Bug#301322: PHP4 hokey pokey: please rebuild *without* ZTS support
Package: php4-auth-pam Version: 0.4-6 Severity: grave Tags: sid After a good deal of soul searching, discussion with upstream, and various bug reports about the subject (#299820, #297223, #297679), the PHP team has made the hard decision to revert support for the ZTS ABI in the Debian packages. Please rebuild php4-auth-pam to match with a build-dependency on php4-dev (= 4:4.3.10-10) and a dependency on phpapi-20020918, and please accept our apologies for the inconvenience. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.4.27-2-686 Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages php4-auth-pam depends on: ii debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.4.46 Debian configuration management sy ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-20 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libpam0g0.76-22 Pluggable Authentication Modules l pn phpapi-20020918-zts Not found. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#301325: PHP4 hokey pokey: please rebuild *without* ZTS support
Package: php4-dbtcp Version: 0.1.17-4.1 Severity: grave Tags: sid After a good deal of soul searching, discussion with upstream, and various bug reports about the subject (#299820, #297223, #297679), the PHP team has made the hard decision to revert support for the ZTS ABI in the Debian packages. Please rebuild dbtcp to match with a build-dependency on php4-dev (= 4:4.3.10-10) and a dependency on phpapi-20020918, and please accept our apologies for the inconvenience. -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#297806: Dietlibc
On Tue, Mar 22, 2005 at 05:19:37PM +0100, Ola Lundqvist wrote: On Tue, Mar 22, 2005 at 11:53:52AM +0100, Helmut Toplitzer wrote: Do the dietlibc-people know about the problem. Could not find any bugreport about that. I do not know. I have not checked yet. I'll file a bugreport about it. Hi, looking at the build log snippet in this bug report I would simply give the 'diet' compiler wrapper the -Os option (or better yet -v -Os to be verbose) so that it adjusts the gcc options. On sparc it then adds -mcpu=supersparc which should fix this problem. The 'diet -v -Os' wrapper should also be used for the linker. Regards, Gerrit. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#301339: turck-mmcache: PHP4 hokey pokey: please rebuild *without* ZTS support
Package: turck-mmcache Version: 2.4.6-10 Severity: grave Tags: sid After a good deal of soul searching, discussion with upstream, and various bug reports about the subject (#299820, #297223, #297679), the PHP team has made the hard decision to revert support for the ZTS ABI in the the Debian packages. Please rebuild turck-mmcache to match with a build-dependency on php4-dev (= 4:4.3.10-10) and a dependency on phpapi-20020918, and please accept our apologies for the inconvenience. -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#301336: php4-sqlrelay: PHP4 hokey pokey: please rebuild *without* ZTS support
Package: php4-sqlrelay Version: 1:0.35-6.1 Severity: grave Tags: sid After a good deal of soul searching, discussion with upstream, and various bug reports about the subject (#299820, #297223, #297679), the PHP team has made the hard decision to revert support for the ZTS ABI in the the Debian packages. Please rebuild sqlrelay to match with a build-dependency on php4-dev (= 4:4.3.10-10) and a dependency on phpapi-20020918, and please accept our apologies for the inconvenience. -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#301333: php4-rrdtool: PHP4 hokey pokey: please rebuild *without* ZTS support
Package: php4-rrdtool Version: 1.04-10 Severity: grave Tags: sid After a good deal of soul searching, discussion with upstream, and various bug reports about the subject (#299820, #297223, #297679), the PHP team has made the hard decision to revert support for the ZTS ABI in the the Debian packages. Please rebuild php4-rrdtool to match with a build-dependency on php4-dev (= 4:4.3.10-10) and a dependency on phpapi-20020918, and please accept our apologies for the inconvenience. -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#301332: php4-ps: PHP4 hokey pokey: please rebuild *without* ZTS support
Package: php4-ps Version: 1.3.1-5 Severity: grave Tags: sid After a good deal of soul searching, discussion with upstream, and various bug reports about the subject (#299820, #297223, #297679), the PHP team has made the hard decision to revert support for the ZTS ABI in the the Debian packages. Please rebuild php4-ps to match with a build-dependency on php4-dev (= 4:4.3.10-10) and a dependency on phpapi-20020918, and please accept our apologies for the inconvenience. -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#301331: php4-mcrypt: PHP4 hokey pokey: please rebuild *without* ZTS support
Package: php4-mcrypt Version: 3:4.3.10-0.1 Severity: grave Tags: sid After a good deal of soul searching, discussion with upstream, and various bug reports about the subject (#299820, #297223, #297679), the PHP team has made the hard decision to revert support for the ZTS ABI in the the Debian packages. Please rebuild php4-mcrypt to match with a build-dependency on php4-dev (= 4:4.3.10-10) and a dependency on phpapi-20020918, and please accept our apologies for the inconvenience. -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#301330: php4-lasso: PHP4 hokey pokey: please rebuild *without* ZTS support
Package: php4-lasso Version: 0.6.1-1 Severity: grave Tags: sid After a good deal of soul searching, discussion with upstream, and various bug reports about the subject (#299820, #297223, #297679), the PHP team has made the hard decision to revert support for the ZTS ABI in the the Debian packages. Please rebuild lasso to match with a build-dependency on php4-dev (= 4:4.3.10-10) and a dependency on phpapi-20020918, and please accept our apologies for the inconvenience. -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#301326: php4-gpib: PHP4 hokey pokey: please rebuild *without* ZTS support
Package: php4-gpib Version: 3.2.03-1 Severity: grave Tags: sid After a good deal of soul searching, discussion with upstream, and various bug reports about the subject (#299820, #297223, #297679), the PHP team has made the hard decision to revert support for the ZTS ABI in the Debian packages. Please rebuild gpib to match with a build-dependency on php4-dev (= 4:4.3.10-10) and a dependency on phpapi-20020918, and please accept our apologies for the inconvenience. -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#301327: php4-idn: PHP4 hokey pokey: please rebuild *without* ZTS support
Package: php4-idn Version: 1.1-1.1 Severity: grave Tags: sid After a good deal of soul searching, discussion with upstream, and various bug reports about the subject (#299820, #297223, #297679), the PHP team has made the hard decision to revert support for the ZTS ABI in the Debian packages. Please rebuild php4-idn to match with a build-dependency on php4-dev (= 4:4.3.10-10) and a dependency on phpapi-20020918, and please accept our apologies for the inconvenience. -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#301328: php4-imagick: PHP4 hokey pokey: please rebuild *without* ZTS support
Package: php4-imagick Version: 0.9.11-0.1 Severity: grave Tags: sid After a good deal of soul searching, discussion with upstream, and various bug reports about the subject (#299820, #297223, #297679), the PHP team has made the hard decision to revert support for the ZTS ABI in the Debian packages. Please rebuild php4-imagick to match with a build-dependency on php4-dev (= 4:4.3.10-10) and a dependency on phpapi-20020918, and please accept our apologies for the inconvenience. -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#301335: php4-sqlite: PHP4 hokey pokey: please rebuild *without* ZTS support
Package: php4-sqlite Version: 1.0.2-6 Severity: grave Tags: sid After a good deal of soul searching, discussion with upstream, and various bug reports about the subject (#299820, #297223, #297679), the PHP team has made the hard decision to revert support for the ZTS ABI in the the Debian packages. Please rebuild php4-sqlite to match with a build-dependency on php4-dev (= 4:4.3.10-10) and a dependency on phpapi-20020918, and please accept our apologies for the inconvenience. -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#301334: php4-spplus: PHP4 hokey pokey: please rebuild *without* ZTS support
Package: php4-spplus Version: 1.0-4 Severity: grave Tags: sid After a good deal of soul searching, discussion with upstream, and various bug reports about the subject (#299820, #297223, #297679), the PHP team has made the hard decision to revert support for the ZTS ABI in the the Debian packages. Please rebuild spplus to match with a build-dependency on php4-dev (= 4:4.3.10-10) and a dependency on phpapi-20020918, and please accept our apologies for the inconvenience. -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#301337: php4-syck: PHP4 hokey pokey: please rebuild *without* ZTS support
Package: php4-syck Version: 0.42-7 Severity: grave Tags: sid After a good deal of soul searching, discussion with upstream, and various bug reports about the subject (#299820, #297223, #297679), the PHP team has made the hard decision to revert support for the ZTS ABI in the the Debian packages. Please rebuild syck to match with a build-dependency on php4-dev (= 4:4.3.10-10) and a dependency on phpapi-20020918, and please accept our apologies for the inconvenience. -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#298617: marked as done (glibmm2.4/mipsel built with a broken g++ (3.3_3.3.5-9) compiler)
Your message dated Fri, 25 Mar 2005 09:46:13 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Binary rebuild for mipsel has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Mar 2005 21:15:15 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 08 13:15:15 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.17.13] (root) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D8m2t-0001Vw-00; Tue, 08 Mar 2005 13:15:15 -0800 Received: from mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [130.149.17.13]) by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3p2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA18233 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 8 Mar 2005 22:15:13 +0100 (MET) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1446F21B for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 8 Mar 2005 22:15:12 +0100 (MET) Received: from mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (bueno [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10224) with ESMTP id 25851-46 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 8 Mar 2005 22:15:12 +0100 (MET) Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.19.1]) by mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de (Postfix) with ESMTP for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 8 Mar 2005 22:15:12 +0100 (MET) Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.8/Submit) id j28LFCtV007233; Tue, 8 Mar 2005 22:15:12 +0100 (MET) From: Matthias Klose [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2005 22:15:12 +0100 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: glibmm2.4/mipsel built with a broken g++ (3.3_3.3.5-9) compiler X-Mailer: VM 7.03 under 21.4 (patch 6) Common Lisp XEmacs Lucid X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at cs.tu-berlin.de Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: glibmm2.4 Version: 2.6.1-1 Severity: grave Tags: sid glibmm2.4/mipsel built with a broken g++ (3.3_3.3.5-9) compiler. It has to rebuilt with an older or a newer (-10) version. --- Received: (at 298617-done) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Mar 2005 08:47:04 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Mar 25 00:47:04 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mx02.qsc.de [213.148.130.14] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DEkTA-kD-00; Fri, 25 Mar 2005 00:47:04 -0800 Received: from port-195-158-170-192.dynamic.qsc.de ([195.158.170.192] helo=hattusa.textio) by mx02.qsc.de with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 1DEkSe-Xq-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 25 Mar 2005 09:46:32 +0100 Received: from ths by hattusa.textio with local (Exim 4.50) id 1DEkSL-0004ge-Ex for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 25 Mar 2005 09:46:13 +0100 Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2005 09:46:13 +0100 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Binary rebuild for mipsel Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i From: Thiemo Seufer [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Version 2.6.1-1.0.1 is uploaded for mipsel. Thiemo -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Bug#286636: still fails to build on sparc, different error
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 286636 libimlib2-dev,illuminator Bug#286636: illuminator: ftbfs [sparc] /bin/sed: can't read /usr/lib/libltdl.la: No such file or directory Bug reassigned from package `illuminator' to `libimlib2-dev,illuminator'. retitle 286636 Package '@requirements@', required by 'imlib2', not found Bug#286636: illuminator: ftbfs [sparc] /bin/sed: can't read /usr/lib/libltdl.la: No such file or directory Changed Bug title. tags 286636 -sid Bug#286636: Package '@requirements@', required by 'imlib2', not found Tags were: sid Tags removed: sid thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#301330: php4-lasso: PHP4 hokey pokey: please rebuild *without* ZTS support
Steve Langasek wrote: Package: php4-lasso Version: 0.6.1-1 Severity: grave Tags: sid After a good deal of soul searching, discussion with upstream, and various bug reports about the subject (#299820, #297223, #297679), the PHP team has made the hard decision to revert support for the ZTS ABI in the the Debian packages. Please rebuild lasso to match with a build-dependency on php4-dev (= 4:4.3.10-10) and a dependency on phpapi-20020918, and please accept our apologies for the inconvenience. No problem; I was warned and uploaded 0.6.1-2 this morning when I saw the new php4-dev. But it was perhaps too early in the morning and I forgot to update Build-depends. I'm building an updated package now. Regards, Frederic -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#286636: still fails to build on sparc, different error
reassign 286636 libimlib2-dev,illuminator retitle 286636 Package '@requirements@', required by 'imlib2', not found tags 286636 -sid thanks On Wed, Mar 09, 2005 at 03:56:06PM -0800, Blars Blarson wrote: Now the error is: checking LIBXML2_LIBS... -lxml2 -lpthread -lz -lm checking for imlib2 = 1.1... Package @requirements@ was not found in the pkg-co nfig search path. Perhaps you should add the directory containing [EMAIL PROTECTED]@.pc' to the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable Package '@requirements@', required by 'imlib2', not found configure: error: Library requirements (imlib2 = 1.1) not met; consider adjusti ng the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable if your libraries are in a nonstanda rd prefix so pkg-config can find them. make: *** [stamp-configure] Error 1 This build failure in illuminator appears to be a bug in the pkg-config file shipped by current libimlib2-dev. Since this version of libimlib2-dev is in sarge, the sid tag is no longer appropriate here. I'm digging to see why libimlib2-dev is now shipping a broken .pc file; this problem apparently affects all architectures, not just sparc. -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#300440: post-installation returns error code 21 if /usr/share/doc/menu/html does not exist
On Thu, 24 Mar 2005 23:43:04 -0300 Gustavo Franco [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: tags 300440 +patch thanks Hi Stefan, I've tracked this bug and with the vorlon and fatalerror help i reproduced it this way: - Install dhelp package; - Install doc-linux-it package; - Remove or move /usr/share/doc; - dpkg-reconfigure doc-linux-it. =) There's patch below that i think can help you fixing this problem. If you can't upload a new package soon, since it's a RC bug let me known and i'll do a NMU with this patch. Thanks, I'll check this out this weekend. Bye Racke -- LinuXia Systems = http://www.linuxia.de/ Expert Interchange Consulting and System Administration ICDEVGROUP = http://www.icdevgroup.org/ Interchange Development Team -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Package '@requirements@', required by 'imlib2', not found
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 286636 patch Bug#286636: Package '@requirements@', required by 'imlib2', not found There were no tags set. Tags added: patch thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: severity of 296518 is grave, severity of 286636 is grave, merging 296518 286636
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.11 severity 296518 grave Bug#296518: libimlib2-dev: pkg-config description with wrong Requires field Severity set to `grave'. severity 286636 grave Bug#286636: Package '@requirements@', required by 'imlib2', not found Severity set to `grave'. merge 296518 286636 Bug#286636: Package '@requirements@', required by 'imlib2', not found Bug#296518: libimlib2-dev: pkg-config description with wrong Requires field Mismatch - only Bugs in same state can be merged: Values for `package' don't match: #286636 has `libimlib2-dev,illuminator'; #296518 has `libimlib2-dev' End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#286636: Package '@requirements@', required by 'imlib2', not found
tags 286636 patch
thanks
Ok, well, that was easy enough; there are simply no references anywhere in
the current imlib2 code that would replace '@requirements@' with a proper
value. So the best solution here, AFAICT, is to simply remove that line
from imlib2.pc.in. Patch attached.
Cheers,
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
diff -u imlib2-1.2.0/debian/changelog imlib2-1.2.0/debian/changelog
--- imlib2-1.2.0/debian/changelog
+++ imlib2-1.2.0/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,13 @@
+imlib2 (1.2.0-2.2) unstable; urgency=high
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+ * High-urgency upload for sarge-targetted RC bugfix.
+ * Drop the Requires: line from imlib2.pc.in, since there's nothing in
+the current code that will populate it with a proper pkg-config
+dependency list. Closes: #286636.
+
+ -- Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri, 25 Mar 2005 01:37:23 -0800
+
imlib2 (1.2.0-2.1) unstable; urgency=low
* Non-maintainer upload.
only in patch2:
unchanged:
--- imlib2-1.2.0.orig/imlib2.pc.in
+++ imlib2-1.2.0/imlib2.pc.in
@@ -5,7 +5,6 @@
Name: imlib2
Description: Powerful image loading and rendering library
-Requires: @requirements@
Version: @VERSION@
Libs: -L${libdir} -lImlib2
Cflags: -I${includedir}
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Processed: reassign 286636 to libimlib2-dev, merging 286636 296518
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.11 reassign 286636 libimlib2-dev Bug#286636: Package '@requirements@', required by 'imlib2', not found Bug reassigned from package `libimlib2-dev,illuminator' to `libimlib2-dev'. merge 286636 296518 Bug#286636: Package '@requirements@', required by 'imlib2', not found Bug#296518: libimlib2-dev: pkg-config description with wrong Requires field Merged 286636 296518. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#300484: marked as done (gstreamer0.8: FTBFS in sarge: failed to make documentation?)
