Bug#309585: libGL.so.1: SIGFPE in glxCreateNewContext

2005-05-18 Thread Greg Hazel
Package: xlibmesa-gl
Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-12.0.1
Severity: grave
File: libGL.so.1
Justification: renders package unusable



Program received signal SIGFPE, Arithmetic exception.
[Switching to Thread -1241085008 (LWP 32440)]
0xb77a811c in _mesa_test_os_sse_exception_support ()
from /usr/lib/i686/mmx/cmov/libGL.so.1
(gdb) up
#1  0xb77a7b71 in _mesa_init_all_x86_transform_asm ()
from /usr/lib/i686/mmx/cmov/libGL.so.1
(gdb) bt
#0  0xb77a811c in _mesa_test_os_sse_exception_support ()
from /usr/lib/i686/mmx/cmov/libGL.so.1
#1  0xb77a7b71 in _mesa_init_all_x86_transform_asm ()
from /usr/lib/i686/mmx/cmov/libGL.so.1
#2  0xb77a76c8 in _mesa_init_all_x86_transform_asm ()
from /usr/lib/i686/mmx/cmov/libGL.so.1
#3  0xb76fc204 in _math_init_transformation ()
from /usr/lib/i686/mmx/cmov/libGL.so.1
#4  0xb76fc229 in _math_init () from
/usr/lib/i686/mmx/cmov/libGL.so.1
#5  0xb765d1f5 in _mesa_Flush () from
/usr/lib/i686/mmx/cmov/libGL.so.1
#6  0xb765c1c7 in _mesa_initialize_context ()
from /usr/lib/i686/mmx/cmov/libGL.so.1
#7  0xb77b9907 in XMesaCreateContext () from
/usr/lib/i686/mmx/cmov/libGL.so.1
#8  0xb77b64c9 in _mesa_GetGLXDispatchTable ()
from /usr/lib/i686/mmx/cmov/libGL.so.1
#9  0xb77b36c6 in glXCreateNewContext () from
/usr/lib/i686/mmx/cmov/libGL.so.1


-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.10-1-686
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1)

Versions of packages xlibmesa-gl depends on:
ii  libc62.3.2.ds1-21GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libxext6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-12.0.1 X Window System miscellaneous exte
ii  xlibs4.3.0.dfsg.1-12 X Keyboard Extension (XKB) configu

-- no debconf information



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#309485: marked as done (libldap2 - some old version left libldap.so.2.0.15 behind, breaks with symlink)

2005-05-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 18 May 2005 02:02:11 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#309485: fixed in openldap2 2.1.30-8
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 17 May 2005 15:06:21 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue May 17 08:06:20 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from wavehammer.waldi.eu.org [82.139.196.55] (postfix)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DY3eG-00084R-00; Tue, 17 May 2005 08:06:20 -0700
Received: by wavehammer.waldi.eu.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 2821F3C025; Tue, 17 May 2005 17:06:17 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Tue, 17 May 2005 17:06:17 +0200
From: Bastian Blank [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: libldap2 - some old version left libldap.so.2.0.15 behind, breaks with 
symlink
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=1yeeQ81UyVL57Vl7
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 


--1yeeQ81UyVL57Vl7
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Package: libldap2
Version: 2.1.30-7
Severity: grave

The divertion of libldap.so.2.0.15 done by the libldap2-tls package left
behind this file. The version 2.1.30-7 decided to make
libldap.so.2.0.130 a symlink which is ignored by ldconfig. This make
libldap.so.2 a symlink to libldap.so.2.0.15.

I don't know if woody contains libldap2-tls, but I expect that it does.
So this may affect woody - sarge upgrades with libldap2-tls installed.

Bastian

--=20
Emotions are alien to me.  I'm a scientist.
-- Spock, This Side of Paradise, stardate 3417.3

--1yeeQ81UyVL57Vl7
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkKKCGgACgkQnw66O/MvCNEQ3wCfU1HlB4r3mX1dhwg1jyPJuErc
IKoAn2TGktVX8iIIYYgDEnFSUj1geFRY
=7g/6
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--1yeeQ81UyVL57Vl7--

---
Received: (at 309485-close) by bugs.debian.org; 18 May 2005 06:08:02 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue May 17 23:08:02 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DYHis-0008Gj-00; Tue, 17 May 2005 23:08:02 -0700
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DYHdD-00018j-00; Wed, 18 May 2005 02:02:11 -0400
From: Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $
Subject: Bug#309485: fixed in openldap2 2.1.30-8
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 18 May 2005 02:02:11 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Source: openldap2
Source-Version: 2.1.30-8

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
openldap2, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

libldap2-dev_2.1.30-8_i386.deb
  to pool/main/o/openldap2/libldap2-dev_2.1.30-8_i386.deb
libldap2_2.1.30-8_i386.deb
  to pool/main/o/openldap2/libldap2_2.1.30-8_i386.deb
openldap2_2.1.30-8.diff.gz
  to pool/main/o/openldap2/openldap2_2.1.30-8.diff.gz
openldap2_2.1.30-8.dsc
  to pool/main/o/openldap2/openldap2_2.1.30-8.dsc



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated openldap2 package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem 

Bug#309181: marked as done (libldap2: -7 upload built with wrong libraries?)

2005-05-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 18 May 2005 02:02:11 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#309485: fixed in openldap2 2.1.30-8
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 15 May 2005 10:05:42 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun May 15 03:05:42 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from mx02.qsc.de [213.148.130.14] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DXG0D-000657-00; Sun, 15 May 2005 03:05:41 -0700
Received: from port-212-202-192-37.dynamic.qsc.de ([212.202.192.37] 
helo=treasure.calvinsplayground.de)
by mx02.qsc.de with smtp (Exim 3.35 #1)
id 1DXFzi-00049H-00
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 15 May 2005 12:05:10 +0200
Received: (qmail 13112 invoked by uid 1000); 15 May 2005 10:05:56 -
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Bastian Kleineidam [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: libldap2: -7 upload built with wrong libraries?
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.12
Date: Sun, 15 May 2005 12:05:56 +0200
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: libldap2
Version: 2.1.30-7
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks unrelated software

Hi,

the 2.1.30-7 upload broke some packages (among them apache2 and mplayer)
on my system due to unresolved library dependencies:
$ ldd /usr/lib/libldap.so.2
liblber.so.2 = /usr/lib/liblber.so.2 (0xb7fad000)
libnsl.so.1 = /lib/tls/libnsl.so.1 (0xb7f99000)
libresolv.so.2 = /lib/tls/libresolv.so.2 (0xb7f86000)
libdl.so.2 = /lib/tls/libdl.so.2 (0xb7f83000)
libcrypt.so.1 = /lib/tls/libcrypt.so.1 (0xb7f56000)
libsasl.so.7 = not found
libssl.so.0.9.6 = not found
libcrypto.so.0.9.6 = not found
libc.so.6 = /lib/tls/libc.so.6 (0xb7e2)
/lib/ld-linux.so.2 = /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x8000)


After downgrading to libldap2 2.1.30-6, apache2 and mplayer worked again.
It seems this upload has been built on a different system with old
libraries. Please rebuild this package with proper dependencies.


Regards,
  Bastian

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.11-treasure3
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15)

Versions of packages libldap2 depends on:
ii  libc6   2.3.2.ds1-22 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libgnutls11 1.0.16-13GNU TLS library - runtime library
ii  libsasl22.1.19-1.5   Authentication abstraction library

-- no debconf information

---
Received: (at 309485-close) by bugs.debian.org; 18 May 2005 06:08:02 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue May 17 23:08:02 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DYHis-0008Gj-00; Tue, 17 May 2005 23:08:02 -0700
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DYHdD-00018j-00; Wed, 18 May 2005 02:02:11 -0400
From: Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $
Subject: Bug#309485: fixed in openldap2 2.1.30-8
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 18 May 2005 02:02:11 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Source: openldap2
Source-Version: 2.1.30-8

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
openldap2, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

libldap2-dev_2.1.30-8_i386.deb
  to pool/main/o/openldap2/libldap2-dev_2.1.30-8_i386.deb
libldap2_2.1.30-8_i386.deb
  to pool/main/o/openldap2/libldap2_2.1.30-8_i386.deb
openldap2_2.1.30-8.diff.gz
  to 

Bug#309381: marked as done (xemacs21-nomule: missing SSL dependency)

2005-05-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 18 May 2005 02:02:11 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#309485: fixed in openldap2 2.1.30-8
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 16 May 2005 20:43:36 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon May 16 13:43:36 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from bal.lis.inpg.fr [195.220.21.15] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DXmR6-ZY-00; Mon, 16 May 2005 13:43:36 -0700
Received: from smtpc.lis.inpg.Fr (smtpc.lis.inpg.fr [195.220.21.17])
by bal.lis.inpg.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF5DC3067CF;
Mon, 16 May 2005 22:43:00 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by smtpc.lis.inpg.Fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id A248B2C80FB;
Mon, 16 May 2005 22:43:00 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from smtpc.lis.inpg.Fr ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (smtpc.lis.inpg.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id 15470-08; Mon, 16 May 2005 22:42:56 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from irancy.lis.inpg.fr (irancy.lis.inpg.fr [195.220.21.167])
by smtpc.lis.inpg.Fr (Postfix) with SMTP id C128D2C80F4;
Mon, 16 May 2005 22:42:56 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by irancy.lis.inpg.fr (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Mon, 16 May 2005 
22:42:56 +0200
From: Laurent Bonnaud [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: xemacs21-nomule: missing SSL dependency
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.12
Date: Mon, 16 May 2005 22:42:56 +0200
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at lis.inpg.fr
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: xemacs21-nomule
Version: 21.4.17-1
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 0.0 dependencies must be complete


Hi,

here is the problem:

$ xemacs
xemacs: error while loading shared libraries: libssl.so.0.9.6: cannot open 
shared object file: No such file or directory

and indeed:

$ ldd /usr/bin/xemacs21-nomule
[...]
libssl.so.0.9.6 = not found
libcrypto.so.0.9.6 = not found


-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.11-1-686
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15)

Versions of packages xemacs21-nomule depends on:
ii  emacsen-common   1.4.16  Common facilities for all emacsen
ii  libc62.3.5-1 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libcompfaceg11989.11.11-24   Compress/decompress images for mai
ii  libdb3   3.2.9-22Berkeley v3 Database Libraries [ru
ii  libice6  4.3.0.dfsg.1-13 Inter-Client Exchange library
ii  libjpeg626b-10   The Independent JPEG Group's JPEG 
ii  libldap2 2.1.30-7OpenLDAP libraries
ii  libncurses5  5.4-4   Shared libraries for terminal hand
ii  libpng12-0   1.2.8rel-1  PNG library - runtime
ii  libsm6   4.3.0.dfsg.1-13 X Window System Session Management
ii  libtiff4 3.7.2-2 Tag Image File Format (TIFF) libra
ii  libx11-6 6.8.1-1ubuntu5  X Window System protocol client li
ii  libxaw7  4.3.0.dfsg.1-13 X Athena widget set library
ii  libxext6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-13 X Window System miscellaneous exte
ii  libxmu6  4.3.0.dfsg.1-13 X Window System miscellaneous util
ii  libxpm4  4.3.0.dfsg.1-13 X pixmap library
ii  libxt6   4.3.0.dfsg.1-13 X Toolkit Intrinsics
ii  xemacs21-basesupport 2005.03.07-1Editor and kitchen sink -- compile
ii  xemacs21-bin 21.4.17-1   highly customizable text editor --
ii  xemacs21-support 21.4.17-1   highly customizable text editor --
ii  xlibs4.3.0.dfsg.1-13 X Keyboard Extension (XKB) configu

-- no debconf information

---
Received: (at 309485-close) by bugs.debian.org; 18 May 2005 06:08:02 +

Processed: Re: Bug#309585: libGL.so.1: SIGFPE in glxCreateNewContext

2005-05-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 severity 309585 important
Bug#309585: libGL.so.1: SIGFPE in glxCreateNewContext
Severity set to `important'.

 tags 309585 = moreinfo
Bug#309585: libGL.so.1: SIGFPE in glxCreateNewContext
There were no tags set.
Tags set to: moreinfo

 thanks mate
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#309259: please accept gmailfs-0.4

2005-05-18 Thread Steve Langasek
On Tue, May 17, 2005 at 01:32:33AM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
 I just uploaded gmailfs 0.4, which fixes #309259. It is a new
 upstream version, but Sebastian, the maintainer, verified each line
 of the diff and we were able to conclude that 0.4 fixes the RC bug
 but does not add anything else. Please see the bug transcript for
 the analysis. 

 Thus, please accept gmailfs 0.4 into sarge.

Yes, approved.

Thanks,
-- 
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#309585: libGL.so.1: SIGFPE in glxCreateNewContext

2005-05-18 Thread Steve Langasek
reassign 309585 mesag3
thanks

Greg,

On Tue, May 17, 2005 at 10:47:08PM -0700, Greg Hazel wrote:
 Package: xlibmesa-gl
 Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-12.0.1
 Severity: grave
 File: libGL.so.1
 Justification: renders package unusable

 Program received signal SIGFPE, Arithmetic exception.
 [Switching to Thread -1241085008 (LWP 32440)]
 0xb77a811c in _mesa_test_os_sse_exception_support ()
 from /usr/lib/i686/mmx/cmov/libGL.so.1
 (gdb) up
 #1  0xb77a7b71 in _mesa_init_all_x86_transform_asm ()
 from /usr/lib/i686/mmx/cmov/libGL.so.1
 (gdb) bt
 #0  0xb77a811c in _mesa_test_os_sse_exception_support ()
 from /usr/lib/i686/mmx/cmov/libGL.so.1
 #1  0xb77a7b71 in _mesa_init_all_x86_transform_asm ()
 from /usr/lib/i686/mmx/cmov/libGL.so.1
 #2  0xb77a76c8 in _mesa_init_all_x86_transform_asm ()
 from /usr/lib/i686/mmx/cmov/libGL.so.1
 #3  0xb76fc204 in _math_init_transformation ()
 from /usr/lib/i686/mmx/cmov/libGL.so.1
 #4  0xb76fc229 in _math_init () from
 /usr/lib/i686/mmx/cmov/libGL.so.1
 #5  0xb765d1f5 in _mesa_Flush () from
 /usr/lib/i686/mmx/cmov/libGL.so.1
 #6  0xb765c1c7 in _mesa_initialize_context ()
 from /usr/lib/i686/mmx/cmov/libGL.so.1
 #7  0xb77b9907 in XMesaCreateContext () from
 /usr/lib/i686/mmx/cmov/libGL.so.1
 #8  0xb77b64c9 in _mesa_GetGLXDispatchTable ()
 from /usr/lib/i686/mmx/cmov/libGL.so.1
 #9  0xb77b36c6 in glXCreateNewContext () from
 /usr/lib/i686/mmx/cmov/libGL.so.1

This file does not come from xlibmesa-gl; it comes from either mesag3 or
from libgl1-mesa-glide3.  Please indicate the versions of those packages
that you have installed on your system.

-- 
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Processed: severity of 309585 is grave

2005-05-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
 severity 309585 grave
Bug#309585: libGL.so.1: SIGFPE in glxCreateNewContext
Severity set to `grave'.


End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#309583: Unreproducible on system with real OpenGL support

2005-05-18 Thread Petri Latvala
I cannot reproduce this on my system, which is fast enough and has
real OpenGL drivers. It handles SIGTERM, it shows graphics, shows
window title.

It grabs the mouse, yes. But here it also has focus when it does
that. You can escape it with pressing esc (if your system is juicy
enough to run the game and the window is visible and handles input).

Man page description is correct, except on great fun *smirk*.

