Bug#341945: Investigation of the bug

2005-12-11 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sat, Dec 10, 2005 at 11:18:53AM +0100, Enrico Zini wrote:

 Sorry to have been lingering on this bug: on Igloo's buildd report I saw
 that some of the packages were still rebuilding and I thought it was
 just a matter of waiting.

 Today I investigated a bit more.  The problem is indeed connected to the
 C++ allocator thing, and the recompile was incomplete because debtags
 links statically with some libraries, and it's nonobvious to find the
 dependencies.  Luckily, thanks to a suggestion of Jonas Smedegaard at
 Debconf4, I use dh_buildinfo.

 It turned out that the libtagcoll-dev is still built with libstdc++6
 4.0.2-3.  It in turn gets statically linked into libapt-front-dev, which
 in turn gets statically linked into debtags.

 So, it seems that there are some recompiles to be triggered:

 Step 1: libtagcoll-dev

 Step 2: tagcoll, tagcolledit, libapt-front-dev
 (since they statically link libtagcoll-dev)

 Step 3: debtags, debtags-edit, packagesearch
 (since they statically link libapt-front-dev)

Could you perform these steps locally on your system and confirm that it
does correct the failure, before we commit buildd time on all archs to
rebuilding these?

Thanks,
-- 
Steve Langasek   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer   to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://www.debian.org/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#341945: Investigation of the bug

2005-12-11 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sat, Dec 10, 2005 at 11:18:53AM +0100, Enrico Zini wrote:
 Hello,

 Sorry to have been lingering on this bug: on Igloo's buildd report I saw
 that some of the packages were still rebuilding and I thought it was
 just a matter of waiting.

 Today I investigated a bit more.  The problem is indeed connected to the
 C++ allocator thing, and the recompile was incomplete because debtags
 links statically with some libraries, and it's nonobvious to find the
 dependencies.  Luckily, thanks to a suggestion of Jonas Smedegaard at
 Debconf4, I use dh_buildinfo.

 It turned out that the libtagcoll-dev is still built with libstdc++6
 4.0.2-3.  It in turn gets statically linked into libapt-front-dev, which
 in turn gets statically linked into debtags.

 So, it seems that there are some recompiles to be triggered:

 Step 1: libtagcoll-dev

 Step 2: tagcoll, tagcolledit, libapt-front-dev
 (since they statically link libtagcoll-dev)

 Step 3: debtags, debtags-edit, packagesearch
 (since they statically link libapt-front-dev)

BTW, due to the way static linking works, this is only two steps. 
libapt-front-dev doesn't *contain* the code from libtagcoll-dev; rather, the
reverse-build-deps of libapt-front-dev pull this code in directly from
libtagcoll-dev at build-time.

-- 
Steve Langasek   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer   to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://www.debian.org/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Processed: yaagh

2005-12-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 tags 326581 -patch
Bug#326581: [hppa] glibc causes illegal instructions  FTBFS on many packages
Tags were: patch
Tags removed: patch

 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#342852: cogito: cg-commit breaks with new version of bash

2005-12-11 Thread Jeff King
Package: cogito
Version: 0.16.0-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable

Since upgrading to bash 3.1 (the latest in unstable), cogito's cg-commit
command breaks:
  $ cg-init
  defaulting to local storage area
  /usr/bin/cg-commit: line 190: syntax error near unexpected token `('
  /usr/bin/cg-commit: line 190: ` eval commitfiles=($(cat $filter |
  path_xargs git-diff-index -r -m HEAD -- | \'

Bash 3.1 is pickier about the parentheses in the eval; () must be quoted
(as \(\) or in ).  It looks like upstream has already fixed this (and
a few other bash 3.1 problems) in commit:
  c34455488fa8c91466b9e8cceb025a203a19f0c5


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#342741: marked as done (superkaramba is uninstallable in sid)

2005-12-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 11 Dec 2005 01:34:44 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#342741: superkaramba is uninstallable in sid
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Dec 2005 00:38:14 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Dec 09 16:38:14 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.21])
by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1Ekskg-0005cP-Hg
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 09 Dec 2005 16:38:14 -0800
Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 10 Dec 2005 00:37:42 -
Received: from p548BEC61.dip.t-dialin.net (EHLO morpheus.apaku.dnsalias.org) 
[84.139.236.97]
  by mail.gmx.net (mp019) with SMTP; 10 Dec 2005 01:37:42 +0100
X-Authenticated: #15861332
Received: from andreas by morpheus.apaku.dnsalias.org with local (Exim 4.60)
(envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
id 1EkskY-0003Zl-LZ; Sat, 10 Dec 2005 01:38:06 +0100
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Andreas Pakulat [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: superkaramba is uninstallable in sid
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.18
Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2005 01:38:05 +0100
X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: superkaramba
Version: 0.37-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable

Hi,

due to the current C++ allocator transition superkaramba needs to be
rebuilt against kdelibs4c2a.

Andreas

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (500, 'experimental'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 
'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.14.3-cherry+radeon
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

Versions of packages superkaramba depends on:
ii  kdelibs4c2a  4:3.4.3-2   core libraries for all KDE applica
ii  libart-2.0-2 2.3.17-1Library of functions for 2D graphi
ii  libaudio21.7-3   The Network Audio System (NAS). (s
ii  libc62.3.5-8.1   GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libfam0  2.7.0-8 client library to control the FAM 
ii  libfontconfig1   2.3.2-1.1   generic font configuration library
ii  libfreetype6 2.1.10-1FreeType 2 font engine, shared lib
ii  libgcc1  1:4.0.2-5   GCC support library
ii  libice6  6.8.2.dfsg.1-11 Inter-Client Exchange library
ii  libidn11 0.5.18-1GNU libidn library, implementation
ii  libjpeg626b-10   The Independent JPEG Group's JPEG 
ii  libpng12-0   1.2.8rel-5  PNG library - runtime
ii  libqt3-mt3:3.3.5-3   Qt GUI Library (Threaded runtime v
ii  libsm6   6.8.2.dfsg.1-11 X Window System Session Management
ii  libstdc++6   4.0.2-5 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3
ii  libx11-6 6.8.2.dfsg.1-11 X Window System protocol client li
ii  libxcursor1  1.1.3-1 X cursor management library
ii  libxext6 6.8.2.dfsg.1-11 X Window System miscellaneous exte
ii  libxft2  2.1.7-1 FreeType-based font drawing librar
ii  libxi6   6.8.2.dfsg.1-11 X Window System Input extension li
ii  libxinerama1 6.8.2.dfsg.1-11 X Window System multi-head display
ii  libxrandr2   6.8.2.dfsg.1-11 X Window System Resize, Rotate and
ii  libxrender1  1:0.9.0-2   X Rendering Extension client libra
ii  libxt6   6.8.2.dfsg.1-11 X Toolkit Intrinsics
ii  python2.32.3.5-9 An interactive high-level object-o
ii  zlib1g   1:1.2.3-8   compression library - runtime

superkaramba recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information

---
Received: (at 342741-done) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Dec 2005 09:34:44 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Dec 11 01:34:44 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from 

Bug#342821: marked as done (tellico: not installable, dependencies are not satisfied.)

2005-12-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 11 Dec 2005 01:36:29 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#342821: tellico: not installable, dependencies are not 
satisfied.
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Dec 2005 20:54:40 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Dec 10 12:54:40 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.21])
by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1ElBjs-00056R-Gy
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 10 Dec 2005 12:54:40 -0800
Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 10 Dec 2005 20:54:08 -
Received: from i577B4364.versanet.de (EHLO [192.168.222.3]) [87.123.67.100]
  by mail.gmx.net (mp017) with SMTP; 10 Dec 2005 21:54:08 +0100
X-Authenticated: #7311904
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2005 21:54:17 +0100
From: Uwe Koziolek [EMAIL PROTECTED]
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051017)
X-Accept-Language: de-DE, de, en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: tellico: not installable, dependencies are not satisfied.
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: tellico
Version: 1.0-1
Severity: serious


the binary package in unstable is no longer installable, because the libaries 
for kde in unstable are changed.

apt-get install tellico

The following packages have unmet dependencies:
  tellico: Depends: kdelibs4c2 (= 4:3.4.2-1) but it is not going to be 
installed
   Depends: libtag1c2 (= 1.3.1) but it is not going to be installed
E: Broken packages

dpkg -l 'kdelibs4*' 'libtag1*'
||/ Name  Version   Description
+++-=-=-===
rc  kdelibs4c23.4.2-4   core libraries for all KDE 
applications
ii  kdelibs4c2a   3.4.3-2   core libraries for all KDE 
applications
rc  libtag1c2 1.4-2 TagLib Audio Meta-Data Library
ii  libtag1c2a1.4-3 TagLib Audio Meta-Data Library

It is sufficient to rebuild the package.

regards
Uwe Koziolek


---
Received: (at 342821-done) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Dec 2005 09:36:32 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Dec 11 01:36:32 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from dsl093-039-086.pdx1.dsl.speakeasy.net ([66.93.39.86] 
helo=tennyson.dodds.net)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1ElNd7-0004iI-MS
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 11 Dec 2005 01:36:32 -0800
Received: by tennyson.dodds.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 6EF917007; Sun, 11 Dec 2005 01:36:29 -0800 (PST)
Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2005 01:36:29 -0800
From: Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Uwe Koziolek [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#342821: tellico: not installable, dependencies are not 
satisfied.
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
References: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=O3WNCzIuUImKerqE
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02


--O3WNCzIuUImKerqE
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sat, Dec 10, 2005 at 09:54:17PM +0100, Uwe Koziolek wrote:
 Package: tellico
 Version: 1.0-1
 Severity: serious

 the binary package in unstable is no longer installable, because the
 libaries for kde in unstable are changed.

BinNMUs have been scheduled on all architectures to resolve this issue; no
further maintainer action is required.

Thanks,
--=20
Steve Langasek   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer   to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   

Bug#335105: perl FTBFS in t/op/fork

2005-12-11 Thread Andrew Suffield
On Sat, Dec 10, 2005 at 07:39:04PM +0100, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
 Andrew Suffield wrote:
  This doesn't look like #223110 to me - that bug is specific to signal
  handlers.
 
 After a closer look I agree.
 
  I just tried the test on casals against 5.8.7-6 though, and
  I can't get it to break (although it is still breaking on the buildd). 
  
  What do you know about it? I need to duplicate the pesky thing
  somehow...
 
 Hm, it is easily reproducible on SWARM, as well as on a Octane with 2
 CPUs. Which probably means it is a SMP-induced race condition in fork.

My bet is that it's this kernel bug:

  I don't know if you've been following, but it was recently discoverd that on
  smp, if multiple processes read from /dev/urandom at the same time, they can
  get the same data.  Theodore Tytso posted a patch to fix this for 2.6, and
  someone else told me this problem has existed all the way back to 1.3.

Fixed in 2.4.29 and 2.6.5. What kernel version have you got there? If
it's 2.4.27 (sarge) then I think we have our problem found.

-- 
  .''`.  ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield
 : :' :  http://www.debian.org/ |
 `. `'  |
   `- --  |


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Processed: Re: bash: Fails to install through debootstrap

2005-12-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 reassign 342855 debianutils
Bug#342855: bash: Fails to install through debootstrap
Bug reassigned from package `debianutils' to `debianutils'.

 severity 342855 critical
Bug#342855: bash: Fails to install through debootstrap
Severity set to `critical'.

 clone 342855 -1
Bug#342855: bash: Fails to install through debootstrap
Bug 342855 cloned as bug 342858.

 retitle 342855 debianutils: should provide /etc/shells (breaks debootstrap 
 install of sid, and D-I)
Bug#342855: bash: Fails to install through debootstrap
Changed Bug title.

 retitle -1 Should remove the useless shells template file and postinst code 
 to install it
Bug#342858: bash: Fails to install through debootstrap
Changed Bug title.

 severity -1 normal
Bug#342858: Should remove the useless shells template file and postinst code to 
install it
Severity set to `normal'.

 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#342704: ocaml: FTBFS on hppa: Error: Field out of range [-262144..262143] (-267528).

2005-12-11 Thread Florian Weimer
* Florian Weimer:

 This looks indeed like a GAS bug (or a miscompilation of GAS).  The
 branch target is only a few hundred instructions away, so it should be
 reachable using a BL instruction.

I was wrong, this is not a real GAS bug.  (See the binutils list for a
discussion.)  The object file is larger than 64K instructions, and GAS
apparently cannot express the necessary relocation in the object file
in this case.

In other words, Objective Caml is at fault.  It generates invalid
assembler input.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#337259: marked as done (debian-reference: FTBFS with new tetex-bin: Error trying to create pdflatex.fmt)

2005-12-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 11 Dec 2005 02:32:08 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#337259: fixed in debian-reference 1.09-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Nov 2005 15:24:25 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Nov 03 07:24:25 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from srv-smtp.math.univ-rennes1.fr [129.20.36.164] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EXgwz-0002rG-00; Thu, 03 Nov 2005 07:24:25 -0800
Received: from frobnitz.homelinux.net (dyn37079.math.univ-rennes1.fr 
[129.20.37.79])
by srv-smtp.math.univ-rennes1.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56066B8A1
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu,  3 Nov 2005 16:23:54 +0100 (CET)
Received: from daniel by frobnitz.homelinux.net with local (Exim 4.54)
id 1EXgwT-00077O-Hn
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 03 Nov 2005 16:23:53 +0100
From: Daniel Schepler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: debian-reference: FTBFS with new tetex-bin: Error trying to create 
pdflatex.fmt
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 03 Nov 2005 16:23:53 +0100
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: debian-reference
Severity: serious
Version: 1.08-4

From my pbuilder build log:

...
ln -sf fix.txt.ent fix.ent
debiandoc2text  -l $(echo ja | bin/getlocale) quick-reference.ja.sgml
bin/fixtxt ja quick-reference.ja.txt
TEXINPUTS=$(pwd)/texmf/:$(kpsetool -n pdftex -p tex) \
pdftex -ini pdflatex.ini  /dev/null
make[1]: *** [pdflatex.fmt] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/debian-reference-1.08'
make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.14-1-686
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

---
Received: (at 337259-close) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Dec 2005 10:41:29 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Dec 11 02:41:29 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1ElOUy-0003r0-HB; Sun, 11 Dec 2005 02:32:08 -0800
From: Osamu Aoki [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.60 $
Subject: Bug#337259: fixed in debian-reference 1.09-1
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2005 02:32:08 -0800
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Source: debian-reference
Source-Version: 1.09-1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
debian-reference, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

debian-reference-common_1.09-1_all.deb
  to pool/main/d/debian-reference/debian-reference-common_1.09-1_all.deb
debian-reference-de_1.09-1_all.deb
  to pool/main/d/debian-reference/debian-reference-de_1.09-1_all.deb
debian-reference-en_1.09-1_all.deb
  to pool/main/d/debian-reference/debian-reference-en_1.09-1_all.deb
debian-reference-es_1.09-1_all.deb
  to pool/main/d/debian-reference/debian-reference-es_1.09-1_all.deb
debian-reference-fr_1.09-1_all.deb
  to pool/main/d/debian-reference/debian-reference-fr_1.09-1_all.deb
debian-reference-it_1.09-1_all.deb
  to pool/main/d/debian-reference/debian-reference-it_1.09-1_all.deb
debian-reference-ja_1.09-1_all.deb
  to pool/main/d/debian-reference/debian-reference-ja_1.09-1_all.deb
debian-reference-pl_1.09-1_all.deb
  to pool/main/d/debian-reference/debian-reference-pl_1.09-1_all.deb
debian-reference-pt-br_1.09-1_all.deb
  to pool/main/d/debian-reference/debian-reference-pt-br_1.09-1_all.deb
debian-reference-zh-cn_1.09-1_all.deb
  to pool/main/d/debian-reference/debian-reference-zh-cn_1.09-1_all.deb
debian-reference-zh-tw_1.09-1_all.deb
  to pool/main/d/debian-reference/debian-reference-zh-tw_1.09-1_all.deb
debian-reference_1.09-1.diff.gz
  to 

Bug#320260: qgo: cannot libtoolize due to removal of automake1.6

2005-12-11 Thread Cyril Chaboisseau
Package: qgo
Version: 1.0.3-2
Followup-For: Bug #320260

I finally managed to have someone upload qgo last week but there was an
error :

it FTBS on a friend's computer because automake1.6 has been removed

so I tried to switch over to automake1.7 as proposed here
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=340921

and it didn't work as expected

$ debuild
[...]
/bin/sh ../libtool --mode=link --tag=CXX x86_64-linux-gnu-g++  -fno-exceptions 
-fno-check-new-o qgo -L/usr/X11R6/lib  board.o boardhandler.o gamedialog.o 
gamestable.o gametree.o group.o helpviewer.o igsconnection.o imagehandler.o 
interfacehandler.o main.o maintable.o mainwidget.o mainwin.o mainwindow.o 
mark.o matrix.o misc.o move.o msg_handler.o noderesults.o parser.o 
playertable.o preferences.o qgo.o qgo_interface.o qgtp.o qnewgamedlg.o 
setting.o sgfparser.o stone.o stonehandler.o tables.o telnet.o textview.o tip.o 
tree.o wavfile.o wavplay.o xmlparser.o clientwindow_gui.o gameinfo_gui.o 
gui_dialog.o mainwidget_gui.o newgame_gui.o newlocalgame_gui.o 
noderesults_gui.o normaltools_gui.o nthmove_gui.o preferences_gui.o 
qnewgamedlg_gui.o scoretools_gui.o talk_gui.o textedit_gui.o textview_gui.o 
noderesults.moc.o parser.moc.o mainwin.moc.o gamestable.moc.o qnewgamedlg.moc.o 
mainwidget.moc.o maintable.moc.o tip.moc.o tables.moc.o gametree.moc.o 
qgtp.moc.o helpviewer.moc.o gamedialog.moc.o igsconnection.moc.o board.moc.o 
mainwindow.moc.o playertable.moc.o qgo_interface.moc.o telnet.moc.o 
preferences.moc.o qgo.moc.o textview.moc.o  -lresolv  -lqt-mt -lpng -lz -lm 
-lXext -lX11 -lresolv -lSM -lICE -lpthread
../libtool: line 361: s,^.*/,,g: Aucun fichier ou répertoire de ce type
../libtool: line 686: -e: command not found
../libtool: line 686: -e: command not found
: ignoring unknown tag
*** Warning: inferring the mode of operation is deprecated.
*** Future versions of Libtool will require --mode=MODE be specified.
: link: unable to infer tagged configuration
: link: specify a tag with `--tag'
make[4]: *** [qgo] Erreur 1
make[4]: quittant le répertoire « /home/cyril/src/Debian/qgo-1.0.3/src »
make[3]: *** [all-recursive] Erreur 1
make[3]: quittant le répertoire « /home/cyril/src/Debian/qgo-1.0.3/src »
make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Erreur 1
make[2]: quittant le répertoire « /home/cyril/src/Debian/qgo-1.0.3 »
make[1]: *** [all] Erreur 2
make[1]: quittant le répertoire « /home/cyril/src/Debian/qgo-1.0.3 »
make: *** [build-stamp] Erreur 2
debuild: fatal error at line 768:
dpkg-buildpackage failed!


so for the moment I'm quite hopeless to find out what is wrong

if I don't find how to upgrade, I'll revert all libtoolization until
upstream has upgraded to a newer automake


-- 
Cyril Chaboisseau



Bug#339243: It's OK to upload openscenegraph now....

