Bug#341945: Investigation of the bug
On Sat, Dec 10, 2005 at 11:18:53AM +0100, Enrico Zini wrote: Sorry to have been lingering on this bug: on Igloo's buildd report I saw that some of the packages were still rebuilding and I thought it was just a matter of waiting. Today I investigated a bit more. The problem is indeed connected to the C++ allocator thing, and the recompile was incomplete because debtags links statically with some libraries, and it's nonobvious to find the dependencies. Luckily, thanks to a suggestion of Jonas Smedegaard at Debconf4, I use dh_buildinfo. It turned out that the libtagcoll-dev is still built with libstdc++6 4.0.2-3. It in turn gets statically linked into libapt-front-dev, which in turn gets statically linked into debtags. So, it seems that there are some recompiles to be triggered: Step 1: libtagcoll-dev Step 2: tagcoll, tagcolledit, libapt-front-dev (since they statically link libtagcoll-dev) Step 3: debtags, debtags-edit, packagesearch (since they statically link libapt-front-dev) Could you perform these steps locally on your system and confirm that it does correct the failure, before we commit buildd time on all archs to rebuilding these? Thanks, -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#341945: Investigation of the bug
On Sat, Dec 10, 2005 at 11:18:53AM +0100, Enrico Zini wrote: Hello, Sorry to have been lingering on this bug: on Igloo's buildd report I saw that some of the packages were still rebuilding and I thought it was just a matter of waiting. Today I investigated a bit more. The problem is indeed connected to the C++ allocator thing, and the recompile was incomplete because debtags links statically with some libraries, and it's nonobvious to find the dependencies. Luckily, thanks to a suggestion of Jonas Smedegaard at Debconf4, I use dh_buildinfo. It turned out that the libtagcoll-dev is still built with libstdc++6 4.0.2-3. It in turn gets statically linked into libapt-front-dev, which in turn gets statically linked into debtags. So, it seems that there are some recompiles to be triggered: Step 1: libtagcoll-dev Step 2: tagcoll, tagcolledit, libapt-front-dev (since they statically link libtagcoll-dev) Step 3: debtags, debtags-edit, packagesearch (since they statically link libapt-front-dev) BTW, due to the way static linking works, this is only two steps. libapt-front-dev doesn't *contain* the code from libtagcoll-dev; rather, the reverse-build-deps of libapt-front-dev pull this code in directly from libtagcoll-dev at build-time. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Processed: yaagh
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 326581 -patch Bug#326581: [hppa] glibc causes illegal instructions FTBFS on many packages Tags were: patch Tags removed: patch thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#342852: cogito: cg-commit breaks with new version of bash
Package: cogito Version: 0.16.0-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Since upgrading to bash 3.1 (the latest in unstable), cogito's cg-commit command breaks: $ cg-init defaulting to local storage area /usr/bin/cg-commit: line 190: syntax error near unexpected token `(' /usr/bin/cg-commit: line 190: ` eval commitfiles=($(cat $filter | path_xargs git-diff-index -r -m HEAD -- | \' Bash 3.1 is pickier about the parentheses in the eval; () must be quoted (as \(\) or in ). It looks like upstream has already fixed this (and a few other bash 3.1 problems) in commit: c34455488fa8c91466b9e8cceb025a203a19f0c5 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#342741: marked as done (superkaramba is uninstallable in sid)
Your message dated Sun, 11 Dec 2005 01:34:44 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#342741: superkaramba is uninstallable in sid has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Dec 2005 00:38:14 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Dec 09 16:38:14 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.21]) by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Ekskg-0005cP-Hg for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 09 Dec 2005 16:38:14 -0800 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 10 Dec 2005 00:37:42 - Received: from p548BEC61.dip.t-dialin.net (EHLO morpheus.apaku.dnsalias.org) [84.139.236.97] by mail.gmx.net (mp019) with SMTP; 10 Dec 2005 01:37:42 +0100 X-Authenticated: #15861332 Received: from andreas by morpheus.apaku.dnsalias.org with local (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) id 1EkskY-0003Zl-LZ; Sat, 10 Dec 2005 01:38:06 +0100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Andreas Pakulat [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: superkaramba is uninstallable in sid Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Mailer: reportbug 3.18 Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2005 01:38:05 +0100 X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: superkaramba Version: 0.37-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Hi, due to the current C++ allocator transition superkaramba needs to be rebuilt against kdelibs4c2a. Andreas -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (500, 'experimental'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.14.3-cherry+radeon Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages superkaramba depends on: ii kdelibs4c2a 4:3.4.3-2 core libraries for all KDE applica ii libart-2.0-2 2.3.17-1Library of functions for 2D graphi ii libaudio21.7-3 The Network Audio System (NAS). (s ii libc62.3.5-8.1 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libfam0 2.7.0-8 client library to control the FAM ii libfontconfig1 2.3.2-1.1 generic font configuration library ii libfreetype6 2.1.10-1FreeType 2 font engine, shared lib ii libgcc1 1:4.0.2-5 GCC support library ii libice6 6.8.2.dfsg.1-11 Inter-Client Exchange library ii libidn11 0.5.18-1GNU libidn library, implementation ii libjpeg626b-10 The Independent JPEG Group's JPEG ii libpng12-0 1.2.8rel-5 PNG library - runtime ii libqt3-mt3:3.3.5-3 Qt GUI Library (Threaded runtime v ii libsm6 6.8.2.dfsg.1-11 X Window System Session Management ii libstdc++6 4.0.2-5 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 ii libx11-6 6.8.2.dfsg.1-11 X Window System protocol client li ii libxcursor1 1.1.3-1 X cursor management library ii libxext6 6.8.2.dfsg.1-11 X Window System miscellaneous exte ii libxft2 2.1.7-1 FreeType-based font drawing librar ii libxi6 6.8.2.dfsg.1-11 X Window System Input extension li ii libxinerama1 6.8.2.dfsg.1-11 X Window System multi-head display ii libxrandr2 6.8.2.dfsg.1-11 X Window System Resize, Rotate and ii libxrender1 1:0.9.0-2 X Rendering Extension client libra ii libxt6 6.8.2.dfsg.1-11 X Toolkit Intrinsics ii python2.32.3.5-9 An interactive high-level object-o ii zlib1g 1:1.2.3-8 compression library - runtime superkaramba recommends no packages. -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 342741-done) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Dec 2005 09:34:44 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Dec 11 01:34:44 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from
Bug#342821: marked as done (tellico: not installable, dependencies are not satisfied.)
Your message dated Sun, 11 Dec 2005 01:36:29 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#342821: tellico: not installable, dependencies are not satisfied. has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Dec 2005 20:54:40 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Dec 10 12:54:40 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.21]) by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 4.50) id 1ElBjs-00056R-Gy for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 10 Dec 2005 12:54:40 -0800 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 10 Dec 2005 20:54:08 - Received: from i577B4364.versanet.de (EHLO [192.168.222.3]) [87.123.67.100] by mail.gmx.net (mp017) with SMTP; 10 Dec 2005 21:54:08 +0100 X-Authenticated: #7311904 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2005 21:54:17 +0100 From: Uwe Koziolek [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051017) X-Accept-Language: de-DE, de, en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: tellico: not installable, dependencies are not satisfied. Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: tellico Version: 1.0-1 Severity: serious the binary package in unstable is no longer installable, because the libaries for kde in unstable are changed. apt-get install tellico The following packages have unmet dependencies: tellico: Depends: kdelibs4c2 (= 4:3.4.2-1) but it is not going to be installed Depends: libtag1c2 (= 1.3.1) but it is not going to be installed E: Broken packages dpkg -l 'kdelibs4*' 'libtag1*' ||/ Name Version Description +++-=-=-=== rc kdelibs4c23.4.2-4 core libraries for all KDE applications ii kdelibs4c2a 3.4.3-2 core libraries for all KDE applications rc libtag1c2 1.4-2 TagLib Audio Meta-Data Library ii libtag1c2a1.4-3 TagLib Audio Meta-Data Library It is sufficient to rebuild the package. regards Uwe Koziolek --- Received: (at 342821-done) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Dec 2005 09:36:32 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Dec 11 01:36:32 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from dsl093-039-086.pdx1.dsl.speakeasy.net ([66.93.39.86] helo=tennyson.dodds.net) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1ElNd7-0004iI-MS for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 11 Dec 2005 01:36:32 -0800 Received: by tennyson.dodds.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 6EF917007; Sun, 11 Dec 2005 01:36:29 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2005 01:36:29 -0800 From: Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Uwe Koziolek [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Bug#342821: tellico: not installable, dependencies are not satisfied. Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] References: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=O3WNCzIuUImKerqE Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 --O3WNCzIuUImKerqE Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Dec 10, 2005 at 09:54:17PM +0100, Uwe Koziolek wrote: Package: tellico Version: 1.0-1 Severity: serious the binary package in unstable is no longer installable, because the libaries for kde in unstable are changed. BinNMUs have been scheduled on all architectures to resolve this issue; no further maintainer action is required. Thanks, --=20 Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#335105: perl FTBFS in t/op/fork
On Sat, Dec 10, 2005 at 07:39:04PM +0100, Thiemo Seufer wrote: Andrew Suffield wrote: This doesn't look like #223110 to me - that bug is specific to signal handlers. After a closer look I agree. I just tried the test on casals against 5.8.7-6 though, and I can't get it to break (although it is still breaking on the buildd). What do you know about it? I need to duplicate the pesky thing somehow... Hm, it is easily reproducible on SWARM, as well as on a Octane with 2 CPUs. Which probably means it is a SMP-induced race condition in fork. My bet is that it's this kernel bug: I don't know if you've been following, but it was recently discoverd that on smp, if multiple processes read from /dev/urandom at the same time, they can get the same data. Theodore Tytso posted a patch to fix this for 2.6, and someone else told me this problem has existed all the way back to 1.3. Fixed in 2.4.29 and 2.6.5. What kernel version have you got there? If it's 2.4.27 (sarge) then I think we have our problem found. -- .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield : :' : http://www.debian.org/ | `. `' | `- -- | signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Processed: Re: bash: Fails to install through debootstrap
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 342855 debianutils Bug#342855: bash: Fails to install through debootstrap Bug reassigned from package `debianutils' to `debianutils'. severity 342855 critical Bug#342855: bash: Fails to install through debootstrap Severity set to `critical'. clone 342855 -1 Bug#342855: bash: Fails to install through debootstrap Bug 342855 cloned as bug 342858. retitle 342855 debianutils: should provide /etc/shells (breaks debootstrap install of sid, and D-I) Bug#342855: bash: Fails to install through debootstrap Changed Bug title. retitle -1 Should remove the useless shells template file and postinst code to install it Bug#342858: bash: Fails to install through debootstrap Changed Bug title. severity -1 normal Bug#342858: Should remove the useless shells template file and postinst code to install it Severity set to `normal'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#342704: ocaml: FTBFS on hppa: Error: Field out of range [-262144..262143] (-267528).
* Florian Weimer: This looks indeed like a GAS bug (or a miscompilation of GAS). The branch target is only a few hundred instructions away, so it should be reachable using a BL instruction. I was wrong, this is not a real GAS bug. (See the binutils list for a discussion.) The object file is larger than 64K instructions, and GAS apparently cannot express the necessary relocation in the object file in this case. In other words, Objective Caml is at fault. It generates invalid assembler input. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#337259: marked as done (debian-reference: FTBFS with new tetex-bin: Error trying to create pdflatex.fmt)
Your message dated Sun, 11 Dec 2005 02:32:08 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#337259: fixed in debian-reference 1.09-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Nov 2005 15:24:25 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Nov 03 07:24:25 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from srv-smtp.math.univ-rennes1.fr [129.20.36.164] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EXgwz-0002rG-00; Thu, 03 Nov 2005 07:24:25 -0800 Received: from frobnitz.homelinux.net (dyn37079.math.univ-rennes1.fr [129.20.37.79]) by srv-smtp.math.univ-rennes1.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56066B8A1 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 3 Nov 2005 16:23:54 +0100 (CET) Received: from daniel by frobnitz.homelinux.net with local (Exim 4.54) id 1EXgwT-00077O-Hn for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 03 Nov 2005 16:23:53 +0100 From: Daniel Schepler [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: debian-reference: FTBFS with new tetex-bin: Error trying to create pdflatex.fmt Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 03 Nov 2005 16:23:53 +0100 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: debian-reference Severity: serious Version: 1.08-4 From my pbuilder build log: ... ln -sf fix.txt.ent fix.ent debiandoc2text -l $(echo ja | bin/getlocale) quick-reference.ja.sgml bin/fixtxt ja quick-reference.ja.txt TEXINPUTS=$(pwd)/texmf/:$(kpsetool -n pdftex -p tex) \ pdftex -ini pdflatex.ini /dev/null make[1]: *** [pdflatex.fmt] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/debian-reference-1.08' make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2 -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.14-1-686 Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) --- Received: (at 337259-close) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Dec 2005 10:41:29 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Dec 11 02:41:29 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1ElOUy-0003r0-HB; Sun, 11 Dec 2005 02:32:08 -0800 From: Osamu Aoki [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.60 $ Subject: Bug#337259: fixed in debian-reference 1.09-1 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2005 02:32:08 -0800 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: debian-reference Source-Version: 1.09-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of debian-reference, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: debian-reference-common_1.09-1_all.deb to pool/main/d/debian-reference/debian-reference-common_1.09-1_all.deb debian-reference-de_1.09-1_all.deb to pool/main/d/debian-reference/debian-reference-de_1.09-1_all.deb debian-reference-en_1.09-1_all.deb to pool/main/d/debian-reference/debian-reference-en_1.09-1_all.deb debian-reference-es_1.09-1_all.deb to pool/main/d/debian-reference/debian-reference-es_1.09-1_all.deb debian-reference-fr_1.09-1_all.deb to pool/main/d/debian-reference/debian-reference-fr_1.09-1_all.deb debian-reference-it_1.09-1_all.deb to pool/main/d/debian-reference/debian-reference-it_1.09-1_all.deb debian-reference-ja_1.09-1_all.deb to pool/main/d/debian-reference/debian-reference-ja_1.09-1_all.deb debian-reference-pl_1.09-1_all.deb to pool/main/d/debian-reference/debian-reference-pl_1.09-1_all.deb debian-reference-pt-br_1.09-1_all.deb to pool/main/d/debian-reference/debian-reference-pt-br_1.09-1_all.deb debian-reference-zh-cn_1.09-1_all.deb to pool/main/d/debian-reference/debian-reference-zh-cn_1.09-1_all.deb debian-reference-zh-tw_1.09-1_all.deb to pool/main/d/debian-reference/debian-reference-zh-tw_1.09-1_all.deb debian-reference_1.09-1.diff.gz to
Bug#320260: qgo: cannot libtoolize due to removal of automake1.6
Package: qgo Version: 1.0.3-2 Followup-For: Bug #320260 I finally managed to have someone upload qgo last week but there was an error : it FTBS on a friend's computer because automake1.6 has been removed so I tried to switch over to automake1.7 as proposed here http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=340921 and it didn't work as expected $ debuild [...] /bin/sh ../libtool --mode=link --tag=CXX x86_64-linux-gnu-g++ -fno-exceptions -fno-check-new-o qgo -L/usr/X11R6/lib board.o boardhandler.o gamedialog.o gamestable.o gametree.o group.o helpviewer.o igsconnection.o imagehandler.o interfacehandler.o main.o maintable.o mainwidget.o mainwin.o mainwindow.o mark.o matrix.o misc.o move.o msg_handler.o noderesults.o parser.o playertable.o preferences.o qgo.o qgo_interface.o qgtp.o qnewgamedlg.o setting.o sgfparser.o stone.o stonehandler.o tables.o telnet.o textview.o tip.o tree.o wavfile.o wavplay.o xmlparser.o clientwindow_gui.o gameinfo_gui.o gui_dialog.o mainwidget_gui.o newgame_gui.o newlocalgame_gui.o noderesults_gui.o normaltools_gui.o nthmove_gui.o preferences_gui.o qnewgamedlg_gui.o scoretools_gui.o talk_gui.o textedit_gui.o textview_gui.o noderesults.moc.o parser.moc.o mainwin.moc.o gamestable.moc.o qnewgamedlg.moc.o mainwidget.moc.o maintable.moc.o tip.moc.o tables.moc.o gametree.moc.o qgtp.moc.o helpviewer.moc.o gamedialog.moc.o igsconnection.moc.o board.moc.o mainwindow.moc.o playertable.moc.o qgo_interface.moc.o telnet.moc.o preferences.moc.o qgo.moc.o textview.moc.o -lresolv -lqt-mt -lpng -lz -lm -lXext -lX11 -lresolv -lSM -lICE -lpthread ../libtool: line 361: s,^.*/,,g: Aucun fichier ou répertoire de ce type ../libtool: line 686: -e: command not found ../libtool: line 686: -e: command not found : ignoring unknown tag *** Warning: inferring the mode of operation is deprecated. *** Future versions of Libtool will require --mode=MODE be specified. : link: unable to infer tagged configuration : link: specify a tag with `--tag' make[4]: *** [qgo] Erreur 1 make[4]: quittant le répertoire « /home/cyril/src/Debian/qgo-1.0.3/src » make[3]: *** [all-recursive] Erreur 1 make[3]: quittant le répertoire « /home/cyril/src/Debian/qgo-1.0.3/src » make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Erreur 1 make[2]: quittant le répertoire « /home/cyril/src/Debian/qgo-1.0.3 » make[1]: *** [all] Erreur 2 make[1]: quittant le répertoire « /home/cyril/src/Debian/qgo-1.0.3 » make: *** [build-stamp] Erreur 2 debuild: fatal error at line 768: dpkg-buildpackage failed! so for the moment I'm quite hopeless to find out what is wrong if I don't find how to upgrade, I'll revert all libtoolization until upstream has upgraded to a newer automake -- Cyril Chaboisseau
Bug#339243: It's OK to upload openscenegraph now....
