Bug#301471: checkstyle: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'cdbs'
Package: checkstyle Severity: serious Tags: patch When building 'checkstyle' in a clean chroot, I get the following error: dpkg-buildpackage: host architecture is amd64 debian/rules clean debian/rules:9: /usr/share/cdbs/1/rules/simple-patchsys.mk: No such file or directory debian/rules:10: /usr/share/cdbs/1/rules/debhelper.mk: No such file or directory debian/rules:11: /usr/share/cdbs/1/class/ant.mk: No such file or directory make: *** No rule to make target `/usr/share/cdbs/1/class/ant.mk'. Stop. Please add the missing Build-Depends on 'cdbs' to debian/control. Regards Andreas Jochens diff -urN ../tmp-orig/checkstyle-3.4/debian/control ./debian/control --- ../tmp-orig/checkstyle-3.4/debian/control 2005-03-26 08:35:26.754320933 +0100 +++ ./debian/control2005-03-26 08:28:37.275096185 +0100 @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ Priority: optional Maintainer: Debian Java Maintainers [EMAIL PROTECTED] Uploaders: Arnaud Vandyck [EMAIL PROTECTED], Michael Koch [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Build-Depends-Indep: debhelper ( 4.0.0), jikes (= 1.22), kaffe (= 1.1.4.PRECVS8-2), libant1.6-java, junit (= 3.8.1), libcommons-beanutils-java (= 1.5), libcommons-collections-java (= 2.1), libcommons-logging-java (= 1.0.3), libregexp-java, antlr, libcommons-cli-java, gjdoc (= 0.7.2) +Build-Depends-Indep: debhelper, cdbs, jikes (= 1.22), kaffe (= 1.1.4.PRECVS8-2), libant1.6-java, junit (= 3.8.1), libcommons-beanutils-java (= 1.5), libcommons-collections-java (= 2.1), libcommons-logging-java (= 1.0.3), libregexp-java, antlr, libcommons-cli-java, gjdoc (= 0.7.2) Standards-Version: 3.6.1 Package: checkstyle -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: not reproducible
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 299947 unreproducible Bug#299947: ifplugd: Long networking interruption when updating There were no tags set. Tags added: unreproducible severity 299947 normal Bug#299947: ifplugd: Long networking interruption when updating Severity set to `normal'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#296514: Cervisia licensing: moving forward?
On Saturday 26 March 2005 09:15, Ben Burton wrote: Hi again, At this stage it seems that everyone is happy to go with a dual QPL/GPL license for cervisia. My question now is how to go forward with the change. I prefer a single GPL license and AFAIK Christian too. I think this shouldn't be a problem, right? Cheers, André
Bug#296514: Cervisia licensing: moving forward?
On Saturday 26 March 2005 10:15, Ben Burton wrote: I'm not sure if Bernd Gehrmann still uses his CVS account. Andras, would it be in any way possible to find out if Bernd wishes to make these changes himself, and if not to obtain some form of authorisation? I'm not sure how formal the KDE project requires this to be, though I expect an unsigned email would not suffice (since such a thing is easily spoofed). If anyone knows more about KDE policy on such matters then their input would be appreciated. I asked him to do it. It seems that he still has the account, but I have no idea if he uses Linux or not (last time he was not), and it may be *very* probable that he does not have a CVS checkout. So I don't expect that he can do the change himself, but he can send a mail to authorize it. I think it was already a case when the license changed (in KMail, adding the Qt exception?), and I don't think the change was committed by every single copyright holder. You know, what is the case when the same file has many copyright holders. Who makes the commit? Andras -- Quanta Plus developer - http://quanta.sourceforge.net K Desktop Environment - http://www.kde.org pgpsR80NOR0GY.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#296514: Cervisia licensing: moving forward?
Hi again, At this stage it seems that everyone is happy to go with a dual QPL/GPL license for cervisia. My question now is how to go forward with the change. Thiago has written with the following instructions: If you people are ok with a dual license, then please place notices in all your files that the file is dual-licensed. Only the copyright holder can do that. Commit the changes to KDE_3_3_BRANCH, HEAD and ask Coolo for instructions on KDE_3_4_BRANCH. The copyright holders whose names appear in the relevant sources are Bernd Gehrmann, Christian Loose and André Wöbbeking. Would it be possible for each of you to make the relevant commits? Coolo, do you have any specific requests or instructions for KDE_3_4_BRANCH? I'm not sure if Bernd Gehrmann still uses his CVS account. Andras, would it be in any way possible to find out if Bernd wishes to make these changes himself, and if not to obtain some form of authorisation? I'm not sure how formal the KDE project requires this to be, though I expect an unsigned email would not suffice (since such a thing is easily spoofed). If anyone knows more about KDE policy on such matters then their input would be appreciated. For reference I've included a list below of files in KDE_3_4_BRANCH with the relevant author names in the copyright headers. I believe this covers all the files in KDE_3_3_BRANCH as well, though there may be new files in HEAD or the subversion_support branch; I haven't looked into those. Note that no changes are needed for cervisia/cvsservice, since those files are already LGPL. Many thanks again to everyone for their help in this matter, and I apologise for the tedium that accompanies it. Ben. Files in KDE_3_4_BRANCH sorted by copyright name: Bernd Gehrmann: addremovedlg.cpp addrepositorydlg.cpp annotatedlg.cpp annotateview.cpp cervisiapart.cpp cervisiashell.cpp changelogdlg.cpp checkoutdlg.cpp commitdlg.cpp cvsdir.cpp diffdlg.cpp diffview.cpp historydlg.cpp logdlg.cpp loglist.cpp logtree.cpp main.cpp mergedlg.cpp misc.cpp progressdlg.cpp protocolview.cpp repositories.cpp repositorydlg.cpp resolvedlg.cpp settingsdlg.cpp tagdlg.cpp updatedlg.cpp updateview.cpp updateview_items.cpp watchdlg.cpp addremovedlg.h addrepositorydlg.h annotatedlg.h annotateview.h cervisiapart.h cervisiashell.h changelogdlg.h checkoutdlg.h commitdlg.h cvsdir.h diffdlg.h diffview.h historydlg.h logdlg.h loglist.h logtree.h mergedlg.h misc.h progressdlg.h protocolview.h repositories.h repositorydlg.h resolvedlg.h settingsdlg.h tagdlg.h updatedlg.h updateview.h updateview_items.h watchdlg.h Christian Loose: addremovedlg.cpp addrepositorydlg.cpp annotatectl.cpp cervisiapart.cpp cervisiashell.cpp changelogdlg.cpp checkoutdlg.cpp commitdlg.cpp cvsinitdlg.cpp dirignorelist.cpp editwithmenu.cpp globalignorelist.cpp ignorelistbase.cpp logdlg.cpp logplainview.cpp logtree.cpp main.cpp misc.cpp patchoptiondlg.cpp progressdlg.cpp protocolview.cpp repositorydlg.cpp resolvedlg.cpp resolvedlg_p.cpp settingsdlg.cpp watchersdlg.cpp addremovedlg.h addrepositorydlg.h annotatectl.h cervisiapart.h cervisiashell.h changelogdlg.h cvsinitdlg.h dirignorelist.h editwithmenu.h globalignorelist.h ignorelistbase.h logplainview.h logtree.h misc.h patchoptiondlg.h progressdlg.h protocolview.h repositorydlg.h resolvedlg.h resolvedlg_p.h settingsdlg.h watchersdlg.h André Wöbbeking: annotateview.cpp entry.cpp entry_status.cpp loginfo.cpp stringmatcher.cpp tooltip.cpp updateview.cpp updateview_items.cpp updateview_visitors.cpp annotateview.h entry.h entry_status.h entry_status_change.h loginfo.h stringmatcher.h tooltip.h updateview.h updateview_items.h updateview_visitors.h
Bug#301471: checkstyle: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'cdbs'
Hi Andreas, On Sat, Mar 26, 2005 at 08:46:03AM +0100, Andreas Jochens wrote: Package: checkstyle Severity: serious Tags: patch Particularly when filing release-critical bugs against a package, please include the package version that it's known to apply against. For FTBFS reports, it is also generally useful to indicate whether your build environment was unstable or testing. (Obviously it shouldn't matter in the case of a missing build-dep.) For the record, this bug appears to apply to both 3.4-3 in testing and 3.4-6 in unstable, since both use cdbs and neither mention it in Build-Depends-Indep. Thanks, -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#289362: fixed in gstreamer0.8 0.8.9-2
Hi, On mer, mar 16, 2005, David I. Lehn wrote: * debian/patches/cpuid.patch: * Patch from upstream to check for cpuid support (Closes: #289362) Upstream said the initial patch was crap (see http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=166696), could you backport a newer patch from CVS? Bye, -- Loïc Minier [EMAIL PROTECTED] Neutral President: I have no strong feelings one way or the other.
Bug#296514: Cervisia licensing: moving forward?
I prefer a single GPL license and AFAIK Christian too. I think this shouldn't be a problem, right? I don't see why not; from Bernd's reply (courtsey of Andras), he seems happy with this also. Ben. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#296514: Cervisia licensing: moving forward?
On Saturday 26 March 2005 10:36, Ben Burton wrote: I prefer a single GPL license and AFAIK Christian too. I think this shouldn't be a problem, right? I don't see why not; from Bernd's reply (courtsey of Andras), he seems happy with this also. Yes, he wrote that if the licensing of the Cervisia part is a problem for applications embedding or using it, it is fine for me to change the license to GPL. Andras -- Quanta Plus developer - http://quanta.sourceforge.net K Desktop Environment - http://www.kde.org pgpDfuqf5VJ5H.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#301479: fails to start w/o config with bogus Xlib error messages
Package: mozilla-firefox Version: 1.0.2-1 Severity: grave Hello, when I kill all mozilla-firefox and mozilla instanzes and wipe out the .mozilla and .firefox directories, mozilla-firefox fails to start with following message: Xlib: connection to :0.0 refused by server Xlib: XDM authorization key matches an existing client! (firefox-bin:12546): Gtk-WARNING **: cannot open display: This makes no sense. With strace -f, I see multiple openings of the .Xauthority file and only after a while it simply breaks. When I run host + and start FF once, then it does work after that, even with host -. Regards, Eduard. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.11.5 Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages mozilla-firefox depends on: ii debianutils 2.13.1 Miscellaneous utilities specific t ii fontconfig 2.3.1-2 generic font configuration library ii libatk1.0-0 1.8.0-4 The ATK accessibility toolkit ii libc62.3.2.ds1-20GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libfontconfig1 2.3.1-2 generic font configuration library ii libfreetype6 2.1.7-2.3 FreeType 2 font engine, shared lib ii libgcc1 1:3.4.3-12 GCC support library ii libglib2.0-0 2.6.3-1 The GLib library of C routines ii libgtk2.0-0 2.6.2-4 The GTK+ graphical user interface ii libidl0 0.8.5-1 library for parsing CORBA IDL file ii libjpeg626b-10 The Independent JPEG Group's JPEG ii libkrb53 1.3.6-1 MIT Kerberos runtime libraries ii libpango1.0-01.8.1-1 Layout and rendering of internatio ii libpng12-0 1.2.8rel-1 PNG library - runtime ii libstdc++5 1:3.3.5-12 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 ii libx11-6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-12.0.1 X Window System protocol client li ii libxext6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-12.0.1 X Window System miscellaneous exte ii libxft2 2.1.2-6 FreeType-based font drawing librar hi libxp6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-12.0.1 X Window System printing extension hi libxt6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-12.0.1 X Toolkit Intrinsics ii psmisc 21.6-1 Utilities that use the proc filesy ii xlibs4.3.0.dfsg.1-12 X Keyboard Extension (XKB) configu ii zlib1g 1:1.2.2-4 compression library - runtime -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: tagging 300787, severity of 300787 is important
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10 tags 300787 unreproducible moreinfo Bug#300787: impossible to upgrade makedev There were no tags set. Tags added: unreproducible, moreinfo severity 300787 important Bug#300787: impossible to upgrade makedev Severity set to `important'. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#282292: marked as done (FTBFS: fails test suite)
Your message dated Sat, 26 Mar 2005 04:47:09 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#282292: fixed in libgd-perl 1.41-13 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Nov 2004 01:42:08 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Nov 20 17:42:08 2004 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from sorrow.cyrius.com [65.19.161.204] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1CVgjw-0007XW-00; Sat, 20 Nov 2004 17:42:08 -0800 Received: by sorrow.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 10) id 53D4A64D4B; Sun, 21 Nov 2004 01:42:08 + (UTC) Received: by derision.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id B068B17AC8; Sun, 21 Nov 2004 01:41:40 + (GMT) Date: Sun, 21 Nov 2004 01:41:40 + From: Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: FTBFS: fails test suite Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] References: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040722i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Package: libgd-noxpm-perl Version: 1.41-9 Severity: serious Hi Jonas, Sorry to report this bug without investigating very closely; libgd-perl and libgd-noxpm-perl no longer build from source because they show failures in their test suite. I'm not sure if this is related to a new version of gd or maybe perl; in any case, libgdchart-gd1 still builds but it also doesn't have a test suite so maybe you should take a look at that package as well. I've reproduced this on powerpc and i386. Automatic build of libgd-noxpm-perl_1.41-9 on derision by sbuild/powerpc 1.1.1.1 Build started at 20041120-1431 ... (cd . /usr/bin/perl Makefile.PL INSTALLDIRS=vendor ) NOTICE: This module requires libgd 1.8.4 or higher (shared library version 4.X). If you experience compile problems, please check the @INC, @LIBPATH and @LIBS arrays defined in Makefile.PL and manually adjust, if necessary. Checking if your kit is complete... Looks good Writing Makefile for GD make -C . OPTIMIZE=-g -Wall -O2 all make[1]: Entering directory `/build/tbm/libgd-noxpm-perl-1.41' cp patch_gd.pl blib/lib/patch_gd.pl cp qd.pl blib/lib/qd.pl cp GD.pm blib/lib/GD.pm AutoSplitting blib/lib/GD.pm (blib/lib/auto/GD) /usr/bin/perl /usr/share/perl/5.8/ExtUtils/xsubpp -typemap /usr/share/perl/5.8/ExtUtils/typemap -typemap typemap GD.xs GD.xsc mv GD.xsc GD.c cc -c -D_REENTRANT -D_GNU_SOURCE -DTHREADS_HAVE_PIDS -DDEBIAN -fno-strict-aliasing -I/usr/local/include -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -g -Wall -O2 -DVERSION=\1.41\ -DXS_VERSION=\1.41\ -fPIC -I/usr/lib/perl/5.8/CORE -DHAVE_JPEG -DHAVE_TTF GD.c GD.xs: In function `constant': GD.xs:234: warning: label `not_there' defined but not used GD.c: In function `XS_GD__Image_newFromGifData': GD.c:553: warning: unused variable `imageData' GD.xs:442: warning: unused variable `ctx' GD.xs:443: warning: unused variable `data' GD.xs:444: warning: unused variable `len' GD.c: In function `XS_GD__Image_newFromJpegData': GD.xs:469: warning: unused variable `errormsg' GD.c: In function `XS_GD__Image__newFromGif': GD.c:666: warning: unused variable `filehandle' GD.c: In function `XS_GD__Image_newFromXpm': GD.c:853: warning: unused variable `filename' GD.xs:601: warning: unused variable `img' GD.xs: In function `XS_GD__Image_gif': GD.xs:667: warning: unused variable `data' GD.xs:668: warning: unused variable `size' GD.c: At top level: GD.xs:26: warning: `not_here' defined but not used Running Mkbootstrap for GD () chmod 644 GD.bs rm -f blib/arch/auto/GD/GD.so LD_RUN_PATH= cc -shared -L/usr/local/lib GD.o -o blib/arch/auto/GD/GD.so -lgd -lpng -lz -lfreetype -ljpeg -lm chmod 755 blib/arch/auto/GD/GD.so cp GD.bs blib/arch/auto/GD/GD.bs chmod 644 blib/arch/auto/GD/GD.bs Manifying blib/man3/GD.3pm make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/tbm/libgd-noxpm-perl-1.41' /usr/bin/fakeroot debian/rules binary-arch test -x debian/rules test `id -u` = 0 dh_clean -k dh_installdirs -A if [ ! -d . ]; then \ mkdir -p .; \ fi if [ -z ]; then \ if ! test -f debian/compat; then echo