2005-12-11 Thread Nathanael Nerode
All its dependencies are built with the needed ABIs everywhere that matters 
(m68k currently doesn't matter because it's so far behind that its 
uninstallability count is allowed to increase).

-- 
Nathanael Nerode  [EMAIL PROTECTED]

A thousand reasons. http://www.thousandreasons.org/
Lies, theft, war, kidnapping, torture, rape, murder...
Get me out of this fascist nightmare!


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#337965: After upgrading to latest unstable wine works

2005-12-11 Thread Anders Ellenshøj Andersen
Package: wine
Version: 0.9-1
Followup-For: Bug #337965


I just upgraded to the latest unstable version and the problem seems to have 
gone away now.

I think you can close this.

Anders


-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.14-asus-1
Locale: LANG=da_DK, LC_CTYPE=da_DK (charmap=ISO-8859-1)

Versions of packages wine depends on:
ii  debconf [debconf-2.0]1.4.62  Debian configuration management sy
ii  libwine  0.9-1   Windows API Implementation (Librar
ii  xbase-clients6.8.2.dfsg.1-11 miscellaneous X clients

wine recommends no packages.

-- debconf information:
  wine/del_wine_conf: true
  wine/install_type: Autodetect


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#341945: Investigation of the bug

2005-12-11 Thread Enrico Zini
On Sun, Dec 11, 2005 at 12:41:57AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:

 On Sat, Dec 10, 2005 at 11:18:53AM +0100, Enrico Zini wrote:
  So, it seems that there are some recompiles to be triggered:
  Step 1: libtagcoll-dev
  Step 2: tagcoll, tagcolledit, libapt-front-dev
  (since they statically link libtagcoll-dev)
  Step 3: debtags, debtags-edit, packagesearch
  (since they statically link libapt-front-dev)
 Could you perform these steps locally on your system and confirm that it
 does correct the failure, before we commit buildd time on all archs to
 rebuilding these?

Sure.  Done.  It works.

Here's the list of things I did: there are small mismatches with the
list I gave above, as I was thinking more in terms of upstream deps than
actual debian deps.

 * tagcoll
   apt-get source tagcoll
   cd tagcoll-1.5.1/
   debuild -us -uc -rfakeroot
   cd ..
   su -c dpkg -i libtagcoll-dev_1.5.1-1_i386.deb tagcoll_1.5.1-1_i386.deb

 * tagcolledit
   apt-get source tagcolledit
   cd tagcolledit-1.2/
   debuild -us -uc -rfakeroot
   cd ..
   su -c dpkg -i tagcolledit_1.2-1_i386.deb

 * libapt-front-dev
   apt-get source libapt-front-dev
   cd libapt-front-0.3.4/
   debuild -us -uc -rfakeroot
   cd ..
   su -c dpkg -i libapt-front-dev_0.3.4_i386.deb
 
 * debtags
   apt-get source debtags
   cd debtags-1.5.2/
   debuild -us -uc -rfakeroot
   cd ..
   su -c dpkg -i debtags_1.5.2_i386.deb

   * It works! *

 * debtags-edit
   apt-get source debtags-edit
   cd debtags-edit-1.1.2/
   debuild -us -uc -rfakeroot
   cd ..
   su -c dpkg -i debtags-edit_1.1.2_i386.deb

Haven't done packagesearch, but I think we have the idea.


Ciao,

Enrico

--
GPG key: 1024D/797EBFAB 2000-12-05 Enrico Zini [EMAIL PROTECTED]


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#342819: Processed: block 342819 with 342740

2005-12-11 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Steve Langasek wrote:
 I don't get it.  Why should *any* Debian package be depending on pgxs
 to tell it what compiler to use?  Why shouldn't postgresql-pljava not
 be fixed to call gcc directly, if it can be built with it?

Because that is how the build system of those packages works.  You just 
write what your module is called and what the source files are and the 
rest is done automatically.  You could probably override the compiler 
but that should not be necessary as part of the normal operation.

(I think this is a bit like MakeMaker.  If you build Perl with a 
non-standard compiler, then all packages using MakeMaker will also 
attempt to use that compiler by default.)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#314988: Starting geomview ends up with InstCreate: undefined option: 7042768

2005-12-11 Thread Steve Langasek
reopen 314988
thanks


  geomview (1.8.1-10) unstable; urgency=low
  .
* debian/control: Add texinfo to build-deps so that command makeinfo
  is available.  Closes: #338773.
  .
* debian/control: Restrict architectures.  This package was not designed
for 64-bit machines.  Closes: #314988.

Sorry, this is *not* (just) a 64-bit bug; geomview runs fine for me on my
alpha.  Since the etch RC policy says that packages must be supported on as
many architectures as is reasonably possible, this is therefore an RC bug;
please re-add alpha to the architecture list.  ia64 can reasonably be left
out until someone can confirm that this bug doesn't exist there, but given
that both people who have reported this bug say they're using nvidia on
amd64, I suspect it may be a 64-bit issue in geomview that only manifests
when using the nvidia binary drivers -- in which case the package really
ought to be supported on amd64 as well.

Next time if you want to sneak a change like this past the porters, don't
forget to ask the ftpmasters to remove the stale binary packages. ;)

-- 
Steve Langasek   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer   to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://www.debian.org/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#320260: qgo: cannot libtoolize due to removal of automake1.6

2005-12-11 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sun, Dec 11, 2005 at 12:33:52PM +0100, Cyril Chaboisseau wrote:
 so I tried to switch over to automake1.7 as proposed here
 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=340921

 and it didn't work as expected

 $ debuild
 [...]
 /bin/sh ../libtool --mode=link --tag=CXX x86_64-linux-gnu-g++  
 -fno-exceptions -fno-check-new-o qgo -L/usr/X11R6/lib  board.o 
 boardhandler.o gamedialog.o gamestable.o gametree.o group.o helpviewer.o 
 igsconnection.o imagehandler.o interfacehandler.o main.o maintable.o 
 mainwidget.o mainwin.o mainwindow.o mark.o matrix.o misc.o move.o 
 msg_handler.o noderesults.o parser.o playertable.o preferences.o qgo.o 
 qgo_interface.o qgtp.o qnewgamedlg.o setting.o sgfparser.o stone.o 
 stonehandler.o tables.o telnet.o textview.o tip.o tree.o wavfile.o wavplay.o 
 xmlparser.o clientwindow_gui.o gameinfo_gui.o gui_dialog.o mainwidget_gui.o 
 newgame_gui.o newlocalgame_gui.o noderesults_gui.o normaltools_gui.o 
 nthmove_gui.o preferences_gui.o qnewgamedlg_gui.o scoretools_gui.o talk_gui.o 
 textedit_gui.o textview_gui.o noderesults.moc.o parser.moc.o mainwin.moc.o 
 gamestable.moc.o qnewgamedlg.moc.o mainwidget.moc.o maintable.moc.o tip.moc.o 
 tables.moc.o gametree.moc.o qgtp.moc.o helpviewer.moc.o gamedialog.moc.o 
 igsconnection.moc.o board.moc.o mainwindow.moc.o playertable.moc.o 
 qgo_interface.moc.o telnet.moc.o preferences.moc.o qgo.moc.o textview.moc.o  
 -lresolv  -lqt-mt -lpng -lz -lm -lXext -lX11 -lresolv -lSM -lICE -lpthread
 ../libtool: line 361: s,^.*/,,g: Aucun fichier ou répertoire de ce type
 ../libtool: line 686: -e: command not found
 ../libtool: line 686: -e: command not found
 : ignoring unknown tag
 *** Warning: inferring the mode of operation is deprecated.
 *** Future versions of Libtool will require --mode=MODE be specified.
 : link: unable to infer tagged configuration
 : link: specify a tag with `--tag'
 make[4]: *** [qgo] Erreur 1
 make[4]: quittant le répertoire « /home/cyril/src/Debian/qgo-1.0.3/src »
 make[3]: *** [all-recursive] Erreur 1
 make[3]: quittant le répertoire « /home/cyril/src/Debian/qgo-1.0.3/src »
 make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Erreur 1
 make[2]: quittant le répertoire « /home/cyril/src/Debian/qgo-1.0.3 »
 make[1]: *** [all] Erreur 2
 make[1]: quittant le répertoire « /home/cyril/src/Debian/qgo-1.0.3 »
 make: *** [build-stamp] Erreur 2
 debuild: fatal error at line 768:
 dpkg-buildpackage failed!

See http://people.debian.org/~keybuk/libtool-updating.html.

-- 
Steve Langasek   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer   to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://www.debian.org/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#342247: [SPAM?]: Bug#342247: marked as done (updating tetex-extra fails)

2005-12-11 Thread Frank Küster
Hilmar Preusse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I had two points of failure:

 1. I refused to replace the changed language.dat by that one from the
 maintainers. The old one referenced the hyph. patterns czhyph2e.tex,
 which does not exist any more in teTeX 2.0. Hence the build of all
 formats having hyph. patterns failed.

Here I think we cannot help.  Once we had code in the postinst that
parsed language.dat, but it was too complicated and error-prone.

 2. I refused to replace the changed 05TeXMF. The code, which should
 have introduced VARTEXMF seemed to fail. Hence updmap.cfg was not
 found.

 Robert, can you send us your /etc/texmf/texmf.cnf and
 /etc/texmf/texmf.d/05TeXMF.cnf, ideally the versions before you fixed
 it? 
 
 Attached is texmf.d.tar.bz2. It is taken from the backup I made
 before I upgraded to sarge. Hope it is helpful.
 And yes, after I fixed my system and got it running. As I'm a tetex
 maintainer myself I didn't bother to report a bug about my failures.

I think it would have been better to explicitly inform everybody, at
least if you encountered the problem before sarge's release.  But well,
that's history now.

 Should I open another bug instead of continue discussing in a closed
 one?

Yes, I think so - I guess we'll need to do similar checks for the
sarge-etch upgrade, and we should know whether there's a flaw in the
procedure.  I won't have time to investigate this now, but here's what I
think should be done:

- Check which packages installed files in your texmf.d.tar.bz2

- install those packages in a woody pbuilder 

- replace texmf.d by the contents of your tar.bz2

- make preinst and postinst scripts use set -x, e.g. with the
  contol-overrides mechanism

- Do the upgrade...

Regards, Frank

-- 
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer




Processed: Re: Starting geomview ends up with InstCreate: undefined option: 7042768

2005-12-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 reopen 314988
Bug#314988: Starting geomview ends up with InstCreate: undefined option: 
7042768
Bug reopened, originator not changed.

 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#339243: It's OK to upload openscenegraph now....

2005-12-11 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sun, Dec 11, 2005 at 06:45:17AM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
 All its dependencies are built with the needed ABIs everywhere that matters 
 (m68k currently doesn't matter because it's so far behind that its 
 uninstallability count is allowed to increase).

This was actually ok *before* now; it just required adding a versioned
build-dependency on gdal.  This versioned build-dependency is still
recommended, to keep m68k from accidentally trying to build the packages out
of order later once it does catch up (AFAIK it won't work because
openscenegraph builds binaries linked against libgdal instead of just
building libraries, but why take chances?).

Incidentally, this bug is actually due to be downgraded shortly; because
libopenscenegraph1c2 didn't reach testing before this mess happened, we've
decided that the *rename* of the library is not RC (because it doesn't
affect upgrades between releases), it's only RC to keep binaries built with
the broken and no-longer-supported ABI out of the release -- and that's
almost done, as openscenegraph has been binNMUed on all architectures but
arm and m68k at this point.  I would still encourage you to rename the
library package per this transition, but there should be no need for you to
regard it as release-critical.

Cheers,
-- 
Steve Langasek   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer   to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://www.debian.org/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#342292: tetex-bin: Multiple exploitable heap overflows in embedded xpdf copy

2005-12-11 Thread Frank Küster
Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Frank Küster wrote:
 Hi Joey,
 
 Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  The original patch was not sufficient.  I'm attaching the entire and the
  incremental patch.  Please apply the incremental patch to the version in
  sid as well.
 
 Did you see Martin Pitt's enhanced patch - do both address the same
 problems?

 The appendix removes the douplette Martin found, so yes.

I looked at both, and it seems that Martin's does more.  I'm speaking of
the patch attached to 
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=342292;msg=136

It introduces limits.h and does the same we did for the xpdf patches at
the beginning of the year, namely change code that can be optimized away
by compilers.  

It seems to me that Martin Pitt's patch also has everything that yours
(Joey's) has, but I'm not completely sure; anyway it seems that also the
stable packages should use the code with limits.h.

Am I correct that the other issues that Florian found are not addressed
by any patch yet, and have not yet been widely published?  Should I
delay an upload to sid until this can be fixed, too?

 P.S. Did you see my mail to -release regarding the tetex-base upload to
 stable/proposed-updates?

 No.  Could you forward it?

Sent in a separate mail.

Regards, Frank
-- 
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer




Bug#342870: licq contains dev headers from licq-dev

2005-12-11 Thread Uli Martens
Package: licq
Version: 1.3.2-4+b1
Severity: serious

Hi there!

While trying to install licq-dev (1.3.2-4, last version in sid), it
tries to overwrite include files from licq (1.3.2-4+b1), which AIUI
should not be in this package at all. BIN-NMU gone wrong...

| ii  licq   1.3.2-4+b1 ICQ client (base files)

| Unpacking licq-dev (from .../licq-dev_1.3.2-4_all.deb) ...
| dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/licq-dev_1.3.2-4_all.deb 
(--unpack):
|  trying to overwrite `/usr/include/licq/licq_buffer.h', which is also in 
package licq

greetings,
Uli

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.27-2-686
Locale: LANG=C, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#341945: Investigation of the bug

2005-12-11 Thread Steve Langasek
Version: 1.5.2+b2

On Sun, Dec 11, 2005 at 12:34:42PM +0100, Enrico Zini wrote:
 On Sun, Dec 11, 2005 at 12:41:57AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:

  On Sat, Dec 10, 2005 at 11:18:53AM +0100, Enrico Zini wrote:
   So, it seems that there are some recompiles to be triggered:
   Step 1: libtagcoll-dev
   Step 2: tagcoll, tagcolledit, libapt-front-dev
   (since they statically link libtagcoll-dev)
   Step 3: debtags, debtags-edit, packagesearch
   (since they statically link libapt-front-dev)
  Could you perform these steps locally on your system and confirm that it
  does correct the failure, before we commit buildd time on all archs to
  rebuilding these?

 Sure.  Done.  It works.

Spiff.  Closing the bug as fixed in the next binNMU then, which is already
scheduled (along with the binNMUs for tagcolledit, debtags-edit,
libapt-front, and packagesearch).

Cheers,
-- 
Steve Langasek   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer   to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://www.debian.org/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Processed: Re: libpam-encfs - is not i386 specific

2005-12-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 severity 340575 serious
Bug#340575: libpam-encfs - is not i386 specific
Severity set to `serious'.

 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#285198: Bug#337259: debian-reference: FTBFS with new tetex-bin: Error trying to create pdflatex.fmt

2005-12-11 Thread Frank Küster
tags 285198 patch
thanks

Osamu Aoki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 After reviewing my package, IO realized cjk-latex has been removed from
 testing. Until some fix is done on postinst script, it will not enter
 testing due to  #285198  (Manual edit of texmf.cnf not recommended).

 It seems we need to add some script to /etc/texmf/texmf.d insted of
 screwing around with /etc/texmf/texmf.conf file.

 This needs to be fixed frst before my debian-reference since it depends
 on it.  Any idea how to fix this?

It's even easier:  Simply drop the code from postinst and depend on 

tex-common (= 0.13) | tetex-bin ( 3.0)

This looks a little strange, but the explanation is that tetex-bin in
sarge and currently in etch already had the setting that cjk-latex wants
to introduce; when the configuration files where moved from tetex-bin to
tex-common we first forgot it, and I've now readded it in the SVN
repository of tex-common; the next release will again include it.  But
tex-common's release will not limit cjk-latex's testing migration,
because in testing it has tetex-bin ( 3.0) to satisfy the dependency.

Attached is a patch to achieve this.

Regards, Frank

diff -Nur cjk-latex-4.5.1.orig/debian/changelog cjk-latex-4.5.1/debian/changelog
--- cjk-latex-4.5.1.orig/debian/changelog	2005-12-11 14:50:58.459814408 +0100
+++ cjk-latex-4.5.1/debian/changelog	2005-12-11 14:44:22.003084992 +0100
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+cjk-latex (4.5.1-4.1) unstable; urgency=low
+
+  * Do not mess around with the generated file texmf.cnf; instead depend
+on tex-common (= 0.13) which provides the font support we need.
+
+ -- Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Sun, 11 Dec 2005 14:31:05 +0100
+
 cjk-latex (4.5.1-4) unstable; urgency=low
 
   * CVS update as of 2003-02-11.
diff -Nur cjk-latex-4.5.1.orig/debian/control cjk-latex-4.5.1/debian/control
--- cjk-latex-4.5.1.orig/debian/control	2005-12-11 14:50:58.462813952 +0100
+++ cjk-latex-4.5.1/debian/control	2005-12-11 14:43:23.812931240 +0100
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
 
 Package: cjk-latex
 Architecture: any
-Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, tetex-base (= 1.0-1), tetex-bin (= 1.0.6-1.1)
+Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, tetex-base (= 1.0-1), tetex-bin (= 1.0.6-1.1), tex-common (= 0.13)
 Recommends: freetype1-tools
 Suggests: tfm-arphic-bsmi00lp, tfm-arphic-bkai00mp, tfm-arphic-gbsn00lp, tfm-arphic-gkai00mp, hbf-jfs56, hbf-cns40-b5, hbf-kanji48
 Description: A LaTeX macro package for CJK (Chinese/Japanese/Korean)
diff -Nur cjk-latex-4.5.1.orig/debian/postinst cjk-latex-4.5.1/debian/postinst
--- cjk-latex-4.5.1.orig/debian/postinst	2005-12-11 14:50:58.463813800 +0100
+++ cjk-latex-4.5.1/debian/postinst	2005-12-11 14:44:50.159804520 +0100
@@ -18,10 +18,3 @@
 
 #DEBHELPER#
 
-# Fixes /etc/texmf/texmf.cnf.
-# Remove the following line when Debian's teTeX package comes with
-# the same setting.
-if ! /bin/grep -q '^T1FONTS.*;$TEXMF/fonts/hbf//' /etc/texmf/texmf.cnf; then
-/usr/bin/perl -pi -e 's|^(T1FONTS.*)$|$1;\$TEXMF/fonts/hbf//|;' \
-	/etc/texmf/texmf.cnf
-fi

-- 
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer


Bug#342583: postgresql-server-dev-8.0 depends upon libpq-dev which is 8.1 specific.

2005-12-11 Thread Martin Pitt
tag 342583 moreinfo
thanks

Hi Andreas!

