Bug#311616: marked as done (Sarge installation doesn't work, missing files in the init.d/snort file)

2005-06-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 13 Jun 2005 01:47:05 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#311616: fixed in snort 2.3.2-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Jun 2005 08:55:53 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jun 02 01:55:53 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from free.adelux.fr (mail1.adelux.fr) [82.225.207.168] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DdlUX-0007Jm-00; Thu, 02 Jun 2005 01:55:53 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by amavis.adelux.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 006333AB6
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu,  2 Jun 2005 10:55:50 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from mail1.adelux.fr ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (relais [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10025)
with ESMTP id 32315-01 for [EMAIL PROTECTED];
Thu, 2 Jun 2005 10:55:34 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from hydra2.intra.adelux.fr (hydra2.adelux.fr [192.168.100.1])
by mail1.adelux.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E6F639AF
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu,  2 Jun 2005 10:55:34 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from fwall (unknown [192.168.100.254])
by hydra2.intra.adelux.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53A5B54620
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu,  2 Jun 2005 10:55:34 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by fwall (Postfix, from userid 0)
id C9E231B0EA; Thu,  2 Jun 2005 10:38:31 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Luc Stepniewski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Sarge installation doesn't work, missing files in the init.d/snort file
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8
Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2005 10:38:30 +0200
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at adelux.fr
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: snort
Version: 2.3.2-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable

When installing Snort (no previous version installed), the install stops
with:

Setting up snort (2.3.2-2) ...
No snort instance found to be stopped!
Starting Network Intrusion Detection System: /etc/init.d/snort: stat:
command not found

It seems the 'stat' command does not exists in the line
real_log_user=`stat -c %U $LOGDIR`



-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i586)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.26adelux
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)

Versions of packages snort depends on:
ii  adduser 3.63 Add and remove users and groups
ii  debconf 1.0.32   Debian configuration management sy
ii  libc6   2.3.2.ds1-22 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libpcap0.8  0.8.3-5  System interface for user-level pa
ii  libpcre34.5-1.2  Perl 5 Compatible Regular Expressi
ii  logrotate   3.5.9-8  Log rotation utility
ii  snort-common2.3.2-2  Flexible Network Intrusion Detecti
ii  snort-rules-default 2.3.2-2  Flexible Network Intrusion Detecti
ii  sysklogd [system-log-daemon 1.4.1-10 System Logging Daemon

---
Received: (at 311616-close) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Jun 2005 05:51:35 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jun 12 22:51:35 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DhhrC-0004K7-00; Sun, 12 Jun 2005 22:51:34 -0700
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Dhhmr-0006Kk-00; Mon, 13 Jun 2005 01:47:05 -0400
From: Javier Fernandez-Sanguino Pen~a [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#311616: fixed in snort 2.3.2-4
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 01:47:05 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 

Bug#313334: twisted-doc-api: API Documentation non-existant

2005-06-13 Thread Thomas Nilsson
Package: twisted-doc-api
Version: 2.0.1-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable


[EMAIL PROTECTED] dpkg -L twisted-doc-api 
/.
/usr
/usr/share
/usr/share/doc
/usr/share/doc/twisted-doc-api

:)


-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.11.6-win4lin-ftl1
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=sv_SE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

Versions of packages twisted-doc-api depends on:
ii  twisted-doc   2.0.1-2The official documentation of Twis

-- no debconf information


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processed: tagging 313334

2005-06-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
 tags 313334 sid
Bug#313334: twisted-doc-api: API Documentation non-existant
There were no tags set.
Tags added: sid


End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#313014: marked as done (mol-modules tight version bindings make this package uninstallable, thwart security support)

2005-06-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 13 Jun 2005 03:47:08 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#313014: fixed in mol-modules-2.6.11 1:0.9.70+2.6.11+2-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Jun 2005 10:00:24 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jun 11 03:00:24 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from dsl093-039-086.pdx1.dsl.speakeasy.net (mauritius.dodds.net) 
[66.93.39.86] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Dh2mu-0005bT-00; Sat, 11 Jun 2005 03:00:24 -0700
Received: by mauritius.dodds.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 6B402171E36; Sat, 11 Jun 2005 03:00:24 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: mol-modules tight version bindings make this package uninstallable,
 thwart security support
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8
Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2005 03:00:24 -0700
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: mol-modules-2.6.8
Version: 1:0.9.70+2.6.8+12
Severity: serious

The current version of mol-modules-2.6.8 is uninstallable in unstable,
because it depends on kernel-image-2.6.8-powerpc (= 2.6.8-12) where the
current version in unstable is 2.6.8-16.  This strict dependency is a
serious problem, and contributed to not being able to get a security-fixed
powerpc kernel into testing in time for sarge.  The current dependency
handling is really quite unmaintainable, IMHO, and I don't believe etch
should release with mol-modules in its current condition.

This probably requires first fixing the powerpc kernel-image packages to
encode a module ABI version in the package name, as is currently being done
for most other architectures.


-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-686-smp
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

---
Received: (at 313014-close) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Jun 2005 07:51:58 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jun 13 00:51:58 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Dhjji-0008AF-00; Mon, 13 Jun 2005 00:51:58 -0700
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Dhjf2-0007GE-00; Mon, 13 Jun 2005 03:47:08 -0400
From: Jens Schmalzing [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#313014: fixed in mol-modules-2.6.11 1:0.9.70+2.6.11+2-1
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 03:47:08 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Source: mol-modules-2.6.11
Source-Version: 1:0.9.70+2.6.11+2-1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
mol-modules-2.6.11, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

mol-modules-2.6.11-powerpc-smp_0.9.70+2.6.11+2-1_powerpc.deb
  to 
pool/main/m/mol-modules-2.6.11/mol-modules-2.6.11-powerpc-smp_0.9.70+2.6.11+2-1_powerpc.deb
mol-modules-2.6.11-powerpc_0.9.70+2.6.11+2-1_powerpc.deb
  to 
pool/main/m/mol-modules-2.6.11/mol-modules-2.6.11-powerpc_0.9.70+2.6.11+2-1_powerpc.deb
mol-modules-2.6.11_0.9.70+2.6.11+2-1.dsc
  to pool/main/m/mol-modules-2.6.11/mol-modules-2.6.11_0.9.70+2.6.11+2-1.dsc
mol-modules-2.6.11_0.9.70+2.6.11+2-1.tar.gz
  to pool/main/m/mol-modules-2.6.11/mol-modules-2.6.11_0.9.70+2.6.11+2-1.tar.gz



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance 

Processed: breaks dpkg in unstable

2005-06-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 severity 310796 critical
Bug#310796: type-handling: does not work with dpkg 1.13
Severity set to `critical'.

 # Justification: breaks unrelated packages
 tags 310796 - experimental
Bug#310796: type-handling: does not work with dpkg 1.13
Tags were: experimental
Tags removed: experimental

 tags 310796 + patch
Bug#310796: type-handling: does not work with dpkg 1.13
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch

 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#313066: marked as done (gem: FTBFS: Shared lib links against static non-PIC lib.)

2005-06-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 13 Jun 2005 05:32:43 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#313066: fixed in gem 1:0.90.0-14
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Jun 2005 16:03:06 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jun 11 09:03:06 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from apate.telenet-ops.be [195.130.132.57] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Dh8Ru-0005L0-00; Sat, 11 Jun 2005 09:03:06 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by apate.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with SMTP id 8CF213819E
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 11 Jun 2005 18:03:05 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from Q.roeckx.be (dD5775FD9.access.telenet.be [213.119.95.217])
by apate.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48A8F38249
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 11 Jun 2005 18:03:05 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by Q.roeckx.be (Postfix, from userid 501)
id DC7EB26136; Sat, 11 Jun 2005 18:03:04 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2005 18:03:04 +0200
From: Kurt Roeckx [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: gem: FTBFS: Shared lib links against static non-PIC lib.
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: gem
Version: 1:0.90.0-13
Severity: serious

Hi,

You added a build dependency on libavcodec-dev, which does not
provide a shared library.  You are linking against the static
non-PIC version of the library and this is causing build
failures on a few arches:

g++ -o Gem.pd_linux -shared ../Manips/*.o ../Particles/*.o ../Base/*.o ../MarkE
x/*.o ../Pixes/*.o ../Controls/*.o ../Nongeos/*.o ../Geos/*.o ../openGL/*.o  -l
ftgl -ldv -lmpeg3 -lquicktime -lavcodec -lavformat -lpng -ljpeg -ltiff -lGLU -l
GL -ldl -lz -lm   -lfreetype -lz
/usr/bin/ld: /usr/lib/gcc-lib/hppa-linux/3.3.6/../../../libavcodec.a(utils.o):
relocation R_PARISC_DPREL21L can not be used when making a shared object; recom
pile with -fPIC
/usr/lib/gcc-lib/hppa-linux/3.3.6/../../../libavcodec.a: could not read symbols
: Bad value
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status

Shared libs should always be made using PIC code.  The
libavcodec-dev packages does not provide a shared library,
but it does provide a pic version of the static library:
libavcodec_pic

You have 2 options:
- link against libavcodec_pic instead.
- Ask the ffmpeg maintainer to provide a shared version of
  libavcodec.  There is no good reason not to have a
  shared version of it.


Kurt


---
Received: (at 313066-close) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Jun 2005 09:39:26 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jun 13 02:39:26 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DhlPi-0005Jr-00; Mon, 13 Jun 2005 02:39:26 -0700
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DhlJD-75-00; Mon, 13 Jun 2005 05:32:43 -0400
From: Guenter Geiger (Debian/GNU) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#313066: fixed in gem 1:0.90.0-14
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 05:32:43 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Source: gem
Source-Version: 1:0.90.0-14

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
gem, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

gem_0.90.0-14.diff.gz
  to pool/main/g/gem/gem_0.90.0-14.diff.gz
gem_0.90.0-14.dsc
  to pool/main/g/gem/gem_0.90.0-14.dsc
gem_0.90.0-14_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/gem/gem_0.90.0-14_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please 

Processed: retitle 308702 to RM: mdctl -- RoM; obsolete transition package

2005-06-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
 retitle 308702 RM: mdctl -- RoM; obsolete transition package
Bug#308702: mdctl: Dummy package still needed?
Changed Bug title.


End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#312406: gnome-core does install on my system!

2005-06-13 Thread Luk Claes
Hi

I very recently upgraded my sid system with apt-get and gnome-core (as
well as gnome-panel etc.) is upgraded.

Does this mean that the transition is complete or is it still ongoing and
can there be similar bugs?

Cheers

Luk


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#313334: twisted-doc-api: API Documentation non-existant

2005-06-13 Thread Matthias Klose
severtiy 313334 normal
thanks

Thomas Nilsson writes:
 Package: twisted-doc-api
 Version: 2.0.1-2
 Severity: grave
 Justification: renders package unusable
 
 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] dpkg -L twisted-doc-api 
 /.
 /usr
 /usr/share
 /usr/share/doc
 /usr/share/doc/twisted-doc-api
 
 :)

Please read the changelog.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processed: severity of 313375 is serious

2005-06-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
  # _if_ it is a missing Depends, it is serious
 severity 313375 serious
Bug#313375: khelpcenter: missing Depends: htdig
Severity set to `serious'.


End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processed: severity of 313094 is serious

2005-06-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
  # this is RC
 severity 313094 serious
Bug#313094: libdar2 =2.2.1-1 needed
Severity set to `serious'.


End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#312406: gnome-core does install on my system!

2005-06-13 Thread Jordi Mallach
On Mon, Jun 13, 2005 at 01:05:59PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
 I very recently upgraded my sid system with apt-get and gnome-core (as
 well as gnome-panel etc.) is upgraded.
 
 Does this mean that the transition is complete or is it still ongoing and
 can there be similar bugs?

No, gnome-core will be upgraded again maybe today, maybe tomorrow, when
the last few packages (just three pending) enter unstable.

Jordi
-- 
Jordi Mallach Pérez  --  Debian developer http://www.debian.org/
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.sindominio.net/
GnuPG public key information available at http://oskuro.net/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#313395: gaim seqfaults on startup

2005-06-13 Thread Soeren Sonnenburg
Package: gaim
Version: 1:1.3.1-1
Severity: grave


(gdb) bt full
#0  0x0f40b678 in strlen () from /lib/libc.so.6
No symbol table info available.
#1  0x0f3dd9cc in vfprintf () from /lib/libc.so.6
No symbol table info available.
#2  0x0f3fcc94 in vasprintf () from /lib/libc.so.6
No symbol table info available.
#3  0x0f6fe00c in IA__g_vasprintf (string=0x7f8f64b8, 
format=0xfefefefc Address 0xfefefefc out of bounds, args=0x18)
at gprintf.c:313
len = 1
#4  0x0f6fe00c in IA__g_vasprintf (string=0x7f8f64b8, 
format=0xfefefefc Address 0xfefefefc out of bounds, args=0x18)
at gprintf.c:313
len = 1
#5  0x0f6fe00c in IA__g_vasprintf (string=0x7f8f64b8, 
format=0xfefefefc Address 0xfefefefc out of bounds, args=0x18)
at gprintf.c:313
len = 1
#6  0x0f6fe00c in IA__g_vasprintf (string=0x7f8f64b8, 
format=0xfefefefc Address 0xfefefefc out of bounds, args=0x18)
at gprintf.c:313
len = 1
#7  0x0f6fe00c in IA__g_vasprintf (string=0x7f8f64b8, 
---Type return to continue, or q return to quit---
format=0xfefefefc Address 0xfefefefc out of bounds, args=0x18)
at gprintf.c:313
len = 1
#8  0x0f6fe00c in IA__g_vasprintf (string=0x7f8f64b8, 
format=0xfefefefc Address 0xfefefefc out of bounds, args=0x18)
at gprintf.c:313
len = 1
#9  0x0f6fe00c in IA__g_vasprintf (string=0x7f8f64b8, 
format=0xfefefefc Address 0xfefefefc out of bounds, args=0x18)
at gprintf.c:313
len = 1
#10 0x0f6fe00c in IA__g_vasprintf (string=0x7f8f64b8, 
format=0xfefefefc Address 0xfefefefc out of bounds, args=0x18)
at gprintf.c:313
len = 1
#11 0x0f6fe00c in IA__g_vasprintf (string=0x7f8f64b8, 
format=0xfefefefc Address 0xfefefefc out of bounds, args=0x18)
at gprintf.c:313
len = 1
#12 0x0f6fe00c in IA__g_vasprintf (string=0x7f8f64b8, 
format=0xfefefefc Address 0xfefefefc out of bounds, args=0x18)
at gprintf.c:313
len = 1
---Type return to continue, or q return to quit---
#13 0x0f6fe00c in IA__g_vasprintf (string=0x7f8f64b8, 
format=0xfefefefc Address 0xfefefefc out of bounds, args=0x18)
at gprintf.c:313
len = 1
#14 0x0f6fe00c in IA__g_vasprintf (string=0x7f8f64b8, 
format=0xfefefefc Address 0xfefefefc out of bounds, args=0x18)
at gprintf.c:313
len = 1
Previous frame inner to this frame (corrupt stack?)


