Bug#316093: ncurses-base: binaries terminfo files marked as conffiles
On Tue, Jun 28, 2005 at 01:51:46PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote: However theses files are binaries files, not text files. They probably do not beong in /etc in the first place but at least they should not be marked as conffiles, since dpkg do not handle non-text conffiles in a useful way: Setting up ncurses-base (5.4-8) ... Configuration file `/etc/terminfo/r/rxvt-unicode' == File on system created by you or by a script. == File also in package provided by package maintainer. What would you like to do about it ? Your options are: Y or I : install the package maintainer's version N or O : keep your currently-installed version D : show the differences between the versions Z : background this process to examine the situation The default action is to keep your current version. *** rxvt-unicode (Y/I/N/O/D/Z) [default=N] ? D Binary files /etc/terminfo/r/rxvt-unicode and /etc/terminfo/r/rxvt-unicode.dpkg-new differ But they ARE conffiles! One of the reasons they're in /etc is so that the system administrator can modify them if desired. I'm sorry dpkg doesn't offer a way to specify a diff program usefully; infocmp would work fine. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery, LLC -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Bug#315945: seyon does not work when gnome-terminal is installed
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 315945 important Bug#315945: seyon does not work when gnome-terminal is installed Severity set to `important'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: exim4-config - fails to install if system uses no shadow
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign #316089 adduser Bug#316089: exim4-config - fails to install if system uses no shadow Bug reassigned from package `exim4-config' to `adduser'. # too bad this doesn't make this bug SEP. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#316089: exim4-config - fails to install if system uses no shadow
reassign #316089 adduser # too bad this doesn't make this bug SEP. thanks On Tue, Jun 28, 2005 at 01:31:39PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: exim4-config fails to install if the system have no /etc/shadow file. | Setting up exim4-config (4.51-1) ... | hostname: Unknown host | hostname: Unknown host | Adding system-user for exim (v4) | chage: can't open shadow password file | groupdel: group Debian-exim does not exist | dpkg: error processing exim4-config (--configure): | subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1 This is an error message which clearly happens during the adduser call in exim4-config.postinst. shadow maintainers, would you be willing to make the case of no shadow passwords in use, chage will fail easily detectable from inside adduser? Or am I better off by jumping through hoops in adduser to find out whether shadow passwords are in use? Greetings Marc -- - Marc Haber | I don't trust Computers. They | Mailadresse im Header Mannheim, Germany | lose things.Winona Ryder | Fon: *49 621 72739834 Nordisch by Nature | How to make an American Quilt | Fax: *49 621 72739835 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#315945: seyon does not work when gnome-terminal is installed
severity 315945 important thanks On Mon, Jun 27, 2005 at 01:54:32PM +0200, Simon K?gstr?m wrote: Package: seyon Version: 2.20c-16 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable seyon does not work when gnome-terminal is installed. When I try to run it, I get the following message: Option --tclass is no longer supported in this version of gnome-terminal; you might want to create a profile with the desired setting, and use the new --window-with-profile option Two --title options given for one tab without gnome-terminal, seyon starts. I did not change any configuration (just installed the two packages). This is not a grave bug, it's easy to install rxvt or xterm and configure seyon to use those. I'm actually tempted to reassign the bug to gnome-terminal instead, for willfully breaking compatibility with the older terminal programs for no obvious reason... -- Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.[EMAIL PROTECTED] You raise the blade, you make the change... You re-arrange me 'til I'm sane... signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#315444: marked as done (eval false || true exits set -e script)
Your message dated Tue, 28 Jun 2005 09:17:10 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#315444: fixed in busybox 1:1.00-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Jun 2005 23:05:17 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jun 15 16:05:17 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from smtp-out4.tiscali.nl [195.241.79.137]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Digwf-0006mu-00; Wed, 15 Jun 2005 16:05:17 -0700
Received: from [195.240.184.66] (helo=strider.fjphome.nl)
by smtp-out4.tiscali.nl with esmtp (Tiscali http://www.tiscali.nl)
id 1Digwe-0002LY-C5
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 16 Jun 2005 01:05:16 +0200
From: Frans Pop [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [debootstrap-udeb] Breaks new installations
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2005 01:05:16 +0200
User-Agent: KMail/1.7.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed;
boundary=nextPart1399542.tyP9Ym90NH;
protocol=application/pgp-signature;
micalg=pgp-sha1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
--nextPart1399542.tyP9Ym90NH
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
Package: debootstrap-udeb
Version: 0.3.1
Severity: grave
Two errors in functions breaking new installations have been confirmed
testing debootstrap udeb in sid during an emulated S/390 installation.
The following 2 changes will fix them.
=3D=3D=3D
=20
local totaldebs=3D0
=2D local leftoverdebs=3D$*
+ local leftoverdebs=3D$@
for c in $COMPONENTS; do
if [ $countdebs -ge $numdebs ]; then break; fi
=3D=3D=3D
fi
done
=2Decho 3 ${leftover# }
+echo 5 ${leftover# }
)
}
=2D--
local pkgdest=3D$TARGET/$($DLDEST pkg $SUITE $c $ARCH $m $path)
if [ ! -e $pkgdest ]; then continue; fi
=2D pkgs_to_get=3D$(download_debs $m $pkgdest $pkgs_to_get 31 1=
4)
+ pkgs_to_get=3D$(download_debs $m $pkgdest $pkgs_to_get 51 1=
4)
if [ $pkgs_to_get =3D ]; then break; fi
done 41
=3D=3D=3D
With these two changes base-installation finishes successfully, with
good progress information on VT1.
There _is_ another error from debootstrap at the very end:
The debootstrap program exited with an error (return value 1).
The logs had already been copied and the /target/debootstrap dir was gone.
I have not (yet) been able to trace this bug. At first I thought it could
be caused by the fact that I was running the script set -x, but the same
errors occurs without set -x.
The last lines in /target/var/log/bootstrap.log (with set -x) were:
+ info BASESUCCESS Base system installed successfully.
+ local name=3DBASESUCCESS
+ local fmt=3DBase system installed successfully.
+ shift
+ shift
+ [ yes ]
+ echo I: BASESUCCESS
+ echo IF: Base system installed successfully.
I will try to debug this further tomorrow.
Cheers,
=46JP
--nextPart1399542.tyP9Ym90NH
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQBCsLQ0gm/Kwh6ICoQRAgafAJ927AMeziERf8jyQQ1Vr4U524Gg9wCgzzaw
OourqyheoV5yXucHIDkKedI=
=Ty0z
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
--nextPart1399542.tyP9Ym90NH--
---
Received: (at 315444-close) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Jun 2005 13:21:52 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jun 28 06:21:52 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DnG2C-0001zU-00; Tue, 28 Jun 2005 06:21:52 -0700
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DnFxe-0003fh-00; Tue, 28 Jun 2005 09:17:10 -0400
From: Bastian Blank [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#315444: fixed in busybox 1:1.00-3
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2005 09:17:10 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0
Bug#316093: ncurses-base: binaries terminfo files marked as conffiles
On Tue, Jun 28, 2005 at 09:01:21AM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: On Tue, Jun 28, 2005 at 01:51:46PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote: However theses files are binaries files, not text files. They probably do not beong in /etc in the first place but at least they should not be marked as conffiles, since dpkg do not handle non-text conffiles in a useful way: Setting up ncurses-base (5.4-8) ... Configuration file `/etc/terminfo/r/rxvt-unicode' == File on system created by you or by a script. == File also in package provided by package maintainer. What would you like to do about it ? Your options are: Y or I : install the package maintainer's version N or O : keep your currently-installed version D : show the differences between the versions Z : background this process to examine the situation The default action is to keep your current version. *** rxvt-unicode (Y/I/N/O/D/Z) [default=N] ? D Binary files /etc/terminfo/r/rxvt-unicode and /etc/terminfo/r/rxvt-unicode.dpkg-new differ But they ARE conffiles! One of the reasons they're in /etc is so that the system administrator can modify them if desired. No, they are maybe config files, but they cannot be conffiles, since they are not text files. I'm sorry dpkg doesn't offer a way to specify a diff program usefully; infocmp would work fine. That is why you should not mark them as conffiles but handle them manually with a script that provide a way to edit and diff them. Cheers, Bill. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#316084: marked as done (dpkg - fails to install if base-passwd is not configured)
Your message dated Tue, 28 Jun 2005 09:47:16 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#316084: fixed in dpkg 1.13.10 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Jun 2005 11:10:11 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jun 28 04:10:11 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from wavehammer.waldi.eu.org [82.139.196.55] (postfix) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DnDyk-0003xS-00; Tue, 28 Jun 2005 04:10:11 -0700 Received: by wavehammer.waldi.eu.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id A763C3C026; Tue, 28 Jun 2005 13:10:06 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2005 13:10:06 +0200 From: Bastian Blank [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: dpkg - fails to install if base-passwd is not configured Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=9jxsPFA5p3P2qPhR Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: --9jxsPFA5p3P2qPhR Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Package: dpkg Version: 1.13.9 Severity: serious dpkg fails to install if base-passwd is not configured and does not declare a pre-dependency against. At this time, no /etc/passwd or /etc/group exists, as base-passwd builds them in its postinstall script. | Unpacking dpkg (from .../archives/dpkg_1.13.9_i386.deb) ... | chown: | `root:adm': invalid user |=20 | dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/dpkg_1.13.9_i386.deb (--in= stall): | subprocess pre-installation script returned error exit status 1 This violates against policy 3.5, paragraph 4: | Sometimes, a package requires another package to be installed and | configured before it can be installed. In this case, you must | specify a Pre-Depends entry for the package. Anyway, a predependency is impossible as base-passwd is not installable without a configured dpkg. | Unpacking base-passwd (from .../base-passwd_3.5.9_i386.deb) ... | dpkg not recorded as installed, cannot check for epoch support ! | dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/base-passwd_3.5.9_i386.deb= (--install): | subprocess pre-installation script returned error exit status 1 Bastian --=20 Humans do claim a great deal for that particular emotion (love). -- Spock, The Lights of Zetar, stardate 5725.6 --9jxsPFA5p3P2qPhR Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkLBMA4ACgkQnw66O/MvCNFYNACgkIqPh5kbusjVR5YJBQBnveYm EHMAoJHd8f8iKdYL9OGG1qBab9N/iZqz =93LS -END PGP SIGNATURE- --9jxsPFA5p3P2qPhR-- --- Received: (at 316084-close) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Jun 2005 13:52:28 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jun 28 06:52:28 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DnGVn-0007Vt-00; Tue, 28 Jun 2005 06:52:27 -0700 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DnGQm-0007PI-00; Tue, 28 Jun 2005 09:47:16 -0400 From: Scott James Remnant [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#316084: fixed in dpkg 1.13.10 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2005 09:47:16 -0400 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 20 Source: dpkg Source-Version: 1.13.10 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of dpkg, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: dpkg-dev_1.13.10_all.deb to pool/main/d/dpkg/dpkg-dev_1.13.10_all.deb dpkg_1.13.10.dsc to pool/main/d/dpkg/dpkg_1.13.10.dsc