Your message dated Fri, 25 Mar 2005 02:08:29 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line gstreamer0.8: FTBFS in sarge: failed to make documentation? has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Mar 2005 00:01:13 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Mar 19 16:01:12 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from asia.telenet-ops.be [195.130.132.59] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DCnsW-0001TR-00; Sat, 19 Mar 2005 16:01:12 -0800 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by asia.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with SMTP id A7A46224762 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 20 Mar 2005 01:01:11 +0100 (MET) Received: from Q.roeckx.be (dD5775FD9.access.telenet.be [213.119.95.217]) by asia.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98444224578 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 20 Mar 2005 01:01:11 +0100 (MET) Received: by Q.roeckx.be (Postfix, from userid 501) id 5A70126136; Sun, 20 Mar 2005 01:01:11 +0100 (CET) Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2005 01:01:11 +0100 From: Kurt Roeckx [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: gstreamer0.8: FTBFS in sarge: failed to make documentation? Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: gstreamer0.8 Version: 0.8.8-1 Severity: serious Tags: sarge Hi, The version is sarge is failing to build (on sarge) with the following error: touch scan-build.stamp *** Rebuilding template files *** if test x. != x. ; then \ cp ./gstreamer-sections.txt . ; \ touch gstreamer-decl.txt ; \ fi gtkdoc-mktmpl --module=gstreamer | tee tmpl-build.log = WARNING: 1 unused declarations. These can be found in gstreamer-unused.txt. They should be added to gstreamer-sections.txt in the appropriate place. = GstPoptOption make[4]: *** [tmpl-build.stamp] Error 1 This seems to be caused by this in the Makefile: gtkdoc-mktmpl --module=$(DOC_MODULE) | tee tmpl-build.log @if grep WARNING: tmpl-build.log /dev/null; then \ cat $(DOC_MODULE)-unused.txt ; \ exit 1; fi Note that the version in sid is building without problems (on sid). Kurt --- Received: (at 300484-done) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Mar 2005 10:08:30 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Mar 25 02:08:30 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from dsl093-039-086.pdx1.dsl.speakeasy.net (localhost.localdomain) [66.93.39.86] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DEljy-0006s2-00; Fri, 25 Mar 2005 02:08:30 -0800 Received: by localhost.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000) id E331C171D21; Fri, 25 Mar 2005 02:08:29 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2005 02:08:29 -0800 From: Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: gstreamer0.8: FTBFS in sarge: failed to make documentation? Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=X3gaHHMYHkYqP6yf Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: --X3gaHHMYHkYqP6yf Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable gstreamer0.8 version 0.8.9-2 has been accepted into testing, therefore I believe this bug can be closed. Thanks, --=20 Steve Langasek postmodern programmer --X3gaHHMYHkYqP6yf Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)
Bug#265165: error when symlink exists but target doesn't
Hi, Relatedly: when /etc/network/run exists as a symlink to /dev/shm/network, but /dev/shm/network doesn't exist (which for some reason was the case here), the script fails with `The canonical path of /etc/network/run could not be determined. Aborting'. Removing the symlink seems to have solved it, might be a good idea to do that automatically (or, at least, suggest it in the error message). Kind regards, -- Arnout Engelen [EMAIL PROTECTED] If it sounds good, it /is/ good. -- Duke Ellington -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#301352: xmpi: ftbfs [sparc] automake version mismatch
Package: xmpi Version: 2.2.3b8-6 Severity: serious Tags: sid Justification: fails to build from source xmpi failed to build from source on a sparc buildd. This problem was NOT duplicated on my sparc pbuilder. There may be insufficiently strict build dependancies. Making install in src make[2]: Entering directory `/build/buildd/xmpi-2.2.3b8/src' cd .. \ /bin/sh /build/buildd/xmpi-2.2.3b8/config/missing --run automake-1.7 --foreign src/Makefile configure.in:34: version mismatch. This is Automake 1.7.9, configure.in:34: but the definition used by this AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE configure.in:34: comes from Automake 1.7.6. You should recreate configure.in:34: aclocal.m4 with aclocal and run automake again. make[2]: *** [Makefile.in] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/xmpi-2.2.3b8/src' -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#300534: marked as done (libgnumail-java: FTBFS: java.lang.NullPointerException)
Your message dated Fri, 25 Mar 2005 05:47:17 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#300534: fixed in libgnumail-java 1.0-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Mar 2005 12:19:52 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Mar 20 04:19:52 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mail-out.m-online.net [212.18.0.9] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DCzPC-tr-00; Sun, 20 Mar 2005 04:19:42 -0800 Received: from mail.m-online.net (svr20.m-online.net [192.168.3.148]) by mail-out.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95B43735F; Sun, 20 Mar 2005 13:19:11 +0100 (CET) Received: from atari.stigge.org (ppp-82-135-3-101.mnet-online.de [82.135.3.101]) by mail.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 462285FEA1; Sun, 20 Mar 2005 13:19:05 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.5.99] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by atari.stigge.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09D8C100442A0; Sun, 20 Mar 2005 13:19:04 +0100 (CET) From: Roland Stigge [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: libgnumail-java: FTBFS: java.lang.NullPointerException Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2005 13:19:04 +0100 (CET) Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: libgnumail-java Version: 1.0-3.1 Severity: serious Hi, building the package libgnumail-java in a clean build environment (with pbuilder) on i386 results in: = [...] fi ; \ done ; \ fi make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/libgnumail-java-1.0' if test -e /usr/share/misc/config.guess ; then \ for i in ./config.guess ./config/config.guess ; do \ if ! test -e $i.cdbs-orig ; then \ mv $i $i.cdbs-orig ; \ cp --remove-destination /usr/share/misc/config.guess $i ; \ fi ; \ done ; \ fi if test -e /usr/share/misc/config.sub ; then \ for i in ./config.sub ./config/config.sub ; do \ if ! test -e $i.cdbs-orig ; then \ mv $i $i.cdbs-orig ; \ cp --remove-destination /usr/share/misc/config.sub $i ; \ fi ; \ done ; \ fi cd . /usr/bin/java-sablevm -classpath /usr/share/ant1.6/lib/ant.jar:/usr/share/java/activation.jar:/usr/share/java/inetlib.jar:/usr/share/ant1.6/lib/ant-launcher.jar:/usr/share/java/jsse.jar: -Dant.home=/usr/share/ant1.6 org.apache.tools.ant.Main -Dcompile.debug=true -Dcompile.optimize=true -Dbuild.compiler=jikes -propertyfile /tmp/buildd/libgnumail-java-1.0/debian/ant.properties dist Buildfile: build.xml init: BUILD FAILED /tmp/buildd/libgnumail-java-1.0/build.xml:65: java.lang.NullPointerException Total time: 0 seconds make: *** [debian/stamp-ant-build] Error 1 = Thanks for considering. -- DARTS - Debian Archive Regression Test Suite http://darts.alioth.debian.org/ Please note that this report has not been generated fully automatically. DARTS just helped finding the problem. --- Received: (at 300534-close) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Mar 2005 11:07:50 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Mar 25 03:07:50 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DEmfO-0005wL-00; Fri, 25 Mar 2005 03:07:50 -0800 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DEmLV-0005n1-00; Fri, 25 Mar 2005 05:47:17 -0500 From: Wolfgang Baer [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $ Subject: Bug#300534: fixed in libgnumail-java 1.0-4 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2005 05:47:17 -0500 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no
Bug#300573: sylpheed-claws-vcalendar-plugin: FTBFS on various arches: outdated libtool and PIC issues.
On Sun, 20 Mar 2005 15:27:17 +0100 Kurt Roeckx [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Package: sylpheed-claws-vcalendar-plugin Version: 0.9-1 Severity: serious Tags: sid Hi, Hello Kurt, Your package is failing to build on various arches because the libical directory is using a very old version of libtool (1.3.4). Please update that to the latest version. This Vcalendar does not compile with latest libical version :-/ It's also trying to make a shared library without using -fPIC. This also causes build failures on other arches and is probably the result of not using libtool properly. It also linking staticly to it, so it should probably be easy to work around that. Could you to explain me how? Sorry for being dense but I don't see what workaround are you referring to. I don't want to install the library globally but the plugin needs it, how can I achieve this without static linking? Is there a reason that libical isn't a seperate package? Can it be useful for other programs to link to? Seems there was more than one when I tried to package it... See http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2004/10/msg01485.html regards, -- Ricardo Mones Lastra - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Centro de Inteligencia Artificial, Universidad de Oviedo en Gijon 33271 Asturias, SPAIN. - http://www.aic.uniovi.es/mones -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#301337: marked as done (php4-syck: PHP4 hokey pokey: please rebuild *without* ZTS support)
Your message dated Fri, 25 Mar 2005 06:20:05 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#301337: fixed in syck 0.42-8 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Mar 2005 08:55:31 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Mar 25 00:55:31 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from dsl093-039-086.pdx1.dsl.speakeasy.net (localhost.localdomain) [66.93.39.86] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DEkbL-0001qJ-00; Fri, 25 Mar 2005 00:55:31 -0800 Received: by localhost.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 08695171D21; Fri, 25 Mar 2005 00:55:30 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2005 00:55:30 -0800 From: Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: php4-syck: PHP4 hokey pokey: please rebuild *without* ZTS support Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=sWvRP97dwRHm9fX+ Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: --sWvRP97dwRHm9fX+ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Package: php4-syck Version: 0.42-7 Severity: grave Tags: sid After a good deal of soul searching, discussion with upstream, and various bug reports about the subject (#299820, #297223, #297679), the PHP team has made the hard decision to revert support for the ZTS ABI in the the Debian packages. Please rebuild syck to match with a build-dependency on php4-dev (=3D 4:4.3.10-10) and a dependency on phpapi-20020918, and please accept our apologies for the inconvenience. --=20 Steve Langasek postmodern programmer --sWvRP97dwRHm9fX+ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFCQ9IAKN6ufymYLloRAlsxAJ9s9QgcKSKhFJ2lsp46/+yZvh/c7ACeK6Do B00OlcI11gc9yhQeDYhIF2g= =IofY -END PGP SIGNATURE- --sWvRP97dwRHm9fX+-- --- Received: (at 301337-close) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Mar 2005 11:33:12 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Mar 25 03:33:12 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DEn3w-0001WF-00; Fri, 25 Mar 2005 03:33:12 -0800 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DEmrF-00014o-00; Fri, 25 Mar 2005 06:20:05 -0500 From: Robert Jordens [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $ Subject: Bug#301337: fixed in syck 0.42-8 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2005 06:20:05 -0500 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Source: syck Source-Version: 0.42-8 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of syck, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: libsyck0-dev_0.42-8_powerpc.deb to pool/main/s/syck/libsyck0-dev_0.42-8_powerpc.deb php4-syck_0.42-8_powerpc.deb to pool/main/s/syck/php4-syck_0.42-8_powerpc.deb python-syck_0.42-8_powerpc.deb to pool/main/s/syck/python-syck_0.42-8_powerpc.deb python2.3-syck_0.42-8_powerpc.deb to pool/main/s/syck/python2.3-syck_0.42-8_powerpc.deb syck_0.42-8.diff.gz to pool/main/s/syck/syck_0.42-8.diff.gz syck_0.42-8.dsc to pool/main/s/syck/syck_0.42-8.dsc A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Robert Jordens [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated syck package) (This message was generated
Bug#301339: turck-mmcache: PHP4 hokey pokey: please rebuild *without* ZTS support
Hi Steve, Please rebuild turck-mmcache to match with a build-dependency on php4-dev (= 4:4.3.10-10) and a dependency on phpapi-20020918, and please accept our apologies for the inconvenience. Hehe, yep, so it obviously caused you guys as much stress as it did me then ;-) No problem, I'll change the deps and rebuild as soon as I've got the latest dev packages updated. And thanks for the work you put into the PHP packages, too, it must be pretty hairy to manage. Cheers :-) Jonathan Oxer -- The Debian Universe: Installing, managing and using Debian GNU/Linux http://www.debianuniverse.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#301364: rxtx: FTBFS: Jikes could not find package gnu.io
Package: rxtx Severity: serious When building 'rxtx' in a clean chroot, I get the following error: 344. throw new gnu.io.PortInUseException( ^^ *** Semantic Error: You need to modify your classpath, sourcepath, bootclasspath, and/or extdirs setup. Jikes could not find package gnu.io in: /usr/lib/kaffe/pthreads/jre/lib/rt.jar . /rxtx-2.1.6 /rxtx-2.1.6/src . make[1]: *** [/rxtx-2.1.6/gnu/io/CommDriver.class] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/rxtx-2.1.6' make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2 Regards Andreas Jochens -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#297806: FTBFS in experimental
On Fri, Mar 25, 2005 at 01:08:30PM +0200, Lars Wirzenius wrote: Attached is a patch to fix most of the compilation problems for util-vserver. Steve Langasek tested this on sparc and it worked. Builds still fail on at least hppa, powerpc, and mipsel, since the dietlibc linking fails. See #300926 for some discussion about this. I didn't try giving the -Os option to the diet command at the linking stage, since I didn't see an easy way to do it from util-vserver's debian/rules. I have so far failed to debug the linking problem to any successful degree. Gerrit, perhaps you could give Ola a helping hand with the linking issue? vorlon liw: if you invoke it as diet -v gcc -Wall -g [...] instead of diet -v hppa-linux-gcc [...], what happens? liw vorlon, it fails by not recognizing some link file without libtool; if I add the libtool stuff in front, then it does link vorlon liw: basically, by calling ./configure --host=... --build=..., util-vserver is incorrectly causing autoconf to think this is a cross-compile invocation, and therefore calls hppa-linux-gcc instead of just calling gcc; if you do in fact get different errors, this may be the root of the problem vorlon liw: in that case, switching util-vserver to use the confflags sample stanza from /usr/share/doc/autotools-dev/README.Debian.gz may be enough to cure the remaining ills -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#248853: Can someone please resolve this problem so x3270 will be back in Debian?
As a user who used x3270 I am very displeased about the disappearance of x3270 from Debian. I read here about the events that caused this and I'm amazed. It seem to me the the situation can be cleared by sending few emails and instead the pacage was removed. If the package maintainer did not see for this that's his fault, not the users'. Somone else shoult take on himself to work ariund this problems and make x3270 available again. Elad Tsur -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#301368: icecast2: Several vulnerabilities in Icecast2
Package: icecast2 Severity: grave Tags: security Justification: user security hole Several security issues have been reported for Icecast2. Please refer to the CAN Ids in the changelog when fixing them: CAN-2005-0838: Multiple buffer overflows in the XSL parser may cause DoS and possibly remote code execution through overly long values in the xsl:when and xsl:if tags and overly long select values in the xsl:value-of tag. CAN-2005-0839: A remote attacker can bypass security measures and can obtain access to XSL files through a request for an xsl-file with a trailing dot. See these URLs for reference: http://xforce.iss.net/xforce/xfdb/19760/ http://xforce.iss.net/xforce/xfdb/19753/ I could not find fixes on the Icecast website, please contact upstream for a solution. Cheers, Moritz -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.11 Locale: LANG=C, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#301372: kernel-source-2.6.8: [CAN-2005-0839] Insecure restriction of access to the N_MOUSE line disciple for TTYs
Package: kernel-source-2.6.8 Version: 2.6.8-15 Severity: grave Tags: security Kernels before 2.6.11 do not properly restrict access to the N_MOUSE line disciple for TTYs, which allows local users to inject mouse or keyboard events into other's users sessions and possibly gain extended privileges. A fix is referenced at http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CAN-2005-0839 (I currently don't have a mouse and typing Bitkeeper web URLs is too weird :-)) Cheers, Moritz -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.11 Locale: LANG=C, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) Versions of packages kernel-source-2.6.8 depends on: ii binutils 2.15-5 The GNU assembler, linker and bina ii bzip2 1.0.2-5high-quality block-sorting file co ii coreutils [fileutils] 5.2.1-2The GNU core utilities -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#301330: marked as done (php4-lasso: PHP4 hokey pokey: please rebuild *without* ZTS support)
Your message dated Fri, 25 Mar 2005 07:32:06 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#301330: fixed in lasso 0.6.1-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Mar 2005 08:50:33 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Mar 25 00:50:33 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from dsl093-039-086.pdx1.dsl.speakeasy.net (localhost.localdomain) [66.93.39.86] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DEkWW-0001Lz-00; Fri, 25 Mar 2005 00:50:32 -0800 Received: by localhost.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 7EA48171D21; Fri, 25 Mar 2005 00:50:32 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2005 00:50:32 -0800 From: Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: php4-lasso: PHP4 hokey pokey: please rebuild *without* ZTS support Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=65ImJOski3p8EhYV Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: --65ImJOski3p8EhYV Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Package: php4-lasso Version: 0.6.1-1 Severity: grave Tags: sid After a good deal of soul searching, discussion with upstream, and various bug reports about the subject (#299820, #297223, #297679), the PHP team has made the hard decision to revert support for the ZTS ABI in the the Debian packages. Please rebuild lasso to match with a build-dependency on php4-dev (=3D 4:4.3.10-10) and a dependency on phpapi-20020918, and please accept our apologies for the inconvenience. --=20 Steve Langasek postmodern programmer --65ImJOski3p8EhYV Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFCQ9DVKN6ufymYLloRAvkCAKCVD+gj/bI9HXDfv1NV0kBtc5bF5wCfXELL Eoj2/6CVfEXpXtNC2bJHSn8= =dx96 -END PGP SIGNATURE- --65ImJOski3p8EhYV-- --- Received: (at 301330-close) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Mar 2005 12:40:15 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Mar 25 04:40:15 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DEo6o-00067W-00; Fri, 25 Mar 2005 04:40:14 -0800 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DEnyw-0005UB-00; Fri, 25 Mar 2005 07:32:06 -0500 From: Frederic Peters [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $ Subject: Bug#301330: fixed in lasso 0.6.1-3 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2005 07:32:06 -0500 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Source: lasso Source-Version: 0.6.1-3 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of lasso, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: lasso_0.6.1-3.diff.gz to pool/main/l/lasso/lasso_0.6.1-3.diff.gz lasso_0.6.1-3.dsc to pool/main/l/lasso/lasso_0.6.1-3.dsc liblasso-cil_0.6.1-3_i386.deb to pool/main/l/lasso/liblasso-cil_0.6.1-3_i386.deb liblasso3-dev_0.6.1-3_i386.deb to pool/main/l/lasso/liblasso3-dev_0.6.1-3_i386.deb liblasso3_0.6.1-3_i386.deb to pool/main/l/lasso/liblasso3_0.6.1-3_i386.deb php4-lasso_0.6.1-3_i386.deb to pool/main/l/lasso/php4-lasso_0.6.1-3_i386.deb python2.3-lasso_0.6.1-3_i386.deb to pool/main/l/lasso/python2.3-lasso_0.6.1-3_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp.
