Bug#312292: maradns: Maradns 1.0.28 works around a serious Linux kernel 2.6 bug that causes MaraDNS to hang
Package: maradns Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable The 1.0.28 packages are here: http://www.cs.helsinki.fi/u/hendry/debian/maradns/ -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.4.27-2-386 Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to en_GB.UTF-8) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#268475: marked as done (Pimd package does not contain Pimd)
Your message dated Tue, 7 Jun 2005 08:54:36 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line bug in bug system? has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Aug 2004 22:35:44 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Aug 27 15:35:44 2004 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from airrunner.com (test1.airrunner.com) [63.205.217.165] (qmailr) by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1C0pJv-0008C6-00; Fri, 27 Aug 2004 15:35:43 -0700 Received: (qmail 25728 invoked from network); 27 Aug 2004 22:35:37 - Received: from unknown (HELO honk.glines.org) (10.0.0.1) by test1.vpn with SMTP; 27 Aug 2004 22:35:37 - Received: (qmail 18024 invoked from network); 27 Aug 2004 22:35:37 - Received: from unknown (HELO tweet.glines.org) (10.1.0.2) by honk.noid.vpn with SMTP; 27 Aug 2004 22:35:37 - Received: (qmail 4763 invoked by uid 1000); 27 Aug 2004 22:35:37 - Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2004 15:35:37 -0700 From: Mark Glines [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Pimd package does not contain Pimd Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Mark Glines [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Package: pimd Version: 2.1.0-alpha29.17-4 The x86 pimd package does not seem to contain any binaries. bing:~# dpkg -L pimd | grep bin /usr/sbin bing:~# I suggest that the /usr/sbin/pimd binary be included. I am using Debian GNU/Linux 3.1 on x86. --- Received: (at 268475-done) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Jun 2005 06:55:13 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jun 06 23:55:12 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from srv1.trusted.cz [81.2.209.38] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DfXzU-0001Az-00; Mon, 06 Jun 2005 23:55:12 -0700 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by srv1.trusted.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 989642C00177 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 7 Jun 2005 08:54:40 +0200 (CEST) Received: from srv1.trusted.cz ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (srv1 [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 11447-07 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 7 Jun 2005 08:54:37 +0200 (CEST) Received: from bobek.sh.cvut.cz (bobek.sh.cvut.cz [147.32.115.98]) (using TLSv1 with cipher EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA (168/168 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by srv1.trusted.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B7852C00094 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 7 Jun 2005 08:54:37 +0200 (CEST) Received: from bobek by bobek.sh.cvut.cz with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1DfXyv-0005kt-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 07 Jun 2005 08:54:37 +0200 Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2005 08:54:36 +0200 From: Antonin Kral [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: bug in bug system? Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-URL: http://www.bobek.cz Organization: Trusted Solutions s.r.o. http://www.trusted.cz User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at Trusted Solutions Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Hi, this bug has been corrected on Fri, 28 Jan 2005 11:11:18 +0100 in 2.1.0-alpha29.17-6. I don't understand why is not closed. Thank you for reporting. antonin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#285046: marked as done (wmkbd: FTBFS: g++ internal compiler error)
Your message dated Tue, 07 Jun 2005 03:02:12 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#285046: fixed in wmkbd 0.4.1-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Dec 2004 10:18:55 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Dec 10 02:18:55 2004 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from postman2.arcor-online.net (postman.arcor.de) [151.189.20.157] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1CchrS-fe-00; Fri, 10 Dec 2004 02:18:54 -0800 Received: from localhost (pD95D190A.dip.t-dialin.net [217.93.25.10]) (authenticated bits=0) by postman.arcor.de (8.13.0.PreAlpha4/8.13.0.PreAlpha4) with ESMTP id iBAAIUTh013505; Fri, 10 Dec 2004 11:18:30 +0100 (MET) Received: by localhost (Postfix, from userid 1001) id C9C7929E9440; Fri, 10 Dec 2004 11:21:20 +0100 (CET) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Roland Stigge [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: wmkbd: FTBFS: g++ internal compiler error X-Mailer: reportbug 3.4 Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2004 11:21:20 +0100 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Package: wmkbd Version: 0.4.1-3 Severity: important Hi, it seems that #276632 is back and also applies to g++-3.4: == dh_testdir # Add here commands to compile the package. /usr/bin/make CC=g++-3.4 CCFLAGS=-Wall -g -DXLIB_ILLEGAL_ACCESS -O2 make[1]: Entering directory `/tmp/buildd/wmkbd-0.4.1' g++-3.4 -Wall -g -DXLIB_ILLEGAL_ACCESS -O2 -I/usr/openwin/include -I/usr/local/include `glib-config --cflags` `gnome-config gnomeui --cflags` `gtk-config --cflags` app.c -c -o app.o In file included from app.c:76: keysyms.c:921: internal compiler error: in tree_low_cst, at tree.c:3315 Please submit a full bug report, with preprocessed source if appropriate. See URL:http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html for instructions. For Debian GNU/Linux specific bug reporting instructions, see URL:file:///usr/share/doc/gcc-3.4/README.Bugs. make[1]: *** [app.o] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/wmkbd-0.4.1' make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2 == Sorry, the original bug can't be reopened anymore. Please reassign, if appropriate. Thanks. bye, Roland -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-1-686 Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to en_GB.UTF-8) Versions of packages wmkbd depends on: ii gdk-imlib11.9.14-16 imaging library for use with gtk ( ii libart2 1.4.2-19 The GNOME canvas widget - runtime ii libaudiofile0 0.2.6-5Open-source version of SGI's audio ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-19 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libdb33.2.9-20 Berkeley v3 Database Libraries [ru ii libesd0 0.2.35-2 Enlightened Sound Daemon - Shared ii libgcc1 1:3.4.3-4 GCC support library ii libglib1.21.2.10-9 The GLib library of C routines ii libgnome321.4.2-19 The GNOME libraries ii libgnomesupport0 1.4.2-19 The GNOME libraries (Support libra ii libgnomeui32 1.4.2-19 The GNOME libraries (User Interfac ii libgtk1.2 1.2.10-17 The GIMP Toolkit set of widgets fo ii libice6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-8 Inter-Client Exchange library ii libsm64.3.0.dfsg.1-8 X Window System Session Management ii libstdc++63.4.3-4The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 ii libx11-6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-8 X Window System protocol client li ii libxext6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-8 X Window System miscellaneous exte ii libxi64.3.0.dfsg.1-8 X Window System Input extension li ii libxpm4 4.3.0.dfsg.1-8 X pixmap library ii xlibs
Bug#262608: marked as done (FTBFS when gain-root command gains real root.)