Bug#313400: marked as done (dpkg: Please remove /usr/sbin/start-stop-daemon)
Your message dated Tue, 28 Jun 2005 09:47:16 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#313400: fixed in dpkg 1.13.10 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Jun 2005 13:16:38 + From aj@azure.humbug.org.au Mon Jun 13 06:16:38 2005 Return-path: aj@azure.humbug.org.au Received: from azure.humbug.org.au (azure.erisian.com.au) [66.179.181.62] (Debian-exim) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Dhonu-0004U5-00; Mon, 13 Jun 2005 06:16:38 -0700 Received: from aj by azure.erisian.com.au with local (Exim 4.50 #1 (Debian)) id 1Dhonu-00085c-2Z for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 13 Jun 2005 23:16:38 +1000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Anthony Towns aj@azure.humbug.org.au To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: dpkg: Please remove /usr/sbin/start-stop-daemon X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8 Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 23:16:38 +1000 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: dpkg Version: 1.13.0 Severity: serious Hey, dpkg is now shipping both /sbin/s-s-d and /usr/sbin/s-s-d; only /sbin/s-s-d is required. Having both breaks bootstrapping since daemons get randomly started when they're not supposed to, because only /sbin/s-s-d is diverted. Presumably this is a still-glowing scar from: * Scorched-earth reimplementation of the build process and control files with debhelper and automake. Also, * Remove /usr/sbin/start-stop-daemon. Closes: #156437. -- Adam Heath [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu, 29 Aug 2002 16:43:15 -0500 Advantage: doogie. Cheers, aj --- Received: (at 313400-close) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Jun 2005 13:52:21 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jun 28 06:52:21 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DnGVg-0007EY-00; Tue, 28 Jun 2005 06:52:21 -0700 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DnGQm-0007Os-00; Tue, 28 Jun 2005 09:47:16 -0400 From: Scott James Remnant [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#313400: fixed in dpkg 1.13.10 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2005 09:47:16 -0400 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 7 Source: dpkg Source-Version: 1.13.10 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of dpkg, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: dpkg-dev_1.13.10_all.deb to pool/main/d/dpkg/dpkg-dev_1.13.10_all.deb dpkg_1.13.10.dsc to pool/main/d/dpkg/dpkg_1.13.10.dsc dpkg_1.13.10.tar.gz to pool/main/d/dpkg/dpkg_1.13.10.tar.gz dpkg_1.13.10_i386.deb to pool/main/d/dpkg/dpkg_1.13.10_i386.deb dselect_1.13.10_i386.deb to pool/main/d/dpkg/dselect_1.13.10_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Scott James Remnant [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated dpkg package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2005 14:19:06 +0100 Source: dpkg Binary: dpkg dselect dpkg-dev Architecture: source i386 all Version: 1.13.10 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Scott James Remnant [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Scott James Remnant [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: dpkg - Package maintenance
Bug#316106: FTBFS with freetype 2.1.10
Package: mozilla Severity: serious Justification: no longer builds from source Building Mozilla on an up-to-date unstable machine results in the below build failure: g++ -o nsFreeType.o -c -DOSTYPE=\Linux2.6\ -DOSARCH=\Linux\ -I../.. -I../../../dist/include/xpcom -I../../../dist/include/string -I../../../dist/include/pref -I../../../dist/include/uconv -I../../../dist/include/unicharutil -I../../../dist/include/gfx -I../../../dist/include -I/home/joe/src/mozilla-1.7.8/build-tree/mozilla/dist/include/nspr -I/usr/include/freetype2 -I/usr/X11R6/include -fPIC -I/usr/X11R6/include -fno-rtti -fno-exceptions -Wall -Wconversion -Wpointer-arith -Wcast-align -Woverloaded-virtual -Wsynth -Wno-ctor-dtor-privacy -Wno-non-virtual-dtor -Wno-long-long -O2 -DDEBIAN -fshort-wchar -pthread -pipe -DNDEBUG -DTRIMMED -I/usr/X11R6/include -DMOZILLA_CLIENT -include ../../../mozilla-config.h -Wp,-MD,.deps/nsFreeType.pp nsFreeType.cpp In file included from nsFreeType.h:39, from nsFreeType.cpp:48: ../../../dist/include/gfx/nsIFreeType2.h:53: error: `FTC_Image_Cache' was not declared in this scope ../../../dist/include/gfx/nsIFreeType2.h:53: error: `aImageCache' was not declared in this scope ../../../dist/include/gfx/nsIFreeType2.h:53: error: variable declaration is not allowed here ../../../dist/include/gfx/nsIFreeType2.h:92: error: `FTC_Image_Cache' was not declared in this scope ../../../dist/include/gfx/nsIFreeType2.h:92: error: syntax error before `,' token ../../../dist/include/gfx/nsIFreeType2.h:104: error: type specifier omitted for parameter `FTC_Image_Cache' ../../../dist/include/gfx/nsIFreeType2.h:104: error: syntax error before `*' token In file included from nsFreeType.cpp:48: nsFreeType.h:107: error: `FTC_Image_Cache' was not declared in this scope nsFreeType.h:107: error: `FTC_Image_Desc' was not declared in this scope nsFreeType.h:107: error: syntax error before `,' token nsFreeType.h:113: error: type specifier omitted for parameter `FTC_Image_Cache' nsFreeType.h:113: error: syntax error before `*' token nsFreeType.h:145: error: `FTC_Image_Cache' was not declared in this scope nsFreeType.h:145: error: `aImageCache' was not declared in this scope nsFreeType.h:145: error: invalid data member initialization nsFreeType.h:145: error: (use `=' to initialize static data members) nsFreeType.h:145: error: `GetImageCache' declared as a `virtual' field nsFreeType.h:145: warning: `visibility' attribute ignored nsFreeType.h:145: error: `FTC_Image_Cache' was not declared in this scope nsFreeType.h:145: error: syntax error before `,' token nsFreeType.h:145: error: type specifier omitted for parameter `FTC_Image_Cache' nsFreeType.h:145: error: syntax error before `*' token nsFreeType.h:216: error: 'FTC_Image_Cache' is used as a type, but is not defined as a type. [...] etc. Looks like Freetype has up and broken the API, though. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.11-1-686-smp Locale: LANG=en_CA, LC_CTYPE=en_CA (charmap=ISO-8859-1) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Bug#316094: sendmail: Enabling IPv6 breaks submit.mc (Deferred:Connection refused by [127.0.0.1])
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 316094 normal Bug#316094: sendmail: Enabling IPv6 breaks submit.mc (Deferred:Connection refused by [127.0.0.1]) Severity set to `normal'. thanks, Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#316094: sendmail: Enabling IPv6 breaks submit.mc (Deferred:Connection refused by [127.0.0.1])
severity 316094 normal thanks, On Tue, 28 Jun 2005, Benoit Panizzon wrote: Package: sendmail Version: 8.13.4-3 Severity: grave Justification: causes non-serious data loss The messages (below) indicate no loss of data, just a delay in sending Hi Cowboy Hello ! I did desperately try to track down this error I saw on different systems: Jun 28 13:53:41 go sendmail[18911]: j5SBrfKk018911: [EMAIL PROTECTED], ctladdr=benoit (1024/100), delay=00:00:00, xdelay=00:00:00, mailer=relay, pri=31826, relay=[127.0.0.1] [127.0.0.1], dsn=4.0.0, stat=Deferred:Connection refused by [127.0.0.1] Did you specify bind address for sendmail and forget to include 127.0.0.1 ? If things are kosher, you should have some message in the logs about not being able to bind to a port. Usualy after purging the config and re-installing sendmail everything was fine until I enabled IPv6 according to the advice in sendmail.mc file which reads: dnl # If you want to support IPv6, switch the commented/uncommentd lines FEATURE(`no_default_msa')dnl DAEMON_OPTIONS(`Family=inet6, Name=MTA-v6, Port=smtp, Addr=::1')dnl dnl DAEMON_OPTIONS(`Family=inet, Name=MTA-v4, Port=smtp, Addr=127.0.0.1')dnl DAEMON_OPTIONS(`Family=inet6, Name=MSP-v6, Port=submission, Addr=::1')dnl dnl DAEMON_OPTIONS(`Family=inet, Name=MSP-v4, Port=submission, Addr=127.0.0.1')dnl I have: FEATURE(`no_default_msa')dnl DAEMON_OPTIONS(`Family=inet6, Name=MTA-v6, Port=smtp, M=')dnl DAEMON_OPTIONS(`Family=inet6, Name=MSA-v6, Port=587, M=Ea')dnl DAEMON_OPTIONS(`Family=inet6, Name=SMTA-v6, Port=smtps, M=s')dnl DAEMON_OPTIONS(`Family=local, Name=MTA-Unix, Addr=/var/run/sendmail/mta/smsocket')dnl If you do this, sendmail only binds to the IPv6 Localhost and is not able to transmit emails from the MTA to the queue runner (or vice versa?). What kernel are you using ? # lsof -i | grep sendmail sendmail- 6462 root4u IPv6 72288 TCP *:smtp (LISTEN) sendmail- 6462 root5u IPv6 72396 TCP *:submission (LISTEN) sendmail- 6462 root6u IPv6 72450 TCP *:ssmtp (LISTEN) You have to twitch submit.mc too: FEATURE(`msp', `[IPv6:::1]', `MSA')dnl Nope... I have FEATURE(`msp', `[127.0.0.1]', `MSA')dnl I remember that older versions of sendmail didn't habe that problem, because listening on IPv6 did mean you also opened the IPv4 socket. Yes, there were problems with older sendmails - mostly related to the fact that early 2.4 kernels did not support both ipv4 and ipv6 on the same port. Probably this has changes somewhen either in the Kernel or in sendmail itself. Something odd is happening on your box, as this is working fine on several local boxen - running various 2.6 kernels. -- Rick Nelson Joy that's a Kludge(TM) knghtbrd It Works(tm) Joy AIX works(TM) knghtbrd no it doesn't knghtbrd = -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#315886: elinks: core dump while sorting thru bookmarks' saved snapshots
