Bug#343037: marked as done (Package explicitely build-depends on g++-3.3)
Your message dated Sat, 24 Dec 2005 00:07:58 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Package explicitly build-depends on g++-3.3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at maintonly) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Dec 2005 01:18:38 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Dec 11 17:18:38 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de ([130.149.17.13] ident=root) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1ElcKr-0007q9-RE for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 11 Dec 2005 17:18:38 -0800 Received: from mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [130.149.17.13]) by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3p2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id CAA25367 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 12 Dec 2005 02:18:32 +0100 (MET) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50D84F2C5 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 12 Dec 2005 02:18:32 +0100 (MET) Received: from mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (bueno [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10224) with ESMTP id 22829-17 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 12 Dec 2005 02:18:31 +0100 (MET) 14191 Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.19.1]) by mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de (Postfix) with ESMTP for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 12 Dec 2005 02:18:31 +0100 (MET) Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.8/Submit) id jBC1IVvR019300 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 12 Dec 2005 02:18:31 +0100 (MET) Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 02:18:31 +0100 (MET) From: Matthias Klose [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Package explicitely build-depends on g++-3.3 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at cs.tu-berlin.de Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: libbonobomm1.3 Severity: serious Usertag: g++-3.3 This package build-depends for some reason on g++-3.3 (most likely, because it could not be built with a newer g++ version. We will get rid of g++-3.3 for the etch release and remove the g++-3.3 package. Please (re)check, if the package can be built by g++, and if not, if it can be built using gcc-snapshot (or g++-4.1, currently found in experimental). Please keep the bug report open until you can avoid the build dependency on g++-3.3. Collect further information in this bug report (i.e. if it builds with a newer/experimental version). --- Received: (at 343037-done) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Dec 2005 08:07:59 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Dec 24 00:07:59 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from dsl093-039-086.pdx1.dsl.speakeasy.net ([66.93.39.86] helo=tennyson.dodds.net) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Eq4Rb-0006Kx-IC for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 24 Dec 2005 00:07:59 -0800 Received: by tennyson.dodds.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 91A377002; Sat, 24 Dec 2005 00:07:58 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2005 00:07:58 -0800 From: Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Package explicitly build-depends on g++-3.3 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=ew6BAiZeqk4r7MaW Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 --ew6BAiZeqk4r7MaW Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable This bug report seems to be a false positive; libbonobomm1.3 doesn't build-depend on g++-3.3, it build-*conflicts* with it. Cheers, --=20 Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ --ew6BAiZeqk4r7MaW Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Digital signature
Bug#344416: marked as done ([powerpc] kernel-package breaks mkvmlinuz, rendering 2.6.14-6 kernels uninstallable on powerpc)
Your message dated Sat, 24 Dec 2005 00:15:16 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line retrigger a binNMU build for powerpc with new kernel-package ? has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Dec 2005 15:46:37 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Dec 22 07:46:37 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from smtp9.wanadoo.fr ([193.252.22.22]) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EpSeL-vN-1y for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 22 Dec 2005 07:46:37 -0800 Received: from me-wanadoo.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mwinf0912.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 9FD241C005CF for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 22 Dec 2005 16:46:05 +0100 (CET) Received: from pegasos (AStrasbourg-251-1-21-123.w82-126.abo.wanadoo.fr [82.126.211.123]) by mwinf0912.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 765FE1C005DD for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 22 Dec 2005 16:46:05 +0100 (CET) X-ME-UUID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from sven by pegasos with local (Exim 4.50) id 1EpScK-0005Jo-NV; Thu, 22 Dec 2005 16:44:32 +0100 Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2005 16:44:27 +0100 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], debian-kernel@lists.debian.org Subject: [powerpc] kernel-package breaks mkvmlinuz, rendering 2.6.14-6 kernels uninstallable on powerpc Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i From: Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE, RCVD_IN_SORBS autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: linux-2.6 Version: 2.6.14-6 Severity: grave kernel-package 10.0xx does call db_stop before calling the /etc/kernel/*.d snipplets, which means all debconf using snipplets will be broken, and hang forever for a response from debconf which will never come. mkvmlinuz is among those using debconf in a /etc/kernel/*.d snipplet, and as the powerpc kernel depends on it, the result is that the powerpc kernel will not only be uninstallable, leave the dpkg-database in a unclean state, and wait-forever during installation thus playing hell with automated upgrades or whatever. I guess this means a new 2.6.14-7 upload quickly as soon as k-p gets fixed, but it would be nice if new k-p upgrades where tested more thoroughly before being inflicted unto the unsuspecting masses. Friendly, Sven Luther --- Received: (at 344416-done) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Dec 2005 08:15:17 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Dec 24 00:15:17 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from dsl093-039-086.pdx1.dsl.speakeasy.net ([66.93.39.86] helo=tennyson.dodds.net) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Eq4Yf-0007jX-5K for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 24 Dec 2005 00:15:17 -0800 Received: by tennyson.dodds.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id D12F47002; Sat, 24 Dec 2005 00:15:16 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2005 00:15:16 -0800 From: Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: retrigger a binNMU build for powerpc with new kernel-package ? Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] References: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=zx4FCpZtqtKETZ7O Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 --zx4FCpZtqtKETZ7O Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Dec 23, 2005 at 01:14:03PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote: I wonder if you would be able to trigger a binNMU of the powerpc kernel, = which would then build with the kernel-package version Manoj uploaded yesterday= , and claims fixes this issue. I have no tested it, nor will i be able to do the binNMU upload myself, but i understand the buildd network has nice suppor= t for doing this all by itself, so i think this is the best way