Your message dated Tue, 07 Jun 2005 00:39:17 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line confirm a4b718c88aeb3ff018eac6eaaf4d5679cd91aec8 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Aug 2004 03:02:58 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jul 31 20:02:58 2004 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from 86.red-80-24-13.pooles.rima-tde.net (bilbo) [80.24.13.86] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Br6ck-0006L2-00; Sat, 31 Jul 2004 20:02:58 -0700 Received: from rmh by bilbo with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1Br6il-0003Nk-00; Sun, 01 Aug 2004 05:09:11 +0200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Robert Millan [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: FTBFS when gain-root command gains real root. X-Mailer: reportbug 2.64 Date: Sun, 01 Aug 2004 05:09:10 +0200 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-BadReturnPath: [EMAIL PROTECTED] rewritten as [EMAIL PROTECTED] using From header Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Package: gdbm Severity: serious Building gdbm when gain-root command gains real root (e.g. -rsudo) leaves the source tree in an unconsistent state. The next time build is attempted (either with -rsudo or -rfakeroot) it will fail with: [...] debian/rules build test -d debian/patched || install -d debian/patched dpatch apply-all applying patch 01_texinfo-usr-local to ./ ...patch: can't open file gdbm.texinfo : Permission denied failed. make: *** [patch-stamp] Error 1 -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.4.26-1-686 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (ignored: LC_ALL set to C) --- Received: (at 262608-done) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Jun 2005 07:39:25 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jun 07 00:39:25 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from smtp.openaccess.org [216.57.214.76] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DfYgH-00069K-00; Tue, 07 Jun 2005 00:39:25 -0700 Received: from cp1.geminisolutions.com (unknown [66.165.37.2]) by smtp.openaccess.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E24A141F8 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 7 Jun 2005 00:39:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=cp1.geminisolutions.com) by cp1.geminisolutions.com with esmtp (Exim 4.51 (FreeBSD)) id 1DfYgB-0001wa-VU for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 07 Jun 2005 00:39:20 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: confirm a4b718c88aeb3ff018eac6eaaf4d5679cd91aec8 Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2005 00:39:17 -0700 Precedence: bulk X-BeenThere: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5p1 Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.4 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_01,NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Mailing list subscription confirmation notice for mailing list Slirc-mail We have received a request from [EMAIL PROTECTED] for subscription of your email address, [EMAIL PROTECTED], to the [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list. To confirm that you want to be added to this mailing list, simply reply to this message, keeping the Subject: header intact. Or visit this web page: http://mail.starlink-irc.org/mailman/confirm/slirc-mail_starlink-irc.org/a4b718c88aeb3ff018eac6eaaf4d5679cd91aec8 Or include the following line -- and only the following line -- in a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]: confirm a4b718c88aeb3ff018eac6eaaf4d5679cd91aec8 Note that simply sending a `reply' to this message should work from most mail readers, since that usually leaves the Subject: line in the right form (additional Re: text in the Subject: is okay). If you do not wish to be subscribed to this list,
Bug#311357: Upgrade of 386 version of the 2.6.8 kernel breaks via-rhine
On Sun, Jun 05, 2005 at 01:11:54PM +0200, Norbert Tretkowski wrote: severity 311357 grave thanks * Alan W. Irwin wrote: This is a confirmation of the bad problem with the via-rhine module for the latest version of the 386 version of the 2.6.8 kernel. Sounds like a RC bug, so I'm setting it's severity to grave. I upgraded today from kernel-image-2.6.8.2-386 version 2.6.8-13 to 2.6.8-16, and my network card (D-link 10/100 DFE-530TX) that is controlled by the via-rhine module immediately quit working Too bad this bug didn't get realized when -16 was in unstable... looks like it's too late to fix this for 3.1r0. True, there was some late minute package shiffling which meant that -16 ended up going straight into sarge. Unfortunately now we have this bug. A similar thing seems to have happened with 2.4.27 and some neftilter symbols. It partly my fault (in the sense that I uploaded the packages) and partly a process issue. I do appologise for any inconvenience and I'll try and get updates together over the next few days. But we have clearly missed the boat for 3.1r0. -- Horms -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#310929: marked as done (smart: ftbfs [sparc] attempts to install into build system /usr/share)
Your message dated Tue, 7 Jun 2005 12:52:19 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#310929: smart: ftbfs [sparc] attempts to install into build system /usr/share has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 27 May 2005 00:00:46 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu May 26 17:00:46 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from blars.org (renig.nat.blars.org) [64.81.35.59] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DbSHN-0001wP-00; Thu, 26 May 2005 17:00:46 -0700 Received: from renig.nat.blars.org (plergb.nat.blars.org [172.16.1.1]) by renig.nat.blars.org (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian-7.1) with ESMTP id j4R00hit013228 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Thu, 26 May 2005 17:00:44 -0700 Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by renig.nat.blars.org (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian-7.1) id j4R00hwk013226; Thu, 26 May 2005 17:00:43 -0700 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Blars Blarson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: smart: ftbfs [sparc] attempts to install into build system /usr/share X-Mailer: reportbug 1.50 Date: Thu, 26 May 2005 17:00:43 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: smart Version: 0.30.2-1 Severity: serious Tags: sid Justification: fails to build from source smart fails to build on the sparc buildd when it is unable to copy a file into /usr/share: byte-compiling /build/buildd/smart-0.30.2/debian/smartpm/usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/smart/util/elementtree/HTMLTreeBuilder.py to HTMLTreeBuilder.pyc running install_scripts copying build/scripts-2.3/smart.py - /build/buildd/smart-0.30.2/debian/smartpm/usr/bin/smart changing mode of /build/buildd/smart-0.30.2/debian/smartpm/usr/bin/smart to 755 running install_data copying locale/fr/LC_MESSAGES/smart.mo - /usr/share/locale/fr/LC_MESSAGES error: /usr/share/locale/fr/LC_MESSAGES/smart.mo: Permission denied --- Received: (at 310929-done) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Jun 2005 10:53:46 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jun 07 03:53:46 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mail.gmx.de (mail.gmx.net) [213.165.64.20] by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DfbiM-jH-00; Tue, 07 Jun 2005 03:53:46 -0700 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 07 Jun 2005 10:53:14 - Received: from ip181.135.1511I-CUD12K-01.ish.de (EHLO top.ping.de) [62.143.135.181] by mail.gmx.net (mp022) with SMTP; 07 Jun 2005 12:53:14 +0200 X-Authenticated: #18895133 Received: by top.ping.de (Postfix, from userid 1000) id B6F676F255; Tue, 7 Jun 2005 12:52:19 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2005 12:52:19 +0200 From: Michael Vogt [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Blars Blarson [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Bug#310929: smart: ftbfs [sparc] attempts to install into build system /usr/share Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] References: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: On Thu, May 26, 2005 at 05:00:43PM -0700, Blars Blarson wrote: Package: smart Version: 0.30.2-1 Severity: serious Tags: sid Justification: fails to build from source Thanks for your bugreport. This is fixed with the upload of 0.35. Cheers, Michael smart fails to build on the sparc buildd when it is unable to copy a file into /usr/share: byte-compiling /build/buildd/smart-0.30.2/debian/smartpm/usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/smart/util/elementtree/HTMLTreeBuilder.py to HTMLTreeBuilder.pyc running install_scripts copying build/scripts-2.3/smart.py - /build/buildd/smart-0.30.2/debian/smartpm/usr/bin/smart changing mode of /build/buildd/smart-0.30.2/debian/smartpm/usr/bin/smart to 755 running install_data
