Processed: [ach@mpe.mpg.de: Bug#299709: digikam: Fails to install]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: retitle 299709 digikam: Fails to install depenant on libexif1 Bug#299709: digikam: Fails to install Changed Bug title. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#299125: marked as done (libcommons-jexl-java: FTBFS: java.lang.NullPointerException)
Your message dated Wed, 16 Mar 2005 09:28:24 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#299125: libcommons-jexl-java: FTBFS: java.lang.NullPointerException has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Mar 2005 22:59:06 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Mar 11 14:59:06 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mail-out.m-online.net [212.18.0.9] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D9t61-F4-00; Fri, 11 Mar 2005 14:59:05 -0800 Received: from mail.m-online.net (svr20.m-online.net [192.168.3.148]) by mail-out.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EC4276E2; Fri, 11 Mar 2005 23:59:04 +0100 (CET) Received: from atari.stigge.org (ppp-82-135-6-11.mnet-online.de [82.135.6.11]) by mail.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 792E75C5BB; Fri, 11 Mar 2005 23:59:00 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.5.99] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by atari.stigge.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82C75100442A0; Fri, 11 Mar 2005 23:58:59 +0100 (CET) From: Roland Stigge [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: libcommons-jexl-java: FTBFS: java.lang.NullPointerException Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2005 23:58:59 +0100 (CET) Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: libcommons-jexl-java Version: 1.0-1 Severity: serious Hi, building the package libcommons-jexl-java in a clean build environment (with pbuilder) on i386 results in: = [...] patches: debian/patches/01_jar_without_tests.patch Trying patch debian/patches/01_jar_without_tests.patch at level 0...success. if [ debian/stamp-patched = debian/stamp-patched ] ; then touch debian/stamp-patched ; \ elif [ debian/stamp-patched = reverse-patches ] ; then rm -f debian/stamp-patch* ; \ fi /usr/bin/make -f debian/rules update-config dpkg-parsechangelog: warning: no utmp entry available and LOGNAME not defined; using uid of process (1001) debian: warning: no utmp entry available and LOGNAME not defined; using uid of process (1001) dpkg-parsechangelog: warning: no utmp entry available and LOGNAME not defined; using uid of process (1001) debian: warning: no utmp entry available and LOGNAME not defined; using uid of process (1001) make[1]: Entering directory `/tmp/buildd/libcommons-jexl-java-1.0' make[1]: Nothing to be done for `update-config'. make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/libcommons-jexl-java-1.0' cd . /usr/bin/java-sablevm -classpath /usr/share/ant1.6/lib/ant.jar:/usr/share/java/junit.jar:/usr/share/java/commons-logging.jar:/usr/share/java/gnujaxp.jar:/usr/share/ant1.6/lib/ant-launcher.jar: -Dant.home=/usr/share/ant1.6 org.apache.tools.ant.Main -Dcompile.debug=true -Dcompile.optimize=true -Dbuild.compiler=jikes -propertyfile /tmp/buildd/libcommons-jexl-java-1.0/debian/ant.properties jar Buildfile: build.xml init: [mkdir] Created dir: /tmp/buildd/libcommons-jexl-java-1.0/target/lib get-deps: compile: [mkdir] Created dir: /tmp/buildd/libcommons-jexl-java-1.0/target/classes [javac] Compiling 82 source files to /tmp/buildd/libcommons-jexl-java-1.0/target/classes BUILD FAILED /tmp/buildd/libcommons-jexl-java-1.0/build.xml:46: java.lang.NullPointerException Total time: 1 second make: *** [debian/stamp-ant-build] Error 1 = Thanks for considering. -- DARTS - Debian Archive Regression Test Suite --- Received: (at 299125-done) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Mar 2005 08:29:06 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Mar 16 00:29:05 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from serv54.segi.ulg.ac.be [139.165.32.99] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DBTto-0002NB-00; Wed, 16 Mar 2005 00:29:04 -0800 Received: (qmail 13468 invoked by uid 510); 16 Mar 2005 09:28:33 +0100 Received: from 139.165.77.198 by serv54.segi.ulg.ac.be (envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED], uid 501) with qmail-scanner-1.25 (clamdscan: 0.83/762. bitdefender: v7.0/2490/107198. spamassassin: 3.0.2. Clear:RC:1(139.165.77.198):. Processed in 0.394748 secs);
Bug#299475: amule: Bug solved
Package: amule Version: 1.2.6+rc8-2 Followup-For: Bug #299475 apt-get reinstalling the package and/or reconfiguring preferences solved the problem. Still wondering what the problem were, anyway :) You can close the bug - thanks for all the fish! -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.10 Locale: LANG=it_IT.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=it_IT.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages amule depends on: ii libatk1.0-0 1.8.0-4 The ATK accessibility toolkit ii libc62.3.2.ds1-20GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libcurl3 7.13.1-1Multi-protocol file transfer libra ii libgcc1 1:3.4.3-12 GCC support library ii libglib2.0-0 2.6.3-1 The GLib library of C routines ii libgtk2.0-0 2.6.2-4 The GTK+ graphical user interface ii libidn11 0.5.13-1.0 GNU libidn library, implementation ii libpango1.0-01.8.1-1 Layout and rendering of internatio ii libpng12-0 1.2.8rel-1 PNG library - runtime ii libssl0.9.7 0.9.7e-3SSL shared libraries ii libstdc++5 1:3.3.5-12 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 ii libwxgtk2.5.32.5.3.2 wxWidgets Cross-platform C++ GUI t ii libx11-6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-12.0.1 X Window System protocol client li ii xlibs4.3.0.dfsg.1-12 X Keyboard Extension (XKB) configu ii zlib1g 1:1.2.2-4 compression library - runtime -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#299762: jadetex: Does not preserve user changes upon upgrade
Package: jadetex
Version: 3.13-3.2
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
Justification: Violates policy 10.7.3
Every time the postinst is called with configure, be it upon upgrade,
install after remove, or dpkg-reconfigure, the file
/etc/texmf/fmt.d/40jadetex.cnf is restored. If the file is deleted or
renamed by adding an additional suffix, it is restored. This violates
Policy 10.7.3,
,
| Configuration file handling must conform to the following behavior:
|
| * local changes must be preserved during a package upgrade,
`
The attached patch fixes this behavior. 40jadetex.cnf is made a
conffile, and just left on the system when jadetex is removed, but not
purged. fmtutil has no problem with this, it simply ignores formats in
fmtutil.cnf for which the ini files cannot be found.
I have added one additional feature in the patch: It uses fmtutil-sys if
it is available, fmtutil otherwise. This is the script to be used with
teTeX-3.0, now in experimental, but it's not important at all, because
I've patched fmtutil in teTeX-3.0 to do the right thing.
Regards, Frank
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (900, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.27
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15)
Versions of packages jadetex depends on:
ii debianutils 2.8.4 Miscellaneous utilities specific t
ii tetex-bin 3.0-2 The teTeX binary files
ii tetex-extra 3.0-2 Additional library files of teTeX
-- no debconf information
diff -Nur jadetex-3.13.orig/debian/changelog jadetex-3.13/debian/changelog
--- jadetex-3.13.orig/debian/changelog 2005-03-16 08:10:47.0 +0100
+++ jadetex-3.13/debian/changelog 2005-03-15 22:30:33.0 +0100
@@ -1,11 +1,12 @@
-jadetex (3.13-3) unstable; urgency=low
+jadetex (3.13-3.2) unstable; urgency=low
+ * NMU version number for local testing
* New Maintainer. (Closes: #288204)
* debian/control: Update Standards-Version.
* Acknowledge NMU. (Closes: #266630).
* debian/control: Drop Build-Dependency to openjade1.3, use openjade.
- -- OHURA Makoto [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat, 15 Jan 2005 16:20:53 +0900
+ -- Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue, 15 Mar 2005 18:05:45 +0100
jadetex (3.13-2.1) unstable; urgency=high
diff -Nur jadetex-3.13.orig/debian/postinst jadetex-3.13/debian/postinst
--- jadetex-3.13.orig/debian/postinst 2005-03-16 08:10:47.0 +0100
+++ jadetex-3.13/debian/postinst 2005-03-16 08:14:19.0 +0100
@@ -56,8 +56,10 @@
make_and_check_fmt ( ) {
local fmt
fmt=$1
+fmtutil=fmtutil
+if [ -x /usr/bin/fmtutil-sys ]; then fmtutil=fmtutil-sys; fi
-if [ ! -f /etc/texmf/jadetex/$fmt.ini ]; then
+if ! kpsewhich --progname=jadetex jadetex.ini; then
warn /etc/texmf/jadetex/$fmt.ini not found, skipping $fmt memory dump
warn If you wish to use JadeTeX, you will have to create the dump manually
warn or else purge then reinstall this package to restore default configuration.
@@ -65,14 +67,9 @@
elif [ ! -f ${FMTCNF} ]; then
warn $FMTCNF is missing but should be there; report this bug please
return 1
-elif ! grep -qw ^$fmt ${FMTCNF}; then
-warn $FMTCNF doesn't contain '$fmt', skipping memory dump
-warn If you wish to use JadeTeX, you will have to create the dump manually
-warn or else purge then reinstall this package to restore default configuration.
-return 0
else
-log running 'fmtutil --cnffile ${FMTCNF} --byfmt $fmt'...
-if ! fmtutil --cnffile ${FMTCNF} --byfmt $fmt $MYTMPFILE; then
+log running '$fmtutil --byfmt $fmt'...
+if ! $fmtutil --byfmt $fmt $MYTMPFILE; then
warn ERROR: $fmt fmtutil failed
return 1
elif ! kpsewhich $fmt.fmt /dev/null ; then
@@ -125,30 +122,7 @@
MYTMPFILE=`mktemp -t jadetex-postinst.XX`
: $MYTMPFILE
-# new fmt.d handling; we have to handle this in postinst rather
-# than conffiles so that we can disable it when pkg is removed
-#
-# first we check if the file or any jadetex.cnf file is already there,
-# if not, is there is a disabled version of the script available?
-# if not, is there a globbed version of the disabled file available?
-# if not, copy in the file from the template area
-if [ -f ${FMTDIR}/40jadetex.cnf ]; then
-:
-elif ls ${FMTDIR}/*jadetex.cnf 2/dev/null; then
-FMTCNF=`ls ${FMTDIR}/*jadetex.cnf | tail -1`
-elif [ -f ${FMTDIR}/40jadetex.cnf.disable ]; then
-mv ${FMTDIR}/40jadetex.cnf.disable ${FMTCNF}
-else
-OLD=`ls -1 ${FMTDIR}/*jadetex.cnf* 2/dev/null | tail -1`
-if [ ${OLD} -a -f ${OLD} ]; then
-FMTCNF=`echo $OLD | sed -e 's/.cnf.*/.cnf/'`
-warn re-enabling $FMTCNF from $OLD
-mv ${OLD} ${FMTCNF}
-else
-cp
Bug#299731: kernel-image-2.6-686-smp: SMP kernel causes krenele panic during boot
Aprotim Sanyal writes..., Tested on both testing and unstable. On my (old) dual-P3 system (Asus CUV4X- D), booting the SMP kernels for 2.6.8 or 2.6.10 causes a hand on boot, with the message Kernel panic: attempted to kill init! shortly after printi ng out some IDE bud information. Non-SMP kernels boot normally (though, of course, without SMP support). Adding noapic or acpi=no to the boot li ne in either LILO or GRUB makes a difference to this problem. Hmm, interesting problem I think more info is needed. Could you capture and send the boot logs of the success and failure cases using another machine and a serial cable? Having those two files to diff (I use tkdiff) is often useful in finding the problem. Here's what I do: Connect the two machines together via a null modem cable Setup an additional entry in the bootloader to use serial console with your desired settings for the serial port you're using (I add console=ttyS0,38400n8 to the cmdline for my setup). For a standard Debian grub setup I added this line # altoptions=(serial) console=ttyS0,38400n8 and ran update-grub. This creates a serial boot option for each of my installed kernels which is pretty nice. For lilo you can just create additional images adding the console option above. Run something like minicom or cu on the logging machine and configure to use the correct serial port and your desired settings Turn on logging in that program (minicom has a way to do this, for cu you might want to run within script(1) ) Reboot the machine and select the serial console boot method When done logging (after the hang or successful boot) close the logfile to ensure that and buffered lines are flushed to the log file (same command in minicom as to start logging IIRC). Send the logs to the BTS as mime attachments. Thanks, -- Matt Taggart [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: tagging 299651
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10 tags 299651 sid Bug#299651: ippl postinst stalls upgrade. Tags were: patch Tags added: sid End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: tagging 299709
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10 tags 299709 sid Bug#299709: digikam: Fails to install depenant on libexif1 There were no tags set. Tags added: sid End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: tagging 299702
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10 tags 299702 sid Bug#299702: hugs shouldn't go into sarge yet There were no tags set. Tags added: sid End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: kernel-source-2.6.8: race which could allow for privilege escalation on Radeon
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 297203 pending Bug#297203: kernel-source-2.6.8: race which could allow for privilege escalation on Radeon Tags were: security Tags added: pending thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: severity of 299717 is important
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10 severity 299717 important Bug#299717: hal: Install-time script cranks mixer up while soundcard is in use Severity set to `important'. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: severity of 299731 is important
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10 severity 299731 important Bug#299731: kernel-image-2.6-686-smp: SMP kernel causes krenele panic during boot Severity set to `important'. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#299744: marked as done (broken package, gimp depends on gimp-data (= 2.2.4-1))
Your message dated Wed, 16 Mar 2005 02:07:18 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#299744: broken package, gimp depends on gimp-data (= 2.2.4-1) has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Mar 2005 04:18:19 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 15 20:18:18 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from pop.gmx.de (mail.gmx.net) [213.165.64.20] by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DBPz8-0005uo-00; Tue, 15 Mar 2005 20:18:18 -0800 Received: (qmail 10136 invoked by uid 0); 16 Mar 2005 04:17:44 - Received: from 217.233.26.108 by www14.gmx.net with HTTP; Wed, 16 Mar 2005 05:17:44 +0100 (MET) Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2005 05:17:44 +0100 (MET) From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: broken package, gimp depends on gimp-data (= 2.2.4-1) X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-Authenticated: #1024932 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Mailer: WWW-Mail 1.6 (Global Message Exchange) X-Flags: 0001 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.4 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE, NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: gimp Version: unstable (2.2.4-1) Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable missing dependency for gimp-data on powerpc. thanks a lot for your work. Wolfgang -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: powerpc (ppc) Kernel: Linux 2.6.5-rc3-ben0 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) Versions of packages gimp depends on: ii aalib1 1.4p5-22ascii art library pn gimp-dataNot found. ii libart-2.0-2 2.3.17-1Library of functions for 2D graphi ii libatk1.0-0 1.8.0-4 The ATK accessibility toolkit ii libbz2-1.0 1.0.2-5 high-quality block-sorting file co ii libc62.3.2.ds1-20GNU C Library: Shared libraries an pn libexif9 Not found. ii libexpat11.95.8-1XML parsing C library - runtime li ii libfontconfig1 2.2.3-4 generic font configuration library ii libfreetype6 2.1.7-2.3 FreeType 2 font engine, shared lib pn libgail-common Not found. pn libgail17Not found. pn libgimp2.0 Not found. ii libgimpprint14.2.7-5 The Gimp-Print printer driver libr ii libglib2.0-0 2.6.3-1 The GLib library of C routines ii libgnomecanvas2-02.8.0-1 A powerful object-oriented display ii libgsf-1 1.11.1-1Structured File Library - runtime ii libgtk2.0-0 2.6.2-4 The GTK+ graphical user interface pn libgtkhtml2-0Not found. ii libice6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-12 Inter-Client Exchange library ii libjpeg626b-10 The Independent JPEG Group's JPEG ii liblcms1 1.13-1 Color management library ii libmng1 1.0.8-1 Multiple-image Network Graphics li ii libncurses5 5.4-4 Shared libraries for terminal hand ii libpango1.0-01.8.1-1 Layout and rendering of internatio ii libpng12-0 1.2.8rel-1 PNG library - runtime pn librsvg2-2 Not found. ii libsm6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-12 X Window System Session Management pn libtiff3gNot found. pn libwmf0.2-7 Not found. ii libx11-6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-12 X Window System protocol client li ii libxml2 2.6.16-3GNOME XML library ii libxmu6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-12 X Window System miscellaneous util ii libxpm4 4.3.0.dfsg.1-12 X pixmap library ii libxt6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-12 X Toolkit Intrinsics ii slang1 1.4.9dbs-8 The S-Lang programming library - r ii wget 1.9.1-10retrieves files from the web ii
Bug#299772: qmailadmin does not work correctly, but a rebuild is sufficient to fix it
Package: qmailadmin Version: 1.0.6-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Hello, I installed the package and used it to modify domains. It was half-working because, for example: - qmailadmin searched for the wrong Maildir, for example Postmaster/Maildir instead of postmaster/Maildir - some information (like people names) was not showing up - impossible to modify user or alias information - a lot of other small things I just recompiled sources with: apt-get source -b qmailadmin installed the result package, and all the problems went away. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (50, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.10-1-k7 Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Versions of packages qmailadmin depends on: ii apache2-mpm-prefork [httpd] 2.0.53-5 traditional model for Apache2 ii autorespond 2.0.4-2 email autoresponder for qmail ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-20 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libvpopmail15.4.4-1 vpopmail libraries -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#299770: nuauth: Installation fails
Package: nuauth Version: 0.8.5-3 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Setting up nuauth (0.8.5-3) ... chown: cannot access `/var/run/nuauth/': No such file or directory I don't know if it works for systems where some another nufw package is previously unpakced/installed/run, but the package in impossible to install. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-1-386 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) Versions of packages nuauth depends on: ii debconf 1.4.30.11Debian configuration management sy ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-20 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libgdbm31.8.3-2 GNU dbm database routines (runtime ii libglib2.0-02.6.3-1 The GLib library of C routines ii libldap22.1.30-3 OpenLDAP libraries ii libmysqlclient124.0.23-7 mysql database client library ii libpq3 7.4.7-2 PostgreSQL C client library ii libssl0.9.7 0.9.7e-2 SSL shared libraries -- debconf information excluded -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] OpenPGP 0xD9D50D8A signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Processed: retitle 291408 to [fixed in 2.2.23] database corruption
