Processed: Re: Bug#303281: mkinitrd should be updated for libc6 2.3.4 whose ldd changed output format
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 301455 initrd-tools Bug#301455: ldd no longer puts a = before /bin/ld-linux.so.2 Bug reassigned from package `libc6' to `initrd-tools'. severity 303281 important Bug#303281: mkinitrd should be updated for libc6 2.3.4 whose ldd changed output format Severity set to `important'. merge 301455 303281 Bug#301455: ldd no longer puts a = before /bin/ld-linux.so.2 Bug#303281: mkinitrd should be updated for libc6 2.3.4 whose ldd changed output format Merged 301455 303281. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#301356: marked as done (FTBFS because of nspr dependency)
Your message dated Thu, 28 Apr 2005 15:00:10 +0900 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line fixed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Mar 2005 10:59:56 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Mar 25 02:59:55 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mail.aliacom.fr [213.41.82.82] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DEmXj-0005Bh-00; Fri, 25 Mar 2005 02:59:55 -0800 Received: from chienne.aliacom.local (chienne.aliacom.local [192.168.1.38]) by mail.aliacom.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E4C233C75; Fri, 25 Mar 2005 11:59:23 +0100 (CET) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Thomas Cataldo [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: evolution-data-server1.2: FTBS in experimental nspr.h no such file or directory X-Mailer: reportbug 3.9 Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2005 11:59:19 +0100 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: evolution-data-server1.2 Version: 1.1.5-2 Severity: normal I downloaded the source packages of 1.1.6-1 (.dsc, .orig.tar.gz, .diff.gz and .changes) and tried a build with : $ apt-get build-dep evolution-data-server1.2 $ apt-get source -b evolution-data-server1.2 The build fails on e-msgport.c with : e-msgport.c:39:18: nspr.h: No such file or directory I have libnspr-dev installed. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.11 Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages evolution-data-server1.2 depends on: ii libaudiofile0 0.2.6-5 Open-source version of SGI's audio ii libbonobo2-02.8.1-2 Bonobo CORBA interfaces library ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-20 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libcamel1.2-0 1.1.5-2 The Evolution MIME message handlin ii libebook1.2-3 1.1.5-2 Client library for evolution addre ii libecal1.2-21.1.5-2 Client library for evolution calen ii libedata-book1.2-2 1.1.5-2 Backend library for evolution addr ii libedata-cal1.2-1 1.1.5-2 Backend library for evolution cale ii libedataserver1.2-4 1.1.5-2 Utily library for evolution data s ii libegroupwise1.2-4 1.1.5-2 Client library for accessing group ii libesd0 0.2.35-2 Enlightened Sound Daemon - Shared ii libgconf2-4 2.8.1-4 GNOME configuration database syste ii libgcrypt11 1.2.0-11 LGPL Crypto library - runtime libr ii libglib2.0-02.6.3-1 The GLib library of C routines ii libgnome2-0 2.8.1-2 The GNOME 2 library - runtime file ii libgnomevfs2-0 2.8.4-2 The GNOME virtual file-system libr ii libgnutls11 1.0.16-13GNU TLS library - runtime library ii libgpg-error0 1.0-1library for common error values an ii libhowl00.9.8-2 Library for Zeroconf service disco ii libldap22.1.30-3 OpenLDAP libraries ii liborbit2 1:2.12.1-1 libraries for ORBit2 - a CORBA ORB ii libpopt01.7-5lib for parsing cmdline parameters ii libsoup2.2-72.2.2-1 an HTTP library implementation in ii libtasn1-2 0.2.10-4 Manage ASN.1 structures (runtime) ii libxml2 2.6.16-4 GNOME XML library ii zlib1g 1:1.2.2-4compression library - runtime -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 301356-close) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Apr 2005 06:00:43 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Apr 27 23:00:42 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from fourier.airs.net (fourier.northeye.org) [210.150.176.206] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DR24o-0003C0-00; Wed, 27 Apr 2005 23:00:42 -0700 Received: from [192.168.254.200]
Bug#303281: mkinitrd should be updated for libc6 2.3.4 whose ldd changed output format
reassign 301455 initrd-tools
severity 303281 important
merge 301455 303281
thanks
At Wed, 6 Apr 2005 00:13:54 +0300,
George Cristian Birzan wrote:
On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 10:44:12PM +0200, Harald Dunkel wrote:
sed -n 's/.*\(=\)\?[[:blank:]]\+\(\/[^[:blank:]]*\).*/\2/p'
Something like '[:blank:]' is too much gawk. A few weeks ago
I had sent the attached patch.
--- /u/harri/initrd-tools/initrd-tools-0.1.77/mkinitrd 2005-01-23
19:37:41.0 +0100
+++ mkinitrd2005-03-10 16:57:41.933283835 +0100
@@ -1181,7 +1181,16 @@
add_command $i
done
exec 3-
-tmp2 sed 's/.*=[[:blank:]]*\([^[:blank:]]*\).*/\1/'
+tmp2 awk '
+ /[ ]*.*=[ ]*\/[^ ]*.*/ {
+ print $3;
+ next;
+ };
+ /[ ]*\/[^ ]*.*/ {
+ print $1;
+ next;
+ };
+ '
echo /dev/console
echo /dev/null
I don't really care either way, but I think [[:blank:]] works with all
locales. Plus, it's easier to read. :-)
As I wrote in #301455, I plan to put the change to initrd-tools:
sed 's/\(.*=\)\?[[:blank:]]*\(.*\)[[:blank:]]\+\((.*)\)/\2/;/^$/d'
It's just straightforward and small change.
I merged these two reports.
This change also fixes #279382, #292080, #295412, #295422, #297724,
and actual fix covered over the previous workaround e2fsprogs change.
Regards,
-- gotom
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: tagging 303085, closing 303085
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10 tags 303085 - sarge Bug#303085: [Fixed in sid] Brown paper bag bugs Tags were: pending patch sarge Tags removed: sarge # 1.4.3-4 in testing close 303085 Bug#303085: [Fixed in sid] Brown paper bag bugs 'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing. Bug closed, send any further explanations to J.H.M. Dassen (Ray) [EMAIL PROTECTED] Removed pending tag. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#298930: marked as done (tulip: contains non-free fonts)
Your message dated Thu, 28 Apr 2005 02:02:22 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#298930: fixed in tulip 2.0.2-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Mar 2005 18:37:29 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Mar 10 10:37:29 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mailhost.vub.ac.be (dorado.vub.ac.be) [134.184.129.10] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D9SXJ-0004cN-00; Thu, 10 Mar 2005 10:37:29 -0800 Received: from igwe.vub.ac.be (igwe1.vub.ac.be [134.184.49.1]) by dorado.vub.ac.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id B007D146 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 10 Mar 2005 19:36:57 +0100 (CET) Received: from caladan.rave.org ([134.184.49.23]) by igwe.vub.ac.be with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.44) id 1D9SXG-0004ru-5y for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 10 Mar 2005 19:37:26 +0100 Received: from pdewacht by caladan.rave.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1D9SWk-0008B6-V1 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 10 Mar 2005 19:36:55 +0100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Peter De Wachter [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: tulip: contains non-free fonts X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8 Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 19:36:54 +0100 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: tulip Severity: serious Justification: Policy 2.2.1 Tulip contains two non-free fonts, Luxi Sans Regular and Luxi Sans Bold: tulip-2.0.0/library/tulip-ogl/bitmaps/font.ttf tulip-2.0.0/library/tulip-ogl/bitmaps/fontb.ttf These fonts should be removed. To get replacement fonts, you can depend on ttf-bitstream-vera, ttf-freefont, or one of the other font packages in Debian. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.9 Locale: LANG=nl_BE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=nl_BE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) --- Received: (at 298930-close) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Apr 2005 06:08:17 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Apr 27 23:08:17 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DR2C9-0005uO-00; Wed, 27 Apr 2005 23:08:17 -0700 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DR26Q-00083Y-00; Thu, 28 Apr 2005 02:02:22 -0400 From: Yann Dirson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $ Subject: Bug#298930: fixed in tulip 2.0.2-1 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2005 02:02:22 -0400 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Source: tulip Source-Version: 2.0.2-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of tulip, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: libtulip-2.0-dev_2.0.2-1_i386.deb to pool/main/t/tulip/libtulip-2.0-dev_2.0.2-1_i386.deb libtulip-2.0_2.0.2-1_i386.deb to pool/main/t/tulip/libtulip-2.0_2.0.2-1_i386.deb libtulip-ogl-2.0-dev_2.0.2-1_i386.deb to pool/main/t/tulip/libtulip-ogl-2.0-dev_2.0.2-1_i386.deb libtulip-ogl-2.0_2.0.2-1_i386.deb to pool/main/t/tulip/libtulip-ogl-2.0_2.0.2-1_i386.deb libtulip-qt-2.0-dev_2.0.2-1_i386.deb to pool/main/t/tulip/libtulip-qt-2.0-dev_2.0.2-1_i386.deb libtulip-qt-2.0_2.0.2-1_i386.deb to pool/main/t/tulip/libtulip-qt-2.0_2.0.2-1_i386.deb tulip_2.0.2-1.diff.gz to pool/main/t/tulip/tulip_2.0.2-1.diff.gz tulip_2.0.2-1.dsc to pool/main/t/tulip/tulip_2.0.2-1.dsc tulip_2.0.2-1_i386.deb to pool/main/t/tulip/tulip_2.0.2-1_i386.deb tulip_2.0.2.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/t/tulip/tulip_2.0.2.orig.tar.gz A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will
Processed: your mail
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 302711 normal Bug#302711: plib: FTBFS: linker error Severity set to `normal'. -- Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: tagging 305411
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10 tags 305411 patch Bug#305411: cal3d: FTBFS: cp: cannot stat `debian/tmp//usr/share/doc/libcal3d-doc/html/functions_rela.html': No such file or directory There were no tags set. Tags added: patch End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#306639: batik: FTBFS: JAVA_HOME_DIRS incorrect
Hello Arnaud,
On 05-Apr-27 23:07, Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
Thanks for your bug reports, but you have to know that you can't file
FTBFS bugs reports about packages that are in contrib and relay on
packages that are not in Debian to build!
The non-free JDK's are not officially supported so the packages built
with non-free jdk's are not meant to be built 'as is' (I mean without
modification).
I have no problem with wishlist bugs to ease the build of the package on
every arches (which is not needed because these packages are arch: all!)
but this is *not* serious bugs!
I tried to file only those bugs as 'serious' which can be reproduced on
i386. For bugs which are amd64 specific, I usually use 'wishlist' severity.
Of course, I may have made a mistake in some cases.
At least this particular bug occurs on all arches. It is not very nice
to have to read, understand and manually change 'debian/rules' and
maybe some other files to get a package built. In particular, this makes
any kind of autobuilding impossible, which is a bad thing from a
security point of view - and also inconvenient, of course.
For the Java related packages, the {sun,ibm,blackdown}-j2sdk1.x packages
which can be created by make-jpkg from 'java-package' make it easy to
set up an autobuilder, as long as all packages support this by setting
the correct JAVA_HOME directories and by specifying the correct
Build-Depends.
Anyway, I will file those problems as 'wishlist' in the remaining cases.
Some other types of bugs like
'Missing Build-Depends on 'junit' or
'./debian_patch' not executable
also appear on all arches including i386. I think those are 'serious'
FTBFS bugs, even for packages in 'contrib'. What should be done with
those?
Any way, I leave all the bug you reported and will try to upload fixes
as soon as possible.
Thank you for all the fixes to my reports which you already uploaded
and for your work in general!
Regards
Andreas Jochens
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Tagging as pending
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 298960 pending Bug#298960: freewrl: contains non-free fonts There were no tags set. Tags added: pending End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#306534: [Pkg-octave-devel] Bug#306534: FTBFS in experimental
* Andreas Barth [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-04-27 10:44]: please see http://experimental.ftbfs.de/build.php?arch=pkg=octave2.9 for the full build log How frequently does the page above get updated? I am asking because I uploaded yesterday a new version octave2.9 that may fix the problem reported in the buildd logs. Cheers, -- Rafael -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#306739: jakarta-log4j: FTBFS: 'enum' is a keyword, and may not be used as an identifier
Package: jakarta-log4j Version: 1.1.3-6 Severity: serious Tags: patch When trying to build 'jakarta-log4j' in a clean chroot with sun-j2sdk1.5 installed, I get the following error: [javac] /jakarta-log4j-1.1.3/src/java/org/apache/log4j/test/Finalize.java:76: as of release 1.5, 'enum' is a keyword, and may not be used as an identifier [javac] (try -source 1.4 or lower to use 'enum' as an identifier) [javac] ((org.apache.log4j.Appender) enum.nextElement()).close(); [javac]^ [javac] 15 errors BUILD FAILED Please change the Build-Depends in debian/control from 'java2-compiler', which includes 'sun-j2sdk1.5', to 'j2sdk1.4' to make it clear that the package does not build with j2sdk1.5. Alternatively, the sources could be fixed to replace all uses of 'enum' as an identifier with something else like 'en'. Please also change debian/rules to support the correct JAVA_HOME_DIRS which are used by the packages created with make-jpkg from java-package. Regards Andreas Jochens diff -urN ../tmp-orig/jakarta-log4j-1.1.3/debian/control ./debian/control --- ../tmp-orig/jakarta-log4j-1.1.3/debian/control 2005-04-28 09:25:25.878644990 +0200 +++ ./debian/control2005-04-28 09:25:06.379609294 +0200 @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ Section: contrib/libs Priority: optional Maintainer: Debian QA Group [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Build-Depends-Indep: debhelper ( 4.0.0), java2-compiler, libxerces-java +Build-Depends-Indep: debhelper, j2sdk1.4, libxerces-java Standards-Version: 3.5.10 Package: liblog4j-java diff -urN ../tmp-orig/jakarta-log4j-1.1.3/debian/rules ./debian/rules --- ../tmp-orig/jakarta-log4j-1.1.3/debian/rules2005-04-28 09:25:25.879644838 +0200 +++ ./debian/rules 2005-04-28 09:21:07.951855822 +0200 @@ -11,9 +11,8 @@ export VER=1.1.3 -#export JAVA_HOME=/usr/lib/jdk1.1 -export JAVA_HOME=/usr/lib/j2se/1.3/ -#export JAVA_HOME=/usr/lib/j2se/1.4 +JAVA_HOME_DIRS=/usr/lib/j2sdk1.5-sun /usr/lib/j2sdk1.4-sun /usr/lib/j2sdk1.4-ibm /usr/lib/j2sdk1.4-blackdown +export JAVA_HOME ?= $(shell for j in $(JAVA_HOME_DIRS); do [ -d $$j ] echo $$j exit 0; done) export JSHARE=/usr/share/java export BUILDFILE=build/build.xml @@ -26,7 +25,7 @@ #export CLASSPATH=$(JAVA_HOME)/lib/tools.jar:$(ANT_JAR):$(PARSER_JAR) export CLASSPATH=$(JAVA_HOME)/lib/tools.jar:$(ANT_JAR):$(PARSER_JAR) -export BUILD=/usr/bin/java -classpath $(CLASSPATH) \ +export BUILD=$(JAVA_HOME)/bin/java -classpath $(CLASSPATH) \ org.apache.tools.ant.Main -buildfile $(BUILDFILE) export JDEST=debian/liblog4j-java/usr/share/java -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#306595: tetex-bin: postinst failure with jadetex and xmltex
On 27.04.05 Richard Lewis ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Laurent Bonnaud [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hi, fmtutil: running `tex -ini -jobname=xmltex -progname=xmltex latex xmltex.ini' ... This is TeX, Version 3.141592 (Web2C 7.5.4) (INITEX) ---! /var/lib/texmf/web2c/latex.fmt was written by pdfetex (Fatal format file error; I'm stymied) definitely jadetex trying to create its format with Knuth's tex. Jadetex is now at 3.16 in testing, I suggest you do apt-get update and try again. [I'm not the maintainer, just an interested user] I guess tetex needs to conflict with old jadetex? According to the CVS this is already the case (changelog for 3.0-3). I rather guess the changes applied to jadetex has to be applied to xmltex too. Unfortunately I don't see in the logfile, why the format creation for jadetex fails. H. -- sigmentation fault -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#242682: gwydion-dylan [i386] build failure
At one time I was able to reproduce the gwydion-dylan build failure on i386, but now I can't; just today it built successfully under pbuilder. You can probably close this bug now. -- Daniel Schepler Please don't disillusion me. I [EMAIL PROTECTED]haven't had breakfast yet. -- Orson Scott Card -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#306749: libpixie-java: FTBFS: ./debian_patch: Permission denied
Package: libpixie-java
Version: 20030705-3
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
When trying to build 'libpixie-java', I get the following error:
pixie-0.8.0/ant/build.xml
./debian_patch pixie-0.8.0/ant/build.xml
make: execvp: ./debian_patch: Permission denied
make: *** [configure-stamp] Error 127
The attached patch fixes this by changing debian/rules.
Please also amend debian/rules to set JAVA_HOME correctly for
the {sun,ibm,blackdown}-j2sdk1.4.