Package description should indeed be updated to notify the user of it
being heavy and in need of OpenGL.


-- 
Petri Latvala


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#309591: pmount: DANGEROUS default settings (sync)

2005-05-18 Thread Andreas Mohr
Package: pmount
Version: 0.8-1
Severity: grave

Hi,

apparently the sync option really should *NOT* be used, especially not by
default:

http://readlist.com/lists/vger.kernel.org/linux-kernel/22/111748.html

Probably the best way is to get rid of the sync default in favour of an async 
default,
and also make sure to warn against using sync on flash media in the man page 
(and
README?)

(eikke: JFYI)

Andreas Mohr


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#309583: hangs the system

2005-05-18 Thread Reinhard Tartler
On Wed, May 18, 2005 at 07:16:24AM +0200, Siward de Groot wrote:
 When pong2 is started on my 200 MHz Pentium
   with ATI Mach64 videocard (running at 16 bits per pixel),

 It's manpage and package description say
   'fast game, crazy graphics, great fun'.
 Fast game, graphics, and great fun are not correct.

I'm very sorry this package disappointed you. Your hardware is clearly
way to weak to keep up with pong2.
 
 If it can't run on some systems (as is at least the case),
   it should mention this in it's packagedescription.

I will talk to upstream about this, and will change the package
description. I think the real problem here is, that the debian package
managment does not have any way to express hardware requirements, so it
would have to be written in the package description, which I find very
ugly.

 It should never ignore sigterm.
 Most importantly,
It should never grab the mouse if it doesn't have focus.
   (and it shouldn't grab focus either ofcourse).
 I don't remember whether it grabbed focus,
i do remember that it even failed to display it's name as windowtitle.

I will talk to upstream about this, but I think thats normal behavior
(you don't say anything about your windowmanager). I would consider it
normal if a program called by an menu entry immediatly gets focus.

The last to could be an upstream bug, but I want to talk to Johannes
first about this before cloning this bug.

To say it cleary again: This bug is in no way RC, and will be downgraded
soon.

regards,
Reinhard



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processed: Re: Bug#309308: kernel-image-2.6.8-2-686-smp: null pointer oops on udp packets

2005-05-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 tags 309308 moreinfo
Bug#309308: kernel-image-2.6.8-2-686-smp: null pointer oops on udp packets
Tags were: sarge-ignore security
Tags added: moreinfo

 stop
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processed: swfdec0.3 happiness

2005-05-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 reopen 308266
Bug#308266: swf-player: Failed to set pipeline to PLAYING
Bug reopened, originator not changed.

 reopen 308267
Bug#308267: Failed to set pipeline on PLAYING
Bug reopened, originator not changed.

 merge 308267 308266
Bug#308266: swf-player: Failed to set pipeline to PLAYING
Bug#308267: Failed to set pipeline on PLAYING
Merged 308266 308267.

 submitter 308267 Jordi Mallach [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#308267: Failed to set pipeline on PLAYING
Changed Bug submitter from Alfonso Aguarón Turrientes [EMAIL PROTECTED] to 
Jordi Mallach [EMAIL PROTECTED].

 thank you sir
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#309308: kernel-image-2.6.8-2-686-smp: null pointer oops on udp packets

2005-05-18 Thread maximilian attems
tags 309308 moreinfo
stop

On Mon, 16 May 2005, Peter Sandstrom wrote:

 Package: kernel-image-2.6.8-2-686-smp
 Version: 2.6.8-13
 Severity: critical
 Tags: security
 Justification: breaks the whole system
 
please send in dmesg after boot.
 
 kernel oops while trying to do a snmpwalk from a remote host. the entire
 udp stack becomes unresponsive and reboot fails when trying to bring
 down network interfaces. unsure if this is exploitable for a DoS attack,
 will investigate further when i have time if this not a know issue.

is it repeatable and how?
assume i never used that snmp beast.

can you try the 2.6.11 image from unstable, is it fixed there?
 
thanks for your feedback.

--
maks


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#309189: marked as done (libedataserver-1.2.so: undefined references)

2005-05-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 18 May 2005 03:32:09 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#309189: fixed in evolution-data-server1.2 1.2.2-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 15 May 2005 11:49:27 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun May 15 04:49:26 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from poros.telenet-ops.be [195.130.132.44] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DXHcc-0002Gg-00; Sun, 15 May 2005 04:49:26 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by poros.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with SMTP id 6397E3BC443
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 15 May 2005 13:49:25 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from Q.roeckx.be (dD5775FD9.access.telenet.be [213.119.95.217])
by poros.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4888E3BC406
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 15 May 2005 13:49:25 +0200 (MEST)
Received: by Q.roeckx.be (Postfix, from userid 501)
id 07D3D26136; Sun, 15 May 2005 13:49:24 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Sun, 15 May 2005 13:49:24 +0200
From: Kurt Roeckx [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: libedataserver-1.2.so: undefined references
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: libedataserver1.2-dev
Version: 1.2.2-4
Severity: serious

When trying to build gnome-panel 2.10.1-2 from
experimental, I get the following error:
/bin/sh ../../libtool --mode=link gcc  -g -O2  -Wl,-z,defs -Wl,-O1 -o 
clock-applet  clock.o calendar-client.o calendar-sources.o 
../../libpanel-applet/libpanel-applet-2.la -Wl,--export-dynamic -pthread 
-L/usr/X11R6/lib -lgnomeui-2 -lSM -lICE -lbonoboui-2 -lgnomecanvas-2 
-lart_lgpl_2 -lpangoft2-1.0 -lgtk-x11-2.0 -lgdk-x11-2.0 -latk-1.0 
-lgdk_pixbuf-2.0 -lpangoxft-1.0 -lpangox-1.0 -lpango-1.0 -lgobject-2.0 
-lecal-1.2 -ledataserver-1.2 -lgnome-2 -lpopt -lxml2 -lpthread -lz -lgnomevfs-2 
-lbonobo-2 -lgconf-2 -lbonobo-activation -lORBit-2 -lm -lgmodule-2.0 -ldl 
-lgthread-2.0 -lglib-2.0
gcc -g -O2 -Wl,-z -Wl,defs -Wl,-O1 -o .libs/clock-applet clock.o 
calendar-client.o calendar-sources.o -Wl,--export-dynamic  
../../libpanel-applet/.libs/libpanel-applet-2.so -pthread -L/usr/X11R6/lib 
/usr/lib/libgnomeui-2.so -lSM -lICE /usr/lib/libbonoboui-2.so 
/usr/lib/libgnomecanvas-2.so /usr/lib/libart_lgpl_2.so 
/usr/lib/libpangoft2-1.0.so /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so 
/usr/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.so /usr/lib/libatk-1.0.so /usr/lib/libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so 
/usr/lib/libpangoxft-1.0.so /usr/lib/libpangox-1.0.so /usr/lib/libpango-1.0.so 
/usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so /usr/lib/libecal-1.2.so 
/usr/lib/libedataserver-1.2.so /usr/lib/libgnome-2.so /usr/lib/libpopt.so 
/usr/lib/libxml2.so -lpthread -lz /usr/lib/libgnomevfs-2.so 
/usr/lib/libbonobo-2.so /usr/lib/libgconf-2.so /usr/lib/libbonobo-activation.so 
/usr/lib/libORBit-2.so -lm /usr/lib/libgmodule-2.0.so -ldl 
/usr/lib/libgthread-2.0.so /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so
/usr/bin/ld: warning: libplc4.so, needed by /usr/lib/libedataserver-1.2.so, not
found (try using -rpath or -rpath-link)
/usr/bin/ld: warning: libplds4.so, needed by /usr/lib/libedataserver-1.2.so, 
not found (try using -rpath or -rpath-link)
/usr/bin/ld: warning: libnspr4.so, needed by /usr/lib/libedataserver-1.2.so, 
not found (try using -rpath or -rpath-link)
/usr/lib/libedataserver-1.2.so: undefined reference to `PR_Poll'
/usr/lib/libedataserver-1.2.so: undefined reference to `PR_Close'
/usr/lib/libedataserver-1.2.so: undefined reference to `PR_Read'
/usr/lib/libedataserver-1.2.so: undefined reference to `PR_GetError'
/usr/lib/libedataserver-1.2.so: undefined reference to `PR_CreatePipe'
/usr/lib/libedataserver-1.2.so: undefined reference to `PR_Write'
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status

Please note that I have lots of gnome packages from experimental
installed, but I don't think that's related.  I think this
probably affects sid too.  (The packages doesn't seem to
be in sarge atm.)


Kurt


---
Received: (at 309189-close) by bugs.debian.org; 18 May 2005 07:38:05 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed May 18 00:38:05 2005

Bug#309259: please accept gmailfs-0.4

2005-05-18 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005.05.18.0834 +0200]:
 Yes, approved.

You rock. Thanks.

-- 
Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list!
 
 .''`. martin f. krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED]
: :'  :proud Debian developer, admin, user, and author
`. `'`
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system
 
Invalid/expired PGP subkeys? Use subkeys.pgp.net as keyserver!


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Processed: Re: Bug#309591: pmount: DANGEROUS default settings (sync)

2005-05-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 tags 309591 sid
Bug#309591: pmount: DANGEROUS default settings (sync)
There were no tags set.
Tags added: sid

 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#309591: pmount: DANGEROUS default settings (sync)

2005-05-18 Thread Steve Langasek
tags 309591 sid
thanks

On Wed, May 18, 2005 at 08:51:42AM +0200, Andreas Mohr wrote:
 Package: pmount
 Version: 0.8-1
 Severity: grave

 apparently the sync option really should *NOT* be used, especially not by
 default:

 http://readlist.com/lists/vger.kernel.org/linux-kernel/22/111748.html

 Probably the best way is to get rid of the sync default in favour of an async 
 default,
 and also make sure to warn against using sync on flash media in the man page 
 (and
 README?)

This may or may not be a grave bug, but AFAIK it doesn't apply to sarge
because the kernels in sarge do not support sync on FAT/VFAT.

-- 
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Processed: tagging 308266

2005-05-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
 tags 308266 sarge
Bug#308266: swf-player: Failed to set pipeline to PLAYING
There were no tags set.
Bug#308267: Failed to set pipeline on PLAYING
Tags added: sarge


End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processed: Re: Bug#309185: tetex-bin: FTBFS in experimental: Endless loop.

2005-05-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 clone 309185 -1
Bug#309185: tetex-bin: FTBFS in experimental: Endless loop.
Bug 309185 cloned as bug 309596.

 reassign -1 tetex-base
Bug#309596: tetex-bin: FTBFS in experimental: Endless loop.
Bug reassigned from package `tetex-bin' to `tetex-base'.

 retitle -1 tetex-base: FTBFS in experimental: Endless loop on Linux 2.6
Bug#309596: tetex-bin: FTBFS in experimental: Endless loop.
Changed Bug title.

 stop
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#309185: tetex-bin: FTBFS in experimental: Endless loop.

2005-05-18 Thread Hilmar Preusse
clone 309185 -1
reassign -1 tetex-base
retitle -1 tetex-base: FTBFS in experimental: Endless loop on Linux 2.6
stop

On 16.05.05 Florent Rougon ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
 Kurt Roeckx [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Hi *,

  Note that I'm doing this on a 2.6 kernel, which has sub-second
  timestamps on files, which might be why you're not seeing it.
 
 Good to know (I'm working with a 2.4 kernel). Now, I have a possible
 explanation:
 
 Suppose we start debian/rules with the rules file in 3.0-3.
 
 10 Make sees this rule:
 
% :: %.in $(eperl_sourcefiles) 
 eperl -P -o $@ $
 
 On my and Frank's systems, the loop quickly breaks because it is
 easy to do the following in less than 1 second:
   - Make regenerates debian/rules
   - Make reruns itself with the new rules file
   - Make runs the .PHONY targets and updates common.variables and
 common.functions
 
 Now, Make checks the time stamps of the new debian/rules and the
 newer-but-still-generated-in-the-same-second common.variables and
 common.functions, sees that they are all equal and concludes that
 rules doesn't need to be regenerated. Thus, the build can start
 normally.
 
Something similar happens to tetex-base, when trying to build on 2.6.
I'm cloning and reassigning to tetex-base. The above analysis tells
me, that the build will fail on 2.4 too, if the first and the second
step will happen in different seconds (by chance). Is that correct?

Regards,
  Hilmar
-- 
sigmentation fault


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processed: Fixed in NMU of swfdec0.3 0.3.4-2sarge0.1

2005-05-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 tag 308266 + fixed
Bug#308266: swf-player: Failed to set pipeline to PLAYING
Tags were: sarge
Bug#308267: Failed to set pipeline on PLAYING
Tags added: fixed

 quit
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processed: reopen

2005-05-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 reopen 308664
Bug#308664: cdbs_0.4.28-1(i386/unstable): FTBFS: missing build-depends: 
debhelper
Bug reopened, originator not changed.

 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#309591: pmount: DANGEROUS default settings (sync)

2005-05-18 Thread Andreas Mohr
Indeed, grave may have been too high, but then the Severity description
forgot to include the possibility of actually killing hardware, which should
be rated rather high IMHO.

I didn't know about the Sid tagging (Sid here, with a custom 2.6.11-ck8
kernel), sorry.

The LKML thread indicates that FAT sync behaviour has been changed by
Colin Leroy
(http://readlist.com/lists/vger.kernel.org/linux-kernel/22/112590.html).
The discussion thread for this patch is at
http://www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0411.3/.html

For the record, I'd like to publicly state here:
- pmount should get rid of default sync ASAP for the moment,
  in order to avoid too many killed USB sticks
- contrary to the strange belief of certain people:
  we don't need a new sync mode,
  http://readlist.com/lists/vger.kernel.org/linux-kernel/22/112509.html)
  , I do think we want a special mount mode (if possible), to indicate
  that we want fast, but not ultra-immediate (sync) writeout of dirty buffers.
  The usual caching in async mode will take too long for people to notice
  that things aren't fully written yet (the USB flash LED will switch off
  again!), thus we need faster processing (almost constant writing without
  many dropouts would be desireable, yet not as crazy as updates on every
  single-byte change as with the sync flag).
  Plus, thinking of *manually* using umount or even something esoteric as
  sync is absolutely unthinkable for less educated (ahem) people
  who unplug things on a whim.
  Such a new mount flag could be called nowritecache or nowritebuffer
  to indicate that we don't want any write caching in the OS.
  But this is not a very accurate description of what we really want to have
  with USB sticks, so maybe fastwrite (preferred) or instantwrite
  or immediatewrite (hmm) are better.

Thanks,

Andreas Mohr

-- 
No programming skills!? Why not help translate many Linux applications! 
https://launchpad.ubuntu.com/rosetta


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#309605: a2ps: missing dependency on psutils (for psnup)

2005-05-18 Thread Frederic LEHOBEY
Package: a2ps
Version: 1:4.13b-4.3
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable

I found a2ps to be missing dependency on psutils (currently it is only
a `recommends').

$ LANG=C a2ps -2 /tmp/developers-reference.fr.ps 
sh: line 1: psnup: command not found
[/tmp/developers-reference.fr.ps (ps, delegated to PsNup): failed.  Ignored]
[No output produced]

# apt-get install psutils

solves it:

$ LANG=C a2ps -2 /tmp/developers-reference.fr.ps 
[/tmp/developers-reference.fr.ps (ps, delegated to PsNup): 121 pages on 61 
sheets]
request id is HL-1430-551 (1 file(s))
[Total: 122 pages on 61 sheets] sent to the default printer

$ apt-cache show a2ps   
Package: a2ps
Priority: optional
Section: text
Installed-Size: 3096
Maintainer: Masayuki Hatta (mhatta) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Architecture: i386
Version: 1:4.13b-4.3
Depends: libc6 (= 2.3.2.ds1-4), libpaper1
Pre-Depends: emacsen-common
Recommends: bzip2, lpr | cupsys-client, psutils, wdiff

By the way it may not be the only problem as the previous command only
printed blank pages (but they are properly seen on screen by gv).  I
have not yet tracked down the roots of this second problem.