Bug#299144: Please detail bug #299144
I used to use phpWiki on Debian, and I'm wondering exactly what minor bugs make it unreleasable. Could you detail, or better, submit bugreports? Thanks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#282293: marked as done (FTBFS: test suite fails)
Your message dated Sat, 26 Mar 2005 05:02:09 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#282293: fixed in libgd-noxpm-perl 1.41-10 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Nov 2004 01:43:30 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Nov 20 17:43:30 2004 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from sorrow.cyrius.com [65.19.161.204] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1CVglG-0007fg-00; Sat, 20 Nov 2004 17:43:30 -0800 Received: by sorrow.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 10) id B95E364D4A; Sun, 21 Nov 2004 01:43:29 + (UTC) Received: by derision.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 4165C17AC8; Sun, 21 Nov 2004 01:43:03 + (GMT) Date: Sun, 21 Nov 2004 01:43:03 + From: Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: FTBFS: test suite fails Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] References: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040722i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Package: libgd-perl Version: 1.41-12 Severity: serious Hi Jonas, Sorry to report this bug without investigating very closely; libgd-perl and libgd-noxpm-perl no longer build from source because they show failures in their test suite. I'm not sure if this is related to a new version of gd or maybe perl; in any case, libgdchart-gd1 still builds but it also doesn't have a test suite so maybe you should take a look at that package as well. I've reproduced this on powerpc and i386. Automatic build of libgd-perl_1.41-12 on derision by sbuild/powerpc 1.1.1.1 Build started at 20041120-1434 ... NOTICE: This module requires libgd 1.8.4 or higher (shared library version 4.X). If you experience compile problems, please check the @INC, @LIBPATH and @LIBS arrays defined in Makefile.PL and manually adjust, if necessary. Checking if your kit is complete... Looks good Writing Makefile for GD make -C . OPTIMIZE=-g -Wall -O2 all make[1]: Entering directory `/build/tbm/libgd-perl-1.41' cp patch_gd.pl blib/lib/patch_gd.pl cp qd.pl blib/lib/qd.pl cp GD.pm blib/lib/GD.pm AutoSplitting blib/lib/GD.pm (blib/lib/auto/GD) /usr/bin/perl /usr/share/perl/5.8/ExtUtils/xsubpp -typemap /usr/share/perl/5.8/ExtUtils/typemap -typemap typemap GD.xs GD.xsc mv GD.xsc GD.c cc -c -D_REENTRANT -D_GNU_SOURCE -DTHREADS_HAVE_PIDS -DDEBIAN -fno-strict-aliasing -I/usr/local/include -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -g -Wall -O2 -DVERSION=\1.41\ -DXS_VERSION=\1.41\ -fPIC -I/usr/lib/perl/5.8/CORE -DHAVE_JPEG -DHAVE_TTF -DHAVE_XPM GD.c GD.xs: In function `constant': GD.xs:234: warning: label `not_there' defined but not used GD.c: In function `XS_GD__Image_newFromGifData': GD.c:553: warning: unused variable `imageData' GD.xs:442: warning: unused variable `ctx' GD.xs:443: warning: unused variable `data' GD.xs:444: warning: unused variable `len' GD.c: In function `XS_GD__Image_newFromJpegData': GD.xs:469: warning: unused variable `errormsg' GD.c: In function `XS_GD__Image__newFromGif': GD.c:666: warning: unused variable `filehandle' GD.xs: In function `XS_GD__Image_gif': GD.xs:667: warning: unused variable `data' GD.xs:668: warning: unused variable `size' GD.c: At top level: GD.xs:26: warning: `not_here' defined but not used Running Mkbootstrap for GD () chmod 644 GD.bs rm -f blib/arch/auto/GD/GD.so LD_RUN_PATH= cc -shared -L/usr/local/lib GD.o -o blib/arch/auto/GD/GD.so -L/usr/X11R6/lib -lgd -lpng -lz -lfreetype -ljpeg -lm -lX11 -lXpm chmod 755 blib/arch/auto/GD/GD.so cp GD.bs blib/arch/auto/GD/GD.bs chmod 644 blib/arch/auto/GD/GD.bs Manifying blib/man3/GD.3pm make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/tbm/libgd-perl-1.41' /usr/bin/fakeroot debian/rules binary-arch test -x debian/rules test `id -u` = 0 dh_clean -k dh_installdirs -A if [ ! -d . ]; then \ mkdir -p .; \ fi if [ -z ]; then \ if ! test -f debian/compat; then echo 4 debian/compat; fi; \ fi make -C . OPTIMIZE=-g -Wall -O2 all make[1]: Entering directory `/build/tbm/libgd-perl-1.41' make[1]: Leaving directory
Bug#301489: kernel is unable to mount file system on raid0 device
Package: kernel-image-2.6.8-2-64-smp Version: 2.6.8-6 Severity: grave Seen on an A500 SMP system, it works fine with an A500 kernel found at ftp.parisc-linux.org. http://cvs.parisc-linux.org/download/linux-2.6/autobuild/a500_defconfig/palinux-a500-defconfig-2.6.8.1-pa11_0-2_all.deb Just rebooting with this kernel (or vmlinux-2.6.11-pa2-a500_defconfig, vmlinux-2.6.12-rc1-pa1-a500_defconfig) sucessfully mounts the file system. All modules loaded. md: md driver 0.90.0 MAX_MD_DEVS=256, MD_SB_DISKS=27 Starting raid devices: md: md0 stopped. md: bindsdb9 md: bindsda5 md: raid0 personality registered as nr 2 md0: setting max_sectors to 128, segment boundary to 32767 raid0: looking at sda5 raid0: comparing sda5(15802240) with sda5(15802240) raid0: END raid0: == UNIQUE raid0: 1 zones raid0: looking at sdb9 raid0: comparing sdb9(15802240) with sda5(15802240) raid0: EQUAL raid0: FINAL 1 zones raid0: done. raid0 : md_size is 31604480 blocks. raid0 : conf-hash_spacing is 31604480 blocks. raid0 : nb_zone is 1. raid0 : Allocating 8 bytes for hash. mdadm: /dev/md0 has been started with 2 drives. done. Checking all file systems... fsck 1.35 (28-Feb-2004) /dev/sdb5: clean, 21431/488640 files, 619977/976636 blocks /dev/sdb7: clean, 3646/977280 files, 95489/1953020 blocks /dev/sdb8: clean, 30041/304608 files, 411790/608764 blocks fsck.ext3: Invalid argument while trying to open /dev/md1 /dev/md1: The superblock could not be read or does not describe a correct ext2 filesystem. If the device is valid and it really contains an ext2 filesystem (and not swap or ufs or something else), then the superblock is corrupt, and you might try running e2fsck with an alternate superblock: e2fsck -b 8193 device fsck failed. Please repair manually. CONTROL-D will exit from this shell and continue system startup. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Bug#301479: fails to start w/o config with bogus Xlib error messages
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 301479 normal Bug#301479: fails to start w/o config with bogus Xlib error messages Severity set to `normal'. forwarded 301479 http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=246313 Bug#301479: fails to start w/o config with bogus Xlib error messages Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=246313. merge 301479 259215 Bug#259215: mozilla-firefox: firefox fails to start with 'Xlib: connection to :0.0 refused by server' Bug#301479: fails to start w/o config with bogus Xlib error messages Bug#272929: mozilla-firefox: (firefox-bin:16601): Gtk-WARNING **: cannot open display Bug#278440: firefox doesn't start at all... Bug#282101: firefox sometimes doesn't start Merged 259215 272929 278440 282101 301479. Downgrading to normal, this is workaroundable and doesn't occur for Unknown command or malformed arguments to command. everybody at anytime. Unknown command or malformed arguments to command. See upstream bug for a workaround. Unknown command or malformed arguments to command. Mike Unknown command or malformed arguments to command. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#301479: fails to start w/o config with bogus Xlib error messages
severity 301479 normal forwarded 301479 http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=246313 merge 301479 259215 Downgrading to normal, this is workaroundable and doesn't occur for everybody at anytime. See upstream bug for a workaround. Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: tagging 300278
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10 tags 300278 - patch Bug#300278: defoma: debhelper files fail if defoma is removed before package Tags were: patch Tags removed: patch End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#301494: linphone and linphonec segfault on startup
Package: linphone Version: 1.0.1-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable linphone and linphonec segfault on startup -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.10-ck5 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) Versions of packages linphone depends on: ii libart-2.0-22.3.17-1 Library of functions for 2D graphi ii libatk1.0-0 1.8.0-4 The ATK accessibility toolkit ii libbonobo2-02.8.1-2 Bonobo CORBA interfaces library ii libbonoboui2-0 2.8.1-2 The Bonobo UI library ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-20 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libgconf2-4 2.8.1-4 GNOME configuration database syste ii libglib2.0-02.6.3-1 The GLib library of C routines ii libgnome2-0 2.8.1-2 The GNOME 2 library - runtime file ii libgnomecanvas2-0 2.8.0-1 A powerful object-oriented display ii libgnomeui-02.8.1-3 The GNOME 2 libraries (User Interf ii libgnomevfs2-0 2.8.4-2 The GNOME virtual file-system libr ii libgtk2.0-0 2.6.2-4 The GTK+ graphical user interface ii libice6 6.8.1-0.4Inter-Client Exchange library ii liblinphone11.0.1-1 linphone web phone's library (supp ii liborbit2 1:2.12.1-1 libraries for ORBit2 - a CORBA ORB ii libosip2-3 2.2.0-1 Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) ii libpanel-applet2-0 2.8.3-1 library for GNOME 2 panel applets ii libpango1.0-0 1.8.1-1 Layout and rendering of internatio ii libpopt01.7-5lib for parsing cmdline parameters ii libsm6 6.8.1-0.4X Window System Session Management ii libxml2 2.6.16-3 GNOME XML library ii linphone-nox1.0.1-1 web phone ii xlibs 6.8.1-0.4X Window System client libraries m ii zlib1g 1:1.2.2-4compression library - runtime -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#301497: missing dependences ucf, mysql-client | postgresql-client
Package: dbconfig-common
Version: 1.5
Severity: grave
Tags: experimental
I've builded a new package (mydms) with dbconfig-common dependence in a
debootstrap chroot and fails executing ucf, I've seen dbconfig-common uses it
and it's not on dependences.
Another dependence: mysql-client | postgresql-client. It
needs one of them.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.10.moria
Locale: LANG=ca_ES.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=ca_ES.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Versions of packages dbconfig-common depends on:
ii debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.4.46 Debian configuration management sy
-- debconf information:
dbconfig-common/mysql/dbname: ${pkg}
dbconfig-common/pgsql/host:
dbconfig-common/mysql/port:
dbconfig-common/pgsql/manualconf:
dbconfig-common/dbconfig-remove: true
dbconfig-common/mysql/app-user:
dbconfig-common/mysql/method: unix socket
dbconfig-common/pgsql/dbname: ${pkg}
dbconfig-common/upgrade-backup: true
dbconfig-common/pgsql/authmethod-admin: ident
dbconfig-common/upgrade-error:
dbconfig-common/purge: false
dbconfig-common/install-error:
dbconfig-common/pgsql/admin-user: postgres
dbconfig-common/dbconfig-install: true
dbconfig-common/mysql/newhost:
dbconfig-common/remember-app-pass: false
dbconfig-common/mysql/host:
dbconfig-common/pgsql/changeconf: false
dbconfig-common/pgsql/newhost:
dbconfig-common/dbconfig-upgrade: true
dbconfig-common/pgsql/app-user: ${pkg}
dbconfig-common/passwords-do-not-match:
dbconfig-common/remove-error:
dbconfig-common/remember-admin-pass: false
dbconfig-common/mysql/admin-user: root
dbconfig-common/pgsql/port:
dbconfig-common/pgsql/method: unix socket
dbconfig-common/pgsql/authmethod-user: ident
dbconfig-common/database-type:
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#300522: gal: FTBFS: gnome-autogen.sh: aclocal: AM_LC_MESSAGES not found
tags 300522 sid thanks This bug only shows up in sid, where gettext has been upgraded to version 0.14.2-1. The AM_LC_MESSAGES macro has been renamed to gt_LC_MESSAGES in this version, and gal expects this macro to be available from an external source. Currently, the best fix for this is to include a verbatim copy of the needed macro in the macros/ directory, so that it's always available. Updating the code to use gt_LC_MESSAGES instead is possible, but only once the updated gettext is in testing, which I currently don't expect to happen for sarge. Post-sarge, this hopefully won't be an issue at all; I hope we'll be phasing out the old packages still using gal before the etch release. Cheers, -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#294396: kernel-kbuild-2.6-3 - does not support kernel images without symbol versions
Hi Bastian, Has anything been done with Horms' suggestion to work around this in the s390 kernel-headers package for sarge? Should this bug be reassigned to kernel-image-2.6.8-s390? Thanks, -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#296514: Cervisia licensing: moving forward?
Do I need to add a copyright since I did the kparts port? Rich. On Sat, 26 Mar 2005 11:02:25 +0200, Andras Mantia [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Saturday 26 March 2005 10:36, Ben Burton wrote: I prefer a single GPL license and AFAIK Christian too. I think this shouldn't be a problem, right? I don't see why not; from Bernd's reply (courtsey of Andras), he seems happy with this also. Yes, he wrote that if the licensing of the Cervisia part is a problem for applications embedding or using it, it is fine for me to change the license to GPL. Andras -- Quanta Plus developer - http://quanta.sourceforge.net K Desktop Environment - http://www.kde.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#300460: Test case
Hi, Could you please attach a test case to this bug because I can't reproduce it using the testsuite (after converting the .jpg file to .png and changing the relevant reference). Thanks, Mark -- Mark Hymers, University of Newcastle Medical School Intercalating Medical Student (MBBS / PhD) signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#300265: xnap-snapshot: FTBFS: make[1]: *** [jar] Segmentation fault
I can't reproduce a segfault here when building this package; what I *do* get appears to be an error identical to bug #301267. Cheers, -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#301507: bcel_5.1.orig.tar.gz missing in the archive.