Regards
Andreas Jochens
diff -urN ../tmp-orig/libpixie-java-20030705/debian/rules ./debian/rules
--- ../tmp-orig/libpixie-java-20030705/debian/rules 2005-04-28
10:53:33.569793750 +0200
+++ ./debian/rules 2005-04-28 10:53:02.999441150 +0200
@@ -4,10 +4,8 @@
#export DH_VERBOSE=1
# Build
-export JAVA_HOME=/usr/lib/j2se/1.4
-export JAVA=/usr/lib/j2se/1.4/bin/java
-export JAVAC=/usr/lib/j2se/1.4/bin/javac
-export CLASSPATH=/usr/lib/j2se/1.4/jre/lib/rt.jar
+JAVA_HOME_DIRS=/usr/lib/j2sdk1.4-sun /usr/lib/j2sdk1.4-ibm
/usr/lib/j2sdk1.4-blackdown
+export JAVA_HOME ?= $(shell for j in $(JAVA_HOME_DIRS); do [ -d $$j ]
echo $$j exit 0; done)
export LIBRARY=pixie
export VERSION=$(shell ls pixie-*.tar.gz | sed 's/pixie-\(.*\).tar.gz/\1/' )
@@ -21,7 +19,7 @@
# Add here commands to configure the package.
mkdir $(SRCDIR)
tar xvzf pixie-$(VERSION).tar.gz
- ./debian_patch $(SRCDIR)/ant/build.xml
+ sh ./debian_patch $(SRCDIR)/ant/build.xml
touch configure-stamp
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#306750: libjakarta-poi-java: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'ant'
Package: libjakarta-poi-java
Version: 1.10.0-3
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
When building 'libjakarta-poi-java' in a clean 'unstable' chroot,
I get the following error:
touch configure-stamp
dh_testdir
(cd jakarta-poi-1.10.0 ant compile jar)
/bin/sh: ant: command not found
make: *** [build-stamp] Error 127
Please add the missing Build-Depends on 'ant' to debian/control.
Please also change debian/rules to set JAVA_HOME correctly for
the {sun,ibm,blackdown}-j2sdk1.4 packages which are created
by make-jpkg from java-package.
Regards
Andreas Jochens
diff -urN ../tmp-orig/libjakarta-poi-java-1.10.0/debian/control ./debian/control
--- ../tmp-orig/libjakarta-poi-java-1.10.0/debian/control 2005-04-28
11:14:55.246949206 +0200
+++ ./debian/control2005-04-28 11:14:10.041821430 +0200
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
Section: contrib/libs
Priority: optional
Maintainer: Christian Bayle [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Build-Depends-Indep: debhelper ( 4.0.0), jikes-sablevm , sablevm, fastjar,
j2sdk1.4, gjdoc
+Build-Depends-Indep: debhelper, ant, jikes-sablevm , sablevm, fastjar,
j2sdk1.4, gjdoc
Standards-Version: 3.5.8
Package: libjakarta-poi-java
diff -urN ../tmp-orig/libjakarta-poi-java-1.10.0/debian/rules ./debian/rules
--- ../tmp-orig/libjakarta-poi-java-1.10.0/debian/rules 2005-04-28
11:14:55.247949054 +0200
+++ ./debian/rules 2005-04-28 11:14:52.954297742 +0200
@@ -5,9 +5,9 @@
# Build
# Choose the VM
-export JAVA_HOME=/usr/lib/j2sdk1.4/
+JAVA_HOME_DIRS=/usr/lib/j2sdk1.4-sun /usr/lib/j2sdk1.4-ibm
/usr/lib/j2sdk1.4-blackdown
+export JAVA_HOME ?= $(shell for j in $(JAVA_HOME_DIRS); do [ -d $$j ]
echo $$j exit 0; done)
export JAVADOC=javadoc
-export CLASSPATH=/usr/lib/j2sdk1.4/jre/lib/rt.jar:/usr/share/java/xerces.jar
export LIBRARY = $(shell head -1 debian/control | sed 's/Source.
lib\(.*\)-java/\1/')
export VERSION = $(shell head -1 debian/changelog | sed
's/.*(\(.*\)-.*).*/\1/' )
export SRCDIR=$(LIBRARY)-$(VERSION)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#306639: batik: FTBFS: JAVA_HOME_DIRS incorrect
On Thu, Apr 28, 2005 at 08:55:01AM +0200, Andreas Jochens wrote: On 05-Apr-27 23:07, Arnaud Vandyck wrote: Thanks for your bug reports, but you have to know that you can't file FTBFS bugs reports about packages that are in contrib and relay on packages that are not in Debian to build! The non-free JDK's are not officially supported so the packages built with non-free jdk's are not meant to be built 'as is' (I mean without modification). I have no problem with wishlist bugs to ease the build of the package on every arches (which is not needed because these packages are arch: all!) but this is *not* serious bugs! I tried to file only those bugs as 'serious' which can be reproduced on i386. For bugs which are amd64 specific, I usually use 'wishlist' severity. Of course, I may have made a mistake in some cases. At least this particular bug occurs on all arches. It is not very nice to have to read, understand and manually change 'debian/rules' and maybe some other files to get a package built. In particular, this makes any kind of autobuilding impossible, which is a bad thing from a security point of view - and also inconvenient, of course. The definition of contrib is free but needs some stuff not in Debian. For any particular package, this stuff may or may not be something packaged in Debian's non-free archive, but the net result is that contrib is not completely autobuildable, and security support for contrib happens only opportunistically. As a result, I don't think it's a release-critical issue to try to force all Java-based contrib packages into an autobuildable state; it's nice if they autobuild, but Java is just one instance of non-Debian stuff. Make-jpkg is the currently favored method of making j2sdk packages available, but none of the half-dozen mutually-incompatible j2sdk packages (including those generated by make-jpkg) are actually distributed by Debian, so I don't think it's fair to require that contrib java packages be buildable with any particular j2sdk package. By all means, please keep filing (and fixing) bugs so that we can get as many contrib packages as possible autobuilding, but especially with the freeze coming soon, I don't think this should be RC for sarge. Some other types of bugs like 'Missing Build-Depends on 'junit' or './debian_patch' not executable also appear on all arches including i386. I think those are 'serious' FTBFS bugs, even for packages in 'contrib'. What should be done with those? I agree that those should be RC, since they are not about packages we don't distribute. Cheers, -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#306639: batik: FTBFS: JAVA_HOME_DIRS incorrect
Hello Steve, On 05-Apr-28 02:56, Steve Langasek wrote: by Debian, so I don't think it's fair to require that contrib java packages be buildable with any particular j2sdk package. By all means, please keep filing (and fixing) bugs so that we can get as many contrib packages as possible autobuilding, but especially with the freeze coming soon, I don't think this should be RC for sarge. OK, I will file the remaining similar issues as 'wishlist' items. Some other types of bugs like 'Missing Build-Depends on 'junit' or './debian_patch' not executable also appear on all arches including i386. I think those are 'serious' FTBFS bugs, even for packages in 'contrib'. What should be done with those? I agree that those should be RC, since they are not about packages we don't distribute. Thank you for clarifying this. Regards Andreas Jochens P.S.: Thanks a lot for the upload of the 'libmysqlclient-lgpl' package with the amd64 fix! -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#304803: still happens 0.10.4-2
This bug still happens building 0.10.4-2 on a sparc pbuilder. -- Blars Blarson [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.blars.org/blars.html With Microsoft, failure is not an option. It is a standard feature. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#306754: libjfreereport-java: transition to liblog4j1.2-java
Package: libjfreereport-java Version: 0.8.3c-3 Severity: serious Tags: patch liblog4j-java is currently unbuildable (#306739) and likely to be removed (#263870); please switch to liblog4j1.2-java. libjfreereport-java comes bundled with log4j 1.2.3, so there shouldn't be any compatibility problems. diff -ruN libjfreereport-java-0.8.3c.dist/debian/control libjfreereport-java-0.8.3c/debian/control --- libjfreereport-java-0.8.3c.dist/debian/control 2005-04-28 11:09:44.0 +0200 +++ libjfreereport-java-0.8.3c/debian/control 2005-04-28 11:53:16.0 +0200 @@ -2,13 +2,13 @@ Section: contrib/libs Priority: optional Maintainer: Christian Bayle [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Build-Depends-Indep: debhelper ( 4.0.0), j2sdk1.4, ant, bsh, libjcommon-java, libgnujaxp-java, libitext-java, libjakarta-poi-java, libpixie-java, liblog4j-java +Build-Depends-Indep: debhelper ( 4.0.0), j2sdk1.4, ant, bsh, libjcommon-java, libgnujaxp-java, libitext-java, libjakarta-poi-java, libpixie-java, liblog4j1.2-java Standards-Version: 3.6.1 Package: libjfreereport-java Section: contrib/libs Architecture: all -Depends: j2re1.4 | java2-runtime, libjcommon-java, libgnujaxp-java, libitext-java, libjakarta-poi-java, liblog4j-java +Depends: j2re1.4 | java2-runtime, libjcommon-java, libgnujaxp-java, libitext-java, libjakarta-poi-java, liblog4j1.2-java Description: report library for java JFreeReport is a free Java report library. It has the following features: * full on-screen print preview; diff -ruN libjfreereport-java-0.8.3c.dist/debian_patch libjfreereport-java-0.8.3c/debian_patch --- libjfreereport-java-0.8.3c.dist/debian_patch2005-04-28 11:09:44.0 +0200 +++ libjfreereport-java-0.8.3c/debian_patch 2005-04-28 11:54:39.0 +0200 @@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ perl -pi -e 's:pixie-0\.8\.0\.jar:pixie.jar:g' $1 perl -pi -e 's:jcommon-0\.8\.3\.jar:jcommon.jar:g' $1 perl -pi -e 's:jakarta-poi-1\.10\.0-dev-20030222\.jar:jakarta-poi.jar:g' $1 -perl -pi -e 's:log4j-1\.2\.3\.jar:log4j\.jar:g' $1 +perl -pi -e 's:log4j-1\.2\.3\.jar:log4j-1.2.jar:g' $1 perl -pi -e 's:servlet\.jar:servlet-2.3.jar:g' $1 # BEurk Thanks! Matej -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#306534: marked as done (FTBFS in experimental)
Your message dated Thu, 28 Apr 2005 13:06:23 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#306534: [Pkg-octave-devel] Bug#306534: FTBFS in experimental has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Apr 2005 08:44:49 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Apr 27 01:44:49 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mail-out.m-online.net [212.18.0.9] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DQiA5-0006sX-00; Wed, 27 Apr 2005 01:44:49 -0700 Received: from mail.m-online.net (svr20.m-online.net [192.168.3.148]) by mail-out.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DF849FE7 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 27 Apr 2005 10:44:47 +0200 (CEST) Received: from sol.so.argh.org (ppp-62-245-211-87.mnet-online.de [62.245.211.87]) by mail.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 312B875321 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 27 Apr 2005 10:44:47 +0200 (CEST) Received: from aba by sol.so.argh.org with local (Exim 4.22 #1 (Debian) [+prerelease]) id 1DQi9a-0007NC-Tq for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 27 Apr 2005 10:44:18 +0200 Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2005 10:44:18 +0200 From: Andreas Barth [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: FTBFS in experimental Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Editor: Vim http://www.vim.org/ User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: octave2.9 Version: 2.9.2-1 Severity: serious Tags: experimental Hi, please see http://experimental.ftbfs.de/build.php?arch=pkg=octave2.9 for the full build log Cheers, Andi Automatic build of octave2.9_2.9.2-1 on zx6000 by sbuild/ia64 1.170.5 Build started at 20050427-0113 ** [...] Checking correctness of source dependencies... Toolchain package versions: libc6.1-dev_2.3.2.ds1-21 linux-kernel-headers_2.5.999-test7-bk-17 gcc-3.3_1:3.3.5-12 g++-3.3_1:3.3.5-6 binutils_2.15-5 libstdc++5_1:3.3.5-6 libstdc++5-3.3-dev_1:3.3.5-6 -- make[4]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/octave2.9-2.9.2/scripts/time' /usr/bin/g++ -O2 -o gethelp gethelp.cc -s ./mkdoc . DOCSTRINGS.t mv DOCSTRINGS.t DOCSTRINGS make[3]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/octave2.9-2.9.2/scripts' /usr/bin/make -C doc all make[3]: Entering directory `/build/buildd/octave2.9-2.9.2/doc' /usr/bin/make -C faq all make[4]: Entering directory `/build/buildd/octave2.9-2.9.2/doc/faq' make[4]: Nothing to be done for `all'. make[4]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/octave2.9-2.9.2/doc/faq' /usr/bin/make -C interpreter all make[4]: Entering directory `/build/buildd/octave2.9-2.9.2/doc/interpreter' /usr/bin/make -C ../../src DOCSTRINGS make[5]: Entering directory `/build/buildd/octave2.9-2.9.2/src' making defaults.h from defaults.h.in making oct-conf.h from oct-conf.h.in ../missing flex DLD-FUNCTIONS/gplot.l gplot.cc /bin/sh: ../missing: No such file or directory make[5]: *** [gplot.cc] Error 127 make[5]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/octave2.9-2.9.2/src' make[4]: *** [src-DOCSTRINGS] Error 2 make[4]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/octave2.9-2.9.2/doc/interpreter' make[3]: *** [interpreter] Error 2 make[3]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/octave2.9-2.9.2/doc' make[2]: *** [doc] Error 2 make[2]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/octave2.9-2.9.2' make[1]: *** [all] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/octave2.9-2.9.2' make: *** [make-stamp] Error 2 ** Build finished at 20050427-0154 FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died] --- Received: (at 306534-done) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Apr 2005 11:06:27 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 28 04:06:27 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from kom.psy.mpg.de (kom.mpipf-muenchen.mpg.de) [192.129.1.23] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DR6qh-00041e-00; Thu, 28 Apr 2005 04:06:27 -0700 Received: from amalie.intra.mpipf-muenchen.mpg.de ([10.1.1.2]) by kom.mpipf-muenchen.mpg.de with
Bug#306639: batik: FTBFS: JAVA_HOME_DIRS incorrect
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Thu, 28 Apr 2005 08:55:01 +0200,
Andreas Jochens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Arnaud,
Yo Andreas,
[...]
At least this particular bug occurs on all arches. It is not very nice
to have to read, understand and manually change 'debian/rules' and
maybe some other files to get a package built. In particular, this makes
any kind of autobuilding impossible, which is a bad thing from a
security point of view - and also inconvenient, of course.
I can understand but I still don't think it's that serious.
For the Java related packages, the {sun,ibm,blackdown}-j2sdk1.x packages
which can be created by make-jpkg from 'java-package' make it easy to
set up an autobuilder, as long as all packages support this by setting
the correct JAVA_HOME directories and by specifying the correct
Build-Depends.
I must admit I'm more focused on moving java packages to main than
supporting non-free jdk's ;-)
Anyway, I will file those problems as 'wishlist' in the remaining cases.
Many thanks.
Some other types of bugs like
'Missing Build-Depends on 'junit' or
'./debian_patch' not executable
also appear on all arches including i386. I think those are 'serious'
FTBFS bugs, even for packages in 'contrib'. What should be done with
those?
You are right, those are really serious! and should be corrected asap!
Also, I really appreciate you provide patches when you file bugs, please
continue to do so! :-D
Any way, I leave all the bug you reported and will try to upload fixes
as soon as possible.
Thank you for all the fixes to my reports which you already uploaded
and for your work in general!
Thanks ;-)
- --
.''`.