Best regards,
Frederic Lehobey

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-k7
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15)

Versions of packages a2ps depends on:
ii  emacsen-common  1.4.16   Common facilities for all emacsen
ii  libc6   2.3.2.ds1-20 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libpaper1   1.1.14-3 Library for handling paper charact

-- no debconf information


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#309606: [ia64] FTBFS: testsuite failure

2005-05-18 Thread Luk Claes
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Package: pcre3
Severity: serious
Version: 5.0-1
Tags: sid

Relevant snippet of the build log [1]:

./RunTest: line 111: 25459 Bus error
./pcretest -i $testdata/testinput2 testtry
make[1]: *** [runtest] Error 1

Cheers

Luk

[1]http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?pkg=pcre3ver=5.0-1arch=ia64stamp=1116338491file=log
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFCixC05UTeB5t8Mo0RAp4zAJ491F2bxyP3Q+zK+0HGUuARlllJKQCfVDCm
DbLw8SITY449N/gyUxFXLig=
=iNky
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processed: NMU waiting for upload

2005-05-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 tags 247192 +pending
Bug#247192: gnome-pim: uninstallable due to conflict with gnome-pim-conduits
Tags were: patch
Tags added: pending

 thanks.
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#247192: NMU waiting for upload

2005-05-18 Thread Maurizio Lemmo - Tannoiser
tags 247192 +pending

thanks.

Hi, there.

Package are ready, and checked by my AM. My sponsor will upload as soon
as possible.

Bye.

-- 
  Maurizio - Tannoiser - Lemmo
 Founder Member of ERLUG http://erlug.linux.it
---
BOFH excuse #50:

Change in Earth's rotational speed


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#309209: patch contains CVS files

2005-05-18 Thread Thomas Lange
I will not use your patch, since it contains patches for the CVS files,
which would corrupt my CVS tree. Instead I will apply these changes by
hand and will also add some changes that are missing in your patch.

-- 
regards Thomas


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#309583: Unreproducible on system with real OpenGL support

2005-05-18 Thread Reinhard Tartler
severity minor
retitle Package description should mention hardware requirements
thanks, mate

On Wed, May 18, 2005 at 10:00:34AM +0300, Petri Latvala wrote:
 I cannot reproduce this on my system, which is fast enough and has
 real OpenGL drivers. It handles SIGTERM, it shows graphics, shows
 window title.
 
 It grabs the mouse, yes. But here it also has focus when it does
 that. You can escape it with pressing esc (if your system is juicy
 enough to run the game and the window is visible and handles input).

Thank you for your additional information. I will prepare an upload with
a fixed manpage and package description.

Gruesse,
Reinhard



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processed: I'm too stupid to use control@bugs.debian.org :/

2005-05-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 severity 309583 minor
Bug#309583: hangs the system
Severity set to `minor'.

 retitle 309583 Package description should mention hardware requirements
Bug#309583: hangs the system
Changed Bug title.

 thanks, mate
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#308846: marked as done (file conflict in pimppa, parmetis-test)

2005-05-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 18 May 2005 07:02:29 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#308846: fixed in parmetis 3.1-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 12 May 2005 17:10:26 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu May 12 10:10:26 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from mail.lenk.info [217.160.183.176] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DWHCc-00075S-00; Thu, 12 May 2005 10:10:26 -0700
Received: from mail.sorgfalt.net ([217.160.134.107] ident=Debian-exim)
by mail.lenk.info with asmtp 
(Cipher TLS-1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA:16) (Exim 4.34 1)
id 1DWHEo-0008HF-DH
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 12 May 2005 19:12:42 +0200
Received: from p54a3d80a.dip.t-dialin.net ([84.163.216.10] 
helo=feynman.djpig.de)
by mail.sorgfalt.net with asmtp 
(Cipher TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA:16) (Exim 4.34 1)
id 1DWHFZ-0006ta-Di
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 12 May 2005 19:13:31 +0200
Received: from djpig by feynman.djpig.de with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1DWHBq-0003rP-HO
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 12 May 2005 19:09:38 +0200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: file conflict in pimppa, parmetis-test
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8
Date: Thu, 12 May 2005 19:09:37 +0200
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: pimppa,parmetis-test
Severity: grave

Unpacking parmetis-test (from .../parmetis-test_3.1-1_i386.deb) ...
dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/parmetis-test_3.1-1_i386.deb 
(--unpack):
 trying to overwrite `/usr/bin/ptest', which is also in package pimppa
dpkg-deb: subprocess paste killed by signal (Broken pipe)

Gruesse,
Frank Lichtenheld

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-k7
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

---
Received: (at 308846-close) by bugs.debian.org; 18 May 2005 11:15:32 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed May 18 04:15:32 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DYMWS-00066F-00; Wed, 18 May 2005 04:15:32 -0700
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DYMJp-0006ve-00; Wed, 18 May 2005 07:02:29 -0400
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Adam C. Powell, IV)
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $
Subject: Bug#308846: fixed in parmetis 3.1-2
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 18 May 2005 07:02:29 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Source: parmetis
Source-Version: 3.1-2

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
parmetis, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

libparmetis-dev_3.1-2_i386.deb
  to pool/non-free/p/parmetis/libparmetis-dev_3.1-2_i386.deb
libparmetis3.1_3.1-2_i386.deb
  to pool/non-free/p/parmetis/libparmetis3.1_3.1-2_i386.deb
parmetis-doc_3.1-2_all.deb
  to pool/non-free/p/parmetis/parmetis-doc_3.1-2_all.deb
parmetis-test_3.1-2_i386.deb
  to pool/non-free/p/parmetis/parmetis-test_3.1-2_i386.deb
parmetis_3.1-2.diff.gz
  to pool/non-free/p/parmetis/parmetis_3.1-2.diff.gz
parmetis_3.1-2.dsc
  to pool/non-free/p/parmetis/parmetis_3.1-2.dsc



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian 

Processed: tags

2005-05-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 tag 308664 sid
Bug#308664: cdbs_0.4.28-1(i386/unstable): FTBFS: missing build-depends: 
debhelper
There were no tags set.
Tags added: sid

 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#309605: a2ps: missing dependency on psutils (for psnup)

2005-05-18 Thread Steve Langasek
severity 309605 wishlist
thanks

On Wed, May 18, 2005 at 11:50:49AM +0200, Frederic LEHOBEY wrote:
 Package: a2ps
 Version: 1:4.13b-4.3
 Severity: grave
 Justification: renders package unusable

 I found a2ps to be missing dependency on psutils (currently it is only
 a `recommends').

 $ LANG=C a2ps -2 /tmp/developers-reference.fr.ps 
 sh: line 1: psnup: command not found
 [/tmp/developers-reference.fr.ps (ps, delegated to PsNup): failed.  Ignored]
 [No output produced]

This doesn't look like a bug at all to me.  The a2ps package is usable
without psutils, it just can't handle postscript input files.  I believe
this is a perfectly correct use of Recommends: under policy.

-- 
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#309591: pmount: DANGEROUS default settings (sync)

2005-05-18 Thread Martin Pitt
tag 309591 sarge
thanks

Steve Langasek [2005-05-18  1:05 -0700]:
  apparently the sync option really should *NOT* be used, especially not by
  default:
 
  http://readlist.com/lists/vger.kernel.org/linux-kernel/22/111748.html
 
 This may or may not be a grave bug, but AFAIK it doesn't apply to sarge
 because the kernels in sarge do not support sync on FAT/VFAT.

That's not entirely true. Older kernels indeed do not completely
implement sync on vfat, but at least to a certain degree; there is
still a small amount of data that does get written after calling
sync, but it is by no way the same amount of data that gets written
when mounting async.

I read the thread and it convinced me to change the pmount default
from sync to async (which would be a trivial change) and replace the
--async option with a --sync option. The advantages (don't destroy
flash hardware and greatly speed up the writing process) outweigh the
disadvantages (protect users from corruption if they don't unmount
their drives) IMHO.

I will prepare the patch ASAP and send it to this bug. In the
meantime, would you accept this change for Sarge?

Thanks,

Martin

-- 
Martin Pitt  http://www.piware.de
Ubuntu Developer   http://www.ubuntulinux.org
Debian Developerhttp://www.debian.org


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#309321: approx: Approx stops processing TCP rx queue

2005-05-18 Thread Tim Wootton
Hi Eric,

Yep, no problem:

Just to help here's a diagram of the initial setup


+-+ +--++--+
+---+
|uk.debian.org||server01  |---|server02
||client01   |
+-+ |(approx  ||(approx  |
|(client of |
+---+   |client of ||client of |
|server02)  |
|security.debian.org|--|localhost)||localhost)| |
| 
+---+   +--++--+
+---+

I should also point out that server02 is shared by a number of other
clients, not just 
client01. 

Is it possible that approx somehow marks a file as pending from
upstream, when in fact 
the download has failed, or been interrupted? It could then permanently
believe the file 
is not yet available, when it never will be.

Syslog on server02 only thing that looks odd is a few
utimes: Operation not permitted on Packages.gz files
When I checked the perms the file is rw for user approx which seems
right to me.


Can fail at any point, sometimes in the download of packages files,
sometimes 
in the fetch of the package.dpkg files. It may not be related, but even
when things
are working fairly ok, I do seem to get quite a few 
Error reading from server - read (104 Connection reset by peer) 
messages in aptitude/apt-get which I don't get if I switch back to
apt-proxy. Each
time it leaves a bunch of connections to it's upstream in the CLOSE_WAIT
state. There
remains, however only one connection in the ESTABLISHED state with a
high value rx q.
If I then repeat the run it will be all or most of the same downloads
that fail.

If I connect apt directly to the upstream, and the upstream is the
remote debian mirror,
that always works fine. Otherwise the same thing happens but not quite
so
regularly, I guess the problem can occur in any of the approx instances
in the chain.
For each instance you take out of the chain the lower the chance of
bumping into a problem.

Different remote? - see above, the debian mirror never fails.

Wget seems to work ok on the files that are getting 
Error reading from server - read (104 Connection reset by peer)
from aptitude/apt-get
which is interesting.

Hope this helps rather than confuses the issue, anything else you'd like
me to try just let me know.

Cheers,

Tim

  
#
   CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
The information contained in this email is confidential and may also 
be privileged. It is intended to be for the exclusive use of the 
addressee(s) and access to it by any other person is unauthorised.
If you are not the addressee please note that you must not distribute,
copy, circulate or in any other way use or rely on the information 
contained in this email.  If you have received this email in error 
please notify us by phone (+44 (0)870 445 1445) and then destroy the 
email and any copies of it.
##



Bug#309591: pmount: DANGEROUS default settings (sync)

2005-05-18 Thread Steve Langasek
On Wed, May 18, 2005 at 01:25:55PM +0200, Martin Pitt wrote:
 Steve Langasek [2005-05-18  1:05 -0700]:
   apparently the sync option really should *NOT* be used, especially not by
   default:
  
   http://readlist.com/lists/vger.kernel.org/linux-kernel/22/111748.html
  
  This may or may not be a grave bug, but AFAIK it doesn't apply to sarge
  because the kernels in sarge do not support sync on FAT/VFAT.

 That's not entirely true. Older kernels indeed do not completely
 implement sync on vfat, but at least to a certain degree; there is
 still a small amount of data that does get written after calling
 sync, but it is by no way the same amount of data that gets written
 when mounting async.

 I read the thread and it convinced me to change the pmount default
 from sync to async (which would be a trivial change) and replace the
 --async option with a --sync option. The advantages (don't destroy
 flash hardware and greatly speed up the writing process) outweigh the
 disadvantages (protect users from corruption if they don't unmount
 their drives) IMHO.

 I will prepare the patch ASAP and send it to this bug. In the
 meantime, would you accept this change for Sarge?

If you think that's the correct course of action for addressing this bug,
then yes.

Thanks,
-- 
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#308664: marked as done (cdbs_0.4.28-1(i386/unstable): FTBFS: missing build-depends: debhelper)

2005-05-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 18 May 2005 07:32:17 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#308664: fixed in cdbs 0.4.29
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 11 May 2005 20:02:26 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed May 11 13:02:26 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from mmjgroup.com [192.34.35.33] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DVxPW-yj-00; Wed, 11 May 2005 13:02:26 -0700
Received: from mix.mmjgroup.com (mix.mmjgroup.com [192.34.35.16])
by mmjgroup.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A92A316DF7
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 11 May 2005 14:02:25 -0600 (MDT)
Received: by mix.mmjgroup.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id A436F906A4; Wed, 11 May 2005 14:02:25 -0600 (MDT)
Date: Wed, 11 May 2005 14:02:25 -0600
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: cdbs_0.4.28-1(i386/unstable): FTBFS: missing build-depends: debhelper
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.4 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: cdbs
Version: 0.4.28-1
Severity: serious

There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:

 Automatic build of cdbs_0.4.28-1 on mix by sbuild/i386 1.170.5
 Build started at 20050511-1353

[...]

 ** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
 Build-Depends-Indep: docbook-xsl, xsltproc, springgraph, 
 ocaml-native-compilers | ocaml, realpath, fakeroot, python-dev

[...]

   -e s/$/\/g \
  debian/control.in | /bin/sh  debian/control
 dpkg-checkbuilddeps -B
 test -x debian/rules
 test `id -u` = 0
 if test -n   test  != .; then rmdir ; fi
 if test . != .; then rmdir .; fi
 for i in ./test/autotools/config.guess ./test/autotools/config.sub  ; do \
   if test -e $i.cdbs-orig ; then \
   mv $i.cdbs-orig $i ; \
   fi ; \
 done
 dh_clean
 make: dh_clean: Command not found
 make: *** [clean] Error 127

---
Received: (at 308664-close) by bugs.debian.org; 18 May 2005 11:38:05 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed May 18 04:38:05 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DYMsH-0002Q0-00; Wed, 18 May 2005 04:38:05 -0700
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DYMmf-0002JA-00; Wed, 18 May 2005 07:32:17 -0400
From: Robert Millan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $
Subject: Bug#308664: fixed in cdbs 0.4.29
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 18 May 2005 07:32:17 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 6

Source: cdbs
Source-Version: 0.4.29

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
cdbs, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

cdbs_0.4.29.dsc
  to pool/main/c/cdbs/cdbs_0.4.29.dsc
cdbs_0.4.29.tar.gz
  to pool/main/c/cdbs/cdbs_0.4.29.tar.gz
cdbs_0.4.29_all.deb
  to pool/main/c/cdbs/cdbs_0.4.29_all.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Robert Millan [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated cdbs package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 18 May 2005 12:52:21 +0200
Source: cdbs
Binary: cdbs
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.4.29
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low

Bug#309615: marked as done (libapache2-svn: missing Depends)

2005-05-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 18 May 2005 04:36:14 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#309615: libapache2-svn: missing Depends
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 18 May 2005 11:01:29 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed May 18 04:01:29 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from canyonero.dot.net.au [202.147.68.14] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DYMIq-0002ct-00; Wed, 18 May 2005 04:01:29 -0700
Received: from [203.129.41.236] (helo=democritus.tekno.house)
by canyonero.dot.net.au with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 1DYMIK-0007fi-00
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 18 May 2005 21:00:56 +1000
Received: from yosamite (yosamite.tekno.house [10.1.75.21])
by democritus.tekno.house (Postfix) with SMTP id 0B10D19385
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 18 May 2005 21:00:56 +1000 (EST)
Received: by yosamite (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Wed, 18 May 2005 21:00:55 
+1000
Date: Wed, 18 May 2005 21:00:55 +1000
From: Sam Couter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: libapache2-svn: missing Depends
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=oyUTqETQ0mS9luUI
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Operating-System: Linux 2.6.10-1-k7 on a i686
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 


--oyUTqETQ0mS9luUI
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Package: libapache2-svn
Version: 1.1.4-2
Severity: serious
Justification: Breaks apache

The libapache2-svn package needs a few extra Depends: on SASL and SSL
libraries.