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: retitle 291408 [fixed in 2.2.23] database corruption Bug#291408: slapd: Index and Data corruption with openldap2 2.1.30 Changed Bug title. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: tagging 291408
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 291408 fixed-in-experimental Bug#291408: [fixed in 2.2.23] database corruption There were no tags set. Tags added: fixed-in-experimental End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#293758: marked as done (Package superseded and scheduled for removal (#282554))
Your message dated Wed, 16 Mar 2005 12:53:59 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line mysqlcc removed from Debian has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Nov 2004 00:26:53 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Nov 22 16:26:53 2004 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from polaris.galacticasoftware.com [206.45.95.222] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1CWOWD-00035Z-00; Mon, 22 Nov 2004 16:26:53 -0800 Received: from mira.lan.galacticasoftware.com ([192.168.53.2] helo=mira) by polaris.galacticasoftware.com with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CWOWC-0001yc-Lo; Mon, 22 Nov 2004 18:26:52 -0600 Received: from adamm by mira with local (Exim 4.34) id 1CWOWC-0002no-J4; Mon, 22 Nov 2004 18:26:52 -0600 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Adam Majer [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: O: mysqlcc -- The official GUI interface for MySQL X-Mailer: reportbug 3.2 Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2004 18:26:52 -0600 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Package: wnpp Severity: normal I intend to orphan the mysqlcc package. The package description is: MySQL Control Center is a platform-independent GUI administration client for the MySQL database server. . Features include: * Interactive queries with a syntax-highlighting SQL editor * Database and table management * Server administration * Cross-platform capability . For more information see www.mysql.com/products/mysqlcc/ NOTE: This package is abandoned upstream in favour of mysql-admin and mysql-query-browser. MySQL CC is no longer maintained by MySQL AB. If no one has any objections, this package should probably be removed from Debian *before* Sarge is released. - Adam -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-1-k7 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) --- Received: (at 293758-done) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Mar 2005 12:54:18 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Mar 16 04:54:17 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from sorrow.cyrius.com [65.19.161.204] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DBY2S-0001U2-00; Wed, 16 Mar 2005 04:54:16 -0800 Received: by sorrow.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 10) id D2DDF64D40; Wed, 16 Mar 2005 12:54:15 + (UTC) Received: by deprecation.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 4F9764EDA4; Wed, 16 Mar 2005 12:53:59 + (GMT) Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2005 12:53:59 + From: Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: mysqlcc removed from Debian Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,SORTED_RECIPS autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 6 This package has been removed from Debian because it has been abandoned upstream for mysql-admin mysql-query-browser. Please switch to those packages. See http://bugs.debian.org/282554 for more information. -- Martin Michlmayr http://www.cyrius.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#241112: marked as done (Please remove distributed-net-pproxy.)
Your message dated Wed, 16 Mar 2005 12:55:40 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line distributed-net-pproxy removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Mar 2004 19:53:08 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 30 11:53:08 2004 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from 86.red-80-24-13.pooles.rima-tde.net (aragorn) [80.24.13.86] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1B8PIF-UN-00; Tue, 30 Mar 2004 11:53:08 -0800 Received: from rmh by aragorn with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1B8P6f-oS-00; Tue, 30 Mar 2004 21:41:05 +0200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Robert Millan [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Please remove distributed-net-pproxy. X-Mailer: reportbug 2.54 Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2004 21:40:52 +0200 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Package: distributed-net-pproxy Severity: wishlist Hi, This package is in non-free and has been orphaned for a while. It has an important functionality bug (#145410) that nobody cared to fix for almost 2 years now. It's also very unpopular (only 1 person voted for it in popcon). I recommend that it is removed from Debian unstable. Please reassign this bug to ftp.debian.org is you approve my request. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.4.25-1-k7 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C --- Received: (at 241112-done) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Mar 2005 12:55:55 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Mar 16 04:55:55 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from sorrow.cyrius.com [65.19.161.204] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DBY43-0001hm-00; Wed, 16 Mar 2005 04:55:55 -0800 Received: by sorrow.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 10) id EBC5364D40; Wed, 16 Mar 2005 12:55:54 + (UTC) Received: by deprecation.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id CE2974EDA4; Wed, 16 Mar 2005 12:55:40 + (GMT) Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2005 12:55:40 + From: Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: distributed-net-pproxy removed Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,SORTED_RECIPS autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 7 distributed-net-pproxy has been removed from Debian. It has not been maintained and it was out of date so severly that it didn't properly work anymore. -- Martin Michlmayr http://www.cyrius.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#197593: marked as done (gtkglareamm: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on libglu-dev)
Your message dated Wed, 16 Mar 2005 12:56:35 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Jun 2003 08:55:55 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jun 16 03:55:54 2003 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from maynard.mail.mindspring.net [207.69.200.243] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 19RpmM-0003yM-00; Mon, 16 Jun 2003 03:55:54 -0500 Received: from user-119bq03.biz.mindspring.com ([66.149.232.3]) by maynard.mail.mindspring.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 19RpmM-0007cb-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 16 Jun 2003 04:55:54 -0400 Received: from daniel by user-119bq03.biz.mindspring.com with local (Exim 4.20) id 19RpmL-FB-8p for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 16 Jun 2003 01:55:53 -0700 To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: gtkglareamm: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on libglu-dev From: Daniel Schepler [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2003 01:55:53 -0700 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: Daniel Schepler [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_01,HAS_PACKAGE version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_06_10 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_06_10 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp) Package: gtkglareamm Version: 1.1.1-7 Severity: serious From my build log running pbuilder with a partial mirror: ... - Considering mesag-dev | libgl-dev - Trying mesag-dev - Cannot install mesag-dev; apt errors follow: Reading Package Lists... Building Dependency Tree... Package mesag-dev has no available version, but exists in the database. This typically means that the package was mentioned in a dependency and never uploaded, has been obsoleted or is not available with the contents of sources.list However the following packages replace it: xlibmesa-glu-dev xlibmesa-gl-dev E: Package mesag-dev has no installation candidate - Trying libgl-dev ... - Installing debhelper libgtkmm-dev libgtk1.2-dev libgl-dev gtkglarea5-dev autotools-dev libtool autoconf g++ Reading Package Lists... Building Dependency Tree... Note, selecting xlibmesa-gl-dev instead of libgl-dev g++ is already the newest version. The following extra packages will be installed: debconf-utils file gettext gettext-base gtkglarea5 html2text libfreetype6 libglib1.2 libglib1.2-dev libglib2.0-0 libgtk1.2 libgtk1.2-common libgtkmm1.2-0 libmagic1 libsigc++-dev libsigc++0c102 m4 pkg-config po-debconf xfree86-common xlibmesa-gl-dev xlibmesa3-gl xlibmesa3-glu xlibs xlibs-dev zlib1g ... checking for gtkmm-config... /usr/bin/gtkmm-config checking for GTK-- - version = 1.1.7... yes checking Mesa... no checking Mesa with pthreads... no checking OpenGL... yes checking for gtk_gl_area_new in -lgtkgl... no configure: error: Missing gtkglarea library make: *** [build-stamp] Error 1 The config.log file says: ... configure:9302: checking OpenGL configure:9322: gcc -o conftest -g -O2 conftest.c -L/usr/lib -L/usr/X11R6/lib -lgtk -lgdk -rdynamic -lgmodule -lglib -ldl -lXi -lXext -lX11 -lm -lGL 5 configure:9325: $? = 0 configure:9328: test -s conftest configure:9331: $? = 0 configure:9341: result: yes configure:9399: checking for gtk_gl_area_new in -lgtkgl configure:9430: gcc -o conftest -g -O2 conftest.c -lgtkgl -L/usr/lib -L/usr/X11R6/lib -lgtk -lgdk -rdynamic -lgmodule -lglib -ldl -lXi -lXext -lX11 -lm -lGLU -lGL 5 /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lGLU collect2: ld returned 1 exit status configure:9433: $? = 1 -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux frobnitz 2.4.21-pre5 #1 Sat Mar 1 09:01:10 PST 2003 i686 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C -- Daniel Schepler Please don't disillusion me. I [EMAIL PROTECTED]haven't had breakfast yet. -- Orson Scott Card --- Received: (at 197593-done) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Mar 2005 12:56:50 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Mar 16 04:56:50 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from sorrow.cyrius.com [65.19.161.204] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DBY4v-0001nC-00; Wed, 16 Mar 2005 04:56:49 -0800 Received: by sorrow.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 10) id D71B864D40;
Bug#290111: marked as done (digikamplugins: FTBFS: Cannot find headers)
Your message dated Wed, 16 Mar 2005 13:05:28 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Jan 2005 20:05:25 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jan 12 12:05:24 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from tisch.mail.mindspring.net [207.69.200.157] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Cook8-0007Pa-00; Wed, 12 Jan 2005 12:05:24 -0800 Received: from user-119bq03.biz.mindspring.com ([66.149.232.3] helo=frobnitz.homelinux.net) by tisch.mail.mindspring.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 1Cook1-0008QX-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 12 Jan 2005 15:05:17 -0500 Received: from daniel by frobnitz.homelinux.net with local (Exim 4.34) id 1Cook0-0007KA-Pt for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 12 Jan 2005 12:05:16 -0800 To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: digikamplugins: FTBFS: Cannot find headers From: Daniel Schepler [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2005 12:05:16 -0800 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: digikamplugins Severity: serious Version: 0.6.2-3 From my build log, using pbuilder in an ia32 chroot: ... make[3]: Entering directory `/tmp/buildd/digikamplugins-0.6.2/acquireimages' if /bin/sh ../libtool --silent --mode=compile --tag=CXX g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I/usr/include/kde -I/usr/share/qt3/include -I. -DQT_THREAD_SUPPORT -D_REENTRANT -Wnon-virtual-dtor -Wno-long-long -Wundef -ansi -D_XOPEN_SOURCE=500 -D_BSD_SOURCE -Wcast-align -Wconversion -Wchar-subscripts -Wall -W -Wpointer-arith -Wwrite-strings -DNDEBUG -DNO_DEBUG -O2 -O2 -Wformat-security -Wmissing-format-attribute -fno-exceptions -fno-check-new -fno-common -MT plugin_acquireimages.lo -MD -MP -MF .deps/plugin_acquireimages.Tpo \ -c -o plugin_acquireimages.lo `test -f 'plugin_acquireimages.cpp' || echo './'`plugin_acquireimages.cpp; \ then mv -f .deps/plugin_acquireimages.Tpo .deps/plugin_acquireimages.Plo; \ else rm -f .deps/plugin_acquireimages.Tpo; exit 1; \ fi In file included from plugin_acquireimages.cpp:46: plugin_acquireimages.h:28:34: digikam/albummanager.h: No such file or directory plugin_acquireimages.h:29:31: digikam/albuminfo.h: No such file or directory plugin_acquireimages.h:30:28: digikam/plugin.h: No such file or directory In file included from plugin_acquireimages.cpp:46: plugin_acquireimages.h:39: error: `Digikam' is not a class or namespace plugin_acquireimages.h:40: error: `Plugin' is not a class or namespace ... make[3]: *** [plugin_acquireimages.lo] Error 1 make[3]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/digikamplugins-0.6.2/acquireimages' make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/digikamplugins-0.6.2' make[1]: *** [all] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/digikamplugins-0.6.2' make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2 -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.9-9-amd64-k8 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to en_US.UTF-8) -- Daniel Schepler Please don't disillusion me. I [EMAIL PROTECTED]haven't had breakfast yet. -- Orson Scott Card --- Received: (at 290111-done) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Mar 2005 13:05:46 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Mar 16 05:05:46 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from sorrow.cyrius.com [65.19.161.204] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DBYDa-0002Zy-00; Wed, 16 Mar 2005 05:05:46 -0800 Received: by sorrow.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 10) id 9623164D40; Wed, 16 Mar 2005 13:05:45 + (UTC) Received: by deprecation.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id BF0EF4EDA4; Wed, 16 Mar 2005 13:05:28 + (GMT) Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2005 13:05:28 + From: Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: removed Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
Bug#290111: digikamplugins: FTBFS: Cannot find headers
* Achim Bohnet [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-01-18 15:43]: As I tried to explain in my last msg, I would like to upload a dummy digikamplugins pkg, that just depends on kipi-plugins as 'soon' as kipi-plugins enters sid (currently still pending in NEW queue). That's just to smooth upgrade. Some weeks before pkg freeze, my plan was ask for the digikamplugin removal. I'm confused about this situation. digikamplugins has just been removed and I was wondering whether to close its oustanding bugs, or reassign them to digikam... or should I reassign them to kipi-plugins? Can you please reassign or close the following bugs as appropriate: 245656: wishlist: Please provide mpeg encoder plugin 254570: normal: digikamplugins: print wizard uses too low resolution 259346: normal: digikamplugins: HTML album export adds a second .jpg to the generated filenames 265934: normal: digikamplugins: Unticking Resize target images isn't honoured 285447: wishlist: digikamplugins: New version available, this version not work with digikam 0.7 -- Martin Michlmayr http://www.cyrius.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#296732: marked as done (3dwm: FTBFS: Fails to detect OpenGL)
Your message dated Wed, 16 Mar 2005 12:46:38 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line 3dwm removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Feb 2005 11:19:21 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Feb 24 03:19:21 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from smtp6.mindspring.com [207.69.200.110] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D4H1a-0006qq-00; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 03:19:18 -0800 Received: from user-119bq03.biz.mindspring.com ([66.149.232.3] helo=frobnitz.homelinux.net) by smtp6.mindspring.com with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 1D4H1a-0003XI-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 06:19:18 -0500 Received: from daniel by frobnitz.homelinux.net with local (Exim 4.44) id 1D4H1Z-0002XZ-5l for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 03:19:17 -0800 To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: 3dwm: FTBFS: Fails to detect OpenGL From: Daniel Schepler [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 03:19:17 -0800 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: 3dwm Severity: serious Version: 0.3.1-11.3 From my build log (using pbuilder in an i386 chroot): ... checking for IceConnectionNumber in -lICE... yes checking for main in -lm... yes checking for OpenGL... yes configure: error: OpenGL subsystem not found. make: *** [configure-stamp] Error 1 -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.9-9-amd64-k8 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to en_US.UTF-8) -- Daniel Schepler Please don't disillusion me. I [EMAIL PROTECTED]haven't had breakfast yet. -- Orson Scott Card --- Received: (at 296732-done) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Mar 2005 12:46:56 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Mar 16 04:46:55 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from sorrow.cyrius.com [65.19.161.204] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DBXvL-ka-00; Wed, 16 Mar 2005 04:46:55 -0800 Received: by sorrow.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 10) id 02C6C64D40; Wed, 16 Mar 2005 12:46:55 + (UTC) Received: by deprecation.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 873284EDA4; Wed, 16 Mar 2005 12:46:38 + (GMT) Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2005 12:46:38 + From: Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: 3dwm removed Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 9 3dwm has been removed from Debian unstable because it is no longer maintained upstream and (apparently) not used. Yeah, http://www.3dwm.org just times out... -- Martin Michlmayr http://www.cyrius.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#293769: marked as done (libproplist: to be removed)