On Sun, 26 Jun 2005 14:51:03 -0400 grok [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am getting this crash pretty regularly now when I start shuffling around the 'snapshot' URLs (they've already been moved away from where elinks puts them as per the configuration setting, so they should just be 'regular' URLs now, right?) Sorry to be dumb but, um, what are you doing, and where's the data loss? I have no idea what you mean by shuffling snapshot URLs. I put core dump in quotes in the subjectline, because the error message _says_ that it has produced a core dump, but I don't actually get one -- just the backtrace below. Seems to me, perhaps, that I turned off core dumps somewhere, some time ago? ; bash$ ulimit -c unlimited Let me know what I should do if you want to go further on this with me. I have to understand the bug first. P.S.: The english in your error message is a little awkward. You can MY english? You mean the upstream? :) swap-in my version below here, if you want (I may have dropped some of your text while cutting pasting). [ELinks crashed. That shouldn't happen. Please report this incident to the developers. If you would like to help in debugging the problem you've just uncovered, please keep the core you've just got and send the developers the output of the 'bt' command, entered from inside gdb (which you run as: gdb elinks core). Thanks a lot for your cooperation!] I'll forward that anyway. Thanks, Peter -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#316121: apt: Ubuntu key installed in /etc/apt/trusted.gpg
Package: apt Version: 0.6.38 Severity: serious Hi, I currently have the ubuntu key installed in /etc/apt/trusted.gpg, and do not have the debian key in it. This is not at all what I expect. I never had anything from ubuntu installed. I assume this happened with an earlier version apt (0.6.36) from experimental which was needed to build something else from experimental (aptitude?). The file is from May 14, so this must have happened before the current version in unstable. This was then back downgraded to 0.5.28.6, and now just upgraded to 0.6.38. I think you should always import the debian key into trusted.gpg file, optional with debconf questions. Kurt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#316121: marked as done (apt: Ubuntu key installed in /etc/apt/trusted.gpg)
Your message dated Tue, 28 Jun 2005 10:35:50 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#316121: apt: Ubuntu key installed in /etc/apt/trusted.gpg has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Jun 2005 17:09:04 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jun 28 10:09:04 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from adicia.telenet-ops.be [195.130.132.56] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DnJa4-00073Y-00; Tue, 28 Jun 2005 10:09:04 -0700 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by adicia.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with SMTP id D684D442AF for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 28 Jun 2005 19:09:02 +0200 (MEST) Received: from Q.roeckx.be (dD5775FD9.access.telenet.be [213.119.95.217]) by adicia.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id C21E544298 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 28 Jun 2005 19:09:02 +0200 (MEST) Received: by Q.roeckx.be (Postfix, from userid 501) id 7747D26136; Tue, 28 Jun 2005 19:09:02 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2005 19:09:02 +0200 From: Kurt Roeckx [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: apt: Ubuntu key installed in /etc/apt/trusted.gpg Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: apt Version: 0.6.38 Severity: serious Hi, I currently have the ubuntu key installed in /etc/apt/trusted.gpg, and do not have the debian key in it. This is not at all what I expect. I never had anything from ubuntu installed. I assume this happened with an earlier version apt (0.6.36) from experimental which was needed to build something else from experimental (aptitude?). The file is from May 14, so this must have happened before the current version in unstable. This was then back downgraded to 0.5.28.6, and now just upgraded to 0.6.38. I think you should always import the debian key into trusted.gpg file, optional with debconf questions. Kurt --- Received: (at 316121-done) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Jun 2005 17:36:22 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jun 28 10:36:22 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mta13.mail.adelphia.net (mta13.adelphia.net) [68.168.78.44] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DnK0U-00067N-00; Tue, 28 Jun 2005 10:36:22 -0700 Received: from mizar.alcor.net ([68.66.78.251]) by mta13.adelphia.net (InterMail vM.6.01.04.01 201-2131-118-101-20041129) with ESMTP id [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 28 Jun 2005 13:35:51 -0400 Received: by mizar.alcor.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 895963BF92; Tue, 28 Jun 2005 10:35:50 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2005 10:35:50 -0700 From: Matt Zimmerman [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Kurt Roeckx [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Bug#316121: apt: Ubuntu key installed in /etc/apt/trusted.gpg Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] References: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: On Tue, Jun 28, 2005 at 07:09:02PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote: I currently have the ubuntu key installed in /etc/apt/trusted.gpg, and do not have the debian key in it. This is not at all what I expect. I never had anything from ubuntu installed. I assume this happened with an earlier version apt (0.6.36) from experimental which was needed to build something else from experimental (aptitude?). The file is from May 14, so this must have happened before the current version in unstable. This was then back downgraded to 0.5.28.6, and now just upgraded to 0.6.38. I think you should always import the debian key into trusted.gpg file, optional with debconf questions. This was a bug which affected one
Bug#316143: subversion: segfault (not due to libapr0) when add a directory
Package: subversion Version: 1.2.0-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Hi. I know the bug 266165 (http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=266165). The behavior is the same but the segfault IMHO does not depend on libapr0 because it shows even using the local filesystem as $ svn co file:///var/lib/svn/my_project_name/ $ cd my_project_name/trunk/ $ mkdir a $ svn add a A a Segmentation fault -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-rc6 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) Versions of packages subversion depends on: ii db4.2-util 4.2.52-19 Berkeley v4.2 Database Utilities ii libapr02.0.54-4 the Apache Portable Runtime ii libc6 2.3.5-1 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libdb4.2 4.2.52-19 Berkeley v4.2 Database Libraries [ ii libexpat1 1.95.8-3 XML parsing C library - runtime li ii libldap2 2.1.30-10 OpenLDAP libraries ii libneon24 0.24.7.dfsg-2 An HTTP and WebDAV client library ii libssl0.9.70.9.7g-1 SSL shared libraries ii libsvn01.2.0-1 shared libraries used by Subversio ii libxml22.6.16-7 GNOME XML library ii patch 2.5.9-2 Apply a diff file to an original ii zlib1g 1:1.2.2-4 compression library - runtime subversion recommends no packages. -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#315651: marked as done (exim4-daemon-heavy: TLS error (gnutls_handshake) - 4.51-1; was OK in 4.50-8)
Your message dated Tue, 28 Jun 2005 15:47:41 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#315650: fixed in exim4 4.51-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Jun 2005 11:35:12 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jun 24 04:35:12 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from nat6.sesnet.co.uk (cdmnet.org) [217.206.93.237] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DlmSm-0001Wx-00; Fri, 24 Jun 2005 04:35:12 -0700 Received: from calum by cdmnet.org with local (Exim 4.51) id 1DlmRg-0003Lq-NB; Fri, 24 Jun 2005 12:34:04 +0100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Calum Mackay [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: exim4-daemon-heavy: TLS error (gnutls_handshake) - 4.51-1; was OK in 4.50-8 X-Mailer: reportbug 3.15 Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2005 12:34:04 +0100 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2 Package: exim4-daemon-heavy Version: 4.51-1 Severity: important The problem here is some, but not all, incoming TLS emails getting deferred: 2005-06-24 11:55:01 TLS error on connection from host81-136-150-217.in-addr.btopenworld.com (thegerhards.com) [81.136.150.217]:30228 (gnutls_handshake): A TLS fatal alert has been received. This coincided with (a few hours after) upgrading from 4.50-8 to 4.51-1. I can reliably reproduce the problem on 4.51-1, within an hour or two. With the previous 4.50-8 I have never seen the problem. Switching back and forth between the versions reliably reproduces the problem (on 4.51-1). For this reason, I believe this bug may be different than the two existing, older, bugs #285371 #297174, which affected previous releases (where I never saw a problem). I would note that not all incoming TLS traffic seems to be affected. Somes sites' TLS traffic is deferred, others accepted. Outgoing TLS traffic seems to be fine. Running -d+all didn't provide any further information, unfortunately. One other data point: 4.50-8 seems to reliably recreate the gnutls-params file if it is removed, whereas I've noted that with 4.51-1 the file is never created. Of course, this may just be a symptom of the problem. Please let me know if I can provide more information. cheers, calum. -- Package-specific info: Exim version 4.51 #1 built 10-Jun-2005 19:02:02 Copyright (c) University of Cambridge 2005 Berkeley DB: Sleepycat Software: Berkeley DB 4.2.52: (December 3, 2003) Support for: iconv() IPv6 PAM Perl GnuTLS Content_Scanning Old_Demime Lookups: lsearch wildlsearch nwildlsearch iplsearch cdb dbm dbmnz dnsdb dsearch ldap ldapdn ldapm mysql nis nis0 passwd pgsql Authenticators: cram_md5 cyrus_sasl plaintext spa Routers: accept dnslookup ipliteral iplookup manualroute queryprogram redirect Transports: appendfile/maildir/mailstore/mbx autoreply lmtp pipe smtp Fixed never_users: 0 Configuration file is /var/lib/exim4/config.autogenerated # /etc/exim4/update-exim4.conf.conf # # Edit this file and /etc/mailname by hand and execute update-exim4.conf # yourself or use 'dpkg-reconfigure exim4-config' dc_eximconfig_configtype='internet' # Our primary hostname is in /etc/mailname dc_other_hostnames='diz : cdmnet.org.uk : cdmnet.info : cdm.homelinux.org : dialachef.co.uk:cdmnet.org' dc_local_interfaces='' dc_readhost='' dc_relay_domains='CONFDIR/relay.domains' dc_minimaldns='false' dc_relay_nets='' dc_smarthost='' CFILEMODE='644' dc_use_split_config='true' dc_hide_mailname='' dc_mailname_in_oh='true' mailname:cdmnet.org -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.10 Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages exim4-daemon-heavy depends on: hi exim4-base 4.51-1 support files for all exim MTA (v4 ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-22 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libdb4.24.2.52-19Berkeley v4.2 Database Libraries [ ii libgnutls11 1.0.16-13.1 GNU
Bug#315115: marked as done ([bugtraq] Sudo version 1.6.8p9 now available, fixes security issue.)