hope that helps

(gdb) p string
$2 = (gchar **) 0x7f8f64b8
(gdb) p *string
$3 = (gchar *) 0x0


-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (650, 'testing'), (600, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: powerpc (ppc)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-rc6-sonne
Locale: LANG=C, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15)

Versions of packages gaim depends on:
ii  gaim-data  1:1.3.1-1 multi-protocol instant messaging c
ii  libao2 0.8.6-1   Cross Platform Audio Output Librar
ii  libaspell150.60.2+20050121-3 The GNU Aspell spell-checker runti
ii  libatk1.0-01.10.1-2  The ATK accessibility toolkit
ii  libaudiofile0  0.2.6-6   Open-source version of SGI's audio
ii  libc6  2.3.5-1   GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libgcrypt111.2.0-11.1LGPL Crypto library - runtime libr
ii  libglib2.0-0   2.6.5-1   The GLib library of C routines
ii  libgnutls111.0.16-13.1   GNU TLS library - runtime library
ii  libgtk2.0-02.6.7-2   The GTK+ graphical user interface 
ii  libgtkspell0   2.0.10-2  a spell-checking addon for GTK's T
ii  libice66.8.2-10  Inter-Client Exchange library
ii  libpango1.0-0  1.8.1-1   Layout and rendering of internatio
ii  libsm6 6.8.2-10  X Window System Session Management
ii  libstartup-notificatio 0.8-1 library for program launch feedbac
ii  libx11-6   6.8.2-22  X Window System protocol client li
ii  libxext6   6.8.2-22  X Window System miscellaneous exte
ii  xlibs  6.8.2-22  X Window System client libraries m

-- no debconf information


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processed: (no subject)

2005-06-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 severity 313345 grave
Bug#313345: gaim: Segfaults on start
Severity set to `grave'.

 merge 313345 313345
Bug#313345: gaim: Segfaults on start
Merged 313345.


End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#313395: gaim seqfaults on startup

2005-06-13 Thread Ari Pollak
Does gaim start properly when run as gaim -n? Also, could you include
the complete output of gaim -d?

Soeren Sonnenburg wrote:
 Package: gaim
 Version: 1:1.3.1-1
 Severity: grave
 



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#313399: FTBFS: missing build-depends on quilt

2005-06-13 Thread Christian T. Steigies
Package: ncurses
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS

Automatic build of ncurses_5.4-5 on aahz by sbuild/m68k 33
[...]
** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
Build-Depends: debhelper (= 3.0.23), libc6-dev-sparc64 [sparc], 
libc6-dev-s390x [s390], lib64gcc1 [sparc s390], libgpmg1-dev (= 1.19.6-20)
[...]
dpkg-buildpackage: host architecture is m68k
 /usr/bin/fakeroot debian/rules clean
QUILT_PATCHES=debian/patches quilt pop -a -R || test $? = 2 
/bin/sh: quilt: command not found
make: *** [unpatch] Error 1

The package failed to autobuild on all arches with the same error, see

http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?arch=pkg=ncursesvers=5.4-5

Christian


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#313395: gaim seqfaults on startup

2005-06-13 Thread Soeren Sonnenburg
On Mon, 2005-06-13 at 08:55 -0400, Ari Pollak wrote:
 Does gaim start properly when run as gaim -n? Also, could you include
 the complete output of gaim -d?

FYI: rebuilding/reinstalling gaim-encryption from source fixes this
problem
-- 
Sometimes, there's a moment as you're waking, when you become aware of
the real world around you, but you're still dreaming.



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#313395: gaim seqfaults on startup

2005-06-13 Thread Soeren Sonnenburg
On Mon, 2005-06-13 at 08:55 -0400, Ari Pollak wrote:
 Does gaim start properly when run as gaim -n? Also, could you include
 the complete output of gaim -d?

argh!, you are right, it is the gaim-encryption-plugin that causes this
problem and the warning about incompatible versions between
gaim/gaim-encryption has just been removed in some recent upload. Now we
know what it was good for...

gaim -n
Gaim has segfaulted and attempted to dump a core file.
This is a bug in the software and has happened through
no fault of your own.

It is possible that this bug is already fixed in CVS.
If you can reproduce the crash, please notify the gaim
maintainers by reporting a bug at
http://gaim.sourceforge.net/bug.php

Please make sure to specify what you were doing at the time,
and post the backtrace from the core file. If you do not know
how to get the backtrace, please get instructions at
http://gaim.sourceforge.net/gdb.php. If you need further
assistance, please IM either RobFlynn or SeanEgn and
they can help you.
Aborted

gaim -d
sound: Initializing sound output drivers.
plugins: registering plugin-load signal
plugins: registering plugin-unload signal
plugins: probing /usr/lib/gaim/libnovell.so
plugins: probing /usr/lib/gaim/gaim-remote.so
plugins: probing /usr/lib/gaim/libirc.so
plugins: probing /usr/lib/gaim/libmsn.so
plugins: probing /usr/lib/gaim/timestamp.so
plugins: probing /usr/lib/gaim/libzephyr.so
plugins: probing /usr/lib/gaim/gevolution.so
plugins: probing /usr/lib/gaim/statenotify.so
plugins: probing /usr/lib/gaim/libyahoo.so
plugins: probing /usr/lib/gaim/ssl-gnutls.so
plugins: probing /usr/lib/gaim/notify.so
plugins: probing /usr/lib/gaim/guifications.la
plugins: probing /usr/lib/gaim/guifications.so
plugins: probing /usr/lib/gaim/gestures.so
plugins: probing /usr/lib/gaim/ssl-nss.so
plugins: probing /usr/lib/gaim/libjabber.so
plugins: probing /usr/lib/gaim/iconaway.so
plugins: probing /usr/lib/gaim/history.so
plugins: probing /usr/lib/gaim/spellchk.so
plugins: probing /usr/lib/gaim/tcl.so
plugins: probing /usr/lib/gaim/ssl.so
plugins: probing /usr/lib/gaim/relnot.so
plugins: probing /usr/lib/gaim/liboscar.so
plugins: probing /usr/lib/gaim/encrypt.so
plugins: probing /usr/lib/gaim/extplacement.so
plugins: probing /usr/lib/gaim/idle.so
plugins: probing /usr/lib/gaim/extendedprefs.so
plugins: probing /usr/lib/gaim/libgg.so
plugins: probing /usr/lib/gaim/libnapster.so
plugins: probing /usr/lib/gaim/ticker.so
plugins: probing /usr/lib/gaim/docklet.so
plugins: probing /usr/lib/gaim/autorecon.so
plugins: probing /home/sonne/.gaim/id
plugins: probing /home/sonne/.gaim/logs
plugins: probing /home/sonne/.gaim/icons
plugins: probing /home/sonne/.gaim/prefs.xml
plugins: probing /home/sonne/.gaim/blist.xml
plugins: probing /home/sonne/.gaim/smileys
plugins: probing /home/sonne/.gaim/accels
plugins: probing /home/sonne/.gaim/sonne.gif
plugins: probing /home/sonne/.gaim/id.priv
plugins: probing /home/sonne/.gaim/status.xml
plugins: probing /home/sonne/.gaim/accounts.xml
plugins: probing /home/sonne/.gaim/guifications
plugins: probing /home/sonne/.gaim/known_keys
plugins: registering plugin-load signal
plugins: registering plugin-unload signal
blist import: Reading /home/sonne/.gaim/blist.xml
blist import: Finished reading /home/sonne/.gaim/blist.xml
prefs: Reading /home/sonne/.gaim/prefs.xml
(15:00:51) prefs: Finished reading /home/sonne/.gaim/prefs.xml
(15:00:51) plugins: Loading saved plugin /usr/lib/gaim/docklet.so
(15:00:51) tray icon: plugin loaded
(15:00:51) tray icon: created
(15:00:51) plugins: Loading saved plugin /usr/lib/gaim/idle.so
(15:00:51) plugins: Loading saved plugin /usr/lib/gaim/autorecon.so
(15:00:51) plugins: Loading saved plugin /usr/lib/gaim/encrypt.so
Gaim has segfaulted and attempted to dump a core file.
This is a bug in the software and has happened through
no fault of your own.

It is possible that this bug is already fixed in CVS.
If you can reproduce the crash, please notify the gaim
maintainers by reporting a bug at
http://gaim.sourceforge.net/bug.php

Please make sure to specify what you were doing at the time,
and post the backtrace from the core file. If you do not know
how to get the backtrace, please get instructions at
http://gaim.sourceforge.net/gdb.php. If you need further
assistance, please IM either RobFlynn or SeanEgn and
they can help you.
Aborted



 Soeren Sonnenburg wrote:
  Package: gaim
  Version: 1:1.3.1-1
  Severity: grave
  
 
-- 
Sometimes, there's a moment as you're waking, when you become aware of
the real world around you, but you're still dreaming.



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#313400: dpkg: Please remove /usr/sbin/start-stop-daemon

2005-06-13 Thread Anthony Towns
Package: dpkg
Version: 1.13.0
Severity: serious

Hey,

dpkg is now shipping both /sbin/s-s-d and /usr/sbin/s-s-d; only
/sbin/s-s-d is required. Having both breaks bootstrapping since
daemons get randomly started when they're not supposed to, because only
/sbin/s-s-d is diverted.

Presumably this is a still-glowing scar from:

  * Scorched-earth reimplementation of the build process and control files
with debhelper and automake.

Also,

  * Remove /usr/sbin/start-stop-daemon.  Closes: #156437.
 -- Adam Heath [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Thu, 29 Aug 2002 16:43:15 -0500

Advantage: doogie.

Cheers,
aj


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#313395: gaim seqfaults on startup

2005-06-13 Thread Luke Schierer
Do you have gaim-encryption loaded?

we recently found (and reported to them) a bug in their code which
would cause gaim to crash if you load it with a different version of
gaim from what it was compiled with.

luke


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#313345: gaim: Segfaults on start

2005-06-13 Thread Ari Pollak
Do you use gaim-encryption?

Jacob Sparre Andersen wrote:
 Package: gaim
 Version: 1:1.3.1-1
 Severity: normal
 
 
 Gaim segfaults with the following message, when I try to start it:
 
 [ 9:42] hugin.crs4.it:% gaim
 Gaim has segfaulted and attempted to dump a core file.
 This is a bug in the software and has happened through
 no fault of your own.
 
 It is possible that this bug is already fixed in CVS.
 If you can reproduce the crash, please notify the gaim
 maintainers by reporting a bug at
 http://gaim.sourceforge.net/bug.php
 
 Please make sure to specify what you were doing at the time,
 and post the backtrace from the core file. If you do not know
 how to get the backtrace, please get instructions at
 http://gaim.sourceforge.net/gdb.php. If you need further
 assistance, please IM either RobFlynn or SeanEgn and
 they can help you.
 zsh: abort  gaim
 [ 9:43] hugin.crs4.it:% 
 
 -- System Information:
 Debian Release: testing/unstable
   APT prefers unstable
   APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing')
 Architecture: powerpc (ppc)
 Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
 Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-powerpc
 Locale: LANG=fo_FO.ISO8859-1, LC_CTYPE=fo_FO.ISO8859-1 (charmap=ISO-8859-1)
 
 Versions of packages gaim depends on:
 ii  gaim-data  1:1.3.1-1 multi-protocol instant messaging 
 c
 ii  libao2 0.8.6-1   Cross Platform Audio Output 
 Librar
 ii  libaspell150.60.2+20050121-3 The GNU Aspell spell-checker 
 runti
 ii  libatk1.0-01.10.1-2  The ATK accessibility toolkit
 ii  libaudiofile0  0.2.6-6   Open-source version of SGI's 
 audio
 ii  libc6  2.3.2.ds1-22  GNU C Library: Shared libraries 
 an
 ii  libgcrypt111.2.0-11.1LGPL Crypto library - runtime 
 libr
 ii  libglib2.0-0   2.6.4-1   The GLib library of C routines
 ii  libgnutls111.0.16-13.1   GNU TLS library - runtime library
 ii  libgtk2.0-02.6.7-2   The GTK+ graphical user 
 interface 
 ii  libgtkspell0   2.0.10-2  a spell-checking addon for GTK's 
 T
 ii  libice64.3.0.dfsg.1-14   Inter-Client Exchange library
 ii  libpango1.0-0  1.8.1-1   Layout and rendering of 
 internatio
 ii  libsm6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-14   X Window System Session 
 Management
 ii  libstartup-notificatio 0.8-1 library for program launch 
 feedbac
 ii  libx11-6   4.3.0.dfsg.1-14   X Window System protocol client 
 li
 ii  libxext6   4.3.0.dfsg.1-14   X Window System miscellaneous 
 exte
 ii  xlibs  4.3.0.dfsg.1-14   X Keyboard Extension (XKB) 
 configu
 
 -- no debconf information
 
 



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#312821: Configuration is world-readable

2005-06-13 Thread Jerome Warnier
Le vendredi 10 juin 2005 à 16:20 -0400, Tim Peeler a écrit :
 Could you double-check that version?  Version 0.9.45-4 fixes this bug.
I'm positively sure about the current version, though I think it was an
upgrade from an older version.
Could you tell me what it should look like with a fresh install?

 On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 11:54:35AM +0200, Jerome Warnier wrote:
  Package: webcalendar
  Version: 0.9.45-4
  Severity: critical
  
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/etc/webcalendar$ ls -l /etc/webcalendar/
  total 88
  -rw-r--r--  1 root root   487 May 18 18:39 apache.conf
  -rw-r--r--  1 root root   461 Nov 11  2004 print_styles.css
  -rw-r--r--  1 www-data www-data   378 Apr 25 11:52 settings.php
  -rw-r--r--  1 root root   369 Apr 20 11:06 settings.php.old
  -rw-r--r--  1 root root   774 Dec 28 23:22 settings.php.tpl
  -rw-r--r--  1 root root  6701 Nov 16  2004 site_extras.php
  -rw-r--r--  1 root root 21879 Dec  7  2004 styles.php
  -rw-r--r--  1 root root 12133 Dec 14 01:09 user-ldap.php
  -rw-r--r--  1 root root 11417 Nov 16  2004 user-nis.php
  -rw-r--r--  1 root root 11647 Nov 25  2004 user.php
  
  
  All configuration files are world-readable. As settings.php includes a
  clear-text password and login to the database, this it highly unsecure,
  hence the severity critical. Wish I had seen this before Sarge's
  release.
  
