Processed: [bugzilla #308232] confirmed
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 308232 + confirmed Bug#308232: bugzilla: [FHS] Creates tempfiles on /usr/share. Tags were: sid Tags added: confirmed thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#308232: [bugzilla #308232] confirmed
tags 308232 + confirmed thanks Indeed, I confirm this is only a 2.18 issue. The 2.18 package did not entered sarge. I'll certainly come back to the /var/lib/bugzilla directory for $datadir, as it was done for the 2.16 package. Thanks for the report. -- Alexis Sukrieh [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.sukria.net « Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum sonatur. » Whatever is said in Latin sounds profound.
Bug#302771: followups
I tried to build a Debian package for it to minimize work for Gabor, but the compilation failed with an error I reported to Jerry Carter and Jeremy. Let's just wait them to wake up if already back to USA from the SambaXP conference. More news about this, mostly for Gabor... The compile error I reported to upstream is identified as a transitory error while merging code coming from Samba 4 branch. Jerry Carter has mentioned me it will need a few days to get this fixed so that we can recompile the package and finally test whether 302771 is completely away or not. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#308283: Upgrade to 1.999.23-1 breaks dependant packages
Package: libapache2-mod-perl2 Version: 1.999.21-1 Severity: serious I think breaking every dependant package of libapache2-mod-perl2 in unstable is a Bad Idea. It would be a lot smoother to keep such a major change in Experimental until dependant package maintainers have uploaded their changes to Experimental and then do a graceful transistion. That's what Experimental is for. As it is, I've had to downgrade until such time as the dependendant package mainers have had a chance to catch up. My particular problem is with libapache-gallery-perl, but I imagine everyone's affected. Thanks for the NEWS line, though. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.11-tengwar Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Versions of packages libapache2-mod-perl2 depends on: ii apache2-common 2.0.54-3 next generation, scalable, extenda ii libapr0 2.0.54-3 the Apache Portable Runtime ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-21 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libdb4.24.2.52-18Berkeley v4.2 Database Libraries [ ii libdevel-symdump-perl 2.03-3 Perl module for inspecting perl's ii libexpat1 1.95.8-3 XML parsing C library - runtime li ii libldap22.1.30-6 OpenLDAP libraries ii libperl5.8 5.8.4-8 Shared Perl library ii liburi-perl 1.35-1 Manipulates and accesses URI strin ii libwww-perl 5.803-4 WWW client/server library for Perl ii perl [libmime-base64-perl] 5.8.4-8 Larry Wall's Practical Extraction ii perl-base [perlapi-5.8.4] 5.8.4-8 The Pathologically Eclectic Rubbis -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#308281: libapache2-mod-perl2: File Registry.pm missing from .deb package, causing mod_perl2 to fail
Package: libapache2-mod-perl2 Version: 1.999.23-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Registry.pm is missing from new libapache2-mod-perl2 debian package (unstable distribution). This causing errors in apache2/error.log: failed to resolve handler `ModPerl::Registry': Can't locate ModPerl/Registry.pm in @INC (@INC contains: /local/www/html /etc/perl . The whole mod_perl2 because unusable therefore. Everything works fine with the version 1.999.21-1. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.11.8 Locale: LANG=ru_RU.KOI8-R, LC_CTYPE=ru_RU.KOI8-R (charmap=KOI8-R) Versions of packages libapache2-mod-perl2 depends on: ii apache2-common 2.0.54-3 next generation, scalable, extenda ii libapr0 2.0.54-3 the Apache Portable Runtime ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-21 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libdb4.24.2.52-18Berkeley v4.2 Database Libraries [ ii libdevel-symdump-perl 2.03-3 Perl module for inspecting perl's ii libexpat1 1.95.8-3 XML parsing C library - runtime li ii libldap22.1.30-6 OpenLDAP libraries ii libperl5.8 5.8.4-8 Shared Perl library ii liburi-perl 1.35-1 Manipulates and accesses URI strin ii libwww-perl 5.803-4 WWW client/server library for Perl ii perl [libmime-base64-perl] 5.8.4-8 Larry Wall's Practical Extraction ii perl-base [perlapi-5.8.4] 5.8.4-8 The Pathologically Eclectic Rubbis -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#308282: phpbb2: Security issue in url/bbcode
Package: phpbb2 Severity: grave Justification: user security hole [Upstream's description is not overly verbose; they intent to release full details in five days; please lower severity if you don't think it's grave] phpbb2 2.0.15 has been released and addresses a security issue, which upstream describes as serious. I'm not familiar with phpbb2, but it looks like missing input sanitization in the bbcode code. There's something, what seems to be a patch in the PHP world, in this forum message: http://www.phpbb.com/phpBB/viewtopic.php?f=14t=288194 Cheers, Moritz -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.4.29-vs1.2.10 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#308234: upgrading from 2.1.23 failed because of not setting slapd/dump_database_destdir
Hi Ferenc, On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 12:21:32AM +0200, Ferenc Engard wrote: While I have upgraded my system, slapd upgrade asked some questions, including directory to dump databases. The text said the default is /var/backups/slapd-VERSION. Reading that, I simply pushed enter. After that, the preinst script have failed, rendering slapd unconfigured. Meanwhile, apt has upgraded my libldap2 package. Which debconf frontend to you use? I hit the same problem with the readline frontend which does not seem to use the default value if you just push enter but instead the empty value. Maybe the configuration script should just replace the empty value by the default value again. After that I have recognized that the error is that there is no default for this setting despite of the description, I tried to set this with dpkg-reconfigure, but it didn't asked this question again (maybe there is a switch for that, just I didn't found it). I had to manually edit That could be considered a bug, yes. The question is only asked before upgrading, running dpkg-reconfigure will not ask for it but create a new OpenLDAP directory. /var/cache/debconf/config.dat (and that was not easy to find that this file is what I have to edit :( ). Hint: You could also use debconf-communicate for stuff like that. The game was not over: because of my libldap2 was upgraded, but slapd was not installed yet, slapcat didn't run. For some unknown reason the apt-get install slapd=2.1.23-1 libldap2=2.1.23-1 command said 'E: Version '2.1.23-1' for 'slapd' was not found', although my old packages were still in the cache directory. apt does not use packages in the cache directory unless they are still in the packages list for that package source. IOW: Because 2.1.23-1 is no longer in the Debian archive apt-get just forgets that they are still available somewhere in your cache. But you can use dpkg to install them. In the end, I successfully downgraded with dpkg. I still sucked with that the dumpdir already existed, and preinst didn't like it, but it was a piece of cake after these all. Erm, you mean, that you upgraded to 2.2.23 again afterwards? The most screamy was when it seemed that I cannot downgrade, and I system was useless. Do somebody have a tip what could cause that? My understanding of dpkg and apt-get says that at the time the preinst is run the old packages should still be installed. To get the broken state you describe, the system must have continued the installation despite the error in the slapd preinst. Which is in fact not expected to ever happen. I'll safeguard against an empty value for the dump dir... Greetings Torsten signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Processed: setting package to openldap2.2 slapd ldap-utils libldap-2.2-7, tagging 303505, tagging 306229 ...
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: package openldap2.2 slapd ldap-utils libldap-2.2-7 Ignoring bugs not assigned to: libldap-2.2-7 ldap-utils slapd openldap2.2 tags 303505 + pending Bug#303505: openldap2.2: [INTL:ja] update Japanese debconf translation Tags were: l10n patch Bug#227142: slapd: Please update Japanese translation Tags added: pending tags 306229 + pending Bug#306229: openldap2.2: [INTL:fr] French debconf templates translation Tags were: l10n patch Tags added: pending tags 308234 + pending Bug#308234: upgrading from 2.1.23 failed because of not setting slapd/dump_database_destdir There were no tags set. Tags added: pending End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#308287: Depends on weechat-gtk (0.1.1-1) which can't be installed
Package: weechat Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Hi, weechat can't be installed because of weechat-gtk. The following packages contain unsatisfied dependencies : weechat: Depends: weechat-gtk (= 0.1.1-1) but it is not installable E: Erroneous packages Les paquets suivants contiennent des dépendances non satisfaites : weechat: Dépend: weechat-gtk (= 0.1.1-1) mais il n'est pas installable E: Paquets défectueux -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.11.7 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) (ignored: LC_ALL set to [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Bug#300432: marked as done (Spontaneously reboots server...)
Your message dated Mon, 09 May 2005 03:17:05 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#300432: fixed in watchdog 5.2.4-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Mar 2005 18:24:23 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Mar 19 10:24:23 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from argo.pl.eu.org (master.argo.pl.eu.org) [62.121.75.39] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DCicZ-00066h-00; Sat, 19 Mar 2005 10:24:23 -0800 Received: from josh by master.argo.pl.eu.org with local (Exim 4.44) id 1DCicW-0001L4-5b for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 19 Mar 2005 19:24:20 +0100 Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2005 19:24:20 +0100 From: Artur =?iso-8859-2?Q?G=F3rniak?= [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Spontaneously reboots server... Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Artur =?iso-8859-2?Q?G=F3rniak?= [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2 Content-Disposition: inline X-Reportbug-Version: 3.8 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i Sender: =?iso-8859-2?Q?Artur_G=F3rniak?= [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: watchdog Version: 5.2.4-2 Severity: grave I am getting errors 101 and 2 resulting in system reboot when trying to use advanced features of the deamon. I was trying to use: ping interface file min-memory pidfile with realtime=yes and priority=19 seems that watchdog is restarting system if any event occurs in 10 sec interval. The problem is: upgrading system with watchdog running (restart of deamons could/will trigger watchdog) seems that for some reason watchdog is getting false events but I have not examined that. It can for example restart my machine again and again when using pid or file option. Last thing (it should be probably separate bug report): watchdog starts too early. If I want to monitor any other deamon than syslog my computer will never start with current configuration. I think that watchdog should be started at 99 not 10 in rc runlevels. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (101, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.7 Locale: LANG=pl_PL, LC_CTYPE=pl_PL (charmap=ISO-8859-2) Versions of packages watchdog depends on: ii devfsd 1.3.25-19Daemon for the device file system ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-18 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii makedev 2.3.1-75 Creates device files in /dev -- debconf-show failed --- Received: (at 300432-close) by bugs.debian.org; 9 May 2005 07:25:31 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon May 09 00:25:31 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DV2dv-0003fQ-00; Mon, 09 May 2005 00:25:31 -0700 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DV2Vl-0003VB-00; Mon, 09 May 2005 03:17:05 -0400 From: Michael Meskes [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $ Subject: Bug#300432: fixed in watchdog 5.2.4-3 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 09 May 2005 03:17:05 -0400 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2 Source: watchdog Source-Version: 5.2.4-3 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of watchdog, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: watchdog_5.2.4-3.diff.gz to pool/main/w/watchdog/watchdog_5.2.4-3.diff.gz watchdog_5.2.4-3.dsc to pool/main/w/watchdog/watchdog_5.2.4-3.dsc watchdog_5.2.4-3_i386.deb to pool/main/w/watchdog/watchdog_5.2.4-3_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
Processed: tagging 308283
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 tags 308283 sid Bug#308283: Upgrade to 1.999.23-1 breaks dependant packages There were no tags set. Tags added: sid End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#298054: patch for problem
This patch should fix the problem: --- main.c.orig 2005-05-09 03:29:59.0 -0400 +++ main.c 2005-05-09 03:30:37.0 -0400 @@ -415,7 +415,7 @@ standardise(buf); */ - SMTP_write(sock, ht-string); + SMTP_write(sock, %s, ht-string); ht = ht-next; } The nature of the issue should be obvious from this patch. The problem is fixed in more recent versions of debian (see ssmtp 2.61-3, ssmtp.c, line 1522) due to substantial rewriting (not sure exactly when the fix was introduced, though). I checked over both versions for similar issues. ssmtp-2.61 is clean (though ssmtp.c line 1424 looks problematic it is not because the buffer contains base64-encoded data). ssmtp-2.50.6.1 just has the issue mentioned here, and is otherwise fine. HTH, -Peff -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#304661: marked as done (superkaramba: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends)
Your message dated Mon, 09 May 2005 03:32:09 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#304661: fixed in superkaramba 0.35-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Apr 2005 14:37:29 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 14 07:37:28 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from granger.mail.mindspring.net [207.69.200.148] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DM5TE-0007OF-00; Thu, 14 Apr 2005 07:37:28 -0700 Received: from user-119bq03.biz.mindspring.com ([66.149.232.3] helo=frobnitz.homelinux.net) by granger.mail.mindspring.net with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1) id 1DM5TB-0004E3-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 14 Apr 2005 10:37:26 -0400 Received: from daniel by frobnitz.homelinux.net with local (Exim 4.50) id 1DM5TB-0008TK-8c for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 14 Apr 2005 07:37:25 -0700 To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: superkaramba: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends From: Daniel Schepler [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2005 07:37:25 -0700 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: superkaramba Version: 0.35-2 Severity: serious Tags: patch /bin/sh ../libtool --silent --mode=3Dlink --tag=3DCXX i386-linux-g++ -Wnon= -virtual-dtor -Wno-long-long -Wundef -pedantic -W -Wpointer-arith -Wmissing= -prototypes -ansi -D_XOPEN_SOURCE=3D500 -D_BSD_SOURCE -Wcast-align -Wconver= sion -DNDEBUG -DNO_DEBUG -O2 -fno-exceptions -fno-check-new-o superkara= mba -Wl,-export-dynamic -L/usr/X11R6/lib -L/usr/lib -L/usr/lib/python2.3= /config main.o karamba.o meter.o bar.o sensor.o datesensor.o textlabel.o = memsensor.o uptimesensor.o cpusensor.o networksensor.o imagelabel.o graph.o= xmmssensor.o programsensor.o disksensor.o sensorparams.o sensorsensor.o te= xtfilesensor.o clickarea.o noatunsensor.o karambarootpixmap.o clickmap.o rs= ssensor.o textfield.o taskmanager.o showdesktop.o richtextlabel.o karambase= ssionmanaged.o welcomeform.o systemtray.o bar_python.o meter_python.o textl= abel_python.o richtextlabel_python.o imagelabel_python.o config_python.o mi= sc_python.o systray_python.o task_python.o widget_python.o menu_python.o th= emelistwindow.o karambalistboxitem.o graph_python.o karambainterface.o kara= mbaapp.o karamba_python.o dcopinterface_skel.o dcopinterface_stub.o themeli= stwindow.moc.o cpusensor.moc.o sensor.moc.o datesensor.moc.o textlabel.moc.= o programsensor.moc.o bar.moc.o rsssensor.moc.o imagelabel.moc.o richtextla= bel.moc.o clickmap.moc.o sensorsensor.moc.o clickarea.moc.o systemtray.moc.= o welcomeform.moc.o disksensor.moc.o memsensor.moc.o meter.moc.o xmmssensor= .moc.o networksensor.moc.o graph.moc.o textfilesensor.moc.o -lkio -lXpm -l= kdeui -L/usr/lib -L/usr/X11R6/lib -lgtk -lgdk -rdynamic -lgmodule -lglib -l= dl -lXi -lXext -lX11 -lm -lxmms -lpython2.3 -ldl=20=20 /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lXpm collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make[4]: *** [superkaramba] Error 1 make[4]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/superkaramba-0.35/src' make[3]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[3]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/superkaramba-0.35/src' make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/superkaramba-0.35' make[1]: *** [all] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/superkaramba-0.35' make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2 Adding libxpm-dev to the Build-Depends allows the package to build. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.11-9-amd64-k8 Locale: LANG=3DC, LC_CTYPE=3DC (charmap=3DUTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to en= _US.UTF-8) --=20 Daniel Schepler Please don't disillusion me. I [EMAIL PROTECTED]haven't had breakfast yet. -- Orson Scott Card --- Received: (at 304661-close) by bugs.debian.org; 9 May 2005 07:41:10 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon May 09 00:41:10 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim
Bug#302771: followups
Hi Christian, On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 07:07:48AM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote: I tried to build a Debian package for it to minimize work for Gabor, but the compilation failed with an error I reported to Jerry Carter and Jeremy. Let's just wait them to wake up if already back to USA from the SambaXP conference. More news about this, mostly for Gabor... The compile error I reported to upstream is identified as a transitory error while merging code coming from Samba 4 branch. Jerry Carter has mentioned me it will need a few days to get this fixed so that we can recompile the package and finally test whether 302771 is completely away or not. For testing purposes, I think you might get away with just disabling compilation of the python module in debian/rules. Cheers, -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Processed: your mail
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: close 307275 Bug#307275: phpmyadmin: upgrade breaks included conffiles from other packages 'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing. Bug#304786: apache2-common: Include /etc/apache2/conf.d/*.conf Bug closed, send any further explanations to Jelmer Jaarsma [EMAIL PROTECTED] close 304786 Bug#304786: apache2-common: Include /etc/apache2/conf.d/*.conf 'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing. Bug is already closed, cannot re-close. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Bug#308268: mboxcheck-applet: Should depend on python-gnome2-extras
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 308268 experimental Bug#308268: mboxcheck-applet: Should depend on python-gnome2-extras There were no tags set. Tags added: experimental thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#298054: patch for problem
On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 03:38:49AM -0400, Jeff King wrote: This patch should fix the problem: --- main.c.orig 2005-05-09 03:29:59.0 -0400 +++ main.c 2005-05-09 03:30:37.0 -0400 @@ -415,7 +415,7 @@ standardise(buf); */ - SMTP_write(sock, ht-string); + SMTP_write(sock, %s, ht-string); ht = ht-next; } The nature of the issue should be obvious from this patch. The problem is fixed in more recent versions of debian (see ssmtp 2.61-3, ssmtp.c, line 1522) due to substantial rewriting (not sure exactly when the fix was introduced, though). I checked over both versions for similar issues. ssmtp-2.61 is clean (though ssmtp.c line 1424 looks problematic it is not because the buffer contains base64-encoded data). ssmtp-2.50.6.1 just has the issue mentioned here, and is otherwise fine. HTH, -Peff Thank you Jeff for the patch. Michelle, could you please test Jeff's patch for me? Mit freundlichen Grüßen, Anibal Monsalve Salazar -- .''`. Debian GNU/Linux : :' : Free Operating System `. `' http://debian.org/ `- http://v7w.com/anibal signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#308268: mboxcheck-applet: Should depend on python-gnome2-extras
tag 308268 experimental thanks Le dimanche 08 mai 2005 à 22:06 -0500, Erik Meitner a écrit : Package: mboxcheck-applet Version: 0.3-1 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 7.2 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:$ /usr/lib/gnome-panel/mboxcheck Traceback (most recent call last): File /usr/lib/gnome-panel/mboxcheck, line 8, in ? import gnome.applet ImportError: No module named applet Hi, You are using experimental packages, there is no python-gnome2 split for sarge. I'm tagging this bug as it should be. Cheers, Sebastien Bacher
Processed: Re: Bug#308244: severity: serious?