Processed: Re: Bug#308897: backup-manager: insecure default configuration
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 308897 + pending Bug#308897: backup-manager: insecure default configuration Tags were: security Tags added: pending thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#310139: marked as done (kmd: Integer overflow in ELF header parsing)
Your message dated Tue, 07 Jun 2005 13:33:28 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line kmd: Integer overflow in ELF header parsing has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 21 May 2005 23:34:49 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat May 21 16:34:49 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from inutil.org (vserver151.vserver151.serverflex.de) [193.22.164.111] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DZdUW-0005xD-00; Sat, 21 May 2005 16:34:48 -0700 Received: from p54896152.dip.t-dialin.net ([84.137.97.82] helo=localhost.localdomain) by vserver151.vserver151.serverflex.de with esmtpsa (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.50) id 1DZdSd-0002ib-N1 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 22 May 2005 01:32:52 +0200 Received: from jmm by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.50) id 1DZdUM-0002N4-EZ; Sun, 22 May 2005 01:34:38 +0200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Moritz Muehlenhoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: kmd: Integer overflow in ELF header parsing X-Mailer: reportbug 3.11 Date: Sun, 22 May 2005 01:34:37 +0200 X-Debbugs-Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 84.137.97.82 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on vserver151.vserver151.serverflex.de); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE, X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: kmd Version: 0.9.19-1 Severity: grave Tags: security Justification: user security hole kmd uses binutils-dev's BFD library for ELF header parsing and is therefore vulnerable to it's integer overflow in ELF segment handling. kmd needs to be recompiled against binutils-dev 2.15-6 once this has entered the archive. I've verified a that a complete rebuild with binutils-dev from incoming.d.o correctly refuses the invalid ELF header of the crafted test binary. Cheers, Moritz -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.11 Locale: LANG=C, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) Versions of packages kmd depends on: ii libc62.3.2.ds1-21GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libglib1.2 1.2.10-10 The GLib library of C routines ii libgtk1.21.2.10-17 The GIMP Toolkit set of widgets fo ii libx11-6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-12.0.1 X Window System protocol client li ii libxext6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-12.0.1 X Window System miscellaneous exte ii libxi6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-12.0.1 X Window System Input extension li ii xlibs4.3.0.dfsg.1-12 X Keyboard Extension (XKB) configu -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 310139-done) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Jun 2005 11:33:26 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jun 07 04:33:26 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from cerbero.die.upm.es (super.die.upm.es) [138.4.9.89] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DfcKk-00020v-00; Tue, 07 Jun 2005 04:33:26 -0700 Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1]) by super.die.upm.es with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1DfcKm-00069D-Fx for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 07 Jun 2005 13:33:28 +0200 Subject: Re: kmd: Integer overflow in ELF header parsing From: Jose M. Moya [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Technical University of Madrid Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2005 13:33:28 +0200 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Patch applied to my build tree. Closing as no new version is expected in the near future and there is no reason for a new upload. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
Bug#308897: backup-manager: insecure default configuration
tags 308897 + pending thanks * Paul Brossier ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) disait : please correct me if this is over inflated severity. justification: introduces a security hole on systems where you install the packages in its default configuration, backup-manager stores a .tar.gz of /etc in /var/backups. this file is world readable, so that any local user is able to read /etc/shadow, /etc/ppp/chap-scripts and other interesting bits from it. You're absolutely right. This bug is closed in the upcoming new upstream version 0.5.8 I'll ask my sponsor to upload the new package as soon as the upstream release is ready. a solution to this problem is to have backup-manager create files with perms 0700. I chose the solution to add two new configuration keys: BM_USER and BM_GROUP. The archives repository will be chowned to $BM_USER:$BM_GROUP and will be chmoded 660 -- Alexis Sukrieh [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.sukria.net « Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum sonatur. » Whatever is said in Latin sounds profound.
Processed: telnetd: can't remove the package
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 308439 serious Bug#308439: telnetd: usermod doesn't work with LDAP Severity set to `serious'. retitle 308439 telnetd: can't remove the package Bug#308439: telnetd: usermod doesn't work with LDAP Changed Bug title. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#306791: filler: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'sharutils'
Thank you for your bug report. I apologize for taking so long to
respond to it and for the delay in fixing it. Expect an upload shortly.
On Thu, 2005-04-28 at 17:24 +0200, Andreas Jochens wrote:
Package: filler
Version: 1.02-3
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
When building 'filler' in a clean 'unstable' chroot,
I get the following error:
dh_installdirs
#/usr/bin/make CFLAGS=-O2 -g -Wall
uudecode -o other/filler.png other/filler.u
make: uudecode: Command not found
make: *** [install] Error 127
This is due to a missing Build-Depends on sharutils.
Additionally, I also get the following:
mkdir classes || /bin/rm -rf classes/*
javac -d classes src/friendless/awt/*.java
javac -classpath classes -d classes src/friendless/games/filler/*.java
src/friendless/games/filler/player/*.java
src/friendless/games/filler/remote/*.java
src/friendless/games/filler/remote/messages/*.java
src/friendless/games/filler/TournamentPointsTableRow.java:81: unreachable
statement
return (other.getWon() - this.getWon());; // use wins to seperate
teams
^
1 error
make[1]: *** [filler.jar] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/filler-1.02'
make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2
Please add the missing Build-Depends on 'sharutils' to debian/control and
remove one ';' from the double ';;' in
src/friendless/games/filler/TournamentPointsTableRow.java.