Andreas Kostyrka [2005-12-08  9:23 -0800]:
 postgresql-server-dev-8.0 depends upon libpq-dev which happens
 to be 8.1 specific. 

libpq{4,-dev} is not version specific, it works for all PostgreSQL
versions starting from 7.3. It just makes sense (and is generally
necessary) to have the client side files for server-side extensions,
too.

 Which makes it completely useless as the headers do not match. There
 is no other libpq-dev version being shown by apt-cache.
 
 The installed ubuntu package below fixes at least the compile time
 stuff, but it still is not able to link.

Can you please give more details about what exactly you are trying to
do? 'It breaks' is not very helpful for fixing things.

Thank you,

Martin

-- 
Martin Pitthttp://www.piware.de
Ubuntu Developer   http://www.ubuntu.com
Debian Developer   http://www.debian.org

In a world without walls and fences, who needs Windows and Gates?


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#342212: python-visual - FTBFS: error: expected type-specifier before ';' token

2005-12-11 Thread Steve Langasek
clone 342212 -1
reassign -1 python2.3-numarray
thanks

This looks like a bug in python2.3-nummarray to me; this header is not
usable on its own, because it depends on macro definitions from other
headers which it doesn't include.

-- 
Steve Langasek   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer   to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://www.debian.org/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Processed: Re: Bug#342583: postgresql-server-dev-8.0 depends upon libpq-dev which is 8.1 specific.

2005-12-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 tag 342583 moreinfo
Bug#342583: postgresql-server-dev-8.0 depends upon libpq-dev which is 8.1 
specific.
There were no tags set.
Tags added: moreinfo

 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processed: Re: Bug#337259: debian-reference: FTBFS with new tetex-bin: Error trying to create pdflatex.fmt

2005-12-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 tags 285198 patch
Bug#285198: Manual edit of texmf.cnf not recommended
Tags were: fixed
Tags added: patch

 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processed: Re: python-visual - FTBFS: error: expected type-specifier before ';' token

2005-12-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 clone 342212 -1
Bug#342212: python-visual - FTBFS: error: expected type-specifier before ';' 
token
Bug 342212 cloned as bug 342875.

 reassign -1 python2.3-numarray
Bug#342875: python-visual - FTBFS: error: expected type-specifier before ';' 
token
Bug reassigned from package `python-visual' to `python2.3-numarray'.

 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#342879: make: new version breaks cdbs

2005-12-11 Thread Aurelien Jarno
Package: make
Version: 3.80+3.81.b3-1
Severity: grave
Justification: render hundred of packages unbuildable

Hi,

Since version 3.80+3.81.b3-1 of make, all packages using cdbs fail to 
build: example of digikam:

rmdir /build/buildd/digikam-0.8.0-1/debian/digikam/usr/share/doc/kde/HTML/en
rmdir /build/buildd/digikam-0.8.0-1/debian/digikam/usr/share/doc/kde/HTML
rmdir /build/buildd/digikam-0.8.0-1/debian/digikam/usr/share/doc/kde
make: *** No rule to make target `install', needed by `binary/digikam'.  Stop.
**

I don't know if the bug is in make or cdbs, but as it was triggered by a
new version of make, I reported it here. Please feel free to reassign it.

Bye,
Aurelien

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (x86_64)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.14
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL 
set to fr_FR.UTF-8)

cdbs depends on no packages.

Versions of packages cdbs recommends:
ii  autotools-dev 20050803.1 Update infrastructure for config.{
ii  debhelper 5.0.10 helper programs for debian/rules

-- no debconf information


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#340852: gpsd: FTBFS: undefined reference to `floor'

2005-12-11 Thread Tilman Koschnick
merge 340081 340852
thanks

On Sat, 2005-11-26 at 13:17 +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
 Package: gpsd
 Version: 2.30-1
 Severity: serious
 
 Hi,
 
 Your package is failing to build with the following error:
 gpxlogger.o: In function 
 `signal_handler':/build/buildd/gpsd-2.30/gpxlogger.c:6
 7: undefined reference to `floor'
 collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
 make[2]: *** [gpxlogger] Error 1
 
 You will need to link with -lm

Hi Kurt,

thanks for the report. This bug was already reported before and is
tagged pending.

Cheers, Til



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#340852: gpsd: FTBFS: undefined reference to `floor'

2005-12-11 Thread Tilman Koschnick
On Sun, 2005-12-11 at 13:32 +0800, Zak B. Elep wrote:
 package gpsd
 tags 340852 patch
 thanks control ;)
 
 I've fixed this in my merge of gpsd for Ubuntu.  Attached is the
 (rather trivial) fix, though I suspect that a better solution would be
 to notify upstream of this problem and modify ./Makefile.am and update
 the autotools infrastructure accordingly.
 
 Cheers,
 
 Zakame


Hi Zakame,

thanks for your report. The bug report you replied to is actually a
duplicate, merging bugs right now (#340081, #340852). The patch I used
is attached, you might want to use this for the Ubuntu vesion as well.

Just out of curiosity - is it customary to close Debian bugs in Ubuntu
changelogs? I think this is slightly misleading to Ubuntu users - a) the
bug doesn't actually get closed by the upload, b) as an Ubuntu user I'd
look in the Ubuntu BTS for the bug number.

Cheers, Til


15_link_lm_fix.dpatch
Description: application/shellscript


Processed: block 342212 with 342875

2005-12-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.10
 block 342212 with 342875
Bug#342212: python-visual - FTBFS: error: expected type-specifier before ';' 
token
Was not blocked by any bugs.
Blocking bugs added: 342875


End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processed: Re: Bug#340852: gpsd: FTBFS: undefined reference to `floor'

2005-12-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 merge 340081 340852
Bug#340081: gpsd: ftbfs [sparc] undefined reference to `floor'
Bug#340852: gpsd: FTBFS: undefined reference to `floor'
Merged 340081 340852.

 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#342892: Incompatible with make 3.80+3.81.b3-1

2005-12-11 Thread Loic Minier
Package: cdbs
Version: 0.4.32
Severity: serious

Hi,

 Cdbs breaks for some packages when upgrading to make 3.80+3.81.b3-1.
 This make version explicitely has incompatibilities with previous
 versions, I'm afraid this has to be fixed on the side of CDBS.

 The problem I encountered was with the gst-plugins0.8 packages, when
 dh_installdirs -p has been called for all binary packages, I get a
 make error saying it can't find the install target.
make: *** No rule to make target install,
necessary for binary/gstreamer0.8-plugins. Stop.
 In previous builds, or when downgrading to a previous make version,
 the following command would have been run:
dh_installdocs -pgstreamer0.8-plugins debian/README.Debian NEWS

 Hence, I believe that the incompatibility might be due to this
 expression in debhelper.mk:
$(patsubst %,install/%,$(DEB_ALL_PACKAGES)) :: install/%:

 I'm not versed in Makefiles, but if I can provide more information, let
 me know.

-- 
Loïc Minier [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#342879: make: new version breaks cdbs

2005-12-11 Thread Manoj Srivastava
Hi,

You know, as good bug reports go, this one is pretty
 deficient; there is no useful information to go on, and the package
 in question is not a small, self contained one to ease debugging, and
 no effort has been made to dig deeper. I expected better from a
 fellow developer.

manoj
-- 
pos += screamnext[pos] /* does this goof up anywhere? */ Larry Wall in
util.c from the perl source code
Manoj Srivastava   [EMAIL PROTECTED]  http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B  924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#338334: marked as done (tetex-doc: Debian changelog is missing)

2005-12-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 11 Dec 2005 07:02:55 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#338334: fixed in tetex-base 3.0-11
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Nov 2005 15:34:32 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Nov 09 07:34:32 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from smtp07.web.de [217.72.192.225] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EZry4-0005kX-00; Wed, 09 Nov 2005 07:34:32 -0800
Received: from [217.251.234.173] (helo=[127.0.0.1])
by smtp07.web.de with asmtp (WEB.DE 4.105 #317)
id 1EZrxX-0005XE-00
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 09 Nov 2005 16:34:00 +0100
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2005 16:28:33 +0100
From: Sven Joachim [EMAIL PROTECTED]
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051017)
X-Accept-Language: de-DE, de, en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: tetex-doc: Debian changelog is missing
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: tetex-doc
Version: 3.0-10
Severity: serious

The Debian changelog is missing in the /usr/share/doc/tetex-doc
directory. Please add it there as mandated by section 12.7 of the
Policy Manual.

-- System Information excluded




---
Received: (at 338334-close) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Dec 2005 15:11:05 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Dec 11 07:11:04 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1ElSj1-000811-Tz; Sun, 11 Dec 2005 07:02:55 -0800
From: =?utf-8?q?Frank_K=C3=BCster?= [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.60 $
Subject: Bug#338334: fixed in tetex-base 3.0-11
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2005 07:02:55 -0800
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Source: tetex-base
Source-Version: 3.0-11

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
tetex-base, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

tetex-base_3.0-11.diff.gz
  to pool/main/t/tetex-base/tetex-base_3.0-11.diff.gz
tetex-base_3.0-11.dsc
  to pool/main/t/tetex-base/tetex-base_3.0-11.dsc
tetex-base_3.0-11_all.deb
  to pool/main/t/tetex-base/tetex-base_3.0-11_all.deb
tetex-doc_3.0-11_all.deb
  to pool/main/t/tetex-base/tetex-doc_3.0-11_all.deb
tetex-extra_3.0-11_all.deb
  to pool/main/t/tetex-base/tetex-extra_3.0-11_all.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated tetex-base package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2005 15:10:55 +0100
Source: tetex-base
Binary: tetex-extra tetex-doc tetex-base
Architecture: source all
Version: 3.0-11
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: teTeX maintainers debian-tetex-maint@lists.debian.org
Changed-By: Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description: 
 tetex-base - Basic library files of teTeX
 tetex-doc  - The documentation component of the Debian teTeX packages
 tetex-extra - Additional library files of teTeX
Closes: 261529 338334 341110
Changes: 
 tetex-base (3.0-11) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Since /etc/texmf is a real TEXMF tree now, TeX input files are no
 longer treated as configuration files.  Upon upgrade, unchanged files
 are removed, changed ones are 

Bug#342902: upgrade fails

2005-12-11 Thread Norbert Tretkowski
Package: udev
Version: 0.076-5
Severity: serious

Preparing to replace udev 0.076-4 (using .../archives/udev_0.076-5_i386.deb) ...
Unpacking replacement udev ...
dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/udev_0.076-5_i386.deb (--unpack):
 trying to overwrite `/usr/share/initramfs-tools/hooks/udev', which is also in 
package initramfs-tools
dpkg-deb: subprocess paste killed by signal (Broken pipe)

Installed version of initramfs-tools was 0.41, after upgrading to 0.42
the problem was fixed... looks like a replaces: initramfs-tools = 0.41
is missing here.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.14-2-686
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=de_DE (charmap=ISO-8859-1)

Versions of packages udev depends on:
ii  initscripts   2.86.ds1-4 Standard scripts needed for bootin
ii  libc6 2.3.5-8GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libselinux1   1.26-1 SELinux shared libraries
ii  lsb-base  3.0-11 Linux Standard Base 3.0 init scrip
ii  makedev   2.3.1-79   creates device files in /dev
ii  sed   4.1.2-8The GNU sed stream editor

udev recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#334338: marked as done (rhapsody: Segmentation fault when join in a channel)

2005-12-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 11 Dec 2005 12:52:17 -0300
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line (no subject)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Oct 2005 09:56:23 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Oct 17 02:56:23 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from mailfe05.tele2.it (swip.net) [212.247.154.141] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1ERRjD-0008NZ-00; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 02:56:23 -0700
X-T2-Posting-ID: v4XIVZW7JrcRQ3HmJRaApFKdq9HfQ9X8NEP5SUzk5uQ=
Received: from [83.176.117.57] (HELO localhost.localdomain)
  by mailfe05.swip.net (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3.8)
  with ESMTPS id 5985951; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 11:55:50 +0200
Received: from joshua by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.54)
id 1ERRpD-0001v9-Uo; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 12:02:36 +0200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Joshua Dunamis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: rhapsody: Segmentation fault when join in a channel
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.17
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2005 12:02:35 +0200
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: rhapsody
Version: 0.26b-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable


Hello,
the first time I joined in a channel it worked fine but the users list
showed only the ops of the channel. So I closed the program. Now when I
just join in a channel the program is closed with a segmentation
fault.
What is happened?

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-686
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15)

Versions of packages rhapsody depends on:
ii  libc6 2.3.5-7GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libncurses5   5.5-1  Shared libraries for terminal hand

rhapsody recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information

---
Received: (at 334338-done) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Dec 2005 15:53:21 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Dec 11 07:53:21 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from avas-mr11.fibertel.com.ar ([24.232.0.224])
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1ElTVp-0002kk-2P
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 11 Dec 2005 07:53:21 -0800
Received: from OL34-105.fibertel.com.ar ([24.232.105.34]:37899 EHLO
[192.168.1.32] smtp-auth: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by avas-mr11.fibertel.com.ar with ESMTP id S180276AbVLKPwo;
Sun, 11 Dec 2005 12:52:44 -0300
X-Comment: RFC 2476 MSA function at avas-mr11.fibertel.com.ar logged sender 
identity as: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2005 12:52:17 -0300
From: Marcela Tiznado [EMAIL PROTECTED]
User-Agent: Debian Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051017)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Fib-Al-Info: Al
X-Fib-Al-MRId: 5bda1f9df6de83731a25b7c8756776a4
X-Fib-Al-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.9 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_44,NOSUBJECT,
RCVD_IN_SORBS autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

I'm closing this bug cause was imposible to reproduce, and got no answer
on a prudential time from the submitter.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#339056: Is Lars Steinke MIA?

2005-12-11 Thread Lars Steinke
On Sat, Dec 10, 2005 at 06:31:34PM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote:
 On 2005-11-14, I filed grave bug #339056: Library package fails
 to include shlibs file [0] on package tktable-dev [1] , on which my
 package saods9 build-depends.  I'm concerned about this bug because 1)
 its RC; 2) I haven't heard back in a month, despite pinging the
 maintainer last week; 3) My package depends on it [2]; and 4) Only 1
 other package, also maintained by Lars, depends on it.
 
 I would have expected some response by now, so I'm alerting -qa and
 asking -devel for info. 
 
 Has anyone heard from Lars Steinke [EMAIL PROTECTED] in the last month?
 A quick google search indicates that he was active early this year, at
 least, and his bug page indicates that he has probably been inactive
 for ~6 months.

Dear Justin,

my time has been rather limited the last few months and this has not
been security relevant in any respect - sorry for the delay.
Also, it seems the requirements you quote in your bug report have 
not been in place when I uploaded, as there was no warning from 
lintian then.

If you find tktable useful, I'd like to propose that you take over
maintainersahip from me, as I simply had to provide it as prerequisite
for packaging moodss.

Let me know if you'd find this satisfactory.

Regards,
Lars


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#342906: klibc: FTBFS on Sparc64 (local build)

2005-12-11 Thread Frans Pop
Package: klibc
Version: 1.1.1-4
Severity: serious
Justification: Fails to build from source

I was trying to recover from yaird failing to create an initrd for the
new kernel and, to install initramfs-tools, had to try to build klibc
locally as it's not available from the mirrors for Sparc.

This resulted in the following build failure:

[...]
strip gzip -o gzip.stripped
make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/projects/klibc/klibc-1.1.1/gzip'
make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/projects/klibc/klibc-1.1.1'
touch debian/stamp-makefile-build
if [ -e ash/sh.shared ]; then mv -f ash/sh.shared ash/sh; fi
make: *** No rule to make target `configure', needed by `build/libklibc-dev'.  
Stop.

Builddeps:
ii  bison2.1-0.2   A parser generator that is compatible with 
YACC
ii  cdbs 0.4.32common build system for Debian packages
ii  debhelper5.0.10helper programs for debian/rules
ii  flex 2.5.31-36 A fast lexical analyzer generator.
ii  gcc-3.3  3.3.6-10  The GNU C compiler
ii  linux-headers-2.6-12 2.6.12-10 Common architecture-specific header files 
for Linu


pgpV3OjGpRYvO.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Bug#314988: Starting geomview ends up with InstCreate: undefined option: 7042768

2005-12-11 Thread Steve M. Robbins
On Sun, Dec 11, 2005 at 03:52:25AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
 reopen 314988
 thanks
 
 
   geomview (1.8.1-10) unstable; urgency=low
   .
 * debian/control: Add texinfo to build-deps so that command makeinfo
   is available.  Closes: #338773.
   .
 * debian/control: Restrict architectures.  This package was not designed
 for 64-bit machines.  Closes: #314988.
 
 Sorry, this is *not* (just) a 64-bit bug; geomview runs fine for me on my
 alpha.  

OK, thanks for the confirmation.


 Since the etch RC policy says that packages must be supported on as
 many architectures as is reasonably possible, this is therefore an RC bug;
 please re-add alpha to the architecture list.  

OK.  Technically, though, you're describing a different bug, namely
alpha is missing.


 ia64 can reasonably be left
 out until someone can confirm that this bug doesn't exist there, but given
 that both people who have reported this bug say they're using nvidia on
 amd64, I suspect it may be a 64-bit issue in geomview that only manifests
 when using the nvidia binary drivers

Yes, could be.  


 in which case the package really ought to be supported on amd64 as well.

Sure.  But then it ain't grave since it's only unusable in certain
circumstances.  Right?


 Next time if you want to sneak a change like this past the porters, don't
 forget to ask the ftpmasters to remove the stale binary packages. ;)

To be honest, I was a little surprised that this manual step is
necessary.  I'm not in a hurry to get them removed since geomview is
being stalled by gcc-4.0 anyway.


-Steve


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processed: retitle

2005-12-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 retitle 342902 missing replaces on initramfs-tools
Bug#342902: upgrade fails
Changed Bug title.