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 308244 serious Bug#308244: Don't compile on Ubuntu. Severity set to `serious'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#307188: marked as done (octave-gpc: FTBFS: no match for 'operator[]' in '*m[vertices]')
Your message dated Mon, 9 May 2005 01:36:14 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line octave-gpc: FTBFS: no match for 'operator[]' in '*m[vertices]' has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 1 May 2005 13:15:57 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun May 01 06:15:57 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from c203005.adsl.hansenet.de (localhost.localdomain) [213.39.203.5] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DSEIf-0008Vh-00; Sun, 01 May 2005 06:15:57 -0700 Received: from aj by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.50) id 1DSEJ0-lY-Jy; Sun, 01 May 2005 15:16:18 +0200 To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Andreas Jochens [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: octave-gpc: FTBFS: no match for 'operator[]' in '*m[vertices]' Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sun, 01 May 2005 15:16:18 +0200 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: octave-gpc Version: 0.1.4-1 Severity: serious Tags: sarge When building 'octave-gpc' on i386/testing, I get the following error: /usr/bin/mkoctfile -v -s -c gpc_create.cc /usr/bin/g++ -c -fPIC -I/usr/include/octave-2.1.69 -I/usr/include/octave-2.1.69/octave -O2 gpc_create.cc -o gpc_create.o gpc_create.cc: In function `octave_value_list Fgpc_create(const octave_value_list, int)': gpc_create.cc:81: error: no match for 'operator[]' in '*m[vertices]' gpc_create.cc:84: error: no match for 'operator[]' in '*m[indices]' gpc_create.cc:86: error: no match for 'operator[]' in '*m[hole]' make[1]: *** [gpc_create.o] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/octave-gpc-0.1.4' make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2 The newer version 0.1.5-4 in sid builds fine. Regards Andreas Jochens --- Received: (at 307188-done) by bugs.debian.org; 9 May 2005 08:36:15 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon May 09 01:36:15 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from dsl093-039-086.pdx1.dsl.speakeasy.net (localhost.localdomain) [66.93.39.86] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DV3kM-0001kL-00; Mon, 09 May 2005 01:36:15 -0700 Received: by localhost.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000) id AD0BA172843; Mon, 9 May 2005 01:36:14 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 9 May 2005 01:36:14 -0700 From: Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: octave-gpc: FTBFS: no match for 'operator[]' in '*m[vertices]' Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=C7zPtVaVf+AK4Oqc Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: --C7zPtVaVf+AK4Oqc Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable gpcl has been built on all architectures, so it (and along with it, the new version of octave-gpc) have been approved for sarge and should go in tomorrow. Therefore, I think this bug can be closed. Thanks, --=20 Steve Langasek postmodern programmer --C7zPtVaVf+AK4Oqc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFCfyD5KN6ufymYLloRAqhdAJ43CsvoG49xyDXMf5ngIbwi+F9rRQCgnhZN hbx2x5OFlNpsgW5JsAhL/FQ= =WsXl -END PGP SIGNATURE- --C7zPtVaVf+AK4Oqc-- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: your mail
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 308244 sid Bug#308244: Don't compile on Ubuntu. Tags were: sid Tags added: sid thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: llvm: Conflict with /usr/bin/extract from package extract.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 304035 patch Bug#304035: llvm: Conflict with /usr/bin/extract from package extract. There were no tags set. Tags added: patch thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#304035: llvm: Conflict with /usr/bin/extract from package extract.
tags 304035 patch
thanks
Hi Al,
As Frank correctly identified, an undeclared conflict is a release critical
bug. I've attached a patch that implements the naive solution to this
problem; if I hear no objections from you in the next day or two, I'll plan
to upload an NMU with this patch.
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
diff -Nru /var/tmp/vOqu163GkP/llvm-1.4/debian/changelog
/var/tmp/au6ZkyCsOl/llvm-1.4/debian/changelog
--- /var/tmp/vOqu163GkP/llvm-1.4/debian/changelog 2005-03-11
16:02:09.0 -0800
+++ /var/tmp/au6ZkyCsOl/llvm-1.4/debian/changelog 2005-05-09
01:49:03.0 -0700
@@ -1,3 +1,12 @@
+llvm (1.4-2.1) unstable; urgency=high
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+ * High urgency upload for sarge-targetted RC bugfix
+ * Add Conflicts: with extract because of /usr/bin/extract, as required
+by policy. Closes: #304035.
+
+ -- Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon, 9 May 2005 01:43:54 -0700
+
llvm (1.4-2) unstable; urgency=low
* An older version of llvmc was inadvertently used; now fixed.
diff -Nru /var/tmp/vOqu163GkP/llvm-1.4/debian/control
/var/tmp/au6ZkyCsOl/llvm-1.4/debian/control
--- /var/tmp/vOqu163GkP/llvm-1.4/debian/control 2005-03-11 13:50:43.0
-0800
+++ /var/tmp/au6ZkyCsOl/llvm-1.4/debian/control 2005-05-09 01:49:26.0
-0700
@@ -34,6 +34,7 @@
Package: llvm
Architecture: i386 amd64 sparc powerpc
Recommends: llvm-doc, llvm-cfe
+Conflicts: extract
Depends: llvm-libs, ${shlibs:Depends}, ${misc:Depends}
Description: Low-Level Virtual Machine (LLVM) compiler for C/C++
The Low-Level Virtual Machine (LLVM) is a collection of libraries and
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Processed: Fixed in NMU of enigma 0.91-2
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 308244 + fixed Bug#308244: Don't compile on Ubuntu. Tags were: sid Tags added: fixed quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#308225: marked as done (python-id3lib: uninstallable)
Your message dated Mon, 09 May 2005 05:02:50 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#308225: fixed in pyid3lib 0.5.1-5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 8 May 2005 21:09:35 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun May 08 14:09:35 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from dkv254.neoplus.adsl.tpnet.pl (mp.pl.eu.org) [83.24.25.254] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DUt1q-0007cI-00; Sun, 08 May 2005 14:09:35 -0700 Received: from mike by mp.pl.eu.org with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1DUt1L-0003YS-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 08 May 2005 23:09:03 +0200 Date: Sun, 8 May 2005 23:09:03 +0200 From: Michal Politowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: python-id3lib: uninstallable Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=BOKacYhQ+x31HxR3 Content-Disposition: inline X-Reportbug-Version: 3.11 X-PGP: 1024D/6B757C5B; 1C98 622F 6A6D 822D 3E95 2626 14EB 98C1 6B75 7C5B; 2004-02-29 -- 2006-02-28 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Sender: Michal Politowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: --BOKacYhQ+x31HxR3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Package: python-id3lib Version: 0.5.1-4 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable /usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/pyid3lib.so is in this dummy package, probably accidentally, and causes a conflict with python2.3-id3lib. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (500, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.10 Locale: LANG=3Dpl_PL, LC_CTYPE=3Dpl_PL (charmap=3DISO-8859-2) Versions of packages python-id3lib depends on: ii python2.3.5-2An interactive high-level obje= ct-o ii python2.3-id3lib 0.5.1-4id3lib wrapper for Python - li= brar --=20 Micha=B3 Politowski Talking has been known to lead to communication if practised carelessly. --BOKacYhQ+x31HxR3 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFCfn/vFOuYwWt1fFsRAvQcAKCPAW1rnwRzwUugSAb06xW/xwO4LACeOoT4 jXuANuCxedNs904kMEUI3oY= =LA/y -END PGP SIGNATURE- --BOKacYhQ+x31HxR3-- --- Received: (at 308225-close) by bugs.debian.org; 9 May 2005 09:17:38 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon May 09 02:17:38 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DV4OQ-0003oE-00; Mon, 09 May 2005 02:17:38 -0700 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DV4A6-00010k-00; Mon, 09 May 2005 05:02:50 -0400 From: Jonas Smedegaard [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $ Subject: Bug#308225: fixed in pyid3lib 0.5.1-5 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 09 May 2005 05:02:50 -0400 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2 Source: pyid3lib Source-Version: 0.5.1-5 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of pyid3lib, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: pyid3lib_0.5.1-5.diff.gz to pool/main/p/pyid3lib/pyid3lib_0.5.1-5.diff.gz pyid3lib_0.5.1-5.dsc to pool/main/p/pyid3lib/pyid3lib_0.5.1-5.dsc python-id3lib_0.5.1-5_all.deb to pool/main/p/pyid3lib/python-id3lib_0.5.1-5_all.deb python2.2-id3lib_0.5.1-5_powerpc.deb to pool/main/p/pyid3lib/python2.2-id3lib_0.5.1-5_powerpc.deb python2.3-id3lib_0.5.1-5_powerpc.deb to
Bug#308282: phpbb2: Security issue in url/bbcode
On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 08:13:46AM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: Package: phpbb2 Severity: grave Justification: user security hole [Upstream's description is not overly verbose; they intent to release full details in five days; please lower severity if you don't think it's grave] phpbb2 2.0.15 has been released and addresses a security issue, which upstream describes as serious. I'm not familiar with phpbb2, but it looks like missing input sanitization in the bbcode code. Yeah, I read about it yesterday (was away for a few days) -- thanks for reporting. I didn't yet look into it completely, looks like XSS to me. There's something, what seems to be a patch in the PHP world, in this forum message: http://www.phpbb.com/phpBB/viewtopic.php?f=14t=288194 Only phpbb manages to produce this kind of insane manual patches... :( --Jeroen -- Jeroen van Wolffelaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] (also for Jabber MSN; ICQ: 33944357) http://Jeroen.A-Eskwadraat.nl -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#308003: FTBFS: cannot find -lc (forwarded from Andreas Jochens)
On lun, 2005-05-09 at 05:47 +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: Please make sure you have: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~% ls -lhd /usr/lib32 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 24 2005-05-08 20:01 /usr/lib32 - /emul/ia32-linux/usr/lib/ Thank you for the hint ! My system was messed up, indeed. I fixed it and it solved the problem. Therefore I'm closing this bug. The build is not finished yet (it takes ages), but if there is another problem, I'll open another bug... BTW, my system has this line in /etc/apt/sources.list: deb http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian-amd64/debian/ experimental main contrib but gcc-4.0 is not available. I'm wondering which packages Andreas Jochens is using to report all the build failures in Debian packages with gcc-4.0. Thanks again, -- Laurent Bonnaud. http://www.lis.inpg.fr/pages_perso/bonnaud/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#307258: marked as done (Components.idl missing)
Your message dated Mon, 09 May 2005 05:47:09 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#307258: fixed in ace 5.4.2.1.0-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 2 May 2005 06:50:51 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun May 01 23:50:51 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from master.debian.org [146.82.138.7] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DSUlX-0001NI-00; Sun, 01 May 2005 23:50:51 -0700 Received: from p54896af8.dip.t-dialin.net ([127.0.0.1]) [84.137.106.248] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DSUlU-00059K-00; Mon, 02 May 2005 01:50:50 -0500 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Stefan Strasser [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Components.idl missing X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8 Date: Mon, 02 May 2005 08:51:29 +0200 X-Debbugs-Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-9.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE, OUR_MTA_MSGID,X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: libciao-dev Version: 5.4.2.1.0-3 Severity: grave Components.idl is not provided with this package which renders it useless because it is included in any cidl file. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.10 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) Versions of packages libciao-dev depends on: ii libciao1.4 5.4.2.1.0-3 CIAO, TAO's implementation of CORB ii libtao-orbsvcs-dev 5.4.2.1.0-3 The ACE ORB, an open-source implem -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 307258-close) by bugs.debian.org; 9 May 2005 09:53:06 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon May 09 02:53:06 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DV4wj-0001F3-00; Mon, 09 May 2005 02:53:05 -0700 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DV4qz-0004yg-00; Mon, 09 May 2005 05:47:09 -0400 From: Konstantinos Margaritis [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $ Subject: Bug#307258: fixed in ace 5.4.2.1.0-4 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 09 May 2005 05:47:09 -0400 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Source: ace Source-Version: 5.4.2.1.0-4 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of ace, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: ace_5.4.2.1.0-4.diff.gz to pool/main/a/ace/ace_5.4.2.1.0-4.diff.gz ace_5.4.2.1.0-4.dsc to pool/main/a/ace/ace_5.4.2.1.0-4.dsc gperf-ace_5.4.2.1.0-4_i386.deb to pool/main/a/ace/gperf-ace_5.4.2.1.0-4_i386.deb libace-dev_5.4.2.1.0-4_i386.deb to pool/main/a/ace/libace-dev_5.4.2.1.0-4_i386.deb libace-doc_5.4.2.1.0-4_all.deb to pool/main/a/ace/libace-doc_5.4.2.1.0-4_all.deb libace-flreactor-dev_5.4.2.1.0-4_i386.deb to pool/main/a/ace/libace-flreactor-dev_5.4.2.1.0-4_i386.deb libace-flreactor5.4_5.4.2.1.0-4_i386.deb to pool/main/a/ace/libace-flreactor5.4_5.4.2.1.0-4_i386.deb libace-qtreactor-dev_5.4.2.1.0-4_i386.deb to pool/main/a/ace/libace-qtreactor-dev_5.4.2.1.0-4_i386.deb libace-qtreactor5.4_5.4.2.1.0-4_i386.deb to pool/main/a/ace/libace-qtreactor5.4_5.4.2.1.0-4_i386.deb libace-rmcast-dev_5.4.2.1.0-4_i386.deb to pool/main/a/ace/libace-rmcast-dev_5.4.2.1.0-4_i386.deb libace-rmcast5.4_5.4.2.1.0-4_i386.deb to pool/main/a/ace/libace-rmcast5.4_5.4.2.1.0-4_i386.deb libace-tkreactor-dev_5.4.2.1.0-4_i386.deb to pool/main/a/ace/libace-tkreactor-dev_5.4.2.1.0-4_i386.deb libace-tkreactor5.4_5.4.2.1.0-4_i386.deb to pool/main/a/ace/libace-tkreactor5.4_5.4.2.1.0-4_i386.deb libace-xtreactor-dev_5.4.2.1.0-4_i386.deb to
Bug#308244: marked as done (Don't compile on Ubuntu.)