Your message dated Tue, 28 Jun 2005 16:02:51 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#315115: fixed in sudo 1.6.8p9-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Jun 2005 17:04:47 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jun 20 10:04:47 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mail3b.westend.com (mail3b1.westend.com) [212.117.79.78] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DkPhW-0005Mj-00; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 10:04:46 -0700 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail3b1.westend.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D26FC190 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 19:04:45 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail3b1.westend.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail3b [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 28557-02 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 19:04:42 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail3b1.westend.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 8E8DEC18D; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 19:04:42 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 19:04:42 +0200 From: Christian Hammers [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [bugtraq] Sudo version 1.6.8p9 now available, fixes security issue. Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary=yrj/dFKFPuw6o+aM Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.6 required=4.0 tests=BZ_TLD,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: --yrj/dFKFPuw6o+aM Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Disposition: inline Package: sudo Severity: critical Tags: security Version: 1.6.8p7-1.1 Please see attached announcement. bye, -christian- --yrj/dFKFPuw6o+aM Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Original-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail3b2.westend.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95E291212B4 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 18:58:45 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail3b2.westend.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail3b [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 20024) with ESMTP id 24249-05 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 18:58:37 +0200 (CEST) Received: from outgoing.securityfocus.com (outgoing.securityfocus.com [205.206.231.26]) by mail3b2.westend.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7013412126A for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 18:58:37 +0200 (CEST) Received: from outgoing.securityfocus.com by outgoing.securityfocus.com via smtpd (for mail3b2.westend.com [212.117.79.69]) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 09:58:37 -0700 Received: from lists2.securityfocus.com (lists2.securityfocus.com [205.206.231.20]) by outgoing2.securityfocus.com (Postfix) with QMQP id C28BA152FA3; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 09:10:36 -0600 (MDT) Mailing-List: contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: bugtraq.list-id.securityfocus.com List-Post: mailto:bugtraq@securityfocus.com List-Help: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] List-Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] List-Subscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: mailing list bugtraq@securityfocus.com Delivered-To: moderator for bugtraq@securityfocus.com Received: (qmail 10121 invoked from network); 20 Jun 2005 06:47:16 - Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: bugtraq@securityfocus.com Subject: [bugtraq] Sudo version 1.6.8p9 now available, fixes security issue. Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 08:24:43 -0600 From: Todd C. Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-13.2 tagged_above=-999.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL, DNS_FROM_RFC_POST, RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_51_100, RAZOR2_CHECK, SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_PASS, USER_IN_DEF_WHITELIST X-Spam-Level: Sudo version 1.6.8, patchlevel 9 is now available, which fixes a race condition in Sudo's pathname validation. This is a security issue. Summary: A race condition in Sudo's command pathname handling prior to Sudo version 1.6.8p9 that could allow a user with Sudo privileges to run arbitrary commands. Sudo versions affected: Sudo versions 1.3.1 up to and including 1.6.8p8. Details: When a user runs a command via Sudo, the inode and device numbers of the command are compared to those of
Bug#315771: perdition: FTBFS: Not using -fPIC to make shared lib.
On Mon, Jun 27, 2005 at 12:38:29PM +0900, Horms wrote: Hi Kurt, I have tried a fresh approach to this problem, that is making the code in question a shared object. It is compiled with -fPIC as far as I can see. This change is included in the 1.17-2 packages that I have put in http://debian.vergenet.net/pending/perdition/ If you have a chance, could you test to see if these solve the problem that you are seeing. It would be nice to make sure it is resolved before uploading these to Debian.Org. It seems to have build fine. PS: You have 2 virtual packages as build dependency, libdb-dev and libmysqlclient-dev. Can I suggest you use something like libmysqlclient12-dev | libmysqlclient-dev and libdb4.3-dev | libdb-dev as build dependency instead, so you get predictable results when installing the dependencies. And maybe you should switch to libmysqlclient14-dev if possible? Kurt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#305735: marked as done (/usr/bin/sudoedit links to debian/sudo/usr/bin/sudo)
Your message dated Tue, 28 Jun 2005 16:32:16 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#305735: fixed in sudo 1.6.8p9-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Apr 2005 20:26:30 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 21 13:26:29 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from 220pc220.sshunet.nl (mordor.wolffelaar.nl) [145.97.220.220] (Debian-exim) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DOiFp-0004gY-00; Thu, 21 Apr 2005 13:26:29 -0700 Received: from jeroen by mordor.wolffelaar.nl with local (Exim 4.50) id 1DOiFo-0007fE-Af for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 21 Apr 2005 22:26:28 +0200 Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2005 22:26:28 +0200 From: Jeroen van Wolffelaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: /usr/bin/sudoedit links to debian/sudo/usr/bin/sudo Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Reportbug-Version: 3.8 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: sudo Version: 1.6.8p7-1 Severity: serious $ ls -l /usr/bin/sudoedit lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 24 2005-04-11 20:37 /usr/bin/sudoedit - debian/sudo/usr/bin/sudo $ No comment :) --Jeroen -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-686 Locale: LANG=nl_NL.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=nl_NL.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages sudo depends on: ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-20 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libpam-modules 0.76-22 Pluggable Authentication Modules f ii libpam0g0.76-22 Pluggable Authentication Modules l -- no debconf information -- Jeroen van Wolffelaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://jeroen.A-Eskwadraat.nl --- Received: (at 305735-close) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Jun 2005 20:38:58 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jun 28 13:38:58 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DnMrC-0007f1-00; Tue, 28 Jun 2005 13:38:58 -0700 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DnMki-0003YT-00; Tue, 28 Jun 2005 16:32:16 -0400 From: Bdale Garbee [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#305735: fixed in sudo 1.6.8p9-2 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2005 16:32:16 -0400 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Source: sudo Source-Version: 1.6.8p9-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of sudo, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: sudo_1.6.8p9-2.diff.gz to pool/main/s/sudo/sudo_1.6.8p9-2.diff.gz sudo_1.6.8p9-2.dsc to pool/main/s/sudo/sudo_1.6.8p9-2.dsc sudo_1.6.8p9-2_i386.deb to pool/main/s/sudo/sudo_1.6.8p9-2_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Bdale Garbee [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated sudo package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2005 16:18:47 -0400 Source: sudo Binary: sudo Architecture: source i386 Version: 1.6.8p9-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: high Maintainer: Bdale Garbee [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Bdale Garbee [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: sudo - Provide
Bug#316157: gringotts: Fails to start: Invalid LANG environment variable
Package: gringotts Version: 1.2.8+1.2.9pre1-1 Severity: grave Tags: l10n Justification: renders package unusable -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 hi, recently I wanted to access my passwords, most of which I now store in a gringotts file. I punchend in gringotts -f passwd.grg in rox (i.e. not in a terminal) and presto: nothing! Maybe you can imagine my first thoughts... Oh f**k! My password file is corrupted! (my second thought was along the line Hey, I have backups, so I have not lost anything :-). Long story short, when started in a terminal, gringotts emits the following: $ gringotts (process:15830): gringotts-CRITICAL **: Invalid LANG environment variable: [EMAIL PROTECTED]' It does not work with de_DE.UTF-8 either, but works with de_DE (even with the Umlaute, e.g. Angehängte Dateien in gringotts itself) or C (English). $ LANG=de_DE gringotts Gringotts Version 1.2.9pre1 (libGringotts 1.2.1) © 2002 Germano Rizzo [EMAIL PROTECTED] veröffentlicht unter GNU General Public License (GPL) v.2 oder später Siehe COPYING oder http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/gpl.html $ LANG=C gringotts Gringotts version 1.2.9pre1 (libGringotts 1.2.1) (c) 2002 Germano Rizzo [EMAIL PROTECTED] released under GNU General Public License (GPL) v.2 or later See COPYING or go to http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/gpl.html I am no programmer, and did not look this up thoroughly (quick googling turns up nothing), but is does seem to me as something specific to gringotts, as my other GTK apps run fine without any problem. If you have any ideas how I might be able to help I will do my very best :-). Regards, Sebastian Fontius - -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (700, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-phobos Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages gringotts depends on: ii libatk1.0-0 1.10.1-2 The ATK accessibility toolkit ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-22 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libglib2.0-02.6.4-1 The GLib library of C routines ii libgringotts1 1.2.1-4 encapsulate data in an encrypted a ii libgtk2.0-0 2.6.8-1 The GTK+ graphical user interface ii libpango1.0-0 1.8.1-1 Layout and rendering of internatio ii libpopt01.7-5lib for parsing cmdline parameters - -- no debconf information -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFCwbZbv/95EltIOGIRAj2UAJ0UalzJ++JTDvJD16SBIHQ8NH+L6gCfb4yB lT9dY0AgRZ3nUbwWoCw0ua8= =jkY+ -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#315968: Bug fixed in later kernel version upstream
It seems the bug got fixed in later kernel versions upstream: I tested kernel-2.6.11.5 and kernel-2.6.12.1 and there are no problems. -- Andreas Gösele
Processed: tagging 316106
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 tags 316106 sid Bug#316106: FTBFS with freetype 2.1.10 There were no tags set. Tags added: sid End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#316173: apache2: Security issues in HTTP proxy responses with both Transfer-Encoding and Content-Length headers
Package: apache2 Severity: grave Tags: security Justification: user security hole Latest 2.1.6-alpha fixes a security in the proxy HTTP code: | The 2.1.6-alpha release addresses a security vulnerability present | in all previous 2.x versions. This fault did not affect Apache 1.3.x | (which did not proxy keepalives or chunked transfer encoding); |Proxy HTTP: If a response contains both Transfer-Encoding |and a Content-Length, remove the Content-Length to eliminate |an HTTP Request Smuggling vulnerability and don't reuse the |connection, stopping some HTTP Request Spoofing attacks. Cheers, Moritz -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-rc5 Locale: LANG=C, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#315339: installation of new lvm2 renders vg unusable
Package: lvm2
Version: 2.01.12-2
Followup-For: Bug #315339
Installing new lvm2 makes stripped VG unrecognizable.
Downgrading lvm2 back to 2.01.04-5 fixes the problem.
# vgdisplay lvmg
LV backup: inconsistent LE count 1832 != 3662
Internal error: LV segments corrupted in backup.
Volume group lvmg doesn't exist
Attached is the /etc/lvm/backup/lvmg config file for the group.