  Thanks
  -- 
  Jerome Warnier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  BeezNest
  
  
 
-- 
Jerome Warnier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
BeezNest




Bug#313345: gaim: Segfaults on start

2005-06-13 Thread Jacob Sparre Andersen
On Mon, 13 Jun 2005, Ari Pollak wrote:

 Do you use gaim-encryption?

Yes.

Jacob
-- 
from DoD Directive 2000.12

DEFINITIONS
(...)
 18. Terrorism.  The calculated use of violence or threat of
 violence to inculcate fear; intended to coerce or to
 intimidate governments or societies in the pursuit of goals
 that are generally political, religious, or ideological.



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#313345: gaim: Segfaults on start

2005-06-13 Thread Luke Schierer
a bug (a missing comma) was recently (friday-ish) found in
gaim-encryption that would cause it to crash gaim when loaded by a
version of gaim other than that it was compiled with.

luke

On Mon, Jun 13, 2005 at 03:36:34PM +0200, Jacob Sparre Andersen wrote:
 On Mon, 13 Jun 2005, Ari Pollak wrote:
 
  Do you use gaim-encryption?
 
 Yes.
 
 Jacob
 -- 
 from DoD Directive 2000.12
 
 DEFINITIONS
 (...)
  18. Terrorism.  The calculated use of violence or threat of
  violence to inculcate fear; intended to coerce or to
  intimidate governments or societies in the pursuit of goals
  that are generally political, religious, or ideological.
 
 


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#313395: gaim-encryption crash from version miss-match

2005-06-13 Thread Luke Schierer
We (gaim upstream) tracked this down and reported it to
gaim-encryption Friday-ish.  In the gaim-encryption code there is a
test that reads more or less
if (VERSION != gaim_get_version())
(treat the above as psuedo code, one of the other gaim developers did
the actual work, I'm going from memory here)
followed by a gaim_debug line.  the following line was only called
when you load the plugin with a different version of gaim from what
it was compiled against, and was missing a comma.  not sure why/how
it got past gcc, but it did.

luke


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#313375: khelpcenter: missing Depends: htdig

2005-06-13 Thread Christopher Martin
On June 13, 2005 10:28, Christopher Martin wrote:
 Unless there is some trick I'm missing

Indeed.

FINDCMD: find /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/ -name index.docbook
Creating index for 'kde_application_manuals'
find: /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/: No such file or directory

Perhaps the only problem is simply that it isn't using Debian's correct path 
of /usr/share/doc/kde/HTML/en/. Let's try patching that and see what 
happens...


pgpnKu560aiSg.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Bug#313345: gaim: Segfaults on start

2005-06-13 Thread Jacob Sparre Andersen
Luke Schierer wrote:

 a bug (a missing comma) was recently (friday-ish) found in
 gaim-encryption that would cause it to crash gaim when
 loaded by a version of gaim other than that it was
 compiled with.

Thanks.  Uninstalling gaim-encryption allowed me to start
Gaim.  Hopefully a corrected version of gaim-encryption will
soon be available.

Jacob
-- 
The universe isn't for the likes of me to understand. I only work here.



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#313345: gaim: Segfaults on start

2005-06-13 Thread Justin Pryzby
On Mon, Jun 13, 2005 at 09:55:46AM -0400, Luke Schierer wrote:
 a bug (a missing comma) was recently (friday-ish) found in
 gaim-encryption that would cause it to crash gaim when loaded by a
 version of gaim other than that it was compiled with.
A missing hyphen forced the self-destruction of the mariner 1 probe.

http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/nmc/tmp/MARIN1.html
(Though I could have sworn it was a colon or semicolon).


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#313375: khelpcenter: missing Depends: htdig

2005-06-13 Thread Christopher Martin
On June 13, 2005 06:50, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
 I just wanted to create a search index for the helpcenter but couldn't
 as it's missing htdig. If indexing is not possible without htdig,
 khelpcenter should depend on it. I wasn't sure if this is a severe
 policy violation, thus only used severity: important instead of
 serious...

If you install htdig, does it work? Even with htdig installed, I can't get 
KHelpCenter to actually index the handbooks, though it tells me that it 
succeeded. A quick google revealed a large number of people with similar 
problems. See KDE bug #102912 and Gentoo bug #89515 for a sample.

Unless there is some trick I'm missing, I suspect that this feature is 
simply broken, or at least unsupported by Debian's htdig.

Cheers,
Christopher Martin


pgpvAmC9VksyI.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Bug#310796: marked as done (type-handling: does not work with dpkg 1.13)

2005-06-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 13 Jun 2005 10:03:57 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#310796: fixed in type-handling 0.2.12
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 26 May 2005 03:09:48 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed May 25 20:09:48 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from smtp5.wanadoo.fr [193.252.22.26] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Db8km-00077X-00; Wed, 25 May 2005 20:09:48 -0700
Received: from me-wanadoo.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by mwinf0507.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id D18511C01626
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 26 May 2005 05:09:16 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from argos.server.maison 
(AToulouse-152-1-67-217.w83-200.abo.wanadoo.fr [83.200.169.217])
by mwinf0507.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id A750C1C01625;
Thu, 26 May 2005 05:09:16 +0200 (CEST)
X-ME-UUID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from prahal by argos.server.maison with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1Db8ld-0004tF-SJ; Thu, 26 May 2005 05:10:41 +0200
Date: Thu, 26 May 2005 05:10:41 +0200
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: type-handling: does not work with dpkg 1.13
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Reportbug-Version: 3.12
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.4 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: type-handling
Version: 0.2.10
Severity: normal
Tags: experimental


I don' know how to deal with that. It is meanly to prevent
package which depends on type-handling to use it in experimental
(i found out that gnome-applets 2.10 does though it seems it managed
to compile).


dpkg-architecture does not output the gnu system with the help
output.
It now have a switch to get the architectures ( -L) but it does
not match with previous list of debian arch nor is gnu
systems (a mix of both). Maybe the conflict between both have
been fixed ? 


Regards
Alban


-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.11-rc5
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=UTF-8)

Versions of packages type-handling depends on:
ii  dpkg-dev  1.13.4 Package building tools for Debian

-- no debconf information


---
Received: (at 310796-close) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Jun 2005 14:09:05 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jun 13 07:09:05 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Dhpcf-0002wZ-00; Mon, 13 Jun 2005 07:09:05 -0700
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DhpXh-0005cn-00; Mon, 13 Jun 2005 10:03:57 -0400
From: Aurelien Jarno [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#310796: fixed in type-handling 0.2.12
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 10:03:57 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.8 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS,
HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Source: type-handling
Source-Version: 0.2.12

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
type-handling, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

type-handling_0.2.12.dsc
  to pool/main/t/type-handling/type-handling_0.2.12.dsc
type-handling_0.2.12.tar.gz
  to pool/main/t/type-handling/type-handling_0.2.12.tar.gz
type-handling_0.2.12_hppa.deb
  to pool/main/t/type-handling/type-handling_0.2.12_hppa.deb
type-handling_0.2.12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/t/type-handling/type-handling_0.2.12_i386.deb
type-handling_0.2.12_mips.deb
  to pool/main/t/type-handling/type-handling_0.2.12_mips.deb

Bug#313375: khelpcenter: missing Depends: htdig

2005-06-13 Thread Christopher Martin
On June 13, 2005 10:36, Christopher Martin wrote:
 Perhaps the only problem is simply that it isn't using Debian's correct
 path of /usr/share/doc/kde/HTML/en/. Let's try patching that and see what
 happens...

Still doesn't work:

FINDCMD: find /usr/share/doc/kde/HTML/en/ -name index.docbook
Creating index for 'kde_application_manuals'
Warning: unknown locale!

New server: home, 80
Unknown host: home
0:0:0:file://home/chris/.kde/share/apps/khelpcenter/ \
index/kde_application_manuals.tmp/index.html: \ 
 size = 12663
htdig: Run complete
htdig: 1 server seen:
htdig: home:80 1 document
Finished successfully.

I noticed that htdig's debconf prompts mentioned the existence of an 
htdig3.2 package, yet I couldn't find it in the archive. It is available 
from http://users.linuxbourg.ch/ribnitz/debian, however, and while I now 
get a much longer and more promising set of errors, no index.


pgpSt6v4kCqna.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Processed: (no subject)

2005-06-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 reassign 313345 gaim-encryption
Bug#313345: gaim: Segfaults on start
Bug reassigned from package `gaim' to `gaim-encryption'.

 merge 313345 313395
Bug#313345: gaim: Segfaults on start
Bug#313395: gaim seqfaults on startup
Merged 313345 313395.


End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#313278: marked as done ([ncurses-term] file conflict with mlterm-common during upgrade)

2005-06-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 13 Jun 2005 11:32:25 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#313278: fixed in ncurses 5.4-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Jun 2005 20:52:47 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jun 12 13:52:47 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from e178121025.adsl.alicedsl.de (melo.dyndns.org) [85.178.121.25] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DhZRm-0002Cj-00; Sun, 12 Jun 2005 13:52:47 -0700
Received: by melo.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 80A4179DDD; Sun, 12 Jun 2005 22:52:48 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2005 22:52:48 +0200
From: Cyril Brulebois [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [ncurses-term] file conflict with mlterm-common during upgrade
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=wTWi5aaYRw9ix9vO
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 


--wTWi5aaYRw9ix9vO
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Package: ncurses-term
Version: 5.4-5
Severity: normal

Hi,

I got an error while upgrading ncurses-term from 5.4-4 to 5.4-5, it's
a conflict with a file from mlterm-common.

Here is the output:
D=E9paquetage de la mise =E0 jour de ncurses-term ...
dpkg=A0: erreur de traitement de /var/cache/apt/archives/ncurses-term_5.4-5=
_all.deb (--unpack)=A0:
 tentative de remplacement de =AB=A0/usr/share/terminfo/m/mlterm=A0=BB, qui=
 appartient aussi au paquet mlterm-common
dpkg-deb: sous-processus paste tu=E9 par le signal (Relais bris=E9 (pipe))

System: Debian/Sid
Package versions:
ii  mlterm  2.9.2-2
ii  mlterm-common   2.9.2-2
ii  ncurses-term5.4-4 (installed)

Greetings,

--=20
Cyril Brulebois

--wTWi5aaYRw9ix9vO
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFCrKCgeGfVPHR5Nd0RAug6AJ9QxlwV9UiNPKg8BpGOS4rtroYGdwCfUKco
wq1e3q8/2pw+2xxsJNWrfVU=
=P7bI
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--wTWi5aaYRw9ix9vO--

---
Received: (at 313278-close) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Jun 2005 15:38:27 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jun 13 08:38:26 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Dhr18-0003RX-00; Mon, 13 Jun 2005 08:38:26 -0700
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DhqvJ-0004Qf-00; Mon, 13 Jun 2005 11:32:25 -0400
From: Daniel Jacobowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#313278: fixed in ncurses 5.4-6
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 11:32:25 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Source: ncurses
Source-Version: 5.4-6

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
ncurses, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

libncurses5-dbg_5.4-6_i386.deb
  to pool/main/n/ncurses/libncurses5-dbg_5.4-6_i386.deb
libncurses5-dev_5.4-6_i386.deb
  to pool/main/n/ncurses/libncurses5-dev_5.4-6_i386.deb
libncurses5_5.4-6_i386.deb
  to pool/main/n/ncurses/libncurses5_5.4-6_i386.deb
libncursesw5-dbg_5.4-6_i386.deb
  to pool/main/n/ncurses/libncursesw5-dbg_5.4-6_i386.deb
libncursesw5-dev_5.4-6_i386.deb
  to pool/main/n/ncurses/libncursesw5-dev_5.4-6_i386.deb
libncursesw5_5.4-6_i386.deb
  to pool/main/n/ncurses/libncursesw5_5.4-6_i386.deb
ncurses-base_5.4-6_all.deb
  to pool/main/n/ncurses/ncurses-base_5.4-6_all.deb
ncurses-bin_5.4-6_i386.deb
  

Bug#313399: marked as done (FTBFS: missing build-depends on quilt)

2005-06-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 13 Jun 2005 11:32:26 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#313399: fixed in ncurses 5.4-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Jun 2005 12:56:35 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jun 13 05:56:35 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from dsl-082-083-112-086.arcor-ip.net (gleep.earth.sol) 
[82.83.112.86] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DhoUV-00062Z-00; Mon, 13 Jun 2005 05:56:35 -0700
Received: from cts by gleep.earth.sol with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1DhoUU-0002UI-79
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 13 Jun 2005 14:56:34 +0200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Christian T. Steigies [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: FTBFS: missing build-depends on quilt
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8
Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 14:56:34 +0200
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: ncurses
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS

Automatic build of ncurses_5.4-5 on aahz by sbuild/m68k 33
[...]
** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
Build-Depends: debhelper (= 3.0.23), libc6-dev-sparc64 [sparc], 
libc6-dev-s390x [s390], lib64gcc1 [sparc s390], libgpmg1-dev (= 1.19.6-20)
[...]
dpkg-buildpackage: host architecture is m68k
 /usr/bin/fakeroot debian/rules clean
QUILT_PATCHES=debian/patches quilt pop -a -R || test $? = 2 
/bin/sh: quilt: command not found
make: *** [unpatch] Error 1

The package failed to autobuild on all arches with the same error, see

http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?arch=pkg=ncursesvers=5.4-5

Christian

---
Received: (at 313399-close) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Jun 2005 15:38:03 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jun 13 08:38:03 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Dhr0l-0003MW-00; Mon, 13 Jun 2005 08:38:03 -0700
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DhqvK-0004Qh-00; Mon, 13 Jun 2005 11:32:26 -0400
From: Daniel Jacobowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#313399: fixed in ncurses 5.4-6
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 11:32:26 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2