Your message dated Mon, 09 May 2005 02:57:05 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Fixed in NMU of enigma 0.91-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 8 May 2005 23:36:30 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun May 08 16:36:30 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from f05s05.cac.psu.edu (f05n05.cac.psu.edu) [128.118.141.48] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DUvK1-0003QL-00; Sun, 08 May 2005 16:36:30 -0700 Received: from jester.burrows.local ([141.151.236.206]) (authenticated bits=0) by f05n05.cac.psu.edu (8.13.2/8.13.2) with ESMTP id j48NaRZB028650 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NOT) for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 8 May 2005 19:36:28 -0400 From: Daniel Burrows [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Don't compile on Ubuntu. Date: Sun, 8 May 2005 19:36:17 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary=nextPart21458139.ZlyplzFSY6; protocol=application/pgp-signature; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: --nextPart21458139.ZlyplzFSY6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Package: enigma Version: 0.91-1 Tags: sid Depends: libc6 (=3D 2.3.4-1), libgcc1 (=3D 1:4.0-0pre6ubuntu4), ... Daniel =2D- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.10-1-686 Locale: LANG=3Den_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=3Den_US.UTF-8 (charmap=3DUTF-8) Versions of packages enigma depends on: ii enigma-data 0.81.1-2 Data file for the game enigma ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-21 GNU C Library: Shared librarie= s=20 an ii libgcc1 1:3.4.3-13 GCC support library ii liblua40 4.0-13 Main interpreter library for t= he=20 L ii liblualib40 4.0-13 Extension library for the Lua = 4.0=20 ii libsdl-image1 1.2.4-1image loading library for Simp= le=20 D ii libsdl-mixer1 1.2.6-1mixer library for Simple=20 DirectMed ii libsdl1.2debi 1.2.7+1.2.8cvs20041007-4.1 Simple DirectMedia Layer ii libstdc++51:3.3.6-3.0.1 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 ii libtolua0 4.0a-3 Tool to integrate C/C++ code w= ith=20 ii libzipios++0c 0.1.5.9+cvs.2004.02.07-3 a small C++ library for readin= g=20 zi ii zlib1g1:1.2.2-4 compression library - runtime =2D- no debconf information =2D-=20 /- Daniel Burrows [EMAIL PROTECTED] = =2D\ |The spork is strong with him... -- Fluble = | \--- Be like the kid in the movie! Play chess! -- http://www.uschess.org -= =2D/ --nextPart21458139.ZlyplzFSY6 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBCfqJ3ch6xsM7kSXgRAvu7AKC/j8cFsITpjnM8dj+mafoei7H0igCeKxjg 7GXr198xsMIXkBYN0j+cJ6s= =uaSM -END PGP SIGNATURE- --nextPart21458139.ZlyplzFSY6-- --- Received: (at 308244-done) by bugs.debian.org; 9 May 2005 09:57:12 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon May 09 02:57:12 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from legolas.drinsama.de [62.91.17.164] (postfix) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DV50i-00024W-00; Mon, 09 May 2005 02:57:12 -0700 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCB75C4C08D for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 9 May 2005 11:57:10 +0200 (CEST) Received: from legolas.drinsama.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (legolas [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with SMTP id 09044-06 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 9 May 2005 11:57:10 +0200 (CEST) Received: from wintermute.xmldesign.de (s78.RIC.Berkeley.EDU [169.229.54.11]) by legolas.drinsama.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC1E1C4C088 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon,
Processed: [phpbb2 #308282] upstream patch
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 308282 + patch Bug#308282: phpbb2: Security issue in url/bbcode There were no tags set. Tags added: patch thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: /usr/share/guessnet/test/test-wireless: line 52: ip: command not found
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 294346 important Bug#294346: /usr/share/guessnet/test/test-wireless: line 52: ip: command not found Severity set to `important'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#290618: marked as done (pinfo: timestamp skew issues with pinfo.info during build.)
Your message dated Mon, 09 May 2005 06:17:03 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#290618: fixed in pinfo 0.6.8-5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Jan 2005 11:21:14 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jan 15 03:21:13 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from asia.telenet-ops.be [195.130.132.59] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1CplzV-0003pv-00; Sat, 15 Jan 2005 03:21:13 -0800 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by asia.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with SMTP id 8D47F22424E for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 15 Jan 2005 12:21:11 +0100 (MET) Received: from kabel.telenet.be (dD5775FD9.access.telenet.be [213.119.95.217]) by asia.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D70C224156 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 15 Jan 2005 12:21:11 +0100 (MET) Received: by kabel.telenet.be (Postfix, from userid 501) id E9A4B26136; Sat, 15 Jan 2005 12:21:10 +0100 (CET) Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2005 12:21:10 +0100 From: Kurt Roeckx [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: pinfo: timestamp skew issues with pinfo.info during build. Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.8 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,DOMAIN_BODY, HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: pinfo Version: 0.6.8-4 Severity: important Hi, Their seems to be a timestamp skew problem with pinfo.info. It's generates via the diff file, and so is pinfo.texi. In the diff the .info comes first and the .texi after it. This can cause the info file to become 0 size if make sees that and tries to run makeinfo to update it. It gives a nice warning that makeinfo is missing too. Could you please add a build dependency on texinfo, or fix this in some other way? PS: The info page seems to be generated using makeinfo 4.0 and current version is 4.7 and that generates a difference, but those seem to be good. Kurt --- Received: (at 290618-close) by bugs.debian.org; 9 May 2005 10:23:04 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon May 09 03:23:04 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DV5Pk-0007nw-00; Mon, 09 May 2005 03:23:04 -0700 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DV5Jv-OE-00; Mon, 09 May 2005 06:17:03 -0400 From: Bas Zoetekouw [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $ Subject: Bug#290618: fixed in pinfo 0.6.8-5 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 09 May 2005 06:17:03 -0400 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2 Source: pinfo Source-Version: 0.6.8-5 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of pinfo, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: pinfo_0.6.8-5.diff.gz to pool/main/p/pinfo/pinfo_0.6.8-5.diff.gz pinfo_0.6.8-5.dsc to pool/main/p/pinfo/pinfo_0.6.8-5.dsc pinfo_0.6.8-5_i386.deb to pool/main/p/pinfo/pinfo_0.6.8-5_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Bas Zoetekouw [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated pinfo package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Mon, 9 May 2005 11:11:20 +0200 Source: pinfo Binary: pinfo Architecture: source i386 Version: 0.6.8-5
Bug#294346: /usr/share/guessnet/test/test-wireless: line 52: ip: command not found
severity 294346 important thanks The maintainer has asserted that this is a missing Recommends:, not a missing Depends:, and recommends are not considered release-critical. Thanks, -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#296459: marked as done (pinfo is uninstallable.)
Your message dated Mon, 09 May 2005 06:17:03 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#290618: fixed in pinfo 0.6.8-5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Feb 2005 16:17:46 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Feb 22 08:17:45 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from chico.rediris.es [130.206.1.3] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D3cjJ-LB-00; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 08:17:45 -0800 Received: from localhost (soberbia.rediris.es [130.206.1.21]) by chico.rediris.es (8.12.10/8.9.1) with ESMTP id j1MGHDNU022672; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 17:17:13 +0100 (CET) From: David =?iso-8859-15?q?Mart=EDnez_Moreno?= [EMAIL PROTECTED] Organization: Debian To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: pinfo is uninstallable. Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 17:17:39 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.1 Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary=nextPart2763104.60EOWF5rha; protocol=application/pgp-signature; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: --nextPart2763104.60EOWF5rha Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Package: pinfo Version: 0.6.8-4 Severity: important Hello, I found pinfo uninstallable with an apt-get install pinfo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ LC_ALL=C sudo apt-get install pinfo Reading Package Lists... Done Building Dependency Tree... Done Suggested packages: mutt The following NEW packages will be installed: pinfo 0 upgraded, 1 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. 1 not fully installed or removed. Need to get 80,3kB of archives. After unpacking 324kB of additional disk space will be used. Get:1 http://bach.hpc2n.umu.se sarge/main pinfo 0.6.8-4 [80,3kB] Fetched 80.3kB in 0s (138kB/s) Selecting previously deselected package pinfo. (Reading database ... 54641 files and directories currently installed.) Setting up pinfo (0.6.8-4) ... No `START-INFO-DIR-ENTRY' and no `This file documents'. install-info(/usr/share/info/pinfo.info.gz): unable to determine description for `dir' entry - giving up dpkg: error processing pinfo (--configure): subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1 Errors were encountered while processing: pinfo E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) I have put important severity instead of grave as this architecture is not going to be released with sarge. Best regards, Ender. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-10-amd64-k8 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) (ignored: LC_ALL set to [EMAIL PROTECTED]) Versions of packages pinfo depends on: ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-20.0.0.1.pure64 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libncurses55.4-4 Shared libraries for terminal hand -- no debconf information -- Servicios de red - Network services RedIRIS - Spanish Academic Network for Research and Development Red.es - Madrid (Spain) Tlf (+34) 91.212.76.25 --nextPart2763104.60EOWF5rha Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBCG1ssWs/EhA1iABsRAj4WAJ9cSSxEDwTxy9xtyhzXjuKEIBeeiwCfe3e+ WMwzKiZJQwZ+qKt/VUbAuBQ= =AQff -END PGP SIGNATURE- --nextPart2763104.60EOWF5rha-- --- Received: (at 290618-close) by bugs.debian.org; 9 May 2005 10:23:04 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon May 09 03:23:04 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DV5Pk-0007nw-00; Mon, 09 May 2005 03:23:04 -0700 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DV5Jv-OE-00; Mon, 09 May 2005 06:17:03 -0400 From: Bas Zoetekouw [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $ Subject: Bug#290618: fixed in pinfo 0.6.8-5 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 09 May 2005 06:17:03
Processed: close 308003
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: close 308003 Bug#308003: FTBFS: cannot find -lc 'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing. Bug closed, send any further explanations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: please consider pinfo for sarge
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reopen 290618 Bug#290618: pinfo: timestamp skew issues with pinfo.info during build. Bug#296459: pinfo is uninstallable. Bug reopened, originator not changed. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#276103: marked as done (kcdlabel: crash on save)
Your message dated Mon, 09 May 2005 06:47:21 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#276103: fixed in kcdlabel 2.13-KDE3-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Oct 2004 00:57:35 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Oct 11 17:57:35 2004 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mxsf23.cluster1.charter.net [209.225.28.223] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1CHAyt-0007XD-00; Mon, 11 Oct 2004 17:57:35 -0700 Received: from mxip08.cluster1.charter.net (mxip08a.cluster1.charter.net [209.225.28.138]) by mxsf23.cluster1.charter.net (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i9C0v19A023098 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 11 Oct 2004 20:57:02 -0400 Received: from commons10k1.mo24.107.43.53.charter-stl.com (HELO localhost.localdomain) (24.107.43.53) by mxip08.cluster1.charter.net with ESMTP; 11 Oct 2004 20:57:01 -0400 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Ironport-AV: i=3.85,134,1094443200; d=scan'208; a=341451172:sNHT13937420 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Chris Weiss [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: kcdlabel: crash on save X-Mailer: reportbug 2.63 Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2004 19:57:01 -0500 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Package: kcdlabel Version: 2.12-KDE3-2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable segfaults on save, backtrace says This backtrace appears to be useless. This is probably because your packages are built in a way which prevents creating of proper backtraces, or the stack frame was seriously corrupted in the crash. then several lines of no begugging symbols found followed by a backtrace, the first few lines are: #0 0x4128f40e in __waitpid_nocancel () from /lib/tls/libpthread.so.0 #1 0x4083fdd0 in KCrash::defaultCrashHandler () from /usr/lib/libkdecore.so.4 #2 signal handler called #3 0x414caa83 in strlen () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6 #4 0x0806d65e in ?? () #5 0x in ?? () #6 0xbfffeb70 in ?? () #7 0x0001 in ?? () #8 0x41078dfc in ?? () from /usr/lib/libqt-mt.so.3 #9 0xbfffec70 in ?? () #10 0x0015 in ?? () #11 0xbfffeb78 in ?? () #12 0x414c026c in _IO_link_in () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6 #13 0xbfffebe0 in ?? () #14 0x414bf464 in _IO_file_xsputn () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6 #15 0x414b4234 in fwrite () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6 #16 0x40eac3af in QFile::writeBlock () from /usr/lib/libqt-mt.so.3 -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-mppe Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US Versions of packages kcdlabel depends on: ii kdelibs4 4:3.2.3-2 KDE core libraries ii libart-2.0-2 2.3.16-6Library of functions for 2D graphi ii libaudio21.6d-2 The Network Audio System (NAS). (s ii libc62.3.2.ds1-16GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libfam0c102 2.7.0-5 client library to control the FAM ii libfontconfig1 2.2.3-1 generic font configuration library ii libfreetype6 2.1.7-2.2 FreeType 2 font engine, shared lib ii libgcc1 1:3.4.1-4sarge1 GCC support library ii libjpeg626b-9The Independent JPEG Group's JPEG ii libpng12-0 1.2.5.0-7 PNG library - runtime ii libqt3c102-mt3:3.3.3-4.1 Qt GUI Library (Threaded runtime v ii libstdc++5 1:3.3.4-13 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 ii libxcursor1 1.1.3-1 X cursor management library ii libxft2 2.1.2-6 FreeType-based font drawing librar ii libxrender1 0.8.3-7 X Rendering Extension client libra ii xlibmesa-gl [libgl1] 4.3.0.dfsg.1-8 Mesa 3D graphics library [XFree86] ii xlibs4.3.0.dfsg.1-8 X Window System client libraries m ii zlib1g 1:1.2.1.1-7 compression library - runtime -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 276103-close) by bugs.debian.org; 9 May 2005
Bug#298054: [Test-Mail] %c %i %o %t
Hello Anibal, I have added your patch and send this message as test: -- This message will test the Subject for Subject: [Test-Mail] %c %i %o %t -- Greetings Michelle -- Linux-User #280138 with the Linux Counter, http://counter.li.org/ Michelle Konzack Apt. 917 ICQ #328449886 50, rue de Soultz MSM LinuxMichi 0033/3/8845235667100 Strasbourg/France IRC #Debian (irc.icq.com) signature.pgp Description: Digital signature
Bug#308234: upgrading from 2.1.23 failed because of not setting slapd/dump_database_destdir
Hi Torsten, On Mon, 9 May 2005, Torsten Landschoff wrote: including directory to dump databases. The text said the default is /var/backups/slapd-VERSION. Reading that, I simply pushed enter. After that, the preinst script have failed, rendering slapd unconfigured. Meanwhile, apt has upgraded my libldap2 package. Which debconf frontend to you use? I hit the same problem with the readline frontend which does not seem to use the default value if you I use the readline frontend, too. Hint: You could also use debconf-communicate for stuff like that. I will look at it, I didn't hear about this cmd so far... :) apt does not use packages in the cache directory unless they are still in the packages list for that package source. IOW: Because 2.1.23-1 is no longer in the Debian archive apt-get just forgets that they are still available somewhere in your cache. But you can use dpkg to install them. Understood. Anyway, I hope nobody will make up some day with the idea that some process should delete the cache dir regularly, as with debian it is nearly impossible to get a (even not-so-far) old binary package if you don't have it in your cache. In the end, I successfully downgraded with dpkg. I still sucked with that the dumpdir already existed, and preinst didn't like it, but it was a piece of cake after these all. Erm, you mean, that you upgraded to 2.2.23 again afterwards? Oh, yes, sorry, that logical step was dropped you of the list. The most screamy was when it seemed that I cannot downgrade, and I system was useless. Do somebody have a tip what could cause that? My understanding of dpkg and apt-get says that at the time the preinst is run the old packages should still be installed. To get the broken state you describe, the system must have continued the installation despite the error in the slapd preinst. Which is in fact not expected to ever happen. I just use debian, and don't understand package handling deeply, but I experienced that after a (preinst) install script fails, many packages still get installed and configured. I do not know the algorithm of which packages are allowed to be installed, but it seems that libldap2 was installed, and it made my old ldap package useless... I'll safeguard against an empty value for the dump dir... It is a good idea. Thanks for the fast reply, I hope I could help: Ferenc -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Bug#279489: wmaker: restarts on window resize
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: package wmaker Ignoring bugs not assigned to: wmaker severity 279489 grave Bug#279489: wmaker: restarts on window resize Severity set to `grave'. tags 279489 patch Bug#279489: wmaker: restarts on window resize There were no tags set. Tags added: patch End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: closing 301782, tagging 301782
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 close 301782 Bug#301782: goobox: Ripping to ogg causes segfault 'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing. Bug closed, send any further explanations to Helge Kreutzmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] tags 301782 - sarge Bug#301782: goobox: Ripping to ogg causes segfault Tags were: sarge Tags removed: sarge End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Bug#308234: upgrading from 2.1.23 failed because of not setting slapd/dump_database_destdir
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 308234 debconf Bug#308234: upgrading from 2.1.23 failed because of not setting slapd/dump_database_destdir Bug reassigned from package `slapd' to `debconf'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#308253: marked as done (broxen dependency?)