Regards
Andreas Jochens
diff -urN ../tmp-orig/filler-1.02/debian/control ./debian/control
--- ../tmp-orig/filler-1.02/debian/control2005-04-28 17:07:17.328864214
+0200
+++ ./debian/control 2005-04-28 16:52:11.0 +0200
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
Section: contrib/games
Priority: optional
Maintainer: James Damour (Suvarov454) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Build-Depends-Indep: j2sdk1.4 |j2sdk1.3 | java2-compiler, debhelper
+Build-Depends-Indep: debhelper, sharutils, j2sdk1.4 | java2-compiler
Standards-Version: 3.6.1
Package: filler
diff -urN
../tmp-orig/filler-1.02/src/friendless/games/filler/TournamentPointsTableRow.java
./src/friendless/games/filler/TournamentPointsTableRow.java
---
../tmp-orig/filler-1.02/src/friendless/games/filler/TournamentPointsTableRow.java
2001-01-03 08:26:12.0 +0100
+++ ./src/friendless/games/filler/TournamentPointsTableRow.java
2005-04-28 16:52:11.0 +0200
@@ -78,7 +78,7 @@
public int compareTo(TournamentPointsTableRow other) {
if (this.getWon() != other.getWon()) {
// wins aren't equal
-return (other.getWon() - this.getWon());; // use wins to
seperate teams
+return (other.getWon() - this.getWon()); // use wins to seperate
teams
} else {
return (other.getDiff() - this.getDiff()); //else use goal
difference to seperate teams
}
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#310982: smbmount does not honor uid and gid options with 2.4 kernel
On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 04:19:28AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: reopen 310982 tags 310982 security thanks samba 3.0.14a-4 didn't make the cut for sarge, so this bug is still present in the release. That being the case, it would be far better to fix this bug in the kernel instead of in smbfs. Hi Steve, I'm kind of trying to read your mind here, but are you thinking of just making a kernel that doesn't do SMB_CAP_UNIX at all? -- Horms -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#312331: ntp-server: preinst is killall happytastic
Package: ntp-server Version: 1:4.2.0a+stable-8 Severity: serious ObJustification: installation of ntp-server into a clean/buildd chroot kills ntpd in base 25 # There's also the problem of spurious ntpd server processes, 26 # caused by the old (buggy) script in /etc/init.d whic fail to 27 # properly shutdown the server sometimes. 28 # Thus, we just kill all servers off here. This is not very nice, 29 # but unfortunately it's necessary. :-/ 30 if [ $1 = install ] || dpkg --compare-versions $2 lt 1:4.2.0a-10 31 then 32 killall ntpd || true 33 fi This triggers when $2 is blank, please either use 'lt-nl' or something else that doesn't trigger on fresh/new installs. -- James -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#311357: Upgrade of 386 version of the 2.6.8 kernel breaks via-rhine
On 2005-06-07 17:48+0900 Horms wrote: On Sun, Jun 05, 2005 at 01:11:54PM +0200, Norbert Tretkowski wrote: severity 311357 grave thanks * Alan W. Irwin wrote: This is a confirmation of the bad problem with the via-rhine module for the latest version of the 386 version of the 2.6.8 kernel. Sounds like a RC bug, so I'm setting it's severity to grave. I upgraded today from kernel-image-2.6.8.2-386 version 2.6.8-13 to 2.6.8-16, and my network card (D-link 10/100 DFE-530TX) that is controlled by the via-rhine module immediately quit working Too bad this bug didn't get realized when -16 was in unstable... looks like it's too late to fix this for 3.1r0. True, there was some late minute package shiffling which meant that -16 ended up going straight into sarge. Unfortunately now we have this bug. A similar thing seems to have happened with 2.4.27 and some neftilter symbols. It partly my fault (in the sense that I uploaded the packages) and partly a process issue. I do appologise for any inconvenience and I'll try and get updates together over the next few days. But we have clearly missed the boat for 3.1r0. Hi Horms: Thanks for acknowledging the via-rhine problem that has gotten into 3.1r0. For Debian sarge users it sounds like you have plans to fix version 2.6.8-16 which is excellent. But until that happens, and for on-going Debian testing users like me what kernel 2.6 solution do you recommend for all those who require via-rhine for their networking? For example, do you (or anybody else paying attention to this bug thread) know whether the via-rhine problems also occur for kernel-image-2.6.11 (currently in unstable)? Alan __ Alan W. Irwin email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] phone: 250-727-2902 Astronomical research affiliation with Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Victoria (astrowww.phys.uvic.ca). Programming affiliations with the FreeEOS equation-of-state implementation for stellar interiors (freeeos.sf.net); PLplot scientific plotting software package (plplot.org); the Yorick front-end to PLplot (yplot.sf.net); the Loads of Linux Links project (loll.sf.net); and the Linux Brochure Project (lbproject.sf.net). __ Linux-powered Science __ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#312350: cdimage.debian.org: Release files on netinst/businesscard cds cause apt-config to try to get testing security sources
Package: cdimage.debian.org Severity: critical Justification: root security hole After grabing yesterday's i386 sarge businesscard CD (3.1r0) and installing, during base-config, apt-config thinks the system is testing, and tries to insert use the following sources line: # deb http://security.debian.org/ testing/updates main contrib Since that fails (as currently there is no testing security repository), the user is warned, and apt-setup comments out the line, and continues on with no security updates. Right now this causes any newly installed sarge installation to never grab security fixes without manual intervention, but when http://security.debian.org/dists/testing/updates eventually exists, dist-upgrades will start to try to grab testing security updates for a stable system. After a little digging, the source of the problem seems to be the Release files on the installation CD: dists/sarge/main/binary-i386/Release: Archive: testing Component: main Origin: Debian Label: Debian Architecture: i386 This manifests itself in apt-cache policy, which apt-setup uses to determine whether an installation is stable/testing/unstable. Heck, even reportbug thinks the system is testing (see below). I have reproduced this problem on i386 businesscard and netinst images (haven't tried CD sets or other arches yet). -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-686 Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#312358: kdm crashes on startup