: :' :rnaud
`. `'
`-
Java Trap: http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/java-trap.html
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFCcMQ04vzFZu62tMIRAi6hAJwLv5acbcIf5oVjThpuPUIspxWrlwCgt/Z7
uIDwtXbqbu9TTSvhfCu+tDo=
=0oV5
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
Bug#306761: jetty-extra: transition to liblog4j1.2-java
Package: jetty-extra Version: 5.0.0-2 Severity: serious Tags: patch, sid liblog4j-java is currently unbuildable (#306739) and likely to be removed (#263870); please switch to liblog4j1.2-java. Since extra/plus/src/org/- mortbay/log4j/CRS.java uses org.apache.log4j.Level, a class found only in liblog4j1.2-java, you should make the transition in any case. diff -ruN jetty-5.0.0.dist/debian/control jetty-5.0.0/debian/control --- jetty-5.0.0.dist/debian/control 2005-04-28 12:42:39.0 +0200 +++ jetty-5.0.0/debian/control 2005-04-28 12:43:42.0 +0200 @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ Section: contrib/web Priority: optional Maintainer: Philipp Meier [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Build-Depends-Indep: j2sdk1.4 | j2sdk1.3, debhelper ( 4.0.0), ant, junit, libmx4j-java, liblog4j-java, libservlet2.3-java, libtomcat4-java, libcommons-logging-java, cdbs ( 0.4.5.3) +Build-Depends-Indep: j2sdk1.4 | j2sdk1.3, debhelper ( 4.0.0), ant, junit, libmx4j-java, liblog4j1.2-java, libservlet2.3-java, libtomcat4-java, libcommons-logging-java, cdbs ( 0.4.5.3) Standards-Version: 3.6.0 Package: jetty @@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ Package: jetty-extra Architecture: all -Depends: jetty, liblog4j-java +Depends: jetty, liblog4j1.2-java Description: Extensions to jetty Provides some extensions of jetty: * JettyPlus: contains a number of useful facilities integrated with Jetty, diff -ruN jetty-5.0.0.dist/debian/rules jetty-5.0.0/debian/rules --- jetty-5.0.0.dist/debian/rules 2005-04-28 12:42:39.0 +0200 +++ jetty-5.0.0/debian/rules2005-04-28 12:43:20.0 +0200 @@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ /usr/lib/j2se/1.3 ANT_HOME := /usr/share/ant -DEB_JARS := mx4j.jar log4j-core.jar /usr/share/ant/lib/ant-launcher.jar log4j.jar +DEB_JARS := mx4j.jar log4j-1.2.jar /usr/share/ant/lib/ant-launcher.jar DEB_ANT_INSTALL_TARGET := extra javadoc Thanks, Matej -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#306765: inn2 - fails to upgrade
Package: inn2 Version: 2.4.2-2 Severity: grave inn2 fails to upgrade if pathdb in inn.conf is not /var/lib/news. | Preparing to replace inn2 2.4.2-1 (using .../archives/inn2_2.4.2-2_i386.deb) ... | Stopping news server: done. | Unpacking replacement inn2 ... | Setting up inn2 (2.4.2-2) ... | Installing new version of config file /etc/news/buffindexed.conf ... | Installing new version of config file /etc/news/radius.conf ... | Installing initial content for /var/lib/news/active | Installing initial content for /var/lib/news/newsgroups | Building history database in /var/lib/news... chown: cannot access `history*': No such file or directory | dpkg: error processing inn2 (--configure): | subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1 | Errors were encountered while processing: | inn2 | E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) | # grep path /etc/news/inn.conf | pathhost: XXX | pathnews: /usr/lib/news | #pathalias: | patharchive:/srv/news/archive | patharticles: /srv/news/articles | pathbin:/usr/lib/news/bin | pathcontrol:/usr/lib/news/bin/control | pathdb: /srv/news/db | pathetc:/etc/news | pathfilter: /etc/news/filter | pathhttp: /var/log/news | pathincoming: /srv/news/incoming | pathlog:/var/log/news | pathoutgoing: /srv/news/outgoing | pathoverview: /srv/news/overview | pathrun:/var/run/news | pathspool: /srv/news | pathtmp:/srv/news/incoming/tmp Bastian -- Conquest is easy. Control is not. -- Kirk, Mirror, Mirror, stardate unknown signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#306739: jakarta-log4j: FTBFS: 'enum' is a keyword, and may not be used as an identifier
Hi, The only packages that haven't moved to liblog4j1.2-java are: * libjfreereport-java: Upstream comes bundled with 1.2.3, so the switch should be painless. Patch at #306754. * jetty-extra: Upstream comes bundled with 1.2.6, and uses features specific to 1.2; Log4J support is either not used or already broken. Naive patch at #306761. I think we can remove jakarta-log4j as soon as #306754 is fixed. Thanks, Matej -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#254122: Bug #254122
Am / On Tue, 19 Apr 2005 23:24:00 +0400 schrieb Al Nikolov [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Package: eroaster Version: 2.2.0-0.8-2 Severity: normal Followup-For: Bug #254122 tags 254122 +patch I hope this would satisfy both sides. This patch adds 2 preference options: transport layer indicators (TLI) for reader and recorder. Instead of using of USE_ATAPI variable in the code there is GUI options now for user interaction. One who wish to use experimental ATAPI feature can set they to ATAPI. In fact, only cdrecord accepts TLI, but no other eroaster's backends: cdda2wav, cdrdao, readcd (please fix me if i'm wrong). Thus, the value of setting TLI to ATAPI for the reader device is under question. Both TLI options are by default, cdrecord will operate on SCSI bus, in an old style fashion (experimental feature disabled). For me, on a machine with kernel 2.6 the patch doesn't work. When I put ATAPI in the TLI-fields, eroaster does not recognize my CD-Rom-drives When I put ATA in the fields the drives are recognized, but trying to burn a Data-CD or just create an image for a data-cd doesn't work. It also didn't work without the patch, so maybe there's only no change and the patch works fine ;-) , but with kernel 2.6.x without scsi-emeulation the program seems to be useless. Here's the output in the xterm, which I started eroaster in (only the lines after clicking on the create-image- or burn-button): image-button: Original exception was: Traceback (most recent call last): File /usr/lib/eroaster/Application.py, line 811, in CreateImage self.BurnCDNow() File /usr/lib/eroaster/Application.py, line 830, in BurnCDNow cdrecord = cdrtools.cdrecord(tli, channel, id, lun, self.devWriter.get_text(), self.cat.get_loglevel()) File /usr/lib/eroaster/cdrtools.py, line 121, in __init__ self.__cdrecord_read_version() File /usr/lib/eroaster/cdrtools.py, line 246, in __cdrecord_read_version for i in range(len(version[1])): IndexError: list index out of range burn-button: Original exception was: Traceback (most recent call last): File /usr/lib/eroaster/Application.py, line 760, in BurnWriterOptions self.BurnCDNow() File /usr/lib/eroaster/Application.py, line 830, in BurnCDNow cdrecord = cdrtools.cdrecord(tli, channel, id, lun, self.devWriter.get_text(), self.cat.get_loglevel()) File /usr/lib/eroaster/cdrtools.py, line 121, in __init__ self.__cdrecord_read_version() File /usr/lib/eroaster/cdrtools.py, line 246, in __cdrecord_read_version for i in range(len(version[1])): IndexError: list index out of range Versions of packages eroaster depends on: ii cdda2wav 2.01+01a01-2 Creates WAV files from audio CDs ii cdrecord 2.01+01a01-2 command line CD writing tool ii mkisofs2.01+01a01-2 Creates ISO-9660 CD-ROM filesystem images ii python 2.3.5-1An interactive high-level object-oriented la ii python-gtk22.6.1-2Python bindings for the GTK+ widget set Sorry, but I've no better news! Klaumi -- Klaus-M. Klingsporn [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.klaumikli.de -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#306770: aegis: creates ~/integrate.log while building
Package: aegis Severity: serious When building aegis from source, using dpkg-buildpackage -us -uc -rfakeroot, it creates a file called integrate.log in my home directory. This will likely make the package fail to build on buildds, which have no $HOME (thus the serious severity). Even disregarding that, creating files outside the source tree is bad. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.10-1-686 Locale: LANG=fi_FI.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fi_FI.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: tagging 306765
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 tags 306765 sid sarge woody Bug#306765: inn2 - fails to upgrade There were no tags set. Tags added: sid, sarge, woody End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#306647: libgef-java: FTBFS: The java class is not found: org.apache.tools.ant.launch.AntMain
On Wed, Apr 27, 2005 at 10:23:38PM +0200, Andreas Jochens wrote:
Package: libgef-java
Version: 0.9.6-5
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
To build the package in a clean chroot with j2sdk1.4-{sun,ibm,blackdown}
installed, I first have to change debian/rules to use the correct
JAVA_HOME_DIRS. Then I get the following error:
The java class is not found: org.apache.tools.ant.launch.AntMain
This package needs to Build-Depends on libant1.6-java. libant1.5-java will we
removed soon.
Adding $(ANT_HOME)/lib/ant-launcher.jar to DEB_JARS should help with the error
from above.
Michael
--
Escape the Java Trap with GNU Classpath!
http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/java-trap.html
Join the community at http://planet.classpath.org/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#306765: inn2 - fails to upgrade
On Apr 28, Bastian Blank [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: inn2 fails to upgrade if pathdb in inn.conf is not /var/lib/news. If you want to see this resolved soon, please send a patch. -- ciao, Marco signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#306775: libsaxon-java: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'gjdoc'
Package: libsaxon-java
Version: 1:6.5.3-2
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
When building 'libsaxon-java' in a clean 'testing' chroot,
I get the following error:
# split off fop and jdom classes, everything else into saxon.jar
(cd build; fastjar -cf ../saxon.jar META-INF `find . -name \*.class | egrep -v c
om/icl/saxon/jdom\|com/icl/saxon/fop`; \
fastjar -cf ../saxon-fop.jar com/icl/saxon/fop/*.class; \
fastjar -cf ../saxon-jdom.jar com/icl/saxon/jdom/*.class )
(cd build/api ; gjdoc -sourcepath ../../src @../../debian/libsaxon-java-doc.java
doc)
/bin/sh: line 1: gjdoc: command not found
make: *** [build-stamp] Error 127
Please add the missing Build-Depends on 'gjdoc'
to debian/control.
Please also amend debian/rules to support the JAVA_HOME directories
used by the {sun,ibm,blackdown}-j2sdk1.x packages which are created
by java-package.
Regards
Andreas Jochens
diff -urN ../tmp-orig/libsaxon-java-6.5.3/debian/control ./debian/control
--- ../tmp-orig/libsaxon-java-6.5.3/debian/control 2005-04-28
14:28:11.914987694 +0200
+++ ./debian/control2005-04-28 14:28:10.084266006 +0200
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
Priority: optional
Maintainer: Debian Java Maintainers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Uploaders: Arnaud Vandyck [EMAIL PROTECTED], Wolfgang Baer [EMAIL
PROTECTED]
-Build-Depends-Indep: debhelper (= 4.2.30), j2sdk1.4, fastjar,
libgnujaxp-java, fop, libjdom-java
+Build-Depends-Indep: debhelper (= 4.2.30), j2sdk1.4, fastjar, gjdoc,
libgnujaxp-java, fop, libjdom-java
Standards-Version: 3.6.1
Package: libsaxon-java
diff -urN ../tmp-orig/libsaxon-java-6.5.3/debian/rules ./debian/rules
--- ../tmp-orig/libsaxon-java-6.5.3/debian/rules2005-04-28
14:28:11.914987694 +0200
+++ ./debian/rules 2005-04-28 14:26:55.716571614 +0200
@@ -7,7 +7,8 @@
export JITC_PROCESSOR_TYPE=6
PACKAGE=libsaxon-java
-JAVA_HOME=/usr/lib/j2se/1.4
+JAVA_HOME_DIRS=/usr/lib/j2sdk1.4-sun /usr/lib/j2sdk1.4-ibm
/usr/lib/j2sdk1.4-blackdown
+JAVA_HOME ?= $(shell for j in $(JAVA_HOME_DIRS); do [ -d $$j ] echo $$j
exit 0; done)
BASE=debian/$(PACKAGE)
JAVASHARE=usr/share/java
SOURCES=src
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#306530: powernowd: stuck at lower freq
The new package works fine on my system - custom 2.6.11 kernel. $ cd cd /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/ $ cat scaling_available_frequencies 498320 597984 697648 996640 1395296 $ cat scaling_available_governors userspace Is the userspace governor module loaded? I see from bug #277605 that powernowd doesn't automatically load the module. Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: testing
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 254122 +moreinfo Bug#254122: eroaster: Assumes CD burner is ATAPI Tags were: patch Tags added: moreinfo For me, on a machine with kernel 2.6 the patch doesn't work. Unknown command or malformed arguments to command. When I put ATAPI in the TLI-fields, eroaster does not recognize my Unknown command or malformed arguments to command. CD-Rom-drives Unknown command or malformed arguments to command. When I put ATA in the fields the drives are recognized, but trying to Unknown command or malformed arguments to command. Then, i presume that the cdrecord backend (used to scan devices and burn data cd) works fine (with default empty or ATA TLI, not ATAPI). Unknown command or malformed arguments to command. Too many unknown commands, stopping here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#254122: testing
tags 254122 +moreinfo For me, on a machine with kernel 2.6 the patch doesn't work. When I put ATAPI in the TLI-fields, eroaster does not recognize my CD-Rom-drives When I put ATA in the fields the drives are recognized, but trying to Then, i presume that the cdrecord backend (used to scan devices and burn data cd) works fine (with default empty or ATA TLI, not ATAPI). burn a Data-CD or just create an image for a data-cd doesn't work. It also didn't work without the patch, so maybe there's only no change and the patch works fine ;-) , but with kernel 2.6.x without scsi-emeulation the program seems to be useless. In fact, Create Image creates image (a file on harddisk) first, then simply runs Burn CD sequence. Have you got the file? I don't understand clearly: is the original code shows you the same error output? Are you getting the same error even for SCSI bus (with default empty TLI)? If so, you probably should open another bug against cdrecord version detecting. This part of code isn't depends on TLI. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#306151: missing dependency: please recompile
Unless someone tells me not to, I intend to NMU cappuccino with the attached patch in a day or two. In addition to triggering a rebuild, the patch adds proper quoting to the menu file (thereby silencing two lintian warnings). It does not update Standards-Version. I would wait a week, but we're close to freezing and the release managers assure me that we're in a 0-day NMU period. Hopefully this is helpful. Happy hacking. diff -ruN old/debian/changelog cappuccino-0.4/debian/changelog --- old/debian/changelog 2005-04-28 16:46:47.0 +0300 +++ cappuccino-0.4/debian/changelog 2005-04-28 16:33:41.0 +0300 @@ -1,3 +1,13 @@ +cappuccino (0.4-2.1) unstable; urgency=high + + * Non-maintainer upload. + * Rebuilt since linc no longer in archive. Closes: #306151 +(the bug is release critical, hence the urgency). + * debian/menu: Quoted values that weren't quoted, since that's what the +menu file syntax requires. + + -- Lars Wirzenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu, 28 Apr 2005 16:32:00 +0300 + cappuccino (0.4-2) unstable; urgency=low * The It's time for the upload release diff -ruN old/debian/menu cappuccino-0.4/debian/menu --- old/debian/menu 2005-04-28 16:46:47.0 +0300 +++ cappuccino-0.4/debian/menu 2005-04-28 16:31:31.0 +0300 @@ -1,2 +1,2 @@ -?package(cappuccino):needs=X11 section=Games/Toys\ +?package(cappuccino):needs=X11 section=Games/Toys\ title=cappuccino command=/usr/bin/cappuccino
Bug#306266: djvulibre_3.5.14-4(powerpc/unstable): FTBFS: can't find header files
I can reproduce the build problem in a sid i386 pbuilder. Looks like the file tools/jb2cmp/mdjvucfg.h is missing. Note that it is being used only from files created by the Debian changes. I assume therefore that it should be included in the .diff.gz. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#306739: jakarta-log4j: FTBFS: 'enum' is a keyword, and may not be used as an identifier
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Thu, 28 Apr 2005 13:43:59 +0200, Matej Vela [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, The only packages that haven't moved to liblog4j1.2-java are: * libjfreereport-java: Upstream comes bundled with 1.2.3, so the switch should be painless. Patch at #306754. * jetty-extra: Upstream comes bundled with 1.2.6, and uses features specific to 1.2; Log4J support is either not used or already broken. Naive patch at #306761. I think we can remove jakarta-log4j as soon as #306754 is fixed. Is someone working on those? If not, I can have a look this friday (tomorrow). Cheers, - -- .''`. : :' :rnaud `. `' `- Java Trap: http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/java-trap.html -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFCcOzH4vzFZu62tMIRAhUmAJ9FutInMfcyx/Il+R+nJn/8lSyRPwCeJRK3 NlnYbnQ1BBiKo7r6Ks2KggE= =89t8 -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Bug#304803: elinks: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on libperl-dev
I can reproduce the build problem in an i386 sid pbuilder. Changing --with-perl to --without-perl or adding libperl-dev to the build-dependencies on debian/control.in will fix the build problem. I don't know which is better, but at least they both seem simple fixes. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#304803: marked as done (elinks: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on libperl-dev)