Source: ncurses
Source-Version: 5.4-6

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
ncurses, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

libncurses5-dbg_5.4-6_i386.deb
  to pool/main/n/ncurses/libncurses5-dbg_5.4-6_i386.deb
libncurses5-dev_5.4-6_i386.deb
  to pool/main/n/ncurses/libncurses5-dev_5.4-6_i386.deb
libncurses5_5.4-6_i386.deb
  to pool/main/n/ncurses/libncurses5_5.4-6_i386.deb
libncursesw5-dbg_5.4-6_i386.deb
  to pool/main/n/ncurses/libncursesw5-dbg_5.4-6_i386.deb
libncursesw5-dev_5.4-6_i386.deb
  to pool/main/n/ncurses/libncursesw5-dev_5.4-6_i386.deb
libncursesw5_5.4-6_i386.deb
  to pool/main/n/ncurses/libncursesw5_5.4-6_i386.deb
ncurses-base_5.4-6_all.deb
  to pool/main/n/ncurses/ncurses-base_5.4-6_all.deb
ncurses-bin_5.4-6_i386.deb
  to pool/main/n/ncurses/ncurses-bin_5.4-6_i386.deb
ncurses-term_5.4-6_all.deb
  to pool/main/n/ncurses/ncurses-term_5.4-6_all.deb
ncurses_5.4-6.diff.gz
  to pool/main/n/ncurses/ncurses_5.4-6.diff.gz
ncurses_5.4-6.dsc
  to pool/main/n/ncurses/ncurses_5.4-6.dsc



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Daniel Jacobowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Bug#295310: marked as done (gnome-cups-manager: Cannot add a new printer if executed as non root)

2005-06-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 13 Jun 2005 11:47:04 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#295310: fixed in gnome-cups-manager 0.30-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Feb 2005 23:15:32 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Feb 14 15:15:32 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from 80-28-156-16.adsl.nuria.telefonica-data.net 
(smtp.tecknolabs.com) [80.28.156.16] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1D0pRD-00089T-00; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 15:15:32 -0800
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by smtp.tecknolabs.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1CDD427DB;
Tue, 15 Feb 2005 00:14:58 +0100 (CET)
Received: from smtp.tecknolabs.com ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (evangelion.tecknolabs.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 
10024)
with LMTP id 16837-01; Tue, 15 Feb 2005 00:14:53 +0100 (CET)
Received: from doomslayer.tecknolabs.com (doomslayer.tecknolabs.com 
[192.168.1.2])
by smtp.tecknolabs.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6EAF427D8;
Tue, 15 Feb 2005 00:14:52 +0100 (CET)
Received: by doomslayer.tecknolabs.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id B8148221; Tue, 15 Feb 2005 00:14:52 +0100 (CET)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Francisco Javier F. Serrador [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: gnome-cups-manager: Cannot add a new printer if executed as non root
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.7.1
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 00:14:52 +0100
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at tecknolabs.com
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: gnome-cups-manager
Version: 0.25-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable


If you select add new printer as an ordinary user, root password is
promted but nothing happens.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (101, 'testing'), (99, 'unstable'), (9, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.9-1-k7
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) (ignored: 
LC_ALL set to [EMAIL PROTECTED])

Versions of packages gnome-cups-manager depends on:
ii  libart-2.0-2 2.3.17-1Library of functions for 2D graphi
ii  libatk1.0-0  1.8.0-4 The ATK accessibility toolkit
ii  libbonobo2-0 2.8.1-1 Bonobo CORBA interfaces library
ii  libbonoboui2-0   2.8.1-1 The Bonobo UI library
ii  libc62.3.2.ds1-20GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libcupsys2-gnutls10  1.1.23-4Common UNIX Printing System(tm) - 
ii  libgconf2-4  2.8.1-4 GNOME configuration database syste
ii  libglade2-0  1:2.4.2-1   library to load .glade files at ru
ii  libglib2.0-0 2.6.2-1 The GLib library of C routines
ii  libgnome-keyring00.4.1-1 GNOME keyring services library
ii  libgnome2-0  2.8.0-6 The GNOME 2 library - runtime file
ii  libgnomecanvas2-02.8.0-1 A powerful object-oriented display
ii  libgnomecups1.0-10.1.13-1GNOME library for CUPS interaction
ii  libgnomecupsui1.0-1  0.25-2  UI extensions to libgnomecups
ii  libgnomeui-0 2.8.0-3 The GNOME 2 libraries (User Interf
ii  libgnomevfs2-0   2.8.3-11The GNOME virtual file-system libr
ii  libgtk2.0-0  2.6.2-2 The GTK+ graphical user interface 
ii  libice6  4.3.0.dfsg.1-10 Inter-Client Exchange library
ii  liborbit21:2.10.5-0.1libraries for ORBit2 - a CORBA ORB
ii  libpango1.0-01.8.0-3 Layout and rendering of internatio
ii  libpopt0 1.7-5   lib for parsing cmdline parameters
ii  libsm6   4.3.0.dfsg.1-10 X Window System Session Management
ii  libx11-6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-10 X Window System protocol client li
ii  libxml2  2.6.16-2GNOME XML library
ii  xlibs4.3.0.dfsg.1-10 X Keyboard Extension (XKB) configu
ii  

Bug#313375: khelpcenter: missing Depends: htdig

2005-06-13 Thread Andreas Pakulat
On 13.Jun 2005 - 11:20:42, Christopher Martin wrote:
 On June 13, 2005 10:36, Christopher Martin wrote:
  Perhaps the only problem is simply that it isn't using Debian's correct
  path of /usr/share/doc/kde/HTML/en/. Let's try patching that and see what
  happens...
 
 Still doesn't work:

Here khelpcenter crashes when I do a symlink from /u/s/d/kde/HTML ot
/u/s/d/HTML...

 FINDCMD: find /usr/share/doc/kde/HTML/en/ -name index.docbook
 Creating index for 'kde_application_manuals'
 Warning: unknown locale!
 
 New server: home, 80
 Unknown host: home

I don't quite get what khelpcenter is doing here. 

Hmm, wait. I set home to point to localhost meanwhile. Removing that
khelpcenter does not crash but I get the same output (only my file is
16.6 KB)

 I noticed that htdig's debconf prompts mentioned the existence of an 
 htdig3.2 package, yet I couldn't find it in the archive. It is available 
 from http://users.linuxbourg.ch/ribnitz/debian, however, and while I now 
 get a much longer and more promising set of errors, no index.

Yeah and looking at htdig upstream this project seems to be very slow...
The 3.2.0b6 is 12 months old.

While you found the packages, I compiled htdig3.2.0b6 from source and
installed in $HOME. But khelpcenter doesn't find htdig...

So I tried the deb and yes it seems that creating the index is comletely
broken. At least: khelpcenter tries to resolve all the help://XXX URL's
via normal DNS, which is wrong, IMHO. I'll add another comment to the
upstream bugreport...

Andreas

-- 
You will inherit some money or a small piece of land.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#307683: needs to be properly fixed, FTBFS is RC

2005-06-13 Thread Santiago Vila
On Mon, 30 May 2005, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:

 On 30 May 2005 at 14:20, Steve Langasek wrote:
 | It would probably be better if r-base-dev simply specified awk,
 | which IIRC is virtually-essential by virtue of being a
 | dependency of an essential package.
 
 I like that much better. So now the changelog stands at
 
   * debian/rules: configure call with AWK=/usr/bin/awk

This is fine.

   * debian/control: Build-Depends on mawk | gawk | awk
   * debian/control: Depends for r-base-core on 'mawk | gawk | awk'

But this is not. Please don't do that. As it has been already pointed out,
awk is essential, so any dependency or build-dependency on
'mawk | gawk | awk' is completely gratuitous.

 | In any case, I've tagged this sarge-ignore because being
 | virtually-essential, mawk is available on all Debian buildds -- accounting
 | for the lack of *actual* build failures on archs other than amd64.

For the record, the reason I am reading the logs for this bug is that
this package failed to build from source on kfreebsd-i386 last time
I tried:

mawk -f convert.awk  world.line  world2.line
/bin/sh: mawk: command not found

I would call this an actual build failure.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processed: Re: Bug#307683: needs to be properly fixed, FTBFS is RC

2005-06-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 reassign 307683 r-cran-maps, r-cran-mapdata, r-base-dev
Bug#307683: r-cran-maps: FTBFS: missing build dependency.
Bug reassigned from package `r-cran-maps' to `r-cran-maps, r-cran-mapdata, 
r-base-dev'.

 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#307683: needs to be properly fixed, FTBFS is RC

2005-06-13 Thread Chris Lawrence
reassign 307683 r-cran-maps, r-cran-mapdata, r-base-dev
thanks

On 6/13/05, Santiago Vila [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(Proposed solution elided; looks good to me, given Santiago's changes
to debian/control.)
 mawk -f convert.awk  world.line  world2.line
 /bin/sh: mawk: command not found
 
 I would call this an actual build failure.

But not RC for sarge, since that architecture (like amd64) wasn't
supported for sarge...

Anyway, I've reassigned this bug to all 3 packages affected;
presumably, we can close it when a new r-base-dev is uploaded, then we
can get on with our lives.


Chris
-- 
Chris Lawrence - http://blog.lordsutch.com/



Bug#313435: proftpd: FTBFS

2005-06-13 Thread dann frazier
Package: proftpd
Version: 1.2.10-16
Severity: serious
Justification: no longer builds from source

This version of proftpd fails to autobuild on all architectures.  Here's one of
the failed build logs:
  
http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?pkg=proftpdver=1.2.10-16arch=ia64stamp=1118668682file=logas=raw

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: ia64
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.11-1-mckinley
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)

Versions of packages proftpd depends on:
ii  adduser 3.63 Add and remove users and groups
ii  debconf 1.4.51   Debian configuration management sy
ii  libc6.1 2.3.2.ds1-22 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libcap1 1:1.10-14support for getting/setting POSIX.
ii  libpam0g0.76-22  Pluggable Authentication Modules l
ii  libssl0.9.7 0.9.7g-1 SSL shared libraries
ii  libwrap07.6.dbs-8Wietse Venema's TCP wrappers libra
ii  netbase 4.21 Basic TCP/IP networking system
pn  proftpd-common   Not found.
ii  ucf 1.18 Update Configuration File: preserv


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processed: tagging 313400

2005-06-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.6
 tags 313400 pending
Bug#313400: dpkg: Please remove /usr/sbin/start-stop-daemon
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending


End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#312018: marked as done (gaim-encryption: archived bug #305719 is still present in sarge)

2005-06-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 13 Jun 2005 14:41:20 -0300
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Sarge released
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Jun 2005 21:30:37 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jun 04 14:30:37 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from mailout.stusta.mhn.de [141.84.69.5] 
by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DegE1-0003S5-00; Sat, 04 Jun 2005 14:30:37 -0700
Received: (qmail 31487 invoked from network); 4 Jun 2005 21:30:06 -
Received: from r063144.stusta.swh.mhn.de (10.150.63.144)
  by mailout.stusta.mhn.de with SMTP; 4 Jun 2005 21:30:06 -
Received: by r063144.stusta.swh.mhn.de (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 319DCBB6A9; Sat,  4 Jun 2005 23:30:04 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: gaim-encryption: archived bug #305719 is still present in sarge
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.9
Date: Sat, 04 Jun 2005 23:30:03 +0200
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: gaim-encryption
Version: 2.36-3
Severity: grave
Tags: sarge


This is a reminder that archived bug #305719 is still present in sarge.

Note that woody's gaim would suffice for the dependency of the package
in sarge...

---
Received: (at 312018-done) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Jun 2005 17:40:38 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jun 13 10:40:38 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from (mime.fmu.br) [200.182.6.10] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DhsvN-0007Pg-00; Mon, 13 Jun 2005 10:40:38 -0700
Received: from [192.168.0.226] (201-26-154-23.dial-up.telesp.net.br 
[:::201.26.154.23])
  (AUTH: LOGIN [EMAIL PROTECTED], SSL: TLSv1/SSLv3,128bits,RC4-MD5)
  by mime.fmu.br with esmtp; Mon, 13 Jun 2005 14:36:22 -0300
  id 003C41EC.42ADC417.05A0
Subject: Sarge released
From: Leo \Costela\ Antunes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Organization: Debian
Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 14:41:20 -0300
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; 
protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary==_mime-1440-1118684184-0001-2
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.2 
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no 
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

This is a MIME-formatted message.  If you see this text it means that your
E-mail software does not support MIME-formatted messages.

--=_mime-1440-1118684184-0001-2
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I didn't spot this in time and unfortunately Sarge got released with
this bug.

I don't beleive this warrants an update to Sarge, since the version of
Gaim released with Sarge will not cause the bug to manifest, so I'll
just close this.

Cheers

--=20

 Leo Antunes
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED]

--=_mime-1440-1118684184-0001-2
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBCrcVAImLTb3rflGYRAhjJAJ9Avmv9evs4CBID4z+OJRbx0Mg+8ACePxND
PijKEWESh5H3K5fnnlop5Xc=
=A1uZ
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--=_mime-1440-1118684184-0001-2--


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#313435: proftpd: FTBFS

2005-06-13 Thread Francesco Paolo Lovergine
On Mon, Jun 13, 2005 at 11:04:00AM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
 Package: proftpd
 Version: 1.2.10-16
 Severity: serious
 Justification: no longer builds from source
 
 This version of proftpd fails to autobuild on all architectures.  Here's one 
 of
 the failed build logs:
   
 http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?pkg=proftpdver=1.2.10-16arch=ia64stamp=1118668682file=logas=raw
 

FYI, 1.2.10 is at a dead end since sarge release in my own roadmap. 
Next upload will be a 1.3.0+cvs, which will fix the postgresql transition and 
of course 
introduce a new great series of bugs. Yay!

-- 
Francesco P. Lovergine


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#313454: package is empty

2005-06-13 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Package: libecpg4
Severity: grave

The package does not contain any files except some documentation.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#313451: strace: ftbfs [sparc] error while loading shared libraries: libfakeroot-sysv.so.0

2005-06-13 Thread Blars Blarson
Package: strace
Version: 4.5.12-1
Severity: serious
Tags: sid
Justification: fails to build from source

strace failed to build from source on a sparc buildd:

gzip -9 debian/tmp/usr/share/doc/strace/*
install -p -o root -g root -m 644 debian/copyright \
debian/tmp/usr/share/doc/strace/copyright
install -p -o root -g root -m 644 strace.1 
debian/tmp/usr/share/man/man1/strace.1
gzip -9 debian/tmp/usr/share/man/man1/strace.1
install -s -o root -g root -m 755 build64/strace debian/tmp/usr/bin/strace64
ln -s strace.1.gz debian/tmp/usr/share/man/man1/strace64.1.gz
dpkg-shlibdeps build/strace build64/strace
build64/strace: error while loading shared libraries: libfakeroot-sysv.so.0: 
cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
dpkg-shlibdeps: failure: ldd on `build64/strace' gave error exit status 1
make: *** [binary-arch] Error 1



It failed in a different way on my sparc pbuilder:

checking for sparc64-linux-gcc... gcc -m64
checking for C compiler default output file name... configure: error: C 
compiler cannot create executables
See `config.log' for more details.
make: *** [build64/Makefile] Error 77



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#313452: package is empty

2005-06-13 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Package: libecpg-compat1
Version: 8.0.3-5
Severity: grave

The package doesn't contain any files except some documentation.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#313453: does not depend on libecpg5 (package missing?)