Igor
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.11
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=ru_RU.KOI8-R (charmap=KOI8-R)
Versions of packages lvm2 depends on:
ii debconf 1.4.51 Debian configuration management sy
ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-22 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libdevmapper1.012:1.01.03-1 The Linux Kernel Device Mapper use
hi lvm-common 1.5.19 The Logical Volume Manager for Lin
lvm2 recommends no packages.
-- debconf information:
lvm2/snapshots:
# Generated by LVM2: Tue Jun 28 16:41:34 2005
contents = Text Format Volume Group
version = 1
description = Created *after* executing '/sbin/vgcfgbackup'
creation_host = leonid# Linux leonid 2.6.11 #1 Wed Mar 2 09:29:56 EST
2005 i686
creation_time = 1119991294 # Tue Jun 28 16:41:34 2005
lvmg {
id = BSy91n-ruZ9-cPDQ-aD8u-hNVI-NhxK-kzr4Rq
seqno = 0
status = [RESIZEABLE, READ, WRITE]
system_id = leonid1067528333
extent_size = 65536 # 32 Megabytes
max_lv = 256
max_pv = 256
physical_volumes {
pv0 {
id = yDDqdI-Zm8P-fcfz-veUd-3erD-lo7L-74LLT5
device = /dev/hda # Hint only
status = [ALLOCATABLE]
pe_start = 65920
pe_count = 1831 # 57.2188 Gigabytes
}
pv1 {
id = a2cuJy-QuIa-k4nx-eHdB-qTXB-4X0n-EoYa2L
device = /dev/hdc # Hint only
status = [ALLOCATABLE]
pe_start = 65920
pe_count = 1831 # 57.2188 Gigabytes
}
}
logical_volumes {
backup {
id = 00------00
status = [READ, WRITE, VISIBLE]
allocation_policy = normal
read_ahead = 1024
segment_count = 1
segment1 {
start_extent = 0
extent_count = 3662 # 114.438 Gigabytes
type = striped
stripe_count = 2
stripe_size = 32# 16 Kilobytes
stripes = [
pv1, 0,
pv0, 0
]
}
}
}
}
Bug#316093: ncurses-base: binaries terminfo files marked as conffiles
On Tue, Jun 28, 2005 at 03:32:42PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote: On Tue, Jun 28, 2005 at 09:01:21AM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: But they ARE conffiles! One of the reasons they're in /etc is so that the system administrator can modify them if desired. No, they are maybe config files, but they cannot be conffiles, since they are not text files. Do you have a reference for this? I see nothing in policy to suggest that conffiles must be text files. Other than the inflexibility of using diff, the conffile management in dpkg is appropriate. I'm sorry dpkg doesn't offer a way to specify a diff program usefully; infocmp would work fine. That is why you should not mark them as conffiles but handle them manually with a script that provide a way to edit and diff them. You don't edit them. You build from alternate source, presumably provided by whatever oddball terminal you're using or derived by some overly clever sysadmin from terminfo.src. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery, LLC -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#316177: daemontools-installer: daemontools package tries to remove /usr/local folder upon removal
Package: daemontools-installer Version: 0.76-9 Severity: critical Justification: causes serious data loss Package daemontools created through daemontools-installer can cause catastrophe upon removal. Simply trying to remove daemontools package from the system tries to remove the /usr/local directory. This is to do with the post-uninstallation script. Thanks, rrs -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (300, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.11-bsplash-skas3-v8 Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Versions of packages daemontools-installer depends on: ii build-essential 10.1informational list of build-essent ii debconf 1.4.51 Debian configuration management sy ii debhelper4.2.36 helper programs for debian/rules ii fakeroot 1.3 Gives a fake root environment ii patch2.5.9-2 Apply a diff file to an original ii sudo 1.6.8p7-1.1 Provide limited super user privile ii wget 1.10-1 retrieves files from the web -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#316093: ncurses-base: binaries terminfo files marked as conffiles
On Tue, Jun 28, 2005 at 07:26:25PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: On Tue, Jun 28, 2005 at 03:32:42PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote: On Tue, Jun 28, 2005 at 09:01:21AM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: But they ARE conffiles! One of the reasons they're in /etc is so that the system administrator can modify them if desired. No, they are maybe config files, but they cannot be conffiles, since they are not text files. Do you have a reference for this? I see nothing in policy to suggest that conffiles must be text files. Other than the inflexibility of using diff, the conffile management in dpkg is appropriate. Please see: http://release.debian.org/etch_rc_policy.txt 3. Configuration files Conffiles must be plain text. I am really sorry to have to resort to that, though. Cheers, -- Bill. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Imagine a large red swirl here. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#315899: marked as done (alsaplayer_0.99.76-1(alpha/unstable): FTBFS: outdated build-depends)
Your message dated Tue, 28 Jun 2005 19:47:19 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#315899: fixed in alsaplayer 0.99.76-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Jun 2005 23:04:57 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jun 26 16:04:57 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from h24-80-164-222.sbm.shawcable.net (straylight.cyberhqz.com) [24.80.164.222] (postfix) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DmgBM-00012n-00; Sun, 26 Jun 2005 16:04:57 -0700 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by straylight.cyberhqz.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D79342002 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 26 Jun 2005 16:04:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from straylight.cyberhqz.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (straylight [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 23125-03 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 26 Jun 2005 16:04:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: by straylight.cyberhqz.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 9741D4200D; Sun, 26 Jun 2005 16:04:53 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2005 16:04:53 -0700 From: Ryan Murray [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: alsaplayer_0.99.76-1(alpha/unstable): FTBFS: outdated build-depends Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: alsaplayer Version: 0.99.76-1 Severity: serious There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: Automatic build of alsaplayer_0.99.76-1 on goedel by sbuild/alpha 42 Build started at 20050626-2204 [...] ** Using build dependencies supplied by package: Build-Depends: libasound2-dev, libgtk1.2-dev, debhelper (= 4), libesd0-dev, alsa-headers, libmikmod2-dev, libaudio-dev, libogg-dev, libvorbis-dev, libtool, xlibmesa-gl-dev | libgl-dev, libmad0-dev, libid3tag0-dev, libaudiofile-dev, zlib1g-dev, libjack0.80.0-dev, libflac-dev (= 1.1.1-3), liboggflac-dev, libxosd-dev, libsndfile1-dev, doxygen, libxt-dev [...] alsaplayer build-depends on alsa-headers, which is no longer in the archive. --- Received: (at 315899-close) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Jun 2005 23:53:13 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jun 28 16:53:13 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DnPtB-00063h-00; Tue, 28 Jun 2005 16:53:13 -0700 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DnPnT-0004wQ-00; Tue, 28 Jun 2005 19:47:19 -0400 From: Paul Brossier [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#315899: fixed in alsaplayer 0.99.76-4 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2005 19:47:19 -0400 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 6 Source: alsaplayer Source-Version: 0.99.76-4 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of alsaplayer, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: alsaplayer-alsa_0.99.76-4_powerpc.deb to pool/main/a/alsaplayer/alsaplayer-alsa_0.99.76-4_powerpc.deb alsaplayer-common_0.99.76-4_powerpc.deb to pool/main/a/alsaplayer/alsaplayer-common_0.99.76-4_powerpc.deb alsaplayer-daemon_0.99.76-4_powerpc.deb to pool/main/a/alsaplayer/alsaplayer-daemon_0.99.76-4_powerpc.deb alsaplayer-esd_0.99.76-4_powerpc.deb to pool/main/a/alsaplayer/alsaplayer-esd_0.99.76-4_powerpc.deb alsaplayer-gtk_0.99.76-4_powerpc.deb to pool/main/a/alsaplayer/alsaplayer-gtk_0.99.76-4_powerpc.deb alsaplayer-jack_0.99.76-4_powerpc.deb to pool/main/a/alsaplayer/alsaplayer-jack_0.99.76-4_powerpc.deb alsaplayer-nas_0.99.76-4_powerpc.deb to pool/main/a/alsaplayer/alsaplayer-nas_0.99.76-4_powerpc.deb
Bug#316093: ncurses-base: binaries terminfo files marked as conffiles
On Wed, Jun 29, 2005 at 01:40:42AM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote: On Tue, Jun 28, 2005 at 07:26:25PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: On Tue, Jun 28, 2005 at 03:32:42PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote: On Tue, Jun 28, 2005 at 09:01:21AM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: But they ARE conffiles! One of the reasons they're in /etc is so that the system administrator can modify them if desired. No, they are maybe config files, but they cannot be conffiles, since they are not text files. Do you have a reference for this? I see nothing in policy to suggest that conffiles must be text files. Other than the inflexibility of using diff, the conffile management in dpkg is appropriate. Please see: http://release.debian.org/etch_rc_policy.txt 3. Configuration files Conffiles must be plain text. I am really sorry to have to resort to that, though. You're not resorting to anything. I only asked you for a reference, and I will go investigate the history and intent behind this apparent change. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery, LLC -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#222443: marked as done (zopectl logrotate leads to zope instances crash)
Your message dated Tue, 28 Jun 2005 20:26:25 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#222443: fixed in zope 2.6.4-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Nov 2003 09:48:17 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Nov 29 03:48:16 2003 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from sud-1-82-67-113-39.fbx.proxad.net (bcroq.no-ip.org) [82.67.113.39] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1AQ1i4-0006vp-00; Sat, 29 Nov 2003 03:48:16 -0600 Received: from groumph.croq.org (groumph.croq.org [192.168.210.2]) by bcroq.no-ip.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D43C43C4002; Sat, 29 Nov 2003 10:48:14 +0100 (CET) Received: by groumph.croq.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 5FA56380008; Sat, 29 Nov 2003 10:48:14 +0100 (CET) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Bertrand CROQ [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: zopectl logrotate leads to zope instances crash X-Mailer: reportbug 2.36 Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2003 10:48:14 +0100 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_20 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_20 X-Spam-Level: Package: zope Version: 2.6.2-6 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Each time I run zopectl logrotate, the Zope instances crash after the first HTTP request and don't respond when using PCGI. As the /etc/logrotate.d/zope configuration asks for a zopectl logrotate every night, this makes Zope unusable on the 2 servers I use, both using Sid (in fact, I just replaced zopectl logrotate with zopectl restart and it works fine). I have tried to send a SIGUSR2 signal to a running Zope instance, and it seems to be enough to raise the problem. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux groumph 2.4.21-ck1 #1 mer sep 24 12:52:55 CEST 2003 i686 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Versions of packages zope depends on: ii adduser 3.51 Add and remove users and groups ii debconf 1.3.21 Debian configuration management sy ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-10 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii python2.2 2.2.3-7 An interactive high-level object-o ii python2.2-xml 0.8.3-4 XML tools for Python (2.2.x) ii zopectl 0.3.1Zope instances controlling utility -- debconf information: * zope/instance_home/move: false zope/changes/step1: zope/ZServer/port: * shared/zope/restart: end zope/upgrade/2.4.99beta3: zope/upgrade/2.6.1-7: zope/access/remove: --- Received: (at 222443-close) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Jun 2005 00:39:46 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jun 28 17:39:46 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DnQcD-0007TN-00; Tue, 28 Jun 2005 17:39:45 -0700 Received: from jeroen by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DnQPJ-oL-00; Tue, 28 Jun 2005 20:26:25 -0400 From: Fabio Tranchitella [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: lisa $Revision: 1.30 $ Subject: Bug#222443: fixed in zope 2.6.4-2 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Jeroen van Wolffelaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2005 20:26:25 -0400 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2 Source: zope Source-Version: 2.6.4-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of zope, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: zope2.6_2.6.4-2_i386.deb to pool/main/z/zope/zope2.6_2.6.4-2_i386.deb zope_2.6.4-2.diff.gz to pool/main/z/zope/zope_2.6.4-2.diff.gz zope_2.6.4-2.dsc to pool/main/z/zope/zope_2.6.4-2.dsc A summary of the changes between