Processed: Fixed in NMU of poppler 0.4.2-1.1
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 342288 + fixed Bug#342288: libpoppler0c2: source taken from xpdf may introduce heap-overflow vulnerabilities Tags were: patch security Tags added: fixed quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#342925: missing ide-generic
On Sat, 24 Dec 2005, Frans Pop wrote: On Friday 23 December 2005 14:34, maximilian attems wrote: please try the attached patch, should load ide-generic even if udev didn't yet bring it up: Although my initial report was for Sparc (which I will test tomorrow, I've also tested it on my laptop. ide-generic is loaded, but ide-disk is not, so not quite there yet for me. The laptop (Toshiba Satellite A40) needs piix (which is loaded): :00:1f.1 IDE interface: Intel Corp. 82801DBM (ICH4) Ultra ATA Storage Controller (rev 03) Cheers, FJP thanks to you all for your testing!! indeed other test request generated the same feedback, working on some but for others still missing ide-disk. need to talk to the ubuntu guys what we are doing falsly as it works on their side. Md states that udev should pick up any ide-generic, which su... that it doesn't do. anyway happy christmas :) -- maks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: New version of bandwidthd available, waiting for sponsors approval/upload.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 343921 + pending Bug#343921: bandwidthd: FTBFS: build-depends on removed package libgd2-dev There were no tags set. Tags added: pending tags 328576 + pending Bug#328576: Bash'ism in /etc/init.d/bandwidthd Tags were: patch Tags added: pending tags 328577 + pending Bug#328577: Bad syntax error message There were no tags set. Tags added: pending tags 328178 + pending Bug#328178: bandwidthd: problem with description formatting There were no tags set. Tags added: pending tags 335661 + pending Bug#335661: bandwidthd: please depend on `libgd2-noxpm | libgd2-xpm' There were no tags set. Tags added: pending thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: reassign 344515 to linux-2.6
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 reassign 344515 linux-2.6 Bug#344515: kernel module ip2100 crashes when loading firmware on amd64-system Warning: Unknown package 'linux-image-2.6.14-2-amd64-k8' Bug reassigned from package `linux-image-2.6.14-2-amd64-k8' to `linux-2.6'. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#344401: firefox: Confirmation
Package: firefox Version: 1.5.dfsg-2 Followup-For: Bug #344401 Hello, I can confirm this bug. My papersize is A4 by default on my system. My CUPS works in A4 mode for most applications. When i try to print anything with firefox and CUPS, i get an error about papersize. I have also tried to change the papersize in the property of the printer. Anyway, i can print with Xprint. But this bug is very annoying. Thanks for maintaining firefox, Kind regard Sylvain Le Gall -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.12.3-grand Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) Versions of packages firefox depends on: ii debianutils 2.15.2 Miscellaneous utilities specific t ii fontconfig 2.3.2-1.1 generic font configuration library ii libatk1.0-0 1.10.3-1The ATK accessibility toolkit ii libc62.3.5-9 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libcairo21.0.2-3 The Cairo 2D vector graphics libra ii libfontconfig1 2.3.2-1.1 generic font configuration library ii libfreetype6 2.1.10-1FreeType 2 font engine, shared lib ii libgcc1 1:4.0.2-5 GCC support library ii libglib2.0-0 2.8.4-2 The GLib library of C routines ii libgtk2.0-0 2.8.9-2 The GTK+ graphical user interface ii libidl0 0.8.5-1 library for parsing CORBA IDL file ii libjpeg626b-11 The Independent JPEG Group's JPEG ii libpango1.0-01.10.1-2Layout and rendering of internatio ii libpng12-0 1.2.8rel-5 PNG library - runtime ii libstdc++6 4.0.2-5 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 ii libx11-6 6.8.2.dfsg.1-11 X Window System protocol client li ii libxcursor1 1.1.3-1 X cursor management library ii libxext6 6.8.2.dfsg.1-11 X Window System miscellaneous exte ii libxft2 2.1.7-1 FreeType-based font drawing librar ii libxi6 6.8.2.dfsg.1-11 X Window System Input extension li ii libxinerama1 6.8.2.dfsg.1-11 X Window System multi-head display ii libxp6 6.8.2.dfsg.1-11 X Window System printing extension ii libxrandr2 6.8.2.dfsg.1-11 X Window System Resize, Rotate and ii libxrender1 1:0.9.0-2 X Rendering Extension client libra ii libxt6 6.8.2.dfsg.1-11 X Toolkit Intrinsics ii psmisc 21.8-1 Utilities that use the proc filesy ii zlib1g 1:1.2.3-9 compression library - runtime firefox recommends no packages. -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#328534: Adaptec 2005S Hangs
the bug your reported at the beginning of your bug report regarding initramfs-tools was a timing bug by udev, which is fixed since long. please retest against latest 2.6.14 in unstable usinig initramfs-tools? thanks for your feedback. -- maks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#342545: qt-x11-free build fails
[cc:ed to the hppa porters individually, as well as to debian-hppa; please let me know if you prefer to get such mail just via the list in the future.] Are the hppa porters aware of bug #342545 in libgcc2, which is affecting builds of most Qt-related packages on hppa today? I had suggested to LaMont that this was a result of the buildd being configured to throw SIGBUS instead of silently doing alignment fixups, but I see that this bug is actually an illegal instruction, *not* a SIGBUS, so this is presumably not as easy to fix as just throwing a kernel switch. This is currently the single largest blocker for KDE completing the c2a ABI transition, and large numbers of missing hppa builds are being ignored in the analysis right now because it's the only way to see what other real package bugs are outstanding. Aurelien has done some good work on pinning down the location of the problem, but an hppa porter is going to need to look at this to tell us what the proper fix is. If this bug isn't fixed by the time the rest of the KDE hint is ready to go in, we'll probably push it in leaving the packages out of date (and possibly uninstallable) for hppa. At that point we would also have to reconsider hppa's status as a release port, so hopefully someone will have a chance to look at this soon. Thanks, -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#344615: missinglib: ftbfs [sparc] *** [test] Bus error