Your message dated Mon, 09 May 2005 07:17:34 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#308253: fixed in roxen-fonts-iso8859-2 0-8 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 9 May 2005 00:14:17 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun May 08 17:14:17 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mail.lenk.info [217.160.183.176] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DUvub-0007uo-00; Sun, 08 May 2005 17:14:17 -0700 Received: from mail.sorgfalt.net ([217.160.134.107] ident=Debian-exim) by mail.lenk.info with asmtp (Cipher TLS-1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA:16) (Exim 4.34 1) id 1DUvwK-00024J-Ht for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 09 May 2005 02:16:04 +0200 Received: from p54a3edb9.dip.t-dialin.net ([84.163.237.185] helo=feynman.djpig.de) by mail.sorgfalt.net with asmtp (Cipher TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA:16) (Exim 4.34 1) id 1DUvwn-00059Z-E3 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 09 May 2005 02:16:33 +0200 Received: from djpig by feynman.djpig.de with local (Exim 4.50) id 1DUvtI-00076i-Pt for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 09 May 2005 02:12:57 +0200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: broxen dependency? X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8 Date: Mon, 09 May 2005 02:12:56 +0200 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: roxen-fonts-iso8859-1 Severity: serious roxen-fonts-iso8859-1 depends on roxen2 | roxen3 | caudium However, if only caudium is installed the installation fails with Unpacking roxen-fonts-iso8859-1 (from .../roxen-fonts-iso8859-1_0-7_all.deb) ...Setting up roxen-fonts-iso8859-1 (0-7) ... Roxen is not configured yet, aborting dpkg: error processing roxen-fonts-iso8859-1 (--configure): subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1 Errors were encountered while processing: roxen-fonts-iso8859-1 E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) Seems caudium is not enough. Gruesse, Frank Lichtenheld -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-k7 Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) --- Received: (at 308253-close) by bugs.debian.org; 9 May 2005 11:25:00 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon May 09 04:25:00 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DV6Ng-8J-00; Mon, 09 May 2005 04:25:00 -0700 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DV6GU-0004Ur-00; Mon, 09 May 2005 07:17:34 -0400 From: Turbo Fredriksson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $ Subject: Bug#308253: fixed in roxen-fonts-iso8859-2 0-8 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 09 May 2005 07:17:34 -0400 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Source: roxen-fonts-iso8859-2 Source-Version: 0-8 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of roxen-fonts-iso8859-2, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: roxen-fonts-iso8859-2_0-8.diff.gz to pool/main/r/roxen-fonts-iso8859-2/roxen-fonts-iso8859-2_0-8.diff.gz roxen-fonts-iso8859-2_0-8.dsc to pool/main/r/roxen-fonts-iso8859-2/roxen-fonts-iso8859-2_0-8.dsc roxen-fonts-iso8859-2_0-8_all.deb to pool/main/r/roxen-fonts-iso8859-2/roxen-fonts-iso8859-2_0-8_all.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further
Bug#308250: marked as done (broxen dependency?)
Your message dated Mon, 09 May 2005 07:17:33 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#308250: fixed in roxen-fonts-iso8859-1 0-8 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 9 May 2005 00:14:17 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun May 08 17:14:17 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mail.lenk.info [217.160.183.176] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DUvub-0007uo-00; Sun, 08 May 2005 17:14:17 -0700 Received: from mail.sorgfalt.net ([217.160.134.107] ident=Debian-exim) by mail.lenk.info with asmtp (Cipher TLS-1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA:16) (Exim 4.34 1) id 1DUvwK-00024J-Ht for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 09 May 2005 02:16:04 +0200 Received: from p54a3edb9.dip.t-dialin.net ([84.163.237.185] helo=feynman.djpig.de) by mail.sorgfalt.net with asmtp (Cipher TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA:16) (Exim 4.34 1) id 1DUvwn-00059Z-E3 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 09 May 2005 02:16:33 +0200 Received: from djpig by feynman.djpig.de with local (Exim 4.50) id 1DUvtI-00076i-Pt for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 09 May 2005 02:12:57 +0200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: broxen dependency? X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8 Date: Mon, 09 May 2005 02:12:56 +0200 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: roxen-fonts-iso8859-1 Severity: serious roxen-fonts-iso8859-1 depends on roxen2 | roxen3 | caudium However, if only caudium is installed the installation fails with Unpacking roxen-fonts-iso8859-1 (from .../roxen-fonts-iso8859-1_0-7_all.deb) ...Setting up roxen-fonts-iso8859-1 (0-7) ... Roxen is not configured yet, aborting dpkg: error processing roxen-fonts-iso8859-1 (--configure): subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1 Errors were encountered while processing: roxen-fonts-iso8859-1 E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) Seems caudium is not enough. Gruesse, Frank Lichtenheld -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-k7 Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) --- Received: (at 308250-close) by bugs.debian.org; 9 May 2005 11:20:12 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon May 09 04:20:12 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DV6J2-0007yR-00; Mon, 09 May 2005 04:20:12 -0700 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DV6GT-0004UU-00; Mon, 09 May 2005 07:17:33 -0400 From: Turbo Fredriksson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $ Subject: Bug#308250: fixed in roxen-fonts-iso8859-1 0-8 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 09 May 2005 07:17:33 -0400 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Source: roxen-fonts-iso8859-1 Source-Version: 0-8 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of roxen-fonts-iso8859-1, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: roxen-fonts-iso8859-1_0-8.diff.gz to pool/main/r/roxen-fonts-iso8859-1/roxen-fonts-iso8859-1_0-8.diff.gz roxen-fonts-iso8859-1_0-8.dsc to pool/main/r/roxen-fonts-iso8859-1/roxen-fonts-iso8859-1_0-8.dsc roxen-fonts-iso8859-1_0-8_all.deb to pool/main/r/roxen-fonts-iso8859-1/roxen-fonts-iso8859-1_0-8_all.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further
Bug#308234: upgrading from 2.1.23 failed because of not setting slapd/dump_database_destdir
reassign 308234 debconf thanks Hi guys, On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 08:20:23AM +0200, Torsten Landschoff wrote: On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 12:21:32AM +0200, Ferenc Engard wrote: While I have upgraded my system, slapd upgrade asked some questions, including directory to dump databases. The text said the default is /var/backups/slapd-VERSION. Reading that, I simply pushed enter. After that, the preinst script have failed, rendering slapd unconfigured. Meanwhile, apt has upgraded my libldap2 package. Which debconf frontend to you use? I hit the same problem with the readline frontend which does not seem to use the default value if you just push enter but instead the empty value. Maybe the configuration script should just replace the empty value by the default value again. I really think this is a bug that needs to be dealt with from the debconf side of things. Torsten, if you want to add a workaround to slapd, that should be ok, but the real bug appears to be that the readline frontend is somehow defaulting to an empty string for text values (although, not in my testing here...). It may be that slapd is one of the more severely affected packages, but I'm sure it's not the only place this causes problems. Thanks, -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#298054: [Test-Mail] %c %i %o %t
OK, it works correctly. Patch can officialy applyed to ssmtp (woody). Thank Michelle Am 2005-05-09 12:57:57, schrieb Michelle Konzack: Hello Anibal, I have added your patch and send this message as test: -- This message will test the Subject for Subject: [Test-Mail] %c %i %o %t -- Greetings Michelle - ENE OF REPLYED MESSAGE - -- Linux-User #280138 with the Linux Counter, http://counter.li.org/ Michelle Konzack Apt. 917 ICQ #328449886 50, rue de Soultz MSM LinuxMichi 0033/3/8845235667100 Strasbourg/France IRC #Debian (irc.icq.com) signature.pgp Description: Digital signature
Bug#290618: please consider pinfo for sarge
reopen 290618
thanks
Hi Bas,
On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 12:13:49PM +0200, Bas Zoetekouw wrote:
Please consider pinfo 0.6.8-5 (currently in incoming) for Sarge.
It fixes a serious bug (#290618, #296459) that made the package
uninstallable in some cases.
The other fixes are trivial changes like spelling errors and simple
changes to debian/rules.
Changelog:
* Fixed timestamp skew issue with the building of pinfo.info: removed the
info file from the diff and explicitly build it in debian/rules
(closes: #290618, #296459)
* Fixed building on systems with non-022 umasks by explicitly chmodding the
$(TEMPDIR) dir
* Removed Bugs: and Origin: headers from debian/control
(closes: #220098)
* Fixed spelling errors in man page (closes: #305625)
* Fixed quotes in menu file
* Remove config.{cache,status,log} in clean target
* Boosted the Standards-Version to 3.6.1 (no changes necessary)
Well, I don't think you've fixed this RC bug at all: instead, by removing
doc/pinfo.info in debian/rules, you've ensured that makeinfo is required for
*all* builds of the package, and by not adding a build-depends on texinfo,
it will be missing when building on all of the buildds. I think you really
need to add that build-dep.
You may also want to clean up debian/changelog.dch and src/pinforc before
your next upload, I guess.
Cheers,
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Bug#308316: patchutils: FTBFS on the Hurd
Package: patchutils
Version: 0.2.30-1
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
Justification: no longer builds from source
Current version of patchutils makes use of PATH_MAX which isn't defined
on some systems (like GNU/Hurd).
The attached patch fixes this.