Your message dated Thu, 28 Apr 2005 11:17:12 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#304803: fixed in elinks 0.10.4-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Apr 2005 15:15:58 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Apr 15 08:15:58 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mclean.mail.mindspring.net [207.69.200.57] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DMSY2-000809-00; Fri, 15 Apr 2005 08:15:58 -0700 Received: from user-119bq03.biz.mindspring.com ([66.149.232.3] helo=frobnitz.homelinux.net) by mclean.mail.mindspring.net with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1) id 1DMSY1-0006pR-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 15 Apr 2005 11:15:57 -0400 Received: from daniel by frobnitz.homelinux.net with local (Exim 4.50) id 1DMSY0-0005Ym-MA for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 15 Apr 2005 08:15:56 -0700 To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: elinks: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on libperl-dev From: Daniel Schepler [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2005 08:15:56 -0700 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: elinks Severity: serious Version: 0.10.4-1 Tags: patch From my build log, using pbuilder in an i386 chroot (the error message is different on amd64 for some reason, but the fix is the same): ... gcc -g -O2 -Wall -D_REENTRANT -D_GNU_SOURCE -DTHREADS_HAVE_PIDS -DDEBIAN = -fno-strict-aliasing -I/usr/local/include -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSE= T_BITS=3D64 -I/usr/lib/perl/5.8/CORE -I/usr/include -I/usr/include/lua50 = -I/usr/include -fno-strict-aliasing -rdynamic -o elinks main.o vernum.o ..= /src/intl/gettext/libintl.a modules/libmodules.a cookies/libcookies.a vi= ewer/text/libviewer_text.a viewer/dump/libviewer_dump.a cache/libcache.a = document/libdocument.a intl/libintl.a sched/libsched.a lowlevel/liblowl= evel.a terminal/libterminal.a scripting/libscripting.a osdep/libosdep.a = protocol/libprotocol.a ssl/libssl.a bookmarks/libbookmarks.a formhist/l= ibformhist.a globhist/libglobhist.aconfig/libconfig.a dialogs/libdial= ogs.a mime/libmime.a bfu/libbfu.a encoding/libencoding.a util/libutil.a= -lgnutls -L/usr/lib -llua50 -llualib50 -lm -Wl,-E -L/usr/local/lib /usr/l= ib/perl/5.8/auto/DynaLoader/DynaLoader.a -L/usr/lib/perl/5.8/CORE -ldl -lm = -lpthread -lc -lcrypt -ldl -lgpm -lz -lbz2 -lexpat -lgnutls-openssl=20 sched/libsched.a(download.o)(.text+0xf0d): In function `get_temp_name': /tmp/buildd/elinks-0.10.4/src/sched/download.c:661: warning: the use of `te= mpnam' is dangerous, better use `mkstemp' scripting/libscripting.a(core.o)(.text+0xa7): In function `precleanup_perl': /tmp/buildd/elinks-0.10.4/src/scripting/perl/core.c:56: undefined reference= to `perl_destruct' scripting/libscripting.a(core.o)(.text+0xb4):/tmp/buildd/elinks-0.10.4/src/= scripting/perl/core.c:57: undefined reference to `perl_free' scripting/libscripting.a(core.o)(.text+0xe9): In function `cleanup_perl': /tmp/buildd/elinks-0.10.4/src/scripting/perl/core.c:66: undefined reference= to `Perl_Gop_mutex_ptr' ... Adding libperl-dev to the Build-Depends allows the package to build again. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.11-9-amd64-k8 Locale: LANG=3DC, LC_CTYPE=3DC (charmap=3DUTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to en= _US.UTF-8) --=20 Daniel Schepler Please don't disillusion me. I [EMAIL PROTECTED]haven't had breakfast yet. -- Orson Scott Card --- Received: (at 304803-close) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Apr 2005 15:22:46 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 28 08:22:46 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DRAqk-0001sR-00; Thu, 28 Apr 2005 08:22:46 -0700 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DRAlM-0007ko-00; Thu, 28 Apr 2005 11:17:12 -0400 From: Peter Gervai [EMAIL
Bug#306107: gnome-doc-utils: FTBFS: missing build-depends
checking for pkg-config... no The attached patch fixes the problem by adding a build dependency on pkg-config. Since we are close to freezing sarge, I will make an NMU tomorrow with this patch, unless there is an objection (I'm also happy to see a maintainer upload, of course). diff -ruN orig/debian/changelog gnome-doc-utils-0.1.3/debian/changelog --- orig/debian/changelog 2005-04-28 18:12:38.0 +0300 +++ gnome-doc-utils-0.1.3/debian/changelog 2005-04-28 18:14:34.0 +0300 @@ -1,3 +1,10 @@ +gnome-doc-utils (0.1.3-2.1) unstable; urgency=low + + * Non-maintainer upload. + * debian/control: Added pkg-config to build dependencies. + + -- Lars Wirzenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu, 28 Apr 2005 18:15:00 +0300 + gnome-doc-utils (0.1.3-2) unstable; urgency=low * docbook2x included as a build dependency to solve the xml2po blank manpage problem. diff -ruN orig/debian/control gnome-doc-utils-0.1.3/debian/control --- orig/debian/control 2005-04-28 18:12:38.0 +0300 +++ gnome-doc-utils-0.1.3/debian/control 2005-04-28 18:14:43.0 +0300 @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ Section: gnome Priority: optional Maintainer: Fernanda Giroleti Weiden [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Build-Depends-Indep: cdbs, debhelper (= 4.1.0), libxml2-dev (= 2.6.0), libxslt1-dev (= 1.1.8), libxml-parser-perl, python-dev, xsltproc, libxml2-utils, docbook2x +Build-Depends-Indep: cdbs, debhelper (= 4.1.0), libxml2-dev (= 2.6.0), libxslt1-dev (= 1.1.8), libxml-parser-perl, python-dev, xsltproc, libxml2-utils, docbook2x, pkg-config Standards-Version: 3.6.1 Package: gnome-doc-utils
Bug#306246: marked as done (elinks_0.10.4-1(mipsel/unstable): FTBFS: missing build-depends)
Your message dated Thu, 28 Apr 2005 11:17:12 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#304803: fixed in elinks 0.10.4-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Apr 2005 08:51:09 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Apr 25 01:51:09 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from h24-80-164-222.sbm.shawcable.net (straylight.cyberhqz.com) [24.80.164.222] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DPzJ7-g6-00; Mon, 25 Apr 2005 01:51:09 -0700 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by straylight.cyberhqz.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60A7023F3A for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 25 Apr 2005 01:51:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from straylight.cyberhqz.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (straylight [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 19605-10 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 25 Apr 2005 01:51:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: by straylight.cyberhqz.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id CE16223F36; Mon, 25 Apr 2005 01:51:02 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2005 01:51:02 -0700 From: Ryan Murray [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: elinks_0.10.4-1(mipsel/unstable): FTBFS: missing build-depends Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: elinks Version: 0.10.4-1 Severity: serious There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: Automatic build of elinks_0.10.4-1 on solitude by sbuild/mipsel 27 Build started at 20050414-0031 [...] ** Using build dependencies supplied by package: Build-Depends: debhelper (= 4.0.0), m4, bison, libgnutls11-dev, libgpmg1-dev [alpha arm hppa i386 ia64 m68k mips mipsel powerpc s390 s390x sh3 sh3eb sh4 sh4eb sparc sparc64 amd64], liblua50-dev, liblualib50-dev, libbz2-dev, libexpat1-dev (= 1.95.6), type-handling (= 0.2.1) [...] The following central src deps are (probably) missing: xlibs-dev ( 4.1.0) [...] make[4]: Entering directory `/build/buildd/elinks-0.10.4/src' gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I.. -I../src -g -O2 -Wall -D_REENTRANT -D_GNU_SOURCE -DTHREADS_HAVE_PIDS -DDEBIAN -fno-strict-aliasing -I/usr/local/include -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -I/usr/lib/perl/5.8/CORE -fno-strict-aliasing -c main.c gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I.. -I../src -g -O2 -Wall -D_REENTRANT -D_GNU_SOURCE -DTHREADS_HAVE_PIDS -DDEBIAN -fno-strict-aliasing -I/usr/local/include -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -I/usr/lib/perl/5.8/CORE -fno-strict-aliasing -c vernum.c gcc -g -O2 -Wall -D_REENTRANT -D_GNU_SOURCE -DTHREADS_HAVE_PIDS -DDEBIAN -fno-strict-aliasing -I/usr/local/include -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -I/usr/lib/perl/5.8/CORE -fno-strict-aliasing -rdynamic -o elinks main.o vernum.o ../src/intl/gettext/libintl.a modules/libmodules.a cookies/libcookies.a viewer/text/libviewer_text.a viewer/dump/libviewer_dump.a cache/libcache.a document/libdocument.a intl/libintl.a sched/libsched.a lowlevel/liblowlevel.a terminal/libterminal.a scripting/libscripting.a osdep/libosdep.a protocol/libprotocol.abookmarks/libbookmarks.a formhist/libformhist.a globhist/libglobhist.aconfig/libconfig.a dialogs/libdialogs.a mime/libmime.a bfu/libbfu.a encoding/libencoding.a util/libutil.a -Wl,-E -L/usr/local/lib /usr/lib/perl/5.8/auto/DynaLoader/DynaLoader.a -L/usr/lib/perl/5.8/CORE -lperl -ldl -lm -lpthread -lc -lcrypt -ldl -lgpm -lz -lbz2 -lexpat /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lperl collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make[4]: *** [elinks] Error 1 make[4]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/elinks-0.10.4/src' make[3]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[3]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/elinks-0.10.4/src' make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/elinks-0.10.4' make[1]: *** [all-recursive-am] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/elinks-0.10.4' make: *** [debian/build-stamp] Error 2 A full build log can be found at: http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?arch=mipselpkg=elinksver=0.10.4-1 You need to
Bug#306150: missing dependency: please recompile
I've checked that a simple rebuild will fix this, so I'll do an NMU tomorrow or so, given that we're near a sarge freeze and in a 0-day NMU phase. No changes to the source, just a new changelog entry. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#306153: dependency removed: please recompile
I've verified that a simple rebuild will fix this (i.e., results in a working package). Since sarge freeze is nearing and we're in a 0-day NMU phase, I'll NMU tomorrow. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#306150: missing dependency: please recompile
Le jeudi 28 avril 2005 à 18:41 +0300, Lars Wirzenius a écrit : I've checked that a simple rebuild will fix this, so I'll do an NMU tomorrow or so, given that we're near a sarge freeze and in a 0-day NMU phase. No changes to the source, just a new changelog entry. Please go ahead, with a high urgency. I have a GNOME 2.10 setup here and can't upload until this weekend. -- .''`. Josselin Mouette/\./\ : :' : [EMAIL PROTECTED] `. `'[EMAIL PROTECTED] `- Debian GNU/Linux -- The power of freedom signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#306265: nstx_1.1-beta6-2(powerpc/unstable): FTBFS: assumes signedness of chars
The attached patch fixes the build problem.
I may do an NMU tomorrow or next week, since we're close to a sarge
freeze (and in a 0-day NMU phase). Should be an innocent enough change.
diff -ruN orig/debian/changelog nstx-1.1-beta6/debian/changelog
--- orig/debian/changelog 2005-04-28 19:29:02.0 +0300
+++ nstx-1.1-beta6/debian/changelog 2005-04-28 19:40:45.0 +0300
@@ -1,3 +1,12 @@
+nstx (1.1-beta6-2.1) unstable; urgency=high
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+ * nstxcd.c: changed the variable ch to be an int instead of a char, since
+that is what it must be when it gets the return value from getopt.
+Closes: #306265 (which is release critical, hence a high severity).
+
+ -- Lars Wirzenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu, 28 Apr 2005 19:39:00 +0300
+
nstx (1.1-beta6-2) unstable; urgency=low
* don't cast things to signed chars if you want numbers greater than 128
diff -ruN orig/nstxcd.c nstx-1.1-beta6/nstxcd.c
--- orig/nstxcd.c 2005-04-28 19:29:02.0 +0300
+++ nstx-1.1-beta6/nstxcd.c 2005-04-28 19:38:58.0 +0300
@@ -63,7 +63,7 @@
int main (int argc, char * argv[]) {
struct nstxmsg *msg;
const char *device = NULL;
- char ch;
+ int ch;
nsid = time(NULL);
Processed: Set severity as discussed to wishlist
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 306639 wishlist Bug#306639: batik: FTBFS: JAVA_HOME_DIRS incorrect Severity set to `wishlist'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: babel: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'kaffe-dev'
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 285487 serious Bug#285487: babel: FTBFS on amd64: Missing Build-Depends on 'kaffe-dev' Severity set to `serious'. retitle 285487 babel: FTBFS on amd64: Missing Build-Depends on 'kaffe-dev' Bug#285487: babel: FTBFS on amd64: Missing Build-Depends on 'kaffe-dev' Changed Bug title. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#306639: Set severity as discussed to wishlist
severity 306639 wishlist thanks Set the severity to whishlist as decided by discussion between Andreas Jochen, Arnaud Vandyck and release team. Wolfgang -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Fixed in NMU of gnome-swallow 1.2-1.1
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 306150 + fixed Bug#306150: missing dependency: please recompile Tags were: sid Tags added: fixed quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#306816: dbishell: FTBFS: perl-readline check fails with TIOCSPTLCK: Invalid argument
Package: dbishell Version: 0.8.9-7 Severity: serious When building 'dbishell' with dpkg-buildpackage build.log I get the following error: make[1]: Entering directory `/dbishell-0.8.9' Looking for supported readline implementation TIOCSPTLCK: Invalid argument EINVAL: kludging ioctls ioctl() calls succeeded: 7/0 /dev/pts/7: No such file or directory make[1]: *** [perl-readline] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/dbishell-0.8.9' make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2 Without the redirection of the output of 'dpkg-buildpackage' to 'build.log' the build succeeds. However, autobuilding is not possible because of this. Regards Andreas Jochens diff -urN ../tmp-orig/dbishell-0.8.9/Makefile ./Makefile --- ../tmp-orig/dbishell-0.8.9/Makefile 2004-11-03 15:44:21.514223392 + +++ ./Makefile 2004-11-03 15:44:21.554217312 + @@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ -e printf(STDOUT qq[%-20.20s\tOk\\n], '$$M'); \ done -bundled-modules: perl-readline +bundled-modules: @echo @echo Checking bundled DBIShell modules @for M in $(BUNDLED_MODULES); do $(PERL) -I.\ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#306595: tetex-bin: postinst failure with jadetex and xmltex
Looks like jadetex problem #298437. Unfortunately no. What version of jadetex do you have installed (or was trying to be installed with tetex)? The latest one in sid+experimental: ii jadetex 3.13-6 generator of printable output from SGML or XML using J -- Laurent Bonnaud. http://www.lis.inpg.fr/pages_perso/bonnaud/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#230677: rc bug #230677 for package phpdoc
You're right. I noticed that bug after I sent the mail. Well, I'll try someone to help with another NMU, since bug #282274 is just a small fix in the build-depeneds lines of the package. On Thu, Apr 28, 2005 at 12:16:04AM +0300, Lior Kaplan wrote: What can be done for bug #230677? It was a year since an NMU was done (march 2004). The problem is fixed. But since it was fixed by the NMU, it's still open as RC bug, and the package won't go to sarge. I think the bug should be closed. What do you think? No, bugs that are tagged fixed are excluded from consideration by the testing scripts; and you should never close an NMU bug unless you're the maintainer. The reason phpdoc is not in testing is bug #282274. -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#306816: dbishell: FTBFS: perl-readline check fails with TIOCSPTLCK: Invalid argument
On Thu, 28 Apr 2005, Andreas Jochens wrote: Without the redirection of the output of 'dpkg-buildpackage' to 'build.log' the build succeeds. However, autobuilding is not possible because of this. Autobuilding is possible so long as the autobuild environment provides /dev/ptmx and /dev/pts/*, as I believe they are required to do. The command fakeroot dpkg-buildpackage build.log works for me. (build.log attached)dpkg-buildpackage: source package is dbishell dpkg-buildpackage: source version is 0.8.9-7 dpkg-buildpackage: source maintainer is Vivek Dasmohapatra [EMAIL PROTECTED] dpkg-buildpackage: host architecture is i386 debian/rules clean if [ -f debian/patches/050-Makefile.patch.pdone ]; then patch -R -p0 debian/patches/050-Makefile.patch rm -f debian/patches/050-Makefile.patch.pdone; fi patching file Makefile if [ -f debian/patches/060-dbishell.patch.pdone ]; then patch -R -p0 debian/patches/060-dbishell.patch rm -f debian/patches/060-dbishell.patch.pdone; fi patching file dbishell if [ -f debian/patches/070-help-bareword.patch.pdone ]; then patch -R -p0 debian/patches/070-help-bareword.patch rm -f debian/patches/070-help-bareword.patch.pdone; fi patching file DBIShell/dr/DEFAULT.pm patching file DBIShell/dr/mysql.pm if [ -f debian/patches/075-term-ctl-csi-maybe.patch.pdone ]; then patch -R -p0 debian/patches/075-term-ctl-csi-maybe.patch rm -f debian/patches/075-term-ctl-csi-maybe.patch.pdone; fi patching file DBIShell/Term_CTL.pm dh_testdir dh_testroot rm -f build-stamp /usr/bin/make clean make[1]: Entering directory `/tmp/dbishell-0.8.9' rm -f ./.cf.cache make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/dbishell-0.8.9' dh_clean dpkg-source -b dbishell-0.8.9 dpkg-source: building dbishell using existing dbishell_0.8.9.orig.tar.gz dpkg-source: building dbishell in dbishell_0.8.9-7.diff.gz dpkg-source: building dbishell in dbishell_0.8.9-7.dsc debian/rules build patch -p0 debian/patches/050-Makefile.patch touch debian/patches/050-Makefile.patch.pdone patching file Makefile patch -p0 debian/patches/060-dbishell.patch touch debian/patches/060-dbishell.patch.pdone patching file dbishell patch -p0 debian/patches/070-help-bareword.patch touch debian/patches/070-help-bareword.patch.pdone patching file DBIShell/dr/DEFAULT.pm patching file DBIShell/dr/mysql.pm patch -p0 debian/patches/075-term-ctl-csi-maybe.patch touch debian/patches/075-term-ctl-csi-maybe.patch.pdone patching file DBIShell/Term_CTL.pm dh_testdir /usr/bin/make make[1]: Entering directory `/tmp/dbishell-0.8.9' Looking for supported readline implementation TIOCSPTLCK: Invalid argument EINVAL: kludging ioctls ioctl() calls succeeded: 4/0 TTY /dev/pts/4 opened TIOCGWINSZ succeeded *TTY is a pty fd of TTY is: 4 readline == Term::ReadLine::Perl Checking bundled DBIShell modules DBIShell::Term_CTL Ok DBIShell::UTIL Ok DBIShell::Help Ok DBIShell::Fixup Ok DBIShell::Readline Ok DBIShellOk Checking basic Perl module dependencies DBI Ok Term::ReadKey Ok Term::ReadLine Ok Getopt::LongOk Checking included DB drivers DBIShell::dr::DEFAULT Ok DBIShell::dr::MSSQL_A Ok DBIShell::dr::mysql Ok DBIShell::dr::OracleOk DBIShell::dr::PgOk DBIShell::dr::SybaseOk Checking included help modules DBIShell::help::mysql Ok DBIShell::help::Oracle Ok ./dbishell syntax OK make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/dbishell-0.8.9' touch build-stamp debian/rules binary dh_testdir /usr/bin/make make[1]: Entering directory `/tmp/dbishell-0.8.9' Looking for supported readline implementation TIOCSPTLCK: Invalid argument EINVAL: kludging ioctls ioctl() calls succeeded: 4/0 TTY /dev/pts/4 opened TIOCGWINSZ succeeded *TTY is a pty fd of TTY is: 4 readline == Term::ReadLine::Perl Checking bundled DBIShell modules DBIShell::Term_CTL Ok DBIShell::UTIL Ok DBIShell::Help Ok DBIShell::Fixup Ok DBIShell::Readline Ok DBIShellOk Checking basic Perl module dependencies DBI Ok Term::ReadKey Ok Term::ReadLine Ok Getopt::LongOk Checking included DB drivers DBIShell::dr::DEFAULT Ok DBIShell::dr::MSSQL_A Ok DBIShell::dr::mysql Ok DBIShell::dr::OracleOk DBIShell::dr::PgOk DBIShell::dr::SybaseOk Checking included help modules DBIShell::help::mysql Ok DBIShell::help::Oracle Ok ./dbishell syntax OK make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/dbishell-0.8.9' touch build-stamp dh_testdir dh_testroot dh_clean -k dh_installdirs echo -e \n\n\n\n\n | perl ./installer.pl /usr/bin/perl /usr /usr/share/perl5 `pwd`/debian/dbishell Where does your perl live? [/usr/bin/perl] : Where should I install dbishell? [/usr] : Where should I install the dbishell script? [/usr/bin] : Where should I install the dbishell libs? [/usr/share/perl5] : Where should I install the dbishell docs? [/usr/share/doc/dbishell] : Where should I install extra data files?
