Bug#290009: any luck with r5rs-doc?
Anything happening here? It would be nice to get this package back in for etch, but scm doesn't seem to be having much luck -- can it be made to run on a different scheme interpreter? Or is there a new maintainer in the works for scm? -- Nathanael Nerode [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Instead, we front-load the flamewars and grudges in the interest of efficiency.) --Steve Lanagasek, http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2005/09/msg01056.html -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#328048: mod_perl makes apache2 segv
On 2005-09-28 20:52:23 -0700, Jurij Smakov wrote: FWIW, I cannot reproduce it in current sid. Application I maintain (torrus) uses libapache2-mod-perl2 and it's working happily. Here are currently installed versions of relevant packages: apache2-common2.0.54-5 apache2-mpm-worker2.0.54-5 libapache2-mod-perl2 2.0.1-3 perl 5.8.7-5 Here, on a PowerPC machine, Apache crashes with: apache2-common2.0.54-5 apache2-mpm-prefork 2.0.54-5 libapache2-mod-perl2 2.0.1-3 perl 5.8.7-5 I had to remove perl.* symlinks from /etc/apache2/mods-enabled. -- Vincent Lefèvre [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Web: http://www.vinc17.org/ 100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: http://www.vinc17.org/blog/ Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / SPACES project at LORIA -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#327960: marked as done (rlplot: uninstallable; needs rebuild for the Qt/KDE transition)
Your message dated Thu, 29 Sep 2005 00:17:06 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#327960: fixed in rlplot 1.0-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Sep 2005 23:48:12 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Sep 12 16:48:12 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from 84-120-66-144.onocable.ono.com (chistera.yi.org) [84.120.66.144] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EEy20-0003TD-00; Mon, 12 Sep 2005 16:48:12 -0700 Received: from userid 1000 by chistera.yi.org with local (Exim 4.52) id 1EEy1e-0002UN-1g for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 01:47:50 +0200 From: Adeodato =?utf-8?B?U2ltw7M=?= [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: rlplot: uninstallable; needs rebuild for the Qt/KDE transition Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2005 01:47:50 +0200 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.8 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS, HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: rlplot Version: 0.99.14-1 Severity: grave Tags: sid Hello, This is a grave bug filed against your package because it depends on libqt3c102-mt, which no longer exists, thus rendering yor package uninstallable in unstable. As part of the C++ ABI transition, this library has moved to the libqt3-mt package. Simply recompiling and uploading your package should be enough to fix this; as per this mail [1], you need not bump your Qt, kdelibs or aRts build-dependencies. Beware, though, that that may not be the case for all the involved librares. Also, make sure that you build the package in an up to date and clean sid environment, so that final dependencies are correct. Please do this as soon as possible in order to accelerate the Qt/KDE transition to testing. [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/09/msg0.html Perhaps you find that your package fails to compile with gcc4. If that's the case, there's probably a bug about it in the BTS, and it may include a patch. If not (or if you have doubts about the correctness of the patch), you may be able to find a fix in upstream's CVS, or in the Ubuntu distribution. If your package fails only in arm, m68k, and hppa, see instructions in the above mail. Finally, if there's a strong reason for which your package should not be NMUed, please note so in this bug report. Prospective NMUers will read your reasoning, and will decide if it's strong enough to delay their upload. Thanks for your cooperation, and happy hacking! P.S.: There may be an already reported bug against this package for this very same reason. I've checked for that, and will be merging the bugs soon. The reason for still filing this bug was to have the opportunity of including the small bits of information above. I apologize for the inconvenience. --- Received: (at 327960-close) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Sep 2005 07:18:19 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Sep 29 00:18:19 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EKsfC-0005bx-00; Thu, 29 Sep 2005 00:17:06 -0700 From: James Stone [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#327960: fixed in rlplot 1.0-1 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2005 00:17:06 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: rlplot Source-Version: 1.0-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of rlplot, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: rlplot_1.0-1.diff.gz to pool/main/r/rlplot/rlplot_1.0-1.diff.gz rlplot_1.0-1.dsc to pool/main/r/rlplot/rlplot_1.0-1.dsc rlplot_1.0-1_i386.deb to pool/main/r/rlplot/rlplot_1.0-1_i386.deb rlplot_1.0.orig.tar.gz to
Bug#330627: Gentoo had an advisory for this
Hi, there has been a Gentoo advisory about insecure temp files in rkhunter, which got assigned CAN-2005-1270: http://www.gentoo.org/security/en/glsa/glsa-200504-25.xml So please check, whether the mentioned check_update.sh script is vulnerable in the Debian package as well. Cheers, Moritz -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#329870: pydf: Does not start on alpha architecture after installing
On Wed, Sep 28, 2005 at 07:57:56PM +0200, Adrian Neumaier wrote: ... python2.4 (2.4.1+2.4.2rc1-1): python2.4 -c 'import os; print os.statvfs(/)' (4096, 4096, 1802133918588257, 2020764933271418, 1546304191037019, 0, 0, 255, 0, 0) ^^^ ^ this says your filesystem is 1802133918588257*4096 B == 6.4 exabytes big(!) likewise, it says you have 7.2 exabytes of free space, therefore the occupied space is negative and this is where pydf fails. I am going to reassign the bug to python. python2.4 -c 'import os; print os.statvfs(/home)' (4096, 4096, 1640913730780508, 1108307721154497, 1101865270110756, 0, 0, 255, 0, 0) ditto -- --- | Radovan Garabík http://kassiopeia.juls.savba.sk/~garabik/ | | __..--^^^--..__garabik @ kassiopeia.juls.savba.sk | --- Antivirus alert: file .signature infected by signature virus. Hi! I'm a signature virus! Copy me into your signature file to help me spread!
Bug#320413: Take over of texinfo/info packages
Norbert Preining [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mit, 28 Sep 2005, Frank Küster wrote: For more than 5 weeks no answer. How do we proceed with this? We should think about something rather soon, as with teTeX 3 going into unstable texinfo is broken. I think we do it rather now, than when I'm busy with uploading teTeX 3.0. Is the patch you posted to the bug log still up-to-date wrt to the version on http://www.tug.org/texlive/Debian/texinfo/? Yes it is. But: lintian spits out: W: texinfo: binary-without-manpage texi2pdf There is a manpage in the sources of teTeX 2.0.2 (and thus in the sid Debian package, or on http://cvs.debian.org/*checkout*/tetex-bin/texk/tetex/texi2pdf.man?rev=1.1.1.2cvsroot=tetexcontent-type=application/x-troff-man W: texinfo: possible-bashism-in-maintainer-script postinst:3 '[ $1 = configure -a ' - if [ $1 = configure -a -z $2 ] ; then + if [ $1 = configure ] [ -z $2 ] ; then E: texinfo: old-fsf-address-in-copyright-file W: info: possible-bashism-in-maintainer-script postinst:3 '[ $1 = configure -o ' - if [ $1 = configure -o $1 = upgrade ]; then + if [ $1 = configure ] || [ $1 = upgrade ]; then E: info: old-fsf-address-in-copyright-file What the hell is this stupid old-fsf-address-in-copyright-file error. Doesn't lintian tell you more with -i? web.ask.com pointed me to , Lintian report for old-fsf-address-in-copyright-file | | The /usr/share/doc/pkg/copyright file refers to the old postal | address of the Free Software Foundation (FSF). The new address is: | | Free Software Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place - Suite 330, Boston, | MA 02111-1307, USA. | ` Of course this is an upstream issue, just as the manpage. But what is with the bashism?! That test or [ understands boolean operators is specific to bash, or at least it isn't guaranteed by POSIX and probably not implemented in the test builtins of dash and posh. Do you accept it like this? Or should I prepare a new 0.1. We're not really in a hurry; I'd say fix them first. And: Did we come to the conclusion that I write myself as teh new Maintainer or that I make a NMU upload? In fact we were always talking about taking over. So it's gonna be 4.8-1, with you as the maintainer and your signature in the changelog file. Regards, Frank -- Frank Küster Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich Debian Developer
Bug#330602: irssi-text: irssi SEGVs with recent sid perl upgrade
On Sep 28, 2005 at 21:59, simon raven praised the llamas by saying: Package: irssi-text Version: 0.8.10rc5-0.1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable hi, just like the subject says, it SEGVs when i launch it. also it dumps core. seems to be DynaLoader related, since i'm seeing similar behaviour with mod_perl (DynaLoader involved in the borkedness). more info provided upon request. Can you disable loading all perl scripts on start up? Does it still crash? Can you load one script at a time and let me know if it is all scripts that cause it to crash or if it is just one or a set of scripts. -- David Pashley [EMAIL PROTECTED] Nihil curo de ista tua stulta superstitione. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: os.statvfs bogus results on alpha
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 329870 python Bug#329870: pydf: Does not start on alpha architecture after installing Bug reassigned from package `pydf' to `python'. severity 329870 normal Bug#329870: pydf: Does not start on alpha architecture after installing Severity set to `normal'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#330336: Patch for NMU 2.0.7-1.2
Jeremy T. Bouse wrote: Next time I would appreciate it if you followed section 5.11.1 of the Developers Reference a bit more closely. You did submit a bug report, atleast the snmp dependency was one that actually did not already have a report submitted on; however giving less than 24 hours before you uploaded not only the NMU but the patch to the BTS hardly gives time for a response from the developer. Submitting the patch within 24 hours and not uploading the NMU after giving some time for a response would have been better. 5.11.1 states the following order, please abid by it: 1) File a bug report *Hurray you did that atleast* 2) Wait a few days for a response. File a 'patch' if no response 3) Wait a few more days if you get no answer, then mail announcing the intent to NMU 4) Upload your package to DELAYED/7-day (not 3-DAY, not 5-DAY, *7-DAY*) It's part of the gcc and Qt/KDE transition. At least for libfwbuilder 3-DAY is apropriate... Open RC bugs are an intent to NMU... and an NMU is no attack, it's just to help you... If you had checked all the other bugs you closed and read them you would have noticed that I was working on the 2.0.9 packaging already as it had been released. I had been working on 2.0.8 when the C++ ABI transition hit the mirrors. You would have also noticed I respond to just about every bug report filed, so not getting a response from a bug filed within 24 hours isn't a problem. Fixing RC bugs is more important than a new upstream... I won't go on about the fact that some of the items in the bugs you closed were not addressed in your NMU to begin with and would have been closed without being addressed. You mean the bug that was already fixed, but not closed by you? Checking the QA mia-history would have also showed I wasn't MIA as well; however you made no attempt, other than the one bug report to, contact me prior to doing the NMU. Note that the NMU has not reached the archive yet and that your packages are holding the Qt/KDE transition... The other option next to NMUing was asking its removal from testing in a couple of days... Note also that NMUing is to help you. I'm sorry if you misunderstood this NMUs as an attack. The procedure for NMUing described in the Developers Reference is indeed a good one for fixing random bugs, but please understand that it is too much hassle for a testing migration of a *big* transition. So, sorry again if it came over as an attack. Cheers Luk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#330604: inkscape does not start
Hi Torsten, On Wed, Sep 28, 2005 at 10:40:13PM +0200, Torsten Zirzlaff wrote: Package: inkscape Version: 0.42.2-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable During startup of inkscape it does display the beginnings of the canvas area, but then stops with a popup that it has encountered an internal error and closed now. On console the following appears: tinuviel zirzlaff 65 (~):inkscape Emergency save activated! Emergency save completed. Inkscape will close now. If you can reproduce this crash, please file a bug at www.inkscape.org with a detailed description of the steps leading to the crash, so we can fix it. Abbruch -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing-proposed-updates APT policy: (500, 'testing-proposed-updates'), (500, 'testing') Architecture: alpha Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.12.4.20050814 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) Since you are using alpha, this is probably a reintroduction of 64Bit uncleanliness in inkscape. Hm, I hoped that this would be closed. Can you provide a backtrace please? I had a look at the buildlog for inkscape on alpha, but there are so many warnings that I'm lost. Thanks for your help, Wolfi signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#330682: mantis: Several vulnerabilities in Mantis
Package: mantis Severity: grave Tags: security Justification: user security hole mantis 1.0.0-rc2 fixed these security problems, that seem to be missing in the latest DSA upload that fixed several others: - 0006097: [security] user ID is cached indefinately (thraxisp) - 0006189: [security] List of users (in filter) visible for unauthorized users. (thraxisp) Besides that there was a CVE assignment (CAN-2005-3091) for a Cross-Site-Scripting vulnerability that refers the Mantis bug 5751, for which I can't find a referenced fix in the 0.19.2-4 changelog as well. Cheers, Moritz -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.14-rc1 Locale: LANG=C, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: proper tagging
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 329839 grave Bug#329839: buffer overflow security fix Severity set to `grave'. tags 329839 security Bug#329839: buffer overflow security fix There were no tags set. Tags added: security thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#329848: stripclub: FTBFS on hppa
Steve Langasek wrote: The fact that this only fails on hppa is rather odd, and is probably worthy of a closer look. Sure. Test it on other architectures, and see if it still builds -- judging by the timestamps, I think hppa is the only arch that's tried it since the new binutils hit the archive, so it's a fair assumption that it's not actually hppa-specific. Looking at the timestamps, from what I can tell it looks like it's been doing this for a while, and seems to be hppa specific (although the error used to be 'file truncated'). I *just* tested rebuilding it on my i386 box, using the latest sid packages, and it worked fine, so I'm not sure why it's failing on hppa buildd. I don't have any other architectures available to me. Is there any documentation on whether or not compiling into /dev/null is supported, or is this undocumented behavior that just happens to work on everything BUT hppa? Seems like it's worth asking the gcc guys, so I'm forwarding this to the gcc list. In the mean time, I'll twiddle with the build scripts tomorrow and send in a new package that should compile on hppa. I've known about this for quite some time, but really had no idea what was causing it, so I just kinda left it alone, hoping it was some hppa bug that would just get fixed later. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#306693: Ubuntu patch for cpio CAN-2005-1111 and CAN-2005-1229
tag 306693 patch tag 305372 patch thanks Hi! I finally got some time to fix these issues: http://patches.ubuntu.com/patches/cpio.CAN-2005-_1229.diff In case it is useful for a DSA, here is the USN text: | Imran Ghory found a race condition in the handling of output files. | While a file was unpacked with cpio, a local attacker with write | permissions to the target directory could exploit this to change the | permissions of arbitrary files of the cpio user. (CAN-2005-) | | Imran Ghory discovered a path traversal vulnerability. Even when the | --no-absolute-filenames option was specified, cpio did not filter out | .. path components. By tricking an user into unpacking a malicious | cpio archive, this could be exploited to install files in arbitrary | paths with the privileges of the user calling cpio. (CAN-2005-1229) Have a nice day, Martin -- Martin Pitthttp://www.piware.de Ubuntu Developer http://www.ubuntu.com Debian Developer http://www.debian.org In a world without walls and fences, who needs Windows and Gates? signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#330664: linux-image-2.6.12-1-alpha-smp: kernel panic: trying to kill interrupt handler
severity 330664 important tags 330664 moreinfo thanks On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 06:58:58AM +0200, DEMAINE Benoit-Pierre wrote: hand copy of KP: [...] Kernel panic - not syncing: Aiee, killing interrupt handler! Please copy the whole output (serial console makes this easy). This line don't show where it does wrong and what happened. Bastian -- Schshschshchsch. -- The Gorn, Arena, stardate 3046.2 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Processed: Ubuntu patch for cpio CAN-2005-1111 and CAN-2005-1229
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 306693 patch Bug#306693: [CAN-2005-1229] cpio: allows extracting insecure pathnames (leading slash = / and dotdot = ..) Tags were: security Tags added: patch tag 305372 patch Bug#305372: TOCTOU file-permissions vulnerability (CAN-2005-) Tags were: security Tags added: patch thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#330364: Helix Player 1.0.6
Helix Player 1.0.6 does fix the mentioned security problem. Because Noah said he will prepare the stable-security package (and packages by me seems not to be considered), I only made the package for sid so far. It is in the usual place at http://archive.daniel-baumann.ch/debian/packages/helix-player/ and will be uploaded today. For sarge: As usual, there is no broken-out patch available, so one have to pull it oneself from the 1.0.6 tarball. -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#312058: Planning to fix this one?