Bug#297806: FTBFS in experimental
On Fri, Mar 25, 2005 at 12:55:59PM +, Gerrit Pape wrote: On Fri, Mar 25, 2005 at 03:45:58AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: On Fri, Mar 25, 2005 at 01:08:30PM +0200, Lars Wirzenius wrote: Attached is a patch to fix most of the compilation problems for util-vserver. Steve Langasek tested this on sparc and it worked. Builds still fail on at least hppa, powerpc, and mipsel, since the dietlibc linking fails. See #300926 for some discussion about this. I didn't try giving the -Os option to the diet command at the linking stage, since I didn't see an easy way to do it from util-vserver's debian/rules. I have so far failed to debug the linking problem to any successful degree. Gerrit, perhaps you could give Ola a helping hand with the linking issue? vorlon liw: if you invoke it as diet -v gcc -Wall -g [...] instead of diet -v hppa-linux-gcc [...], what happens? liw vorlon, it fails by not recognizing some link file without libtool; if I add the libtool stuff in front, then it does link vorlon liw: basically, by calling ./configure --host=... --build=..., util-vserver is incorrectly causing autoconf to think this is a cross-compile invocation, and therefore calls hppa-linux-gcc instead of just calling gcc; if you do in fact get different errors, this may be the root of the problem vorlon liw: in that case, switching util-vserver to use the confflags sample stanza from /usr/share/doc/autotools-dev/README.Debian.gz may be enough to cure the remaining ills The workaround for sparc wouldn't be necessary if the diet wrapper is called with the -Os option (this adds -mcpu=supersparc), a good idea anyway for all architectures. It most certainly is *not* a good idea; it's contraindicated by policy to build binaries with -Os instead of -O2, and the idea of calling -Os to set -mcpu=supersparc leaves me very much afraid of what other random options diet would set. -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#297806: FTBFS in experimental
On Fri, Mar 25, 2005 at 03:45:58AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: On Fri, Mar 25, 2005 at 01:08:30PM +0200, Lars Wirzenius wrote: Attached is a patch to fix most of the compilation problems for util-vserver. Steve Langasek tested this on sparc and it worked. Builds still fail on at least hppa, powerpc, and mipsel, since the dietlibc linking fails. See #300926 for some discussion about this. I didn't try giving the -Os option to the diet command at the linking stage, since I didn't see an easy way to do it from util-vserver's debian/rules. I have so far failed to debug the linking problem to any successful degree. Gerrit, perhaps you could give Ola a helping hand with the linking issue? vorlon liw: if you invoke it as diet -v gcc -Wall -g [...] instead of diet -v hppa-linux-gcc [...], what happens? liw vorlon, it fails by not recognizing some link file without libtool; if I add the libtool stuff in front, then it does link vorlon liw: basically, by calling ./configure --host=... --build=..., util-vserver is incorrectly causing autoconf to think this is a cross-compile invocation, and therefore calls hppa-linux-gcc instead of just calling gcc; if you do in fact get different errors, this may be the root of the problem vorlon liw: in that case, switching util-vserver to use the confflags sample stanza from /usr/share/doc/autotools-dev/README.Debian.gz may be enough to cure the remaining ills I prepared a new dietlibc upload to fix #300917 and some other things. I'll now also include the missing defines for O_NOFOLLOW and O_LARGEFILE on hppa, which is already fixed in upstream cvs. So these two workarounds can be omitted when build-depending on dietlibc-dev (= 0.28-2). The workaround for sparc wouldn't be necessary if the diet wrapper is called with the -Os option (this adds -mcpu=supersparc), a good idea anyway for all architectures. With the additional change suggested by Steve, things should look much better then. Regards, Gerrit. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: your mail
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 300168 + pending Bug#300168: arpack++: fails to comple simple.cc example given in nonsym examples directory There were no tags set. Tags added: pending -- Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#297806: FTBFS in experimental
On Fri, Mar 25, 2005 at 04:59:04AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Fri, Mar 25, 2005 at 12:55:59PM +, Gerrit Pape wrote:
The workaround for sparc wouldn't be necessary if the diet wrapper is
called with the -Os option (this adds -mcpu=supersparc), a good idea
anyway for all architectures.
It most certainly is *not* a good idea; it's contraindicated by policy to
build binaries with -Os instead of -O2, and the idea of calling -Os to set
-mcpu=supersparc leaves me very much afraid of what other random options
diet would set.
It's that diet libc is meant to produce statically linked binaries
optimized for size; that's what it's designed for. Here're the options
it uses on Debian, I'm not aware of any problems they cause.
static const char* Os[] = {
i386,-Os,-mpreferred-stack-boundary=2,
-malign-functions=1,-malign-jumps=1,
-malign-loops=1,-fomit-frame-pointer,0,
x86_64,-Os,-fno-omit-frame-pointer,0,
sparc,-Os,-mcpu=supersparc,0,
sparc64,-Os,-m64,-mhard-quad-float,0,
alpha,-Os,-fomit-frame-pointer,0,
arm,-Os,-fomit-frame-pointer,0,
mips,-Os,-fomit-frame-pointer,0,
mipsel,-Os,-fomit-frame-pointer,-mno-abicalls,-fno-pic,-G,0,0,
ppc,-Os,-fomit-frame-pointer,-mpowerpc-gpopt,-mpowerpc-gfxopt,0,
ppc64,-Os,-fomit-frame-pointer,-mpowerpc-gpopt,-mpowerpc-gfxopt,0,
s390,-Os,-fomit-frame-pointer,0,
s390x,-Os,-fomit-frame-pointer,0,
sh,-Os,-fomit-frame-pointer,0,
ia64,-Os,0,
x86_64,-Os,-fstrict-aliasing,-momit-leaf-frame-pointer,-mfancy-math-3
87,0,
0};
Regards, Gerrit.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: revelation Don't start
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 300117 important Bug#300117: revelation: Don't start Severity set to `important'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#300117: revelation Don't start
severity 300117 important thanks This bug only affects compatibility with old versions of packages from testing, and therefore is not release-critical. Stefan, the problem here is that you depend on a series of python2.3-specific packages (python (= 2.3), python2.3-crypto, libxml2-python2.3), but then you also depend on python-gtk2 and python-gnome2, which don't specify which version of python they depend on. The current python-gtk2 package *still* doesn't say what version of python it requires, so previous versions probably didn't either; the current python-gnome package has a dependency on python (= 2.3), python ( 2.4), so it appears to work correctly on upgrades, but historical versions may have been broken. Cheers, -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#195173: Tha new rawlex repliccas has finelly arrived assonant
The new craze is finnally here - one of the bast sites that can give you the things you've allways wanted to get - watchees, repliccas to be correct, of the bast brand s in the world! Impress you're lady with tag heur, roleex, and more. You naame it - We got it for you! m show me more http://agree.wlue.com/r/erika/credit.htm like sid said this has totally renued my spirit for the band i m so excited about saturday i can hardly contain myself we rock. the only dyke bar in the east village! we have genius producer star dj hottie. wuz up y all anyway you guys have a great web page and all i wanted to say is keep it up anyways peace out i now listen to your tapes while laying down it takes me deeper faster and best of all i do not hear the brain chatter noise. this land is our land and we have an inherited right to use our land we do not need the few washington dc land grabbers taking our land from us to please the radical environmentalist. the power of loving thought in energizing and healing nature and healing an older beloved family pet. we knew a week ago that paul was going to come and play but we were not allowed to say anything it has been the longest week of my life said bill heckle a director of the cavern club. i love this poem nbsp it s strong clearly written and understandable nbsp i m sorry chris that i misinterpreted the comment as part of the poem. my first cousin once removed has a friend who knows alan doyle!! doesn t that sound like i almost know them? ahhh poor melanie she will be so jealous. me interesa conocer mas a fondo sobre este tema asà mismo los lugares reconocidos para su capacitación. note include your e-mail address if you d like us to consider your comments for publication in adventure. ok since platinumblonde has been doing quizes i thought i should do one too about our family. sign the guestbook all you ppl who are coming here the counter goes up but nobody loves me!!! the subject of all things beatley is never-ending and i have two questions that i ve been trying to resolve for years maybe you will know or perhaps some posters can help. sometime s our demons aren t ours at all we mesh with the sins of those who wronged us and we assume total blame it s so hard to break free for fear of being alone but poets are never alone are they? an upcoming christie s auction will feature the handwritten lyrics to if you ve got troubles reports the. because of these issues an appropriate legal structure is essential to eliminating institutional cultural racism. abeg make uns keep of.
Processed: Re: Bug#301378: geneweb: near 100% memory utilisation and slow system
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 301378 serious Bug#301378: geneweb: near 100% memory utilisation and slow system Severity set to `serious'. tags 301378 sid -experimental Unknown tag/s: -experimental. Recognized are: patch wontfix moreinfo unreproducible fixed potato woody sid help security upstream pending sarge sarge-ignore experimental d-i confirmed ipv6 lfs fixed-in-experimental fixed-upstream l10n. Bug#301378: geneweb: near 100% memory utilisation and slow system Tags were: experimental Tags added: sid thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: FIX: libant1.6-java: FTBFS: Jikes could not find package java.lang
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 301267 patch Bug#301267: libant1.6-java: FTBFS: Jikes could not find package java.lang There were no tags set. Tags added: patch thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#301267: FIX: libant1.6-java: FTBFS: Jikes could not find package java.lang
tags 301267 patch thanks Since a few months SableVM's class library is compressed, so the /usr/share/sablevm/sablevm-classpath does not contain it. The preferred interface for finding the boot class path has always been `cat /usr/share/sablevm/classlib.pth`, while the rules had the path hardcoded. In any case, the upstream now includes a stable path: /usr/lib/sablevm/jre/lib/rt.jar for the boot class library, so the attached patch modifies the debian/rules to use it. This resolves one problem, but I am getting: build: Created dir: /tmp/libant1.6-java-1.6.2/build/lib Compiling 218 source files to /tmp/libant1.6-java-1.6.2/build/classes Error: -source only recognizes Java releases 1.3 (JLS 2 features), 1.4 (assert statement), and 1.5 (partial support beta, see NEWS for supported features). use: jikes [options] [EMAIL PROTECTED] file.java... For more help, try -help or -version. BUILD FAILED /tmp/libant1.6-java-1.6.2/build.xml:1063: The following error occurred while executing this line: /tmp/libant1.6-java-1.6.2/build.xml:631: Compile failed; see the compiler error output for details. I have not figured out why jikes does not like the -source parameter. I am looking into that. Thanks cheers, Grzegorz B. Prokopski -- Grzegorz B. Prokopski [EMAIL PROTECTED] SableVM - Free, LGPL'ed Java VM http://sablevm.org Why SableVM ?!? http://sablevm.org/wiki/Features Debian GNU/Linux - the Free OS http://www.debian.org --- ./orig/rules 2005-03-25 09:44:51.0 -0500 +++ ./new/rules 2005-03-25 09:38:15.0 -0500 @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ # Java compiler for bootstrap.sh and the Ant javac task export JAVAC=/usr/bin/jikes -export BOOTJAVAC_OPTS=-bootclasspath /usr/share/sablevm/sablevm-classpath:/usr/share/java/jaxp-1.2.jar -target 1.2 +export BOOTJAVAC_OPTS=-bootclasspath /usr/lib/sablevm/jre/lib/rt.jar:/usr/share/java/jaxp-1.2.jar -target 1.2 # The Xerces-J classes are added by a symlink in lib/ export CLASSPATH=/usr/share/java/junit.jar
Bug#301390: libjavascript-perl: Simple class binding causes SIGSEGV
Package: libjavascript-perl
Version: 0.52-4
Severity: grave
Tags: experimental
Justification: renders package unusable
I tried to simulate 'document.write()', so I wrote a simple package Document.pm:
-- cut --
package Document;
sub new {
my $self = {};
bless $self;
return $self;
}
sub write {
my $self = $_[0];
my $text = $_[1];
$self-{buffer} .= $text;
}
1;
-- cut --
and a script:
-- cut --
#!/usr/bin/perl
use JavaScript;
use Document;
my $runtime = new JavaScript::Runtime;
my $context = $runtime-create_context();
$context-bind_class(
name = 'Document',
constructor = \Document::new,
methods = {
write = \Document::write
},
package = 'Document'
);
$context-eval('var document = new Document()');
-- cut --
Executing the script gives SIGSEGV. gdb where shows the following:
(gdb) where
#0 0x402feef5 in JS_GetClass () from /usr/lib/libsmjs.so.1
#1 0x4001be5c in ?? () from /usr/lib/perl5/auto/JavaScript/JavaScript.so
#2 0x0820a048 in ?? ()
#3 0x08214570 in ?? ()
#4 0x081f7f60 in ?? ()
#5 0x in ?? ()
#6 0x6a1e3e9c in ?? ()
#7 0x0814e298 in ?? ()
#8 0xbfffeb50 in ?? ()
#9 0x4036c298 in ?? () from /usr/lib/libsmjs.so.1
#10 0x081a92a8 in ?? ()
#11 0x08214908 in ?? ()
#12 0xbfffec28 in ?? ()
#13 0x40326de6 in js_Invoke () from /usr/lib/libsmjs.so.1
#14 0x40326de6 in js_Invoke () from /usr/lib/libsmjs.so.1
#15 0x4032b3fc in js_Interpret () from /usr/lib/libsmjs.so.1
#16 0x403274ac in js_Execute () from /usr/lib/libsmjs.so.1
#17 0x403028c4 in JS_EvaluateUCScriptForPrincipals ()
from /usr/lib/libsmjs.so.1
#18 0x4030281f in JS_EvaluateUCScript () from /usr/lib/libsmjs.so.1
#19 0x4030270a in JS_EvaluateScript () from /usr/lib/libsmjs.so.1
#20 0x4001fbaa in XS_JavaScript__Context_EvaluateScriptImpl ()
from /usr/lib/perl5/auto/JavaScript/JavaScript.so
#21 0x080c32d6 in Perl_pp_entersub ()
#22 0x080bbdc9 in Perl_runops_standard ()
#23 0x080635e8 in perl_run ()
#24 0x080633f5 in perl_run ()
#25 0x0805fb9f in main ()
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.25
Locale: LANG=ru_RU.KOI8-R, LC_CTYPE=ru_RU.KOI8-R (charmap=KOI8-R)
Versions of packages libjavascript-perl depends on:
ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-20 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libsmjs11.5rc6a-1The Mozilla SpiderMonkey JavaScrip
ii perl5.8.4-8 Larry Wall's Practical Extraction
ii perl-base [perlapi-5.8.4] 5.8.4-8 The Pathologically Eclectic Rubbis
-- no debconf information
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#297806: FTBFS in experimental
On Fri, Mar 25, 2005 at 05:44:40AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: On Fri, Mar 25, 2005 at 01:23:01PM +, Gerrit Pape wrote: On Fri, Mar 25, 2005 at 04:59:04AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: It most certainly is *not* a good idea; it's contraindicated by policy to build binaries with -Os instead of -O2, and the idea of calling -Os to set -mcpu=supersparc leaves me very much afraid of what other random options diet would set. It's that diet libc is meant to produce statically linked binaries optimized for size; that's what it's designed for. Here're the options it uses on Debian, I'm not aware of any problems they cause. As it's explained to me, util-vserver's use of dietlibc has nothing to do with a need for small binaries; it's because the package is used in a chroot-intensive environment and should not depend on glibc's NSS. As a result, I don't see any reason to use -Os when building util-vserver. Ah ok. I now also see it's the upstream author of util-vserver who contributed most of the changes that I included in the recent upload to the dietlibc development ;-). Looks like he put quite some work into it.. I think the idea of having -Os do *anything* besides setting -Os is shaky, FWIW. Other than overriding the CPU selection on sparc, the other problem I see with the chosen options is that you use -fomit-frame-pointer everywhere, which discards valuable debugging information for no discernible gain... Nearly all of the options is upstream's choice, and I think the porters of the different architectures measured the efficiency of the options regarding size optimization. Generally I prefer to make as less changes to upstream as possible, and these options are in place for quite some time, used with various compiler version. I well understand your point of view though. Thanks, Gerrit. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#289182: kino endianness issues on powerpc
On Fri, Mar 25, 2005 at 02:26:41AM +, Paul Brossier wrote: On Fri, Mar 25, 2005 at 01:38:27AM +0100, Daniel Kobras wrote: it works perfectly on powerpc, a much nicer solution indeed. and the first patch was wrong, the image was slightly more redish. Great. We're getting closer, it seems. Does the video part of mpeg2 export also work correctly now? oh yes, very well. and the video filters too. Very good! I've just uploaded 0.75-6 that should finally address all problems in this bug report. Thanks for testing! Regards, Daniel. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#289182: marked as done (kino endianness issues on powerpc)
Your message dated Fri, 25 Mar 2005 11:03:24 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#289182: fixed in kino 0.75-6 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Jan 2005 17:37:55 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jan 07 09:37:55 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from zirkon.biophys.uni-duesseldorf.de [134.99.176.3] (root) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Cmy3f-0004Ld-00; Fri, 07 Jan 2005 09:37:55 -0800 Received: from zirkon.biophys.uni-duesseldorf.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [127.0.0.1]) by zirkon.biophys.uni-duesseldorf.de (8.12.11/8.12.11/Debian-3) with ESMTP id j07Hbr79025914 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 18:37:53 +0100 Received: from localhost ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) by zirkon.biophys.uni-duesseldorf.de (8.12.11/8.12.11/Debian-3) with ESMTP id j07HbqpQ025910 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 18:37:52 +0100 Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2005 18:37:52 +0100 (CET) From: Michael Schmitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: kino endianness issues on powerpc Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: kino Version: 0.75-2 Severity: serious kino appears to have multiple issues with data endianness on powerpc. Symptoms: Video display: fine when using GDK, reverse video (or rather: magenta on cyan) when using XV for display in the edit and trim menus. Audio in edit/trim mode is fine BTW (see audio problems below). Video export: when using the MPEG export with mjpegtools 1.6.2-0.7 (built from source from Christian Marillat's site), mp2enc fails to produce output with a message like EOF in WAV header when searching for tag data The resulting .mpv file shows the same reverse video effects as the XV display in edit/trim mode. Audio export: Exporting to WAV format directly results in audio data that can't be used with mp2enc, while exporting to WAV format using sox generates correct data (feeding such data to the MPEG encode process results in reverse video, correct audio files). Using ffmpeg (20041227-0.1, built from source from Christian Marillat's site as well), exporting as DivX or DVD results in correct color video, while the audio stream is loud noise. Verbose output in ffmpeg shows audio format detection as pcm_s16le. Suspecting an endianness bug here, I've hacked ffmpeg to decode pcm 16 bit data as big endian regardless of detected data type, which gives perfect audio encoding in DivX or DVD exports. I suspect kino declares BE audio data to be LE in the DV export (or indeed any) pipe. No idea what's the cause of the XV and mpeg2enc endianness problems though. HTH, Michael --- Received: (at 289182-close) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Mar 2005 16:24:08 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Mar 25 08:24:08 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DErbT-0008Ty-00; Fri, 25 Mar 2005 08:24:07 -0800 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DErHQ-0003fy-00; Fri, 25 Mar 2005 11:03:24 -0500 From: Daniel Kobras [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $ Subject: Bug#289182: fixed in kino 0.75-6 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2005 11:03:24 -0500 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2 Source: kino Source-Version: 0.75-6 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of kino, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: kino_0.75-6.diff.gz to pool/main/k/kino/kino_0.75-6.diff.gz kino_0.75-6.dsc to pool/main/k/kino/kino_0.75-6.dsc kino_0.75-6_i386.deb to pool/main/k/kino/kino_0.75-6_i386.deb A summary of
Bug#300573: sylpheed-claws-vcalendar-plugin: FTBFS on various arches: outdated libtool and PIC issues.