Bug#306827: rbscrobbler: FTBFS: missing files
Package: rbscrobbler Version: 0.0.9pre3-1 Severity: serious Hi, building the package rbscrobbler in a clean sid build environment (with pbuilder) on i386 results in: = dh_testdir /usr/bin/make PREFIX=/usr make[1]: Entering directory `/tmp/buildd/rbscrobbler-0.0.9pre3' make[2]: Entering directory `/tmp/buildd/rbscrobbler-0.0.9pre3/trayicon' cc `pkg-config --cflags gtk+-2.0 pygtk-2.0` -I/usr/include/python2.3/ -I. -fPIC -c -o eggtrayicon.o eggtrayicon.c /bin/sh: pkg-config: command not found In file included from eggtrayicon.c:25: eggtrayicon.h:24:25: gtk/gtkplug.h: No such file or directory eggtrayicon.h:25:22: gdk/gdkx.h: No such file or directory In file included from eggtrayicon.c:25: eggtrayicon.h:36: error: syntax error before typedef eggtrayicon.h:41: error: parse error before GtkPlug eggtrayicon.h:41: warning: no semicolon at end of struct or union eggtrayicon.h:43: warning: data definition has no type or storage class eggtrayicon.h:45: error: parse error before selection_atom eggtrayicon.h:45: warning: data definition has no type or storage class eggtrayicon.h:46: error: parse error before manager_atom eggtrayicon.h:46: warning: data definition has no type or storage class eggtrayicon.h:47: error: parse error before system_tray_opcode_atom eggtrayicon.h:47: warning: data definition has no type or storage class eggtrayicon.h:48: error: parse error before orientation_atom eggtrayicon.h:48: warning: data definition has no type or storage class eggtrayicon.h:49: error: parse error before manager_window eggtrayicon.h:49: warning: data definition has no type or storage class eggtrayicon.h:51: error: parse error before orientation eggtrayicon.h:51: warning: data definition has no type or storage class [...] eggtrayicon.c:405: error: `len' undeclared (first use in this function) eggtrayicon.c:412: error: `Window' undeclared (first use in this function) eggtrayicon.c:412: error: parse error before gtk_plug_get_id eggtrayicon.c:419: error: `XClientMessageEvent' undeclared (first use in this function) eggtrayicon.c:419: error: parse error before ev eggtrayicon.c:420: error: `Display' undeclared (first use in this function) eggtrayicon.c:424: error: `ev' undeclared (first use in this function) eggtrayicon.c:424: error: `ClientMessage' undeclared (first use in this function) eggtrayicon.c:425: error: parse error before gtk_plug_get_id eggtrayicon.c:428: error: `False' undeclared (first use in this function) eggtrayicon.c:442: error: `StructureNotifyMask' undeclared (first use in this function) eggtrayicon.c:442: error: `XEvent' undeclared (first use in this function) eggtrayicon.c:442: error: parse error before ')' token eggtrayicon.c: At top level: eggtrayicon.c:452: error: parse error before guint eggtrayicon.c: In function `egg_tray_icon_cancel_message': eggtrayicon.c:454: error: `icon' undeclared (first use in this function) eggtrayicon.c:455: error: `id' undeclared (first use in this function) eggtrayicon.c:458: error: `Window' undeclared (first use in this function) eggtrayicon.c:458: error: parse error before gtk_plug_get_id eggtrayicon.c: At top level: eggtrayicon.c:463: error: parse error before egg_tray_icon_get_orientation eggtrayicon.c: In function `egg_tray_icon_get_orientation': eggtrayicon.c:465: error: `GTK_ORIENTATION_HORIZONTAL' undeclared (first use in this function) eggtrayicon.c:467: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type make[2]: *** [eggtrayicon.o] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/rbscrobbler-0.0.9pre3/trayicon' make[1]: *** [all] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/rbscrobbler-0.0.9pre3' make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2 = Thanks for considering. -- DARTS - Debian Archive Regression Test Suite http://darts.alioth.debian.org/ Please note that this report has not been generated fully automatically. DARTS just helped finding the problem. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#306828: svnmailer: FTBFS: missing python Makefile
Package: svnmailer Version: 0.9.9-1 Severity: serious Hi, building the package svnmailer in a clean sid build environment (with pbuilder) on i386 results in: = [...] copying src/lib/svnmailer/_test/suite/struct.py - build/lib/svnmailer/_test/suite copying src/lib/svnmailer/_test/suite/main.py - build/lib/svnmailer/_test/suite copying src/lib/svnmailer/_test/suite/settings.py - build/lib/svnmailer/_test/suite copying src/lib/svnmailer/_test/suite/__init__.py - build/lib/svnmailer/_test/suite copying src/lib/svnmailer/_test/suite/util.py - build/lib/svnmailer/_test/suite copying src/lib/svnmailer/_test/suite/differ.py - build/lib/svnmailer/_test/suite copying src/lib/svnmailer/_test/suite/subversion.py - build/lib/svnmailer/_test/suite creating build/lib/svnmailer/_test/suite/notifier copying src/lib/svnmailer/_test/suite/notifier/_text.py - build/lib/svnmailer/_test/suite/notifier copying src/lib/svnmailer/_test/suite/notifier/_textmail.py - build/lib/svnmailer/_test/suite/notifier copying src/lib/svnmailer/_test/suite/notifier/mail.py - build/lib/svnmailer/_test/suite/notifier copying src/lib/svnmailer/_test/suite/notifier/stdout.py - build/lib/svnmailer/_test/suite/notifier copying src/lib/svnmailer/_test/suite/notifier/_base.py - build/lib/svnmailer/_test/suite/notifier copying src/lib/svnmailer/_test/suite/notifier/__init__.py - build/lib/svnmailer/_test/suite/notifier running build_scripts creating build/scripts-2.3 copying and adjusting src/svn-mailer - build/scripts-2.3 changing mode of build/scripts-2.3/svn-mailer from 644 to 755 #docbook-to-man debian/svnmailer.sgml svnmailer.1 touch build-stamp fakeroot debian/rules binary dh_testdir dh_testroot dh_clean -k dh_installdirs # Add here commands to install the package into debian/svnmailer. python setup.py install --root=/tmp/buildd/svnmailer-0.9.9/debian/svnmailer running install error: invalid Python installation: unable to open /usr/lib/python2.3/config/Makefile (No such file or directory) make: *** [install] Error 1 = Thanks for considering. -- DARTS - Debian Archive Regression Test Suite http://darts.alioth.debian.org/ Please note that this report has not been generated fully automatically. DARTS just helped finding the problem. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#306770: Caused by aeintegratq
In aegis-4.20/script/aeintegratq.in:
$BinDir = @bindir@;
$ComDir = @sharedstatedir@;
$TmpDir = /var/tmp;
$SendMail = /usr/lib/sendmail
...
# define some locations for logging and such
if ( -d $ComDir/integrations ) {
$LogFile = $ComDir/integrations/integrate.log;
}else{
$LogFile = $ENV{'HOME'}/integrate.log;
}
All of the directory loctions should be prefixed with some environment
variable in order to fix this - I don'w know if you want to use
RPM_BUILD_DIR, WORKDIR, or something else altogether, but this would
allow for normal operation when not being run at build time, and fix out
of build-directory file installs during autobuilding. There are also
several other calls to $ENV{'HOME'} further down in the script that
should get this massaging.
--
-
| ,''`.Stephen Gran |
| : :' :[EMAIL PROTECTED] |
| `. `'Debian user, admin, and developer |
|`- http://www.debian.org |
-
pgpZ70ntlUleP.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Bug#305300: followup: this package cannot be distributed at all
...since serious licence problems have been discovered... IIRC licence problems were in include/msw/gluwin32, so they are not used/distributed with wxgtk, no? Or do you also package wxmsw crosscompiler for Debian? Anyway, you can just remove these files before packaging. And there were very little changes in wxgtk from 2.6.0 release, so you could just package current cvs IMHO (and it has an important fix for not being able to use native gtk2 File dialog from wxPython, so Robin will probably require it anyway). Regards, Nerijus -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#306254: axe: FTBFS: Failed to satisfy Build-Depends dependency for axe: libxaw-dev
On Mon, Apr 25, 2005 at 11:42:50AM +0200, Andreas Jochens wrote: [...] When building 'axe' in a clean 'testing' chroot, I get the following error: Building axe testing main amd64... Reading Package Lists... Building Dependency Tree... Package libxaw-dev is not available, but is referred to by another package. This may mean that the package is missing, has been obsoleted, or is only available from another source However the following packages replace it: libxaw7-dev libxaw6-dev E: Package libxaw-dev has no installation candidate E: Failed to satisfy Build-Depends dependency for axe: libxaw-dev The new version 6.1.2-14 in 'sid' does not have this problem. [...] Yes, I have already fixed this problem in 6.1.2-14, but it is not getting into testing. This package is non-free, and unfortunately that means people aren't very inclined to build it on the various archs for me. Also, I don't think this bug should affect the RC bug count for sarge, since it *is* non-free after all. Is there any reason for severity: serious here, other than the fact that the fixed package hasn't made it into testing yet? T -- Today's society is one of specialization: as you grow, you learn more and more about less and less. Eventually, you know everything about nothing. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: pending fixes
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 291386 pending Bug#291386: creates initrd that cannot use lvm 2 volumes if both lvm2 and lvm10 are installed Tags were: patch Tags added: pending tags 296894 pending Bug#296894: initrd-tools: function module_exist doesn't recognize modules in subdirs There were no tags set. Tags added: pending tags 306219 pending Bug#306219: initrd-tools: Does not handle woody's architecture string well on sparc, breaking upgrades There were no tags set. Tags added: pending tags 266591 pending Bug#266591: initrd-tools: mkinitrd assumes /dev/mapper/* == LVM device Tags were: moreinfo Tags added: pending tags 298727 pending Bug#298727: initrd-tools: After updating libdevmapper, no initrd can be built There were no tags set. Bug#303401: mkinitrd fails with cryptsetup and libdevmapper1.01 Tags added: pending tags 303401 pending Bug#303401: mkinitrd fails with cryptsetup and libdevmapper1.01 Tags were: pending Bug#298727: initrd-tools: After updating libdevmapper, no initrd can be built Tags added: pending stop Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#230677: rc bug #230677 for package phpdoc
Lior Kaplan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hi, What can be done for bug #230677? It was a year since an NMU was done (march 2004). The problem is fixed. But since it was fixed by the NMU, it's still open as RC bug, and the package won't go to sarge. I think the bug should be closed. What do you think? Please CC me, I'm not listed. It also looks like you filed an orphaned indication on the package, which you should not have done. Only the maintainer or QA can do that; if you think the maintainer is absent, you should send mail to debian-qa asking if he's MIA. Thomas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#306828: marked as done (svnmailer: FTBFS: missing python Makefile)
Your message dated Thu, 28 Apr 2005 15:32:55 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#306828: fixed in svnmailer 0.9.9-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Apr 2005 18:32:46 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 28 11:32:46 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mail-out.m-online.net [212.18.0.9] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DRDob-0004uy-00; Thu, 28 Apr 2005 11:32:46 -0700 Received: from mail.m-online.net (svr20.m-online.net [192.168.3.148]) by mail-out.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11FA79D24; Thu, 28 Apr 2005 20:32:45 +0200 (CEST) Received: from atari.stigge.org (ppp-82-135-14-110.mnet-online.de [82.135.14.110]) by mail.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAFD075D55; Thu, 28 Apr 2005 20:31:34 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.5.99] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by atari.stigge.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70EE1100442A3; Thu, 28 Apr 2005 20:31:34 +0200 (CEST) From: Roland Stigge [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: svnmailer: FTBFS: missing python Makefile Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2005 20:31:34 +0200 (CEST) Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: svnmailer Version: 0.9.9-1 Severity: serious Hi, building the package svnmailer in a clean sid build environment (with pbuilder) on i386 results in: = [...] copying src/lib/svnmailer/_test/suite/struct.py - build/lib/svnmailer/_test/suite copying src/lib/svnmailer/_test/suite/main.py - build/lib/svnmailer/_test/suite copying src/lib/svnmailer/_test/suite/settings.py - build/lib/svnmailer/_test/suite copying src/lib/svnmailer/_test/suite/__init__.py - build/lib/svnmailer/_test/suite copying src/lib/svnmailer/_test/suite/util.py - build/lib/svnmailer/_test/suite copying src/lib/svnmailer/_test/suite/differ.py - build/lib/svnmailer/_test/suite copying src/lib/svnmailer/_test/suite/subversion.py - build/lib/svnmailer/_test/suite creating build/lib/svnmailer/_test/suite/notifier copying src/lib/svnmailer/_test/suite/notifier/_text.py - build/lib/svnmailer/_test/suite/notifier copying src/lib/svnmailer/_test/suite/notifier/_textmail.py - build/lib/svnmailer/_test/suite/notifier copying src/lib/svnmailer/_test/suite/notifier/mail.py - build/lib/svnmailer/_test/suite/notifier copying src/lib/svnmailer/_test/suite/notifier/stdout.py - build/lib/svnmailer/_test/suite/notifier copying src/lib/svnmailer/_test/suite/notifier/_base.py - build/lib/svnmailer/_test/suite/notifier copying src/lib/svnmailer/_test/suite/notifier/__init__.py - build/lib/svnmailer/_test/suite/notifier running build_scripts creating build/scripts-2.3 copying and adjusting src/svn-mailer - build/scripts-2.3 changing mode of build/scripts-2.3/svn-mailer from 644 to 755 #docbook-to-man debian/svnmailer.sgml svnmailer.1 touch build-stamp fakeroot debian/rules binary dh_testdir dh_testroot dh_clean -k dh_installdirs # Add here commands to install the package into debian/svnmailer. python setup.py install --root=/tmp/buildd/svnmailer-0.9.9/debian/svnmailer running install error: invalid Python installation: unable to open /usr/lib/python2.3/config/Makefile (No such file or directory) make: *** [install] Error 1 = Thanks for considering. -- DARTS - Debian Archive Regression Test Suite http://darts.alioth.debian.org/ Please note that this report has not been generated fully automatically. DARTS just helped finding the problem. --- Received: (at 306828-close) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Apr 2005 19:51:42 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 28 12:51:42 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DRF30-Ki-00; Thu, 28 Apr 2005 12:51:42 -0700 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DREkp-94-00; Thu, 28 Apr 2005 15:32:55 -0400 From: Julien Danjou [EMAIL PROTECTED] To:
Bug#306839: blackbox: ftbfs [sparc] Blackbox requires the X Window System
Package: blackbox Version: 0.70.0-1 Severity: serious Tags: sid Justification: fails to build from source blackbox fails to build from source on sparc and other buildds, duplicated on sparc pbuilder. checking for socket in -lsocket... no checking for X... no configure: error: Blackbox requires the X Window System libraries and headers. make: *** [config.status] Error 1 pbuilder: Failed autobuilding of package -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#306843: nvidia-kernel-common: nvidia module not found when XFree86 starts
Package: nvidia-kernel-common Version: 1.0.7174-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Hello, this is an up to date debian box. XFree86 won't start. It complains: Loadmodule: nvidia Warning, couldn't open module nvidia Failed to load module nvidia (module does not exist, 0) I tried several combinations of apt-get remove --purge nvidia* and fresh modules made with modules-assistant and also tried a custom kernel from people.debian.org/~rdonald.. none of these improves. Replacing nvidia with nv in /etx/X11/XFree86-4 helps, though.. Thank you for your attention Regards Gijs -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (900, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-1-k7 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Versions of packages nvidia-kernel-common depends on: ii module-init-tools 3.2-pre1-2 tools for managing Linux kernel mo ii modutils 2.4.26-1.2 Linux module utilities -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#306254: axe: FTBFS: Failed to satisfy Build-Depends dependency for axe: libxaw-dev
On 05-Apr-28 12:21, H. S. Teoh wrote: On Mon, Apr 25, 2005 at 11:42:50AM +0200, Andreas Jochens wrote: E: Package libxaw-dev has no installation candidate E: Failed to satisfy Build-Depends dependency for axe: libxaw-dev The new version 6.1.2-14 in 'sid' does not have this problem. [...] Yes, I have already fixed this problem in 6.1.2-14, but it is not getting into testing. This package is non-free, and unfortunately that means people aren't very inclined to build it on the various archs for me. Also, I don't think this bug should affect the RC bug count for sarge, since it *is* non-free after all. Is there any reason for severity: serious here, other than the fact that the fixed package hasn't made it into testing yet? The bug is tagged 'sarge' which indicates that it does not affect sid. I think it is an RC bug for sarge as long as the new version has not entered testing/sarge, which may or may not happen before the release. Please correct me if I am wrong here. Regards Andreas Jochens -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: nvu_0.99+1.0pre-1(mipsel/unstable): uses old version of mozilla
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 306822 serious Bug#306822: nvu_0.99+1.0pre-1(mipsel/unstable): uses old version of mozilla Severity set to `serious'. tags 306822 security Bug#306822: nvu_0.99+1.0pre-1(mipsel/unstable): uses old version of mozilla There were no tags set. Tags added: security thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#306770: aegis: creates ~/integrate.log while building
In order to fix the problem, Jerry Pendergraft, the aeintegratq
author, has prepared the patch in the attached message.