Hi, Hello! This bug has been open and patched for quite a while. Planning to make a new upload soon? Please reply to bug trail. It has been on my TODO list for ages now... :-( Sorry, I didn't have time for it yet. best regards, Erich Schubert -- erich@(vitavonni.de|debian.org)--GPG Key ID: 4B3A135C(o_ To understand recursion you first need to understand recursion. //\ Die kürzeste Verbindung zwischen zwei Menschen ist ein Lächeln. V_/_
Bug#330664: linux-image-2.6.12-1-alpha-smp: kernel panic: trying to kill interrupt handler
Please copy the whole output (serial console makes this easy). This line don't show where it does wrong and what happened. I have been trying to use a serial cable for that for about 2h before sending this report, but my cable seems faulty; I try againe when I have a new cable. The only thing you see on screen is just a list of stack addresse, and name of functions. I do think that may be helpfull ... if I can give th ebegining of the list. It is the first time I report a bug being 'serious', and I hope I can proove it is so within 4 days. -- DEMAINE Benoit-Pierre (aka DoubleHP ) http://www.demaine.info/ \_o If computing were an exact science, IT engineers would not have work o_/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#330607: marked as done (current version does not provide a binary :/)
Your message dated Thu, 29 Sep 2005 04:32:15 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#330607: fixed in qgo 1.0.2-5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Sep 2005 21:15:55 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Sep 28 14:15:55 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from master.debian.org [146.82.138.7] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EKjHP-0003k6-00; Wed, 28 Sep 2005 14:15:55 -0700 Received: from pd95348f6.dip.t-dialin.net (localhost.localdomain) [217.83.72.246] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1EKjHO-Mz-00; Wed, 28 Sep 2005 16:15:54 -0500 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Bastian Venthur [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: current version does not provide a binary :/ X-Mailer: reportbug 3.17 Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2005 23:15:59 +0200 X-Debbugs-Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.8 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS, HAS_PACKAGE,OUR_MTA_MSGID,X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: qgo Version: 1.0.2-3 Severity: grave Hi new qgo maintainer ;) I think you've made a little mistake in you last update. At least on my box the qgo-binary is not installed anymore: $ dpkg -L qgo /. /usr /usr/share /usr/share/doc /usr/share/doc/qgo /usr/share/doc/qgo/copyright /usr/share/doc/qgo/changelog.gz /usr/share/doc/qgo/changelog.Debian.gz /usr/share/menu /usr/share/menu/qgo /usr/share/man /usr/share/man/man6 /usr/share/man/man6/qgo.6.gz Please fix ASAP -- I need this programm, really ;) kind regards Bastian -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.13-laptop Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 330607-close) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Sep 2005 11:38:02 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Sep 29 04:38:02 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EKwe7-0007bs-00; Thu, 29 Sep 2005 04:32:15 -0700 From: Cyril Chaboisseau [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#330607: fixed in qgo 1.0.2-5 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2005 04:32:15 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: qgo Source-Version: 1.0.2-5 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of qgo, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: qgo_1.0.2-5.diff.gz to pool/main/q/qgo/qgo_1.0.2-5.diff.gz qgo_1.0.2-5.dsc to pool/main/q/qgo/qgo_1.0.2-5.dsc qgo_1.0.2-5_i386.deb to pool/main/q/qgo/qgo_1.0.2-5_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Cyril Chaboisseau [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated qgo package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2005 00:32:07 +0200 Source: qgo Binary: qgo Architecture: source i386 Version: 1.0.2-5 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Cyril Chaboisseau [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Cyril Chaboisseau [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: qgo- Go client and full featured SGF editor Closes: 330607 Changes: qgo (1.0.2-5) unstable;
Bug#330706: freenet-unstable: package spectacularly out of date
Package: freenet-unstable Version: 0.4.3+20020413-2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Nobody out there is still using version 0.4, there have been two major point releases since that version was current and a third is in the works. Unfortunately, the nature of this package means that using a significantly out of date version will not work unless a large number of others are also using that version. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.4.26 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Versions of packages freenet-unstable depends on: ii adduser 3.67 Add and remove users and groups ii debconf 1.4.58 Debian configuration management sy ii debianutils 2.14.3 Miscellaneous utilities specific t ii gij-4.0 [java-virtual-machine 4.0.1-2The GNU Java bytecode interpreter ii j2re1.4 [java-virtual-machine 1.4.2.02-1 Blackdown Java(TM) 2 Runtime Envir ii kaffe 2:1.1.5-3 A JVM to run Java bytecode ii kaffe-pthreads [kaffe]2:1.1.5-3 A POSIX threads enabled version of ii net-tools 1.60-15The NET-3 networking toolkit freenet-unstable recommends no packages. -- debconf information: * freenet-unstable/storeSize: 209715200 freenet-unstable/missing-address: * freenet-unstable/ipAddress: 127.0.0.1 freenet-unstable/services: fproxy freenet-unstable/port-not-a-short: freenet-unstable/bigfile-supported: false freenet-unstable/address-means-nontransient: freenet-unstable/listenPort: 21615 freenet-unstable/size-not-a-number: -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#222384: Processed: Not security related
tags 222384 + security thanks The removal of the security tag seams to be a mistake. There was no explanation in the mail and I got no answer on my question about it. The problem is clearly security related. Christoph Debian Bug Tracking System schrieb: Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 222384 - security Bug#222384: mason: Mason does not setup /etc/rc.* links Tags were: patch sarge security Tags removed: security thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Christoph Martin, Leiter der EDV der Verwaltung, Uni-Mainz, Germany Internet-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Telefon: +49-6131-3926337 Fax: +49-6131-3922856 signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#330164: Fwd: Provisional patch for mysql authentication bypass
Hi! I accidentially sent this to the wrong patch at first. Martin - Forwarded message from Martin Pitt [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2005 19:49:34 +0200 From: Martin Pitt [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Provisional patch for mysql authentication bypass Hi! I ported the two patches to 4.0.24: http://patches.ubuntu.com/patches/mysql-dfsg.CAN-2004-0627_0628.diff they look straightforward; however, the exploit on http://downloads.securityfocus.com/vulnerabilities/exploits/mysql-auth-bypass.pl still claims that access is granted. It also claims that with mysql 4.1.12-1 (which has the patch already applied upstream), so I begin to wonder whether it is actually the exploit that is broken, not the patch. Christian, can upstream shed some light on this? Thanks in advance and have a nice day! Martin -- Martin Pitthttp://www.piware.de Ubuntu Developer http://www.ubuntu.com Debian Developer http://www.debian.org In a world without walls and fences, who needs Windows and Gates? - End forwarded message - -- Martin Pitthttp://www.piware.de Ubuntu Developer http://www.ubuntu.com Debian Developer http://www.debian.org In a world without walls and fences, who needs Windows and Gates? signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Processed: Fixed in NMU of view3ds 1.0.0-9.1
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 328002 + fixed Bug#328002: view3ds: uninstallable; needs rebuild for the Qt/KDE transition Tags were: pending sid Tags added: fixed quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Fixed in NMU of wvstreams 4.0.2-4.1
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 328001 + fixed Bug#328001: wvstreams: uninstallable; needs rebuild for the Qt/KDE transition Tags were: pending sid Bug#325247: libwvstreams4.0-qt: uninstallable because of missing libqt3c102-mt Tags added: fixed quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Fixed in NMU of synce-kde 0.8.1.1-1.1
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 328020 + fixed Bug#328020: synce-kde: uninstallable; needs rebuild for the Qt/KDE transition Tags were: pending sid Bug#327204: synce-kde: broken dependencies Tags added: fixed quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Fixed in NMU of kwirelessmonitor 0.5.91-1.1
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 327991 + fixed Bug#327991: kwirelessmonitor: uninstallable; needs rebuild for the Qt/KDE transition Tags were: pending sid Bug#326104: kwirelessmonitor: please update dependencies for new KDE 3.4.2 Tags added: fixed quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Fixed in NMU of kiosktool 1.0-1.1
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 327996 + fixed Bug#327996: kiosktool: uninstallable; needs rebuild for the Qt/KDE transition Tags were: pending sid Tags added: fixed quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Fixed in NMU of kompose 0.5.1-2.1
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 327970 + fixed Bug#327970: kompose: uninstallable; needs rebuild for the Qt/KDE transition Tags were: pending sid Tags added: fixed quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Fixed in NMU of klog 0.3.2-1.1
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 327972 + fixed Bug#327972: klog: uninstallable; needs rebuild for the Qt/KDE transition Tags were: pending sid Tags added: fixed quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Fixed in NMU of prokyon3 0.9.2-2.1
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 328008 + fixed Bug#328008: prokyon3: uninstallable; needs rebuild for the Qt/KDE transition Tags were: pending sid Tags added: fixed quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Fixed in NMU of zsafe 2.1.3-2.1
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 328018 + fixed Bug#328018: zsafe: uninstallable; needs rebuild for the Qt/KDE transition Tags were: pending sid Tags added: fixed quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Fixed in NMU of qtstalker 0.26-5.1
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 327990 + fixed Bug#327990: qtstalker: uninstallable; needs rebuild for the Qt/KDE transition Tags were: pending sid Tags added: fixed quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: (no subject)
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 324836 fixed Bug#324836: initng: /dev/MAKEDEV isn't created There were no tags set. Tags added: fixed tags 323244 fixed Bug#323244: initng: Cardmgr should started before networking There were no tags set. Tags added: fixed tags 323693 fixed Bug#323693: initng: /dev/xconsole is missing Tags were: experimental Tags added: fixed tags 325486 fixed Bug#325486: initng: Bashisms in postinst - doesn't work with dash Tags were: fixed-upstream Tags added: fixed tags 323144 fixed Bug#323144: initng: Link to package's homepage is wrong Tags were: fixed-in-experimental experimental Tags added: fixed End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#330364: Helix Player 1.0.6
On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 01:05:22PM +0200, Daniel Baumann wrote: For sarge: As usual, there is no broken-out patch available, so one have to pull it oneself from the 1.0.6 tarball. I've already done it. The packages are built and the advisory is on its way. noah signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#330364: Helix Player 1.0.6
Noah Meyerhans wrote: I've already done it. The packages are built and the advisory is on its way. Thank you. -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#330714: ispellcat: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'aspell'
Package: ispellcat Version: 0.4-5 Severity: serious Tags: patch When building 'ispellcat' in a clean 'unstable' chroot, I get the following error: debian/strip_mwl | ispell -d /ispellcat-0.4/catala.debian -e | \ tr -s ' ' '\n' | uniq catala.words.debian cp catala.words.debian ca.wl prezip ca.wl make: prezip: Command not found make: *** [build-stamp] Error 127 Please add the missing Build-Depends on 'aspell' to debian/control. Regards Andreas Jochens diff -urN ../tmp-orig/ispellcat-0.4/debian/control ./debian/control --- ../tmp-orig/ispellcat-0.4/debian/control2005-09-29 13:08:05.0 + +++ ./debian/control2005-09-29 13:08:01.0 + @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ Source: ispellcat Section: text Priority: optional -Build-Depends: ispell, debhelper (= 4.0.0), dictionaries-common-dev (= 0.20) +Build-Depends: debhelper, aspell, ispell, dictionaries-common-dev (= 0.20) Maintainer: Jordi Mallach [EMAIL PROTECTED] Standards-Version: 3.6.1.0 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#266176: marked as done (libapache2-mod-layout needs to be recompiled for apache2 LFS transition)
Your message dated Thu, 29 Sep 2005 06:02:06 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#266176: fixed in libapache2-mod-layout 4.0.1a-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Aug 2004 23:30:47 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Aug 16 16:30:47 2004 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from s010600e029962405.cg.shawcable.net (lucifer.0c3.net) [68.147.116.8] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BwqwB-0008Ka-00; Mon, 16 Aug 2004 16:30:47 -0700 Received: from adconrad by lucifer.0c3.net with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1Bwqw9-6k-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 16 Aug 2004 17:30:45 -0600 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: libapache2-mod-layout needs to be recompiled for apache2 LFS transition Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Adam Conrad [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2004 17:30:45 -0600 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Package: libapache2-mod-layout Severity: serious Due to an unfortunate but necessary change to the apache2 packages that changed the ABI of libapr0, your package needs to be rebuilt against the latest apache2 packages. To make this transition happen smoothly, the following must happen: Bump your apache2-*/libapr build-depends to (= 2.0.50-9) Upload with urgency=medium I apologize for the lack of warning, however I spent all weekend getting apache2 ready for this, and I didn't have much time to send out warning bugs. We've tested subversion, php4, and mod_perl extensively to make sure these changes in APR don't break anything, and we're satisfied they don't. If those three aren't broken, the smaller ones should certainly be fine too. :) If action isn't taken before today's dinstall, I *WILL* NMU with the above simple changes. Thanks, ... Adam Conrad (with the blessing of the RM team) --- Received: (at 266176-close) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Sep 2005 13:08:27 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Sep 29 06:08:27 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EKy34-0006hU-00; Thu, 29 Sep 2005 06:02:06 -0700 From: Guus Sliepen [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#266176: fixed in libapache2-mod-layout 4.0.1a-3 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2005 06:02:06 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: libapache2-mod-layout Source-Version: 4.0.1a-3 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of libapache2-mod-layout, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: libapache2-mod-layout_4.0.1a-3.diff.gz to pool/main/liba/libapache2-mod-layout/libapache2-mod-layout_4.0.1a-3.diff.gz libapache2-mod-layout_4.0.1a-3.dsc to pool/main/liba/libapache2-mod-layout/libapache2-mod-layout_4.0.1a-3.dsc libapache2-mod-layout_4.0.1a-3_i386.deb to pool/main/liba/libapache2-mod-layout/libapache2-mod-layout_4.0.1a-3_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Guus Sliepen [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated libapache2-mod-layout package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2005 14:42:59 +0200 Source: libapache2-mod-layout Binary: libapache2-mod-layout Architecture: source i386 Version: 4.0.1a-3 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Guus Sliepen [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Guus Sliepen
Bug#320413: Take over of texinfo/info packages
Hi Frank! Please get the version 4.8-1 from the tug server. I have fixed all the lintian warnings and errors, changed maintainer, added several bug-closings due to upstream fixes. And stole the manpage from tetex. The package is lintian clean and build in my pbuilder/sid. On Don, 29 Sep 2005, Frank Küster wrote: , Lintian report for old-fsf-address-in-copyright-file | | The /usr/share/doc/pkg/copyright file refers to the old postal | address of the Free Software Foundation (FSF). The new address is: | | Free Software Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place - Suite 330, Boston, | MA 02111-1307, USA. | ` THis adress is the wrong one. The right one is in /usr/share/common-licences. In fact we were always talking about taking over. So it's gonna be 4.8-1, with you as the maintainer and your signature in the changelog file. Done. After the package is in Debian I will work on the other bugs. Probably most of them are also solved by upstream already, but this has to be checked. Best wishes Norbert --- Dr. Norbert Preining preining AT logic DOT at Università di Siena sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED] +43 (0) 59966-690018 gpg DSA: 0x09C5B094 fp: 14DF 2E6C 0307 BE6D AD76 A9C0 D2BF 4AA3 09C5 B094 --- BURES The scabs on knees and elbows formed by a compulsion to make love on cheap Habitat floor-matting. --- Douglas Adams, The Meaning of Liff -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#330715: lvm2: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'libreadline5-dev'