Best regards,
Chris
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: hurd-i386 (i686-AT386)
Kernel: GNU 0.3
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)
Versions of packages patchutils depends on:
ii debianutils 2.13.2 Miscellaneous utilities specific t
ii libc0.3 2.3.2.ds1-20.0.1 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii patch 2.5.9-2 Apply a diff file to an original
ii perl5.8.4-5 Larry Wall's Practical Extraction
-- no debconf information
--- patchutils-0.2.30.orig/src/rediff.c 2004-06-07 16:07:46.0 +0200
+++ patchutils-0.2.30/src/rediff.c 2005-05-09 13:22:14.0 +0200
@@ -1039,7 +1039,7 @@ int main (int argc, char *argv[])
syntax (1);
if (argc - optind == 1) {
- char *p = xmalloc (PATH_MAX);
+ char *p = xmalloc (strlen(argv[0]) + 1);
char *f;
char **const new_argv = xmalloc (sizeof (char *) * argc);
memcpy (new_argv, argv, sizeof (char *) * argc);
Bug#307784: marked as done (pam-pgsql: CAN-2004-0366)
Your message dated Mon, 09 May 2005 07:32:18 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#230875: fixed in pam-pgsql 0.5.2-9 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 5 May 2005 13:41:05 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu May 05 06:41:05 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from master.debian.org [146.82.138.7] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DTgbB-0005vL-00; Thu, 05 May 2005 06:41:05 -0700 Received: from bsn-77-143-219.dsl.siol.net [193.77.143.219] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DTgb9-0003Rr-00; Thu, 05 May 2005 08:41:04 -0500 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Primoz Bratanic [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: pam-pgsql: CAN-2004-0366 X-Mailer: reportbug 3.11 Date: Thu, 05 May 2005 15:41:13 +0200 X-Debbugs-Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-9.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE, OUR_MTA_MSGID,X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: pam-pgsql Severity: critical Tags: security Justification: root security hole -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 The problem reported in BUG#230875 and marked as fixed (NMU upload) was open again. The changes have disappeared. Please see the patch attached to Bug#230875 regarding sql injection problem with changing password (easy impact would be changing uid to 0 ... root compromise). Primoz Bratanic - -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.10-1-686-smp Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFCeiJ5HOuqnSwJthERAiigAJ0WclQhayauLF6qUHr05qdvuWpFuACgzrFQ EILLu3ovr/HW3W08sUij+n8= =a+R3 -END PGP SIGNATURE- --- Received: (at 230875-close) by bugs.debian.org; 9 May 2005 11:46:56 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon May 09 04:46:56 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DV6iu-0004E4-00; Mon, 09 May 2005 04:46:56 -0700 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DV6Uk-0004lU-00; Mon, 09 May 2005 07:32:18 -0400 From: Primoz Bratanic [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $ Subject: Bug#230875: fixed in pam-pgsql 0.5.2-9 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 09 May 2005 07:32:18 -0400 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 11 Source: pam-pgsql Source-Version: 0.5.2-9 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of pam-pgsql, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: libpam-pgsql_0.5.2-9_i386.deb to pool/main/p/pam-pgsql/libpam-pgsql_0.5.2-9_i386.deb pam-pgsql_0.5.2-9.diff.gz to pool/main/p/pam-pgsql/pam-pgsql_0.5.2-9.diff.gz pam-pgsql_0.5.2-9.dsc to pool/main/p/pam-pgsql/pam-pgsql_0.5.2-9.dsc A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Primoz Bratanic [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated pam-pgsql package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Sun, 8 May 2005 23:10:16 +0200 Source: pam-pgsql Binary: libpam-pgsql Architecture: source i386 Version:
Bug#307366: marked as done (libpam-pgsql: new package misses features/fixes from NMUs)
Your message dated Mon, 09 May 2005 07:32:18 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#230875: fixed in pam-pgsql 0.5.2-9 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 2 May 2005 20:09:38 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon May 02 13:09:38 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from smtp2.rz.uni-karlsruhe.de [129.13.185.218] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DShEY-hc-00; Mon, 02 May 2005 13:09:38 -0700 Received: from fsmi-s1.fs.uni-karlsruhe.de (fsmi-s1.fs.uni-karlsruhe.de [172.22.59.161]) by smtp2.rz.uni-karlsruhe.de with esmtp (Exim 4.43 #1) id 1DShET-0007Hj-I6; Mon, 02 May 2005 22:09:33 +0200 Received: from fsm-pc1.math.uni-karlsruhe.de ([172.22.59.171]:32877 helo=fsm-pc1.fsmi.local ident=mail) by fsmi-s1.fs.uni-karlsruhe.de with esmtp (Exim 4.34 #1 (Debian)) id 1DShET-Lv-CI for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 02 May 2005 22:09:33 +0200 Received: from fsm-pc2.fsmi.local ([10.14.2.2] ident=mail) by fsm-pc1.fsmi.local with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1DShES-0001Fa-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 02 May 2005 22:09:32 +0200 Received: from fk by fsm-pc2.fsmi.local with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1DShES-kY-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 02 May 2005 22:09:32 +0200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Fabian Knittel [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: libpam-pgsql: new package misses features/fixes from NMUs X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8 Date: Mon, 02 May 2005 22:09:31 +0200 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: libpam-pgsql Version: 0.5.2-8 Severity: important Hi, since 0.5.2-8 the perfectly working MD5 support included in 0.5.2-7.2 has been removed again. Apparently the fixes from the NMUs since 0.5.2-7 weren't included (at least the changelog completely omits them - although this might be common practice for non-NMUs, INADD). Please re-upload a package including the features from 0.5.2-7.2. Currently the package is unusable for us (authentication fails for pgsql and drops through to the next PAM module in the stack, although all SQL querys complete successfully - so I assume crypt() fails to handle the MD5-Crypt-hash). I don't know why crypt fails to verify MD5-Crypt hashes with this package and succeeds with 0.5.2-7.2, but whatever was changed should be changed again. :-) (Note: Before 0.5.2-7.2 came out we had to patch 0.5.2-7.1 to use a hard-coded md5_crypt crypt() function, as some sort of library weirdness caused it to only accept DES-hashes. Somehow this was fixed and now reintroduced.) Fabian -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.10 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Versions of packages libpam-pgsql depends on: ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-21 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libmhash2 0.9.1-1 Library for cryptographic hashing ii libpam0g0.76-22 Pluggable Authentication Modules l ii libpq3 7.4.7-5 PostgreSQL C client library -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 230875-close) by bugs.debian.org; 9 May 2005 11:46:56 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon May 09 04:46:56 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DV6iu-0004E4-00; Mon, 09 May 2005 04:46:56 -0700 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DV6Uk-0004lU-00; Mon, 09 May 2005 07:32:18 -0400 From: Primoz Bratanic [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $ Subject: Bug#230875: fixed in pam-pgsql 0.5.2-9 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 09 May 2005 07:32:18 -0400 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin
Bug#230875: marked as done (libpam-pgsql: Some notes about pam_pgsql security)
Your message dated Mon, 09 May 2005 07:32:18 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#230875: fixed in pam-pgsql 0.5.2-9 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Feb 2004 03:01:13 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Feb 02 19:01:13 2004 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from master.debian.org [146.82.138.7] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1AnqoL-RW-00; Mon, 02 Feb 2004 19:01:13 -0800 Received: from bsn-77-233-170.dsl.siol.net ([192.168.50.1]) [193.77.233.170] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1AnqoK-0001Pe-00; Mon, 02 Feb 2004 21:01:12 -0600 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Primoz Bratanic [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: libpam-pgsql: Some notes about pam_pgsql security X-Mailer: reportbug 2.41 Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2004 04:01:11 +0100 X-Debbugs-Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_01 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.4 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE,OUR_MTA_MSGID, UPPERCASE_25_50,X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_01 X-Spam-Level: Package: libpam-pgsql Version: 0.5.2-7 Severity: grave Tags: security sid Justification: user security hole -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Since shipping with postgresql 7.4 it should probably make use of PQescapeString function. Package does not escape anything sent to database except username. It should probably escape everything. Otherwise strange things may happen due to errors in configuration files. IMPORTANT: NEW PASSWORDS ARE NOT ESCAPED. CONFIGURATION ALLOWS HAVING PLAINTEXT PASSWORDS. USING PLAINTEXT PASSWORDS ALLOW INJECTION OF ARBITRARY STRING INTO UPDATE SQL TO ANY USER CHANGING HIS/HER PASSWORD. - -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.0-1-686 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=sl_SI.UTF-8 Versions of packages libpam-pgsql depends on: ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-11 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libmhash2 0.8.18-4 Library for cryptographic hashing ii libpam0g0.76-15 Pluggable Authentication Modules l ii libpq3 7.4.1-2 Shared library libpq.so.3 for Post - -- no debconf information -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFAHw73HOuqnSwJthERAnPIAKDhcfT2jV9SKmQRVjknUi5Qlv3KrACfSVqD V6jaxxc3+VeblveWLKNi8Us= =t4sT -END PGP SIGNATURE- --- Received: (at 230875-close) by bugs.debian.org; 9 May 2005 11:46:56 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon May 09 04:46:56 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DV6iu-0004E4-00; Mon, 09 May 2005 04:46:56 -0700 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DV6Uk-0004lU-00; Mon, 09 May 2005 07:32:18 -0400 From: Primoz Bratanic [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $ Subject: Bug#230875: fixed in pam-pgsql 0.5.2-9 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 09 May 2005 07:32:18 -0400 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 11 Source: pam-pgsql Source-Version: 0.5.2-9 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of pam-pgsql, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: libpam-pgsql_0.5.2-9_i386.deb to pool/main/p/pam-pgsql/libpam-pgsql_0.5.2-9_i386.deb pam-pgsql_0.5.2-9.diff.gz to pool/main/p/pam-pgsql/pam-pgsql_0.5.2-9.diff.gz pam-pgsql_0.5.2-9.dsc to pool/main/p/pam-pgsql/pam-pgsql_0.5.2-9.dsc A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be
Processed: severity of 308316 is important
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 # not a release arch severity 308316 important Bug#308316: patchutils: FTBFS on the Hurd Severity set to `important'. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#308218: And 308219 and 308261
I also have tripped over this bug. It doesn't really effect anything here, but I noticed my most recent upgrade didn't go to completion. I am curious as to how this proposed fix of yours is going to work. All 3 reports of this bug in the bug system, are from people running i386 architecture (i686) on 2.6 kernels. Your latest version of autogen which is supposed to fix this, looks like it is powerpc only (*_5.7-2_powerpc.deb) and the description at packages.debian.org for libopts25 only lists packages for alpha and hppa, not even i386 (or the powerpc packages you suggest fix a i386 problem). You have uploaded a bunch of other packages as well, including i386 ones? Gord -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#302771: Win XP file listing bug in smbclient and libsmbclient
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Christian Perrier wrote: | | Jerry, I grabbed SAMBA_3_0 from svn 2 hours ago | and, while trying to recompile a Debian | package from it (to get it tested by our bug submitter): | ... | python/py_spoolss_printers_conv.c:294: error: |parse error before ')' token | error: command 'gcc' failed with exit status 1 This is fixed in the svn tree now. cheers, jerry = Alleviating the pain of Windows(tm) --- http://www.samba.org GnuPG Key- http://www.plainjoe.org/gpg_public.asc I never saved anything for the swim back. Ethan Hawk in Gattaca -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFCf1sfIR7qMdg1EfYRAuEDAJ46clbPKEjnMGpq51UpfPE73hifZACcDXrT ILVsY8KUItxEOcjfA+0Xsmw= =QGGo -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#290618: please consider pinfo for sarge
Hi Steve! You wrote: Well, I don't think you've fixed this RC bug at all: instead, by removing doc/pinfo.info in debian/rules, you've ensured that makeinfo is required for *all* builds of the package, and by not adding a build-depends on texinfo, it will be missing when building on all of the buildds. I think you really need to add that build-dep. You're right of course, I overlooked that. You may also want to clean up debian/changelog.dch and src/pinforc before your next upload, I guess. I just uploaded -6, in which all of this should be fixed. I also checked building it in a clean chroot, so it really should be fine now. -- Kind regards, ++ | Bas Zoetekouw | GPG key: 0644fab7 | || Fingerprint: c1f5 f24c d514 3fec 8bf6 | | [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] | a2b1 2bae e41f 0644 fab7 | ++ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#290618: marked as done (pinfo: timestamp skew issues with pinfo.info during build.)
Your message dated Mon, 09 May 2005 08:47:10 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#290618: fixed in pinfo 0.6.8-6 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Jan 2005 11:21:14 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jan 15 03:21:13 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from asia.telenet-ops.be [195.130.132.59] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1CplzV-0003pv-00; Sat, 15 Jan 2005 03:21:13 -0800 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by asia.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with SMTP id 8D47F22424E for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 15 Jan 2005 12:21:11 +0100 (MET) Received: from kabel.telenet.be (dD5775FD9.access.telenet.be [213.119.95.217]) by asia.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D70C224156 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 15 Jan 2005 12:21:11 +0100 (MET) Received: by kabel.telenet.be (Postfix, from userid 501) id E9A4B26136; Sat, 15 Jan 2005 12:21:10 +0100 (CET) Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2005 12:21:10 +0100 From: Kurt Roeckx [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: pinfo: timestamp skew issues with pinfo.info during build. Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.8 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,DOMAIN_BODY, HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: pinfo Version: 0.6.8-4 Severity: important Hi, Their seems to be a timestamp skew problem with pinfo.info. It's generates via the diff file, and so is pinfo.texi. In the diff the .info comes first and the .texi after it. This can cause the info file to become 0 size if make sees that and tries to run makeinfo to update it. It gives a nice warning that makeinfo is missing too. Could you please add a build dependency on texinfo, or fix this in some other way? PS: The info page seems to be generated using makeinfo 4.0 and current version is 4.7 and that generates a difference, but those seem to be good. Kurt --- Received: (at 290618-close) by bugs.debian.org; 9 May 2005 12:56:37 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon May 09 05:56:37 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DV7oL-00014A-00; Mon, 09 May 2005 05:56:37 -0700 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DV7fC-J7-00; Mon, 09 May 2005 08:47:10 -0400 From: Bas Zoetekouw [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $ Subject: Bug#290618: fixed in pinfo 0.6.8-6 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 09 May 2005 08:47:10 -0400 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2 Source: pinfo Source-Version: 0.6.8-6 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of pinfo, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: pinfo_0.6.8-6.diff.gz to pool/main/p/pinfo/pinfo_0.6.8-6.diff.gz pinfo_0.6.8-6.dsc to pool/main/p/pinfo/pinfo_0.6.8-6.dsc pinfo_0.6.8-6_i386.deb to pool/main/p/pinfo/pinfo_0.6.8-6_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Bas Zoetekouw [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated pinfo package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Mon, 9 May 2005 14:01:32 +0200 Source: pinfo Binary: pinfo Architecture: source i386 Version: 0.6.8-6
Bug#296459: marked as done (pinfo is uninstallable.)