Your message dated Wed, 16 Mar 2005 12:57:36 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Feb 2005 16:59:35 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Feb 05 08:59:35 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from pop.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net) [213.165.64.20] by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1CxTHT-0007LD-00; Sat, 05 Feb 2005 08:59:35 -0800 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 05 Feb 2005 16:59:03 - Received: from heredia-a428.racsa.co.cr (EHLO jacinta.casa) (196.40.93.54) by mail.gmx.net (mp018) with SMTP; 05 Feb 2005 17:59:03 +0100 X-Authenticated: #20727617 Received: from marcelo by jacinta.casa with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1CxTIL-0002WP-00; Sat, 05 Feb 2005 11:00:29 -0600 Date: Sat, 5 Feb 2005 11:00:29 -0600 From: Marcelo E. Magallon [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Please remove source package libproplist; not maintained upstream, unneeded in Debian Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Reportbug-Version: 3.6 X-Operating-System: Linux jacinta 2.6.10-rc3 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i Sender: Marcelo E. Magallon [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: serious Hi, the package libproplist has been obsoleted by functions in libwings-dev. No packages in sid are using this package anymore. Thanks, Marcelo --- Received: (at 293769-done) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Mar 2005 12:57:51 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Mar 16 04:57:51 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from sorrow.cyrius.com [65.19.161.204] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DBY5u-0001uW-00; Wed, 16 Mar 2005 04:57:50 -0800 Received: by sorrow.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 10) id 94B1964D40; Wed, 16 Mar 2005 12:57:50 + (UTC) Received: by deprecation.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 0C5664EDA4; Wed, 16 Mar 2005 12:57:36 + (GMT) Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2005 12:57:36 + From: Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Removed Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,ONEWORD autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2 Removed from the archive - superseded by libwings-dev. -- Martin Michlmayr http://www.cyrius.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#293770: marked as done (gltt: to be removed)
Your message dated Wed, 16 Mar 2005 12:57:08 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Feb 2005 16:53:27 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Feb 05 08:53:27 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from imap.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net) [213.165.64.20] by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1CxTBX-0005u4-00; Sat, 05 Feb 2005 08:53:27 -0800 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 05 Feb 2005 16:52:55 - Received: from heredia-a428.racsa.co.cr (EHLO jacinta.casa) (196.40.93.54) by mail.gmx.net (mp025) with SMTP; 05 Feb 2005 17:52:55 +0100 X-Authenticated: #20727617 Received: from marcelo by jacinta.casa with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1CxTCO-0002UN-00; Sat, 05 Feb 2005 10:54:20 -0600 Date: Sat, 5 Feb 2005 10:54:20 -0600 From: Marcelo E. Magallon [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Please remove source package gltt Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Reportbug-Version: 3.6 X-Operating-System: Linux jacinta 2.6.10-rc3 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i Sender: Marcelo E. Magallon [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: serious Justification: Obsolete package hi, please remove the source package 'gltt' which I maintain. This package has been obsoleted by ftgl. No packages in sid depend on gltt now. Thanks, Marcelo --- Received: (at 293770-done) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Mar 2005 12:57:23 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Mar 16 04:57:23 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from sorrow.cyrius.com [65.19.161.204] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DBY5S-0001q7-00; Wed, 16 Mar 2005 04:57:22 -0800 Received: by sorrow.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 10) id 7C38664D40; Wed, 16 Mar 2005 12:57:22 + (UTC) Received: by deprecation.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id A14A04EDA4; Wed, 16 Mar 2005 12:57:08 + (GMT) Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2005 12:57:08 + From: Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Removed Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,ONEWORD autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2 This package has been removed - it is superseded by ftgl. -- Martin Michlmayr http://www.cyrius.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#299572: marked as done (ntp-server: Fails to start after upgrade.)
Your message dated Wed, 16 Mar 2005 08:02:21 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#299572: fixed in ntp 1:4.2.0a+stable-6 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Mar 2005 01:58:22 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Mar 14 17:58:22 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mta9.adelphia.net [68.168.78.199] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DB1KA-0004Nz-00; Mon, 14 Mar 2005 17:58:22 -0800 Received: from bigbird.haucks.org ([67.21.240.198]) by mta9.adelphia.net (InterMail vM.6.01.04.01 201-2131-118-101-20041129) with ESMTP id [EMAIL PROTECTED] for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 14 Mar 2005 20:57:51 -0500 Received: from robin.haucks.org ([192.168.1.33] ident=Debian-exim) by bigbird.haucks.org with esmtp (Exim 4.44) id 1DB1Je-0007K6-Sr for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 14 Mar 2005 20:57:50 -0500 Received: from bobh by robin.haucks.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1DB1Je-0001Mn-Kh for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 14 Mar 2005 20:57:50 -0500 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Bob Hauck [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: ntp-server: Fails to start after upgrade. X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8 Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2005 20:57:50 -0500 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: ntp-server Version: 1:4.2.0a+stable-4 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable After doing a dist-upgrade today, ntpd refuses to start. I have run ntpdate to ensure that the system clock is reasonably close to correct. I get the following in the system long, then ntpd exits leaving the pid file behind in /var/run. Mar 14 20:46:55 robin ntpd[5207]: ntpd [EMAIL PROTECTED]:4.2.0a+stable-4-r Sat Mar 12 06:38:34 CET 2005 (1) Mar 14 20:46:55 robin ntpd[5207]: precision = 3.000 usec Mar 14 20:46:55 robin ntpd[5207]: Listening on interface wildcard,0.0.0.0#123 Mar 14 20:46:55 robin ntpd[5207]: Listening on interface wildcard,::#123 Mar 14 20:46:55 robin ntpd[5207]: Listening on interface lo, 127.0.0.1#123 Mar 14 20:46:55 robin ntpd[5207]: Listening on interface eth1, 192.168.1.33#123 Mar 14 20:46:55 robin ntpd[5207]: kernel time sync status 0040 This is a laptop, eth1 is a wireless connection, eth0 is wired but currently turned off. I am using a Debian Sarge machine as my time server and it is currently working fine with the other Sarge boxes on the network. My /etc/ntp.conf is unchanged from before the upgrade. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.9-1-686 Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Versions of packages ntp-server depends on: ii ntp1:4.2.0a+stable-4 Network Time Protocol: network uti ii ntp-simple 1:4.2.0a+stable-4 Network Time Protocol: daemon for -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 299572-close) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Mar 2005 13:19:20 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Mar 16 05:19:19 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DBYQh-0003zb-00; Wed, 16 Mar 2005 05:19:19 -0800 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DBYAH-0007ZC-00; Wed, 16 Mar 2005 08:02:21 -0500 From: Matthias Urlichs [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $ Subject: Bug#299572: fixed in ntp 1:4.2.0a+stable-6 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2005 08:02:21 -0500 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Source: ntp Source-Version: 1:4.2.0a+stable-6 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed
Bug#299748: marked as done (Please remove ngspice; it is not distributable)
Your message dated Wed, 16 Mar 2005 08:26:41 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#299748: fixed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Dec 2004 07:31:12 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Dec 26 23:31:12 2004 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from gizmo06bw.bigpond.com [144.140.70.41] by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1CipLT-0006rh-00; Sun, 26 Dec 2004 23:31:11 -0800 Received: (qmail 569 invoked from network); 27 Dec 2004 07:30:37 - Received: from unknown (HELO bwmam12.bigpond.com) (144.135.24.103) by gizmo06bw.bigpond.com with SMTP; 27 Dec 2004 07:30:37 - Received: from cpe-60-225-25-205.nsw.bigpond.net.au ([60.225.25.205]) by bwmam12.bigpond.com(MAM REL_3_4_2a 189/22515407) with SMTP id 22515407; Mon, 27 Dec 2004 17:30:37 +1000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Matt Flax [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: ngspice: legal issue Bcc: Matt Flax [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Mailer: reportbug 3.2 Date: Mon, 27 Dec 2004 18:30:36 +1100 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Package: ngspice Version: 15-1 Severity: normal Tags: experimental Bug to make sure that ngspice (which has some non-free licenses) is not put into main branch of debian. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-1-686 Locale: LANG=en_AU, LC_CTYPE=en_AU (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Versions of packages ngspice depends on: ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-18 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libice6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-8 Inter-Client Exchange library ii libncurses5 5.4-4 Shared libraries for terminal hand ii libreadline5 5.0-7 GNU readline and history libraries ii libsm64.3.0.dfsg.1-8 X Window System Session Management ii libx11-6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-8 X Window System protocol client li ii libxaw7 4.3.0.dfsg.1-8 X Athena widget set library ii libxext6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-8 X Window System miscellaneous exte ii libxmu6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-8 X Window System miscellaneous util ii libxt64.3.0.dfsg.1-8 X Toolkit Intrinsics ii xlibs 4.3.0.dfsg.1-8 X Window System client libraries m -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 299748-close) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Mar 2005 13:49:02 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Mar 16 05:49:02 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DBYtR-0008Rh-00; Wed, 16 Mar 2005 05:49:01 -0800 Received: from jeroen by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DBYXp-0001UG-00; Wed, 16 Mar 2005 08:26:41 -0500 From: Debian Archive Maintenance [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: melanie $Revision: 1.43 $ Subject: Bug#299748: fixed Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Jeroen van Wolffelaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2005 08:26:41 -0500 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: ngspice | 15-2 | source, i386 Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug. The package(s) will be physically removed automatically when no suite references them (and in the case of source, when no binary references it). Please also remember that the changes have been done on the master archive (ftp-master.debian.org) and will not propagate to any mirrors (ftp.debian.org included) until the next cron.daily
Bug#299155: libnss-mysql: Causes segfault when running /usr/sbin/adduser
Package: libnss-mysql Version: 0.43-2 Followup-For: Bug #299155 i can confirm this bug and was able to track this down to a fault in the function getpwnam called by the adduser script. the function getgrnam shows same behaviour. i am experiencing the problem a long time now and looking forward to see this fixed soon. Yours sincerely, Mario Lipinski -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.11-garfield Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Versions of packages libnss-mysql depends on: ii libmysqlclient10 3.23.56-2 LGPL-licensed client library for M -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#240546: marked as done (libapache-asp-perl: can't fulfill the recommends in unstable)
Your message dated Wed, 16 Mar 2005 15:09:16 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line libapache-asp-perl: can't fulfill the recommends in unstable has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Mar 2004 00:12:29 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Mar 27 16:12:29 2004 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mailout.stusta.mhn.de [141.84.69.5] by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1B7Nuf-0003mS-00; Sat, 27 Mar 2004 16:12:29 -0800 Received: (qmail 9593 invoked from network); 28 Mar 2004 00:12:28 - Received: from r063144.stusta.swh.mhn.de (10.150.63.144) by mailhub.stusta.mhn.de with SMTP; 28 Mar 2004 00:12:28 - Received: from bunk by r063144.stusta.swh.mhn.de with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1B7NuD-0007Hs-00; Sun, 28 Mar 2004 01:12:01 +0100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: libapache-asp-perl: can't fulfill the recommends in unstable X-Mailer: reportbug 2.48 Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2004 01:12:01 +0100 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Package: libapache-asp-perl Version: 2.57-2 Severity: grave Package libapache-asp-perl version 2.57-2 has an unmet dep: Recommends: libcgi-pm-perl (= 2.53) It seems a recommends on a recent version of perl-modules is required instead. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 (i686) --- Received: (at 240546-done) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Mar 2005 14:09:23 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Mar 16 06:09:23 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from enz.schiach.de (schiach.de) [213.155.82.133] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DBZD8-0006sI-00; Wed, 16 Mar 2005 06:09:23 -0800 Received: by schiach.de (Postfix, from userid 2002) id 34B7911961; Wed, 16 Mar 2005 15:09:16 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2005 15:09:16 +0100 From: Michael Ablassmeier [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: libapache-asp-perl: can't fulfill the recommends in unstable Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Accept-Language: de en Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: hi, given that this bug has been fixed by Erich's upload nearly one year ago: libapache-asp-perl (2.57-2.1) unstable; urgency=low * NMU from Munich BugSquash Party * fix the recommends onto perl-modules (Closes: #240546) -- Erich Schubert [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun, 18 Apr 2004 18:16:13 +0200 i'm closing this bugreport now. bye, - michael -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#287347: marked as done (ngspice: legal issue)
Your message dated Wed, 16 Mar 2005 14:02:48 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line ngspice removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Dec 2004 07:31:12 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Dec 26 23:31:12 2004 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from gizmo06bw.bigpond.com [144.140.70.41] by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1CipLT-0006rh-00; Sun, 26 Dec 2004 23:31:11 -0800 Received: (qmail 569 invoked from network); 27 Dec 2004 07:30:37 - Received: from unknown (HELO bwmam12.bigpond.com) (144.135.24.103) by gizmo06bw.bigpond.com with SMTP; 27 Dec 2004 07:30:37 - Received: from cpe-60-225-25-205.nsw.bigpond.net.au ([60.225.25.205]) by bwmam12.bigpond.com(MAM REL_3_4_2a 189/22515407) with SMTP id 22515407; Mon, 27 Dec 2004 17:30:37 +1000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Matt Flax [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: ngspice: legal issue Bcc: Matt Flax [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Mailer: reportbug 3.2 Date: Mon, 27 Dec 2004 18:30:36 +1100 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Package: ngspice Version: 15-1 Severity: normal Tags: experimental Bug to make sure that ngspice (which has some non-free licenses) is not put into main branch of debian. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-1-686 Locale: LANG=en_AU, LC_CTYPE=en_AU (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Versions of packages ngspice depends on: ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-18 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libice6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-8 Inter-Client Exchange library ii libncurses5 5.4-4 Shared libraries for terminal hand ii libreadline5 5.0-7 GNU readline and history libraries ii libsm64.3.0.dfsg.1-8 X Window System Session Management ii libx11-6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-8 X Window System protocol client li ii libxaw7 4.3.0.dfsg.1-8 X Athena widget set library ii libxext6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-8 X Window System miscellaneous exte ii libxmu6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-8 X Window System miscellaneous util ii libxt64.3.0.dfsg.1-8 X Toolkit Intrinsics ii xlibs 4.3.0.dfsg.1-8 X Window System client libraries m -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 287347-done) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Mar 2005 14:03:32 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Mar 16 06:03:32 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from sorrow.cyrius.com [65.19.161.204] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DBZ7T-00061a-00; Wed, 16 Mar 2005 06:03:31 -0800 Received: by sorrow.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 10) id A634464D40; Wed, 16 Mar 2005 14:03:27 + (UTC) Received: by deprecation.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id D7A554EDA4; Wed, 16 Mar 2005 14:02:48 + (GMT) Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2005 14:02:48 + From: Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: ngspice removed Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2 ngspice has been removed because of legal issues. -- Martin Michlmayr http://www.cyrius.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Fixed in NMU of libapache2-mod-encoding 20040616-4
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 297981 + fixed Bug#297981: libapache2-mod-encoding: FTBFS: 'regex_t' undeclared (first use in this function) Tags were: patch Tags added: fixed quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#267236: cman: source package name confict!