Package: lvm2 Version: 2.01.14-2 Severity: serious Tags: patch When building 'lvm2' in a clean 'unstable' chroot, I get the following error: checking getopt.h presence... yes checking for getopt.h... yes checking for readline in -lreadline... no configure: error: GNU Readline could not be found which is required for the --enable-readline option (which is enabled by default). Either disable readline support with --disable-readline or download and install readline from: ftp.gnu.org/gnu/readline Note: if you are using precompiled packages you will also need the development package as well (which may be called readline-devel or something similar). make: *** [debian/build/build-deb/config.status] Error 1 Please add the missing Build-Depends on 'libreadline5-dev' to debian/control. Regards Andreas Jochens diff -urN ../tmp-orig/lvm2-2.01.14/debian/control ./debian/control --- ../tmp-orig/lvm2-2.01.14/debian/control 2005-09-29 13:11:49.0 + +++ ./debian/control2005-09-29 13:11:47.0 + @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ Priority: optional Maintainer: Debian LVM Team [EMAIL PROTECTED] Uploaders: Bastian Blank [EMAIL PROTECTED], Andres Salomon [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Build-Depends: debhelper ( 4.2), libdevmapper-dev (= 2:1.00.07-1), autotools-dev, libdlm-dev (= 0.trunk20050206-2), libselinux1-dev, libncurses5-dev +Build-Depends: debhelper ( 4.2), libreadline5-dev, libdevmapper-dev (= 2:1.00.07-1), autotools-dev, libdlm-dev (= 0.trunk20050206-2), libselinux1-dev, libncurses5-dev Standards-Version: 3.6.2 Package: lvm2 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#330716: crossfire-maps: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'debhelper'
Package: crossfire-maps Version: 1.8.0-1 Severity: serious Tags: patch When building 'crossfire-maps' in a clean 'unstable' chroot, I get the following error: if test /crossfire-maps-1.8.0/build != .; then rmdir /crossfire-maps-1.8.0/build; fi rmdir: `/crossfire-maps-1.8.0/build': No such file or directory make: [cleanbuilddir] Error 1 (ignored) dh_clean make: dh_clean: Command not found make: *** [clean] Error 127 Please add the missing Build-Depends on 'debhelper' to debian/control. Regards Andreas Jochens diff -urN ../tmp-orig/crossfire-maps-1.8.0/debian/control ./debian/control --- ../tmp-orig/crossfire-maps-1.8.0/debian/control 2005-09-29 13:12:48.0 + +++ ./debian/control2005-09-29 13:12:44.0 + @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ Priority: optional Maintainer: Kari Pahula [EMAIL PROTECTED] Standards-Version: 3.6.2 -Build-Depends: cdbs +Build-Depends: debhelper, cdbs Package: crossfire-maps Architecture: all -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#329664: marked as done (shell command execution)
Your message dated Thu, 29 Sep 2005 06:32:14 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#329664: fixed in mozilla-thunderbird 1.0.6-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Sep 2005 14:52:55 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Sep 22 07:52:55 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from ms-2.rz.rwth-aachen.de (ms-dienst.rz.rwth-aachen.de) [134.130.3.131] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EISRT-0007Ts-00; Thu, 22 Sep 2005 07:52:55 -0700 Received: from r220-1 (r220-1.rz.RWTH-Aachen.DE [134.130.3.31]) by ms-dienst.rz.rwth-aachen.de (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 Patch 2 (built Jul 14 2004)) with ESMTP id [EMAIL PROTECTED] for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 22 Sep 2005 16:52:52 +0200 (MEST) Received: from relay.rwth-aachen.de ([134.130.3.1]) by r220-1 (MailMonitor for SMTP v1.2.2 ) ; Thu, 22 Sep 2005 16:52:51 +0200 (MEST) Received: from [134.130.118.117] (coyote.mmweg.RWTH-Aachen.DE [134.130.118.117])by relay.rwth-aachen.de (8.13.3/8.13.3/1) with ESMTP id j8MEqp8L001249; Thu, 22 Sep 2005 16:52:51 +0200 (MEST) Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2005 16:53:02 +0200 From: Sebastian Ley [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: shell command execution To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: reportbug 3.17 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-Debbugs-Cc: Debian Security Team [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE, X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: mozilla-thunderbird Severity: grave Tags: security Secunia reports in http://secunia.com/advisories/16901/ that thunderbird can be exploited to execute arbitrary shell commands in the context of the user running thuderbird. This bug has been assigned CAN-2005-2968. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-686 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) --- Received: (at 329664-close) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Sep 2005 13:38:04 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Sep 29 06:38:04 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EKyWE-0001Qp-00; Thu, 29 Sep 2005 06:32:14 -0700 From: Alexander Sack [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#329664: fixed in mozilla-thunderbird 1.0.6-4 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2005 06:32:14 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-CrossAssassin-Score: 3 Source: mozilla-thunderbird Source-Version: 1.0.6-4 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of mozilla-thunderbird, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: mozilla-thunderbird-dev_1.0.6-4_i386.deb to pool/main/m/mozilla-thunderbird/mozilla-thunderbird-dev_1.0.6-4_i386.deb mozilla-thunderbird-inspector_1.0.6-4_i386.deb to pool/main/m/mozilla-thunderbird/mozilla-thunderbird-inspector_1.0.6-4_i386.deb mozilla-thunderbird-offline_1.0.6-4_i386.deb to pool/main/m/mozilla-thunderbird/mozilla-thunderbird-offline_1.0.6-4_i386.deb mozilla-thunderbird-typeaheadfind_1.0.6-4_i386.deb to pool/main/m/mozilla-thunderbird/mozilla-thunderbird-typeaheadfind_1.0.6-4_i386.deb mozilla-thunderbird_1.0.6-4.diff.gz to pool/main/m/mozilla-thunderbird/mozilla-thunderbird_1.0.6-4.diff.gz mozilla-thunderbird_1.0.6-4.dsc to pool/main/m/mozilla-thunderbird/mozilla-thunderbird_1.0.6-4.dsc mozilla-thunderbird_1.0.6-4_i386.deb to pool/main/m/mozilla-thunderbird/mozilla-thunderbird_1.0.6-4_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be
Bug#325536: marked as done (mozilla: FTBFS: change in behavior of __attribute__((unused)))
Your message dated Thu, 29 Sep 2005 06:32:14 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#325536: fixed in mozilla-thunderbird 1.0.6-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Aug 2005 09:07:53 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Aug 29 02:07:52 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from dsl093-039-086.pdx1.dsl.speakeasy.net (tennyson.netexpress.net) [66.93.39.86] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1E9fcO-0002LY-00; Mon, 29 Aug 2005 02:07:52 -0700 Received: by tennyson.netexpress.net (Postfix, from userid 1003) id 610437049; Mon, 29 Aug 2005 02:07:51 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2005 02:07:51 -0700 From: Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: mozilla: FTBFS: change in behavior of __attribute__((unused)) Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=XMCwj5IQnwKtuyBG Content-Disposition: inline X-Debbugs-Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 --XMCwj5IQnwKtuyBG Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary=ftEhullJWpWg/VHq Content-Disposition: inline --ftEhullJWpWg/VHq Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Package: mozilla Severity: serious The current mozilla package fails to build on alpha, arm, and ia64 because it uses __attribute__((unused)) to mark static functions that are called only from assembly routines. As of gcc 3.1, __attribute__((used)) exists for marking static functions that are used; as of gcc 4.0, __attribute__((unused)) still suppresses compiler warnings about unused static functions, but it does *not* prevent the compiler from optimizing them away. The attached patch should fix this failure for all three architectures. It has only been tested on alpha, and each architecture has its own implementation for this bit of code, but this patch fixes all uses of __attribute__((unused)), so it should be sufficient. (FWIW, one other architecture -- i386 -- already uses ((used)) in the code...) Since this bug is in the XPCOM code, it also affects other packages that build copies of XPCOM. I'll clone this bug off to them as soon as I have a bug number back. Thanks, --=20 Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ --ftEhullJWpWg/VHq Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=mozilla-unused.diff Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable diff -ur mozilla.orig/xpcom/reflect/xptcall/src/md/unix/xptcinvoke_linux_al= pha.cpp=20 mozilla/xpcom/reflect/xptcall/src/md/unix/xptcinvoke_linux_alpha.cpp --- mozilla.orig/xpcom/reflect/xptcall/src/md/unix/xptcinvoke_linux_alpha.c= pp 2005-08-28 20:01:29.0 -0700 +++ mozilla/xpcom/reflect/xptcall/src/md/unix/xptcinvoke_linux_alpha.cpp 20= 05-08-28 02:36:43.0 -0700 @@ -43,7 +43,8 @@ /* Prototype specifies unmangled function name and disables unused warning= */ static void invoke_copy_to_stack(PRUint64* d, PRUint32 paramCount, nsXPTCVariant* s) -__asm__(invoke_copy_to_stack) __attribute__((unused)); +__asm__(invoke_copy_to_stack) __attribute__((used)); + =20 static void invoke_copy_to_stack(PRUint64* d, PRUint32 paramCount, nsXPTCVariant* s) diff -ur mozilla.orig/xpcom/reflect/xptcall/src/md/unix/xptcstubs_arm.cpp m= ozilla/xpcom/reflect/xptcall/src/md/unix/xptcstubs_arm.cpp --- mozilla.orig/xpcom/reflect/xptcall/src/md/unix/xptcstubs_arm.cpp2002-0= 3-04 22:35:50.0 -0800 +++ mozilla/xpcom/reflect/xptcall/src/md/unix/xptcstubs_arm.cpp 2005-08-28 = 02:46:41.0 -0700 @@ -45,7 +45,8 @@ #endif =20 /* Specify explicitly a symbol for this function, don't try to guess the c= ++ mangled symbol. */ -static nsresult PrepareAndDispatch(nsXPTCStubBase* self, uint32 methodInde= x, PRUint32* args) asm(_PrepareAndDispatch); +static nsresult PrepareAndDispatch(nsXPTCStubBase* self, uint32
Bug#329667: marked as done (mozilla-thunderbird --compose executes shell commands)
Your message dated Thu, 29 Sep 2005 06:32:14 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#329667: fixed in mozilla-thunderbird 1.0.6-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Sep 2005 15:27:41 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Sep 22 08:27:41 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mail.enyo.de [212.9.189.167] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EISz7-0006i6-00; Thu, 22 Sep 2005 08:27:41 -0700 Received: from deneb.vpn.enyo.de ([212.9.189.177] helo=deneb.enyo.de) by albireo.enyo.de with esmtp id 1EISz6-0006gy-0d for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 22 Sep 2005 17:27:40 +0200 Received: from fw by deneb.enyo.de with local (Exim 4.52) id 1EISyp-j8-FR; Thu, 22 Sep 2005 17:27:23 +0200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Florian Weimer [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: mozilla-thunderbird --compose executes shell commands X-Mailer: reportbug 3.15 Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2005 17:27:23 +0200 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: mozilla-thunderbird Version: 1.0.6-3 Severity: grave Tags: security The --compose option executes shell commands: mozilla-thunderbird --compose 'mailto:`df`' The df output appears in the To: line of the message. (This is related to the recently disclosed Firefox bug, which does not seem to affect Debian thanks to a different wrapper script.) --- Received: (at 329667-close) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Sep 2005 13:38:03 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Sep 29 06:38:03 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EKyWE-0001Qr-00; Thu, 29 Sep 2005 06:32:14 -0700 From: Alexander Sack [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#329667: fixed in mozilla-thunderbird 1.0.6-4 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2005 06:32:14 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-CrossAssassin-Score: 4 Source: mozilla-thunderbird Source-Version: 1.0.6-4 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of mozilla-thunderbird, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: mozilla-thunderbird-dev_1.0.6-4_i386.deb to pool/main/m/mozilla-thunderbird/mozilla-thunderbird-dev_1.0.6-4_i386.deb mozilla-thunderbird-inspector_1.0.6-4_i386.deb to pool/main/m/mozilla-thunderbird/mozilla-thunderbird-inspector_1.0.6-4_i386.deb mozilla-thunderbird-offline_1.0.6-4_i386.deb to pool/main/m/mozilla-thunderbird/mozilla-thunderbird-offline_1.0.6-4_i386.deb mozilla-thunderbird-typeaheadfind_1.0.6-4_i386.deb to pool/main/m/mozilla-thunderbird/mozilla-thunderbird-typeaheadfind_1.0.6-4_i386.deb mozilla-thunderbird_1.0.6-4.diff.gz to pool/main/m/mozilla-thunderbird/mozilla-thunderbird_1.0.6-4.diff.gz mozilla-thunderbird_1.0.6-4.dsc to pool/main/m/mozilla-thunderbird/mozilla-thunderbird_1.0.6-4.dsc mozilla-thunderbird_1.0.6-4_i386.deb to pool/main/m/mozilla-thunderbird/mozilla-thunderbird_1.0.6-4_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Alexander Sack [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated mozilla-thunderbird package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2005 17:00:00 +0100 Source: mozilla-thunderbird
Bug#329667: marked as done (mozilla-thunderbird --compose executes shell commands)
Your message dated Thu, 29 Sep 2005 06:32:14 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#329664: fixed in mozilla-thunderbird 1.0.6-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Sep 2005 15:27:41 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Sep 22 08:27:41 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mail.enyo.de [212.9.189.167] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EISz7-0006i6-00; Thu, 22 Sep 2005 08:27:41 -0700 Received: from deneb.vpn.enyo.de ([212.9.189.177] helo=deneb.enyo.de) by albireo.enyo.de with esmtp id 1EISz6-0006gy-0d for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 22 Sep 2005 17:27:40 +0200 Received: from fw by deneb.enyo.de with local (Exim 4.52) id 1EISyp-j8-FR; Thu, 22 Sep 2005 17:27:23 +0200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Florian Weimer [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: mozilla-thunderbird --compose executes shell commands X-Mailer: reportbug 3.15 Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2005 17:27:23 +0200 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: mozilla-thunderbird Version: 1.0.6-3 Severity: grave Tags: security The --compose option executes shell commands: mozilla-thunderbird --compose 'mailto:`df`' The df output appears in the To: line of the message. (This is related to the recently disclosed Firefox bug, which does not seem to affect Debian thanks to a different wrapper script.) --- Received: (at 329664-close) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Sep 2005 13:38:04 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Sep 29 06:38:04 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EKyWE-0001Qp-00; Thu, 29 Sep 2005 06:32:14 -0700 From: Alexander Sack [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#329664: fixed in mozilla-thunderbird 1.0.6-4 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2005 06:32:14 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-CrossAssassin-Score: 3 Source: mozilla-thunderbird Source-Version: 1.0.6-4 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of mozilla-thunderbird, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: mozilla-thunderbird-dev_1.0.6-4_i386.deb to pool/main/m/mozilla-thunderbird/mozilla-thunderbird-dev_1.0.6-4_i386.deb mozilla-thunderbird-inspector_1.0.6-4_i386.deb to pool/main/m/mozilla-thunderbird/mozilla-thunderbird-inspector_1.0.6-4_i386.deb mozilla-thunderbird-offline_1.0.6-4_i386.deb to pool/main/m/mozilla-thunderbird/mozilla-thunderbird-offline_1.0.6-4_i386.deb mozilla-thunderbird-typeaheadfind_1.0.6-4_i386.deb to pool/main/m/mozilla-thunderbird/mozilla-thunderbird-typeaheadfind_1.0.6-4_i386.deb mozilla-thunderbird_1.0.6-4.diff.gz to pool/main/m/mozilla-thunderbird/mozilla-thunderbird_1.0.6-4.diff.gz mozilla-thunderbird_1.0.6-4.dsc to pool/main/m/mozilla-thunderbird/mozilla-thunderbird_1.0.6-4.dsc mozilla-thunderbird_1.0.6-4_i386.deb to pool/main/m/mozilla-thunderbird/mozilla-thunderbird_1.0.6-4_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Alexander Sack [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated mozilla-thunderbird package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2005 17:00:00 +0100 Source: mozilla-thunderbird
Bug#329664: marked as done (shell command execution)