 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#342902: marked as done (missing replaces on initramfs-tools)

2005-12-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 11 Dec 2005 08:47:12 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#342902: fixed in udev 0.076-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Dec 2005 15:48:33 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Dec 11 07:48:33 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from rollcage.inittab.de ([194.150.191.146])
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1ElTRB-0002Dl-Cl
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 11 Dec 2005 07:48:33 -0800
Received: from magellan.home.inittab.de (gateway.home.inittab.de [62.91.23.197])
by rollcage.inittab.de (Postfix) with SMTP id 4B9EBCE04C;
Sun, 11 Dec 2005 16:48:31 +0100 (CET)
Received: (nullmailer pid 8563 invoked by uid 1000);
Sun, 11 Dec 2005 15:48:26 -
Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2005 16:48:26 +0100
From: Norbert Tretkowski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: upgrade fails
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Reportbug-Version: 3.18
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: udev
Version: 0.076-5
Severity: serious

Preparing to replace udev 0.076-4 (using .../archives/udev_0.076-5_i386.deb) ...
Unpacking replacement udev ...
dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/udev_0.076-5_i386.deb (--unpack):
 trying to overwrite `/usr/share/initramfs-tools/hooks/udev', which is also in 
package initramfs-tools
dpkg-deb: subprocess paste killed by signal (Broken pipe)

Installed version of initramfs-tools was 0.41, after upgrading to 0.42
the problem was fixed... looks like a replaces: initramfs-tools = 0.41
is missing here.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.14-2-686
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=de_DE (charmap=ISO-8859-1)

Versions of packages udev depends on:
ii  initscripts   2.86.ds1-4 Standard scripts needed for bootin
ii  libc6 2.3.5-8GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libselinux1   1.26-1 SELinux shared libraries
ii  lsb-base  3.0-11 Linux Standard Base 3.0 init scrip
ii  makedev   2.3.1-79   creates device files in /dev
ii  sed   4.1.2-8The GNU sed stream editor

udev recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information

---
Received: (at 342902-close) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Dec 2005 16:51:06 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Dec 11 08:51:05 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1ElULw-0005Fz-HM; Sun, 11 Dec 2005 08:47:12 -0800
From: Marco d'Itri [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.60 $
Subject: Bug#342902: fixed in udev 0.076-6
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2005 08:47:12 -0800
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Source: udev
Source-Version: 0.076-6

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
udev, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

udev-udeb_0.076-6_i386.udeb
  to pool/main/u/udev/udev-udeb_0.076-6_i386.udeb
udev_0.076-6.diff.gz
  to pool/main/u/udev/udev_0.076-6.diff.gz
udev_0.076-6.dsc
  to pool/main/u/udev/udev_0.076-6.dsc
udev_0.076-6_i386.deb
  to pool/main/u/udev/udev_0.076-6_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Marco d'Itri [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated 

Bug#342906: klibc: FTBFS on Sparc64 (local build))

2005-12-11 Thread Frans Pop
The bug seems to be caused by the new make (3.80+3.81.b3-1).
The README.Debian lists several backwards incompatibility warnings for 
this version. Possibly the build failure is caused by one of those.

The build succeeded after downgrading to make 3.80-12.

I'm not sure where this problem needs to be fixed: klibc, cdbs or make. 
I'll leave it up to you to reassign.

Cheers,
FJP


pgpLtijdpDEq6.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Processed: reassign 335220 to doc-linux, cloning 335220 ...

2005-12-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.9
 reassign 335220 doc-linux
Bug#335220: doc-linux-text: [NONFREE-DOC] includes non-free documentation
Bug reassigned from package `doc-linux-text' to `doc-linux'.

 clone 335220 -1
Bug#335220: doc-linux-text: [NONFREE-DOC] includes non-free documentation
Bug 335220 cloned as bug 342915.

 retitle -1 [NONFREE-DOC] includes many GFDL licensed HOWTOs
Bug#342915: doc-linux-text: [NONFREE-DOC] includes non-free documentation
Changed Bug title.


End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processed: cloning 335220, reassign -1 to doc-linux-nonfree, severity of -1 is important ...

2005-12-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.9
 clone 335220 -1
Bug#335220: doc-linux-text: [NONFREE-DOC] includes non-free documentation
Bug 335220 cloned as bug 342916.

 reassign -1 doc-linux-nonfree
Bug#342916: doc-linux-text: [NONFREE-DOC] includes non-free documentation
Bug reassigned from package `doc-linux' to `doc-linux-nonfree'.

 severity -1 important
Bug#342916: doc-linux-text: [NONFREE-DOC] includes non-free documentation
Severity set to `important'.

 retitle -1 Boot+Root+Raid+LILO an Root-RAID need explicit permission to modify
Bug#342916: doc-linux-text: [NONFREE-DOC] includes non-free documentation
Changed Bug title.


End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processed: cloning 335220, severity of -1 is important, retitle -1 to DNS-HOWTO license should be clarified

2005-12-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.9
 clone 335220 -1
Bug#335220: doc-linux-text: [NONFREE-DOC] includes non-free documentation
Bug 335220 cloned as bug 342917.

 severity -1 important
Bug#342917: doc-linux-text: [NONFREE-DOC] includes non-free documentation
Severity set to `important'.

 retitle -1 DNS-HOWTO license should be clarified
Bug#342917: doc-linux-text: [NONFREE-DOC] includes non-free documentation
Changed Bug title.


End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#342879: make: new version breaks cdbs

2005-12-11 Thread Aurelien Jarno

Manoj Srivastava a écrit :

Hi,

You know, as good bug reports go, this one is pretty
 deficient; there is no useful information to go on, and the package
 in question is not a small, self contained one to ease debugging, and
 no effort has been made to dig deeper. I expected better from a
 fellow developer.



Well the fact is that I know nothing about CDBS, and I am not an user of 
it (I don't like it). I found the bug while trying to debug some 
packages that have FTBFS on sparc.


Aurelien

--
  .''`.  Aurelien Jarno | GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
 : :' :  Debian developer   | Electrical Engineer
 `. `'   [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   `-people.debian.org/~aurel32 | www.aurel32.net


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#342879: make: new version breaks cdbs

2005-12-11 Thread Loïc Minier
tags 342879 + confirmed
block 342892 by 342879
retile 342892 Make regression: all CDBS packages FTBFS, see #342879
thanks

Hi,

 Attached is a sample Makefile which used to work in previous versions
 of make.

   Bye,
-- 
Loïc Minier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
default: bar/foo

$(patsubst %,bar/%,foo) :: bar/% : baz/%

baz/foo:
@echo in baz

.PHONY: $(patsubst %,bar/%,foo)



Processed: Re: make: new version breaks cdbs

2005-12-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 tags 342879 + confirmed
Bug#342879: make: new version breaks cdbs
There were no tags set.
Tags added: confirmed

 block 342892 by 342879
Bug#342892: Incompatible with make 3.80+3.81.b3-1
Was not blocked by any bugs.
Blocking bugs added: 342879

 retile 342892 Make regression: all CDBS packages FTBFS, see #342879
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.

 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processed: cloning 335220, reassign -1 to doc-linux-nonfree, severity of -1 is important ...

2005-12-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.9
 clone 335220 -1
Bug#335220: doc-linux-text: [NONFREE-DOC] includes non-free documentation
Bug 335220 cloned as bug 342921.

 reassign -1 doc-linux-nonfree
Bug#342921: doc-linux-text: [NONFREE-DOC] includes non-free documentation
Bug reassigned from package `doc-linux' to `doc-linux-nonfree'.

 severity -1 important
Bug#342921: doc-linux-text: [NONFREE-DOC] includes non-free documentation
Severity set to `important'.

 retitle -1 HOWTOs with old-style ESR license need license clarification
Bug#342921: doc-linux-text: [NONFREE-DOC] includes non-free documentation
Changed Bug title.


End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processed: cloning 335220, severity of -1 is important, retitle -1 to German-HOWTO license should be clarified

2005-12-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.9
 clone 335220 -1
Bug#335220: doc-linux-text: [NONFREE-DOC] includes non-free documentation
Bug 335220 cloned as bug 342922.

 severity -1 important
Bug#342922: doc-linux-text: [NONFREE-DOC] includes non-free documentation
Severity set to `important'.

 retitle -1 German-HOWTO license should be clarified
Bug#342922: doc-linux-text: [NONFREE-DOC] includes non-free documentation
Changed Bug title.


End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processed: cloning 335220, reassign -1 to doc-linux-nonfree, severity of -1 is important ...

2005-12-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.9
 clone 335220 -1
Bug#335220: doc-linux-text: [NONFREE-DOC] includes non-free documentation
Bug 335220 cloned as bug 342928.

 reassign -1 doc-linux-nonfree
Bug#342928: doc-linux-text: [NONFREE-DOC] includes non-free documentation
Bug reassigned from package `doc-linux' to `doc-linux-nonfree'.

 severity -1 important
Bug#342928: doc-linux-text: [NONFREE-DOC] includes non-free documentation
Severity set to `important'.

 retitle -1 Oracle-7-HOWTO needs explicit permission to modify
Bug#342928: doc-linux-text: [NONFREE-DOC] includes non-free documentation
Changed Bug title.


End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#338813: marked as done (mp32ogg: Destroys MP4 movies!)

2005-12-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 11 Dec 2005 09:47:30 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#338813: fixed in mp32ogg 0.11-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Nov 2005 01:28:51 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Nov 12 17:28:51 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from smtp-1.vancouver.ipapp.com ([216.152.192.190])
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1Eb6fq-ss-TY
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 12 Nov 2005 17:28:50 -0800
Received: from debian-sbernier ([64.11.26.235]) by smtp-1.vancouver.ipapp.com ; 
Sat, 12 Nov 2005 17:28:48 -0800
Received: from sbernier by debian-sbernier with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1Eb6jc-0001Rv-00; Sat, 12 Nov 2005 20:32:44 -0500
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Sylvain Bernier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: mp32ogg: Destroys MP4 movies!
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.17
Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2005 20:32:43 -0500
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: Sylvain Bernier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Country: US
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.4 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS,
FROM_HAS_ULINE_NUMS,HAS_PACKAGE,RCVD_IN_SORBS autolearn=no 
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: mp32ogg
Version: 0.11-5
Severity: critical
Justification: causes serious data loss

I had a directory full of Real Media videos (.rm), Quick Time movies 
(.mov), MPEG-4 movies (.mp4) and MPEG Layer 3 audio files (.mp3).

I asked for a conversion of that directory in Ogg Vorbis files. 
Unfortunatly, I also used the --delete option because I never had any 
problem with mp32ogg before.

Well... mp32ogg converted my MPEG-4 movies to audio Ogg Vorbis files. 
Well... No more pictures, no more sound, only noise. The movies are 
unrecoverable. You understand the problem.

Well, I don't know how mp32ogg recognize mp3 files. But it should not 
convert MPEG-4 movies (.mp4).

If the scripts looks for *.mp?, it should be documented. Thanks.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.4.27-2-k7-smp
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1) (ignored: LC_ALL set to 
en_US.ISO-8859-1)

Versions of packages mp32ogg depends on:
ii  libmp3-info-perl  1.13-1 Perl MP3::Info - Manipulate / fetc
ii  libstring-shellquote-perl 1.03-1 quote strings for passing through 
ii  mpg3210.2.10.3   A Free command-line mp3 player, co
hi  perl  5.8.7-6Larry Wall's Practical Extraction 
hi  vorbis-tools  1.0.1-1.4  Several Ogg Vorbis Tools

mp32ogg recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information

---
Received: (at 338813-close) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Dec 2005 17:52:03 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Dec 11 09:52:03 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1ElVII-0002sD-7p; Sun, 11 Dec 2005 09:47:30 -0800
From: Julien Danjou [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.60 $
Subject: Bug#338813: fixed in mp32ogg 0.11-6
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2005 09:47:30 -0800
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Source: mp32ogg
Source-Version: 0.11-6

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
mp32ogg, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

mp32ogg_0.11-6.dsc
  to pool/main/m/mp32ogg/mp32ogg_0.11-6.dsc
mp32ogg_0.11-6.tar.gz
  to pool/main/m/mp32ogg/mp32ogg_0.11-6.tar.gz
mp32ogg_0.11-6_all.deb
  to pool/main/m/mp32ogg/mp32ogg_0.11-6_all.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and 

Bug#341542: perl: Still vulnerable...

2005-12-11 Thread Gisle Aas
Brendan O'Dea [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 You're causing a SEGV by attempting to address a non-existant argument
 to printf.  You don't need a large number to do this--the same happens
 with:
 
   perl -e 'printf q/%1$vs/'

This was because %vs by itself did strange things.  Same with %vc,
%vn, and even %v%'. Fixed by change 26321.

--Gisle


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#341945: Success story of dh-buildinfo!

2005-12-11 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi,

By accident (I was bitten by this bug as well, being a fan of debtags),
I noticed this[1] comment of a succesful use of dh-buildinfo.

Thanks for a neat little tool!


 - Jonas


[1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=341945;msg=31;att=0
- -- 
* Jonas Smedegaard - idealist og Internet-arkitekt
* Tlf.: +45 40843136  Website: http://dr.jones.dk/

 - Enden er nær: http://www.shibumi.org/eoti.htm
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDnHAXn7DbMsAkQLgRAjiKAKCRGfrE9t/4kVuDYFpsZ/NrcUPlCQCcDNY4
p8AZncU5EdGF7c5GlJGC9Xo=
=uA51
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



Processed: block 342870 with 342879

2005-12-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.9
 block 342870 with 342879
Bug#342870: licq contains dev headers from licq-dev
Was not blocked by any bugs.
Blocking bugs added: 342879


End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processed: Re: [Build-common-hackers] Processed: Re: make: new version breaks cdbs

2005-12-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 retitle 342892 Make regression: all CDBS packages FTBFS, see #342879
Bug#342892: Incompatible with make 3.80+3.81.b3-1
Changed Bug title.

 stop
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#325678: marked as done (svnmailer: FTBFS: cannot stat `debian/svnmailer.conf.example': No such file or directory)

2005-12-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 11 Dec 2005 10:32:14 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#325678: fixed in svnmailer 1.0.5-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Aug 2005 08:03:43 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Aug 30 01:03:43 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from c147112.adsl.hansenet.de (localhost.localdomain) 
[213.39.147.112] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EA15r-iC-00; Tue, 30 Aug 2005 01:03:43 -0700
Received: from aj by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.52)
id 1EA15l-0001zB-1p; Tue, 30 Aug 2005 10:03:39 +0200
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Andreas Jochens [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: svnmailer: FTBFS: cannot stat `debian/svnmailer.conf.example': No such 
file or directory
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2005 10:03:37 +0200
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: svnmailer
Version: 1.0.5-1
Severity: serious
Tags: patch

When building 'svnmailer' on unstable,
I get the following error:

dh_installexamples
cp: cannot stat `debian/svnmailer.conf.example': No such file or directory
dh_installexamples: command returned error code 256
make: *** [binary-arch] Error 1

With the attached patch 'svnmailer' can be built on unstable.

Regards
Andreas Jochens

diff -urN ../tmp-orig/svnmailer-1.0.5/debian/rules ./debian/rules
--- ../tmp-orig/svnmailer-1.0.5/debian/rules2005-08-30 07:46:08.0 
+
+++ ./debian/rules  2005-08-30 07:45:48.0 +
@@ -67,7 +67,7 @@
dh_testroot
dh_installchangelogs CHANGES
dh_installdocs
-   dh_installexamples
+#  dh_installexamples
dh_link
dh_strip
dh_compress

---
Received: (at 325678-close) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Dec 2005 18:41:18 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Dec 11 10:41:18 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1ElVza-0003sq-If; Sun, 11 Dec 2005 10:32:14 -0800
From: Julien Danjou [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.60 $
Subject: Bug#325678: fixed in svnmailer 1.0.5-3
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2005 10:32:14 -0800
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Source: svnmailer
Source-Version: 1.0.5-3

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
svnmailer, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

svnmailer_1.0.5-3.diff.gz
  to pool/main/s/svnmailer/svnmailer_1.0.5-3.diff.gz
svnmailer_1.0.5-3.dsc
  to pool/main/s/svnmailer/svnmailer_1.0.5-3.dsc
svnmailer_1.0.5-3_all.deb
  to pool/main/s/svnmailer/svnmailer_1.0.5-3_all.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Julien Danjou [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated svnmailer package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2005 18:54:17 +0100
Source: svnmailer
Binary: svnmailer
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.0.5-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Julien Danjou [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Julien Danjou [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description: 
 svnmailer  - an extensible subversion commit notification tool
Closes: 325678
Changes: 
 svnmailer (1.0.5-3) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Fix this FTBFS again (Closes: #325678)
Files: 
 2b2655844a2c803e6ba3a80968250d86 646 utils optional svnmailer_1.0.5-3.dsc
 950fbdc0cf1a443281eeb0d8195c0afe 63533 utils 

Bug#341675: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: cppunit: FTBFS on hppa]

2005-12-11 Thread Daniel Kobras
On Sat, Dec 03, 2005 at 01:59:18PM -0500, Christopher Martin wrote:
 This is probably related to qt-x11-free's FTBFS on hppa.
 
 Our build fails like this:
  /build/buildd/qt-x11-free-3.3.5/bin/uic 
 -L /build/buildd/qt-x11-free-3.3.5/plugins pixmapfunction.ui -o 
 pixmapfunction.h
  make[4]: *** [pixmapfunction.h] Illegal instruction
 
 ...which looks like what you're experiencing. According to lamont, this is a 
 glibc issue (which was thought fixed by building glibc with gcc-3.4 instead 
 of gcc-4.0, but apparently wasn't). See 
 http://lists.debian.org/debian-glibc/2005/12/msg2.html. No reaction 
 from the glibc team thus far.

While I fail to see an immediate connection between glibc bug #326581
that caused uic to bus error, and the illegal instruction in libgcc2's
__umoddi3(), I'm also aware of my complete ignorance of hppa
peculiarities and resist the temptation to put blame on gcc-4.0 or
binutils for this bug. ;-)

Anyway, I while trying to debug why uic fails on some files but works
fine with others, I noticed that a test .ui file with

!DOCTYPE UIUI version=3.0/UI

compiles just fine with uic on paer. Anything with a version less than
3.0, or no version identifier at all leads to a SIGILL. So if you're in
dire need to work around this bug, upgrading .ui files to a later
version might be an option.

Regards,

Daniel.



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#342879: Possible broken rule

2005-12-11 Thread Ken Bloom
is it possible that the broken rule is in
/usr/share/cdbs/1/rules/debhelper.mk?

I see a bunch of rules that look like this:
$(patsubst %,install/%,$(DEB_ALL_PACKAGES)) :: install/%:
dh_installdirs -p$(cdbs_curpkg) $(DEB_INSTALL_DIRS_$(cdbs_curpkg))

These kinds of rules look like good candidates to interact badly with
the new second expansion. And this rule that I have posted is
consistent with people's failures right after CDBS runs dh_installdirs.

Not that I have any clue what's going on or how to fix it, but I bet a
bazillion DD's are subscribing to this bug, so maybe somone else who
reads it would have an idea.

--Ken Bloom

-- 
I usually have a GPG digital signature included as an attachment.
See http://www.gnupg.org/ for info about these digital signatures.


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#335220: marked as done (doc-linux-text: [NONFREE-DOC] includes non-free documentation)

2005-12-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
 similar to the GFDL
ones, even if they grant minor exceptions for translations...).
This fails DFSG#3.

Please note that the second invariant section (``GNU General Public
License''), is the text of the GNU GPL license, but it's not
(one of) the license(s) the document may be distributed under.
Its inclusion as unmodifiable and unremovable section makes the
document non-free.
The first invariant section (``Distribution'') is instead a sort of
essay about teTeX's license or something.

I suggest trying to persuade upstream to relicense under the GNU GPL v2,
since he seems to want a copyleft license and clearly wants the GPLv2
text to accompany the document (if the document itself is licensed
under the GPLv2, any redistributor must accompany it with the GPLv2
text!).
Obviously section ``Distribution'' should be removed or made modifiable.