Thanks. I'm not a DD, but I'm willing to adopt this package. The upstream translation team have released several new versions, and I need to seperate it into 4 binary packages or more. I'm quite busy now, and this work is a bit time consuming. So, I can't guarantee when it will be done. Again, thank you for working on this package and closing the bug. -- Best Regards, Carlos -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#299572: [debian-ntp] Bug#299572: ntp-server: strace log
Hi,
Beat Bolli:
Package: ntp-server
Version: 1:4.2.0a+stable-4
Followup-For: Bug #299572
Thanks. Please test whether -6 fixes this problem.
People: If you're stracing a server, use strace -f -s 300 -o FILE PROGRAM,
then send FILE as a (possibly gzipped) attachment unless you're very
sure that your mail client doesn't word-wrap.
Otherwise (a) the fork() call will make your trace useless, (b) any
syslog strings or other important information the server writes will be
truncated, and/or (c) program output will be interspersed with strace
output, which makes analysis harder than necessary.
--
Matthias Urlichs | {M:U} IT Design @ m-u-it.de | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Processed: Wrong severity
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 299560 normal Bug#299560: dsniff: fails due to not finding libnids Severity set to `normal'. tags 299560 + pending Bug#299560: dsniff: fails due to not finding libnids There were no tags set. Tags added: pending stop Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#299328: streamtuner: Confirmation of this bug
Package: streamtuner Version: 0.99.99-3 Followup-For: Bug #299328 The last time I ran streamtuner was about 2 weeks ago, and it ran fine then. I did do a weekly upgrade in the mean-time, though. $ gdb streamtuner GNU gdb 6.3-debian [snip] This GDB was configured as i386-linux...(no debugging symbols found) Using host libthread_db library /lib/tls/libthread_db.so.1. (gdb) r Starting program: /usr/bin/streamtuner (no debugging symbols found) [snip] (no debugging symbols found) [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] [New Thread -1214945280 (LWP 29555)] (no debugging symbols found) [snip] Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. [Switching to Thread -1214945280 (LWP 29555)] 0xb739a6bc in init_gtk () from /usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/gtk-2.0/gtk/_gtk.so -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.10n Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Versions of packages streamtuner depends on: ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-20 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libcurl37.13.1-1 Multi-protocol file transfer libra ii libglib2.0-02.6.3-1 The GLib library of C routines ii libgtk2.0-0 2.6.2-4 The GTK+ graphical user interface ii libidn110.5.13-1.0 GNU libidn library, implementation ii libpango1.0-0 1.8.1-1 Layout and rendering of internatio ii libssl0.9.7 0.9.7e-3 SSL shared libraries ii libtagc01.3.1-1 TagLib Audio Meta-Data Library (C ii libxml2 2.6.16-3 GNOME XML library ii python 2.3.5-1 An interactive high-level object-o ii python-gtk2 2.6.0-1 Python bindings for the GTK+ widge ii python2.3 2.3.5-1 An interactive high-level object-o ii zlib1g 1:1.2.2-4compression library - runtime -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#299157: aspseek-libmysqldb must be rebuilt against libmysqlclient12
Hey there, Can you tell me if this project has been orphaned? I cannot reach the developer, check out from CVS, etc. If it has not been orphaned, may I orphan it? Thanks, Jeremiah Steve Langasek wrote: Package: aspseek-libmysqldb Version: 1.2.10-1.1 Severity: grave Packages connected to apache and scripting languages (python/perl/php/ruby) are in the process of transitioning from libmysqlclient10 to libmysqlclient12 for sarge. Because libmysqlclient does not include versioned symbols, it is not possible for multiple versions of this library to be loaded by a process without causing segfaults. Since aspseek-libmysqldb will be loaded by apache processes that may also have loaded libmysqlclient12, this is therefore a grave bug in aspseek-libmysqldb. Please rebuild aspseek-libmysqldb against libmysqlclient12 by updating your build depends to point to libmysqlclient12-dev. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.4.26-1-686 Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages aspseek-libmysqldb depends on: ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-20 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libmysqlclient103.23.56-2LGPL-licensed client library for M ii libstdc++2.10-glibc2.2 1:2.95.4-22 The GNU stdc++ library -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#299572: [debian-ntp] Bug#299572: ntp-server: strace log
Matthias Urlichs wrote: Hi, Beat Bolli: Package: ntp-server Version: 1:4.2.0a+stable-4 Followup-For: Bug #299572 Thanks. Please test whether -6 fixes this problem. Yes. It has been running without problems for a few minutes now. Hey, and I even found out about incoming.debian.org! People: If you're stracing a server, use strace -f -s 300 -o FILE PROGRAM, then send FILE as a (possibly gzipped) attachment unless you're very sure that your mail client doesn't word-wrap. Sorry, I had done so if I had known that reportbug can attach a file or use mutt to compose the mail... man pages are enlightening! Thanks for the fast fix! Beat Bolli -- mail: echo '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' | tr -d '[A-S]' pgp: 0x506A903A; 49D5 794A EA77 F907 764F D89E 304B 93CF 506A 903A gsm: 4.7.7.6.0.7.7.9.7.1.4.e164.arpa icbm: 47.0452 N, 7.2715 E It takes love over gold, and mind over matter -- Dire Straits signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#299572: [debian-ntp] Bug#299572: ntp-server: strace log
Matthias Urlichs wrote:
Hi,
Beat Bolli:
Package: ntp-server
Version: 1:4.2.0a+stable-4
Followup-For: Bug #299572
Thanks. Please test whether -6 fixes this problem.
People: If you're stracing a server, use strace -f -s 300 -o FILE PROGRAM,
then send FILE as a (possibly gzipped) attachment unless you're very
sure that your mail client doesn't word-wrap.
Otherwise (a) the fork() call will make your trace useless, (b) any
syslog strings or other important information the server writes will be
truncated, and/or (c) program output will be interspersed with strace
output, which makes analysis harder than necessary.
On my PowerBook it looks fine now!
I tried on one of the servers that has problems, and there, I still have
segfaults, while the mentioned cvs version works fine. I attach an strace.
Thinking again of this, I want to point out two things. First, this might
be a different story, namely the mentioned bug #272511. Second, this server
runs sarge with the last dist-upgrade probably several months back, because
it is difficult to take it down. So I am not sure of how much use this is
to you, because perhaps a dist-upgrade would fix the ntpd segfault.
Anyway, thanks a lot!
Harald Staub
2138 execve(/usr/sbin/ntpd, [/usr/sbin/ntpd, -n], [/* 28 vars */]) = 0
2138 uname({sys=Linux, node=ezmp1, ...}) = 0
2138 brk(0)= 0x8b3f000
2138 old_mmap(NULL, 4096, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1,
0) = 0x2004
2138 access(/etc/ld.so.nohwcap, F_OK) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
2138 open(/etc/ld.so.preload, O_RDONLY) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or
directory)
2138 open(/etc/ld.so.cache, O_RDONLY) = 3
2138 fstat64(3, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=25318, ...}) = 0
2138 old_mmap(NULL, 25318, PROT_READ, MAP_PRIVATE, 3, 0) = 0x20039000
2138 close(3) = 0
2138 access(/etc/ld.so.nohwcap, F_OK) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
2138 open(/lib/libm.so.6, O_RDONLY) = 3
2138 read(3, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
\0\7\0(\0\35\0\34\0\6\0\0\0004\0\0\0004\0\0\0004\0\0\0\340\0\0\0\340\0\0\0\5\0\0\0\4\0\0\0\3\0\0\0\30\5\2\0\30\5\2\0\30\5\2\0\23\0\0\0\23\0\0\0\4\0\0\0\1\0\0\0\1\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0+\5\2\0+\5\2\0\5\0\0\0\0\20\0\0\1\0\0\\5\2\\25\2\\25\2\0|\1\0\0\300\1\0\0\6\0\0\0\0\20\0\0\2\0\0\0`\5\2\0`\25\2\0`\25\2\0\340\0\0\0\340\0\0\0\6\0\0\0\4\0\0\0\4\0\0\0\24\1\0\0\24\1\0\0\24\1\0\0
\0\0\0
\0\0\0\4\0\0\0\4\0\0\0Q\345td\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\6\0\0\0\4\0\0\0\4\0\0\0\20\0\0...,
512) = 512
2138 fstat64(3, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=134464, ...}) = 0
2138 old_mmap(NULL, 136944, PROT_READ|PROT_EXEC, MAP_PRIVATE, 3, 0) = 0xdc1000
2138 old_mmap(0xde2000, 4096, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED, 3,
0x2) = 0xde2000
2138 close(3) = 0
2138 access(/etc/ld.so.nohwcap, F_OK) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
2138 open(/usr/lib/i686/cmov/libcrypto.so.0.9.7, O_RDONLY) = 3
2138 read(3,
\177ELF\1\1\1\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\3\0\3\0\1\0\0\0p\300\2\0004\0\0\0\220\262\17\0\0\0\0\0004\0
\0\5\0(\0\27\0\26\0\1\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\f\231\16\0\f\231\16\0\5\0\0\0\0\20\0\0\1\0\0\0\0\240\16\0\0\240\16\0\0\240\16\0\340\21\1\0\230L\1\0\6\0\0\0\0\20\0\0\2\0\0\0\30\254\17\0\30\254\17\0\30\254\17\0\330\0\0\0\330\0\0\0\6\0\0\0\4\0\0\0P\345td\360\230\16\0\360\230\16\0\360\230\16\0\34\0\0\0\34\0\0\0\4\0\0\0\4\0\0\0Q\345td\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\7\0\0\0\4\0\0\0\5\10\0\0\346\n\0\0\0\0\0\0\253\n\0\0\0\0\0\0;\7\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0E\7\0\0\221\n\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\363\6...,
512) = 512
2138 fstat64(3, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=1029672, ...}) = 0
2138 old_mmap(NULL, 1043608, PROT_READ|PROT_EXEC, MAP_PRIVATE, 3, 0) = 0x111000
2138 old_mmap(0x1fb000, 73728, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED, 3,
0xea000) = 0x1fb000
2138 old_mmap(0x20d000, 11416, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE,
MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0) = 0x20d000
2138 close(3) = 0
2138 access(/etc/ld.so.nohwcap, F_OK) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
2138 open(/lib/libcap.so.1, O_RDONLY) = 3
2138 read(3,
\177ELF\1\1\1\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\3\0\3\0\1\0\0\0\20\r\0\0004\0\0\0\240\'\0\0\0\0\0\0004\0
\0\4\0(\0\26\0\25\0\1\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\17%\0\0\17%\0\0\5\0\0\0\0\20\0\0\1\0\0\0
%\0\0 5\0\0
5\0\0\334\1\0\0004\4\0\0\6\0\0\0\0\20\0\0\2\0\0\0\270%\0\0\2705\0\0\2705\0\0\310\0\0\0\310\0\0\0\6\0\0\0\4\0\0\0Q\345td\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\6\0\0\0\4\0\0\0C\0\0\0F\0\0\0\0\0\0\0B\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0E\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0#\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0006\0\0\0007\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0=\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0001\0\0\0009\0\0\0\0\0\000...,
512) = 512
2138 fstat64(3, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=11024, ...}) = 0
2138 old_mmap(NULL, 4096, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1,
0) = 0x20038000
2138 old_mmap(NULL, 14676, PROT_READ|PROT_EXEC, MAP_PRIVATE, 3, 0) = 0x55b000
2138
Bug#267236: manpages-zh/cman
Hi Carlos, I didn't know your intension to adopt the package when I offered on debian-devel today. It seems you are already working on that, while I don't even know where the latest upstream release is, the links on the website [1] are broken. Where did you get the release? So, I will do nothing now, unless you need any help. By the way, Bastian Blank [EMAIL PROTECTED] offered to sponser the upload. You may contact him if necessary. [1] http://cmpp.linuxforum.net/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#299155: libnss-mysql: Causes segfault when running /usr/sbin/adduser
Quoting Mario Lipinski [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Package: libnss-mysql Version: 0.43-2 Followup-For: Bug #299155 i can confirm this bug and was able to track this down to a fault in the function getpwnam called by the adduser script. the function getgrnam shows same behaviour. i am experiencing the problem a long time now and looking forward to see this fixed soon. Hmm, Ok. Could you elaborate a little bit? I can fix the code but I would need to get some details. Do you know what is wrong? A lot of code is calling these functions, so it is clearly not an obvious bug. Otherwise everything would blow up. Guillaume. -- Guillaume Morin [EMAIL PROTECTED] This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#299811: checksecurity: Doesn't seem to install cleanly.