All its dependencies are built with the needed ABIs everywhere that matters (m68k currently doesn't matter because it's so far behind that its uninstallability count is allowed to increase). -- Nathanael Nerode [EMAIL PROTECTED] A thousand reasons. http://www.thousandreasons.org/ Lies, theft, war, kidnapping, torture, rape, murder... Get me out of this fascist nightmare! -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#337965: After upgrading to latest unstable wine works
Package: wine Version: 0.9-1 Followup-For: Bug #337965 I just upgraded to the latest unstable version and the problem seems to have gone away now. I think you can close this. Anders -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.14-asus-1 Locale: LANG=da_DK, LC_CTYPE=da_DK (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Versions of packages wine depends on: ii debconf [debconf-2.0]1.4.62 Debian configuration management sy ii libwine 0.9-1 Windows API Implementation (Librar ii xbase-clients6.8.2.dfsg.1-11 miscellaneous X clients wine recommends no packages. -- debconf information: wine/del_wine_conf: true wine/install_type: Autodetect -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#341945: Investigation of the bug
On Sun, Dec 11, 2005 at 12:41:57AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: On Sat, Dec 10, 2005 at 11:18:53AM +0100, Enrico Zini wrote: So, it seems that there are some recompiles to be triggered: Step 1: libtagcoll-dev Step 2: tagcoll, tagcolledit, libapt-front-dev (since they statically link libtagcoll-dev) Step 3: debtags, debtags-edit, packagesearch (since they statically link libapt-front-dev) Could you perform these steps locally on your system and confirm that it does correct the failure, before we commit buildd time on all archs to rebuilding these? Sure. Done. It works. Here's the list of things I did: there are small mismatches with the list I gave above, as I was thinking more in terms of upstream deps than actual debian deps. * tagcoll apt-get source tagcoll cd tagcoll-1.5.1/ debuild -us -uc -rfakeroot cd .. su -c dpkg -i libtagcoll-dev_1.5.1-1_i386.deb tagcoll_1.5.1-1_i386.deb * tagcolledit apt-get source tagcolledit cd tagcolledit-1.2/ debuild -us -uc -rfakeroot cd .. su -c dpkg -i tagcolledit_1.2-1_i386.deb * libapt-front-dev apt-get source libapt-front-dev cd libapt-front-0.3.4/ debuild -us -uc -rfakeroot cd .. su -c dpkg -i libapt-front-dev_0.3.4_i386.deb * debtags apt-get source debtags cd debtags-1.5.2/ debuild -us -uc -rfakeroot cd .. su -c dpkg -i debtags_1.5.2_i386.deb * It works! * * debtags-edit apt-get source debtags-edit cd debtags-edit-1.1.2/ debuild -us -uc -rfakeroot cd .. su -c dpkg -i debtags-edit_1.1.2_i386.deb Haven't done packagesearch, but I think we have the idea. Ciao, Enrico -- GPG key: 1024D/797EBFAB 2000-12-05 Enrico Zini [EMAIL PROTECTED] signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#342819: Processed: block 342819 with 342740
Steve Langasek wrote: I don't get it. Why should *any* Debian package be depending on pgxs to tell it what compiler to use? Why shouldn't postgresql-pljava not be fixed to call gcc directly, if it can be built with it? Because that is how the build system of those packages works. You just write what your module is called and what the source files are and the rest is done automatically. You could probably override the compiler but that should not be necessary as part of the normal operation. (I think this is a bit like MakeMaker. If you build Perl with a non-standard compiler, then all packages using MakeMaker will also attempt to use that compiler by default.) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#314988: Starting geomview ends up with InstCreate: undefined option: 7042768
reopen 314988 thanks geomview (1.8.1-10) unstable; urgency=low . * debian/control: Add texinfo to build-deps so that command makeinfo is available. Closes: #338773. . * debian/control: Restrict architectures. This package was not designed for 64-bit machines. Closes: #314988. Sorry, this is *not* (just) a 64-bit bug; geomview runs fine for me on my alpha. Since the etch RC policy says that packages must be supported on as many architectures as is reasonably possible, this is therefore an RC bug; please re-add alpha to the architecture list. ia64 can reasonably be left out until someone can confirm that this bug doesn't exist there, but given that both people who have reported this bug say they're using nvidia on amd64, I suspect it may be a 64-bit issue in geomview that only manifests when using the nvidia binary drivers -- in which case the package really ought to be supported on amd64 as well. Next time if you want to sneak a change like this past the porters, don't forget to ask the ftpmasters to remove the stale binary packages. ;) -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#320260: qgo: cannot libtoolize due to removal of automake1.6
On Sun, Dec 11, 2005 at 12:33:52PM +0100, Cyril Chaboisseau wrote: so I tried to switch over to automake1.7 as proposed here http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=340921 and it didn't work as expected $ debuild [...] /bin/sh ../libtool --mode=link --tag=CXX x86_64-linux-gnu-g++ -fno-exceptions -fno-check-new-o qgo -L/usr/X11R6/lib board.o boardhandler.o gamedialog.o gamestable.o gametree.o group.o helpviewer.o igsconnection.o imagehandler.o interfacehandler.o main.o maintable.o mainwidget.o mainwin.o mainwindow.o mark.o matrix.o misc.o move.o msg_handler.o noderesults.o parser.o playertable.o preferences.o qgo.o qgo_interface.o qgtp.o qnewgamedlg.o setting.o sgfparser.o stone.o stonehandler.o tables.o telnet.o textview.o tip.o tree.o wavfile.o wavplay.o xmlparser.o clientwindow_gui.o gameinfo_gui.o gui_dialog.o mainwidget_gui.o newgame_gui.o newlocalgame_gui.o noderesults_gui.o normaltools_gui.o nthmove_gui.o preferences_gui.o qnewgamedlg_gui.o scoretools_gui.o talk_gui.o textedit_gui.o textview_gui.o noderesults.moc.o parser.moc.o mainwin.moc.o gamestable.moc.o qnewgamedlg.moc.o mainwidget.moc.o maintable.moc.o tip.moc.o tables.moc.o gametree.moc.o qgtp.moc.o helpviewer.moc.o gamedialog.moc.o igsconnection.moc.o board.moc.o mainwindow.moc.o playertable.moc.o qgo_interface.moc.o telnet.moc.o preferences.moc.o qgo.moc.o textview.moc.o -lresolv -lqt-mt -lpng -lz -lm -lXext -lX11 -lresolv -lSM -lICE -lpthread ../libtool: line 361: s,^.*/,,g: Aucun fichier ou répertoire de ce type ../libtool: line 686: -e: command not found ../libtool: line 686: -e: command not found : ignoring unknown tag *** Warning: inferring the mode of operation is deprecated. *** Future versions of Libtool will require --mode=MODE be specified. : link: unable to infer tagged configuration : link: specify a tag with `--tag' make[4]: *** [qgo] Erreur 1 make[4]: quittant le répertoire « /home/cyril/src/Debian/qgo-1.0.3/src » make[3]: *** [all-recursive] Erreur 1 make[3]: quittant le répertoire « /home/cyril/src/Debian/qgo-1.0.3/src » make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Erreur 1 make[2]: quittant le répertoire « /home/cyril/src/Debian/qgo-1.0.3 » make[1]: *** [all] Erreur 2 make[1]: quittant le répertoire « /home/cyril/src/Debian/qgo-1.0.3 » make: *** [build-stamp] Erreur 2 debuild: fatal error at line 768: dpkg-buildpackage failed! See http://people.debian.org/~keybuk/libtool-updating.html. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#342247: [SPAM?]: Bug#342247: marked as done (updating tetex-extra fails)
Hilmar Preusse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I had two points of failure: 1. I refused to replace the changed language.dat by that one from the maintainers. The old one referenced the hyph. patterns czhyph2e.tex, which does not exist any more in teTeX 2.0. Hence the build of all formats having hyph. patterns failed. Here I think we cannot help. Once we had code in the postinst that parsed language.dat, but it was too complicated and error-prone. 2. I refused to replace the changed 05TeXMF. The code, which should have introduced VARTEXMF seemed to fail. Hence updmap.cfg was not found. Robert, can you send us your /etc/texmf/texmf.cnf and /etc/texmf/texmf.d/05TeXMF.cnf, ideally the versions before you fixed it? Attached is texmf.d.tar.bz2. It is taken from the backup I made before I upgraded to sarge. Hope it is helpful. And yes, after I fixed my system and got it running. As I'm a tetex maintainer myself I didn't bother to report a bug about my failures. I think it would have been better to explicitly inform everybody, at least if you encountered the problem before sarge's release. But well, that's history now. Should I open another bug instead of continue discussing in a closed one? Yes, I think so - I guess we'll need to do similar checks for the sarge-etch upgrade, and we should know whether there's a flaw in the procedure. I won't have time to investigate this now, but here's what I think should be done: - Check which packages installed files in your texmf.d.tar.bz2 - install those packages in a woody pbuilder - replace texmf.d by the contents of your tar.bz2 - make preinst and postinst scripts use set -x, e.g. with the contol-overrides mechanism - Do the upgrade... Regards, Frank -- Frank Küster Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich Debian Developer
Processed: Re: Starting geomview ends up with InstCreate: undefined option: 7042768
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reopen 314988 Bug#314988: Starting geomview ends up with InstCreate: undefined option: 7042768 Bug reopened, originator not changed. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#339243: It's OK to upload openscenegraph now....
On Sun, Dec 11, 2005 at 06:45:17AM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote: All its dependencies are built with the needed ABIs everywhere that matters (m68k currently doesn't matter because it's so far behind that its uninstallability count is allowed to increase). This was actually ok *before* now; it just required adding a versioned build-dependency on gdal. This versioned build-dependency is still recommended, to keep m68k from accidentally trying to build the packages out of order later once it does catch up (AFAIK it won't work because openscenegraph builds binaries linked against libgdal instead of just building libraries, but why take chances?). Incidentally, this bug is actually due to be downgraded shortly; because libopenscenegraph1c2 didn't reach testing before this mess happened, we've decided that the *rename* of the library is not RC (because it doesn't affect upgrades between releases), it's only RC to keep binaries built with the broken and no-longer-supported ABI out of the release -- and that's almost done, as openscenegraph has been binNMUed on all architectures but arm and m68k at this point. I would still encourage you to rename the library package per this transition, but there should be no need for you to regard it as release-critical. Cheers, -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#342292: tetex-bin: Multiple exploitable heap overflows in embedded xpdf copy
Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Frank Küster wrote: Hi Joey, Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The original patch was not sufficient. I'm attaching the entire and the incremental patch. Please apply the incremental patch to the version in sid as well. Did you see Martin Pitt's enhanced patch - do both address the same problems? The appendix removes the douplette Martin found, so yes. I looked at both, and it seems that Martin's does more. I'm speaking of the patch attached to http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=342292;msg=136 It introduces limits.h and does the same we did for the xpdf patches at the beginning of the year, namely change code that can be optimized away by compilers. It seems to me that Martin Pitt's patch also has everything that yours (Joey's) has, but I'm not completely sure; anyway it seems that also the stable packages should use the code with limits.h. Am I correct that the other issues that Florian found are not addressed by any patch yet, and have not yet been widely published? Should I delay an upload to sid until this can be fixed, too? P.S. Did you see my mail to -release regarding the tetex-base upload to stable/proposed-updates? No. Could you forward it? Sent in a separate mail. Regards, Frank -- Frank Küster Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich Debian Developer
Bug#342870: licq contains dev headers from licq-dev
Package: licq Version: 1.3.2-4+b1 Severity: serious Hi there! While trying to install licq-dev (1.3.2-4, last version in sid), it tries to overwrite include files from licq (1.3.2-4+b1), which AIUI should not be in this package at all. BIN-NMU gone wrong... | ii licq 1.3.2-4+b1 ICQ client (base files) | Unpacking licq-dev (from .../licq-dev_1.3.2-4_all.deb) ... | dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/licq-dev_1.3.2-4_all.deb (--unpack): | trying to overwrite `/usr/include/licq/licq_buffer.h', which is also in package licq greetings, Uli -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.4.27-2-686 Locale: LANG=C, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#341945: Investigation of the bug
Version: 1.5.2+b2 On Sun, Dec 11, 2005 at 12:34:42PM +0100, Enrico Zini wrote: On Sun, Dec 11, 2005 at 12:41:57AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: On Sat, Dec 10, 2005 at 11:18:53AM +0100, Enrico Zini wrote: So, it seems that there are some recompiles to be triggered: Step 1: libtagcoll-dev Step 2: tagcoll, tagcolledit, libapt-front-dev (since they statically link libtagcoll-dev) Step 3: debtags, debtags-edit, packagesearch (since they statically link libapt-front-dev) Could you perform these steps locally on your system and confirm that it does correct the failure, before we commit buildd time on all archs to rebuilding these? Sure. Done. It works. Spiff. Closing the bug as fixed in the next binNMU then, which is already scheduled (along with the binNMUs for tagcolledit, debtags-edit, libapt-front, and packagesearch). Cheers, -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Processed: Re: libpam-encfs - is not i386 specific
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 340575 serious Bug#340575: libpam-encfs - is not i386 specific Severity set to `serious'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#285198: Bug#337259: debian-reference: FTBFS with new tetex-bin: Error trying to create pdflatex.fmt
tags 285198 patch thanks Osamu Aoki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: After reviewing my package, IO realized cjk-latex has been removed from testing. Until some fix is done on postinst script, it will not enter testing due to #285198 (Manual edit of texmf.cnf not recommended). It seems we need to add some script to /etc/texmf/texmf.d insted of screwing around with /etc/texmf/texmf.conf file. This needs to be fixed frst before my debian-reference since it depends on it. Any idea how to fix this? It's even easier: Simply drop the code from postinst and depend on tex-common (= 0.13) | tetex-bin ( 3.0) This looks a little strange, but the explanation is that tetex-bin in sarge and currently in etch already had the setting that cjk-latex wants to introduce; when the configuration files where moved from tetex-bin to tex-common we first forgot it, and I've now readded it in the SVN repository of tex-common; the next release will again include it. But tex-common's release will not limit cjk-latex's testing migration, because in testing it has tetex-bin ( 3.0) to satisfy the dependency. Attached is a patch to achieve this. Regards, Frank diff -Nur cjk-latex-4.5.1.orig/debian/changelog cjk-latex-4.5.1/debian/changelog --- cjk-latex-4.5.1.orig/debian/changelog 2005-12-11 14:50:58.459814408 +0100 +++ cjk-latex-4.5.1/debian/changelog 2005-12-11 14:44:22.003084992 +0100 @@ -1,3 +1,10 @@ +cjk-latex (4.5.1-4.1) unstable; urgency=low + + * Do not mess around with the generated file texmf.cnf; instead depend +on tex-common (= 0.13) which provides the font support we need. + + -- Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun, 11 Dec 2005 14:31:05 +0100 + cjk-latex (4.5.1-4) unstable; urgency=low * CVS update as of 2003-02-11. diff -Nur cjk-latex-4.5.1.orig/debian/control cjk-latex-4.5.1/debian/control --- cjk-latex-4.5.1.orig/debian/control 2005-12-11 14:50:58.462813952 +0100 +++ cjk-latex-4.5.1/debian/control 2005-12-11 14:43:23.812931240 +0100 @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ Package: cjk-latex Architecture: any -Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, tetex-base (= 1.0-1), tetex-bin (= 1.0.6-1.1) +Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, tetex-base (= 1.0-1), tetex-bin (= 1.0.6-1.1), tex-common (= 0.13) Recommends: freetype1-tools Suggests: tfm-arphic-bsmi00lp, tfm-arphic-bkai00mp, tfm-arphic-gbsn00lp, tfm-arphic-gkai00mp, hbf-jfs56, hbf-cns40-b5, hbf-kanji48 Description: A LaTeX macro package for CJK (Chinese/Japanese/Korean) diff -Nur cjk-latex-4.5.1.orig/debian/postinst cjk-latex-4.5.1/debian/postinst --- cjk-latex-4.5.1.orig/debian/postinst 2005-12-11 14:50:58.463813800 +0100 +++ cjk-latex-4.5.1/debian/postinst 2005-12-11 14:44:50.159804520 +0100 @@ -18,10 +18,3 @@ #DEBHELPER# -# Fixes /etc/texmf/texmf.cnf. -# Remove the following line when Debian's teTeX package comes with -# the same setting. -if ! /bin/grep -q '^T1FONTS.*;$TEXMF/fonts/hbf//' /etc/texmf/texmf.cnf; then -/usr/bin/perl -pi -e 's|^(T1FONTS.*)$|$1;\$TEXMF/fonts/hbf//|;' \ - /etc/texmf/texmf.cnf -fi -- Frank Küster Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich Debian Developer
Bug#342583: postgresql-server-dev-8.0 depends upon libpq-dev which is 8.1 specific.