Package: kdm Version: 4:3.3.2-1 Severity: grave Tags: experimental Justification: renders package unusable I think the title says it all. :) I've upgraded all my kde packages to 3.4 (experimental) and now kdm crashes on startup. The trace is included below. Using host libthread_db library /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libthread_db.so.1. (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] [New Thread -1226388800 (LWP 3899)] (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) [KCrash handler] #7 0xb785f959 in QString::QString () from /usr/lib/libqt-mt.so.3 #8 0xb6b072d2 in KClassicGreeter::KClassicGreeter () from /usr/lib/kde3/kgreet_classic.so #9 0xb6b091ae in KClassicGreeter::slotLoginLostFocus () from /usr/lib/kde3/kgreet_classic.so #10 0x080616fd in ?? () #11 0x080f2078 in ?? () #12 0x080deea8 in ?? () #13 0x0810e868 in ?? () #14 0x080f20e4 in ?? () #15 0x in ?? () #16 0x in ?? () #17 0x08106ae0 in ?? () #18 0xb79f453c in ?? () from /usr/lib/libqt-mt.so.3 #19 0x in ?? () #20 0x080ded10 in ?? () #21 0xbac8 in ?? () #22 0xb7573846 in QBoxLayout::addLayout () from /usr/lib/libqt-mt.so.3 #23 0x08068922 in ?? () #24 0x080f2050 in ?? () #25 0x in ?? () #26 0x in ?? () #27 0x0810e868 in ?? () #28 0x08075134 in typeinfo for KListView () #29 0x080756d8 in typeinfo for KListViewItem () #30 0x in ?? () #31 0x in ?? () #32 0xb70e38a8 in __after_morecore_hook () from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6 #33 0xb70e3860 in __after_morecore_hook () from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6 #34 0x0807c3b8 in ?? () #35 0x08155e08 in ?? () #36 0x08106ae0 in ?? () #37 0x0810e6a0 in ?? () #38 0x in ?? () #39 0x0085 in ?? () #40 0x080acce0 in ?? () #41 0xb70e3860 in __after_morecore_hook () from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6 #42 0x0001 in ?? () #43 0xbb38 in ?? () #44 0xb79beba8 in vtable for QPaintDevice () from /usr/lib/libqt-mt.so.3 #45 0x00400028 in ?? () #46 0x08092180 in ?? () #47 0x0002 in ?? () #48 0x in ?? () #49 0x08092150 in ?? () #50 0xbb68 in ?? () #51 0xb71a32fe in operator new () from /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.5 #52 0x0806ce4a in ?? () #53 0x080ded10 in ?? () #54 0x in ?? () #55 0x0044 in ?? () #56 0xbcc8 in ?? () #57 0x in ?? () #58 0x in ?? () #59 0x0001 in ?? () #60 0xbbe0 in ?? () #61 0xb7ff1b3c in _dl_unload_cache () from /lib/ld-linux.so.2 #62 0x0805a59d in ?? () #63 0xbf19 in ?? () #64 0x0807c9e0 in ?? () #65 0x0001 in ?? () #66 0x080753f4 in typeinfo for KListViewItem () #67 0x080753e8 in typeinfo for KListViewItem () #68 0x080753ec in typeinfo for KListViewItem () #69 0xbd98 in ?? () #70 0x0806fc25 in QMemArraychar::detach () #71 0xb6fc6970 in __libc_start_main () from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6 #72 0x08057fc1 in ?? () -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.10grvisitor1 Locale: LANG=he_IL.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=he_IL.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages kdm depends on: ii debconf 1.4.50 Debian configuration management sy ii kdebase-bin 4:3.4.1-1 core binaries for the KDE base mod ii kdelibs4 4:3.4.1-1 core libraries for all KDE applica ii libart-2.0-2 2.3.17-1Library of functions for 2D graphi ii
Bug#312358: kdm crashes on startup
On Tuesday, 7 June 2005 18:53, Itai Seggev wrote: Package: kdm Version: 4:3.3.2-1 Severity: grave Tags: experimental Justification: renders package unusable I think the title says it all. :) I've upgraded all my kde packages to 3.4 (experimental) and now kdm crashes on startup. That's false, according to your own report you're still using kdm 3.3.2 ;) Upgrading it should work. Best regards -- Isaac Clerencia at Warp Networks, http://www.warp.es Work: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Debian: [EMAIL PROTECTED] pgpKMkx9VqlFt.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#312364: failure on \o character
Package: muttprint Version: 0.72d-1 Severity: serious muttprint failed while parsing an e-mail with the word Veiligheidsco\366rdinatie The \366 character is an o with an umlaut. Replacing that character solves the problem (\o to o). -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Kernel: Linux 2.6.11 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Versions of packages muttprint depends on: ii debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.4.50 Debian configuration management sy ii libtext-iconv-perl1.2-3 Convert between character sets in ii perl 5.8.4-8Larry Wall's Practical Extraction ii tetex-extra 2.0.2c-8 Additional library files of teTeX -- debconf information: muttprint/moved_pics: muttprint/utf8: -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#312366: non-free specs in /usr/share/doc/pptp-linux ?
Package: pptp-linux Version: 1.5.0-5 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 2.2.1 /usr/share/doc/pptp-linux includes specification documents like pptp-draft.txt.gz, rfc1701.txt.gz, rfc1702.txt.gz, and rfc1990.txt.gz. I thought RFCs were not free? Thanks, Ken -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.11.8 Locale: LANG=zh_TW.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=zh_TW.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages pptp-linux depends on: ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-22 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii ppp 2.4.3-20050321+2 Point-to-Point Protocol (PPP) daem -- no debconf information -- Edit this signature at http://www.digitas.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/ken/sig Mothers are the necessity of invention. --Bill Watterson signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#312350: cdimage.debian.org: Release files on netinst/businesscard cds cause apt-config to try to get testing security sources
Looks like the announcement to debian-devel-announce was sent as I was typing this bug report. Doh. RF -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: zorp bugs forwarded to upstream
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: forwarded 301618 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug#301618: Two new stable upstream versions fix serious bugs Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to [EMAIL PROTECTED] forwarded 304666 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug#304666: zorp: FTBFS: Link errors in zorp binary Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to [EMAIL PROTECTED] forwarded 309685 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug#309685: Unused library while zorp is not in testing Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to [EMAIL PROTECTED] End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: severity of 312364 is important
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 312364 important Bug#312364: failure on \o character Severity set to `important'. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#299308: marked as done (Depends on libhowl0)
Your message dated Tue, 07 Jun 2005 17:03:29 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#299308: fixed in vino 2.10.0-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Mar 2005 13:29:58 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Mar 13 05:29:58 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from simons.xs4all.nl (fire.luon.net) [80.126.201.244] (postfix) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DATAL-0006xK-00; Sun, 13 Mar 2005 05:29:57 -0800 Received: from spring.luon.net (spring-wired.ipv6.luon.net [IPv6:2001:888:1d84:0:20a:95ff:fed1:4834]) by fire.luon.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 765C459 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 13 Mar 2005 14:29:48 +0100 (CET) Received: by spring.luon.