On Fri, Mar 25, 2005 at 12:31:00PM +0100, Ricardo Mones wrote: On Sun, 20 Mar 2005 15:27:17 +0100 Kurt Roeckx [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It's also trying to make a shared library without using -fPIC. This also causes build failures on other arches and is probably the result of not using libtool properly. It also linking staticly to it, so it should probably be easy to work around that. Could you to explain me how? Sorry for being dense but I don't see what workaround are you referring to. I don't want to install the library globally but the plugin needs it, how can I achieve this without static linking? Since you only want to link staticly, there is no need to make the shared version. Only the shared version requires the -fPIC. It shouldn't be too hard to let it only make the static version. Kurt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#301193: marked as done (sylpheed: buffer overflow bug in 0.8.0 - 1.0.3, 1.9.0 - 1.9.4)
Your message dated Fri, 25 Mar 2005 11:47:30 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#301193: fixed in sylpheed 1.0.4-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Mar 2005 11:34:15 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Mar 24 03:34:14 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from bacterio.telecable.es (smtp.telecable.es) [212.89.0.17]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DEQbO-0002ee-00; Thu, 24 Mar 2005 03:34:14 -0800
Received: (qmail 20451 invoked from network); 24 Mar 2005 11:33:42 -
Received: from cm-85-152-104-25.telecable.es (HELO busgosu.home.net)
([85.152.104.25])
(envelope-sender [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by mail.telecable.es (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 24 Mar 2005 11:33:42 -
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2005 12:33:42 +0100
From: Ricardo Mones [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: sylpheed: buffer overflow bug in 0.8.0 - 1.0.3, 1.9.0 - 1.9.4
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 1.9.6cvs1 (GTK+ 2.6.2; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
X-Face:
;%Ws3L$.3^vnZGdjc-N\sIaOI1)zEJW{~f!E|WLg0}[]]#'p=~f7uZT=?r!{yZ#g!nVG9?8YC!24qH7(VA}AFiACRfNW5?[XLG3Bx#.BX9A|\yVgr]v:QIn*b,#vUS30QH!*1]:ah(_DioSgsy(K{(Vno,2ED
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Package: sylpheed
Severity: critical
Justification: security hole, buffer overflow
Tags: security, sarge, sid, experimental
According upstream:
A buffer overflow which occurred when displaying a message with
attachments which have MIME-encoded filenames was fixed.
This is fixed in 1.0.4, to be uploaded ASAP.
Upstream report: http://www.tmtm.org/cgi-bin/w3ml/sylpheed/msg/24429
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-9-amd64-k8
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)
--
Ricardo Mones Lastra - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Centro de Inteligencia Artificial, Universidad de Oviedo en Gijon
33271 Asturias, SPAIN. - http://www.aic.uniovi.es/mones
---
Received: (at 301193-close) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Mar 2005 16:53:08 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Mar 25 08:53:08 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DEs3Y-0003Vo-00; Fri, 25 Mar 2005 08:53:08 -0800
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DEry6-00083u-00; Fri, 25 Mar 2005 11:47:30 -0500
From: Ricardo Mones [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $
Subject: Bug#301193: fixed in sylpheed 1.0.4-1
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2005 11:47:30 -0500
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Source: sylpheed
Source-Version: 1.0.4-1
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
sylpheed, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
sylpheed-i18n_1.0.4-1_all.deb
to pool/main/s/sylpheed/sylpheed-i18n_1.0.4-1_all.deb
sylpheed_1.0.4-1.diff.gz
to pool/main/s/sylpheed/sylpheed_1.0.4-1.diff.gz
sylpheed_1.0.4-1.dsc
to pool/main/s/sylpheed/sylpheed_1.0.4-1.dsc
sylpheed_1.0.4-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/s/sylpheed/sylpheed_1.0.4-1_i386.deb
sylpheed_1.0.4.orig.tar.gz
to pool/main/s/sylpheed/sylpheed_1.0.4.orig.tar.gz
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Ricardo Mones [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated sylpheed
Bug#301352: marked as done (xmpi: ftbfs [sparc] automake version mismatch)
Your message dated Fri, 25 Mar 2005 11:47:57 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#301352: fixed in xmpi 2.2.3b8-7 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Mar 2005 10:15:51 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Mar 25 02:15:51 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from blars.org (renig.nat.blars.org) [64.81.35.59] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DElr5-0007x0-00; Fri, 25 Mar 2005 02:15:51 -0800 Received: from renig.nat.blars.org (plergb.nat.blars.org [172.16.1.1]) by renig.nat.blars.org (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian-7.1) with ESMTP id j2PAFnXE015979 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Fri, 25 Mar 2005 02:15:49 -0800 Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by renig.nat.blars.org (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian-7.1) id j2PAFnlR015977; Fri, 25 Mar 2005 02:15:49 -0800 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Blars Blarson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: xmpi: ftbfs [sparc] automake version mismatch X-Mailer: reportbug 1.50 Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2005 02:15:49 -0800 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: xmpi Version: 2.2.3b8-6 Severity: serious Tags: sid Justification: fails to build from source xmpi failed to build from source on a sparc buildd. This problem was NOT duplicated on my sparc pbuilder. There may be insufficiently strict build dependancies. Making install in src make[2]: Entering directory `/build/buildd/xmpi-2.2.3b8/src' cd .. \ /bin/sh /build/buildd/xmpi-2.2.3b8/config/missing --run automake-1.7 --foreign src/Makefile configure.in:34: version mismatch. This is Automake 1.7.9, configure.in:34: but the definition used by this AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE configure.in:34: comes from Automake 1.7.6. You should recreate configure.in:34: aclocal.m4 with aclocal and run automake again. make[2]: *** [Makefile.in] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/xmpi-2.2.3b8/src' --- Received: (at 301352-close) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Mar 2005 16:53:07 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Mar 25 08:53:06 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DEs3W-0003Va-00; Fri, 25 Mar 2005 08:53:06 -0800 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DEryX-0008F8-00; Fri, 25 Mar 2005 11:47:57 -0500 From: Camm Maguire [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $ Subject: Bug#301352: fixed in xmpi 2.2.3b8-7 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2005 11:47:57 -0500 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Source: xmpi Source-Version: 2.2.3b8-7 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of xmpi, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: libxmpi4-dev_2.2.3b8-7_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xmpi/libxmpi4-dev_2.2.3b8-7_i386.deb libxmpi4_2.2.3b8-7_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xmpi/libxmpi4_2.2.3b8-7_i386.deb xmpi_2.2.3b8-7.diff.gz to pool/main/x/xmpi/xmpi_2.2.3b8-7.diff.gz xmpi_2.2.3b8-7.dsc to pool/main/x/xmpi/xmpi_2.2.3b8-7.dsc xmpi_2.2.3b8-7_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xmpi/xmpi_2.2.3b8-7_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Camm Maguire [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated xmpi package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Bug#301243: marked as done ([CAN-2005-0399][CAN-2005-0401][CAN-2005-0402] Three security vulnerabilities in Firefox 1.0.1)
Your message dated Fri, 25 Mar 2005 12:03:24 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#301243: fixed in mozilla-firefox 1.0.2-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Mar 2005 16:28:09 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Mar 24 08:28:09 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.173] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DEVBo-YP-00; Thu, 24 Mar 2005 08:28:09 -0800 Received: from [212.227.126.179] (helo=mrelayng.kundenserver.de) by moutng.kundenserver.de with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 1DEVBo-000131-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 24 Mar 2005 17:28:08 +0100 Received: from [195.90.9.8] (helo=anton) by mrelayng.kundenserver.de with asmtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 1DEVBn-ru-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 24 Mar 2005 17:28:07 +0100 Received: by anton (Postfix, from userid 2028) id 91676B6EC4; Thu, 24 Mar 2005 17:28:07 +0100 (CET) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Moritz Muehlenhoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [CAN-2005-0399][CAN-2005-0401][CAN-2005-0402] Three security vulnerabilities in Firefox 1.0.1 X-Mailer: reportbug 2.26.1.1.200308291454 Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2005 17:28:07 +0100 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Provags-ID: kundenserver.de [EMAIL PROTECTED] auth:4ad79d65ac46f2345c6ef2e856c1d9ef Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: mozilla-firefox Version: 1.0-2.37.200411220627 Severity: grave Tags: security Three security vulnerabilities have been found in Firefox: I'm write a collective bugreport for all three vulnerabilities, as you'll they're all fixed in 1.0.2: CAN-2005-0399: An GIF processing error when parsing the obsolete Netscape extension 2 can lead to an exploitable heap overrun, allowing an attacker to run arbitrary code on the user's machine. CAN-2005-0401: A malicious page that could lure a user into dragging something (such as a fake scrollbar) can bypass the restriction on opening privileged XUL. The startup scripts in the XUL will run with enhanced privilege, though the actions taken upon merely opening most XUL are benign. So far no way to run arbitrary code supplied by the attacker has been found, but this could be a stepping-stone to future attacks. CAN-2005-0402: If a user bookmarked a malicious page as a Firefox sidebar panel that page could execute arbitrary programs by opening a privileged page and injecting javascript into it. Cheers, Moritz -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.0 Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux anton 2.4.29-univention.1 #1 SMP Thu Jan 27 17:08:46 CET 2005 i686 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Versions of packages mozilla-firefox depends on: ii debianutil 2.5.4.1.200308251040 Miscellaneous utilities specific t ii fontconfig 2.2.1-2.18.200308310006 generic font configuration library ii libatk1.0- 1.4.1-1.5.200312191610The ATK accessibility toolkit ii libc6 2.3.2-9 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libfontcon 2.2.1-2.18.200308310006 generic font configuration library ii libfreetyp 2.1.5-2.3.200310081510FreeType 2 font engine, shared lib ii libgcc11:3.3.2-0pre4.12.200309291809 GCC support library ii libglib2.0 2.2.2-1.6.200308220957The GLib library of C routines ii libgtk2.0- 2.2.2-2.24.200409211203 The GTK+ graphical user interface ii libidl00.8.2-1.4.200308222135library for parsing CORBA IDL file ii libjpeg62 6b-5.4.20030802 The Independent JPEG Group's JPEG ii libkrb53 1.3-2.5.200308221740 MIT Kerberos runtime libraries ii libpango1. 1.2.3-1.15.200408231011 Layout and rendering of internatio ii libpng12-0 1.2.5.0-8.6.200410161035 PNG library - runtime ii libstdc++5 1:3.3.2-0pre4.12.200309291809 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 ii libx11-6 4.3.0-0pre1v5.51.200409211658 X Window System protocol client li ii libxext6 4.3.0-0pre1v5.51.200409211658 X Window System miscellaneous exte ii libxft2
Bug#301267: libant1.6-java: Working patch
Package: libant1.6-java Version: 1.6.2-2 Followup-For: Bug #301267 Here is a full patch to solve the problem. Have fun! Etienne -- Etienne M. Gagnon, Ph.D. http://www.info.uqam.ca/~egagnon/ SableVM: http://www.sablevm.org/ SableCC: http://www.sablecc.org/ -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: powerpc (ppc) Kernel: Linux 2.4.24-ben1 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Versions of packages libant1.6-java depends on: ii classpath-common 2:0.14-1 architecture independent files ii jamvm [java1-runtime] 1.2.5-1virtual machine which conforms to ii java2-runtime-equivs [java2-r 1.0Dummy package to fulfil package de ii sablevm [java1-runtime] 1.11.1-2 Free implementation of Java Virtua -- no debconf information Only in libant1.6-java-1.6.2: bin Only in libant1.6-java-1.6.2-modified/: bootstrap Only in libant1.6-java-1.6.2-modified/build: LICENSE.dom.txt Only in libant1.6-java-1.6.2-modified/build: LICENSE.sax.txt Only in libant1.6-java-1.6.2-modified/build: LICENSE.txt Only in libant1.6-java-1.6.2-modified/build: LICENSE.xerces.txt Only in libant1.6-java-1.6.2-modified/build: NOTICE.txt Only in libant1.6-java-1.6.2/build: classes Only in libant1.6-java-1.6.2-modified/build: lib Only in libant1.6-java-1.6.2-modified/build: optional.manifest diff -r -u libant1.6-java-1.6.2/build.xml libant1.6-java-1.6.2-modified/build.xml --- libant1.6-java-1.6.2/build.xml 2005-03-25 12:31:30.0 -0500 +++ libant1.6-java-1.6.2-modified/build.xml 2005-03-25 12:23:20.0 -0500 @@ -48,8 +48,8 @@ property name=chmod.maxparallel value=250/ property name=deprecation value=false/ property name=optimize value=true/ - property name=javac.target value=1.2/ - property name=javac.source value=1.2/ + property name=javac.target value=1.3/ + property name=javac.source value=1.3/ property name=junit.fork value=false/ property name=junit.filtertrace value=off/ property name=junit.summary value=no/ Only in libant1.6-java-1.6.2-modified/debian: files Only in libant1.6-java-1.6.2-modified/debian: libant1.6-java diff -r -u libant1.6-java-1.6.2/debian/rules libant1.6-java-1.6.2-modified/debian/rules --- libant1.6-java-1.6.2/debian/rules 2005-03-25 12:31:27.0 -0500 +++ libant1.6-java-1.6.2-modified/debian/rules 2005-03-25 12:18:08.0 -0500 @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ # Java compiler for bootstrap.sh and the Ant javac task export JAVAC=/usr/bin/jikes -export BOOTJAVAC_OPTS=-bootclasspath /usr/share/sablevm/sablevm-classpath:/usr/share/java/jaxp-1.2.jar -target 1.2 +export BOOTJAVAC_OPTS=-bootclasspath /usr/lib/sablevm/jre/lib/rt.jar:/usr/share/java/jaxp-1.2.jar -target 1.2 # The Xerces-J classes are added by a symlink in lib/ export CLASSPATH=/usr/share/java/junit.jar
Bug#301200: marked as done (sylpheed-claws: buffer overflow bug in 0.8.0 - 1.0.3, 1.9.0 - 1.9.4)
Your message dated Fri, 25 Mar 2005 12:47:38 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#301200: fixed in sylpheed-claws 1.0.4-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Mar 2005 12:18:04 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Mar 24 04:18:04 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from zape.telecable.es [212.89.0.25]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DERHo-0007fv-00; Thu, 24 Mar 2005 04:18:04 -0800
Received: (qmail 18446 invoked from network); 24 Mar 2005 12:17:30 -
Received: from unknown (HELO busgosu.home.net) ([85.152.104.25])
(envelope-sender [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by 0 (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 24 Mar 2005 12:17:30 -
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2005 13:17:30 +0100
From: Ricardo Mones [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: sylpheed-claws: buffer overflow bug in 0.8.0 - 1.0.3, 1.9.0 -
1.9.4
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 1.9.6cvs1 (GTK+ 2.6.2; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
X-Face:
;%Ws3L$.3^vnZGdjc-N\sIaOI1)zEJW{~f!E|WLg0}[]]#'p=~f7uZT=?r!{yZ#g!nVG9?8YC!24qH7(VA}AFiACRfNW5?[XLG3Bx#.BX9A|\yVgr]v:QIn*b,#vUS30QH!*1]:ah(_DioSgsy(K{(Vno,2ED
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Package: sylpheed-claws
Severity: critical
Justification: security hole, buffer overflow
Tags: security, sarge, sid, experimental
According upstream:
A buffer overflow which occurred when displaying a message with
attachments which have MIME-encoded filenames was fixed.
This is fixed in 1.0.4 (sid/sarge) and 1.9.6 (experimental), to be uploaded
ASAP. Please upgrade.