tag 342583 moreinfo thanks Hi Andreas! Andreas Kostyrka [2005-12-08 9:23 -0800]: postgresql-server-dev-8.0 depends upon libpq-dev which happens to be 8.1 specific. libpq{4,-dev} is not version specific, it works for all PostgreSQL versions starting from 7.3. It just makes sense (and is generally necessary) to have the client side files for server-side extensions, too. Which makes it completely useless as the headers do not match. There is no other libpq-dev version being shown by apt-cache. The installed ubuntu package below fixes at least the compile time stuff, but it still is not able to link. Can you please give more details about what exactly you are trying to do? 'It breaks' is not very helpful for fixing things. Thank you, Martin -- Martin Pitthttp://www.piware.de Ubuntu Developer http://www.ubuntu.com Debian Developer http://www.debian.org In a world without walls and fences, who needs Windows and Gates? signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#342212: python-visual - FTBFS: error: expected type-specifier before ';' token
clone 342212 -1 reassign -1 python2.3-numarray thanks This looks like a bug in python2.3-nummarray to me; this header is not usable on its own, because it depends on macro definitions from other headers which it doesn't include. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Processed: Re: Bug#342583: postgresql-server-dev-8.0 depends upon libpq-dev which is 8.1 specific.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 342583 moreinfo Bug#342583: postgresql-server-dev-8.0 depends upon libpq-dev which is 8.1 specific. There were no tags set. Tags added: moreinfo thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Bug#337259: debian-reference: FTBFS with new tetex-bin: Error trying to create pdflatex.fmt
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 285198 patch Bug#285198: Manual edit of texmf.cnf not recommended Tags were: fixed Tags added: patch thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: python-visual - FTBFS: error: expected type-specifier before ';' token
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: clone 342212 -1 Bug#342212: python-visual - FTBFS: error: expected type-specifier before ';' token Bug 342212 cloned as bug 342875. reassign -1 python2.3-numarray Bug#342875: python-visual - FTBFS: error: expected type-specifier before ';' token Bug reassigned from package `python-visual' to `python2.3-numarray'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#342879: make: new version breaks cdbs
Package: make Version: 3.80+3.81.b3-1 Severity: grave Justification: render hundred of packages unbuildable Hi, Since version 3.80+3.81.b3-1 of make, all packages using cdbs fail to build: example of digikam: rmdir /build/buildd/digikam-0.8.0-1/debian/digikam/usr/share/doc/kde/HTML/en rmdir /build/buildd/digikam-0.8.0-1/debian/digikam/usr/share/doc/kde/HTML rmdir /build/buildd/digikam-0.8.0-1/debian/digikam/usr/share/doc/kde make: *** No rule to make target `install', needed by `binary/digikam'. Stop. ** I don't know if the bug is in make or cdbs, but as it was triggered by a new version of make, I reported it here. Please feel free to reassign it. Bye, Aurelien -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (x86_64) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.14 Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to fr_FR.UTF-8) cdbs depends on no packages. Versions of packages cdbs recommends: ii autotools-dev 20050803.1 Update infrastructure for config.{ ii debhelper 5.0.10 helper programs for debian/rules -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#340852: gpsd: FTBFS: undefined reference to `floor'
merge 340081 340852 thanks On Sat, 2005-11-26 at 13:17 +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote: Package: gpsd Version: 2.30-1 Severity: serious Hi, Your package is failing to build with the following error: gpxlogger.o: In function `signal_handler':/build/buildd/gpsd-2.30/gpxlogger.c:6 7: undefined reference to `floor' collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make[2]: *** [gpxlogger] Error 1 You will need to link with -lm Hi Kurt, thanks for the report. This bug was already reported before and is tagged pending. Cheers, Til -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#340852: gpsd: FTBFS: undefined reference to `floor'
On Sun, 2005-12-11 at 13:32 +0800, Zak B. Elep wrote: package gpsd tags 340852 patch thanks control ;) I've fixed this in my merge of gpsd for Ubuntu. Attached is the (rather trivial) fix, though I suspect that a better solution would be to notify upstream of this problem and modify ./Makefile.am and update the autotools infrastructure accordingly. Cheers, Zakame Hi Zakame, thanks for your report. The bug report you replied to is actually a duplicate, merging bugs right now (#340081, #340852). The patch I used is attached, you might want to use this for the Ubuntu vesion as well. Just out of curiosity - is it customary to close Debian bugs in Ubuntu changelogs? I think this is slightly misleading to Ubuntu users - a) the bug doesn't actually get closed by the upload, b) as an Ubuntu user I'd look in the Ubuntu BTS for the bug number. Cheers, Til 15_link_lm_fix.dpatch Description: application/shellscript
Processed: block 342212 with 342875
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.10 block 342212 with 342875 Bug#342212: python-visual - FTBFS: error: expected type-specifier before ';' token Was not blocked by any bugs. Blocking bugs added: 342875 End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Bug#340852: gpsd: FTBFS: undefined reference to `floor'
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: merge 340081 340852 Bug#340081: gpsd: ftbfs [sparc] undefined reference to `floor' Bug#340852: gpsd: FTBFS: undefined reference to `floor' Merged 340081 340852. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#342892: Incompatible with make 3.80+3.81.b3-1
Package: cdbs Version: 0.4.32 Severity: serious Hi, Cdbs breaks for some packages when upgrading to make 3.80+3.81.b3-1. This make version explicitely has incompatibilities with previous versions, I'm afraid this has to be fixed on the side of CDBS. The problem I encountered was with the gst-plugins0.8 packages, when dh_installdirs -p has been called for all binary packages, I get a make error saying it can't find the install target. make: *** No rule to make target install, necessary for binary/gstreamer0.8-plugins. Stop. In previous builds, or when downgrading to a previous make version, the following command would have been run: dh_installdocs -pgstreamer0.8-plugins debian/README.Debian NEWS Hence, I believe that the incompatibility might be due to this expression in debhelper.mk: $(patsubst %,install/%,$(DEB_ALL_PACKAGES)) :: install/%: I'm not versed in Makefiles, but if I can provide more information, let me know. -- Loïc Minier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#342879: make: new version breaks cdbs
Hi, You know, as good bug reports go, this one is pretty deficient; there is no useful information to go on, and the package in question is not a small, self contained one to ease debugging, and no effort has been made to dig deeper. I expected better from a fellow developer. manoj -- pos += screamnext[pos] /* does this goof up anywhere? */ Larry Wall in util.c from the perl source code Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/ 1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#338334: marked as done (tetex-doc: Debian changelog is missing)
Your message dated Sun, 11 Dec 2005 07:02:55 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#338334: fixed in tetex-base 3.0-11 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Nov 2005 15:34:32 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Nov 09 07:34:32 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from smtp07.web.de [217.72.192.225] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EZry4-0005kX-00; Wed, 09 Nov 2005 07:34:32 -0800 Received: from [217.251.234.173] (helo=[127.0.0.1]) by smtp07.web.de with asmtp (WEB.DE 4.105 #317) id 1EZrxX-0005XE-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 09 Nov 2005 16:34:00 +0100 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2005 16:28:33 +0100 From: Sven Joachim [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051017) X-Accept-Language: de-DE, de, en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: tetex-doc: Debian changelog is missing Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: tetex-doc Version: 3.0-10 Severity: serious The Debian changelog is missing in the /usr/share/doc/tetex-doc directory. Please add it there as mandated by section 12.7 of the Policy Manual. -- System Information excluded --- Received: (at 338334-close) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Dec 2005 15:11:05 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Dec 11 07:11:04 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1ElSj1-000811-Tz; Sun, 11 Dec 2005 07:02:55 -0800 From: =?utf-8?q?Frank_K=C3=BCster?= [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.60 $ Subject: Bug#338334: fixed in tetex-base 3.0-11 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2005 07:02:55 -0800 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: tetex-base Source-Version: 3.0-11 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of tetex-base, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: tetex-base_3.0-11.diff.gz to pool/main/t/tetex-base/tetex-base_3.0-11.diff.gz tetex-base_3.0-11.dsc to pool/main/t/tetex-base/tetex-base_3.0-11.dsc tetex-base_3.0-11_all.deb to pool/main/t/tetex-base/tetex-base_3.0-11_all.deb tetex-doc_3.0-11_all.deb to pool/main/t/tetex-base/tetex-doc_3.0-11_all.deb tetex-extra_3.0-11_all.deb to pool/main/t/tetex-base/tetex-extra_3.0-11_all.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated tetex-base package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2005 15:10:55 +0100 Source: tetex-base Binary: tetex-extra tetex-doc tetex-base Architecture: source all Version: 3.0-11 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: teTeX maintainers debian-tetex-maint@lists.debian.org Changed-By: Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: tetex-base - Basic library files of teTeX tetex-doc - The documentation component of the Debian teTeX packages tetex-extra - Additional library files of teTeX Closes: 261529 338334 341110 Changes: tetex-base (3.0-11) unstable; urgency=low . * Since /etc/texmf is a real TEXMF tree now, TeX input files are no longer treated as configuration files. Upon upgrade, unchanged files are removed, changed ones are
Bug#342902: upgrade fails
Package: udev Version: 0.076-5 Severity: serious Preparing to replace udev 0.076-4 (using .../archives/udev_0.076-5_i386.deb) ... Unpacking replacement udev ... dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/udev_0.076-5_i386.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite `/usr/share/initramfs-tools/hooks/udev', which is also in package initramfs-tools dpkg-deb: subprocess paste killed by signal (Broken pipe) Installed version of initramfs-tools was 0.41, after upgrading to 0.42 the problem was fixed... looks like a replaces: initramfs-tools = 0.41 is missing here. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.14-2-686 Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=de_DE (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Versions of packages udev depends on: ii initscripts 2.86.ds1-4 Standard scripts needed for bootin ii libc6 2.3.5-8GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libselinux1 1.26-1 SELinux shared libraries ii lsb-base 3.0-11 Linux Standard Base 3.0 init scrip ii makedev 2.3.1-79 creates device files in /dev ii sed 4.1.2-8The GNU sed stream editor udev recommends no packages. -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#334338: marked as done (rhapsody: Segmentation fault when join in a channel)
Your message dated Sun, 11 Dec 2005 12:52:17 -0300 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line (no subject) has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Oct 2005 09:56:23 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Oct 17 02:56:23 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mailfe05.tele2.it (swip.net) [212.247.154.141] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1ERRjD-0008NZ-00; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 02:56:23 -0700 X-T2-Posting-ID: v4XIVZW7JrcRQ3HmJRaApFKdq9HfQ9X8NEP5SUzk5uQ= Received: from [83.176.117.57] (HELO localhost.localdomain) by mailfe05.swip.net (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3.8) with ESMTPS id 5985951; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 11:55:50 +0200 Received: from joshua by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.54) id 1ERRpD-0001v9-Uo; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 12:02:36 +0200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Joshua Dunamis [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: rhapsody: Segmentation fault when join in a channel X-Mailer: reportbug 3.17 Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2005 12:02:35 +0200 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: rhapsody Version: 0.26b-2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Hello, the first time I joined in a channel it worked fine but the users list showed only the ops of the channel. So I closed the program. Now when I just join in a channel the program is closed with a segmentation fault. What is happened? -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-686 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) Versions of packages rhapsody depends on: ii libc6 2.3.5-7GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libncurses5 5.5-1 Shared libraries for terminal hand rhapsody recommends no packages. -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 334338-done) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Dec 2005 15:53:21 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Dec 11 07:53:21 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from avas-mr11.fibertel.com.ar ([24.232.0.224]) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1ElTVp-0002kk-2P for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 11 Dec 2005 07:53:21 -0800 Received: from OL34-105.fibertel.com.ar ([24.232.105.34]:37899 EHLO [192.168.1.32] smtp-auth: [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by avas-mr11.fibertel.com.ar with ESMTP id S180276AbVLKPwo; Sun, 11 Dec 2005 12:52:44 -0300 X-Comment: RFC 2476 MSA function at avas-mr11.fibertel.com.ar logged sender identity as: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2005 12:52:17 -0300 From: Marcela Tiznado [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Debian Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051017) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Fib-Al-Info: Al X-Fib-Al-MRId: 5bda1f9df6de83731a25b7c8756776a4 X-Fib-Al-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.9 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_44,NOSUBJECT, RCVD_IN_SORBS autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 I'm closing this bug cause was imposible to reproduce, and got no answer on a prudential time from the submitter. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#339056: Is Lars Steinke MIA?
On Sat, Dec 10, 2005 at 06:31:34PM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote: On 2005-11-14, I filed grave bug #339056: Library package fails to include shlibs file [0] on package tktable-dev [1] , on which my package saods9 build-depends. I'm concerned about this bug because 1) its RC; 2) I haven't heard back in a month, despite pinging the maintainer last week; 3) My package depends on it [2]; and 4) Only 1 other package, also maintained by Lars, depends on it. I would have expected some response by now, so I'm alerting -qa and asking -devel for info. Has anyone heard from Lars Steinke [EMAIL PROTECTED] in the last month? A quick google search indicates that he was active early this year, at least, and his bug page indicates that he has probably been inactive for ~6 months. Dear Justin, my time has been rather limited the last few months and this has not been security relevant in any respect - sorry for the delay. Also, it seems the requirements you quote in your bug report have not been in place when I uploaded, as there was no warning from lintian then. If you find tktable useful, I'd like to propose that you take over maintainersahip from me, as I simply had to provide it as prerequisite for packaging moodss. Let me know if you'd find this satisfactory. Regards, Lars signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#342906: klibc: FTBFS on Sparc64 (local build)
Package: klibc Version: 1.1.1-4 Severity: serious Justification: Fails to build from source I was trying to recover from yaird failing to create an initrd for the new kernel and, to install initramfs-tools, had to try to build klibc locally as it's not available from the mirrors for Sparc. This resulted in the following build failure: [...] strip gzip -o gzip.stripped make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/projects/klibc/klibc-1.1.1/gzip' make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/projects/klibc/klibc-1.1.1' touch debian/stamp-makefile-build if [ -e ash/sh.shared ]; then mv -f ash/sh.shared ash/sh; fi make: *** No rule to make target `configure', needed by `build/libklibc-dev'. Stop. Builddeps: ii bison2.1-0.2 A parser generator that is compatible with YACC ii cdbs 0.4.32common build system for Debian packages ii debhelper5.0.10helper programs for debian/rules ii flex 2.5.31-36 A fast lexical analyzer generator. ii gcc-3.3 3.3.6-10 The GNU C compiler ii linux-headers-2.6-12 2.6.12-10 Common architecture-specific header files for Linu pgpV3OjGpRYvO.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#314988: Starting geomview ends up with InstCreate: undefined option: 7042768
On Sun, Dec 11, 2005 at 03:52:25AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: reopen 314988 thanks geomview (1.8.1-10) unstable; urgency=low . * debian/control: Add texinfo to build-deps so that command makeinfo is available. Closes: #338773. . * debian/control: Restrict architectures. This package was not designed for 64-bit machines. Closes: #314988. Sorry, this is *not* (just) a 64-bit bug; geomview runs fine for me on my alpha. OK, thanks for the confirmation. Since the etch RC policy says that packages must be supported on as many architectures as is reasonably possible, this is therefore an RC bug; please re-add alpha to the architecture list. OK. Technically, though, you're describing a different bug, namely alpha is missing. ia64 can reasonably be left out until someone can confirm that this bug doesn't exist there, but given that both people who have reported this bug say they're using nvidia on amd64, I suspect it may be a 64-bit issue in geomview that only manifests when using the nvidia binary drivers Yes, could be. in which case the package really ought to be supported on amd64 as well. Sure. But then it ain't grave since it's only unusable in certain circumstances. Right? Next time if you want to sneak a change like this past the porters, don't forget to ask the ftpmasters to remove the stale binary packages. ;) To be honest, I was a little surprised that this manual step is necessary. I'm not in a hurry to get them removed since geomview is being stalled by gcc-4.0 anyway. -Steve -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: retitle
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: retitle 342902 missing replaces on initramfs-tools Bug#342902: upgrade fails Changed Bug title. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#342902: marked as done (missing replaces on initramfs-tools)
Your message dated Sun, 11 Dec 2005 08:47:12 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#342902: fixed in udev 0.076-6 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Dec 2005 15:48:33 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Dec 11 07:48:33 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from rollcage.inittab.de ([194.150.191.146]) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1ElTRB-0002Dl-Cl for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 11 Dec 2005 07:48:33 -0800 Received: from magellan.home.inittab.de (gateway.home.inittab.de [62.91.23.197]) by rollcage.inittab.de (Postfix) with SMTP id 4B9EBCE04C; Sun, 11 Dec 2005 16:48:31 +0100 (CET) Received: (nullmailer pid 8563 invoked by uid 1000); Sun, 11 Dec 2005 15:48:26 - Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2005 16:48:26 +0100 From: Norbert Tretkowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: upgrade fails Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Reportbug-Version: 3.18 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: udev Version: 0.076-5 Severity: serious Preparing to replace udev 0.076-4 (using .../archives/udev_0.076-5_i386.deb) ... Unpacking replacement udev ... dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/udev_0.076-5_i386.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite `/usr/share/initramfs-tools/hooks/udev', which is also in package initramfs-tools dpkg-deb: subprocess paste killed by signal (Broken pipe) Installed version of initramfs-tools was 0.41, after upgrading to 0.42 the problem was fixed... looks like a replaces: initramfs-tools = 0.41 is missing here. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.14-2-686 Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=de_DE (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Versions of packages udev depends on: ii initscripts 2.86.ds1-4 Standard scripts needed for bootin ii libc6 2.3.5-8GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libselinux1 1.26-1 SELinux shared libraries ii lsb-base 3.0-11 Linux Standard Base 3.0 init scrip ii makedev 2.3.1-79 creates device files in /dev ii sed 4.1.2-8The GNU sed stream editor udev recommends no packages. -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 342902-close) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Dec 2005 16:51:06 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Dec 11 08:51:05 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1ElULw-0005Fz-HM; Sun, 11 Dec 2005 08:47:12 -0800 From: Marco d'Itri [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.60 $ Subject: Bug#342902: fixed in udev 0.076-6 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2005 08:47:12 -0800 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: udev Source-Version: 0.076-6 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of udev, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: udev-udeb_0.076-6_i386.udeb to pool/main/u/udev/udev-udeb_0.076-6_i386.udeb udev_0.076-6.diff.gz to pool/main/u/udev/udev_0.076-6.diff.gz udev_0.076-6.dsc to pool/main/u/udev/udev_0.076-6.dsc udev_0.076-6_i386.deb to pool/main/u/udev/udev_0.076-6_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Marco d'Itri [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated
Bug#342906: klibc: FTBFS on Sparc64 (local build))
The bug seems to be caused by the new make (3.80+3.81.b3-1). The README.Debian lists several backwards incompatibility warnings for this version. Possibly the build failure is caused by one of those. The build succeeded after downgrading to make 3.80-12. I'm not sure where this problem needs to be fixed: klibc, cdbs or make. I'll leave it up to you to reassign. Cheers, FJP pgpLtijdpDEq6.pgp Description: PGP signature
Processed: reassign 335220 to doc-linux, cloning 335220 ...
