Processed: tagging 298510, closing 298510
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 tags 298510 - sarge Bug#298510: python-gd: adventure.ttf probably not distributable Tags were: sarge patch Tags removed: sarge close 298510 Bug#298510: python-gd: adventure.ttf probably not distributable 'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing. Bug closed, send any further explanations to Peter De Wachter [EMAIL PROTECTED] End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#301659: marked as done (libclass-dbi-asform-perl: FTBFS in sarge: Can't locate DBD/SQLite2.pm)
Your message dated Fri, 1 Apr 2005 23:52:52 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line libclass-dbi-asform-perl: FTBFS in sarge: Can't locate DBD/SQLite2.pm has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Mar 2005 14:45:20 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Mar 27 06:45:20 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from adicia.telenet-ops.be [195.130.132.56] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DFZ0y-00042e-00; Sun, 27 Mar 2005 06:45:20 -0800 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by adicia.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with SMTP id 941E04413A for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 27 Mar 2005 16:45:19 +0200 (MEST) Received: from Q.roeckx.be (dD5775FD9.access.telenet.be [213.119.95.217]) by adicia.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78D3E4413C for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 27 Mar 2005 16:45:19 +0200 (MEST) Received: by Q.roeckx.be (Postfix, from userid 501) id 2D62E26136; Sun, 27 Mar 2005 16:45:19 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2005 16:45:19 +0200 From: Kurt Roeckx [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: libclass-dbi-asform-perl: FTBFS in sarge: Can't locate DBD/SQLite2.pm Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: libclass-dbi-asform-perl Version: 2.41-1 Severity: serious Tags: sarge Hi, This package is failing to build on sarge but can be build on sid. On sarge you get the following error: PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1 /usr/bin/perl -Iblib/lib -Iblib/arch test.pl Can't locate DBD/SQLite2.pm in @INC (@INC contains: blib/lib blib/arch /etc/perl/usr/local/lib/perl/5.8.4 /usr/local/share/perl/5.8.4 /usr/lib/perl5 /usr/share/perl5 /usr/lib/perl/5.8 /usr/share/perl/5.8 /usr/local/lib/site_perl.) at test.pl line 3. # Looks like your test died before it could output anything. make[1]: *** [test_dynamic] Error 2 This looks like it's caused by a different version of libdbd-sqlite-perl in sarge and sid. The version in sid has an RC bug on it that seems relevant: #283896 Kurt --- Received: (at 301659-done) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Apr 2005 07:52:54 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Apr 01 23:52:54 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from dsl093-039-086.pdx1.dsl.speakeasy.net (localhost.localdomain) [66.93.39.86] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DHdR7-0006Ip-00; Fri, 01 Apr 2005 23:52:54 -0800 Received: by localhost.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 03813171E11; Fri, 1 Apr 2005 23:52:52 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2005 23:52:52 -0800 From: Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: libclass-dbi-asform-perl: FTBFS in sarge: Can't locate DBD/SQLite2.pm Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=3lcZGd9BuhuYXNfi Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: --3lcZGd9BuhuYXNfi Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Stephen, I've bumped the urgency of libclass-dbi-asform-perl, so this fix should reach testing after tomorrow's britney run. Thanks, --=20 Steve Langasek postmodern programmer --3lcZGd9BuhuYXNfi Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFCTk9QKN6ufymYLloRAk//AJsFqC2P8HHmUYX7IkjjmoHcjAS9/QCgkdlG oEd6c5eYhHIBYEzH/x1lDP4= =IV6E -END PGP SIGNATURE- --3lcZGd9BuhuYXNfi-- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: tagging 291426, closing 291426
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 tags 291426 - sarge Bug#291426: util-vserver doesn't work if compiled on a !ctx-kernel Tags were: sarge Tags removed: sarge close 291426 Bug#291426: util-vserver doesn't work if compiled on a !ctx-kernel 'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing. Bug closed, send any further explanations to Andreas Barth [EMAIL PROTECTED] End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#302573: cnews: newsrun can overwrite already decompressed batches while using mutliple UUCP feeds
I think most systems with multiple newsfeeds use the same compression method, stagger the batches, or both. However I agree this should be fixed. -- Blars Blarson [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.blars.org/blars.html With Microsoft, failure is not an option. It is a standard feature. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#302633: broken dependencies keep it out of testing
Jonas Smedegaard wrote: For unsupported/untested architectures, I choose to make it depend on nothing, although this could be handled better. How? I am quite interested in improving the situation for untested archs if at all possible. I don't know, I just think there's probably a better fix. Maybe only building the packages on arches with a supported kernel. Or adding support for all arches, as I am trying to do. ;-) However, I just noticed your April 1 updates, looks like we ended up working in the same direction on this dependency problem. -- see shy jo signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#302553: xnap-snapshot: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'unzip'
Hello, thanks for your patch, I'll upload a fixed package soon. (To be more exact: after I return from my holidays, which will be in in two weeks approximately.) Cheers, Yven On Friday 01 April 2005 14:37, Andreas Jochens wrote: Package: xnap-snapshot Version: 2.4-pre6-cvs1-1 Severity: serious Tags: patch The package does not build because 'unzip' is missing from the Build-Depends. Additionally, I get the following error when trying to build 'xnap-snapshot': jikes -q -classpath .:lib/java_readline.jar:lib/jd3lib.jar:lib/gnu.getopt.jar:lib/kunststoff.ja r:lib/libxnap.jar:lib/log4j.jar:lib/xnap-ziga.jar: +D +P +F -d /tmp/root/xnap xnap/XNap.java xnap/XNapLoader.java xnap/plugin/nap/Plugin.java xnap/plugin/nap/GUIPlugin.java xnap/plugin/viewer/image/Plugin.java xnap/plugin/viewer/mp3/Plugin.java xnap/plugin/viewer/text/Plugin.java xnap/plugin/viewer/video/Plugin.java xnap/plugin/gift/Plugin.java xnap/plugin/gift/GUIPlugin.java xnap/XNap.java:0:-1091872367:0:-1091872368: Semantic Error: You need to modify your classpath, sourcepath, bootclasspath, and/or extdirs setup. Jikes could notfind package java.lang in: . lib/java_readline.jar lib/jd3lib.jar lib/gnu.getopt.jar lib/kunststoff.jar lib/libxnap.jar lib/log4j.jar lib/xnap-ziga.jar . make[1]: *** [jar] Error 1 With the attached patch the package compiles. Regards Andreas Jochens diff -urN ../tmp-orig/xnap-snapshot-2.4-pre6-cvs1/Makefile ./Makefile --- ../tmp-orig/xnap-snapshot-2.4-pre6-cvs1/Makefile 2003-01-19 19:21:07.0 +0100 +++ ./Makefile 2005-04-01 14:21:30.067949996 +0200 @@ -15,10 +15,10 @@ #PLUGINS += gnutella MAKE= make -JAVAC = jikes -q -JAVAC_OPTS = -classpath $(CP) +D +P +F -#JAVAC = javac -#JAVAC_OPTS = -classpath $(CP) +#JAVAC = jikes -q +#JAVAC_OPTS = -classpath $(CP) +D +P +F +JAVAC = javac +JAVAC_OPTS = -classpath $(CP) JAR = jar JRE = java JDB = jdb diff -urN ../tmp-orig/xnap-snapshot-2.4-pre6-cvs1/debian/control ./debian/control --- ../tmp-orig/xnap-snapshot-2.4-pre6-cvs1/debian/control2003-01-19 21:30:07.0 +0100 +++ ./debian/control 2005-04-01 14:22:08.478748169 +0200 @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ Section: contrib/net Priority: optional Maintainer: Yven Johannes Leist [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Build-Depends-Indep: docbook-to-man, jikes, debhelper ( 3.0.0) +Build-Depends-Indep: docbook-to-man, jikes, debhelper ( 3.0.0), unzip, j2sdk1.4 Standards-Version: 3.5.8 Package: xnap-snapshot -- Yven Johannes Leist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.leist.beldesign.de -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#301729: marked as done (code injection security hole)
Your message dated Sat, 02 Apr 2005 03:32:19 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#301729: fixed in dcl 1:0.9.4.4-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Mar 2005 23:41:18 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Mar 27 15:41:18 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from kitenet.net [64.62.161.42] (postfix) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DFhNe-cK-00; Sun, 27 Mar 2005 15:41:18 -0800 Received: from dragon.kitenet.net (dial-190.r06.scabvl.infoave.net [207.144.140.190]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN Joey Hess, Issuer Joey Hess (verified OK)) by kitenet.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF7F0181AE for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 27 Mar 2005 23:41:15 + (GMT) Received: by dragon.kitenet.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id DEBDB6E100; Sun, 27 Mar 2005 18:44:18 -0500 (EST) Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2005 18:44:18 -0500 From: Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: code injection security hole Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=Q68bSM7Ycu6FN28Q Content-Disposition: inline X-Reportbug-Version: 3.8 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: --Q68bSM7Ycu6FN28Q Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Package: dcl Version: 1:0.9.2-2 Severity: grave Tags: security CAN-2005-0887 describes this security hole: Code injection vulnerability in Double Choco Latte before 0.9.4.3 allows re= mote attackers to execute arbitrary PHP code via the menuAction variable in (1) functions.inc.php or (2) main.php, which causes code to be injected into an eval statement. http://securitytracker.com/alerts/2005/Mar/1013559.html has some details; note that we have an older version of the program so will not be affected by the XSS vulnerability that was intorduced in version 0.9.4.3. Both holes are fixed in 0.9.4.4. There's little detail about the problem and I've not checked in depth, but some cursory diffing to see what was changed between 0.9.4.2 and .3 suggests that dcl was vulnerable to this hole as far back as the version in unstable. I notice that this package is orphaned. If nobody steps up to take over maintenance, it will likely e removed from debian. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.4.27 Locale: LANG=3Den_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=3Den_US.UTF-8 (charmap=3DUTF-8) Versions of packages dcl depends on: ii apache2-mpm-prefork [httpd] 2.0.53-5traditional model for Apache2 ii bash 3.0-14 The GNU Bourne Again SHell ii debconf 1.4.46 Debian configuration managemen= t sy ii grep 2.5.1.ds1-4 GNU grep, egrep and fgrep pn php4 | php3 Not found. ii python 2.3.5-1 An interactive high-level obje= ct-o ii sed 4.1.4-2 The GNU sed stream editor pn wwwconfig-common Not found. --=20 see shy jo --Q68bSM7Ycu6FN28Q Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFCR0VSd8HHehbQuO8RAkviAJ42PdqXJF4Iu/HHY/K4lpxC00BHMACdEham riYHBgXq0Ki2Fr0HYOKyX8M= =KsBF -END PGP SIGNATURE- --Q68bSM7Ycu6FN28Q-- --- Received: (at 301729-close) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Apr 2005 08:39:18 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Apr 02 00:39:18 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from gluck.debian.org [192.25.206.10] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DHeA2-gA-00; Sat, 02 Apr 2005 00:39:18 -0800 Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by gluck.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DHeA0-0007BM-00; Sat, 02
Processed: Re: dcl: install does not work AND there is no doc - UNUSABLE
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: package dcl Ignoring bugs not assigned to: dcl severity 263456 important Bug#263456: dcl: install does not work AND there is no doc - UNUSABLE Severity set to `important'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#302633: broken dependencies keep it out of testing
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 02-04-2005 10:21, Joey Hess wrote: Jonas Smedegaard wrote: For unsupported/untested architectures, I choose to make it depend on nothing, although this could be handled better. How? I am quite interested in improving the situation for untested archs if at all possible. I don't know, I just think there's probably a better fix. Maybe only building the packages on arches with a supported kernel. Or adding support for all arches, as I am trying to do. ;-) Given the long discussions I've had with Vagrant on this, I prefer making the untested archs aware of the kernel-image-netbootable package - - so that we can reach the ultimate goal of getting proper support for all archs (or at least know for sure if an arch won't work). Hmm - thinking now that maybe a step in the right direction would be a debconf warning on untested archs, that it didn't know what to pull in and feedback is appreciated. Whatta you think? However, I just noticed your April 1 updates, looks like we ended up working in the same direction on this dependency problem. Yeah :-) I'll postpone the upload of -15 some hours to give the debconf approach a chance in my head and in yours... Have a look here for a sneak preview: http://debian.jones.dk/auryn/pool/official/lessdisks/ - Jonas - -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist og Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ - Enden er nr: http://www.shibumi.org/eoti.htm -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFCTmGjn7DbMsAkQLgRAm9sAJ4w70UKUxjJb9eZvZfMNDTpCORKYgCeOsQD RmjEtFJ8No3YmcNQqC9qDUU= =KxTa -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Bug#302524: caspar-doc: installs files in /usr/share/doc/caspar/
On Sat, Apr 02, 2005 at 09:00:21AM +0200, Joost van Baal wrote: On Fri, Apr 01, 2005 at 12:28:47PM +0200, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote: On Fri, Apr 01, 2005 at 02:03:25AM -0800, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: On Fri, Apr 01, 2005 at 11:30:24AM +0200, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote: caspar-doc installs files in /usr/share/doc/caspar/ ; it should install them in /usr/share/doc/caspar-doc/ No, this is the customary location for -doc packages to install their documentation if it accompanies a non-doc package. The files that policy requires to be in /usr/share/doc/package/ are there. Text documentation should be installed in the directory /usr/share/doc/package, where package is the name of the package, A more complete quote is: If a package comes with large amounts of documentation which many users of the package will not require you should create a separate binary package to contain it, so that it does not take up disk space on the machines of users who do not need or want it installed. dpkg-doc has a symlink: /usr/share/doc/dpkg-doc - dpkg perl-doc and vim-doc do the same postfix-doc installs docs in /usr/share/doc/postfix/ . python2.4-doc installs docs in /usr/share/doc/python2.4 . Which of these packages violate policy? Symlinks are explicitly introduced by: /usr/share/doc/package may be a symbolic link to another directory in /usr/share/doc only if the two packages both come from the same source and the first package Depends on the second. So it seems that dpkg violates policy, as dpkg-doc doesn't depend on dpkg? perl-doc and vim-doc seem OK. But according to Steve, my reading of the policy is wrong anyway, so... -- Lionel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#302524: caspar-doc: installs files in /usr/share/doc/caspar/
On Sat, Apr 02, 2005 at 11:19:45AM +0200, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote: On Sat, Apr 02, 2005 at 09:00:21AM +0200, Joost van Baal wrote: On Fri, Apr 01, 2005 at 12:28:47PM +0200, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote: On Fri, Apr 01, 2005 at 02:03:25AM -0800, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: On Fri, Apr 01, 2005 at 11:30:24AM +0200, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote: caspar-doc installs files in /usr/share/doc/caspar/ ; it should install them in /usr/share/doc/caspar-doc/ No, this is the customary location for -doc packages to install their documentation if it accompanies a non-doc package. The files that policy requires to be in /usr/share/doc/package/ are there. Text documentation should be installed in the directory /usr/share/doc/package, where package is the name of the package, A more complete quote is: If a package comes with large amounts of documentation which many users of the package will not require you should create a separate binary package to contain it, so that it does not take up disk space on the machines of users who do not need or want it installed. dpkg-doc has a symlink: /usr/share/doc/dpkg-doc - dpkg perl-doc and vim-doc do the same postfix-doc installs docs in /usr/share/doc/postfix/ . python2.4-doc installs docs in /usr/share/doc/python2.4 . Which of these packages violate policy? Symlinks are explicitly introduced by: /usr/share/doc/package may be a symbolic link to another directory in /usr/share/doc only if the two packages both come from the same source and the first package Depends on the second. So it seems that dpkg violates policy, as dpkg-doc doesn't depend on dpkg? perl-doc and vim-doc seem OK. Yes, that would indeed be a bug in dpkg-doc, because /usr/share/doc/package/copyright and .../changelog.Debian.gz must exist and must correspond to the package in question. -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#246486: marked as done (roleplaying: FTBFS: Swig errors)
