: ghc6 -package Cabal Setup.lhs -o setup ** NOW BUILDING libghc6-hsql-dev FOR ghc6 OUTPUT TO debian/libghc6-hsql-dev Cleaning... Fail: Line 12: Unknown field 'extra-libs' Running: rm -f .*config* Running: ./setup configure --prefix=/usr/lib/haskell-packages/ghc6 --with-compiler=/usr/bin/ghc6 Fail: Line 12: Unknown field 'extra-libs' ./setup configure --prefix=/usr/lib/haskell-packages/ghc6 --with-compiler=/usr/bin/ghc6 files: 256 at /usr/bin/dh_haskell line 167, COMPAT_IN line 7. make: *** [install] Error 9 = Thanks for considering. -- DARTS - Debian Archive Regression Test Suite -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Patch causes other breakage
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reopen #297607 Bug#297607: dpkg-reconfigure exim4-config hangs, blocks debian installation Bug reopened, originator not changed. tags #297607 -sid Bug#297607: dpkg-reconfigure exim4-config hangs, blocks debian installation Tags were: confirmed sid Tags removed: sid severity #297607 normal Bug#297607: dpkg-reconfigure exim4-config hangs, blocks debian installation Severity set to `normal'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#294720: lirc_dev is not in the generated package
Thomas Schmidt wrote: The attached patch will install the lirc_dev module also in the resulting package. (With this patch lirc-modules-source has been usable for me the first time since ages - i used the normal lirc cvs since kernel 2.6 is out.) ;-) Thanks so much... I have been making a terrible job as a maintainer for lirc, but thanks to you and people like you, the package is slowly improving. Expect an upload tonight. -- .''`. sleep: command not found : :' : `. `'Proudly running Debian GNU/Linux (Sid 2.6.10 Ext3) `- www.amayita.com www.malapecora.com www.chicasduras.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#297607: Patch causes other breakage
reopen #297607 tags #297607 -sid severity #297607 normal thanks On Wed, Mar 02, 2005 at 03:02:11AM -0500, Marc Haber wrote: * fix 10_daemon_close_fds.dpatch to actually apply again. Sheesh. Thanks to Joey Hess. (mh) Closes: #297607 I am afraid that we'll have to back out that patch as it is a likely cause for #299051 and probable #297174. Can you please give the inofficial 4.50-4.0 from http://zg.debian.zugschlus.de/zg/pool/main/exim4 a try before I upload to unstable and probably cause _more_ breakage? Grüße Marc -- - Marc Haber | I don't trust Computers. They | Mailadresse im Header Mannheim, Germany | lose things.Winona Ryder | Fon: *49 621 72739834 Nordisch by Nature | How to make an American Quilt | Fax: *49 621 72739835 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#299129: breaks debootstrap run
Package: tcpd Version: 7.6.dbs-7 Severity: critical It's impossible to debootstrap sid anymore due to some change in tcpd's postinst. Here's how the debootstrap run fails: Setting up tcpd (7.6.dbs-7) ... postinst called with unknown argument '' dpkg: error processing tcpd (--configure): subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1 Seems to me that the postinst needs to be less picky about its arguments; apparently it's valid for $1 to not be set, since dpkg does this as part of a debootstrap run. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.4.27 Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages tcpd depends on: ii debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.4.46 Debian configuration management sy ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-20 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libwrap07.6.dbs-6Wietse Venema's TCP wrappers libra -- debconf information excluded -- see shy jo signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#298132: libgnujaxp-java: FTBFS: Wrong build depends?