[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/var/log/apache2# /etc/init.d/apache2 start
Starting web server: Apache2/usr/sbin/apache2: error while loading shared l=
ibraries: libsasl.so.7: cannot open shared object file: No such file or dir=
ectory
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/var/log/apache2# ldd /usr/lib/apache2/modules/mod_authz_svn=
=2Eso | grep not found
   libsasl.so.7 =3D not found
   libssl.so.0.9.6 =3D not found
   libcrypto.so.0.9.6 =3D not found

--=20
Sam Eddie Couter  |  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Debian Developer|  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
|  jabber:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OpenPGP fingerprint:  A46B 9BB5 3148 7BEA 1F05  5BD5 8530 03AE DE89 C75C

--oyUTqETQ0mS9luUI
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFCiyBnhTADrt6Jx1wRAkH6AJ0WoPdTLpqBnYTQU92SPssS8ArA1ACg44aC
weuXF7+sHde+mU0ODrjE18w=
=ApYE
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--oyUTqETQ0mS9luUI--

---
Received: (at 309615-done) by bugs.debian.org; 18 May 2005 11:36:15 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed May 18 04:36:15 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from dsl093-039-086.pdx1.dsl.speakeasy.net (mauritius.dodds.net) 
[66.93.39.86] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DYMqV-0001rI-00; Wed, 18 May 2005 04:36:15 -0700
Received: by mauritius.dodds.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 25423A3B3D; Wed, 18 May 2005 04:36:14 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Wed, 18 May 2005 04:36:14 -0700
From: Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Sam Couter [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#309615: libapache2-svn: missing Depends
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
References: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=Fba/0zbH8Xs+Fj9o
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 


--Fba/0zbH8Xs+Fj9o
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wed, May 18, 2005 

Processed: control

2005-05-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 severity 308664 important
Bug#308664: cdbs_0.4.28-1(i386/unstable): FTBFS: missing build-depends: 
debhelper
Severity set to `important'.

 tags 308664 - sid
Bug#308664: cdbs_0.4.28-1(i386/unstable): FTBFS: missing build-depends: 
debhelper
Tags were: sid
Tags removed: sid

 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#305277: marked as done (gnbd: Can't fulfill the build dependencies in sarge)

2005-05-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 18 May 2005 13:58:43 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Package not it sarge
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Apr 2005 23:58:58 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Apr 18 16:58:58 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from emailhub.stusta.mhn.de (mailout.stusta.mhn.de) [141.84.69.5] 
by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DNg8o-0003r7-00; Mon, 18 Apr 2005 16:58:58 -0700
Received: (qmail 4146 invoked from network); 18 Apr 2005 23:58:26 -
Received: from r063144.stusta.swh.mhn.de (10.150.63.144)
  by mailhub.stusta.mhn.de with SMTP; 18 Apr 2005 23:58:26 -
Received: by r063144.stusta.swh.mhn.de (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id C6110BB586; Tue, 19 Apr 2005 01:58:21 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: gnbd: Can't fulfill the build dependencies in sarge
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.9
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2005 01:58:20 +0200
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: gnbd
Version: 0.trunk20050206-1
Severity: serious
Tags: sarge


The build dependency on libmagma-dev can't be fulfilled in sarge.

---
Received: (at 305277-done) by bugs.debian.org; 18 May 2005 11:58:44 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed May 18 04:58:44 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from higgs.djpig.de [213.133.98.126] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DYNCG-0006ui-00; Wed, 18 May 2005 04:58:44 -0700
Received: from djpig by higgs.djpig.de with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1DYNCF-0006R5-EH
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 18 May 2005 13:58:43 +0200
Date: Wed, 18 May 2005 13:58:43 +0200
From: Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Package not it sarge
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no 
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

The bug is specific to sarge but the package is not in sarge anymore
so it can be closed

Gruesse,
-- 
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http://www.djpig.de/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#308680: MySQL docs not distributable?

2005-05-18 Thread Stefan Hinz
Hi Christian,
Christian Hammers wrote:
Hello
On 2005-05-13 Stefan Hinz wrote:
Christian Hammers wrote:
I maintain the MySQL packages for the Debian distribution and are
facing some licence issues here.
I'm working with our contracts dept. to change that copyright note so it 
doesn't confuse our users. I'll get back to you soon.

As our next release is in preparation I would have to know this week,
if the docs may be distributed or not, else they get thrown out.
Can you already tell me what the outcome will be like?
The outcome will not be any different from how we've been handling this 
for the last ten years. ;-) That is, MySQL software has always been 
shipped with the Manual, and we won't change that. We'll try to phrase 
the copyright note more user-friendly, or easier to interpret correctly. 
But let's have a look of what's in manual.texi now, with a few comments 
of mine.

@c This manual is NOT distributed under a GPL style license.
If it were, then you could just do with it whatever you want, as long as 
what you do complies to the restrictions imposed by the GPL. For our 
Manual, this is not the case: It's regular copyright, and the note 
above doesn't change anything regarding regular copyright, it just 
emphasises that fact.

Now what are you allowed to do with regularly copyrighted material? You 
may make a copy for personal use, but you're not allowed to distribute 
it, unless the copyright owner grants you permission to do that. (This 
is true for most countries in the world since copyright laws are very 
similar.) This is what one of the following clauses is for; see below.

@c Use of the manual is subject to the following terms:
@c - Conversion to other formats is allowed, but the actual
@c   content may not be altered or edited in any way.
The previous sentence actually states two different things:
1. You may not fork the Manual (why else would anyone want to alter or 
edit it if not for forking?). This is just an emphasis of what's 
regular copyright: You're not allowed to fork copyrighted material 
without the owner's permission.
2. Since TexInfo isn't the most readable format there is we allow to 
convert it into other formats. (In the near future, after we've switched 
from TexInfo to DocBook XML we'll ship other formats, anyway, so that 
note will probably be removed.)

@c - You may create a printed copy for your own personal use.
As said above, this is what copyright laws grant you, anyway.
@c - For all other uses, such as selling printed copies or
@c   using (parts of) the manual in another publication,
@c   prior written agreement from MySQL AB is required.
The things explicitly mentioned here are what we're really after: We 
don't want anyone to sell printed copies (since we're doing this 
ourselves :-), and we don't want parts of the Manual to be copied to 
training materials etc. What's not mentioned here is what we *do* allow, 
and that's what all this discussion is about: We want the Manual to be 
shipped with the software *but not separately*.

I hope this clarifies our reasoning. Let me know if you have further 
questions!

Regards,
Stefan
--
Stefan Hinz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MySQL AB, Documentation Team
Taunusstr. 27, 12161 Berlin, Germany
Desk: +49 30 82702940 Fax: +49 30 82702941
Mobile: +49 177 7841069
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Processed: tagging 309591

2005-05-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
 tags 309591 pending
Bug#309591: pmount: DANGEROUS default settings (sync)
Tags were: sarge sid
Tags added: pending


End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#297196: marked as done (Dummy bug to keep kernel-image-2.6.10-amd64 out of sarge)

2005-05-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 18 May 2005 14:32:53 +0100
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Feb 2005 21:08:38 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Feb 27 13:08:37 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from defiant.lowpingbastards.de [213.178.77.226] (UNKNOWN)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1D5VeX-00062t-00; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 13:08:37 -0800
Received: from defiant.lowpingbastards.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [127.0.0.1])
by defiant.lowpingbastards.de (8.13.3/8.13.3/Debian-6) with ESMTP id 
j1RL8T7G017058;
Sun, 27 Feb 2005 22:08:29 +0100
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by defiant.lowpingbastards.de (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id j1RL8S2Y017057;
Sun, 27 Feb 2005 22:08:28 +0100
Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 22:08:28 +0100
From: Frederik Schueler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Dummy bug to keep kernel-image-2.6.10-amd64 out of sarge
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=9DptZICXTlJ7FQ09
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 


--9DptZICXTlJ7FQ09
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

package: kernel-image-2.6.10-amd64 =
   =
 =20
version: 2.6.10-2  =
   =
 =20
severity: grave=
   =
 =20
justification: please keep kernel-image-2.6.10-amd64 out of sarge  =
   =
 =20
   =
   =
 =20
This is a dummy bug to keep kernel-image-2.6.10-amd64 out of sarge.=
   =
 =20
   =
   =
 =20
Kind regards   =
   =
 =20
Frederik Schueler  =
   =
 =20


--=20
ENOSIG

--9DptZICXTlJ7FQ09
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFCIjbM6n7So0GVSSARAiNUAJ94uOS9WD7RhC6oWdChoxkzzVSaeQCfemkX
0KzQiNteu7hnLMCDzvwLluE=
=SYhT
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--9DptZICXTlJ7FQ09--

---
Received: (at 297196-done) by bugs.debian.org; 18 May 2005 13:33:07 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed May 18 06:33:07 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from sorrow.cyrius.com [65.19.161.204] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DYOfV-0007fG-00; Wed, 18 May 2005 06:33:01 -0700
Received: by sorrow.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 10)
id 692DC64D50; Wed, 18 May 2005 13:33:01 + (UTC)
Received: by deprecation.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 1DCDC4F35C; Wed, 18 May 2005 14:32:53 +0100 (BST)
Date: Wed, 18 May 2005 14:32:53 +0100
From: Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: removed
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mime-Version: 1.0

Bug#308825: ,gdm logins fail to start sessions

2005-05-18 Thread Jay Kline
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Steve Langasek wrote:
| On Wed, May 18, 2005 at 07:51:05AM -0500, Jay Kline wrote:
|
|| Jay, taking care to run rm -f /usr/lib/libldap.so.2.0.15 before
doing so,
|| would you mind upgrading to the libldap2 from unstable to see if it
fixes
|| your problem?
|
|
|
| Does this mean you only upgraded to 2.1.30-6?  You need 2.1.30-7 from
| unstable to check whether it's the bug we fixed.
Oops, my mistake.  Our local repository hasnt been updated since we
started running into problems.  However, still no change with these
versions:
ldap-utils 2.1.30-3
libldap-2.2-7  2.2.23-1
libldap2   2.1.30-7
libldap2   2.1.30-7
libnss-ldap238-1
libpam-ldap178-1
gdm2.6.0.8-1
Jay
- --
Jay Kline
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
p: 612.337.3517
c: 612.384.1568
- --
This message (including any attachments) may contain proprietary or
privileged information, the use and disclosure of which is legally
restricted.  If you have received this message in error please notify
the sender by reply message, do not otherwise distribute it, and
delete this message, with all of its contents, from your files.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFCi0PHDxbn5aHZgBgRAmrxAKCQZhlqUScWHZRrWEYDhCz5zbxZRwCgjV2b
sgRQ5Qq+yJaczWwHoyBdBtk=
=sIg4
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Bug#309321: approx: Approx stops processing TCP rx queue

2005-05-18 Thread Tim Wootton
Hi Eric,

I may have a clue on reproducing the problem:

Try aborting apt-get or aptitude midway through a download and then
re-try.
This is seems to trigger the problem here. 

Tim
  
#
   CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
The information contained in this email is confidential and may also 
be privileged. It is intended to be for the exclusive use of the 
addressee(s) and access to it by any other person is unauthorised.
If you are not the addressee please note that you must not distribute,
copy, circulate or in any other way use or rely on the information 
contained in this email.  If you have received this email in error 
please notify us by phone (+44 (0)870 445 1445) and then destroy the 
email and any copies of it.
##



Bug#308680: MySQL docs not distributable?

2005-05-18 Thread Christian Hammers
Hello Stefan

On 2005-05-18 Stefan Hinz wrote:
  As our next release is in preparation I would have to know this week,
  if the docs may be distributed or not, else they get thrown out.
  Can you already tell me what the outcome will be like?
...
 What's not mentioned here is what we *do* allow, and that's what all this
 discussion is about: We want the Manual to be shipped with the software
 *but not separately*.

The manual cannot be shipped with the software in a strict sense as
 a) at least in Debian it does not comply the Debian Free Software 
Guidelines (because it may not be altered) and thus must reside in 
it's own mysql-doc package in the non-free part of the ftp archive.
 b) (minor point: for convinience, it is in it's own package due 
to it's size)

So was your above sentence just not exact and you really require me 
to remove the mysql manual from Debian?

If, on the other hand, you want to have it shipped in a distribution that
also has the mysql server and client binaries in another package then I need
a short and clear copyright addition that I can put into the copyright file
of the package to make the ftp master happy again.

bye,

-christian- 



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#309645: oregano: Plot window freezes due to a libcairo bug

2005-05-18 Thread Margarita Manterola
Package: oregano
Version: 0.40.0-3
Severity: grave
Tags: upstream
Justification: renders package unusable

Due to an incompatibility problem with the current libcairo, the plot
window in Oregano causes a total freeze of the program.

This is to say, you are not able to simulate any circuit, because the
program freezes when reaching the plot part.  Therefore the program is
practically useless (you can draw a circuit and generate the netlist, but
not simulate it).

The bug is actually in the cairo library, but the buggy function has been 
dropped in the CVS version, and there's noone wishing to fix the old one.

Upstream is already aware of the problem and is now trying to find a
workaround.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-686-smp
Locale: LANG=es_AR, LC_CTYPE=es_AR (charmap=ISO-8859-1)

Versions of packages oregano depends on:
ii  libart-2.0-2 2.3.17-1Library of functions for 2D graphi
ii  libatk1.0-0  1.8.0-4 The ATK accessibility toolkit
ii  libbonobo2-0 2.8.1-2 Bonobo CORBA interfaces library
ii  libbonoboui2-0   2.8.1-2 The Bonobo UI library
ii  libc62.3.2.ds1-21GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libcairo10.4.0-1 Multi-platform 2D graphics library
ii  libfontconfig1   2.3.1-2 generic font configuration library
ii  libfreetype6 2.1.7-2.4   FreeType 2 font engine, shared lib
ii  libgconf2-4  2.8.1-5 GNOME configuration database syste
ii  libglade2-0  1:2.4.2-2   library to load .glade files at ru
ii  libglib2.0-0 2.6.4-1 The GLib library of C routines
ii  libgnome2-0  2.8.1-2 The GNOME 2 library - runtime file
ii  libgnomecanvas2-02.8.0-1 A powerful object-oriented display
ii  libgnomeprint2.2-0   2.8.2-1 The GNOME 2.2 print architecture -
ii  libgnomeprintui2.2-0 2.8.2-2 GNOME 2.2 print architecture User 
ii  libgnomeui-0 2.8.1-3 The GNOME 2 libraries (User Interf
ii  libgnomevfs2-0   2.8.4-2 The GNOME virtual file-system libr
ii  libgtk2.0-0  2.6.4-1 The GTK+ graphical user interface 
ii  libgtksourceview1.0- 1.2.0-1 shared libraries for the GTK+ synt
ii  libice6  4.3.0.dfsg.1-12.0.1 Inter-Client Exchange library
ii  liborbit21:2.12.2-1  libraries for ORBit2 - a CORBA ORB
ii  libpango1.0-01.8.1-1 Layout and rendering of internatio
ii  libpixman1   0.1.4-1 Cairo pixel manipulation library
ii  libpng12-0   1.2.8rel-1  PNG library - runtime
ii  libpopt0 1.7-5   lib for parsing cmdline parameters
ii  libsm6   4.3.0.dfsg.1-12.0.1 X Window System Session Management
ii  libx11-6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-12.0.1 X Window System protocol client li
ii  libxml2  2.6.16-7GNOME XML library
ii  libxrender1  0.8.3-7 X Rendering Extension client libra
ii  xlibs4.3.0.dfsg.1-12 X Keyboard Extension (XKB) configu
ii  zlib1g   1:1.2.2-4   compression library - runtime

-- no debconf information


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#309648: Cheetah loads arbitrary code from /tmp

2005-05-18 Thread Moritz Muehlenhoff
Package: cheetah
Severity: grave
Tags: security

Cheetah loads arbitrary module code from /tmp, see
http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_id=7070332forum_id=1542
for a detailed discussion. It's fixed in CVS and 0.9.17rc1,
but since Sarge is in freeze an upload with only the security
fix would surely be appreciated by the release managers.