Your message dated Sat, 2 Apr 2005 10:55:29 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Apr 2004 09:20:13 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 29 02:20:13 2004 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from tisch.mail.mindspring.net [207.69.200.157] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BJ7iH-XT-00; Thu, 29 Apr 2004 02:20:13 -0700 Received: from user-119bq03.biz.mindspring.com ([66.149.232.3] helo=frobnitz.ddts.net) by tisch.mail.mindspring.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 1BJ7iG-0006XW-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 29 Apr 2004 05:20:13 -0400 Received: from daniel by frobnitz.ddts.net with local (Exim 4.32) id 1BJ7iu-0004nd-IK for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 29 Apr 2004 02:20:55 -0700 To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: roleplaying: FTBFS: Swig errors From: Daniel Schepler [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2004 02:20:48 -0700 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: Daniel Schepler [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 1 Package: roleplaying Severity: serious Version: 2.0-10 From my build log: ... make[3]: Entering directory `/tmp/buildd/roleplaying-2.0/C++/swig' /usr/bin/swig -tcl -c++ -dlatex -I../lib rpg.i swig: Warning. -dlatex option deprecated. rpg.i:85: Warning(109): %title is deprecated rpg.i:106: Warning(110): %section is deprecated rpg.i:134: Warning(110): %section is deprecated rpg.i:161: Warning(110): %section is deprecated rpg.i:177: Warning(110): %section is deprecated rpg.i:178: Syntax error in input. rpg.i:236: Warning(113): %addmethods is now %extend rpg.i:299: Warning(110): %section is deprecated ... make[3]: *** [rpg_wrap.cc] Error 1 make[3]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/roleplaying-2.0/C++/swig' make[2]: *** [all] Error 2 make[2]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/roleplaying-2.0/C++' make[1]: *** [all] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/roleplaying-2.0' make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2 -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.5 Locale: LANG=en, LC_CTYPE=en (ignored: LC_ALL set to en_US.UTF-8) -- Daniel Schepler Please don't disillusion me. I [EMAIL PROTECTED]haven't had breakfast yet. -- Orson Scott Card --- Received: (at 246486-done) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Apr 2005 09:56:42 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Apr 02 01:56:42 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from gluck.debian.org [192.25.206.10] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DHfMw-000628-00; Sat, 02 Apr 2005 01:56:42 -0800 Received: from sorrow.cyrius.com [65.19.161.204] by gluck.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DHfMv-0001Iy-00; Sat, 02 Apr 2005 02:56:41 -0700 Received: by sorrow.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 10) id C1EC264D3C; Sat, 2 Apr 2005 09:55:49 + (UTC) Received: by deprecation.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 7ED7F4EF49; Sat, 2 Apr 2005 10:55:29 +0100 (BST) Date: Sat, 2 Apr 2005 10:55:29 +0100 From: Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: removed Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,ONEWORD autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2 This package has been removed from Debian because it was unmaintained and is buggy. -- Martin Michlmayr http://www.cyrius.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#302105: marked as done (Superseeded by kernel-patch-vserver)
Your message dated Sat, 2 Apr 2005 10:54:16 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Mar 2005 05:14:48 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 29 21:14:48 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from c-adt-5.ataco.se (bixbite.opalsys.net) [213.115.168.248] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DGVXU-cX-00; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 21:14:48 -0800 Received: from ola by bixbite.opalsys.net with local (Exim 4.44) id 1DGVS7-00014Z-2J for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 30 Mar 2005 07:09:15 +0200 Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 07:09:15 +0200 From: Ola Lundqvist [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Superseeded by kernel-patch-vserver Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: kernel-patch-ctx Severity: serious This package has been superseeded by kernel-patch-ctx and it has been asked for removal. So it should not be used anymore. Regards, // Ola -- - Ola Lundqvist --- / [EMAIL PROTECTED] Annebergsslingan 37 \ | [EMAIL PROTECTED] 654 65 KARLSTAD | | +46 (0)54-10 14 30 +46 (0)70-332 1551 | | http://www.opal.dhs.org UIN/icq: 4912500 | \ gpg/f.p.: 7090 A92B 18FE 7994 0C36 4FE4 18A1 B1CF 0FE5 3DD9 / --- --- Received: (at 302105-done) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Apr 2005 09:55:34 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Apr 02 01:55:34 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from gluck.debian.org [192.25.206.10] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DHfLq-0005zU-00; Sat, 02 Apr 2005 01:55:34 -0800 Received: from sorrow.cyrius.com [65.19.161.204] by gluck.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DHfLq-00019R-00; Sat, 02 Apr 2005 02:55:34 -0700 Received: by sorrow.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 10) id DFFE264D3D; Sat, 2 Apr 2005 09:54:29 + (UTC) Received: by deprecation.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id CC62C4EF49; Sat, 2 Apr 2005 10:54:16 +0100 (BST) Date: Sat, 2 Apr 2005 10:54:16 +0100 From: Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: removed Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,ONEWORD autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: this has been removed. -- Martin Michlmayr http://www.cyrius.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#302557: Uninstallable: file conflict with php4-cli
Steve Langasek said: On Sat, Apr 02, 2005 at 12:37:01AM +0200, 'Lionel Elie Mamane' wrote: I was sure I was installing from sid... Sorry about that. But shouldn't php4-cli declare a conflict (or Replace?) with the php4-cgi versions having the file then? Replaces: php4-cgi ( 4:4.3.8-6) snip It does, but it doesn't work the way you think it does. Or, more to the point, it doesn't work the way policy says it should, which may or may not be a bug in dpkg. Installing a new php4-cli over an old php4-cgi will work, but installing an old php4-cgi after a new php4-cli is installed doesn't honour the 'Replaces'. Given that this is a pretty weird corner case, I'm not sure if anyone cares enough to fix the behaviour. ... Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#294867: base: de4x5.ko generates endless loop of errors with phobos p430tx
Hello, As of version 0.0.20040329-20, hotplug has re-blacklisted the de4x5 module, so this is probably no longer an RC bug. However, please c.f. http://lists.debian.org/debian-alpha/2005/04/msg2.html, which is a report from a user indicating that tulip still doesn't work on his hardware. :/ No information is available yet about the PCI ids at issue. -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#302677: qmail: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'groff-base' and missing users and groups
Package: qmail Version: 1.03-36 Severity: serious Tags: patch When building 'qmail' in a clean 'unstable' chroot, I get the following error: /usr/bin/make man make[1]: Entering directory `/qmail-1.03' nroff -man qmail-local.8 qmail-local.0 /bin/sh: nroff: command not found make[1]: *** [qmail-local.0] Error 127 make[1]: Leaving directory `/qmail-1.03' make: *** [build] Error 2 Please add the missing Build-Depends on 'groff-base' to debian/control. Additionally, the package does not build because some users and groups are missing (user 'alias' and 'qmail*', group 'nofiles'). I am not really sure what to do about that. With the attached patch 'qmail' builds in a clean chroot. Regards Andreas Jochens diff -urN ../tmp-orig/qmail-1.03/debian/control ./debian/control --- ../tmp-orig/qmail-1.03/debian/control 2005-04-02 11:54:12.692356241 +0200 +++ ./debian/control2005-04-02 11:51:09.377726792 +0200 @@ -2,6 +2,7 @@ Maintainer: Jon Marler [EMAIL PROTECTED] Section: non-free/mail Priority: extra +Build-Depends: groff-base Standards-Version: 3.6.1 Package: qmail-src diff -urN ../tmp-orig/qmail-1.03/debian/rules ./debian/rules --- ../tmp-orig/qmail-1.03/debian/rules 2005-04-02 11:54:12.697355303 +0200 +++ ./debian/rules 2005-04-02 11:53:41.830142747 +0200 @@ -8,6 +8,18 @@ INSTALL = '/usr/bin/install' build: checkdir +# Create qmail users and groups + ( groupadd nofiles \ + useradd -g nofiles -d /var/qmail/alias alias \ + useradd -g nofiles -d /var/qmail qmaild \ + useradd -g nofiles -d /var/qmail qmaill \ + useradd -g nofiles -d /var/qmail qmailp \ + groupadd qmail \ + useradd -g qmail -d /var/qmail qmailq \ + useradd -g qmail -d /var/qmail qmailr \ + useradd -g qmail -d /var/qmail qmails ) || \ + echo All qmail users already exist. + if fgrep QMAIL/bin *.sh /dev/null; then \ echo 2 You must run debian/debianize-source-tree first!; \ exit 1; \ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#302680: Inadequate copyright information
Package: zeroconf Version: 0.2-1 Severity: serious The copyright file says: It was downloaded from http://www.progsoc.org/~wildfire/zeroconf/ That URL reports Your browser requested a page that could not be found: Copyright: This line must be of the form: Copyright (C) date copyright-holder (The (C) is optional, I think, but it is safer to put it in.) -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (50, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.11 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) Versions of packages zeroconf depends on: ii ifupdown0.6.4-4.12 high level tools to configure netw ii iproute 20041019-3 Professional tools to control the ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-20 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: tags sid
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 302585 sid Bug#302585: Please shorten hook script name There were no tags set. Tags added: sid tags 302680 sid Bug#302680: Inadequate copyright information There were no tags set. Tags added: sid thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: moreinfo
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 302519 moreinfo Bug#302519: ifupdown: postinst fails if /dev/shm/network/ does not exist There were no tags set. Tags added: moreinfo thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#302685: After removing gdm 'startx' wont start X
Subject: After removing gdm 'startx' wont start X Package: gdm Version: 2.6.0.6-1 Severity: grave I decided to 'dpkg -P gdm' yesterday and 'startx' wont start X any more when issued by normal user 'leszek'. ( root can start it ) X server starts, ( I added a 'echo Got here! ~/startx' to ~/.xinitrc and I get to see the log, also, there are no errors in /etc/X11/XFConfig-4.log ) but things go wrong later. I think this is not an issue of a crashing WM ( WindowMaker ) because I've tried copying all WindowMaker's -working- init settings of root to leszek's home dir, to no avail. I suspect this may have something to do with the fact that I had 'gdm' to auto-login 'leszek' before. 'apt-get install gdm' solved the issue for me. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.11 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Versions of packages gdm depends on: ii adduser 3.63Add and remove users and groups ii debconf 1.4.30.11 Debian configuration management sy ii dpkg 1.10.27 Package maintenance system for Deb ii gksu 1.2.4-1 graphical frontend to su ii libart-2.0-2 2.3.17-1Library of functions for 2D graphi ii libatk1.0-0 1.8.0-4 The ATK accessibility toolkit ii libattr1 2.4.16-1Extended attribute shared library ii libaudiofile00.2.6-5 Open-source version of SGI's audio ii libbonobo2-0 2.8.1-2 Bonobo CORBA interfaces library ii libbonoboui2-0 2.8.1-2 The Bonobo UI library ii libbz2-1.0 1.0.2-5 high-quality block-sorting file co ii libc62.3.2.ds1-20GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libcroco30.6.0-2 a generic Cascading Style Sheet (C ii libesd0 0.2.35-2Enlightened Sound Daemon - Shared ii libgconf2-4 2.8.1-4 GNOME configuration database syste ii libgcrypt11 1.2.0-4 LGPL Crypto library - runtime libr ii libglade2-0 1:2.4.2-2 library to load .glade files at ru ii libglib2.0-0 2.6.3-1 The GLib library of C routines ii libgnome-keyring00.4.1-1 GNOME keyring services library ii libgnome2-0 2.8.1-2 The GNOME 2 library - runtime file ii libgnomecanvas2-02.8.0-1 A powerful object-oriented display ii libgnomeui-0 2.8.1-3 The GNOME 2 libraries (User Interf ii libgnomevfs2-0 2.8.4-2 The GNOME virtual file-system libr ii libgnutls11 1.0.16-9GNU TLS library - runtime library ii libgpg-error01.0-1 library for common error values an ii libgsf-1 1.11.1-1Structured File Library - runtime ii libgtk2.0-0 2.6.2-4 The GTK+ graphical user interface ii libice6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-10 Inter-Client Exchange library ii libjpeg626b-9The Independent JPEG Group's JPEG ii liborbit21:2.12.1-1 libraries for ORBit2 - a CORBA ORB ii libpam-modules 0.76-22 Pluggable Authentication Modules f ii libpam-runtime 0.76-22 Runtime support for the PAM librar ii libpam0g 0.76-22 Pluggable Authentication Modules l ii libpango1.0-01.8.1-1 Layout and rendering of internatio ii libpopt0 1.7-5 lib for parsing cmdline parameters ii librsvg2-2 2.8.1-2 SAX-based renderer library for SVG ii libselinux1 1.22-1 SELinux shared libraries ii libsm6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-10 X Window System Session Management ii libtasn1-2 0.2.10-3Manage ASN.1 structures (runtime) ii libwrap0 7.6.dbs-8 Wietse Venema's TCP wrappers libra ii libx11-6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-10 X Window System protocol client li ii libxext6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-10 X Window System miscellaneous exte ii libxml2 2.6.16-4GNOME XML library ii rxvt-ml [x-terminal-emul 1:2.6.4-6.2 multi-lingual VT102 terminal emula ii wmaker [x-window-manager 0.91.0-7NeXTSTEP-like window manager for X ii xbase-clients4.3.0.dfsg.1-10 miscellaneous X clients ii xlibs4.3.0.dfsg.1-10 X Keyboard Extension (XKB) configu ii xterm [x-terminal-emulat 4.3.0.dfsg.1-10 X terminal emulator ii zlib1g 1:1.2.2-3 compression library - runtime -- debconf information: gdm/daemon_name: /usr/bin/gdm shared/default-x-display-manager: gdm -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#302687: libgnomecups: Hold from Sarge for now
Package: libgnomecups Version: 0.2.0-1 Severity: serious X-Debbugs-CC: debian-release@lists.debian.org This version of libgnomecups should be held from Sarge until we (the GNOME packaging team) have decided what version of gnome-cups-manager will be in Sarge. If the gnome-cups-manager currently in testing (0.28) will be used in Sarge, this version of libgnomecups cannot be allowed into Sarge (testing currently has 0.1.4) as then g-c-m will fail to rebuild due to API changes in libgnomecups. If the gnome-cups-manager currently in experimental (0.30 w/Ubuntu patches) will be pushed into Sarge, then I shall close this bug and let both libgnomecups and gnome-cups-manager migrate to Sarge. Personally I believe the version in experimental is suitable for Sarge as it is largely based upon the version in the latest Ubuntu release, but we shall see. Ross -- Ross Burton mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] www: http://www.burtonini.com./ PGP Fingerprint: 1A21 F5B0 D8D0 CFE3 81D4 E25A 2D09 E447 D0B4 33DF signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Processed: tagging 302687
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 tags 302687 sid Bug#302687: libgnomecups: Hold from Sarge for now There were no tags set. Tags added: sid End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Downgrading according to release team suggestion.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 297181 normal Bug#297181: auctex dont't install Severity set to `normal'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#267799: Is this really RC?