reopen 298132 thanks It's still missing the build-depends (indep) on gjdoc. Kurt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#299144: Keep PHPWiki out of Sarge
Package: phpwiki Severity: serious Version: 1.3.7-3 I do not believe that the phpwiki package, as-is, is suitable for testing. It is several minor releases behind upstream, will take significant work to ensure easy upgrades to the latest upstream version, and has lots of minor things that make it quirky in live use. - Matt signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#299028: marked as done (distcc: FTBFS: alpha and amd64)
Your message dated Fri, 11 Mar 2005 21:47:15 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#299028: fixed in distcc 2.18.3-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Mar 2005 09:07:52 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Mar 11 01:07:52 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mailhub.id.cbs.dk [130.226.47.91] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D9g7c-00023p-00; Fri, 11 Mar 2005 01:07:52 -0800 Received: from mail.id.cbs.dk ([172.16.14.53] ident=mail) by mailhub.id.cbs.dk with esmtp (Cipher TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1D9g7S-0002Ul-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 11 Mar 2005 10:07:42 +0100 Received: from deskpro02.id.cbs.dk ([130.226.34.10]) by mail.id.cbs.dk with esmtp (Cipher TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1D9g7S-0002LC-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 11 Mar 2005 10:07:42 +0100 Received: from ukh by deskpro02.id.cbs.dk with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1D9g6y-0006hy-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 11 Mar 2005 10:07:12 +0100 Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2005 10:07:12 +0100 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: distcc: FTBFS: alpha and amd64 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i From: Kaare Hviid [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Scanner: exiscan *1D9g7S-0002Ul-00*t7x5bPLYLFc* Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: distcc Version: 2.18.3-1 Severity: serious Tags: patch distcc suffers FTBFS on alpha and amd64: x86_64-linux-gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -D_GNU_SOURCE -I./src -DSYSCONFDIR=\/etc\ -DPKGDATADIR=\/usr/share/distcc\ -Isrc -I./lzo -g -O2 -W -Wall -Wimplicit -Wshadow -Wpointer-arith -Wcast-align -Wwrite-strings -Waggregate-return -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wnested-externs -Wconversion -Wpointer-arith -Wmissing-declarations -o src/rpc.o -c src/rpc.c src/rpc.c: In function `dcc_x_token_int': src/rpc.c:78: warning: passing arg 3 of `memcpy' with different width due to prototype src/rpc.c:91: warning: passing arg 3 of `dcc_writex' with different width due to prototype src/rpc.c: In function `dcc_r_token': src/rpc.c:113: warning: passing arg 3 of `dcc_readx' with different width due to prototype src/rpc.c: In function `dcc_r_token_int': src/rpc.c:174: warning: passing arg 3 of `dcc_readx' with different width due to prototype src/rpc.c:180: warning: passing arg 3 of `memcmp' with different width due to prototype src/rpc.c:182: warning: passing arg 2 of `dcc_explain_mismatch' with different width due to prototype src/rpc.c:192: warning: passing arg 2 of `dcc_explain_mismatch' with different width due to prototype src/rpc.c: At top level: src/rpc.c:207: error: conflicting types for `dcc_r_str_alloc' src/distcc.h:268: error: previous declaration of `dcc_r_str_alloc' src/rpc.c: In function `dcc_r_token_string': src/rpc.c:263: warning: passing arg 2 of `dcc_r_str_alloc' with different width due to prototype make[1]: *** [src/rpc.o] Error 1 Fast fix: diff -Naur distcc-2.18.3/src/distcc.h distcc-2.18.3.fixed/src/distcc.h --- distcc-2.18.3/src/distcc.h 2004-11-21 19:36:30.0 +0100 +++ distcc-2.18.3.fixed/src/distcc.h2005-03-11 09:00:43.071459437 +0100 @@ -265,7 +265,7 @@ int dcc_readx(int fd, void *buf, size_t len); int dcc_pump_sendfile(int ofd, int ifd, size_t n); -int dcc_r_str_alloc(int fd, unsigned len, char **buf); +int dcc_r_str_alloc(int fd, size_t len, char **buf); int tcp_cork_sock(int fd, int corked); int dcc_close(int fd); -ukh --- Received: (at 299028-close) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Mar 2005 02:54:22 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Mar 11 18:54:22 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D9wlh-0007yg-00; Fri, 11 Mar 2005 18:54:21 -0800 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D9wep-0005ME-00; Fri, 11 Mar 2005 21:47:15 -0500 From: Carsten Wolff [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL
Bug#298790: marked as done (ewiki: FTBFS: Missing build dependency.)