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.9 reassign 335220 doc-linux Bug#335220: doc-linux-text: [NONFREE-DOC] includes non-free documentation Bug reassigned from package `doc-linux-text' to `doc-linux'. clone 335220 -1 Bug#335220: doc-linux-text: [NONFREE-DOC] includes non-free documentation Bug 335220 cloned as bug 342915. retitle -1 [NONFREE-DOC] includes many GFDL licensed HOWTOs Bug#342915: doc-linux-text: [NONFREE-DOC] includes non-free documentation Changed Bug title. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: cloning 335220, reassign -1 to doc-linux-nonfree, severity of -1 is important ...
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.9 clone 335220 -1 Bug#335220: doc-linux-text: [NONFREE-DOC] includes non-free documentation Bug 335220 cloned as bug 342916. reassign -1 doc-linux-nonfree Bug#342916: doc-linux-text: [NONFREE-DOC] includes non-free documentation Bug reassigned from package `doc-linux' to `doc-linux-nonfree'. severity -1 important Bug#342916: doc-linux-text: [NONFREE-DOC] includes non-free documentation Severity set to `important'. retitle -1 Boot+Root+Raid+LILO an Root-RAID need explicit permission to modify Bug#342916: doc-linux-text: [NONFREE-DOC] includes non-free documentation Changed Bug title. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: cloning 335220, severity of -1 is important, retitle -1 to DNS-HOWTO license should be clarified
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.9 clone 335220 -1 Bug#335220: doc-linux-text: [NONFREE-DOC] includes non-free documentation Bug 335220 cloned as bug 342917. severity -1 important Bug#342917: doc-linux-text: [NONFREE-DOC] includes non-free documentation Severity set to `important'. retitle -1 DNS-HOWTO license should be clarified Bug#342917: doc-linux-text: [NONFREE-DOC] includes non-free documentation Changed Bug title. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#342879: make: new version breaks cdbs
Manoj Srivastava a écrit : Hi, You know, as good bug reports go, this one is pretty deficient; there is no useful information to go on, and the package in question is not a small, self contained one to ease debugging, and no effort has been made to dig deeper. I expected better from a fellow developer. Well the fact is that I know nothing about CDBS, and I am not an user of it (I don't like it). I found the bug while trying to debug some packages that have FTBFS on sparc. Aurelien -- .''`. Aurelien Jarno | GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73 : :' : Debian developer | Electrical Engineer `. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] `-people.debian.org/~aurel32 | www.aurel32.net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#342879: make: new version breaks cdbs
tags 342879 + confirmed block 342892 by 342879 retile 342892 Make regression: all CDBS packages FTBFS, see #342879 thanks Hi, Attached is a sample Makefile which used to work in previous versions of make. Bye, -- Loïc Minier [EMAIL PROTECTED] default: bar/foo $(patsubst %,bar/%,foo) :: bar/% : baz/% baz/foo: @echo in baz .PHONY: $(patsubst %,bar/%,foo)
Processed: Re: make: new version breaks cdbs
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 342879 + confirmed Bug#342879: make: new version breaks cdbs There were no tags set. Tags added: confirmed block 342892 by 342879 Bug#342892: Incompatible with make 3.80+3.81.b3-1 Was not blocked by any bugs. Blocking bugs added: 342879 retile 342892 Make regression: all CDBS packages FTBFS, see #342879 Unknown command or malformed arguments to command. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: cloning 335220, reassign -1 to doc-linux-nonfree, severity of -1 is important ...
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.9 clone 335220 -1 Bug#335220: doc-linux-text: [NONFREE-DOC] includes non-free documentation Bug 335220 cloned as bug 342921. reassign -1 doc-linux-nonfree Bug#342921: doc-linux-text: [NONFREE-DOC] includes non-free documentation Bug reassigned from package `doc-linux' to `doc-linux-nonfree'. severity -1 important Bug#342921: doc-linux-text: [NONFREE-DOC] includes non-free documentation Severity set to `important'. retitle -1 HOWTOs with old-style ESR license need license clarification Bug#342921: doc-linux-text: [NONFREE-DOC] includes non-free documentation Changed Bug title. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: cloning 335220, severity of -1 is important, retitle -1 to German-HOWTO license should be clarified
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.9 clone 335220 -1 Bug#335220: doc-linux-text: [NONFREE-DOC] includes non-free documentation Bug 335220 cloned as bug 342922. severity -1 important Bug#342922: doc-linux-text: [NONFREE-DOC] includes non-free documentation Severity set to `important'. retitle -1 German-HOWTO license should be clarified Bug#342922: doc-linux-text: [NONFREE-DOC] includes non-free documentation Changed Bug title. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: cloning 335220, reassign -1 to doc-linux-nonfree, severity of -1 is important ...
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.9 clone 335220 -1 Bug#335220: doc-linux-text: [NONFREE-DOC] includes non-free documentation Bug 335220 cloned as bug 342928. reassign -1 doc-linux-nonfree Bug#342928: doc-linux-text: [NONFREE-DOC] includes non-free documentation Bug reassigned from package `doc-linux' to `doc-linux-nonfree'. severity -1 important Bug#342928: doc-linux-text: [NONFREE-DOC] includes non-free documentation Severity set to `important'. retitle -1 Oracle-7-HOWTO needs explicit permission to modify Bug#342928: doc-linux-text: [NONFREE-DOC] includes non-free documentation Changed Bug title. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#338813: marked as done (mp32ogg: Destroys MP4 movies!)
Your message dated Sun, 11 Dec 2005 09:47:30 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#338813: fixed in mp32ogg 0.11-6 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Nov 2005 01:28:51 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Nov 12 17:28:51 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from smtp-1.vancouver.ipapp.com ([216.152.192.190]) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Eb6fq-ss-TY for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 12 Nov 2005 17:28:50 -0800 Received: from debian-sbernier ([64.11.26.235]) by smtp-1.vancouver.ipapp.com ; Sat, 12 Nov 2005 17:28:48 -0800 Received: from sbernier by debian-sbernier with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1Eb6jc-0001Rv-00; Sat, 12 Nov 2005 20:32:44 -0500 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Sylvain Bernier [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: mp32ogg: Destroys MP4 movies! X-Mailer: reportbug 3.17 Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2005 20:32:43 -0500 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Sylvain Bernier [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Country: US Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.4 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS, FROM_HAS_ULINE_NUMS,HAS_PACKAGE,RCVD_IN_SORBS autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: mp32ogg Version: 0.11-5 Severity: critical Justification: causes serious data loss I had a directory full of Real Media videos (.rm), Quick Time movies (.mov), MPEG-4 movies (.mp4) and MPEG Layer 3 audio files (.mp3). I asked for a conversion of that directory in Ogg Vorbis files. Unfortunatly, I also used the --delete option because I never had any problem with mp32ogg before. Well... mp32ogg converted my MPEG-4 movies to audio Ogg Vorbis files. Well... No more pictures, no more sound, only noise. The movies are unrecoverable. You understand the problem. Well, I don't know how mp32ogg recognize mp3 files. But it should not convert MPEG-4 movies (.mp4). If the scripts looks for *.mp?, it should be documented. Thanks. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.4.27-2-k7-smp Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1) (ignored: LC_ALL set to en_US.ISO-8859-1) Versions of packages mp32ogg depends on: ii libmp3-info-perl 1.13-1 Perl MP3::Info - Manipulate / fetc ii libstring-shellquote-perl 1.03-1 quote strings for passing through ii mpg3210.2.10.3 A Free command-line mp3 player, co hi perl 5.8.7-6Larry Wall's Practical Extraction hi vorbis-tools 1.0.1-1.4 Several Ogg Vorbis Tools mp32ogg recommends no packages. -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 338813-close) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Dec 2005 17:52:03 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Dec 11 09:52:03 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1ElVII-0002sD-7p; Sun, 11 Dec 2005 09:47:30 -0800 From: Julien Danjou [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.60 $ Subject: Bug#338813: fixed in mp32ogg 0.11-6 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2005 09:47:30 -0800 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: mp32ogg Source-Version: 0.11-6 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of mp32ogg, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: mp32ogg_0.11-6.dsc to pool/main/m/mp32ogg/mp32ogg_0.11-6.dsc mp32ogg_0.11-6.tar.gz to pool/main/m/mp32ogg/mp32ogg_0.11-6.tar.gz mp32ogg_0.11-6_all.deb to pool/main/m/mp32ogg/mp32ogg_0.11-6_all.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
Bug#341542: perl: Still vulnerable...
Brendan O'Dea [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: You're causing a SEGV by attempting to address a non-existant argument to printf. You don't need a large number to do this--the same happens with: perl -e 'printf q/%1$vs/' This was because %vs by itself did strange things. Same with %vc, %vn, and even %v%'. Fixed by change 26321. --Gisle -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#341945: Success story of dh-buildinfo!
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, By accident (I was bitten by this bug as well, being a fan of debtags), I noticed this[1] comment of a succesful use of dh-buildinfo. Thanks for a neat little tool! - Jonas [1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=341945;msg=31;att=0 - -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist og Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ - Enden er nær: http://www.shibumi.org/eoti.htm -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDnHAXn7DbMsAkQLgRAjiKAKCRGfrE9t/4kVuDYFpsZ/NrcUPlCQCcDNY4 p8AZncU5EdGF7c5GlJGC9Xo= =uA51 -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Processed: block 342870 with 342879
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.9 block 342870 with 342879 Bug#342870: licq contains dev headers from licq-dev Was not blocked by any bugs. Blocking bugs added: 342879 End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: [Build-common-hackers] Processed: Re: make: new version breaks cdbs
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: retitle 342892 Make regression: all CDBS packages FTBFS, see #342879 Bug#342892: Incompatible with make 3.80+3.81.b3-1 Changed Bug title. stop Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#325678: marked as done (svnmailer: FTBFS: cannot stat `debian/svnmailer.conf.example': No such file or directory)
Your message dated Sun, 11 Dec 2005 10:32:14 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#325678: fixed in svnmailer 1.0.5-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Aug 2005 08:03:43 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Aug 30 01:03:43 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from c147112.adsl.hansenet.de (localhost.localdomain) [213.39.147.112] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EA15r-iC-00; Tue, 30 Aug 2005 01:03:43 -0700 Received: from aj by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.52) id 1EA15l-0001zB-1p; Tue, 30 Aug 2005 10:03:39 +0200 To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Andreas Jochens [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: svnmailer: FTBFS: cannot stat `debian/svnmailer.conf.example': No such file or directory Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2005 10:03:37 +0200 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: svnmailer Version: 1.0.5-1 Severity: serious Tags: patch When building 'svnmailer' on unstable, I get the following error: dh_installexamples cp: cannot stat `debian/svnmailer.conf.example': No such file or directory dh_installexamples: command returned error code 256 make: *** [binary-arch] Error 1 With the attached patch 'svnmailer' can be built on unstable. Regards Andreas Jochens diff -urN ../tmp-orig/svnmailer-1.0.5/debian/rules ./debian/rules --- ../tmp-orig/svnmailer-1.0.5/debian/rules2005-08-30 07:46:08.0 + +++ ./debian/rules 2005-08-30 07:45:48.0 + @@ -67,7 +67,7 @@ dh_testroot dh_installchangelogs CHANGES dh_installdocs - dh_installexamples +# dh_installexamples dh_link dh_strip dh_compress --- Received: (at 325678-close) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Dec 2005 18:41:18 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Dec 11 10:41:18 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1ElVza-0003sq-If; Sun, 11 Dec 2005 10:32:14 -0800 From: Julien Danjou [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.60 $ Subject: Bug#325678: fixed in svnmailer 1.0.5-3 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2005 10:32:14 -0800 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: svnmailer Source-Version: 1.0.5-3 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of svnmailer, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: svnmailer_1.0.5-3.diff.gz to pool/main/s/svnmailer/svnmailer_1.0.5-3.diff.gz svnmailer_1.0.5-3.dsc to pool/main/s/svnmailer/svnmailer_1.0.5-3.dsc svnmailer_1.0.5-3_all.deb to pool/main/s/svnmailer/svnmailer_1.0.5-3_all.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Julien Danjou [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated svnmailer package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2005 18:54:17 +0100 Source: svnmailer Binary: svnmailer Architecture: source all Version: 1.0.5-3 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Julien Danjou [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Julien Danjou [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: svnmailer - an extensible subversion commit notification tool Closes: 325678 Changes: svnmailer (1.0.5-3) unstable; urgency=low . * Fix this FTBFS again (Closes: #325678) Files: 2b2655844a2c803e6ba3a80968250d86 646 utils optional svnmailer_1.0.5-3.dsc 950fbdc0cf1a443281eeb0d8195c0afe 63533 utils
Bug#341675: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: cppunit: FTBFS on hppa]
On Sat, Dec 03, 2005 at 01:59:18PM -0500, Christopher Martin wrote: This is probably related to qt-x11-free's FTBFS on hppa. Our build fails like this: /build/buildd/qt-x11-free-3.3.5/bin/uic -L /build/buildd/qt-x11-free-3.3.5/plugins pixmapfunction.ui -o pixmapfunction.h make[4]: *** [pixmapfunction.h] Illegal instruction ...which looks like what you're experiencing. According to lamont, this is a glibc issue (which was thought fixed by building glibc with gcc-3.4 instead of gcc-4.0, but apparently wasn't). See http://lists.debian.org/debian-glibc/2005/12/msg2.html. No reaction from the glibc team thus far. While I fail to see an immediate connection between glibc bug #326581 that caused uic to bus error, and the illegal instruction in libgcc2's __umoddi3(), I'm also aware of my complete ignorance of hppa peculiarities and resist the temptation to put blame on gcc-4.0 or binutils for this bug. ;-) Anyway, I while trying to debug why uic fails on some files but works fine with others, I noticed that a test .ui file with !DOCTYPE UIUI version=3.0/UI compiles just fine with uic on paer. Anything with a version less than 3.0, or no version identifier at all leads to a SIGILL. So if you're in dire need to work around this bug, upgrading .ui files to a later version might be an option. Regards, Daniel. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#342879: Possible broken rule
is it possible that the broken rule is in /usr/share/cdbs/1/rules/debhelper.mk? I see a bunch of rules that look like this: $(patsubst %,install/%,$(DEB_ALL_PACKAGES)) :: install/%: dh_installdirs -p$(cdbs_curpkg) $(DEB_INSTALL_DIRS_$(cdbs_curpkg)) These kinds of rules look like good candidates to interact badly with the new second expansion. And this rule that I have posted is consistent with people's failures right after CDBS runs dh_installdirs. Not that I have any clue what's going on or how to fix it, but I bet a bazillion DD's are subscribing to this bug, so maybe somone else who reads it would have an idea. --Ken Bloom -- I usually have a GPG digital signature included as an attachment. See http://www.gnupg.org/ for info about these digital signatures. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#335220: marked as done (doc-linux-text: [NONFREE-DOC] includes non-free documentation)
similar to the GFDL ones, even if they grant minor exceptions for translations...). This fails DFSG#3. Please note that the second invariant section (``GNU General Public License''), is the text of the GNU GPL license, but it's not (one of) the license(s) the document may be distributed under. Its inclusion as unmodifiable and unremovable section makes the document non-free. The first invariant section (``Distribution'') is instead a sort of essay about teTeX's license or something. I suggest trying to persuade upstream to relicense under the GNU GPL v2, since he seems to want a copyleft license and clearly wants the GPLv2 text to accompany the document (if the document itself is licensed under the GPLv2, any redistributor must accompany it with the GPLv2 text!). Obviously section ``Distribution'' should be removed or made modifiable. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.4.31 Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1) -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 335220-close) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Dec 2005 19:21:08 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Dec 11 11:21:08 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1ElWh3-0003ed-4R; Sun, 11 Dec 2005 11:17:09 -0800 From: Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.60 $ Subject: Bug#335220: fixed in doc-linux 2005.12-1 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2005 11:17:09 -0800 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: doc-linux Source-Version: 2005.12-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of doc-linux, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: doc-linux-html_2005.12-1_all.deb to pool/main/d/doc-linux/doc-linux-html_2005.12-1_all.deb doc-linux-text_2005.12-1_all.deb to pool/main/d/doc-linux/doc-linux-text_2005.12-1_all.deb doc-linux_2005.12-1.diff.gz to pool/main/d/doc-linux/doc-linux_2005.12-1.diff.gz doc-linux_2005.12-1.dsc to pool/main/d/doc-linux/doc-linux_2005.12-1.dsc doc-linux_2005.12.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/d/doc-linux/doc-linux_2005.12.orig.tar.gz A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated doc-linux package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2005 19:04:15 +0100 Source: doc-linux Binary: doc-linux-text doc-linux-html Architecture: source all Version: 2005.12-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian LDP Maintainers [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: doc-linux-html - Linux HOWTOs and FAQs in HTML format doc-linux-text - Linux HOWTOs and FAQs in ASCII format Closes: 335220 Changes: doc-linux (2005.12-1) unstable; urgency=low . * new upstream release (20051211) * Updated HOWTOs: DB2-HOWTO FBB Font-HOWTO Howtos-with-LinuxDoc IP-Masquerade-HOWTO LILO Leased-Line Linksys-Blue-Box-Router-HOWTO Linux+WinNT Linux-Complete-Backup-and-Recovery-HOWTO Quake-HOWTO TimePrecision-HOWTO * All above mentioned HOWTOs are free, except for the DB2-HOWTO * Francesco Poli did a license audit for the free HOWTOs and pointed out some ambigous stuff which needs to be sorted out with the respective authors: + Moved Boot+Root+Raid+LILO and Root-RAID to non-free until their license contains explicit permission to modify + Moved the HOWTOs under the old-style ESR license (Installation-HOWTO, Oracle-8-HOWTO, Reading-List-HOWTO, Wacom-USB-mini-HOWTO) to non-free for similar reasons + Same for Oracle-7-HOWTO, NCD-X-Terminal and TT-XFree86 which probably derived their license come from an old, misleading LDP template + Some of the arguments against the CC Attribution licenses also apply to CC-SA 1.0. Move K7s5a-HOWTO to non-free + The TeTeX-HOWTO tries to introduce invariant sections and includes the GPL for other purposes than its own license text. Seems to be clearly non-free. Moved. + All other HOWTOs mentioned in the bug report will remain in main even though they still
Bug#342879: The broken rule
My last message was wrong about the broken rule. It's the following rule from /usr/share/cdbs/1/rules/buildcore.mk: # These rules should do all the work of actually creating a .deb from the staging # directory. $(patsubst %,binary/%,$(DEB_ARCH_PACKAGES)) :: binary/% : testdir testroot common-binary-arch install/% $(patsubst %,binary/%,$(DEB_INDEP_PACKAGES)) :: binary/% : testdir testroot common-binary-indep install/% I've attached a minimal makefile which demonstrates the problem. Expected result (run on a make 3.80) [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ make list/a install... list... Debian/sid result (run on make 3.81) [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ make list/a make: *** No rule to make target `install', needed by `list/a'. Stop. I'm not sure how to fix the offending rule. --Ken Bloom -- I usually have a GPG digital signature included as an attachment. See http://www.gnupg.org/ for info about these digital signatures. LIST=a $(patsubst %,install/%,$(LIST)): @echo install... $(patsubst %,list/%,$(LIST)):: list/%: install/% @echo list... signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#342939: FTBFS: Hardcoded -march=pentium
Package: toolame Version: 02l-1 Severity: serious Justification: no longer builds from source toolame fails to build on almost all architectures: make[1]: Entering directory `/tmp/toolame-02l' gcc -O3 -DNDEBUG -DINLINE=inline -march=pentium -fomit-frame-pointer -Wall -DNEWENCODE -DNEWATAN -c common.c -o common.o cc1: error: invalid option 'arch=pentium' make[1]: *** [common.o] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/toolame-02l' This option also mustn't be present on i386, since it breaks the program on 486 class machines, which we still support. Falk -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: alpha Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.13.2 Locale: LANG=C, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) Versions of packages toolame depends on: ii libc6.1 2.3.5-8.1 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an toolame recommends no packages. -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Bug#342936: Bug detected in: k3b on testing dist
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 342936 grave Bug#342936: Bug detected in: k3b on testing dist Severity set to `grave'. close 342936 Bug#342936: Bug detected in: k3b on testing dist 'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing. Bug closed, send any further explanations to LukeC [EMAIL PROTECTED] merge 342936 337755 Bug#337755: Unable to install k3b Bug#342936: Bug detected in: k3b on testing dist Bug#338616: k3b: fails to install on debian testing using apt-get Merged 337755 338616 342936. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#337735: OOo Quickstarter (for KDE)
Matej Cepl wrote: On Sat 10. December 2005 16:47, Matej Cepl wrote: I am not sure, whether it is correct, but when applied patch from http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=47835, I was able to create new version of package which seems to work. Correction, no it doesn't work (it runs, but I cannot open file or create new one). It would be resolution of bug# 337735, but unfortunately it isn't. I'll look at it. The GNOME one was my priority (as I use GNOME ;) ). For what I did see http://lists.debian.org/debian-openoffice/2005/12/msg00083.html Of course, if there's a new upstream release it would be easier :-) Regards, Rene signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Processed: aargh wrong bug
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: unblock 338460 with 339688 Bug#338460: rfb: Uninstallable due to libxclass0 - libxclass0c2 Was blocked by: 339688 Blocking bugs removed: 339688 block 339259 with 339688 Bug#339259: library package needs to be renamed (libstdc++ allocator change) Was not blocked by any bugs. Blocking bugs added: 339688 thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#341514: libc6-sparc64: All 64-bit binaries fail to execute.