2005-06-13 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Package: libecpg-dev
Severity: grave

The package contains shared library symlinks to (for instance) libecpg.so.5.0
but does not depend on the package which would provide that library.
Given that that package should be called libecpg5, it seems to be missing.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#313218: gtodo: Program refuses to load if a single todo item exists

2005-06-13 Thread Guilherme de S. Pastore
Em Dom, 2005-06-12 s 15:04 +0100, Barrie Millar escreveu:

 After performing a security update this afternoon which also downloaded
 and installed Gnome 2.10, gtodo totally fails to restart if a single
 todo item is located on an existing list. It starts perfectly if a
 configuration cannot be found. However, add a single item, exit and then
 try to restart it, and you get the following error:
 
 Segmentation fault

I haven't yet upgraded to GNOME 2.10 in unstable, as it's still horribly
broken. With GNOME 2.8, I cannot reproduce your problem, though.
Therefore, I ask for your patience until GNOME 2.10 in unstable is
merely usable, so I can try to figure out what happens to be wrong.

 Could somebody also tell me how to output a package information view
 like those I see in other posts (sample shown below). I've had a look
 around, but can't see how it's done anywhere. Thanks

reportbug does that automagically for people who use it.

Regards,

-- 
Guilherme de S. Pastore (fatalerror)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Bug#313081: marked as done (find -follow: infinite loop with symlinks to ./)

2005-06-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 13 Jun 2005 15:47:34 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#313081: fixed in findutils 4.2.22-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Jun 2005 18:32:12 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jun 11 11:32:12 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from (debian.huawei.com) [218.17.119.32] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DhAmC-wT-00; Sat, 11 Jun 2005 11:32:12 -0700
Received: from hzhr by debian.huawei.com with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1DhAnz-0001no-HL; Sun, 12 Jun 2005 02:34:03 +0800
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Huang, Zhangrong [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: findutils sucks dpkg-scanpackages
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.12
Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2005 02:34:02 +0800
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: findutils
Version: 4.2.20-2
Severity: normal

I set-up a local deb repository for myself, wrote a simple script to
generate the Packages file, say
$ cat update-here
dpkg-scanpackages . /dev/null  Packages
gzip -f Packages

Now I upgrade findutils to 4.2.20-2, when I run this script,

$ sh update-here

seems find is trying to eat up all of my memory and swap, then the system is
becoming not useable.

PS: dpkg-scanpackages comes from dpkg-dev.


-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.11-1-686
Locale: LANG=zh_CN.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=zh_CN.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

Versions of packages findutils depends on:
ii  libc6   2.3.2.ds1-22 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an

-- no debconf information

---
Received: (at 313081-close) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Jun 2005 19:53:42 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jun 13 12:53:42 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Dhv09-00035J-00; Mon, 13 Jun 2005 12:53:42 -0700
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DhuuE-0007xp-00; Mon, 13 Jun 2005 15:47:34 -0400
From: Andreas Metzler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#313081: fixed in findutils 4.2.22-1
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 15:47:34 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 6

Source: findutils
Source-Version: 4.2.22-1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
findutils, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

findutils_4.2.22-1.diff.gz
  to pool/main/f/findutils/findutils_4.2.22-1.diff.gz
findutils_4.2.22-1.dsc
  to pool/main/f/findutils/findutils_4.2.22-1.dsc
findutils_4.2.22-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/f/findutils/findutils_4.2.22-1_i386.deb
findutils_4.2.22.orig.tar.gz
  to pool/main/f/findutils/findutils_4.2.22.orig.tar.gz



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Andreas Metzler [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated findutils package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 19:39:46 +0200
Source: findutils
Binary: findutils
Architecture: source i386
Version: 

Processed: tagging 313400

2005-06-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
 tags 313400 sid
Bug#313400: dpkg: Please remove /usr/sbin/start-stop-daemon
Tags were: pending
Tags added: sid


End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#307167: marked as done (affix-source: Integer underflow possibly permits local privilege escalation)

2005-06-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 13 Jun 2005 17:02:46 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#307167: fixed in affix-kernel 2.1.2-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 1 May 2005 11:36:00 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun May 01 04:36:00 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from inutil.org (vserver151.vserver151.serverflex.de) 
[193.22.164.111] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DSCjw-0004ym-00; Sun, 01 May 2005 04:36:00 -0700
Received: from p54894682.dip.t-dialin.net ([84.137.70.130] 
helo=localhost.localdomain)
by vserver151.vserver151.serverflex.de with esmtpsa 
(TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32)
(Exim 4.50)
id 1DSCju-R5-54
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 01 May 2005 13:35:58 +0200
Received: from jmm by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1DSCjj-000316-V0; Sun, 01 May 2005 13:35:47 +0200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Moritz Muehlenhoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: affix-source: Integer underflow possibly permits local privilege 
escalation
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.9
Date: Sun, 01 May 2005 13:35:47 +0200
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 84.137.70.130
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on vserver151.vserver151.serverflex.de); SAEximRunCond 
expanded to false
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: affix-source
Severity: grave
Justification: user security hole

Inproper bounds checking in affix_sock_register() may allow local privilege
escalation. Please see 
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=bugtraqm=111445064725591w=2
for details.

Upstream patch available at http://affix.sourceforge.net/patch_hci_2_1_2

Cheers,
Moritz

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.11
Locale: LANG=C, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15)

---
Received: (at 307167-close) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Jun 2005 21:08:41 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jun 13 14:08:41 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DhwAj-0002Bm-00; Mon, 13 Jun 2005 14:08:41 -0700
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Dhw50-0006HY-00; Mon, 13 Jun 2005 17:02:46 -0400
From: Mario Joussen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#307167: fixed in affix-kernel 2.1.2-1
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 17:02:46 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Source: affix-kernel
Source-Version: 2.1.2-1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
affix-kernel, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

affix-common_2.1.2-1_all.deb
  to pool/main/a/affix-kernel/affix-common_2.1.2-1_all.deb
affix-headers_2.1.2-1_all.deb
  to pool/main/a/affix-kernel/affix-headers_2.1.2-1_all.deb
affix-kernel_2.1.2-1.diff.gz
  to pool/main/a/affix-kernel/affix-kernel_2.1.2-1.diff.gz
affix-kernel_2.1.2-1.dsc
  to pool/main/a/affix-kernel/affix-kernel_2.1.2-1.dsc
affix-kernel_2.1.2.orig.tar.gz
  to pool/main/a/affix-kernel/affix-kernel_2.1.2.orig.tar.gz
affix-source_2.1.2-1_all.deb
  to pool/main/a/affix-kernel/affix-source_2.1.2-1_all.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Mario Joussen [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of 

Bug#313435: proftpd: FTBFS

2005-06-13 Thread Steve Langasek
clone 313435 -1
retitle 313435 postgresql-dev: uninstallable package
reassign 313435 postgresql-dev
thanks

Hi guys,

On Mon, Jun 13, 2005 at 11:04:00AM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
 Package: proftpd
 Version: 1.2.10-16
 Severity: serious
 Justification: no longer builds from source

 This version of proftpd fails to autobuild on all architectures.  Here's one 
 of
 the failed build logs:
   
 http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?pkg=proftpdver=1.2.10-16arch=ia64stamp=1118668682file=logas=raw

Looking at the build log shows that this is caused by postgresql-dev 7.5.4's
dependency on libpq-dev; libpq-dev 8.0.3-5 Conflicts: with postgresql-dev,
which means that postgresql-dev 7.5.4 is uninstallable on all systems and is
therefore never a candidate for testing.  If you mean to provide this as a
transition package, please do so without the self-conflicts; otherwise,
postgresql-dev probably needs to either be dropped or have its dependencies
fixed.

-- 
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#308702: marked as done (RM: mdctl -- RoM; obsolete transition package)

2005-06-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 13 Jun 2005 17:30:31 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Removed mdctl from unstable
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 11 May 2005 23:30:26 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed May 11 16:30:26 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from tornado.dat.etsit.upm.es (dat.etsit.upm.es) [138.100.17.73] 
by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DW0en-0007cw-00; Wed, 11 May 2005 16:30:26 -0700
Received: (qmail 8338 invoked by uid 1013); 11 May 2005 23:30:24 -
Date: Thu, 12 May 2005 01:30:24 +0200
From: Javier =?iso-8859-1?Q?Fern=E1ndez-Sanguino_Pe=F1a?= [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: mdctl: Dummy package still needed?
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: mdctl
Version: 0.7.2-1

The 'mdctl' package is present in sarge/sid and is also present (with the
exact same version) in woody. However, this is a dummy transition-only
package (for potato?). Are there any reasons for this package to still
exist in the distribution? If not, please ask for its removal.

Regards

Javier

---
Received: (at 308702-done) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Jun 2005 21:39:21 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jun 13 14:39:21 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DhweP-0002KZ-00; Mon, 13 Jun 2005 14:39:21 -0700
Received: from jeroen by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DhwVr-00012P-00; Mon, 13 Jun 2005 17:30:31 -0400
From: Debian Archive Maintenance [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: melanie $Revision: 1.43 $
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Subject: Removed mdctl from unstable
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: Jeroen van Wolffelaar [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 17:30:31 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no 
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

We believe that the request you reported is now fixed; the following
package(s) have been removed from unstable:

 mdctl |0.7.2-1 | source, all

Reason: RoM; obsolete transition package

Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag
database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug.
The package(s) will be physically removed automatically when no suite
references them (and in the case of source, when no binary references
it).  Please also remember that the changes have been done on the
master archive (ftp-master.debian.org) and will not propagate to any
mirrors (ftp.debian.org included) until the next cron.daily run at the
earliest.

Packages are never removed from testing by hand.  Testing tracks
unstable and will automatically remove packages which were removed
from unstable when removing them from testing causes no dependency
problems.

Bugs which have been reported against this package are not automatically
removed from the Bug Tracking System.  Please check all open bugs and
close them or re-assign them to another package if the removed package
was superseded by another one.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to the just-closed bug (or by
replying to this mail if there is no bug closed).

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Jeroen van Wolffelaar (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#313475: gksu: FTBFS due to error in build-depends

2005-06-13 Thread Christian T. Steigies
Package: gksu
Version: 1.2.6-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS

Automatic build of gksu_1.2.6-1 on aahz by sbuild/m68k 33
[...]
** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
Build-Depends: cdbs, debhelper (= 4.1.0), libgtk2.0-dev (= 2.2.0), 
libgksu1.2-dev, libgksuui1.0-dev, gettext, autotools-dev, gnome-pkg-tools
[...]
checking pkg-config is at least version 0.9.0... yes
checking for GKSU_CFLAGS... 
checking for GKSU_LIBS... 
configure: error: Package requirements (libgksu1.2 = 1.3.0, libgksuui1.0 = 
1.0,
gtk+-2.0 = 2.4.0) were not met.
Consider adjusting the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable if you
installed software in a non-standard prefix.

Alternatively you may set the GKSU_CFLAGS and GKSU_LIBS environment variables
to avoid the need to call pkg-config.  See the pkg-config man page for
more details.
make: *** [config.status] Error 1

I suppose at least the build-depends for libgtk2.0-dev has to be adjusted.

The package fails to build on all arches, see:

http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?arch=pkg=gksuvers=1.2.6-1

Christian


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processed: tagging 313475

2005-06-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
 tags 313475 sid
Bug#313475: gksu: FTBFS due to error in build-depends
There were no tags set.
Tags added: sid


End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#313477: libgtop2: ftbfs [sparc] siglist.c:54: error: `SIGSTKFLT' undeclared here

2005-06-13 Thread Blars Blarson
Package: libgtop2
Version: 2.10.1-2
Severity: serious
Tags: sid
Justification: fails to build from source

libgtop2 failed to build on a sparc buildd, duplicated on my sparc pbuilder:

/bin/sh ../../libtool --mode=compile cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../.. 
-D_IN_LIBGTOP -D_GNU_SOURCE -I../.. -I../.. -I../../sysdeps/linux 
-I../../include -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/lib/glib-2.0/include   
-Winline-Wall   -std=gnu89  -Wchar-subscripts 
-Wmissing-declarations -Wmissing-prototypes   -Wnested-externs -Wpointer-arith  
  -Wcast-align -Wsign-compare -fno-strict-aliasing-g -Wall -O2  
-DGTOPLOCALEDIR=\/usr/share/locale\ -DLIBGTOP_VERSION=\2.10.1\ 
-DLIBGTOP_SERVER_VERSION=\5\ -DLIBGTOP_VERSION_CODE=2010001 
-DLIBGTOP_SERVER=\/usr/bin/libgtop_server2\-Winline-Wall   
-std=gnu89  -Wchar-subscripts -Wmissing-declarations -Wmissing-prototypes   
-Wnested-externs -Wpointer-arith-Wcast-align -Wsign-compare 
-fno-strict-aliasing-g -Wall -O2 -c procargs.c
 cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../.. -D_IN_LIBGTOP -D_GNU_SOURCE -I../.. -I../.. 
-I../../sysdeps/linux -I../../include -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 
-I/usr/lib/glib-2.0/include -Winline -Wall -std=gnu89 -Wchar-subscripts 
-Wmissing-declarations -Wmissing-prototypes -Wnested-externs -Wpointer-arith 
-Wcast-align -Wsign-compare -fno-strict-aliasing -g -Wall -O2 
-DGTOPLOCALEDIR=\/usr/share/locale\ -DLIBGTOP_VERSION=\2.10.1\ 
-DLIBGTOP_SERVER_VERSION=\5\ -DLIBGTOP_VERSION_CODE=2010001 
-DLIBGTOP_SERVER=\/usr/bin/libgtop_server2\ -Winline -Wall -std=gnu89 
-Wchar-subscripts -Wmissing-declarations -Wmissing-prototypes -Wnested-externs 
-Wpointer-arith -Wcast-align -Wsign-compare -fno-strict-aliasing -g -Wall -O2 
-c procargs.c  -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/procargs.o
 cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../.. -D_IN_LIBGTOP -D_GNU_SOURCE -I../.. -I../.. 
-I../../sysdeps/linux -I../../include -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 
-I/usr/lib/glib-2.0/include -Winline -Wall -std=gnu89 -Wchar-subscripts 
-Wmissing-declarations -Wmissing-prototypes -Wnested-externs -Wpointer-arith 
-Wcast-align -Wsign-compare -fno-strict-aliasing -g -Wall -O2 
-DGTOPLOCALEDIR=\/usr/share/locale\ -DLIBGTOP_VERSION=\2.10.1\ 
-DLIBGTOP_SERVER_VERSION=\5\ -DLIBGTOP_VERSION_CODE=2010001 
-DLIBGTOP_SERVER=\/usr/bin/libgtop_server2\ -Winline -Wall -std=gnu89 
-Wchar-subscripts -Wmissing-declarations -Wmissing-prototypes -Wnested-externs 
-Wpointer-arith -Wcast-align -Wsign-compare -fno-strict-aliasing -g -Wall -O2 
-c procargs.c -o procargs.o /dev/null 21
/bin/sh ../../libtool --mode=compile cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../.. 
-D_IN_LIBGTOP -D_GNU_SOURCE -I../.. -I../.. -I../../sysdeps/linux 
-I../../include -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/lib/glib-2.0/include   
-Winline-Wall   -std=gnu89  -Wchar-subscripts 
-Wmissing-declarations -Wmissing-prototypes   -Wnested-externs -Wpointer-arith  
  -Wcast-align -Wsign-compare -fno-strict-aliasing-g -Wall -O2  
-DGTOPLOCALEDIR=\/usr/share/locale\ -DLIBGTOP_VERSION=\2.10.1\ 
-DLIBGTOP_SERVER_VERSION=\5\ -DLIBGTOP_VERSION_CODE=2010001 
-DLIBGTOP_SERVER=\/usr/bin/libgtop_server2\-Winline-Wall   
-std=gnu89  -Wchar-subscripts -Wmissing-declarations -Wmissing-prototypes   
-Wnested-externs -Wpointer-arith-Wcast-align -Wsign-compare 
-fno-strict-aliasing-g -Wall -O2 -c procmap.c
 cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../.. -D_IN_LIBGTOP -D_GNU_SOURCE -I../.. -I../.. 
-I../../sysdeps/linux -I../../include -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 
-I/usr/lib/glib-2.0/include -Winline -Wall -std=gnu89 -Wchar-subscripts 
-Wmissing-declarations -Wmissing-prototypes -Wnested-externs -Wpointer-arith 
-Wcast-align -Wsign-compare -fno-strict-aliasing -g -Wall -O2 
-DGTOPLOCALEDIR=\/usr/share/locale\ -DLIBGTOP_VERSION=\2.10.1\ 
-DLIBGTOP_SERVER_VERSION=\5\ -DLIBGTOP_VERSION_CODE=2010001 
-DLIBGTOP_SERVER=\/usr/bin/libgtop_server2\ -Winline -Wall -std=gnu89 
-Wchar-subscripts -Wmissing-declarations -Wmissing-prototypes -Wnested-externs 
-Wpointer-arith -Wcast-align -Wsign-compare -fno-strict-aliasing -g -Wall -O2 
-c procmap.c  -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/procmap.o
procmap.c: In function `glibtop_get_proc_map_s':
procmap.c:73: warning: cast increases required alignment of target type
procmap.c:136: warning: cast increases required alignment of target type
 cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../.. -D_IN_LIBGTOP -D_GNU_SOURCE -I../.. -I../.. 
-I../../sysdeps/linux -I../../include -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 
-I/usr/lib/glib-2.0/include -Winline -Wall -std=gnu89 -Wchar-subscripts 
-Wmissing-declarations -Wmissing-prototypes -Wnested-externs -Wpointer-arith 
-Wcast-align -Wsign-compare -fno-strict-aliasing -g -Wall -O2 
-DGTOPLOCALEDIR=\/usr/share/locale\ -DLIBGTOP_VERSION=\2.10.1\ 
-DLIBGTOP_SERVER_VERSION=\5\ -DLIBGTOP_VERSION_CODE=2010001 
-DLIBGTOP_SERVER=\/usr/bin/libgtop_server2\ -Winline -Wall -std=gnu89 
-Wchar-subscripts -Wmissing-declarations -Wmissing-prototypes -Wnested-externs 
-Wpointer-arith -Wcast-align 

Processed: Bug#313435: proftpd: FTBFS

2005-06-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 clone 313435 -1
Bug#313435: proftpd: FTBFS
Bug 313435 cloned as bug 313481.

 retitle 313435 postgresql-dev: uninstallable package
Bug#313435: proftpd: FTBFS
Changed Bug title.

 reassign 313435 postgresql-dev
Bug#313435: postgresql-dev: uninstallable package
Bug reassigned from package `proftpd' to `postgresql-dev'.

 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#313219: gedit: Full backtrace

2005-06-13 Thread Barrie Millar
Package: gedit
Version: 2.10.3-1
Followup-For: Bug #313219


I'm afraid not. More information was provided, but it appears mostly
stripped, despite my attempts to rebuild a non-stripped version which
seemed to go perfectly.

The backtrace information is displayed below

Regards,

Barrie

 Backtrace information 

GNU gdb 6.3-debian
Copyright 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you are
welcome to change it and/or distribute copies of it under certain
conditions.
Type show copying to see the conditions.
There is absolutely no warranty for GDB.  Type show warranty for details.
This GDB was configured as i386-linux...Using host libthread_db library
/lib/
libthread_db.so.1.

(gdb) set pagination 0
(gdb) run ./gedit
Starting program: /tmp/gedit/gedit-2.10.3/debian/tmp/usr/bin/gedit ./gedit
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread 16384 (LWP 18201)]

Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
[Switching to Thread 16384 (LWP 18201)]
0x in ?? ()
(gdb) bt full
#0  0x in ?? ()
No symbol table info available.
#1  0x0014 in ?? ()
No symbol table info available.
#2  0x40f104d0 in ?? () from /usr/lib/gnome-vfs-2.0/modules/libfile.so
No symbol table info available.
#3  0x40f0b660 in ?? () from /usr/lib/gnome-vfs-2.0/modules/libfile.so
No symbol table info available.
#4  0x0014 in ?? ()
No symbol table info available.
#5  0x in ?? ()
No symbol table info available.
#6  0x in ?? ()
No symbol table info available.
#7  0x in ?? ()
No symbol table info available.
#8  0x in ?? ()
No symbol table info available.
#9  0x0002 in ?? ()
No symbol table info available.
#10 0x40017028 in ?? ()
No symbol table info available.
#11 0x0007 in ?? ()
No symbol table info available.
#12 0x0001 in ?? ()
No symbol table info available.
#13 0x in ?? ()
No symbol table info available.
#14 0x0001 in ?? ()
No symbol table info available.
#15 0x in ?? ()
No symbol table info available.
#16 0xb6a4 in ?? ()
No symbol table info available.
#17 0xb6c4 in ?? ()
No symbol table info available.
#18 0x40017028 in ?? ()
No symbol table info available.
#19 0x0007 in ?? ()
No symbol table info available.
#20 0x0001 in ?? ()
No symbol table info available.
#21 0x in ?? ()
No symbol table info available.
#22 0x03e788e5 in ?? ()
No symbol table info available.
#23 0x4018e790 in ?? ()
No symbol table info available.
#24 0x4020c27e in ?? () from /usr/lib/libgnomevfs-2.so.0
No symbol table info available.
#25 0x4025877c in MAX_AVAILABLE_THREADS () from /usr/lib/libgnomevfs-2.so.0
No symbol table info available.
#26 0x in ?? ()
No symbol table info available.
#27 0x40260864 in __JCR_LIST__ () from /usr/lib/libgnomevfs-2.so.0
No symbol table info available.
#28 0x0823a6b8 in ?? ()
No symbol table info available.
#29 0x402056b0 in ?? () from /usr/lib/libgnomevfs-2.so.0
No symbol table info available.
#30 0x4018e790 in ?? ()
No symbol table info available.
#31 0x40016ca0 in ?? () from /lib/ld-linux.so.2
No symbol table info available.
#32 0x in ?? ()
No symbol table info available.
#33 0x4018e790 in ?? ()
No symbol table info available.
#34 0xb700 in ?? ()
No symbol table info available.
#35 0x4000baa3 in _dl_map_object_deps () from /lib/ld-linux.so.2
No symbol table info available.
#36 0x4022292c in gnome_vfs_open_uri_cancellable (handle=0xb7a4,
uri=0x81293b8, open_mode=GNOME_VFS_OPEN_READ, context=0x0) at
gnome-vfs-cancellable-ops.c:57
method_handle = (GnomeVFSMethodHandle *) 0x
result = 75
#37 0x4023cc13 in gnome_vfs_open_uri (handle=0x4b, uri=0x4b, open_mode=75)
at gnome-vfs-ops.c:81
No locals.
#38 0x4023cb8e in gnome_vfs_open (handle=0xb7a4, text_uri=0x4b Address
0x4b out of bounds, open_mode=75) at gnome-vfs-ops.c:58
uri = (GnomeVFSURI *) 0x81293b8
result = 3221223332
#39 0x40245a23 in gnome_vfs_read_entire_file (uri=0x4b Address 0x4b out of
bounds, file_size=0xb7e4, file_contents=0xb7e8) at
gnome-vfs-utils.c:1058
result = 136563344
handle = (GnomeVFSHandle *) 0x4000bcd0
buffer = 0x402078d0 tj
total_bytes_read = 577898870562882250
bytes_read = 581688964453236736
#40 0x08069144 in load_local (doc=0x823c708) at gedit-document.c:1196
error = (GError *) 0x0
info = (GnomeVFSFileInfo *) 0x8129308
res = GNOME_VFS_OK
file_size = 0
file_contents = (gchar *) 0x0
#41 0x40866cdc in g_main_context_wakeup () from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
No symbol table info available.
#42 0x408645c2 in g_main_depth () from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
No symbol table info available.
#43 0x40865638 in g_main_context_dispatch () from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
No symbol table info available.
#44 0x40865970 in g_main_context_dispatch () from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
No symbol table info available.
#45 0x40865f13 in g_main_loop_run () 

Bug#313477: marked as done (libgtop2: ftbfs [sparc] siglist.c:54: error: `SIGSTKFLT' undeclared here)

2005-06-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 13 Jun 2005 19:17:57 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#313477: fixed in libgtop2 2.10.2-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Jun 2005 22:08:21 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jun 13 15:08:21 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from blars.org (renig.nat.blars.org) [64.81.35.59] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Dhx6T-00034q-00; Mon, 13 Jun 2005 15:08:21 -0700
Received: from renig.nat.blars.org (plergb.nat.blars.org [172.16.1.1])
by renig.nat.blars.org (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian-7.1) with ESMTP id 
j5DM8JCN025488
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO);
Mon, 13 Jun 2005 15:08:19 -0700
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by renig.nat.blars.org (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian-7.1) id j5DM8JF7025486;
Mon, 13 Jun 2005 15:08:19 -0700
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Blars Blarson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: libgtop2: ftbfs [sparc] siglist.c:54: error: `SIGSTKFLT' undeclared 
here
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.50
Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 15:08:18 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: libgtop2
Version: 2.10.1-2
Severity: serious
Tags: sid
Justification: fails to build from source

libgtop2 failed to build on a sparc buildd, duplicated on my sparc pbuilder:

/bin/sh ../../libtool --mode=compile cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../.. 
-D_IN_LIBGTOP -D_GNU_SOURCE -I../.. -I../.. -I../../sysdeps/linux 
-I../../include -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/lib/glib-2.0/include   
-Winline-Wall   -std=gnu89  -Wchar-subscripts 
-Wmissing-declarations -Wmissing-prototypes   -Wnested-externs -Wpointer-arith  
  -Wcast-align -Wsign-compare -fno-strict-aliasing-g -Wall -O2  
-DGTOPLOCALEDIR=\/usr/share/locale\ -DLIBGTOP_VERSION=\2.10.1\ 
-DLIBGTOP_SERVER_VERSION=\5\ -DLIBGTOP_VERSION_CODE=2010001 
-DLIBGTOP_SERVER=\/usr/bin/libgtop_server2\-Winline-Wall   
-std=gnu89  -Wchar-subscripts -Wmissing-declarations -Wmissing-prototypes   
-Wnested-externs -Wpointer-arith-Wcast-align -Wsign-compare 
-fno-strict-aliasing-g -Wall -O2 -c procargs.c
 cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../.. -D_IN_LIBGTOP -D_GNU_SOURCE -I../.. -I../.. 
-I../../sysdeps/linux -I../../include -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 
-I/usr/lib/glib-2.0/include -Winline -Wall -std=gnu89 -Wchar-subscripts 
-Wmissing-declarations -Wmissing-prototypes -Wnested-externs -Wpointer-arith 
-Wcast-align -Wsign-compare -fno-strict-aliasing -g -Wall -O2 
-DGTOPLOCALEDIR=\/usr/share/locale\ -DLIBGTOP_VERSION=\2.10.1\ 
-DLIBGTOP_SERVER_VERSION=\5\ -DLIBGTOP_VERSION_CODE=2010001 
-DLIBGTOP_SERVER=\/usr/bin/libgtop_server2\ -Winline -Wall -std=gnu89 
-Wchar-subscripts -Wmissing-declarations -Wmissing-prototypes -Wnested-externs 
-Wpointer-arith -Wcast-align -Wsign-compare -fno-strict-aliasing -g -Wall -O2 
-c procargs.c  -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/procargs.o
 cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../.. -D_IN_LIBGTOP -D_GNU_SOURCE -I../.. -I../.. 
-I../../sysdeps/linux -I../../include -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 
-I/usr/lib/glib-2.0/include -Winline -Wall -std=gnu89 -Wchar-subscripts 
-Wmissing-declarations -Wmissing-prototypes -Wnested-externs -Wpointer-arith 
-Wcast-align -Wsign-compare -fno-strict-aliasing -g -Wall -O2 
-DGTOPLOCALEDIR=\/usr/share/locale\ -DLIBGTOP_VERSION=\2.10.1\ 
-DLIBGTOP_SERVER_VERSION=\5\ -DLIBGTOP_VERSION_CODE=2010001 
-DLIBGTOP_SERVER=\/usr/bin/libgtop_server2\ -Winline -Wall -std=gnu89 
-Wchar-subscripts -Wmissing-declarations -Wmissing-prototypes -Wnested-externs 
-Wpointer-arith -Wcast-align -Wsign-compare -fno-strict-aliasing -g -Wall -O2 
-c procargs.c -o procargs.o /dev/null 21
/bin/sh ../../libtool --mode=compile cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../.. 
-D_IN_LIBGTOP -D_GNU_SOURCE -I../.. -I../.. -I../../sysdeps/linux 
-I../../include -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/lib/glib-2.0/include   
-Winline-Wall   -std=gnu89  -Wchar-subscripts 
-Wmissing-declarations -Wmissing-prototypes   -Wnested-externs -Wpointer-arith  
  -Wcast-align -Wsign-compare -fno-strict-aliasing-g -Wall -O2  