Upstream report: http://www.tmtm.org/cgi-bin/w3ml/sylpheed/msg/24429
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-9-amd64-k8
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)
--
Ricardo Mones Lastra - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Centro de Inteligencia Artificial, Universidad de Oviedo en Gijon
33271 Asturias, SPAIN. - http://www.aic.uniovi.es/mones
---
Received: (at 301200-close) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Mar 2005 17:59:12 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Mar 25 09:59:12 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DEt5T-0006bd-00; Fri, 25 Mar 2005 09:59:11 -0800
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DEsuI-0002Zg-00; Fri, 25 Mar 2005 12:47:38 -0500
From: Ricardo Mones [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $
Subject: Bug#301200: fixed in sylpheed-claws 1.0.4-1
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2005 12:47:38 -0500
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Source: sylpheed-claws
Source-Version: 1.0.4-1
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
sylpheed-claws, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
libsylpheed-claws-dev_1.0.4-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/s/sylpheed-claws/libsylpheed-claws-dev_1.0.4-1_i386.deb
sylpheed-claws-clamav_1.0.4-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/s/sylpheed-claws/sylpheed-claws-clamav_1.0.4-1_i386.deb
sylpheed-claws-dillo-viewer_1.0.4-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/s/sylpheed-claws/sylpheed-claws-dillo-viewer_1.0.4-1_i386.deb
sylpheed-claws-i18n_1.0.4-1_all.deb
to pool/main/s/sylpheed-claws/sylpheed-claws-i18n_1.0.4-1_all.deb
sylpheed-claws-image-viewer_1.0.4-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/s/sylpheed-claws/sylpheed-claws-image-viewer_1.0.4-1_i386.deb
sylpheed-claws-pgpmime_1.0.4-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/s/sylpheed-claws/sylpheed-claws-pgpmime_1.0.4-1_i386.deb
sylpheed-claws-plugins_1.0.4-1_all.deb
to
Processed: tagging 301267
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10 tags 301267 patch Bug#301267: libant1.6-java: FTBFS: Jikes could not find package java.lang Tags were: patch Tags added: patch End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#299939: gkdial
#299939 and #218014 likely have the same cause. Someone might
consider downgrading #299939 and/or merging them.
It seems that both are caused by a user-trigged disconnect event while
in a state when disconnect should be disallowed. A proper solution
probably requires glib synchronization, but I'll bet that the problems
can be visibly solved by something like:
/*
* runs the command the user defined to disconnect
*/
void
gk_disconnect (GtkWidget * button, gpointer data)
{
GkDial *gkdial = (GkDial *) data;
gchar *disconnect_cmd = DOWNCMD;
+
+ if (!disconnect_valid) return;
+ disconnect_valid=0;
/*
* this shows that gkdial was the responsible for the connection
* being
* closed
*/
gkdial-was_gkdial = FALSE;
gkdial_exec (gkdial, disconnect_cmd, DISCONNECTING);
}
where disconnect_valid is a global variable, set to TRUE at the
appropriate time, and set to FALSE above, and while redialing.
I'm having trouble testing this since I don't have a linmodem..
Justin
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: tagging 301038
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10 tags 301038 confirmed Bug#301038: imagefs: segfaults on startup There were no tags set. Tags added: confirmed End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: imagefs crash
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 301038 patch Bug#301038: imagefs: segfaults on startup Tags were: confirmed Tags added: patch thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#301038: imagefs crash
tag 301038 patch
thanks
It appears that the imagefs crash can be avoided by pre-creating the
file. It will crash if the file doesn't exist, but seems to succeed
if you /usr/bin/touch the file beforehand.
There's something wrong with the constructor CImage::CImage. When you
try to create a file, its boolean create parameters is true; but the
code is wrong somehow, and strace has:
open(z, O_RDWR) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or
directory)
instead of creat(z). So, someone that actually knows something
about c++ needs to look at the code an either create the file
beforehand, or add a flag similar to O_CREAT.
There are other problems, too, but they seem to be caused only by lack
of input checking:
$ imagefs d a
Read directory from image file [a].
Fatal: could not open file a.
Directory listing:
Segmentation fault (core dumped)
$ imagefs r a c
Remove files from image file [a].
Fatal: could not open file a.
Segmentation fault (core dumped)
That's pretty simple to solve:
catch (...)
{
cout Fatal: could not open file pcImageFile . endl;
+ return 1;
}
There are several instances of these. Probably there should be a
wrapper function which outputs Fatal: %s to stderr, and exit(1) (or
whatever the c++ification of exit is).
Justin
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#301416: libgtkmm-2.4-1: Broken dependencies
Package: libgtkmm-2.4-1 Version: 2.4.10-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable The following packages have unmet dependencies: libgtkmm-2.4-1: Depends: libatk1.0-0 (= 1.9.0) but 1.8.0-4 is to be installed E: Broken packages I've tried 2 italian mirror, but situation is the same. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.11.3 Locale: LANG=it_IT, LC_CTYPE=it_IT (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Versions of packages libgtkmm-2.4-1 depends on: ii libatk1.0-0 1.8.0-4 The ATK accessibility toolkit ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-20 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libgcc1 1:3.4.3-12 GCC support library ii libglib2.0-02.6.3-1 The GLib library of C routines ii libglibmm-2.4-1 2.6.1-1 C++ wrapper for the GLib toolkit ( ii libgtk2.0-0 2.6.2-4 The GTK+ graphical user interface ii libpango1.0-0 1.8.1-1 Layout and rendering of internatio ii libsigc++-2.0-0 2.0.10-1 type-safe Signal Framework for C++ ii libstdc++5 1:3.3.5-12 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#300662: marked as done (qalculate: New version depend on experimental version of library)
Your message dated Fri, 25 Mar 2005 14:47:58 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#300662: fixed in qalculate 0.7.2-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Mar 2005 23:32:14 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Mar 20 15:32:14 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from smtpout1.compass.net.nz [203.97.97.123] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DD9u1-0004cC-00; Sun, 20 Mar 2005 15:32:14 -0800 Received: from cliux.homeunix.net (IP203-97-107-224.compass.net.nz [203.97.107.224]) by smtpout1.compass.net.nz (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id j2KNlL5U006338; Mon, 21 Mar 2005 11:47:22 +1200 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cliux.homeunix.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9125B14FDB01; Mon, 21 Mar 2005 11:31:52 +1200 (NZST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Carlos Z.F. Liu [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: qalculate: New version depend on experimental version of library Reply-To: Carlos Liu [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8 Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2005 11:31:51 +1200 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: qalculate Version: 0.7.2-2 Severity: serious Hello, The new 0.7.2-2 version of qalculate depends on libatk1.0-0 (= 1.9.0). However, this version of the library only exists in experimental. Please rebuilt in a pbuilder or pure unstable environment. Thanks. -- Best Regards, Carlos --- Received: (at 300662-close) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Mar 2005 19:55:03 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Mar 25 11:55:03 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DEutb-00053c-00; Fri, 25 Mar 2005 11:55:03 -0800 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DEumk-0004J4-00; Fri, 25 Mar 2005 14:47:58 -0500 From: Martin Waitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $ Subject: Bug#300662: fixed in qalculate 0.7.2-3 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2005 14:47:58 -0500 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Source: qalculate Source-Version: 0.7.2-3 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of qalculate, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: qalc_0.7.2-3_i386.deb to pool/main/q/qalculate/qalc_0.7.2-3_i386.deb qalculate_0.7.2-3.diff.gz to pool/main/q/qalculate/qalculate_0.7.2-3.diff.gz qalculate_0.7.2-3.dsc to pool/main/q/qalculate/qalculate_0.7.2-3.dsc qalculate_0.7.2-3_i386.deb to pool/main/q/qalculate/qalculate_0.7.2-3_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Martin Waitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated qalculate package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2005 20:07:35 +0100 Source: qalculate Binary: qalculate qalc Architecture: source i386 Version: 0.7.2-3 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Martin Waitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Martin Waitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: qalc - Powerful and easy to use command line calculator qalculate - Powerful and easy to use desktop calculator Closes: 300662 Changes: qalculate (0.7.2-3) unstable;
Bug#299709: Shall I upload libexif1 to unstable
Le 24/03/05 à 16:31 Achim Bohnet ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) écrivait : Sorry for the delay to answer. I have hundred mails to read. Could you please tell me what I've to do for showimg ? Thanks. On Thursday 24 March 2005 15:41, Mark Purcell wrote: [...] I intend to upload libkexif1 and rebuilt kipi-plugins and digkameplugins to unstable. They will all sit in unstable until showimg is uploaded to unstable at which time they can all migrate to testing together. I don't want to wait on this any longer. showimg can catch up when it is ready. Okay. I have some cosmetic changes on disk. I'll checkin tonight. Achim Mark -- To me vi is Zen. To use vi is to practice zen. Every command is a koan. Profound to the user, unintelligible to the uninitiated. You discover truth everytime you use it. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Jean-Michel Kelbert signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#301331: marked as done (php4-mcrypt: PHP4 hokey pokey: please rebuild *without* ZTS support)
Your message dated Fri, 25 Mar 2005 16:47:14 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#301331: fixed in php4-mcrypt 3:4.3.10-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Mar 2005 08:51:16 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Mar 25 00:51:16 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from dsl093-039-086.pdx1.dsl.speakeasy.net (localhost.localdomain) [66.93.39.86] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DEkXE-0001OQ-00; Fri, 25 Mar 2005 00:51:16 -0800 Received: by localhost.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000) id D96F0171D21; Fri, 25 Mar 2005 00:51:15 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2005 00:51:15 -0800 From: Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: php4-mcrypt: PHP4 hokey pokey: please rebuild *without* ZTS support Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=ahP6B03r4gLOj5uD Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: --ahP6B03r4gLOj5uD Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Package: php4-mcrypt Version: 3:4.3.10-0.1 Severity: grave Tags: sid After a good deal of soul searching, discussion with upstream, and various bug reports about the subject (#299820, #297223, #297679), the PHP team has made the hard decision to revert support for the ZTS ABI in the the Debian packages. Please rebuild php4-mcrypt to match with a build-dependency on php4-dev (=3D 4:4.3.10-10) and a dependency on phpapi-20020918, and please accept our apologies for the inconvenience. --=20 Steve Langasek postmodern programmer --ahP6B03r4gLOj5uD Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFCQ9EBKN6ufymYLloRAocCAKCIPTgcHyh6gGZ201eTxAPI4oLMPACeNEEt tCiRgE4IJRTcwnLp6WaQpGE= =j7j4 -END PGP SIGNATURE- --ahP6B03r4gLOj5uD-- --- Received: (at 301331-close) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Mar 2005 21:55:21 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Mar 25 13:55:20 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DEwm0-0001LU-00; Fri, 25 Mar 2005 13:55:20 -0800 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DEweA-0008Ga-00; Fri, 25 Mar 2005 16:47:14 -0500 From: Christian Bayle [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $ Subject: Bug#301331: fixed in php4-mcrypt 3:4.3.10-1 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2005 16:47:14 -0500 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Source: php4-mcrypt Source-Version: 3:4.3.10-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of php4-mcrypt, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: php4-mcrypt_4.3.10-1.diff.gz to pool/main/p/php4-mcrypt/php4-mcrypt_4.3.10-1.diff.gz php4-mcrypt_4.3.10-1.dsc to pool/main/p/php4-mcrypt/php4-mcrypt_4.3.10-1.dsc php4-mcrypt_4.3.10-1_i386.deb to pool/main/p/php4-mcrypt/php4-mcrypt_4.3.10-1_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Christian Bayle [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated php4-mcrypt package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
Bug#280043: marked as done (opie-tools-fb: FTBFS: g++ compile error)
Your message dated Sat, 26 Mar 2005 00:40:49 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line opie removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Nov 2004 20:52:51 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Nov 06 12:52:51 2004 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from pd9e7de86.dip.t-dialin.net (stigge.org) [217.231.222.134] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1CQXYI-0007xD-00; Sat, 06 Nov 2004 12:52:50 -0800 Received: (qmail 24885 invoked from network); 6 Nov 2004 20:52:48 - Received: from unknown (HELO atari.stigge.org) (192.168.1.99) by sbo.stigge.org with SMTP; 6 Nov 2004 20:52:48 - Received: from [192.168.1.99] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by atari.stigge.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 836471007E3A5; Sat, 6 Nov 2004 21:52:48 +0100 (CET) From: Roland Stigge [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: opie-tools-fb: FTBFS: g++ compile error Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sat, 6 Nov 2004 21:52:48 +0100 (CET) Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Package: opie-tools-fb Version: 0.9.1-0.snapshot.20030303-2 Severity: serious Hi, building the package opie-tools-fb in a clean build environment (with pbuilder) on i386 results in: = [...] g++ -c -pipe -DQWS -fno-exceptions -fno-rtti -Wall -W -O2 -DQT_NO_DEBUG -I/tmp/buildd/opie-tools-fb-0.9.1-0.snapshot.20030303/include -I/usr/share/qte2/include -I/tmp/buildd/opie-tools-fb-0.9.1-0.snapshot.20030303/mkspecs/qws/linux-generic-g++ -o calculator.o calculator.cpp calculator.cpp: In constructor `Calculator::Calculator(QWidget*, const char*, unsigned int)': calculator.cpp:29: error: no matching function for call to `QSizePolicy:: QSizePolicy(QSizePolicy::SizeType, QSizePolicy::SizeType, int, int, bool)' /usr/share/qte2/include/qsizepolicy.h:46: error: candidates are: QSizePolicy::QSizePolicy(const QSizePolicy) /usr/share/qte2/include/qsizepolicy.h:93: error: QSizePolicy::QSizePolicy(int) /usr/share/qte2/include/qsizepolicy.h:100: error: QSizePolicy::QSizePolicy(QSizePolicy::SizeType, QSizePolicy::SizeType, bool) /usr/share/qte2/include/qsizepolicy.h:63: error: QSizePolicy::QSizePolicy() calculator.cpp:35: error: no matching function for call to `QSizePolicy:: QSizePolicy(QSizePolicy::SizeType, QSizePolicy::SizeType, int, int, bool)' /usr/share/qte2/include/qsizepolicy.h:46: error: candidates are: QSizePolicy::QSizePolicy(const QSizePolicy) /usr/share/qte2/include/qsizepolicy.h:93: error: QSizePolicy::QSizePolicy(int) /usr/share/qte2/include/qsizepolicy.h:100: error: QSizePolicy::QSizePolicy(QSizePolicy::SizeType, QSizePolicy::SizeType, bool) /usr/share/qte2/include/qsizepolicy.h:63: error: QSizePolicy::QSizePolicy() [...] QSizePolicy::QSizePolicy(int) /usr/share/qte2/include/qsizepolicy.h:100: error: QSizePolicy::QSizePolicy(QSizePolicy::SizeType, QSizePolicy::SizeType, bool) /usr/share/qte2/include/qsizepolicy.h:63: error: QSizePolicy::QSizePolicy() calculator.cpp:274: error: no matching function for call to `QSizePolicy:: QSizePolicy(QSizePolicy::SizeType, QSizePolicy::SizeType, int, int, bool)' /usr/share/qte2/include/qsizepolicy.h:46: error: candidates are: QSizePolicy::QSizePolicy(const QSizePolicy) /usr/share/qte2/include/qsizepolicy.h:93: error: QSizePolicy::QSizePolicy(int) /usr/share/qte2/include/qsizepolicy.h:100: error: QSizePolicy::QSizePolicy(QSizePolicy::SizeType, QSizePolicy::SizeType, bool) /usr/share/qte2/include/qsizepolicy.h:63: error: QSizePolicy::QSizePolicy() calculator.cpp:284: error: no matching function for call to `QSizePolicy:: QSizePolicy(QSizePolicy::SizeType, QSizePolicy::SizeType, int, int, bool)' /usr/share/qte2/include/qsizepolicy.h:46: error: candidates are: QSizePolicy::QSizePolicy(const QSizePolicy) /usr/share/qte2/include/qsizepolicy.h:93: error: QSizePolicy::QSizePolicy(int)
Bug#279316: marked as done (opie-themeing-fb: FTBFS: #error: The moc has changed too much)
Your message dated Sat, 26 Mar 2005 00:40:49 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line opie removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Nov 2004 09:52:04 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Nov 02 01:52:04 2004
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from pd95d1e62.dip.t-dialin.net (stigge.org) [217.93.30.98]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1COvKe-00010Q-00; Tue, 02 Nov 2004 01:52:04 -0800
Received: (qmail 24505 invoked from network); 1 Nov 2004 20:25:20 -
Received: from unknown (HELO atari.stigge.org) (192.168.1.99)
by sbo.stigge.org with SMTP; 1 Nov 2004 20:25:20 -
Received: from [192.168.1.99] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by atari.stigge.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52F7310083109;
Mon, 1 Nov 2004 21:25:20 +0100 (CET)
From: Roland Stigge [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: opie-themeing-fb: FTBFS: #error: The moc has changed too much
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2004 21:25:20 +0100 (CET)
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
Package: opie-themeing-fb
Version: 0.9.1-0.snapshot.20030303-3
Severity: serious
Hi,
building the package opie-themeing-fb in a clean build environment
(with pbuilder) on i386 results in:
=
[...]
g++ -c -pipe -DQWS -fno-exceptions -fno-rtti -Wall -W -O2 -fPIC
-DQT_NO_DEBUG -I/tmp/buildd/opie-themeing-fb-0.9.1-0.snapshot.20030303/include
-I/usr/share/qte2/include
-I/tmp/buildd/opie-themeing-fb-0.9.1-0.snapshot.20030303/mkspecs/qws/linux-generic-g++
-o flat.o flat.cpp
In file included from flat.cpp:1032:
flat.moc:13:34: private/qucomextra_p.h: No such file or directory
flat.moc:15:2: #error This file was generated using the moc from 3.3.3. It
flat.moc:16:2: #error cannot be used with the include files from this version
of Qt.
flat.moc:17:2: #error (The moc has changed too much.)