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id B042937C89; Sun, 13 Mar 2005 14:29:39 +0100 (CET) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Sjoerd Simons [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Depends on libhowl0 X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8 Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2005 14:29:39 +0100 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: vino Version: 2.8.1-1 Severity: grave Justification: libhowl0 moving to non-free Hi, As discussed on irc, vino on at least ppc depends on libhowl0. Which is unfortunately non-free. For now it seems the best solution is to add --as-needed to you LDFLAGS. Sjoerd -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: powerpc (ppc) Kernel: Linux 2.6.11-spring Locale: LANG=C, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) Versions of packages vino depends on: ii gconf22.8.1-4GNOME configuration database syste ii libart-2.0-2 2.3.17-1 Library of functions for 2D graphi ii libatk1.0-0 1.8.0-4The ATK accessibility toolkit ii libaudiofile0 0.2.6-5Open-source version of SGI's audio ii libbonobo2-0 2.8.1-2Bonobo CORBA interfaces library ii libbonoboui2-02.8.1-2The Bonobo UI library ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-20 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libesd-alsa0 [libesd0 0.2.35-2 Enlightened Sound Daemon (ALSA) - ii libgconf2-4 2.8.1-4GNOME configuration database syste ii libgcrypt11 1.2.0-11 LGPL Crypto library - runtime libr ii libglade2-0 1:2.4.2-2 library to load .glade files at ru ii libglib2.0-0 2.6.3-1The GLib library of C routines ii libgnome-keyring0 0.4.1-1GNOME keyring services library ii libgnome2-0 2.8.1-2The GNOME 2 library - runtime file ii libgnomecanvas2-0 2.8.0-1A powerful object-oriented display ii libgnomeui-0 2.8.1-3The GNOME 2 libraries (User Interf ii libgnomevfs2-02.8.4-2The GNOME virtual file-system libr ii libgnutls11 1.0.16-13 GNU TLS library - runtime library ii libgpg-error0 1.0-1 library for common error values an ii libgtk2.0-0 2.6.2-4The GTK+ graphical user interface pi libhowl0 0.9.8-2Library for Zeroconf service disco ii libice6 6.8.1-1ubuntu9.0.1 Inter-Client Exchange library ii libjpeg62 6b-10 The Independent JPEG Group's JPEG ii liborbit2 1:2.10.5-0.1 libraries for ORBit2 - a CORBA ORB ii libpango1.0-0 1.8.1-1Layout and rendering of internatio ii libpopt0 1.7-5 lib for parsing cmdline parameters ii libsm66.8.1-1ubuntu9.0.1 X Window System Session Management ii libtasn1-20.2.10-4 Manage ASN.1 structures (runtime) ii libx11-6 6.8.1-1ubuntu9.0.1 X Window System protocol client li ii libxext6 6.8.1-1ubuntu9.0.1 X Window System miscellaneous exte ii libxml2 2.6.16-3 GNOME XML library ii libxtst6 6.8.1-1ubuntu9.0.1 X Window System
Bug#312390: apache-ssl: apache-ssl uses 100% cpu after bogus http request
Package: apache-ssl Version: 1.3.26.1+1.48-0woody3 Severity: grave Tags: security Justification: user security hole I'm using debian woody, with the apache-ssl server, and several times over the past two months I've seen the server start using 100% cpu (per process; sometimes just one apache-ssl process is affected; sometimes as many as 12!). I'm filing this with a rather aggressive priority since it appears to be a remotely accessible DoS exploit, though no user data seems to be compromised. When this happens, I've looked at apache's access.log, and each time I've found requests that look like 213.148.18.198 - - [07/Jun/2005:01:20:55 -0700] GET / HTTP/1.1 200 7090 http://www.qptv.ru; MSIE 6.0 213.148.18.198 - - [07/Jun/2005:01:20:55 -0700] \t\x15\x10 400 - - - repeated over and over, near the time I estimate the server started sucking up 100% cpu. Always from that exact IP address (213.148.18.198, for which I can find no information), and always, a pair of requests, GET / followed by \t\x15\x10. I'd think this has been reported before, but google turns up no hits for the offending IP address. When this happens, I've tried strace'ing the apache-ssl process, and all it does is set timers and then wake up with SIGITIMER repeatedly. -- System Information Debian Release: 3.0 Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux skynet 2.4.18-686 #1 Sun Apr 14 11:32:47 EST 2002 i686 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C Versions of packages apache-ssl depends on: ii apache-common 1.3.26-0woody6 Support files for all Apache webse ii dpkg1.9.21 Package maintenance system for Deb ii libc6 2.2.5-11.8 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libdb2 2:2.7.7.0-7 The Berkeley database routines (ru ii libexpat1 1.95.2-6 XML parsing C library - runtime li ii libssl0.9.6 0.9.6c-2.woody.7 SSL shared libraries ii logrotate 3.5.9-8 Log rotation utility ii mime-support3.18-1.3 MIME files 'mime.types' 'mailcap ii openssl 0.9.6c-2.woody.7 Secure Socket Layer (SSL) binary a ii perl5.6.1-8.9Larry Wall's Practical Extraction ii perl [perl5]5.6.1-8.9Larry Wall's Practical Extraction -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#312406: gnome-core: Does not install in SID
Package: gnome-core Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Just finished upgrading Debian SID, can't install gnome-core anymore due to missing dependencies. Reading Package Lists... Building Dependency Tree... Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable distribution that some required packages have not yet been created or been moved out of Incoming. The following information may help to resolve the situation: The following packages have unmet dependencies: gnome-applets: Depends: libbonoboui2-0 (= 2.5.4) but it is not going to be installed Depends: libgnome2-0 (= 2.8.0) but it is not going to be installed Depends: libgnomeui-0 (= 2.8.0) but it is not going to be installed Depends: libgnomevfs2-0 (= 2.8.3-7) but it is not going to be installed Depends: libpanel-applet2-0 (= 2.8.3) but it is not going to be installed gnome-core: Depends: bug-buddy (= 2.8.0) but it is not going to be installed Depends: eog (= 2.8.2) but it is not going to be installed Depends: gedit (= 2.8.2) but it is not going to be installed Depends: gnome-control-center (= 1:2.8.1) but it is not going to be installed Depends: gnome-session (= 2.8.1) but it is not going to be installed Depends: gnome-terminal (= 2.8.2) but it is not going to be installed Depends: nautilus (= 2.8.2) but it is not going to be installed Depends: yelp (= 2.6.5) but it is not going to be installed gnome-panel: Depends: libbonoboui2-0 (= 2.5.4) but it is not going to be installed Depends: libecal6 (= 1.0.4) but it is not going to be installed Depends: libedataserver3 (= 1.0.4) but it is not going to be installed Depends: libgnome-desktop-2 (= 2.8.0) but it is not going to be installed Depends: libgnome2-0 (= 2.8.0) but it is not going to be installed Depends: libgnomeui-0 (= 2.8.0) but it is not going to be installed Depends: libgnomevfs2-0 (= 2.8.3-7) but it is not going to be installed Depends: libpanel-applet2-0 (= 2.8.3) but it is not going to be installed Depends: gnome-session (= 2.8.1-4) but it is not going to be installed Depends: gnome-control-center (= 1:2.8.1-3) but it is not going to be installed -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.6-1-686 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Versions of packages gnome-core depends on: ii bug-buddy 2.8.0-3The GNOME Desktop Environment's bu ii eog 2.8.2-0.1 Eye of Gnome graphics viewer progr ii gedit 2.8.3-4light-weight text editor pn gnome-appletsNot found. ii gnome-control-center 1:2.8.2-3 The GNOME Control Center for GNOME ii gnome-icon-theme 2.8.0-4GNOME Desktop icon theme pn gnome-panel Not found. ii gnome-session 2.8.1-6The GNOME 2 Session Manager ii gnome-terminal2.8.2-2The GNOME 2 terminal emulator appl ii metacity 1:2.8.8-1 A lightweight GTK2 based Window Ma ii nautilus 2.8.2-2file manager and graphical shell f ii scrollkeeper 0.3.14-10 A free electronic cataloging syste ii yelp 2.6.5-1Help browser for GNOME 2 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#312406: gnome-core: Does not install in SID
On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 06:56:41PM -0400, Percival Tiglao wrote: Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable This is a temporary situation while we transition to GNOME 2.10. -- Jordi Mallach Pérez -- Debian developer http://www.debian.org/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.sindominio.net/ GnuPG public key information available at http://oskuro.net/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Processed: tagging 312406