Cheers,
 Moritz

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (990, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.29-vs1.2.10
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#308680: MySQL docs not distributable?

2005-05-18 Thread Stefan Hinz
Christian,
Christian Hammers wrote:
Hello Stefan
On 2005-05-18 Stefan Hinz wrote:
As our next release is in preparation I would have to know this week,
if the docs may be distributed or not, else they get thrown out.
Can you already tell me what the outcome will be like?
...
What's not mentioned here is what we *do* allow, and that's what all this
discussion is about: We want the Manual to be shipped with the software
*but not separately*.

The manual cannot be shipped with the software in a strict sense as
 a) at least in Debian it does not comply the Debian Free Software 
Guidelines (because it may not be altered) and thus must reside in 
it's own mysql-doc package in the non-free part of the ftp archive.
 b) (minor point: for convinience, it is in it's own package due 
to it's size)

So was your above sentence just not exact and you really require me 
to remove the mysql manual from Debian?
I was imprecise. What I meant to say is not separately in the sense of 
putting the Manual somewhere outside the vicinity of the MySQL software. 
E.g. putting the Manual on a book CD that doesn't contain the MySQL 
software. Does this sound clearer?

If, on the other hand, you want to have it shipped in a distribution that
also has the mysql server and client binaries in another package then I need
a short and clear copyright addition that I can put into the copyright file
of the package to make the ftp master happy again.
OK, I've asked our contract dept. for such a paper. Not sure if they get 
this done by ... By when do you need to have it? And since it's legal 
stuff, you probably need it on paper; so where should we send that paper to?

Regards,
Stefan
--
Stefan Hinz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MySQL AB, Documentation Team
Taunusstr. 27, 12161 Berlin, Germany
Desk: +49 30 82702940 Fax: +49 30 82702941
Mobile: +49 177 7841069
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Bug#309486: libc6 upgrade failed leaving system unusable

2005-05-18 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
On Wed, May 18, 2005 at 10:51:09AM +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
 On Wed, May 18, 2005 at 10:42:08AM +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
  On Tue, May 17, 2005 at 11:34:58AM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
   If you dare, could you try to reproduce the problem?
  
  I can try that, as the system isn't too critical. Installing the -22 deb 
  now works. Should I install -21 and then -22 again?
 
 That worked.

Do you mean worked OK or successfully reproduced the problem?

If it worked OK, let's close this; there's nothing we can do about it.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery, LLC


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#308680: MySQL docs not distributable?

2005-05-18 Thread Christian Hammers
Hi

On 2005-05-18 Stefan Hinz wrote:
  So was your above sentence just not exact and you really require me 
  to remove the mysql manual from Debian?
 
 I was imprecise. What I meant to say is not separately in the sense of 
 putting the Manual somewhere outside the vicinity of the MySQL software. 
 E.g. putting the Manual on a book CD that doesn't contain the MySQL 
 software. Does this sound clearer?

Ok.

  If, on the other hand, you want to have it shipped in a distribution that
  also has the mysql server and client binaries in another package then I 
  need
  a short and clear copyright addition that I can put into the copyright file
  of the package to make the ftp master happy again.
 
 OK, I've asked our contract dept. for such a paper. Not sure if they get 
 this done by ... By when do you need to have it? And since it's legal 
 stuff, you probably need it on paper; so where should we send that paper to?

It's enough if you write it per email and state that this addition applies
to 4.0.x, 4.1.x and will appear in the next release. Something like

In addition to the current MySQL manual licence, MySQL grants
permission to everyone to distribute the manual in unaltered
form (regarding to the content not the format) as long as the
server is distributed, too.

(please be careful with the definition of how exactly the server is
distributed as e.g. in Debian non-free is not considered part of the Debian
distribution but rather a part of the archive that is maintained for
convinience only... and also it maybe on a different CD-ROM so on the same
medium is also not valid... complicated...

If I have it in the next days that would be nice, else the release manager
might have no pardon as this is only a non-free package and the archive is
frozen for release..

bye,

-christian-



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#309367: non-bug

2005-05-18 Thread Jeroen van Wolffelaar
(Please cc submitter when updating a bug)

On Wed, May 18, 2005 at 01:27:37PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
 Hi,
 
 I have verified that gnome-applets debian/control file is correct.
 The broken lines you pasted are the result of running the clean target
 without satisfying the build dependencies (which is not correct as
 exlained in Policy 7.6).

Well, the bug I discovered because some ftp-master script puking on the
Sources.gz file of upstream, which comes from the .dsc of gnome-applets.
In whatever way that has become, is not relevant to this being an
question of Build-Depends syntax error.

The problem with the package is then that the .dsc can have different
Build-Depends depending on what packages were installed during clean
run, something that's very awkward and, as this bugs shows, will
introduce bugs. If you're doing akward things like control rebuilding in
clean, please make sure you have proper tests in place to get it right,
that is, error out if something is missing, and/or even better, don't
autoupdate control, but only do so on a specific, non-automaticly
invoked, debian/rules target.

 Josselin, however, if you want to use type-handling's Provides
 feature, you'll be happy to know I had to bring it back.
 
 Otherwise you may just close this bug.

No, please don't, the bug is present in this version.

This also applies to the elinks bug.

--Jeroen

-- 
Jeroen van Wolffelaar
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://jeroen.A-Eskwadraat.nl


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#309591: pmount: DANGEROUS default settings (sync)

2005-05-18 Thread Martin Pitt
Hi!

Steve Langasek [2005-05-18  4:38 -0700]:
  I read the thread and it convinced me to change the pmount default
  from sync to async (which would be a trivial change) and replace the
  --async option with a --sync option. The advantages (don't destroy
  flash hardware and greatly speed up the writing process) outweigh the
  disadvantages (protect users from corruption if they don't unmount
  their drives) IMHO.
 
  I will prepare the patch ASAP and send it to this bug. In the
  meantime, would you accept this change for Sarge?
 
 If you think that's the correct course of action for addressing this bug,
 then yes.

Alright, I uploaded 

 pmount (0.8-2) unstable; urgency=high
 .
   * Urgency high since this fixes an RC bug, the fix should reach Sarge.
   * Added debian/patches/02-async_by_default.patch:
 - Mount devices 'async' by default instead of 'sync'. This will avoid
   physical damage of flash chips due to exaggerated updating of inode/FAT
   structures and greatly speed up the write throughput. On the bad side
   this makes it much less safe to remove devices without proper umounting.
 - Replace option --async with option --sync.
 - Document change in the manpages.
 - Closes: #309591
   * debian/control: Correct package priority to optional, to match the katie
 overrides.

The applied patch can be seen at [1], it's pretty trivial.

I also talked with Sjoerd Simons (hal maintainer). Above pmount upload
will fix the issue for command line users of pmount, but for Utopia users
(i. e. who use gnome-volume-manager and hal) the policy needs to be
fixed in hal; this means nothing more than removing the sync/async
policy stanza from the policy XML file, so I kindly ask to approve
this as well (Sjoerd will prepare an update soon).

Thanks a lot for your hard work and have a nice day!

Martin

[1] http://people.debian.org/~mpitt/02-async_by_default.patch

-- 
Martin Pitt  http://www.piware.de
Ubuntu Developer   http://www.ubuntulinux.org
Debian Developerhttp://www.debian.org


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#309591: marked as done (pmount: DANGEROUS default settings (sync))

2005-05-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 18 May 2005 11:32:18 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#309591: fixed in pmount 0.8-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 18 May 2005 06:51:44 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue May 17 23:51:44 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from rhlx01.fht-esslingen.de [129.143.116.10] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DYIPA-0003L0-00; Tue, 17 May 2005 23:51:44 -0700
Received: by rhlx01.fht-esslingen.de (Postfix, from userid 102)
id CDBF8236A6; Wed, 18 May 2005 08:51:42 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Wed, 18 May 2005 08:51:42 +0200
From: Andreas Mohr [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: pmount: DANGEROUS default settings (sync)
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
X-Priority: none
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.8 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_01,HAS_PACKAGE,
PRIORITY_NO_NAME autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: pmount
Version: 0.8-1
Severity: grave

Hi,

apparently the sync option really should *NOT* be used, especially not by
default:

http://readlist.com/lists/vger.kernel.org/linux-kernel/22/111748.html

Probably the best way is to get rid of the sync default in favour of an async 
default,
and also make sure to warn against using sync on flash media in the man page 
(and
README?)

(eikke: JFYI)

Andreas Mohr

---
Received: (at 309591-close) by bugs.debian.org; 18 May 2005 15:45:48 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed May 18 08:45:48 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (root)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DYQk0-0001N1-00; Wed, 18 May 2005 08:45:48 -0700
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DYQWw-0004U8-00; Wed, 18 May 2005 11:32:18 -0400
From: Martin Pitt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $
Subject: Bug#309591: fixed in pmount 0.8-2
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 18 May 2005 11:32:18 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Source: pmount
Source-Version: 0.8-2

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
pmount, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

pmount_0.8-2.diff.gz
  to pool/main/p/pmount/pmount_0.8-2.diff.gz
pmount_0.8-2.dsc
  to pool/main/p/pmount/pmount_0.8-2.dsc
pmount_0.8-2_i386.deb
  to pool/main/p/pmount/pmount_0.8-2_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Martin Pitt [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated pmount package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 18 May 2005 15:41:13 +0200
Source: pmount
Binary: pmount
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.8-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Martin Pitt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Martin Pitt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description: 
 pmount - mount removable devices as normal user
Closes: 309591
Changes: 
 pmount (0.8-2) unstable; urgency=high
 .
   * Urgency high since this fixes an RC bug, the fix should reach Sarge.
   * Added debian/patches/02-async_by_default.patch:
 - Mount devices 'async' by default instead of 'sync'. This will avoid
   physical damage of flash chips due to exaggerated updating of inode/FAT
   structures and greatly speed up the write throughput. On the bad side
   this makes 

Processed: reassign 307989 to cdebconf, severity of 307989 is normal ...

2005-05-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
 reassign 307989 cdebconf
Bug#307989: does not prompt for country/manual entry, and backup broken
Bug reassigned from package `choose-mirror' to `cdebconf'.

 severity 307989 normal
Bug#307989: does not prompt for country/manual entry, and backup broken
Severity set to `normal'.

 retitle 307989 choose-mirror question is skipped if there are Indices- fields 
 in it
Bug#307989: does not prompt for country/manual entry, and backup broken
Changed Bug title.


End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#309591: pmount: DANGEROUS default settings (sync)

2005-05-18 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Martin Pitt [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005.05.18.1732 +0200]:
  - Mount devices 'async' by default instead of 'sync'. This
  will avoid physical damage of flash chips due to exaggerated
  updating of inode/FAT structures and greatly speed up the
  write throughput. On the bad side this makes it much less
  safe to remove devices without proper umounting.

Ouch!!

What I am wondering is whether Linux provides a way to decrease the
flush interval on a per-filesystem level. I can see the problem with
synchronous updates and flash technology, but async is just calling
for trouble. If it were possible to cause flushing every 10 seconds
or so, this would be good.

I did not research this further. Thanks for your work (and pmount!)

-- 
Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list!
 
 .''`. martin f. krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED]
: :'  :proud Debian developer, admin, user, and author
`. `'`
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system
 
Invalid/expired PGP subkeys? Use subkeys.pgp.net as keyserver!
 
alle menschen zerfallen, wie zu allen zeiten so auch jetzt noch, in
 sklaven und freie; denn wer von seinem tag nicht zwei drittel für
 sich hat, ist ein sklave, er sei übrigens wer er wolle: staatsmann,
 kaufmann, beamter, gelehrter.
 - friedrich nietzsche


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#308680: MySQL docs not distributable?

2005-05-18 Thread Stefan Hinz
Christian,
you make me phone with American lawyers; frightening. ;-) Please see below.
Christian Hammers wrote:
Hi
On 2005-05-18 Stefan Hinz wrote:
So was your above sentence just not exact and you really require me 
to remove the mysql manual from Debian?
I was imprecise. What I meant to say is not separately in the sense of 
putting the Manual somewhere outside the vicinity of the MySQL software. 
E.g. putting the Manual on a book CD that doesn't contain the MySQL 
software. Does this sound clearer?

Ok.

If, on the other hand, you want to have it shipped in a distribution that
also has the mysql server and client binaries in another package then I need
a short and clear copyright addition that I can put into the copyright file
of the package to make the ftp master happy again.
OK, I've asked our contract dept. for such a paper. Not sure if they get 
this done by ... By when do you need to have it? And since it's legal 
stuff, you probably need it on paper; so where should we send that paper to?

It's enough if you write it per email and state that this addition applies
to 4.0.x, 4.1.x and will appear in the next release. Something like
In addition to the current MySQL manual licence, MySQL grants
permission to everyone to distribute the manual in unaltered
form (regarding to the content not the format) as long as the
server is distributed, too.
The lawyer I just phoned to is telling me she'll get back to me soon 
with an assessment whether or not we can give that permission. I hope I 
can get back to you in time.

(please be careful with the definition of how exactly the server is
distributed as e.g. in Debian non-free is not considered part of the Debian
distribution but rather a part of the archive that is maintained for
convinience only... and also it maybe on a different CD-ROM so on the same
medium is also not valid... complicated...
If I have it in the next days that would be nice, else the release manager
might have no pardon as this is only a non-free package and the archive is
frozen for release..
Argh. Are you referring to the whole MySQL package, or just to the 
Reference Manual, when you're talking about the non-free package?

Regards,
Stefan
--
Stefan Hinz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MySQL AB, Documentation Team
Taunusstr. 27, 12161 Berlin, Germany
Desk: +49 30 82702940 Fax: +49 30 82702941
Mobile: +49 177 7841069
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Bug#309201: osgcal - uses ccache but does not clean up the cache

2005-05-18 Thread Luk Claes
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

 I will disable ccache in the next build. Thanks for your help.

Hopefully soon as this is an RC bug for sarge?

Do you need any help?