Package: bcel, ftp.debian.org Severity: serious Hi, The bcel_5.1.orig.tar.gz seems to be missing from the archive. Kurt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: tagging 282873
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.11 tags 282873 pending Bug#282873: nhc98 causes hat build to fail on sparc Tags were: sarge Bug#289150: nhc98 causes hat build to fail on sparc Tags added: pending End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#301038: marked as done (imagefs: segfaults on startup)
Your message dated Sat, 26 Mar 2005 07:17:14 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#301038: fixed in imagefs 1.03-5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Mar 2005 13:58:25 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Mar 23 05:58:25 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from oceanite.ens-lyon.fr [140.77.1.22] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DE6NM-0001D3-00; Wed, 23 Mar 2005 05:58:24 -0800 Received: from localhost (oceanite.ens-lyon.fr [127.0.0.1]) by oceanite.ens-lyon.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEBE9320623 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 23 Mar 2005 14:50:58 +0100 (CET) Received: from oceanite.ens-lyon.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (oceanite [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 19892-04 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 23 Mar 2005 14:50:58 +0100 (CET) Received: from macvin.cri2000.ens-lyon.fr (macvin.cri2000.ens-lyon.fr [140.77.13.44]) by oceanite.ens-lyon.fr (Postfix) with SMTP id D4F6132048B for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 23 Mar 2005 14:50:58 +0100 (CET) Received: (nullmailer pid 31080 invoked by uid 5345); Wed, 23 Mar 2005 13:58:23 - Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Brice Goglin [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: imagefs: segfaults on startup X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8 Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2005 14:58:22 +0100 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at ens-lyon.fr Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: imagefs Version: 1.03-4 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable imagefs fails to open the image, either when opening an existing one or creating a new one: macvin:~% imagefs c prout 2880 Create new image file [prout] with [2880] sectors. Fatal: could not create file prout. Incident de segmentation (core dumped) macvin:~% imagefs d funk.img Read directory from image file [funk.img]. Fatal: could not open file funk.img. Directory listing: Incident de segmentation (core dumped) -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.11=Macvin Locale: LANG=fr_FR, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Versions of packages imagefs depends on: ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-20 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libgcc1 1:3.4.3-6 GCC support library ii libstdc++51:3.3.5-8 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 301038-close) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Mar 2005 12:32:27 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Mar 26 04:32:27 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DFASo-0002RV-00; Sat, 26 Mar 2005 04:32:27 -0800 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DFAE6-Ls-00; Sat, 26 Mar 2005 07:17:14 -0500 From: Matej Vela [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $ Subject: Bug#301038: fixed in imagefs 1.03-5 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2005 07:17:14 -0500 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2 Source: imagefs Source-Version: 1.03-5 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of imagefs, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: imagefs_1.03-5.diff.gz to pool/main/i/imagefs/imagefs_1.03-5.diff.gz imagefs_1.03-5.dsc to pool/main/i/imagefs/imagefs_1.03-5.dsc imagefs_1.03-5_i386.deb to pool/main/i/imagefs/imagefs_1.03-5_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for
Bug#294404: udev and mdadm mess
Package: mdadm Version: 1.9.0-1 Followup-For: Bug #294404 Hello, I've been trying to setup md-raid on a system using udev and ran across the problem described in this bug. AFAICS udev won't create device nodes as long as there is no device initialized in the kernel. OTOH mdadm insists on having a device node for the RAID before it is built. So far my understanding of the problem. Now my solution. mdadm 1.9.0 has the auto option for the mdadm.conf file. However it seems to be picky about the position of that statement inside the conf file. So far, it has worked for me only if auto=md was the last statement for the ARRAY definition. Another problem: it seems that DEVICE partitions in mdadm.conf doesn't properly detect all raid partitions. I've replaced that line with the old-style def. Here my working mdadm.conf: DEVICE /dev/sda*, /dev/sdb* ARRAY /dev/md0 level=raid1 num-devices=2 UUID= devices=/dev/sda1,/dev/sdb1 auto=md This works nicely on a couple of machines here. The partitions are type 0xFD (raid autodetect). Hope that helps. Warm regards, -Dimitri -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: cantlr: Depends on ligbcc1 from experimental.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 301508 + sid Bug#301508: cantlr: Depends on libgcc1 from experimental. There were no tags set. Tags added: sid thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#301511: sysklogd: hangs the whole system
Package: sysklogd Version: 1.4.1-16 Severity: grave Justification: breaks the whole system References: http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/3/26/37 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103392 http://lkml.org/lkml/2004/12/21/208 http://lkml.org/lkml/2004/11/2/17 Syslogd can hang if domark() is called while the main loop is just calling in the ctime() libc function. ctime() is not reentrant and will make syslogd hang (with recent glibc and 2.6 kernels, because glibc uses __libc_lock which uses a [fm]utex). Because AF_UNIX SOCK_DGRAM sockets are blocking by default under Linux, after a short while everything on the system that calls syslog() will hang as well. Which means you can't login anymore, and almost all other network services hang as well. Also cron will fork every now and again and call syslog() so the whole process table will fill up. The system is fubared. The original syslogd protects itself from this by blocking SIGHUP and SIGALRM in logmsg(), but that is under #ifndef SYSV. The attached patch fixes this by adding POSIX sigprocmask calls in logmsg(), as that is the simplest fix. Non-bug related comments: A better fix would be to just set a flag in domark() and check that flag every so often in the mainloop and do the MARKing there. Someone should take out all the #ifdef/#ifndef SYSV stuff and replace it with POSIX routines so that this syslogd compiles under all modern OSes. I think that it doesn't even compile without #define SYSV anymore, anyway. Mike. --- sysklogd-1.4.1/syslogd.c.ORIG 2005-03-25 22:04:07.360493000 +0100 +++ sysklogd-1.4.1/syslogd.c2005-03-26 13:28:17.650819246 +0100 @@ -1558,11 +1558,21 @@ int fac, prilev, lognum; int msglen; char *timestamp; +#ifdef linux + sigset_t mask, omask; +#endif dprintf(logmsg: %s, flags %x, from %s, msg %s\n, textpri(pri), flags, from, msg); -#ifndef SYSV +#ifdef linux /* POSIX, really. */ + sigemptyset(mask); + sigaddset(mask, SIGHUP); + sigaddset(mask, SIGALRM); + sigprocmask(SIG_BLOCK, mask, omask); +#else +# ifndef SYSV omask = sigblock(sigmask(SIGHUP)|sigmask(SIGALRM)); +# endif #endif /* @@ -1603,8 +1613,12 @@ (void) close(f-f_file); f-f_file = -1; } -#ifndef SYSV +#ifdef linux + sigprocmask(SIG_SETMASK, omask, NULL); +#else +# ifndef SYSV (void) sigsetmask(omask); +# endif #endif return; } @@ -1668,8 +1682,12 @@ } } } -#ifndef SYSV +#ifdef linux + sigprocmask(SIG_SETMASK, omask, NULL); +#else +# ifndef SYSV (void) sigsetmask(omask); +# endif #endif } #if FALSE
Bug#298930: marked as forwarded (tulip: contains non-free fonts)
Your message dated Sat, 26 Mar 2005 14:29:20 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] has caused the Debian Bug report #298930, regarding tulip: contains non-free fonts to be marked as having been forwarded to the upstream software author(s) David Auber [EMAIL PROTECTED]. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) --- Received: (at 298930-forwarded) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Mar 2005 13:29:03 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Mar 26 05:29:03 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from postfix4-1.free.fr [213.228.0.62] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DFBLb-000388-00; Sat, 26 Mar 2005 05:29:03 -0800 Received: from nanterre-1-81-57-214-146 (nanterre-1-81-57-214-146.fbx.proxad.net [81.57.214.146]) by postfix4-1.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B60B2C0A18; Sat, 26 Mar 2005 14:29:02 +0100 (CET) Received: from dwitch by nanterre-1-81-57-214-146 with local (Exim 4.50) id 1DFBLt-0004xz-I3; Sat, 26 Mar 2005 14:29:21 +0100 Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2005 14:29:20 +0100 To: David Auber [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: tulip and font licences Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] References: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary=fCcDWlUEdh43YKr8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i From: Yann Dirson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: --fCcDWlUEdh43YKr8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Hello David, There is a licencing issue with the fonts shipped in the tulip tarball. It would surely be possible to replace them, for example with fonts from the Vera series. I can easily adapt the Debian package to replace the ttf files (although I'll have to shipped a modified tarball with those non-free bits removed). But the Fonts.bmp file annoys me a little : how did you produce it ? Although it does not seem to be derived from the Luxi fonts, it would be nice to have a Makefile rule, or even just a README, to help regenerate it from another font (ie. it is probably not the preferred form of the work for making modifications to it that would qualify as source code for the GPL - although the original font is probably not covered by the GPL). Cordialement, -- Yann Dirson[EMAIL PROTECTED] | Debian-related: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Support Debian GNU/Linux: | Freedom, Power, Stability, Gratis http://ydirson.free.fr/| Check http://www.debian.org/ --fCcDWlUEdh43YKr8 Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from pop.altern.org [80.67.174.57] by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-6.2.5) for [EMAIL PROTECTED] (single-drop); Thu, 10 Mar 2005 20:50:59 +0100 (CET) Received: (qmail 9533 invoked by alias); 10 Mar 2005 18:58:36 - Received: from unknown (HELO mx.altern.org) (80.67.174.51) by altern.org with SMTP; 10 Mar 2005 18:58:36 - Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mx.altern.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DED99790 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 10 Mar 2005 20:07:24 +0100 (CET) Received: from mx.altern.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (filer [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 28631-01 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 10 Mar 2005 20:07:24 +0100 (CET) Received: from spohr.debian.org (spohr.debian.org [128.193.0.4]) by mx.altern.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC0A99786 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 10 Mar 2005 20:07:23 +0100 (CET) Received: from debbugs by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D9Shk-0005vo-00; Thu, 10 Mar 2005 10:48:16 -0800 X-Loop: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Bug#298930: tulip: contains non-free fonts Reply-To: Peter De Wachter [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Resent-From: Peter De Wachter [EMAIL PROTECTED] Resent-To: debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org Resent-Cc: Yann Dirson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Resent-Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 18:48:11 UTC Resent-Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Debian-PR-Message: report 298930 X-Debian-PR-Package: tulip X-Debian-PR-Keywords: Received: via spool by [EMAIL PROTECTED] id=B.111047984917940 (code B ref -1); Thu, 10 Mar 2005 18:48:11 UTC Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Mar 2005 18:37:29 + Received: from mailhost.vub.ac.be (dorado.vub.ac.be) [134.184.129.10] by
Processed: a
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 301511 patch Bug#301511: sysklogd: hangs the whole system There were no tags set. Tags added: patch thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: tagging 247192
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.12 tags 247192 + patch Bug#247192: gnome-pim: uninstallable due to conflict with gnome-pim-conduits There were no tags set. Tags added: patch End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#301494: linphone and linphonec segfault on startup
Samuel Mimram wrote: Hi, Dino Puller wrote: Package: linphone Version: 1.0.1-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable linphone and linphonec segfault on startup Argl. Could you please send me a stack trace to see where the problem is? You can do that by: % gdb linphone (gdb) r [...] segfault (gdb) where and send me the output. Thanks in advance. Regards, Sam. Here it is: [New Thread -1226335312 (LWP 8428)] Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. [Switching to Thread -1223622528 (LWP 8425)] 0xb75e1fea in strcmp () from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6 (gdb) where #0 0xb75e1fea in strcmp () from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6 #1 0xb76c59f4 in ms_audio_codec_info_get () from /usr/lib/liblinphone.so.1 #2 0xb76bf13a in linphone_core_setup_local_rtp_profile () from /usr/lib/liblinphone.so.1 #3 0xb76ba8be in codecs_config_read () from /usr/lib/liblinphone.so.1 #4 0xb76bacd7 in linphone_core_init () from /usr/lib/liblinphone.so.1 #5 0x080514fa in linphone_gnome_init () #6 0x08050c59 in main () (gdb) bye, Dino Puller -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#247192: [patch] conflict gnome-pim-conduits with gnome-pim
Package: gnome-pim
Followup-For: Bug #247192
Hello.
Because seems that gnome-pim include now old gnome-pim-conduits
(disappeared from archive), here is a little patch to fix the RC bug.