---BeginMessage---
It would be aeintegratq being run by some tests that is creating the log.
Easy fix. I will create the log in the aegis test directory if/when being
run by tests. Here is the patch and I will send Peter an aedist.
***
*** 152,158
hash_option(-c, $Option{change}, \%Ready)if
defined($Option{change});
# define some locations for logging and such
! if ( -d $ComDir/integrations ) {
$LogFile = $ComDir/integrations/integrate.log;
}else{
$LogFile = $ENV{'HOME'}/integrate.log;
--- 152,160
hash_option(-c, $Option{change}, \%Ready)if
defined($Option{change});
# define some locations for logging and such
! if ( defined( $ENV{'AEGIS_TEST_DIR'} ) ) {
! $LogFile = $ENV{'AEGIS_TEST_DIR'}/integrate.log;
! }elsif ( -d $ComDir/integrations ) {
$LogFile = $ComDir/integrations/integrate.log;
}else{
$LogFile = $ENV{'HOME'}/integrate.log;
--
Jerry Pendergraft[EMAIL PROTECTED]
St. Jude Medical voice: 651-523-6935
1350 Energy Lane, Suite 110fax: 651-644-7897
St Paul, MN 55108-5254 mobile: 651-491-0163
On Thu, 28 Apr 2005, Walter Franzini wrote:
I'm now working on debian and monitoring aegis related bugs.
SysNet - via Dossi,8 27100 Pavia Tel: +390382573859 Fax: +390382476497
---End Message---
Processed: Re: Bug#306595: tetex-bin: postinst failure with jadetex and xmltex
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 306595 xmltex Bug#306595: tetex-bin: postinst failure with jadetex and xmltex Bug reassigned from package `tetex-bin' to `xmltex'. severity 306595 important Bug#306595: tetex-bin: postinst failure with jadetex and xmltex Severity set to `important'. merge 306595 262395 Bug#262395: *** ERROR: can't make xmltex fmt files, installation doesn't work Bug#306595: tetex-bin: postinst failure with jadetex and xmltex Merged 262395 306595. severity 262395 serious Bug#262395: *** ERROR: can't make xmltex fmt files, installation doesn't work Bug#306595: tetex-bin: postinst failure with jadetex and xmltex Severity set to `serious'. tags 262395 +patch Bug#262395: *** ERROR: can't make xmltex fmt files, installation doesn't work Tags were: experimental Bug#306595: tetex-bin: postinst failure with jadetex and xmltex Tags added: patch thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#306595: tetex-bin: postinst failure with jadetex and xmltex
reassign 306595 xmltex severity 306595 important merge 306595 262395 severity 262395 serious tags 262395 +patch thanks On Thu, Apr 28, 2005 at 07:40:00PM +0200, Laurent Bonnaud wrote: Could you give us the contents of the files in /etc/texmf/fmt.d/ Here is what I have: -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4203 2005-03-30 10:25 00tetex.cnf -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 269 2002-12-10 14:02 40jadetex.cnf -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 271 2005-03-09 14:05 40jadetex.cnf.dpkg-dist -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 97 2002-11-01 20:20 40xmltex.cnf -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 97 2002-10-29 15:30 40xmltex.cnf.disable Thank you for the hint ! Cleaning-up the old cruft: mv 40jadetex.cnf.dpkg-dist 40jadetex.cnf fixed the jadetex problem. This is strange because I never touch those files and I always choose to use the new version from the maintainer. Now I only have a problem with xmltex (see below). # cat 40xmltex.cnf xmltex tex language.datlatex xmltex.ini pdfxmltex pdftex language.datpdflatex pdfxmltex.ini and tell us which version of xmltex and jadetex you're using? The latest one in sid+experimental: ii jadetex 3.13-6 generator of printable output from SGML or XML using J ii xmltex 1.9-8 TeX package for processing XML files This is bug #262395, so reassigning there. This is a serious bug as it will break all installations with the current (testing and unstable) tetex packages. Patch: edit /usr/share/texmf/tex/xmltex/templates/40xmltex.cnf to read: xmltex latex language.datlatex xmltex.ini pdfxmltex pdflatex language.datpdflatex pdfxmltex.ini i.e., changing tex - latex and pdftex to pdflatex. or xmltex etex language.datlatex xmltex.ini pdfxmltex pdfetex language.datpdflatex pdfxmltex.ini The latter is better, as it works whatever the setting of latex is. Julian -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#306843: nvidia-kernel-common: nvidia module not found when XFree86 starts
On Thu, 2005-04-28 at 22:29 +0200, Gijs Hillenius wrote: Package: nvidia-kernel-common Version: 1.0.7174-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Hello, this is an up to date debian box. XFree86 won't start. It complains: Loadmodule: nvidia Warning, couldn't open module nvidia Failed to load module nvidia (module does not exist, 0) Did you install nvidia-glx ? -- Randall Donald [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.khensu.org[EMAIL PROTECTED] Programmer/Debian Developer GnuPG: 6C27DEAB -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#306770: aegis: creates ~/integrate.log while building
This one time, at band camp, Walter Franzini said: In order to fix the problem, Jerry Pendergraft, the aeintegratq author, has prepared the patch in the attached message. Looks good for this bug. -- - | ,''`.Stephen Gran | | : :' :[EMAIL PROTECTED] | | `. `'Debian user, admin, and developer | |`- http://www.debian.org | - pgpfsaFz2HlIy.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#304803: still happens 0.10.4-2
Hello Blars^2[on], On Thu, 28 Apr 2005 03:27:26 -0700 Blars Blarson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This bug still happens building 0.10.4-2 on a sparc pbuilder. Yes, sorry, a fix that a fellow non-linux debian user created tricks me all the time. -3 should have fixed it for good, it's in the incoming at least now. Peter -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Bug#306816: dbishell: FTBFS: perl-readline check fails with TIOCSPTLCK: Invalid argument
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 306816 important Bug#306816: dbishell: FTBFS: perl-readline check fails with TIOCSPTLCK: Invalid argument Severity set to `important'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#306816: dbishell: FTBFS: perl-readline check fails with TIOCSPTLCK: Invalid argument
severity 306816 important thanks On Thu, Apr 28, 2005 at 07:14:06PM +0100, Vivek Dasmohapatra wrote: On Thu, 28 Apr 2005, Andreas Jochens wrote: Without the redirection of the output of 'dpkg-buildpackage' to 'build.log' the build succeeds. However, autobuilding is not possible because of this. Autobuilding is possible so long as the autobuild environment provides /dev/ptmx and /dev/pts/*, as I believe they are required to do. The command fakeroot dpkg-buildpackage build.log works for me. (build.log attached) Downgrading based on this analysis, then. Thanks, -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#306617: marked as done (statcvs: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'junit, libjdom-java')
Your message dated Thu, 28 Apr 2005 17:33:07 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#306617: fixed in statcvs 20030713-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Apr 2005 17:51:02 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Apr 27 10:51:02 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from c173165.adsl.hansenet.de (localhost.localdomain) [213.39.173.165] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DQqgf-0006sr-00; Wed, 27 Apr 2005 10:51:01 -0700 Received: from aj by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.50) id 1DQqgm-0003i0-NR; Wed, 27 Apr 2005 19:51:09 +0200 To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Andreas Jochens [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: statcvs: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'junit, libjdom-java' Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2005 19:51:09 +0200 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: statcvs Version: 20030713-3 Severity: serious Tags: patch When building 'statcvs' in a clean 'unstable' chroot, I get the following errors: # If upstream make StatCVS port for new jfreechart one day #cp /usr/share/java/jfreechart.jar statcvs-20030713/lib #cp /usr/share/java/jcommon.jar statcvs-20030713/lib cp /usr/share/java/junit.jar statcvs-20030713/lib cp: cannot stat `/usr/share/java/junit.jar': No such file or directory make: *** [configure-stamp] Error 1 cp /usr/share/java/junit.jar statcvs-20030713/lib cp /usr/share/java/jdom.jar statcvs-20030713/lib cp: cannot stat `/usr/share/java/jdom.jar': No such file or directory make: *** [configure-stamp] Error 1 (END) Please add the missing Build-Depends on 'junit, libjdom-java' to debian/control. Please also allow to build the package with j2sdk1.5-sun instead of j2sdk1.4-sun since j2sdk1.4-sun is not available on some architectures (e.g. amd64 and ppc64). Regards Andreas Jochens diff -urN ../tmp-orig/statcvs-20030713/debian/control ./debian/control --- ../tmp-orig/statcvs-20030713/debian/control 2005-04-27 19:41:13.983475766 +0200 +++ ./debian/control2005-04-27 19:41:08.283342318 +0200 @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ Section: contrib/devel Priority: optional Maintainer: Christian Bayle [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Build-Depends-Indep: debhelper ( 4.0.0), sun-j2sdk1.4, ant +Build-Depends-Indep: debhelper, sun-j2sdk1.5 | sun-j2sdk1.4, ant, junit, libjdom-java Standards-Version: 3.6.0 Package: statcvs diff -urN ../tmp-orig/statcvs-20030713/debian/rules ./debian/rules --- ../tmp-orig/statcvs-20030713/debian/rules 2005-04-27 19:41:13.982475918 +0200 +++ ./debian/rules 2005-04-27 19:31:55.0 +0200 @@ -4,13 +4,11 @@ #export DH_VERBOSE=1 # Build -#export JAVA_HOME=/usr/lib/j2se/1.4 -#export JAVA=/usr/lib/j2se/1.4/bin/java -#export JAVAC=/usr/lib/j2se/1.4/bin/javac -export JAVA_HOME=/usr/lib/j2sdk1.4-sun -export JAVA=/usr/lib/j2sdk1.4-sun/bin/java -export JAVAC=/usr/lib/j2sdk1.4-sun/bin/javac -export JAR=/usr/lib/j2sdk1.4-sun/bin/jar +JAVA_HOME_DIRS=/usr/lib/j2sdk1.5-sun /usr/lib/j2sdk1.4-sun +export JAVA_HOME ?= $(shell for j in $(JAVA_HOME_DIRS); do [ -d $$j ] echo $$j exit 0; done) +export JAVA=$(JAVA_HOME)/bin/java +export JAVAC=$(JAVA_HOME)/bin/javac +export JAR=$(JAVA_HOME)/bin/jar # this only compile with sun javac and jar at the moment #export CLASSPATH=$(JAVA_HOME)/lib/tools.jar:$(JAVA_HOME)/lib/classes.zip --- Received: (at 306617-close) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Apr 2005 21:38:05 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 28 14:38:05 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DRGhx-0003wl-00; Thu, 28 Apr 2005 14:38:05 -0700 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DRGd9-0001MQ-00; Thu, 28 Apr 2005 17:33:07 -0400 From: Christian Bayle [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $ Subject: Bug#306617: fixed in statcvs 20030713-4 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2005 17:33:07 -0400 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin
Bug#306750: marked as done (libjakarta-poi-java: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'ant')
Your message dated Thu, 28 Apr 2005 17:32:15 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#306750: fixed in libjakarta-poi-java 1.10.0-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Apr 2005 09:27:38 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 28 02:27:38 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from c156142.adsl.hansenet.de (localhost.localdomain)
[213.39.156.142]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DR5J4-0003Oj-00; Thu, 28 Apr 2005 02:27:38 -0700
Received: from aj by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1DR5JF-0007eD-1c; Thu, 28 Apr 2005 11:27:49 +0200
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Andreas Jochens [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: libjakarta-poi-java: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'ant'
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2005 11:27:49 +0200
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Package: libjakarta-poi-java
Version: 1.10.0-3
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
When building 'libjakarta-poi-java' in a clean 'unstable' chroot,
I get the following error:
touch configure-stamp
dh_testdir
(cd jakarta-poi-1.10.0 ant compile jar)
/bin/sh: ant: command not found
make: *** [build-stamp] Error 127
Please add the missing Build-Depends on 'ant' to debian/control.
Please also change debian/rules to set JAVA_HOME correctly for
the {sun,ibm,blackdown}-j2sdk1.4 packages which are created
by make-jpkg from java-package.