Cheers

Luk
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFCi3Nu5UTeB5t8Mo0RAnHeAKCLfCZM5I52dBXhsW3ifKvrtBj+bACghbYG
gc0/QrjESACNIv+dx32tmPM=
=rs/Z
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#309419: marked as done (libquantlib0 no longer contains libQuantLib.so.0)

2005-05-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 18 May 2005 13:00:28 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#309419: fixed in quantlib 0.3.9-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 17 May 2005 04:25:15 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon May 16 21:25:15 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from dsl093-039-086.pdx1.dsl.speakeasy.net (mauritius.dodds.net) 
[66.93.39.86] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DXtdr-00059L-00; Mon, 16 May 2005 21:25:15 -0700
Received: by mauritius.dodds.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id B130BA32BD; Mon, 16 May 2005 21:25:14 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Mon, 16 May 2005 21:25:14 -0700
From: Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: libquantlib0 no longer contains libQuantLib.so.0
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=PyMzGVE0NRonI6bs
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 


--PyMzGVE0NRonI6bs
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Package: libquantlib0
Version: 0.3.9-1
Severity: serious

Hi Dirk,

Reviewing the changes in quantlib 0.3.9-2 has brought this fact to my
attention:

$ dpkg -c q/quantlib/libquantlib0_0.2.1.cvs20020322-1_i386.deb |grep libQua=
ntLib
-rw-r--r-- root/root   2815996 2002-03-23 14:49:03 ./usr/lib/libQuantLib.so=
=2E0.0.0
lrwxrwxrwx root/root 0 2002-03-23 14:48:43 ./usr/lib/libQuantLib.so=
=2E0 - libQuantLib.so.0.0.0

$ dpkg -c q/quantlib/libquantlib0_0.3.9-1_i386.deb |grep libQuantLib
-rw-r--r-- root/root   5192416 2005-05-02 22:22:23 ./usr/lib/libQuantLib-0.=
3.9.so
-rw-r--r-- root/root208464 2005-05-02 22:22:23 ./usr/lib/libQuantLibFun=
ctions-0.3.9.so
lrwxrwxrwx root/root 0 2005-05-02 22:21:47 ./usr/lib/libQuantLib.so=
 - libQuantLib-0.3.9.so
lrwxrwxrwx root/root 0 2005-05-02 22:21:57 ./usr/lib/libQuantLibFun=
ctions.so - libQuantLibFunctions-0.3.9.so

The soname of the quantlib library has been changed, but the package name
has not.  Since there are packages in woody which have a Depends:
libquantlib0, this is a release-critical bug because it invalidates the
shlibs from libquantlib0 in woody and breaks partial upgrades between stable
releases.  E.g., consider a user who has quantlib and quantlib-python
installed on woody, begins transitioning to sarge, and pulls in
quantlib-ruby -- the quantlib-python package will be silently broken by the
new libquantlib0 package that is pulled in.

Please rename libquantlib0 so that the package name reflects the soname of
the library it contains (e.g., libquantlib-0.3.9).

Thanks,
--=20
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer

--PyMzGVE0NRonI6bs
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFCiXInKN6ufymYLloRAulLAJ9OZwKXeNTuEg4sdq2a7ds595QzQQCgsF59
j2V2ThtRX9+MNx377WnpUFI=
=uxUv
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--PyMzGVE0NRonI6bs--

---
Received: (at 309419-close) by bugs.debian.org; 18 May 2005 17:08:06 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed May 18 10:08:06 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DYS1e-nS-00; Wed, 18 May 2005 10:08:06 -0700
Received: from joerg by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DYRuG-0001iF-00; Wed, 18 May 2005 13:00:28 -0400
From: Dirk Eddelbuettel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: lisa $Revision: 1.30 $
Subject: Bug#309419: fixed in quantlib 0.3.9-3
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: Joerg Jaspert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 18 May 2005 13:00:28 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no 

Bug#309401: more debugging

2005-05-18 Thread Daniel van Eeden
Maybe you could use a system trace to further debug this problem:
strace -f /usr/bin/zynaddsubfx 2 zynaddsubfx.trace
-- 
Daniel van Eeden [EMAIL PROTECTED]


smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature


Bug#309367: non-bug

2005-05-18 Thread Peter Gervai
Whatever, he's right, it's ugly. I'll do some sanity
checking, it's not a big deal.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#309670: gabber: FTBFS: Missing build dependency.

2005-05-18 Thread Kurt Roeckx
Package: gabber
Version: 1.9.4-1
Severity: serious
Tags: experimental

Hi,

Gabber is failing to build in experimental with the following
error:
checking for intltool = 0.23... 0.30 found
checking for perl... /usr/bin/perl
configure: error: XML::Parser perl module is required for intltool
make: *** [config.status] Error 1

Adding a bulid dependency on libxml-parser-perl could fix this.


Kurt



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#309401: more debugging for zynaddsubfx

2005-05-18 Thread Daniel van Eeden
I think I reproduced this bug.

2 backtraces attached. One normal and one with
DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=nostrip.

src/Makefile is using -O6 as optimization options, which is stupid. (-O3
is maximum).

Note that I'm using amd64 in 64-bit mode.

-- 
Daniel van Eeden [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GNU gdb 6.3-debian
Copyright 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you are
welcome to change it and/or distribute copies of it under certain conditions.
Type show copying to see the conditions.
There is absolutely no warranty for GDB.  Type show warranty for details.
This GDB was configured as x86_64-linux...Using host libthread_db library 
/lib/libthread_db.so.1.

(gdb) r
Starting program: /usr/bin/zynaddsubfx 
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread 182922426656 (LWP 26448)]

ZynAddSubFX - Copyright (c) 2002-2005 Nasca Octavian Paul
Compiled: May 18 2005 19:44:38
This program is free software (GNU GPL v.2) and 
it comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY.

Try 'zynaddsubfx --help' for command-line options.
Sound Buffer Size = 256 samples
Internal latency =  5.8 ms
ADsynth Oscil.Size =512 samples

ERROR: Cannot make a jack client (possible reasons: JACK server is not running 
or jackd is launched by root and zynaddsubfx by another user.).
ALSA lib seq_hw.c:446:(snd_seq_hw_open) open /dev/snd/seq failed: No such file 
or directory
[New Thread 1082128752 (LWP 26451)]
[New Thread 1090517360 (LWP 26452)]
[New Thread 1098905968 (LWP 26453)]
[New Thread 1107294576 (LWP 26454)]

Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
[Switching to Thread 1098905968 (LWP 26453)]
0x00457cd0 in MasterUI::cb_Beginner ()
(gdb) q
The program is running.  Exit anyway? (y or n) GNU gdb 6.3-debian
Copyright 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you are
welcome to change it and/or distribute copies of it under certain conditions.
Type show copying to see the conditions.
There is absolutely no warranty for GDB.  Type show warranty for details.
This GDB was configured as x86_64-linux...(no debugging symbols found)
Using host libthread_db library /lib/libthread_db.so.1.

(gdb) r
Starting program: /usr/bin/zynaddsubfx 
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread 182922426656 (LWP 24599)]
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)

ZynAddSubFX - Copyright (c) 2002-2005 Nasca Octavian Paul
Compiled: May  3 2005 12:23:39
This program is free software (GNU GPL v.2) and 
it comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY.

Try 'zynaddsubfx --help' for command-line options.
Sound Buffer Size = 256 samples
Internal latency =  5.8 ms
ADsynth Oscil.Size =512 samples

ERROR: Cannot make a jack client (possible reasons: JACK server is not running 
or jackd is launched by root and zynaddsubfx by another user.).
ALSA lib seq_hw.c:446:(snd_seq_hw_open) open /dev/snd/seq failed: No such file 
or directory
(no debugging symbols found)
[New Thread 1082128752 (LWP 24602)]
[New Thread 1090517360 (LWP 24603)]
[New Thread 1098905968 (LWP 24604)]

Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
[Switching to Thread 1098905968 (LWP 24604)]
0x0045ba62 in ?? ()
(gdb) q
The program is running.  Exit anyway? (y or n) 

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Bug#309313: mysql driver cannot retrieve data

2005-05-18 Thread Luk Claes
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi

 Package: libdbd-mysql

Do you experience this bug on a i386 system?

 Building libdbi and libdbi-drivers from CVS source cures both problems.

Is the CVS source of a different version?

 I suggest rebuilding the package using recent versions of libmysqlclient.

What version do you mean: of the libmysqlclient12 or the
libmysqlclient14 package?

Cheers

Luk
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFCi3TF5UTeB5t8Mo0RAjgDAKDBqzjBaB6lF7vEVWfGu2bFvvM//gCdHfx8
URIvQpMY62abgXZTKtbZAlg=
=oLmI
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#309677: Dumps core on Alpha

2005-05-18 Thread Falk Hueffner
Package: asc
Version: 1.16.0.0-1
Severity: grave

When I start asc, I get a screen with some aircrafts for a second or
so, and then:

[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~% asc
open /dev/sequencer: No such device
zsh: abort (core dumped)  asc


-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: alpha
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.11.3
Locale: LANG=C, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15)

Versions of packages asc depends on:
ii  aalib11.4p5-22   ascii art library
ii  asc-data  1.16.0.0-1 data files for the Advanced Strate
ii  libartsc0 1.3.2-3aRts Sound system C support librar
ii  libasound21.0.8-3ALSA library
ii  libaudio2 1.7-2  The Network Audio System (NAS). (s
ii  libaudiofile0 0.2.6-6Open-source version of SGI's audio
ii  libc6.1   2.3.2.ds1-22   GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libesd0   0.2.35-2   Enlightened Sound Daemon - Shared 
ii  libexpat1 1.95.8-3   XML parsing C library - runtime li
ii  libfreetype6  2.1.7-2.4  FreeType 2 font engine, shared lib
ii  libgcc1   1:4.0-0pre9GCC support library
ii  libglib2.0-0  2.6.4-1The GLib library of C routines
ii  libjpeg62 6b-10  The Independent JPEG Group's JPEG 
ii  libncurses5   5.4-4  Shared libraries for terminal hand
ii  libogg0   1.1.2-1Ogg Bitstream Library
ii  libparagui1.0 1.0.4-8a real crossplatform widget set ba
ii  libphysfs-1.0 1.0.0-4filesystem abstraction library for
ii  libpng12-01.2.8rel-1 PNG library - runtime
ii  libsdl-image1 1.2.4-1image loading library for Simple D
ii  libsdl-mixer1 1.2.6-1mixer library for Simple DirectMed
ii  libsdl1.2debi 1.2.7+1.2.8cvs20041007-4.1 Simple DirectMedia Layer
ii  libsigc++-1.2 1.2.5-4type-safe Signal Framework for C++
ii  libsmpeg0 0.4.5+cvs20030824-1SDL MPEG Player Library - shared l
ii  libstdc++51:3.3.6-5  The GNU Standard C++ Library v3
ii  libtiff4  3.7.2-2Tag Image File Format (TIFF) libra
ii  libvorbis0a   1.1.0-1The Vorbis General Audio Compressi
ii  libvorbisfile 1.1.0-1The Vorbis General Audio Compressi
ii  libx11-6  4.3.0.dfsg.1-13X Window System protocol client li
ii  libxext6  4.3.0.dfsg.1-13X Window System miscellaneous exte
ii  libxt64.3.0.dfsg.1-13X Toolkit Intrinsics
ii  slang11.4.9dbs-8 The S-Lang programming library - r
ii  xlibs 4.3.0.dfsg.1-13X Keyboard Extension (XKB) configu
ii  zlib1g1:1.2.2-4  compression library - runtime

-- no debconf information


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#308680: MySQL docs not distributable?

2005-05-18 Thread Christian Hammers
Hi Stefan

On 2005-05-18 Stefan Hinz wrote:
  It's enough if you write it per email and state that this addition applies
  to 4.0.x, 4.1.x and will appear in the next release. Something like
  
  In addition to the current MySQL manual licence, MySQL grants
  permission to everyone to distribute the manual in unaltered
  form (regarding to the content not the format) as long as the
  server is distributed, too.
 
 The lawyer I just phoned to is telling me she'll get back to me soon 
 with an assessment whether or not we can give that permission. I hope I 
 can get back to you in time.

Ok, thanks.
 
  (please be careful with the definition of how exactly the server is
  distributed as e.g. in Debian non-free is not considered part of the
  Debian distribution but rather a part of the archive that is maintained
  for convinience only... and also it maybe on a different CD-ROM so on the
  same medium is also not valid... complicated...
  
  If I have it in the next days that would be nice, else the release manager
  might have no pardon as this is only a non-free package and the archive
  is frozen for release..
 
 Argh. Are you referring to the whole MySQL package, or just to the 
 Reference Manual, when you're talking about the non-free package?

Everything under Docs/ is split away to the mysql-doc package and part
of the non-free area. The rest (mysql-server, mysql-client, libs)
is also in separate packages but all belongs to the main area. The only
thing I removed was the benchmark tests but that doesn't matter, I guess.

 Stefan
bye,

-christian-


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#309313: mysql driver cannot retrieve data

2005-05-18 Thread Markus Hoenicka
Hi Luk,

Luk Claes writes:
  -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
  Hash: SHA1
  
  Hi
  
   Package: libdbd-mysql
  
  Do you experience this bug on a i386 system?
  

Yep.

   Building libdbi and libdbi-drivers from CVS source cures both problems.
  
  Is the CVS source of a different version?
  

Yes, there were a couple of changes to both libdbi and the libdbd-xx
drivers. But I'm quite sure that it is not these source code changes
that somehow fixed the problem on Debian. The library and the drivers
were tested on various systems at release time, among them David
Parker's Debian box. The driver did work for sure at release time. I
rather suspect that the driver is incompatible with the current
version of libmysqlclient.

   I suggest rebuilding the package using recent versions of libmysqlclient.
  
  What version do you mean: of the libmysqlclient12 or the
  libmysqlclient14 package?
  

I've been testing things on a box that ran MySQL 4.1, therefore I used
the libmysqlclient14 package. The current CVS code contains a lot of
functionality related to character encodings. I guess that
libmysqlclient12 would not work anyway.

I've fixed the stuff in the debian subdirs of both libdbi and
libdbi-drivers. If you check out the current CVS version you should be
able to build the packages without any hassles on a Debian testing
box. However, I did not change the package version numbers as I simply
don't know how to do this. Remember that you will need the CVS
versions of both libdbi and libdbi-drivers. The current CVS version
drivers won't work with the packaged library and vice versa.

Please see my orignal post for the relevant package versions. If you
have any further questions, please contact me anytime. However, I can
access my Debian box only on weekends as it is located elsewhere.

regards,
Markus

-- 
Markus Hoenicka
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Spam-protected email: replace the quadrupeds with mhoenicka)
http://www.mhoenicka.de



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processed: reopening 309591, tagging 309591

2005-05-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
 reopen 309591
Bug#309591: pmount: DANGEROUS default settings (sync)
Bug reopened, originator not changed.

 tags 309591 - sid
Bug#309591: pmount: DANGEROUS default settings (sync)
Tags were: sarge sid
Tags removed: sid


End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#309681: util-vserver: Does not install on Sid

2005-05-18 Thread Tom Laermans
Package: util-vserver
Version: 0.30.204-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable

util-vserver does not install on unstable due to dependency on beecrypt2
which seems to have been removed from the debian system (it exists on
woody and on sarge).

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.10-deepspace-swsusp2
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)

Versions of packages util-vserver depends on:
ii  iproute 20041019-3   Professional tools to control the 
ii  libc6   2.3.2.ds1-21 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libgcc1 1:3.4.3-7GCC support library
ii  libstdc++5  1:3.3.5-8The GNU Standard C++ Library v3
ii  net-tools   1.60-10  The NET-3 networking toolkit

-- no debconf information


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#309686: tuxracer in sarge should really be replaced by the transition package to planetpenguin-racer

2005-05-18 Thread Adrian Bunk
Package: tuxracer
Version: 0.61-6.4
Severity: serious
Tags: sarge


This might technically not be a RC bug, but for not forgetting it:

I don't see any reason for shipping sarge with the obsolete
package in sarge instead of the transition package in unstable.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#309685: Unused library while zorp is not in testing

2005-05-18 Thread Jeroen van Wolffelaar
Package: libzorpll
Severity: serious

This package has been tagged for removal because it is not used in
testing at the moment, while zorp is held out by an RC bug.