Hi, Blars Blarson wrote: missinglib failed to build on a sparc buildd, duplicated on my sparc pbuilder. Please note that some buggy code that casts structures used to work no longer works due to changes in gcc. ./runtests Ran: 56 tests in: 0.02 seconds. OK ./runtests.opt make[2]: *** [test] Bus error make[2]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/missinglib-0.4.10.debian/test' make[1]: *** [test] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/missinglib-0.4.10.debian' make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2 Right. Thanks for the report. I'll investigate this a bit since I have access to a sparc, but it looks very much like yet another bug in the ocaml compiler (missinglib does not contain C code). Regards, Samuel. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#326353: NMU to fix the RC bug on gphoto2 uploaded to 7-day delay queue
I have just made an NMU to the 7 day delayed queue to fix this bug. If you wish to override this NMU, you will need to make a maintainer upload between now and then. Please find the interdiff for the NMU attached. Don Armstrong -- Those who begin coercive elimination of dissent soon find themselves exterminating dissenters. Compulsory unification of opinion achieves only the unanimity of the graveyard. -- Justice Roberts in 319 U.S. 624 (1943) http://www.donarmstrong.com http://rzlab.ucr.edu diff -u gphoto2-2.1.6/debian/changelog gphoto2-2.1.6/debian/changelog --- gphoto2-2.1.6/debian/changelog +++ gphoto2-2.1.6/debian/changelog @@ -1,3 +1,10 @@ +gphoto2 (2.1.6-2.1) unstable; urgency=low + + * NMU + * Rebuild against libreadline5-dev (Closes: #326353) + + -- Don Armstrong [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri, 23 Dec 2005 17:12:55 -0800 + gphoto2 (2.1.6-2) unstable; urgency=low * Rebuilt with new libexif. diff -u gphoto2-2.1.6/debian/control gphoto2-2.1.6/debian/control --- gphoto2-2.1.6/debian/control +++ gphoto2-2.1.6/debian/control @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ Section: utils Priority: extra Maintainer: Frederic Peters [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Build-Depends: debhelper ( 3.0.0), libgphoto2-2-dev (= 2.1.1), zlib1g-dev, libtool, libgpmg1-dev, libjpeg62-dev, libexif-dev (= 0.5.9), libcdk-dev, libreadline4-dev, pkg-config, libncurses5-dev +Build-Depends: debhelper ( 3.0.0), libgphoto2-2-dev (= 2.1.1), zlib1g-dev, libtool, libgpmg1-dev, libjpeg62-dev, libexif-dev (= 0.5.9), libcdk-dev, libreadline5-dev | libreadline-dev, pkg-config, libncurses5-dev Build-Conflicts: liblockdev1-dev Standards-Version: 3.6.1.0 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Processed: retitle 340174 to libcwd0: FTBFS with g++-4.0
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.10 retitle 340174 libcwd0: FTBFS with g++-4.0 Bug#340174: libcwd0: built with gcc-3.4 instead of gcc-4.0? Changed Bug title. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Bug#344416: marked as done ([powerpc] kernel-package breaks mkvmlinuz, rendering 2.6.14-6 kernels uninstallable on powerpc)
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reopen 344416 Bug#344416: [powerpc] kernel-package breaks mkvmlinuz, rendering 2.6.14-6 kernels uninstallable on powerpc Bug reopened, originator not changed. reopen 344413 Bug#344413: [powerpc] k-p 10.00x breaks debconf based /etc/kernel/*.d scripts like mkvmlinuz Bug reopened, originator not changed. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#344571: marked as done (cheops-ng_0.2.3-1(ia64/unstable): FTBFS: missing build-dep: flex)
Your message dated Sat, 24 Dec 2005 03:17:05 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#344571: fixed in cheops-ng 0.2.3-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Dec 2005 20:55:39 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Dec 23 12:55:39 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from mmjgroup.com ([192.34.35.33])
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1Eptwx-0005eF-Mc
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 23 Dec 2005 12:55:39 -0800
Received: from mix.mmjgroup.com (mix.mmjgroup.com [192.34.35.16])
by mmjgroup.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8F3516EEA
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 23 Dec 2005 13:55:38 -0700 (MST)
Received: by mix.mmjgroup.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 72D4D171E3C; Fri, 23 Dec 2005 13:55:38 -0700 (MST)
Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2005 13:55:38 -0700
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: cheops-ng_0.2.3-1(ia64/unstable): FTBFS: missing build-dep: flex
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.4 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Package: cheops-ng
Version: 0.2.3-1
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
Automatic build of cheops-ng_0.2.3-1 on caballero by sbuild/ia64 79
Build started at 20051218-2304
[...]
** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
Build-Depends: libgtk1.2-dev, xlibs-dev, libwrap0-dev, debhelper (= 4.0.0),
autotools-dev, libadns1-dev, libssl-dev, imlib11-dev, libxml-dev,
libgnome-dev, libungif4-dev, libgtkxmhtml-dev, libzvt-dev
[...]
# Add here commands to configure the package.
CFLAGS=-Wall -g -O2 -Wl,-z,defs ./configure --host=ia64-linux-gnu
--build=ia64-linux-gnu --prefix=/usr --mandir=\${prefix}/share/man
--infodir=\${prefix}/share/info
loading cache ./config.cache
checking for gcc... gcc
checking whether the C compiler (gcc -Wall -g -O2 -Wl,-z,defs ) works... yes
checking whether the C compiler (gcc -Wall -g -O2 -Wl,-z,defs ) is a
cross-compiler... no
checking whether we are using GNU C... yes
checking whether gcc accepts -g... yes
checking for a BSD compatible install... /usr/bin/install -c
checking for ranlib... ranlib
checking host system type... ia64-unknown-linux-gnu
checking for flex... no
checking for lex... no
configure: error: You need to install either flex (preferebly) or lex to
compile cheops-ng
make: *** [config.status] Error 1
A full build log can be found at:
http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?arch=ia64pkg=cheops-ngver=0.2.3-1
---
Received: (at 344571-close) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Dec 2005 11:20:53 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Dec 24 03:20:53 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1Eq7Ob-0001CK-Mr; Sat, 24 Dec 2005 03:17:05 -0800
From: Javier Fernandez-Sanguino Pen~a [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.65 $
Subject: Bug#344571: fixed in cheops-ng 0.2.3-2
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2005 03:17:05 -0800
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Source: cheops-ng
Source-Version: 0.2.3-2
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
cheops-ng, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
cheops-ng_0.2.3-2.diff.gz
to pool/main/c/cheops-ng/cheops-ng_0.2.3-2.diff.gz
cheops-ng_0.2.3-2.dsc
to pool/main/c/cheops-ng/cheops-ng_0.2.3-2.dsc
cheops-ng_0.2.3-2_i386.deb
to pool/main/c/cheops-ng/cheops-ng_0.2.3-2_i386.deb
cheops-ng_0.2.3.orig.tar.gz
to pool/main/c/cheops-ng/cheops-ng_0.2.3.orig.tar.gz
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen
Bug#324877: libdevice-serialport-perl still tries to find serial port
severity 324877 important thanks Hi Daniel, You reported that you were able to reproduce this build failure with libdevice-serialporl-perl 1.002-0.2, but this version has successfully built on all archs (except s390 where it shouldn't be). At this point, the package is *not* running make test, but is instead simply checking for the presence of a serial device node in /dev/; it's arguable whether this is the correct check, but why does your pbuilder chroot not have /dev/ttyS1 when all of the buildds do have it? I'm inclined to believe this is a pbuilder-specific bug, and should therefore not be RC. Thanks, -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#326352: marked as done (please rebuild with libreadline5-dev as build dependency)