Bug#313435: marked as done (postgresql-dev: uninstallable package)

2005-06-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 13 Jun 2005 16:26:41 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line postgresql-dev: uninstallable package
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Jun 2005 17:01:58 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jun 13 10:01:58 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from atlrel6.hp.com [156.153.255.205] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DhsJy-0005zO-00; Mon, 13 Jun 2005 10:01:58 -0700
Received: from smtp1.fc.hp.com (smtp.fc.hp.com [15.11.136.119])
by atlrel6.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8F8B16A78
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 13 Jun 2005 13:01:57 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ldl.fc.hp.com (ldl.fc.hp.com [15.11.146.30])
by smtp1.fc.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 160E63859E; Mon, 13 Jun 2005 11:01:57 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by ldl.fc.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3D3A1341DA;
Mon, 13 Jun 2005 11:01:56 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from ldl.fc.hp.com ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (ldl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP
id 12498-01; Mon, 13 Jun 2005 11:01:55 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from krebs (krebs.dannf [10.8.0.7])
by ldl.fc.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B13231340D4;
Mon, 13 Jun 2005 11:01:55 -0600 (MDT)
Received: by krebs (Postfix, from userid 20800)
id 91A4F3B62C2; Mon, 13 Jun 2005 11:04:00 -0600 (MDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: dann frazier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: proftpd: FTBFS
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.12
Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 11:04:00 -0600
X-Debbugs-Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at ldl.fc.hp.com
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: proftpd
Version: 1.2.10-16
Severity: serious
Justification: no longer builds from source

This version of proftpd fails to autobuild on all architectures.  Here's one of
the failed build logs:
  
http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?pkg=proftpdver=1.2.10-16arch=ia64stamp=1118668682file=logas=raw

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: ia64
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.11-1-mckinley
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)

Versions of packages proftpd depends on:
ii  adduser 3.63 Add and remove users and groups
ii  debconf 1.4.51   Debian configuration management sy
ii  libc6.1 2.3.2.ds1-22 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libcap1 1:1.10-14support for getting/setting POSIX.
ii  libpam0g0.76-22  Pluggable Authentication Modules l
ii  libssl0.9.7 0.9.7g-1 SSL shared libraries
ii  libwrap07.6.dbs-8Wietse Venema's TCP wrappers libra
ii  netbase 4.21 Basic TCP/IP networking system
pn  proftpd-common   Not found.
ii  ucf 1.18 Update Configuration File: preserv

---
Received: (at 313435-done) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Jun 2005 23:26:42 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jun 13 16:26:42 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from dsl093-039-086.pdx1.dsl.speakeasy.net (mauritius.dodds.net) 
[66.93.39.86] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DhyKI-0005vO-00; Mon, 13 Jun 2005 16:26:42 -0700
Received: by mauritius.dodds.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id A4140A3247; Mon, 13 Jun 2005 16:26:41 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 16:26:41 -0700
From: Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: postgresql-dev: uninstallable package
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=Q68bSM7Ycu6FN28Q
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: 

Bug#306375: marked as done (gnome-python/experimental/m68k: FTBFS: insufficient build-dependency on gconf)

2005-06-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 13 Jun 2005 20:02:06 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#306375: fixed in gnome-python 2.10.0-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Apr 2005 06:41:01 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Apr 25 23:41:01 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from apate.telenet-ops.be [195.130.132.57] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DQJkj-vk-00; Mon, 25 Apr 2005 23:41:01 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by apate.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with SMTP id C54A7380FD
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 26 Apr 2005 08:40:59 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from western.grep.be (dD5E0678D.access.telenet.be [213.224.103.141])
by apate.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADEC238048
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 26 Apr 2005 08:40:59 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [2001:838:37f:20:20d:93ff:fec0:b54a] (helo=country.grep.be)
by western.grep.be with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1DQJkh-0004NZ-DT
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]
message size 2038; Tue, 26 Apr 2005 08:40:59 +0200
Received: from wouter by country.grep.be with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1DQJjj-0001S9-AJ
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 26 Apr 2005 08:39:59 +0200
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2005 08:39:59 +0200
From: Wouter Verhelst [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: gnome-python/experimental/m68k: FTBFS: insufficient build-dependency 
on gconf
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Speed: Gates'' Law: Every 18 months, the speed of software halves.
Organization: none
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
Sender: Wouter Verhelst,,, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: gnome-python
Version: 2.10.0-1
Severity: serious

Hi,

There was an error trying to autobuild your package. From the build log:

Automatic build of gnome-python_2.10.0-1 on quickstep by sbuild/m68k 1.170.5
Build started at 20050425-2025
**
[...]
Build-Depends: debhelper (= 4.2.28), dpatch, gnome-pkg-tools, python2.3-dev, 
python-gtk2-dev (= 2.4), python2.3-pyorbit (= 2.0.1), libgconf2-dev (= 2.0), 
libgtk2.0-dev (= 2.4), libgnome2-dev (= 2.8), libgnomeui-dev (= 2.8), 
libgnomecanvas2-dev (= 2.0), libgnomevfs2-dev (= 2.0), libbonobo2-dev (= 
2.6), libbonoboui2-dev (= 2.0), librsvg2-dev (= 2.0), libgnome-desktop-dev 
(= 2.0), python (= 2.3)
[...]
checking GNOMECANVAS_LIBS... -Wl,--export-dynamic -lgnomecanvas-2 -lart_lgpl_2 
-lpangoft2-1.0 -lgtk-x11-2.0 -lgdk-x11-2.0 -latk-1.0 -lgdk_pixbuf-2.0 -lm 
-lpangoxft-1.0 -lpangox-1.0 -lpango-1.0 -lgobject-2.0 -lgmodule-2.0 -ldl 
-lglib-2.0  
checking for gnome-vfs-2.0 = 2.9.0 pyorbit-2 = 
2.0.1... checking for gconf-2.0 = 2.9.0... configure: error: gconf-2.0 is 
required.
make: *** [build-2.3/config.status] Error 1

It would seem that you need to modify your build-dependency on
libgconf2-dev to specify at least that version.
-- 
The amount of time between slipping on the peel and landing on the
pavement is precisely one bananosecond

---
Received: (at 306375-close) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Jun 2005 00:08:24 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jun 13 17:08:24 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Dhyye-GP-00; Mon, 13 Jun 2005 17:08:24 -0700
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DhysY-0005AF-00; Mon, 13 Jun 2005 20:02:06 -0400
From: Jordi Mallach [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#306375: fixed in gnome-python 2.10.0-2
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 20:02:06 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 

Bug#313218: gtodo: Agreed

2005-06-13 Thread Barrie Millar
Package: gtodo
Version: 0.14-4
Followup-For: Bug #313218


No problem, I agree with what you're saying. I wish I could of avoided
upgrading to 2.10 too, but unfortunately the core must of been upgraded
during the update of another package. I had 2.8 installed previously and had no
problems like you, so we can practically guarantee Gnome, or Gtodo-Gnome
2.10 compatibility is to blame. 

I've been having problems with other Gnome applications too, and it appears
thus far that the Gnome VFS packages are the cause of these problems. Since
this package depends on libgnomevfs2-0, that seems the most likely at
present.

Regards, 

Barrie

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.0
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.4.27-bm041127-k7
Locale: LANG=en_GB, LC_CTYPE=en_GB (charmap=ISO-8859-1)

Versions of packages gtodo depends on:
ii  gconf2  2.10.0-2 GNOME configuration database syste
ii  libatk1.0-0 1.10.1-2 The ATK accessibility toolkit
ii  libbonobo2-02.8.1-2  Bonobo CORBA interfaces library
ii  libc6   2.3.2.ds1-22 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libgconf2-4 2.10.0-2 GNOME configuration database syste
ii  libglib2.0-02.6.5-1  The GLib library of C routines
ii  libgnomevfs2-0  2.10.1-4 The GNOME virtual file-system libr
ii  libgtk2.0-0 2.6.7-2  The GTK+ graphical user interface 
ii  liborbit2   1:2.12.2-1   libraries for ORBit2 - a CORBA ORB
ii  libpango1.0-0   1.8.1-1  Layout and rendering of internatio
ii  libxml2 2.6.16-7 GNOME XML library
ii  zlib1g  1:1.2.2-4compression library - runtime

-- no debconf information


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#307683: needs to be properly fixed, FTBFS is RC

2005-06-13 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel

On 13 June 2005 at 11:59, Chris Lawrence wrote:
| reassign 307683 r-cran-maps, r-cran-mapdata, r-base-dev
| thanks
| 
| On 6/13/05, Santiago Vila [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| (Proposed solution elided; looks good to me, given Santiago's changes
| to debian/control.)
|  mawk -f convert.awk  world.line  world2.line
|  /bin/sh: mawk: command not found
|  
|  I would call this an actual build failure.
| 
| But not RC for sarge, since that architecture (like amd64) wasn't
| supported for sarge...
| 
| Anyway, I've reassigned this bug to all 3 packages affected;
| presumably, we can close it when a new r-base-dev is uploaded, then we

With a little luck maybe later tonight for the first upload of the first beta
of R 2.1.1.

| can get on with our lives.

Wouldn't that be nice :)

Dirk

-- 
Statistics: The (futile) attempt to offer certainty about uncertainty.
 -- Roger Koenker, 'Dictionary of Received Ideas of Statistics'


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#307683: needs to be properly fixed, FTBFS is RC

2005-06-13 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel

On 13 June 2005 at 18:43, Santiago Vila wrote:
| On Mon, 30 May 2005, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| 
|  On 30 May 2005 at 14:20, Steve Langasek wrote:
|  | It would probably be better if r-base-dev simply specified awk,
|  | which IIRC is virtually-essential by virtue of being a
|  | dependency of an essential package.
|  
|  I like that much better. So now the changelog stands at
|  
|* debian/rules: configure call with AWK=/usr/bin/awk
| 
| This is fine.
| 
|* debian/control: Build-Depends on mawk | gawk | awk
|* debian/control: Depends for r-base-core on 'mawk | gawk | awk'
| 
| But this is not. Please don't do that. As it has been already pointed out,
| awk is essential, so any dependency or build-dependency on
| 'mawk | gawk | awk' is completely gratuitous.

a) It actually is only required, and not essential:

[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ apt-cache show mawk | head -2
Package: mawk
Priority: required
[...]

b) I actually made exactly the same argument, but it was pointed out to me
that essential != build-essential. So I gave up arguing the issue and made
this change.

Dirk

-- 
Statistics: The (futile) attempt to offer certainty about uncertainty.
 -- Roger Koenker, 'Dictionary of Received Ideas of Statistics'


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#307683: needs to be properly fixed, FTBFS is RC

2005-06-13 Thread Steve Langasek
On Mon, Jun 13, 2005 at 08:04:37PM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:

 On 13 June 2005 at 18:43, Santiago Vila wrote:
 | On Mon, 30 May 2005, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:

 |  On 30 May 2005 at 14:20, Steve Langasek wrote:
 |  | It would probably be better if r-base-dev simply specified awk,
 |  | which IIRC is virtually-essential by virtue of being a
 |  | dependency of an essential package.

 |  I like that much better. So now the changelog stands at

 |* debian/rules: configure call with AWK=/usr/bin/awk

 | This is fine.

 |* debian/control: Build-Depends on mawk | gawk | awk
 |* debian/control: Depends for r-base-core on 'mawk | gawk | awk'

 | But this is not. Please don't do that. As it has been already pointed out,
 | awk is essential, so any dependency or build-dependency on
 | 'mawk | gawk | awk' is completely gratuitous.

 a) It actually is only required, and not essential:

   [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ apt-cache show mawk | head -2
   Package: mawk
   Priority: required
   [...]

base-files Depends on awk, which makes awk virtually essential (it's
necessary for it to be virtually essential because awk is after all a
virtual package, provided by multiple real packages).  Santiago is right,
there really is no need to Build-Depend on awk or any of its variants here.

-- 
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#307683: needs to be properly fixed, FTBFS is RC

2005-06-13 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel

On 13 June 2005 at 18:23, Steve Langasek wrote:
| On Mon, Jun 13, 2005 at 08:04:37PM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| 
|  On 13 June 2005 at 18:43, Santiago Vila wrote:
|  | On Mon, 30 May 2005, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| 
|  |  On 30 May 2005 at 14:20, Steve Langasek wrote:
|  |  | It would probably be better if r-base-dev simply specified awk,
|  |  | which IIRC is virtually-essential by virtue of being a
|  |  | dependency of an essential package.
| 
|  |  I like that much better. So now the changelog stands at
| 
|  |* debian/rules: configure call with AWK=/usr/bin/awk
| 
|  | This is fine.
| 
|  |* debian/control: Build-Depends on mawk | gawk | awk
|  |* debian/control: Depends for r-base-core on 'mawk | gawk | awk'
| 
|  | But this is not. Please don't do that. As it has been already pointed out,
|  | awk is essential, so any dependency or build-dependency on
|  | 'mawk | gawk | awk' is completely gratuitous.
| 
|  a) It actually is only required, and not essential:
| 
|  [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ apt-cache show mawk | head -2
|  Package: mawk
|  Priority: required
|  [...]
| 
| base-files Depends on awk, which makes awk virtually essential (it's
| necessary for it to be virtually essential because awk is after all a
| virtual package, provided by multiple real packages).  Santiago is right,
| there really is no need to Build-Depend on awk or any of its variants here.