Your message dated Thu, 29 Sep 2005 06:32:14 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#329667: fixed in mozilla-thunderbird 1.0.6-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Sep 2005 14:52:55 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Sep 22 07:52:55 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from ms-2.rz.rwth-aachen.de (ms-dienst.rz.rwth-aachen.de) [134.130.3.131] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EISRT-0007Ts-00; Thu, 22 Sep 2005 07:52:55 -0700 Received: from r220-1 (r220-1.rz.RWTH-Aachen.DE [134.130.3.31]) by ms-dienst.rz.rwth-aachen.de (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 Patch 2 (built Jul 14 2004)) with ESMTP id [EMAIL PROTECTED] for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 22 Sep 2005 16:52:52 +0200 (MEST) Received: from relay.rwth-aachen.de ([134.130.3.1]) by r220-1 (MailMonitor for SMTP v1.2.2 ) ; Thu, 22 Sep 2005 16:52:51 +0200 (MEST) Received: from [134.130.118.117] (coyote.mmweg.RWTH-Aachen.DE [134.130.118.117])by relay.rwth-aachen.de (8.13.3/8.13.3/1) with ESMTP id j8MEqp8L001249; Thu, 22 Sep 2005 16:52:51 +0200 (MEST) Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2005 16:53:02 +0200 From: Sebastian Ley [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: shell command execution To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: reportbug 3.17 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-Debbugs-Cc: Debian Security Team [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE, X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: mozilla-thunderbird Severity: grave Tags: security Secunia reports in http://secunia.com/advisories/16901/ that thunderbird can be exploited to execute arbitrary shell commands in the context of the user running thuderbird. This bug has been assigned CAN-2005-2968. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-686 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) --- Received: (at 329667-close) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Sep 2005 13:38:03 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Sep 29 06:38:03 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EKyWE-0001Qr-00; Thu, 29 Sep 2005 06:32:14 -0700 From: Alexander Sack [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#329667: fixed in mozilla-thunderbird 1.0.6-4 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2005 06:32:14 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-CrossAssassin-Score: 4 Source: mozilla-thunderbird Source-Version: 1.0.6-4 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of mozilla-thunderbird, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: mozilla-thunderbird-dev_1.0.6-4_i386.deb to pool/main/m/mozilla-thunderbird/mozilla-thunderbird-dev_1.0.6-4_i386.deb mozilla-thunderbird-inspector_1.0.6-4_i386.deb to pool/main/m/mozilla-thunderbird/mozilla-thunderbird-inspector_1.0.6-4_i386.deb mozilla-thunderbird-offline_1.0.6-4_i386.deb to pool/main/m/mozilla-thunderbird/mozilla-thunderbird-offline_1.0.6-4_i386.deb mozilla-thunderbird-typeaheadfind_1.0.6-4_i386.deb to pool/main/m/mozilla-thunderbird/mozilla-thunderbird-typeaheadfind_1.0.6-4_i386.deb mozilla-thunderbird_1.0.6-4.diff.gz to pool/main/m/mozilla-thunderbird/mozilla-thunderbird_1.0.6-4.diff.gz mozilla-thunderbird_1.0.6-4.dsc to pool/main/m/mozilla-thunderbird/mozilla-thunderbird_1.0.6-4.dsc mozilla-thunderbird_1.0.6-4_i386.deb to pool/main/m/mozilla-thunderbird/mozilla-thunderbird_1.0.6-4_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be
Processed: tagging 330715
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.7 tags 330715 pending Bug#330715: lvm2: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'libreadline5-dev' Tags were: patch Tags added: pending End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#306693: Ubuntu patch for cpio CAN-2005-1111 and CAN-2005-1229
Hi Clint! Clint Adams [2005-09-29 9:34 -0400]: http://patches.ubuntu.com/patches/cpio.CAN-2005-_1229.diff Has this been sent to GNU upstream? No idea. This vuln is ages old, but there is no new upstream version yet, so I presume not. Martin -- Martin Pitt http://www.piware.de Ubuntu Developer http://www.ubuntulinux.org Debian Developerhttp://www.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#324628: marked as done (xt-sdf2: FTBFS with gcc-4.0: static declaration of 'hash_table' follows non-static declaration)
Your message dated Thu, 29 Sep 2005 07:17:09 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#324628: fixed in xt-sdf2 2.0.1-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Aug 2005 05:12:52 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Aug 22 22:12:51 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from (frobnitz.homelinux.net) [67.188.213.204] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1E7R5f-0005Q3-00; Mon, 22 Aug 2005 22:12:51 -0700 Received: from daniel by frobnitz.homelinux.net with local (Exim 4.52) id 1E7R5Y-0005zF-Ez for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 22 Aug 2005 22:12:45 -0700 From: Daniel Schepler [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: xt-sdf2: FTBFS with gcc-4.0: static declaration of 'hash_table' follows non-static declaration Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2005 22:12:39 -0700 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: xt-sdf2 Severity: serious Version: 2.0.1-3 From my build log, using pbuilder in an i386 chroot: ... gcc -I/usr/include/xt-aterm -DPACKAGE=\toolbuslib\ -DVERSION=\0.5.1\ -DHAVE_STRERROR=1 -DHAVE_STRDUP=1 -I. -I. -I.-Wall -g -O2 -c symbol.c symbol.c:44: error: static declaration of 'hash_table' follows non-static declaration symbol.h:53: error: previous declaration of 'hash_table' was here symbol.c:45: error: static declaration of 'idx_table' follows non-static declaration symbol.h:54: error: previous declaration of 'idx_table' was here make[4]: *** [symbol.o] Error 1 make[4]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/xt-sdf2-2.0.1/pre-pkgs/build/toolbuslib/libtb' make[3]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[3]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/xt-sdf2-2.0.1/pre-pkgs/build/toolbuslib' make[2]: *** [pre-pkgs/build/toolbuslib.dummy] Error 2 make[2]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/xt-sdf2-2.0.1' make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/xt-sdf2-2.0.1' make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2 -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-amd64-k8 Locale: LANG=en, LC_CTYPE=en (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to en_US.UTF-8) -- Daniel Schepler Please don't disillusion me. I [EMAIL PROTECTED]haven't had breakfast yet. -- Orson Scott Card --- Received: (at 324628-close) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Sep 2005 14:18:38 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Sep 29 07:18:38 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EKzDh-0005ZC-00; Thu, 29 Sep 2005 07:17:09 -0700 From: Matej Vela [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#324628: fixed in xt-sdf2 2.0.1-4 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2005 07:17:09 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: xt-sdf2 Source-Version: 2.0.1-4 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of xt-sdf2, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: xt-sdf2-dev_2.0.1-4_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xt-sdf2/xt-sdf2-dev_2.0.1-4_i386.deb xt-sdf2_2.0.1-4.diff.gz to pool/main/x/xt-sdf2/xt-sdf2_2.0.1-4.diff.gz xt-sdf2_2.0.1-4.dsc to pool/main/x/xt-sdf2/xt-sdf2_2.0.1-4.dsc xt-sdf2_2.0.1-4_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xt-sdf2/xt-sdf2_2.0.1-4_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Matej Vela [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated xt-sdf2 package) (This message
Bug#306693: marked as done ([CAN-2005-1229] cpio: allows extracting insecure pathnames (leading slash = / and dotdot = ..))
Your message dated Thu, 29 Sep 2005 08:02:07 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#306693: fixed in cpio 2.6-6 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Apr 2005 01:49:29 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Apr 27 18:49:28 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from master.debian.org [146.82.138.7] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DQy9g-0001LR-00; Wed, 27 Apr 2005 18:49:28 -0700 Received: from ip024.subnet65.gci-net.com ([127.0.0.1]) [216.183.65.24] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DQy9f-0001dr-00; Wed, 27 Apr 2005 20:49:27 -0500 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: cpio: allows extracting insecure pathnames (leading slash = / and dotdot = ..) Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], bug-cpio@gnu.org X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8 Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2005 18:47:41 -0700 X-Debbugs-Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_30,HAS_PACKAGE, NO_REAL_NAME,OUR_MTA_MSGID,X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: cpio Version: 2.5-1.2 Severity: normal Hi, OK, several related issues here. You probably already see where I am going, but please humor me for a minute just in case. Not sure if I'm supposed to file with debian or with cpio's own bug lair. I believe (IMHO) that this is a security issue and should be fixed soon. Anybody can create an archive and put it on the net that lots of trusting people will run cpio -i on to inadvertently write a file in, say, /etc/cron.daily. ~# touch /etc/cron.daily/aaa ~# find /etc/cron.daily/aaa|cpio -oa.cpio 1 block ~# \rm -v /etc/cron.daily/aaa removed `/etc/cron.daily/aaa' Imagine that that file is buried deep in a huge archive of files with innocent relative pathnames, and was made executable first. Now the unsuspecting user (who should, but does not, know better), does this: ~# cpio -t a.cpio lots of innocent files /etc/cron.daily/aaa lots of innocent files 1 block ~# cpio -i a.cpio #oops, forgot an option 1 block And does not do this: ~# ls -l /etc/cron.daily/aaa -rw--- 1 root root 0 Apr 27 18:23 /etc/cron.daily/aaa ~# \rm -v /etc/cron.daily/aaa removed `/etc/cron.daily/aaa' Note that the user should have used the --no-absolute-filenames option, but did not. So you could say it's preventable. But consider what happens if the pathname is relative: ~# find ../../../../../../../../../../../../etc/cron.daily/aaa | cpio -oa.cpio Now that option will not help. To prevent that requires preprocessing the archive with cpio -t and grep '\.\.'. How many users do that? Especially on a large archive? OK, here are my comments: First, there is no way that I know of within cpio -o to prohibit absolute pathnames and .. in a pathname. This is important to flag mistakes in the input and to prevent somebody who runs cpio -i (including unfixed versions of cpio) from inadvertently installing your files in unexpected (i.e. not below pwd) places. IMHO safety should be the default, but an option would be OK if necessary. Prohibiting ^/ and \.\. is easy in a shell, but it should be built in to make error handling easier. Of course, this doesn't solve the security problem. It just avoids mistakes. Second, more importantly, cpio -o does not by default prohibit absolute filenames. The option --no-absolute-filenames is an OK workaround, but IMHO it should be the default. Third, even more importantly, cpio -o does not by default or via an option appear to check for .. in pathnames. Using .. in the archive is rarely needed, and IMHO it should be disallowed by default. At least, it should be an option. (If it is disallowed by default, a nop option to disallow should probably still be provided so that other versions of cpio will (ideally) balk at an unrecognized option, tipping the user to be more careful.) Finally, I have a related wishlist item, which is an option to cpio -o archives in which all pathnames, whether relative or absolute, are converted to fully canonical (but NOT symlink-dereferenced
Bug#330364: marked as done (helix-player: Helix Player Remote Format String Exploit)
Your message dated Thu, 29 Sep 2005 08:17:17 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#330364: fixed in helix-player 1.0.6-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Sep 2005 18:32:50 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Sep 27 11:32:50 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mail-out.m-online.net [212.18.0.9] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EKKG2-Mo-00; Tue, 27 Sep 2005 11:32:50 -0700 Received: from mail.m-online.net (svr20.m-online.net [192.168.3.148]) by mail-out.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA2C8703C5; Tue, 27 Sep 2005 20:32:28 +0200 (CEST) Received: from k.local (ppp-82-135-79-97.mnet-online.de [82.135.79.97]) by mail.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C638105C6F; Tue, 27 Sep 2005 20:32:48 +0200 (CEST) Received: from stf by k.local with local (Exim 4.52) id 1EKKFq-0001j8-Fh; Tue, 27 Sep 2005 20:32:38 +0200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Stefan Fritsch [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: helix-player: Helix Player Remote Format String Exploit X-Mailer: reportbug 3.17 Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2005 20:32:38 +0200 X-Debbugs-Cc: Debian Security Team [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE, X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: helix-player Severity: grave Tags: security Justification: user security hole According to http://www.open-security.org/advisories/13, there is another remote vulnerability in helix player. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.12.3-k1 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) --- Received: (at 330364-close) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Sep 2005 15:18:20 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Sep 29 08:18:19 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EL09t-0005YS-00; Thu, 29 Sep 2005 08:17:17 -0700 From: Daniel Baumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#330364: fixed in helix-player 1.0.6-1 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2005 08:17:17 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: helix-player Source-Version: 1.0.6-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of helix-player, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: helix-player_1.0.6-1.diff.gz to pool/main/h/helix-player/helix-player_1.0.6-1.diff.gz helix-player_1.0.6-1.dsc to pool/main/h/helix-player/helix-player_1.0.6-1.dsc helix-player_1.0.6-1_i386.deb to pool/main/h/helix-player/helix-player_1.0.6-1_i386.deb helix-player_1.0.6.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/h/helix-player/helix-player_1.0.6.orig.tar.gz A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Daniel Baumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated helix-player package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Thr, 29 Sep 2005 11:39:00 +0200 Source: helix-player Binary: helix-player Architecture: source i386 Version: 1.0.6-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: high Maintainer: Daniel Baumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Daniel Baumann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#218908: Candidates for removal
On Thu, 2005-09-29 at 10:15 +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: 1266 days: tuxtype (0 waiting, new pkg, has RC bugs) [Rune B. Broberg] Copyright issues (see bug 218908). Jeroen wrote let's see if someone interested jumps in, otherwise, removal seems to be the best option to me. -- on 21 June. Someone said that they were trying to make a sponsored upload on 18 August; I've pinged them. I hope Debian-Junior guys will do some action ... It would be a shame to loose this nice thing. Well, I just looked at the bug, and I think I can help out somewhat. I was the original creator of Tux Typing and maintained it up to the 1.0 release. After that, I passed on maintainer-ship over to Jesse Andrews (see this http://www.samhart.com/snh/oldnews/2002-Apr-news.shtml#2002Apr7-23:27) Nearly every graphic, sound and animation was something that I created except for a few images which were pulled from the Copyright Free Photo Archive here: http://gimp-savvy.com/PHOTO-ARCHIVE/index.html Beyond the 1.0 release, there may have been some graphics that originated from somewhere else, I'm afraid you'd have to track down and ask Jesse Andrews for those details. However, I'm more than willing to do whatever I need to to ensure that the graphics and sounds I've created have some sort of copyright or text associated with them to make them work inside the DFSG. I can certainly identify those images and sounds that I personally created (many of the sounds, for example, are me doing things like taking a bite out of an apple or saying things like excuse me). I can also identify which images came from the Copyright Free Photo Archive. If anyone is willing to work with me to identify what /specifically/ is needed for it, I'd be more than obliged. (FWIW, this was something we actually struggled with in Tux4Kids and later at OSEF... we never really found a license that did for media what other FLOSS licenses do for software. So, honestly, the lack of any real text describing license or copyright was because we were at a loss as to what to use.) -- ' .O. Sam Hart, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ..OProgeny Linux Systems, Inc OOO http://www.progeny.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#325286: tagcolledit: FTBFS: Versioned Build-Depends on 'libtagcoll1-dev' can not be satisfied in 'unstable'
On Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 03:06:15PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: Build-Depends: cdbs, debhelper ( 4.1), dh-buildinfo, pkg-config, libtagcoll-dev (= 1.5), libtagcoll-dev ( 1.6), libgtkmm-2.4-dev There is no libtagcoll-dev package in unstable. It should be in NEW, hopefully coming in soon. Ok, then please don't close the bug in the changelog of tagcolledit, you didn't make any changes to tagcolledit to fix it. I updated the build-depends to depend on the right package name and version: isn't that worthwile of closing the bug? Ciao, Enrico -- GPG key: 1024D/797EBFAB 2000-12-05 Enrico Zini [EMAIL PROTECTED] signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#330733: twiki: INCLUDE function allows arbitrary shell command execution
Package: twiki
Version: 20040902-3
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Justification: user security hole
A new security bug in twiki showed up today:
http://twiki.org/cgi-bin/view/Codev/SecurityAlertExecuteCommandsWithInclude
An attacker is able to execute arbitrary shell commands with the
privileges of the web server process. The TWiki INCLUDE function
enables a malicious user to compose a command line executed by the
Perl backtick (`) operator.