Your message dated Fri, 11 Mar 2005 22:02:18 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#298790: fixed in ewiki 1.02-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Mar 2005 23:08:04 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Mar 09 15:08:04 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from astra.telenet-ops.be [195.130.132.58] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D9AHc-0001T9-00; Wed, 09 Mar 2005 15:08:04 -0800 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by astra.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with SMTP id E23B43281AC for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 10 Mar 2005 00:08:03 +0100 (MET) Received: from Q.roeckx.be (dD5775FD9.access.telenet.be [213.119.95.217]) by astra.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id D516B32827B for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 10 Mar 2005 00:08:03 +0100 (MET) Received: by Q.roeckx.be (Postfix, from userid 501) id 6A4B126136; Thu, 10 Mar 2005 00:08:03 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 00:08:03 +0100 From: Kurt Roeckx [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: ewiki: FTBFS: Missing build dependency. Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: ewiki Version: 1.02-1 Severity: serious Tags: sid Hi, Your package is failing to build because it's missing atleast a build dependency on dpatch: fakeroot debian/rules clean debian/rules:3: /usr/share/dpatch/dpatch.make: No such file or directory make: *** No rule to make target `/usr/share/dpatch/dpatch.make'. Stop. Kurt --- Received: (at 298790-close) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Mar 2005 03:08:21 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Mar 11 19:08:21 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D9wzE-0001WP-00; Fri, 11 Mar 2005 19:08:20 -0800 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D9wtO-0006Uc-00; Fri, 11 Mar 2005 22:02:18 -0500 From: Tiago Bortoletto Vaz [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $ Subject: Bug#298790: fixed in ewiki 1.02-2 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2005 22:02:18 -0500 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Source: ewiki Source-Version: 1.02-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of ewiki, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: ewiki_1.02-2.diff.gz to pool/main/e/ewiki/ewiki_1.02-2.diff.gz ewiki_1.02-2.dsc to pool/main/e/ewiki/ewiki_1.02-2.dsc ewiki_1.02-2_all.deb to pool/main/e/ewiki/ewiki_1.02-2_all.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Tiago Bortoletto Vaz [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated ewiki package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2005 15:05:47 -0300 Source: ewiki Binary: ewiki Architecture: source all Version: 1.02-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Tiago Bortoletto Vaz [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Tiago Bortoletto Vaz [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: ewiki - ErfurtWiki: an implementation of the WikiWikiWeb hypertext system Closes: 298790 Changes: ewiki (1.02-2) unstable; urgency=low . * Fix README.Debian adding the correct path for apache.conf
Bug#299152: backuppc: Loses backup history on full disk
Package: backuppc Severity: grave Justification: causes non-serious data loss -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Help! All my backups have vanished! server:/mnt/md2/backuppc/pc/kiste.smurf.noris.de# ls -l back* - -rw-r- 1 backuppc backuppc 0 Mar 11 22:58 backups - -rw-r- 1 backuppc backuppc1264 Mar 11 21:38 backups.old Fortunately, I noticed the problem before the next run happened... others may not be that lucky. The problem turned out to be a full disk. Error reporting in that case is non-helpful; I see Child exited prematurely and aborted by signal=PIPE on my status page. The average user is going to wonder what could possibly be wrong all of a sudden. :-/ - -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (730, 'testing'), (620, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.11-1.19 Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages backuppc depends on: ii adduser 3.59Add and remove users and groups ii apache2-mpm-prefork [apa 2.0.53-4ubuntu1 traditional model for Apache2 ii debconf 1.4.42ubuntu4 Debian configuration management sy ii dpkg 1.10.26ubuntu1 Package maintenance system for Deb pn libarchive-zip-perl Not found. ii libcompress-zlib-perl1.33-3 Perl module for creation and manip ii perl [libdigest-md5-perl 5.8.4-6ubuntu1 Larry Wall's Practical Extraction ii perl-suid5.8.4-6ubuntu1 Runs setuid Perl scripts ii samba-common 3.0.10-1ubuntu2 Samba common files used by both th ii smbclient3.0.10-1ubuntu2 a LanManager-like simple client fo ii tar 1.14-2 GNU tar pn wwwconfig-common Not found. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFCMmkY8+hUANcKr/kRAsHkAKClCnJ+4EdEv3z5xmo1bjjmfhQhvQCeMT68 XLmeYGsBZxAVqisquB38D7A= =oBYy -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#299155: libnss-mysql: Causes segfault when running /usr/sbin/adduser
Package: libnss-mysql Version: 0.43-2 Severity: critical Justification: breaks unrelated software I have libnss-mysql installed and it seemed to be working correctly. Running /usr/bin/getent successfully pulls the entries from MySQL. I have my /etc/nsswitch.conf confiured like such: passwd: compat mysql group: compat mysql shadow: compat mysql I went to install a package (stunnel4) after I had configured libnss-mysql and the install failed due to a segfault of /usr/sbin/adduser. I ran /usr/sbin/adduser by hand to collect a core and ran gdb with a backtrace: (gdb) back #0 0x4021c3b8 in XS_Locale__gettext_gettext () from /usr/lib/perl5/auto/Locale/gettext/gettext.so #1 0x080c32d6 in Perl_pp_entersub () #2 0x080bbdc9 in Perl_runops_standard () #3 0x080635e8 in perl_run () #4 0x080633f5 in perl_run () #5 0x0805fb9f in main () If I remove mysql from /etc/nsswitch.conf this problem goes away. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-686 Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Versions of packages libnss-mysql depends on: ii libmysqlclient10 3.23.56-2 LGPL-licensed client library for M -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#297665: bug in sablevm-classpath
the classpath in debian/rules is incorrect as pointed out previously. though looking at the NullPointerException that follows, it seems that libant1.6-java is not to blame, sablevm-classlib is. I filed #299121 against libsablevm-classlib1-java about this problem. I am working on a workaround for libant in the meantime. Hopefully, I'll have something soon. -stew signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Processed: Raising severity because this bit me again and made me angry
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 265021 grave Bug#265021: New package overwrites /var/www/blosxom/flavour files w/o asking Severity set to `grave'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#299157: aspseek-libmysqldb must be rebuilt against libmysqlclient12
Package: aspseek-libmysqldb Version: 1.2.10-1.1 Severity: grave Packages connected to apache and scripting languages (python/perl/php/ruby) are in the process of transitioning from libmysqlclient10 to libmysqlclient12 for sarge. Because libmysqlclient does not include versioned symbols, it is not possible for multiple versions of this library to be loaded by a process without causing segfaults. Since aspseek-libmysqldb will be loaded by apache processes that may also have loaded libmysqlclient12, this is therefore a grave bug in aspseek-libmysqldb. Please rebuild aspseek-libmysqldb against libmysqlclient12 by updating your build depends to point to libmysqlclient12-dev. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.4.26-1-686 Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages aspseek-libmysqldb depends on: ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-20 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libmysqlclient103.23.56-2LGPL-licensed client library for M ii libstdc++2.10-glibc2.2 1:2.95.4-22 The GNU stdc++ library -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: stunnel NMU patch (Re: links to wrong library)
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 299105 patch Bug#299105: links to wrong library There were no tags set. Tags added: patch thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#296511: marked as done (kdevelop3: FTBFS: Linking shared library with static library.)