There are some critical things missing in the sparc64 TLS support code in the current debian glibc tree, for example none of the TLS relcation support is in sysdeps/sparc/sparc64/dl-machine.h, and therefore so no binary linked against 64-bit libc can execute. Not even /lib64/libc.so.6 --version will work, it will fail because the dynamic linker doesn't understand the TLS relocations present in the /libc64/libc.so.64 binary. Replacing Aurelien's patch with this one fixes the /lib64/libc.so.6: error while loading shared libraries: unexpected reloc type 0x4f problem, and /lib64/libc.so.6 --version works fine. However, 64-bit binaries segfault. #! /bin/sh -e # DP: TLS code for sparc64, taken from CVS if [ $# -ne 2 ]; then echo 2 `basename $0`: script expects -patch|-unpatch as argument exit 1 fi case $1 in -patch) patch -d $2 -f --no-backup-if-mismatch -p1 $0;; -unpatch) patch -d $2 -f --no-backup-if-mismatch -R -p1 $0;; *) echo 2 `basename $0`: script expects -patch|-unpatch as argument exit 1 esac exit 0 --- glibc-2.3.5.orig/elf/tls-macros.h 2005-11-12 03:47:57.0 +0100 +++ glibc-2.3.5/elf/tls-macros.h2005-11-12 03:56:01.0 +0100 @@ -440,6 +440,74 @@ o5, o7, cc);\ __o0; }) +#elif defined __sparc__ defined __arch64__ + +# define TLS_LE(x) \ + ({ int *__l; \ + asm (sethi %%tle_hix22( #x ), %0 : =r (__l)); \ + asm (xor %1, %%tle_lox10( #x ), %0 : =r (__l) : r (__l)); \ + asm (add %%g7, %1, %0 : =r (__l) : r (__l)); \ + __l; }) + +# ifdef __PIC__ +# define TLS_LOAD_PIC \ + ({ long pc, got; \ + asm (sethi %%hi(_GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_-4), %1\n\t \ + rd %%pc, %0\n\t \ + add %1, %%lo(_GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_+4), %1\n\t \ + add %1, %0, %1\n\t\ + : =r (pc), =r (got)); \ + got; }) +# else +# define TLS_LOAD_PIC \ + ({ long got; \ + asm (.hidden _GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_\n\t \ + sethi %%hi(_GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_), %0\n\t\ + or %0, %%lo(_GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_), %0 \ + : =r (got)); \ + got; }) +# endif + +# define TLS_IE(x) \ + ({ int *__l; \ + asm (sethi %%tie_hi22( #x ), %0 : =r (__l)); \ + asm (add %1, %%tie_lo10( #x ), %0 : =r (__l) : r (__l));\ + asm (ldx [%1 + %2], %0, %%tie_ldx( #x ) \ + : =r (__l) : r (TLS_LOAD_PIC), r (__l)); \ + asm (add %%g7, %1, %0, %%tie_add( #x ) : =r (__l) : r (__l));\ + __l; }) + +# define TLS_LD(x) \ + ({ int *__l; register void *__o0 asm (%o0); \ + long __o; \ + asm (sethi %%tldm_hi22( #x ), %0 : =r (__l)); \ + asm (add %1, %%tldm_lo10( #x ), %0 : =r (__l) : r (__l)); \ + asm (add %1, %2, %0, %%tldm_add( #x ) \ + : =r (__o0) : r (TLS_LOAD_PIC), r (__l)); \ + asm (call __tls_get_addr, %%tgd_call( #x )\n\t \ + nop \ + : =r (__o0) : 0 (__o0) \ + : g1, g2, g3, g4, g5, g6, o1, o2, o3, o4, \ + o5, o7, cc);\ + asm (sethi %%tldo_hix22( #x ), %0 : =r (__o));\ + asm (xor %1, %%tldo_lox10( #x ), %0 : =r (__o) : r (__o)); \ + asm (add %1, %2, %0, %%tldo_add( #x ) : =r (__l) \ + : r (__o0), r (__o)); \ + __l; }) + +# define TLS_GD(x) \ + ({ int *__l; register void *__o0 asm (%o0); \ + asm (sethi %%tgd_hi22( #x ), %0 : =r (__l)); \ + asm (add %1, %%tgd_lo10( #x ), %0 : =r (__l) : r (__l));\ + asm (add %1, %2, %0, %%tgd_add( #x )\ + : =r (__o0) : r (TLS_LOAD_PIC), r (__l)); \ + asm (call __tls_get_addr, %%tgd_call( #x )\n\t \ + nop \ + : =r (__o0)
Processed: Fixed in NMU of wftk 0.7.1-7.1
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 339278 + fixed Bug#339278: library package needs to be renamed (libstdc++ allocator change) Tags were: patch Tags added: fixed quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#337524: marked as done (Cannot Install: libogre)
Your message dated Sun, 11 Dec 2005 14:55:30 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#337524: fixed in ogre 1.0.6-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Nov 2005 18:06:07 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Nov 04 10:06:07 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from zproxy.gmail.com [64.233.162.194] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EY5x1-0003hQ-00; Fri, 04 Nov 2005 10:06:07 -0800 Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id n29so360844nzf for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 04 Nov 2005 10:06:06 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=RuoMELvRuitpiJD+BkZ1FdT8dK9jihi4NH+zJdkBZ+EwX1hO8zWVGbbau9BmM62FmgaiLtAAf+IPt9CzBWOuXof4i1l9ZyTbN0H0GY9AUyoCC7NxX5fyJCKXvOdG8OtwPRDxEHxA+FvCs9fsfzLogk4F7M3kdVaISDK9MNuHsEI= Received: by 10.36.153.7 with SMTP id a7mr868486nze; Fri, 04 Nov 2005 10:06:06 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.37.2.17 with HTTP; Fri, 4 Nov 2005 10:06:06 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2005 23:36:06 +0530 From: Suman [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Cannot Install: libogre MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Subject: libogre: fails to install because of Package dependency Package: libogre Version: libogre-dev Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable *** Please type your report below this line *** I am unable to install ogre on my machine(debian unstable) because i am getting a package dependency issue.It appears that the present version of libogre-dev depends on an onl version of libopenexr-dev. This package cannot be downgraded because almost all the kde applications depend on it. When i perform an apt-get install libogre-dev i get the following error: The following packages have unmet dependencies: libogre-dev: Depends: libogre5 (=3D 1.0.5-1) but it is not going to be installed Depends: libopenexr-dev but it is not going to be installed E: Broken packages Also, when i do a complete install of all the ogre files including dependencies saying: apt-get install libogre-dev libcegui-mk2-dev libcegui-mk2-doc ogre-doc ogre-tools ogre-plugins-cgprogrammanager blender-ogrexml ogre-plugins-cgprogrammanager: Depends: libdevil1 but it is not installable Depends: libogre5 but it is not going to be installed ogre-tools: Depends: libogre5 but it is not going to be installed Also, creating a highlevel virtual package which installs ogre completely will be much better than the present system because there are lots of variations of what needs to be installed on the ogre forums. I have posted this on the forum but not much attention has been given to the issue. -Suman -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.11-1-686 Locale: LANG=3Den_US, LC_CTYPE=3Den_US (charmap=3DISO-8859-1) --- Received: (at 337524-close) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Dec 2005 23:01:53 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Dec 11 15:01:53 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from joerg by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1Ela6M-Xt-Cn; Sun, 11 Dec 2005 14:55:30 -0800 From: Federico Di Gregorio [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: lisa $Revision: 1.31 $ Subject: Bug#337524: fixed in ogre 1.0.6-1 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Joerg Jaspert [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2005 14:55:30 -0800 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: ogre Source-Version: 1.0.6-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version
Bug#339217: marked as done (library package needs to be renamed (libstdc++ allocator change))
Your message dated Sun, 11 Dec 2005 14:59:55 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#339217: fixed in libprinterconf 0.5-8 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Nov 2005 06:56:32 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Nov 14 22:56:32 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de ([130.149.17.13] ident=root) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Ebuk4-00071N-6i for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 14 Nov 2005 22:56:32 -0800 Received: from mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [130.149.17.13]) by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3p2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id HAA25407 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 15 Nov 2005 07:56:30 +0100 (MET) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 327B0F212 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 15 Nov 2005 07:56:30 +0100 (MET) Received: from mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (bueno [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10224) with ESMTP id 01084-21 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 15 Nov 2005 07:56:29 +0100 (MET) 13909 Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.19.1]) by mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de (Postfix) with ESMTP for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 15 Nov 2005 07:56:29 +0100 (MET) Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.8/Submit) id jAF6uTnN009053 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 15 Nov 2005 07:56:29 +0100 (MET) Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2005 07:56:29 +0100 (MET) From: Matthias Klose [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: library package needs to be renamed (libstdc++ allocator change) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at cs.tu-berlin.de Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: libprinterconf Severity: important Please do not take any action before reading http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/11/msg00010.html This bug report is filed against the source package which builds a library depending on libstdc++6 and defining or referencing *mt_alloc* symbols. The package has to be rebuilt with either g++-4.0_4.0.2-4 or g++-3.4_3.4.4-10 (or newer). Please rename the library package to a name with a c2a suffix, and adjust the build dependencies if dependencies on another renamed library do exist. Do *not* yet upload the package, but wait for a followup mail to this bug report. If this bug report is for some reason invalid, please close it with a short reasoning. --- Received: (at 339217-close) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Dec 2005 23:02:31 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Dec 11 15:02:31 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from joerg by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1ElaAd-0001HD-HN; Sun, 11 Dec 2005 14:59:55 -0800 From: A Mennucc1 [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: lisa $Revision: 1.31 $ Subject: Bug#339217: fixed in libprinterconf 0.5-8 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Joerg Jaspert [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2005 14:59:55 -0800 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: libprinterconf Source-Version: 0.5-8 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of libprinterconf, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: libprinterconf-dev_0.5-8_i386.deb to pool/main/libp/libprinterconf/libprinterconf-dev_0.5-8_i386.deb libprinterconf0c2a_0.5-8_i386.deb to pool/main/libp/libprinterconf/libprinterconf0c2a_0.5-8_i386.deb libprinterconf_0.5-8.diff.gz to pool/main/libp/libprinterconf/libprinterconf_0.5-8.diff.gz libprinterconf_0.5-8.dsc to pool/main/libp/libprinterconf/libprinterconf_0.5-8.dsc pconf-detect_0.5-8_i386.deb to pool/main/libp/libprinterconf/pconf-detect_0.5-8_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further
Bug#339156: marked as done (library package needs to be renamed (libstdc++ allocator change))
Your message dated Sun, 11 Dec 2005 14:55:11 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#339156: fixed in cegui-mk2 0.4.1-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Nov 2005 06:55:31 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Nov 14 22:55:31 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de ([130.149.17.13] ident=root) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Ebuj4-0006lV-KR for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 14 Nov 2005 22:55:31 -0800 Received: from mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [130.149.17.13]) by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3p2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id HAA25042 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 15 Nov 2005 07:55:28 +0100 (MET) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93543F212 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 15 Nov 2005 07:55:28 +0100 (MET) Received: from mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (bueno [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10224) with ESMTP id 01425-15 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 15 Nov 2005 07:55:28 +0100 (MET) 13909 Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.19.1]) by mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de (Postfix) with ESMTP for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 15 Nov 2005 07:55:28 +0100 (MET) Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.8/Submit) id jAF6tSTR008738 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 15 Nov 2005 07:55:28 +0100 (MET) Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2005 07:55:28 +0100 (MET) From: Matthias Klose [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: library package needs to be renamed (libstdc++ allocator change) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at cs.tu-berlin.de Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: cegui-mk2 Severity: important Please do not take any action before reading http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/11/msg00010.html This bug report is filed against the source package which builds a library depending on libstdc++6 and defining or referencing *mt_alloc* symbols. The package has to be rebuilt with either g++-4.0_4.0.2-4 or g++-3.4_3.4.4-10 (or newer). Please rename the library package to a name with a c2a suffix, and adjust the build dependencies if dependencies on another renamed library do exist. Do *not* yet upload the package, but wait for a followup mail to this bug report. If this bug report is for some reason invalid, please close it with a short reasoning. --- Received: (at 339156-close) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Dec 2005 23:02:11 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Dec 11 15:02:10 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from joerg by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1Ela63-UM-7o; Sun, 11 Dec 2005 14:55:11 -0800 From: Federico Di Gregorio [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: lisa $Revision: 1.31 $ Subject: Bug#339156: fixed in cegui-mk2 0.4.1-1 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Joerg Jaspert [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2005 14:55:11 -0800 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: cegui-mk2 Source-Version: 0.4.1-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of cegui-mk2, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: cegui-mk2_0.4.1-1.diff.gz to pool/main/c/cegui-mk2/cegui-mk2_0.4.1-1.diff.gz cegui-mk2_0.4.1-1.dsc to pool/main/c/cegui-mk2/cegui-mk2_0.4.1-1.dsc cegui-mk2_0.4.1.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/c/cegui-mk2/cegui-mk2_0.4.1.orig.tar.gz libcegui-mk2-0c2a-dbg_0.4.1-1_i386.deb to pool/main/c/cegui-mk2/libcegui-mk2-0c2a-dbg_0.4.1-1_i386.deb libcegui-mk2-0c2a_0.4.1-1_i386.deb to pool/main/c/cegui-mk2/libcegui-mk2-0c2a_0.4.1-1_i386.deb libcegui-mk2-dev_0.4.1-1_i386.deb to pool/main/c/cegui-mk2/libcegui-mk2-dev_0.4.1-1_i386.deb libcegui-mk2-doc_0.4.1-1_i386.deb to pool/main/c/cegui-mk2/libcegui-mk2-doc_0.4.1-1_i386.deb A summary of the changes
Bug#339235: marked as done (library package needs to be renamed (libstdc++ allocator change))