according to http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer.en.html, grave means makes the package in question unusable or mostly so, or causes data loss, or introduces a security hole allowing access to the accounts of users who use the package. I don't think this applies to this bug. Considering this bug is holding nvidia drivers out of sarge, I think this bug should really be downgraded! Please reconsider this bug severity soon. -- regards, Reinhard -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#302694: [DUMMY] libtifiles0: do not migrate to testing
Package: libtifiles0 Severity: serious Tags: sid This version should not migrate to testing yet. JB. -- Julien BLACHE [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Debian, because code matters more Debian GNU/Linux Developer| http://www.debian.org Public key available on http://www.jblache.org - KeyID: F5D6 5169 GPG Fingerprint : 935A 79F1 C8B3 3521 FD62 7CC7 CD61 4FD7 F5D6 5169 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#302695: [DUMMY] libticables3: do not migrate to testing
Package: libticables3 Severity: serious Tags: sid This version of libticables3 should not migrate to testing yet. JB. -- Julien BLACHE [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Debian, because code matters more Debian GNU/Linux Developer| http://www.debian.org Public key available on http://www.jblache.org - KeyID: F5D6 5169 GPG Fingerprint : 935A 79F1 C8B3 3521 FD62 7CC7 CD61 4FD7 F5D6 5169 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: rsplib: FTBFS: conflicting types for 'rspSessionSelect'
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 302358 serious Bug#302358: rsplib: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): conflicting types for 'rspSessionSelect' Severity set to `serious'. tags 302358 + sid Bug#302358: rsplib: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): conflicting types for 'rspSessionSelect' Tags were: patch Tags added: sid thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Track autofs RC bug in sarge
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reopen 300703 Bug#300703: autofs: Upgrade fails Bug reopened, originator not changed. tags 300703 + sarge Bug#300703: autofs: Upgrade fails Tags were: patch Tags added: sarge thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#302074: marked as done (rsplib_0.8.0-1: FTBFS: byteswap64: 'value' undeclared)
Your message dated Sat, 02 Apr 2005 07:03:00 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#302074: fixed in rsplib 0.8.0-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Mar 2005 00:28:25 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 29 16:28:25 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from cpe-138-217-160-143.vic.bigpond.net.au (nukak.apana.org.au) [138.217.160.143] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DGR4L-LT-00; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 16:28:25 -0800 Received: by nukak.apana.org.au (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 1858A7B6CD; Wed, 30 Mar 2005 10:28:16 +1000 (EST) Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 10:28:16 +1000 From: Anibal Monsalve Salazar [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: rsplib_0.8.0-1: FTBFS: byteswap64: 'value' undeclared Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=oWj5HoUXCVjyUFuT Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: --oWj5HoUXCVjyUFuT Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Package: rsplib Severity: serious Version: 0.8.0-1 Tags: sid Justification: fails to build from source There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: Automatic build of rsplib_0.8.0-1 on sarti by sbuild/hppa 17 Build started at 20050329-1328 [...] ** Using build dependencies supplied by package: Build-Depends: automake1.6, libglib1.2-dev, sctplib-dev (= 1:1.0.3-1), socketapi-dev (= 1.3.2-1) [...] /bin/sh ../libtool --mode=compile gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -g -O2 -I/usr/include/glib-1.2 -I/usr/lib/glib/include -D_REENTRANT -DINCLUDE_LEAFLINKEDREDBLACKTREE -DUSE_LEAFLINKEDREDBLACKTREE -Wall -g -DLINUX -D_BSD_SOURCE -D_REENTRANT -D_THREAD_SAFE -O0 -g -c -o netutilities.lo `test -f 'netutilities.c' || echo './'`netutilities.c gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -g -O2 -I/usr/include/glib-1.2 -I/usr/lib/glib/include -D_REENTRANT -DINCLUDE_LEAFLINKEDREDBLACKTREE -DUSE_LEAFLINKEDREDBLACKTREE -Wall -g -DLINUX -D_BSD_SOURCE -D_REENTRANT -D_THREAD_SAFE -O0 -g -c netutilities.c -MT netutilities.lo -MF .deps/netutilities.TPlo -MD -MP -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/netutilities.o netutilities.c: In function `byteswap64': netutilities.c:1929: error: `value' undeclared (first use in this function) netutilities.c:1929: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once netutilities.c:1929: error: for each function it appears in.) make[2]: *** [netutilities.lo] Error 1 Full build logs are available on buildd.debian.org. Please refer to the build log at: http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?pkg=rsplibver=0.8.0-1arch=hppastamp=1112099686file=logas=raw If this problem has been reported already, please merge it with the appropiate bug report. If you believe this bug should be reassigned to one or more packages, you must clone it and then reassign it to the other packages, like so: clone bug# -1 clone bug# -2 clone bug# -3 reassign -1 package1 reassign -2 package2 reassign -3 package3 thanks Anibal Monsalve Salazar -- .''`. Debian GNU/Linux : :' : Free Operating System `. `' http://debian.org/ `- http://v7w.com/anibal --oWj5HoUXCVjyUFuT Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFCSfKgipBneRiAKDwRArPpAKC1B20mCY2RJlJhhQ0Qp4UOoPBi4wCgtw66 rLEwsb+yZ9vyXyK8zwfScqA= =lTKx -END PGP SIGNATURE- --oWj5HoUXCVjyUFuT-- --- Received: (at 302074-close) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Apr 2005 12:08:11 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Apr 02 04:08:11 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from gluck.debian.org [192.25.206.10] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DHhQA-0006bx-00; Sat, 02 Apr 2005 04:08:11 -0800 Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by gluck.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DHhQA-0002EF-00; Sat, 02 Apr 2005 05:08:10 -0700 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with
Bug#302685: After removing gdm 'startx' wont start X
On Sat, Apr 02, 2005 at 01:01:38PM +0200, Leszek Koltunski wrote: Subject: After removing gdm 'startx' wont start X Package: gdm Version: 2.6.0.6-1 Severity: grave I decided to 'dpkg -P gdm' yesterday and 'startx' wont start X any more when issued by normal user 'leszek'. ( root can start it ) X server starts, ( I added a 'echo Got here! ~/startx' to ~/.xinitrc and I get to see the log, also, there are no errors in /etc/X11/XFConfig-4.log ) but things go wrong later. I think this is not an issue of a crashing WM ( WindowMaker ) because I've tried copying all WindowMaker's -working- init settings of root to leszek's home dir, to no avail. I suspect this may have something to do with the fact that I had 'gdm' to auto-login 'leszek' before. 'apt-get install gdm' solved the issue for me. With gdm purged, are you able to run XFree86 as a normal user? What if you add a completely new user; does startx work for that user? Justin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#302680: Inadequate copyright information
On Sat, Apr 02, 2005 at 12:40:27PM +0200, Thomas Hood wrote: Package: zeroconf Version: 0.2-1 Severity: serious The copyright file says: It was downloaded from http://www.progsoc.org/~wildfire/zeroconf/ That URL reports Your browser requested a page that could not be found: Copyright: This line must be of the form: Copyright (C) date copyright-holder (The (C) is optional, I think, but it is safer to put it in.) Indeed. I'm hoping that someone can shed some light on this. I recall hearing something like the countries of the world have agreed to uphold each others' copyright laws, but you are only guaranteed to be protected if you use the 'c in a circle' mark. In which case we need non-ascii characters, since (C) is probably not good enough. Justin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#302358: marked as done (rsplib: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): conflicting types for 'rspSessionSelect')
Your message dated Sat, 02 Apr 2005 07:03:00 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#302358: fixed in rsplib 0.8.0-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 31 Mar 2005 12:24:47 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Mar 31 04:24:47 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from c129061.adsl.hansenet.de (localhost.localdomain) [213.39.129.61]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DGyj8-0004fn-00; Thu, 31 Mar 2005 04:24:47 -0800
Received: from aj by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1DGyjA-0004XK-VS; Thu, 31 Mar 2005 14:24:48 +0200
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Andreas Jochens [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: rsplib: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): conflicting types for 'rspSessionSelect'
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2005 14:24:48 +0200
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Package: rsplib
Version: 0.8.0-1
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
When building 'rsplib' on amd64/unstable with gcc-4.0,
I get the following error:
gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -g -O2 -I/usr/include/glib-1.2
-I/usr/lib/glib/include -D_REENTRANT -DINCLUDE_LEAFLINKEDREDBLACKTREE
-DUSE_LEAFLINKEDREDBLACKTREE -Wall -g -DLINUX -D_BSD_SOURCE -D_REENTRANT
-D_THREAD_SAFE -O0 -g -c rspsession.c -MT rspsession.lo -MF
.deps/rspsession.TPlo -MD -MP -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/rspsession.o
rspsession.c: In function 'rspSessionRead':
rspsession.c:1023: warning: format '%d' expects type 'int', but argument 3 has
type 'ssize_t'
rspsession.c: At top level:
rspsession.c:1144: error: conflicting types for 'rspSessionSelect'
rsplib.h:342: error: previous declaration of 'rspSessionSelect' was here
make[2]: *** [rspsession.lo] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory `/rsplib-0.8.0/rsplib'
With the attached patch 'rsplib' can be compiled
on amd64 using gcc-4.0.