Package: checksecurity Version: 2.0.7-2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable I tried to install checksecurity today, and this is what I got: # apt-get install checksecurity Reading Package Lists... Done Building Dependency Tree... Done Suggested packages: apt-watch cron-apt Recommended packages: tripwire integrit aide samhain fcheck The following NEW packages will be installed: checksecurity 0 upgraded, 1 newly installed, 0 to remove and 121 not upgraded. Need to get 19.9kB of archives. After unpacking 168kB of additional disk space will be used. Get:1 http://http.us.debian.org unstable/main checksecurity 2.0.7-2 [19.9kB] Fetched 19.9kB in 0s (21.6kB/s) Preconfiguring packages ... Selecting previously deselected package checksecurity. (Reading database ... 200154 files and directories currently installed.) Unpacking checksecurity (from .../checksecurity_2.0.7-2_all.deb) ... Setting up checksecurity (2.0.7-2) ... dpkg: error processing checksecurity (--configure): subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1 Errors were encountered while processing: checksecurity E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) I haven't looked further into it, but if you need more information I'll happily provide it. Uwe. -- Uwe Hermann [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.hermann-uwe.de | http://www.crazy-hacks.org http://www.it-services-uh.de | http://www.phpmeat.org http://www.unmaintained-free-software.org | http://www.holsham-traders.de -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: tagging 299811
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10 tags 299811 sid Bug#299811: checksecurity: Doesn't seem to install cleanly. There were no tags set. Tags added: sid End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#299811: checksecurity bug
I was able to upgrade then purge, then reinstall sid's new checksecurity. So, I think it would be useful if you could make the postinst set -x and reconfigure it to point out where the problem is. Thanks, Justin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#265045: conflict
Couldn't you just use Replaces: unrar-nonfree? I'm not sure I understand this bug report though; are there two packages with the same name? Is there meant to be a seamless upgrade from unrar (nonfree) to unrar (free)? In that case, why can't one of the just be renamed? Justin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#299183: streamtuner workaround
Just as an aside, if you want to get streamtuner working again without waiting for an update, you can disable the python plugin by running the following and trying to start streamtuner again: echo /usr/lib/streamtuner/plugins/python.so ~/.streamtuner/disabled-plugins -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#299811: checksecurity bug
On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 01:21:34PM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote: I was able to upgrade then purge, then reinstall sid's new checksecurity. So, I think it would be useful if you could make the postinst set -x and reconfigure it to point out where the problem is. That might work too, but I suggested previously running the script through debconf with DEBUG on to see what's going on. Regards Javier -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#299814: GnuPG 1.2.5 selects wrong encryption keys
Package: gnupg
Version: 1.2.5-3
Severity: grave
Tags: woody, sarge, patch
Hi.
GnuPG 1.2.5 selects wrong encryption keys (e.g. for my key in the debian
keyring). Thus, data is encrypted irreversible, i.e. lost.
When discussed on debian-private in February, I was encouraged to file
this bug.
According to upstream, this is fixed by newer installments of the GnuPG
(=1.2.7 IIRC).
Simon Richter pointed out that a fix can be found with
cvs -d :pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvs/gnupg login
cvs -d :pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvs/gnupg rdiff -u \
-D'2004/11/29' -D'2004/11/30' gnupg
The attached patch is a version of the above rdiff that cleanly applies
to debianized source of gnupg 1.2.5-3 and with it applied gnupg packages
without this bug are build.
Kind regards
T.
P.S.: I really would like to see this bug fixed on db.debian.org (or
whereever ud-mailgate runs) and would happily try to come up with a
patch for the appropriate version of gnupg if that means that I can hope
to be able to read ud-mailgate's encrypted mails.
diff -urN gnupg-1.2.5~/g10/getkey.c gnupg-1.2.5/g10/getkey.c
--- gnupg-1.2.5~/g10/getkey.c 2004-05-01 11:19:03.0 +0200
+++ gnupg-1.2.5/g10/getkey.c 2005-03-16 19:15:52.0 +0100
@@ -1248,6 +1248,51 @@
}
}
+static int
+parse_key_usage(PKT_signature *sig)
+{
+ int key_usage=0;
+ const byte *p;
+ size_t n;
+ byte flags;
+
+ p=parse_sig_subpkt(sig-hashed,SIGSUBPKT_KEY_FLAGS,n);
+ if(p n)
+{
+ /* first octet of the keyflags */
+ flags=*p;
+
+ if(flags 3)
+ {
+ key_usage |= PUBKEY_USAGE_SIG;
+ flags=~3;
+ }
+
+ if(flags 12)
+ {
+ key_usage |= PUBKEY_USAGE_ENC;
+ flags=~12;
+ }
+
+ if(flags 0x20)
+ {
+ key_usage |= PUBKEY_USAGE_AUTH;
+ flags=~0x20;
+ }
+
+ if(flags)
+ key_usage |= PUBKEY_USAGE_UNKNOWN;
+}
+
+ /* We set PUBKEY_USAGE_UNKNOWN to indicate that this key has a
+ capability that we do not handle. This serves to distinguish
+ between a zero key usage which we handle as the default
+ capabilities for that algorithm, and a usage that we do not
+ handle. */
+
+ return key_usage;
+}
+
/*
* Apply information from SIGNODE (which is the valid self-signature
* associated with that UID) to the UIDNODE:
@@ -1280,17 +1325,7 @@
uid-expiredate = sig-expiredate;
/* store the key flags in the helper variable for later processing */
-uid-help_key_usage = 0;
-p = parse_sig_subpkt (sig-hashed, SIGSUBPKT_KEY_FLAGS, n );
-if ( p n ) {
-/* first octet of the keyflags */
-if ( (*p 3) )
-uid-help_key_usage |= PUBKEY_USAGE_SIG;
-if ( (*p 12) )
-uid-help_key_usage |= PUBKEY_USAGE_ENC;
-/* Note: we do not set the CERT flag here because it can be assumed
- * that thre is no real policy to set it. */
-}
+uid-help_key_usage=parse_key_usage(sig);
/* ditto or the key expiration */
uid-help_key_expire = 0;
@@ -1486,16 +1521,8 @@
*/
PKT_signature *sig = signode-pkt-pkt.signature;
const byte *p;
-size_t n;
-
-p = parse_sig_subpkt (sig-hashed, SIGSUBPKT_KEY_FLAGS, n );
-if ( p n ) {
-/* first octet of the keyflags */
-if ( (*p 3) )
-key_usage |= PUBKEY_USAGE_SIG;
-if ( (*p 12) )
-key_usage |= PUBKEY_USAGE_ENC;
-}
+
+ key_usage=parse_key_usage(sig);
p = parse_sig_subpkt (sig-hashed, SIGSUBPKT_KEY_EXPIRE, NULL);
if ( p ) {
@@ -1831,7 +1858,6 @@
u32 keytimestamp = 0;
u32 key_expire = 0;
const byte *p;
-size_t n;
if ( subnode-pkt-pkttype != PKT_PUBLIC_SUBKEY )
BUG ();
@@ -1890,14 +1916,7 @@
sig = signode-pkt-pkt.signature;
sig-flags.chosen_selfsig=1; /* so we know which selfsig we chose later */
-p = parse_sig_subpkt (sig-hashed, SIGSUBPKT_KEY_FLAGS, n );
-if ( p n ) {
-/* first octet of the keyflags */
-if ( (*p 3) )
-key_usage |= PUBKEY_USAGE_SIG;
-if ( (*p 12) )
-key_usage |= PUBKEY_USAGE_ENC;
-}
+key_usage=parse_key_usage(sig);
if ( !key_usage ) { /* no key flags at all: get it from the algo */
key_usage = openpgp_pk_algo_usage ( subpk-pubkey_algo );
}
diff -urN gnupg-1.2.5~/include/cipher.h gnupg-1.2.5/include/cipher.h
--- gnupg-1.2.5~/include/cipher.h 2003-12-03 11:10:16.0 +0100
+++ gnupg-1.2.5/include/cipher.h 2005-03-16 19:10:05.0 +0100
@@ -51,6 +51,8 @@
#define PUBKEY_USAGE_SIG 1 /* key is good for signatures */
#define PUBKEY_USAGE_ENC 2 /* key is good for encryption */
#define PUBKEY_USAGE_CERT4 /* key is also good to certify other keys*/
+#define PUBKEY_USAGE_AUTH8 /* key is good for authentication */
+#define PUBKEY_USAGE_UNKNOWN 128/* key has an unknown usage bit */
#define DIGEST_ALGO_MD5 1
#define DIGEST_ALGO_SHA1 2
Bug#299572: [debian-ntp] Bug#299572: ntp-server: strace log
Hi,
Harald Staub:
I tried on one of the servers that has problems, and there, I still have
segfaults, while the mentioned cvs version works fine. I attach an strace.
Gah.
Can you send me
- the output of ifconfig
- the contents of your ntp.conf
Thanks.
--
Matthias Urlichs | {M:U} IT Design @ m-u-it.de | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Bug#299722: Re : Re: Bug#299722: mldonkey-server does not start because of /var/run/mldonkey permissions
Hello, On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 08:15:48AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 08:11:00PM -0500, elias humbolt wrote: Package: mldonkey-server Version: 2.5.28-2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (600, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.10-1-686 Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Versions of packages mldonkey-server depends on: ii adduser 3.63 Add and remove users and groups ii debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.4.30.11Debian configuration management sy ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-20 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii mime-support3.28-1 MIME files 'mime.types' 'mailcap ii ucf 1.14 Update Configuration File: preserv ii zlib1g 1:1.2.2-3compression library - runtime -- debconf information: Several people in other bug reports have mentioned that /etc/init.d/mldonkey-server start does actually fail to start the server. Part of the problem might be that /var/lib/mldonkey is not actually generated on install, eventhough this dir is selected via dpkg. However, what sure is the case is the fact that /var/run/mldonkey is owned by root on install and the mldonkey-server init script simply is not able to write to it for some reason. I guess that might be because of chroot or running mldonkey by the mldonkey user. However, it is absolutely certain, that it starts after I set the ownership of the /var/run/mldonkey DIR to mldonkey user! Setting the group instead of the user to mldonkey might help as well. The other problems I still have are described in other bug reports, like the one that whatever I enter in debconf never makes it to the /etc/defaults/mldonkey-server file. I am not sure if /var/lib/mldonkey + files is actually created on first startup when set in defaults accordingly since I first thought it mldonkey does not start up for the reason of the dir + files not being there and therefore copied a working set over from another machine. I never removed it afterwards since I was so happy that it finally worked and fed up with dealing with it. I hope this bug report makes mldonkey-server usable again out of the box. (At least as soon as the startup value users set via debconf on install really makes it into the defaults file). We already talk about this issue, as far as i remember ( but it was not on a bug report ). I don't remenber if you answer my question : with which user do you launch the init script ? Concerning your options, i see that you have set up launch_at_startup to false ( see your debconf information ). It could explain why your script doesn't start. Regard Sylvain Le Gall The debconf information is not what is actually in /etc/defaults/mldonkey-server! Since debconf does not do what anybody would expect it to do, I had to edit everything by hand anyway. I start init as root, just like it would be started on init either. mldonkey however ist running as mldonkey users, as far as I remember. I found that behavior strange as well, but it is like that! If all config is right, the dir rights on /var/run/mldonkey still prevent the service from start!! I have investigated that very carefully. However, I did not investigate any code, since I was satisfied when it was finally running. It is not that strange actually. How could an mldonkey user write into a dir, that he has no rights for, well that does not even belong to its group. By the way, as it seems, mldonkey does not seem to run as mldonkey group either, since all files saved belong to group users!!! Just a question for my personnal information : is there already a mldonkey user ? ( because it could explain that mldonkey is running as mldonkey:user ). If so, i think the error in the debconf comes from the fact that no mldonkey user can be created ( in fact, we cannot create a mldonkey user with primary group mldonkey ). This could stop the debconf process. Regard Sylvain Le Gall ps : could you send me the output of getent passwd mldonkey command. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#289362: marked as done (capplets: gnome-settings-daemon dies repeatedly with SIGILL)
Your message dated Wed, 16 Mar 2005 14:33:04 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#289362: fixed in gstreamer0.8 0.8.9-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Jan 2005 18:10:43 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jan 08 10:10:43 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from bridge.oldelvet.org.uk (shirehall.home.oldelvet.org.uk) [194.106.37.22] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1CnL2w-0003iY-00; Sat, 08 Jan 2005 10:10:42 -0800 Received: from localhost.localdomain ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [192.168.1.201]) by shirehall.home.oldelvet.org.uk (8.13.2/8.13.2/Debian-1) with ESMTP id j08I9tlg007936 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Sat, 8 Jan 2005 18:09:56 GMT Received: from root by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.34) id 1CnL00-0001Co-EQ; Sat, 08 Jan 2005 18:07:40 + Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Richard Mortimer [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: capplets: gnome-settings-daemon dies repeatedly with SIGILL X-Mailer: reportbug 3.2 Date: Sat, 08 Jan 2005 18:07:39 + Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-oldelvet-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-MailScanner-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: capplets Version: 1:2.8.1-3 Severity: important I have just loaded Debian/testing on an old Cyrix P133+ based machine and when I attempted to start control-center I found that gnome-settings-daemon was continually crashing with a SIGILL. I got a backtrace from GDB which shows it was running libgstreamer-0.8.so.1 code and had executed a cpuid instruction. I'm presuming that this is either privileged or not-implemented on the cpu. (gdb) cont Continuing. Program received signal SIGILL, Illegal instruction. 0x40078a7e in _gst_cpu_initialize_none () from /usr/lib/libgstreamer-0.8.so.1 (gdb) where #0 0x40078a7e in _gst_cpu_initialize_none () from /usr/lib/libgstreamer-0.8.so.1 #1 0x40078b1e in _gst_cpu_initialize_i386 () from /usr/lib/libgstreamer-0.8.so.1 #2 0x400789b8 in _gst_cpu_initialize () from /usr/lib/libgstreamer-0.8.so.1 #3 0x4006cb6d in gst_init_check_with_popt_table () from /usr/lib/libgstreamer-0.8.so.1 #4 0x400c7846 in ?? () from /usr/lib/libgstreamer-0.8.so.1 #5 0x4006c500 in gst_init_check_with_popt_table () from /usr/lib/libgstreamer-0.8.so.1 #6 0x0245 in ?? () #7 0x in ?? () #8 0x400c8020 in ?? () from /usr/lib/libgstreamer-0.8.so.1 #9 0x400c7991 in ?? () from /usr/lib/libgstreamer-0.8.so.1 #10 0x4017238c in ?? () from /usr/lib/libgstreamer-0.8.so.1 #11 0xb414 in ?? () #12 0xb578 in ?? () #13 0x4006c4d1 in gst_init_check_with_popt_table () from /usr/lib/libgstreamer-0.8.so.1 #14 0x40c8cae3 in realloc () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6 Previous frame inner to this frame (corrupt stack?) (gdb) disassemble 0x40078a7e Dump of assembler code for function _gst_cpu_initialize_none: 0x40078a60 _gst_cpu_initialize_none+0:push %ebp 0x40078a61 _gst_cpu_initialize_none+1:xor%eax,%eax 0x40078a63 _gst_cpu_initialize_none+3:mov%esp,%ebp 0x40078a65 _gst_cpu_initialize_none+5:pop%ebp 0x40078a66 _gst_cpu_initialize_none+6:ret 0x40078a67 _gst_cpu_initialize_none+7:mov%esi,%esi 0x40078a69 _gst_cpu_initialize_none+9:lea0x0(%edi),%edi 0x40078a70 _gst_cpu_initialize_none+16: push %ebp 0x40078a71 _gst_cpu_initialize_none+17: mov%esp,%ebp 0x40078a73 _gst_cpu_initialize_none+19: sub$0x18,%esp 0x40078a76 _gst_cpu_initialize_none+22: mov %esi,0xfffc(%ebp) 0x40078a79 _gst_cpu_initialize_none+25: mov0x8(%ebp),%eax 0x40078a7c _gst_cpu_initialize_none+28: mov%ebx,%esi 0x40078a7e _gst_cpu_initialize_none+30: cpuid 0x40078a80 _gst_cpu_initialize_none+32: mov %eax,0xffe8(%ebp) 0x40078a83 _gst_cpu_initialize_none+35: mov %ebx,0xffec(%ebp) 0x40078a86 _gst_cpu_initialize_none+38: mov %ecx,0xfff0(%ebp) 0x40078a89 _gst_cpu_initialize_none+41: mov %edx,0xfff4(%ebp)