Your message dated Mon, 09 May 2005 08:47:10 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#290618: fixed in pinfo 0.6.8-6 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Feb 2005 16:17:46 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Feb 22 08:17:45 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from chico.rediris.es [130.206.1.3] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D3cjJ-LB-00; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 08:17:45 -0800 Received: from localhost (soberbia.rediris.es [130.206.1.21]) by chico.rediris.es (8.12.10/8.9.1) with ESMTP id j1MGHDNU022672; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 17:17:13 +0100 (CET) From: David =?iso-8859-15?q?Mart=EDnez_Moreno?= [EMAIL PROTECTED] Organization: Debian To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: pinfo is uninstallable. Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 17:17:39 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.1 Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary=nextPart2763104.60EOWF5rha; protocol=application/pgp-signature; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: --nextPart2763104.60EOWF5rha Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Package: pinfo Version: 0.6.8-4 Severity: important Hello, I found pinfo uninstallable with an apt-get install pinfo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ LC_ALL=C sudo apt-get install pinfo Reading Package Lists... Done Building Dependency Tree... Done Suggested packages: mutt The following NEW packages will be installed: pinfo 0 upgraded, 1 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. 1 not fully installed or removed. Need to get 80,3kB of archives. After unpacking 324kB of additional disk space will be used. Get:1 http://bach.hpc2n.umu.se sarge/main pinfo 0.6.8-4 [80,3kB] Fetched 80.3kB in 0s (138kB/s) Selecting previously deselected package pinfo. (Reading database ... 54641 files and directories currently installed.) Setting up pinfo (0.6.8-4) ... No `START-INFO-DIR-ENTRY' and no `This file documents'. install-info(/usr/share/info/pinfo.info.gz): unable to determine description for `dir' entry - giving up dpkg: error processing pinfo (--configure): subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1 Errors were encountered while processing: pinfo E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) I have put important severity instead of grave as this architecture is not going to be released with sarge. Best regards, Ender. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-10-amd64-k8 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) (ignored: LC_ALL set to [EMAIL PROTECTED]) Versions of packages pinfo depends on: ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-20.0.0.1.pure64 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libncurses55.4-4 Shared libraries for terminal hand -- no debconf information -- Servicios de red - Network services RedIRIS - Spanish Academic Network for Research and Development Red.es - Madrid (Spain) Tlf (+34) 91.212.76.25 --nextPart2763104.60EOWF5rha Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBCG1ssWs/EhA1iABsRAj4WAJ9cSSxEDwTxy9xtyhzXjuKEIBeeiwCfe3e+ WMwzKiZJQwZ+qKt/VUbAuBQ= =AQff -END PGP SIGNATURE- --nextPart2763104.60EOWF5rha-- --- Received: (at 290618-close) by bugs.debian.org; 9 May 2005 12:56:37 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon May 09 05:56:37 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DV7oL-00014A-00; Mon, 09 May 2005 05:56:37 -0700 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DV7fC-J7-00; Mon, 09 May 2005 08:47:10 -0400 From: Bas Zoetekouw [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $ Subject: Bug#290618: fixed in pinfo 0.6.8-6 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 09 May 2005 08:47:10
Bug#308218: And 308219 and 308261
On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 06:16:45AM -0600, Gordon Haverland wrote: I also have tripped over this bug. It doesn't really effect anything here, but I noticed my most recent upgrade didn't go to completion. I am curious as to how this proposed fix of yours is going to work. All 3 reports of this bug in the bug system, are from people running i386 architecture (i686) on 2.6 kernels. Your latest version of autogen which is supposed to fix this, looks like it is powerpc only (*_5.7-2_powerpc.deb) and the description at packages.debian.org for libopts25 only lists packages for alpha and hppa, not even i386 (or the powerpc packages you suggest fix a i386 problem). You have uploaded a bunch of other packages as well, including i386 ones? No. I uploaded the PowerPC package, since the system that I use for development is an iBook2. The build daemons for the other architectures (including i386) will build packages for their respective architectures. For more information, see http://buildd.debian.org/ -- Matt signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#307502: illuminator: ftbfs [sparc] could not find path for libluminate.so.6
Hi, Can you do me a favor and upload the illuminator package you built? Otherwise I'll try to figure out how to re-queue it on the sparc buildd (I've been meaning to learn how to do this for some time). Thanks. On Tue, 2005-05-03 at 23:08 -0400, Jurij Smakov wrote: On Tue, 3 May 2005, Blars Blarson wrote: 2.6.8-6 is in sarge, my kernel is/was out of date on that box. (I just installed 2.6.8-6, it will be active next reboot.) Good to know. I've just tested the build with kernel-image-2.4.27-2-sparc64 (version 2.4.27-9) from sid and even though the warnings are still there, it does not FTBFS anymore: [...] dh_makeshlibs -a dh_compress -a dh_fixperms -a dh_installdeb -a dh_shlibdeps -a dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: could not find path for libluminate.so.6 dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: could not find path for libluminate.so.6 dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: could not find path for libluminate.so.6 dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: could not find path for libluminate.so.6 dh_gencontrol -a dh_md5sums -a dh_builddeb -a dpkg-deb: building package `libluminate-dev' in `../libluminate-dev_0.9.1-1_sparc.deb'. dpkg-deb: building package `libluminate6' in `../libluminate6_0.9.1-1_sparc.deb'. dpkg-deb: building package `illuminator-demo' in `../illuminator-demo_0.9.1-1_sparc.deb'. For the record, the following (or later) kernel versions (both currently in sarge) are required for the builds to succeed: kernel-image-2.4.27-2-sparc64 version 2.4.27-2 kernel-image-2.6.8-2-sparc64 version 2.6.8-6 Best regards, Jurij Smakov -Adam -- GPG fingerprint: D54D 1AEE B11C CE9B A02B C5DD 526F 01E8 564E E4B6 Welcome to the best software in the world today cafe! http://www.take6.com/albums/greatesthits.html -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#308330: kcdlabel: not fit for release
Package: kcdlabel Version: 2.13-KDE3-3 Severity: grave Tags: sarge This package has a (mostly) dead upstream, and my c++ is just not good enough to take over being upstream. I do not want to see it release with sarge in this state of maintainership. I have had an offer of comaintainership, and if it pans out, we can close this bug. If not, I will ask for removal from sid. Thanks, -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.10-1-686-smp Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=en_US.ISO-8859-15 (charmap=ISO-8859-15) (ignored: LC_ALL set to en_US.ISO-8859-15) Versions of packages kcdlabel depends on: ii kdelibs4 4:3.3.2-6 KDE core libraries ii libart-2.0-2 2.3.17-1Library of functions for 2D graphi ii libaudio21.7-2 The Network Audio System (NAS). (s ii libc62.3.2.ds1-21GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libfam0c102 2.7.0-7 client library to control the FAM ii libfontconfig1 2.3.2-1 generic font configuration library ii libfreetype6 2.1.7-2.4 FreeType 2 font engine, shared lib ii libgcc1 1:3.4.3-13 GCC support library ii libice6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-12.0.1 Inter-Client Exchange library ii libidn11 0.5.13-1.0 GNU libidn library, implementation ii libjpeg626b-10 The Independent JPEG Group's JPEG ii libpng12-0 1.2.8rel-1 PNG library - runtime ii libqt3c102-mt3:3.3.4-3 Qt GUI Library (Threaded runtime v ii libsm6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-12.0.1 X Window System Session Management ii libstdc++5 1:3.3.6-3.0.1 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 ii libx11-6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-12.0.1 X Window System protocol client li ii libxcursor1 1.1.3-1 X cursor management library ii libxext6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-12.0.1 X Window System miscellaneous exte ii libxft2 2.1.7-1 FreeType-based font drawing librar ii libxrandr2 4.3.0.dfsg.1-12.0.1 X Window System Resize, Rotate and ii libxrender1 0.8.3-7 X Rendering Extension client libra ii libxt6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-12.0.1 X Toolkit Intrinsics ii xlibs4.3.0.dfsg.1-12 X Keyboard Extension (XKB) configu ii zlib1g 1:1.2.2-4 compression library - runtime -- no debconf information -- - | ,''`.Stephen Gran | | : :' :[EMAIL PROTECTED] | | `. `'Debian user, admin, and developer | |`- http://www.debian.org | - signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#308218: And 308219 and 308261
On Monday 09 May 2005 07:32, Matt Kraai wrote: On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 06:16:45AM -0600, Gordon Haverland wrote: I also have tripped over this bug. It doesn't really effect anything here, but I noticed my most recent upgrade didn't go to completion. I am curious as to how this proposed fix of yours is going to work. All 3 reports of this bug in the bug system, are from people running i386 architecture (i686) on 2.6 kernels. Your latest version of autogen which is supposed to fix this, looks like it is powerpc only (*_5.7-2_powerpc.deb) and the description at packages.debian.org for libopts25 only lists packages for alpha and hppa, not even i386 (or the powerpc packages you suggest fix a i386 problem). You have uploaded a bunch of other packages as well, including i386 ones? No. I uploaded the PowerPC package, since the system that I use for development is an iBook2. The build daemons for the other architectures (including i386) will build packages for their respective architectures. For more information, see http://buildd.debian.org/ I still don't see how your uploading libopts25 for powerpc fixes a bug on i386. packages.debian.org is probably out of date, and I guess will soon have powerpc on its list of architectures that libopts25 is available for due to your upload. buildd.debian.org as near as I can tell, doesn't have libopts25 for unstable (or libopts or libopts9 or libopts*), or for any architecture. So for the 3 people who submitted bug reports on libopts25, and myself, there is currently nothing by the way of a fix for the installation problem in the works? Gord -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Bug#308232: bugzilla: [FHS] Creates tempfiles on /usr/share.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 308232 + pending Bug#308232: bugzilla: [FHS] Creates tempfiles on /usr/share. Tags were: confirmed sid Tags added: pending thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#306261: #306261 and sarge
Hello, according to bugzilla this bug is fixed in version 2.4.3-20050321+2, but debian sarge still has version 2.4.3-20050321+1 affected by this bug. Could you please upload a fixed version to sarge? Maxi signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#308003: FTBFS: cannot find -lc (forwarded from Andreas Jochens)
Harald Dunkel [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Unpacking ia32-libs (from .../ia32-libs_1.3.0.0.1.gcc4_amd64.deb) ... Setting up lib32gcc1 (4.0.0-1) ... Setting up ia32-libs (1.3.0.0.1.gcc4) ... Version 1.3 was broken, version 1.4 is fixed. Please upgrade. MfG Goswin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#308232: bugzilla: [FHS] Creates tempfiles on /usr/share.
tags 308232 + pending thanks Bug closed in the SVN repository: http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/pkg-bugzilla/trunk/bugzilla-2.18/debian/changelog?op=filerev=0sc=0 I now use /var/lib/bugzilla for the root dir of every data files, which is FHS compliant. Thanks for the report. Regards. -- Alexis Sukrieh [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.sukria.net « Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum sonatur. » Whatever is said in Latin sounds profound.
Processed: Re: Bug#308257: doesn't clean up properly due to syntax error in postrm
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 308257 grave Bug#308257: doesn't clean up properly due to syntax error in postrm Severity set to `grave'. thank you Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#308254: londonlaw: Depends on non-existent package: wxpython
wxwidgets2.5 has been removed from debian and no other package is providing wxpython. I've created an updated package at http://siretart.tauware.de/debian/londonlaw, which depends on libwxgtk2.4-python, as you suggested. Gruesse, Reinhard -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#308233: file conflicts in lsh-utils, nettle-bin
This looks like I should rename my binary, like I've already done with sexp-conv. Simon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#308246: file conflicts in uniconf-tools, fonty-rg
Hi Radovan, Can you upload fonty-rg's /usr/bin/uni as /usr/bin/utf8 instead? In UniConf, the /usr/bin/uni tool queries and manages a database, while in fonty-rg, it's used just for switching console-fonts. Simon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#308233: file conflicts in lsh-utils, nettle-bin
On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 06:05:32PM +0200, Niels Möller wrote: Simon Law [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: This looks like I should rename my binary, like I've already done with sexp-conv. Another alternative is not including the nettle-lfib-stream program at all in the lsh package. Well, that sounds like a marvellous plan. One that I shall enact tonight after-work. Simon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#298939: marked as done (xlibs: new buffer overflow security hole (CAN-2005-0605))
Your message dated Mon, 09 May 2005 12:02:45 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#298939: fixed in xfree86 4.1.0-16woody6 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Mar 2005 19:01:38 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Mar 10 11:01:38 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from cpe-65-26-182-85.indy.res.rr.com (sisyphus.deadbeast.net) [65.26.182.85] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D9Sug-0006v1-00; Thu, 10 Mar 2005 11:01:38 -0800 Received: by sisyphus.deadbeast.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 18D7E68C024; Thu, 10 Mar 2005 14:01:37 -0500 (EST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Branden Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: libxpm4: new buffer overflow security hole (CAN-2005-0605) X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8 Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 14:01:37 -0500 X-Debbugs-Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE, X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: libxpm4 Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-12 Severity: grave Tags: security, upstream, fixed-upstream, patch CAN-2005-0605 indicates that scan.c for LibXPM may allow attackers to execute arbitrary code via a negative bitmap_unit value that leads to a buffer overflow. Patch is here: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=1909 Description is here: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1920 Gentoo issued an advisory about this on 4 March. Ubuntu issued an advisory about this on 7 March. I learned about this from Linux Weekly News. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing') Architecture: powerpc (ppc) Kernel: Linux 2.6.9-powerpc-smp Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages libxpm4 depends on: ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-20 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 298939-close) by bugs.debian.org; 9 May 2005 16:19:47 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon May 09 09:19:45 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DVAyt-0004kj-00; Mon, 09 May 2005 09:19:43 -0700 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DVAiT-0005jS-00; Mon, 09 May 2005 12:02:45 -0400 From: Branden Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $ Subject: Bug#298939: fixed in xfree86 4.1.0-16woody6 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 09 May 2005 12:02:45 -0400 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Source: xfree86 Source-Version: 4.1.0-16woody6 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of xfree86, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: lbxproxy_4.1.0-16woody6_powerpc.deb to pool/main/x/xfree86/lbxproxy_4.1.0-16woody6_powerpc.deb libdps-dev_4.1.0-16woody6_powerpc.deb to pool/main/x/xfree86/libdps-dev_4.1.0-16woody6_powerpc.deb libdps1-dbg_4.1.0-16woody6_powerpc.deb to pool/main/x/xfree86/libdps1-dbg_4.1.0-16woody6_powerpc.deb libdps1_4.1.0-16woody6_powerpc.deb to pool/main/x/xfree86/libdps1_4.1.0-16woody6_powerpc.deb libxaw6-dbg_4.1.0-16woody6_powerpc.deb to pool/main/x/xfree86/libxaw6-dbg_4.1.0-16woody6_powerpc.deb libxaw6-dev_4.1.0-16woody6_powerpc.deb to pool/main/x/xfree86/libxaw6-dev_4.1.0-16woody6_powerpc.deb libxaw6_4.1.0-16woody6_powerpc.deb to pool/main/x/xfree86/libxaw6_4.1.0-16woody6_powerpc.deb libxaw7-dbg_4.1.0-16woody6_powerpc.deb to pool/main/x/xfree86/libxaw7-dbg_4.1.0-16woody6_powerpc.deb libxaw7-dev_4.1.0-16woody6_powerpc.deb to pool/main/x/xfree86/libxaw7-dev_4.1.0-16woody6_powerpc.deb
Processed: Fixed in NMU of phpdoc 20030911-1.2
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 282274 + fixed Bug#282274: phpdoc: FTBFS: openjade keeps running. Tags were: patch Tags added: fixed quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#298294: marked as done (non-free icons)
Your message dated Mon, 09 May 2005 13:32:15 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#298294: fixed in baghira 0.6f-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Mar 2005 13:25:21 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Mar 06 05:25:21 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from panthera-systems.net [213.239.209.134] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D7vl3-0008AO-00; Sun, 06 Mar 2005 05:25:21 -0800 Received: from [10.0.0.4] (217-162-105-2.dclient.hispeed.ch [217.162.105.2]) by panthera-systems.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D4E22DC03B for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 6 Mar 2005 14:25:04 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sun, 06 Mar 2005 14:25:18 +0100 From: Daniel Baumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Debian Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20050116) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: non-free icons X-Enigmail-Version: 0.90.0.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: baghira Version: 0.6a-1 Severity: serious The license of the icons are not clearly dfsg-compliant. Please clear the situation with upstream and get a proper license statement. Otherwise, the package must go to non-free. Regards, Daniel -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/ --- Received: (at 298294-close) by bugs.debian.org; 9 May 2005 17:42:15 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon May 09 10:42:15 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DVCGl-0001tA-00; Mon, 09 May 2005 10:42:15 -0700 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DVC75-0004lj-00; Mon, 09 May 2005 13:32:15 -0400 From: Jose Luis Tallon [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $ Subject: Bug#298294: fixed in baghira 0.6f-1 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 09 May 2005 13:32:15 -0400 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Source: baghira Source-Version: 0.6f-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of baghira, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: baghira_0.6f-1.diff.gz to pool/main/b/baghira/baghira_0.6f-1.diff.gz baghira_0.6f-1.dsc to pool/main/b/baghira/baghira_0.6f-1.dsc baghira_0.6f.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/b/baghira/baghira_0.6f.orig.tar.gz kwin-baghira_0.6f-1_i386.deb to pool/main/b/baghira/kwin-baghira_0.6f-1_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Jose Luis Tallon [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated baghira package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Thu, 05 May 2005 19:01:17 +0200 Source: baghira Binary: kwin-baghira Architecture: source i386 Version: 0.6f-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Jose Luis Tallon [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Jose Luis Tallon [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: kwin-baghira - KDE theme for Apple junkies :) Closes: 298294 Changes: baghira (0.6f-1) unstable; urgency=medium . * New upstream version - Upstream removed all
Bug#308003: FTBFS: cannot find -lc (forwarded from Andreas Jochens)
Goswin von Brederlow wrote: Version 1.3 was broken, version 1.4 is fixed. Please upgrade. Still no change: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:harri 1003} ls -lhd /usr/lib32 ls: /usr/lib32: No such file or directory [EMAIL PROTECTED]:harri 1003} apt-get install ia32-libs Reading Package Lists... Done Building Dependency Tree... Done The following extra packages will be installed: lib32gcc1 libc6-i386 The following NEW packages will be installed: ia32-libs lib32gcc1 libc6-i386 0 upgraded, 3 newly installed, 0 to remove and 14 not upgraded. Need to get 0B/6366kB of archives. After unpacking 15.7MB of additional disk space will be used. Do you want to continue? [Y/n] y Selecting previously deselected package lib32gcc1. (Reading database ... 63422 files and directories currently installed.) Unpacking lib32gcc1 (from .../lib32gcc1_4.0.0-2_amd64.deb) ... Selecting previously deselected package libc6-i386. Unpacking libc6-i386 (from .../libc6-i386_2.3.5-1_amd64.deb) ... Selecting previously deselected package ia32-libs. Unpacking ia32-libs (from .../ia32-libs_1.4.0.0.1.gcc4_amd64.deb) ... Setting up lib32gcc1 (4.0.0-2) ... Setting up libc6-i386 (2.3.5-1) ... Setting up ia32-libs (1.4.0.0.1.gcc4) ... [EMAIL PROTECTED]:harri 1003} ls -lhd /usr/lib32 drwxr-xr-x 5 root root 2.2K May 9 19:49 /usr/lib32 Regards Harri signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Processed: Fixed in NMU of libcgicc 3.2.3-2.1
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 302854 + fixed Bug#302854: libcgicc-doc: Cannot install -doc: cannot create .dhelp file Tags were: patch Tags added: fixed quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#308358: fails to install
Package: wesnoth-ei Version: 0.9.1-1 Severity: serious When I upgraded today: S'est seleccionant el paquet wesnoth-ei prviament no seleccionat. S'est desempaquetant wesnoth-ei (de .../wesnoth-ei_0.9.1-1_all.deb) ... dpkg: s'ha produt un error en processar /net/debian/pool/main/w/wesnoth/wesnoth-ei_0.9.1-1_all.deb (--unpack): s'est intentant sobreescriure /usr/share/locale/bg/LC_MESSAGES/wesnoth-ei.mo, que tamb est en el paquet wesnoth-data You probably miss some replaces somewhere. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.10-1-k7 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages wesnoth-ei depends on: pn wesnoth Not found.