Having an unused library in Sarge benefits basicly noone.

--Jeroen

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)

Versions of packages libzorpll depends on:
ii  libc6   2.3.2.ds1-21 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libcap1 1:1.10-14support for getting/setting POSIX.
ii  libglib2.0-02.6.4-1  The GLib library of C routines
ii  libssl0.9.7 0.9.7e-3 SSL shared libraries

-- 
Jeroen van Wolffelaar
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://jeroen.A-Eskwadraat.nl


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#308680: MySQL docs not distributable?

2005-05-18 Thread Stefan Hinz
Christian Hammers wrote:
Hi Stefan
On 2005-05-18 Stefan Hinz wrote:
It's enough if you write it per email and state that this addition applies
to 4.0.x, 4.1.x and will appear in the next release. Something like
In addition to the current MySQL manual licence, MySQL grants
permission to everyone to distribute the manual in unaltered
form (regarding to the content not the format) as long as the
server is distributed, too.
The lawyer I just phoned to is telling me she'll get back to me soon 
with an assessment whether or not we can give that permission. I hope I 
can get back to you in time.

Ok, thanks.
 

(please be careful with the definition of how exactly the server is
distributed as e.g. in Debian non-free is not considered part of the
Debian distribution but rather a part of the archive that is maintained
for convinience only... and also it maybe on a different CD-ROM so on the
same medium is also not valid... complicated...
If I have it in the next days that would be nice, else the release manager
might have no pardon as this is only a non-free package and the archive
is frozen for release..
Argh. Are you referring to the whole MySQL package, or just to the 
Reference Manual, when you're talking about the non-free package?

Everything under Docs/ is split away to the mysql-doc package and part
of the non-free area. The rest (mysql-server, mysql-client, libs)
is also in separate packages but all belongs to the main area. The only
thing I removed was the benchmark tests but that doesn't matter, I guess.
Hi Christian,
phew! :) I'm happy to see that issues with the Manual don't keep you 
from putting MySQL where it belongs -- in the main area. However, I'll 
keep trying to resolve unclarities about the MySQL Manual once and for 
all -- so thanks for taking your time to discuss this with me!

Regards,
Stefan
--
Stefan Hinz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MySQL AB, Documentation Team
Taunusstr. 27, 12161 Berlin, Germany
Desk: +49 30 82702940 Fax: +49 30 82702941
Mobile: +49 177 7841069
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Bug#303200: kernel-image-2.6.10-1-686: kernel BUG at fs/reiserfs/file.c:534!

2005-05-18 Thread maximilian attems
severity 303200 important
thanks

On Tue, 05 Apr 2005, Pau Capdevila wrote:

 *** Please type your report below this line ***
 
 When the following occurs:
 
 Apr  3 21:59:31 localhost kernel: hda: dma_intr: status=0x51 {
 DriveReady SeekComplete Error }
 Apr  3 21:59:31 localhost kernel: hda: dma_intr: error=0x40 {
 UncorrectableError }, LBAsect=57642412, sector=57642408
 Apr  3 21:59:31 localhost kernel: ide: failed opcode was: unknown
 Apr  3 21:59:31 localhost kernel: end_request: I/O error, dev hda,
 sector 57642408
 Apr  3 21:59:31 localhost kernel: [ cut here ]
 Apr  3 21:59:31 localhost kernel: kernel BUG at fs/reiserfs/file.c:534!
 Apr  3 21:59:31 localhost kernel: invalid operand:  [#1]
 Apr  3 21:59:31 localhost kernel: PREEMPT 
 Apr  3 21:59:31 localhost kernel: Modules linked in: tdfx lp ipv6 floppy
 parport_pc parport pcspkr rtc snd_ens1371 snd_rawmidi snd_seq_device
 snd_ac97_codec snd_pcm_oss snd_mixer_oss snd_pcm snd_timer snd soundcore
 snd_page_alloc gameport 8139cp 8139too mii i2c_piix4 i2c_core joydev
 tsdev usbhid uhci_hcd usbcore pci_hotplug intel_agp agpgart
 nls_iso8859_1 vfat fat nls_cp437 ntfs capability commoncap evdev apm
 ide_cd cdrom mousedev psmouse reiserfs ext2 ext3 jbd mbcache ide_generic
 siimage aec62xx trm290 alim15x3 hpt34x hpt366 ide_disk cmd64x piix
 rz1000 slc90e66 generic cs5530 cs5520 sc1200 triflex atiixp pdc202xx_old
 pdc202xx_new opti621 ns87415 cy82c693 amd74xx sis5513 via82cxxx
 serverworks ide_core unix fbcon font bitblit vesafb cfbcopyarea
 cfbimgblt cfbfillrect
 Apr  3 21:59:31 localhost kernel: CPU:0
 Apr  3 21:59:31 localhost kernel: EIP:
 0060:[pg0+341663470/1069863936]Not tainted VLI
 Apr  3 21:59:31 localhost kernel: EFLAGS: 00210256   (2.6.10-1-686) 
 Apr  3 21:59:31 localhost kernel: EIP is at
 reiserfs_allocate_blocks_for_region+0xb6e/0x1620 [reiserfs]
 Apr  3 21:59:31 localhost kernel: eax: 2000   ebx: c2709ad8   ecx:
    edx: c1028d20
 Apr  3 21:59:31 localhost kernel: esi: 0001   edi: cbb4fedc   ebp:
 cf5a6018   esp: cbb4fcb0
 Apr  3 21:59:31 localhost kernel: ds: 007b   es: 007b   ss: 0068
 Apr  3 21:59:31 localhost kernel: Process amule (pid: 4705,
 threadinfo=cbb4e000 task=cb8c0570)
 Apr  3 21:59:31 localhost kernel: Stack: cbb4feac c8850bfc cbb4fdb4
 fffb 000f 0003 c02a343e c1280ca8 
 Apr  3 21:59:31 localhost kernel:cbb4fd24  cbb4fd2c
 c02a3651 c24b3fb8 c0157100 cbb4fd38 cb8c0570 
 Apr  3 21:59:31 localhost kernel:cbb4fd20 c0157100 00200296
 0002 c1280ca8  c8850bb0  
 Apr  3 21:59:31 localhost kernel: Call Trace:
 Apr  3 21:59:31 localhost kernel:  [io_schedule+14/32]
 io_schedule+0xe/0x20
 Apr  3 21:59:31 localhost kernel:  [__wait_on_bit+81/112]
 __wait_on_bit+0x51/0x70
 Apr  3 21:59:31 localhost kernel:  [sync_buffer+0/80]
 sync_buffer+0x0/0x50
 Apr  3 21:59:31 localhost kernel:  [sync_buffer+0/80]
 sync_buffer+0x0/0x50
 Apr  3 21:59:31 localhost kernel:  [free_buffer_head+57/112]
 free_buffer_head+0x39/0x70
 Apr  3 21:59:31 localhost kernel:  [pg0+341666258/1069863936]
 reiserfs_unprepare_pages+0x32/0x70 [reiserfs]
 Apr  3 21:59:31 localhost kernel:  [pg0+341669618/1069863936]
 reiserfs_prepare_file_region_for_write+0x562/0x990 [reiserfs]
 Apr  3 21:59:31 localhost kernel:  [pg0+341672407/1069863936]
 reiserfs_file_write+0x6b7/0x6d0 [reiserfs]
 Apr  3 21:59:31 localhost kernel:  [vfs_statfs+100/128]
 vfs_statfs+0x64/0x80
 Apr  3 21:59:31 localhost kernel:  [vfs_statfs64+64/80]
 vfs_statfs64+0x40/0x50
 Apr  3 21:59:31 localhost kernel:  [path_release+21/80]
 path_release+0x15/0x50
 Apr  3 21:59:31 localhost kernel:  [sys_statfs64+143/208]
 sys_statfs64+0x8f/0xd0
 Apr  3 21:59:31 localhost kernel:  [vfs_write+237/352]
 vfs_write+0xed/0x160
 Apr  3 21:59:31 localhost kernel:  [sys_write+81/128]
 sys_write+0x51/0x80
 Apr  3 21:59:31 localhost kernel:  [syscall_call+7/11]
 syscall_call+0x7/0xb
 Apr  3 21:59:31 localhost kernel: Code: 24 e8 c7 9e 00 00 8b 94 24 8c 01
 00 00 b8 60 5d 9a d4 89 44 24 04 8b 82 8c 00 00 00 eb e0 0f 0b 19 02 20
 a6 9a d4 e9 00 ff ff ff 0f 0b 16 02 20 a6 9a d4 e9 e5 fe ff ff 89 7c
 24 04 8b 84 24 88 
 
 The system doesn't panic but X fall down and you must reset the machine.
 
well reiserfs doesn't work well with preempt,
could you please try the 2.6.11 kernel-iamge.
there preempt is disabled afair.

also aboves looks like an hardware error of your harddisc,
is it still alive?
can you reproduce the dma error with ext3?


thanks for your reply.

--
maks


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#309691: zope-testcase in sarge still uses the non-free profile module

2005-05-18 Thread Adrian Bunk
Package: zope-testcase
Version: 0.9.0-1
Severity: grave
Tags: sarge


zope-testcase in sarge still uses the non-free profile module.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processed: severity of 305937 is grave, tagging 305937, reopening 305937, merging 305937 309691

2005-05-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
 severity 305937 grave
Bug#305937: error in ztc_common.py, cannot import 'profiler'
Severity set to `grave'.

 tags 305937 sarge
Bug#305937: error in ztc_common.py, cannot import 'profiler'
There were no tags set.
Tags added: sarge

 reopen 305937
Bug#305937: error in ztc_common.py, cannot import 'profiler'
Bug reopened, originator not changed.

 merge 305937 309691
Bug#305937: error in ztc_common.py, cannot import 'profiler'
Bug#309691: zope-testcase in sarge still uses the non-free profile module
Merged 305937 309691.


End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#295657: EXT3 on RAID problems in all 2.6-smp

2005-05-18 Thread maximilian attems
On Thu, 17 Feb 2005, Jeroen van Disseldorp wrote:

 2 months ago I bought 4 new hard drives, which I configured as follows:
 
 -
 |  Linux  |  Swap  |  RAIDSET-1 disk 1  |
 -
 | RAIDSET-0 disk 1 |  RAIDSET-1 disk 2  |
 -
 | RAIDSET-0 disk 2 |  RAIDSET-1 disk 3  |
 -
 | RAIDSET-0 disk 3 |  RAIDSET-1 disk 4  |
 -
 
 RAIDSET-0 is 20G, RAIDSET-1 is 709G.
 
 On top of both raid devices I use the device mapper to encrypt those
 disks, so data travels to the disk through the following layers:
 
   vfs - ext3 - device mapper - raid - physical disks
 
 Since the beginning I have been having problems with heavy disk usage
 on RAIDSET-1. It seems that under normal circumstances the system is
 stable, but under heavy load the following error occurs:
 
 Feb 12 06:27:25 einstein kernel: EXT3-fs error (device dm-2): ext3_readdir: 
 bad entry in directory #84509561: rec_len %% 4 != 0 - offset=0, 
 inode=1629516644, rec_len=29795, name_len=117
 Feb 12 06:27:25 einstein kernel: Aborting journal on device dm-2.
 Feb 12 06:27:25 einstein kernel: ext3_abort called.
 Feb 12 06:27:25 einstein kernel: EXT3-fs abort (device dm-2): 
 ext3_journal_start: Detected aborted journal
 Feb 12 06:27:25 einstein kernel: Remounting filesystem read-only
 
 As I do some spam-learning and backups at night, requiring some heavy
 disk use, this happens just about every day. Running fsck after the
 error is useless, as it finds no errors at all. So there is little
 else to do then remount and hope for the best for another day.
 
 My system is a dual Pentium II 400MHz with 384MB memory. All four
 disks are Hitachi/IBM Deskstar 250G. The problem occurs with every
 2.6 kernel I have tried so far, starting from 2.6.7.
 
 Typical thing is that it only seems to occur on -smp kernels. I've
 been running some UP-kernels as well and (although slower) they do
 not thrash the ext3 journal. Could this be an SMP race?
 
 More system information can be found in the attached kern.log.
 
can you try to reproduce it with more recent 2.6.11 from unstable?

--
maks


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#303233: njbtools: Uninstallable in sid

2005-05-18 Thread Lawrence Williams
Hello,
I think I have figured out a solution, as it seems to build fine against 
libnjb1. Seems some API has changed upstream since 1.1

I will investigate further. If my solution works, I will try to get an 
upload sponsored ASAP.

Thanks!
Lars Wirzenius wrote:
Furthermore, njbtools FTBFS with the current libnjb-dev:

Indeed. njbtools requires libnjb-dev version 1.0.1-2 (or thereabouts),
from May 2004. libnjb has had source-incompatible changes since then:
functions have changed names and require different arguments now (or so
a quick read of the upstream changelog indicates).
This means that njbtools needs to be ported to the newer libnjb. I tried
to find the upstream home page so as to see if there is a newer version,
but I failed to find one. debian/copyright does not say anything about
it. Google showed me endless numbers of Debian web page mirrors, but
nothing useful.
Lawrence, do you have an address to the upstream home page for njbtools?
I think that unless someone can find a newer version, or port the one in
Debian to the libnjb-dev in sarge, that njbtools may have to be removed
from sarge.

.

--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Processed: Fixed in NMU of gnome-pim 1.4.9-2.2

2005-05-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 tag 247192 + fixed
Bug#247192: gnome-pim: uninstallable due to conflict with gnome-pim-conduits
Tags were: pending patch
Tags added: fixed

 quit
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processed: severity of 307981 is serious

2005-05-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 severity 307981 serious
Bug#307981: Correction of typo
Severity set to `serious'.

 stop
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#309625: marked as done (pmount: DANGEROUS default settings (sync))

2005-05-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 18 May 2005 18:17:53 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#309625: fixed in hal 0.4.7-3sarge1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 18 May 2005 06:51:44 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue May 17 23:51:44 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from rhlx01.fht-esslingen.de [129.143.116.10] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DYIPA-0003L0-00; Tue, 17 May 2005 23:51:44 -0700
Received: by rhlx01.fht-esslingen.de (Postfix, from userid 102)
id CDBF8236A6; Wed, 18 May 2005 08:51:42 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Wed, 18 May 2005 08:51:42 +0200
From: Andreas Mohr [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: pmount: DANGEROUS default settings (sync)
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
X-Priority: none
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.8 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_01,HAS_PACKAGE,
PRIORITY_NO_NAME autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: pmount
Version: 0.8-1
Severity: grave

Hi,

apparently the sync option really should *NOT* be used, especially not by
default:

http://readlist.com/lists/vger.kernel.org/linux-kernel/22/111748.html

Probably the best way is to get rid of the sync default in favour of an async 
default,
and also make sure to warn against using sync on flash media in the man page 
(and
README?)