Bug#297981: marked as done (libapache2-mod-encoding: FTBFS: 'regex_t' undeclared (first use in this function))
Your message dated Thu, 17 Mar 2005 05:18:35 +0900 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line #297981 was fixed in NMU has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Mar 2005 19:48:45 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Mar 03 11:48:45 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from c223012.adsl.hansenet.de (localhost.localdomain) [213.39.223.12] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D6wJQ-00033D-00; Thu, 03 Mar 2005 11:48:45 -0800 Received: from aj by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.44) id 1D6xFk-00074O-Sg; Thu, 03 Mar 2005 21:49:00 +0100 To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Andreas Jochens [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: libapache2-mod-encoding: FTBFS: 'regex_t' undeclared (first use in this function) Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2005 21:49:00 +0100 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: libapache2-mod-encoding Severity: serious Tags: patch When trying to build 'libapache2-mod-encoding', I get the following error: /usr/bin/libtool --silent --mode=compile gcc -prefer-pic -pipe -I/usr/include/xmltok -I/usr/include/openssl -Wall -O2 -DAP_HAVE_DESIGNATED_INITIALIZER -DLINUX=2 -D_REENTRANT -D_XOPEN_SOURCE=500 -D_BSD_SOURCE -D_SVID_SOURCE -D_GNU_SOURCE -pipe -I/usr/include/xmltok -I/usr/include/openssl -Wall -O2 -pthread -I/usr/include/apache2 -I/usr/include/apr-0 -I/usr/include/apr-0 -I/usr/include -c -o mod_encoding.lo mod_encoding.c touch mod_encoding.slo mod_encoding.c: In function 'iconv_header': mod_encoding.c:192: warning: implicit declaration of function 'apr_pstrdup' mod_encoding.c:192: warning: assignment makes pointer from integer without a cast mod_encoding.c:193: warning: passing argument 2 of 'ap_getword' from incompatible pointer type mod_encoding.c:199: warning: implicit declaration of function 'apr_pstrcat' mod_encoding.c:199: warning: passing argument 2 of 'ap_parse_uri' makes pointer from integer without a cast mod_encoding.c: In function 'get_client_encoding': mod_encoding.c:236: warning: assignment makes pointer from integer without a cast mod_encoding.c:243: error: 'regex_t' undeclared (first use in this function) mod_encoding.c:243: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once mod_encoding.c:243: error: for each function it appears in.) mod_encoding.c:243: error: syntax error before ')' token With the attached patch 'libapache2-mod-encoding' can be compiled. Regards Andreas Jochens diff -urN ../tmp-orig/libapache2-mod-encoding-20040616/mod_encoding.c ./mod_encoding.c --- ../tmp-orig/libapache2-mod-encoding-20040616/mod_encoding.c 2004-06-15 17:52:25.0 +0200 +++ ./mod_encoding.c2005-03-03 21:46:34.162465697 +0100 @@ -68,6 +68,7 @@ */ +#include regex.h #include httpd.h #include http_config.h #include http_core.h --- Received: (at 297981-done) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Mar 2005 20:18:36 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Mar 16 12:18:36 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from 229.9.111.219.st.bbexcite.jp (tempest.nemui.org) [219.111.9.229] (foobar) by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DBeyR-0006o1-00; Wed, 16 Mar 2005 12:18:35 -0800 Received: (qmail 11953 invoked from network); 17 Mar 2005 05:18:36 +0900 Received: from unknown (HELO tempest.nemui.org) (192.168.51.1) by tempest.private.nemui.org with SMTP; 17 Mar 2005 05:18:36 +0900 Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2005 05:18:35 +0900 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Tatsuki Sugiura [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: #297981 was fixed in NMU In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] References: [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.11.30 (Wonderwall) SEMI/1.14.6 (Maruoka) FLIM/1.14.6 (Marutamachi) APEL/10.6 Emacs/21.3 (i386-pc-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (=?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCOC1MWhsoQg==?=) X-Face: %#SbsX5Ajq`)JKPGXyq8Cn6`M~n\?,}`vYU7[}gM!q_K=\v6[}y8R:Dy3O0Ymmw$@T $Ys$^Tw8ghB'uxX)I(n_x\5RQ|s'D0m$,I^\S X-GPG-Fingerprint: C4BC EDCC 50B2 2D7B 4A85 4A13 6CAD 85CE 4502 FDC2 X-Public-Key: http://pgp.nic.ad.jp:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0x4502FDC2 X-GPG-KeyID: 4502FDC2 MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 -
Bug#299589: marked as done (per-plugin group directive apparently ignored)
Your message dated Wed, 16 Mar 2005 16:02:54 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#299589: fixed in munin 1.2.2-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Mar 2005 08:16:02 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 15 00:16:02 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from chardonnay.math.bme.hu [152.66.83.144] ([IFGT7g3C9CRIybKXTspyguR7fp0czku/]) by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DB7Dd-0003a1-00; Tue, 15 Mar 2005 00:16:01 -0800 Received: (qmail 18204 invoked by uid 1000); 15 Mar 2005 08:15:58 - Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2005 09:15:58 +0100 From: Andras Korn [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: per-plugin group directive apparently ignored Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2 Content-Disposition: inline X-Reportbug-Version: 3.7.1 Organization: Technical University of Budapest, Department of Calculus User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: munin-node Version: 1.2.2-2 Severity: normal Hi, I have a /etc/munin/plugin-conf.d/entropy file which reads: [entropy] user root group proc Originally it just had group proc, because: dr-xr-x--- 11 root proc 0 Mar 15 09:10 /proc/sys (/proc/sys is only accessible to root and to group proc on my ststem). I recently noticed that this no longer worked; the entropy plugin couldn't read the entropy_avail file. I added an 'id' command to the plugin, and noticed the following: # telnet localhost 4949 Trying 127.0.0.1... Connected to localhost. Escape character is '^]'. # munin node at name-of-box fetch entropy #uid=0(root) gid=183(munin) groups=183(munin) entropy.value 16814 . Note how it is not a member of the proc group. The situation is the same if I remove user root (obviously it runs as a different uid then, but still no group proc). Naturally, a large number of other plugins are affected as well. This used to work before and got broken recently. Alas, I can't say exactly when. Andras -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=hu_HU (charmap=ISO-8859-2) Versions of packages munin-node depends on: ii libnet-server-perl0.87-2 An extensible, general perl server ii perl 5.8.4-5Larry Wall's Practical Extraction ii procps1:3.2.5-1 /proc file system utilities -- no debconf information -- Andras Korn korn at chardonnay.math.bme.hu http://chardonnay.math.bme.hu/~korn/ QOTD: Computer Lie #1: You'll never use all that disk space. --- Received: (at 299589-close) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Mar 2005 21:09:37 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Mar 16 13:09:36 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DBflo-0006vd-00; Wed, 16 Mar 2005 13:09:36 -0800 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DBffK-0002wg-00; Wed, 16 Mar 2005 16:02:54 -0500 From: Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsaker [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $ Subject: Bug#299589: fixed in munin 1.2.2-3 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2005 16:02:54 -0500 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Source: munin Source-Version: 1.2.2-3 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of munin, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: munin-node_1.2.2-3_all.deb to pool/main/m/munin/munin-node_1.2.2-3_all.deb munin_1.2.2-3.diff.gz to pool/main/m/munin/munin_1.2.2-3.diff.gz munin_1.2.2-3.dsc to
Bug#299157: aspseek-libmysqldb must be rebuilt against libmysqlclient12
On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 04:37:03PM +0100, Jeremiah Foster wrote: Can you tell me if this project has been orphaned? I cannot reach the developer, check out from CVS, etc. If it has not been orphaned, may I orphan it? Orphaning Debian packages is handled through the QA team (debian-qa@lists.debian.org). -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer Steve Langasek wrote: Package: aspseek-libmysqldb Version: 1.2.10-1.1 Severity: grave Packages connected to apache and scripting languages (python/perl/php/ruby) are in the process of transitioning from libmysqlclient10 to libmysqlclient12 for sarge. Because libmysqlclient does not include versioned symbols, it is not possible for multiple versions of this library to be loaded by a process without causing segfaults. Since aspseek-libmysqldb will be loaded by apache processes that may also have loaded libmysqlclient12, this is therefore a grave bug in aspseek-libmysqldb. Please rebuild aspseek-libmysqldb against libmysqlclient12 by updating your build depends to point to libmysqlclient12-dev. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#299734: broken on 64-bit systems
Peter, Actually, the only bad thing I noticed is incorrect file I/O. User interface works pretty fine and stable. So I believe it will not hard to fix goldedplus for 64-bit system. One just need to carefully inspect parameters of all fseek/lseek/fread/fwrite/etc. calls. As of FIDO, it's pretty still alive in xUSSR. ;) Max Peter Karlsson wrote: Max Alekseyev: There are multiple problems with goldedplus on 64-bit systems such as segfaults (see bug 251856 as well) and hanling data files. Yeah, this probably is the same problem as in bug 251856. The program was simply not designed for 64-bit systems. I should probably just exclude the 64-bit architectures from the supported systems list, until such a time when 64-bit support is added (which is unlikely given that the project is quite dead, much like Fidonet itself). -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Bug#299498: Only grave on unstable
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 299498 + sid Bug#299498: valgrind-callgrind: undefined symbol: vgPlain_register_compact_helper There were no tags set. Tags added: sid thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#299498: Only grave on unstable
tags 299498 + sid thanks Dear Bruce Am Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 02:49:41PM + hat Bruce Stephens getippert: My apologies. I hadn't noticed that this same version is used in testing, too. Probably the package works fine with the valgrind in testing, and is only broken in unstable. This is indeed the case. And as I can tell from earlier occurences of the same problem, a recompile against the newest valgrind should suffice. However, my first try did not succeed as valgrind has changed some paths in the packaging or is missing some include files. I will look into this problem later...or maybe you have time, knowledge and feel like looking into it? Regards -- Philipp | work: [EMAIL PROTECTED] +41 1 802 20 00 Frauenfelder | home: [EMAIL PROTECTED] +41 1 862 73 14 [PGP]| http://www.frauenfelder-kuerner.ch/ Proudly running Debian GNU/Linux. See http://www.debian.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#263979: userv FTBFS
Santiago Vila writes (Bug#263979: userv FTBFS): Alternatively, you could rewrite debian/rules so that it does not use bashisms. With a little bit of care, debian/rules does not become a lot longer. (Sorry for the delay replying.) Your patch does make it longer, and I don't think that build-time speed is worth sacrificing clarity and brevity for. But you say: It could be made even shorter if you use install -m 755 for the maintainer scripts instead of cp followed by chmod. and you are right. I'll update the scripts to use install as I come across them. Ian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#296514: Cervisia again, plus greater problems
Hi, It's me writing about Cervisia licensing again. We still haven't heard back from Bernd Gehrmann at this stage, which means there's not really much that we can do. AFAICT he hasn't been around for a few years now; does anyone know of a way that we might be able to contact him? I've already tried a few other email addresses but to no avail. (For those who missed the initial post: http://lists.kde.org/?t=11092988861r=1w=2 ) On further examination, there does also seem to be a greater worry regarding the QPL licensing, which is other GPLed applications that use cervisia. I had initially thought that this was not a problem, since the cvsservice that sits beneath cervisia is LGPLed (this is why I didn't mention this issue earlier). However, further examination shows that the cervisia kpart does in fact contain a fair amount of QPLed code. Given that the QPL is GPL-incompatible, this raises issues for GPLed programs that wish to use this kpart. I believe this at least includes quanta and kdevelop (unless I'm mistaken). It would seem to me then that the current options are: (i) try harder to get in touch with Bernd Gehrmann, or (ii) alter the kdevelop and quanta licenses to explicitly allow use of the QPLed cervisia part. Though IMHO (i) would be preferable, since (ii) involves many more people and still raises issues for any other GPLed code that kdevelop and/or quanta might be linked with. CCing the kdevelop and kdewebdev lists also. Ben. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#299811: checksecurity: Doesn't seem to install cleanly.