Your message dated Sat, 24 Dec 2005 04:00:44 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line This bug was fixed in 0.20.14-7.2 by Luk Claes has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Sep 2005 20:40:52 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Sep 02 13:40:52 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.17.13] (root) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EBILE-0007BN-00; Fri, 02 Sep 2005 13:40:52 -0700 Received: from mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [130.149.17.13]) by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3p2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA10267 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 2 Sep 2005 22:40:50 +0200 (MEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 575BDFD4A for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 2 Sep 2005 22:40:50 +0200 (MEST) Received: from mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (bueno [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10224) with ESMTP id 17169-24 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 2 Sep 2005 22:40:50 +0200 (MEST) 13915 Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.19.1]) by mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de (Postfix) with ESMTP for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 2 Sep 2005 22:40:50 +0200 (MEST) Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.8/Submit) id j82KeoTu003844 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 2 Sep 2005 22:40:50 +0200 (MEST) Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2005 22:40:50 +0200 (MEST) From: Matthias Klose [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: please rebuild with libreadline5-dev as build dependency X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at cs.tu-berlin.de Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: gpsim The package depends/recommends libreadline4. This version will be removed from the archive in the near future. Please change your build dependencies to libreadline5-dev | libreadline-dev Please raise the severity of this bug report to serious, if the package cannot be built with libreadline5-dev. --- Received: (at 326352-done) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Dec 2005 12:00:49 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Dec 24 04:00:49 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu ([138.23.92.77] helo=epsilon.donarmstrong.com) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Eq84v-0007nR-9T for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 24 Dec 2005 04:00:49 -0800 Received: from epsilon.donarmstrong.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by epsilon.donarmstrong.com (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3) with ESMTP id jBOC0ntX012916 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 24 Dec 2005 04:00:49 -0800 Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by epsilon.donarmstrong.com (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id jBOC0mg7012915 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 24 Dec 2005 04:00:48 -0800 Received: (nullmailer pid 20428 invoked by uid 1000); Sat, 24 Dec 2005 12:00:44 - Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2005 04:00:44 -0800 From: Don Armstrong [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: This bug was fixed in 0.20.14-7.2 by Luk Claes Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mail-Followup-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=uc35eWnScqDcQrv5 Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 --uc35eWnScqDcQrv5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Version: 0.20.14-7.2 gpsim (0.20.14-7.2) unstable; urgency=3Dmedium * Non-maintainer upload. * Rebuilt with libreadline5-dev as build-dep. Closes: #244126. * Fix: Default arguments are only permitted for function parameters Closes: #265766, #334155. * Fix FTBFS with gcc-4.0. Closes: #293660. -- Luk Claes [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon, 17 Oct 2005 17:11:32 +0200 Don Armstrong --=20 A
Processed: Re: libdevice-serialport-perl still tries to find serial port
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 324877 important Bug#324877: libdevice-serialport-perl: FTBFS: Trying to find a serial port for testing... Severity set to `important'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#326327: NMU to fix this RC bug in 7 day delayed queue
An NMU to fix this bug has been made to the 7 day delay queue. You can override this NMU by making a maintainer upload between now and then. The interdiff of the NMU is attached. Don Armstrong -- LEADERSHIP -- A form of self-preservation exhibited by people with autodestructive imaginations in order to ensure that when it comes to the crunch it'll be someone else's bones which go crack and not their own. -- The HipCrime Vocab by Chad C. Mulligan (John Brunner _Stand On Zanzibar_ p256-7) http://www.donarmstrong.com http://rzlab.ucr.edu diff -u lua50-5.0.2/debian/control lua50-5.0.2/debian/control --- lua50-5.0.2/debian/control +++ lua50-5.0.2/debian/control @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ Section: interpreters Priority: optional Maintainer: Daniel Silverstone [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Build-Depends: debhelper (= 3.0.24), libreadline4-dev +Build-Depends: debhelper (= 3.0.24), libreadline5-dev | libreadline-dev Standards-Version: 3.6.1 Package: lua50 diff -u lua50-5.0.2/debian/changelog lua50-5.0.2/debian/changelog --- lua50-5.0.2/debian/changelog +++ lua50-5.0.2/debian/changelog @@ -1,3 +1,11 @@ +lua50 (5.0.2-5.1) unstable; urgency=low + + * Non Maintainer Upload + * Build-Depend on libreadline5-dev instead of libreadline4 +(closes: #326327) + + -- Don Armstrong [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat, 24 Dec 2005 04:13:30 -0800 + lua50 (5.0.2-5) unstable; urgency=low * Missed a place where calling do_path() is kinda important in lua.c signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#344651: smtpguard - FTBFS: undefined reference to `yywrap'
Package: smtpguard Version: 1.1.2-1 Severity: serious There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: Automatic build of smtpguard_1.1.2-1 on debian01 by sbuild/s390 79 [...] s390-linux-gnu-gcc -Wall -g -O2 -DFG_DISABLE_DEPRECATED -o .libs/smtpguard-daemon symtbl.o smtpguard-daemon.o eval.o evalguard.o lex.o mailwarn.o sg_io.o parse.o ./.libs/libsmtpguard.so -lpthread /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so /usr/lib/libxml2.so -lz -lm /usr/lib/libdb-4.3.so parse.o: In function `spam_parse_perror':/build/buildd/smtpguard-1.1.2/smtpguard/parse.y:92: warning: `sys_errlist' is deprecated; use `strerror' or `strerror_r' instead lex.o: In function `yylex':/build/buildd/smtpguard-1.1.2/smtpguard/lex.c:883: undefined reference to `yywrap' collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make[3]: *** [smtpguard-daemon] Error 1 make[3]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/smtpguard-1.1.2/smtpguard' make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/smtpguard-1.1.2' make[1]: *** [all-recursive-am] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/smtpguard-1.1.2' make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2 ** Build finished at 20051223-1632 FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died] Bastian -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#344652: libsmbios - FTBFS: architecture specific