Regards
Andreas Jochens
diff -urN ../tmp-orig/rsplib-0.8.0/rsplib/rspsession.c ./rsplib/rspsession.c
--- ../tmp-orig/rsplib-0.8.0/rsplib/rspsession.c2005-03-04
13:58:52.0 +0100
+++ ./rsplib/rspsession.c 2005-03-31 14:21:47.911160782 +0200
@@ -1139,7 +1139,7 @@
struct PoolElementDescriptor** pedArray,
unsigned int* pedStatusArray,
const size_t peds,
- const unsigned long long timeout,
+ const card64 timeout,
struct TagItem*tags)
{
struct TagItem mytags[16];
---
Received: (at 302358-close) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Apr 2005 12:19:04 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Apr 02 04:19:04 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from gluck.debian.org [192.25.206.10]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DHhai-0007Q3-00; Sat, 02 Apr 2005 04:19:04 -0800
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by gluck.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DHhai-0006nY-00; Sat, 02 Apr 2005 05:19:04 -0700
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DHhLA-0001qh-00; Sat, 02 Apr 2005 07:03:00 -0500
From: Anibal Monsalve Salazar [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $
Subject: Bug#302358: fixed in rsplib 0.8.0-2
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat, 02 Apr 2005 07:03:00 -0500
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2
Source: rsplib
Source-Version: 0.8.0-2
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
rsplib, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
rsplib-dev_0.8.0-2_i386.deb
to pool/main/r/rsplib/rsplib-dev_0.8.0-2_i386.deb
rsplib1_0.8.0-2_i386.deb
to pool/main/r/rsplib/rsplib1_0.8.0-2_i386.deb
rsplib_0.8.0-2.diff.gz
to
Processed: rsplib: reopen 302074
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: package rsplib Ignoring bugs not assigned to: rsplib reopen 302074 Bug#302074: rsplib_0.8.0-1: FTBFS: byteswap64: 'value' undeclared Bug reopened, originator not changed. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#302680: Inadequate copyright information
On Sat, Apr 02, 2005 at 07:22:38AM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote: On Sat, Apr 02, 2005 at 12:40:27PM +0200, Thomas Hood wrote: Package: zeroconf Version: 0.2-1 Severity: serious The copyright file says: It was downloaded from http://www.progsoc.org/~wildfire/zeroconf/ That URL reports Your browser requested a page that could not be found: Copyright: This line must be of the form: Copyright (C) date copyright-holder (The (C) is optional, I think, but it is safer to put it in.) Indeed. I'm hoping that someone can shed some light on this. I recall hearing something like the countries of the world have agreed to uphold each others' copyright laws, but you are only guaranteed to be protected if you use the 'c in a circle' mark. In which case we need non-ascii characters, since (C) is probably not good enough. If you country is a party to the Berne convention on copyrights, (almost all are), then: URL: http://www.copyright.org.au/information/basics.htm You do not need to publish your work, to put a copyright notice on it, or to do anything else to be covered by copyright the protection is free and automatic. There are no forms to fill in, and there are no fees to be paid. You do not have to send your work to us or to anyone else. You can see Wikipedia for further information on how the formalities are no longer required (since 1989 or so). URL: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copyright All this, however, doesn't mean that this isn't a Debian specific bug though. Cheers, Anand -- `When any government, or any church for that matter, undertakes to say to its subjects, This you may not read, this you must not see, this you are forbidden to know, the end result is tyranny and oppression no matter how holy the motives' -- Robert A Heinlein, If this goes on -- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#302704: CAN-2005-0750: Possible local root exploit through insufficient range checking in af_bluetooth
Package: kernel-source-2.4.27 Severity: grave Tags: security Justification: user security hole CAN-2005-0750: Insufficient range checking in af_bluetooth allows local root exploit. This is the full advisory: http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/ attachments/20050327/3f128a09/adv1.pdf This has been fixed in 2.4.30rc3, a fix is available in Bitkeeper: http://linux.bkbits.net:8080/linux-2.4/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Cheers, Moritz -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.11 Locale: LANG=C, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#267799: Is this really RC?
severity 267799 normal thanks #include hallo.h * Reinhard Tartler [Sat, Apr 02 2005, 01:44:20PM]: I don't think this applies to this bug. Considering this bug is holding nvidia drivers out of sarge, I think this bug should really be downgraded! Please reconsider this bug severity soon. Okay. I will send more data if I come to test it again. Regards, Eduard. -- Immerhin meint die Filmförderungsanstalt, im Jahr 2002 seien 59 Millionen CD-Rohlinge von 5,9 Millionen Nutzern mit Filmen bespielt worden, im Durchschnitt also zwölf Rohlinge pro Anwender. -- http://www.heise.de/newsticker/data/see-08.04.03-000/
Processed: Re: Bug#300953: nice: FTBFS: halts on nice.tools.compiler.console: parsing
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 300953 pending Bug#300953: nice: FTBFS: halts on nice.tools.compiler.console: parsing There were no tags set. Tags added: pending thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#300953: nice: FTBFS: halts on nice.tools.compiler.console: parsing
tags 300953 pending thanks The error you get in sid is due to a bug in kaffe. I reported it upstream, and it has been fixed in kaffe CVS. Hopefully they will release 1.1.5 soon, and we can close this report. I'm also trying to make sure it will make it possible to upload a more recent version of nice in Debian. Not assigning the bug to kaffe to avoid bothering the maintainers, since the bug is already analysed an fixed upstream. Daniel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: tagging 302704
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10 tags 302704 patch Bug#302704: CAN-2005-0750: Possible local root exploit through insufficient range checking in af_bluetooth Tags were: security Tags added: patch End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Bug#294867: base: de4x5.ko generates endless loop of errors with phobos p430tx
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 294867 important Bug#294867: base: de4x5.ko generates endless loop of errors with phobos p430tx Severity set to `important'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#302711: plib: FTBFS: linker error
Package: plib Version: 1.8.4-1 Severity: serious Hi, building the package plib in a clean sid build environment (with pbuilder) on i386 results in: = [...] make[2]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/plib-1.8.4' make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/plib-1.8.4' set -e; for i in `find src -name 'lib*a'`; do \ ( cd `dirname $i`;\ libname=`basename $i .a` ;\ gcc -shared -Wl,-soname,$libname.so.1.8.4 \ -o $libname.so.1.8.4 `ar t $libname.a` ) ;\ done jsLinuxOld.o(.text+0x0): In function `jsJoystick::open()': /tmp/buildd/plib-1.8.4/src/js/jsLinuxOld.cxx:42: multiple definition of `jsJoystick::open()' jsLinux.o(.text+0x10):/tmp/buildd/plib-1.8.4/src/js/jsLinux.cxx:47: first defined here /usr/bin/ld: Warning: size of symbol `jsJoystick::open()' changed from 536 in jsLinux.o to 279 in jsLinuxOld.o jsLinuxOld.o(.text+0x2b0): In function `jsJoystick::rawRead(int*, float*)': /tmp/buildd/plib-1.8.4/src/js/jsLinuxOld.cxx:111: multiple definition of `jsJoystick::rawRead(int*, float*)' jsLinux.o(.text+0x3c0):/tmp/buildd/plib-1.8.4/src/js/jsLinux.cxx:129: first defined here /usr/bin/ld: Warning: size of symbol `jsJoystick::rawRead(int*, float*)' changed from 588 in jsLinux.o to 199 in jsLinuxOld.o jsLinuxOld.o(.text+0x120): In function `jsJoystick::close()': /tmp/buildd/plib-1.8.4/src/js/jsLinuxOld.cxx:89: multiple definition of `jsJoystick::close()' jsLinux.o(.text+0x230):/tmp/buildd/plib-1.8.4/src/js/jsLinux.cxx:107: first defined here jsLinuxOld.o(.text+0x170): In function `jsJoystick::jsJoystick[not-in-charge](int)': /tmp/buildd/plib-1.8.4/src/js/jsLinuxOld.cxx:97: multiple definition of `jsJoystick::jsJoystick[not-in-charge](int)' jsLinux.o(.text+0x280):/tmp/buildd/plib-1.8.4/src/js/jsLinux.cxx:115: first defined here jsLinuxOld.o(.text+0x210): In function `jsJoystick::jsJoystick[in-charge](int)': /tmp/buildd/plib-1.8.4/src/js/jsLinuxOld.cxx:97: multiple definition of `jsJoystick::jsJoystick[in-charge](int)' jsLinux.o(.text+0x320):/tmp/buildd/plib-1.8.4/src/js/jsLinux.cxx:115: first defined here jsLinuxOld.o(.text+0x380): In function `jsInit()': /tmp/buildd/plib-1.8.4/src/js/jsLinuxOld.cxx:143: multiple definition of `jsInit()' jsLinux.o(.text+0x0):/tmp/buildd/plib-1.8.4/src/js/jsLinux.cxx:44: first defined here collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make: *** [build-stamp] Error 1 = Thanks for considering. -- DARTS - Debian Archive Regression Test Suite http://darts.alioth.debian.org/ Please note that this report has not been generated fully automatically. DARTS just helped finding the problem. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#302074: marked as done (rsplib_0.8.0-1: FTBFS: byteswap64: 'value' undeclared)
Your message dated Sat, 02 Apr 2005 09:02:23 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#302074: fixed in rsplib 0.8.0-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Mar 2005 00:28:25 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 29 16:28:25 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from cpe-138-217-160-143.vic.bigpond.net.au (nukak.apana.org.au) [138.217.160.143] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DGR4L-LT-00; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 16:28:25 -0800 Received: by nukak.apana.org.au (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 1858A7B6CD; Wed, 30 Mar 2005 10:28:16 +1000 (EST) Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 10:28:16 +1000 From: Anibal Monsalve Salazar [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: rsplib_0.8.0-1: FTBFS: byteswap64: 'value' undeclared Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=oWj5HoUXCVjyUFuT Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: --oWj5HoUXCVjyUFuT Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Package: rsplib Severity: serious Version: 0.8.0-1 Tags: sid Justification: fails to build from source There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: Automatic build of rsplib_0.8.0-1 on sarti by sbuild/hppa 17 Build started at 20050329-1328 [...] ** Using build dependencies supplied by package: Build-Depends: automake1.6, libglib1.2-dev, sctplib-dev (= 1:1.0.3-1), socketapi-dev (= 1.3.2-1) [...] /bin/sh ../libtool --mode=compile gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -g -O2 -I/usr/include/glib-1.2 -I/usr/lib/glib/include -D_REENTRANT -DINCLUDE_LEAFLINKEDREDBLACKTREE -DUSE_LEAFLINKEDREDBLACKTREE -Wall -g -DLINUX -D_BSD_SOURCE -D_REENTRANT -D_THREAD_SAFE -O0 -g -c -o netutilities.lo `test -f 'netutilities.c' || echo './'`netutilities.c gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -g -O2 -I/usr/include/glib-1.2 -I/usr/lib/glib/include -D_REENTRANT -DINCLUDE_LEAFLINKEDREDBLACKTREE -DUSE_LEAFLINKEDREDBLACKTREE -Wall -g -DLINUX -D_BSD_SOURCE -D_REENTRANT -D_THREAD_SAFE -O0 -g -c netutilities.c -MT netutilities.lo -MF .deps/netutilities.TPlo -MD -MP -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/netutilities.o netutilities.c: In function `byteswap64': netutilities.c:1929: error: `value' undeclared (first use in this function) netutilities.c:1929: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once netutilities.c:1929: error: for each function it appears in.) make[2]: *** [netutilities.lo] Error 1 Full build logs are available on buildd.debian.org. Please refer to the build log at: http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?pkg=rsplibver=0.8.0-1arch=hppastamp=1112099686file=logas=raw If this problem has been reported already, please merge it with the appropiate bug report. If you believe this bug should be reassigned to one or more packages, you must clone it and then reassign it to the other packages, like so: clone bug# -1 clone bug# -2 clone bug# -3 reassign -1 package1 reassign -2 package2 reassign -3 package3 thanks Anibal Monsalve Salazar -- .''`. Debian GNU/Linux : :' : Free Operating System `. `' http://debian.org/ `- http://v7w.com/anibal --oWj5HoUXCVjyUFuT Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFCSfKgipBneRiAKDwRArPpAKC1B20mCY2RJlJhhQ0Qp4UOoPBi4wCgtw66 rLEwsb+yZ9vyXyK8zwfScqA= =lTKx -END PGP SIGNATURE- --oWj5HoUXCVjyUFuT-- --- Received: (at 302074-close) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Apr 2005 14:08:16 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Apr 02 06:08:16 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from gluck.debian.org [192.25.206.10] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DHjIO-0003gh-00; Sat, 02 Apr 2005 06:08:16 -0800 Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by gluck.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DHjIN-00048k-00; Sat, 02 Apr 2005 07:08:16 -0700 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with
Bug#302713: spplus: FTBFS: Missing build dependencies.