In file included from flat.cpp:1032:
flat.moc:26: error: syntax error before `(' token
flat.moc: In static member function `static QString FlatStylePrivate::tr(const
char*, const char*)':
flat.moc:32: error: `DefaultCodec' is not a member of type `QApplication'
flat.moc: At global scope:
flat.moc:38: error: no `QString FlatStylePrivate::trUtf8(const char*, const
char*)' member function declared in class `FlatStylePrivate'
[...]
flat.moc:62: error: `cleanUp_FlatStylePrivate' undeclared (first use this
function)
flat.moc:62: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each
function it appears in.)
flat.moc: At global scope:
flat.moc:67: error: no `void* FlatStylePrivate::qt_cast(const char*)' member
function declared in class `FlatStylePrivate'
flat.moc: In member function `void* FlatStylePrivate::qt_cast(const char*)':
flat.moc:70: error: 'class QObject' has no member named 'qt_cast'
flat.moc: At global scope:
flat.moc:73: error: type specifier omitted for parameter `QUObject'
flat.moc:73: error: parse error before `*' token
flat.moc:74: error: no `bool FlatStylePrivate::qt_invoke(...)' member function
declared in class `FlatStylePrivate'
flat.moc: In member function `bool FlatStylePrivate::qt_invoke(...)':
flat.moc:75: error: `_id' undeclared (first use this function)
flat.moc:75: error: `_o' undeclared (first use this function)
flat.moc:75: error: 'class QObject' has no member named 'qt_invoke'
flat.moc: At global scope:
flat.moc:78: error: type specifier omitted for parameter `QUObject'
flat.moc:78: error: parse error before `*' token
flat.moc:79: error: no `bool FlatStylePrivate::qt_emit(...)' member function
declared in class `FlatStylePrivate'
flat.moc: In member function `bool FlatStylePrivate::qt_emit(...)':
flat.moc:80: error: 'class QObject' has no member named 'qt_emit'
make[2]: *** [flat.o] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory
`/tmp/buildd/opie-themeing-fb-0.9.1-0.snapshot.20030303/noncore/styles/flat'
make[1]: *** [noncore/styles/flat] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory
`/tmp/buildd/opie-themeing-fb-0.9.1-0.snapshot.20030303'
make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2
=
Thanks for considering.
Bug#276036: marked as done (opie-applets-fb: FTBFS)
Your message dated Sat, 26 Mar 2005 00:40:49 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line opie removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Oct 2004 17:57:33 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Oct 11 10:57:33 2004
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from pd9e7e012.dip.t-dialin.net (stigge.org) [217.231.224.18]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CH4QO-0005lx-00; Mon, 11 Oct 2004 10:57:33 -0700
Received: (qmail 32422 invoked from network); 11 Oct 2004 17:57:29 -
Received: from unknown (HELO atari.stigge.org) (192.168.1.99)
by sbo.stigge.org with SMTP; 11 Oct 2004 17:57:29 -
Received: from [192.168.1.99] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by atari.stigge.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FEDF1007ECE8;
Mon, 11 Oct 2004 19:57:29 +0200 (CEST)
From: Roland Stigge [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: opie-applets-fb: FTBFS
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2004 19:57:29 +0200 (CEST)
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
Package: opie-applets-fb
Version: 0.9.1-0.snapshot.20030303-2
Severity: serious
Hi,
building the package opie-applets-fb in a clean build environment
(with pbuilder) on i386 results in:
=
[...]
g++ -c -pipe -DQWS -fno-exceptions -fno-rtti -Wall -W -O2 -O2
-Wpointer-arith -Wwrite-strings -Wmissing-prototypes -fPIC -DQT_NO_DEBUG
-I/tmp/buildd/opie-applets-fb-0.9.1-0.snapshot.20030303/include
-I/usr/share/qte2/include -Iopieobj/
-I/tmp/buildd/opie-applets-fb-0.9.1-0.snapshot.20030303/mkspecs/qws/linux-generic-g++
-o opieobj/moc_restart.o opieobj/moc_restart.cpp
opieobj/moc_restart.cpp:15:34: private/qucomextra_p.h: No such file or directory
opieobj/moc_restart.cpp:17:2: #error This file was generated using the moc
from 3.3.3. It
opieobj/moc_restart.cpp:18:2: #error cannot be used with the include files
from this version of Qt.
opieobj/moc_restart.cpp:19:2: #error (The moc has changed too much.)
opieobj/moc_restart.cpp:28: error: syntax error before `(' token
opieobj/moc_restart.cpp: In static member function `static QString
RestartApplet::tr(const char*, const char*)':
opieobj/moc_restart.cpp:34: error: `DefaultCodec' is not a member of type `
QApplication'
[...]
make[2]: *** [opieobj/moc_restart.o] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory
`/tmp/buildd/opie-applets-fb-0.9.1-0.snapshot.20030303/core/applets/restartapplet'
make[1]: *** [core/applets/restartapplet] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory
`/tmp/buildd/opie-applets-fb-0.9.1-0.snapshot.20030303'
make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2
=
Thanks for considering.
---
Received: (at 276036-done) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Mar 2005 00:41:04 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Mar 25 16:41:04 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from sorrow.cyrius.com [65.19.161.204]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DEzMK-VA-00; Fri, 25 Mar 2005 16:41:00 -0800
Received: by sorrow.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 10)
id 33C0C64D3D; Sat, 26 Mar 2005 00:40:58 + (UTC)
Received: by deprecation.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 06DC34F1AF; Sat, 26 Mar 2005 00:40:50 + (GMT)
Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2005 00:40:49 +
From: Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#221081: marked as done (opie-games-fb: FTBFS: cannot open noncore/games/chess/config.in)
Your message dated Sat, 26 Mar 2005 00:40:49 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line opie removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Nov 2003 14:15:10 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Nov 16 08:15:09 2003 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mclean.mail.mindspring.net [207.69.200.57] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1ALNgD-0002fk-00; Sun, 16 Nov 2003 08:15:09 -0600 Received: from user-119bq03.biz.mindspring.com ([66.149.232.3] helo=frobnitz.ddts.net) by mclean.mail.mindspring.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 1ALNgD-0003jN-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 16 Nov 2003 09:15:09 -0500 Received: from daniel by frobnitz.ddts.net with local (Exim 4.24) id 1ALNfx-0002zb-Jt for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 16 Nov 2003 06:14:53 -0800 To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: opie-games-fb: FTBFS: cannot open noncore/games/chess/config.in From: Daniel Schepler [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2003 06:14:53 -0800 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: Daniel Schepler [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_15 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_15 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp) Package: opie-games-fb Severity: serious Version: 1.0.1.1snapshot20030828-1 From my build log: ... make[2]: Entering directory `/tmp/buildd/opie-games-fb-1.0.1.1snapshot20030828/scripts/kconfig' make[2]: `conf' is up to date. make[2]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/opie-games-fb-1.0.1.1snapshot20030828/scripts/kconfig' ./scripts/kconfig/conf -s ./config.in noncore/games/config.in:4: can't open file noncore/games/chess/config.in make[1]: *** [/tmp/buildd/opie-games-fb-1.0.1.1snapshot20030828/.config] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/opie-games-fb-1.0.1.1snapshot20030828' make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2 -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux frobnitz 2.6.0-test9 #1 Thu Oct 30 13:37:15 PST 2003 i686 Locale: LANG=en, LC_CTYPE=en (ignored: LC_ALL set to en_US.UTF-8) -- Daniel Schepler Please don't disillusion me. I [EMAIL PROTECTED]haven't had breakfast yet. -- Orson Scott Card --- Received: (at 221081-done) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Mar 2005 00:41:05 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Mar 25 16:41:05 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from sorrow.cyrius.com [65.19.161.204] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DEzMK-VA-00; Fri, 25 Mar 2005 16:41:00 -0800 Received: by sorrow.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 10) id 33C0C64D3D; Sat, 26 Mar 2005 00:40:58 + (UTC) Received: by deprecation.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 06DC34F1AF; Sat, 26 Mar 2005 00:40:50 + (GMT) Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2005 00:40:49 + From: Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: opie removed Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 17 The whole opie set of packages has
Bug#210803: marked as done (opie-inputmethods-fb: (m68k/unstable) FTBFS: config fails)
Your message dated Sat, 26 Mar 2005 00:40:49 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line opie removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Sep 2003 19:18:01 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Sep 13 14:17:59 2003 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from pool-138-88-6-6.res.east.verizon.net (gleep.earth.sol) [138.88.6.6] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 19yFuB-00036C-00; Sat, 13 Sep 2003 14:17:59 -0500 Received: from cts by gleep.earth.sol with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 19yFu7-00031d-00; Sat, 13 Sep 2003 15:17:55 -0400 From: Christian T. Steigies [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: opie-inputmethods-fb: (m68k/unstable) FTBFS: config fails X-Mailer: reportbug 1.50 Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2003 15:17:55 -0400 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Christian T. Steigies [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_20,HAS_PACKAGE version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_9_13 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_9_13 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp) Package: opie-inputmethods-fb Version: 1.0.1.1snapshot20030828-2 Severity: serious Automatic build of opie-inputmethods-fb_1.0.1.1snapshot20030828-2 on tanda by sbuild/m68k 1.170 [...] ./scripts/kconfig/conf -s ./config.in .config:21: trying to assign nonexistent symbol OPIE-LOGIN .config:22: trying to assign nonexistent symbol LAUNCHER [...] .config:211: trying to assign nonexistent symbol OPIE-SH .config:212: trying to assign nonexistent symbol REMOTE .config:217: trying to assign nonexistent symbol KEYVIEW # # using defaults found in .config # * * Restart config... * * * Build Parameters * Target Machine (Intel X86, Sharp Zaurus SL-5x00 - stock, Ipaq, Ramses, SIMpad) [Intel X86] (NEW) aborted! Console input/output is redirected. Run 'make oldconfig' to update configuration. make[1]: *** [/build/buildd/opie-inputmethods-fb-1.0.1.1snapshot20030828/.config] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/opie-inputmethods-fb-1.0.1.1snapshot20030828' make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2 --- Received: (at 210803-done) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Mar 2005 00:41:05 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Mar 25 16:41:05 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from sorrow.cyrius.com [65.19.161.204] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DEzMK-VA-00; Fri, 25 Mar 2005 16:41:00 -0800 Received: by sorrow.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 10) id 33C0C64D3D; Sat, 26 Mar 2005 00:40:58 + (UTC) Received: by deprecation.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 06DC34F1AF; Sat, 26 Mar 2005 00:40:50 + (GMT) Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2005 00:40:49 + From: Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: opie removed Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 16 The whole opie set of packages has been removed so I'm closing these bugs which don't apply anymore. -- Martin Michlmayr http://www.cyrius.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#221083: marked as done (opie-settings-fb: FTBFS: Compiler error in usermanager/userdialog.h)
Your message dated Sat, 26 Mar 2005 00:40:49 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line opie removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Nov 2003 14:28:53 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Nov 16 08:28:52 2003 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from granger.mail.mindspring.net [207.69.200.148] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1ALNtU-0004Q2-00; Sun, 16 Nov 2003 08:28:52 -0600 Received: from user-119bq03.biz.mindspring.com ([66.149.232.3] helo=frobnitz.ddts.net) by granger.mail.mindspring.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 1ALNtU-0005OG-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 16 Nov 2003 09:28:52 -0500 Received: from daniel by frobnitz.ddts.net with local (Exim 4.24) id 1ALNtR-0003xv-MT for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 16 Nov 2003 06:28:49 -0800 To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: opie-settings-fb: FTBFS: Compiler error in usermanager/userdialog.h From: Daniel Schepler [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2003 06:28:48 -0800 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: Daniel Schepler [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_15 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_15 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp) Package: opie-settings-fb Severity: serious Version: 0.9.1-0.snapshot.20030303-2 From my build log: ... make[2]: Entering directory `/tmp/buildd/opie-settings-fb-0.9.1-0.snapshot.20030303/noncore/settings/usermanager' g++ -c -pipe -DQWS -fno-exceptions -fno-rtti -Wall -W -O2 -DQT_NO_DEBUG -I/tmp/buildd/opie-settings-fb-0.9.1-0.snapshot.20030303/include -I/usr/share/qte2/include -I/tmp/buildd/opie-settings-fb-0.9.1-0.snapshot.20030303/mkspecs/qws/linux-generic-g++ -o usermanager.o usermanager.cpp In file included from usermanager.h:21, from usermanager.cpp:10: userdialog.h:36: error: syntax error before `*' token usermanager.cpp: In member function `void UserConfig::showUserMenu(QListViewItem*)': usermanager.cpp:251: warning: unused parameter `QListViewItem*item' make[2]: *** [usermanager.o] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/opie-settings-fb-0.9.1-0.snapshot.20030303/noncore/settings/usermanager' make[1]: *** [noncore/settings/usermanager] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/opie-settings-fb-0.9.1-0.snapshot.20030303' make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2 -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux frobnitz 2.6.0-test9 #1 Thu Oct 30 13:37:15 PST 2003 i686 Locale: LANG=en, LC_CTYPE=en (ignored: LC_ALL set to en_US.UTF-8) -- Daniel Schepler Please don't disillusion me. I [EMAIL PROTECTED]haven't had breakfast yet. -- Orson Scott Card --- Received: (at 221083-done) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Mar 2005 00:41:05 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Mar 25 16:41:05 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from sorrow.cyrius.com [65.19.161.204] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DEzMK-VA-00; Fri, 25 Mar 2005 16:41:00 -0800 Received: by sorrow.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 10) id 33C0C64D3D; Sat, 26 Mar 2005 00:40:58 + (UTC) Received: by deprecation.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 06DC34F1AF; Sat, 26 Mar 2005 00:40:50 + (GMT) Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2005 00:40:49 + From: Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: opie removed
Bug#240562: marked as done (op-fb: can't fulfill the recommends in unstable and testing)
Your message dated Sat, 26 Mar 2005 00:40:49 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line opie removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Mar 2004 00:32:23 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Mar 27 16:32:23 2004 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mailout.stusta.mhn.de [141.84.69.5] by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1B7ODv-00057P-00; Sat, 27 Mar 2004 16:32:23 -0800 Received: (qmail 9913 invoked from network); 28 Mar 2004 00:32:22 - Received: from r063144.stusta.swh.mhn.de (10.150.63.144) by mailhub.stusta.mhn.de with SMTP; 28 Mar 2004 00:32:22 - Received: from bunk by r063144.stusta.swh.mhn.de with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1B7ODT-0007UP-00; Sun, 28 Mar 2004 01:31:55 +0100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: op-fb: can't fulfill the recommends in unstable X-Mailer: reportbug 2.48 Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2004 01:31:55 +0100 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Package: op-fb Severity: grave Package op-fb version 1.0.1.1snapshot20030828-2 has an unmet dep: Recommends: op-doc -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 (i686) --- Received: (at 240562-done) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Mar 2005 00:41:05 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Mar 25 16:41:05 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from sorrow.cyrius.com [65.19.161.204] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DEzMK-VA-00; Fri, 25 Mar 2005 16:41:00 -0800 Received: by sorrow.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 10) id 33C0C64D3D; Sat, 26 Mar 2005 00:40:58 + (UTC) Received: by deprecation.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 06DC34F1AF; Sat, 26 Mar 2005 00:40:50 + (GMT) Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2005 00:40:49 + From: Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: opie removed Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 19 The whole opie set of packages has been removed so I'm closing these bugs which don't apply anymore. -- Martin Michlmayr http://www.cyrius.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#257355: marked as done (opie-setting-fb: FTBFS: incompatible version of qt?)