--- debian/control.orig 2005-03-26 14:10:35.178294248 +0100
+++ debian/control 2005-03-26 14:11:51.865636000 +0100
@@ -8,6 +8,7 @@
Priority: optional
Architecture: any
Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, ${misc:Depends}
+Conflicts: gnome-pim-conduits
Description: calendar and address book for GNOME
This package contains a calendar tool (gnomecal) with notifications
and
multiple views, and an address book (gnomecard). Both programs were
Because this is a RC bug open, i'll announce the intent to make a NMU to
solve this issue, if it's necessary.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#301518: clamsmtp: Plain installation on sarge fails with /var/lib/ucf/cache not existing
Package: clamsmtp Version: 1.2-4 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Installing clamsmtp on sarge throws up error as /var/lib/ucf/cache isn't there and there is nobody to create it. That renders package uninstallable. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.4.29-486 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Versions of packages clamsmtp depends on: ii clamav-daemon 0.83-3 antivirus scanner daemon ii debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.4.30.11Debian configuration management sy ii dpkg1.10.27 Package maintenance system for Deb ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-20 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an -- debconf information: clamsmtp/do-fixperms: false * clamsmtp/purge: yes -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: ipopd: upgrade to 7:2002edebian1-6.1 fails
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: retitle 301213 ipop3: upgrade to 7:2002edebian1-6.1 fails (grep) Bug#301213: ipopd: Upgrading to 7:2002edebian1-6.1 fails You already have /etc/ssl/certs/ipop3d.pem Changed Bug title. reassign 301213 uw-imapd,ipopd Bug#301213: ipop3: upgrade to 7:2002edebian1-6.1 fails (grep) Bug reassigned from package `ipopd' to `uw-imapd,ipopd'. severity 301213 serious Bug#301213: ipop3: upgrade to 7:2002edebian1-6.1 fails (grep) Severity set to `serious'. tag 301213 patch Bug#301213: ipop3: upgrade to 7:2002edebian1-6.1 fails (grep) There were no tags set. Tags added: patch thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: tagging 301494
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 301494 sid Bug#301494: linphone and linphonec segfault on startup There were no tags set. Tags added: sid End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#301519: giftui: FTBFS: ui_transfer.c:321: error: `GtkCellRendererProgressColor' undeclared
Package: giftui Verison: 0.4.1-4 Severity: serious Hi, Your package is failing to build with the following error: if i386-linux-gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I. -DXTHREADS -I/usr/include/gtk-2.0 -I/usr/lib/gtk-2.0/include -I/usr/X11R6/include -I/usr/include/atk-1.0 -I/usr/include/pango-1.0 -I/usr/include/freetype2 -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/lib/glib-2.0/include -DORBIT2=1 -pthread -I/usr/include/gconf/2 -I/usr/include/orbit-2.0 -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/lib/glib-2.0/include -Wall -MT ui_transfer.o -MD -MP -MF .deps/ui_transfer.Tpo \ -c -o ui_transfer.o `test -f 'ui_transfer.c' || echo './'`ui_transfer.c; \ then mv -f .deps/ui_transfer.Tpo .deps/ui_transfer.Po; \ else rm -f .deps/ui_transfer.Tpo; exit 1; \ fi ui_transfer.c: In function `giftui_transfer_pause_iter': ui_transfer.c:321: error: `GtkCellRendererProgressColor' undeclared (first use in this function) ui_transfer.c:321: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once ui_transfer.c:321: error: for each function it appears in.) ui_transfer.c:321: error: parse error before status ui_transfer.c:323: error: `status' undeclared (first use in this function) ui_transfer.c:325: error: `GTK_CELL_RENDERER_PROGRESS_CANCELED' undeclared (first use in this function) ui_transfer.c:329: error: `GTK_CELL_RENDERER_PROGRESS_PAUSED' undeclared (first use in this function) ui_transfer.c:331: error: `GTK_CELL_RENDERER_PROGRESS_ACTIVE' undeclared (first use in this function) make[3]: *** [ui_transfer.o] Error 1 Those all seem to be defined in gtkcellrendererprogress.h which is included, however there is also an indirectly an gtk/gtkcellrendererprogress.h included which does not define it. Kurt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: wmkbd: FTBFS: g++ internal compiler error
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 285046 serious Bug#285046: wmkbd: FTBFS: g++ internal compiler error Severity set to `serious'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#223188: marked as done (makepatch: FTBFS: Test failure)
Your message dated Sat, 26 Mar 2005 09:04:38 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#223188: NMU Patch has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Dec 2003 06:47:14 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Dec 07 00:47:13 2003 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from barry.mail.mindspring.net [207.69.200.25] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1ASsgL-0002vp-00; Sun, 07 Dec 2003 00:46:18 -0600 Received: from user-119bq03.biz.mindspring.com ([66.149.232.3] helo=frobnitz.ddts.net) by barry.mail.mindspring.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 1ASsgL-00084x-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 07 Dec 2003 01:46:17 -0500 Received: from daniel by frobnitz.ddts.net with local (Exim 4.24) id 1ASsgG-0007qs-FV for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 06 Dec 2003 22:46:12 -0800 To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: makepatch: FTBFS: Test failure From: Daniel Schepler [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sat, 06 Dec 2003 22:46:12 -0800 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: Daniel Schepler [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_20 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_90,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_20 X-Spam-Level: Package: makepatch Severity: serious Version: 2.00.09-1 From my build log: ... /usr/bin/make test make[1]: Entering directory `/tmp/buildd/makepatch-2.00.09' PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1 /usr/bin/perl -MExtUtils::Command::MM -e test_harness(0, 'blib/lib', 'blib/arch') t/*.t t/basicFAILED test 4 Failed 1/6 tests, 83.33% okay Failed 1/1 test scripts, 0.00% okay. 1/6 subtests failed, 83.33% okay. Failed Test Stat Wstat Total Fail Failed List of Failed --- t/basic.t 61 16.67% 4 make[1]: *** [test_dynamic] Error 255 make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/makepatch-2.00.09' make: *** [debian/stamp.build] Error 2 -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux frobnitz 2.6.0-test11 #1 Wed Dec 3 21:42:26 PST 2003 i686 Locale: LANG=en, LC_CTYPE=en (ignored: LC_ALL set to en_US.UTF-8) -- Daniel Schepler Please don't disillusion me. I [EMAIL PROTECTED]haven't had breakfast yet. -- Orson Scott Card --- Received: (at 223188-done) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Mar 2005 14:04:42 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Mar 26 06:04:42 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from junior.ibcinc.com [198.22.130.72] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DFBu6-0004ee-00; Sat, 26 Mar 2005 06:04:42 -0800 Received: from eeyore.ibcinc.com (eeyore.ibcinc.com [198.22.130.65]) by junior.ibcinc.com (8.8.5/8.8.5/1.10/jr-1.44) with ESMTP id JAA24680 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 26 Mar 2005 09:04:40 -0500 (EST) Received: from eeyore.ibcinc.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by eeyore.ibcinc.com (8.8.5/8.8.5/1.9/ey-1.5) with ESMTP id JAA14888 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 26 Mar 2005 09:04:39 -0500 (EST) To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Roderick Schertler [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Bug#223188: NMU Patch In-reply-to: Your message of Sun, 14 Dec 2003 11:23:21 +0100. References: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2005 09:04:38 -0500 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: On Sun, 14 Dec 2003 11:23:21 +0100, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: This is the final NMU patch. Thanks for the NMU. I uploaded a version which included your changes last summer but forgot to close this bug report. -- Roderick Schertler [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: pending
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 301333 pending Bug#301333: php4-rrdtool: PHP4 hokey pokey: please rebuild *without* ZTS support Tags were: sid Tags added: pending thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#300928: marked as done (socketapi: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'file')
Your message dated Sat, 26 Mar 2005 10:32:38 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#300928: fixed in socketapi 1.3.2-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Mar 2005 18:06:00 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 22 10:05:59 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from c223012.adsl.hansenet.de (localhost.localdomain) [213.39.223.12] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DDnlP-0002K3-00; Tue, 22 Mar 2005 10:05:59 -0800 Received: from aj by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.44) id 1DDnlN-00044X-Kq; Tue, 22 Mar 2005 19:05:57 +0100 To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Andreas Jochens [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: socketapi: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'file' Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2005 19:05:57 +0100 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: socketapi Severity: serious Tags: patch When building 'socketapi' in a clean chroot, I get the following error: ../socketapi/.libs/libsctpsocket.so: undefined reference to `vtable for __cxxabiv1::__class_type_info' ../socketapi/.libs/libsctpsocket.so: undefined reference to `operator delete[](void*)' ../socketapi/.libs/libsctpsocket.so: undefined reference to `std::_Rb_tree_insert_and_rebalance(bool, std::_Rb_tree_node_base*, std::_Rb_tree_node_base*, std::_Rb_tree_node_base)' ../socketapi/.libs/libsctpsocket.so: undefined reference to `std::_Rb_tree_rebalance_for_erase(std::_Rb_tree_node_base*, std::_Rb_tree_node_base)' ../socketapi/.libs/libsctpsocket.so: undefined reference to `__cxa_guard_release' ../socketapi/.libs/libsctpsocket.so: undefined reference to `vtable for __cxxabiv1::__vmi_class_type_info' ../socketapi/.libs/libsctpsocket.so: undefined reference to `std::ios_base::Init::~Init()' ../socketapi/.libs/libsctpsocket.so: undefined reference to `operator new[](unsigned long)' ../socketapi/.libs/libsctpsocket.so: undefined reference to `std::basic_ostreamchar, std::char_traitschar std::endlchar, std::char_traitschar (std::basic_ostreamchar, std::char_traitschar )' ../socketapi/.libs/libsctpsocket.so: undefined reference to `std::_Rb_tree_increment(std::_Rb_tree_node_base*)' ../socketapi/.libs/libsctpsocket.so: undefined reference to `__gnu_cxx::__pooltrue::_M_reserve_block(unsigned long, unsigned long)' ../socketapi/.libs/libsctpsocket.so: undefined reference to `__gnu_cxx::__pooltrue::_M_get_thread_id()' ../socketapi/.libs/libsctpsocket.so: undefined reference to `__gnu_cxx::__pooltrue::_M_destroy_thread_key(void*)' ../socketapi/.libs/libsctpsocket.so: undefined reference to `__cxa_guard_acquire' collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make[2]: *** [combined_server_1to1] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/socketapi-1.3.1/socket_programs' make[1]: *** [install-recursive] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/socketapi-1.3.1' make: *** [build] Error 2 Please add the missing Build-Depends on 'file' to debian/control. Regards Andreas Jochens diff -urN ../tmp-orig/socketapi-1.3.1/debian/control ./debian/control --- ../tmp-orig/socketapi-1.3.1/debian/control 2005-03-22 18:06:55.988893564 +0100 +++ ./debian/control2005-03-22 18:06:53.041462364 +0100 @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ Priority: optional Maintainer: Anibal Monsalve Salazar [EMAIL PROTECTED] Standards-Version: 3.6.1 -Build-Depends: libglib1.2-dev, sctplib-stable-dev | sctplib-dev, chrpath +Build-Depends: file, libglib1.2-dev, sctplib-stable-dev | sctplib-dev, chrpath Package: socketapi1 Section: libs --- Received: (at 300928-close) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Mar 2005 15:45:08 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Mar 26 07:45:08 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DFDTI-0001VD-00; Sat, 26 Mar 2005 07:45:08 -0800 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DFDHC-0005Nd-00; Sat, 26 Mar 2005 10:32:38 -0500 From: Anibal Monsalve Salazar [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $ Subject: Bug#300928: fixed in socketapi 1.3.2-1 Message-Id: [EMAIL
Bug#301489: kernel is unable to mount file system on raid0 device
On Sat, Mar 26, 2005 at 11:20:11AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: mdadm: /dev/md0 has been started with 2 drives. I'm not really sure what to say. None of that code has been modified in any of the hppa patches. Are you sure the device labels are correct? mdadm shows /dev/md0 starting as a raid0, but you're trying to mount /dev/md1. /dev/md1: The superblock could not be read or does not describe a correct ext2 filesystem. If the device is valid and it really contains an ext2 filesystem (and not swap or ufs or something else), then the superblock is corrupt, and you might try running e2fsck with an alternate superblock: e2fsck -b 8193 device Cheers, Kyle -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#295902: marked as done (FTBFS: socketapi_1.3.1-5_arm: needs libtool update for arm)
Your message dated Sat, 26 Mar 2005 10:32:37 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#295902: fixed in socketapi 1.3.2-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Feb 2005 21:40:20 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Feb 18 13:40:20 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from cpe-138-217-174-147.vic.bigpond.net.au (nukak.apana.org.au) [138.217.174.147] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D2FrI-6n-00; Fri, 18 Feb 2005 13:40:20 -0800 Received: by nukak.apana.org.au (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 9C1E57B6C0; Sat, 19 Feb 2005 08:40:18 +1100 (EST) Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2005 08:40:18 +1100 From: Anibal Monsalve Salazar [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: FTBFS: socketapi_1.3.1-5_arm: needs libtool update for arm Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=g++0NlQhRgFs6nMu Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: --g++0NlQhRgFs6nMu Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Package: socketapi Version: 1.3.1-5 Severity: serious The version of libtool used to build this source package is too old to correctly support shared libraries for at least arm. Please see http://people.debian.org/~keybuk/libtool-pass_all.html for more information. Automatic build of socketapi_1.3.1-5 on smackdown by sbuild/arm 1.170.5 Build started at 20050218-1836 [...] ** Using build dependencies supplied by package: Build-Depends: libglib1.2-dev, sctplib-stable-dev | sctplib-dev, chrpath [...] checking how to recognise dependent libraries... file_magic ELF [0-9][0-9]*-bit [LM]SB (shared object|dynamic lib ) [...] *** Warning: linker path does not have real file for library -ldl. A complete build log can be found at http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?pkg=socketapiver=1.3.1-5arch=arm Anibal Monsalve Salazar -- .''`. Debian GNU/Linux : :' : Free Operating System `. `' http://debian.org/ `- http://v7w.com/anibal --g++0NlQhRgFs6nMu Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFCFmDCipBneRiAKDwRAsj2AJ0aozHm3BCFGGHlachRQwpR8fpmCgCgqsaL eyajUkAjAkTQuFWeaaWNCHw= =0zSB -END PGP SIGNATURE- --g++0NlQhRgFs6nMu-- --- Received: (at 295902-close) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Mar 2005 15:42:01 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Mar 26 07:42:01 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DFDQG-r9-00; Sat, 26 Mar 2005 07:42:00 -0800 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DFDHB-0005NZ-00; Sat, 26 Mar 2005 10:32:37 -0500 From: Anibal Monsalve Salazar [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $ Subject: Bug#295902: fixed in socketapi 1.3.2-1 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2005 10:32:37 -0500 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Source: socketapi Source-Version: 1.3.2-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of socketapi, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: socketapi-dev_1.3.2-1_i386.deb to pool/main/s/socketapi/socketapi-dev_1.3.2-1_i386.deb socketapi1_1.3.2-1_i386.deb to pool/main/s/socketapi/socketapi1_1.3.2-1_i386.deb socketapi_1.3.2-1.diff.gz to pool/main/s/socketapi/socketapi_1.3.2-1.diff.gz socketapi_1.3.2-1.dsc to pool/main/s/socketapi/socketapi_1.3.2-1.dsc socketapi_1.3.2.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/s/socketapi/socketapi_1.3.2.orig.tar.gz A summary of the changes between this version and the
Bug#301489: kernel is unable to mount file system on raid0 device
severity 301489 normal thanks Kyle McMartin writes: On Sat, Mar 26, 2005 at 11:20:11AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: mdadm: /dev/md0 has been started with 2 drives. I'm not really sure what to say. None of that code has been modified in any of the hppa patches. Are you sure the device labels are correct? mdadm shows /dev/md0 starting as a raid0, but you're trying to mount /dev/md1. ok, I see, mounting it as /dev/md0 works fine. Now I'm trying to understand, why the parisc kernels don't have this problem (or why I am able to mount it as /dev/md1 ... -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: tagging 301494
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 tags 301494 + upstream Bug#301494: linphone and linphonec segfault on startup Tags were: sid Tags added: upstream End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#301518: clamsmtp: Plain installation on sarge fails with /var/lib/ucf/cache not existing
On Sat, Mar 26, 2005 at 05:40:32PM +0200, Arturas Slajus wrote: Installing clamsmtp on sarge throws up error as /var/lib/ucf/cache isn't there and there is nobody to create it. That renders package uninstallable. I am unable to reproduce this error. This is very strange, indeed. I cannot seem to find any reference to that directory in the source code for 1.2, nor in the package. Can you run clamsmtpd from the command line with the option '-d 4' and include the output in another email to this bug report? If you're patient, clamsmtp_1.3-1 should migrate to testing shortly. I should have clamsmtp_1.4-1 uploaded by Monday. -- Chad Walstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.wookimus.net/ assert(expired(knowledge)); /* core dump */ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#301531: xscreensaver: Hyperball causes system crash