Package: spplus Version: 1.0-5 Severity: serious Tags: sid Hi, Your package is failing to build because it's missing atleast a build dependency on dpatch: dpkg-buildpackage: host architecture is amd64 fakeroot debian/rules clean debian/rules:9: /usr/share/dpatch/dpatch.make: No such file or directory make: *** No rule to make target `/usr/share/dpatch/dpatch.make'. Stop. Kurt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: tagging 302711
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10 tags 302711 sid Bug#302711: plib: FTBFS: linker error There were no tags set. Tags added: sid End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#302716: dpkg screws up GRUB's menu.lst
Subject: dpkg screws up GRUB's menu.lst Package: dpkg Version: 1.10.27 Severity: grave Some time ago I moved my root partition from hda3 to hda5. All online tutorials advise to simply 1) boot into single user 2) copy the files around 3) chroot install-grub in the new partition and that's what I did. Everything works, except when I install a new customized kernel with dpkg -i : utumno:/home/leszek/deb# dpkg -i kernel-image-2.6.12-rc1-mm4_5_i386.deb Selecting previously deselected package kernel-image-2.6.12-rc1-mm4. (Reading database ... 77450 files and directories currently installed.) Unpacking kernel-image-2.6.12-rc1-mm4 (from kernel-image-2.6.12-rc1-mm4_5_i386.deb) ... Setting up kernel-image-2.6.12-rc1-mm4 (5) ... Searching for GRUB installation directory ... found: /boot/grub . Testing for an existing GRUB menu.list file... found: /boot/grub/menu.lst . Searching for splash image... none found, skipping... Found kernel: /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.11wireless Found kernel: /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.12-rc1-mm4 Found kernel: /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.11 Updating /boot/grub/menu.lst ... done utumno:/home/leszek/deb# vim /boot/grub/menu.lst (...) title Debian GNU/Linux, kernel 2.6.12-rc1-mm4 root(hd0,4) kernel /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.12-rc1-mm4 root=/dev/hda3 ro savedefault boot All other kernels I have installed also get 'root=/dev/hda3' passed. I dont know if it is a bug in dpkg, grub or it is something I failed to do whilst moving the root partition. However, as I couldn't find any info on how to inform dpkg about this change in Debian's manuals, I am filing this bug. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.11 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Versions of packages dpkg depends on: ii dselect 1.10.27 a user tool to manage Debian packa ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-20 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: reportlab-accel: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'python*-dev'
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 302162 serious Bug#302162: reportlab-accel: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'python*-dev' Severity set to `serious'. tags 302162 + sid Bug#302162: reportlab-accel: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'python*-dev' Tags were: patch Tags added: sid thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Fixed in upload of pilot-link 0.11.8-0.12.0-pre2-3 to experimental
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 300722 + fixed-in-experimental Bug#300722: FTBFS in experimental Tags were: experimental Tags added: fixed-in-experimental quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#302515: marked as done (ocamlodbc: FTBFS: cannot stat `debian/libocamlodbc-ocaml-bin.override': No such file or directory)
Your message dated Sat, 02 Apr 2005 10:02:34 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#302515: fixed in ocamlodbc 2.8-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Apr 2005 07:39:42 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Mar 31 23:39:42 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from gluck.debian.org [192.25.206.10] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DHGko-00052A-00; Thu, 31 Mar 2005 23:39:42 -0800 Received: from d040155.adsl.hansenet.de (localhost.localdomain) [80.171.40.155] by gluck.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DHGkn-0008BN-00; Fri, 01 Apr 2005 00:39:41 -0700 Received: from aj by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.50) id 1DHGhk-00066K-Hx; Fri, 01 Apr 2005 09:36:32 +0200 To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Andreas Jochens [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: ocamlodbc: FTBFS: cannot stat `debian/libocamlodbc-ocaml-bin.override': No such file or directory Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2005 09:36:32 +0200 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: ocamlodbc Version: 2.8-2 Severity: serious Tags: patch When building 'ocamlodbc' on unstable, I get the following error: fi cp debian/libocamlodbc-ocaml-bin.override \ debian/libocamlodbc-ocaml-bin/usr/share/lintian/overrides/libocamlodbc-ocaml-bin cp: cannot stat `debian/libocamlodbc-ocaml-bin.override': No such file or directory make: *** [install] Error 1 With the attached patch 'ocamlodbc' can be compiled. Regards Andreas Jochens diff -urN ../tmp-orig/ocamlodbc-2.8/debian/rules ./debian/rules --- ../tmp-orig/ocamlodbc-2.8/debian/rules 2005-04-01 09:31:29.090543898 +0200 +++ ./debian/rules 2005-04-01 09:31:24.417420085 +0200 @@ -79,8 +79,6 @@ else \ cp Biniki/biniki debian/tmp/usr/bin; \ fi - cp debian/libocamlodbc-ocaml-bin.override \ - debian/libocamlodbc-ocaml-bin/usr/share/lintian/overrides/libocamlodbc-ocaml-bin # Build architecture-independent files here. binary-indep: build install --- Received: (at 302515-close) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Apr 2005 15:18:41 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Apr 02 07:18:41 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from gluck.debian.org [192.25.206.10] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DHkOW-V0-00; Sat, 02 Apr 2005 07:18:41 -0800 Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by gluck.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DHkOW-0005hP-00; Sat, 02 Apr 2005 08:18:40 -0700 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DHk8w-0005RX-00; Sat, 02 Apr 2005 10:02:34 -0500 From: Samuel Mimram [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $ Subject: Bug#302515: fixed in ocamlodbc 2.8-3 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sat, 02 Apr 2005 10:02:34 -0500 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Source: ocamlodbc Source-Version: 2.8-3 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of ocamlodbc, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: libocamlodbc-ocaml-bin_2.8-3_i386.deb to pool/main/o/ocamlodbc/libocamlodbc-ocaml-bin_2.8-3_i386.deb libocamlodbc-ocaml-dev_2.8-3_i386.deb to pool/main/o/ocamlodbc/libocamlodbc-ocaml-dev_2.8-3_i386.deb ocamlodbc_2.8-3.diff.gz to pool/main/o/ocamlodbc/ocamlodbc_2.8-3.diff.gz ocamlodbc_2.8-3.dsc to pool/main/o/ocamlodbc/ocamlodbc_2.8-3.dsc A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Samuel
Bug#302685: After removing gdm 'startx' wont start X
I once again purged gdm, tried to 'startx' as a normal user 'leszek' - no success. For a brief moment I get to see this gray screen with the hourglass, but after some ~1/2 a second X server exits. I added another normal user and 'startx' - no problems. I added gdm back in - it was complaining that /var/lib/gdm already exists, and it gave some other warning, and voilla, once again I could log onto X as 'leszek'. It really looks like all this has something to do with the fact that I had 'leszek' set to be the 'auto-login username' in gdm's settings. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#301642: marked as done (pdns: FTBFS: error: ambiguous overload for 'operator' in '(+(+(+(+(+(+theL((string(,)
Your message dated Sat, 02 Apr 2005 17:01:58 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line pdns: FTBFS: error: ambiguous overload for 'operator' in '(+(+(+(+(+(+theL((string(, has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Mar 2005 13:13:29 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Mar 27 05:13:29 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from apate.telenet-ops.be [195.130.132.57] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DFXa5-00025s-00; Sun, 27 Mar 2005 05:13:29 -0800 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by apate.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with SMTP id 173A1380CA for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 27 Mar 2005 15:13:28 +0200 (CEST) Received: from Q.roeckx.be (dD5775FD9.access.telenet.be [213.119.95.217]) by apate.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE2A63805C for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 27 Mar 2005 15:13:27 +0200 (CEST) Received: by Q.roeckx.be (Postfix, from userid 501) id CECB826136; Sun, 27 Mar 2005 15:13:27 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2005 15:13:27 +0200 From: Kurt Roeckx [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: pdns: FTBFS: error: ambiguous overload for 'operator' in '(+(+(+(+(+(+theL((string(, Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: pdns Version: 2.9.17-4 Severity: serious Tags: sid Hi, Your package is failing to build on a few arches with the following error: ia64-linux-g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../.. -D_GNU_SOURCE -Wall -g -O2 -Wal l -O2 -c ldapbackend.cc -MT ldapbackend.lo -MD -MP -MF .deps/ldapbackend.TPlo -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/ldapbackend.o In file included from ldapbackend.hh:30, from ldapbackend.cc:1: ../../pdns/dnspacket.hh: In member function `int DNSPacket::parse(const char*, int)': ../../pdns/dnspacket.hh:305: error: ambiguous overload for 'operator' in ' (+(+(+(+(+(+theL((string(, (allocatorchar())-Logger::operator(Logger::Warning))-Logger::oper ator((string(Ignoring packet: question too short from , (allocatorchar())-Logger::operator((DNSPacket::getRemote() const(-Logger::operator((string(, offset , (allocatorchar())-Logger::operator((offset + 15)))-Logger::operator((string(=, (allocatorchar() (this + 88)-std::basic_string_CharT, _Traits, _Alloc::length [with _CharT = char, _Traits = std::char_traitschar, _Alloc = std::allocatorchar]()' ../../pdns/logger.hh:111: error: candidates are: Logger Logger::operator(const std::string) near match ../../pdns/logger.hh:112: error: Logger Logger::operator(int) ../../pdns/logger.hh:113: error: Logger Logger::operator(unsigned int) make[3]: *** [ldapbackend.lo] Error 1 Kurt --- Received: (at 301642-done) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Apr 2005 15:02:08 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Apr 02 07:02:08 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from a80-126-52-161.adsl.xs4all.nl (server.cacholong.nl) [80.126.52.161] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DHk8W-00075O-00; Sat, 02 Apr 2005 07:02:08 -0800 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by server.cacholong.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CAAB83DD45 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 2 Apr 2005 17:02:06 +0200 (CEST) Received: from server.cacholong.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (server.cacholong.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 29961-02 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 2 Apr 2005 17:02:02 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.20.2] (openbsd.xs4all.nl [80.126.240.96]) by server.cacholong.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3B0383DD43 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 2 Apr 2005 17:02:02 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sat, 02 Apr 2005 17:01:58 +0200 From: Matthijs Mohlmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Debian Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050329) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: pdns: FTBFS: error: ambiguous overload for 'operator' in
Processed: Re: Bug#302716: dpkg screws up GRUB's menu.lst
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 302716 kernel Bug#302716: dpkg screws up GRUB's menu.lst Bug reassigned from package `dpkg' to `kernel'. severity 302716 important Bug#302716: dpkg screws up GRUB's menu.lst Severity set to `important'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#302716: dpkg screws up GRUB's menu.lst
reassign 302716 kernel severity 302716 important thanks On Sat, Apr 02, 2005 at 04:49:37PM +0200, Leszek Koltunski wrote: Subject: dpkg screws up GRUB's menu.lst Package: dpkg Version: 1.10.27 Severity: grave Some time ago I moved my root partition from hda3 to hda5. All online tutorials advise to simply 1) boot into single user 2) copy the files around 3) chroot install-grub in the new partition and that's what I did. Everything works, except when I install a new customized kernel with dpkg -i : So, did grubs input file (menu.lst?) get updated? utumno:/home/leszek/deb# dpkg -i kernel-image-2.6.12-rc1-mm4_5_i386.deb Selecting previously deselected package kernel-image-2.6.12-rc1-mm4. (Reading database ... 77450 files and directories currently installed.) Unpacking kernel-image-2.6.12-rc1-mm4 (from kernel-image-2.6.12-rc1-mm4_5_i386.deb) ... Setting up kernel-image-2.6.12-rc1-mm4 (5) ... Searching for GRUB installation directory ... found: /boot/grub . Testing for an existing GRUB menu.list file... found: /boot/grub/menu.lst . Searching for splash image... none found, skipping... Found kernel: /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.11wireless Found kernel: /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.12-rc1-mm4 Found kernel: /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.11 Updating /boot/grub/menu.lst ... done utumno:/home/leszek/deb# vim /boot/grub/menu.lst (...) title Debian GNU/Linux, kernel 2.6.12-rc1-mm4 root(hd0,4) kernel /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.12-rc1-mm4 root=/dev/hda3 ro savedefault boot All other kernels I have installed also get 'root=/dev/hda3' passed. Where did you get this kernel, anyway? That kernel doesn't seem to be provided by Debian. I'm reassinging to the kernel package until more is known. Did you create the .deb yourself with `cd $linux; make deb-pkg`? In that case maybe the upstream kernel people have a problem. Did you even get the kernel source from the debian archive? I dont know if it is a bug in dpkg, grub or it is something I failed to do whilst moving the root partition. However, as I couldn't find any info on how to inform dpkg about this change in Debian's manuals, I am filing this bug. It is definitely not a dpkg bug; all dpkg does is put the files where the .deb tells it to, and then call some shell scripts provided by the .deb. I expect that the shell scripts (maintainer scripts) don't do what you want. They are probably parsing the grub file and rewriting it to add the new kernel image. Justin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#302685: After removing gdm 'startx' wont start X
On Sat, Apr 02, 2005 at 05:08:22PM +0200, Leszek Koltunski wrote: I once again purged gdm, tried to 'startx' as a normal user 'leszek' - no success. For a brief moment I get to see this gray screen with the hourglass, but after some ~1/2 a second X server exits. I added another normal user and 'startx' - no problems. Can you also confirm that XFree86 always works, independent of whether gdm is installed or not, and independent of what user runs it? Thanks, Justin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#302685: After removing gdm 'startx' wont start X
Can you also confirm that XFree86 always works, independent of whether gdm is installed or not, and independent of what user runs it? ok, I've got 3 users here: 'root' , 'leszek' and 'blah' ( which is just a dummy user created to test startx and XFree86 ) I purged gdm again, killed the X server, and tried 'startx-ing' with the three users. root and blah could do it, leszek - no. I then tried to issue 'XFree86'. root could do it, both blah and leszek failed with Fatal server error: Cannot move old log file /var/log/XFree86.0.log.old No wonder, since [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ls -l /var/log | grep XFree -rw-r--r-- 1 rootroot 40196 Apr 3 00:44 XFree86.0.log -rw-r--r-- 1 rootroot 40078 Apr 3 00:43 XFree86.0.log.old However, as I said above, 'blah' still can issue 'startx' with no apparent problems at all! -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: control 302645