Oh well so my inkling was right. Whatever. [ And the 'virtually essential'
was not 'practically good enough', I suppose, as it did break on amd64 ... ]

But the fix is now in, and won't do any harm, so how about if we stop beating
this now-deceased horse and get on with other problems?  Just a thought ...

Dirk, while r-base_2.1.0.beta.20050613 is building

-- 
Statistics: The (futile) attempt to offer certainty about uncertainty.
 -- Roger Koenker, 'Dictionary of Received Ideas of Statistics'


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#307683: needs to be properly fixed, FTBFS is RC

2005-06-13 Thread Steve Langasek
On Mon, Jun 13, 2005 at 08:36:47PM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
 Oh well so my inkling was right. Whatever. [ And the 'virtually essential'
 was not 'practically good enough', I suppose, as it did break on amd64 ... ]

No, it broke because *awk* is virtually essential -- *NOT* mawk, or any
specific implementation.

-- 
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Processed: Re: Bug#307683: needs to be properly fixed, FTBFS is RC

2005-06-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 reassign 307683 r-cran-maps, r-cran-mapdata
Bug#307683: r-cran-maps: FTBFS: missing build dependency.
Bug reassigned from package `r-cran-maps, r-cran-mapdata, r-base-dev' to 
`r-cran-maps, r-cran-mapdata'.

 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#307683: needs to be properly fixed, FTBFS is RC

2005-06-13 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel

reassign 307683 r-cran-maps, r-cran-mapdata
thanks

On 13 June 2005 at 18:41, Steve Langasek wrote:
| On Mon, Jun 13, 2005 at 08:36:47PM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
|  Oh well so my inkling was right. Whatever. [ And the 'virtually essential'
|  was not 'practically good enough', I suppose, as it did break on amd64 ... ]
| 
| No, it broke because *awk* is virtually essential -- *NOT* mawk, or any
| specific implementation.

Steve wins, Dirk looses as Lintian tells me:

  E: r-base-core: needlessly-depends-on-awk depends
  N:
  N:   The package seems to declare a relation on awk. awk is a virtual
  N:   package, but it is special since it's de facto essential. If you don't
  N:   need to depend on a specific version of awk (which wouldn't work
  N:   anyway, as dpkg doesn't support versioned provides), you should remove
  N:   the dependency on awk.
  N:

So I will back this out as far as the Depends goes, but keep the
Build-Depends.

I also reassign this back from r-base-dev.

Chris:  You should adjust the offending package to do the same, i.e. 

  Build-Depends: []  mawk | gawk | awk

on you should be set. All other R packages don't seem to care. 

Dirk

-- 
Statistics: The (futile) attempt to offer certainty about uncertainty.
 -- Roger Koenker, 'Dictionary of Received Ideas of Statistics'


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#307683: needs to be properly fixed, FTBFS is RC

2005-06-13 Thread Chris Lawrence
On 6/13/05, Dirk Eddelbuettel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 reassign 307683 r-cran-maps, r-cran-mapdata
 thanks
 
 On 13 June 2005 at 18:41, Steve Langasek wrote:
 | On Mon, Jun 13, 2005 at 08:36:47PM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
 |  Oh well so my inkling was right. Whatever. [ And the 'virtually essential'
 |  was not 'practically good enough', I suppose, as it did break on amd64 
 ... ]
 |
 | No, it broke because *awk* is virtually essential -- *NOT* mawk, or any
 | specific implementation.
 
 Steve wins, Dirk looses as Lintian tells me:
 
   E: r-base-core: needlessly-depends-on-awk depends
   N:
   N:   The package seems to declare a relation on awk. awk is a virtual
   N:   package, but it is special since it's de facto essential. If you don't
   N:   need to depend on a specific version of awk (which wouldn't work
   N:   anyway, as dpkg doesn't support versioned provides), you should remove
   N:   the dependency on awk.
   N:
 
 So I will back this out as far as the Depends goes, but keep the
 Build-Depends.
 
 I also reassign this back from r-base-dev.
 
 Chris:  You should adjust the offending package to do the same, i.e.
 
   Build-Depends: []  mawk | gawk | awk
 
 on you should be set. All other R packages don't seem to care.

I'm not even sure the build-depends is necessary, since base-files is
Essential and depends on awk.  (Why lintian doesn't catch that too is
beyond me.)  As long as AWK=/usr/bin/awk according to R, we're good to
go.


Chris
-- 
Chris Lawrence - http://blog.lordsutch.com/



Bug#312936: Programmes linked against libacl1 segfault in libacl1 code.

2005-06-13 Thread Nathan Scott
Hi there,

On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 04:39:26PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
 On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 11:36:18PM +0100, Jonathan David Amery wrote:
  I've just upgraded my system from woody to sarge.  Among other upgrade 
  problems I noticed that programmes like cp, mv and install were 
  occasionally 
  segfaulting (and the packages that were invoking them failing to get 

Could you try running cp (or getfacl, might be easier) via gdb
and getting a gdb stack trace from one of these segfaults?  That
might give some more clues as to where the problem lies.

Since I've not seen this on any other platform, including the more
widely-used ones like i386, I'm guessing theres going to be something
about the arm platform thats triggering this - maybe an endian issue,
or a 32/64 bit sort of issue.

  libacl.so.1 = /lib/libacl.so.1 (0x40026000)
  libc.so.6 = /lib/libc.so.6 (0x40034000)
  libattr.so.1 = /lib/libattr.so.1 (0x40159000)
  /lib/ld-linux.so.2 = /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x4000)
  libgcc_s.so.1 = /lib/libgcc_s.so.1 (0x40164000)
 
  Recompiling libacl1 (itself an awkward task since the package itself 
  segfaults in the middle when it is doing something to the postinst script)

Hmm, its not doing anything special there, so I guess we're
probably just seeing the same problem again - calls to cp or mv
in the scripts segfaulting.

  and installing the recompiled version fixes the problem.

Oh, that is interesting.  Maybe this is a gcc-arm problem, i.e. it
could have something to do with the version of gcc in use on the
build machine when this was built.  So, this may in fact be a
compiler problem...?

In fact, if recompiling makes the problem go away, I think by
definition the problem cannot be in the acl/libacl1 packages,
right?  Maybe I'm overlooking something though.

 Do you know if upgrading to the 2.4 kernel version available in sarge makes
 a difference here? 

Anything specific you're looking for there Steve?  I know the ACL
kernel patches fairly well, and nothing has changed for years now
so I'd be surprised if a kernel upgrade changed anything.  Also,
the 2.4 kernels don't tend to have ACL support, although I guess
we may have patched our 2.4 kernels to include that, not sure.

cheers.

-- 
Nathan


pgp1tlXtS7ofR.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Bug#312936: Programmes linked against libacl1 segfault in libacl1 code.

2005-06-13 Thread Steve Langasek
On Tue, Jun 14, 2005 at 11:58:02AM +1000, Nathan Scott wrote:
  Do you know if upgrading to the 2.4 kernel version available in sarge makes
  a difference here? 

 Anything specific you're looking for there Steve?

Yes:

  + arm: upgrade doesn't work with 2.2, but can work with 2.4.24 or above.
(perhaps also with older versions, currently unknown)
(details: glibc vs kernel, source: kylem, tested on netwinder)
[*]

  http://release.debian.org/upgrade-kernel

AFAIK, this was the only discussion of minimum kernel versions for sarge
on ARM prior to release; it's very possible that either a glibc change or a
toolchain change has resulted in the current ARM libacl binaries being
usable only on later kernels than what was available in woody, due to
differing ABIs.  We had a hard time finding people to test this upgrade
path, because there are apparently relatively few machines that are
compatible with the ARM kernels that shipped in woody. :/

 I know the ACL kernel patches fairly well, and nothing has changed for
 years now so I'd be surprised if a kernel upgrade changed anything.

On the contrary, libacl works sanely on kernels lacking any ACL kernel
support whatsoever -- this architecture-specific failure more likely points
to a kernel ABI issue specific to ARM.

-- 
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#312936: Programmes linked against libacl1 segfault in libacl1 code.

2005-06-13 Thread Nathan Scott
On Mon, Jun 13, 2005 at 07:56:13PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
 On Tue, Jun 14, 2005 at 11:58:02AM +1000, Nathan Scott wrote:
  Anything specific you're looking for there Steve?
 
   + arm: upgrade doesn't work with 2.2, but can work with 2.4.24 or above.
 (perhaps also with older versions, currently unknown)
 (details: glibc vs kernel, source: kylem, tested on netwinder)
 [*]
 
  I know the ACL kernel patches fairly well, and nothing has changed for
  years now so I'd be surprised if a kernel upgrade changed anything.
 
 On the contrary, libacl works sanely on kernels lacking any ACL kernel
 support whatsoever -- this architecture-specific failure more likely points
 to a kernel ABI issue specific to ARM.

Hmmm, it was interesting that a libacl recompile made the problem
go away though, that seemed to me to point toward a compiler type
issue rather than a kernel/glibc issue.

cheers.

-- 
Nathan


pgpuZGg6IInbt.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Bug#307683: marked as done (r-cran-maps: FTBFS: missing build dependency.)

2005-06-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 13 Jun 2005 23:47:24 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#307683: fixed in r-base 2.1.0.beta.20050613-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 4 May 2005 17:36:29 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed May 04 10:36:29 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from adicia.telenet-ops.be [195.130.132.56] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DTNnQ-0005kZ-00; Wed, 04 May 2005 10:36:28 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by adicia.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with SMTP id AD51344262
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed,  4 May 2005 19:36:26 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from Q.roeckx.be (dD5775FD9.access.telenet.be [213.119.95.217])
by adicia.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9356044076
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed,  4 May 2005 19:36:26 +0200 (MEST)
Received: by Q.roeckx.be (Postfix, from userid 501)
id A225E26136; Wed, 04 May 2005 19:36:21 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Wed, 4 May 2005 19:36:21 +0200
From: Kurt Roeckx [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: r-cran-maps: FTBFS: missing build dependency.
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: r-cran-maps
Version: 2.0-27-1
Severity: serious

Hi,

Your package is failing to build with the following error:
gawk -f convert.awk  world.line  world2.line
/bin/sh: gawk: command not found
make[1]: *** [world2.line] Error 127


You should add a build dependency on gawk.


Kurt


---
Received: (at 307683-close) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Jun 2005 03:51:38 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jun 13 20:51:38 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Di2Sf-00057M-00; Mon, 13 Jun 2005 20:51:37 -0700
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Di2Oa-00056i-00; Mon, 13 Jun 2005 23:47:24 -0400
From: Dirk Eddelbuettel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#307683: fixed in r-base 2.1.0.beta.20050613-1
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 23:47:24 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Source: r-base
Source-Version: 2.1.0.beta.20050613-1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
r-base, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

r-base-core_2.1.0.beta.20050613-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/r/r-base/r-base-core_2.1.0.beta.20050613-1_i386.deb
r-base-dev_2.1.0.beta.20050613-1_all.deb
  to pool/main/r/r-base/r-base-dev_2.1.0.beta.20050613-1_all.deb
r-base-html_2.1.0.beta.20050613-1_all.deb
  to pool/main/r/r-base/r-base-html_2.1.0.beta.20050613-1_all.deb
r-base-latex_2.1.0.beta.20050613-1_all.deb
  to pool/main/r/r-base/r-base-latex_2.1.0.beta.20050613-1_all.deb
r-base_2.1.0.beta.20050613-1.diff.gz
  to pool/main/r/r-base/r-base_2.1.0.beta.20050613-1.diff.gz
r-base_2.1.0.beta.20050613-1.dsc
  to pool/main/r/r-base/r-base_2.1.0.beta.20050613-1.dsc
r-base_2.1.0.beta.20050613-1_all.deb
  to pool/main/r/r-base/r-base_2.1.0.beta.20050613-1_all.deb
r-base_2.1.0.beta.20050613.orig.tar.gz
  to pool/main/r/r-base/r-base_2.1.0.beta.20050613.orig.tar.gz
r-doc-html_2.1.0.beta.20050613-1_all.deb
  to pool/main/r/r-base/r-doc-html_2.1.0.beta.20050613-1_all.deb
r-doc-info_2.1.0.beta.20050613-1_all.deb
  to pool/main/r/r-base/r-doc-info_2.1.0.beta.20050613-1_all.deb
r-doc-pdf_2.1.0.beta.20050613-1_all.deb
  to pool/main/r/r-base/r-doc-pdf_2.1.0.beta.20050613-1_all.deb
r-gnome_2.1.0.beta.20050613-1_all.deb
  to pool/main/r/r-base/r-gnome_2.1.0.beta.20050613-1_all.deb
r-mathlib_2.1.0.beta.20050613-1_i386.deb
  to pool

Bug#313507: php4-pgsql: Unable to connect to PostgreSQL 7.4

2005-06-13 Thread Pierre Pronchery
Package: php4-pgsql
Version: 3:4.3.10-5
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable

Hi,

it seems that after my upgrade to postgresql-7.4, php can't connect
anymore to the SQL server locally. It looks for the UNIX socket in
/tmp/.s.PGSQL.5432 while it is actually in
/var/run/postgresql/.s.PGSQL.5432.

I don't remember having changed anything about the location of the
socket, either in PHP or Postgres configuration files. Although, it is
possible to workaround this, for instance:
# ln -sf /var/run/postgresql/.s.PGSQL.5432 /tmp/.s.PGSQL.5432

I just thought this would certainly harm only local connections, so I
set the severity to Grave in the first place, but feel free to lower
it if you think it won't affect a vast majority of users. Another
workaround then could be to allow local TCP connections and use the
loopback address (which is the default iirc).

HTH.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.4.29
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1)

Versions of packages php4-pgsql depends on:
ii  debconf [debconf-2.0]   1.4.51   Debian configuration management sy
ii  libapache-mod-php4 [phpapi- 4:4.3.10-15  server-side, HTML-embedded scripti
ii  libc6   2.3.2.ds1-22 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libpq4  8.0.3-5  PostgreSQL C client library

-- debconf information:
  php4/add_extension: true
  php4/remove_extension: true
  php4/extension_pgsql_apache: true


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#313479: python2.3-pythoncard: depends on the not available package libwxgtk2.5.3-python

2005-06-13 Thread Kenneth Pronovici
 Ken suggest to report this as a but, therewith it will not be forgotten.

:)

Thanks for filing the bug.  I'll ping Ron if a new 2.5 package doesn't
appear in the next few weeks.

KEN

-- 
Kenneth J. Pronovici [EMAIL PROTECTED]


pgpxxGeP5fttC.pgp
Description: PGP signature