Processed: Fixed in NMU of xosd 2.2.14-1.1
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 307794 + fixed Bug#307794: xosd: FTBFS: X11 not threadsafe Tags were: patch Tags added: fixed quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#308003: FTBFS: cannot find -lc (forwarded from Andreas Jochens)
Harald Dunkel [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Goswin von Brederlow wrote: Version 1.3 was broken, version 1.4 is fixed. Please upgrade. Still no change: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:harri 1003} ls -lhd /usr/lib32 ls: /usr/lib32: No such file or directory [EMAIL PROTECTED]:harri 1003} apt-get install ia32-libs Reading Package Lists... Done Building Dependency Tree... Done The following extra packages will be installed: lib32gcc1 libc6-i386 The following NEW packages will be installed: ia32-libs lib32gcc1 libc6-i386 0 upgraded, 3 newly installed, 0 to remove and 14 not upgraded. Need to get 0B/6366kB of archives. After unpacking 15.7MB of additional disk space will be used. Do you want to continue? [Y/n] y Selecting previously deselected package lib32gcc1. (Reading database ... 63422 files and directories currently installed.) Unpacking lib32gcc1 (from .../lib32gcc1_4.0.0-2_amd64.deb) ... Selecting previously deselected package libc6-i386. Unpacking libc6-i386 (from .../libc6-i386_2.3.5-1_amd64.deb) ... Selecting previously deselected package ia32-libs. Unpacking ia32-libs (from .../ia32-libs_1.4.0.0.1.gcc4_amd64.deb) ... Setting up lib32gcc1 (4.0.0-2) ... Setting up libc6-i386 (2.3.5-1) ... Setting up ia32-libs (1.4.0.0.1.gcc4) ... [EMAIL PROTECTED]:harri 1003} ls -lhd /usr/lib32 drwxr-xr-x 5 root root 2.2K May 9 19:49 /usr/lib32 Regards Harri Well, that is the gcc4 repository then. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~% dpkg -c /mnt/mirror/ivanova/debian/pool/main/g/gcc-3.4/lib32gcc1_3.4.3-12.1_amd64.deb drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2005-05-04 17:25:03 ./ drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2005-05-04 17:25:02 ./usr/ drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2005-05-04 17:25:02 ./usr/share/ drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2005-05-04 17:25:02 ./usr/share/doc/ drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2005-05-04 17:25:03 ./usr/share/doc/lib32gcc1/ -rw-r--r-- root/root 26669 2005-05-04 13:53:56 ./usr/share/doc/lib32gcc1/copyright -rw-r--r-- root/root 52516 2005-05-04 13:53:56 ./usr/share/doc/lib32gcc1/changelog.Debian.gz drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2005-05-04 17:25:02 ./emul/ drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2005-05-04 17:25:02 ./emul/ia32-linux/ drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2005-05-04 17:25:02 ./emul/ia32-linux/usr/ drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2005-05-04 17:25:02 ./emul/ia32-linux/usr/lib/ -rw-r--r-- root/root 31612 2005-05-04 17:25:02 ./emul/ia32-linux/usr/lib/libgcc_s.so.1 I guess you have /usr/lib32 in the lib32gcc1_4.0.0-2_amd64.deb. That won't work. ia32-libs and lib32gcc1 have to work together on that. MfG Goswin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#308358: fails to install
On Monday, 9 de May de 2005 20:05, Jordi Mallach wrote: You probably miss some replaces somewhere. Yes, it misses a Replaces: wesnoth-data 0.9.1, I will fix it soon. -- Isaac Clerencia at Warp Networks, http://www.warp.es Work: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Debian: [EMAIL PROTECTED] pgp6OMZs5jIII.pgp Description: PGP signature
Processed: reopening 308225
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 reopen 308225 Bug#308225: python-id3lib: uninstallable Bug reopened, originator not changed. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#308225: python-id3lib: It seems this still exists
Package: python-id3lib Version: 0.5.1-3 Followup-For: Bug #308225 My installation gives this error: Unpacking replacement python-id3lib ... dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/python-id3lib_0.5.1-4_all.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite /usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/pyid3lib.so', which is also in package python2.3-id3lib dpkg-deb: subprocess paste killed by signal (Broken pipe) Micah -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (300, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-k7 Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages python-id3lib depends on: ii python2.3.5-2An interactive high-level object-o pn python2.3-id3lib Not found. -- debconf-show failed -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#308283: also breaks Apache in general
Package: libapache2-mod-perl2 Version: 1.999.23-1 Severity: serious Tags: sid After upgrading to 1.999.23-1, apt tried to restart Apache and died with the error: [Mon May 09 17:47:26 2005] [error] Can't locate Apache2.pm in @INC (@INC contains: /etc/perl /usr/local/lib/perl/5.8.4 /u sr/local/share/perl/5.8.4 /usr/lib/perl5 /usr/share/perl5 /usr/lib/perl/5.8 /usr/share/perl/5.8 /usr/local/lib/site_perl . /etc/apache2) at (eval 2) line 3.\n A quick investigation shows this file has been removed. Downgrading to 1.999.23-1 makes Apache work again. Could this change be put off 'til Apache is expecting it? Thanks, Daniel Hulme -- Now as he walked by the sea of Galilee, he saw Simon and Andrew his brother casting a spam into the net: for they were phishers. And Jesus said unto them, Come ye after me, and I will make you to become phishers of men. And straightway they forsook their nets, and followed him. pgpV8JsRwY1kW.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#303352: marked as done (conflicting file: /usr/bin/tea also in package dak)
Your message dated Mon, 09 May 2005 15:49:16 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#303352: fixed in tea 9.0-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Apr 2005 08:10:24 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Apr 06 01:10:24 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from fiona.creditreform.bg [212.36.1.3] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DJ5cF-0005pH-00; Wed, 06 Apr 2005 01:10:23 -0700 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by fiona.creditreform.bg with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1DJ5cC-0003xX-Nf; Wed, 06 Apr 2005 11:10:20 +0300 Received: from fiona.creditreform.bg ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (fiona [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 12874-10; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 11:10:20 +0300 (EEST) Received: from pc1.creditreform.bg ([192.168.110.32] helo=pc1) by fiona.creditreform.bg with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.50) id 1DJ5cC-0003xS-K3; Wed, 06 Apr 2005 11:10:20 +0300 Received: from dam by pc1 with local (Exim 4.50) id 1DJ5cA-0004pI-5N; Wed, 06 Apr 2005 11:10:18 +0300 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Damyan Ivanov \(at work\) [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: conflicting file: /usr/bin/tea also in package dak X-Mailer: reportbug 3.9 Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2005 11:10:18 +0300 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: locally generated X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on pc1); SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at creditreform.bg Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: tea Version: 7.0-1 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 10.1 Hi, This is excerpt from the aptitude session: Unpacking tea (from .../archives/tea_7.0-1_i386.deb) ... dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/tea_7.0-1_i386.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite `/usr/bin/tea', which is also in package dak dpkg-deb: subprocess paste killed by signal (Broken pipe) The Policy, Section 10.1 says: Two different packages must not install programs with different functionality but with the same filenames. .. If this case happens, one of the programs must be renamed. The maintainers should report this to the debian-devel mailing list and try to find a consensus about which program will have to be renamed. If a consensus cannot be reached, both programs must be renamed. Thanks for packaging tea, dam -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (101, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.11+dam.1 Locale: LANG=bg_BG.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=bg_BG.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages tea depends on: ii libaspell150.60.2+20050121-2 The GNU Aspell spell-checker runti ii libatk1.0-01.9.0-1 The ATK accessibility toolkit ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-20 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libglib2.0-0 2.6.3-1 The GLib library of C routines ii libgtk2.0-02.6.2-4 The GTK+ graphical user interface ii libpango1.0-0 1.8.1-1 Layout and rendering of internatio --- Received: (at 303352-close) by bugs.debian.org; 9 May 2005 19:54:01 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon May 09 12:54:01 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DVEKH-0006eA-00; Mon, 09 May 2005 12:54:01 -0700 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DVEFg-0007JF-00; Mon, 09 May 2005 15:49:16 -0400 From: Lior Kaplan [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $ Subject: Bug#303352: fixed in tea 9.0-1 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 09 May 2005 15:49:16 -0400 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Processed: severity of 297706 is serious
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 # removal bugs are RC severity 297706 serious Bug#297706: package-removal fails due to failure of post-removal script Severity set to `serious'. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#308283: also breaks Apache in general
On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 07:53:20PM +0100, Daniel Hulme wrote: After upgrading to 1.999.23-1, apt tried to restart Apache and died with the error: [Mon May 09 17:47:26 2005] [error] Can't locate Apache2.pm in @INC (@INC contains: /etc/perl /usr/local/lib/perl/5.8.4 /u sr/local/share/perl/5.8.4 /usr/lib/perl5 /usr/share/perl5 /usr/lib/perl/5.8 /usr/share/perl/5.8 /usr/local/lib/site_perl . /etc/apache2) at (eval 2) line 3.\n Apache has no knowledge of mod-perl2; simply remove /etc/apache2/mods-enabled/perl.conf for a quick fix. -Thom -- That sounds like a lot of work... Can we out source? The Revolution will not be outsourced! (Slick/Monique - Sinfest) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#308374: doesn't clean up properly
Package: libapache-mod-encoding Severity: serious Tags: patch libapache-mod-encoding.prerm contains the following code: for i in apache apache-ssl apache-perl; do if [ -e /etc/$i/httpd.conf ]; then modules-config $i enable mod_encoding fi done You surely meant disable here. This breaks the apache configuration on removal, hindering apache from restarting correctly. Gruesse, Frank Lichtenheld -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-k7 Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#292337: doc++ 3.4.10-3.1 NMU
El dom, 08-05-2005 a las 20:48 -0700, Rick Younie escribi: reopen 292337 thanks doc++ builds ok but segfaults when run during libupnp_1.2.1-1 build. This bug arises from time to time, depending on the m68k buildd being used. I am not sure that the problem is in the package itself, or it using too much memory. Anyway, you should ask upstream to use doxygen instead of doc++. The latter is abandoned upstream and will be dropped as soon as possible. Cheers, -- Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo [EMAIL PROTECTED] signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#305530: marked as done (Add dependency to libpt sound plugin)
Your message dated Mon, 09 May 2005 17:17:45 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#305530: fixed in ohphone 1:1.4.3+20050304-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Apr 2005 15:17:40 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Apr 20 08:17:40 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from petrel.telecom.mipt.ru [193.125.143.140] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DOGxQ-0004Do-00; Wed, 20 Apr 2005 08:17:40 -0700 Received: by petrel.telecom.mipt.ru (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 3BBEC252B8641; Wed, 20 Apr 2005 19:17:38 +0400 (MSD) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Olleg Samoylov [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Add dependency to libpt sound plugin X-Mailer: reportbug 3.9 Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2005 19:17:38 +0400 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: ohphone-basic Version: 1:1.4.3+20050304-1 Severity: serious Add dependency to one of libpt sound plugin. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.11-9-amd64-k8 Locale: LANG=ru_RU.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=ru_RU.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages ohphone-basic depends on: ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-21 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libexpat1 1.95.8-1 XML parsing C library - runtime li ii libgcc1 1:3.4.3-12 GCC support library ii libldap2 2.1.30-6 OpenLDAP libraries ii libopenh323-1 1.15.3-2 H.323 aka VoIP library ii libpt-1.8.3 1.8.4-1Portable Windows Library ii libsasl2 2.1.19-1.5 Authentication abstraction library ii libsdl1.2debi 1.2.7+1.2.8cvs20041007-4.1 Simple DirectMedia Layer ii libssl0.9.7 0.9.7e-3 SSL shared libraries ii libstdc++51:3.3.5-12 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 305530-close) by bugs.debian.org; 9 May 2005 21:20:14 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon May 09 14:20:14 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DVFfi-0008Oy-00; Mon, 09 May 2005 14:20:14 -0700 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DVFdJ-0007ab-00; Mon, 09 May 2005 17:17:45 -0400 From: Kilian Krause [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $ Subject: Bug#305530: fixed in ohphone 1:1.4.3+20050304-2 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 09 May 2005 17:17:45 -0400 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Source: ohphone Source-Version: 1:1.4.3+20050304-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of ohphone, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: ohphone-basic_1.4.3+20050304-2_i386.deb to pool/main/o/ohphone/ohphone-basic_1.4.3+20050304-2_i386.deb ohphone_1.4.3+20050304-2.diff.gz to pool/main/o/ohphone/ohphone_1.4.3+20050304-2.diff.gz ohphone_1.4.3+20050304-2.dsc to pool/main/o/ohphone/ohphone_1.4.3+20050304-2.dsc ohphone_1.4.3+20050304-2_i386.deb to pool/main/o/ohphone/ohphone_1.4.3+20050304-2_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Kilian Krause [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated ohphone package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please
Bug#307574: Built with wrong OCaml version
Hi Mike, Does fixing this bug actually require the new upstream version? If so, it will have to be removed from sarge. If not, would you like to upload an 0.3.15-3 version of the package to testing-proposed-updates that has the proper dependencies? Thanks, -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#307502: illuminator: ftbfs [sparc] could not find path for libluminate.so.6
On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 09:43:27AM -0400, Adam C Powell IV wrote: Otherwise I'll try to figure out how to re-queue it on the sparc buildd (I've been meaning to learn how to do this for some time). By emailing [EMAIL PROTECTED] But that isn't going to do any good, the sparc autobuilder is *not* going to be able to build this package. -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#308385: recommends common-lisp-controller but depends on it
Package: cl-cclan Severity: serious cl-cclan uncoditionally calls programs from common-lisp-controller in both its postinst and prerm. It only recommends it though, so the installation may fail with: Setting up cl-cclan (1.86-2) ... /var/lib/dpkg/info/cl-cclan.postinst: line 27: /usr/sbin/register-common-lisp-source: No such file or directory dpkg: error processing cl-cclan (--configure): subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1 Errors were encountered while processing: cl-cclan E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) (similar error for the prerm) Gruesse, Frank Lichtenheld -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-k7 Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#308330: kcdlabel: not fit for release
On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 09:50:08AM -0400, Stephen Gran wrote: This package has a (mostly) dead upstream, and my c++ is just not good enough to take over being upstream. I do not want to see it release with sarge in this state of maintainership. I have had an offer of comaintainership, and if it pans out, we can close this bug. If not, I will ask for removal from sid. Hinted for removal from testing. Thanks, -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Processed: tagging 308358
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 tags 308358 sid Bug#308358: fails to install There were no tags set. Tags added: sid End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#308358: fails to install
On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 08:35:23PM +0200, Isaac Clerencia wrote: S'està seleccionant el paquet wesnoth-ei prèviament no seleccionat. S'està desempaquetant wesnoth-ei (de .../wesnoth-ei_0.9.1-1_all.deb) ... dpkg: s'ha produït un error en processar /net/debian/pool/main/w/wesnoth/wesnoth-ei_0.9.1-1_all.deb (--unpack): s'està intentant sobreescriure «/usr/share/locale/bg/LC_MESSAGES/wesnoth-ei.mo», que també està en el paquet wesnoth-data Please, can you use locale C when sending bugs to the BTS? Well, you know this bug normally happens once and on subsequent runs apt finishes alright... I'm not going to run LANG=C just in case. Besides, what was going on was totally obvious... Jordi -- Jordi Mallach Pérez -- Debian developer http://www.debian.org/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.sindominio.net/ GnuPG public key information available at http://oskuro.net/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#307299: Perl taint error on TWiki diffs page after twiki/apache upgrade
Hello Sven Thank you for the response. When I click Diffs on any topic I open a link that looks like: https://twiki/cgi-bin/twiki/rdiff/Systems/SystemData?rev1=1.29rev2=1.24 Assuming you have taint checking turned on, this sort of link will always produce the error with the original RDiff.pm, although I suppose it might be dependant upon the version of perl or mod_perl. What errors did you get in your log? Did you make the change for both rev1 and rev2? A diff of the original and fixed files: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/share/perl5/TWiki/UI# diff RDiff.pm.orig RDiff.pm.works 410,411c410,411 $rev1 =~ s/r?1\.//go; # cut 'r' and major $rev2 =~ s/r?1\.//go; # cut 'r' and major --- ($rev1) = $rev1 =~ /r?1\.(\d*)/; # cut 'r' and major ($rev2) = $rev2 =~ /r?1\.(\d*)/; # cut 'r' and major Tristan On Sat, May 07, 2005 at 07:15:29PM +1000, Sven Dowideit wrote: I'm sorry, but I cannot re-produce this. and when testing your suggested change, I get other errors in my log. is there any more information you can give me? (what topics, what kind of changes, which particular diffs link) Sven -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#308390: protocol error
Package: libgimp-perl
Version: 2.0.dfsg-4
Severity: grave
Tags: patch
Justification: renders package unusable
any example using libgimp-perl fails with a protocol error message, as
shown in 2 other bug reports.