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: retitle 302645 ocurl: FTBFS: Not using -fPIC to make shared library. Bug#302645: ocurl: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): curl-helper.o: relocation R_X86_64_32S can not be used when making a shared object; recompile with -fPIC Changed Bug title. severity 302645 serious Bug#302645: ocurl: FTBFS: Not using -fPIC to make shared library. Severity set to `serious'. tags 302645 + sid Bug#302645: ocurl: FTBFS: Not using -fPIC to make shared library. Tags were: patch Tags added: sid End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#302741: scilab: Scilab starts with a very small window and an unreadable small font
Package: scilab Version: 3.0-14 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Scilab starts with a 27x18 window and a very small unreadable font. Menu font is standard size which causes that some items are not shown. If you resize the window the menu problem is solved but the unreadable small font of the interactive window does not change. I have installed the same version of scilab in a similar computer with debian testing installed and it works fine (except for a small problem with the help browser I've already reported). Both sistems are up to date (with apt-get -f dist-upgrade). -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-k7 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) Versions of packages scilab depends on: ii scilab-bin3.0-14 Matrix-based scientific software p ii tk8.3 [wish] 8.3.5-4Tk toolkit for Tcl and X11, v8.3 - ii tk8.4 [wish] 8.4.9-1Tk toolkit for Tcl and X11, v8.4 - -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#302574: marked as done (groovy: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'bzip2')
Your message dated Sat, 02 Apr 2005 13:47:26 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#302574: fixed in groovy 0.1.0beta10-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Apr 2005 14:47:29 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Apr 01 06:47:29 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from gluck.debian.org [192.25.206.10] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DHNQn-00072U-00; Fri, 01 Apr 2005 06:47:29 -0800 Received: from d040155.adsl.hansenet.de (localhost.localdomain) [80.171.40.155] by gluck.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DHNQm-0004e3-00; Fri, 01 Apr 2005 07:47:28 -0700 Received: from aj by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.50) id 1DHNQp-0003MI-4Z; Fri, 01 Apr 2005 16:47:31 +0200 To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Andreas Jochens [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: groovy: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'bzip2' Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2005 16:47:31 +0200 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: groovy Version: 0.1.0beta10-1 Severity: serious Tags: patch When building 'groovy' in a clean 'unstable' chroot, I get the following error: # Extract bundled dependencies (see README.Debian for explanation) mkdir -p /groovy-0.1.0beta10/debian/lib cd /groovy-0.1.0beta10/debian/lib uudecode /groovy-0.1.0beta10/debian/bundled.tar.bz2.uue | tar xvjf - tar: bzip2: Cannot exec: No such file or directory tar: Error is not recoverable: exiting now tar: Child died with signal 13 tar: Error exit delayed from previous errors make: *** [configure-stamp] Error 2 Please add the missing Build-Depends on 'bzip2' to debian/control. Regards Andreas Jochens diff -urN ../tmp-orig/groovy-0.1.0beta10/debian/control ./debian/control --- ../tmp-orig/groovy-0.1.0beta10/debian/control 2005-04-01 16:37:41.932767310 +0200 +++ ./debian/control2005-04-01 16:37:31.391743697 +0200 @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ Section: contrib/devel Priority: optional Maintainer: Marcus Crafter [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Build-Depends-Indep: debhelper (= 4.0.0), libant1.6-java (= 1.6.2), libasm-java (= 1.5.2), libbsf-java, libclassworlds-java (= 1.0.1), libcommons-cli-java (= 1.0), libcommons-collections3-java (= 3.1), libcommons-logging-java (= 1.0.3), junit (= 3.8.1), libmockobjects-java (= 0.09), libmx4j-java (= 2.0.1), libregexp-java (= 1.2), libservlet2.3-java, sharutils, ant, j2sdk1.4 | j2sdk1.3 | java-virtual-machine +Build-Depends-Indep: debhelper (= 4.0.0), bzip2, libant1.6-java (= 1.6.2), libasm-java (= 1.5.2), libbsf-java, libclassworlds-java (= 1.0.1), libcommons-cli-java (= 1.0), libcommons-collections3-java (= 3.1), libcommons-logging-java (= 1.0.3), junit (= 3.8.1), libmockobjects-java (= 0.09), libmx4j-java (= 2.0.1), libregexp-java (= 1.2), libservlet2.3-java, sharutils, ant, j2sdk1.4 | j2sdk1.3 | java-virtual-machine Standards-Version: 3.6.1 Package: groovy --- Received: (at 302574-close) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Apr 2005 18:57:24 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Apr 02 10:57:24 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from gluck.debian.org [192.25.206.10] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DHnoC-00044x-00; Sat, 02 Apr 2005 10:57:24 -0800 Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by gluck.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DHnoC-0004IH-00; Sat, 02 Apr 2005 11:57:24 -0700 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DHneY-0002eC-00; Sat, 02 Apr 2005 13:47:26 -0500 From: Marcus Crafter [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $ Subject: Bug#302574: fixed in groovy 0.1.0beta10-2 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sat, 02 Apr 2005 13:47:26 -0500 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Source: groovy
Processed: merging
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: merge 302141 301639 Bug#301639: lirc: FTBFS: cp: cannot stat `debian/tmp/usr/bin/xmode2': No such file or directory Bug#302141: lirc_0.7.1pre2-6: FTBFS: cannot stat 'debian/tmp/usr/bin/xmode2' Merged 301639 302141. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#302685: After removing gdm 'startx' wont start X
On Sat, Apr 02, 2005 at 06:51:37PM +0200, Leszek Koltunski wrote: Can you also confirm that XFree86 always works, independent of whether gdm is installed or not, and independent of what user runs it? ok, I've got 3 users here: 'root' , 'leszek' and 'blah' ( which is just a dummy user created to test startx and XFree86 ) I purged gdm again, killed the X server, and tried 'startx-ing' with the three users. root and blah could do it, leszek - no. I then tried to issue 'XFree86'. root could do it, both blah and leszek failed with Fatal server error: Cannot move old log file /var/log/XFree86.0.log.old No wonder, since [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ls -l /var/log | grep XFree -rw-r--r-- 1 rootroot 40196 Apr 3 00:44 XFree86.0.log -rw-r--r-- 1 rootroot 40078 Apr 3 00:43 XFree86.0.log.old However, as I said above, 'blah' still can issue 'startx' with no apparent problems at all! Well, this is interesting, though probably not related to the original problem. X should be SUID root -rwsr-sr-x 1 root root 7860 2005-02-23 04:07 /usr/bin/X11/X which is I guess how its supposed to be relocating the log files. Can you confirm that your permissions match: drwxr-xr-x 14 root root 4096 2005-04-02 11:42 /var/log Justin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: [Logcheck-devel] Bug#302689: treats non-zero egrep exit status as failure
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 302689 serious Bug#302689: treats non-zero egrep exit status as failure Severity set to `serious'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#302685: After removing gdm 'startx' wont start X
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ls -l /var/log | grep XFree -rw-r--r-- 1 rootroot 40196 Apr 3 00:44 XFree86.0.log -rw-r--r-- 1 rootroot 40078 Apr 3 00:43 XFree86.0.log.old this is not a problem since X is setuid root (which means it start with root permissions whatever user start it). You should looks after file in the user for which it fails : ls -l .X* I would do: mkdir ~/backup mv ~/.Xautthority ~/backup then retry startx. Well those are just mind reading guesses. If you send me logs, output and errors it may be easier to help out with this problem. Though this is not a gdm bug. gdm does not mess with those files (be they /var/lo g/XFree.0.log or ~/.Xauthority ). It just check your passward and start X. Cheers Alban -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#302689: [Logcheck-devel] Bug#302689: Patch for logcheck handling egrep return incorrectly
On Sat, Apr 02, 2005 at 05:46:42PM +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote: Package: logcheck Version: 1.2.36 Followup-For: Bug #302689 Logcheck will produce spurious errors at the moment, because egrep returns 2 on error but 1 if no lines are returned. A patch is attached to fix this. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.11.6 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Versions of packages logcheck depends on: ii adduser 3.63Add and remove users and groups ii cron 3.0pl1-87 management of regular background p ii debconf [debconf 1.4.47 Debian configuration management sy ii debianutils 2.13.2 Miscellaneous utilities specific t ii exim [mail-trans 3.36-14 An MTA (Mail Transport Agent) ii lockfile-progs 0.1.10 Programs for locking and unlocking ii logcheck-databas 1.2.36 A database of system log rules for ii logtail 1.2.36 Print log file lines that have not ii mailx1:8.1.2-0.20040524cvs-4 A simple mail user agent ii sysklogd [system 1.4.1-16System Logging Daemon -- debconf information: * logcheck/noroot: logcheck/changes: * logcheck/install-note: --- /usr/sbin/logcheck2005-03-31 03:08:41.0 +0100 +++ logcheck 2005-04-02 17:40:49.0 +0100 @@ -379,8 +379,8 @@ debug cleanchecked - dir - $clean for file in $(ls -1 $clean/); do debug cleanchecked - dir - $clean/$file - (egrep --text -v -f $clean/$file $TMPDIR/checked \ - || warn Could not process file $file) | cat \ + (egrep --text -v -f $clean/$file $TMPDIR/checked; + if [[ $? == 2 ]]; then warn Could not process file $file; fi) | cat \ $TMPDIR/checked.1 \ || error Could not output to $TMPDIR/checked.1 Disk Full? mv $TMPDIR/checked.1 $TMPDIR/checked \ Thanks a lot for the patch, I will get this out shortly. -- [ Todd J. Troxell ,''`. Student, Debian GNU/Linux Developer, SysAdmin, Geek : :' : http://debian.org || http://rapidpacket.com/~xtat`. `' `- ] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#302771: libsmbclient: File listings against WinXP servers still broken
Package: libsmbclient Version: 3.0.11-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable First off, I believe this maybe related to to the patch to fix #29771, but I'm not certain. Anyway, connecting using smbclient on the command line or libsmclient apps (e.g., konqeuror) results in incomplete directory listings against at least WinXP servers. I haven't tried any others (save for Samba 3.0.11), as I don't have any other Windows servers to test against. Downgrading to Samba 3.0.10-1 fixes this. Adam -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.10-9-amd64-k8 Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages libsmbclient depends on: ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-20.0.0.1.pure64 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libcomerr2 1.37-1common error description library ii libkrb53 1.3.6-1 MIT Kerberos runtime libraries ii libldap2 2.1.30-3 OpenLDAP libraries -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#302633: marked as done (broken dependencies keep it out of testing)
Your message dated Sat, 02 Apr 2005 16:02:13 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#302633: fixed in lessdisks 0.5.3cvs.20040906-15 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Apr 2005 02:04:09 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Apr 01 18:04:09 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from kitenet.net [64.62.161.42] (postfix) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DHXzd-0005uA-00; Fri, 01 Apr 2005 18:04:09 -0800 Received: from dragon.kitenet.net (unknown [66.168.94.177]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN Joey Hess, Issuer Joey Hess (verified OK)) by kitenet.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10ECB17FEB for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 2 Apr 2005 02:04:07 + (GMT) Received: by dragon.kitenet.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id EDE876E108; Fri, 1 Apr 2005 16:07:10 -1000 (HST) Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2005 16:07:09 -1000 From: Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: broken dependencies keep it out of testing Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=wq9mPyueHGvFACwf Content-Disposition: inline X-Reportbug-Version: 3.9 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: --wq9mPyueHGvFACwf Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary=bp/iNruPH9dso1Pn Content-Disposition: inline --bp/iNruPH9dso1Pn Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Package: lessdisks Severity: serious Justification: makes package unsuitable for release Version: 0.5.3cvs.20040906-11 Tags: patch I think it would be a shame if sarge release w/o lessdisks in it. For one thing, debian-edu needs lessdisks and it would be easier over there if it were in sarge proper. For another, when I'm not using debian-edu or full lessdisks, I still find initrd-netboot-tools very useful for ad-hoc setting up of various arches netboot machines. Some broken dependencies are keeping the packages out of sarge though: kernel-image-netbootable/i386 unsatisfiable Depends: kernel-image-2.4-g= eneric | kernel-image-2.6-generic | kernel-image-netboot | not+alpha not+alpha (and not+i386) were provided by type-handling, but that was deprecated and dropped. There are other ways to accomplish it, and the attached patch does it by making kernel-image-netbootable arch all and having separate dependency lines for each supported architecture. For unsupported/untested architectures, I choose to make it depend on nothi= ng, although this could be handled better. But I happen to have a lot of information about using lessdisks on other arches than i386 and alpha, so see a future bug report with info about nfs rooted systems on hppa, mipsel, sparc, and ia64! Anyway, I hope the attached patch can be quickly applied and lessdisks can = get into sarge. I took the liberty of setting the urgency to medium in the changelog; I think that would be an appropriate urgency if lessdisks were uploaded with only my patch and no other changes, since the current version has been excessively well tested by its 65 day long wait in unstable. --=20 see shy jo --bp/iNruPH9dso1Pn Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=deps.patch Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable diff -ur --new-file old/lessdisks-0.5.3cvs.20040906/debian/changelog lessdi= sks-0.5.3cvs.20040906/debian/changelog --- old/lessdisks-0.5.3cvs.20040906/debian/changelog2005-04-01 12:59:56.00= 000 -1000 +++ lessdisks-0.5.3cvs.20040906/debian/changelog2005-04-01 16:02:19.00= 000 -1000 @@ -1,3 +1,11 @@ +lessdisks (0.5.3cvs.20040906-12) unstable; urgency=3Dmedium + + * Make kernel-image-netbootable arch all so it can have different deps p= er +architectire. The deps for each architecture are listed in a new file,= =20 +debian/depends.netbootable. + + -- Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri, 1 Apr 2005 16:01:10 -1000 + lessdisks (0.5.3cvs.20040906-11) unstable; urgency=3Dmedium =20 * Fix (for real this time) the bugs
Bug#276974: marked as done (qt-embedded-free: FTBFS: invalid conversion from `SQLINTEGER*' to `long int*')