The rev parameter of the INCLUDE variable is not checked properly for
shell metacharacters and is thus vulnerable to revision numbers
containing pipes and shell commands. The exploit is possible on
included topics with two or more revisions.
Example INCLUDE variable exploiting the rev parameter:
%INCLUDE{ Main.TWikiUsers rev=2|less /etc/passwd }%
The same vulnerability is exposed to all Plugins and add-ons that use
TWiki::Func::readTopicText function to read a previous topic revision.
This has been tested on TWiki:Plugins.RevCommentPlugin and
TWiki:Plugins.CompareRevisionsAddon.
If access to TWiki is not restricted by other means, attackers can use
the revision function with or without prior authentication, depending
on the configuration.
The Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures project has assigned the name
CAN-2005-3056 to this vulnerability. Please include this number in any
changelogs fixing this.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-k7
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#330738: mozilla-firefox: experimental version uninstable due to dependency
Package: mozilla-firefox Version: 1.4.99+1.5beta1.dfsg-3 Severity: serious Tags: experimental I used reportbug to submit this bug a couple of days ago, but I never got a confirmation and I can't find a bug report online. Anyway, it seems to apply to the even newer version in experimental, so I'm resubmitting it. The new version in experimental depends on a non-existence 1.2.8rel-4 version of libpng12-0. According to packags.qa.d.o, the most recernt versions are 1.2.8rel-1 in unstable and 1.2.8rel-2 in experimental. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (10, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.12cavy1 Locale: LANG=he_IL.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=he_IL.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages mozilla-firefox depends on: ii debianutils 2.14.2 Miscellaneous utilities specific t ii fontconfig2.3.2-1generic font configuration library ii libatk1.0-0 1.10.1-2 The ATK accessibility toolkit ii libc6 2.3.5-3GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libfontconfig12.3.2-1generic font configuration library ii libfreetype6 2.1.10-1 FreeType 2 font engine, shared lib ii libgcc1 1:4.0.1-8 GCC support library ii libglib2.0-0 2.8.0-1The GLib library of C routines ii libgtk2.0-0 2.6.9-1The GTK+ graphical user interface ii libidl0 0.8.5-1library for parsing CORBA IDL file ii libjpeg62 6b-10 The Independent JPEG Group's JPEG ii libkrb53 1.3.6-5MIT Kerberos runtime libraries ii libpango1.0-0 1.8.2-1Layout and rendering of internatio ii libpng12-01.2.8rel-1 PNG library - runtime ii libstdc++64.0.1-8The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 ii libx11-6 6.8.2.dfsg.1-5 X Window System protocol client li ii libxext6 6.8.2.dfsg.1-5 X Window System miscellaneous exte ii libxft2 2.1.7-1FreeType-based font drawing librar ii libxinerama1 6.8.2.dfsg.1-5 X Window System multi-head display ii libxp66.8.2.dfsg.1-5 X Window System printing extension ii libxt66.8.2.dfsg.1-5 X Toolkit Intrinsics ii psmisc21.6-1 Utilities that use the proc filesy ii xlibs 6.8.2.dfsg.1-5 X Window System client libraries m ii zlib1g1:1.2.3-3 compression library - runtime mozilla-firefox recommends no packages. -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#330400: more info
More info. When a working rails application is run this message appears in error.log of apache. /home/patrik/public_html/ftplog/../config/../vendor/activesupport/lib/active_support/clean_logger.rb:13:in `remove_const': constant Logger::Format not defined (NameError) from /home/patrik/public_html/ftplog/../config/../vendor/activesupport/lib/active_support/clean_logger.rb:13 from /home/patrik/public_html/ftplog/../config/../vendor/activesupport/lib/active_support.rb:31 from /home/patrik/public_html/ftplog/../config/environment.rb:50 from /home/patrik/public_html/ftplog/dispatch.cgi:5 [Thu Sep 29 17:36:02 2005] [error] [client 127.0.0.1] Premature end of script headers: /home/patrik/public_html/ftplog/dispatch.cgi HTH Mody signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#328227: marked as done (libmpfr-dev: Non-free doc mpfr.texi : GFDL 1.1)
Your message dated Thu, 29 Sep 2005 08:47:08 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#328227: fixed in mpfr 2.2.0.dfsg.1-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Sep 2005 09:05:08 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Sep 14 02:05:08 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from tortoise.loria.fr (tortoise.lateralis.org) [152.81.15.241] (Debian-exim) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EFTCW-00081G-00; Wed, 14 Sep 2005 02:05:08 -0700 Received: from laurent by tortoise with local (Exim 4.52) id 1EFTCU-0001An-4k; Wed, 14 Sep 2005 11:05:06 +0200 Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2005 11:05:06 +0200 From: Laurent Fousse [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: libmpfr-dev: Non-free doc mpfr.texi : GFDL 1.1 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=x+6KMIRAuhnl3hBn Content-Disposition: inline X-Reportbug-Version: 3.17 Organization: =?iso-8859-1?Q?KomiT=EA?= User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.10i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 --x+6KMIRAuhnl3hBn Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Package: libmpfr-dev Version: 2.1.2-1 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 2.2.1 The MPFR documentation is provided as texinfo source file licensed under the GFDL version 1.1 or any later version. Since there is only a limited number of useful rephrasing of this technical documentation, I consider an attempt to rewrite it a complete waste of time and I won't be doing it. Upstream might consider the option of a relicensing, the problem being that the copyright was assigned to the FSF. If you know how to deal with such a situation, please reply. My short time plan is to obliterate the documentation from the source tarball. --x+6KMIRAuhnl3hBn Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDJ+fBTUld8sb4OVwRAiWdAJ9IJPiU5hXoyHM0Lj+d5n61/ZSxMACcCM2+ oZBlFuS81dxE9W+7kPcUceY= =lQIi -END PGP SIGNATURE- --x+6KMIRAuhnl3hBn-- --- Received: (at 328227-close) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Sep 2005 15:48:09 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Sep 29 08:48:09 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EL0cm-0004w4-00; Thu, 29 Sep 2005 08:47:08 -0700 From: Laurent Fousse [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#328227: fixed in mpfr 2.2.0.dfsg.1-1 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2005 08:47:08 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: mpfr Source-Version: 2.2.0.dfsg.1-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of mpfr, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: libmpfr-dev_2.2.0.dfsg.1-1_i386.deb to pool/main/m/mpfr/libmpfr-dev_2.2.0.dfsg.1-1_i386.deb mpfr_2.2.0.dfsg.1-1.diff.gz to pool/main/m/mpfr/mpfr_2.2.0.dfsg.1-1.diff.gz mpfr_2.2.0.dfsg.1-1.dsc to pool/main/m/mpfr/mpfr_2.2.0.dfsg.1-1.dsc mpfr_2.2.0.dfsg.1.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/m/mpfr/mpfr_2.2.0.dfsg.1.orig.tar.gz A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Laurent Fousse [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated mpfr package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Bug#328048: mod_perl makes apache2 segv
On Thu, 2005-09-29 at 09:14 +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote: On 2005-09-28 20:52:23 -0700, Jurij Smakov wrote: FWIW, I cannot reproduce it in current sid. Application I maintain (torrus) uses libapache2-mod-perl2 and it's working happily. Here are currently installed versions of relevant packages: apache2-common2.0.54-5 apache2-mpm-worker2.0.54-5 libapache2-mod-perl2 2.0.1-3 perl 5.8.7-5 Here, on a PowerPC machine, Apache crashes with: apache2-common2.0.54-5 apache2-mpm-prefork 2.0.54-5 libapache2-mod-perl2 2.0.1-3 perl 5.8.7-5 I had to remove perl.* symlinks from /etc/apache2/mods-enabled. This is just a wild guess, but this sounds a whole lot like library conflicts; ie, a perl program pulling in libmysqlclient12 (thus causing modperl to load libmysqlclient12), and php loading libmysqlclient10. What perl libs are installed? What other apache modules are loaded, and what libs are they pulling in? What versions of libmysqlclient and pcre are installed on the system? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#330474: mutt: opens of same mbox by multiple mutt processes erase message bodies
retitle 330474 mutt: rewrites Content-Length message header in mbox folders to be zero, which subsequently causes mutt to nuke the entire message body thanks My initial diagnosis of this bug was overly complex. Here's a repro recipe. 1) Open any mbox folder with mutt -R. (-R means read-only, you don't have to do this, but it will allow you to observe the bug without destroying your mail folder). 2) Tag one or messages in that folder. 3) Observe the Content-Length headers in the message(s) you've tagged. In most cases of real-world mail, the header value will be non-zero. 4) C)opy the tagged message(s) to a new folder. 5) Quit. 6) Use $PAGER or $EDITOR to view the new folder. 7) Observe the Content-Length headers in the message(s). Note that they are all zero. 8) Observe that the message body (or bodies) is/are still present. 9) Open the new folder with mutt. Don't specify -R this time. 10) Read the message(s) in it. 11) Observe that you can't read the message body. 12) Quit back to the index, and quit mutt. Don't use exit. We want changes written to the folder. 13) Use $PAGER or $EDITOR to view the new folder again. 14) WHERE THE HELL ARE THE MESSAGE BODIES? Retitled bug accordingly. I stand by the severity of this report. I don't know if it's specific to mbox folders; that's just the only format I ever use. -- G. Branden Robinson| You are not angry with people when Debian GNU/Linux | you laugh at them. Humor teaches [EMAIL PROTECTED] | them tolerance. http://people.debian.org/~branden/ | -- W. Somerset Maugham signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Processed: Re: Bug#330474: mutt: opens of same mbox by multiple mutt processes erase message bodies
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: retitle 330474 mutt: rewrites Content-Length message header in mbox folders to be zero, which subsequently causes mutt to nuke the entire message body Bug#330474: mutt: opens of same mbox by multiple mutt processes erase message bodies Changed Bug title. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#330743: cups-pdf: No longer installable when not using shadow passwords.
Package: cups-pdf Version: 1.7.3-6 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable When performing a dist-upgrade bringing in the latest cups-pdf the installation fails due to this system not using shadow passwords... Setting up cups-pdf (1.7.3-6) ... chage: the shadow password file is not present adduser: `/usr/bin/chage -M 9 cups-pdf' returned error code 15. Aborting. Cleaning up. Removing user `cups-pdf'. dpkg: error processing cups-pdf (--configure): subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1 Errors were encountered while processing: cups-pdf -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.12.3 Locale: LANG=en_NZ, LC_CTYPE=en_NZ (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Versions of packages cups-pdf depends on: ii adduser 3.67.1 Add and remove users and groups ii cupsys1.1.23-12 Common UNIX Printing System(tm) - ii gs-esp8+8.15rc4.dfsg.1-2 The Ghostscript PostScript interpr ii libc6 2.3.5-6GNU C Library: Shared libraries an cups-pdf recommends no packages. -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#330744: Maintainer field screwed up
Package: aspectj Version: 1.1.1-1 Severity: serious Hi. Maintainer: Takashi Okamoto [EMAIL PROTECTED] Uploaders: James LewisMoss [EMAIL PROTECTED] This can't be right. Please upload a new version that fixes this. That field makes [1] show the wrong name. [1] http://qa.debian.org/~myon/qa/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Christoph -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.df7cb.de/cs/ Universität des Saarlandes, Compiler Design Lab signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Processed: moreinfo
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 329343 important Bug#329343: lincity-ng: Saved game can't be pause after loaded. When save my game is on accelerate mode. Severity set to `important'. tag 329343 moreinfo Bug#329343: lincity-ng: Saved game can't be pause after loaded. When save my game is on accelerate mode. There were no tags set. Tags added: moreinfo thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#218908: Candidates for removal
Hello *, On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 10:37:01AM -0500, Sam Hart wrote: 1266 days: tuxtype (0 waiting, new pkg, has RC bugs) [Rune B. Broberg] Copyright issues (see bug 218908). Jeroen wrote let's see if someone interested jumps in, otherwise, removal seems to be the best option to me. -- on 21 June. Someone said that they were trying to make a sponsored upload on 18 August; I've pinged them. [...] Nearly every graphic, sound and animation was something that I created except for a few images which were pulled from the Copyright Free Photo Archive here: http://gimp-savvy.com/PHOTO-ARCHIVE/index.html ...and the copyright (and redistribution terms) for those images needs to be explicitely listed. Only _most_ of the pictures at this archive are really free to use, as I understand it. E.g. this archive lists the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service as one of their main sources, but the FWS say Not all the information on our site is in the public domain. Some images/graphics are licensed for use under the copyright law, [...] (http://www.fws.gov/help/policies.html#copyright). Please see http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=218908;msg=29 for a longer list dealing with tuxtype_1.5.3 (not in Debian, but parts of this list apply to 1.0 currently present in Debian as well, see http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=218908;msg=41. Beyond the 1.0 release, there may have been some graphics that Graphics, sound files and fonts. originated from somewhere else, I'm afraid you'd have to track down and ^^^ ask Jesse Andrews for those details. [...] If anyone is willing to work with me to identify what /specifically/ is needed for it, I'd be more than obliged. Methinks you already named it as underlined above, but possibly some other people might want to chime in at this point... BTW, there's someone interested in maintaining tuxtype, but currently his approach seems to be to remove all questionable media files from the package... Nathanael Nerode is on the spot, however. Cheers, Flo signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#328048: mod_perl makes apache2 segv
On 2005-09-29 12:01:46 -0400, Andres Salomon wrote: This is just a wild guess, but this sounds a whole lot like library conflicts; ie, a perl program pulling in libmysqlclient12 (thus causing modperl to load libmysqlclient12), and php loading libmysqlclient10. What perl libs are installed? What other apache modules are loaded, and what libs are they pulling in? What versions of libmysqlclient and pcre are installed on the system? In my case, I have (after removing perl.*): cgi.load dav.conf dav.load dav_fs.conf dav_fs.load dav_svn.conf dav_svn.load userdir.conf userdir.load xmlrpc.conf xmlrpc.load When perl.* is there, then this is ruby (used by xmlrpc) that crashes. With perl.* and without xmlrpc.*, I still get the crash (in mod_perl this time). So, perhaps you're right, this may be a library conflict. -- Vincent Lefèvre [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Web: http://www.vinc17.org/ 100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: http://www.vinc17.org/blog/ Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / SPACES project at LORIA -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#328048: mod_perl makes apache2 segv
Le jeu 2005-09-29 a 12:20:01 -0400, Vincent Lefevre [EMAIL PROTECTED] a dit: On 2005-09-29 12:01:46 -0400, Andres Salomon wrote: This is just a wild guess, but this sounds a whole lot like library conflicts; ie, a perl program pulling in libmysqlclient12 (thus causing modperl to load libmysqlclient12), and php loading libmysqlclient10. What perl libs are installed? What other apache modules are loaded, and what libs are they pulling in? What versions of libmysqlclient and pcre are installed on the system? for my case, i think it may be this, but i don't know how to explain irssi crashing, as it seems to crash at the same point. but it certainly sounds like you found something to check out some more. good for you folks. on my end, i'll do more digging. i think it might be a combination of things. -- Vincent Lefèvre [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Web: http://www.vinc17.org/ 100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: http://www.vinc17.org/blog/ Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / SPACES project at LORIA -- Puritanism: The haunting fear that someone, somewhere may be happy. -- unknown pgpYP4CiqQFSO.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#239337: marked as done (xemacs21: Incomplete information in copyright file (in woody))