Bug#267384: marked as done (Need to upload a new zope package to fix zopectl bug)
Your message dated Tue, 28 Jun 2005 20:26:26 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#267384: fixed in zope 2.6.4-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 26 May 2004 14:42:34 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed May 26 07:42:34 2004 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from lilly.csoft.net (mail102.csoft.net) [63.111.22.101] by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BSzc0-0005GC-00; Wed, 26 May 2004 07:42:33 -0700 Received: (qmail 47268 invoked from network); 26 May 2004 14:41:48 - Received: from localhost (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 26 May 2004 14:41:48 - Subject: zopectl not setting up /etc/zopectl/zopectlrc or default instance From: Andy Hird [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 Date: Thu, 27 May 2004 00:41:39 +1000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Package: zopectl Version: 0.3.4.1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Installing zope and zopectl fails to setup a usable zope instance. I could be misinterpreting things but no zopectlrc is setup when zope is installed. When I run zopectl init instance_name no instance is setup and zopectl exits with no messages. dpkg-reconfigure -plow zope asks me a bunch of questions including building the links under /var/lib/zope/instance/default, but after running it theres still nothing under /var/lib/zope/instance (no default directory). This is with zope 2.6.4-1.1 as well. I hope I'm not meant to create a zopectlrc file by hand! Thanks Andy Hird -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.4.24-1-686 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C Versions of packages zopectl depends on: ii dpkg 1.10.21Package maintenance system for Deb ii python2.2 2.2.3-9An interactive high-level object-o --- Received: (at 267384-close) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Jun 2005 00:39:51 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jun 28 17:39:51 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DnQcJ-0007Vc-00; Tue, 28 Jun 2005 17:39:51 -0700 Received: from jeroen by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DnQPK-oj-00; Tue, 28 Jun 2005 20:26:26 -0400 From: Fabio Tranchitella [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: lisa $Revision: 1.30 $ Subject: Bug#267384: fixed in zope 2.6.4-2 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Jeroen van Wolffelaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2005 20:26:26 -0400 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 14 Source: zope Source-Version: 2.6.4-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of zope, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: zope2.6_2.6.4-2_i386.deb to pool/main/z/zope/zope2.6_2.6.4-2_i386.deb zope_2.6.4-2.diff.gz to pool/main/z/zope/zope_2.6.4-2.diff.gz zope_2.6.4-2.dsc to pool/main/z/zope/zope_2.6.4-2.dsc A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Fabio Tranchitella [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated zope package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Thu,
Bug#269940: marked as done (install failure on new installs)
Your message dated Tue, 28 Jun 2005 20:26:26 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#269940: fixed in zope 2.6.4-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Sep 2004 12:31:59 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Sep 04 05:31:59 2004 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.17.13] (root) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1C3Zi3-0002cg-00; Sat, 04 Sep 2004 05:31:59 -0700 Received: from mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [130.149.17.13]) by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3p2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA05302 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 4 Sep 2004 14:31:57 +0200 (MEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59C89F21D for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 4 Sep 2004 14:31:57 +0200 (MEST) Received: from mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (bueno [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10224) with ESMTP id 24787-26 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 4 Sep 2004 14:31:57 +0200 (MEST) Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.19.1]) by mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de (Postfix) with ESMTP for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 4 Sep 2004 14:31:57 +0200 (MEST) Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.8/Submit) id i84CVuBk010237; Sat, 4 Sep 2004 14:31:56 +0200 (MEST) From: Matthias Klose [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sat, 4 Sep 2004 14:31:56 +0200 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: install failure on new installs X-Mailer: VM 7.03 under 21.4 (patch 6) Common Lisp XEmacs Lucid X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at cs.tu-berlin.de Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Package: zope Version: 2.6.4-1.5 Severity: serious Fails on new installs, if you answer the question that it should move existing instances with: Setting up zope (2.6.4-1.5) ... touch: cannot touch `/var/lib/zope/instance/default/access': No such file or directory dpkg: error processing zope (--configure): subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1 --- Received: (at 269940-close) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Jun 2005 00:39:54 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jun 28 17:39:54 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DnQcM-0007Xv-00; Tue, 28 Jun 2005 17:39:54 -0700 Received: from jeroen by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DnQPK-ox-00; Tue, 28 Jun 2005 20:26:26 -0400 From: Fabio Tranchitella [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: lisa $Revision: 1.30 $ Subject: Bug#269940: fixed in zope 2.6.4-2 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Jeroen van Wolffelaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2005 20:26:26 -0400 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 21 Source: zope Source-Version: 2.6.4-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of zope, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: zope2.6_2.6.4-2_i386.deb to pool/main/z/zope/zope2.6_2.6.4-2_i386.deb zope_2.6.4-2.diff.gz to pool/main/z/zope/zope_2.6.4-2.diff.gz zope_2.6.4-2.dsc to pool/main/z/zope/zope_2.6.4-2.dsc A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Fabio Tranchitella [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated zope package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem
Bug#316173: apache2: Security issues in HTTP proxy responses with both Transfer-Encoding and Content-Length headers
Steve Kemp wrote: Can I be the first to say that I don't understand the nature of this issue? The description sounds reasonably straightforward, though I'd classify this as a vulnerability of pretty low importance, from a will people be exploited by this viewpoint. Is this also present in 2.0.54 which is the latest stable release? There's no mention of it in the changelog there.. It looks like it's in 2.0.54, and there's a backport in SVN for the 2.0.55 release, but the backport looks more like a massive feature backport, not just a small security patch, so I may look at if there's a way to fix this a bit less intrusively. Actually, it's worth nothing that we muck with Content-Length at another point, thanks to a Debian-specific patch, so we may accidentally not be vulnerable to this anyway. I'll follow the code around a little later today and see if that's the case. ... Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#316186: evms-ha: file collision with heartbeat package
Package: evms-ha Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable evms-ha includes /etc/heartbeat which is no longer used in the heartbeat package and is now a symlink to /etc/ha.d. Now the evms_failover resource.d scripts should be moved to /etc/ha.d/resource.d. Currently one is not able to install this package as it wont unpack. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.4.20 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: [bdale@gag.com: sudo fix]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reopen 315115 Bug#315115: [bugtraq] Sudo version 1.6.8p9 now available, fixes security issue. Bug#315718: sudo: Sudo version 1.6.8p9 now available, fixes security issue. Bug reopened, originator not changed. tags 315115 woody sarge pending Bug#315115: [bugtraq] Sudo version 1.6.8p9 now available, fixes security issue. Tags were: security Bug#315718: sudo: Sudo version 1.6.8p9 now available, fixes security issue. Tags added: woody, sarge, pending thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#315115: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: sudo fix]
reopen 315115 tags 315115 woody sarge pending thanks Updated packages mailed to security team, awaiting review and upload. --Jeroen -- Jeroen van Wolffelaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] (also for Jabber MSN; ICQ: 33944357) http://Jeroen.A-Eskwadraat.nl -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#316030: python-uno: appears to be completely broken
On Tue, Jun 28, 2005 at 09:56:37AM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
Why don't you tag it experimental then?
I didn't think of it until too late, sorry.
ARGL. Why do you report two bugs in one? Report *one* bug for *one*
issue. And you of course got the severity wrong anyway. Cleaning up.
Thanks. Sorry.
The second problem:
import uno
Traceback (most recent call last):
File stdin, line 1, in ?
File /usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/uno.py, line 62, in ?
import pyuno
SystemError: dynamic module not initialized properly
Yes. This is known. But I have nothing no no clue about python...
It would appear to be because:
1. python can't find the shared library, need to set LD_LIBRARY_PATH to
/usr/lib/openoffice2/program. Ideally the library should go somewhere
where python can see it.
2. the default config in /usr/lib/openoffice2/program/pyunorc is wrong,
it needs to be changed to:
--- cut ---
[Bootstrap]
PYUNO_SHARED_PACKAGES=${$ORIGIN/bootstraprc:BaseInstallation}/share/uno_packages/cache
PYUNO_USER_PACKAGES=${$ORIGIN/bootstraprc:UserInstallation}/user/uno_packages/cache
UNO_TYPES=$ORIGIN/types.rdb ?$PYUNO_SHARED_PACKAGES/types.rdb
?$PYUNO_USER_PACKAGES/types.rdb
UNO_SERVICES=?$PYUNO_USER_PACKAGES/services.rdb
?$PYUNO_SHARED_PACKAGES/services.rdb $ORIGIN/services.rdb
--- cut ---
According to advice I found at:
URL:http://people.ubuntu.com/~fabbione/irclogs/ubuntu-devel-2005-05-10.html
It appears to work now.