Hi, On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 07:47:24PM +0100, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote: Yes, please, I cannot reproduce this. Can you please do this? # export DEBCONF_DEBUG=developer # apt-get install --reinstall checksecurity Reinstalling works without errors. I did some debugging and came up with a patch. The problem is this snippet in postinst: if [ ! -d /var/log/setuid ]; then mkdir -m 750 /var/log/setuid chown root:adm /var/log/setuid || true for file in /var/log/setuid.yesterday /var/log/setuid.today /var/log/setuid.changes \ /var/log/setuid.changes.*; do [ -e $file ] mv $file /var/log/setuid done fi The [ -e $file ] has a return code of 1 if the given files don't exist. This return code seems to become the return code of the whole postinst script, later. Here's my proposed fix, which works for me (tm): --- postinst2005-03-16 23:27:57.0 +0100 +++ postinst.new2005-03-16 23:28:26.0 +0100 @@ -19,7 +19,9 @@ chown root:adm /var/log/setuid || true for file in /var/log/setuid.yesterday /var/log/setuid.today /var/log/setuid.changes \ /var/log/setuid.changes.*; do - [ -e $file ] mv $file /var/log/setuid + if [ -e $file ]; then + mv $file /var/log/setuid + fi done fi HTH, Uwe. -- Uwe Hermann [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.hermann-uwe.de | http://www.crazy-hacks.org http://www.it-services-uh.de | http://www.phpmeat.org http://www.unmaintained-free-software.org | http://www.holsham-traders.de
Bug#299753: marked as done (Broken build-depends)
Your message dated Wed, 16 Mar 2005 17:47:15 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#299753: fixed in control-center 1:2.8.2-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Mar 2005 06:17:31 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 15 22:17:31 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from 220pc220.sshunet.nl (mordor.wolffelaar.nl) [145.97.220.220] (Debian-exim) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DBRqV-0005rx-00; Tue, 15 Mar 2005 22:17:31 -0800 Received: from jeroen by mordor.wolffelaar.nl with local (Exim 4.44) id 1DBRX6-0003yK-DZ for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 16 Mar 2005 06:57:33 +0100 Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2005 06:57:25 +0100 From: Jeroen van Wolffelaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Broken build-depends Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Reportbug-Version: 3.8 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: control-center Severity: serious The control-center build depends now contain, amongst others: libasound2-dev (= 1.0.3b-1) [] This is invalid syntax in the control file, and does not what you expect it to do -- most tools will consider this as a no-op, and not demand this package to be installed. Also, this invalid syntax breaks at least one archive tool (not too serious, but whatever). --Jeroen -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-686 Locale: LANG=nl_NL.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=nl_NL.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) -- Jeroen van Wolffelaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://jeroen.A-Eskwadraat.nl --- Received: (at 299753-close) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Mar 2005 22:53:10 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Mar 16 14:53:10 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DBhO2-0002Q2-00; Wed, 16 Mar 2005 14:53:10 -0800 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DBhIJ-V9-00; Wed, 16 Mar 2005 17:47:15 -0500 From: Sebastien Bacher [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $ Subject: Bug#299753: fixed in control-center 1:2.8.2-2 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2005 17:47:15 -0500 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.8 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS, HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Source: control-center Source-Version: 1:2.8.2-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of control-center, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: capplets-data_2.8.2-2_all.deb to pool/main/c/control-center/capplets-data_2.8.2-2_all.deb capplets_2.8.2-2_i386.deb to pool/main/c/control-center/capplets_2.8.2-2_i386.deb control-center_2.8.2-2.diff.gz to pool/main/c/control-center/control-center_2.8.2-2.diff.gz control-center_2.8.2-2.dsc to pool/main/c/control-center/control-center_2.8.2-2.dsc gnome-control-center_2.8.2-2_i386.deb to pool/main/c/control-center/gnome-control-center_2.8.2-2_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Sebastien Bacher [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated control-center package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2005 23:29:27 +0100
Bug#298473: marked as done (fwanalog violates debconf specification)
Your message dated Wed, 16 Mar 2005 17:47:31 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#298473: fixed in fwanalog 0.6.4-5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Mar 2005 19:23:52 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Mar 07 11:23:52 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from pie.crustynet.org.uk [217.147.177.118] (postfix) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D8NpY-0005ME-00; Mon, 07 Mar 2005 11:23:52 -0800 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pie.crustynet.org.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56DAA1384A for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 7 Mar 2005 19:23:50 + (GMT) Received: from pie.crustynet.org.uk ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (pie [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 08383-06 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 7 Mar 2005 19:23:47 + (GMT) Received: from campfire.crustynet.org.uk (unknown [10.8.0.6]) by pie.crustynet.org.uk (Postfix) with SMTP id DDED513849 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 7 Mar 2005 19:23:46 + (GMT) Received: (nullmailer pid 2041 invoked by uid 1000); Mon, 07 Mar 2005 19:04:08 - Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Chris Butler [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: fwanalog violates debconf specification X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8 Date: Mon, 07 Mar 2005 19:04:08 + Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at crustynet.org.uk Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: fwanalog Version: 0.6.4-4 Severity: serious fwanalog fails to preconfigure during a fresh installation with the following error message. Preconfiguring packages ... /tmp/fwanalog.config.37833: line 10: /etc/fwanalog/debian_config: No such file or directory fwanalog failed to preconfigure, with exit status 1 A quick look at the config script shows that it is attempting to write configuration data to the file /etc/fwanalog/debian_config. However, this is the job of the postinst script, not the config script. All the config script is meant to do is ask the questions for the postinst to act upon. Please see debconf-devel(7) for more information. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: mipsel (mips) Kernel: Linux 2.4.27 Locale: LANG=en_GB, LC_CTYPE=en_GB (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Versions of packages fwanalog depends on: ii analog 2:5.32-12 analyzes logfiles from web servers ii coreutils5.2.1-2 The GNU core utilities ii debconf 1.4.30.11 Debian configuration management sy ii grep 2.5.1.ds1-4 GNU grep, egrep and fgrep ii gzip 1.3.5-9 The GNU compression utility ii mailx1:8.1.2-0.20040524cvs-4 A simple mail user agent ii perl 5.8.4-6 Larry Wall's Practical Extraction -- debconf information: * fwanalog/cron: true * fwanalog/language: us * fwanalog/mailto: root --- Received: (at 298473-close) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Mar 2005 23:00:40 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Mar 16 15:00:40 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DBhVH-0004nt-00; Wed, 16 Mar 2005 15:00:40 -0800 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DBhIZ-Vu-00; Wed, 16 Mar 2005 17:47:31 -0500 From: Emanuele Rocca [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $ Subject: Bug#298473: fixed in fwanalog 0.6.4-5 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2005 17:47:31 -0500 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Bug#299846: openslp: Several non-descript buffer overflows and out-of-bounds memory access
Package: openslp Severity: grave Tags: security Justification: user security hole SuSE Security has found several buffer overflows and out-of-memory access possibilities during a code audit. Neither the original SuSE nor the Mandrake advisory contain detailed information, openslp.org lacks usable information as well, but as both SuSE and Mandrake issued advisories the problem seems to require further evaluation. I couldn't find a CAN assignment yet. Cheers, Moritz -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.11 Locale: LANG=C, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#296514: [quanta-devel] Cervisia again, plus greater problems
Hi, On Thursday 17 March 2005 00:22, Ben Burton wrote: It's me writing about Cervisia licensing again. We still haven't heard back from Bernd Gehrmann at this stage, which means there's not really much that we can do. I know that Bernd was about to change his job some months ago, but I can try to conact him on the mail addresses I know of. AFAICT he hasn't been around for a few years now; does anyone know of a way that we might be able to contact him? I met him ~1.5 years ago personally and we exchanged some personal mails during the last year as well, so as I said I will try to contact him. Given that the QPL is GPL-incompatible, this raises issues for GPLed programs that wish to use this kpart. I believe this at least includes quanta and kdevelop (unless I'm mistaken). I don't think that using a GPL incompatible KPart in a GPL application is a problem. It may be at the corner case, but this is more like writing a GPL frontend to a non-GPL application. Also KParts are usually not a hard requirement, so embedding application are working fine without them as well. Using the Cervisia DCOP services which requires inclusion and link against it might be real problem though, but as far as I know both Quanta and KDevelop can be compiled without the CVS part that requires the Cervisia DCOP services. Quanta can be for sure. ;-) Though IMHO (i) would be preferable, since (ii) involves many more people and still raises issues for any other GPLed code that kdevelop and/or quanta might be linked with. We cannot change the license for the whole Quanta due to its nature (some developers left the project and went commercial...), but it IS possible to change the part of the code that uses the Cervisia part and DCOP services. The first was written by a developer who is no longer active, but I'm sure reachable and cooperative, and myself, the part using the DCOP services was entirely written by myself. I'm not sure if it's enough to change the license only for these parts of the code though. Andras -- Quanta Plus developer - http://quanta.sourceforge.net K Desktop Environment - http://www.kde.org pgpfH83IGRYig.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#298039: this bug is overdue..
This bug has been marked pending for 8 days. I hope an upload can be made soon. -- see shy jo signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#299857: missing fix for CAN-2005-0385 in unstable
Package: luxman Severity: grave Tags: security DSA-693-1 claimed that the security hole CAN-2005-0385 was fixed in unstable in luxman 0.41-20, but it's been two days and I do not see that version has been uploaded. Some details on the hole from the DSA: Kevin Finisterre discovered a buffer overflow in luxman, an SVGA based PacMan clone, that could lead to the execution of arbitrary commands as root. For the stable distribution (woody) this problem has been fixed in version 0.41-17.2. For the unstable distribution (sid) this problem has been fixed in version 0.41-20. We recommend that you upgrade your luxman package. Additional details were posted on bugtraq, but I don't have an url handy. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.4.27 Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages luxman depends on: ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-20 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libgcc1 1:3.4.3-12 GCC support library ii libstdc++5 1:3.3.5-12 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 ii libsvga1 [svgalibg1]1:1.4.3-21 console SVGA display libraries -- see shy jo signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#298039: this bug is overdue..
On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 06:28:42PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote: This bug has been marked pending for 8 days. I hope an upload can be made soon. I've been waiting on the security team to do an upload for stable. However, you are correct. I'll upload the fixed version for unstable this evening. -- gram -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#299865: CAN-2005-0736: Boundary condition error in sys_epoll_wait
Package: kernel-source-2.6.8 Version: 2.6.8-13 Severity: critical Justification: root security hole There is a local integer overflow vulnerability in the sys_epoll_wait() call. See following for detail: http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/12763/ Apologies if already reported. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#299770: confirm
I can confirm that this problem exists with a fresh install. Justin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#299811: marked as done (checksecurity: Doesn't seem to install cleanly.)
Your message dated Wed, 16 Mar 2005 19:47:06 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#299811: fixed in checksecurity 2.0.7-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Mar 2005 17:55:27 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Mar 16 09:55:27 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from (phpmeat.org) [193.151.7.193] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DBcjv-0005SW-00; Wed, 16 Mar 2005 09:55:27 -0800 Received: from aragorn (dsl-084-056-012-194.arcor-ip.net [84.56.12.194]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by phpmeat.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E91EFA3B for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 16 Mar 2005 18:55:24 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2005 18:55:27 +0100 From: Uwe Hermann [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: checksecurity: Doesn't seem to install cleanly. Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Reportbug-Version: 3.8 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: checksecurity Version: 2.0.7-2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable I tried to install checksecurity today, and this is what I got: # apt-get install checksecurity Reading Package Lists... Done Building Dependency Tree... Done Suggested packages: apt-watch cron-apt Recommended packages: tripwire integrit aide samhain fcheck The following NEW packages will be installed: checksecurity 0 upgraded, 1 newly installed, 0 to remove and 121 not upgraded. Need to get 19.9kB of archives. After unpacking 168kB of additional disk space will be used. Get:1 http://http.us.debian.org unstable/main checksecurity 2.0.7-2 [19.9kB] Fetched 19.9kB in 0s (21.6kB/s) Preconfiguring packages ... Selecting previously deselected package checksecurity. (Reading database ... 200154 files and directories currently installed.) Unpacking checksecurity (from .../checksecurity_2.0.7-2_all.deb) ... Setting up checksecurity (2.0.7-2) ... dpkg: error processing checksecurity (--configure): subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1 Errors were encountered while processing: checksecurity E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) I haven't looked further into it, but if you need more information I'll happily provide it. Uwe. -- Uwe Hermann [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.hermann-uwe.de | http://www.crazy-hacks.org http://www.it-services-uh.de | http://www.phpmeat.org http://www.unmaintained-free-software.org | http://www.holsham-traders.de --- Received: (at 299811-close) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Mar 2005 01:18:51 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Mar 16 17:18:51 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DBjf1-0004DG-00; Wed, 16 Mar 2005 17:18:51 -0800 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DBjAI-0007uW-00; Wed, 16 Mar 2005 19:47:06 -0500 From: Javier Fernandez-Sanguino Pen~a [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $ Subject: Bug#299811: fixed in checksecurity 2.0.7-3 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2005 19:47:06 -0500 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Source: checksecurity Source-Version: 2.0.7-3 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of checksecurity, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: checksecurity_2.0.7-3.diff.gz to pool/main/c/checksecurity/checksecurity_2.0.7-3.diff.gz checksecurity_2.0.7-3.dsc to pool/main/c/checksecurity/checksecurity_2.0.7-3.dsc checksecurity_2.0.7-3_all.deb to
Bug#299875: ppp: out-of-memory 30min after LCP terminated by peer
Package: ppp Version: 2.4.2+20040428-6 Severity: critical Justification: breaks the whole system hello pppeople, i've encountered serious problems with pppd and days of monitoring the issues lead me to the assumption that pppd is to blame. feel free to tell me otherwise and i'll happily forward the problem to the right people - because i am not guru enough to fix it. the problem in short: i am using pppd with pppoe (ADSL dialup) i get disconnected by my ISP once a day and pppd receives LCP terminated by peer then. normally pppd will reconnect and the box would be online again. this does not happen anymore, instead 30min after disconnect all RAM is chewed up by *something* (still don't know by what, please read on) and OOM killer kicks in, killing almost every application. i have reported the issue to the linux-kernel mailinglist first, because i thought it was a kernel issue: http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/3/8/173 http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/3/10/109 maybe the replies are noteworthy too. yesterday i hit the issue again, with more (hopefully helpful) details: http://www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0503.2/0316.html again, the time between LCP terminated by peer to the first OOM messages are (alsmost exactly) 30min. when this happens, i am usually not around, so when i get to the machine, OOM has already happened. i can recover the machine (no reboot, but SYSRQ-E) and i have to kill -9 pppd, anything else does not work: http://nerdbynature.de/bits/sheep/2.6.11/oom/pppd.log (Terminating on signal 15 does not work, +++ killed by SIGKILL +++ is the only choice.) i first noticed this behaviour with a new kernel, namely 2.6.11, but downgrading to a former (stable for me) kernel (2.6.11-rc5-bk2) did not help. instead, i downgraded from pppd-2.4.3-20041231+2 to ppp-2.4.2+20040428-6 and got rid of the problem! 2.4.3 was uploaded on 26.02.2005, and a couple of days later i switched to a new kernel and did a apt-get upgrade. that could be the cause, i suspected kernel issues first. have a look at http://nerdbynature.de/bits/sheep/2.6.11/oom/ for further details, feel free to ask. i still did not manage to reproduce the problem by hand, e.g. by setting up a pppoe server on the same machine, connecting with pppd call... and killing the pppoe server (in the hope that it might send LCP terminated by peer to the pppd). thank you for your time, Christian. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.11.3 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Versions of packages ppp depends on: ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-20 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libpam-modules 0.76-22 Pluggable Authentication Modules f ii libpam-runtime 0.76-22 Runtime support for the PAM librar ii libpam0g0.76-22 Pluggable Authentication Modules l ii libpcap0.7 0.7.2-7 System interface for user-level pa ii libssl0.9.7 0.9.7e-3 SSL shared libraries ii makedev 2.3.1-76 creates device files in /dev ii netbase 4.20 Basic TCP/IP networking system ii procps 1:3.2.5-1/proc file system utilities -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#299572: init script bug