Your message dated Sun, 11 Dec 2005 14:55:30 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#339235: fixed in ogre 1.0.6-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Nov 2005 06:56:50 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Nov 14 22:56:50 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de ([130.149.17.13] ident=root) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EbukM-00076L-CS for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 14 Nov 2005 22:56:50 -0800 Received: from mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [130.149.17.13]) by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3p2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id HAA25509 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 15 Nov 2005 07:56:48 +0100 (MET) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C778F212 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 15 Nov 2005 07:56:48 +0100 (MET) Received: from mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (bueno [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10224) with ESMTP id 29850-25 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 15 Nov 2005 07:56:48 +0100 (MET) 13925 Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.19.1]) by mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de (Postfix) with ESMTP for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 15 Nov 2005 07:56:48 +0100 (MET) Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.8/Submit) id jAF6ulXf009132 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 15 Nov 2005 07:56:47 +0100 (MET) Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2005 07:56:47 +0100 (MET) From: Matthias Klose [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: library package needs to be renamed (libstdc++ allocator change) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at cs.tu-berlin.de Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: ogre Severity: important Please do not take any action before reading http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/11/msg00010.html This bug report is filed against the source package which builds a library depending on libstdc++6 and defining or referencing *mt_alloc* symbols. The package has to be rebuilt with either g++-4.0_4.0.2-4 or g++-3.4_3.4.4-10 (or newer). Please rename the library package to a name with a c2a suffix, and adjust the build dependencies if dependencies on another renamed library do exist. Do *not* yet upload the package, but wait for a followup mail to this bug report. If this bug report is for some reason invalid, please close it with a short reasoning. --- Received: (at 339235-close) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Dec 2005 23:01:53 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Dec 11 15:01:53 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from joerg by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1Ela6M-Xv-De; Sun, 11 Dec 2005 14:55:30 -0800 From: Federico Di Gregorio [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: lisa $Revision: 1.31 $ Subject: Bug#339235: fixed in ogre 1.0.6-1 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Joerg Jaspert [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2005 14:55:30 -0800 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: ogre Source-Version: 1.0.6-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of ogre, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: blender-ogrexml_1.0.6-1_all.deb to pool/main/o/ogre/blender-ogrexml_1.0.6-1_all.deb libogre-dev_1.0.6-1_i386.deb to pool/main/o/ogre/libogre-dev_1.0.6-1_i386.deb libogre5c2a-dbg_1.0.6-1_i386.deb to pool/main/o/ogre/libogre5c2a-dbg_1.0.6-1_i386.deb libogre5c2a_1.0.6-1_i386.deb to pool/main/o/ogre/libogre5c2a_1.0.6-1_i386.deb ogre-doc_1.0.6-1_all.deb to pool/main/o/ogre/ogre-doc_1.0.6-1_all.deb ogre-tools_1.0.6-1_i386.deb to pool/main/o/ogre/ogre-tools_1.0.6-1_i386.deb ogre_1.0.6-1.diff.gz to pool/main/o/ogre/ogre_1.0.6-1.diff.gz ogre_1.0.6-1.dsc to pool/main/o/ogre/ogre_1.0.6-1.dsc ogre_1.0.6.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/o/ogre/ogre_1.0.6.orig.tar.gz A
Bug#339222: marked as done (library package needs to be renamed (libstdc++ allocator change))
Your message dated Sun, 11 Dec 2005 14:57:25 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#339222: fixed in libtorrent 0.8.0-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Nov 2005 06:56:37 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Nov 14 22:56:37 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de ([130.149.17.13] ident=root) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Ebuk9-00072Z-9N for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 14 Nov 2005 22:56:37 -0800 Received: from mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [130.149.17.13]) by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3p2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id HAA25435 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 15 Nov 2005 07:56:35 +0100 (MET) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CD12F212 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 15 Nov 2005 07:56:35 +0100 (MET) Received: from mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (bueno [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10224) with ESMTP id 28909-25 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 15 Nov 2005 07:56:34 +0100 (MET) 13924 Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.19.1]) by mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de (Postfix) with ESMTP for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 15 Nov 2005 07:56:34 +0100 (MET) Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.8/Submit) id jAF6uYZm009076 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 15 Nov 2005 07:56:34 +0100 (MET) Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2005 07:56:34 +0100 (MET) From: Matthias Klose [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: library package needs to be renamed (libstdc++ allocator change) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at cs.tu-berlin.de Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: libtorrent Severity: important Please do not take any action before reading http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/11/msg00010.html This bug report is filed against the source package which builds a library depending on libstdc++6 and defining or referencing *mt_alloc* symbols. The package has to be rebuilt with either g++-4.0_4.0.2-4 or g++-3.4_3.4.4-10 (or newer). Please rename the library package to a name with a c2a suffix, and adjust the build dependencies if dependencies on another renamed library do exist. Do *not* yet upload the package, but wait for a followup mail to this bug report. If this bug report is for some reason invalid, please close it with a short reasoning. --- Received: (at 339222-close) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Dec 2005 23:01:20 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Dec 11 15:01:20 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from joerg by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1Ela8D-uO-7C; Sun, 11 Dec 2005 14:57:25 -0800 From: Qingning Huo [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: lisa $Revision: 1.31 $ Subject: Bug#339222: fixed in libtorrent 0.8.0-1 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Joerg Jaspert [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2005 14:57:25 -0800 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: libtorrent Source-Version: 0.8.0-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of libtorrent, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: libtorrent6-dev_0.8.0-1_i386.deb to pool/main/libt/libtorrent/libtorrent6-dev_0.8.0-1_i386.deb libtorrent6_0.8.0-1_i386.deb to pool/main/libt/libtorrent/libtorrent6_0.8.0-1_i386.deb libtorrent_0.8.0-1.diff.gz to pool/main/libt/libtorrent/libtorrent_0.8.0-1.diff.gz libtorrent_0.8.0-1.dsc to pool/main/libt/libtorrent/libtorrent_0.8.0-1.dsc libtorrent_0.8.0.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/libt/libtorrent/libtorrent_0.8.0.orig.tar.gz A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
Bug#342610: marked as done (openoffice.org: update problems 1.1.4-7 - 2.0.0-4)
Your message dated Sun, 11 Dec 2005 15:06:07 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#342610: fixed in openoffice.org 2.0.0-5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Dec 2005 22:31:04 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Dec 08 14:31:04 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mailgate2.urz.uni-halle.de ([141.48.3.8] helo=mailgate2.uni-halle.de) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EkUAz-0005y3-U3 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 08 Dec 2005 14:23:46 -0800 Received: from mserv1.urz.uni-halle.de ([141.48.3.145] helo=mserv1) by mailgate2.uni-halle.de with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1EkUAx-0004yR-0l ; Thu, 08 Dec 2005 23:23:43 +0100 Received: from conversion-daemon.mail.uni-halle.de by mail.uni-halle.de (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.02 (built Oct 21 2004)) id [EMAIL PROTECTED] (original mail from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) ; Thu, 08 Dec 2005 23:23:21 +0100 (MET) Received: from nirvana.informatik.uni-halle.de (nirvana.informatik.uni-halle.de [141.48.9.134]) by mail.uni-halle.de (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.02 (built Oct 21 2004)) with ESMTP id [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 08 Dec 2005 23:23:21 +0100 (MET) Received: from palantir.localnet (p54B7BC10.dip.t-dialin.net [84.183.188.16]) (authenticated bits=0) by nirvana.informatik.uni-halle.de (8.13.2/8.13.2) with ESMTP id jB8MNHvi028575 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 08 Dec 2005 23:23:19 +0100 (CET) Received: from gondor.localnet ([10.10.10.100]) by palantir.localnet with esmtp (Exim 4.44)id 1EkUAS-OI-9h; Thu, 08 Dec 2005 23:23:12 +0100 Received: from andreas by gondor.localnet with local (Exim 4.54) id 1EkUAR-0003OB-Q3; Thu, 08 Dec 2005 23:23:11 +0100 Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2005 23:23:11 +0100 From: Andreas Beckmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: openoffice.org: update problems 1.1.4-7 - 2.0.0-4 To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: reportbug 3.18 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-Scan-Signature: 832086562cf1137ff0359e430bb215b1 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: openoffice.org Version: 1.1.4-7 Severity: normal I'm trying to update to openoffice.org from 1.0.4-7 to 2.0.0-4 and get the following errors: # apt-get -t unstable install openoffice.org . Preparing to replace openoffice.org 1.1.4-7 (using .../openoffice.org_2.0.0-4_i386.deb) ... update-xmlcatalog: error: entity not registered update-xmlcatalog: error: package catalog /etc/xml/openoffice.org.xml not found Unpacking replacement openoffice.org ... dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/openoffice.org_2.0.0-4_i386.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite `/usr/share/doc/openoffice.org/README.Debian.gz', which is also in package openoffice.org-debian-files . Although openoffice.org-debian-files has been scheduled for removal, that package ist still installed when the new openoffice.org deb gets unpacked. There are probably some conflicts/replaces entries missing. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers proposed-updates APT policy: (500, 'proposed-updates'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (300, 'unstable'), (30, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.14-2-k7 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages openoffice.org depends on: ii dictionaries-common [openoff 0.62.5 Common utilities for spelling dict ii openoffice.org-bin 1.1.4-7.0.1 OpenOffice.org office suite binary ii openoffice.org-debian-files 1.1.4-6+1 Debian specific parts of OpenOffic pn openoffice.org-l10n-en | ope none (no description available) ii ttf-opensymbol 1.1.4-7 The OpenSymbol TrueType font ii xml-core 0.09XML infrastructure and XML catalog openoffice.org recommends no packages. -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 342610-close) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Dec 2005 23:11:28 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Dec 11 15:11:28 2005
Bug#342803: marked as done (openoffice.org: needs Replaces against openoffice.org-debian-files)
Your message dated Sun, 11 Dec 2005 15:06:07 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#342610: fixed in openoffice.org 2.0.0-5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Dec 2005 16:02:29 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Dec 10 08:02:29 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from adsl-68-77-160-26.dsl.sfldmi.ameritech.net ([68.77.160.26] helo=shuttle.metzlers.org) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1El7B7-00018L-MN for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 10 Dec 2005 08:02:29 -0800 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by shuttle.metzlers.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8CC51ADD0 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 10 Dec 2005 11:01:57 -0500 (EST) From: Josh Metzler [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: openoffice.org: needs Replaces against openoffice.org-debian-files Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2005 11:01:56 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE, RCVD_IN_SORBS autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: openoffice.org Version: 2.0.0-4 Severity: normal Transcript from failed installation run: Unpacking replacement openoffice.org ... dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/openoffice.org_2.0.0-4_i386.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite `/usr/share/doc/openoffice.org/README.Debian.gz', which is also in package openoffice.org-debian-files openoffice.org-debian-files was going to be removed in this installation run, but the Replaces: is necessary in case it doesn't get removed before openoffice.org 2.0.0-4 is installed. Josh --- Received: (at 342610-close) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Dec 2005 23:11:28 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Dec 11 15:11:28 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from joerg by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1ElaGd-00025b-ED; Sun, 11 Dec 2005 15:06:07 -0800 From: Rene Engelhard [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: lisa $Revision: 1.31 $ Subject: Bug#342610: fixed in openoffice.org 2.0.0-5 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Joerg Jaspert [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2005 15:06:07 -0800 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: openoffice.org Source-Version: 2.0.0-5 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of openoffice.org, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: libmythes-dev_2.0.0-5_i386.deb to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/libmythes-dev_2.0.0-5_i386.deb mozilla-openoffice.org_2.0.0-5_i386.deb to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/mozilla-openoffice.org_2.0.0-5_i386.deb openoffice.org-base_2.0.0-5_i386.deb to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-base_2.0.0-5_i386.deb openoffice.org-calc_2.0.0-5_i386.deb to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-calc_2.0.0-5_i386.deb openoffice.org-common_2.0.0-5_all.deb to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-common_2.0.0-5_all.deb openoffice.org-core_2.0.0-5_i386.deb to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-core_2.0.0-5_i386.deb openoffice.org-dev-doc_2.0.0-5_all.deb to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-dev-doc_2.0.0-5_all.deb openoffice.org-dev_2.0.0-5_i386.deb to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-dev_2.0.0-5_i386.deb openoffice.org-draw_2.0.0-5_i386.deb to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-draw_2.0.0-5_i386.deb openoffice.org-evolution_2.0.0-5_i386.deb to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-evolution_2.0.0-5_i386.deb openoffice.org-filter-so52_2.0.0-5_i386.deb to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-filter-so52_2.0.0-5_i386.deb openoffice.org-gnome_2.0.0-5_i386.deb to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-gnome_2.0.0-5_i386.deb openoffice.org-gtk-gnome_2.0.0-5_all.deb to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-gtk-gnome_2.0.0-5_all.deb openoffice.org-hunspell_1.1-5_i386.deb
Bug#314988: Starting geomview ends up with InstCreate: undefined option: 7042768
On Sun, Dec 11, 2005 at 12:02:41PM -0500, Steve M. Robbins wrote: On Sun, Dec 11, 2005 at 03:52:25AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: geomview (1.8.1-10) unstable; urgency=low . * debian/control: Add texinfo to build-deps so that command makeinfo is available. Closes: #338773. . * debian/control: Restrict architectures. This package was not designed for 64-bit machines. Closes: #314988. Sorry, this is *not* (just) a 64-bit bug; geomview runs fine for me on my alpha. OK, thanks for the confirmation. Since the etch RC policy says that packages must be supported on as many architectures as is reasonably possible, this is therefore an RC bug; please re-add alpha to the architecture list. OK. Technically, though, you're describing a different bug, namely alpha is missing. Sure, treat it as a separate bug if you prefer. :) in which case the package really ought to be supported on amd64 as well. Sure. But then it ain't grave since it's only unusable in certain circumstances. Right? Yes, if someone can test without the nvidia drivers and show that it works on amd64, then the amd64 package shouldn't be treated as RC-buggy. Next time if you want to sneak a change like this past the porters, don't forget to ask the ftpmasters to remove the stale binary packages. ;) To be honest, I was a little surprised that this manual step is necessary. I'm not in a hurry to get them removed since geomview is being stalled by gcc-4.0 anyway. gcc-4.0 is no longer a staller, actually. Cheers, -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#342580: Patch
Hallo, the attached patch fixes the problem. Claus--- usermin-1.110/mailbox/view_mail.cgi 2005-12-12 00:23:55.129641390 +0100 +++ /usr/share/usermin/mailbox/view_mail.cgi2005-12-12 00:20:13.704377761 +0100 @@ -56,10 +56,10 @@ # Check if we have gotten back a DSN for *this* email update_delivery_notification($mail, $folder); open_dsn_hash(); -if (exists($dsnreplies{$mid}) $dsnreplies{$mid} != 1) { +if (eval { exists($dsnreplies{$mid}) } $dsnreplies{$mid} != 1) { ($got_dsn, $got_dsn_from) = split(/\s+/, $dsnreplies{$mid}, 2); } -if (exists($delreplies{$mid}) $delreplies{$mid} != 1) { +if (eval { exists($delreplies{$mid}) } $delreplies{$mid} != 1) { local @del = split(/\s+/, $delreplies{$mid}); local $i; for($i=0; $i@del; $i+=2) {
Bug#341514: libc6-sparc64: All 64-bit binaries fail to execute.