--
Brian May [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: sudo fix]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 315115 patch Bug#315115: [bugtraq] Sudo version 1.6.8p9 now available, fixes security issue. Tags were: pending sarge woody security Bug#315718: sudo: Sudo version 1.6.8p9 now available, fixes security issue. Tags added: patch thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Bug#316096: gnumeric: Crash when saving to MS Excel format
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 316096 important Bug#316096: gnumeric: Crash when saving to MS Excel format Severity set to `important'. tags 316096 sarge upstream Bug#316096: gnumeric: Crash when saving to MS Excel format There were no tags set. Tags added: sarge, upstream forwarded 316096 upstream Bug#316096: gnumeric: Crash when saving to MS Excel format Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to upstream. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#316096: gnumeric: Crash when saving to MS Excel format
severity 316096 important tags 316096 sarge upstream forwarded 316096 upstream thanks On Tue, Jun 28, 2005 at 07:17:57 -0500, Yevgen Muntyan wrote: Package: gnumeric Version: 1.4.3-4 ii libgsf-1 1.12.0-1 Structured File Library - runtime It is a known issue that gnumeric 1.4.x does not work properly against libgsf 1.12.0; you'll need to downgrade libgsf-1 to the 1.11.1-1 version in stable, This problem is limited in scope as the malfunctioning combination does not occur in the stable, testing or unstable trees. (Stable has an older libgsf; testing and unstable have newer versions of gnumeric) Ray -- [...] computer source code, though unintelligible to many, is the preferred method of communication among computer programmers. http://pacer.ca6.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/getopn.pl?OPINION=00a0117p.06 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Bug#316177: daemontools-installer: daemontools package tries to remove /usr/local folder upon removal
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 316177 normal Bug#316177: daemontools-installer: daemontools package tries to remove /usr/local folder upon removal Severity set to `normal'. tag 316177 moreinfo Bug#316177: daemontools-installer: daemontools package tries to remove /usr/local folder upon removal There were no tags set. Tags added: moreinfo thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: [backup-manager #315582] Bug still open in sarge
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reopen 315582 Bug#315582: backup-manager: insecure handling of temporary files Bug reopened, originator not changed. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#315582: [backup-manager #315582] Bug still open in sarge
reopen 315582 thanks This bug is closed in sid, but still opened in sarge. It will will be closed in etch as soon as the package propagate (I'll then remove the etch tag). Regards. -- - Alexis Sukrieh -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: [rene@debian.org: Re: Bug#316030: python-uno: appears to be completely broken]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 316030 + experimental Bug#316030: python-uno: appears to be completely broken There were no tags set. Tags added: experimental clone 316030 -1 Bug#316030: python-uno: appears to be completely broken Bug 316030 cloned as bug 316059. retitle -1 does not find libstdc++6 (missing depenency / broken RPATH) Bug#316059: python-uno: appears to be completely broken Changed Bug title. severity -1 serious Bug#316059: does not find libstdc++6 (missing depenency / broken RPATH) Severity set to `serious'. retitle 316030 SystemError: dynamic module not initalized correctky Bug#316030: python-uno: appears to be completely broken Changed Bug title. severity 316030 grave Bug#316030: SystemError: dynamic module not initalized correctky Severity set to `grave'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: boot-admin should not be in unstable
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 309932 grave Bug#309932: gnome-system-tools: boot-admin is DANGEROUS Severity set to `grave'. retitle 309932 boot-admin should not be in unstable Bug#309932: gnome-system-tools: boot-admin is DANGEROUS Changed Bug title. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: boot-admin should not be in unstable
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 309932 -experimental +sid Unknown tag/s: +sid. Recognized are: patch wontfix moreinfo unreproducible fixed potato woody sid help security upstream pending sarge sarge-ignore experimental d-i confirmed ipv6 lfs fixed-in-experimental fixed-upstream l10n etch etch-ignore. Bug#309932: boot-admin should not be in unstable Tags were: experimental Tags removed: experimental thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#316071: phpbb2: Inproper escaping in viewtopic.php
Package: phpbb2 Severity: grave Tags: security Justification: user security hole [Cc:ing security@ as Sarge is affected as well] phpbb 2.0.16 fixes a security issue due to inproper escaping of the $highlight_match variable in viewtopic.php. Upstream developers classify it as critical and provide something that has a close resemblance of a patch: http://www.phpbb.com/phpBB/viewtopic.php?f=14t=302011 Cheers, Moritz -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-rc5 Locale: LANG=C, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#314234: java-package: Same for jdk-1_5_0_04-linux-i586.bin
Package: java-package Version: 0.24 Followup-For: Bug #314234 It's also broken for the most recent release: $ fakeroot make-jpkg jdk-1_5_0_04-linux-i586.bin Creating temporary directory: /tmp/make-jpkg.qPkjfh Loading plugins: blackdown-j2re.sh blackdown-j2sdk.sh common.sh ibm-j2re.sh ibm-j2sdk.sh j2re.sh j2sdk.sh j2se.sh sun-j2re.sh sun-j2sdk.sh No matching plugin was found. Removing temporary directory: done -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.12 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Versions of packages java-package depends on: ii coreutils 5.2.1-2The GNU core utilities ii debhelper 4.9.1 helper programs for debian/rules ii fakeroot 1.3Gives a fake root environment java-package recommends no packages. -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#316071: phpbb2: Inproper escaping in viewtopic.php
Hello Moritz, Thanks for your report. We were given notice about this but couldn't reproduce the mentioned bug in our current phpbb2 Debian versions. On Tue, June 28, 2005 11:16, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: [Cc:ing security@ as Sarge is affected as well] Can you clarify: have you verified that sarge is affected, or is that based on the version number? phpbb 2.0.16 fixes a security issue due to inproper escaping of the $highlight_match variable in viewtopic.php. Upstream developers classify it as critical and provide something that has a close resemblance of a patch: http://www.phpbb.com/phpBB/viewtopic.php?f=14t=302011 That phpbb-style patch is not that clear but as far as I can tell, it does an addslashes() on $highlight_match. The patch seems to make sense: if you put the words straght into the regexp you can manipulate that at will, and the addslashes prevents that. However, I haven't been able to reproduce it (so we can test whether the problem is actually solved by this). He who has a testcase, please speak up now! regards Thijs -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: bug 316059 is forwarded to http://qa.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=50819
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: forwarded 316059 http://qa.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=50819 Bug#316059: does not find libstdc++6 (missing depenency / broken RPATH) Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to http://qa.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=50819. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Not fixed
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 267527 - fixed Bug#267527: a2ps option -P does not work Tags were: fixed Tags removed: fixed quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#267527: a2ps: version 4.13b-4.3 tries to print using lpr -d, which does not work with the lpr package
Package: a2ps Version: 1:4.13b-4.3 Followup-For: Bug #267527 The bug is still not fixed for the lpr package. a2ps-lpr-wrapper tries printing with lpr -d printername, which does NOT work. Frank -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.4.25smp Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=en_US.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages a2ps depends on: ii emacsen-common 1.4.16 Common facilities for all emacsen ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-22 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libpaper1 1.1.14-3 Library for handling paper charact -- no debconf information -- Frank Gevaerts [EMAIL PROTECTED] fks bvba - Formal and Knowledge Systemshttp://www.fks.be/ Stationsstraat 108 Tel: ++32-(0)11-21 49 11 B-3570 ALKEN Fax: ++32-(0)11-22 04 19 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#316089: exim4-config - fails to install if system uses no shadow
Package: exim4-config Version: 4.51-1 Severity: serious exim4-config fails to install if the system have no /etc/shadow file. | Setting up exim4-config (4.51-1) ... | hostname: Unknown host | hostname: Unknown host | Adding system-user for exim (v4) | chage: can't open shadow password file | groupdel: group Debian-exim does not exist | dpkg: error processing exim4-config (--configure): | subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1 Bastian -- The man on tops walks a lonely street; the chain of command is often a noose. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Processed: Fixed in NMU of ttf2pt1 3.4.4-1.1
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 251182 + fixed Bug#251182: FTBFS - Please rebuild ttf2pt1 with libt1-dev instead t1lib-dev Tags were: sid patch Tags added: fixed quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Fixed in NMU of vflib3 3.6.13-3.1
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 251184 + fixed Bug#251184: FTBFS - Please rebuild vflib3 with libt1-dev instead t1lib-dev Tags were: sid patch Tags added: fixed quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Fixed in NMU of ultrapoint 0.4-9.4
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 251183 + fixed Bug#251183: FTBFS - Please rebuild ultrapoint with libt1-dev instead t1lib-dev Tags were: sid patch Tags added: fixed quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#315650: exim4-daemon-heavy: TLS error (gnutls_handshake) - 4.51-1; was OK in 4.50-8
Calum Mackay wrote: Looking good so far: the file is now being created, and I've yet to see any handshake errors. Still no errors whatsoever here, so I'm confident your update cured the problem, Andreas, thanks. You might want to release this? thanks again. cheers, c. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#316094: sendmail: Enabling IPv6 breaks submit.mc (Deferred:Connection refused by [127.0.0.1])
Package: sendmail
Version: 8.13.4-3
Severity: grave
Justification: causes non-serious data loss
Hi Cowboy
I did desperately try to track down this error I saw on different systems:
Jun 28 13:53:41 go sendmail[18911]: j5SBrfKk018911: [EMAIL PROTECTED],
ctladdr=benoit (1024/100),
delay=00:00:00, xdelay=00:00:00, mailer=relay, pri=31826, relay=[127.0.0.1]
[127.0.0.1],
dsn=4.0.0, stat=Deferred:Connection refused by [127.0.0.1]
Usualy after purging the config and re-installing sendmail everything was
fine until I
enabled IPv6 according to the advice in sendmail.mc file which reads:
dnl # If you want to support IPv6, switch the commented/uncommentd lines
FEATURE(`no_default_msa')dnl
DAEMON_OPTIONS(`Family=inet6, Name=MTA-v6, Port=smtp, Addr=::1')dnl
dnl DAEMON_OPTIONS(`Family=inet, Name=MTA-v4, Port=smtp, Addr=127.0.0.1')dnl
DAEMON_OPTIONS(`Family=inet6, Name=MSP-v6, Port=submission, Addr=::1')dnl
dnl DAEMON_OPTIONS(`Family=inet, Name=MSP-v4, Port=submission,
Addr=127.0.0.1')dnl
If you do this, sendmail only binds to the IPv6 Localhost and is not able to
transmit emails
from the MTA to the queue runner (or vice versa?).