Your message dated Sat, 26 Mar 2005 00:40:49 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line opie removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Jul 2004 23:18:49 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jul 02 16:18:49 2004 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from poros.telenet-ops.be [195.130.132.44] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BgXIu-00076H-00; Fri, 02 Jul 2004 16:18:48 -0700 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by poros.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with SMTP id 7D08336806B for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 3 Jul 2004 01:18:41 +0200 (MEST) Received: from kabel.telenet.be (D5E08CEF.kabel.telenet.be [213.224.140.239]) by poros.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FF1B368066 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 3 Jul 2004 01:18:41 +0200 (MEST) Received: by kabel.telenet.be (Postfix, from userid 501) id 29C03158AD5; Sat, 03 Jul 2004 01:18:41 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sat, 3 Jul 2004 01:18:41 +0200 From: Kurt Roeckx [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: opie-setting-fb: FTBFS: incompatible version of qt? Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Package: opie-settings-fb Version: 0.9.1-0.snapshot.20030303-2 Severity: serious It fails to build with: g++ -c -pipe -DQWS -fno-exceptions -fno-rtti -Wall -W -O2 -DQT_NO_DEBUG -I/usr/src/opie-settings-fb-0.9.1-0.snapshot.20030303/include -I/usr/src/opie-settings-fb-0.9.1-0.snapshot.20030303/include -I/usr/share/qte2/include -I/usr/src/opie-settings-fb-0.9.1-0.snapshot.20030303/mkspecs/qws/linux-generic-g++ -o moc_appearance.o moc_appearance.cpp moc_appearance.cpp:15:34: private/qucomextra_p.h: No such file or directory moc_appearance.cpp:17:2: #error This file was generated using the moc from 3.2.3. It moc_appearance.cpp:18:2: #error cannot be used with the include files from this version of Qt. moc_appearance.cpp:19:2: #error (The moc has changed too much.) I think it should depend on qte3 instead of qte2. When I do that, it fails with this instead: g++ -c -pipe -DQWS -fno-exceptions -fno-rtti -Wall -W -O2 -DQT_NO_DEBUG -I/usr/src/opie-settings-fb-0.9.1-0.snapshot.20030303/include -I/usr/src/opie-settings-fb-0.9.1-0.snapshot.20030303/include -I/usr/share/qte3/include -I/usr/src/opie-settings-fb-0.9.1-0.snapshot.20030303/mkspecs/qws/linux-generic-g++ -o appearance.o appearance.cpp In file included from appearance.cpp:71: decolistitem.h:106:7: warning: no newline at end of file appearance.cpp: In member function `QWidget* Appearance::createStyleTab(QWidget*, Config)': appearance.cpp:131: error: 'class QStyleFactory' has no member named 'styles' make[2]: *** [appearance.o] Error 1 Kurt --- Received: (at 257355-done) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Mar 2005 00:41:05 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Mar 25 16:41:04 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from sorrow.cyrius.com [65.19.161.204] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DEzMK-VA-00; Fri, 25 Mar 2005 16:41:00 -0800 Received: by sorrow.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 10) id 33C0C64D3D; Sat, 26 Mar 2005 00:40:58 + (UTC) Received: by deprecation.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 06DC34F1AF; Sat, 26 Mar 2005 00:40:50 + (GMT) Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2005 00:40:49 + From: Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Bug#276041: marked as done (opie-base-fb: FTBFS: #error ( syntax error in moc_calibrate.cpp)
Your message dated Sat, 26 Mar 2005 00:40:49 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line opie removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Oct 2004 18:25:39 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Oct 11 11:25:39 2004
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from pd9e7e012.dip.t-dialin.net (stigge.org) [217.231.224.18]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CH4ra-0001LL-00; Mon, 11 Oct 2004 11:25:38 -0700
Received: (qmail 32714 invoked from network); 11 Oct 2004 18:25:37 -
Received: from unknown (HELO atari.stigge.org) (192.168.1.99)
by sbo.stigge.org with SMTP; 11 Oct 2004 18:25:37 -
Received: from [192.168.1.99] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by atari.stigge.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBC491007ED4A;
Mon, 11 Oct 2004 20:25:36 +0200 (CEST)
From: Roland Stigge [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: opie-base-fb: FTBFS: #error ( syntax error in moc_calibrate.cpp
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2004 20:25:36 +0200 (CEST)
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
Package: opie-base-fb
Version: 1.0.1.1snapshot20030828-2
Severity: serious
Hi,
building the package opie-base-fb in a clean build environment
(with pbuilder) on i386 results in:
=
[...]
g++ -c -pipe -DQWS -fno-exceptions -fno-rtti -Wall -W -O2 -DQT_NO_DEBUG
-I/usr/share/qte2/include
-I/tmp/buildd/opie-base-fb-1.0.1.1snapshot20030828/include
-I/usr/share/qte2/include
-I/tmp/buildd/opie-base-fb-1.0.1.1snapshot20030828/mkspecs/qws/linux-generic-g++
-o moc_calibrate.o moc_calibrate.cpp
moc_calibrate.cpp:15:34: private/qucomextra_p.h: No such file or directory
moc_calibrate.cpp:17:2: #error This file was generated using the moc from
3.3.3. It
moc_calibrate.cpp:18:2: #error cannot be used with the include files from this
version of Qt.
moc_calibrate.cpp:19:2: #error (The moc has changed too much.)
moc_calibrate.cpp:28: error: syntax error before `(' token
moc_calibrate.cpp: In static member function `static QString
Calibrate::tr(const char*, const char*)':
moc_calibrate.cpp:34: error: `DefaultCodec' is not a member of type `
QApplication'
[...]
make[2]: *** [moc_calibrate.o] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory
`/tmp/buildd/opie-base-fb-1.0.1.1snapshot20030828/core/apps/calibrate'
make[1]: *** [core/apps/calibrate] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/opie-base-fb-1.0.1.1snapshot20030828'
make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2
=
Thanks for considering.
---
Received: (at 276041-done) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Mar 2005 00:41:04 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Mar 25 16:41:04 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from sorrow.cyrius.com [65.19.161.204]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DEzMK-VA-00; Fri, 25 Mar 2005 16:41:00 -0800
Received: by sorrow.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 10)
id 33C0C64D3D; Sat, 26 Mar 2005 00:40:58 + (UTC)
Received: by deprecation.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 06DC34F1AF; Sat, 26 Mar 2005 00:40:50 + (GMT)
Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2005 00:40:49 +
From: Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: opie removed
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Bug#277490: marked as done (opie-apps-fb: FTBFS: moc_advancedfm.cpp: The moc has changed too much)
Your message dated Sat, 26 Mar 2005 00:40:49 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line opie removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Oct 2004 12:06:54 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Oct 20 05:06:54 2004
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from pd9e7e10f.dip.t-dialin.net (stigge.org) [217.231.225.15]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CKFEz-0004U2-00; Wed, 20 Oct 2004 05:06:54 -0700
Received: (qmail 16211 invoked from network); 20 Oct 2004 12:06:51 -
Received: from unknown (HELO atari.stigge.org) (192.168.1.99)
by sbo.stigge.org with SMTP; 20 Oct 2004 12:06:51 -
Received: from [192.168.1.99] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by atari.stigge.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C910D10072372;
Wed, 20 Oct 2004 14:06:50 +0200 (CEST)
From: Roland Stigge [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: opie-apps-fb: FTBFS: moc_advancedfm.cpp: The moc has changed too much
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2004 14:06:50 +0200 (CEST)
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
Package: opie-apps-fb
Version: 1.0.1.1snapshot20030828-2
Severity: serious
Hi,
building the package opie-apps-fb in a clean build environment
(with pbuilder) on i386 results in:
=
[...]
g++ -c -pipe -DQWS -fno-exceptions -fno-rtti -Wall -W -O2 -DQT_NO_DEBUG
-I/tmp/buildd/opie-apps-fb-1.0.1.1snapshot20030828/include
-I/usr/share/qte2/include -I.moc/x86-linux/
-I/tmp/buildd/opie-apps-fb-1.0.1.1snapshot20030828/mkspecs/qws/linux-generic-g++
-o .obj/x86-linux/main.o main.cpp
/usr/bin/moc advancedfm.h -o .moc/x86-linux/moc_advancedfm.cpp
g++ -c -pipe -DQWS -fno-exceptions -fno-rtti -Wall -W -O2 -DQT_NO_DEBUG
-I/tmp/buildd/opie-apps-fb-1.0.1.1snapshot20030828/include
-I/usr/share/qte2/include -I.moc/x86-linux/
-I/tmp/buildd/opie-apps-fb-1.0.1.1snapshot20030828/mkspecs/qws/linux-generic-g++
-o .obj/x86-linux/moc_advancedfm.o .moc/x86-linux/moc_advancedfm.cpp
.moc/x86-linux/moc_advancedfm.cpp:15:34: private/qucomextra_p.h: No such file
or directory
.moc/x86-linux/moc_advancedfm.cpp:17:2: #error This file was generated using
the moc from 3.3.3. It
.moc/x86-linux/moc_advancedfm.cpp:18:2: #error cannot be used with the include
files from this version of Qt.
.moc/x86-linux/moc_advancedfm.cpp:19:2: #error (The moc has changed too much.)
.moc/x86-linux/moc_advancedfm.cpp:29: error: syntax error before `(' token
.moc/x86-linux/moc_advancedfm.cpp: In static member function `static QString
AdvancedFm::tr(const char*, const char*)':
[...]
(first use this function)
.moc/x86-linux/moc_advancedfm.cpp:248: error: `_o' undeclared (first use this
function)
.moc/x86-linux/moc_advancedfm.cpp:261: error: `static_QUType_ptr' undeclared
(first use this function)
.moc/x86-linux/moc_advancedfm.cpp:274: error: `static_QUType_QVariant'
undeclared (first use this function)
.moc/x86-linux/moc_advancedfm.cpp:292: error: `static_QUType_QString'
undeclared (first use this function)
.moc/x86-linux/moc_advancedfm.cpp:294: error: `static_QUType_bool' undeclared
(first use this function)
.moc/x86-linux/moc_advancedfm.cpp:301: error: `static_QUType_charstar'
undeclared (first use this function)
.moc/x86-linux/moc_advancedfm.cpp:306: error: 'class QMainWindow' has no member
named 'qt_invoke'
.moc/x86-linux/moc_advancedfm.cpp: At global scope:
.moc/x86-linux/moc_advancedfm.cpp:311: error: type specifier omitted for
parameter `QUObject'
.moc/x86-linux/moc_advancedfm.cpp:311: error: parse error before `*' token
.moc/x86-linux/moc_advancedfm.cpp:312: error: no `bool AdvancedFm::qt_emit(...)
' member function declared in class `AdvancedFm'
.moc/x86-linux/moc_advancedfm.cpp: In member function `bool
AdvancedFm::qt_emit(...)':
.moc/x86-linux/moc_advancedfm.cpp:313: error: 'class QMainWindow' has no member
named 'qt_emit'
make[2]: *** [.obj/x86-linux/moc_advancedfm.o] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory
`/tmp/buildd/opie-apps-fb-1.0.1.1snapshot20030828/noncore/apps/advancedfm'
make[1]: *** [noncore/apps/advancedfm] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory
Bug#277978: marked as done (opie-multimedia-fb: FTBFS: moc has changed too much)
Your message dated Sat, 26 Mar 2005 00:40:49 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line opie removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Oct 2004 20:54:27 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Oct 23 13:54:27 2004
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from pd9e7f1b0.dip.t-dialin.net (stigge.org) [217.231.241.176]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CLSuA-0003FB-00; Sat, 23 Oct 2004 13:54:27 -0700
Received: (qmail 21578 invoked from network); 23 Oct 2004 20:54:25 -
Received: from unknown (HELO atari.stigge.org) (192.168.1.99)
by sbo.stigge.org with SMTP; 23 Oct 2004 20:54:25 -
Received: from [192.168.1.99] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by atari.stigge.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 329AB100830BA;
Sat, 23 Oct 2004 22:54:25 +0200 (CEST)
From: Roland Stigge [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: opie-multimedia-fb: FTBFS: moc has changed too much
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat, 23 Oct 2004 22:54:25 +0200 (CEST)
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
Package: opie-multimedia-fb
Version: 1.0.1.1snapshot20030828-5
Severity: serious
Hi,
building the package opie-multimedia-fb in a clean build environment
(with pbuilder) on i386 results in:
=
[...]
g++ -c -pipe -DQWS -fno-exceptions -fno-rtti -Wall -W -O2 -DQT_NO_DEBUG
-I/tmp/buildd/opie-multimedia-fb-1.0.1.1snapshot20030828/include
-I/tmp/buildd/opie-multimedia-fb-1.0.1.1snapshot20030828/include
-I/usr/share/qte2/include -I.moc/x86-linux/
-I/tmp/buildd/opie-multimedia-fb-1.0.1.1snapshot20030828/mkspecs/qws/linux-generic-g++
-o .obj/x86-linux/moc_loopcontrol.o .moc/x86-linux/moc_loopcontrol.cpp
.moc/x86-linux/moc_loopcontrol.cpp:15:34: private/qucomextra_p.h: No such file
or directory
.moc/x86-linux/moc_loopcontrol.cpp:17:2: #error This file was generated using
the moc from 3.3.3. It
.moc/x86-linux/moc_loopcontrol.cpp:18:2: #error cannot be used with the
include files from this version of Qt.
.moc/x86-linux/moc_loopcontrol.cpp:19:2: #error (The moc has changed too
much.)
.moc/x86-linux/moc_loopcontrol.cpp:28: error: syntax error before `(' token
.moc/x86-linux/moc_loopcontrol.cpp: In static member function `static QString
LoopControl::tr(const char*, const char*)':
[...]
LoopControl::qt_invoke(...)' member function declared in class `LoopControl'
.moc/x86-linux/moc_loopcontrol.cpp: In member function `bool
LoopControl::qt_invoke(...)':
.moc/x86-linux/moc_loopcontrol.cpp:128: error: `_id' undeclared (first use this
function)
.moc/x86-linux/moc_loopcontrol.cpp:128: error: `slotOffset' undeclared (first
use this function)
.moc/x86-linux/moc_loopcontrol.cpp:131: error: `static_QUType_bool' undeclared
(first use this function)
.moc/x86-linux/moc_loopcontrol.cpp:131: error: `_o' undeclared (first use this
function)
.moc/x86-linux/moc_loopcontrol.cpp:136: error: 'class QObject' has no member
named 'qt_invoke'
.moc/x86-linux/moc_loopcontrol.cpp: At global scope:
.moc/x86-linux/moc_loopcontrol.cpp:141: error: type specifier omitted for
parameter `QUObject'
.moc/x86-linux/moc_loopcontrol.cpp:141: error: parse error before `*' token
.moc/x86-linux/moc_loopcontrol.cpp:142: error: no `bool
LoopControl::qt_emit(...)' member function declared in class `LoopControl'
.moc/x86-linux/moc_loopcontrol.cpp: In member function `bool
LoopControl::qt_emit(...)':
.moc/x86-linux/moc_loopcontrol.cpp:143: error: `signalOffset' undeclared (first
use this function)
.moc/x86-linux/moc_loopcontrol.cpp:146: error: 'class QObject' has no member
named 'qt_emit'
make[2]: *** [.obj/x86-linux/moc_loopcontrol.o] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory
`/tmp/buildd/opie-multimedia-fb-1.0.1.1snapshot20030828/core/multimedia/opieplayer'
make[1]: *** [core/multimedia/opieplayer] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory
`/tmp/buildd/opie-multimedia-fb-1.0.1.1snapshot20030828'
make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2
=
Thanks for considering.