Your message dated Thu, 29 Sep 2005 18:35:26 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line This is woody only. Tell this to the version tracking has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Mar 2004 11:18:03 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Mar 22 03:18:03 2004 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from ms-smtp-03.nyroc.rr.com [24.24.2.57] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1B5NRT-0007KZ-00; Mon, 22 Mar 2004 03:18:03 -0800 Received: from doctormoo (syr-24-59-115-225.twcny.rr.com [24.59.115.225]) by ms-smtp-03.nyroc.rr.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2MBHwVS003643; Mon, 22 Mar 2004 06:17:58 -0500 (EST) Received: by doctormoo (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 94FB944068; Mon, 22 Mar 2004 06:18:16 -0500 (EST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Nathanael Nerode [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: xemacs21: Incomplete information in copyright file (in sarge woody) X-Mailer: reportbug 2.48 Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2004 06:18:16 -0500 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_12 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_12 X-Spam-Level: Package: xemacs21 Version: 21.4.6-8 Severity: serious Tags: woody sarge Justification: Policy 13.6 This is essentially a reopening of bug 161501. This shouldn't be necessary, because it's fixed in sid, but no new version of xemacs has made it into 'testing' since woody released, so this *still* affects the version in sarge. Great, just great. --- Received: (at 239337-done) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Sep 2005 16:35:36 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Sep 29 09:35:36 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from higgs.djpig.de [213.133.98.126] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EL1Ng-0001ff-00; Thu, 29 Sep 2005 09:35:36 -0700 Received: from djpig by higgs.djpig.de with local (Exim 4.50) id 1EL1Nb-0004SJ-Vn for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 29 Sep 2005 18:35:31 +0200 Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2005 18:35:26 +0200 From: Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: This is woody only. Tell this to the version tracking Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Version: 21.4.17-1 Let's close this with the sarge version. If someone wants to track down where it was fixed between woody and sarge, feel free... Gruesse, -- Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED] www: http://www.djpig.de/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: tagging 320875
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.7 # this was fixed in 3.94-1.0 tags 320875 fixed Bug#320875: aalib transition There were no tags set. Tags added: fixed End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#327018: marked as done ([RFS] grace6: An XY plotting tool)
Your message dated Thu, 29 Sep 2005 18:42:08 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line [RFS] grace6: An XY plotting tool has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Sep 2005 05:32:11 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Sep 06 22:32:11 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.171] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1ECsXb-0001ds-00; Tue, 06 Sep 2005 22:32:11 -0700 Received: from i577B0BB2.versanet.de [87.123.11.178] (helo=[192.168.42.100]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de with ESMTP (Nemesis), id 0ML29c-1ECsXW40cA-00015A; Wed, 07 Sep 2005 07:32:06 +0200 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 07 Sep 2005 07:36:52 +0200 From: Torsten Werner [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Organization: Debian GNU/Linux User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050817) X-Accept-Language: de-DE, de, en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Christoph Berg [EMAIL PROTECTED], Li Daobing [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: Ionut Georgescu [EMAIL PROTECTED], debian-mentors@lists.debian.org, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [RFS] grace6: An XY plotting tool References: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: kundenserver.de [EMAIL PROTECTED] login:c71377c073bc7a3d65be7fb93cee7d50 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: grace6 Severity: grave Version: 5.99.0+final-7 Christoph Berg schrieb: Re: Li Daobing in [EMAIL PROTECTED] I want to adopt grace6[1]. [1] http://bugs.debian.org/307358 I rebuild grace6[2], lintian and linda clean. I have upload it to mentors.debian.net[3]. Hi, the package looks fine. Uploaded. A minor nit: update the maintainer name in debian/copyright for the next upload. Christoph Hello, DO NOT DO THAT AGAIN! RFH does not mean, that the package is not maintained. You should have coordinated the upload with the current maintainer - at least the ITA mail should be send some days/weeks *before* the upload. Ionut is the future maintainer who has coordinated with me. Ionut, please send your own ITA mail to the bug report mentioned above. We will discuss privately how to fix the problem. Torsten --- Received: (at 327018-done) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Sep 2005 16:42:13 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Sep 29 09:42:13 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from idefix.mpipks-dresden.mpg.de [193.174.246.34] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EL1U4-0003Hv-00; Thu, 29 Sep 2005 09:42:12 -0700 Received: from bacon.pks.mpg.de by idefix.mpipks-dresden.mpg.de (8.11.1/1.1.22.3/04Jan99-0437PM) id j8TGg8w039748; Thu, 29 Sep 2005 18:42:08 +0200 (CEST) Received: by bacon.pks.mpg.de (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Thu, 29 Sep 2005 18:42:08 +0200 Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2005 18:42:08 +0200 From: Ionut Georgescu [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Christoph Berg [EMAIL PROTECTED], Li Daobing [EMAIL PROTECTED], Torsten Werner [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [RFS] grace6: An XY plotting tool Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=FL5UXtIhxfXey3p5 Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 --FL5UXtIhxfXey3p5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello everyone, I am closing this bug now. The maintainership question has been solved. Ionut --=20 *** * Ionu=C5=A3 Georgescu * Max-Planck-Institut f=C3=BCr Physik komplexer Systeme * Noethnitzer Str. 38, D-01187 Dresden * Phone: +49 (351) 871-2209 * Fax: +49 (351) 871-1999=20 --FL5UXtIhxfXey3p5 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Bug#330738: marked as done (mozilla-firefox: experimental version uninstable due to dependency)
Your message dated Thu, 29 Sep 2005 12:27:08 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#330738: mozilla-firefox: experimental version uninstable due to dependency has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Sep 2005 16:02:15 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Sep 29 09:02:15 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from turing.cs.hmc.edu [134.173.42.99] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EL0rP-0003Bp-00; Thu, 29 Sep 2005 09:02:15 -0700 Received: by turing.cs.hmc.edu (Postfix, from userid 13452) id AC4C3532B4; Thu, 29 Sep 2005 09:02:14 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2005 09:02:14 -0700 From: Itai Seggev [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: mozilla-firefox: experimental version uninstable due to dependency Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] References: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: mozilla-firefox Version: 1.4.99+1.5beta1.dfsg-3 Severity: serious Tags: experimental I used reportbug to submit this bug a couple of days ago, but I never got a confirmation and I can't find a bug report online. Anyway, it seems to apply to the even newer version in experimental, so I'm resubmitting it. The new version in experimental depends on a non-existence 1.2.8rel-4 version of libpng12-0. According to packags.qa.d.o, the most recernt versions are 1.2.8rel-1 in unstable and 1.2.8rel-2 in experimental. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (10, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.12cavy1 Locale: LANG=he_IL.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=he_IL.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages mozilla-firefox depends on: ii debianutils 2.14.2 Miscellaneous utilities specific t ii fontconfig2.3.2-1generic font configuration library ii libatk1.0-0 1.10.1-2 The ATK accessibility toolkit ii libc6 2.3.5-3GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libfontconfig12.3.2-1generic font configuration library ii libfreetype6 2.1.10-1 FreeType 2 font engine, shared lib ii libgcc1 1:4.0.1-8 GCC support library ii libglib2.0-0 2.8.0-1The GLib library of C routines ii libgtk2.0-0 2.6.9-1The GTK+ graphical user interface ii libidl0 0.8.5-1library for parsing CORBA IDL file ii libjpeg62 6b-10 The Independent JPEG Group's JPEG ii libkrb53 1.3.6-5MIT Kerberos runtime libraries ii libpango1.0-0 1.8.2-1Layout and rendering of internatio ii libpng12-01.2.8rel-1 PNG library - runtime ii libstdc++64.0.1-8The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 ii libx11-6 6.8.2.dfsg.1-5 X Window System protocol client li ii libxext6 6.8.2.dfsg.1-5 X Window System miscellaneous exte ii libxft2 2.1.7-1FreeType-based font drawing librar ii libxinerama1 6.8.2.dfsg.1-5 X Window System multi-head display ii libxp66.8.2.dfsg.1-5 X Window System printing extension ii libxt66.8.2.dfsg.1-5 X Toolkit Intrinsics ii psmisc21.6-1 Utilities that use the proc filesy ii xlibs 6.8.2.dfsg.1-5 X Window System client libraries m ii zlib1g1:1.2.3-3 compression library - runtime mozilla-firefox recommends no packages. -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 330738-done) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Sep 2005 16:27:20 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Sep 29 09:27:20 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mailout1.igs.net [216.58.97.34] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
Bug#330753: gtk+2.0-directfb: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'dbs'
Package: gtk+2.0-directfb Version: 2.0.9.2-1 Severity: serious Tags: patch When building 'gtk+2.0-directfb' in a clean 'unstable' chroot, I get the following error: debian/rules clean debian/rules:30: /usr/share/dbs/dbs-build.mk: No such file or directory make: *** No rule to make target `/usr/share/dbs/dbs-build.mk'. Stop. Please add the missing Build-Depends on 'dbs' to debian/control. Regards Andreas Jochens diff -urN ../tmp-orig/gtk+2.0-directfb-2.0.9.2/debian/control ./debian/control --- ../tmp-orig/gtk+2.0-directfb-2.0.9.2/debian/control 2005-09-29 17:13:39.0 + +++ ./debian/control2005-09-29 17:13:35.0 + @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ Section: libs Priority: optional Maintainer: Alastair McKinstry [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Build-Depends: debhelper ( 4.0.0), libgtk2.0-dev, libdirectfb-dev (= 0.9.22), autoconf +Build-Depends: debhelper, dbs, libgtk2.0-dev, libdirectfb-dev (= 0.9.22), autoconf Standards-Version: 3.6.2 Package: libgtk+2.0-directfb0-udeb -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#320413: Take over of texinfo/info packages
Norbert Preining [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Frank! Please get the version 4.8-1 from the tug server. I have fixed all the lintian warnings and errors, changed maintainer, added several bug-closings due to upstream fixes. And stole the manpage from tetex. Fine - but there's still one problem. You should make it a habit to test upgrading packages before you upload or provide new versions: Because it depends on tex-common, but tex-common conflicts with tetex in sid, it cannot be installed. If you write Depends: *, tex-common | tetex-bin ( 3.0) it should work (I only tried with --force-depends). Just tried, it does, although there's now an ugly circular dependency between texinfo and tetex-base; both upgrading texinfo when tetex-base is installed, and installing texinfo and tetex-base in one run works. Regards, Frank -- Frank Küster Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich Debian Developer
Bug#218908: Candidates for removal
On Thu, 2005-09-29 at 18:23 +0200, Florian Ernst wrote: On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 10:37:01AM -0500, Sam Hart wrote: [...] [...] Nearly every graphic, sound and animation was something that I created except for a few images which were pulled from the Copyright Free Photo Archive here: http://gimp-savvy.com/PHOTO-ARCHIVE/index.html ...and the copyright (and redistribution terms) for those images needs to be explicitely listed. Actually, I'm not 100% this really has to be the case on material I originally created. I assumed that by placing material I original created inside an archive where everything else was covered by the GPL, I was licensing them under the GPL. As I understand it, only those from the Copyright Free Photo archive need to be listed specifically. I don't mind explicitly listing copyright and redistribution terms on each of the media files I created, but it seems like an exorbitant amount of work considering they were just intended to be covered by the GPL of the project as a whole anyway. If this isn't the case, then I can find /many/ other projects out there where artwork, sounds, etc. were created for projects that would need to be revised. Only _most_ of the pictures at this archive are really free to use, as I understand it. E.g. this archive lists the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service as one of their main sources, but the FWS say Not all the information on our site is in the public domain. Some images/graphics are licensed for use under the copyright law, [...] (http://www.fws.gov/help/policies.html#copyright). Please see http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=218908;msg=29 for a longer list dealing with tuxtype_1.5.3 (not in Debian, but parts of this list apply to 1.0 currently present in Debian as well, see http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=218908;msg=41. Yes, I actually did see that. I'd need to check again (as it has been so long) but I'm reasonably certain what was originally in 1.0 came specifically from the Copyright Free archive as listed before. BTW, there's someone interested in maintaining tuxtype, but currently his approach seems to be to remove all questionable media files from the package... Nathanael Nerode is on the spot, however. And, as I said, I am available to anyone who has specific questions. I'm no longer part of the Tux Typing team (I really should track them all down, honestly, and see what's up) and I don't think I even have CVS access on sf.net any more, so I can't specifically change any of these at this point. However, if whoever wants to maintain it wants to contact me privately with a list of questionable media files, I would be more than happy to tell where the ones I know of came from. -- ' .O. Sam Hart, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ..OProgeny Linux Systems, Inc OOO http://www.progeny.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#218908: Candidates for removal
On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 12:36:18PM -0500, Sam Hart wrote: On Thu, 2005-09-29 at 18:23 +0200, Florian Ernst wrote: On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 10:37:01AM -0500, Sam Hart wrote: [...] Nearly every graphic, sound and animation was something that I created except for a few images which were pulled from the Copyright Free Photo Archive here: http://gimp-savvy.com/PHOTO-ARCHIVE/index.html ...and the copyright (and redistribution terms) for those images needs to be explicitely listed. Actually, I'm not 100% this really has to be the case on material I originally created. [...] If this isn't the case, then I can find /many/ other projects out there where artwork, sounds, etc. were created for projects that would need to be revised. Ah, sorry, I didn't quite make myself clear. Actually I only mean those few images which were pulled from the Copyright Free Photo Archive, and not those you have created. Cheers, Flo signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#330478: solfege: Should depend on python2.3-gnome2-extras
Package: solfege Version: 2.0.4-4 Tags: patch Followup-For: Bug #330478 It needs to depend on python2.3-gnome2-extras to get it working. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.13-ck3 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Versions of packages solfege depends on: ii libc6 2.3.5-6GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii python2.3.5-3An interactive high-level object-o ii python-gnome2 2.10.0-2 Python bindings for the GNOME desk ii python-gtk2 2.6.2-1Python bindings for the GTK+ widge solfege recommends no packages. -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#330606: mozilla-firefox does not start up
Eric writes: Can you move your ~/.mozilla directory out of the way and try again? I just tried that. No difference. Ps shows: 32305 pts/49 Sl 0:01 /usr/lib/mozilla-firefox/firefox-bin -a firefox ... Hold on. I tried stracing it and it worked. Tried it without strace and it still works. Moved .mozilla back and it still works. WTF? My bookmarks have gone missing, though. -- John Hasler -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#218908: Candidates for removal