On Wed, Nov 30, 2005 at 08:14:43PM -0800, David S. Miller wrote: Package: libc6-sparc64 Version: 2.3.5-8 Severity: normal There are some critical things missing in the sparc64 TLS support code in the current debian glibc tree, for example none of the TLS relcation support is in sysdeps/sparc/sparc64/dl-machine.h, and therefore so no binary linked against 64-bit libc can execute. Not even /lib64/libc.so.6 --version will work, it will fail because the dynamic linker doesn't understand the TLS relocations present in the /libc64/libc.so.64 binary. If this sparc TLS support has been backported, this back has missed significant chunks of the necessary changes and now all 64-bit binaries fail to execute on the system. This is a known problem. It was _not_ backported; rather, binutils was updated to one which supported sparc64 TLS, and glibc's configury automatically started enabling it. An upload to fix this has been waiting on a pile of failures to build, also because of the new binutils. Sorry. I would suggest trying to execute a Hello World program, post-build, to avoid major errors like this. There is no way that any of the testsuite executed properly. Perhaps it was built successfully, but none of the programs linking against libc could have executed properly due to this bug. We run the testsuite. Sparc64 is a special case, however, because we can't assume that the buildd can run sparc64 binaries - in practice it can, of course, I'm sure we could do better than we do. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery, LLC -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#256041: marked as done (gcc-snapshot_20040620-1(mipsel/unstable): configure built with out-of-date libtool.m4)
Your message dated Mon, 12 Dec 2005 00:59:16 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line (mipsel/unstable): configure built with out-of-date libtool.m4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Jun 2004 15:43:04 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jun 24 08:43:04 2004 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from (straylight.cyberhqz.com) [24.85.92.182] (postfix) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BdWNU-0007XJ-00; Thu, 24 Jun 2004 08:43:04 -0700 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by straylight.cyberhqz.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A7AC540AE for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 24 Jun 2004 08:43:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from straylight.cyberhqz.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (straylight [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 10016-07 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 24 Jun 2004 08:42:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: by straylight.cyberhqz.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 65C59540AB; Thu, 24 Jun 2004 08:42:56 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 08:42:56 -0700 From: Ryan Murray [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: gcc-snapshot_20040620-1(mipsel/unstable): configure built with out-of-date libtool.m4 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Package: gcc-snapshot Version: 20040620-1 Severity: serious There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: Automatic build of gcc-snapshot_20040620-1 on repeat.rfc822.org by sbuild/mipsel 1.170.5 Build started at 20040621-0833 [...] ** Using build dependencies supplied by package: Build-Depends: m4, autoconf2.13, automake1.7, libtool, gawk, dejagnu (= 1.4.3), bzip2, binutils (= 2.14.90.0.7), debhelper (= 4.0), gperf (= 2.7-3), bison (= 1:1.875a-1), flex, gettext, texinfo, zlib1g-dev, xlibs-dev, gnat-3.3 [!arm !hurd-i386 !m68k], libgtk2.0-dev, libart-2.0-dev, libgmp3-dev configure was built with an ancient version of libtool.m4 that doesn't correctly support mips, mipsel, arm, and possibly others. This problem was fixed for 3.2/3.3 without relibtoolizing, existed while gcc-snapshot was 3.4 (so is probably still in 3.4), and still exists now. --- Received: (at 256041-done) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Dec 2005 23:59:19 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Dec 11 15:59:19 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de ([130.149.17.13] ident=root) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Elb67-nX-H1 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 11 Dec 2005 15:59:19 -0800 Received: from mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [130.149.17.13]) by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3p2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id AAA20771 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 12 Dec 2005 00:59:17 +0100 (MET) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60895F2C5 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 12 Dec 2005 00:59:17 +0100 (MET) Received: from mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (bueno [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10224) with ESMTP id 01118-33 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 12 Dec 2005 00:59:17 +0100 (MET) 13970 Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.19.1]) by mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de (Postfix) with ESMTP for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 12 Dec 2005 00:59:17 +0100 (MET) Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.8/Submit) id jBBNxGMC025523; Mon, 12 Dec 2005 00:59:16 +0100 (MET) From: Matthias Klose [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 00:59:16 +0100 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: (mipsel/unstable): configure built with out-of-date libtool.m4 X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.4 (patch 17) Jumbo Shrimp XEmacs Lucid X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at cs.tu-berlin.de X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Bug#329135: marked as done ([PR target/23602] [4.1 regression] 1081 test failures in libjava, when configured for i486-linux)
Your message dated Mon, 12 Dec 2005 01:02:43 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line [PR target/23602] [4.1 regression] 1081 test failures in libjava, when configured for i486-linux has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Sep 2005 20:43:05 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Sep 19 13:43:05 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.17.13] (root) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EHSTh-0003Af-00; Mon, 19 Sep 2005 13:43:05 -0700 Received: from mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [130.149.17.13]) by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3p2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA21091 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 19 Sep 2005 22:43:01 +0200 (MEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C8DFF20F for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 19 Sep 2005 22:43:01 +0200 (MEST) Received: from mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (bueno [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10224) with ESMTP id 09093-39 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 19 Sep 2005 22:43:00 +0200 (MEST) 13981 Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.19.1]) by mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de (Postfix) with ESMTP for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 19 Sep 2005 22:43:00 +0200 (MEST) Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.8/Submit) id j8JKh0JE011100; Mon, 19 Sep 2005 22:43:00 +0200 (MEST) From: Matthias Klose [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2005 22:43:00 +0200 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [i386] [4.1 regression] 1081 test failures in libjava, when configured for i486-linux X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.4 (patch 17) Jumbo Shrimp XEmacs Lucid X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at cs.tu-berlin.de Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: gcc Version: 4.1 Severity: grave Tags: experimental, help configuring HEAD for i486-linux (instead of the default i686-linux), libjava fails with 1081 test failures (instead of two with i686-linux). apparently all the execution tests fail. Compiling the testcase by hand, and running it, succeeds. Environment is current Debian unstable, binutils 2.16.1, glibc-2.3.5. The failures don't show, if gcc is configured for i686-linux. Upstream report: http://gcc.gnu.org/23602 --- Received: (at 329135-done) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Dec 2005 00:02:47 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Dec 11 16:02:47 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de ([130.149.17.13] ident=root) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Elb9S-0001oH-NW for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 11 Dec 2005 16:02:47 -0800 Received: from mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [130.149.17.13]) by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3p2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id BAA21562 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 12 Dec 2005 01:02:44 +0100 (MET) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46B11F2C5 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 12 Dec 2005 01:02:44 +0100 (MET) Received: from mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (bueno [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10224) with ESMTP id 24498-45 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 12 Dec 2005 01:02:43 +0100 (MET) 13982 Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.19.1]) by mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de (Postfix) with ESMTP for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 12 Dec 2005 01:02:43 +0100 (MET) Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.8/Submit) id jBC02hj9027764; Mon, 12 Dec 2005 01:02:43 +0100 (MET) From: Matthias Klose [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 01:02:43 +0100 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [PR target/23602] [4.1 regression] 1081 test failures in libjava, when configured for i486-linux
Bug#341514: libc6-sparc64: All 64-bit binaries fail to execute.
From: Clint Adams [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2005 17:41:55 -0500 Replacing Aurelien's patch with this one fixes the /lib64/libc.so.6: error while loading shared libraries: unexpected reloc type 0x4f problem, and /lib64/libc.so.6 --version works fine. However, 64-bit binaries segfault. I would suggest not randomly cherry picking patches from the CVS mainline hoping it will make things start to work. There were several other changes necessary to support TLS properly on sparc64 which went into the glibc CVS tree. You'll need more than just the relocation support. Unless someone is going to make a concerted and dedicated development effort to do the necessary full analysis and backport all of the necessary changes, I would suggest to simply not enable TLS for the sparc64 glibc build at this time so at least we have something which works. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Should have done this when supplying more info
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 339541 - moreinfo Bug#339541: xemacs21-mule: installation fails Tags were: unreproducible moreinfo Tags removed: moreinfo quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#343034: Package explicitely build-depends on g++-3.3
Package: ccmalloc Severity: serious Usertag: g++-3.3 This package build-depends for some reason on g++-3.3 (most likely, because it could not be built with a newer g++ version. We will get rid of g++-3.3 for the etch release and remove the g++-3.3 package. Please (re)check, if the package can be built by g++, and if not, if it can be built using gcc-snapshot (or g++-4.1, currently found in experimental). Please keep the bug report open until you can avoid the build dependency on g++-3.3. Collect further information in this bug report (i.e. if it builds with a newer/experimental version). -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#343035: Package explicitely build-depends on g++-3.3
Package: ava Severity: serious Usertag: g++-3.3 This package build-depends for some reason on g++-3.3 (most likely, because it could not be built with a newer g++ version. We will get rid of g++-3.3 for the etch release and remove the g++-3.3 package. Please (re)check, if the package can be built by g++, and if not, if it can be built using gcc-snapshot (or g++-4.1, currently found in experimental). Please keep the bug report open until you can avoid the build dependency on g++-3.3. Collect further information in this bug report (i.e. if it builds with a newer/experimental version). -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#343036: Package explicitely build-depends on g++-3.3
Package: hermes1 Severity: serious Usertag: g++-3.3 This package build-depends for some reason on g++-3.3 (most likely, because it could not be built with a newer g++ version. We will get rid of g++-3.3 for the etch release and remove the g++-3.3 package. Please (re)check, if the package can be built by g++, and if not, if it can be built using gcc-snapshot (or g++-4.1, currently found in experimental). Please keep the bug report open until you can avoid the build dependency on g++-3.3. Collect further information in this bug report (i.e. if it builds with a newer/experimental version). -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#343037: Package explicitely build-depends on g++-3.3
Package: libbonobomm1.3 Severity: serious Usertag: g++-3.3 This package build-depends for some reason on g++-3.3 (most likely, because it could not be built with a newer g++ version. We will get rid of g++-3.3 for the etch release and remove the g++-3.3 package. Please (re)check, if the package can be built by g++, and if not, if it can be built using gcc-snapshot (or g++-4.1, currently found in experimental). Please keep the bug report open until you can avoid the build dependency on g++-3.3. Collect further information in this bug report (i.e. if it builds with a newer/experimental version). -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#343038: foreign: ftbfs [sparc] 27717 Bus error
Package: foreign Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source foreign failed to build on a sparc buildd, duplicated on my sparc pbuilder. (The number was 27374 rather than 27717 on my pbuilder.) make[2]: Entering directory `/build/buildd/foreign-0.8.11/debian/foreign.Rcheck/tests' Running 'S3.R' Comparing 'S3.Rout' to 'S3.Rout.save' ... OK Running 'xport.R' /bin/sh: line 1: 27715 Done( if test 0 != 0; then echo gctorture(TRUE); fi; cat xport.R ) 27717 Bus error | R_LIBS=/build/buildd/foreign-0.8.11/debian/foreign.Rcheck:/usr/local/lib/R/site-library:/usr/lib/R/site-library:/usr/lib/R/library srcdir=/build/buildd/foreign-0.8.11/debian/foreign/tests LANGUAGE=C /usr/lib/R/bin/R --vanilla xport.Rout 21 make[2]: *** [xport.Rout] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/foreign-0.8.11/debian/foreign.Rcheck/tests' make[1]: *** [all] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/foreign-0.8.11/debian/foreign.Rcheck/tests' ERROR make: *** [R_any_arch] Error 1 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#320904: marked as done (FTBFS: Value has incomplete type)
Your message dated Sun, 11 Dec 2005 17:32:10 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#320904: fixed in k3d 0.5.0.35-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Aug 2005 03:13:06 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Aug 01 20:13:06 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from zoot.lafn.org [206.117.18.6] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1DznDG-zg-00; Mon, 01 Aug 2005 20:13:06 -0700 Received: from localhost.localdomain (pool-71-104-165-253.lsanca.dsl-w.verizon.net [71.104.165.253]) (authenticated bits=0) by zoot.lafn.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j723D5It095010 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 1 Aug 2005 20:13:05 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) Received: from kraai by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.52) id 1DzgBp-00016A-Ji for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 01 Aug 2005 12:43:09 -0700 Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2005 12:43:09 -0700 From: Matt Kraai [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: FTBFS: Value has incomplete type Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=VrqPEDrXMn8OVzN4 Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.86.2/1000/Sun Jul 31 12:28:06 2005 on zoot.lafn.org X-Virus-Status: Clean Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,DATE_IN_PAST_06_12 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 --VrqPEDrXMn8OVzN4 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary=AqsLC8rIMeq19msA Content-Disposition: inline --AqsLC8rIMeq19msA Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Package: k3d Version: 0.4.5.0-5 Severity: serious Tags: patch k3d fails to build because Value has an incomplete type: source=3D'document.cpp' object=3D'document.lo' libtool=3Dyes \ depfile=3D'.deps/document.Plo' tmpdepfile=3D'.deps/document.TPlo' \ depmode=3Dgcc3 /bin/sh ../depcomp \ /bin/sh ../libtool --mode=3Dcompile i486-linux-gnu-g++ -DPACKAGE_NAME=3D\= \ -DPACKAGE_TARNAME=3D\\ -DPACKAGE_VERSION=3D\\ -DPACKAGE_STRING=3D\= \ -DPACKAGE_BUGREPORT=3D\\ -DPACKAGE=3D\k3d\ -DVERSION=3D\0.4.5.0\ -= DSTDC_HEADERS=3D1 -DHAVE_SYS_TYPES_H=3D1 -DHAVE_SYS_STAT_H=3D1 -DHAVE_STDLI= B_H=3D1 -DHAVE_STRING_H=3D1 -DHAVE_MEMORY_H=3D1 -DHAVE_STRINGS_H=3D1 -DHAVE= _INTTYPES_H=3D1 -DHAVE_STDINT_H=3D1 -DHAVE_UNISTD_H=3D1 -DHAVE_DLFCN_H=3D1 = -DSIZEOF_VOIDP=3D4 -DK3D_PLATFORM_POSIX=3D1 -DK3D_HAVE_X86=3D1 -DHAVE_VA_CO= PY=3D1 -DVA_COPY=3Dva_copy -DHAPY_HAVE_NUMERIC_LIMITS=3D1 -DHAPY_HAVE_STD_I= TERATOR_TYPE=3D1 -I. -I. -I.. -I../boost -I/usr/include/sigc++-2.0 -I/usr= /lib/sigc++-2.0/include -DK3D_HAVE_SIGC_2_0 -Wall -Wno-ctor-dtor-privacy= -g -O2 -c -o document.lo `test -f 'document.cpp' || echo './'`document.cpp i486-linux-gnu-g++ -DPACKAGE_NAME=3D\\ -DPACKAGE_TARNAME=3D\\ -DPACK= AGE_VERSION=3D\\ -DPACKAGE_STRING=3D\\ -DPACKAGE_BUGREPORT=3D\\ -DPAC= KAGE=3D\k3d\ -DVERSION=3D\0.4.5.0\ -DSTDC_HEADERS=3D1 -DHAVE_SYS_TYPES_= H=3D1 -DHAVE_SYS_STAT_H=3D1 -DHAVE_STDLIB_H=3D1 -DHAVE_STRING_H=3D1 -DHAVE_= MEMORY_H=3D1 -DHAVE_STRINGS_H=3D1 -DHAVE_INTTYPES_H=3D1 -DHAVE_STDINT_H=3D1= -DHAVE_UNISTD_H=3D1 -DHAVE_DLFCN_H=3D1 -DSIZEOF_VOIDP=3D4 -DK3D_PLATFORM_P= OSIX=3D1 -DK3D_HAVE_X86=3D1 -DHAVE_VA_COPY=3D1 -DVA_COPY=3Dva_copy -DHAPY_H= AVE_NUMERIC_LIMITS=3D1 -DHAPY_HAVE_STD_ITERATOR_TYPE=3D1 -I. -I. -I.. -I../= boost -I/usr/include/sigc++-2.0 -I/usr/lib/sigc++-2.0/include -DK3D_HAVE_SI= GC_2_0 -Wall -Wno-ctor-dtor-privacy -g -O2 -c document.cpp -MT document.lo = -MD -MP -MF .deps/document.TPlo -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/document.o In file included from ../boost/boost/config.hpp:35, from ../boost/boost/utility/addressof.hpp:19, from ../boost/boost/utility.hpp:12, from ../k3dsdk/auto_ptr.h:5, from ../k3dsdk/file_filter.h:28, from document.cpp:33: ../boost/boost/config/compiler/gcc.hpp:92:7: warning: #warning Unknown c= ompiler version - please run the configure tests and report the results ../k3dsdk/path_data.h: In member function 'void
Bug#331104: marked as done (k3d: Uninstallable in SID due to unfullfillable dependencies)