On Sat, Mar 26, 2005 at 04:42:50PM +0100, Dimitri Chausson wrote: Package: xscreensaver Version: 4.16-1 Severity: critical Justification: breaks the whole system Until now, I could reproduce this bug on kernel 2.6.8 and 2.6.11. It seems independant from the desktop/window manager (tried under Gnome, XFce) Step 1: Start xscreensaver-demo Step 2: choose Hyperball, click on preview After a while, the system crashes (not only X). It always happens, in demo mode or real mode. I can provide more information if necessary. Define crashes; could you check if the machine is network-accessible? Thanks, Justin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#300278: defoma: debhelper files fail if defoma is removed before package
On Sat, Mar 26, 2005 at 02:26:41AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: I'm not convinced that this is actually a bug in defoma; the trouble is that the failure happens in the fontconfig *pre*rm script, and fontconfig depends on defoma -- so how is it possible that defoma's files have been removed before the prerm remove call for a package depending on it, unless there is a bug in dpkg? You know, it's entirely possible that this was left over screwage from some other fontconfig/defoma/whatever mess. lamont -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#246486: [Craig P. Steffen craig@craigsteffen.net] drop package roleplaying from Debian
---BeginMessage--- Hi Tomas, You contacted me a while back about the roleplaying package, which I have set to ITA. Your last comment on bug 246486 was that fixing it and bringing it up to date would be the be difficult, and perhaps the package should just be removed. I think that's a good assessment. There was an update January of 2004. The last one before that was 2002. I think given that, and the difficulty of fixing it, and the license changing, that it's best to just flush it. Are you a DD? I assume, then, that it's easier for you to get the ball rolling on that one. Sorry I fell out of touch on this. I'm trying again to get back into that game. The first thing I'm doing is cleaning out old cruft that I left lying around. Thanks, Craig Steffen -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] public key available at http://www.craigsteffen.net/GPG/ current goal: use a CueCat scanner to inventory my books career goal: be the first Vorlon Time Lord signature.asc Description: Digital signature ---End Message---
Bug#301531: xscreensaver: Hyperball causes system crash
* Justin Pryzby [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Until now, I could reproduce this bug on kernel 2.6.8 and 2.6.11. It seems independant from the desktop/window manager (tried under Gnome, XFce) Step 1: Start xscreensaver-demo Step 2: choose Hyperball, click on preview After a while, the system crashes (not only X). It always happens, in demo mode or real mode. I can provide more information if necessary. Define crashes; could you check if the machine is network-accessible? Doesn't crash for me in 4.21 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: f
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 301531 normal Bug#301531: xscreensaver: Hyperball causes system crash Severity set to `normal'. severity normal 301531 Unknown command or malformed arguments to command. quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#299455: marked as done (svn-workbench: FTBFS: make[1]: python: Command not found)
Your message dated Sat, 26 Mar 2005 12:17:41 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#299455: fixed in svn-workbench 1.1.5-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Mar 2005 09:08:14 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Mar 14 01:08:14 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mailhub.id.cbs.dk [130.226.47.91] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DAlYc-0007ga-00; Mon, 14 Mar 2005 01:08:14 -0800 Received: from mail.id.cbs.dk ([172.16.14.53] ident=mail) by mailhub.id.cbs.dk with esmtp (Cipher TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1DAlYS-0006Gs-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 14 Mar 2005 10:08:04 +0100 Received: from deskpro02.id.cbs.dk ([130.226.34.10]) by mail.id.cbs.dk with esmtp (Cipher TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1DAlYS-00076w-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 14 Mar 2005 10:08:04 +0100 Received: from ukh by deskpro02.id.cbs.dk with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1DAlXy-0003qI-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 14 Mar 2005 10:07:34 +0100 Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2005 10:07:33 +0100 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: svn-workbench: FTBFS: make[1]: python: Command not found Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i From: Kaare Hviid [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Scanner: exiscan *1DAlYS-0006Gs-00*7aTUnqIrEj2* Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: svn-workbench Version: 1.0.0-1 Severity: serious svn-workbench 1.0.0-1 suffers FTBFS in pbuilder: /usr/bin/make -C WorkBench/Source -f linux.mak wb_version.py \ PYTHON=python \ PYCHECKER_DIR=/tmp/buildd/svn-workbench-1.0.0 \ MEINC_INSTALLER_DIR=/tmp/buildd/svn-workbench-1.0.0 make[1]: Entering directory `/tmp/buildd/svn-workbench-1.0.0/WorkBench/Source' python ../Builder/brand_version.py ../Builder/version.info wb_version.py.template make[1]: python: Command not found make[1]: *** [wb_version.py] Error 127 make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/svn-workbench-1.0.0/WorkBench/Source' make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2 pbuilder: Failed autobuilding of package Adding a Build-Depends on python solves this. -ukh --- Received: (at 299455-close) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Mar 2005 17:25:36 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Mar 26 09:25:36 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DFF2W-0004FD-00; Sat, 26 Mar 2005 09:25:36 -0800 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DFEur-0004X8-00; Sat, 26 Mar 2005 12:17:41 -0500 From: Matthias Klose [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $ Subject: Bug#299455: fixed in svn-workbench 1.1.5-1 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2005 12:17:41 -0500 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2 Source: svn-workbench Source-Version: 1.1.5-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of svn-workbench, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: svn-workbench_1.1.5-1.diff.gz to pool/main/s/svn-workbench/svn-workbench_1.1.5-1.diff.gz svn-workbench_1.1.5-1.dsc to pool/main/s/svn-workbench/svn-workbench_1.1.5-1.dsc svn-workbench_1.1.5-1_all.deb to pool/main/s/svn-workbench/svn-workbench_1.1.5-1_all.deb svn-workbench_1.1.5.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/s/svn-workbench/svn-workbench_1.1.5.orig.tar.gz A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the
Bug#301518: clamsmtp : ucf not installed
Hi Could you confirm that the ucf pacakge is not installed on your box. $ dpkg -l ucf A workaround would be to install it before retrying to install/upgrade clamsmtp. Please test ucf before. Maye clamsmtp use ucf but miss a dependency on it. Cheers Alban -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#301550: sgcontrol: FTBFS: /bin/sh: ./configure: Permission denied
Package: sgcontrol
Version: 0.3cvs-1
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
When trying to build 'sgcontrol', I get the following error:
# Add here commands to configure the package.
CFLAGS=-Wall -g -O2 ./configure --host=x86_64-linux --build=x86_64-linux
--prefix=/usr --mandir=\${prefix}/share/man --infodir=\${prefix}/share/info
/bin/sh: ./configure: Permission denied
make: *** [config.status] Error 126
Regards
Andreas Jochens
diff -urN ../tmp-orig/sgcontrol-0.3cvs/debian/rules ./debian/rules
--- ../tmp-orig/sgcontrol-0.3cvs/debian/rules 2005-03-26 19:34:12.807388968
+0100
+++ ./debian/rules 2005-03-26 19:27:32.466450838 +0100
@@ -26,6 +26,7 @@
config.status: configure
dh_testdir
+ chmod a+x configure missing
# Add here commands to configure the package.
CFLAGS=$(CFLAGS) ./configure --host=$(DEB_HOST_GNU_TYPE)
--build=$(DEB_BUILD_GNU_TYPE) --prefix=/usr --mandir=\$${prefix}/share/man
--infodir=\$${prefix}/share/info
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#301552: konqueror: Random freezes (whole system) just after entering url
Package: konqueror Version: 4:3.4.0-0pre2 Severity: critical Tags: experimental Justification: breaks the whole system I have been using kde 3.4 for a couple of weeks now. I have just done an aptitude update today, although I am not 100% sure whether this package got updated in this update (last update was only a few days ago). However, almost immediately however the system starting locking up solidly (I could not even ping the machine from elsewhere on my local network and get a response) just after I hit return after entering a URL. (Not every time, although it appears to be most times) To confuse the issue slightly, I have just installed a new harddrive and this has made me suspect a hardware problem. However, I have now managed to work for some time without touching konqueror, and have not had a problem. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-k7 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Versions of packages konqueror depends on: ii kcontrol 4:3.4.0-0pre2 control center for KDE ii kdebase-kio-plugins 4:3.4.0-0pre2 core I/O slaves for KDE ii kdelibs4 4:3.4.0-0pre2 core libraries for all KDE applica ii kdesktop 4:3.4.0-0pre2 miscellaneous binaries and files f ii kfind4:3.4.0-0pre2 file-find utility for KDE ii libart-2.0-2 2.3.17-1Library of functions for 2D graphi ii libaudio21.7-2 The Network Audio System (NAS). (s ii libc62.3.2.ds1-20GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libfam0c102 2.7.0-6 client library to control the FAM ii libfontconfig1 2.3.1-2 generic font configuration library ii libfreetype6 2.1.7-2.3 FreeType 2 font engine, shared lib ii libgcc1 1:3.4.3-12 GCC support library ii libice6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-12.0.1 Inter-Client Exchange library ii libidn11 0.5.13-1.0 GNU libidn library, implementation ii libkonq4 4:3.4.0-0pre2 core libraries for Konqueror ii libpng12-0 1.2.8rel-1 PNG library - runtime ii libqt3c102-mt3:3.3.3-8 Qt GUI Library (Threaded runtime v ii libsm6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-12.0.1 X Window System Session Management ii libstdc++5 1:3.3.5-12 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 ii libx11-6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-12.0.1 X Window System protocol client li ii libxcursor1 1.1.3-1 X cursor management library ii libxext6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-12.0.1 X Window System miscellaneous exte ii libxft2 2.1.2-6 FreeType-based font drawing librar ii libxrandr2 4.3.0.dfsg.1-12.0.1 X Window System Resize, Rotate and ii libxrender1 0.8.3-7 X Rendering Extension client libra ii libxt6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-12.0.1 X Toolkit Intrinsics ii xlibs4.3.0.dfsg.1-12 X Keyboard Extension (XKB) configu ii zlib1g 1:1.2.2-4 compression library - runtime -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#301518: clamsmtp: Plain installation on sarge fails with /var/lib/ucf/cache not existing
This one time, at band camp, Chad Walstrom said: On Sat, Mar 26, 2005 at 05:40:32PM +0200, Arturas Slajus wrote: Installing clamsmtp on sarge throws up error as /var/lib/ucf/cache isn't there and there is nobody to create it. That renders package uninstallable. I am unable to reproduce this error. This is very strange, indeed. I cannot seem to find any reference to that directory in the source code for 1.2, nor in the package. Can you run clamsmtpd from the command line with the option '-d 4' and include the output in another email to this bug report? If you're patient, clamsmtp_1.3-1 should migrate to testing shortly. I should have clamsmtp_1.4-1 uploaded by Monday. clamsmtp depends on clamav-base, and this is where the error is occuring. It is already fixed in sid, will be in sarge in a week or so, if all goes well. Already submitted as 297589 - feel free to reassign, merge, close, etc as you see fit. -- - | ,''`.Stephen Gran | | : :' :[EMAIL PROTECTED] | | `. `'Debian user, admin, and developer | |`- http://www.debian.org | - pgpSYUwxk4ItH.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#301497: dbconfig-common dependencies
Hi do you think such a configuration layer should depends on every database interface ? Wouldn't it be cleaner to have the package using dbconfig depends on the database it can work with and have test in dbconfig to only show option regarding installed databases (or databases detectable via the already installed db client pacakges ? I don't feel well with the idea of a layer adding every client libraries even if no installed program can use most. A little rationale for this rant : Thanks for the test and though you put on dbconfig. I am not the developper but have already though of this problem too (but had no good idea to resolve it). The apache config layer currently in debain have the same kind of problem : it does not depends the scripts it uses (init scripts of apache, apache-perl ...). Thus if one have some installed , configure them with the apache config layer then one deinstall say apache-perl , it will be impossible to upgrade/desintall teh package configured with it. I removed apache-perl then the config layer tried to use /etc/init.d/apache-perl while upgrading phpwiki ... This layer needs those init scripts but does not depends on the packages providing them thus it can led to breakage. (i have not submitted a bug because i don't agree with the idea of adding hundreds hack to make it work, i am in fact waiting to see what will be done in dbconfig-common to manage this problem (as it is not yet heavily used and not in sarge , api/abi changes are way easier there.) If a solution to web application integration in debian is found it will be in this package or it won't be . This will also have interesting improvments for rich clients (but those have usually less complicated setups). Regards Alban PS: sorry if the style is a bit rude. I am always working on improving my english skills but debian comes first :) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#301550: marked as done (sgcontrol: FTBFS: /bin/sh: ./configure: Permission denied)
Your message dated Sat, 26 Mar 2005 14:32:46 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#301550: fixed in sgcontrol 0.3cvs-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Mar 2005 18:50:21 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Mar 26 10:50:21 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from c196015.adsl.hansenet.de (localhost.localdomain) [213.39.196.15]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DFGMX-0005uW-00; Sat, 26 Mar 2005 10:50:21 -0800
Received: from aj by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1DFGMW-0005KE-1o; Sat, 26 Mar 2005 19:50:20 +0100
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Andreas Jochens [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: sgcontrol: FTBFS: /bin/sh: ./configure: Permission denied
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2005 19:50:20 +0100
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Package: sgcontrol
Version: 0.3cvs-1
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
When trying to build 'sgcontrol', I get the following error:
# Add here commands to configure the package.
CFLAGS=-Wall -g -O2 ./configure --host=x86_64-linux --build=x86_64-linux
--prefix=/usr --mandir=\${prefix}/share/man --infodir=\${prefix}/share/info
/bin/sh: ./configure: Permission denied
make: *** [config.status] Error 126
Regards
Andreas Jochens
diff -urN ../tmp-orig/sgcontrol-0.3cvs/debian/rules ./debian/rules
--- ../tmp-orig/sgcontrol-0.3cvs/debian/rules 2005-03-26 19:34:12.807388968
+0100
+++ ./debian/rules 2005-03-26 19:27:32.466450838 +0100
@@ -26,6 +26,7 @@
config.status: configure
dh_testdir
+ chmod a+x configure missing
# Add here commands to configure the package.
CFLAGS=$(CFLAGS) ./configure --host=$(DEB_HOST_GNU_TYPE)
--build=$(DEB_BUILD_GNU_TYPE) --prefix=/usr --mandir=\$${prefix}/share/man
--infodir=\$${prefix}/share/info
---
Received: (at 301550-close) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Mar 2005 19:47:54 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Mar 26 11:47:53 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DFHGD-0003ra-00; Sat, 26 Mar 2005 11:47:53 -0800
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DFH1a-0005fh-00; Sat, 26 Mar 2005 14:32:46 -0500
From: Joop Stakenborg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $
Subject: Bug#301550: fixed in sgcontrol 0.3cvs-2
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2005 14:32:46 -0500
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Source: sgcontrol
Source-Version: 0.3cvs-2
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
sgcontrol, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
sgcontrol_0.3cvs-2.diff.gz
to pool/main/s/sgcontrol/sgcontrol_0.3cvs-2.diff.gz
sgcontrol_0.3cvs-2.dsc
to pool/main/s/sgcontrol/sgcontrol_0.3cvs-2.dsc
sgcontrol_0.3cvs-2_i386.deb
to pool/main/s/sgcontrol/sgcontrol_0.3cvs-2_i386.deb
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Joop Stakenborg [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated sgcontrol package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2005 21:17:33 +0100
Source: sgcontrol
Binary: sgcontrol
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.3cvs-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Joop Stakenborg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#301497: dbconfig-common dependencies
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: | Hi | | do you think such a configuration layer should depends on every | database interface ? | | Wouldn't it be cleaner to have the package using dbconfig depends | on the database it can work with and have test in dbconfig to | only show option regarding installed databases (or databases | detectable via the already installed db client pacakges ? It will be a better solution. But in this moment dbconfig-common *use* one of them mysql-client or postgresql-client, the other aplication could not need it. Policy says: Every package must specify the dependency information about other packages that are required for the first to work correctly. If there no one of postgresql-client and mysql-client, it fails to work in all case, then it has to depend on (at least) one of them. But unfortunately, it doesn't solve the problem of the other package. A possible solution could be if there exists virtual packages dbconfig-mysql-common and dbconfig-postgres-common that depends on (mysql or postgres) and dbconfig-common. | PS: sorry if the style is a bit rude. I am always working on | improving my english skills but debian comes first :) me too... :) - -- e-mail: Miguel Gea Milvaques debian(@nospam)miguelgea.com Blog: http://www.livejournal.com/users/xerakko/ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFCRcRANTNQylgICMQRAmtUAJ0cbLiz3Grud86ZYtZaTPMUNoL9fQCgonKd sVU5IVAlbedBuKJV2qjOeyM= =YtgM -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Bug#301560: mounts original /dev under udev /dev: breaks raid systems (others?)