Your message dated Sat, 12 Mar 2005 02:17:09 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#296511: fixed in kdevelop3 4:3.1.2-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Feb 2005 22:37:16 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Feb 22 14:37:16 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from adicia.telenet-ops.be [195.130.132.56] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D3ieZ-0007vB-00; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 14:37:15 -0800 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by adicia.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with SMTP id 125C14408E for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 23:37:15 +0100 (MET) Received: from Q.roeckx.be (dD5775FD9.access.telenet.be [213.119.95.217]) by adicia.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0C7E44112 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 23:37:14 +0100 (MET) Received: by Q.roeckx.be (Postfix, from userid 501) id CA79526136; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 23:37:14 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 23:37:14 +0100 From: Kurt Roeckx [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: kdevelop3: FTBFS: Linking shared library with static library. Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: kdevelop3 Version: 4:3.1.2-3 Severity: serious Hi, Your package is failing to build on some arches because you're linking a shared lib to a static (non PIC) lib. Here is an extract from the log: if /bin/sh ../../libtool --silent --mode=3Dcompile --tag=3DCXX g++ -DHAVE_C= ONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../.. -I../../lib/catalog -I../../lib/compat -I../../lib/= cppparser -I../../lib/external_interfaces -I../../lib/interfaces -I../../li= b/util -I../../bdb/build_unix -I../../bdb/include -I/usr/include/kde -I/usr= /share/qt3/include -I. -DQT_THREAD_SUPPORT -D_REENTRANT -DAST_DEBUG -Wno= n-virtual-dtor -Wno-long-long -Wundef -ansi -D_XOPEN_SOURCE=3D500 -D_BSD_SO= URCE -Wcast-align -Wconversion -Wchar-subscripts -Wall -W -Wpointer-arith -= Wwrite-strings -O2 -Wformat-security -Wmissing-format-attribute -fno-except= ions -fno-check-new -fno-common -DQT_CLEAN_NAMESPACE -DQT_NO_ASCII_CAST -DQ= T_NO_STL -DQT_NO_COMPAT -DQT_NO_TRANSLATION -MT implementationwidgetbase.l= o -MD -MP -MF .deps/implementationwidgetbase.Tpo -c -o implementationwidg= etbase.lo implementationwidgetbase.cpp; \ then mv -f .deps/implementationwidgetbase.Tpo .deps/implementationwidget= base.Plo; else rm -f .deps/implementationwidgetbase.Tpo; exit 1; fi /bin/sh ../../libtool --silent --mode=3Dlink --tag=3DCXX g++ -DAST_DEBUG -W= non-virtual-dtor -Wno-long-long -Wundef -ansi -D_XOPEN_SOURCE=3D500 -D_BSD_= SOURCE -Wcast-align -Wconversion -Wchar-subscripts -Wall -W -Wpointer-arith= -Wwrite-strings -O2 -Wformat-security -Wmissing-format-attribute -fno-exce= ptions -fno-check-new -fno-common -DQT_CLEAN_NAMESPACE -DQT_NO_ASCII_CAST -= DQT_NO_STL -DQT_NO_COMPAT -DQT_NO_TRANSLATION-o libkdevcppsupport.la -r= path /usr/lib/kde3 -L/usr/X11R6/lib -L/usr/share/qt3/lib -L/usr/lib -avoid= -version -module -no-undefined -Wl,--no-undefined -Wl,--allow-shlib-undefin= ed -R /usr/lib -R /usr/share/qt3/lib -R /usr/X11R6/lib -L../../bdb/dist cp= psupportpart.lo ccconfigwidget.lo kdevdriver.lo cppcodecompletion.lo proble= mreporter.lo backgroundparser.lo ast_utils.lo store_walker.lo KDevCppSuppor= tIface.lo cppsupportfactory.lo tag_creator.lo codeinformationrepository.lo = doxydoc.lo cppcodecompletionconfig.lo cppnewclassdlg.lo classgeneratorconfi= g.lo subclassingdlg.lo addattributedialog.lo addmethoddialog.lo cppsupport_= utils.lo createpcsdialog.lo qtdesignerintegration.lo implementationwidget.l= o KDevCppSupportIface_skel.lo ccconfigwidgetbase.lo configproblemreporter.l= o cppnewclassdlgbase.lo classgeneratorconfigbase.lo subclassingdlgbase.lo a= ddattributedialogbase.lo addmethoddialogbase.lo createpcsdialogbase.lo impl= ementationwidgetbase.lo ../../bdb/build_unix/libdb.a ../../lib/libkdevelop.= la ../../lib/catalog/libkdevcatalog.la ../../lib/cppparser/libkdevcppparser= .la *** Warning: Linking
Bug#299105: stunnel NMU patch (Re: links to wrong library)
tag 299105 patch
thanks
The attached patch fixes this bug. I prepared an NMU for this fix, but