You have to twitch submit.mc too:
FEATURE(`msp', `[IPv6:::1]', `MSA')dnl
I remember that older versions of sendmail didn't habe that problem, because
listening on IPv6
did mean you also opened the IPv4 socket.
Probably this has changes somewhen either in the Kernel or in sendmail itself.
-Benoit-
-- Package-specific info:
Ouput of /usr/share/bug/sendmail/script:
ls -alR /etc/mail:
/etc/mail:
insgesamt 224
drwxr-sr-x4 smmta smmsp 4096 2005-06-28 13:56 .
drwxr-xr-x 115 root root 8192 2005-06-28 13:47 ..
-rw---1 root root 4211 2005-06-28 13:46 access
-rw-r-1 smmta smmsp 12288 2005-06-28 13:47 access.db
lrwxrwxrwx1 root smmsp10 2005-06-28 13:46 aliases - ../aliases
-rw-r-1 smmta smmsp 12288 2005-06-28 13:47 aliases.db
-rw-r--r--1 root smmsp 3095 2005-06-28 13:53 databases
-rw-r--r--1 root smmsp35 2005-06-28 13:46 default-auth-info
-rw-r--r--1 root root 5588 2005-06-03 18:51 helpfile
-rw-r--r--1 root smmsp13 2005-06-28 13:46 local-host-names
drwxr-sr-x2 smmta smmsp 4096 2005-06-28 13:47 m4
-rw-r-1 root smmsp 0 2005-06-28 13:53 mailertable
-rw-r-1 root smmsp 12288 2005-06-28 13:53 mailertable.db
-rwxr-xr--1 root smmsp 9911 2005-06-28 13:53 Makefile
-rw-r--r--1 root smmsp 63816 2005-06-28 13:53 sendmail.cf
-rw-r--r--1 root root 11882 2005-06-28 13:47 sendmail.conf
-rw-r--r--1 root smmsp 3891 2005-06-28 13:53 sendmail.mc
-rw-r--r--1 root smmsp 43944 2005-06-28 13:56 submit.cf
-rw-r--r--1 root smmsp 2325 2005-06-28 13:56 submit.mc
drwxr-xr-x2 smmta smmsp 4096 2005-06-28 13:46 tls
-rw-r--r--1 root smmsp 0 2005-06-28 13:46 trusted-users
/etc/mail/m4:
insgesamt 8
drwxr-sr-x 2 smmta smmsp 4096 2005-06-28 13:47 .
drwxr-sr-x 4 smmta smmsp 4096 2005-06-28 13:56 ..
-rw-r- 1 root smmsp0 2005-06-28 13:47 dialup.m4
-rw-r- 1 root smmsp0 2005-06-28 13:47 provider.m4
/etc/mail/tls:
insgesamt 44
drwxr-xr-x 2 smmta smmsp 4096 2005-06-28 13:46 .
drwxr-sr-x 4 smmta smmsp 4096 2005-06-28 13:56 ..
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 7 2005-06-28 13:46 no_prompt
-rw--- 1 root root 1191 2005-06-28 13:46 sendmail-client.cfg
-rw-r--r-- 1 root smmsp 1155 2005-06-28 13:46 sendmail-client.crt
-rw--- 1 root root 976 2005-06-28 13:46 sendmail-client.csr
-rw-r- 1 root smmsp 1675 2005-06-28 13:46 sendmail-common.key
-rw--- 1 root root 0 2005-06-28 13:46 sendmail-common.prm
-rw--- 1 root root 1191 2005-06-28 13:46 sendmail-server.cfg
-rw-r--r-- 1 root smmsp 1155 2005-06-28 13:46 sendmail-server.crt
-rw--- 1 root root 976 2005-06-28 13:46 sendmail-server.csr
-rwxr--r-- 1 root root 3145 2005-06-28 13:47 starttls.m4
sendmail.conf:
DAEMON_NETMODE=Static;
DAEMON_NETIF=lo;
DAEMON_MODE=Daemon;
DAEMON_PARMS=;
DAEMON_HOSTSTATS=No;
DAEMON_MAILSTATS=No;
QUEUE_MODE=${DAEMON_MODE};
QUEUE_INTERVAL=10m;
QUEUE_PARMS=;
MSP_MODE=Cron;
MSP_INTERVAL=20m;
MSP_PARMS=;
MSP_MAILSTATS=${DAEMON_MAILSTATS};
MISC_PARMS=;
CRON_MAILTO=root;
CRON_PARMS=;
LOG_CMDS=No;
HANDS_OFF=No;
AGE_DATA=;
DAEMON_RUNASUSER=No;
DAEMON_STATS=${DAEMON_MAILSTATS};
MSP_STATS=${MSP_MAILSTATS};
sendmail.mc:
divert(-1)dnl
divert(0)dnl
define(`_USE_ETC_MAIL_')dnl
include(`/usr/share/sendmail/cf/m4/cf.m4')dnl
VERSIONID(`$Id: sendmail.mc, v 8.13.4-3 2005-06-03 16:49:22 cowboy Exp $')
OSTYPE(`debian')dnl
DOMAIN(`debian-mta')dnl
undefine(`confHOST_STATUS_DIRECTORY')dnl#DAEMON_HOSTSTATS=
FEATURE(`no_default_msa')dnl
DAEMON_OPTIONS(`Family=inet6, Name=MTA-v6, Port=smtp, Addr=::1')dnl
DAEMON_OPTIONS(`Family=inet6, Name=MSP-v6, Port=submission, Addr=::1')dnl
define(`confPRIVACY_FLAGS',dnl
`needmailhelo,needexpnhelo,needvrfyhelo,restrictqrun,restrictexpand,nobodyreturn,authwarnings')dnl
Bug#316093: ncurses-base: binaries terminfo files marked as conffiles
Package: ncurses-base Version: 5.4-8 Severity: serious Hello Dan, ncurses-base mark the following files as conffiles: /etc/terminfo/E/Eterm /etc/terminfo/a/ansi /etc/terminfo/c/cons25 /etc/terminfo/c/cygwin /etc/terminfo/d/dumb /etc/terminfo/h/hurd /etc/terminfo/l/linux /etc/terminfo/m/mach /etc/terminfo/m/mach-bold /etc/terminfo/m/mach-color /etc/terminfo/p/pcansi /etc/terminfo/r/rxvt /etc/terminfo/r/rxvt-basic /etc/terminfo/r/rxvt-unicode /etc/terminfo/s/screen /etc/terminfo/s/screen-bce /etc/terminfo/s/screen-s /etc/terminfo/s/screen-w /etc/terminfo/s/sun /etc/terminfo/v/vt100 /etc/terminfo/v/vt102 /etc/terminfo/v/vt220 /etc/terminfo/v/vt52 /etc/terminfo/w/wsvt25 /etc/terminfo/w/wsvt25m /etc/terminfo/x/xterm /etc/terminfo/x/xterm-debian /etc/terminfo/x/xterm-r5 /etc/terminfo/x/xterm-r6 /etc/terminfo/x/xterm-xfree86 /etc/terminfo/x/xterm-mono /etc/terminfo/x/xterm-vt220 /etc/terminfo/x/xterm-color However theses files are binaries files, not text files. They probably do not beong in /etc in the first place but at least they should not be marked as conffiles, since dpkg do not handle non-text conffiles in a useful way: Setting up ncurses-base (5.4-8) ... Configuration file `/etc/terminfo/r/rxvt-unicode' == File on system created by you or by a script. == File also in package provided by package maintainer. What would you like to do about it ? Your options are: Y or I : install the package maintainer's version N or O : keep your currently-installed version D : show the differences between the versions Z : background this process to examine the situation The default action is to keep your current version. *** rxvt-unicode (Y/I/N/O/D/Z) [default=N] ? D Binary files /etc/terminfo/r/rxvt-unicode and /etc/terminfo/r/rxvt-unicode.dpkg-new differ Cheers, -- Bill. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Imagine a large red swirl here. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#316096: gnumeric: Crash when saving to MS Excel format
Package: gnumeric Version: 1.4.3-4 Severity: critical Justification: causes serious data loss Gnumeric crashes when I'm trying to save file in MS Excel format, regardless of file content - it may be a new empty file or file with some data. Steps to reproduce are: 1. Open some file or create a new one. 2. Menu File Save As. 3. Choose MS Excel (tm) 97/2000/XP in the File Type combo, press Save. Result: The Application gnumeric has quit unexpectedly. dialog. It crashes with two other Excel format choices too. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-386 Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Versions of packages gnumeric depends on: ii gconf22.8.1-6GNOME configuration database syste ii gnumeric-common 1.4.3-4common files for Gnumeric, the GNO ii gsfonts 8.14+v8.11+urw-0.2 Fonts for the Ghostscript interpre ii libart-2.0-2 2.3.17-1 Library of functions for 2D graphi ii libatk1.0-0 1.8.0-4The ATK accessibility toolkit ii libbonobo2-0 2.8.1-2Bonobo CORBA interfaces library ii libbonoboui2-02.8.1-2The Bonobo UI library ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-22 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libgconf2-4 2.8.1-6GNOME configuration database syste ii libglade2-0 1:2.4.2-2 library to load .glade files at ru ii libglib2.0-0 2.6.4-1The GLib library of C routines ii libgnome2-0 2.8.1-2The GNOME 2 library - runtime file ii libgnomecanvas2-0 2.8.0-1A powerful object-oriented display ii libgnomeprint2.2-02.8.2-1The GNOME 2.2 print architecture - ii libgnomeprintui2.2-0 2.8.2-2GNOME 2.2 print architecture User ii libgnomeui-0 2.8.1-3The GNOME 2 libraries (User Interf ii libgnomevfs2-02.8.4-4The GNOME virtual file-system libr ii libgsf-1 1.12.0-1 Structured File Library - runtime ii libgsf-gnome-11.11.1-1 Structured File Library - runtime ii libgtk2.0-0 2.6.4-3The GTK+ graphical user interface ii libice6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-14Inter-Client Exchange library ii liborbit2 1:2.12.2-1 libraries for ORBit2 - a CORBA ORB ii libpango1.0-0 1.8.1-1Layout and rendering of internatio ii libpopt0 1.7-5 lib for parsing cmdline parameters ii libsm64.3.0.dfsg.1-14X Window System Session Management ii libxml2 2.6.16-7 GNOME XML library ii xlibs 4.3.0.dfsg.1-14X Keyboard Extension (XKB) configu ii zlib1g1:1.2.2-4 compression library - runtime -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