Regards
Andreas Jochens
diff -urN ../tmp-orig/libjakarta-poi-java-1.10.0/debian/control ./debian/control
--- ../tmp-orig/libjakarta-poi-java-1.10.0/debian/control 2005-04-28
11:14:55.246949206 +0200
+++ ./debian/control2005-04-28 11:14:10.041821430 +0200
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
Section: contrib/libs
Priority: optional
Maintainer: Christian Bayle [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Build-Depends-Indep: debhelper ( 4.0.0), jikes-sablevm , sablevm, fastjar,
j2sdk1.4, gjdoc
+Build-Depends-Indep: debhelper, ant, jikes-sablevm , sablevm, fastjar,
j2sdk1.4, gjdoc
Standards-Version: 3.5.8
Package: libjakarta-poi-java
diff -urN ../tmp-orig/libjakarta-poi-java-1.10.0/debian/rules ./debian/rules
--- ../tmp-orig/libjakarta-poi-java-1.10.0/debian/rules 2005-04-28
11:14:55.247949054 +0200
+++ ./debian/rules 2005-04-28 11:14:52.954297742 +0200
@@ -5,9 +5,9 @@
# Build
# Choose the VM
-export JAVA_HOME=/usr/lib/j2sdk1.4/
+JAVA_HOME_DIRS=/usr/lib/j2sdk1.4-sun /usr/lib/j2sdk1.4-ibm
/usr/lib/j2sdk1.4-blackdown
+export JAVA_HOME ?= $(shell for j in $(JAVA_HOME_DIRS); do [ -d $$j ]
echo $$j exit 0; done)
export JAVADOC=javadoc
-export CLASSPATH=/usr/lib/j2sdk1.4/jre/lib/rt.jar:/usr/share/java/xerces.jar
export LIBRARY = $(shell head -1 debian/control | sed 's/Source.
lib\(.*\)-java/\1/')
export VERSION = $(shell head -1 debian/changelog | sed
's/.*(\(.*\)-.*).*/\1/' )
export SRCDIR=$(LIBRARY)-$(VERSION)
---
Received: (at 306750-close) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Apr 2005 21:41:30 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 28 14:41:30 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DRGlG-0004po-00; Thu, 28 Apr 2005 14:41:30 -0700
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DRGcJ-0001Kd-00; Thu, 28 Apr 2005 17:32:15 -0400
From: Christian Bayle [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $
Subject: Bug#306750: fixed in libjakarta-poi-java 1.10.0-4
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2005 17:32:15 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Source: libjakarta-poi-java
Source-Version: 1.10.0-4
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
libjakarta-poi-java, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
libjakarta-poi-java-doc_1.10.0-4_all.deb
to
Bug#306754: marked as done (libjfreereport-java: transition to liblog4j1.2-java)
Your message dated Thu, 28 Apr 2005 17:32:41 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#306754: fixed in libjfreereport-java 0.8.3c-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Apr 2005 10:40:02 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 28 03:40:02 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mail.irb.hr [161.53.22.8] (UNKNOWN) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DR6R8-VD-00; Thu, 28 Apr 2005 03:40:02 -0700 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.irb.hr (8.13.3/8.13.3/Debian-6) with ESMTP id j3SAe0dX001380 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 28 Apr 2005 12:40:00 +0200 Received: from mail.irb.hr ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [127.0.0.1]) by mail.irb.hr (8.13.3/8.13.3/Debian-6) with ESMTP id j3SAdwfP001370 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 28 Apr 2005 12:39:58 +0200 Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by mail.irb.hr (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id j3SAdwnO001366 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 28 Apr 2005 12:39:58 +0200 Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2005 12:39:57 +0200 From: Matej Vela [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: libjfreereport-java: transition to liblog4j1.2-java Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at irb.hr Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: libjfreereport-java Version: 0.8.3c-3 Severity: serious Tags: patch liblog4j-java is currently unbuildable (#306739) and likely to be removed (#263870); please switch to liblog4j1.2-java. libjfreereport-java comes bundled with log4j 1.2.3, so there shouldn't be any compatibility problems. diff -ruN libjfreereport-java-0.8.3c.dist/debian/control libjfreereport-java-0.8.3c/debian/control --- libjfreereport-java-0.8.3c.dist/debian/control 2005-04-28 11:09:44.0 +0200 +++ libjfreereport-java-0.8.3c/debian/control 2005-04-28 11:53:16.0 +0200 @@ -2,13 +2,13 @@ Section: contrib/libs Priority: optional Maintainer: Christian Bayle [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Build-Depends-Indep: debhelper ( 4.0.0), j2sdk1.4, ant, bsh, libjcommon-java, libgnujaxp-java, libitext-java, libjakarta-poi-java, libpixie-java, liblog4j-java +Build-Depends-Indep: debhelper ( 4.0.0), j2sdk1.4, ant, bsh, libjcommon-java, libgnujaxp-java, libitext-java, libjakarta-poi-java, libpixie-java, liblog4j1.2-java Standards-Version: 3.6.1 Package: libjfreereport-java Section: contrib/libs Architecture: all -Depends: j2re1.4 | java2-runtime, libjcommon-java, libgnujaxp-java, libitext-java, libjakarta-poi-java, liblog4j-java +Depends: j2re1.4 | java2-runtime, libjcommon-java, libgnujaxp-java, libitext-java, libjakarta-poi-java, liblog4j1.2-java Description: report library for java JFreeReport is a free Java report library. It has the following features: * full on-screen print preview; diff -ruN libjfreereport-java-0.8.3c.dist/debian_patch libjfreereport-java-0.8.3c/debian_patch --- libjfreereport-java-0.8.3c.dist/debian_patch2005-04-28 11:09:44.0 +0200 +++ libjfreereport-java-0.8.3c/debian_patch 2005-04-28 11:54:39.0 +0200 @@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ perl -pi -e 's:pixie-0\.8\.0\.jar:pixie.jar:g' $1 perl -pi -e 's:jcommon-0\.8\.3\.jar:jcommon.jar:g' $1 perl -pi -e 's:jakarta-poi-1\.10\.0-dev-20030222\.jar:jakarta-poi.jar:g' $1 -perl -pi -e 's:log4j-1\.2\.3\.jar:log4j\.jar:g' $1 +perl -pi -e 's:log4j-1\.2\.3\.jar:log4j-1.2.jar:g' $1 perl -pi -e 's:servlet\.jar:servlet-2.3.jar:g' $1 # BEurk Thanks! Matej --- Received: (at 306754-close) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Apr 2005 21:38:07 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 28 14:38:07 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DRGhz-00040i-00; Thu, 28 Apr 2005 14:38:07 -0700 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DRGcj-0001La-00; Thu, 28 Apr 2005 17:32:41
Bug#306636: marked as done (libjcommon-java: FTBFS: ./debian_patch: Permission denied)
Your message dated Thu, 28 Apr 2005 17:32:28 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#306636: fixed in libjcommon-java 0.8.3-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Apr 2005 19:41:34 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Apr 27 12:41:34 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from c173165.adsl.hansenet.de (localhost.localdomain)
[213.39.173.165]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DQsPe-0001Xb-00; Wed, 27 Apr 2005 12:41:34 -0700
Received: from aj by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1DQsPm-0003PL-4r; Wed, 27 Apr 2005 21:41:42 +0200
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Andreas Jochens [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: libjcommon-java: FTBFS: ./debian_patch: Permission denied
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2005 21:41:42 +0200
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Package: libjcommon-java
Version: 0.8.3-3
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
When trying to build 'libjcommon-java', I get the following error:
./debian_patch jcommon-0.8.3/ant/build.xml
make: execvp: ./debian_patch: Permission denied
make: *** [configure-stamp] Error 127
The attached patch fixes this problem.
Additionally, the patch changes the JAVA_HOME directory setting
in debian/rules so that it works for the standard Debian
j2sdk1.4-{sun,ibm,blackdown} packages which can be made using
make-jpkg from java-package.
Regards
Andreas Jochens
diff -urN ../tmp-orig/libjcommon-java-0.8.3/debian/rules ./debian/rules
--- ../tmp-orig/libjcommon-java-0.8.3/debian/rules 2005-04-27
21:29:00.173465470 +0200
+++ ./debian/rules 2005-04-27 21:28:56.952955062 +0200
@@ -4,10 +4,8 @@
#export DH_VERBOSE=1
# Build
-export JAVA_HOME=/usr/lib/j2se/1.4
-export JAVA=/usr/lib/j2se/1.4/bin/java
-export JAVAC=/usr/lib/j2se/1.4/bin/javac
-export CLASSPATH=/usr/lib/j2se/1.4/jre/lib/rt.jar
+JAVA_HOME_DIRS=/usr/lib/j2sdk1.4-sun /usr/lib/j2sdk1.4-ibm
/usr/lib/j2sdk1.4-blackdown
+export JAVA_HOME ?= $(shell for j in $(JAVA_HOME_DIRS); do [ -d $$j ]
echo $$j exit 0; done)
export LIBRARY = $(shell head -1 debian/control | sed 's/Source.
lib\(.*\)-java/\1/')
export VERSION = $(shell head -1 debian/changelog | sed
's/.*(\(.*\)-.*).*/\1/' )
@@ -20,7 +18,7 @@
dh_testdir
# Add here commands to configure the package.
tar xvzf $(LIBRARY)-$(VERSION).tar.gz
- ./debian_patch $(SRCDIR)/ant/build.xml
+ sh ./debian_patch $(SRCDIR)/ant/build.xml
touch configure-stamp
---
Received: (at 306636-close) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Apr 2005 21:50:12 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 28 14:50:12 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DRGtg-0005mm-00; Thu, 28 Apr 2005 14:50:12 -0700
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DRGcW-0001LA-00; Thu, 28 Apr 2005 17:32:28 -0400
From: Christian Bayle [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $
Subject: Bug#306636: fixed in libjcommon-java 0.8.3-4
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2005 17:32:28 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Source: libjcommon-java
Source-Version: 0.8.3-4
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
libjcommon-java, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
libjcommon-java_0.8.3-4.diff.gz
to pool/contrib/libj/libjcommon-java/libjcommon-java_0.8.3-4.diff.gz
libjcommon-java_0.8.3-4.dsc
to pool/contrib/libj/libjcommon-java/libjcommon-java_0.8.3-4.dsc
libjcommon-java_0.8.3-4_all.deb
to pool/contrib/libj/libjcommon-java/libjcommon-java_0.8.3-4_all.deb
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for
Bug#306749: marked as done (libpixie-java: FTBFS: ./debian_patch: Permission denied)
Your message dated Thu, 28 Apr 2005 17:32:54 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#306749: fixed in libpixie-java 20030705-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Apr 2005 09:06:19 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 28 02:06:19 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from c156142.adsl.hansenet.de (localhost.localdomain)
[213.39.156.142]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DR4yQ-0007bw-00; Thu, 28 Apr 2005 02:06:18 -0700
Received: from aj by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1DR4yb-0005nF-9E; Thu, 28 Apr 2005 11:06:29 +0200
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Andreas Jochens [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: libpixie-java: FTBFS: ./debian_patch: Permission denied
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2005 11:06:29 +0200
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Package: libpixie-java
Version: 20030705-3
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
When trying to build 'libpixie-java', I get the following error:
pixie-0.8.0/ant/build.xml
./debian_patch pixie-0.8.0/ant/build.xml
make: execvp: ./debian_patch: Permission denied
make: *** [configure-stamp] Error 127
The attached patch fixes this by changing debian/rules.
Please also amend debian/rules to set JAVA_HOME correctly for
the {sun,ibm,blackdown}-j2sdk1.4.
Regards
Andreas Jochens
diff -urN ../tmp-orig/libpixie-java-20030705/debian/rules ./debian/rules
--- ../tmp-orig/libpixie-java-20030705/debian/rules 2005-04-28
10:53:33.569793750 +0200
+++ ./debian/rules 2005-04-28 10:53:02.999441150 +0200
@@ -4,10 +4,8 @@
#export DH_VERBOSE=1
# Build
-export JAVA_HOME=/usr/lib/j2se/1.4
-export JAVA=/usr/lib/j2se/1.4/bin/java
-export JAVAC=/usr/lib/j2se/1.4/bin/javac
-export CLASSPATH=/usr/lib/j2se/1.4/jre/lib/rt.jar
+JAVA_HOME_DIRS=/usr/lib/j2sdk1.4-sun /usr/lib/j2sdk1.4-ibm
/usr/lib/j2sdk1.4-blackdown
+export JAVA_HOME ?= $(shell for j in $(JAVA_HOME_DIRS); do [ -d $$j ]
echo $$j exit 0; done)
export LIBRARY=pixie
export VERSION=$(shell ls pixie-*.tar.gz | sed 's/pixie-\(.*\).tar.gz/\1/' )
@@ -21,7 +19,7 @@
# Add here commands to configure the package.
mkdir $(SRCDIR)
tar xvzf pixie-$(VERSION).tar.gz
- ./debian_patch $(SRCDIR)/ant/build.xml
+ sh ./debian_patch $(SRCDIR)/ant/build.xml
touch configure-stamp
---
Received: (at 306749-close) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Apr 2005 21:50:16 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 28 14:50:15 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DRGtj-0005mz-00; Thu, 28 Apr 2005 14:50:15 -0700
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DRGcw-0001M0-00; Thu, 28 Apr 2005 17:32:54 -0400
From: Christian Bayle [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $
Subject: Bug#306749: fixed in libpixie-java 20030705-4
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2005 17:32:54 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Source: libpixie-java
Source-Version: 20030705-4
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
libpixie-java, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
libpixie-java_20030705-4.diff.gz
to pool/contrib/libp/libpixie-java/libpixie-java_20030705-4.diff.gz
libpixie-java_20030705-4.dsc
to pool/contrib/libp/libpixie-java/libpixie-java_20030705-4.dsc
libpixie-java_20030705-4_all.deb
to pool/contrib/libp/libpixie-java/libpixie-java_20030705-4_all.deb
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug
Processed: tagging 306843, severity of 306843 is important, reassign 306843 to nvidia-glx
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10 tags 306843 moreinfo unreproducible Bug#306843: nvidia-kernel-common: nvidia module not found when XFree86 starts There were no tags set. Tags added: moreinfo, unreproducible severity 306843 important Bug#306843: nvidia-kernel-common: nvidia module not found when XFree86 starts Severity set to `important'. reassign 306843 nvidia-glx Bug#306843: nvidia-kernel-common: nvidia module not found when XFree86 starts Bug reassigned from package `nvidia-kernel-common' to `nvidia-glx'. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: tagging 306839
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 tags 306839 patch Bug#306839: blackbox: ftbfs [sparc] Blackbox requires the X Window System Tags were: sid Tags added: patch End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#306839: patch for FTBFS
Attached is a patch to fix FTBFS: missing build-depends on xlibs-dev. Confirmed on sid/i386 pbuilder. The depends is not versioned; I don't know if it should be; Why are they other dependencies versioned, anyway? Justin References [0] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=306839 --- debian/control.orig 2005-04-28 18:30:33.362702620 -0400 +++ debian/control 2005-04-28 18:26:34.0 -0400 @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ Priority: optional Maintainer: Bruno Barrera C. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Uploaders: Mathieu Baeumler [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Build-Depends: autoconf, debhelper (= 4.0.0), libc6-dev (= 2.3.2.ds1-20 ),libfontconfig1-dev (= 2.2.3-4 ),libfreetype6-dev (= 2.1.7-2.3 ), libstdc++5-3.3-dev (= 1 ), libx11-dev (= 4.3.0.dfsg.1-10 ), libxext-dev (= 4.3.0.dfsg.1-10 ), libxft-dev (= 2.1.2-6 ), libxrender-dev (= 0.8.3-7 ) +Build-Depends: autoconf, debhelper (= 4.0.0), libc6-dev (= 2.3.2.ds1-20 ),libfontconfig1-dev (= 2.2.3-4 ),libfreetype6-dev (= 2.1.7-2.3 ), libstdc++5-3.3-dev (= 1 ), libx11-dev (= 4.3.0.dfsg.1-10 ), libxext-dev (= 4.3.0.dfsg.1-10 ), libxft-dev (= 2.1.2-6 ), libxrender-dev (= 0.8.3-7 ), xlibs-dev Standards-Version: 3.6.1 Package: blackbox
Bug#306739: jakarta-log4j: FTBFS: 'enum' is a keyword, and may not be used as an identifier
On Thu, Apr 28, 2005 at 04:01:41PM +0200, Arnaud Vandyck wrote: Matej Vela [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The only packages that haven't moved to liblog4j1.2-java are: * libjfreereport-java: Upstream comes bundled with 1.2.3, so the switch should be painless. Patch at #306754. * jetty-extra: Upstream comes bundled with 1.2.6, and uses features specific to 1.2; Log4J support is either not used or already broken. Naive patch at #306761. I think we can remove jakarta-log4j as soon as #306754 is fixed. Is someone working on those? If not, I can have a look this friday (tomorrow). libjfreereport-java is fixed now, but you can take a look at jetty, it has another grave bug. Thanks, Matej -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#306265: nstx_1.1-beta6-2(powerpc/unstable): FTBFS: assumes signedness of chars
On Thu, Apr 28, 2005 at 07:46:36PM +0300, Lars Wirzenius wrote: The attached patch fixes the build problem. I may do an NMU tomorrow or next week, since we're close to a sarge freeze (and in a 0-day NMU phase). Should be an innocent enough change. No problem - I'm the wrong side of a thin piece of string at the moment, so an NMU would be helpful. Thanks, -- Matthew Garrett | [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#306254: axe: FTBFS: Failed to satisfy Build-Depends dependency for axe: libxaw-dev
On Thu, Apr 28, 2005 at 12:21:44PM -0700, H. S. Teoh wrote: On Mon, Apr 25, 2005 at 11:42:50AM +0200, Andreas Jochens wrote: [...] When building 'axe' in a clean 'testing' chroot, I get the following error: Building axe testing main amd64... Reading Package Lists... Building Dependency Tree... Package libxaw-dev is not available, but is referred to by another package. This may mean that the package is missing, has been obsoleted, or is only available from another source However the following packages replace it: libxaw7-dev libxaw6-dev E: Package libxaw-dev has no installation candidate E: Failed to satisfy Build-Depends dependency for axe: libxaw-dev The new version 6.1.2-14 in 'sid' does not have this problem. [...] Yes, I have already fixed this problem in 6.1.2-14, but it is not getting into testing. This package is non-free, and unfortunately that means people aren't very inclined to build it on the various archs for me. Have you asked the porter lists? The last three non-free packages that I asked people to build for RC bugfixes were all brought up-to-date in just a couple of days. Cc:ed to the lists for the archs in question. Also, I don't think this bug should affect the RC bug count for sarge, since it *is* non-free after all. Is there any reason for severity: serious here, other than the fact that the fixed package hasn't made it into testing yet? The only exception policy offers for non-free packages is: 2.2.3. The non-free section --- Packages must be placed in _non-free_ or _non-US/non-free_ if they are not compliant with the DFSG or are encumbered by patents or other legal issues that make their distribution problematic. In addition, the packages in _non-free_ and _non-US/non-free_ * must not be so buggy that we refuse to support them, and * must meet all policy requirements presented in this manual that it is possible for them to meet. [1] [1] It is possible that there are policy requirements which the package is unable to meet, for example, if the source is unavailable. These situations will need to be handled on a case-by-case basis. It is obviously possible for axe to have working build-depends here, therefore this requirement should not be waived. -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Processed: severity of 306006 is important
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 severity 306006 important Bug#306006: Package useless without mldonkey-server Severity set to `important'. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#170216: marked as done (gnome-think: Uninstallable: Depends on xlib6g)
Your message dated Thu, 28 Apr 2005 19:47:17 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#170216: fixed in gnome-think 0.1.4-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at maintonly) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Nov 2002 02:40:09 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Nov 21 20:40:01 2002
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from harrier.mail.pas.earthlink.net [207.217.120.12]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18F3jd-00064r-00; Thu, 21 Nov 2002 20:40:01 -0600
Received: from user-vcaunmd.dsl.mindspring.com ([216.175.94.205]
helo=frobnitz.ddts.net)
by harrier.mail.pas.earthlink.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1)
id 18F3jb-0001ww-00
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 21 Nov 2002 18:39:59 -0800
Received: from daniel by frobnitz.ddts.net with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 18F3jb-00066Z-00
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 21 Nov 2002 18:39:59 -0800
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: gnome-think: Build-Depends on xlib6g*
From: Daniel Schepler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: Daniel Schepler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2002 18:39:59 -0800
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.1 required=5.0
tests=SPAM_PHRASE_01_02
version=2.41
X-Spam-Level:
Package: gnome-think
Severity: normal
(This is an automatically generated bug, based on the current contents
of the Packages file for the main section.)