I am not a Debian developer so I will have to ask someone to sponsor the
upload. The new source package is available here:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/stunnel/
I'll see if my AM can perform the NMU.--- client.c.orig 2005-03-11 23:05:36.513448816 -0800
+++ client.c2005-03-11 23:00:13.919490552 -0800
@@ -729,9 +729,9 @@
leave_critical_section(CRIT_NTOA);
putenv(env[0]);
if(c-ip) {
-putenv(LD_PRELOAD= libdir /stunnel.so);
+putenv(LD_PRELOAD= libdir /libstunnel.so);
/* For Tru64 _RLD_LIST is used instead */
-putenv(_RLD_LIST= libdir /stunnel.so:DEFAULT);
+putenv(_RLD_LIST= libdir /libstunnel.so:DEFAULT);
addr.s_addr = c-ip;
}
if(c-ssl) {
Bug#299105: stunnel NMU patch (Re: links to wrong library)
Matt Brubeck wrote: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/stunnel/ Because of a problem with my upload to mentors.debian.net, it seems that the above files are inaccessible. Until this is fixed, the files are available here instead: http://limpet.net/mbrubeck/temp/stunnel/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: retitle 299123 to haskell-hsql: FTBFS: Unknown field 'extra-libs'
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10 retitle 299123 haskell-hsql: FTBFS: Unknown field 'extra-libs' Bug#299123: haskell-hsql: FTBFS Changed Bug title. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#299159: gda-mysql must be rebuilt against libmysqlclient12
Package: gda-mysql Version: 0.2.96-6 Severity: grave Packages connected to apache, odbc, and scripting languages (python/perl/php/ruby) are in the process of transitioning from libmysqlclient10 to libmysqlclient12 for sarge. Because libmysqlclient does not include versioned symbols, it is not possible for multiple versions of this library to be loaded by a process without causing segfaults. Since gda-mysql will be loaded by GNOME processes that may also have loaded myodbc (and therefore libmysqlclient12), this is therefore a grave bug in gda-mysql. Please rebuild gda-mysql against libmysqlclient12 by updating your build depends to point to libmysqlclient12-dev. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.4.26-1-686 Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages gda-mysql depends on: ii bonobo 1.0.22-2.2 The GNOME Bonobo System. ii gdk-imlib1 1.9.14-16.2 imaging library for use with gtk ( ii libart2 1.4.2-19The GNOME canvas widget - runtime ii libaudiofile00.2.6-5 Open-source version of SGI's audio ii libbonobo2 1.0.22-2.2 The GNOME Bonobo library. ii libc62.3.2.ds1-20GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libdb3 3.2.9-22Berkeley v3 Database Libraries [ru ii libesd0 0.2.35-2Enlightened Sound Daemon - Shared ii libgconf11 1.0.9-6 GNOME configuration database syste pn libgda0 Not found. ii libgdk-pixbuf2 0.22.0-7The GdkPixBuf image library, gtk+ ii libglib1.2 1.2.10-9The GLib library of C routines ii libgnome32 1.4.2-19The GNOME libraries ii libgnomesupport0 1.4.2-19The GNOME libraries (Support libra ii libgnomeui32 1.4.2-19The GNOME libraries (User Interfac ii libgtk1.21.2.10-17 The GIMP Toolkit set of widgets fo ii libmysqlclient10 3.23.56-2 LGPL-licensed client library for M ii liboaf0 0.6.10-3The GNOME Object Activation Framew ii liborbit00.5.17-9Libraries for ORBit - a CORBA ORB ii libpopt0 1.7-5 lib for parsing cmdline parameters ii libwrap0 7.6.dbs-6 Wietse Venema's TCP wrappers libra ii libxml1 1:1.8.17-10 GNOME XML library ii oaf 0.6.10-3The GNOME Object Activation Framew ii xlibs4.3.0.dfsg.1-12 X Keyboard Extension (XKB) configu ii zlib1g 1:1.2.2-4 compression library - runtime -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#297665: bug in sablevm-classpath
On Sat, Mar 12, 2005 at 01:41:58AM -0500, Mike O'Connor wrote: the classpath in debian/rules is incorrect as pointed out previously. though looking at the NullPointerException that follows, it seems that libant1.6-java is not to blame, sablevm-classlib is. I filed #299121 against libsablevm-classlib1-java about this problem. I am working on a workaround for libant in the meantime. Hopefully, I'll have something soon. The most easy workaround is to use kaffe to build the package. I tried this locally and it worked fine. Michael -- Java Trap: http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/java-trap.html -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