On Thu, 29 Sep 2005, Sam Hart wrote: Nearly every graphic, sound and animation was something that I created except for a few images which were pulled from the Copyright Free Photo Archive here: http://gimp-savvy.com/PHOTO-ARCHIVE/index.html Well, if you are looking for photos that make a nice background for a penguin why not using WikiMedia, for instance at my Iceland gallery http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Tillea/Gallery/Iceland My other Iceland in winter images http://fam-tille.de/island/winter/ can be provided in a reasonable resolution at request. (I used GFDL for the images in WikiMedia, but for the sake of TuxType I can apply any reasonable DFSG-free license.) Kind regards Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#218908: Candidates for removal
On Thu, 2005-09-29 at 19:50 +0200, Florian Ernst wrote: On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 12:36:18PM -0500, Sam Hart wrote: On Thu, 2005-09-29 at 18:23 +0200, Florian Ernst wrote: On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 10:37:01AM -0500, Sam Hart wrote: [...] Nearly every graphic, sound and animation was something that I created except for a few images which were pulled from the Copyright Free Photo Archive here: http://gimp-savvy.com/PHOTO-ARCHIVE/index.html ...and the copyright (and redistribution terms) for those images needs to be explicitely listed. Actually, I'm not 100% this really has to be the case on material I originally created. [...] If this isn't the case, then I can find /many/ other projects out there where artwork, sounds, etc. were created for projects that would need to be revised. Ah, sorry, I didn't quite make myself clear. Actually I only mean those few images which were pulled from the Copyright Free Photo Archive, and not those you have created. Ah, okay. I was scared there for a bit :-) Well, I can't help on the font issues (I have contacted Jesse Andrews and some of the others who worked on the project after me to see if they can point me to where they came from... most likely external contributors)... however, for the images I'd be more than happy to find or make replacements to any ones which are really questionable. Specifically replacing the FWS ones will be very easy (the FWS website is easily navigable and explicitly says which images are in the public domain and which are not). That being said, the FWS site also says this: Most of the images on our Web pages are in the public domain (which means they have no copyright restrictions). If an image on our Web site is not restricted and does not say it is copyrighted, then you can assume it is in the public domain. If only we could search on their site for all the images that are /not/ in the public domain then we could verify that these images are fine. As far as I can tell, the vast majority of images on their site are in the public domain. -- ' .O. Sam Hart, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ..OProgeny Linux Systems, Inc OOO http://www.progeny.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#330478: solfege: Should depend on python2.3-gnome2-extras
Hello, I'm preparing debian packages for solfege 3.0 that will fix this. I'm a little buzy, but it should be done in a few days. -- Tom Cato Amundsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.solfege.org/ GNU Solfege - free ear traininghttp://www.gnu.org/software/solfege/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#330640: gnuift needs to be rebuilt on m68k for C++ transition
Hello! [Wed, 28 Sep 2005] Nathanael Nerode wrote: gnuift has accidentally been built with the old version of G++ on m68k, as noted at http://people.debian.org/~mfurr/gxx/broken.html. Please rebuild on m68k with G++ 4.0 and binNMU. AFAICS that build was done on a broken buildd. I'd like to ask the m68k admins to do the binNMU. Robert. -- Every program is a part of some other program, and rarely fits. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#330606: mozilla-firefox does not start up
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi. On Thu, 29 Sep 2005, Eric Dorland wrote: * Torsten Zirzlaff ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: [...] Can you move your ~/.mozilla directory out of the way and try again? Done, but the situation is the same, except it creates the nescessary files and waits then. - -- s-mail: Neckarstr. 120 Torsten Zirzlaff 70190 Stuttgart Germanye-mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED] phone: +49 711 285 19 40 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mobil: +49 174 857 56 77 data: +49 711 286 40 57/9 +-+ | The shortest unit of time in the universe is the New York Second, defined | | as the period of time between the traffic lights turning green and the cab | | behind you honking. -- Terry Pratchett 'Lords and Ladies' | +-+ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Made with pgp4pine 1.76 iQEVAwUBQzw7VFqurtge6dVZAQJO1wgAuWuEloakCRtVcwe2NSzHrlnOZXoP0zrN AhohgFUzQOeu2rIsm+ARZnchFNngjFRTPEKUYhr6UHN2S8yBjp3DHvmZevHsnXyd 9bmULr9q0rSltrkplzd+/i2QF1ZqVb/6ma96fa4M+mmH3yLDCwuz3SZBxnPNVj3U 4Fef6aTy8LEBKDOghqv0723wuNFCgfPTY0UgWJM7qh4dgA6ovB+gGqeE/bHD2Izd sT6B6ZCeSG48tK5Kg03sU7zog//i+E/fVG/63SdkpTJAT1PUCrIGcdEVlv+X87dp HoKUwvmewhYYwfT+pyY/3dVwFKEKofQMlHx3pZIRIpRB8N0OZpH+Dg== =LQAV -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Clarify
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: retitle 330603 gbatnav: FTBFS: missing automake1.9 dep, GNOME1 currently FUBAR Bug#330603: gbatnav: ftbfs [sparc] /bin/sh: ../depcomp: No such file or directory Changed Bug title. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#329839: marked as done (buffer overflow security fix )
Your message dated Thu, 29 Sep 2005 11:32:12 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#329839: fixed in abiword 2.2.10-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Sep 2005 18:49:26 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Sep 23 11:49:26 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from ptr-64-201-187-87.ptr.terago.ca (mars.net-itech.com)
[64.201.187.87]
by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EIsbu-0005K1-00; Fri, 23 Sep 2005 11:49:26 -0700
Received: (qmail 6748 invoked from network); 23 Sep 2005 18:49:22 -
Received: from unknown (HELO minimai.internal.nit.ca) (192.168.12.1)
by mars.net-itech.com with SMTP; 23 Sep 2005 18:49:22 -
Received: (qmail 28553 invoked from network); 23 Sep 2005 18:49:22 -
Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.12.210?) (192.168.12.210)
by minimai.internal.nit.ca with SMTP; 23 Sep 2005 18:49:22 -
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2005 14:50:18 -0400
From: Hubert Figuiere [EMAIL PROTECTED]
User-Agent: Debian Thunderbird 1.0.6 (X11/20050802)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: buffer overflow security fix
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
boundary=040704040909040402090504
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--040704040909040402090504
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Package: abiword
Version: 2.2.9
Severity: important
Attached is a security patch for AbiWord that fix a buffer overflow
allowing to execute arbitrary code when importing a bogus RTF file.
Patch is already in upstream CVS, but I recommend to apply it for stable.
Thanks.
Hub
--
http://www.figuiere.net/hub/blog/
--040704040909040402090504
Content-Type: text/x-patch;
name=abiword-security-fix.diff
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline;
filename=abiword-security-fix.diff
Index: src/wp/impexp/xp/ie_imp_RTF.cpp
===
RCS file: /cvsroot/abi/src/wp/impexp/xp/ie_imp_RTF.cpp,v
retrieving revision 1.347.2.18
retrieving revision 1.347.2.19
diff -u -p -u -r1.347.2.18 -r1.347.2.19
--- src/wp/impexp/xp/ie_imp_RTF.cpp 27 Jul 2005 15:20:30 -
1.347.2.18
+++ src/wp/impexp/xp/ie_imp_RTF.cpp 23 Sep 2005 16:37:41 -
1.347.2.19
@@ -7937,9 +7937,10 @@ bool IE_Imp_RTF::ReadOneFontFromTable(bo
FIXME: CJK font names come in form \'aa\'cd\'ef - so we have to
parse \'HH correctly (currently we ignore them!) - VH
*/
- while ( ch != '}'ch != '\\'ch != ';' ch!= '{')
+ while ( ch != '}'ch != '\\'ch != ';' ch!= '{' count
MAX_KEYWORD_LEN)
{
- keyword[count++] = ch;
+ keyword[count] = ch;
+ count++;
if (!ReadCharFromFile(ch))
{
return false;
--040704040909040402090504--
---
Received: (at 329839-close) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Sep 2005 18:40:22 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Sep 29 11:40:22 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EL3CW-0005We-00; Thu, 29 Sep 2005 11:32:12 -0700
From: Joshua Kwan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#329839: fixed in abiword 2.2.10-1
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2005 11:32:12 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2
Source: abiword
Source-Version: 2.2.10-1
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
abiword, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
abiword-common_2.2.10-1_all.deb
to
Bug#330733: marked as done (twiki: INCLUDE function allows arbitrary shell command execution)
Your message dated Thu, 29 Sep 2005 20:42:40 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#330733: twiki: INCLUDE function allows arbitrary shell
command execution
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Sep 2005 15:48:47 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Sep 29 08:48:47 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from mail.riseup.net [69.90.134.155]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EL0eM-0005Tc-00; Thu, 29 Sep 2005 08:48:47 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by mail.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6CFAA2DF6;
Thu, 29 Sep 2005 08:48:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.riseup.net ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (buffy [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP
id 03753-06; Thu, 29 Sep 2005 08:48:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mail.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1271A2D80;
Thu, 29 Sep 2005 08:48:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by pond (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 6BDAC3A847; Thu, 29 Sep 2005 11:28:23 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Micah Anderson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: twiki: INCLUDE function allows arbitrary shell command execution
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.17
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2005 11:28:23 -0400
X-Debbugs-Cc: Debian Security Team [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at riseup.net
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Package: twiki
Version: 20040902-3
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Justification: user security hole
A new security bug in twiki showed up today:
http://twiki.org/cgi-bin/view/Codev/SecurityAlertExecuteCommandsWithInclude
An attacker is able to execute arbitrary shell commands with the
privileges of the web server process. The TWiki INCLUDE function
enables a malicious user to compose a command line executed by the
Perl backtick (`) operator.
The rev parameter of the INCLUDE variable is not checked properly for
shell metacharacters and is thus vulnerable to revision numbers
containing pipes and shell commands. The exploit is possible on
included topics with two or more revisions.
Example INCLUDE variable exploiting the rev parameter:
%INCLUDE{ Main.TWikiUsers rev=2|less /etc/passwd }%
The same vulnerability is exposed to all Plugins and add-ons that use
TWiki::Func::readTopicText function to read a previous topic revision.
This has been tested on TWiki:Plugins.RevCommentPlugin and
TWiki:Plugins.CompareRevisionsAddon.
If access to TWiki is not restricted by other means, attackers can use
the revision function with or without prior authentication, depending
on the configuration.
The Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures project has assigned the name
CAN-2005-3056 to this vulnerability. Please include this number in any
changelogs fixing this.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-k7
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
---
Received: (at 330733-done) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Sep 2005 18:43:15 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Sep 29 11:43:14 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from mail.enyo.de [212.9.189.167]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EL3NC-0007lz-00; Thu, 29 Sep 2005 11:43:14 -0700
Received: from deneb.vpn.enyo.de ([212.9.189.177] helo=deneb.enyo.de)
by albireo.enyo.de with esmtp id 1EL3N7-0004Vk-Pq; Thu, 29 Sep 2005
20:43:09 +0200
Received: from fw by deneb.enyo.de with local (Exim 4.52)
id 1EL3Me-00069B-8z; Thu, 29 Sep 2005 20:42:40 +0200
From: Florian Weimer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Micah Anderson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#330733: twiki: INCLUDE function allows
Bug#330792: libgsl0-dev: floating point problems on alpha
Package: libgsl0-dev Version: 1.7-1 Severity: grave Justification: Steve Langasek said so. bogofilter has been failing to build on alpha, and I am told to blame GSL. http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?pkg=bogofilterarch=alpha -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#218908: [debian-jr] Re: Candidates for removal
On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 01:46:37PM -0500, Sam Hart wrote: Well, I can't help on the font issues (I have contacted Jesse Andrews and some of the others who worked on the project after me to see if they can point me to where they came from... most likely external contributors)... however, for the images I'd be more than happy to find or make replacements to any ones which are really questionable. OOC, is Tux Typing using TTF fonts directly, or pre-rendered bitmaps? I'm guessing the former, for i18n reasons. If the latter, however, some fonts allow _use_ (as in, you can make something with the font and ship that), but not redistribution. (Typically, font licenses have restrictions all over the board, and the licenses are poorly written. Not to mention the oodles of free font sites out there that ship raw TTF files w/o any license info... they just seem to download font ZIPs from everywhere, unzip the whole load of them, and delete everything but the TTFs. Idiots!) Of course, I inadvertendly used some Apple Macintosh font which I found sitting (as a TTF file) in some IceWM theme, or something. The Debian folks pointed that out to me, and I directed them to the theme, which was also being dist'd by Debian. ;^) -bill! -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#330743: cups-pdf: No longer installable when not using shadow passwords.
pe, 2005-09-30 kello 04:24 +1200, James Sleeman kirjoitti: Package: cups-pdf Version: 1.7.3-6 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable When performing a dist-upgrade bringing in the latest cups-pdf the installation fails due to this system not using shadow passwords... cups-pdf does not depend upon the usage of shadow passwords per se, it just adds a system uses, so I suspect that the bug is actually caused by the latest passwd package. See bug #330291 for example. -- Martin-Éric Racine http://q-funk.iki.fi
Processed: Re: basket: FTBFS: cast from 'Item*' to 'int' loses precision
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 300176 serious Bug#300176: basket: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): cast from 'Item*' to 'int' loses precision Severity set to `serious'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#330733: twiki: INCLUDE function allows arbitrary shell command execution
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
excellent.
Micah, did you manage to reproduce this in the debian package at all?
you see, the debian package is significantly more secure than the
upstream version, and as you've marked it as grave, I presume that you
have found a way to make it happen. (as when I had a go, i did not get
the exploit (i got a unhelpful, but correct error message invalid
number argument at /usr/share/perl5/TWiki.pm line 3339.)
could you please either tell me how to reproduce the problem in the
current debian package, or close it?
Cheers
Sven
Micah Anderson wrote:
Package: twiki
Version: 20040902-3
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Justification: user security hole
A new security bug in twiki showed up today:
http://twiki.org/cgi-bin/view/Codev/SecurityAlertExecuteCommandsWithInclude
An attacker is able to execute arbitrary shell commands with the
privileges of the web server process. The TWiki INCLUDE function
enables a malicious user to compose a command line executed by the
Perl backtick (`) operator.
The rev parameter of the INCLUDE variable is not checked properly for
shell metacharacters and is thus vulnerable to revision numbers
containing pipes and shell commands. The exploit is possible on
included topics with two or more revisions.
Example INCLUDE variable exploiting the rev parameter:
%INCLUDE{ Main.TWikiUsers rev=2|less /etc/passwd }%
The same vulnerability is exposed to all Plugins and add-ons that use
TWiki::Func::readTopicText function to read a previous topic revision.
This has been tested on TWiki:Plugins.RevCommentPlugin and
TWiki:Plugins.CompareRevisionsAddon.
If access to TWiki is not restricted by other means, attackers can use
the revision function with or without prior authentication, depending
on the configuration.
The Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures project has assigned the name
CAN-2005-3056 to this vulnerability. Please include this number in any
changelogs fixing this.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-k7
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFDPE2aPAwzu0QrW+kRAqZLAJ90bJEaXjUiwrkNcOu/U25JiLXAjgCeMoiy
VRnVrGHfBUXGaRpLZR8JP0M=
=5784
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#330809: lvm-common: fail to install because devfsd is an unknown initscript
Package: lvm-common Severity: serious Version: 1.5.20 Justification: circular dependency When trying to build a LTSP chroot, the lvm-common package fail to install. I use this command in a sid chroot to build the ltsp environment (chroot): # ltsp-build-client --dist sid --mirror http://ftp.skolelinux.no/debian [...] Setting up lvm-common (1.5.20) ... invoke-rc.d: unknown initscript, /etc/init.d/devfsd not found. dpkg: error processing lvm-common (--configure): subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 100 dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of lvm2: lvm2 depends on lvm-common ( 1.5.8); however: Package lvm-common is not configured yet. dpkg: error processing lvm2 (--configure): dependency problems - leaving unconfigured [...] The problem seem to be related to devfsd, which is to be installed, have not been set up when lvm-common is being set up. Some circular dependency? -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-686 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#318758: Bug#330478: solfege: Should depend on python2.3-gnome2-extras
block 330478 by 318758 thanks On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 11:59:53AM -0500, Andrés Roldán wrote: Package: solfege Version: 2.0.4-4 Tags: patch Followup-For: Bug #330478 It needs to depend on python2.3-gnome2-extras to get it working. solfege *should* depend on python2.3-gnome2-extras, but python2.3-gnome2 *must* depend on python2.3-gnome2-extras because python2.3-gnome2 shipped in sarge and the change in provided modules means there is no partial upgrade path for these packages from sarge to etch. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Processed: Re: Bug#330478: solfege: Should depend on python2.3-gnome2-extras
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: block 330478 by 318758 Bug#330478: solfege: Solfege did not start Was not blocked by any bugs. Blocking bugs added: 318758 thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#330812: Xsession snipped runs init script without checking permissions
Package: xprint-common Version: 1:0.1.0.alpha1-12 Severity: grave Hello, the Xsession.d file tries run the init script but it cannot rely on its existance since it is a conffile. I know of cases where the file was _not_ executable which made Xsession fail because Overfiend insists on using set -e there and your script is executed by the shell of Xsession, not your own shebang interpreter. Obvious workaround: add a || true statement. Eduard. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.14-rc2 Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages xprint-common depends on: ii debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.4.58Debian configuration management sy ii xbase-clients 6.8.2.dfsg.1-7miscellaneous X clients ii xprint 1:0.1.0.alpha1-12 Xprint - the X11 print system (bin Versions of packages xprint-common recommends: ii xfonts-base 6.8.2.dfsg.1-7 standard fonts for X -- debconf information: * xprint-common/default_printer_resolution: 600 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#330792: libgsl0-dev: floating point problems on alpha
On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 03:26:18PM -0400, Clint Adams wrote: Package: libgsl0-dev Version: 1.7-1 Severity: grave Justification: Steve Langasek said so. He has a stack of of 'get out of jail free' cards I owe him, so I can't yell that loud but ... bogofilter has been failing to build on alpha, and I am told to blame GSL. http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?pkg=bogofilterarch=alpha ... that looks like it failed over its 'make test' call. What do gsl and I have to do with that? Swing the cluebat, please. Dirk -- Statistics: The (futile) attempt to offer certainty about uncertainty. -- Roger Koenker, 'Dictionary of Received Ideas of Statistics' -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#330604: inkscape does not start
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Wolfram. On Thu, 29 Sep 2005, Wolfram Quester wrote: Hi Torsten, [...] Since you are using alpha, this is probably a reintroduction of 64Bit uncleanliness in inkscape. Hm, I hoped that this would be closed. Can you provide a backtrace please? I had a look at the buildlog for inkscape on alpha, but there are so many warnings that I'm lost. Hm, sicher kann ich einen backtrace machen. Nur die Frage was für eine Art von Backtrace? Im Anhang ein Backtrace aus dem gdb gestartet. Vielleicht einfach mal mit -mieee übersetzen. Ciao Torsten - -- s-mail: Neckarstr. 120 Torsten Zirzlaff 70190 Stuttgart Germanye-mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED] phone: +49 711 285 19 40 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mobil: +49 174 857 56 77 data: +49 711 286 40 57/9 +-+ | The shortest unit of time in the universe is the New York Second, defined | | as the period of time between the traffic lights turning green and the cab | | behind you honking. -- Terry Pratchett 'Lords and Ladies' | +-+ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Made with pgp4pine 1.76 iQEVAwUBQzw9uFqurtge6dVZAQJPxwf9H9zST9fvXX7p50nkxYstzIwHknNvpZcZ fXrmhHoCH34SfLEUd54vXzPdysazTVL5aVra6L8nuPXb0OvwDmSDgqXKyeMRyi9b DWNCkezPACDv0tJQn2h/QDi+PSz6Dwf53ji0/SuCFOuuXfc6mg7E1tl+762b7hIO PLIFNAA0yQWb/gVmIYUsSEDNry8rbzmMt6RiRNaYHdDHD1Gi5SkBRo30mADi9wyf quqj0OYAuM2LNRpGehYuVKUDrEA2vMytMECbM4ONpj4/Dj5GCWXlc4wMIDbmSL1P Heks/tzAXdBqWFTBzsOYMVGMFqqDDgBKfBGvwRVm8lq2G1XCGeMMbg== =TEvL -END PGP SIGNATURE- Program received signal SIGFPE, Arithmetic exception. [Switching to Thread 16384 (LWP 1928)] 0x0001204db62c in Shape::initialiseEdgeData () (gdb) bt #0 0x0001204db62c in Shape::initialiseEdgeData () #1 0x000120500a10 in Shape::ConvertToShape () #2 0x0001201fdca0 in refresh_offset_source () #3 0x00012020c6bc in sp_shape_set_shape () #4 0x0001201fcb38 in refresh_offset_source () #5 0x0001201f8110 in SPObject::updateDisplay () #6 0x0001201e4e50 in sp_item_group_item_list () #7 0x0001201f8110 in SPObject::updateDisplay () #8 0x0001201e4e50 in sp_item_group_item_list () #9 0x00012020b238 in sp_root_get_type () #10 0x0001201f8110 in SPObject::updateDisplay () #11 0x00012019909c in sp_document_ensure_up_to_date () #12 0x0001203dac0c in sp_icon_doc_icon () #13 0x0001203db338 in sp_icon_doc_icon () #14 0x02791adc in _gtk_marshal_BOOLEAN__BOXED () from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 #15 0x0200013176e0 in g_cclosure_new_swap () from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0 #16 0x020001318144 in g_closure_invoke () from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0 #17 0x02000132e0b8 in g_signal_stop_emission () from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0 #18 0x02000132f804 in g_signal_emit_valist () from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0 #19 0x0200013300b4 in g_signal_emit () from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0 #20 0x028cd744 in gtk_widget_activate () from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 #21 0x026d7a40 in gtk_container_propagate_expose () from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 #22 0x02865508 in gtk_toggle_button_get_inconsistent () from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 #23 0x02791adc in _gtk_marshal_BOOLEAN__BOXED () from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 #24 0x0200013176e0 in g_cclosure_new_swap () from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0 #25 0x020001318144 in g_closure_invoke () from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0 #26 0x02000132e0b8 in g_signal_stop_emission () from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0 #27 0x02000132f804 in g_signal_emit_valist () from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0 #28 0x0200013300b4 in g_signal_emit () from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0 #29 0x028cd744 in gtk_widget_activate () from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 #30 0x026d7a40 in gtk_container_propagate_expose () from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 #31 0x0268471c in gtk_box_reorder_child () from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 #32 0x026d4fc0 in gtk_container_forall () from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 #33 0x026d765c in gtk_container_get_focus_hadjustment () from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 #34 0x02791adc in _gtk_marshal_BOOLEAN__BOXED () from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 #35 0x0200013176e0 in g_cclosure_new_swap () from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0 #36 0x020001318144 in g_closure_invoke () from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0 #37 0x02000132e0b8 in g_signal_stop_emission () from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0 #38 0x02000132f804 in g_signal_emit_valist () from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0 #39 0x0200013300b4 in g_signal_emit () from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0 #40
Processed: Fixed in NMU of krecord 1.16-1.1
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 327166 + fixed Bug#327166: krecord: not yet kde 3.4.2 compatible Tags were: patch pending sid Bug#327941: krecord: uninstallable; needs rebuild for the Qt/KDE transition Tags added: fixed tag 327941 + fixed Bug#327941: krecord: uninstallable; needs rebuild for the Qt/KDE transition Tags were: fixed patch pending sid Bug#327166: krecord: not yet kde 3.4.2 compatible Tags added: fixed quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Fixed in NMU of imgseek 0.8.5-1.1
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 327936 + fixed Bug#327936: imgseek: uninstallable; needs rebuild for the Qt/KDE transition Tags were: patch pending sid Tags added: fixed quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#304260: marked as done (lilo ignores failures on upgrade, leaving the system silently unbootable)
Your message dated Thu, 29 Sep 2005 13:48:06 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#304260: fixed in lilo 1:22.6.1-7 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Apr 2005 23:30:03 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Apr 11 16:30:03 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mailgate1.uni-kl.de [131.246.120.5] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DL8Ly-0007NN-00; Mon, 11 Apr 2005 16:30:02 -0700 Received: from debian.localnet (rotes255.wohnheim.uni-kl.de [131.246.178.65]) by mailgate1.uni-kl.de (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j3BNTxTx018279; Tue, 12 Apr 2005 01:29:59 +0200 Received: from inet by debian.localnet with local (Exim 4.50) id 1DL8Lu-0006It-U9; Tue, 12 Apr 2005 01:29:58 +0200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Eduard Bloch [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Fatal: LVM_GET_IOP_VERSION failed on /dev/lvm X-Mailer: reportbug 3.9 Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2005 01:29:58 +0200 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: lilo Version: 1:22.6.1-6 Severity: grave Hello, trying to update to the Ubuntu (also tried with Sid version), lilo fails on two points where the Woody version worked just fine. The first is a minor issue: for (bogus) redundancy reasons, two harddisks were declared in lilo.conf and mapped to bios=0x80. However, the new version just forbids that for no reason. This problem is already reported in another bug report. Second, and the most annoying: it fails to work with /boot on a LVM-over-Raid1. Woody version (downgraded) works 1a, but Ubuntu and Sid versions exit with the errors listed below. It should also be mentioned that there is no /dev/lvm, the group is called sys and the root volume is /dev/sys/boot, mounted as /boot. And the final problem is: the upgrade does NOT FAIL (thus the severity). Yes, the boot loader has been fscked up and I did not notice it before the next boot and it was not fun to get a recent KNOPPIX for this box :( LILO version 22.6.1, Copyright (C) 1992-1998 Werner Almesberger Development beyond version 21 Copyright (C) 1999-2004 John Coffman Released 17-Nov-2004, and compiled at 22:18:56 on Mar 12 2005 Debian GNU/Linux raid_setup returns offset = ndisk = 0 BIOS VolumeID Device Reading boot sector from /dev/sda pf: dev=0800 id=100F59DC name=/dev/scsi/host0/bus0/target0/lun0/disc bios_dev: device 0800 bios_dev: masked device 0800, which is /dev/scsi/host0/bus0/target0/lun0/disc bios_dev: geometry check found 0 matches bios_dev: (0x81) vol-ID=29014D44 *PT=08078E28 bios_dev: (0x80) vol-ID=100F59DC *PT=08078DE0 bios_dev: PT match found 2 matches (0x80) bios_dev: S/N match found 1 match (0x80) Warning: Kernel BIOS return differing head/sector geometries for device 0x80 Kernel: 35044 cylinders, 64 heads, 32 sectors BIOS: 1024 cylinders, 255 heads, 63 sectors pf: dev=0810 id=29014D44 name=/dev/scsi/host0/bus0/target1/lun0/disc bios_dev: device 0810 bios_dev: masked device 0810, which is /dev/scsi/host0/bus0/target1/lun0/disc bios_dev: geometry check found 0 matches bios_dev: (0x81) vol-ID=29014D44 *PT=08078E28 bios_dev: (0x80) vol-ID=100F59DC *PT=08078DE0 bios_dev: PT match found 2 matches (0x80) bios_dev: S/N match found 1 match (0x81) Warning: Kernel BIOS return differing head/sector geometries for device 0x81 Kernel: 35044 cylinders, 64 heads, 32 sectors BIOS: 1024 cylinders, 255 heads, 63 sectors pf_hard_disk_scan: ndevs=2 0800 100F59DC /dev/scsi/host0/bus0/target0/lun0/disc 0810 29014D44 /dev/scsi/host0/bus0/target1/lun0/disc Resolve invalid VolumeIDs Resolve duplicate VolumeIDs 0800 100F59DC /dev/scsi/host0/bus0/target0/lun0/disc 0810 29014D44 /dev/scsi/host0/bus0/target1/lun0/disc device codes (user assigned pf) = 1 device codes (user assigned) = 1 device codes (BIOS assigned) = 3 device codes (canonical) = 3 bios_dev: device 0800 bios_dev: masked device 0800, which is /dev/scsi/host0/bus0/target0/lun0/disc bios_dev: geometry check found 0 matches bios_dev: (0x81) vol-ID=29014D44
Bug#330753: marked as done (gtk+2.0-directfb: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'dbs')
Your message dated Thu, 29 Sep 2005 13:47:34 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#330753: fixed in gtk+2.0-directfb 2.0.9.2-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Sep 2005 17:20:23 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Sep 29 10:20:23 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from c214041.adsl.hansenet.de (localhost.localdomain) [213.39.214.41] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EL250-0008Pc-00; Thu, 29 Sep 2005 10:20:23 -0700 Received: from aj by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.52) id 1EL24z-0007M1-B1; Thu, 29 Sep 2005 19:20:21 +0200 To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Andreas Jochens [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: gtk+2.0-directfb: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'dbs' Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2005 19:20:21 +0200 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: gtk+2.0-directfb Version: 2.0.9.2-1 Severity: serious Tags: patch When building 'gtk+2.0-directfb' in a clean 'unstable' chroot, I get the following error: debian/rules clean debian/rules:30: /usr/share/dbs/dbs-build.mk: No such file or directory make: *** No rule to make target `/usr/share/dbs/dbs-build.mk'. Stop. Please add the missing Build-Depends on 'dbs' to debian/control. Regards Andreas Jochens diff -urN ../tmp-orig/gtk+2.0-directfb-2.0.9.2/debian/control ./debian/control --- ../tmp-orig/gtk+2.0-directfb-2.0.9.2/debian/control 2005-09-29 17:13:39.0 + +++ ./debian/control2005-09-29 17:13:35.0 + @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ Section: libs Priority: optional Maintainer: Alastair McKinstry [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Build-Depends: debhelper ( 4.0.0), libgtk2.0-dev, libdirectfb-dev (= 0.9.22), autoconf +Build-Depends: debhelper, dbs, libgtk2.0-dev, libdirectfb-dev (= 0.9.22), autoconf Standards-Version: 3.6.2 Package: libgtk+2.0-directfb0-udeb --- Received: (at 330753-close) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Sep 2005 20:55:03 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Sep 29 13:55:03 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EL5JW-0004Zf-00; Thu, 29 Sep 2005 13:47:34 -0700 From: Alastair McKinstry [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#330753: fixed in gtk+2.0-directfb 2.0.9.2-2 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2005 13:47:34 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: gtk+2.0-directfb Source-Version: 2.0.9.2-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of gtk+2.0-directfb, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: gtk+2.0-directfb_2.0.9.2-2.diff.gz to pool/main/g/gtk+2.0-directfb/gtk+2.0-directfb_2.0.9.2-2.diff.gz gtk+2.0-directfb_2.0.9.2-2.dsc to pool/main/g/gtk+2.0-directfb/gtk+2.0-directfb_2.0.9.2-2.dsc libgtk+2.0-directfb0-udeb_2.0.9.2-2_i386.udeb to pool/main/g/gtk+2.0-directfb/libgtk+2.0-directfb0-udeb_2.0.9.2-2_i386.udeb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Alastair McKinstry [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated gtk+2.0-directfb package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2005 20:16:32 +0100 Source: gtk+2.0-directfb Binary: libgtk+2.0-directfb0-udeb Architecture: source i386 Version: 2.0.9.2-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Alastair McKinstry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#330474: mutt/2096: eats mail by setting content-length to zero in mboxes
Number: 2096 Notify-List:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Category: mutt Synopsis: eats mail by setting content-length to zero in mboxes Confidential: no Severity: critical Priority: high Responsible:mutt-dev State: open Keywords: Class: sw-bug Submitter-Id: net Arrival-Date: Thu Sep 29 23:24:29 +0200 2005 Originator: Branden Robinson Release:CVS 2005-09-24 Organization: Environment: Description: This is Debian Bug#330474, filed at severity critical, which you can read in http://bugs.debian.org/330474. In summary: - reproducable on, at least, powerpc (but not on i386) - loosing mail occurs in two steps: - a mailbox is opened, and then the Content-Length of its messages is set to 0 - the mailbox is reopened; if there's modifications to it, the messages with Content-Lenght set to 0 get truncated Se the How-To-Repeat section. How-To-Repeat: Any mbox should do, but I've used this one-message-only one: http://people.debian.org/~adeodato/tmp/2005-09-29/mutt-eating-mail/mbox.gz mutt -f mbox ENTER qq cat mbox # notice the Content-Length header mutt -f mbox wn q cat mbox Fix: Reverting the introduction of fseeko/ftello fixes (http://people.debian.org/~adeodato/tmp/2005-09-29/mutt-eating-mail/revert-this.diff), but it would be better to investigate and come with a real fix. Add-To-Audit-Trail: Unformatted: -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