---
Received: (at 277978-done) by bugs.debian.org; 26
Bug#279996: marked as done (opie-pim-fb: FTBFS: g++ compile error: no matching function for call to ctor QSizePolicy::QSizePolicy)
Your message dated Sat, 26 Mar 2005 00:40:49 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line opie removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Nov 2004 15:25:32 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Nov 06 07:25:32 2004 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from pd9e7de86.dip.t-dialin.net (stigge.org) [217.231.222.134] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1CQSRY-00084p-00; Sat, 06 Nov 2004 07:25:32 -0800 Received: (qmail 20065 invoked from network); 6 Nov 2004 15:25:29 - Received: from unknown (HELO atari.stigge.org) (192.168.1.99) by sbo.stigge.org with SMTP; 6 Nov 2004 15:25:29 - Received: from [192.168.1.99] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by atari.stigge.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F0A91007E398; Sat, 6 Nov 2004 16:25:28 +0100 (CET) From: Roland Stigge [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: opie-pim-fb: FTBFS: g++ compile error: no matching function for call to ctor QSizePolicy::QSizePolicy Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sat, 6 Nov 2004 16:25:28 +0100 (CET) Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Package: opie-pim-fb Version: 0.9.3-1 Severity: serious Hi, building the package opie-pim-fb in a clean build environment (with pbuilder) on i386 results in: = [...] g++ -c -pipe -DQWS -fno-exceptions -fno-rtti -Wall -W -O2 -DQT_NO_DEBUG -I/tmp/buildd/opie-pim-fb-0.9.3/include -I/usr/share/qte2/include -I/tmp/buildd/opie-pim-fb-0.9.3/mkspecs/qws/linux-generic-g++ -o configdlg_base.o configdlg_base.cpp configdlg_base.cpp: In constructor `ConfigDlg_Base::ConfigDlg_Base(QWidget*, const char*, bool, unsigned int)': configdlg_base.cpp:39: error: no matching function for call to `QSizePolicy:: QSizePolicy(QSizePolicy::SizeType, QSizePolicy::SizeType, int, int, bool)' /usr/share/qte2/include/qsizepolicy.h:46: error: candidates are: QSizePolicy::QSizePolicy(const QSizePolicy) /usr/share/qte2/include/qsizepolicy.h:93: error: QSizePolicy::QSizePolicy(int) /usr/share/qte2/include/qsizepolicy.h:100: error: QSizePolicy::QSizePolicy(QSizePolicy::SizeType, QSizePolicy::SizeType, bool) /usr/share/qte2/include/qsizepolicy.h:63: error: QSizePolicy::QSizePolicy() configdlg_base.cpp:44: error: no matching function for call to `QSizePolicy:: QSizePolicy(QSizePolicy::SizeType, QSizePolicy::SizeType, int, int, bool)' /usr/share/qte2/include/qsizepolicy.h:46: error: candidates are: QSizePolicy::QSizePolicy(const QSizePolicy) /usr/share/qte2/include/qsizepolicy.h:93: error: QSizePolicy::QSizePolicy(int) /usr/share/qte2/include/qsizepolicy.h:100: error: QSizePolicy::QSizePolicy(QSizePolicy::SizeType, QSizePolicy::SizeType, bool) /usr/share/qte2/include/qsizepolicy.h:63: error: QSizePolicy::QSizePolicy() configdlg_base.cpp:146: error: no matching function for call to `QSizePolicy:: QSizePolicy(QSizePolicy::SizeType, QSizePolicy::SizeType, int, int, bool)' /usr/share/qte2/include/qsizepolicy.h:46: error: candidates are: QSizePolicy::QSizePolicy(const QSizePolicy) /usr/share/qte2/include/qsizepolicy.h:93: error: QSizePolicy::QSizePolicy(int) [...] QSizePolicy::QSizePolicy(int) /usr/share/qte2/include/qsizepolicy.h:100: error: QSizePolicy::QSizePolicy(QSizePolicy::SizeType, QSizePolicy::SizeType, bool) /usr/share/qte2/include/qsizepolicy.h:63: error: QSizePolicy::QSizePolicy() configdlg_base.cpp:168: error: no matching function for call to `QSizePolicy:: QSizePolicy(QSizePolicy::SizeType, QSizePolicy::SizeType, int, int, bool)' /usr/share/qte2/include/qsizepolicy.h:46: error: candidates are: QSizePolicy::QSizePolicy(const QSizePolicy) /usr/share/qte2/include/qsizepolicy.h:93: error: QSizePolicy::QSizePolicy(int) /usr/share/qte2/include/qsizepolicy.h:100: error: QSizePolicy::QSizePolicy(QSizePolicy::SizeType, QSizePolicy::SizeType, bool) /usr/share/qte2/include/qsizepolicy.h:63: error: QSizePolicy::QSizePolicy()
Processed: RE: Processed: tagging 301416
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Severity 301416 grave Bug#301416: libgtkmm-2.4-1: Broken dependencies Severity set to `grave'. Merge 301416 298517 Bug#298517: new version depends on experimental versions of libraries Bug#301416: libgtkmm-2.4-1: Broken dependencies Mismatch - only Bugs in same state can be merged: Values for `severity' don't match: #298517 has `serious'; #301416 has `grave' Tags 298517 +pending Bug#298517: new version depends on experimental versions of libraries Tags were: sid Tags added: pending Thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#298517: Processed: tagging 301416
Severity 301416 grave Merge 301416 298517 Tags 298517 +pending Thanks I guess there's no way to fix this mistake but to downgrade with an epoch. Should be uploaded soon. -Original Message- From: Debian BTS [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Debian Bug Tracking System Sent: Friday, March 25, 2005 3:49 PM To: Steve Langasek Cc: Bradley Bell (libgtkmm-2.4-1 #301416) Subject: Processed: tagging 301416 Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.11 tags 301416 sid Bug#301416: libgtkmm-2.4-1: Broken dependencies There were no tags set. Tags added: sid End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: RE: Processed: RE: Processed: tagging 301416
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Severity 301416 serious Bug#301416: libgtkmm-2.4-1: Broken dependencies Severity set to `serious'. Merge 301416 298517 Bug#298517: new version depends on experimental versions of libraries Bug#301416: libgtkmm-2.4-1: Broken dependencies Merged 298517 301416. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#300587: marked as done (lirc-modules-source: does not compile with 2.6)
Your message dated Fri, 25 Mar 2005 21:32:08 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#300587: fixed in lirc 0.7.1pre2-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Mar 2005 15:51:19 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Mar 20 07:51:19 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from fp.sigmasoft.ro (sunshine.xenzor.ro) [80.96.89.252] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DD2hz-0003HH-00; Sun, 20 Mar 2005 07:51:19 -0800 Received: by sunshine.xenzor.ro (Postfix, from userid 1000) id C7BD327DC6; Sun, 20 Mar 2005 17:53:30 +0200 (EET) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Dobai-Pataky Balint [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: lirc-modules-source: does not compile with 2.6 X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8 Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2005 17:53:30 +0200 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: lirc-modules-source Version: 0.6.6-12 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable make-kpkg gives the following error: make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/src/modules/lirc' sed -e s!\$KVERS!2.6.8!g; s!\$KSRC!/usr/src/linux!; s!\$KARCH!i386!; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; s!\$KMAINT!Unknown Kernel Package Maintainer!; s!\$KDREV!1!; s!\$DEBDATE!Sun, 20 Mar 2005 17:13:04 +0200! debian/control.in debian/control dh_testdir # Add here commands to compile the package. /usr/bin/make debconf make[2]: Entering directory `/usr/src/modules/lirc' /usr/bin/make -e -C drivers SUBDIRS=lirc_i2c lirc_dev make[3]: Entering directory `/usr/src/modules/lirc/drivers' Making all in lirc_i2c make[4]: Entering directory `/usr/src/modules/lirc/drivers/lirc_i2c' Makefile:359: /usr/src/linux/Rules.make: No such file or directory make[4]: *** No rule to make target `/usr/src/linux/Rules.make'. Stop. make[4]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/modules/lirc/drivers/lirc_i2c' make[3]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[3]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/modules/lirc/drivers' make[2]: *** [i2c] Error 2 make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/modules/lirc' make[1]: *** [build-stamp] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/modules/lirc' Module /usr/src/modules/lirc failed. Hit return to Continue kernel-image-2.6.8-1-6862.6.8-10 kernel-source-2.6.8 2.6.8-13 kernel-headers-2.6.8-1-686 2.6.8-10 installed tried with the kernel-headers, with kernel-source, no luck. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-1-686 Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Versions of packages lirc-modules-source depends on: ii debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.4.30.11 Debian configuration management sy ii debhelper 4.2.31 helper programs for debian/rules ii debianutils 2.8.4 Miscellaneous utilities specific t -- debconf information excluded --- Received: (at 300587-close) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Mar 2005 02:41:25 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Mar 25 18:41:25 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DF1Er-00044i-00; Fri, 25 Mar 2005 18:41:25 -0800 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DF15s-0004MH-00; Fri, 25 Mar 2005 21:32:08 -0500 From: Amaya Rodrigo Sastre [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $ Subject: Bug#300587: fixed in lirc 0.7.1pre2-3 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2005 21:32:08 -0500 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 6 Source: lirc Source-Version: 0.7.1pre2-3 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest
Bug#288180: nis kills sparc64
Discussion on IRC about fixing this for release: vorlon joeyh: we have non-security-related RC bugs in the sparc kernel that aren't fixed in kernel-image-2.6.8-sparc 2.6.8-6. Is rebuilding d-i for a sparc update only better or worse than rebuilding for everything? (Can we do that as a binNMU of d-i?) vorlon the one I'm talking about is 288180 * joeyh notes that this will be significantly easier to do after a freeze, when I can know that we have full control over what things have changed vorlon kernels are all effectively frozen now anyway, fwiw fjp Including the kernel configs. joeyh yes, but everything else vorlon yes, well. :) vorlon so you'd like to let this one sit until we've frozen? joeyh if say, nothing that breaks d-i happens to get into testing by accident, then yes, we can binnmu d-i for sparc, rebuild cds and qual it, I'd not imagine more than a day's work -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Processed: Re: libgnome-vfsmm-2.6-dev
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 300527 patch Bug#300527: libgnome-vfsmm-2.6-dev: missing dependencies. There were no tags set. Tags added: patch thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#300527: libgnome-vfsmm-2.6-dev
tags 300527 patch thanks I'm uploading an NMU for this bug, which consists of a changelog and a rebuild against fresh libs. The changelog entry is attached. :) Cheers, -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer diff -u gnome-vfsmm2.6-2.8.0/debian/changelog gnome-vfsmm2.6-2.8.0/debian/changelog --- gnome-vfsmm2.6-2.8.0/debian/changelog +++ gnome-vfsmm2.6-2.8.0/debian/changelog @@ -1,3 +1,12 @@ +gnome-vfsmm2.6 (2.8.0-2.1) unstable; urgency=high + + * Non-maintainer upload. + * High-urgency upload for sarge-targetted RC bugfix. + * Rebuild against current unstable, to get rid of references to +libhowl in libtool .la files (closes: #300527). + + -- Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri, 25 Mar 2005 06:20:23 -0800 + gnome-vfsmm2.6 (2.8.0-2) unstable; urgency=low * Fix broken shlibs file signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#301462: FTBFS: typo in Build-Depends line
Package: libchewing Version: 0.2.6-2 Severity: serious Tags: sid Justification: Policy 7.6, FTBFS The Build-Depends should be automake1.9 instead of automake-1.9. With this typo libchewing FTBFS due to unsatisfied dependency. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-k7 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#294501: php4-pgsql: php4-psql causes apache to segfault upon startup
Matt Brown said: - Uncomment mod_ssl and the segfault vanishes - Comment either of the modules in php.in and the segfault vanishes - Remove virtual host and the segfault vanishes - Remove config_log_module or dir_module and the segfault vanishes Hrm, on my system, I got the segv even with a more minmal config (I can remove the vhost, log_module, and dir_module, and it still dies). It's been great fun (although time consuming!) tracking all this down, so I hope it helps to solve the bug! If I reverse imap.so and pgsql.so in my php.ini (so that pgsql is loaded first), my segv disappears. I don't suppose you'd have any luck with trying that as well? My backtrace looks different from yours, but with different package versions, different arches (i386 versus PPC), and a corrupt stack, this isn't really surprising. ... Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#296905: marked as done (CAN-2005-0531: Buffer overflow in atm_get_addr)
Your message dated Sat, 26 Mar 2005 01:47:47 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#296905: fixed in kernel-source-2.4.27 2.4.27-9 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Feb 2005 14:16:59 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Feb 25 06:16:59 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mail-out.m-online.net [212.18.0.9] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D4gH5-0003Oc-00; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 06:16:59 -0800 Received: from mail.m-online.net (svr20.m-online.net [192.168.3.148]) by mail-out.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E53C5BA2 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 15:16:58 +0100 (CET) Received: from k.local (ppp-82-135-14-157.mnet-online.de [82.135.14.157]) by mail.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D8B256E77 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 15:16:58 +0100 (CET) Received: from stf by k.local with local (Exim 4.44) id 1D4gH4-0005ay-8m for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 15:16:58 +0100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Stefan Fritsch [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: CAN-2005-0531: Buffer overflow in atm_get_addr X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8 Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 15:16:58 +0100 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: kernel-source-2.6.8 Version: 2.6.8-13 Severity: critical Tags: security Justification: root security hole Cite: The atm_get_addr function in addr.c for Linux kernel 2.6.10 and 2.6.11 before 2.6.11-rc4 may allow local users to trigger a buffer overflow via negative arguments. The offending code is also in 2.6.8 and 2.4.27. Fix: http://linux.bkbits.net:8080/linux-2.6/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Advisory: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=full-disclosurem=110846727602817w=2 Please fix also 2.6.9 and 2.6.10 -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) --- Received: (at 296905-close) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Mar 2005 06:54:03 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Mar 25 22:54:03 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DF5BK-0002cz-00; Fri, 25 Mar 2005 22:54:02 -0800 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DF55H-0002FW-00; Sat, 26 Mar 2005 01:47:47 -0500 From: Simon Horman [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $ Subject: Bug#296905: fixed in kernel-source-2.4.27 2.4.27-9 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2005 01:47:47 -0500 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 3 Source: kernel-source-2.4.27 Source-Version: 2.4.27-9 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of kernel-source-2.4.27, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: kernel-doc-2.4.27_2.4.27-9_all.deb to pool/main/k/kernel-source-2.4.27/kernel-doc-2.4.27_2.4.27-9_all.deb kernel-patch-debian-2.4.27_2.4.27-9_all.deb to pool/main/k/kernel-source-2.4.27/kernel-patch-debian-2.4.27_2.4.27-9_all.deb kernel-source-2.4.27_2.4.27-9.diff.gz to pool/main/k/kernel-source-2.4.27/kernel-source-2.4.27_2.4.27-9.diff.gz kernel-source-2.4.27_2.4.27-9.dsc to pool/main/k/kernel-source-2.4.27/kernel-source-2.4.27_2.4.27-9.dsc kernel-source-2.4.27_2.4.27-9_all.deb to pool/main/k/kernel-source-2.4.27/kernel-source-2.4.27_2.4.27-9_all.deb kernel-tree-2.4.27_2.4.27-9_all.deb to pool/main/k/kernel-source-2.4.27/kernel-tree-2.4.27_2.4.27-9_all.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further
Bug#298517: marked as done (new version depends on experimental versions of libraries)
Your message dated Sat, 26 Mar 2005 02:17:06 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#298517: fixed in gtkmm2.4 1:2.4.11-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Mar 2005 05:25:06 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Mar 07 21:25:06 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from smtp816.mail.sc5.yahoo.com [66.163.170.2] by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D8XDN-0003I0-00; Mon, 07 Mar 2005 21:25:06 -0800 Received: from unknown (HELO triplehelix.org) ([EMAIL PROTECTED]@68.126.186.117 with login) by smtp816.mail.sc5.yahoo.com with SMTP; 8 Mar 2005 05:25:02 - Received: from darjeeling (unknown [192.168.0.7]) by triplehelix.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9ABCD2A95A9 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 7 Mar 2005 21:24:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from joshk by darjeeling with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1D8XDQ-000287-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 07 Mar 2005 21:25:08 -0800 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Joshua Kwan [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: new version depends on experimental versions of libraries X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8 Date: Mon, 07 Mar 2005 21:25:08 -0800 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Joshua Kwan [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: libgtkmm-2.4-1 Version: 2.6.0-1 Severity: serious Hello, Eager to make sure some of my work didn't somehow regress in the transition from gtkmm 2.4 to 2.6, I tried to install the new libraries out of incoming: dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of libgtkmm-2.4-1: libgtkmm-2.4-1 depends on libatk1.0-0 (= 1.9.0); however: Version of libatk1.0-0 on system is 1.8.0-4. dpkg: error processing libgtkmm-2.4-1 (--install): dependency problems - leaving unconfigured dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of libgtkmm-2.4-dev: libgtkmm-2.4-dev depends on libgtkmm-2.4-1 (= 2.6.0-1); however: Package libgtkmm-2.4-1 is not configured yet. dpkg: error processing libgtkmm-2.4-dev (--install): dependency problems - leaving unconfigured Errors were encountered while processing: libgtkmm-2.4-1 libgtkmm-2.4-dev If I install libatk1.0-0 out of experimental, things seem to work. Can this version be built with the one in unstable, 1.8.0? Josh -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (499, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.9 Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to en_US.UTF-8) Versions of packages libgtkmm-2.4-1 depends on: ii libatk1.0-0 1.9.0-1 The ATK accessibility toolkit ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-20 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libgcc1 1:3.4.3-11 GCC support library ii libglib2.0-02.6.3-1 The GLib library of C routines ii libglibmm-2.4-1 2.6.1-1 C++ wrapper for the GLib toolkit ( ii libgtk2.0-0 2.6.2-4 The GTK+ graphical user interface ii libpango1.0-0 1.8.1-1 Layout and rendering of internatio ii libsigc++-2.0-0 2.0.10-1 type-safe Signal Framework for C++ ii libstdc++5 1:3.3.5-9The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 298517-close) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Mar 2005 07:31:58 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Mar 25 23:31:57 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DF5m1-0006qJ-00; Fri, 25 Mar 2005 23:31:57 -0800 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DF5Xe-0005KO-00; Sat, 26 Mar 2005 02:17:06 -0500 From: Bradley Bell [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $ Subject: Bug#298517: fixed in gtkmm2.4 1:2.4.11-1 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2005 02:17:06 -0500
Bug#301416: marked as done (libgtkmm-2.4-1: Broken dependencies)
Your message dated Sat, 26 Mar 2005 02:17:06 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#298517: fixed in gtkmm2.4 1:2.4.11-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Mar 2005 19:35:37 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Mar 25 11:35:37 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from 81-174-11-4.f5.ngi.it (vortex.sythos.net) [81.174.11.4] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DEuam-0002Is-00; Fri, 25 Mar 2005 11:35:36 -0800 Received: from vortex.sythos.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by vortex.sythos.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 292182170D2; Fri, 25 Mar 2005 20:35:03 +0100 (CET) Received: from gastrite.sythos.net (gastrite.sythos.net [192.168.0.1]) by vortex.sythos.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E67F62170D1; Fri, 25 Mar 2005 20:35:02 +0100 (CET) Received: by gastrite.sythos.net (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 83C941F704A; Fri, 25 Mar 2005 20:35:02 +0100 (CET) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Sythos [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: libgtkmm-2.4-1: Broken dependencies X-Mailer: reportbug 3.9 Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2005 20:35:02 +0100 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-AV-Checked: ClamAV using ClamSMTP on vortex.sythos.net Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: libgtkmm-2.4-1 Version: 2.4.10-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable The following packages have unmet dependencies: libgtkmm-2.4-1: Depends: libatk1.0-0 (= 1.9.0) but 1.8.0-4 is to be installed E: Broken packages I've tried 2 italian mirror, but situation is the same. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.11.3 Locale: LANG=it_IT, LC_CTYPE=it_IT (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Versions of packages libgtkmm-2.4-1 depends on: ii libatk1.0-0 1.8.0-4 The ATK accessibility toolkit ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-20 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libgcc1 1:3.4.3-12 GCC support library ii libglib2.0-02.6.3-1 The GLib library of C routines ii libglibmm-2.4-1 2.6.1-1 C++ wrapper for the GLib toolkit ( ii libgtk2.0-0 2.6.2-4 The GTK+ graphical user interface ii libpango1.0-0 1.8.1-1 Layout and rendering of internatio ii libsigc++-2.0-0 2.0.10-1 type-safe Signal Framework for C++ ii libstdc++5 1:3.3.5-12 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 298517-close) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Mar 2005 07:31:58 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Mar 25 23:31:57 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DF5m1-0006qJ-00; Fri, 25 Mar 2005 23:31:57 -0800 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DF5Xe-0005KO-00; Sat, 26 Mar 2005 02:17:06 -0500 From: Bradley Bell [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $ Subject: Bug#298517: fixed in gtkmm2.4 1:2.4.11-1 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2005 02:17:06 -0500 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Source: gtkmm2.4 Source-Version: 1:2.4.11-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of gtkmm2.4, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: gtkmm2.4_2.4.11-1.diff.gz to pool/main/g/gtkmm2.4/gtkmm2.4_2.4.11-1.diff.gz gtkmm2.4_2.4.11-1.dsc to pool/main/g/gtkmm2.4/gtkmm2.4_2.4.11-1.dsc gtkmm2.4_2.4.11.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/g/gtkmm2.4/gtkmm2.4_2.4.11.orig.tar.gz libgtkmm-2.4-1_2.4.11-1_i386.deb to