Package: libsmbios Version: 0.10.6-1 Severity: serious There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: Automatic build of libsmbios_0.10.6-1 on debian01 by sbuild/s390 79 [...] COMPILING C++ (shared) : libraries/cmos/CmosRW_LinuxIO.lo libraries/cmos/CmosRW_LinuxIO.cpp:23:20: error: sys/io.h: No such file or directory libraries/cmos/CmosRW_LinuxIO.cpp: In member function 'virtual u8 cmos::CmosRWIo::readByte(u32, u32, u32) const': libraries/cmos/CmosRW_LinuxIO.cpp:56: error: 'iopl' was not declared in this scope libraries/cmos/CmosRW_LinuxIO.cpp:58: error: 'outb_p' was not declared in this scope libraries/cmos/CmosRW_LinuxIO.cpp:59: error: 'inb_p' was not declared in this scope libraries/cmos/CmosRW_LinuxIO.cpp: In member function 'virtual void cmos::CmosRWIo::writeByte(u32, u32, u32, u8) const': libraries/cmos/CmosRW_LinuxIO.cpp:66: error: 'iopl' was not declared in this scope libraries/cmos/CmosRW_LinuxIO.cpp:68: error: 'outb_p' was not declared in this scope make[1]: *** [libraries/cmos/CmosRW_LinuxIO.lo] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/libsmbios-0.10.6' make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2 ** Build finished at 20051223-1721 FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died] Bastian -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: severity of 344524 is serious
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.10 severity 344524 serious Bug#344524: xfce4-terminal: Depends on libexo-0.3-0 which is not in Debian Severity set to `serious'. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#344653: electricsheep - FTBFS: cannot find -lX11
Package: electricsheep Version: 2.6.4-1 Severity: serious There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: Automatic build of electricsheep_2.6.4-1 on debian01 by sbuild/s390 79 [...] Build-Depends: debhelper (= 4.0.0), libjpeg62-dev, libexpat1-dev, libpng12-dev, dpatch, libxv-dev [...] s390-linux-gnu-gcc -DPACKAGE_DATA_DIR=\/build/buildd/electricsheep-2.6.4/debian/electricsheep/usr/share/electricsheep\ -Wall -g -O2 -o electricsheep-voter electricsheep_voter-electricsheep-voter.o -lX11 -lexpat /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lX11 collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make[3]: *** [electricsheep-voter] Error 1 make[3]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/electricsheep-2.6.4' make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/electricsheep-2.6.4' make[1]: *** [all] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/electricsheep-2.6.4' make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2 ** Build finished at 20051222-1123 FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#344654: jnettop - FTBFS: configure: error: can't figure out gethostbyname_r() since localhost doesn't resolve
Package: jnettop Version: 0.11.0-2 Severity: serious There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: Automatic build of jnettop_0.11.0-2 on debian01 by sbuild/s390 79 [...] checking if localhost resolves... no configure: error: can't figure out gethostbyname_r() since localhost doesn't resolve make: *** [config.status] Error 1 ** Build finished at 20051208-1736 FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: severity of 344523 is serious
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.10 severity 344523 serious Bug#344523: xfmedia: Depends on libexo-0.3-0 which is not in Debian Severity set to `serious'. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: ocamlodbc - FTBFS: cp: cannot stat `libocamlodbc.a': No such file or directory
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reopen 340103 Bug#340103: ocamlodbc - FTBFS: cp: cannot stat `libocamlodbc.a': No such file or directory Bug reopened, originator not changed. found 340103 2.10-2 Bug#340103: ocamlodbc - FTBFS: cp: cannot stat `libocamlodbc.a': No such file or directory Bug marked as found in version 2.10-2. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#344657: tix - FTBFS: /bin/dash: Command not found
Package: tix Version: 8.4.0-1 Severity: serious There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: Automatic build of tix_8.4.0-1 on debian-31 by sbuild/s390 79 [...] ** Using build dependencies supplied by package: Build-Depends: tcl8.4-dev, tk8.4-dev (= 8.4.1), debhelper (= 4.2) [...] /usr/bin/fakeroot debian/rules clean dh_testdir make: /bin/dash: Command not found make: *** [clean] Error 127 ** Build finished at 20051223-2034 FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#344658: vim - FTBFS: cp: cannot stat `./debian/tmp/usr/bin/rview': No such file or directory
Package: vim Version: 1:6.4-006+1 Severity: serious There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: Automatic build of vim_1:6.4-006+1 on debian-31 by sbuild/s390 79 [...] dh_install -X.svn cp: cannot stat `./debian/tmp/usr/bin/rview': No such file or directory dh_install: command returned error code 256 make: *** [install-stamp-vim-tiny] Error 1 ** Build finished at 20051223-0135 FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died] Bastian -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#329387: bugzilla security update for sarge (2.16.7-7sarge2)
* Martin Schulze ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) disait : Do you happen to know about the package in woody? Well, I don't know. Where can I grab woody's source packages? a) what about woody As soon as I know where to fetch woody's sources, I will tell you. b) what about sid Sid is not affected, the vulnerable script does not exist in the sid version. -- Alexis Sukrieh [EMAIL PROTECTED] 0x1EE5DD34 Debian http://www.debian.org Backup Manager http://www.backup-manager.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#344661: slib - not installable
Package: slib Version: 3a2-3 Severity: serious slib conflicts with versions in unstable, makes it impossible to install. The following packages have unmet dependencies: slib: Conflicts: libguile9 (= 1:1.4-26) but 1:1.4-26 is to be installed Conflicts: guile-1.6-libs (= 1.6.7-1.1) but 1.6.7-1.1 is to be installed E: Broken packages Bastian -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: tagging 329387
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 329387 security Bug#329387: Bugzilla: Unsafe use of temporary files in the syncshadow script Tags were: patch sarge woody Tags added: security End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#329387: bugzilla security update for sarge (2.16.7-7sarge2)
Martin Schulze wrote: Yes. I've copied it into the private security archive. Next steps: a) what about woody Woody is vulnerable as well, the vulnerable code is present in syncshadowdb:164 Alexis, you can download the Woody sources through packages.debian.org. Cheers, Moritz -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#344657: marked as done (tix - FTBFS: /bin/dash: Command not found)