-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.31
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1)

-- no debconf information

---
Received: (at 335220-close) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Dec 2005 19:21:08 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Dec 11 11:21:08 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1ElWh3-0003ed-4R; Sun, 11 Dec 2005 11:17:09 -0800
From: Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.60 $
Subject: Bug#335220: fixed in doc-linux 2005.12-1
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2005 11:17:09 -0800
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Source: doc-linux
Source-Version: 2005.12-1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
doc-linux, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

doc-linux-html_2005.12-1_all.deb
  to pool/main/d/doc-linux/doc-linux-html_2005.12-1_all.deb
doc-linux-text_2005.12-1_all.deb
  to pool/main/d/doc-linux/doc-linux-text_2005.12-1_all.deb
doc-linux_2005.12-1.diff.gz
  to pool/main/d/doc-linux/doc-linux_2005.12-1.diff.gz
doc-linux_2005.12-1.dsc
  to pool/main/d/doc-linux/doc-linux_2005.12-1.dsc
doc-linux_2005.12.orig.tar.gz
  to pool/main/d/doc-linux/doc-linux_2005.12.orig.tar.gz



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated doc-linux package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2005 19:04:15 +0100
Source: doc-linux
Binary: doc-linux-text doc-linux-html
Architecture: source all
Version: 2005.12-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian LDP Maintainers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description: 
 doc-linux-html - Linux HOWTOs and FAQs in HTML format
 doc-linux-text - Linux HOWTOs and FAQs in ASCII format
Closes: 335220
Changes: 
 doc-linux (2005.12-1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * new upstream release (20051211)
   * Updated HOWTOs:
 DB2-HOWTO FBB Font-HOWTO Howtos-with-LinuxDoc
 IP-Masquerade-HOWTO LILO Leased-Line
 Linksys-Blue-Box-Router-HOWTO Linux+WinNT
 Linux-Complete-Backup-and-Recovery-HOWTO
 Quake-HOWTO TimePrecision-HOWTO
   * All above mentioned HOWTOs are free, except for the DB2-HOWTO
   * Francesco Poli did a license audit for the free
 HOWTOs and pointed out some ambigous stuff which
 needs to be sorted out with the respective authors:
 + Moved Boot+Root+Raid+LILO and Root-RAID to
   non-free until their license contains explicit
   permission to modify
 + Moved the HOWTOs under the old-style ESR license
   (Installation-HOWTO, Oracle-8-HOWTO, Reading-List-HOWTO,
   Wacom-USB-mini-HOWTO) to non-free for similar reasons
 + Same for Oracle-7-HOWTO, NCD-X-Terminal and TT-XFree86
   which probably derived their license come from an old,
   misleading LDP template
 + Some of the arguments against the CC Attribution
   licenses also apply to CC-SA 1.0. Move K7s5a-HOWTO
   to non-free
 + The TeTeX-HOWTO tries to introduce invariant sections
   and includes the GPL for other purposes than its own
   license text. Seems to be clearly non-free. Moved.
 + All other HOWTOs mentioned in the bug report will remain
   in main even though they still

Bug#342879: The broken rule

2005-12-11 Thread Ken Bloom
My last message was wrong about the broken rule. It's the following
rule from /usr/share/cdbs/1/rules/buildcore.mk:

# These rules should do all the work of actually creating a .deb from the 
staging
# directory.
$(patsubst %,binary/%,$(DEB_ARCH_PACKAGES)) :: binary/% : testdir testroot 
common-binary-arch install/% 
$(patsubst %,binary/%,$(DEB_INDEP_PACKAGES)) :: binary/% : testdir testroot 
common-binary-indep install/% 

I've attached a minimal makefile which demonstrates the problem.

Expected result (run on a make 3.80)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ make list/a
install...
list...

Debian/sid result (run on make 3.81)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ make list/a
make: *** No rule to make target `install', needed by `list/a'.  Stop.

I'm not sure how to fix the offending rule.

--Ken Bloom

-- 
I usually have a GPG digital signature included as an attachment.
See http://www.gnupg.org/ for info about these digital signatures.
LIST=a 
$(patsubst %,install/%,$(LIST)): 
@echo install...
$(patsubst %,list/%,$(LIST)):: list/%: install/%
@echo list...


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#342939: FTBFS: Hardcoded -march=pentium

2005-12-11 Thread Falk Hueffner
Package: toolame
Version: 02l-1
Severity: serious
Justification: no longer builds from source

toolame fails to build on almost all architectures:

make[1]: Entering directory `/tmp/toolame-02l'
gcc -O3 -DNDEBUG -DINLINE=inline -march=pentium -fomit-frame-pointer  -Wall 
-DNEWENCODE -DNEWATAN -c common.c -o common.o
cc1: error: invalid option 'arch=pentium'
make[1]: *** [common.o] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/toolame-02l'

This option also mustn't be present on i386, since it breaks the
program on 486 class machines, which we still support.

Falk


-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: alpha
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.13.2
Locale: LANG=C, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15)

Versions of packages toolame depends on:
ii  libc6.1   2.3.5-8.1  GNU C Library: Shared libraries an

toolame recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processed: Re: Bug#342936: Bug detected in: k3b on testing dist

2005-12-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 severity 342936 grave
Bug#342936: Bug detected in: k3b  on testing dist
Severity set to `grave'.

 close 342936
Bug#342936: Bug detected in: k3b  on testing dist
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug closed, send any further explanations to LukeC [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 merge 342936 337755
Bug#337755: Unable to install k3b
Bug#342936: Bug detected in: k3b  on testing dist
Bug#338616: k3b: fails to install on debian testing using apt-get
Merged 337755 338616 342936.

 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#337735: OOo Quickstarter (for KDE)

2005-12-11 Thread Rene Engelhard
Matej Cepl wrote:
 On Sat 10. December 2005 16:47, Matej Cepl wrote:
  I am not sure, whether it is correct, but when applied patch
  from http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=47835, I
  was able to create new version of package which seems to work.
 
 Correction, no it doesn't work (it runs, but I cannot open file 
 or create new one). It would be resolution of bug# 337735, but 
 unfortunately it isn't.

I'll look at it. The GNOME one was my priority (as I use GNOME ;) ).
For what I did see
http://lists.debian.org/debian-openoffice/2005/12/msg00083.html

Of course, if there's a new upstream release it would be easier :-)

Regards,

Rene



signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Processed: aargh wrong bug

2005-12-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 unblock 338460 with 339688
Bug#338460: rfb: Uninstallable due to libxclass0 - libxclass0c2
Was blocked by: 339688
Blocking bugs removed: 339688

 block 339259 with 339688
Bug#339259: library package needs to be renamed (libstdc++ allocator change)
Was not blocked by any bugs.
Blocking bugs added: 339688

 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#341514: libc6-sparc64: All 64-bit binaries fail to execute.

2005-12-11 Thread Clint Adams
 There are some critical things missing in the sparc64 TLS support code
 in the current debian glibc tree, for example none of the TLS
 relcation support is in sysdeps/sparc/sparc64/dl-machine.h, and
 therefore so no binary linked against 64-bit libc can execute.
 
 Not even /lib64/libc.so.6 --version will work, it will fail
 because the dynamic linker doesn't understand the TLS relocations
 present in the /libc64/libc.so.64 binary.

Replacing Aurelien's patch with this one fixes the
/lib64/libc.so.6: error while loading shared libraries: unexpected reloc type 
0x4f
problem, and /lib64/libc.so.6 --version works fine.

However, 64-bit binaries segfault.
#! /bin/sh -e

# DP: TLS code for sparc64, taken from CVS

if [ $# -ne 2 ]; then
echo 2 `basename $0`: script expects -patch|-unpatch as argument
exit 1
fi
case $1 in
-patch) patch -d $2 -f --no-backup-if-mismatch -p1  $0;;
-unpatch) patch -d $2 -f --no-backup-if-mismatch -R -p1  $0;;
*)
echo 2 `basename $0`: script expects -patch|-unpatch as argument
exit 1
esac
exit 0

--- glibc-2.3.5.orig/elf/tls-macros.h   2005-11-12 03:47:57.0 +0100
+++ glibc-2.3.5/elf/tls-macros.h2005-11-12 03:56:01.0 +0100
@@ -440,6 +440,74 @@
o5, o7, cc);\
  __o0; })
 
+#elif defined __sparc__  defined __arch64__
+
+# define TLS_LE(x) \
+  ({ int *__l;   \
+ asm (sethi %%tle_hix22( #x ), %0 : =r (__l)); \
+ asm (xor %1, %%tle_lox10( #x ), %0 : =r (__l) : r (__l));   \
+ asm (add %%g7, %1, %0 : =r (__l) : r (__l));
  \
+ __l; })
+
+# ifdef __PIC__
+#  define TLS_LOAD_PIC \
+  ({ long pc, got;   \
+ asm (sethi %%hi(_GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_-4), %1\n\t
  \
+ rd %%pc, %0\n\t   \
+ add %1, %%lo(_GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_+4), %1\n\t \
+ add %1, %0, %1\n\t\
+ : =r (pc), =r (got));   \
+ got; })
+# else
+#  define TLS_LOAD_PIC \
+   ({ long got;
  \
+  asm (.hidden _GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_\n\t   \
+  sethi %%hi(_GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_), %0\n\t\
+  or %0, %%lo(_GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_), %0   \
+  : =r (got)); \
+  got; })
+# endif
+
+# define TLS_IE(x) \
+  ({ int *__l;   \
+ asm (sethi %%tie_hi22( #x ), %0 : =r (__l));
  \
+ asm (add %1, %%tie_lo10( #x ), %0 : =r (__l) : r (__l));\
+ asm (ldx [%1 + %2], %0, %%tie_ldx( #x ) \
+ : =r (__l) : r (TLS_LOAD_PIC), r (__l));  \
+ asm (add %%g7, %1, %0, %%tie_add( #x ) : =r (__l) : r (__l));\
+ __l; })
+
+# define TLS_LD(x) \
+  ({ int *__l; register void *__o0 asm (%o0);
  \
+ long __o;   \
+ asm (sethi %%tldm_hi22( #x ), %0 : =r (__l)); \
+ asm (add %1, %%tldm_lo10( #x ), %0 : =r (__l) : r (__l));   \
+ asm (add %1, %2, %0, %%tldm_add( #x )   \
+ : =r (__o0) : r (TLS_LOAD_PIC), r (__l)); \
+ asm (call __tls_get_addr, %%tgd_call( #x )\n\t
  \
+  nop  \
+ : =r (__o0) : 0 (__o0)  \
+ : g1, g2, g3, g4, g5, g6, o1, o2, o3, o4,   \
+   o5, o7, cc);\
+ asm (sethi %%tldo_hix22( #x ), %0 : =r (__o));\
+ asm (xor %1, %%tldo_lox10( #x ), %0 : =r (__o) : r (__o));
  \
+ asm (add %1, %2, %0, %%tldo_add( #x ) : =r (__l)  \
+ : r (__o0), r (__o));   \
+ __l; })
+
+# define TLS_GD(x) \
+  ({ int *__l; register void *__o0 asm (%o0);
  \
+ asm (sethi %%tgd_hi22( #x ), %0 : =r (__l));
  \
+ asm (add %1, %%tgd_lo10( #x ), %0 : =r (__l) : r (__l));\
+ asm (add %1, %2, %0, %%tgd_add( #x )\
+ : =r (__o0) : r (TLS_LOAD_PIC), r (__l)); \
+ asm (call __tls_get_addr, %%tgd_call( #x )\n\t
  \
+  nop  \
+ : =r (__o0) 

Processed: Fixed in NMU of wftk 0.7.1-7.1

2005-12-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 tag 339278 + fixed
Bug#339278: library package needs to be renamed (libstdc++ allocator change)
Tags were: patch
Tags added: fixed

 quit
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#337524: marked as done (Cannot Install: libogre)

2005-12-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 11 Dec 2005 14:55:30 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#337524: fixed in ogre 1.0.6-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Nov 2005 18:06:07 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Nov 04 10:06:07 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from zproxy.gmail.com [64.233.162.194] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EY5x1-0003hQ-00; Fri, 04 Nov 2005 10:06:07 -0800
Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id n29so360844nzf
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 04 Nov 2005 10:06:06 -0800 (PST)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
s=beta; d=gmail.com;

h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition;

b=RuoMELvRuitpiJD+BkZ1FdT8dK9jihi4NH+zJdkBZ+EwX1hO8zWVGbbau9BmM62FmgaiLtAAf+IPt9CzBWOuXof4i1l9ZyTbN0H0GY9AUyoCC7NxX5fyJCKXvOdG8OtwPRDxEHxA+FvCs9fsfzLogk4F7M3kdVaISDK9MNuHsEI=
Received: by 10.36.153.7 with SMTP id a7mr868486nze;
Fri, 04 Nov 2005 10:06:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.37.2.17 with HTTP; Fri, 4 Nov 2005 10:06:06 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2005 23:36:06 +0530
From: Suman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Cannot Install: libogre
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Subject: libogre: fails to install because of Package dependency
Package: libogre
Version: libogre-dev
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable

*** Please type your report below this line ***

I am unable to install ogre on my machine(debian unstable) because i
am getting a package
dependency issue.It appears that the present version of libogre-dev
depends on an onl version of libopenexr-dev. This package cannot be
downgraded because almost all the kde applications depend on it.

When i perform an apt-get install libogre-dev i get the following error:

The following packages have unmet dependencies:
  libogre-dev: Depends: libogre5 (=3D 1.0.5-1) but it is not going to be
  installed
  Depends: libopenexr-dev but it is not going to be installed
E: Broken packages

Also, when i do a complete install of all the ogre files including
dependencies saying:

apt-get install libogre-dev libcegui-mk2-dev libcegui-mk2-doc ogre-doc
ogre-tools ogre-plugins-cgprogrammanager  blender-ogrexml

  ogre-plugins-cgprogrammanager: Depends: libdevil1 but it is not
  installable
   Depends: libogre5 but it is not going to be installed
   ogre-tools: Depends: libogre5 but it is not going to be installed

Also, creating a highlevel virtual package which installs ogre
completely will be much better than the present system because there are
lots of variations of what needs to be installed on the ogre forums. I
have posted this on the forum but not much attention has been given to
the issue.

-Suman

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.11-1-686
Locale: LANG=3Den_US, LC_CTYPE=3Den_US (charmap=3DISO-8859-1)

---
Received: (at 337524-close) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Dec 2005 23:01:53 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Dec 11 15:01:53 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from joerg by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1Ela6M-Xt-Cn; Sun, 11 Dec 2005 14:55:30 -0800
From: Federico Di Gregorio [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: lisa $Revision: 1.31 $
Subject: Bug#337524: fixed in ogre 1.0.6-1
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: Joerg Jaspert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2005 14:55:30 -0800
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Source: ogre
Source-Version: 1.0.6-1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version 

Bug#339217: marked as done (library package needs to be renamed (libstdc++ allocator change))

2005-12-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 11 Dec 2005 14:59:55 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#339217: fixed in libprinterconf 0.5-8
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Nov 2005 06:56:32 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Nov 14 22:56:32 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de ([130.149.17.13] ident=root)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1Ebuk4-00071N-6i
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 14 Nov 2005 22:56:32 -0800
Received: from mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [130.149.17.13])
by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3p2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id HAA25407
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 15 Nov 2005 07:56:30 +0100 (MET)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 327B0F212
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 15 Nov 2005 07:56:30 +0100 (MET)
Received: from mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (bueno [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10224) with ESMTP
 id 01084-21 for [EMAIL PROTECTED];
 Tue, 15 Nov 2005 07:56:29 +0100 (MET) 13909
Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.19.1])
by mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de (Postfix) with ESMTP
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 15 Nov 2005 07:56:29 +0100 (MET)
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.8/Submit) id jAF6uTnN009053
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 15 Nov 2005 07:56:29 +0100 (MET)
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2005 07:56:29 +0100 (MET)
From: Matthias Klose [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: library package needs to be renamed (libstdc++ allocator change)
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at cs.tu-berlin.de
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: libprinterconf
Severity: important

Please do not take any action before reading
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/11/msg00010.html

This bug report is filed against the source package which builds
a library depending on libstdc++6 and defining or referencing
*mt_alloc* symbols.  The package has to be rebuilt with either
g++-4.0_4.0.2-4 or g++-3.4_3.4.4-10 (or newer).  Please rename the
library package to a name with a c2a suffix, and adjust the build
dependencies if dependencies on another renamed library do exist.

Do *not* yet upload the package, but wait for a followup mail to this
bug report.

If this bug report is for some reason invalid, please close it with
a short reasoning.

---
Received: (at 339217-close) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Dec 2005 23:02:31 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Dec 11 15:02:31 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from joerg by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1ElaAd-0001HD-HN; Sun, 11 Dec 2005 14:59:55 -0800
From: A Mennucc1 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: lisa $Revision: 1.31 $
Subject: Bug#339217: fixed in libprinterconf 0.5-8
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: Joerg Jaspert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2005 14:59:55 -0800
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Source: libprinterconf
Source-Version: 0.5-8

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
libprinterconf, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

libprinterconf-dev_0.5-8_i386.deb
  to pool/main/libp/libprinterconf/libprinterconf-dev_0.5-8_i386.deb
libprinterconf0c2a_0.5-8_i386.deb
  to pool/main/libp/libprinterconf/libprinterconf0c2a_0.5-8_i386.deb
libprinterconf_0.5-8.diff.gz
  to pool/main/libp/libprinterconf/libprinterconf_0.5-8.diff.gz
libprinterconf_0.5-8.dsc
  to pool/main/libp/libprinterconf/libprinterconf_0.5-8.dsc
pconf-detect_0.5-8_i386.deb
  to pool/main/libp/libprinterconf/pconf-detect_0.5-8_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further 

Bug#339156: marked as done (library package needs to be renamed (libstdc++ allocator change))

2005-12-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 11 Dec 2005 14:55:11 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#339156: fixed in cegui-mk2 0.4.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Nov 2005 06:55:31 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Nov 14 22:55:31 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de ([130.149.17.13] ident=root)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1Ebuj4-0006lV-KR
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 14 Nov 2005 22:55:31 -0800
Received: from mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [130.149.17.13])
by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3p2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id HAA25042
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 15 Nov 2005 07:55:28 +0100 (MET)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93543F212
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 15 Nov 2005 07:55:28 +0100 (MET)
Received: from mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (bueno [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10224) with ESMTP
 id 01425-15 for [EMAIL PROTECTED];
 Tue, 15 Nov 2005 07:55:28 +0100 (MET) 13909
Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.19.1])
by mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de (Postfix) with ESMTP
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 15 Nov 2005 07:55:28 +0100 (MET)
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.8/Submit) id jAF6tSTR008738
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 15 Nov 2005 07:55:28 +0100 (MET)
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2005 07:55:28 +0100 (MET)
From: Matthias Klose [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: library package needs to be renamed (libstdc++ allocator change)
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at cs.tu-berlin.de
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: cegui-mk2
Severity: important

Please do not take any action before reading
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/11/msg00010.html

This bug report is filed against the source package which builds
a library depending on libstdc++6 and defining or referencing
*mt_alloc* symbols.  The package has to be rebuilt with either
g++-4.0_4.0.2-4 or g++-3.4_3.4.4-10 (or newer).  Please rename the
library package to a name with a c2a suffix, and adjust the build
dependencies if dependencies on another renamed library do exist.

Do *not* yet upload the package, but wait for a followup mail to this
bug report.

If this bug report is for some reason invalid, please close it with
a short reasoning.