Your message dated Sat, 02 Apr 2005 23:14:06 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line qt-embedded-free is removed from unstable has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Oct 2004 20:20:52 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Oct 17 13:20:52 2004 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from pd95d134d.dip.t-dialin.net (stigge.org) [217.93.19.77] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1CJHWO-0005Df-00; Sun, 17 Oct 2004 13:20:52 -0700 Received: (qmail 25323 invoked from network); 17 Oct 2004 20:20:48 - Received: from unknown (HELO atari.stigge.org) (192.168.1.99) by sbo.stigge.org with SMTP; 17 Oct 2004 20:20:48 - Received: from [192.168.1.99] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by atari.stigge.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1892D10041D31; Sun, 17 Oct 2004 22:20:48 +0200 (CEST) From: Roland Stigge [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: qt-embedded-free: FTBFS: invalid conversion from `SQLINTEGER*' to `long int*' Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2004 22:20:48 +0200 (CEST) Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Package: qt-embedded-free Version: 3.1.2-2 Severity: serious Hi, building the package qt-embedded-free in a clean build environment (with pbuilder) on i386 results in: = [...] g++ -O2 -Wpointer-arith -Wwrite-strings -Wmissing-prototypes -c -pipe -DQWS -fno-exceptions -fno-rtti -fno-exceptions -I/usr/include/mysql -I/usr/include/postgresql -I/usr/include/postgresql/server -Wall -W -D_REENTRANT -fPIC -DQT_NO_DEBUG -DQT_THREAD_SUPPORT -DQT_PLUGIN -DQT_SHARED -I/tmp/buildd/qt-embedded-free-3.1.2/mkspecs/qws/linux-x86-g++ -I. -I../../../../include -I.moc/release-shared-mt-emb-x86/ -o .obj/main.o main.cpp g++ -O2 -Wpointer-arith -Wwrite-strings -Wmissing-prototypes -c -pipe -DQWS -fno-exceptions -fno-rtti -fno-exceptions -I/usr/include/mysql -I/usr/include/postgresql -I/usr/include/postgresql/server -Wall -W -D_REENTRANT -fPIC -DQT_NO_DEBUG -DQT_THREAD_SUPPORT -DQT_PLUGIN -DQT_SHARED -I/tmp/buildd/qt-embedded-free-3.1.2/mkspecs/qws/linux-x86-g++ -I. -I../../../../include -I.moc/release-shared-mt-emb-x86/ -o .obj/qsql_odbc.o ../../../../src/sql/drivers/odbc/qsql_odbc.cpp ../../../../src/sql/drivers/odbc/qsql_odbc.cpp: In function `QString qGetStringData(void*, int, int, bool, bool)': ../../../../src/sql/drivers/odbc/qsql_odbc.cpp:219: error: invalid conversion from `SQLINTEGER*' to `long int*' [...] ../../../../src/sql/drivers/odbc/qsql_odbc.cpp:1001: error: invalid conversion from `SQLINTEGER*' to `long int*' ../../../../src/sql/drivers/odbc/qsql_odbc.cpp:1017: error: invalid conversion from `SQLINTEGER*' to `long int*' make[4]: *** [.obj/qsql_odbc.o] Error 1 make[4]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/qt-embedded-free-3.1.2/plugins/src/sqldrivers/odbc' make[3]: *** [sub-odbc] Error 2 make[3]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/qt-embedded-free-3.1.2/plugins/src/sqldrivers' make[2]: *** [sub-sqldrivers] Error 2 make[2]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/qt-embedded-free-3.1.2/plugins/src' make[1]: *** [sub-plugins] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/qt-embedded-free-3.1.2' make: *** [qt-shared-stamp] Error 2 = Thanks for considering. --- Received: (at 276974-done) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Apr 2005 21:12:21 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Apr 02 13:12:21 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from focus.syskonzept.net [85.131.168.32] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DHpun-0003jL-00; Sat, 02 Apr 2005 13:12:21 -0800 Received: from p54a2c0f0.dip.t-dialin.net ([84.162.192.240] helo=o2.net.philkern.de) by focus.syskonzept.net with esmtpsa (TLS-1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_MD5:16) (Exim 4.50) id 1DHpuj-0006l9-4n; Sat, 02 Apr 2005 21:12:17 + Subject: qt-embedded-free is removed from unstable From: Philipp Kern [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: text/plain Organization: The Debian Project Date: Sat, 02 Apr 2005 23:14:06 +0200
Bug#276974: qt-embedded-free is removed from unstable
Dear bug submitter, qt-embedded-free is now removed from the unstable distribution and it was not in testing. Please see bug #300502[1]. Thus I am closing this RC bug report now. Regards, Philipp Kern Debian Developer [1] http://bugs.debian.org/300502 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#299922: marked as done (mailscanner: lock/pid file location violates fhs)
Your message dated Sat, 02 Apr 2005 17:02:58 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#299922: fixed in mailscanner 4.40.11-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Mar 2005 11:57:03 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Mar 17 03:57:03 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from (feyerabend.lis.bremen.de) [134.102.64.25] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DBtcc-0002GS-00; Thu, 17 Mar 2005 03:57:03 -0800 Received: from wollie by feyerabend.lis.bremen.de with local (Exim 4.44) id 1DBtL8-SO-Hl for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 17 Mar 2005 12:38:58 +0100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Wolfgang Kohnen [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: mailscanner: lock/pid file location violates fhs X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8 Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2005 12:38:58 +0100 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-lis.bremen.de-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-MailScanner-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: mailscanner Version: 4.38.10-1 Severity: serious Justification: fhs Hello, with the default configuration, mailscanner uses /tmp as the directory holding pid and lock files. Since these dirs are world writeable, this is a security concern. It should use /var/run/mailscanner instead. I think this bug should be fixed downstream and be reported upstream as well. Greetings, Wollie -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.8 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) Versions of packages mailscanner depends on: ii debconf 1.4.30.11 Debian configuration management sy ii exim4 4.44-2 metapackage to ease exim MTA (v4) ii exim4-daemon-heavy [mail-tran 4.44-2 exim MTA (v4) daemon with extended ii libarchive-zip-perl 1.14-1 Module for manipulation of ZIP arc ii libcompress-zlib-perl 1.34-1 Perl module for creation and manip ii libconvert-binhex-perl1.119-2Perl5 module for extracting data f ii libconvert-tnef-perl 0.17-4 Perl module to read TNEF files ii libhtml-parser-perl 3.45-1 A collection of modules that parse ii libmime-perl 5.417-1Perl5 modules for MIME-compliant m ii libnet-cidr-perl 0.10-1 Manipulate IPv4/IPv6 netblocks in ii perl 5.8.4-6Larry Wall's Practical Extraction ii spamassassin 3.0.2-1Perl-based spam filter using text ii ucf 1.14 Update Configuration File: preserv ii unzip 5.52-1 De-archiver for .zip files ii wget 1.9.1-8retrieves files from the web -- debconf information: mailscanner/v3_upgrade: Don't upgrade --- Received: (at 299922-close) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Apr 2005 22:09:36 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Apr 02 14:09:36 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from gluck.debian.org [192.25.206.10] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DHqoB-0007lB-00; Sat, 02 Apr 2005 14:09:36 -0800 Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by gluck.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DHqoB-0007tb-00; Sat, 02 Apr 2005 15:09:35 -0700 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DHqhm-j8-00; Sat, 02 Apr 2005 17:02:58 -0500 From: Matthias Klose [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $ Subject: Bug#299922: fixed in mailscanner 4.40.11-1 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sat, 02 Apr 2005 17:02:58 -0500 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no
Bug#302771: I can confirm this.
tag +fixed-upstream thanks, I've installed the libsmbclient-3.13 deb from Samba.org at: deb http://us2.samba.org/samba/ftp/Binary_Packages/Debian/samba3/ stable main and I this bug is fixed (if you use gnome you have to restart gnome-vfs-daemon) Regards, Emilio El dom, 03-04-2005 a las 01:59 +0200, Emilio Jesus Gallego Arias escribi: Package: libsmbclient Version: 3.0.11-1 Followup-For: Bug #302771 Just to say I can reproduce this bug. I can provide any extra information you want. Regards, Emilio -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.10-1-k7 Locale: LANG=es_ES.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=es_ES.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages libsmbclient depends on: ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-20 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libcomerr2 1.37-1 common error description library ii libkrb531.3.6-1 MIT Kerberos runtime libraries ii libldap22.1.30-3 OpenLDAP libraries -- no debconf information
Processed: tagging 302771
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 302771 + fixed-upstream Bug#302771: libsmbclient: File listings against WinXP servers still broken There were no tags set. Tags added: fixed-upstream End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#302797: libspoon-perl depends on libio-all-perl, which is not in the archive
Package: libspoon-perl Severity: grave # apt-get install libspoon-perl Reading Package Lists... Done Building Dependency Tree... Done Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable distribution that some required packages have not yet been created or been moved out of Incoming. Since you only requested a single operation it is extremely likely that the package is simply not installable and a bug report against that package should be filed. The following information may help to resolve the situation: The following packages have unmet dependencies: libspoon-perl: Depends: libio-all-perl (= 0.33) but it is not installable E: Broken packages # I can't even find any mention of libio-all-perl in the NEW queue. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-686 Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#302689: marked as done (treats non-zero egrep exit status as failure)
Your message dated Sat, 02 Apr 2005 19:32:08 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#302689: fixed in logcheck 1.2.37 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Apr 2005 11:20:23 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Apr 02 03:20:23 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from gluck.debian.org [192.25.206.10] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DHgfu-0001du-00; Sat, 02 Apr 2005 03:20:22 -0800 Received: from starnet.skynet.com.pl (skynet.skynet.com.pl) [213.25.173.230] by gluck.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DHgfs-0003P2-00; Sat, 02 Apr 2005 04:20:21 -0700 Received: from spider.ds11.agh.edu.pl ([149.156.124.11] helo=melina11.ds11.agh.edu.pl) by skynet.skynet.com.pl with asmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1DHgch-0008Mf-00; Sat, 02 Apr 2005 13:17:03 +0200 Received: from porridge by melina11.ds11.agh.edu.pl with local (Exim kuku 4.50) id 1DHggc-0002n3-HX; Sat, 02 Apr 2005 13:21:06 +0200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Marcin Owsiany [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: treats non-zero egrep exit status as failure X-Mailer: reportbug 3.9 Date: Sat, 02 Apr 2005 13:21:06 +0200 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Scanner: exiscan *1DHgch-0008Mf-00*tHvwUkWdW52* Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: logcheck Version: 1.2.36 Severity: important Tags: patch debdiff logcheck_1.2.35.dsc logcheck_1.2.36.dsc shows this among other changes: - egrep --text -v -f $clean/$file $TMPDIR/checked | cat \ -$TMPDIR/checked.1 \ - || error Could not output to TMPDIR/checked.1 Disk Full? + (egrep --text -v -f $clean/$file $TMPDIR/checked \ + || warn Could not process file $file) | cat \ +$TMPDIR/checked.1 \ + || error Could not output to $TMPDIR/checked.1 Disk Full? However this causes spurious reports looking like this: | System Events | =-=-=-=-=-=-= | | | Logcheck Warnings | =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= | Could not process file spamassassin | This is because egrep returns 1 if no lines are found: | DIAGNOSTICS |Normally, exit status is 0 if selected lines are found and 1 otherwise. |But the exit status is 2 if an error occurred, unless the -q or --quiet |or --silent option is used and a selected line is found. The quick fix is to simply revert that change. A better one would be to write a more elaborate condition on whether egrep returned exit code 2. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.4.27-2-k7 Locale: LANG=pl_PL, LC_CTYPE=pl_PL (charmap=ISO-8859-2) Versions of packages logcheck depends on: ii adduser 3.63Add and remove users and groups ii cron 3.0pl1-87 management of regular background p ii debconf [debconf 1.4.47 Debian configuration management sy ii debianutils 2.13.2 Miscellaneous utilities specific t ii exim44.50-4 metapackage to ease exim MTA (v4) ii exim4-daemon-hea 4.50-4 exim MTA (v4) daemon with extended ii lockfile-progs 0.1.10 Programs for locking and unlocking ii logcheck-databas 1.2.36 A database of system log rules for ii logtail 1.2.36 Print log file lines that have not ii mailx1:8.1.2-0.20040524cvs-4 A simple mail user agent ii sysklogd [system 1.4.1-16System Logging Daemon -- debconf information: logcheck/changes: * logcheck/install-note: --- Received: (at 302689-close) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Apr 2005 00:38:59 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Apr 02 16:38:59 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from gluck.debian.org [192.25.206.10] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DHt8l-0002wx-00; Sat, 02 Apr 2005 16:38:59 -0800
Bug#302801: lessdisks: package fails to install
Package: lessdisks Version: 0.5.3cvs.20040906-15 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable i first tried downloading -14 from unstable, and it failed to install. then i tried -15 from incoming.debian.org, which also failed to install. the error message went a little something like this: Selecting previously deselected package lessdisks. (Reading database ... 149346 files and directories currently installed.) Preparing to replace lessdisks 0.5.3cvs.20040906-14 (using .../lessdisks_0.5.3cvs.20040906-15_all.deb) ... Unpacking replacement lessdisks ... Setting up lessdisks (0.5.3cvs.20040906-15) ... dpkg: error processing lessdisks (--configure): subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 10 Errors were encountered while processing: lessdisks E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) it would be really cool if the package could actually install, without me having to do extensive troubleshooting, especially every time a new release is made :P live well, vagrant -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (400, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-686 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Versions of packages lessdisks depends on: ii adduser 3.63 Add and remove users and groups ii binutils2.15-5 The GNU assembler, linker and bina ii coreutils [shelluti 5.2.1-2 The GNU core utilities ii debootstrap 0.2.45-0.2 Bootstrap a basic Debian system ii lessdisks-easydialo 0.5.3cvs.20040906-14 flexible diskless (x)terminal syst ii nfs-kernel-server [ 1:1.0.6-3.1 Kernel NFS server support ii shellutils 5.2.1-2 The GNU shell programming utilitie ii wget1.9.1-8 retrieves files from the web -- no debconf information pgp5bihG2O9bG.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#302741: Bug #302741 - scilab: Scilab starts with a very small window and an unreadable small font