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 tags 312406 sid Bug#312406: gnome-core: Does not install in SID There were no tags set. Tags added: sid End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#309195: marked as done (epiphany-browser should Build-Depend on libgnomevfs2-dev (= 2.9.2))
Your message dated Tue, 07 Jun 2005 19:47:04 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#309195: fixed in epiphany-browser 1.6.3-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 15 May 2005 12:56:57 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun May 15 05:56:57 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from europa.telenet-ops.be [195.130.132.60] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DXIfw-0004jn-00; Sun, 15 May 2005 05:56:57 -0700 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by europa.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with SMTP id ED488198172 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 15 May 2005 14:56:55 +0200 (MEST) Received: from Q.roeckx.be (dD5775FD9.access.telenet.be [213.119.95.217]) by europa.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6EF019807F for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 15 May 2005 14:56:55 +0200 (MEST) Received: by Q.roeckx.be (Postfix, from userid 501) id AE90A26136; Sun, 15 May 2005 14:56:55 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 15 May 2005 14:56:55 +0200 From: Kurt Roeckx [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: epiphany-browser should Build-Depend on libgnomevfs2-dev (= 2.9.2) Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: epiphany-browser Version: 1.6.3-1 Severity: serious Tags: experimental Hi, When building the package in experimental, it fails with: checking for glib-2.0 = 2.6.0 pango = 1.8.0 gtk+-2.0 = 2.6.3libxml-2.0 = 2.6.12libxslt = 1.1.7libgnomeui-2.0 = 2.6.0 libglade-2.0 = 2.3.1 bonobo-activation-2.0 ORBit-2.0 gnome-vfs-2.0 = 2.9.2 gnome-vfs-module-2.0gconf-2.0 gnome-desktop-2.0 = 2.9.91 libstartup-notification-1.0 ... Requested 'gnome-vfs-2.0 = 2.9.2' but version of gnome-vfs is 2.8.4 configure: error: Library requirements ( glib-2.0 = 2.6.0 pango = 1.8.0 gtk+-2.0 = 2.6.3 libxml-2.0 = 2.6.12libxslt = 1.1.7libgnomeui-2.0 = 2.6.0 libglade-2.0 = 2.3.1bonobo-activation-2.0 ORBit-2.0 gnome-vfs-2.0 = 2.9.2 gnome-vfs-module-2.0 gconf-2.0gnome-desktop-2.0 = 2.9.91 libstartup-notification-1.0 ) not met; consider adjusting the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable if your libraries are in a nonstandard prefix so pkg-config can find them. It currently build depends on libgnomevfs2-dev (= 2.3.1), which should probably be changed to (= 2.9.2) You should probably check the other versions too. For instance it it shows lixbml-2.0 = 2.6.12 while you build depend on libxml2-dev (= 2.6.11) Kurt --- Received: (at 309195-close) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Jun 2005 23:51:42 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jun 07 16:51:42 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DfnrC-0006Fr-00; Tue, 07 Jun 2005 16:51:42 -0700 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Dfnmi-0006BN-00; Tue, 07 Jun 2005 19:47:04 -0400 From: Jordi Mallach [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#309195: fixed in epiphany-browser 1.6.3-2 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2005 19:47:04 -0400 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 4 Source: epiphany-browser Source-Version: 1.6.3-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of epiphany-browser, which is due to be installed in the
Bug#309542: marked as done (epiphany-extensions: FTBFS: Should build depend on epiphany-1.6?)
Your message dated Tue, 07 Jun 2005 21:02:04 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#309542: fixed in epiphany-extensions 1.6.3-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 17 May 2005 21:07:05 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue May 17 14:07:05 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from asia.telenet-ops.be [195.130.132.59] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DY9HN-0002Up-00; Tue, 17 May 2005 14:07:05 -0700 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by asia.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with SMTP id 2268B22494D for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 17 May 2005 23:07:04 +0200 (MEST) Received: from Q.roeckx.be (dD5775FD9.access.telenet.be [213.119.95.217]) by asia.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id C035022464C for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 17 May 2005 23:07:03 +0200 (MEST) Received: by Q.roeckx.be (Postfix, from userid 501) id 75D4B26136; Tue, 17 May 2005 23:07:03 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 17 May 2005 23:07:03 +0200 From: Kurt Roeckx [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: epiphany-extensions: FTBFS: Should build depend on epiphany-1.6? Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: epiphany-extensions Version: 1.6.2-2 Severity: serious Tags: experimental Hi, Your package is failing to build because it can't find epiphany-1.6. From the buildd log: checking for libxml-2.0 = 2.6.0 libglade-2.0 glib-2.0 = 2.6.0 gmodule-2.0 gtk+-2.0 = 2.6.0 epiphany-1.6 = 1.6.0... Package epiphany-1.6 was not found in the pk g-config search path. Perhaps you should add the directory containing `epiphany -1.6.pc' to the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable No package 'epiphany-1.6' found configure: error: Library requirements ( libxml-2.0 = 2.6.0 libglade-2.0glib-2.0 = 2.6.0 gmodule-2.0 gtk+-2.0 = 2.6.0 epiphany-1.6 = 1.6.0) not met; consi der adjusting the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable if your libraries are in a nonstandard prefix so pkg-config can find them. make: *** [config.status] Error 1 You have a bulid dependency on epiphany-browser-dev (= 1.4.6) and I guess that needs to be changed to = 1.6 Kurt --- Received: (at 309542-close) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Jun 2005 01:08:20 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jun 07 18:08:20 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Dfp3M-00066B-00; Tue, 07 Jun 2005 18:08:20 -0700 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DfoxI-0003AG-00; Tue, 07 Jun 2005 21:02:04 -0400 From: Jordi Mallach [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#309542: fixed in epiphany-extensions 1.6.3-1 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2005 21:02:04 -0400 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2 Source: epiphany-extensions Source-Version: 1.6.3-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of epiphany-extensions, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: epiphany-extensions_1.6.3-1.diff.gz to pool/main/e/epiphany-extensions/epiphany-extensions_1.6.3-1.diff.gz epiphany-extensions_1.6.3-1.dsc to pool/main/e/epiphany-extensions/epiphany-extensions_1.6.3-1.dsc epiphany-extensions_1.6.3-1_i386.deb to pool/main/e/epiphany-extensions/epiphany-extensions_1.6.3-1_i386.deb epiphany-extensions_1.6.3.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/e/epiphany-extensions/epiphany-extensions_1.6.3.orig.tar.gz A summary of
Bug#312390: marked as done (apache-ssl: apache-ssl uses 100% cpu after bogus http request)