Gimp/Config.pm contains a line:
GIMP = q[],
Net/Net.pm contains:
exec $Gimp::Config{GIMP},
Both do not go well together apparently. Either the GIMP line should be
fixed, or the environment should be querried at some point to look for
gimp. The easiest way around I have found is this:
--- debian/rules.orig 2005-05-10 00:18:00.481533507 +0200
+++ debian/rules2005-05-10 00:07:30.315113340 +0200
@@ -24,7 +24,7 @@
dh_testdir
# Add here commands to compile the package.
- $(PERL) Makefile.PL INSTALLDIRS=vendor PREFIX=/usr
+ $(PERL) Makefile.PL INSTALLDIRS=vendor PREFIX=/usr GIMP=/usr/bin/gimp
$(MAKE) OPTIMIZE=$(CFLAGS)
touch build-stamp
I must however warn you that I know nothing about either perl or gimp, so
you might want to check it. For me it seems to allow the examples in
/usr/share/doc/libgimp-perl/examples to work properly again (by the way,
these examples should look for perl in /usr/bin and not /opt/bin).
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (70, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.10-1-686
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1)
Versions of packages libgimp-perl depends on:
ii gimp2.2.6-1 The GNU Image Manipulation Program
ii libatk1.0-0 1.8.0-4 The ATK accessibility toolkit
ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-21 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libgimp2.0 2.2.6-1 Libraries necessary to run the GIM
ii libglib2.0-02.6.4-1 The GLib library of C routines
ii libgtk2-perl1:1.081-1Perl interface to the 2.x series o
ii libgtk2.0-0 2.6.4-1 The GTK+ graphical user interface
ii libpango1.0-0 1.8.1-1 Layout and rendering of internatio
ii pdl 1:2.4.2-2perl data language: Perl extension
ii perl5.8.4-8 Larry Wall's Practical Extraction
ii perl-base [perlapi-5.8.4] 5.8.4-8 The Pathologically Eclectic Rubbis
-- no debconf information
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#299814: marked as done (GnuPG 1.2.5 selects wrong encryption keys)
Your message dated Mon, 09 May 2005 19:02:52 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#299814: fixed in gnupg 1.4.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Mar 2005 18:53:31 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Mar 16 10:53:30 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from server.beamnet.de [62.75.155.124]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DBde6-0005n2-00; Wed, 16 Mar 2005 10:53:30 -0800
Received: from [192.168.0.7] (pD956EFAA.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [217.86.239.170])
(sasl authenticated)
by server.beamnet.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87A47231604C
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 16 Mar 2005 19:53:20 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2005 19:53:37 +0100
From: Thomas Viehmann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Organization: beamNet
User-Agent: Debian Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20050116)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: GnuPG 1.2.5 selects wrong encryption keys
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.90.0.0
X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
boundary=060809060500010402020308
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--060809060500010402020308
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Package: gnupg
Version: 1.2.5-3
Severity: grave
Tags: woody, sarge, patch
Hi.
GnuPG 1.2.5 selects wrong encryption keys (e.g. for my key in the debian
keyring). Thus, data is encrypted irreversible, i.e. lost.
When discussed on debian-private in February, I was encouraged to file
this bug.
According to upstream, this is fixed by newer installments of the GnuPG
(=1.2.7 IIRC).
Simon Richter pointed out that a fix can be found with
cvs -d :pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvs/gnupg login
cvs -d :pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvs/gnupg rdiff -u \
-D'2004/11/29' -D'2004/11/30' gnupg
The attached patch is a version of the above rdiff that cleanly applies
to debianized source of gnupg 1.2.5-3 and with it applied gnupg packages
without this bug are build.
Kind regards
T.
P.S.: I really would like to see this bug fixed on db.debian.org (or
whereever ud-mailgate runs) and would happily try to come up with a
patch for the appropriate version of gnupg if that means that I can hope
to be able to read ud-mailgate's encrypted mails.
--060809060500010402020308
Content-Type: text/x-patch;
name=gnupg.dont_encrypt_to_auth_key.diff
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline;
filename=gnupg.dont_encrypt_to_auth_key.diff
diff -urN gnupg-1.2.5~/g10/getkey.c gnupg-1.2.5/g10/getkey.c
--- gnupg-1.2.5~/g10/getkey.c 2004-05-01 11:19:03.0 +0200
+++ gnupg-1.2.5/g10/getkey.c2005-03-16 19:15:52.0 +0100
@@ -1248,6 +1248,51 @@
}
}
+static int
+parse_key_usage(PKT_signature *sig)
+{
+ int key_usage=0;
+ const byte *p;
+ size_t n;
+ byte flags;
+
+ p=parse_sig_subpkt(sig-hashed,SIGSUBPKT_KEY_FLAGS,n);
+ if(p n)
+{
+ /* first octet of the keyflags */
+ flags=*p;
+
+ if(flags 3)
+ {
+ key_usage |= PUBKEY_USAGE_SIG;
+ flags=~3;
+ }
+
+ if(flags 12)
+ {
+ key_usage |= PUBKEY_USAGE_ENC;
+ flags=~12;
+ }
+
+ if(flags 0x20)
+ {
+ key_usage |= PUBKEY_USAGE_AUTH;
+ flags=~0x20;
+ }
+
+ if(flags)
+ key_usage |= PUBKEY_USAGE_UNKNOWN;
+}
+
+ /* We set PUBKEY_USAGE_UNKNOWN to indicate that this key has a
+ capability that we do not handle. This serves to distinguish
+ between a zero key usage which we handle as the default
+ capabilities for that algorithm, and a usage that we do not
+ handle. */
+
+ return key_usage;
+}
+
/*
* Apply information from SIGNODE (which is the valid self-signature
* associated with that UID) to the UIDNODE:
@@ -1280,17 +1325,7 @@
uid-expiredate = sig-expiredate;
/* store the key flags in the helper variable for later processing */
-uid-help_key_usage = 0;
-p = parse_sig_subpkt (sig-hashed, SIGSUBPKT_KEY_FLAGS, n );
-if ( p n ) {
-
Bug#300859: marked as done ([CAN-2005-0366] Minor cryptographic flaw in the OpenPGP protocol)
Your message dated Mon, 09 May 2005 19:02:52 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#300859: fixed in gnupg 1.4.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Mar 2005 10:45:30 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 22 02:45:30 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.189]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DDgt7-0007Y6-00; Tue, 22 Mar 2005 02:45:29 -0800
Received: from [212.227.126.207] (helo=mrelayng.kundenserver.de)
by moutng.kundenserver.de with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1)
id 1DDgt6-00080o-00
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 22 Mar 2005 11:45:28 +0100
Received: from [195.90.9.8] (helo=anton)
by mrelayng.kundenserver.de with asmtp (Exim 3.35 #1)
id 1DDgt6-00047c-00
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 22 Mar 2005 11:45:28 +0100
Received: by anton (Postfix, from userid 2028)
id E79C9B6EC9; Tue, 22 Mar 2005 11:45:27 +0100 (CET)
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary2015084441==
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Moritz Muehlenhoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [CAN-2005-0366] Minor cryptographic flaw in the OpenPGP protocol
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.26.1.1.200308291454
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2005 11:45:27 +0100
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Provags-ID: kundenserver.de [EMAIL PROTECTED]
auth:4ad79d65ac46f2345c6ef2e856c1d9ef
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
This is a multi-part MIME message sent by reportbug.
--===2015084441==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Package: gnupg
Version: 1.4.0-3
Severity: normal
Tags: security
Serge Mister and Robert Zuccherato have published a paper, which describes
an attack against the symmetric encryption as used in the OpenPGP standard.
It's not exploitable in regular gnupg operation with a human endpoint.
Full details are described at the announce mail at:
http://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnupg-announce/2005q1/000191.html
I've attached upstream's fix that circumvents the problem by disabling the
problematic bits of the OpenPGP standard.
Cheers,
Moritz
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.0
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux anton 2.4.29-univention.1 #1 SMP Thu Jan 27 17:08:46 CET 2005 i686
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Versions of packages gnupg depends on:
ii libc6 2.3.2-9 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libldap2 2.1.30-3 OpenLDAP libraries
ii makedev2.3.1-70.3.200407260828 Creates device files in /dev
ii zlib1g 1:1.2.2-4.15.200501191530 compression library - runtime
-- debconf-show failed
--===2015084441==
Content-Type: text/x-c; charset=us-ascii
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=/home/jmm/gpg-can-2005-0366.diff
Index: include/cipher.h
===
RCS file: /cvs/gnupg/gnupg/include/cipher.h,v
retrieving revision 1.53.2.6
diff -u -r1.53.2.6 cipher.h
--- include/cipher.h29 Nov 2004 21:07:43 - 1.53.2.6
+++ include/cipher.h8 Feb 2005 04:12:12 -
@@ -76,6 +76,7 @@
int keylen;
int algo_info_printed;
int use_mdc;
+int symmetric;
byte key[32]; /* this is the largest used keylen (256 bit) */
} DEK;
Index: g10/mainproc.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/gnupg/gnupg/g10/mainproc.c,v
retrieving revision 1.112.2.27
diff -u -r1.112.2.27 mainproc.c
--- g10/mainproc.c 27 Jun 2004 18:26:49 - 1.112.2.27
+++ g10/mainproc.c 8 Feb 2005 04:12:13 -
@@ -317,6 +317,8 @@
c-dek = passphrase_to_dek( NULL, 0, algo, enc-s2k, 0, NULL, NULL );
if(c-dek)
{
+ c-dek-symmetric=1;
+
/* FIXME: This doesn't work perfectly if a symmetric key
comes before a public key in the message - if the user
doesn't know the passphrase, then there is a chance
Index: g10/encr-data.c
Bug#308282: [phpbb2 #308282] upstream patch
On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 12:11:06PM +0200, Alexis Sukrieh wrote:
Find attached a diff made against 2.0.15 and our last sid version.
| + $text = preg_replace('#(script|about|applet|activex|chrome):#is',
\\1#058;, $text);
It looks like this patch can be applied to close the bug.
Ok, based on the patch, whatever is being fixed is definitely suspected
to be a cross-site scripting issue.
It looks like this is about preventing URL's like img
src=javascript:foo to be output. Since browsers are supposed to
parse the html entities before interpreting the resulting URL, this
patch seems wrong to me, it might actually work though if the affected
browsers really do not parse such html entities in advance.
Also, only rewriting specific scheme's would be dangerous as who knows
when a certain browser will actually include yet another such scheme and
start to do funny things with it. A whitelist would also be tricky
though.
I more tend to think it's a browser problem if it allows site-specified
code to be run via a href= and img src= and such, that is, outside
of script context.
Opinions?
--Jeroen
--
Jeroen van Wolffelaar
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (also for Jabber MSN; ICQ: 33944357)
http://Jeroen.A-Eskwadraat.nl
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#308391: crosshurd: Tries to copy a file from sysvinit package even on hurd-i386
Package: crosshurd Version: 1.7.13 Severity: serious Tags: patch Justification: Renders package unusable Second stage of native-install on hurd-i386 aborts with the following error: cp: cannot stat `/usr/share/sysvinit/inittab': No such file or directory This is before fstab is setup and all. This snippet should work: # some boot tarballs have a hacked inittab, let's restore it. if [ -e /usr/share/sysvinit/inittab ] ; then cp /usr/share/sysvinit/inittab /etc/inittab fi Michael -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