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 301560 mdadm Bug#301560: mounts original /dev under udev /dev: breaks raid systems (others?) Bug reassigned from package `udev' to `mdadm'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#301560: mounts original /dev under udev /dev: breaks raid systems (others?)
reassign 301560 mdadm thanks On Mar 26, Ryan Murray [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The fix to #294968 moves the original /dev directory from a safe spot outside of the udev /dev tree to a .static dir inside the udev tree, only accessable to root. Unfortunately, many programs (such as mdadm) that use device nodes often directly scan entire the /dev tree (including subdirs) to find all relevant devices. This causes the This is a bad idea. Walking /dev is not an hardware detection method. I do not use mdadm on my RAID systems, but I will be happy to discuss alternative solutions with its maintainer. Please move the static /dev tree outside of the udev created tree. You never No, because past experience showed that this will break other things and annoy a different class of people. So far I have found their arguments more convincing than your. know what program will scan all of /dev to find relevant devices, and .static You are the first to report one. -- ciao, Marco signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#300874: marked as done (lsh-utils_2.0.1-1_sparc: FTBFS: m4: command not found)
Your message dated Sat, 26 Mar 2005 15:51:31 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#300874: fixed in lsh-utils 2.0.1-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Mar 2005 12:49:14 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 22 04:49:14 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from dsl093-039-086.pdx1.dsl.speakeasy.net (localhost.localdomain) [66.93.39.86] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DDioq-0003at-00; Tue, 22 Mar 2005 04:49:13 -0800 Received: by localhost.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000) id A165E171D21; Tue, 22 Mar 2005 04:48:48 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2005 04:48:48 -0800 From: Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: lsh-utils_2.0.1-1_sparc: FTBFS: m4: command not found Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=YZ5djTAD1cGYuMQK Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: --YZ5djTAD1cGYuMQK Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Package: lsh-utils Version: 2.0.1-1 Severity: serious Tags: sid The most recent attempt to build lsh-utils on sparc has failed with the following error: [...] gcc -g -O2 -ggdb3 -Wall -W -Wmissing-prototypes -Wmissing-declarations -W= strict-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Wbad-function-cast -Wnested-externs sh= adata.o -lgmp -lm -o shadata m4 /build/buildd/lsh-utils-2.0.1/src/nettle/asm.m4 machine.m4 config.m4 \ aes.asm aes.s /bin/sh: m4: command not found make[6]: *** [aes.o] Error 127 make[6]: Leaving directory /build/buildd/lsh-utils-2.0.1/src/nettle' [...] this appears to be a missing build-dependency; m4 is priority: standard only, and not build-essential. Other architectures seem to build the package just fine, because this m4 command is not executed there -- it seems to be some sparc-specific assembly? --=20 Steve Langasek postmodern programmer --YZ5djTAD1cGYuMQK Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFCQBQtKN6ufymYLloRAn9aAJ9c+KQf7Sh+cZt60idrfQz2Qs/qZQCcD4rI jnj0z8GqSwmqmslV4wftRt4= =mKJ4 -END PGP SIGNATURE- --YZ5djTAD1cGYuMQK-- --- Received: (at 300874-close) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Mar 2005 21:02:53 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Mar 26 13:02:52 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DFIQm-0007Gm-00; Sat, 26 Mar 2005 13:02:52 -0800 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DFIFn-0004z8-00; Sat, 26 Mar 2005 15:51:31 -0500 From: Simon Law [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $ Subject: Bug#300874: fixed in lsh-utils 2.0.1-2 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2005 15:51:31 -0500 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2 Source: lsh-utils Source-Version: 2.0.1-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of lsh-utils, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: lsh-client_2.0.1-2_i386.deb to pool/main/l/lsh-utils/lsh-client_2.0.1-2_i386.deb lsh-server_2.0.1-2_i386.deb to pool/main/l/lsh-utils/lsh-server_2.0.1-2_i386.deb lsh-utils-doc_2.0.1-2_all.deb to pool/main/l/lsh-utils/lsh-utils-doc_2.0.1-2_all.deb lsh-utils_2.0.1-2.diff.gz to pool/main/l/lsh-utils/lsh-utils_2.0.1-2.diff.gz lsh-utils_2.0.1-2.dsc to pool/main/l/lsh-utils/lsh-utils_2.0.1-2.dsc lsh-utils_2.0.1-2_i386.deb to pool/main/l/lsh-utils/lsh-utils_2.0.1-2_i386.deb A
Bug#301566: python-4suite: python-4suite-doc fails in postinst
Package: python-4suite Version: 0.99cvs20041008-5 Severity: grave The output pretty much says it all: Setting up python-4suite-doc (0.99cvs20041008-5) ... cannot create dhelp file '/usr/share/doc/python-4suite-doc/html/.dhelp': No such file or directory dpkg: error processing python-4suite-doc (--configure): subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 2 It turns out that the html directory doesn't exist -- creating it causes the postinst script to be run without any error. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.10-1-686 Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages python-4suite depends on: ii python-xml 0.8.4-1 XML tools for Python [dummy packag ii python2.3-4suite 0.99cvs20041008-5 An open-source platform for XML an -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#301213: ipopd: upgrade to 7:2002edebian1-6.1 fails
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 26-03-2005 14:37, Darren Salt wrote: I'm seeing exactly the same problem here. The you already have... message isn't the problem - it's the previous line about the pre-installation script. This is caused by there being no imap line in inetd.conf: grep exits with code 1 if no matching lines were found. Unfortunately, the set -e catches this and treats it as an error. It looks like this bug was introduced by the fix for 295306; as such, it applies to both uw-imapd and ipopd. Thanks for investigating! Sounds sane - I haven't had time to look into the problem myself yet, but with this info it should be fairly trivial to correct the error - I'll have a look at it right away... - Jonas - -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist og Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ - Enden er nær: http://www.shibumi.org/eoti.htm -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFCRddnn7DbMsAkQLgRAuBOAJ4ieLOx/jGPwx8n1eTNZp+Zj9IdwgCggUAH 2Qlrop2h4Jmz3sT/OBEd0CY= =9R3T -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Bug#301576: needs to conflict with wx2.5
Package: libwxgtk2.4-python Version: 2.4.2.6 Severity: serious dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/libwxgtk2.4-python_2.4.2.6_i386.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite `/usr/bin/helpviewer', which is also in package wxpython2.5.3 either wx2.4 needs to conflict with wx2.5, vice versa, or both. -Josh -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (499, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.11ac2 Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to en_US.UTF-8) Versions of packages libwxgtk2.4-python depends on: ii libc62.3.2.ds1-20GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libgcc1 1:3.4.3-12 GCC support library ii libstdc++5 1:3.3.5-12 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 ii libwxgtk2.4 2.4.2.6 wxWindows Cross-platform C++ GUI t ii python2.32.3.5-2 An interactive high-level object-o ii xlibmesa-gl [libgl1] 4.3.0.dfsg.1-12.0.1 Mesa 3D graphics library [XFree86] ii xlibmesa-glu [libglu 4.3.0.dfsg.1-12.0.1 Mesa OpenGL utility library [XFree -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#301577: python-4suite: python-4suite-doc fails in postinst
Package: python-4suite Version: 0.99cvs20041008-5 Severity: grave The output pretty much says it all: Setting up python-4suite-doc (0.99cvs20041008-5) ... cannot create dhelp file '/usr/share/doc/python-4suite-doc/html/.dhelp': No such file or directory dpkg: error processing python-4suite-doc (--configure): subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 2 It turns out that the html directory doesn't exist -- creating it causes the postinst script to be run without any error. It looks as if the HTML documentation simply was not included in the package. Cheers, -Hilko -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.10-1-686 Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages python-4suite depends on: ii python-xml 0.8.4-1 XML tools for Python [dummy packag ii python2.3-4suite 0.99cvs20041008-5 An open-source platform for XML an -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#301213: ipopd: upgrade to 7:2002edebian1-6.1 fails
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 26-03-2005 14:37, Darren Salt wrote:
--- uw-imap-2002edebian1.orig/debian/uw-imapd.preinst
+++ uw-imap-2002edebian1/debian/uw-imapd.preinst
@@ -1,7 +1,5 @@
#!/bin/sh
-set -e
-
PROGRAM=uw-imapd
MY_FILE=/var/cache/${PROGRAM}_inetd.conf_copy
@@ -12,5 +10,6 @@
# will remove entries from /etc/inetd.conf, so we save them for
# restoring them in the postinst.
grep -E ^([# ]+|#off# +)?imap[23s] /etc/inetd.conf $MY_FILE
+RET=$?; test $RET \ 1 exit $RET
fi
I really don't like diabling the set -e completely. Is the problem not
with the grep lines only?
To keep the code compact I'd just append this to the grep lines:
|| true if [ $? \ 2 ]
Do you see a problem with that?
- Jonas
- --
* Jonas Smedegaard - idealist og Internet-arkitekt
* Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/
- Enden er nær: http://www.shibumi.org/eoti.htm
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFCReV7n7DbMsAkQLgRAtS7AJ9j7yFTU0yOjtYT8t/YPG8fdlkIDwCdFVZn
mUx4sEKkQrlxgalXwErGb20=
=joSZ
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
Processed: tagging 301576
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10 tags 301576 sid Bug#301576: needs to conflict with wx2.5 There were no tags set. Tags added: sid End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Bug#300278: defoma: debhelper files fail if defoma is removed before package
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 300278 important Bug#300278: defoma: debhelper files fail if defoma is removed before package Severity set to `important'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#300278: defoma: debhelper files fail if defoma is removed before package
severity 300278 important thanks On Sat, Mar 26, 2005 at 09:34:13AM -0700, LaMont Jones wrote: On Sat, Mar 26, 2005 at 02:26:41AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: I'm not convinced that this is actually a bug in defoma; the trouble is that the failure happens in the fontconfig *pre*rm script, and fontconfig depends on defoma -- so how is it possible that defoma's files have been removed before the prerm remove call for a package depending on it, unless there is a bug in dpkg? You know, it's entirely possible that this was left over screwage from some other fontconfig/defoma/whatever mess. Ok, downgrading; I'll leave it to the maintainer to evaluate whether this is something that needs changing. Thanks, -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#247192: [patch] conflict gnome-pim-conduits with gnome-pim
On Sat, Mar 26, 2005 at 02:31:00PM +0100, Maurizio Lemmo (Tannoiser) wrote:
Package: gnome-pim
Followup-For: Bug #247192
Because seems that gnome-pim include now old gnome-pim-conduits
(disappeared from archive), here is a little patch to fix the RC bug.
--- debian/control.orig 2005-03-26 14:10:35.178294248 +0100
+++ debian/control 2005-03-26 14:11:51.865636000 +0100
@@ -8,6 +8,7 @@
Priority: optional
Architecture: any
Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, ${misc:Depends}
+Conflicts: gnome-pim-conduits
Description: calendar and address book for GNOME
This package contains a calendar tool (gnomecal) with notifications
and
multiple views, and an address book (gnomecard). Both programs were
I think you really want a Replaces here, not a Conflicts.
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Bug#301213: ipopd: upgrade to 7:2002edebian1-6.1 fails
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 27-03-2005 00:13, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Sat, Mar 26, 2005 at 11:43:07PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On 26-03-2005 14:37, Darren Salt wrote:
--- uw-imap-2002edebian1.orig/debian/uw-imapd.preinst
+++ uw-imap-2002edebian1/debian/uw-imapd.preinst
@@ -1,7 +1,5 @@
#!/bin/sh
-set -e
-
PROGRAM=uw-imapd
MY_FILE=/var/cache/${PROGRAM}_inetd.conf_copy
@@ -12,5 +10,6 @@
# will remove entries from /etc/inetd.conf, so we save them for
# restoring them in the postinst.
grep -E ^([# ]+|#off# +)?imap[23s] /etc/inetd.conf $MY_FILE
+RET=$?; test $RET \ 1 exit $RET
fi
I really don't like diabling the set -e completely. Is the problem not
with the grep lines only?
To keep the code compact I'd just append this to the grep lines:
|| true if [ $? \ 2 ]
Do you see a problem with that?
It's not POSIX sh syntax?
true if is actually a waste. The following is POSIXly correct, I beieve:
|| [ $? \ 2 ]
or must it instead be this:
|| test $? \ 2
- Jonas
P.S.
Where to find good info on POSIX sh syntax?