Your message dated Sat, 24 Dec 2005 05:32:09 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#344657: fixed in tix 8.4.0-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Dec 2005 13:03:27 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Dec 24 05:03:21 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mobilewave.waldi.eu.org ([82.139.201.22]) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Eq932-0007jJ-5l for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 24 Dec 2005 05:03:01 -0800 Received: by mobilewave.waldi.eu.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id B709C1854C; Sat, 24 Dec 2005 14:02:48 +0100 (CET) Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2005 14:02:48 +0100 From: Bastian Blank [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: tix - FTBFS: /bin/dash: Command not found Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] References: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: tix Version: 8.4.0-1 Severity: serious There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: Automatic build of tix_8.4.0-1 on debian-31 by sbuild/s390 79 [...] ** Using build dependencies supplied by package: Build-Depends: tcl8.4-dev, tk8.4-dev (= 8.4.1), debhelper (= 4.2) [...] /usr/bin/fakeroot debian/rules clean dh_testdir make: /bin/dash: Command not found make: *** [clean] Error 127 ** Build finished at 20051223-2034 FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died] --- Received: (at 344657-close) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Dec 2005 13:40:49 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Dec 24 05:40:49 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1Eq9VJ-0005YK-3Q; Sat, 24 Dec 2005 05:32:09 -0800 From: Matthias Klose [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.65 $ Subject: Bug#344657: fixed in tix 8.4.0-2 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2005 05:32:09 -0800 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: tix Source-Version: 8.4.0-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of tix, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: tix-dev_8.4.0-2_i386.deb to pool/main/t/tix/tix-dev_8.4.0-2_i386.deb tix_8.4.0-2.diff.gz to pool/main/t/tix/tix_8.4.0-2.diff.gz tix_8.4.0-2.dsc to pool/main/t/tix/tix_8.4.0-2.dsc tix_8.4.0-2_i386.deb to pool/main/t/tix/tix_8.4.0-2_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Matthias Klose [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated tix package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2005 14:21:41 +0100 Source: tix Binary: tix tix-dev Architecture: source i386 Version: 8.4.0-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Matthias Klose [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Matthias Klose [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: tix- The Tix library for Tk -- runtime package tix-dev- The Tix library for Tk -- development package Closes: 344657 Changes: tix (8.4.0-2) unstable; urgency=low . * debian/rules: Fix typo (closes: #344657). Files: 1202f77241f2e6f4337fdd9bf1cc0d8a 587 libs optional tix_8.4.0-2.dsc edb801b5c09c182e9bedf34cfa0b52db 25483 libs optional tix_8.4.0-2.diff.gz c48ce9dc7d2b3d7b8e96563828a419b2 316814 libs optional tix_8.4.0-2_i386.deb 3a473eccf8f40c6f0bead8d1d873e6a5
Bug#344481: Mysterious crash in php4-rrdtool
On Thu, Dec 22, 2005 at 10:21:52PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: Break on rrd_graph_options, step into getopt_long, run bt to see what lib it says it's in. Well, I should tell it earlier. It looks like getopt_long comes from glibc, backtrace follows. Breakpoint 1, 0xb7d085b6 in getopt_long () from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6 (gdb) bt #0 0xb7d085b6 in getopt_long () from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6 #1 0xb78d839c in rrd_graph_options () from /usr/lib/librrd.so.2 #2 0xb78d8fda in rrd_graph () from /usr/lib/librrd.so.2 #3 0xb7c1e64b in zif_rrd_graph () from /usr/lib/php4/20050606/rrdtool.so #4 0xb72bbe82 in execute () from /usr/lib/apache/1.3/libphp4.so #5 0xb72a27f5 in zend_execute_scripts () from /usr/lib/apache/1.3/libphp4.so That does not bring me any closer to the solution. Especially because the example from my previous e-mail works correctly with exactly the same getopt_long: (gdb) r --letter-a -2 Starting program: /tmp/g/gol --letter-a -2 Breakpoint 2 at 0xb7f3c5b6 Pending breakpoint getopt_long resolved Breakpoint 2, 0xb7f3c5b6 in getopt_long () from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6 (gdb) bt #0 0xb7f3c5b6 in getopt_long () from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6 #1 0x0804844b in main () Because only apache/php4(module) is a problematic combination I suspect an apache. If it is sufficient for you I have no objections against reassigning this bug to apache package. I'd rather see some analysis to show where the bug actually belongs instead of guessing and reassigning. That's understandable. But this case exceeds my knowledge. Regards Artur -- Czesiu: Dlaczego wypiłaś cały dzbanek herbaty? Croolik: Bo był. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#344658: vim - FTBFS: cp: cannot stat `./debian/tmp/usr/bin/rview': No such file or directory
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Bastian Blank wrote: Package: vim Version: 1:6.4-006+1 Severity: serious There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: Yes, we've seen that and are investigating why it goes wrong at those 3 architectures and not at the others. Regards, Matthijs Mohlmann -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD4DBQFDrVPt2n1ROIkXqbARAnQFAJwKkfZKwuU4oGvn9fIsSFnIgJrxgACXYV+O UMs6g2GthLzMnZps5SE1SA== =ercD -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#344653: electricsheep - FTBFS: cannot find -lX11
tags 344653 + help tags 344653 + confirmed thanks * Bastian Blank ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) disait : There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lX11 collect2: ld returned 1 exit status Indeed, I reproduced that with my pbuilder... I'm a bit confused, because even if I add libx11-6 in my build-dependencies (which provides libX11.so.6) I still get the error. I don't know how to solve that build issue, if someone can give me a hand, that's very welcome... -- Alexis Sukrieh [EMAIL PROTECTED] 0x1EE5DD34 Debian http://www.debian.org Backup Manager http://www.backup-manager.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Bug#344653: electricsheep - FTBFS: cannot find -lX11
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 344653 + help Bug#344653: electricsheep - FTBFS: cannot find -lX11 There were no tags set. Tags added: help tags 344653 + confirmed Bug#344653: electricsheep - FTBFS: cannot find -lX11 Tags were: help Tags added: confirmed thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#344672: pointless installs python extensions into /usr/share
Package: pointless Severity: serious See http://packages.debian.org/cgi-bin/search_contents.pl?searchmode=filelistword=pointlessversion=unstablearch=i386 the whole usr/share/pointless/lib directory should be removed. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#329212: fisg bug #329212
tag 329212 patch
thanks dude
Hi there,
the segmentation fault reported in this bug happens because the log
fails to be parsed, hence, there is no user list, and it tries to index
NULL. This happens because the number of users is checked, but too late.
There is a simplish patch attached that fixes the problem by moving the
check up with some tweaks, so it is performed earlier, and before
everything blows up.