---
Received: (at 339156-close) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Dec 2005 23:02:11 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Dec 11 15:02:10 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from joerg by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1Ela63-UM-7o; Sun, 11 Dec 2005 14:55:11 -0800
From: Federico Di Gregorio [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: lisa $Revision: 1.31 $
Subject: Bug#339156: fixed in cegui-mk2 0.4.1-1
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: Joerg Jaspert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2005 14:55:11 -0800
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Source: cegui-mk2
Source-Version: 0.4.1-1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
cegui-mk2, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

cegui-mk2_0.4.1-1.diff.gz
  to pool/main/c/cegui-mk2/cegui-mk2_0.4.1-1.diff.gz
cegui-mk2_0.4.1-1.dsc
  to pool/main/c/cegui-mk2/cegui-mk2_0.4.1-1.dsc
cegui-mk2_0.4.1.orig.tar.gz
  to pool/main/c/cegui-mk2/cegui-mk2_0.4.1.orig.tar.gz
libcegui-mk2-0c2a-dbg_0.4.1-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/c/cegui-mk2/libcegui-mk2-0c2a-dbg_0.4.1-1_i386.deb
libcegui-mk2-0c2a_0.4.1-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/c/cegui-mk2/libcegui-mk2-0c2a_0.4.1-1_i386.deb
libcegui-mk2-dev_0.4.1-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/c/cegui-mk2/libcegui-mk2-dev_0.4.1-1_i386.deb
libcegui-mk2-doc_0.4.1-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/c/cegui-mk2/libcegui-mk2-doc_0.4.1-1_i386.deb



A summary of the changes 

Bug#339235: marked as done (library package needs to be renamed (libstdc++ allocator change))

2005-12-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 11 Dec 2005 14:55:30 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#339235: fixed in ogre 1.0.6-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Nov 2005 06:56:50 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Nov 14 22:56:50 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de ([130.149.17.13] ident=root)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1EbukM-00076L-CS
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 14 Nov 2005 22:56:50 -0800
Received: from mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [130.149.17.13])
by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3p2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id HAA25509
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 15 Nov 2005 07:56:48 +0100 (MET)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C778F212
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 15 Nov 2005 07:56:48 +0100 (MET)
Received: from mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (bueno [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10224) with ESMTP
 id 29850-25 for [EMAIL PROTECTED];
 Tue, 15 Nov 2005 07:56:48 +0100 (MET) 13925
Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.19.1])
by mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de (Postfix) with ESMTP
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 15 Nov 2005 07:56:48 +0100 (MET)
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.8/Submit) id jAF6ulXf009132
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 15 Nov 2005 07:56:47 +0100 (MET)
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2005 07:56:47 +0100 (MET)
From: Matthias Klose [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: library package needs to be renamed (libstdc++ allocator change)
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at cs.tu-berlin.de
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: ogre
Severity: important

Please do not take any action before reading
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/11/msg00010.html

This bug report is filed against the source package which builds
a library depending on libstdc++6 and defining or referencing
*mt_alloc* symbols.  The package has to be rebuilt with either
g++-4.0_4.0.2-4 or g++-3.4_3.4.4-10 (or newer).  Please rename the
library package to a name with a c2a suffix, and adjust the build
dependencies if dependencies on another renamed library do exist.

Do *not* yet upload the package, but wait for a followup mail to this
bug report.

If this bug report is for some reason invalid, please close it with
a short reasoning.

---
Received: (at 339235-close) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Dec 2005 23:01:53 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Dec 11 15:01:53 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from joerg by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1Ela6M-Xv-De; Sun, 11 Dec 2005 14:55:30 -0800
From: Federico Di Gregorio [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: lisa $Revision: 1.31 $
Subject: Bug#339235: fixed in ogre 1.0.6-1
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: Joerg Jaspert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2005 14:55:30 -0800
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Source: ogre
Source-Version: 1.0.6-1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
ogre, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

blender-ogrexml_1.0.6-1_all.deb
  to pool/main/o/ogre/blender-ogrexml_1.0.6-1_all.deb
libogre-dev_1.0.6-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/o/ogre/libogre-dev_1.0.6-1_i386.deb
libogre5c2a-dbg_1.0.6-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/o/ogre/libogre5c2a-dbg_1.0.6-1_i386.deb
libogre5c2a_1.0.6-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/o/ogre/libogre5c2a_1.0.6-1_i386.deb
ogre-doc_1.0.6-1_all.deb
  to pool/main/o/ogre/ogre-doc_1.0.6-1_all.deb
ogre-tools_1.0.6-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/o/ogre/ogre-tools_1.0.6-1_i386.deb
ogre_1.0.6-1.diff.gz
  to pool/main/o/ogre/ogre_1.0.6-1.diff.gz
ogre_1.0.6-1.dsc
  to pool/main/o/ogre/ogre_1.0.6-1.dsc
ogre_1.0.6.orig.tar.gz
  to pool/main/o/ogre/ogre_1.0.6.orig.tar.gz



A 

Bug#339222: marked as done (library package needs to be renamed (libstdc++ allocator change))

2005-12-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 11 Dec 2005 14:57:25 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#339222: fixed in libtorrent 0.8.0-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Nov 2005 06:56:37 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Nov 14 22:56:37 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de ([130.149.17.13] ident=root)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1Ebuk9-00072Z-9N
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 14 Nov 2005 22:56:37 -0800
Received: from mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [130.149.17.13])
by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3p2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id HAA25435
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 15 Nov 2005 07:56:35 +0100 (MET)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CD12F212
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 15 Nov 2005 07:56:35 +0100 (MET)
Received: from mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (bueno [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10224) with ESMTP
 id 28909-25 for [EMAIL PROTECTED];
 Tue, 15 Nov 2005 07:56:34 +0100 (MET) 13924
Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.19.1])
by mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de (Postfix) with ESMTP
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 15 Nov 2005 07:56:34 +0100 (MET)
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.8/Submit) id jAF6uYZm009076
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 15 Nov 2005 07:56:34 +0100 (MET)
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2005 07:56:34 +0100 (MET)
From: Matthias Klose [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: library package needs to be renamed (libstdc++ allocator change)
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at cs.tu-berlin.de
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: libtorrent
Severity: important

Please do not take any action before reading
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/11/msg00010.html

This bug report is filed against the source package which builds
a library depending on libstdc++6 and defining or referencing
*mt_alloc* symbols.  The package has to be rebuilt with either
g++-4.0_4.0.2-4 or g++-3.4_3.4.4-10 (or newer).  Please rename the
library package to a name with a c2a suffix, and adjust the build
dependencies if dependencies on another renamed library do exist.

Do *not* yet upload the package, but wait for a followup mail to this
bug report.

If this bug report is for some reason invalid, please close it with
a short reasoning.

---
Received: (at 339222-close) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Dec 2005 23:01:20 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Dec 11 15:01:20 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from joerg by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1Ela8D-uO-7C; Sun, 11 Dec 2005 14:57:25 -0800
From: Qingning Huo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: lisa $Revision: 1.31 $
Subject: Bug#339222: fixed in libtorrent 0.8.0-1
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: Joerg Jaspert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2005 14:57:25 -0800
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Source: libtorrent
Source-Version: 0.8.0-1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
libtorrent, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

libtorrent6-dev_0.8.0-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/libt/libtorrent/libtorrent6-dev_0.8.0-1_i386.deb
libtorrent6_0.8.0-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/libt/libtorrent/libtorrent6_0.8.0-1_i386.deb
libtorrent_0.8.0-1.diff.gz
  to pool/main/libt/libtorrent/libtorrent_0.8.0-1.diff.gz
libtorrent_0.8.0-1.dsc
  to pool/main/libt/libtorrent/libtorrent_0.8.0-1.dsc
libtorrent_0.8.0.orig.tar.gz
  to pool/main/libt/libtorrent/libtorrent_0.8.0.orig.tar.gz



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and 

Bug#342610: marked as done (openoffice.org: update problems 1.1.4-7 - 2.0.0-4)

2005-12-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 11 Dec 2005 15:06:07 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#342610: fixed in openoffice.org 2.0.0-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Dec 2005 22:31:04 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Dec 08 14:31:04 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from mailgate2.urz.uni-halle.de ([141.48.3.8] 
helo=mailgate2.uni-halle.de)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1EkUAz-0005y3-U3
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 08 Dec 2005 14:23:46 -0800
Received: from mserv1.urz.uni-halle.de ([141.48.3.145] helo=mserv1)
 by mailgate2.uni-halle.de with esmtp  (Exim 4.54)
 id 1EkUAx-0004yR-0l ; Thu, 08 Dec 2005 23:23:43 +0100
Received: from conversion-daemon.mail.uni-halle.de by mail.uni-halle.de
 (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.02 (built Oct 21 2004))
 id [EMAIL PROTECTED] (original mail from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
 ; Thu, 08 Dec 2005 23:23:21 +0100 (MET)
Received: from nirvana.informatik.uni-halle.de
 (nirvana.informatik.uni-halle.de [141.48.9.134])
 by mail.uni-halle.de (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.02 (built Oct 21
 2004)) with ESMTP id [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu,
 08 Dec 2005 23:23:21 +0100 (MET)
Received: from palantir.localnet (p54B7BC10.dip.t-dialin.net [84.183.188.16])
(authenticated bits=0)  by nirvana.informatik.uni-halle.de 
(8.13.2/8.13.2)
 with ESMTP id jB8MNHvi028575
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu,
 08 Dec 2005 23:23:19 +0100 (CET)
Received: from gondor.localnet ([10.10.10.100]) by palantir.localnet with esmtp
 (Exim 4.44)id 1EkUAS-OI-9h; Thu, 08 Dec 2005 23:23:12 +0100
Received: from andreas by gondor.localnet with local (Exim 4.54)
id 1EkUAR-0003OB-Q3; Thu, 08 Dec 2005 23:23:11 +0100
Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2005 23:23:11 +0100
From: Andreas Beckmann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: openoffice.org: update problems 1.1.4-7 - 2.0.0-4
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MIME-version: 1.0
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.18
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
X-Scan-Signature: 832086562cf1137ff0359e430bb215b1
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: openoffice.org
Version: 1.1.4-7
Severity: normal


I'm trying to update to openoffice.org from 1.0.4-7 to 2.0.0-4 and get
the following errors:

# apt-get -t unstable install openoffice.org
.
Preparing to replace openoffice.org 1.1.4-7 (using
.../openoffice.org_2.0.0-4_i386.deb) ...
update-xmlcatalog: error: entity not registered
update-xmlcatalog: error: package catalog /etc/xml/openoffice.org.xml
not found
Unpacking replacement openoffice.org ...
dpkg: error processing
/var/cache/apt/archives/openoffice.org_2.0.0-4_i386.deb (--unpack):
trying to overwrite `/usr/share/doc/openoffice.org/README.Debian.gz',
which is also in package openoffice.org-debian-files
.

Although openoffice.org-debian-files has been scheduled for removal,
that package ist still installed when the new openoffice.org deb gets
unpacked. There are probably some conflicts/replaces entries missing.


-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers proposed-updates
  APT policy: (500, 'proposed-updates'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), 
(300, 'unstable'), (30, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.14-2-k7
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

Versions of packages openoffice.org depends on:
ii  dictionaries-common [openoff 0.62.5  Common utilities for spelling dict
ii  openoffice.org-bin   1.1.4-7.0.1 OpenOffice.org office suite binary
ii  openoffice.org-debian-files  1.1.4-6+1   Debian specific parts of OpenOffic
pn  openoffice.org-l10n-en | ope none  (no description available)
ii  ttf-opensymbol   1.1.4-7 The OpenSymbol TrueType font
ii  xml-core 0.09XML infrastructure and XML catalog

openoffice.org recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information

---
Received: (at 342610-close) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Dec 2005 23:11:28 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Dec 11 15:11:28 2005

Bug#342803: marked as done (openoffice.org: needs Replaces against openoffice.org-debian-files)

2005-12-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 11 Dec 2005 15:06:07 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#342610: fixed in openoffice.org 2.0.0-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Dec 2005 16:02:29 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Dec 10 08:02:29 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from adsl-68-77-160-26.dsl.sfldmi.ameritech.net ([68.77.160.26] 
helo=shuttle.metzlers.org)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1El7B7-00018L-MN
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 10 Dec 2005 08:02:29 -0800
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by shuttle.metzlers.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8CC51ADD0
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 10 Dec 2005 11:01:57 -0500 (EST)
From: Josh Metzler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: openoffice.org: needs Replaces against openoffice.org-debian-files
Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2005 11:01:56 -0500
User-Agent: KMail/1.8.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
RCVD_IN_SORBS autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: openoffice.org
Version: 2.0.0-4
Severity: normal

Transcript from failed installation run:

Unpacking replacement openoffice.org ...
dpkg: error processing
/var/cache/apt/archives/openoffice.org_2.0.0-4_i386.deb (--unpack):
 trying to overwrite `/usr/share/doc/openoffice.org/README.Debian.gz',
which is also in package openoffice.org-debian-files


openoffice.org-debian-files was going to be removed in this installation
run, but the Replaces: is necessary in case it doesn't get removed
before openoffice.org 2.0.0-4 is installed.

Josh

---
Received: (at 342610-close) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Dec 2005 23:11:28 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Dec 11 15:11:28 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from joerg by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1ElaGd-00025b-ED; Sun, 11 Dec 2005 15:06:07 -0800
From: Rene Engelhard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: lisa $Revision: 1.31 $
Subject: Bug#342610: fixed in openoffice.org 2.0.0-5
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: Joerg Jaspert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2005 15:06:07 -0800
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Source: openoffice.org
Source-Version: 2.0.0-5

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
openoffice.org, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

libmythes-dev_2.0.0-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/libmythes-dev_2.0.0-5_i386.deb
mozilla-openoffice.org_2.0.0-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/mozilla-openoffice.org_2.0.0-5_i386.deb
openoffice.org-base_2.0.0-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-base_2.0.0-5_i386.deb
openoffice.org-calc_2.0.0-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-calc_2.0.0-5_i386.deb
openoffice.org-common_2.0.0-5_all.deb
  to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-common_2.0.0-5_all.deb
openoffice.org-core_2.0.0-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-core_2.0.0-5_i386.deb
openoffice.org-dev-doc_2.0.0-5_all.deb
  to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-dev-doc_2.0.0-5_all.deb
openoffice.org-dev_2.0.0-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-dev_2.0.0-5_i386.deb
openoffice.org-draw_2.0.0-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-draw_2.0.0-5_i386.deb
openoffice.org-evolution_2.0.0-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-evolution_2.0.0-5_i386.deb
openoffice.org-filter-so52_2.0.0-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-filter-so52_2.0.0-5_i386.deb
openoffice.org-gnome_2.0.0-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-gnome_2.0.0-5_i386.deb
openoffice.org-gtk-gnome_2.0.0-5_all.deb
  to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-gtk-gnome_2.0.0-5_all.deb
openoffice.org-hunspell_1.1-5_i386.deb
  

Bug#314988: Starting geomview ends up with InstCreate: undefined option: 7042768

2005-12-11 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sun, Dec 11, 2005 at 12:02:41PM -0500, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
 On Sun, Dec 11, 2005 at 03:52:25AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:

geomview (1.8.1-10) unstable; urgency=low
.
  * debian/control: Add texinfo to build-deps so that command 
   makeinfo
is available.  Closes: #338773.
.
  * debian/control: Restrict architectures.  This package was not 
   designed
  for 64-bit machines.  Closes: #314988.

  Sorry, this is *not* (just) a 64-bit bug; geomview runs fine for me on my
  alpha.  

 OK, thanks for the confirmation.

  Since the etch RC policy says that packages must be supported on as
  many architectures as is reasonably possible, this is therefore an RC bug;
  please re-add alpha to the architecture list.  

 OK.  Technically, though, you're describing a different bug, namely
 alpha is missing.

Sure, treat it as a separate bug if you prefer. :)

  in which case the package really ought to be supported on amd64 as well.

 Sure.  But then it ain't grave since it's only unusable in certain
 circumstances.  Right?

Yes, if someone can test without the nvidia drivers and show that it works
on amd64, then the amd64 package shouldn't be treated as RC-buggy.

  Next time if you want to sneak a change like this past the porters, don't
  forget to ask the ftpmasters to remove the stale binary packages. ;)

 To be honest, I was a little surprised that this manual step is
 necessary.  I'm not in a hurry to get them removed since geomview is
 being stalled by gcc-4.0 anyway.

gcc-4.0 is no longer a staller, actually.

Cheers,
-- 
Steve Langasek   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer   to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://www.debian.org/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#342580: Patch

2005-12-11 Thread Claus =?UTF-8?Q?F=C3=A4rber
Hallo,

the attached patch fixes the problem.

Claus--- usermin-1.110/mailbox/view_mail.cgi 2005-12-12 00:23:55.129641390 +0100
+++ /usr/share/usermin/mailbox/view_mail.cgi2005-12-12 00:20:13.704377761 
+0100
@@ -56,10 +56,10 @@
 # Check if we have gotten back a DSN for *this* email
 update_delivery_notification($mail, $folder);
 open_dsn_hash();
-if (exists($dsnreplies{$mid})  $dsnreplies{$mid} != 1) {
+if (eval { exists($dsnreplies{$mid}) }  $dsnreplies{$mid} != 1) {
($got_dsn, $got_dsn_from) = split(/\s+/, $dsnreplies{$mid}, 2);
}
-if (exists($delreplies{$mid})  $delreplies{$mid} != 1) {
+if (eval { exists($delreplies{$mid}) }  $delreplies{$mid} != 1) {
local @del = split(/\s+/, $delreplies{$mid});
local $i;
for($i=0; $i@del; $i+=2) {


Bug#341514: libc6-sparc64: All 64-bit binaries fail to execute.

2005-12-11 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
On Wed, Nov 30, 2005 at 08:14:43PM -0800, David S. Miller wrote:
 Package: libc6-sparc64
 Version: 2.3.5-8
 Severity: normal
 
 There are some critical things missing in the sparc64 TLS support code
 in the current debian glibc tree, for example none of the TLS
 relcation support is in sysdeps/sparc/sparc64/dl-machine.h, and
 therefore so no binary linked against 64-bit libc can execute.
 
 Not even /lib64/libc.so.6 --version will work, it will fail
 because the dynamic linker doesn't understand the TLS relocations
 present in the /libc64/libc.so.64 binary.
 
 If this sparc TLS support has been backported, this back has missed
 significant chunks of the necessary changes and now all 64-bit
 binaries fail to execute on the system.

This is a known problem.  It was _not_ backported; rather, binutils was
updated to one which supported sparc64 TLS, and glibc's configury
automatically started enabling it.  An upload to fix this has been
waiting on a pile of failures to build, also because of the new
binutils.  Sorry.

 I would suggest trying to execute a Hello World program, post-build,
 to avoid major errors like this.  There is no way that any of the
 testsuite executed properly.  Perhaps it was built successfully, but
 none of the programs linking against libc could have executed properly
 due to this bug.