Your message dated Wed, 8 Jun 2005 11:36:41 +1000 (EST) with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#312390: apache-ssl: apache-ssl uses 100% cpu after bogus http request has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Jun 2005 21:51:10 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jun 07 14:51:10 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from skynet.ginzton.net (mail.ginzton.net) [69.36.243.55] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DflyY-0003n8-00; Tue, 07 Jun 2005 14:51:10 -0700 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (uid 1000) by mail.ginzton.net with local; Tue, 07 Jun 2005 14:51:09 -0700 From: Matt Ginzton [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: apache-ssl: apache-ssl uses 100% cpu after bogus http request X-Mailer: reportbug 1.50 Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2005 14:51:09 -0700 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-BadReturnPath: [EMAIL PROTECTED] rewritten as [EMAIL PROTECTED] using From header Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: apache-ssl Version: 1.3.26.1+1.48-0woody3 Severity: grave Tags: security Justification: user security hole I'm using debian woody, with the apache-ssl server, and several times over the past two months I've seen the server start using 100% cpu (per process; sometimes just one apache-ssl process is affected; sometimes as many as 12!). I'm filing this with a rather aggressive priority since it appears to be a remotely accessible DoS exploit, though no user data seems to be compromised. When this happens, I've looked at apache's access.log, and each time I've found requests that look like 213.148.18.198 - - [07/Jun/2005:01:20:55 -0700] GET / HTTP/1.1 200 7090 http://www.qptv.ru; MSIE 6.0 213.148.18.198 - - [07/Jun/2005:01:20:55 -0700] \t\x15\x10 400 - - - repeated over and over, near the time I estimate the server started sucking up 100% cpu. Always from that exact IP address (213.148.18.198, for which I can find no information), and always, a pair of requests, GET / followed by \t\x15\x10. I'd think this has been reported before, but google turns up no hits for the offending IP address. When this happens, I've tried strace'ing the apache-ssl process, and all it does is set timers and then wake up with SIGITIMER repeatedly. -- System Information Debian Release: 3.0 Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux skynet 2.4.18-686 #1 Sun Apr 14 11:32:47 EST 2002 i686 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C Versions of packages apache-ssl depends on: ii apache-common 1.3.26-0woody6 Support files for all Apache webse ii dpkg1.9.21 Package maintenance system for Deb ii libc6 2.2.5-11.8 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libdb2 2:2.7.7.0-7 The Berkeley database routines (ru ii libexpat1 1.95.2-6 XML parsing C library - runtime li ii libssl0.9.6 0.9.6c-2.woody.7 SSL shared libraries ii logrotate 3.5.9-8 Log rotation utility ii mime-support3.18-1.3 MIME files 'mime.types' 'mailcap ii openssl 0.9.6c-2.woody.7 Secure Socket Layer (SSL) binary a ii perl5.6.1-8.9Larry Wall's Practical Extraction ii perl [perl5]5.6.1-8.9Larry Wall's Practical Extraction --- Received: (at 312390-done) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Jun 2005 01:37:12 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jun 07 18:37:12 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from loki.0c3.net [69.0.240.48] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DfpVI-0005bZ-00; Tue, 07 Jun 2005 18:37:12 -0700 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=mail.0c3.net ident=www-data) by loki.0c3.net with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1DfpUn-Yv-9s for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 07 Jun 2005 19:36:41 -0600 Received: from 203.49.196.168 (SquirrelMail authenticated user adconrad) by mail.0c3.net with HTTP; Wed, 8 Jun 2005 11:36:41 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] References: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 8 Jun
Bug#310982: smbmount does not honor uid and gid options with 2.4 kernel
On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 06:42:33PM +0900, Horms wrote: On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 04:19:28AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: reopen 310982 tags 310982 security thanks samba 3.0.14a-4 didn't make the cut for sarge, so this bug is still present in the release. That being the case, it would be far better to fix this bug in the kernel instead of in smbfs. Hi Steve, I'm kind of trying to read your mind here, but are you thinking of just making a kernel that doesn't do SMB_CAP_UNIX at all? I think the best answer is for the kernel to track whether uid,gid,fmask,dmask options were specified, and if so, to ignore the permission info sent by the CAP_UNIX-enabled server. That may require changes to the ioctl interface, though; I'd have to check again whether there's any distinction between not setting the option, and setting the option to 0. -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#305403: marked as done (lilypond: pseudo-bug)
Your message dated Tue, 07 Jun 2005 21:44:35 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line go away! has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Apr 2005 20:14:18 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Apr 19 13:14:18 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from vp085189.reshsg.uci.edu (becket.becket.net) [128.195.85.189] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DNz6w-0004ng-00; Tue, 19 Apr 2005 13:14:18 -0700 Received: from tb by becket.becket.net with local (Exim 4.50) id 1DNz79-000612-EO for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 19 Apr 2005 13:14:31 -0700 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: lilypond: pseudo-bug From: Thomas Bushnell BSG [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Reply-Permission: Posted or emailed replies to this message constitute permission for an emailed response. X-PGP-Fingerprint: 1F0A1E51 63 28 EB DA E6 44 E5 5E EC F3 04 26 4E BF 1A 92 X-Tom-Swiftie: This is illegal, I just know it, Tom said with conviction Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2005 13:14:31 -0700 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Gnus/5.1007 (Gnus v5.10.7) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: lilypond Severity: critical This is a pseudo-bug to prevent the new lilypond from entering sarge. In my opinion there is a likelihood of interoperation bugs which will take a while to iron out, and I am not confident that we should ship the new version in sarge. Thomas --- Received: (at 305403-done) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Jun 2005 04:44:36 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jun 07 21:44:36 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from vp085189.reshsg.uci.edu (becket.becket.net) [128.195.85.189] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DfsQe-00014r-00; Tue, 07 Jun 2005 21:44:36 -0700 Received: from tb by becket.becket.net with local (Exim 4.50) id 1DfsQd-0004nx-5n for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 07 Jun 2005 21:44:35 -0700 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: go away! From: Thomas Bushnell BSG [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Reply-Permission: Posted or emailed replies to this message constitute permission for an emailed response. X-PGP-Fingerprint: 1F0A1E51 63 28 EB DA E6 44 E5 5E EC F3 04 26 4E BF 1A 92 X-Windows: All the problems and twice the bugs. Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2005 21:44:35 -0700 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Gnus/5.1007 (Gnus v5.10.7) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Now that sarge is released, this bug can be closed so that the new lilypond migrates into testing. Thomas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