Cheers,
--
Guilherme de S. Pastore (fatalerror)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- src/fisg.c 2003-10-05 03:40:55.0 -0300
+++ src/fisg.c.new 2005-12-24 13:01:26.0 -0200
@@ -1336,6 +1336,15 @@
}
/*
+ * Check if any users have been found
+ */
+ if (myStats-userList == NULL)
+ {
+ FERR(No users found? Check that you really specified correct log-format!\n);
+ return -10;
+ }
+
+ /*
* Index the list for sorting
*/
if (stats_index(myStats) 0)
@@ -1362,16 +1371,6 @@
return -10;
}
-
- /*
- * Check number of users
- */
- if (myStats-nUsers = 0)
- {
- FERR(No users found? Check that you really specified correct log-format!\n);
- return -10;
- }
-
/* Calculate time */
time(myTime2);
myStats-nTimeElapsed = (myTime2 - myTime1);
Processed: fisg bug #329212
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 329212 patch Bug#329212: fisg: Fisg segfault There were no tags set. Tags added: patch thanks dude Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#335827: marked as done (FTBFS: asis-implementation.adb must be recompiled)
Your message dated Sat, 24 Dec 2005 16:50:09 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line FTBFS: asis-implementation.adb must be recompiled has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Oct 2005 03:35:37 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Oct 25 20:35:37 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from zoot.lafn.org [206.117.18.6] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EUc4f-0003i0-00; Tue, 25 Oct 2005 20:35:37 -0700 Received: from localhost.localdomain (pool-71-104-166-233.lsanca.dsl-w.verizon.net [71.104.166.233]) (authenticated bits=0) by zoot.lafn.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j9Q3ZZp0078889 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 25 Oct 2005 20:35:36 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) Received: from kraai by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.54) id 1EUX2Y-00089v-4p for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 25 Oct 2005 15:13:06 -0700 Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2005 15:13:06 -0700 From: Matt Kraai [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: FTBFS: asis-implementation.adb must be recompiled Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=a8Wt8u1KmwUX3Y2C Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.86.2/1148/Tue Oct 25 12:34:12 2005 on zoot.lafn.org X-Virus-Status: Clean Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.6 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,DATE_IN_PAST_03_06, HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 --a8Wt8u1KmwUX3Y2C Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Package: libaws Version: 2.0p-6 Severity: serious libaws fails to build in an unstable pbuilder chroot on i386: gnatbind -x ada2wsdl-main.ali error: asis-implementation.adb must be recompiled (gnatvsn.ads has be= en modified) gnatmake: *** bind failed. make: *** [debian/tmp/ada2wsdl] Error 4 --=20 Matt --a8Wt8u1KmwUX3Y2C Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDXq3xfNdgYxVXvBARAicHAJ4jM2CzU4FMtNduuCq6rW+bdT1I8QCeIgpS yZTjZX4WQs9IienMao/fYRA= =POS8 -END PGP SIGNATURE- --a8Wt8u1KmwUX3Y2C-- --- Received: (at 335827-done) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Dec 2005 15:50:54 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Dec 24 07:50:54 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from oola.is.scarlet.be ([193.74.71.23]) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EqBfa-0005Du-3h for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 24 Dec 2005 07:50:54 -0800 Received: from (ip-83-134-243-56.dsl.scarlet.be [83.134.243.56]) by oola.is.scarlet.be with ESMTP id jBOFocn22086 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 24 Dec 2005 16:50:45 +0100 From: Ludovic Brenta [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: FTBFS: asis-implementation.adb must be recompiled Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2005 16:50:09 +0100 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Version: 2.0p-8 Fixing libgnatprj-dev (see #334772, #337800) corrects the root cause for this bug. In turn, it was necessary to rebuild asis, which was done in asis 3.15p-9, before aws would be fixed. This is now done. -- Ludovic Brenta. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#344354: marked as done (avahi-utils: contains arch-dependany binaries)
Your message dated Sat, 24 Dec 2005 16:49:53 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#344354: ahh... has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Dec 2005 01:46:55 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Dec 21 17:46:55 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from smtp-out2.blueyonder.co.uk ([195.188.213.5]) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EpFXj-0003Ir-Kb for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 21 Dec 2005 17:46:55 -0800 Received: from xerces ([82.32.57.57]) by smtp-out2.blueyonder.co.uk with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Thu, 22 Dec 2005 01:47:50 + Received: from sam by xerces with local (Exim 4.50) id 1EpFXi-0004pT-BA for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 22 Dec 2005 01:46:54 + Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Sam Morris [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: avahi-utils: contains arch-dependany binaries X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8 Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2005 01:46:54 + Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-OriginalArrivalTime: 22 Dec 2005 01:47:50.0748 (UTC) FILETIME=[B7A589C0:01C60699] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE, RCVD_IN_SORBS autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: avahi-utils Version: 0.6.1-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable The avahi-utils package is for architecture 'all' yet it contains binaries for the powerpc architecture: $ avahi-resolve bash: /usr/bin/avahi-resolve: cannot execute binary file $ file /usr/bin/avahi-resolve /usr/bin/avahi-resolve: ELF 32-bit MSB executable, PowerPC or cisco 4500, version 1 (SYSV), for GNU/Linux 2.2.0, dynamically linked (uses shared libs), stripped $ dpkg-architecture dpkg-architecture: warning: Unknown gcc system type i486-linux-gnu, falling back to default (native compilation) dpkg-architecture: warning: Specified GNU system type i386-linux does not match gcc system type i486-linux-gnu. DEB_BUILD_ARCH=i386 DEB_BUILD_GNU_CPU=i386 DEB_BUILD_GNU_SYSTEM=linux DEB_BUILD_GNU_TYPE=i386-linux DEB_HOST_ARCH=i386 DEB_HOST_GNU_CPU=i386 DEB_HOST_GNU_SYSTEM=linux DEB_HOST_GNU_TYPE=i386-linux -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (530, 'testing'), (520, 'unstable'), (510, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.14-2-k7 Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages avahi-utils depends on: ii avahi-daemon 0.6.1-1Avahi mDNS/DNS-SD daemon -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 344354-done) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Dec 2005 15:50:10 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Dec 24 07:50:10 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from simons.xs4all.nl ([80.126.201.244] helo=fire.luon.net ident=postfix) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EqBes-0005By-J7 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 24 Dec 2005 07:50:10 -0800 Received: from spring.luon.net (cc956686-a.groni1.gr.home.nl [82.73.160.105]) by fire.luon.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F460FEC7; Sat, 24 Dec 2005 16:50:02 +0100 (CET) Received: by spring.luon.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 13016301E9; Sat, 24 Dec 2005 16:49:54 +0100 (CET) Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2005 16:49:53 +0100 To: Trent Lloyd [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Bug#344354: ahh... Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] References: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Operating-System: Linux spring 2.6.15-rc4-powerpc #2 Wed Dec 21 20:32:04 CET 2005 ppc GNU/Linux User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Sjoerd Simons) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-9.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_01,HAS_BUG_NUMBER, HAS_PACKAGE,RCVD_IN_SORBS autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: avahi-utils Version: 0.6.1-2 On Fri, Dec 23, 2005 at 06:52:10PM +0800, Trent Lloyd wrote: avahi-utils used to only contain python stuff, but