Does the problem still happens if you set bitmap to no in: dpkg-reconfigure fotnconfig Else can you check that your dpi settings is sensible (either in gnome font properties advanced or in /var/log/XFree.0.log). You can also try some of the tests in : http://necrotic.deadbeast.net/xsf/XFree86/trunk/debian/local/FAQ.xhtml The problme does not come from scilab but resolving this issue may help to enforce the installation of a proper font for scilab (or avoid a broken one until it is fixed). Cheers Alban -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#302801: lessdisks: package fails to install
the error message went a little something like this: Selecting previously deselected package lessdisks. (Reading database ... 149346 files and directories currently installed.) Preparing to replace lessdisks 0.5.3cvs.20040906-14 (using .../lessdisks_0.5.3cvs.20040906-15_all.deb) ... Unpacking replacement lessdisks ... Setting up lessdisks (0.5.3cvs.20040906-15) ... dpkg: error processing lessdisks (--configure): subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 10 Errors were encountered while processing: lessdisks E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) i just noticed that /var/lib/dpkg/info/lessdisks.config is missing... that would make it hard to run the configure script! live well, vagrant pgplkmsSpJUBb.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#301372: marked as done (kernel-source-2.6.8: [CAN-2005-0839] Insecure restriction of access to the N_MOUSE line disciple for TTYs)
Your message dated Sat, 02 Apr 2005 21:17:36 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#301372: fixed in kernel-source-2.6.11 2.6.11-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Mar 2005 12:37:20 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Mar 25 04:37:20 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from inutil.org (vserver151.vserver151.serverflex.de) [193.22.164.111] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DEo40-0005rI-00; Fri, 25 Mar 2005 04:37:20 -0800 Received: from p54894427.dip.t-dialin.net ([84.137.68.39] helo=localhost.localdomain) by vserver151.vserver151.serverflex.de with esmtpsa (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.44) id 1DEo3y-0001kf-H0 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 25 Mar 2005 13:37:18 +0100 Received: from jmm by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.50) id 1DEo3u-0001sl-HX; Fri, 25 Mar 2005 13:37:14 +0100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Moritz Muehlenhoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: kernel-source-2.6.8: [CAN-2005-0839] Insecure restriction of access to the N_MOUSE line disciple for TTYs X-Mailer: reportbug 3.9 Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2005 13:37:14 +0100 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 84.137.68.39 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on vserver151.vserver151.serverflex.de); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: kernel-source-2.6.8 Version: 2.6.8-15 Severity: grave Tags: security Kernels before 2.6.11 do not properly restrict access to the N_MOUSE line disciple for TTYs, which allows local users to inject mouse or keyboard events into other's users sessions and possibly gain extended privileges. A fix is referenced at http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CAN-2005-0839 (I currently don't have a mouse and typing Bitkeeper web URLs is too weird :-)) Cheers, Moritz -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.11 Locale: LANG=C, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) Versions of packages kernel-source-2.6.8 depends on: ii binutils 2.15-5 The GNU assembler, linker and bina ii bzip2 1.0.2-5high-quality block-sorting file co ii coreutils [fileutils] 5.2.1-2The GNU core utilities --- Received: (at 301372-close) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Apr 2005 02:30:35 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Apr 02 18:30:35 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from gluck.debian.org [192.25.206.10] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DHusl-0005RX-00; Sat, 02 Apr 2005 18:30:35 -0800 Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by gluck.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DHusk-0002uL-00; Sat, 02 Apr 2005 19:30:34 -0700 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DHugC-0008LG-00; Sat, 02 Apr 2005 21:17:36 -0500 From: Andres Salomon [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $ Subject: Bug#301372: fixed in kernel-source-2.6.11 2.6.11-2 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sat, 02 Apr 2005 21:17:36 -0500 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2 Source: kernel-source-2.6.11 Source-Version: 2.6.11-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of kernel-source-2.6.11, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: kernel-doc-2.6.11_2.6.11-2_all.deb to pool/main/k/kernel-source-2.6.11/kernel-doc-2.6.11_2.6.11-2_all.deb kernel-patch-debian-2.6.11_2.6.11-2_all.deb to
Bug#302352: marked as done (kernel-source-2.6.8: possible local DoS in AIO on PPC64 and IA64 (CAN-2005-0916))
Your message dated Sat, 02 Apr 2005 21:17:36 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#302352: fixed in kernel-source-2.6.11 2.6.11-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 31 Mar 2005 11:58:15 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Mar 31 03:58:15 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mail-out.m-online.net [212.18.0.9] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DGyJT-0001u4-00; Thu, 31 Mar 2005 03:58:15 -0800 Received: from mail.m-online.net (svr20.m-online.net [192.168.3.148]) by mail-out.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4F1E76FC; Thu, 31 Mar 2005 13:58:13 +0200 (CEST) Received: from k.local (ppp-82-135-12-44.mnet-online.de [82.135.12.44]) by mail.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89C86657D1; Thu, 31 Mar 2005 13:58:13 +0200 (CEST) Received: from stf by k.local with local (Exim 4.50) id 1DGyJP-0003zs-Eh; Thu, 31 Mar 2005 13:58:11 +0200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Stefan Fritsch [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: kernel-source-2.6.8: possible local DoS in AIO on PPC64 and IA64 (CAN-2005-0916) X-Mailer: reportbug 3.9 Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2005 13:58:11 +0200 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: kernel-source-2.6.8 Version: 2.6.8-15 Severity: critical Tags: security CAN-2005-0916 reads: AIO in the Linux kernel 2.6.11 on the PPC64 or IA64 architectures with CONFIG_HUGETLB_PAGE enabled allows local users to cause a denial of service (system panic) via a process that executes the io_queue_init function but exits without running io_queue_release, which causes exit_aio and is_hugepage_only_range to fail. The vulnerable code is also in 2.6.8 but not in 2.4.27. Please mention the CAN number in the changelog. See also: http://groups-beta.google.com/group/linux.kernel/browse_thread/thread/13b43bd5783842f6/7ce3c5a514a497ab?q=io_queue_initrnum=3#7ce3c5a514a497ab http://linux.bkbits.net:8080/linux-2.6/cset%404248c8c0es30_4YVdwa6vteKi7h_nw --- Received: (at 302352-close) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Apr 2005 02:32:57 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Apr 02 18:32:57 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from gluck.debian.org [192.25.206.10] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DHuv3-0005YV-00; Sat, 02 Apr 2005 18:32:57 -0800 Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by gluck.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DHuv2-0008Nl-00; Sat, 02 Apr 2005 19:32:56 -0700 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DHugC-0008LQ-00; Sat, 02 Apr 2005 21:17:36 -0500 From: Andres Salomon [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $ Subject: Bug#302352: fixed in kernel-source-2.6.11 2.6.11-2 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sat, 02 Apr 2005 21:17:36 -0500 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 6 Source: kernel-source-2.6.11 Source-Version: 2.6.11-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of kernel-source-2.6.11, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: kernel-doc-2.6.11_2.6.11-2_all.deb to pool/main/k/kernel-source-2.6.11/kernel-doc-2.6.11_2.6.11-2_all.deb kernel-patch-debian-2.6.11_2.6.11-2_all.deb to pool/main/k/kernel-source-2.6.11/kernel-patch-debian-2.6.11_2.6.11-2_all.deb kernel-source-2.6.11_2.6.11-2.diff.gz to pool/main/k/kernel-source-2.6.11/kernel-source-2.6.11_2.6.11-2.diff.gz kernel-source-2.6.11_2.6.11-2.dsc to pool/main/k/kernel-source-2.6.11/kernel-source-2.6.11_2.6.11-2.dsc kernel-source-2.6.11_2.6.11-2_all.deb to pool/main/k/kernel-source-2.6.11/kernel-source-2.6.11_2.6.11-2_all.deb
Bug#302801: lessdisks: package fails to install
also, /var/lib/dpkg/info/lessdisks.templates is missing. this is probably causing a problem when lessdisks.postinst tries to do a db_get on numerous lessdisks values (in addItems function) and fails because there is no such value in debconf. these sorts of things would readily show themselves by simply installing the package before uploading it to debian... :P live well, vagrant pgpbVMCEAomFK.pgp Description: PGP signature
Processed: tagging 295554, closing 295554
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10 tags 295554 - sarge Bug#295554: can't remove the package Tags were: sarge patch Tags removed: sarge close 295554 Bug#295554: can't remove the package 'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing. Bug closed, send any further explanations to Robert Millan [EMAIL PROTECTED] End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#302810: ktrack: not able to install, linked against hamlib2
Package: ktrack Version: 0.3.0-alpha1-6 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (300, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.1020050221 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# apt-get install hamlib2 Reading Package Lists... Done Building Dependency Tree... Done Package hamlib2 is not available, but is referred to by another package. This may mean that the package is missing, has been obsoleted, or is only available from another source E: Package hamlib2 has no installation candidate [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# and ktrack requires hamlib2 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#302685: After removing gdm 'startx' wont start X
to answer your questions, Justin, [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ls -l /var | grep log drwxr-xr-x 8 root root 4096 Apr 3 13:49 log [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ whereis XFree86 XFree86: /usr/X11R6/bin/XFree86 /usr/bin/X11/XFree86 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ls -l /usr/X11R6/bin/ | grep X -rwsr-sr-x 1 root root7860 Dec 16 03:19 X -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 1745740 Dec 16 03:19 XFree86 -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 27494 Dec 16 03:13 Xmark -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 4396016 Feb 20 21:27 Xprt [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ls -l /usr/bin/X11/ | grep X -rwsr-sr-x 1 root root7860 Dec 16 03:19 X -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 1745740 Dec 16 03:19 XFree86 -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 27494 Dec 16 03:13 Xmark -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 4396016 Feb 20 21:27 Xprt when I was testing if a normal user could start XFree86 I just typed 'XFree86' at the command prompt. It is not setuid root, so it gave me the errors. I just tried issuing 'X' as 'leszek' and 'blah' and both can do it. To answer your question, Alben, 1) removing .Xauthority didn't change anything 2) here are last lines of XFree86.0.log for both successful run ( with gdm installed ) and unsuccessful one: a) successful: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/var/log$ cat /var/log/XFree86.0.log | tail -n 20 (**) LIRC-Mouse: ZAxisMapping: buttons 4 and 5 (**) LIRC-Mouse: Buttons: 5 (**) Option BaudRate 1200 (**) LIRC-Mouse: BaudRate: 1200 (II) XINPUT: Adding extended input device LIRC-Mouse (type: MOUSE) (II) XINPUT: Adding extended input device Generic Mouse (type: MOUSE) (II) XINPUT: Adding extended input device Configured Mouse (type: MOUSE) (II) Configured Mouse: ps2EnableDataReporting: succeeded (II) Generic Mouse: ps2EnableDataReporting: succeeded Warning: font renderer for .pcf already registered at priority 0 Warning: font renderer for .pcf.Z already registered at priority 0 Warning: font renderer for .pcf.gz already registered at priority 0 Warning: font renderer for .snf already registered at priority 0 Warning: font renderer for .snf.Z already registered at priority 0 Warning: font renderer for .snf.gz already registered at priority 0 Warning: font renderer for .bdf already registered at priority 0 Warning: font renderer for .bdf.Z already registered at priority 0 Warning: font renderer for .bdf.gz already registered at priority 0 Warning: font renderer for .pmf already registered at priority 0 Could not init font path element unix/:7100, removing from list! b) unsucessful: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/var/log$ cat XFree86.0.log.old | tail -n 20 (**) Option BaudRate 1200 (**) LIRC-Mouse: BaudRate: 1200 (II) XINPUT: Adding extended input device LIRC-Mouse (type: MOUSE) (II) XINPUT: Adding extended input device Generic Mouse (type: MOUSE) (II) XINPUT: Adding extended input device Configured Mouse (type: MOUSE) (II) Configured Mouse: ps2EnableDataReporting: succeeded (II) Generic Mouse: ps2EnableDataReporting: succeeded Warning: font renderer for .pcf already registered at priority 0 Warning: font renderer for .pcf.Z already registered at priority 0 Warning: font renderer for .pcf.gz already registered at priority 0 Warning: font renderer for .snf already registered at priority 0 Warning: font renderer for .snf.Z already registered at priority 0 Warning: font renderer for .snf.gz already registered at priority 0 Warning: font renderer for .bdf already registered at priority 0 Warning: font renderer for .bdf.Z already registered at priority 0 Warning: font renderer for .bdf.gz already registered at priority 0 Warning: font renderer for .pmf already registered at priority 0 Could not init font path element unix/:7100, removing from list! (II) RADEON(0): [drm] removed 1 reserved context for kernel (II) RADEON(0): [drm] unmapping 8192 bytes of SAREA 0xe0a37000 at 0xb5d93000 Let me know what other logs you need. L. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: tagging 301891
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10 tags 301891 security Bug#301891: bandersnatch-frontend: config file should be in /etc There were no tags set. Tags added: security End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#302801: lessdisks: package fails to install
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 03-04-2005 05:04, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: also, /var/lib/dpkg/info/lessdisks.templates is missing. Thanks for noticing. this is probably causing a problem when lessdisks.postinst tries to do a db_get on numerous lessdisks values (in addItems function) and fails because there is no such value in debconf. Yes, I am aware this is an error, thanks you. these sorts of things would readily show themselves by simply installing the package before uploading it to debian... :P If I suspected problems of this kind then yes it would make sense to test that the debconf questions worked. I tested updating an existing, working lessdisks environment where no debconf questions will normally be asked. Yes, the test client booted fine afterwards. I'll go fix that packaging bug (hints for debconf and arch-any clashing). Thanks for your watching over me. - Jonas - -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist og Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ - Enden er nr: http://www.shibumi.org/eoti.htm -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFCT5KGn7DbMsAkQLgRAukGAJ4uGts98LfGqYI3rEowGljOUZ64XACgnKd2 3mwwn/+PC9hNCuDz1JBUjvw= =h7Jz -END PGP SIGNATURE-