This package still depends on xlib6g; this needs to be updated since
the xlib6g* packages will disappear by the time of the next release.
(If this was pulled in by ${shlibs:Depends}, all you should need to do
to fix this bug is rebuild the package. However, if your source
package is missing Build-Depends, you may need to add these for the
autobuilders to work.)
---
Received: (at 170216-close) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Apr 2005 23:52:45 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 28 16:52:45 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DRIoH-0006Aa-00; Thu, 28 Apr 2005 16:52:45 -0700
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DRIiz-0001bf-00; Thu, 28 Apr 2005 19:47:17 -0400
From: Andrew Pollock [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $
Subject: Bug#170216: fixed in gnome-think 0.1.4-2
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2005 19:47:17 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2
Source: gnome-think
Source-Version: 0.1.4-2
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
gnome-think, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
gnome-think_0.1.4-2.diff.gz
to pool/main/g/gnome-think/gnome-think_0.1.4-2.diff.gz
gnome-think_0.1.4-2.dsc
to pool/main/g/gnome-think/gnome-think_0.1.4-2.dsc
gnome-think_0.1.4-2_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/gnome-think/gnome-think_0.1.4-2_i386.deb
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Andrew Pollock [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated gnome-think package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2005 09:24:14 +1000
Source: gnome-think
Binary: gnome-think
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.1.4-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian QA Group [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Andrew Pollock [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description:
gnome-think - Hierarchical organizer and outliner
Closes: 84229 140559 170216
Changes:
gnome-think (0.1.4-2) unstable; urgency=low
.
* QA Group upload orphaning this package
* debian/control: changed Section: to gnome
*
Bug#306864: needs a Replaces: python-pymad
Package: python2.3-pymad Version: 0.5.3-1 Severity: serious Selecting previously deselected package python2.3-pymad. Unpacking python2.3-pymad (from .../python2.3-pymad_0.5.3-1_i386.deb) ... dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/python2.3-pymad_0.5.3-1_i386.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite `/usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/madmodule.so', which is also in package python-pymad Preparing to replace python-pymad 0.5.2-1 (using .../python-pymad_0.5.3-1_all.deb) ... Unpacking replacement python-pymad ... Preparing to replace shared-mime-info 0.15-1 (using .../shared-mime-info_0.16-1debian1_i386.deb) ... Unpacking replacement shared-mime-info ... Errors were encountered while processing: /var/cache/apt/archives/python2.3-pymad_0.5.3-1_i386.deb E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) python2.3-pymad should Replaces: python-pymad. -Josh -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.11.7 Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to en_US.UTF-8) Versions of packages python2.3-pymad depends on: ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-21 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libmad0 0.15.1b-1.1 MPEG audio decoder library ii python2.3 2.3.5-2 An interactive high-level object-o -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Bug#306840: quagga: Depends on OpenSSL
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 306840 + pending confirmed Bug#306840: quagga: Depends on OpenSSL There were no tags set. Tags added: pending, confirmed thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#229509: Please test mergeant 0.5x
Hi, Eons ago, you filed a Release Critical bug against mergeant, about a crash when saving exiting the application. A new version of mergeant has been in unstable for a few weeks, and is now waiting for this bug to enter testing. I'd be grateful if you could give it a go and tell us if the bug still applies. Thanks, Jordi -- Jordi Mallach Pérez -- Debian developer http://www.debian.org/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.sindominio.net/ GnuPG public key information available at http://oskuro.net/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#306840: quagga: Depends on OpenSSL
tags 306840 + pending confirmed thanks Hello Faidon On 2005-04-28 Faidon Liambotis wrote: Christian, you're clearly trying to remove this dependency (debian/patches/remove_openssl.diff), but the patch applies to configure.ac and you aren't running autoconf. As a result, configure remains unpatched and the binaries are linking with libssl. That's correct, thanks for reporting! I've just fixed it and will soon upload the new package. I've set the severity to 'serious' because quagga is licensed under the GPL (without explicit OpenSSL exception), therefore linking with OpenSSL makes it unredistributable. Correct. On a side note, you really have to consider using dpatch or cdbs instead of manually patching debian/patches. I like them, too, and started using them on some other packages. It's probably just a question of (spare-) time when Quagga will use them :) Upgrading to debhelper 4 would be nice too - if you don't switch to cdbs that is. I upgraded to DH_COMPAT=4. Does this have any visible effect? bye, -christian- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: tagging 306864
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 tags 306864 sid Bug#306864: needs a Replaces: python-pymad There were no tags set. Tags added: sid End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#306864: needs a Replaces: python-pymad
This one time, at band camp, Joshua Kwan wrote: Package: python2.3-pymad Version: 0.5.3-1 Severity: serious Selecting previously deselected package python2.3-pymad. Unpacking python2.3-pymad (from .../python2.3-pymad_0.5.3-1_i386.deb) ... dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/python2.3-pymad_0.5.3-1_i386.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite `/usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/madmodule.so', which is also in package python-pymad Preparing to replace python-pymad 0.5.2-1 (using .../python-pymad_0.5.3-1_all.deb) ... Unpacking replacement python-pymad ... Preparing to replace shared-mime-info 0.15-1 (using .../shared-mime-info_0.16-1debian1_i386.deb) ... Unpacking replacement shared-mime-info ... Errors were encountered while processing: /var/cache/apt/archives/python2.3-pymad_0.5.3-1_i386.deb E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) python2.3-pymad should Replaces: python-pymad. It does already, but I think I got the version wrong. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#306839: patch for FTBFS
On Fri, Apr 29, 2005 at 03:07:09AM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: On Thu, Apr 28, 2005 at 06:34:15PM -0400, Justin Pryzby wrote: Attached is a patch to fix FTBFS: missing build-depends on xlibs-dev. Confirmed on sid/i386 pbuilder. It would be preferable to exactly detemine which of the xlibs the package depends on and then only build-depend on those. Okay, I'll work on it. Ideas why the dependencies are presently versioned? Justin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#306839: patch for FTBFS
On Thu, Apr 28, 2005 at 06:34:15PM -0400, Justin Pryzby wrote: Attached is a patch to fix FTBFS: missing build-depends on xlibs-dev. Confirmed on sid/i386 pbuilder. It would be preferable to exactly detemine which of the xlibs the package depends on and then only build-depend on those. Gruesse, -- Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED] www: http://www.djpig.de/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#306254: axe: FTBFS: Failed to satisfy Build-Depends dependency for axe: libxaw-dev
On Thu, Apr 28, 2005 at 04:33:50PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: Have you asked the porter lists? The last three non-free packages that I asked people to build for RC bugfixes were all brought up-to-date in just a couple of days. Cc:ed to the lists for the archs in question. Build them all and uploaded. hppa, m68k were buildable on debian.org machines in the chroots without having to ask for any additional packages... (powerpc was build on my own machine). Gruesse, -- Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED] www: http://www.djpig.de/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: tagging 306864
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 tags 306864 pending Bug#306864: needs a Replaces: python-pymad Tags were: sid Tags added: pending End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#306840: marked as done (quagga: Depends on OpenSSL)
Your message dated Thu, 28 Apr 2005 21:32:04 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#306840: fixed in quagga 0.98.3-5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Apr 2005 20:13:49 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 28 13:13:49 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from dtps.ted.unipi.gr (dtps.unipi.gr) [195.251.226.211] (dtps) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DRFOO-0006mn-00; Thu, 28 Apr 2005 13:13:48 -0700 Received: from [10.2.8.81] ([62.1.225.47]) by dtps.unipi.gr (VisNetic.MailServer.v5.8.6.4) with ESMTP id M41DH2; Thu, 28 Apr 2005 23:10:15 +0300 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Faidon Liambotis [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: quagga: Depends on OpenSSL X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8 Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2005 23:15:06 +0300 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: quagga Version: 0.98.3-4 Severity: serious quagga binary currently depends on libssl0.9.7 (OpenSSL), even though it doesn't build-depend on libssl-dev (how did that happen?) Christian, you're clearly trying to remove this dependency (debian/patches/remove_openssl.diff), but the patch applies to configure.ac and you aren't running autoconf. As a result, configure remains unpatched and the binaries are linking with libssl. I've set the severity to 'serious' because quagga is licensed under the GPL (without explicit OpenSSL exception), therefore linking with OpenSSL makes it unredistributable. On a side note, you really have to consider using dpatch or cdbs instead of manually patching debian/patches. Upgrading to debhelper 4 would be nice too - if you don't switch to cdbs that is. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (50, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.9 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Versions of packages quagga depends on: ii debconf 1.4.30.13Debian configuration management sy ii iproute 20041019-3 Professional tools to control the ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-21 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libcap1 1:1.10-14support for getting/setting POSIX. ii libncurses5 5.4-4Shared libraries for terminal hand ii libpam0g0.76-22 Pluggable Authentication Modules l ii libreadline44.3-11 GNU readline and history libraries ii libsnmp55.1.2-6.1NET SNMP (Simple Network Managemen ii libssl0.9.7 0.9.7e-3 SSL shared libraries ii logrotate 3.7-2Log rotation utility -- debconf information excluded --- Received: (at 306840-close) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Apr 2005 01:40:57 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 28 18:40:57 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DRKUy-000596-00; Thu, 28 Apr 2005 18:40:57 -0700 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DRKMO-W1-00; Thu, 28 Apr 2005 21:32:04 -0400 From: Christian Hammers [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $ Subject: Bug#306840: fixed in quagga 0.98.3-5 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2005 21:32:04 -0400 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Source: quagga Source-Version: 0.98.3-5 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of quagga, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: quagga-doc_0.98.3-5_all.deb to pool/main/q/quagga/quagga-doc_0.98.3-5_all.deb
Bug#306839: blackbox FTBFS
blackbox FTBFS may be fixed by an additional build-depends on libxt-dev. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#306107: marked as done (gnome-doc-utils: FTBFS: missing build-depends)
Your message dated Thu, 28 Apr 2005 22:47:41 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#306107: fixed in gnome-doc-utils 0.1.3-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Apr 2005 09:19:20 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Apr 24 02:19:20 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from mail-out.m-online.net [212.18.0.9]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DPdGp-0002Wf-00; Sun, 24 Apr 2005 02:19:20 -0700
Received: from mail.m-online.net (svr20.m-online.net [192.168.3.148])
by mail-out.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7293955B;
Sun, 24 Apr 2005 11:19:18 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from atari.stigge.org (ppp-82-135-13-174.mnet-online.de
[82.135.13.174])
by mail.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E71971986;
Sun, 24 Apr 2005 11:19:12 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [192.168.5.99] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by atari.stigge.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 942FD100442A3;
Sun, 24 Apr 2005 11:19:12 +0200 (CEST)
From: Roland Stigge [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: gnome-doc-utils: FTBFS: missing build-depends
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2005 11:19:12 +0200 (CEST)
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Package: gnome-doc-utils
Version: 0.1.3-2
Severity: serious
Hi,
building the package gnome-doc-utils in a clean sid build environment
(with pbuilder) on i386 results in:
=
[...]
checking locale.h usability... yes
checking locale.h presence... yes
checking for locale.h... yes
checking for LC_MESSAGES... yes
checking libintl.h usability... yes
checking libintl.h presence... yes
checking for libintl.h... yes
checking for ngettext in libc... yes
checking for dgettext in libc... yes
checking for bind_textdomain_codeset... yes
checking for msgfmt... /usr/bin/msgfmt
checking for dcgettext... yes
checking for gmsgfmt... /usr/bin/msgfmt
checking for xgettext... /usr/bin/xgettext
checking for a Python interpreter with version = 2.0... python
checking for python... /usr/bin/python
checking for python version... 2.3
checking for python platform... linux2
checking for script directory... ${prefix}/lib/python2.3/site-packages
checking for extension module directory...
${exec_prefix}/lib/python2.3/site-packages
checking for pkg-config... no
*** The pkg-config script could not be found. Make sure it is
*** in your path, or set the PKG_CONFIG environment variable
*** to the full path to pkg-config.
*** Or see http://www.freedesktop.org/software/pkgconfig to get pkg-config.
configure: error: Library requirements (
libxml-2.0 = 2.6.12
libxslt= 1.1.8
) not met; consider adjusting the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable if your
libraries are in a nonstandard prefix so pkg-config can find them.
make: *** [config.status] Error 1
=
Thanks for considering.
--
DARTS - Debian Archive Regression Test Suite
http://darts.alioth.debian.org/
Please note that this report has not been generated fully automatically.
DARTS just helped finding the problem.
---
Received: (at 306107-close) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Apr 2005 02:51:55 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 28 19:51:55 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DRLbf-00048k-00; Thu, 28 Apr 2005 19:51:55 -0700
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DRLXZ-000508-00; Thu, 28 Apr 2005 22:47:41 -0400
From: Fernanda Giroleti Weiden [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $
Subject: Bug#306107: fixed in gnome-doc-utils 0.1.3-3
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2005 22:47:41 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
Bug#306877: mysql-server: debian-sys-maint shouldn't have ALL PRIVILEGES
Package: mysql-server Version: 4.0.24-5 Severity: grave Tags: security Justification: user security hole The debian-sys-maint user is setup in the postinst to have mostly ALL PRIVILEGES, WITH GRANT, even. As I understand it (and as the README.Debian documents), the debian-sys-maint user is mainly used to stop the server as they would require knowledge of the mysql root users password else. If we give all privileges, with grant, to the debian-sys-maint, why have such a user at all? Why not simply put the root password there, as there is not a big difference between the two users anyways? If I'm missing something, then it should be documented more clearly in the README.Debian. :) I've done some tests here and for the init.d script, all that is required is RELOAD and SHUTDOWN. Some other privileges might be necessary in other environments, namely replication, but I couldn't test this here by lack of resources. This isn't such a grave security concern, but should be considered as a security problem anyways, because we do not leave only the necessary but allow extra privileges the user doesn't need. Thank you for your hard work on this excellent package. A. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-k7 Locale: LANG=fr_CA, LC_CTYPE=fr_CA (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Versions of packages mysql-server depends on: ii adduser 3.63Add and remove users and groups ii debconf 1.4.39 Debian configuration management sy ii gawk 1:3.1.4-2 GNU awk, a pattern scanning and pr ii libc62.3.2.ds1-20GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libdbi-perl 1.46-6 Perl5 database interface by Tim Bu ii libgcc1 1:3.4.3-12 GCC support library ii libmysqlclient12 4.0.24-5mysql database client library ii libstdc++5 1:3.3.5-12 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 ii libwrap0 7.6.dbs-8 Wietse Venema's TCP wrappers libra ii mailx1:8.1.2-0.20040524cvs-4 A simple mail user agent ii mysql-client 4.0.24-5mysql database client binaries ii mysql-common 4.0.24-5mysql database common files (e.g. ii passwd 1:4.0.3-31sarge1change and administer password and ii perl 5.8.4-8 Larry Wall's Practical Extraction ii psmisc 21.5-1 Utilities that use the proc filesy ii zlib1g 1:1.2.2-3 compression library - runtime -- debconf information: mysql-server/skip_networking: false mysql-server/really_downgrade_from_41: false mysql-server/want_chroot: false * mysql-server/start_on_boot: true mysql-server/postrm_remove_databases: false * mysql-server/mysql_install_db_notes: mysql-server/nis_warning: mysql-server/mysql_update_hints1: * mysql-server/postrm_remove_database: false mysql-server/fix_privileges_warning: -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#306878: security hole in ldapdiff.conf path construction
Package: ldapdiff Version: 0.9.2-1 Severity: critical Tags: security fixed-upstream The change logs for ldapdiff report that a security hole in ldapdiff.conf path construction was fixed in version 1.1.1 Upgrading to the current upstream version would both fix this security hole as well as other bugs according to the upstream change logs. Allan. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