We run the testsuite.  Sparc64 is a special case, however, because we
can't assume that the buildd can run sparc64 binaries - in practice it
can, of course, I'm sure we could do better than we do.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery, LLC


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#256041: marked as done (gcc-snapshot_20040620-1(mipsel/unstable): configure built with out-of-date libtool.m4)

2005-12-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 12 Dec 2005 00:59:16 +0100
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line (mipsel/unstable): configure built with out-of-date libtool.m4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Jun 2004 15:43:04 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jun 24 08:43:04 2004
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from (straylight.cyberhqz.com) [24.85.92.182] (postfix)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BdWNU-0007XJ-00; Thu, 24 Jun 2004 08:43:04 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by straylight.cyberhqz.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A7AC540AE
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 24 Jun 2004 08:43:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from straylight.cyberhqz.com ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (straylight [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id 10016-07 for [EMAIL PROTECTED];
Thu, 24 Jun 2004 08:42:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by straylight.cyberhqz.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 65C59540AB; Thu, 24 Jun 2004 08:42:56 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 08:42:56 -0700
From: Ryan Murray [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: gcc-snapshot_20040620-1(mipsel/unstable): configure built with 
out-of-date libtool.m4
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: gcc-snapshot
Version: 20040620-1
Severity: serious

There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:

 Automatic build of gcc-snapshot_20040620-1 on repeat.rfc822.org by 
 sbuild/mipsel 1.170.5
 Build started at 20040621-0833

[...]

 ** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
 Build-Depends: m4, autoconf2.13, automake1.7, libtool, gawk, dejagnu (= 
 1.4.3), bzip2, binutils (= 2.14.90.0.7), debhelper (= 4.0), gperf (= 
 2.7-3), bison (= 1:1.875a-1), flex, gettext, texinfo, zlib1g-dev, xlibs-dev, 
 gnat-3.3 [!arm !hurd-i386 !m68k], libgtk2.0-dev, libart-2.0-dev, libgmp3-dev

configure was built with an ancient version of libtool.m4 that doesn't
correctly support mips, mipsel, arm, and possibly others.  This
problem was fixed for 3.2/3.3 without relibtoolizing, existed while
gcc-snapshot was 3.4 (so is probably still in 3.4), and still exists
now.

---
Received: (at 256041-done) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Dec 2005 23:59:19 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Dec 11 15:59:19 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de ([130.149.17.13] ident=root)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1Elb67-nX-H1
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 11 Dec 2005 15:59:19 -0800
Received: from mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [130.149.17.13])
by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3p2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id AAA20771
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 12 Dec 2005 00:59:17 +0100 (MET)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60895F2C5
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 12 Dec 2005 00:59:17 +0100 (MET)
Received: from mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (bueno [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10224) with ESMTP
 id 01118-33 for [EMAIL PROTECTED];
 Mon, 12 Dec 2005 00:59:17 +0100 (MET) 13970
Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.19.1])
by mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de (Postfix) with ESMTP
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 12 Dec 2005 00:59:17 +0100 (MET)
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.8/Submit) id jBBNxGMC025523;
Mon, 12 Dec 2005 00:59:16 +0100 (MET)
From: Matthias Klose [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 00:59:16 +0100
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: (mipsel/unstable): configure built with out-of-date libtool.m4
X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.4 (patch 17) Jumbo Shrimp XEmacs Lucid
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at cs.tu-berlin.de
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 

Bug#329135: marked as done ([PR target/23602] [4.1 regression] 1081 test failures in libjava, when configured for i486-linux)

2005-12-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 12 Dec 2005 01:02:43 +0100
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line [PR target/23602] [4.1 regression] 1081 test failures in 
libjava, when configured for i486-linux
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Sep 2005 20:43:05 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Sep 19 13:43:05 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.17.13] (root)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EHSTh-0003Af-00; Mon, 19 Sep 2005 13:43:05 -0700
Received: from mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [130.149.17.13])
by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3p2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA21091
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 19 Sep 2005 22:43:01 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C8DFF20F
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 19 Sep 2005 22:43:01 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (bueno [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10224) with ESMTP
 id 09093-39 for [EMAIL PROTECTED];
 Mon, 19 Sep 2005 22:43:00 +0200 (MEST) 13981
Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.19.1])
by mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de (Postfix) with ESMTP
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 19 Sep 2005 22:43:00 +0200 (MEST)
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.8/Submit) id j8JKh0JE011100;
Mon, 19 Sep 2005 22:43:00 +0200 (MEST)
From: Matthias Klose [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2005 22:43:00 +0200
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [i386] [4.1 regression] 1081 test failures in libjava, when configured 
for i486-linux
X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.4 (patch 17) Jumbo Shrimp XEmacs Lucid
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at cs.tu-berlin.de
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: gcc
Version: 4.1
Severity: grave
Tags: experimental, help

configuring HEAD for i486-linux (instead of the default i686-linux),
libjava fails with 1081 test failures (instead of two with
i686-linux).  apparently all the execution tests fail. Compiling the
testcase by hand, and running it, succeeds.

Environment is current Debian unstable, binutils 2.16.1, glibc-2.3.5.

The failures don't show, if gcc is configured for i686-linux.

Upstream report: http://gcc.gnu.org/23602

---
Received: (at 329135-done) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Dec 2005 00:02:47 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Dec 11 16:02:47 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de ([130.149.17.13] ident=root)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1Elb9S-0001oH-NW
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 11 Dec 2005 16:02:47 -0800
Received: from mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [130.149.17.13])
by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3p2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id BAA21562
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 12 Dec 2005 01:02:44 +0100 (MET)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46B11F2C5
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 12 Dec 2005 01:02:44 +0100 (MET)
Received: from mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (bueno [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10224) with ESMTP
 id 24498-45 for [EMAIL PROTECTED];
 Mon, 12 Dec 2005 01:02:43 +0100 (MET) 13982
Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.19.1])
by mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de (Postfix) with ESMTP
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 12 Dec 2005 01:02:43 +0100 (MET)
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.8/Submit) id jBC02hj9027764;
Mon, 12 Dec 2005 01:02:43 +0100 (MET)
From: Matthias Klose [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 01:02:43 +0100
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [PR target/23602] [4.1 regression] 1081 test failures in libjava, 
when configured for i486-linux

Bug#341514: libc6-sparc64: All 64-bit binaries fail to execute.

2005-12-11 Thread David S. Miller
From: Clint Adams [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2005 17:41:55 -0500

 Replacing Aurelien's patch with this one fixes the
 /lib64/libc.so.6: error while loading shared libraries: unexpected reloc type 
 0x4f
 problem, and /lib64/libc.so.6 --version works fine.
 
 However, 64-bit binaries segfault.

I would suggest not randomly cherry picking patches from the CVS
mainline hoping it will make things start to work.

There were several other changes necessary to support TLS properly on
sparc64 which went into the glibc CVS tree.  You'll need more than
just the relocation support.

Unless someone is going to make a concerted and dedicated development
effort to do the necessary full analysis and backport all of the
necessary changes, I would suggest to simply not enable TLS for the
sparc64 glibc build at this time so at least we have something which
works.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processed: Should have done this when supplying more info

2005-12-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 tags 339541 - moreinfo
Bug#339541: xemacs21-mule: installation fails
Tags were: unreproducible moreinfo
Tags removed: moreinfo

 quit
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#343034: Package explicitely build-depends on g++-3.3

2005-12-11 Thread Matthias Klose
Package: ccmalloc
Severity: serious
Usertag: g++-3.3

This package build-depends for some reason on g++-3.3 (most likely,
because it could not be built with a newer g++ version.  We will
get rid of g++-3.3 for the etch release and remove the g++-3.3
package.

Please (re)check, if the package can be built by g++, and if not, if it
can be built using gcc-snapshot (or g++-4.1, currently found in
experimental). Please keep the bug report open until you can avoid the
build dependency on g++-3.3. Collect further information in this bug
report (i.e. if it builds with a newer/experimental version).


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#343035: Package explicitely build-depends on g++-3.3

2005-12-11 Thread Matthias Klose
Package: ava
Severity: serious
Usertag: g++-3.3

This package build-depends for some reason on g++-3.3 (most likely,
because it could not be built with a newer g++ version.  We will
get rid of g++-3.3 for the etch release and remove the g++-3.3
package.

Please (re)check, if the package can be built by g++, and if not, if it
can be built using gcc-snapshot (or g++-4.1, currently found in
experimental). Please keep the bug report open until you can avoid the
build dependency on g++-3.3. Collect further information in this bug
report (i.e. if it builds with a newer/experimental version).


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#343036: Package explicitely build-depends on g++-3.3

2005-12-11 Thread Matthias Klose
Package: hermes1
Severity: serious
Usertag: g++-3.3

This package build-depends for some reason on g++-3.3 (most likely,
because it could not be built with a newer g++ version.  We will
get rid of g++-3.3 for the etch release and remove the g++-3.3
package.

Please (re)check, if the package can be built by g++, and if not, if it
can be built using gcc-snapshot (or g++-4.1, currently found in
experimental). Please keep the bug report open until you can avoid the
build dependency on g++-3.3. Collect further information in this bug
report (i.e. if it builds with a newer/experimental version).


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#343037: Package explicitely build-depends on g++-3.3

2005-12-11 Thread Matthias Klose
Package: libbonobomm1.3
Severity: serious
Usertag: g++-3.3

This package build-depends for some reason on g++-3.3 (most likely,
because it could not be built with a newer g++ version.  We will
get rid of g++-3.3 for the etch release and remove the g++-3.3
package.

Please (re)check, if the package can be built by g++, and if not, if it
can be built using gcc-snapshot (or g++-4.1, currently found in
experimental). Please keep the bug report open until you can avoid the
build dependency on g++-3.3. Collect further information in this bug
report (i.e. if it builds with a newer/experimental version).


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#343038: foreign: ftbfs [sparc] 27717 Bus error

2005-12-11 Thread Blars Blarson
Package: foreign
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source


foreign failed to build on a sparc buildd, duplicated on my sparc pbuilder.
(The number was 27374 rather than 27717 on my pbuilder.)


make[2]: Entering directory 
`/build/buildd/foreign-0.8.11/debian/foreign.Rcheck/tests'
  Running 'S3.R'
  Comparing 'S3.Rout' to 'S3.Rout.save' ... OK
  Running 'xport.R'
/bin/sh: line 1: 27715 Done( if test 0 != 0; then
echo gctorture(TRUE);
fi; cat xport.R )
 27717 Bus error   | 
R_LIBS=/build/buildd/foreign-0.8.11/debian/foreign.Rcheck:/usr/local/lib/R/site-library:/usr/lib/R/site-library:/usr/lib/R/library
 srcdir=/build/buildd/foreign-0.8.11/debian/foreign/tests LANGUAGE=C 
/usr/lib/R/bin/R --vanilla xport.Rout 21
make[2]: *** [xport.Rout] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory 
`/build/buildd/foreign-0.8.11/debian/foreign.Rcheck/tests'
make[1]: *** [all] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory 
`/build/buildd/foreign-0.8.11/debian/foreign.Rcheck/tests'
 ERROR
make: *** [R_any_arch] Error 1


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#320904: marked as done (FTBFS: Value has incomplete type)

2005-12-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 11 Dec 2005 17:32:10 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#320904: fixed in k3d 0.5.0.35-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Aug 2005 03:13:06 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Aug 01 20:13:06 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from zoot.lafn.org [206.117.18.6] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1DznDG-zg-00; Mon, 01 Aug 2005 20:13:06 -0700
Received: from localhost.localdomain 
(pool-71-104-165-253.lsanca.dsl-w.verizon.net [71.104.165.253])
(authenticated bits=0)
by zoot.lafn.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j723D5It095010
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO)
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 1 Aug 2005 20:13:05 -0700 (PDT)
(envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Received: from kraai by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.52)
id 1DzgBp-00016A-Ji
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 01 Aug 2005 12:43:09 -0700
Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2005 12:43:09 -0700
From: Matt Kraai [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: FTBFS: Value has incomplete type
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=VrqPEDrXMn8OVzN4
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.86.2/1000/Sun Jul 31 12:28:06 2005 on zoot.lafn.org
X-Virus-Status: Clean
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,DATE_IN_PAST_06_12 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02


--VrqPEDrXMn8OVzN4
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary=AqsLC8rIMeq19msA
Content-Disposition: inline


--AqsLC8rIMeq19msA
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Package: k3d
Version: 0.4.5.0-5
Severity: serious
Tags: patch

k3d fails to build because Value has an incomplete type:

 source=3D'document.cpp' object=3D'document.lo' libtool=3Dyes \
 depfile=3D'.deps/document.Plo' tmpdepfile=3D'.deps/document.TPlo' \
 depmode=3Dgcc3 /bin/sh ../depcomp \
 /bin/sh ../libtool --mode=3Dcompile i486-linux-gnu-g++ -DPACKAGE_NAME=3D\=
\ -DPACKAGE_TARNAME=3D\\ -DPACKAGE_VERSION=3D\\ -DPACKAGE_STRING=3D\=
\ -DPACKAGE_BUGREPORT=3D\\ -DPACKAGE=3D\k3d\ -DVERSION=3D\0.4.5.0\ -=
DSTDC_HEADERS=3D1 -DHAVE_SYS_TYPES_H=3D1 -DHAVE_SYS_STAT_H=3D1 -DHAVE_STDLI=
B_H=3D1 -DHAVE_STRING_H=3D1 -DHAVE_MEMORY_H=3D1 -DHAVE_STRINGS_H=3D1 -DHAVE=
_INTTYPES_H=3D1 -DHAVE_STDINT_H=3D1 -DHAVE_UNISTD_H=3D1 -DHAVE_DLFCN_H=3D1 =
-DSIZEOF_VOIDP=3D4 -DK3D_PLATFORM_POSIX=3D1 -DK3D_HAVE_X86=3D1 -DHAVE_VA_CO=
PY=3D1 -DVA_COPY=3Dva_copy -DHAPY_HAVE_NUMERIC_LIMITS=3D1 -DHAPY_HAVE_STD_I=
TERATOR_TYPE=3D1  -I. -I.  -I.. -I../boost -I/usr/include/sigc++-2.0 -I/usr=
/lib/sigc++-2.0/include   -DK3D_HAVE_SIGC_2_0  -Wall -Wno-ctor-dtor-privacy=
 -g -O2 -c -o document.lo `test -f 'document.cpp' || echo './'`document.cpp
  i486-linux-gnu-g++ -DPACKAGE_NAME=3D\\ -DPACKAGE_TARNAME=3D\\ -DPACK=
AGE_VERSION=3D\\ -DPACKAGE_STRING=3D\\ -DPACKAGE_BUGREPORT=3D\\ -DPAC=
KAGE=3D\k3d\ -DVERSION=3D\0.4.5.0\ -DSTDC_HEADERS=3D1 -DHAVE_SYS_TYPES_=
H=3D1 -DHAVE_SYS_STAT_H=3D1 -DHAVE_STDLIB_H=3D1 -DHAVE_STRING_H=3D1 -DHAVE_=
MEMORY_H=3D1 -DHAVE_STRINGS_H=3D1 -DHAVE_INTTYPES_H=3D1 -DHAVE_STDINT_H=3D1=
 -DHAVE_UNISTD_H=3D1 -DHAVE_DLFCN_H=3D1 -DSIZEOF_VOIDP=3D4 -DK3D_PLATFORM_P=
OSIX=3D1 -DK3D_HAVE_X86=3D1 -DHAVE_VA_COPY=3D1 -DVA_COPY=3Dva_copy -DHAPY_H=
AVE_NUMERIC_LIMITS=3D1 -DHAPY_HAVE_STD_ITERATOR_TYPE=3D1 -I. -I. -I.. -I../=
boost -I/usr/include/sigc++-2.0 -I/usr/lib/sigc++-2.0/include -DK3D_HAVE_SI=
GC_2_0 -Wall -Wno-ctor-dtor-privacy -g -O2 -c document.cpp -MT document.lo =
-MD -MP -MF .deps/document.TPlo  -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/document.o
 In file included from ../boost/boost/config.hpp:35,
  from ../boost/boost/utility/addressof.hpp:19,
  from ../boost/boost/utility.hpp:12,
  from ../k3dsdk/auto_ptr.h:5,
  from ../k3dsdk/file_filter.h:28,
  from document.cpp:33:
 ../boost/boost/config/compiler/gcc.hpp:92:7: warning: #warning Unknown c=
ompiler version - please run the configure tests and report the results
 ../k3dsdk/path_data.h: In member function 'void 

Bug#331104: marked as done (k3d: Uninstallable in SID due to unfullfillable dependencies)

2005-12-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 11 Dec 2005 17:32:10 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#331104: fixed in k3d 0.5.0.35-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Oct 2005 15:11:37 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Oct 01 08:11:37 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from server2.ka-online.de [85.214.21.40] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1ELj1V-00066F-00; Sat, 01 Oct 2005 08:11:37 -0700
Received: from [192.168.1.11] (p54A39209.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.163.146.9])
by server2.ka-online.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88BF47AC079
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat,  1 Oct 2005 17:12:47 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: k3d: Uninstallable in SID due to unfullfillable dependencies
From: Tobias Bachmor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain
Date: Sat, 01 Oct 2005 17:09:51 +0200
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3 
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: k3d
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable


Hi there,

I tried to install k3d on an uptodate SID-system getting the following
error:

Sleipnir:~# apt-get install k3d
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
or been moved out of Incoming.

Since you only requested a single operation it is extremely likely that
the package is simply not installable and a bug report against
that package should be filed.
The following information may help to resolve the situation:

The following packages have unmet dependencies:
  k3d: Depends: libmagick++6 but it is not installable
   Depends: libsigc++-2.0-0 (= 2.0.2) but it is not installable
E: Broken packages

libmagick++6 is not in unstable (but libmagick++6c2 and libmagick++9
are) but it is in testing.
It's nearly the same with libsigc++-2.0-0, which is not in unstable (but
libsigc++-2.0-0c2 is).
So I guess k3d has to be rebuild against these libs.

Bye,
Tobias

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.13
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15)



---
Received: (at 331104-close) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Dec 2005 01:41:01 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Dec 11 17:41:01 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1ElcXy-Ko-Bl; Sun, 11 Dec 2005 17:32:10 -0800
From: =?utf-8?q?David_Mart=C3=ADnez_Moreno?= [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.60 $
Subject: Bug#331104: fixed in k3d 0.5.0.35-1
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2005 17:32:10 -0800
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2

Source: k3d
Source-Version: 0.5.0.35-1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
k3d, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

k3d-dev_0.5.0.35-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/k/k3d/k3d-dev_0.5.0.35-1_i386.deb
k3d_0.5.0.35-1.diff.gz
  to pool/main/k/k3d/k3d_0.5.0.35-1.diff.gz
k3d_0.5.0.35-1.dsc
  to pool/main/k/k3d/k3d_0.5.0.35-1.dsc
k3d_0.5.0.35-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/k/k3d/k3d_0.5.0.35-1_i386.deb
k3d_0.5.0.35.orig.tar.gz
  to pool/main/k/k3d/k3d_0.5.0.35.orig.tar.gz



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report 

Bug#335125: marked as done (removal of automake1.6)

2005-12-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 11 Dec 2005 17:32:10 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#335125: fixed in k3d 0.5.0.35-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Oct 2005 01:23:21 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Oct 21 18:23:21 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from mailout2.igs.net [216.58.97.88] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1ET86T-00051a-00; Fri, 21 Oct 2005 18:23:21 -0700
Received: from nightcrawler.kuroneko.ca (nightcrawler.kuroneko.ca 
[66.11.161.69])
by mailout2.igs.net (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 7D49547E9CA; Fri, 21 Oct 2005 21:23:21 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by nightcrawler.kuroneko.ca (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id EC3605CAF6E; Fri, 21 Oct 2005 21:23:20 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Eric Dorland [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: removal of automake1.6
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.17
Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2005 21:23:20 -0400
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: k3d
Severity: wishlist

Hello,

As I pointed out in
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2005/07/msg01579.html, I will be
asking for the removal of automake1.6 from Debian in two weeks. Your
package has a strict build-dependency on automake1.6. Once automake1.6
is removed, the severity of this bug will become grave. 