- --
* Jonas Smedegaard - idealist og Internet-arkitekt
* Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/
- Enden er nær: http://www.shibumi.org/eoti.htm
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFCRfB4n7DbMsAkQLgRAoHCAJ9BOgp40ovs8ipthq9pvadUIDcevwCcD2Am
Cbaq7Rmu294psuyoCvD/qVY=
=w0Gq
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
Bug#299168: marked as done (python-mysqldb must be rebuilt against libmysqlclient12)
Your message dated Sat, 26 Mar 2005 18:16:34 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#299168: fixed in python-mysqldb 1.2.0-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Mar 2005 08:30:54 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Mar 12 00:30:54 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from dsl093-039-086.pdx1.dsl.speakeasy.net (minbar.dodds.net) [66.93.39.86] (postfix) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DA21O-vs-00; Sat, 12 Mar 2005 00:30:54 -0800 Received: by minbar.dodds.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 6E0831A103; Sat, 12 Mar 2005 00:30:53 -0800 (PST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: python-mysqldb must be rebuilt against libmysqlclient12 X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8 Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2005 00:30:53 -0800 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: python-mysqldb Version: 1.1.6-1 Severity: grave Packages connected to apache, odbc, and scripting languages (python/perl/php/ruby) are in the process of transitioning from libmysqlclient10 to libmysqlclient12 for sarge. Because libmysqlclient does not include versioned symbols, it is not possible for multiple versions of this library to be loaded by a process without causing segfaults. Since python2.2-mysqldb and python2.3-mysqldb will be loaded by apache processes that may also have loaded libmysqlclient12, depending on libmysqlclient12 is therefore a grave bug in python-mysqldb. Please rebuild python-mysqldb against libmysqlclient12 by updating your build depends to point to libmysqlclient12-dev. Bug #297472 may or may not be caused by the same problem (multiple mysql libraries loaded). -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.4.26-1-686 Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages python-mysqldb depends on: ii python2.3.5-1An interactive high-level object-o pn python2.2-mysqldbNot found. --- Received: (at 299168-close) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Mar 2005 23:30:27 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Mar 26 15:30:26 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DFKja-0005A7-00; Sat, 26 Mar 2005 15:30:26 -0800 Received: from joerg by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DFKWA-0001yx-00; Sat, 26 Mar 2005 18:16:34 -0500 From: Jonas Meurer [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: lisa $Revision: 1.30 $ Subject: Bug#299168: fixed in python-mysqldb 1.2.0-4 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Joerg Jaspert [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2005 18:16:34 -0500 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 3 Source: python-mysqldb Source-Version: 1.2.0-4 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of python-mysqldb, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: python-mysqldb_1.2.0-4.diff.gz to pool/main/p/python-mysqldb/python-mysqldb_1.2.0-4.diff.gz python-mysqldb_1.2.0-4.dsc to pool/main/p/python-mysqldb/python-mysqldb_1.2.0-4.dsc python-mysqldb_1.2.0-4_all.deb to pool/main/p/python-mysqldb/python-mysqldb_1.2.0-4_all.deb python-mysqldb_1.2.0.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/p/python-mysqldb/python-mysqldb_1.2.0.orig.tar.gz python2.3-mysqldb_1.2.0-4_i386.deb to pool/main/p/python-mysqldb/python2.3-mysqldb_1.2.0-4_i386.deb python2.4-mysqldb_1.2.0-4_i386.deb to pool/main/p/python-mysqldb/python2.4-mysqldb_1.2.0-4_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached.
Bug#282873: marked as done (nhc98 causes hat build to fail on sparc)
Your message dated Sat, 26 Mar 2005 15:42:55 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line nhc98 causes hat build to fail on sparc has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Nov 2004 01:02:36 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Nov 24 17:02:36 2004 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from blars.org (renig.nat.blars.org) [64.81.35.59] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1CX81r-00069r-00; Wed, 24 Nov 2004 17:02:36 -0800 Received: from renig.nat.blars.org (plergb.nat.blars.org [172.16.1.1]) by renig.nat.blars.org (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian-7.1) with ESMTP id iAP12YXE018587 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Wed, 24 Nov 2004 17:02:34 -0800 Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by renig.nat.blars.org (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian-7.1) id iAP12Xm4018585; Wed, 24 Nov 2004 17:02:33 -0800 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Blars Blarson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: hat: ftbfs [sparc] Ratio.%: zero denominator X-Mailer: reportbug 1.50 Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2004 17:02:33 -0800 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Package: hat Version: 2.02-11 Severity: serious Tags: sid Justification: fails to build from source hat fails to build from source, duplicated on pbuilder: hmake -hc=nhc98 -H16M -K2M +CTS -H16M -CTS -d /build/buildd/hat-2.02/debian/build-nhc98/targets/sparc-Linux/obj/hattrans -I. -I../compiler98 HatTrans nhc98 +RTS -H16M -K2M -RTS +CTS -H16M -CTS -I. -I../compiler98 -c -o /build/buildd/hat-2.02/debian/build-nhc98/targets/sparc-Linux/obj/hattrans/HbcOnly.o ../compiler98/HbcOnly.hs Ratio.%: zero denominator make[3]: *** [/build/buildd/hat-2.02/debian/build-nhc98/lib/sparc-Linux/hat-trans] Error 1 Full build log at: http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?pkg=hatver=2.02-11arch=sparcstamp=1101091528file=logas=raw -- System Information Debian Release: 3.0 Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux renig 2.4.18r11 #1 Mon Dec 1 17:22:24 PST 2003 i686 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C --- Received: (at 282873-done) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Mar 2005 23:42:56 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Mar 26 15:42:56 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from dsl093-039-086.pdx1.dsl.speakeasy.net (localhost.localdomain) [66.93.39.86] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DFKvg-0007ea-00; Sat, 26 Mar 2005 15:42:56 -0800 Received: by localhost.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 8525A171E11; Sat, 26 Mar 2005 15:42:55 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2005 15:42:55 -0800 From: Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: nhc98 causes hat build to fail on sparc Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=3O1VwFp74L81IIeR Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: --3O1VwFp74L81IIeR Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable The sparc and m68k nhc98 binaries have been removed from unstable, so this will be fixed in testing after tonight's run of the testing scripts. Cheers, --=20 Steve Langasek postmodern programmer --3O1VwFp74L81IIeR Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFCRfN7KN6ufymYLloRAnXyAJ9flSk3o5mkVyPeh9LtXq0Tfao4TwCgiAlo 7Jm8wLTlLfPKJcOeFq9V6gM= =CH27 -END PGP SIGNATURE- --3O1VwFp74L81IIeR-- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#289150: marked as done (nhc98 causes hat build to fail on sparc)
Your message dated Sat, 26 Mar 2005 15:42:55 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line nhc98 causes hat build to fail on sparc has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Jan 2005 13:11:18 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jan 07 05:11:18 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from cpe-138-217-163-107.vic.bigpond.net.au (motilon.apana.org.au) [138.217.163.107] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Cmtte-0003c5-00; Fri, 07 Jan 2005 05:11:18 -0800 Received: from calima.apana.org.au (tairona.apana.org.au [203.12.238.226]) by motilon.apana.org.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33DB4208D for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 00:11:20 +1100 (EST) Received: from nukak.apana.org.au (nukak.apana.org.au [203.12.238.230]) by calima.apana.org.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D6811FF1 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 00:11:14 +1100 (EST) Received: by nukak.apana.org.au (Postfix, from userid 1000) id B90981D1433; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 00:11:13 +1100 (EST) Date: Sat, 8 Jan 2005 00:11:13 +1100 From: Anibal Monsalve Salazar [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: hat_2.02-11_sparc: FTBFS: Ratio.%: zero denominator Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=gsH/BiyznuOL98BK Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: --gsH/BiyznuOL98BK Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Package: hat Severity: serious Version: 2.02-11 Tags: sid Justification: fails to build from source There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: Automatic build of hat_2.02-11 on vore by sbuild/sparc 1.170.5 Build started at 20041224-1651 [...] ** Using build dependencies supplied by package: Build-Depends: sharutils, debhelper (= 4), libncurses5-dev, libglib1.2-dev, hmake (= 3.08-4), nhc98 (= 1.16-7) [arm hppa i386 m68k mips mipsel powerpc s390 sparc], ghc6 (= 6.2.2) [alpha amd64 hppa i386 ia64 m68k powerpc s390 sparc], ghc6 ( 6.2.2+) [alpha amd64 hppa i386 ia64 m68k powerpc s390 sparc], ghc5 (= 5.04.3) [i386], ghc5 ( 5.04.3+) [i386], haskell-utils (= 1.5) [...] nhc98 +RTS -H16M -K2M -RTS +CTS -H16M -CTS -I. -I../compiler98 -c -o /build/buildd/hat-2.02/debian/build-nhc98/targets/sparc-Linux/obj/hattrans/HbcOnly.o ../compiler98/HbcOnly.hs Ratio.%: zero denominator Full build logs are available on buildd.debian.org. Please refer to the build log at: http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?pkg=hatver=2.02-11arch=sparcstamp=1103930436file=logas=raw If this problem has been reported already, please merge it with the appropiate bug report. If you believe this bug should be reassigned to one or more packages, you must clone it and then reassign it to the other packages, like so: clone bug# -1 clone bug# -2 clone bug# -3 reassign -1 package1 reassign -2 package2 reassign -3 package3 thanks Anibal Monsalve Salazar -- .''`. Debian GNU/Linux : :' : Free Operating System `. `' http://debian.org/ `- http://v7w.com/anibal --gsH/BiyznuOL98BK Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFB3opxipBneRiAKDwRAp2UAJ9gZGVzaFtOzXkVXKJC5YUYncdJPwCfa9E3 q6HfOAPul+m40MQ0Rm/aZWw= =vmV2 -END PGP SIGNATURE- --gsH/BiyznuOL98BK-- --- Received: (at 282873-done) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Mar 2005 23:42:56 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Mar 26 15:42:56 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from dsl093-039-086.pdx1.dsl.speakeasy.net (localhost.localdomain) [66.93.39.86] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DFKvg-0007ea-00; Sat, 26 Mar 2005 15:42:56 -0800 Received: by localhost.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 8525A171E11; Sat, 26 Mar 2005 15:42:55 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2005 15:42:55 -0800 From: Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: nhc98 causes hat build to fail on
Bug#247192: [patch] conflict gnome-pim-conduits with gnome-pim
* sabato 26 marzo 2005, alle 15:21, Steve Langasek scrive: I think you really want a Replaces here, not a Conflicts. Sorry, my bad. I've correct my control file with Replaces: gnome-pim-conduits Eventually NMU will be correct. Thank you. -- Maurizio - Tannoiser - Lemmo Founder Member of ERLUG http://erlug.linux.it --- BOFH excuse #154: You can tune a file system, but you can't tune a fish (from most tunefs man pages) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#301584: libgcj-dev: Uninstallable: Bad dependency
Package: libgcj-dev Severity: grave Version: 4:3.3.5-2 Tags: patch The libgcj-dev package added in today's gcc-defaults upload is uninstallable since it Depends on `libgcj4-dev (= 4:3.3.5-2)', but the actual current version of libgcj4-dev is 1:3.3.5-12. I've attached a patch which fixes the dependency. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.9-9-amd64-k8 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to en_US.UTF-8) -- Daniel Schepler Please don't disillusion me. I [EMAIL PROTECTED]haven't had breakfast yet. -- Orson Scott Card diff -urN gcc-defaults-1.20.old/debian/control.m4 gcc-defaults-1.20/debian/control.m4 --- gcc-defaults-1.20.old/debian/control.m4 2005-03-25 19:02:37.0 + +++ gcc-defaults-1.20/debian/control.m4 2005-03-26 23:21:40.0 + @@ -105,7 +105,7 @@ Package: libgcj-dev Priority: optional Architecture: any -Depends: LIBGCJ-dev (= EPOCH:CV_CPP), gcj (= EPOCH:CV_CPP) +Depends: LIBGCJ-dev REQV_LIBGCJ, gcj (= EPOCH:CV_CPP) Description: Java development headers and static library for use with gcj These are the development headers and static libraries that go along with the gcj front end to gcc. libgcj includes parts of the Java Class Libraries, diff -urN gcc-defaults-1.20.old/debian/rules gcc-defaults-1.20/debian/rules --- gcc-defaults-1.20.old/debian/rules 2005-03-25 19:02:37.0 + +++ gcc-defaults-1.20/debian/rules 2005-03-26 23:24:02.0 + @@ -75,6 +75,7 @@ REQV_GCJ = $(REQV_33) REQV_GIJ = $(REQV_33) REQV_GPC = $(REQV_GPC_33) +REQV_LIBGCJ = $(REQV_33) LIBGCJ = libgcj4 @@ -184,6 +185,7 @@ -DREQV_GIJ='$(REQV_GIJ)' \ -DREQV_GPC='$(REQV_GPC)' \ -DREQV_GPCDEP='$(REQV_GPCDEP)' \ + -DREQV_LIBGCJ='$(REQV_LIBGCJ)' \ -DLIBGCJ='$(LIBGCJ)' \ debian/control.m4 debian/control.tmp2 uniq debian/control.tmp2 debian/control.tmp
Bug#301213: ipopd: upgrade to 7:2002edebian1-6.1 fails
On Sun, Mar 27, 2005 at 12:30:19AM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: On 27-03-2005 00:13, Steve Langasek wrote: On Sat, Mar 26, 2005 at 11:43:07PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: To keep the code compact I'd just append this to the grep lines: || true if [ $? \ 2 ] Do you see a problem with that? It's not POSIX sh syntax? true if is actually a waste. The following is POSIXly correct, I beieve: || [ $? \ 2 ] or must it instead be this: || test $? \ 2 Either [ or test is fine in POSIX sh, as they're required aliases. However, I don't think \ is a POSIX test operator -- I think you want -lt instead. Where to find good info on POSIX sh syntax? AIUI the POSIX spec is available for download online, but I don't remember where. Otherwise, you could just test your scripts under dash as well as bash. -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#301213: ipopd: upgrade to 7:2002edebian1-6.1 fails
I demand that Jonas Smedegaard may or may not have written... On 26-03-2005 23:43, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: [snip patch] I really don't like diabling the set -e completely. Is the problem not with the grep lines only? To keep the code compact I'd just append this to the grep lines: || true if [ $? \ 2 ] Or even better (in case true if turns out to be a bashism): No; it just doesn't work - true ignores its parameters. || [ $? \ 2 ] # catch grep failures That seems to work, but you need -lt (numeric), not (string). -- | Darren Salt | nr. Ashington, | linux (or ds) at | woody, sarge, | Northumberland | youmustbejoking | RISC OS | Toon Army | demon co uk | Oh, sarge too... Borg mailreader: Taglines are irrelevant. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#301213: ipopd: upgrade to 7:2002edebian1-6.1 fails
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 27-03-2005 00:34, Steve Langasek wrote: On Sun, Mar 27, 2005 at 12:30:19AM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: On 27-03-2005 00:13, Steve Langasek wrote: On Sat, Mar 26, 2005 at 11:43:07PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: To keep the code compact I'd just append this to the grep lines: || true if [ $? \ 2 ] Do you see a problem with that? It's not POSIX sh syntax? true if is actually a waste. The following is POSIXly correct, I beieve: || [ $? \ 2 ] or must it instead be this: || test $? \ 2 Either [ or test is fine in POSIX sh, as they're required aliases. However, I don't think \ is a POSIX test operator -- I think you want -lt instead. Ah, thanks. So many errors lurking in such little code snippet :-) Where to find good info on POSIX sh syntax? AIUI the POSIX spec is available for download online, but I don't remember where. Hmm - with good I thought more of easy to digest than official. Haven't checked but I imagine the spec is similar to RFCs (which is not easy to digest IMHO). Otherwise, you could just test your scripts under dash as well as bash. I know. But info on POSIXly correct coding style is not the same as throwing code at a (hopefully 100%) POSIXly correct shell and see if it complains. - Jonas - -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist og Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ - Enden er nær: http://www.shibumi.org/eoti.htm -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFCRfeMn7DbMsAkQLgRArbHAJwJ8XJT462A/1n8jwoRb4DRe2NpuQCfRM4e a0CSV+Z+LWp+hUflGzZEw2s= =OyIC -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Bug#301589: liblircclient-dev: conflict with libirclient (library)