There is a small mistake in the new package that makes this bug not fully closed. You have missed to add -u $UGID for restart in the init script. Other than that 4.2.0a+stable-6 works fine for me, good work! /Pär --- ntp-server 2005-03-15 23:40:18.0 + +++ ntp-server 2005-03-17 01:29:45.0 + @@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ echo -n Restarting NTP server: ntpd... start-stop-daemon --stop --quiet --pidfile /var/run/ntpd.pid sleep 2 - start-stop-daemon --start --quiet --exec /usr/sbin/ntpd -- -p /var/run/ntpd.pid + start-stop-daemon --start --quiet --exec /usr/sbin/ntpd -- -p /var/run/ntpd.pid -u $UGID echo done. ;; reload)
Bug#299762: jadetex: Does not preserve user changes upon upgrade
Hi. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Frank Küster) Subject: Bug#299762: jadetex: Does not preserve user changes upon upgrade Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2005 09:18:52 +0100 Every time the postinst is called with configure, be it upon upgrade, install after remove, or dpkg-reconfigure, the file /etc/texmf/fmt.d/40jadetex.cnf is restored. If the file is deleted or renamed by adding an additional suffix, it is restored. This violates Policy 10.7.3, , | Configuration file handling must conform to the following behavior: | | * local changes must be preserved during a package upgrade, ` The attached patch fixes this behavior. 40jadetex.cnf is made a conffile, and just left on the system when jadetex is removed, but not purged. fmtutil has no problem with this, it simply ignores formats in fmtutil.cnf for which the ini files cannot be found. O.K. I'll do so. I'll work this weekend, including your patches in other reports. Thanks. OHURA Makoto: [EMAIL PROTECTED](Debian Project) [EMAIL PROTECTED](LILO/Netfort) GnuPG public key: http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~ohura/gpg.asc.txt 1024D/77DCE083 fingerprint: 54F6 D1B1 2EE1 81CD 65E3 A1D3 EEA2 EFA2 77DC E083 http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~ohura/ pgpvUH32anaSN.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#298039: marked as done (xli: Multiple security problems in xli)
Your message dated Wed, 16 Mar 2005 21:47:30 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#298039: fixed in xli 1.17.0-17 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Mar 2005 08:53:15 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Mar 04 00:53:15 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.186] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D78Yd-00089v-00; Fri, 04 Mar 2005 00:53:15 -0800 Received: from bitz8.bitz.briteline.de[195.90.9.8] (helo=anton) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de with ESMTP (Nemesis), id 0MKwpI-1D78Yc17fi-0006L6; Fri, 04 Mar 2005 09:53:14 +0100 Received: by anton (Postfix, from userid 2028) id C6C4FB6EC4; Fri, 4 Mar 2005 09:53:13 +0100 (CET) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: =?iso-8859-15?q?Moritz_M=C3=BChlenhoff?= [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: xli: Multiple security problems in xli X-Mailer: reportbug 2.26.1.1.200308291454 Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2005 09:53:13 +0100 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Provags-ID: kundenserver.de [EMAIL PROTECTED] login:4ad79d65ac46f2345c6ef2e856c1d9ef Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: xli Version: 1.17.0-16 (not installed) Severity: grave Justification: user security hole [Cc:ing security, as Woody should be affected as well] Multiple security problems in xli have been found by the Gentoo Security folks: 1. Shell meta characters are inaccurately escaped in compressed images 2. A buffer overflow in Faces Project images parsing allows execution of arbitrary code. 3. Insufficient validation of image properties in xli could potentially result in buffer management errors (no further information given wrt the impact of this vulnerability) Fixes: All problems have been fixed in the latest xli (which doesn't have overly many differences to the version in sid): Sun Feb 27 15:16:08 PST 2005 Fix a security problem in the faces loader, a security problem when opening compressed files, and check for integer overflows in image data size calculations. Note: There does only seem to be a CAN assignment for the faces overflow, (CAN-2001-0775), not for the remaining issues. Could anyone from the security team please request one? Cheers, Moritz -- Moritz Muehlenhoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] fon: +49 421 22 232- 0 DevelopmentLinux for Your Business fax: +49 421 22 232-99 Univention GmbHhttp://www.univention.de/ mobil: +49 175 22 999 23 -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.0 Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux anton 2.4.29-univention.1 #1 SMP Thu Jan 27 17:08:46 CET 2005 i686 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Received: (at 298039-close) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Mar 2005 03:10:13 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Mar 16 19:10:13 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DBlMI-0007kK-00; Wed, 16 Mar 2005 19:07:38 -0800 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DBl2o-00070m-00; Wed, 16 Mar 2005 21:47:30 -0500 From: Graham Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $ Subject: Bug#298039: fixed in xli 1.17.0-17 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2005 21:47:30 -0500 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Source: xli Source-Version: 1.17.0-17 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of xli, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: xli_1.17.0-17.diff.gz to pool/main/x/xli/xli_1.17.0-17.diff.gz xli_1.17.0-17.dsc to pool/main/x/xli/xli_1.17.0-17.dsc xli_1.17.0-17_powerpc.deb to pool/main/x/xli/xli_1.17.0-17_powerpc.deb A
Bug#267236: manpages-zh/cman
On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 04:48:44PM +, Qingning Huo wrote: Hi Carlos, I didn't know your intension to adopt the package when I offered on debian-devel today. It seems you are already working on that, while I don't even know where the latest upstream release is, the links on the website [1] are broken. Where did you get the release? Yes, the website was dead for some days, but it's back now. So, I will do nothing now, unless you need any help. By the way, Bastian Blank [EMAIL PROTECTED] offered to sponser the upload. You may contact him if necessary. Thanks. -- Best Regards, Carlos -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Patch to fix this problem
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 298600 + patch Bug#298600: copyright file refers to LGPL 2.1, but points to LGPL-2 file There were no tags set. Tags added: patch The attached patch fixes this problem and is the contents of the NMU Unknown command or malformed arguments to command. that I will be doing shortly. Unknown command or malformed arguments to command. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#298600: Patch to fix this problem
tag 298600 + patch The attached patch fixes this problem and is the contents of the NMU that I will be doing shortly. --- bzflag-2.0.0.20050118/debian/changelog 2005-01-17 21:50:09.0 -0600 +++ /tmp/changelog 2005-03-16 23:46:19.503772768 -0600 @@ -1,3 +1,11 @@ +bzflag (2.0.0.20050118.1) unstable; urgency=medium + + * Non-maintainer upload + * Changed debian/copyright to refer to the proper revision of + the LGPL (Closes: #298600) + + -- Micah Anderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed, 16 Mar 2005 23:45:44 -0600 + bzflag (2.0.0.20050118) unstable; urgency=medium * missing fonts
Bug#299734: broken on 64-bit systems
Max Alekseyev: So I believe it will not hard to fix goldedplus for 64-bit system. One just need to carefully inspect parameters of all fseek/lseek/fread/fwrite/etc. calls. If you have any insight into what might cause the problem (especially if you have fixes for them), I would be very happy to include those. As of FIDO, it's pretty still alive in xUSSR. ;) I participate in a Swedish echo that used to receive about 1000 messages a week back ten years ago. Today it seldom peaks at more than 5 messages a month... :-/ Unfortunately, GoldEd+ development seems to have more or less stopped as well. -- \\// Peter - http://www.softwolves.pp.se/ I do not read or respond to mail with HTML attachments. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#299722: mldonkey-server does not start because of /var/run/mldonkey permissions
Hello, On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 08:12:28PM -0500, Markus Kienast wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Just a question for my personnal information : is there already a mldonkey user ? ( because it could explain that mldonkey is running as mldonkey:user ). If so, i think the error in the debconf comes from the fact that no mldonkey user can be created ( in fact, we cannot create a mldonkey user with primary group mldonkey ). This could stop the debconf process. You are right on this one. I did not make mldonkey users primary group mldonkey. That explains, why mldonkey files are group users. passwd mldonkey:x:1002:100::/var/lib/mldonkey: group mldonkey:x:1002:hugo Does the user mldonkey has been created by another means than the debconf script of mldonkey ? If so, it could help me understand why it has fails to install. Regard Sylvain Le Gall ps : could you reply also to [EMAIL PROTECTED], so our discussion will remains in the archive of the bug. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#298600: Patch to fix this problem
Surely this is not the entire patch? Justin On Thu, Mar 17, 2005 at 12:01:29AM -0600, Micah Anderson wrote: tag 298600 + patch The attached patch fixes this problem and is the contents of the NMU that I will be doing shortly. --- bzflag-2.0.0.20050118/debian/changelog2005-01-17 21:50:09.0 -0600 +++ /tmp/changelog2005-03-16 23:46:19.503772768 -0600 @@ -1,3 +1,11 @@ +bzflag (2.0.0.20050118.1) unstable; urgency=medium + + * Non-maintainer upload + * Changed debian/copyright to refer to the proper revision of + the LGPL (Closes: #298600) + + -- Micah Anderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed, 16 Mar 2005 23:45:44 -0600 + bzflag (2.0.0.20050118) unstable; urgency=medium * missing fonts -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#299572: [debian-ntp] Bug#299572: ntp-server: strace log
Matthias Urlichs wrote: Hi, Harald Staub: I tried on one of the servers that has problems, and there, I still have segfaults, while the mentioned cvs version works fine. I attach an strace. Gah. Can you send me - the output of ifconfig - the contents of your ntp.conf Thanks. Cheers Harry eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:08:02:F1:1F:40 inet addr:130.59.35.2 Bcast:130.59.35.3 Mask:255.255.255.252 inet6 addr: 2001:620:0:101:208:2ff:fef1:1f40/64 Scope:Global inet6 addr: fe80::208:2ff:fef1:1f40/64 Scope:Link UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:4470 Metric:1 RX packets:2755516149 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:4184415013 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000 RX bytes:20518437 (19.5 MiB) TX bytes:2902994749 (2.7 GiB) Interrupt:30 eth1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:08:02:F1:1F:8C inet addr:130.59.35.6 Bcast:130.59.35.7 Mask:255.255.255.252 inet6 addr: 2001:620:0:100:208:2ff:fef1:1f8c/64 Scope:Global inet6 addr: fe80::208:2ff:fef1:1f8c/64 Scope:Link UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX packets:234912636 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:4582874 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000 RX bytes:3169016135 (2.9 GiB) TX bytes:737836491 (703.6 MiB) Interrupt:29 loLink encap:Local Loopback inet addr:127.0.0.1 Mask:255.0.0.0 inet6 addr: ::1/128 Scope:Host inet6 addr: 2001:620:0:ff::2/128 Scope:Global UP LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:16436 Metric:1 RX packets:2883897546 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:2883897546 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:0 RX bytes:872317027 (831.9 MiB) TX bytes:872317027 (831.9 MiB) lo:0 Link encap:Local Loopback inet addr:130.59.31.251 Mask:255.255.255.255 UP LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:16436 Metric:1 lo:1 Link encap:Local Loopback inet addr:130.59.31.70 Mask:255.255.255.255 UP LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:16436 Metric:1 logfile /var/log/ntpd driftfile /var/lib/ntp/ntp.drift keys /etc/ntp.keys trustedkey 12 server 130.59.35.1 maxpoll 6 server 130.59.35.5 maxpoll 6 peer 130.59.35.10 peer 130.59.35.130 peer 130.59.35.30 peer 130.59.35.22
Bug#299875: ppp: out-of-memory 30min after LCP terminated by peer
I assume that you have seen this: http://kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/ChangeLog-2.6.11.4 If not .. tag patch:) In less than 100 lines, even! Justin On Thu, Mar 17, 2005 at 02:54:56AM +0100, Christian wrote: Package: ppp Version: 2.4.2+20040428-6 Severity: critical Justification: breaks the whole system hello pppeople, i've encountered serious problems with pppd and days of monitoring the issues lead me to the assumption that pppd is to blame. feel free to tell me otherwise and i'll happily forward the problem to the right people - because i am not guru enough to fix it. the problem in short: i am using pppd with pppoe (ADSL dialup) i get disconnected by my ISP once a day and pppd receives LCP terminated by peer then. normally pppd will reconnect and the box would be online again. this does not happen anymore, instead 30min after disconnect all RAM is chewed up by *something* (still don't know by what, please read on) and OOM killer kicks in, killing almost every application. i have reported the issue to the linux-kernel mailinglist first, because i thought it was a kernel issue: http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/3/8/173 http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/3/10/109 maybe the replies are noteworthy too. yesterday i hit the issue again, with more (hopefully helpful) details: http://www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0503.2/0316.html again, the time between LCP terminated by peer to the first OOM messages are (alsmost exactly) 30min. when this happens, i am usually not around, so when i get to the machine, OOM has already happened. i can recover the machine (no reboot, but SYSRQ-E) and i have to kill -9 pppd, anything else does not work: http://nerdbynature.de/bits/sheep/2.6.11/oom/pppd.log (Terminating on signal 15 does not work, +++ killed by SIGKILL +++ is the only choice.) i first noticed this behaviour with a new kernel, namely 2.6.11, but downgrading to a former (stable for me) kernel (2.6.11-rc5-bk2) did not help. instead, i downgraded from pppd-2.4.3-20041231+2 to ppp-2.4.2+20040428-6 and got rid of the problem! 2.4.3 was uploaded on 26.02.2005, and a couple of days later i switched to a new kernel and did a apt-get upgrade. that could be the cause, i suspected kernel issues first. have a look at http://nerdbynature.de/bits/sheep/2.6.11/oom/ for further details, feel free to ask. i still did not manage to reproduce the problem by hand, e.g. by setting up a pppoe server on the same machine, connecting with pppd call... and killing the pppoe server (in the hope that it might send LCP terminated by peer to the pppd). thank you for your time, Christian. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.11.3 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Versions of packages ppp depends on: ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-20 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libpam-modules 0.76-22 Pluggable Authentication Modules f ii libpam-runtime 0.76-22 Runtime support for the PAM librar ii libpam0g0.76-22 Pluggable Authentication Modules l ii libpcap0.7 0.7.2-7 System interface for user-level pa ii libssl0.9.7 0.9.7e-3 SSL shared libraries ii makedev 2.3.1-76 creates device files in /dev ii netbase 4.20 Basic TCP/IP networking system ii procps 1:3.2.5-1/proc file system utilities -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Justin Pryzby whois jgalt References [0] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#299875: ppp: out-of-memory 30min after LCP terminated by peer
Including a patch from kernel.org. Given the size of the patch, you may not trust it, but that's what I got .. http://www.kernel.org/diff/diffview.cgi?file=%2Fpub%2Flinux%2Fkernel%2Fv2.6%2Fpatch-2.6.11.4.bz2;z=15 If I understand the situation correctly, this needs to be reassigned and cloned to a couple kernels, but I'll that that up to someone else to confirm. Justin On Thu, Mar 17, 2005 at 02:09:19AM -0500, pryzbyj wrote: I assume that you have seen this: http://kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/ChangeLog-2.6.11.4 If not .. tag patch:) In less than 100 lines, even! Justin On Thu, Mar 17, 2005 at 02:54:56AM +0100, Christian wrote: Package: ppp Version: 2.4.2+20040428-6 Severity: critical Justification: breaks the whole system hello pppeople, i've encountered serious problems with pppd and days of monitoring the issues lead me to the assumption that pppd is to blame. feel free to tell me otherwise and i'll happily forward the problem to the right people - because i am not guru enough to fix it. the problem in short: i am using pppd with pppoe (ADSL dialup) i get disconnected by my ISP once a day and pppd receives LCP terminated by peer then. normally pppd will reconnect and the box would be online again. this does not happen anymore, instead 30min after disconnect all RAM is chewed up by *something* (still don't know by what, please read on) and OOM killer kicks in, killing almost every application. i have reported the issue to the linux-kernel mailinglist first, because i thought it was a kernel issue: http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/3/8/173 http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/3/10/109 maybe the replies are noteworthy too. yesterday i hit the issue again, with more (hopefully helpful) details: http://www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0503.2/0316.html again, the time between LCP terminated by peer to the first OOM messages are (alsmost exactly) 30min. when this happens, i am usually not around, so when i get to the machine, OOM has already happened. i can recover the machine (no reboot, but SYSRQ-E) and i have to kill -9 pppd, anything else does not work: http://nerdbynature.de/bits/sheep/2.6.11/oom/pppd.log (Terminating on signal 15 does not work, +++ killed by SIGKILL +++ is the only choice.) i first noticed this behaviour with a new kernel, namely 2.6.11, but downgrading to a former (stable for me) kernel (2.6.11-rc5-bk2) did not help. instead, i downgraded from pppd-2.4.3-20041231+2 to ppp-2.4.2+20040428-6 and got rid of the problem! 2.4.3 was uploaded on 26.02.2005, and a couple of days later i switched to a new kernel and did a apt-get upgrade. that could be the cause, i suspected kernel issues first. have a look at http://nerdbynature.de/bits/sheep/2.6.11/oom/ for further details, feel free to ask. i still did not manage to reproduce the problem by hand, e.g. by setting up a pppoe server on the same machine, connecting with pppd call... and killing the pppoe server (in the hope that it might send LCP terminated by peer to the pppd). thank you for your time, Christian. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.11.3 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Versions of packages ppp depends on: ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-20 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libpam-modules 0.76-22 Pluggable Authentication Modules f ii libpam-runtime 0.76-22 Runtime support for the PAM librar ii libpam0g0.76-22 Pluggable Authentication Modules l ii libpcap0.7 0.7.2-7 System interface for user-level pa ii libssl0.9.7 0.9.7e-3 SSL shared libraries ii makedev 2.3.1-76 creates device files in /dev ii netbase 4.20 Basic TCP/IP networking system ii procps 1:3.2.5-1/proc file system utilities -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Justin Pryzby whois jgalt References [0] -- Justin Pryzby whois jgalt References [0] !DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01//EN html head title/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/patch-2.6.11.4.bz2/title meta http-equiv=Content-Type content=text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 link href=/diff/diff.css rel=stylesheet type=text/css /head body !-- $Id: diffview.cgi,v 1.53 2005/02/26 02:18:44 hpa Exp $ -- !-- /pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/patch-2.6.11.4.bz2 15 -- h1a href=/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/patch-2.6.11.4.bz2 class=lsrc/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/patch-2.6.11.4.bz2/a/h1 pre div class=subha name=15--- a/drivers/net/ppp_async.c 2005-03-15 16:09:56 -08:00/a