Your message dated Sun, 11 Dec 2005 17:32:10 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#331104: fixed in k3d 0.5.0.35-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Oct 2005 15:11:37 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Oct 01 08:11:37 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from server2.ka-online.de [85.214.21.40] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1ELj1V-00066F-00; Sat, 01 Oct 2005 08:11:37 -0700 Received: from [192.168.1.11] (p54A39209.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.163.146.9]) by server2.ka-online.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88BF47AC079 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 1 Oct 2005 17:12:47 +0200 (CEST) Subject: k3d: Uninstallable in SID due to unfullfillable dependencies From: Tobias Bachmor [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: text/plain Date: Sat, 01 Oct 2005 17:09:51 +0200 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: k3d Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Hi there, I tried to install k3d on an uptodate SID-system getting the following error: Sleipnir:~# apt-get install k3d Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree... Done Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable distribution that some required packages have not yet been created or been moved out of Incoming. Since you only requested a single operation it is extremely likely that the package is simply not installable and a bug report against that package should be filed. The following information may help to resolve the situation: The following packages have unmet dependencies: k3d: Depends: libmagick++6 but it is not installable Depends: libsigc++-2.0-0 (= 2.0.2) but it is not installable E: Broken packages libmagick++6 is not in unstable (but libmagick++6c2 and libmagick++9 are) but it is in testing. It's nearly the same with libsigc++-2.0-0, which is not in unstable (but libsigc++-2.0-0c2 is). So I guess k3d has to be rebuild against these libs. Bye, Tobias -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.13 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) --- Received: (at 331104-close) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Dec 2005 01:41:01 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Dec 11 17:41:01 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1ElcXy-Ko-Bl; Sun, 11 Dec 2005 17:32:10 -0800 From: =?utf-8?q?David_Mart=C3=ADnez_Moreno?= [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.60 $ Subject: Bug#331104: fixed in k3d 0.5.0.35-1 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2005 17:32:10 -0800 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2 Source: k3d Source-Version: 0.5.0.35-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of k3d, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: k3d-dev_0.5.0.35-1_i386.deb to pool/main/k/k3d/k3d-dev_0.5.0.35-1_i386.deb k3d_0.5.0.35-1.diff.gz to pool/main/k/k3d/k3d_0.5.0.35-1.diff.gz k3d_0.5.0.35-1.dsc to pool/main/k/k3d/k3d_0.5.0.35-1.dsc k3d_0.5.0.35-1_i386.deb to pool/main/k/k3d/k3d_0.5.0.35-1_i386.deb k3d_0.5.0.35.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/k/k3d/k3d_0.5.0.35.orig.tar.gz A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report
Bug#335125: marked as done (removal of automake1.6)
Your message dated Sun, 11 Dec 2005 17:32:10 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#335125: fixed in k3d 0.5.0.35-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Oct 2005 01:23:21 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Oct 21 18:23:21 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mailout2.igs.net [216.58.97.88] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1ET86T-00051a-00; Fri, 21 Oct 2005 18:23:21 -0700 Received: from nightcrawler.kuroneko.ca (nightcrawler.kuroneko.ca [66.11.161.69]) by mailout2.igs.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D49547E9CA; Fri, 21 Oct 2005 21:23:21 -0400 (EDT) Received: by nightcrawler.kuroneko.ca (Postfix, from userid 1000) id EC3605CAF6E; Fri, 21 Oct 2005 21:23:20 -0400 (EDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Eric Dorland [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: removal of automake1.6 X-Mailer: reportbug 3.17 Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2005 21:23:20 -0400 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: k3d Severity: wishlist Hello, As I pointed out in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2005/07/msg01579.html, I will be asking for the removal of automake1.6 from Debian in two weeks. Your package has a strict build-dependency on automake1.6. Once automake1.6 is removed, the severity of this bug will become grave. If you need any assistance with making your package work with a newer version of automake, please let me know, but it should be relatively painless for the most part. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.12 Locale: LANG=en_US.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8) --- Received: (at 335125-close) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Dec 2005 01:41:10 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Dec 11 17:41:10 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1ElcXy-Kq-CY; Sun, 11 Dec 2005 17:32:10 -0800 From: =?utf-8?q?David_Mart=C3=ADnez_Moreno?= [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.60 $ Subject: Bug#335125: fixed in k3d 0.5.0.35-1 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2005 17:32:10 -0800 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-CrossAssassin-Score: 6 Source: k3d Source-Version: 0.5.0.35-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of k3d, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: k3d-dev_0.5.0.35-1_i386.deb to pool/main/k/k3d/k3d-dev_0.5.0.35-1_i386.deb k3d_0.5.0.35-1.diff.gz to pool/main/k/k3d/k3d_0.5.0.35-1.diff.gz k3d_0.5.0.35-1.dsc to pool/main/k/k3d/k3d_0.5.0.35-1.dsc k3d_0.5.0.35-1_i386.deb to pool/main/k/k3d/k3d_0.5.0.35-1_i386.deb k3d_0.5.0.35.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/k/k3d/k3d_0.5.0.35.orig.tar.gz A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. David MartÃnez Moreno [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated k3d package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 01:14:51 +0100 Source: k3d Binary: k3d-dev k3d Architecture: source i386 Version: 0.5.0.35-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: David MartÃnez Moreno [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: David MartÃnez Moreno [EMAIL
Bug#326876: marked as done (k3d: FTBFS (amd64): errno: TLS definition in /lib/libc.so.6 section .tbss mismatches non-TLS reference in ../../modules/javascript/js/src/.libs/libjs.a(k_standard.o))
Your message dated Sun, 11 Dec 2005 17:32:10 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#326876: fixed in k3d 0.5.0.35-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Sep 2005 10:55:50 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Sep 06 03:55:50 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from c173076.adsl.hansenet.de (localhost.localdomain) [213.39.173.76] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1ECb7F-Yx-00; Tue, 06 Sep 2005 03:55:50 -0700 Received: from aj by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.52) id 1ECb7E-000307-Q0; Tue, 06 Sep 2005 12:55:48 +0200 To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Andreas Jochens [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: k3d: FTBFS (amd64): errno: TLS definition in /lib/libc.so.6 section .tbss mismatches non-TLS reference in ../../modules/javascript/js/src/.libs/libjs.a(k_standard.o) Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2005 12:55:48 +0200 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: k3d Version: 0.4.5.0-5 Severity: serious Tags: patch When building 'k3d' on amd64/unstable, I get the following error: x86_64-linux-gnu-g++ -shared -nostdlib /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.0.2/../../../../lib64/crti.o /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.0.2/crtbeginS.o .libs/engine.o .libs/object_model.o .libs/renderman.o .libs/streams.o -Wl,--whole-archive ../../modules/javascript/js/src/.libs/libjs.a ../../boost/libs/regex/src/.libs/libregexpp.a -Wl,--no-whole-archive -Wl,--rpath -Wl,/srv/dbuild/tmp/k3d-0.4.5.0/k3dsdk/.libs -Wl,--rpath -Wl,/srv/dbuild/tmp/k3d-0.4.5.0/sdpxml/.libs ../../k3dsdk/.libs/libk3dsdk.so ../../sdpxml/.libs/libsdpxml.so /usr/lib/libsigc-2.0.so -L/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.0.2 -L/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.0.2/../../../../lib64 -L/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.0.2/../../.. -L/lib/../lib64 -L/usr/lib/../lib64 -lstdc++ -lm -lc -lgcc_s /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.0.2/crtendS.o /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.0.2/../../../../lib64/crtn.o -Wl,-soname -Wl,libk3djavascript.so.0 -o .libs/libk3djavascript.so.0.0.0 /usr/bin/ld: errno: TLS definition in /lib/libc.so.6 section .tbss mismatches non-TLS reference in ../../modules/javascript/js/src/.libs/libjs.a(k_standard.o) /lib/libc.so.6: could not read symbols: Bad value collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make[4]: *** [libk3djavascript.la] Error 1 make[4]: Leaving directory `/srv/dbuild/tmp/k3d-0.4.5.0/modules/javascript' make[3]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 The attached patch fixes this by using '#include errno.h' instead of the declaration 'int errno;'. The patch also include the fix for the 'Value' has incomplete type bug. Regards Andreas Jochens diff -urN ../tmp-orig/k3d-0.4.5.0/modules/javascript/js/src/fdlibm/k_standard.c ./modules/javascript/js/src/fdlibm/k_standard.c --- ../tmp-orig/k3d-0.4.5.0/modules/javascript/js/src/fdlibm/k_standard.c 2004-11-04 13:04:12.0 + +++ ./modules/javascript/js/src/fdlibm/k_standard.c 2005-09-06 09:05:53.0 + @@ -51,16 +51,7 @@ */ #include fdlibm.h - -/* XXX ugly hack to get msvc to link without error. */ -#if _LIB_VERSION == _IEEE_ !(defined(DARWIN) || defined(XP_MACOSX)) - int errno; -# define EDOM 0 -# define ERANGE 0 -#else -# include errno.h -#endif - +#include errno.h #ifndef _USE_WRITE #include stdio.h /* fputs(), stderr */ diff -urN ../tmp-orig/k3d-0.4.5.0/k3dsdk/path_data.h ./k3dsdk/path_data.h --- ../tmp-orig/k3d-0.4.5.0/k3dsdk/path_data.h 2004-04-25 22:19:07.0 + +++ ./k3dsdk/path_data.h2005-09-06 08:09:36.0 + @@ -25,6 +25,7 @@ \author Tim Shead ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) */ +#include boost/filesystem/path.hpp #include data.h namespace k3d --- Received: (at 326876-close) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Dec 2005 01:41:09 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Dec 11 17:41:09 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1ElcXy-Km-Aw; Sun, 11 Dec 2005 17:32:10 -0800 From: =?utf-8?q?David_Mart=C3=ADnez_Moreno?= [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.60 $
Bug#341936: marked as done (k3d_0.5.0.34-0pre1(s390/experimental): FTBFS: dh_python fails due to missing python in build-depends)
Your message dated Sun, 11 Dec 2005 17:32:10 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#341936: fixed in k3d 0.5.0.35-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Dec 2005 10:24:02 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Dec 04 02:24:02 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from frigg.ftbfs.de ([212.112.246.221]) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Eir2I-0004pD-IP for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 04 Dec 2005 02:24:02 -0800 Received: from localhost (localimap [192.168.2.3]) by frigg.ftbfs.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1826F5A17F for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 4 Dec 2005 11:24:00 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost ([192.168.2.3]) by localhost (frigg.ftbfs.de [192.168.2.3]) (amavisd-new, port 2525) with SMTP id 14767-21 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 4 Dec 2005 11:24:00 +0100 (CET) Received: from laptop.zobel.private.ftbfs.de (unknown [10.8.0.32]) by frigg.ftbfs.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64623F5A17B for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 4 Dec 2005 11:24:00 +0100 (CET) Received: by laptop.zobel.private.ftbfs.de (Postfix, from userid 1000) id DA862A00FEF; Sun, 4 Dec 2005 11:23:58 +0100 (CET) Date: Sun, 4 Dec 2005 11:23:58 +0100 From: Martin Zobel-Helas [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: k3d_0.5.0.34-0pre1(s390/experimental): FTBFS: dh_python fails due to missing python in build-depends Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at outgoing Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: k3d Version: 0.5.0.34-0pre1 Severity: Serious Justification: Fails to build from source [...] dh_testdir -s dh_testroot -s dh_installchangelogs -s ChangeLog dh_installdocs -s dh_installexamples -s dh_install -s --sourcedir=debian/tmp dh_installmenu -s dh_installman -s dh_link -s dh_strip -s dh_compress -s dh_fixperms -s dh_python -s dh_python: Python is not installed, aborting. (Probably forgot to Build-Depend on python.) make: *** [binary-arch] Error 1 ** Build finished at 20051204-1050 FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died] --- Received: (at 341936-close) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Dec 2005 01:41:00 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Dec 11 17:41:00 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1ElcXy-Ks-DL; Sun, 11 Dec 2005 17:32:10 -0800 From: =?utf-8?q?David_Mart=C3=ADnez_Moreno?= [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.60 $ Subject: Bug#341936: fixed in k3d 0.5.0.35-1 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2005 17:32:10 -0800 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: k3d Source-Version: 0.5.0.35-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of k3d, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: k3d-dev_0.5.0.35-1_i386.deb to pool/main/k/k3d/k3d-dev_0.5.0.35-1_i386.deb k3d_0.5.0.35-1.diff.gz to pool/main/k/k3d/k3d_0.5.0.35-1.diff.gz k3d_0.5.0.35-1.dsc to pool/main/k/k3d/k3d_0.5.0.35-1.dsc k3d_0.5.0.35-1_i386.deb to pool/main/k/k3d/k3d_0.5.0.35-1_i386.deb k3d_0.5.0.35.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/k/k3d/k3d_0.5.0.35.orig.tar.gz A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. David MartÃnez Moreno [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated k3d package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by
Bug#343038: foreign: ftbfs [sparc] 27717 Bus error
On 11 December 2005 at 17:25, Blars Blarson wrote: | Package: foreign | Severity: serious | Justification: fails to build from source | | | foreign failed to build on a sparc buildd, duplicated on my sparc pbuilder. | (The number was 27374 rather than 27717 on my pbuilder.) | | | make[2]: Entering directory `/build/buildd/foreign-0.8.11/debian/foreign.Rcheck/tests' | Running 'S3.R' | Comparing 'S3.Rout' to 'S3.Rout.save' ... OK Ok, I'll turn the regression test off as we did with a few other R packages. Dirk | Running 'xport.R' | /bin/sh: line 1: 27715 Done( if test 0 != 0; then | echo gctorture(TRUE); | fi; cat xport.R ) | 27717 Bus error | R_LIBS=/build/buildd/foreign-0.8.11/debian/foreign.Rcheck:/usr/local/lib/R/site-library:/usr/lib/R/site-library:/usr/lib/R/library srcdir=/build/buildd/foreign-0.8.11/debian/foreign/tests LANGUAGE=C /usr/lib/R/bin/R --vanilla xport.Rout 21 | make[2]: *** [xport.Rout] Error 1 | make[2]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/foreign-0.8.11/debian/foreign.Rcheck/tests' | make[1]: *** [all] Error 2 | make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/foreign-0.8.11/debian/foreign.Rcheck/tests' | ERROR | make: *** [R_any_arch] Error 1 | -- Hell, there are no rules here - we're trying to accomplish something. -- Thomas A. Edison -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#343034: Bug#342959: Package explicitely build-depends on g++-3.4
Howdy, On Mon, Dec 12, 2005 at 02:18:29AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: We will get rid of g++-3.3 for the etch release and remove the g++-3.3 package. On Mon, Dec 12, 2005 at 12:54:22AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: We would like to get rid of g++-3.4 for the etch release, although currently not a hard release goal. I completely missed the discussion surrounding removal of gcc 3.3 and gcc 3.4. For the record, ccmalloc builds a stub library for each C++ compiler shipped. So the build-dependency can be easily removed as soon as the compiler is removed. Cheers, -Steve -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#343042: linux-image-2.6.14-2-686: Boot aborts with message '/bin/cat: /sys/block/hda/hda1/dev: No such file or directory'
Package: linux-image-2.6.14-2-686 Version: 2.6.14-5 Severity: critical Justification: breaks the whole system Right after I upgraded linux-image-2.6.14-2-686 to 2.6.14-5 and rebooted, boot is interrupted with repeated messages: /bin/cat: /sys/block/hda/hda1/dev: No such file or directory until it finally stops completely, with message: Device /sys/block/hda/hda1/dev seems to be down I'm having to reboot with 2.6.12. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-686 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Versions of packages linux-image-2.6.14-2-686 depends on: ii module-init-tools 3.2.2-1tools for managing Linux kernel mo ii yaird [linux-initramfs-tool] 0.0.12-1 Yet Another mkInitRD Versions of packages linux-image-2.6.14-2-686 recommends: pn libc6-i686none (no description available) -- debconf information: * linux-image-2.6.14-2-686/preinst/already-running-this-2.6.14-2-686: linux-image-2.6.14-2-686/preinst/lilo-has-ramdisk: linux-image-2.6.14-2-686/postinst/create-kimage-link-2.6.14-2-686: true linux-image-2.6.14-2-686/preinst/initrd-2.6.14-2-686: linux-image-2.6.14-2-686/preinst/bootloader-initrd-2.6.14-2-686: true linux-image-2.6.14-2-686/postinst/old-system-map-link-2.6.14-2-686: true linux-image-2.6.14-2-686/preinst/failed-to-move-modules-2.6.14-2-686: linux-image-2.6.14-2-686/postinst/depmod-error-initrd-2.6.14-2-686: false linux-image-2.6.14-2-686/postinst/old-dir-initrd-link-2.6.14-2-686: true linux-image-2.6.14-2-686/preinst/elilo-initrd-2.6.14-2-686: true linux-image-2.6.14-2-686/prerm/would-invalidate-boot-loader-2.6.14-2-686: true linux-image-2.6.14-2-686/preinst/overwriting-modules-2.6.14-2-686: true linux-image-2.6.14-2-686/preinst/abort-install-2.6.14-2-686: linux-image-2.6.14-2-686/postinst/kimage-is-a-directory: linux-image-2.6.14-2-686/preinst/lilo-initrd-2.6.14-2-686: true linux-image-2.6.14-2-686/prerm/removing-running-kernel-2.6.14-2-686: true linux-image-2.6.14-2-686/postinst/depmod-error-2.6.14-2-686: false linux-image-2.6.14-2-686/postinst/bootloader-test-error-2.6.14-2-686: linux-image-2.6.14-2-686/postinst/old-initrd-link-2.6.14-2-686: true linux-image-2.6.14-2-686/postinst/bootloader-error-2.6.14-2-686: linux-image-2.6.14-2-686/preinst/abort-overwrite-2.6.14-2-686: -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#343038: foreign: ftbfs [sparc] 27717 Bus error
On 11 December 2005 at 19:49, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: | | On 11 December 2005 at 17:25, Blars Blarson wrote: | | Package: foreign | | Severity: serious | | Justification: fails to build from source | | | | | | foreign failed to build on a sparc buildd, duplicated on my sparc pbuilder. | | (The number was 27374 rather than 27717 on my pbuilder.) | | | | | | make[2]: Entering directory `/build/buildd/foreign-0.8.11/debian/foreign.Rcheck/tests' | | Running 'S3.R' | | Comparing 'S3.Rout' to 'S3.Rout.save' ... OK | | Ok, I'll turn the regression test off as we did with a few other R packages. Darn, I ran into #342879 : cdbs is currently broken so the fix will have to wait. If you haven't upgrade your pbuilder, try the following change in debian/rules: R CMD INSTALL -l $(debRlib) --clean . # mkdir debian/$(cranName) # find . -not -path ./debian* | cpio -p -m debian/$(cranName) # (cd debian \ # R CMD check --no-latex $(cranName) \ # R CMD INSTALL -l $(debRlib) $(cranName) \ # rm -rf $(cranName) ) ie flip the commented out status between the R CMD INSTALL line (now in) and the segment that follows. My whole section now looks like R_any_arch: ##dh_installdirsusr/lib/R/site-library dh_installdirs usr/lib/R/library R CMD INSTALL -l $(debRlib) --clean . # mkdir debian/$(cranName) # find . -not -path ./debian* | cpio -p -m debian/$(cranName) # (cd debian \ # R CMD check --no-latex $(cranName) \ # R CMD INSTALL -l $(debRlib) $(cranName) \ # rm -rf $(cranName) ) rm -vf $(debRlib)/R.css $(debRlib)/$(cranNameLC)/COPYING ## appease lintian chmod 0644 $(debRlib)/$(cranNameLC)/files/sids.dbf Dirk -- Hell, there are no rules here - we're trying to accomplish something. -- Thomas A. Edison -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#343038: foreign: ftbfs [sparc] 27717 Bus error
On 11 December 2005 at 19:02, Steve Langasek wrote: | On Sun, Dec 11, 2005 at 07:49:55PM -0600, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: | | On 11 December 2005 at 17:25, Blars Blarson wrote: | | Package: foreign | | Severity: serious | | Justification: fails to build from source | | | foreign failed to build on a sparc buildd, duplicated on my sparc pbuilder. | | (The number was 27374 rather than 27717 on my pbuilder.) | | | make[2]: Entering directory `/build/buildd/foreign-0.8.11/debian/foreign.Rcheck/tests' | | Running 'S3.R' | | Comparing 'S3.Rout' to 'S3.Rout.save' ... OK | | Ok, I'll turn the regression test off as we did with a few other R packages. | | And ship packages that generate bus errors?! Naaarrr, mate, don't panic. The R packages compare pre-generated output to actual output, and tend to have the numerical precision too tight, in particular for the foreign package that is focussed on importing data sets for other statistical applications. I can detail this some more if you wish but rest assured that there are no bus errors anywhere. See http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?pkg=foreign for almost two years of happy build logs. Now, cdbs is really broken so I can't upload the fix anyway. Dirk -- Hell, there are no rules here - we're trying to accomplish something. -- Thomas A. Edison -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]