Package: liblircclient-dev Version: 0.7.1pre2-2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable This is a strange conflict (it is the library itself ...) Unpacking replacement liblircclient-dev ... dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/liblircclient-dev_0.7.1pre2-3_i386.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite `/usr/lib/liblirc_client.so.0.0.0', which is also in package liblircclient0 I retried two times in case it would have been installed on the version if the library but no luck. Grave : as the -dev cannot be installed without removing the library it provide headers for . (well --force-overwrite woould be fix such a conflict without damage ) Cheers Alban -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.11-rc5 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) (ignored: LC_ALL set to C) Versions of packages liblircclient-dev depends on: ii libc6-dev2.3.4-2 GNU C Library: Development Librari ii liblircclient0 0.7.1pre2-3 LIRC client library -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: severity of 299605 is important, tagging 299605
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10 severity 299605 important Bug#299605: libapache-mod-php4 crashes in __kernel_vsyscall Severity set to `important'. tags 299605 moreinfo Bug#299605: libapache-mod-php4 crashes in __kernel_vsyscall There were no tags set. Tags added: moreinfo End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#301590: lirc-modules-source: does not accept kernel source
Package: lirc-modules-source Version: 0.7.1pre2-3 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Hi, the packages does not automaticly build with linux 2.6.11 I have the source of my current kernel in /usr/src/linux, but after configuring lirc-modules-source, he complains /usr/src/liux is not a valid kernel source tree lrwxrwxrwx 1 blackm src 13 2005-03-10 17:00 linux - linux-2.6.11/ drwxr-sr-x 20 blackm src 4096 2005-03-10 17:23 linux-2.6.11 I think the problem is, that there is no Rules.make in the 2.6 kernel-source by, Martin -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.11 Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Versions of packages lirc-modules-source depends on: ii debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.4.30.11 Debian configuration management sy ii debhelper 4.2.31 helper programs for debian/rules ii debianutils 2.8.4 Miscellaneous utilities specific t -- debconf information: lirc-modules-source/use_lirc_hints: true lirc-modules-source/parallel_irq: 7 * lirc-modules-source/do-build: false lirc-modules-source/parallel_timer: 65536 lirc-modules-source/sir_type: Other * lirc-modules-source/serial_softcarrier: true * lirc-modules-source/kernel-source-not-found: * lirc-modules-source/serial_transmitter: true lirc-modules-source/not_needed: * lirc-modules-source/serial_port: 0x2f8 * lirc-modules-source/drivers: serial * lirc-modules-source/serial_irq: 3 * lirc-modules-source/serial_type: Other * lirc-modules-source/kernel-source: /usr/src/linux/ lirc-modules-source/sir_irq: 3 lirc-modules-source/sir_port: 0x2f8 lirc-modules-source/parallel_port: 0x378 * lirc-modules-source/what_next: -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#301213: posix online
Well i cannot help much about the bug , else the posix standard online spec is there : http://www.posix.com/posix.html (faq and permanent link) http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/toc.htm (current version) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: tagging 301589
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10 tags 301589 sid Bug#301589: liblircclient-dev: conflict with libirclient (library) There were no tags set. Tags added: sid End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: sslwrap: FTBFS: timestamp skew issues: WARNING: `aclocal-1.4' is needed
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 301513 serious Bug#301513: sslwrap: FTBFS: timestamp skew issues: WARNING: `aclocal-1.4' is needed Severity set to `serious'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#300424: gthumb: FTBFS: wrong version of automake
This is caused by the Makefile.in in the package being out-of-date relative to the configure.in and aclocal.m4 files that are patched in the Debian diff. This package needs to be repacked with freshly-generated aclocal.m4 and Makefile.in files, to get them in sync and prevent this problem in the future. -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#285046: Bug #285046 - wmkbd: FTBFS: g++ internal compiler error
Thank you for reporting bug. I've posted bug report to gcc bugzilla http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18922 -- Additional Comment #3 From Andrew Pinski 2004-12-10 13:27 [reply] --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 18384 *** __ It looks like the bug is fixed upstream (as you currently compile with 3.4) http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18384 --- Additional Comment #23 From Jakub Jelinek 2005-03-10 14:22 [reply] --- Fixed for 3.4/4.0/4.1. The bug should be reassigned to gcc-3.4 (and other version but cloned) isn't it ? Regards Alban -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#301589: liblircclient-dev: conflict with libirclient (library)
tags 301589 pending thanks OMG, thanks for reporting this... upload is on the way! -- .''`. sleep: command not found : :' : `. `'Proudly running Debian GNU/Linux (Sid 2.6.10 Ext3) `- www.amayita.com www.malapecora.com www.chicasduras.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: tagging 301513
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.11 tags 301513 sid Bug#301513: sslwrap: FTBFS: timestamp skew issues: WARNING: `aclocal-1.4' is needed There were no tags set. Tags added: sid End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: tagging 301584
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10 tags 301584 sid Bug#301584: libgcj-dev: Uninstallable: Bad dependency Tags were: patch Tags added: sid End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Bug#301590: lirc-modules-source: does not accept kernel source
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 301590 sid pending Bug#301590: lirc-modules-source: does not accept kernel source There were no tags set. Tags added: sid, pending priority 301590 important Bug#301590: lirc-modules-source: does not accept kernel source Severity set to `important'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#231483: gnome-spell: bug report is an error
Package: gnome-spell Version: N/A; reported 2005-03-27 Followup-For: Bug #231483 Sorry but, this reporting seems completely wrong. aspell package is regolary in woody (and, also in sarge and sid): [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ apt-cache policy aspell aspell: Installed: (none) Candidate: 0.33.7.1.1-9 Version Table: 0.33.7.1.1-9 0 500 http://debian.fastweb.it woody/main Packages As you see also here: http://packages.debian.org/aspell Considering closing this bug, someone. -- System Information Debian Release: 3.0 Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux gate 2.4.18-1-686 #1 Wed Apr 14 18:20:10 UTC 2004 i686 Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#301590: lirc-modules-source: does not accept kernel source
tags 301590 sid pending priority 301590 important thanks I am downloading priority because the package builds fine with other kernels Debian ships. See #294174 for the release manager explaining how this kind of bug is not Release Critical. -- .''`. sleep: command not found : :' : `. `'Proudly running Debian GNU/Linux (Sid 2.6.10 Ext3) `- www.amayita.com www.malapecora.com www.chicasduras.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#301584: marked as done (libgcj-dev: Uninstallable: Bad dependency)
Your message dated Sat, 26 Mar 2005 20:02:23 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#301584: fixed in gcc-defaults 1.21 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Mar 2005 23:38:05 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Mar 26 15:38:05 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from maynard.mail.mindspring.net [207.69.200.243] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DFKqy-0006N5-00; Sat, 26 Mar 2005 15:38:04 -0800 Received: from user-119bq03.biz.mindspring.com ([66.149.232.3] helo=frobnitz.homelinux.net) by maynard.mail.mindspring.net with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1) id 1DFKqx-0004ZQ-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 26 Mar 2005 18:38:04 -0500 Received: from daniel by frobnitz.homelinux.net with local (Exim 4.50) id 1DFKqx-0001IY-9d for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 26 Mar 2005 15:38:03 -0800 To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: libgcj-dev: Uninstallable: Bad dependency From: Daniel Schepler [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2005 15:38:02 -0800 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary==-=-= Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: --=-=-= Package: libgcj-dev Severity: grave Version: 4:3.3.5-2 Tags: patch The libgcj-dev package added in today's gcc-defaults upload is uninstallable since it Depends on `libgcj4-dev (= 4:3.3.5-2)', but the actual current version of libgcj4-dev is 1:3.3.5-12. I've attached a patch which fixes the dependency. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.9-9-amd64-k8 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to en_US.UTF-8) -- Daniel Schepler Please don't disillusion me. I [EMAIL PROTECTED]haven't had breakfast yet. -- Orson Scott Card --=-=-= Content-Type: text/x-patch Content-Disposition: inline; filename=gcc-defaults.diff diff -urN gcc-defaults-1.20.old/debian/control.m4 gcc-defaults-1.20/debian/control.m4 --- gcc-defaults-1.20.old/debian/control.m4 2005-03-25 19:02:37.0 + +++ gcc-defaults-1.20/debian/control.m4 2005-03-26 23:21:40.0 + @@ -105,7 +105,7 @@ Package: libgcj-dev Priority: optional Architecture: any -Depends: LIBGCJ-dev (= EPOCH:CV_CPP), gcj (= EPOCH:CV_CPP) +Depends: LIBGCJ-dev REQV_LIBGCJ, gcj (= EPOCH:CV_CPP) Description: Java development headers and static library for use with gcj These are the development headers and static libraries that go along with the gcj front end to gcc. libgcj includes parts of the Java Class Libraries, diff -urN gcc-defaults-1.20.old/debian/rules gcc-defaults-1.20/debian/rules --- gcc-defaults-1.20.old/debian/rules 2005-03-25 19:02:37.0 + +++ gcc-defaults-1.20/debian/rules 2005-03-26 23:24:02.0 + @@ -75,6 +75,7 @@ REQV_GCJ = $(REQV_33) REQV_GIJ = $(REQV_33) REQV_GPC = $(REQV_GPC_33) +REQV_LIBGCJ= $(REQV_33) LIBGCJ = libgcj4 @@ -184,6 +185,7 @@ -DREQV_GIJ='$(REQV_GIJ)' \ -DREQV_GPC='$(REQV_GPC)' \ -DREQV_GPCDEP='$(REQV_GPCDEP)' \ + -DREQV_LIBGCJ='$(REQV_LIBGCJ)' \ -DLIBGCJ='$(LIBGCJ)' \ debian/control.m4 debian/control.tmp2 uniq debian/control.tmp2 debian/control.tmp --=-=-=-- --- Received: (at 301584-close) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Mar 2005 01:13:22 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Mar 26 17:13:22 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DFMLB-0002qi-00; Sat, 26 Mar 2005 17:13:21 -0800 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DFMAZ-0007qq-00; Sat, 26 Mar 2005 20:02:23 -0500 From: Matthias Klose [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $ Subject: Bug#301584: fixed in gcc-defaults 1.21 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2005 20:02:23 -0500 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version:
Bug#301589: marked as done (liblircclient-dev: conflict with libirclient (library))
Your message dated Sat, 26 Mar 2005 20:19:21 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#301589: fixed in lirc 0.7.1pre2-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Mar 2005 00:00:24 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Mar 26 16:00:24 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from smtp9.wanadoo.fr [193.252.22.22] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DFLCZ-0003hj-00; Sat, 26 Mar 2005 16:00:24 -0800 Received: from me-wanadoo.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mwinf0904.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 59B68240019E for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 27 Mar 2005 00:59:52 +0100 (CET) Received: from argos.server.maison (AToulouse-152-1-17-239.w82-125.abo.wanadoo.fr [82.125.15.239]) by mwinf0904.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 0ADAA2400196; Sun, 27 Mar 2005 00:59:51 +0100 (CET) X-ME-UUID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from prahal by argos.server.maison with local (Exim 4.50) id 1DFLCE-0001ul-Q6; Sun, 27 Mar 2005 01:00:02 +0100 Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2005 01:00:02 +0100 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: liblircclient-dev: conflict with libirclient (library) Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Reportbug-Version: 3.9 Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.4 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE, NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: liblircclient-dev Version: 0.7.1pre2-2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable This is a strange conflict (it is the library itself ...) Unpacking replacement liblircclient-dev ... dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/liblircclient-dev_0.7.1pre2-3_i386.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite `/usr/lib/liblirc_client.so.0.0.0', which is also in package liblircclient0 I retried two times in case it would have been installed on the version if the library but no luck. Grave : as the -dev cannot be installed without removing the library it provide headers for . (well --force-overwrite woould be fix such a conflict without damage ) Cheers Alban -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.11-rc5 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) (ignored: LC_ALL set to C) Versions of packages liblircclient-dev depends on: ii libc6-dev2.3.4-2 GNU C Library: Development Librari ii liblircclient0 0.7.1pre2-3 LIRC client library -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 301589-close) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Mar 2005 01:25:12 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Mar 26 17:25:12 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DFMWe-0004ha-00; Sat, 26 Mar 2005 17:25:12 -0800 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DFMQz-0001zG-00; Sat, 26 Mar 2005 20:19:21 -0500 From: Amaya Rodrigo Sastre [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $ Subject: Bug#301589: fixed in lirc 0.7.1pre2-4 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2005 20:19:21 -0500 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Source: lirc Source-Version: 0.7.1pre2-4 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of lirc, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: liblircclient-dev_0.7.1pre2-4_i386.deb to pool/main/l/lirc/liblircclient-dev_0.7.1pre2-4_i386.deb liblircclient0_0.7.1pre2-4_i386.deb to pool/main/l/lirc/liblircclient0_0.7.1pre2-4_i386.deb lirc-modules-source_0.7.1pre2-4_i386.deb to
Bug#301598: bootcd: cd cannot boot -- /sbin/init cannot open dev/console
Package: bootcd Version: 2.47 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Note that I have previously successfully created working CDs using bootcd on this installation; the following started happening after an apt-get upgrade a couple of weeks ago. When the created ISO is booted, it freezes up, and these are the last messages on the screen: pivot_root: No such file or directory /sbin/init: 426: cannot open dev/console: No such file Kernel panic: Attempted to kill init! I have the kernel and initrd set correctly in bootcdwrite.conf. Let me know if I can help by sending you my bootcdwrite.conf file or the created ISO or parts of it. Thanks in advance for any attention you can give this, and thanks for writing bootcd -- I have found it to be an extremely useful utility. --Rob Ristroph -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.4.27-1-386 Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Versions of packages bootcd depends on: ii bootcd-i386 2.47 bootcd extension to create images ii cpio 2.5-1.2GNU cpio -- a program to manage ar ii dosfstools2.10-1 Utilities to create and check MS-D ii fdutils 5.4-20040228-1 Linux floppy utilities ii file 4.12-1 Determines file type using magic ii mkisofs 4:2.01+01a01-2 Creates ISO-9660 CD-ROM filesystem ii realpath 1.9.16 Return the canonicalized absolute -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