If you need any assistance with making your package work with a newer
version of automake, please let me know, but it should be relatively
painless for the most part.


-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.12
Locale: LANG=en_US.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)

---
Received: (at 335125-close) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Dec 2005 01:41:10 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Dec 11 17:41:10 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1ElcXy-Kq-CY; Sun, 11 Dec 2005 17:32:10 -0800
From: =?utf-8?q?David_Mart=C3=ADnez_Moreno?= [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.60 $
Subject: Bug#335125: fixed in k3d 0.5.0.35-1
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2005 17:32:10 -0800
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 6

Source: k3d
Source-Version: 0.5.0.35-1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
k3d, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

k3d-dev_0.5.0.35-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/k/k3d/k3d-dev_0.5.0.35-1_i386.deb
k3d_0.5.0.35-1.diff.gz
  to pool/main/k/k3d/k3d_0.5.0.35-1.diff.gz
k3d_0.5.0.35-1.dsc
  to pool/main/k/k3d/k3d_0.5.0.35-1.dsc
k3d_0.5.0.35-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/k/k3d/k3d_0.5.0.35-1_i386.deb
k3d_0.5.0.35.orig.tar.gz
  to pool/main/k/k3d/k3d_0.5.0.35.orig.tar.gz



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
David Martínez Moreno [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated k3d package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 01:14:51 +0100
Source: k3d
Binary: k3d-dev k3d
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.5.0.35-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: David Martínez Moreno [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: David Martínez Moreno [EMAIL 

Bug#326876: marked as done (k3d: FTBFS (amd64): errno: TLS definition in /lib/libc.so.6 section .tbss mismatches non-TLS reference in ../../modules/javascript/js/src/.libs/libjs.a(k_standard.o))

2005-12-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 11 Dec 2005 17:32:10 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#326876: fixed in k3d 0.5.0.35-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Sep 2005 10:55:50 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Sep 06 03:55:50 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from c173076.adsl.hansenet.de (localhost.localdomain) [213.39.173.76] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1ECb7F-Yx-00; Tue, 06 Sep 2005 03:55:50 -0700
Received: from aj by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.52)
id 1ECb7E-000307-Q0; Tue, 06 Sep 2005 12:55:48 +0200
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Andreas Jochens [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: k3d: FTBFS (amd64): errno: TLS definition in /lib/libc.so.6 section 
.tbss mismatches non-TLS reference in 
../../modules/javascript/js/src/.libs/libjs.a(k_standard.o)
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2005 12:55:48 +0200
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: k3d
Version: 0.4.5.0-5
Severity: serious
Tags: patch

When building 'k3d' on amd64/unstable, I get the following error:

x86_64-linux-gnu-g++ -shared -nostdlib 
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.0.2/../../../../lib64/crti.o 
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.0.2/crtbeginS.o  .libs/engine.o 
.libs/object_model.o .libs/renderman.o .libs/streams.o -Wl,--whole-archive 
../../modules/javascript/js/src/.libs/libjs.a 
../../boost/libs/regex/src/.libs/libregexpp.a -Wl,--no-whole-archive  
-Wl,--rpath -Wl,/srv/dbuild/tmp/k3d-0.4.5.0/k3dsdk/.libs -Wl,--rpath 
-Wl,/srv/dbuild/tmp/k3d-0.4.5.0/sdpxml/.libs ../../k3dsdk/.libs/libk3dsdk.so 
../../sdpxml/.libs/libsdpxml.so /usr/lib/libsigc-2.0.so 
-L/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.0.2 
-L/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.0.2/../../../../lib64 
-L/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.0.2/../../.. -L/lib/../lib64 
-L/usr/lib/../lib64 -lstdc++ -lm -lc -lgcc_s 
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.0.2/crtendS.o 
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.0.2/../../../../lib64/crtn.o  -Wl,-soname 
-Wl,libk3djavascript.so.0 -o .libs/libk3djavascript.so.0.0.0
/usr/bin/ld: errno: TLS definition in /lib/libc.so.6 section .tbss mismatches 
non-TLS reference in ../../modules/javascript/js/src/.libs/libjs.a(k_standard.o)
/lib/libc.so.6: could not read symbols: Bad value
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
make[4]: *** [libk3djavascript.la] Error 1
make[4]: Leaving directory `/srv/dbuild/tmp/k3d-0.4.5.0/modules/javascript'
make[3]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1

The attached patch fixes this by using '#include errno.h'
instead of the declaration 'int errno;'.

The patch also include the fix for the 'Value' has incomplete type bug.

Regards
Andreas Jochens

diff -urN ../tmp-orig/k3d-0.4.5.0/modules/javascript/js/src/fdlibm/k_standard.c 
./modules/javascript/js/src/fdlibm/k_standard.c
--- ../tmp-orig/k3d-0.4.5.0/modules/javascript/js/src/fdlibm/k_standard.c   
2004-11-04 13:04:12.0 +
+++ ./modules/javascript/js/src/fdlibm/k_standard.c 2005-09-06 
09:05:53.0 +
@@ -51,16 +51,7 @@
  */
 
 #include fdlibm.h
-
-/* XXX ugly hack to get msvc to link without error. */
-#if _LIB_VERSION == _IEEE_  !(defined(DARWIN) || defined(XP_MACOSX))
-   int errno;
-#  define EDOM 0
-#  define ERANGE 0
-#else
-#  include errno.h
-#endif
-
+#include errno.h
 
 #ifndef _USE_WRITE
 #include stdio.h /* fputs(), stderr */
diff -urN ../tmp-orig/k3d-0.4.5.0/k3dsdk/path_data.h ./k3dsdk/path_data.h
--- ../tmp-orig/k3d-0.4.5.0/k3dsdk/path_data.h  2004-04-25 22:19:07.0 
+
+++ ./k3dsdk/path_data.h2005-09-06 08:09:36.0 +
@@ -25,6 +25,7 @@
\author Tim Shead ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
 */
 
+#include boost/filesystem/path.hpp
 #include data.h
 
 namespace k3d

---
Received: (at 326876-close) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Dec 2005 01:41:09 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Dec 11 17:41:09 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1ElcXy-Km-Aw; Sun, 11 Dec 2005 17:32:10 -0800
From: =?utf-8?q?David_Mart=C3=ADnez_Moreno?= [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.60 $

Bug#341936: marked as done (k3d_0.5.0.34-0pre1(s390/experimental): FTBFS: dh_python fails due to missing python in build-depends)

2005-12-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 11 Dec 2005 17:32:10 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#341936: fixed in k3d 0.5.0.35-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Dec 2005 10:24:02 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Dec 04 02:24:02 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from frigg.ftbfs.de ([212.112.246.221])
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1Eir2I-0004pD-IP
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 04 Dec 2005 02:24:02 -0800
Received: from localhost (localimap [192.168.2.3])
by frigg.ftbfs.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1826F5A17F
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun,  4 Dec 2005 11:24:00 +0100 (CET)
Received: from localhost ([192.168.2.3])
by localhost (frigg.ftbfs.de [192.168.2.3]) (amavisd-new, port 2525)
with SMTP id 14767-21 for [EMAIL PROTECTED];
Sun, 4 Dec 2005 11:24:00 +0100 (CET)
Received: from laptop.zobel.private.ftbfs.de (unknown [10.8.0.32])
by frigg.ftbfs.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64623F5A17B
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun,  4 Dec 2005 11:24:00 +0100 (CET)
Received: by laptop.zobel.private.ftbfs.de (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id DA862A00FEF; Sun,  4 Dec 2005 11:23:58 +0100 (CET)
Date: Sun, 4 Dec 2005 11:23:58 +0100
From: Martin Zobel-Helas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: k3d_0.5.0.34-0pre1(s390/experimental): FTBFS: dh_python fails due to 
missing python in build-depends
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at outgoing
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: k3d
Version: 0.5.0.34-0pre1
Severity: Serious
Justification: Fails to build from source

[...]

dh_testdir -s
dh_testroot -s
dh_installchangelogs -s ChangeLog
dh_installdocs -s
dh_installexamples -s
dh_install -s --sourcedir=debian/tmp
dh_installmenu -s
dh_installman -s
dh_link -s
dh_strip -s
dh_compress -s
dh_fixperms -s
dh_python -s
dh_python: Python is not installed, aborting. (Probably forgot to Build-Depend 
on python.)
make: *** [binary-arch] Error 1
**
Build finished at 20051204-1050
FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died]


---
Received: (at 341936-close) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Dec 2005 01:41:00 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Dec 11 17:41:00 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1ElcXy-Ks-DL; Sun, 11 Dec 2005 17:32:10 -0800
From: =?utf-8?q?David_Mart=C3=ADnez_Moreno?= [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.60 $
Subject: Bug#341936: fixed in k3d 0.5.0.35-1
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2005 17:32:10 -0800
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Source: k3d
Source-Version: 0.5.0.35-1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
k3d, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

k3d-dev_0.5.0.35-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/k/k3d/k3d-dev_0.5.0.35-1_i386.deb
k3d_0.5.0.35-1.diff.gz
  to pool/main/k/k3d/k3d_0.5.0.35-1.diff.gz
k3d_0.5.0.35-1.dsc
  to pool/main/k/k3d/k3d_0.5.0.35-1.dsc
k3d_0.5.0.35-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/k/k3d/k3d_0.5.0.35-1_i386.deb
k3d_0.5.0.35.orig.tar.gz
  to pool/main/k/k3d/k3d_0.5.0.35.orig.tar.gz



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
David Martínez Moreno [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated k3d package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by 

Bug#343038: foreign: ftbfs [sparc] 27717 Bus error

2005-12-11 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel

On 11 December 2005 at 17:25, Blars Blarson wrote:
| Package: foreign
| Severity: serious
| Justification: fails to build from source
| 
| 
| foreign failed to build on a sparc buildd, duplicated on my sparc pbuilder.
| (The number was 27374 rather than 27717 on my pbuilder.)
| 
| 
| make[2]: Entering directory 
`/build/buildd/foreign-0.8.11/debian/foreign.Rcheck/tests'
|   Running 'S3.R'
|   Comparing 'S3.Rout' to 'S3.Rout.save' ... OK

Ok, I'll turn the regression test off as we did with a few other R packages.

Dirk

|   Running 'xport.R'
| /bin/sh: line 1: 27715 Done( if test 0 != 0; then
| echo gctorture(TRUE);
| fi; cat xport.R )
|  27717 Bus error   | 
R_LIBS=/build/buildd/foreign-0.8.11/debian/foreign.Rcheck:/usr/local/lib/R/site-library:/usr/lib/R/site-library:/usr/lib/R/library
 srcdir=/build/buildd/foreign-0.8.11/debian/foreign/tests LANGUAGE=C 
/usr/lib/R/bin/R --vanilla xport.Rout 21
| make[2]: *** [xport.Rout] Error 1
| make[2]: Leaving directory 
`/build/buildd/foreign-0.8.11/debian/foreign.Rcheck/tests'
| make[1]: *** [all] Error 2
| make[1]: Leaving directory 
`/build/buildd/foreign-0.8.11/debian/foreign.Rcheck/tests'
|  ERROR
| make: *** [R_any_arch] Error 1
| 

-- 
Hell, there are no rules here - we're trying to accomplish something. 
  -- Thomas A. Edison


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#343034: Bug#342959: Package explicitely build-depends on g++-3.4

2005-12-11 Thread Steve M. Robbins
Howdy,

On Mon, Dec 12, 2005 at 02:18:29AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:

 We will get rid of g++-3.3 for the etch release and remove the
 g++-3.3 package.

On Mon, Dec 12, 2005 at 12:54:22AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:

 We would like to get rid of g++-3.4 for the etch release, although
 currently not a hard release goal.
 

I completely missed the discussion surrounding removal of gcc 3.3 and
gcc 3.4.


For the record, ccmalloc builds a stub library for each C++ compiler
shipped.  So the build-dependency can be easily removed as soon as the
compiler is removed.

Cheers,
-Steve



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#343042: linux-image-2.6.14-2-686: Boot aborts with message '/bin/cat: /sys/block/hda/hda1/dev: No such file or directory'

2005-12-11 Thread Paulo Marcel Coelho Aragao
Package: linux-image-2.6.14-2-686
Version: 2.6.14-5
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system

Right after I upgraded linux-image-2.6.14-2-686 to 2.6.14-5 and rebooted, boot 
is interrupted with repeated messages:

/bin/cat: /sys/block/hda/hda1/dev: No such file or directory

until it finally stops completely, with message:

Device /sys/block/hda/hda1/dev seems to be down

I'm having to reboot with 2.6.12.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1)

Versions of packages linux-image-2.6.14-2-686 depends on:
ii  module-init-tools 3.2.2-1tools for managing Linux kernel mo
ii  yaird [linux-initramfs-tool]  0.0.12-1   Yet Another mkInitRD

Versions of packages linux-image-2.6.14-2-686 recommends:
pn  libc6-i686none (no description available)

-- debconf information:
* linux-image-2.6.14-2-686/preinst/already-running-this-2.6.14-2-686:
  linux-image-2.6.14-2-686/preinst/lilo-has-ramdisk:
  linux-image-2.6.14-2-686/postinst/create-kimage-link-2.6.14-2-686: true
  linux-image-2.6.14-2-686/preinst/initrd-2.6.14-2-686:
  linux-image-2.6.14-2-686/preinst/bootloader-initrd-2.6.14-2-686: true
  linux-image-2.6.14-2-686/postinst/old-system-map-link-2.6.14-2-686: true
  linux-image-2.6.14-2-686/preinst/failed-to-move-modules-2.6.14-2-686:
  linux-image-2.6.14-2-686/postinst/depmod-error-initrd-2.6.14-2-686: false
  linux-image-2.6.14-2-686/postinst/old-dir-initrd-link-2.6.14-2-686: true
  linux-image-2.6.14-2-686/preinst/elilo-initrd-2.6.14-2-686: true
  linux-image-2.6.14-2-686/prerm/would-invalidate-boot-loader-2.6.14-2-686: true
  linux-image-2.6.14-2-686/preinst/overwriting-modules-2.6.14-2-686: true
  linux-image-2.6.14-2-686/preinst/abort-install-2.6.14-2-686:
  linux-image-2.6.14-2-686/postinst/kimage-is-a-directory:
  linux-image-2.6.14-2-686/preinst/lilo-initrd-2.6.14-2-686: true
  linux-image-2.6.14-2-686/prerm/removing-running-kernel-2.6.14-2-686: true
  linux-image-2.6.14-2-686/postinst/depmod-error-2.6.14-2-686: false
  linux-image-2.6.14-2-686/postinst/bootloader-test-error-2.6.14-2-686:
  linux-image-2.6.14-2-686/postinst/old-initrd-link-2.6.14-2-686: true
  linux-image-2.6.14-2-686/postinst/bootloader-error-2.6.14-2-686:
  linux-image-2.6.14-2-686/preinst/abort-overwrite-2.6.14-2-686:


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#343038: foreign: ftbfs [sparc] 27717 Bus error

2005-12-11 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel

On 11 December 2005 at 19:49, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| 
| On 11 December 2005 at 17:25, Blars Blarson wrote:
| | Package: foreign
| | Severity: serious
| | Justification: fails to build from source
| | 
| | 
| | foreign failed to build on a sparc buildd, duplicated on my sparc pbuilder.
| | (The number was 27374 rather than 27717 on my pbuilder.)
| | 
| | 
| | make[2]: Entering directory 
`/build/buildd/foreign-0.8.11/debian/foreign.Rcheck/tests'
| |   Running 'S3.R'
| |   Comparing 'S3.Rout' to 'S3.Rout.save' ... OK
| 
| Ok, I'll turn the regression test off as we did with a few other R packages.

Darn, I ran into #342879 : cdbs is currently broken so the fix will have to
wait.   

If you haven't upgrade your pbuilder, try the following change in
debian/rules:


R CMD INSTALL -l $(debRlib) --clean .
#   mkdir debian/$(cranName)
#   find . -not -path ./debian* | cpio -p -m debian/$(cranName)
#   (cd debian   \
#   R CMD check --no-latex $(cranName)   \
#   R CMD INSTALL -l $(debRlib) $(cranName)  \
#   rm -rf $(cranName)  )

ie flip the commented out status between the R CMD INSTALL line (now in) and
the segment that follows.  My whole section now looks like


R_any_arch:
##dh_installdirsusr/lib/R/site-library
dh_installdirs  usr/lib/R/library
R CMD INSTALL -l $(debRlib) --clean .
#   mkdir debian/$(cranName)
#   find . -not -path ./debian* | cpio -p -m debian/$(cranName)
#   (cd debian   \
#   R CMD check --no-latex $(cranName)   \
#   R CMD INSTALL -l $(debRlib) $(cranName)  \
#   rm -rf $(cranName)  )
rm -vf $(debRlib)/R.css $(debRlib)/$(cranNameLC)/COPYING
## appease lintian
chmod 0644 $(debRlib)/$(cranNameLC)/files/sids.dbf


Dirk

-- 
Hell, there are no rules here - we're trying to accomplish something. 
  -- Thomas A. Edison


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#343038: foreign: ftbfs [sparc] 27717 Bus error

2005-12-11 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel

On 11 December 2005 at 19:02, Steve Langasek wrote:
| On Sun, Dec 11, 2005 at 07:49:55PM -0600, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| 
|  On 11 December 2005 at 17:25, Blars Blarson wrote:
|  | Package: foreign
|  | Severity: serious
|  | Justification: fails to build from source
| 
|  | foreign failed to build on a sparc buildd, duplicated on my sparc 
pbuilder.
|  | (The number was 27374 rather than 27717 on my pbuilder.)
| 
|  | make[2]: Entering directory 
`/build/buildd/foreign-0.8.11/debian/foreign.Rcheck/tests'
|  |   Running 'S3.R'
|  |   Comparing 'S3.Rout' to 'S3.Rout.save' ... OK
| 
|  Ok, I'll turn the regression test off as we did with a few other R packages.
| 
| And ship packages that generate bus errors?!

Naaarrr, mate, don't panic.  The R packages compare pre-generated output to
actual output, and tend to have the numerical precision too tight, in
particular for the foreign package that is focussed on importing data sets
for other statistical applications.

I can detail this some more if you wish but rest assured that there are no
bus errors anywhere.  See http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?pkg=foreign for
almost two years of happy build logs.

Now, cdbs is really broken so I can't upload the fix anyway.

Dirk


-- 
Hell, there are no rules here - we're trying to accomplish something. 
  -- Thomas A. Edison


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



  1   2   >