(eikke: JFYI)

Andreas Mohr

---
Received: (at 309625-close) by bugs.debian.org; 18 May 2005 22:20:19 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed May 18 15:20:18 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DYWtl-0006sT-00; Wed, 18 May 2005 15:20:18 -0700
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DYWrR-0003gL-00; Wed, 18 May 2005 18:17:53 -0400
From: Sjoerd Simons [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $
Subject: Bug#309625: fixed in hal 0.4.7-3sarge1
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 18 May 2005 18:17:53 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Source: hal
Source-Version: 0.4.7-3sarge1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
hal, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

hal-device-manager_0.4.7-3sarge1_all.deb
  to pool/main/h/hal/hal-device-manager_0.4.7-3sarge1_all.deb
hal-doc_0.4.7-3sarge1_all.deb
  to pool/main/h/hal/hal-doc_0.4.7-3sarge1_all.deb
hal_0.4.7-3sarge1.diff.gz
  to pool/main/h/hal/hal_0.4.7-3sarge1.diff.gz
hal_0.4.7-3sarge1.dsc
  to pool/main/h/hal/hal_0.4.7-3sarge1.dsc
hal_0.4.7-3sarge1_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/h/hal/hal_0.4.7-3sarge1_powerpc.deb
libhal-dev_0.4.7-3sarge1_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/h/hal/libhal-dev_0.4.7-3sarge1_powerpc.deb
libhal-storage-dev_0.4.7-3sarge1_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/h/hal/libhal-storage-dev_0.4.7-3sarge1_powerpc.deb
libhal-storage0_0.4.7-3sarge1_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/h/hal/libhal-storage0_0.4.7-3sarge1_powerpc.deb
libhal0_0.4.7-3sarge1_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/h/hal/libhal0_0.4.7-3sarge1_powerpc.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Sjoerd Simons [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated hal package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 18 May 2005 23:03:39 +0200
Source: hal
Binary: libhal-dev hal-doc libhal-storage-dev libhal-storage0 

Bug#291274: openswan in sarge

2005-05-18 Thread Bdale Garbee
severity 291274 important
thanks

I have just confirmed that the openswan package in sid works just fine out
of the box on a sarge system running a prebuilt 2.6.8-2-686 kernel.  It 
therefore seems completely inappropriate for this bug to be release-critical.

Release team, please allow openswan back into sarge.  We had freeswan in woody,
and it's still in sarge.  Unfortunately, freeswan is no longer maintained 
upstream, openswan is where development continues.  See www.freeswan.org for
confirmation of this.  

Bdale


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#309591: pmount: DANGEROUS default settings (sync)

2005-05-18 Thread Sjoerd Simons
On Wed, May 18, 2005 at 05:32:34PM +0200, Martin Pitt wrote:
 Hi!
 
 Steve Langasek [2005-05-18  4:38 -0700]:
   I read the thread and it convinced me to change the pmount default
   from sync to async (which would be a trivial change) and replace the
   --async option with a --sync option. The advantages (don't destroy
   flash hardware and greatly speed up the writing process) outweigh the
   disadvantages (protect users from corruption if they don't unmount
   their drives) IMHO.
  
   I will prepare the patch ASAP and send it to this bug. In the
   meantime, would you accept this change for Sarge?
  
  If you think that's the correct course of action for addressing this bug,
  then yes.
 
 Alright, I uploaded 
 
  pmount (0.8-2) unstable; urgency=high
  .
* Urgency high since this fixes an RC bug, the fix should reach Sarge.
* Added debian/patches/02-async_by_default.patch:
  - Mount devices 'async' by default instead of 'sync'. This will avoid
physical damage of flash chips due to exaggerated updating of inode/FAT
structures and greatly speed up the write throughput. On the bad side
this makes it much less safe to remove devices without proper 
 umounting.
  - Replace option --async with option --sync.
  - Document change in the manpages.
  - Closes: #309591
* debian/control: Correct package priority to optional, to match the katie
  overrides.
 
 The applied patch can be seen at [1], it's pretty trivial.
 
 I also talked with Sjoerd Simons (hal maintainer). Above pmount upload
 will fix the issue for command line users of pmount, but for Utopia users
 (i. e. who use gnome-volume-manager and hal) the policy needs to be
 fixed in hal; this means nothing more than removing the sync/async
 policy stanza from the policy XML file, so I kindly ask to approve
 this as well (Sjoerd will prepare an update soon).

Just uploaded hal 0.4.7-3sarge1 to testing-proposed-updates. This removes the
sync option from the default setup and adds a warning to the example fdi config
file. 

Please approve for Sarge.

Thanks,
  Sjoerd
-- 
One monk said to the other, The fish has flopped out of the net! How will it
live? The other said, When you have gotten out of the net, I'll tell you.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#307981: marked as done (Correction of typo)

2005-05-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 18 May 2005 19:02:22 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#307981: fixed in anthy 6300d-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 7 May 2005 00:30:51 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri May 06 17:30:51 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from mtoichi02e.ns.itscom.net (ns.itscom.net) [219.110.2.32] 
by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DUDDW-0002CO-00; Fri, 06 May 2005 17:30:50 -0700
Received: (qmail 23689 invoked from network); 7 May 2005 09:30:18 +0900
Received: from unknown (HELO ns.itscom.net) (192.168.1.134)
  by mtoichi02e with SMTP; 7 May 2005 09:30:18 +0900
Received: (qmail 1007 invoked from network); 7 May 2005 09:30:18 +0900
Received: from unknown (HELO debian) (210.253.212.160)
  by mtiichi04e with SMTP; 7 May 2005 09:30:18 +0900
Date: Sat, 7 May 2005 09:30:28 +0900
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Correction of typo
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 1.9.9 (GTK+ 2.6.4; i386-pc-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.4 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: anthy
Version: 6300d-1

--- debian/control.orig
+++ debian/control
@@ -8,8 +8,8 @@
 Package: anthy
 Architecture: any
 Replaces: anthy-cannadic, anthy-cannadic-2ch
-Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}
-Coflicts: anthy-cannadic, anthy-cannadic-2ch
+Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, ${misc:Depends}
+Conflicts: anthy-cannadic, anthy-cannadic-2ch
 Description: A Japanese input method (backend, dictionary and utility)
  Anthy is a Japanese input method working on X11 and emacs. It converts
  Hiragana text to Kana Kanji mixed text. It is implemented as a library

---
Received: (at 307981-close) by bugs.debian.org; 18 May 2005 23:08:12 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed May 18 16:08:11 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DYXe7-0005c2-00; Wed, 18 May 2005 16:08:11 -0700
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DYXYU-0005uu-00; Wed, 18 May 2005 19:02:22 -0400
From: Masahito Omote [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $
Subject: Bug#307981: fixed in anthy 6300d-2
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 18 May 2005 19:02:22 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Source: anthy
Source-Version: 6300d-2

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
anthy, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

anthy-el_6300d-2_all.deb
  to pool/main/a/anthy/anthy-el_6300d-2_all.deb
anthy_6300d-2.diff.gz
  to pool/main/a/anthy/anthy_6300d-2.diff.gz
anthy_6300d-2.dsc
  to pool/main/a/anthy/anthy_6300d-2.dsc
anthy_6300d-2_i386.deb
  to pool/main/a/anthy/anthy_6300d-2_i386.deb
libanthy-dev_6300d-2_i386.deb
  to pool/main/a/anthy/libanthy-dev_6300d-2_i386.deb
libanthy0_6300d-2_i386.deb
  to pool/main/a/anthy/libanthy0_6300d-2_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Masahito Omote [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated anthy package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 19 May 2005 07:18:20 +0900
Source: anthy
Binary: libanthy-dev libanthy0 anthy-el anthy
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 

Processed: reopening 307981, tagging 307981 and retitling 307981

2005-05-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 reopen 307981
Bug#307981: Correction of typo
Bug reopened, originator not changed.

 tags 307981 sarge
Bug#307981: Correction of typo
There were no tags set.
Tags added: sarge

 retitle 307981 Correction of typo in control
Bug#307981: Correction of typo
Changed Bug title.

 stop
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#309708: libgcc1 shlibs are Ubuntu-specific

2005-05-18 Thread Roger Leigh
Package: libgcc1
Version: 1:4.0.0-1
Severity: grave
Tags: experimental
Justification: renders package unusable in Debian

$ cat /var/lib/dpkg/info/libgcc1.shlibs
libgcc_s 1 libgcc1 (= 1:4.0-0pre6ubuntu4)

I noticed this when checking a package I NMU'd:
http://packages.qa.debian.org/s/scite.html
# scite/powerpc unsatisfiable Depends: libgcc1 (= 1:4.0-0pre6ubuntu4)

This is the unstable version:
$ cat /var/lib/dpkg/info/libgcc1.shlibs
libgcc_s 1 libgcc1 (= 1:3.4.1-3)

The ubuntu-specific version should not be in Debian.


Regards,
Roger

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (990, 'unstable')
Architecture: powerpc (ppc)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-rc4
Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

Versions of packages libgcc1 depends on:
ii  libc6   2.3.2.ds1-22 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an

-- no debconf information


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processed: Re: Bug#309708: libgcc1 shlibs are Ubuntu-specific

2005-05-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 retitle 309708 scite built with packages from experimental
Bug#309708: libgcc1 shlibs are Ubuntu-specific
Changed Bug title.

 tags 309708 - experimental
Bug#309708: scite built with packages from experimental
Tags were: experimental
Tags removed: experimental

 severity 309708 serious
Bug#309708: scite built with packages from experimental
Severity set to `serious'.

 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#309710: kdenetwork: uninstallable on sparc in sarge/sid

2005-05-18 Thread Blars Blarson
Package: kdenetwork
Version: 4:3.3.2-3
Severity: grave
Tags: sarge sid
Justification: renders package unusable


This is the usual arch all/any mismatch, but this has been propigated
into testing.  The sparc build appears to have succeeded on May 14,
but has not yet been uploaded.  It also built fine on my sparc
pbuilder.

sundry:/home/blarson/src# apt-get install kdenetwork

Reading Package Lists... 0%

Reading Package Lists... 100%

Reading Package Lists... Done

Building Dependency Tree... 0%

Building Dependency Tree... 0%

Building Dependency Tree... 50%

Building Dependency Tree... 50%

Building Dependency Tree... 67%

Building Dependency Tree... 90%

Building Dependency Tree... Done
Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
or been moved out of Incoming.

Since you only requested a single operation it is extremely likely that
the package is simply not installable and a bug report against
that package should be filed.
The following information may help to resolve the situation:

The following packages have unmet dependencies:
  kdenetwork: Depends: dcoprss (= 4:3.3.2-3) but it is not going to be 
installed
  Depends: kdenetwork-filesharing (= 4:3.3.2-3) but it is not 
going to be installed
  Depends: kdict (= 4:3.3.2-3) but it is not going to be installed
  Depends: kget (= 4:3.3.2-3) but it is not going to be installed
  Depends: knewsticker (= 4:3.3.2-3) but it is not going to be 
installed
  Depends: kopete (= 4:3.3.2-3) but it is not going to be installed
  Depends: kpf (= 4:3.3.2-3) but it is not going to be installed
  Depends: kppp (= 4:3.3.2-3) but it is not going to be installed
  Depends: krdc (= 4:3.3.2-3) but it is not going to be installed
  Depends: krfb (= 4:3.3.2-3) but it is not going to be installed
  Depends: ksirc (= 4:3.3.2-3) but it is not going to be installed
  Depends: kwifimanager (= 4:3.3.2-3) but it is not going to be 
installed
  Depends: librss1 (= 4:3.3.2-3) but it is not going to be 
installed
E: Broken packages
sundry:/home/blarson/src# exit

Script done on Wed May 18 16:54:50 2005



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processed: Re: Processed: Re: Bug#309708: libgcc1 shlibs are Ubuntu-specific

2005-05-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 reassign 309708 scite
Bug#309708: scite built with packages from experimental
Bug reassigned from package `libgcc1' to `scite'.

 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#309686: tuxracer in sarge should really be replaced by the transition package to planetpenguin-racer

2005-05-18 Thread Alexander Schmehl
Hi!

* Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED] [050518 22:20]:
 Package: tuxracer
 Version: 0.61-6.4
 Severity: serious
 Tags: sarge
 
 This might technically not be a RC bug, but for not forgetting it:
 
 I don't see any reason for shipping sarge with the obsolete
 package in sarge instead of the transition package in unstable.

I would agree (specialy, since I asked -release for it [1] and fucked up
the transition when getting sick and missing freeze), but:  One day
the transition package, tuxracer 0.61-7, hit sid, I got several mails
(Uh... four I think), asking, why they can't stay with tuxracer.

Three of them pointed out, that ppracer, the inofficial successor of
tuxracer, runs quite slow on their hardware, while tuxracer still runs
fine.

And since tuxracer still compiles and runs, I tend to close this
bugreport, but it would be okay for me, to move tuxracer 0.61-7 to
sarge, if a release manger agrees to remove old software with dead
upstream.

But please note, that you then should push tuxracer-extras 0.5-2 into sarge,
too.


Yours sincerely,
  Alexander


Links:
  1: http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2005/04/msg00131.html


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#302771: Bug unreproducible

2005-05-18 Thread Emilio Jesus Gallego Arias
El sb, 14-05-2005 a las 13:33 -0400, Justin Pryzby escribi:
 On Sat, May 14, 2005 at 05:24:30PM +0200, Emilio Jesus Gallego Arias wrote:
  El sb, 14-05-2005 a las 11:34 +0200, Christian Perrier escribi:
   Against a Win XP Pro with SP2 and a local libsmbclient 3.0.14a-1
   package, both konqueror and smbclient give a proper file listing of a
   directory with 47 files in it.
   
   Could you please give details about the target OS and confirm if you
   can STILL reproduce this bug.
  
  Hello!,
  
  Yes, effectively this bug is fixed in the 3.0.14a-1, I can reproduce it
  anymore. 
 I think you meant I cannot reproduce it anymore.  Correct?

Yes, sorry.

  I thougth you had closed the bug in the package's changelog, sorry. 
  
  I think I can close the bug now because I've tested the new packages in
  various machines and they work OK.
  
   Anyway, I hardly see why it should be considered as RC. It maybe
   deserves an important severity, but certainly not serious, given the
   description.
   
   In short : we won't throw away samba from sarge for that, will we?
 The point is that Sarge should not release with samba/smbclient/kernel
 or whatever giving data loss directory listings.  If necessary,
 Sarge could wait another day while 100 developers anxiously awaiting
 release all pounce on the bug.

I've done extensive testing and I think this bug is gone, I've not seen
truncated directory listings never again. 

I'm experiencing #309689 (unexpected hangs), but it's not a release
critical bug.

 Justin




Processed: tagging 309708

2005-05-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
 tags 309708 sid
Bug#309708: scite built with packages from experimental
There were no tags set.
Tags added: sid


End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#280864: [Fwd: RFS: eaccelerator - PHP script cacher]

2005-05-18 Thread Jonathan Oxer
[CCd to relevant parties including the eAccelerator developers]

Hi Roberto,

Just a quick update on distributability of Turck-MMCache / eAccelerator:
I've now contacted Jeremy Malcolm of iLaw (who also happens to be a DD!)
and provided him with a brief history of the two projects, and asked him
to provide legal advice on how to proceed. I'm happy to pay for his time
to help sort it out, especially if it results in Debian being able to
distribute eAccelerator.

After an informal chat with him I'm hopeful that given the demise of
TurckSoft it will be possible to relicense the Turck-MMCache code in
eAccelerator to allow it to be linked against PHP, but I'll let you know
the outcome in any case.

Cheers   :-)

Jonathan Oxer
-- 
The Debian Universe: Installing, managing and using Debian GNU/Linux
http://www.debianuniverse.com/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processed: Re: Bug#309719: Acknowledgement (python2.3: 'import site' failed, use -v for traceback reported on every invocation)

2005-05-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 severity 309719 normal
Bug#309719: python2.3: 'import site' failed, use -v for traceback reported on 
every invocation
Severity set to `normal'.

 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#309719: Acknowledgement (python2.3: 'import site' failed, use -v for traceback reported on every invocation)

2005-05-18 Thread Jamie Wilkinson
severity 309719 normal
thanks

I had installed python2.2 explicitly before installing python; when
purging all python packages (python2.2, python, python2.3,
python2.3-iconvcodec) and reinstalling python alone then site.py
existed.  So this isn't RC, but it was annoying.



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]