Bug#344413: kernel-package hooks transition
Oh well, messed up the bug email addresses :/ On Sat, Dec 24, 2005 at 05:03:17PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote: On Sat, Dec 24, 2005 at 09:19:36AM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote: Hi, In the recent 10.X series, kernel package has started producing image packages whose maintainer scripts use debconf for user interaction. Unfortunately, this meant that any hook scripts called in the maintainer scripts for the image package (update-grub comes to mind), if they wrote anything at all to the STDout, would cause debconf to throw hissy fits, since it was expecting commands on STDOUT, not random chatter from the hook scripts. One solution was to call db_stop before calling the hook scripts, and redirecting stdout to stderr in hte invocation of the scripts. Unfortunately, this made any scripts that used debconf impossible. Notice that the debconf helper scripts provide stdout on 3, so any scripts writing to stdout only need to redirect their output to 3, no ? Another idea would be to have some tag or something to declare if the script uses debconf or not, and to do the redirection depending on that ? It could be parsing for something like : comment delimiter KPKG-TAG: debconf (where comment delimiter is # for shell scripts, obviously). This would allow for the most flexibility, and still work out fine, and parsing would be a simple grep command, so rather cheap (if grep KPKG-TAG.*debconf; then debconf stuff; else non-debconf stuff; fi) Oh and BTW, 10.023 did not fix the mkvmlinuz problem, not sure if you saw me reopening the bug reports. I will try to investigate this on tuesday, altough i am really lost about this and help will be welcomed. For powerpc users, a workaround is to remove the debconf stuff by hand. There are two scripts : /etc/kernel/postinst.d/mkvmlinuz and /etc/kernel/prerm.d/mkvmlinuz And the best way is to replace the lines : . /usr/share/debconf/confmodule db_get mkvmlinuz/bootloaders bootloader=$RET by : bootloader=your_choice Where your_choice is yaboot on pmac and rs6k, and mkvmlinuz otherwise. Friendly, Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Wanadoo vous informe que cet e-mail a ete controle par l'anti-virus mail. Aucun virus connu a ce jour par nos services n'a ete detecte. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: apt
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 343701 apt Bug#343701: apt-get: Unable to configure a package that failed to install, config.dat locked by frontend Warning: Unknown package 'apt-get' Bug reassigned from package `apt-get' to `apt'. -- Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#300829: marked as done (lshw: ftbfs [sparc] missing wget, tries to fetch over internet durring build)
Your message dated Sat, 24 Dec 2005 19:16:47 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bugs closed with version 02.06-3 of lshw. has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Mar 2005 04:47:14 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Mar 21 20:47:14 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from blars.org (renig.nat.blars.org) [64.81.35.59] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DDbIP-0006Ol-00; Mon, 21 Mar 2005 20:47:13 -0800 Received: from renig.nat.blars.org (plergb.nat.blars.org [172.16.1.1]) by renig.nat.blars.org (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian-7.1) with ESMTP id j2M4kvXE021068 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Mon, 21 Mar 2005 20:46:57 -0800 Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by renig.nat.blars.org (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian-7.1) id j2M4kvDD021065; Mon, 21 Mar 2005 20:46:57 -0800 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Blars Blarson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: lshw: ftbfs [sparc] missing wget, tries to fetch over internet durring build X-Mailer: reportbug 1.50 Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2005 20:46:57 -0800 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: lshw Version: 02.03-1 Severity: serious Tags: sid Justification: fails to build from source lshw fails to build from source on sparc and other architectures, duplicated on sparc pbuilder. It is missing a build dependancy on wget, and is trying to fetch http://pciids.sourceforge.net/pci.ids durring the build process. This makes the package unbuildable when the remote system is inaccessable. c++ -g -Wall -Os -I./core/ -DPREFIX=\/usr\ -DSBINDIR=\/usr/sbin\ -DMANDIR=\/usr/share/man\ -DDATADIR=\/usr/share\ -c lshw.cc -o lshw.o c++ -L./core/ -o lshw lshw.o -llshw wget http://pciids.sourceforge.net/pci.ids make[2]: wget: Command not found make[2]: *** [pci.ids] Error 127 make[2]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/lshw-02.03/src' --- Received: (at 300788-done) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Dec 2005 18:16:52 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Dec 24 10:16:52 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from kabuto.elmundo.es ([193.110.128.11] helo=mail.elmundo.es) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EqDwq-0006qw-14; Sat, 24 Dec 2005 10:16:52 -0800 Received: from xanes.el-mundo.int (xanes.elmundo.int [10.5.222.50]) by mail.elmundo.es (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5ADDC34F4D; Sat, 24 Dec 2005 19:16:53 +0100 (CET) Received: by xanes.el-mundo.int (Postfix, from userid 65500) id 425A817315; Sat, 24 Dec 2005 19:16:49 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by xanes.el-mundo.int (Postfix) with ESMTP id 141C517313; Sat, 24 Dec 2005 19:16:49 +0100 (CET) From: David =?iso-8859-1?q?Mart=EDnez_Moreno?= [EMAIL PROTECTED] Organization: Debian To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Bugs closed with version 02.06-3 of lshw. Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2005 19:16:47 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.3 Cc: Ghe Rivero [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary=nextPart3495050.AaJzHcURVk; protocol=application/pgp-signature; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Bogosity: No, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.366930, version=0.10.3 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 --nextPart3495050.AaJzHcURVk Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Version: 02.06-3 Hello, Ghe, sorry, I forgot to make the final run with -v02.03-1, so I am= =20 closing manually bugs closed with this upload. Thank you for your contribution, Ender. =2D-=20 Network engineer Debian Developer --nextPart3495050.AaJzHcURVk Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -BEGIN PGP
Bug#300829: marked as done (lshw: ftbfs [sparc] missing wget, tries to fetch over internet durring build)
Your message dated Sat, 24 Dec 2005 19:16:47 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bugs closed with version 02.06-3 of lshw. has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Mar 2005 04:47:14 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Mar 21 20:47:14 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from blars.org (renig.nat.blars.org) [64.81.35.59] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DDbIP-0006Ol-00; Mon, 21 Mar 2005 20:47:13 -0800 Received: from renig.nat.blars.org (plergb.nat.blars.org [172.16.1.1]) by renig.nat.blars.org (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian-7.1) with ESMTP id j2M4kvXE021068 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Mon, 21 Mar 2005 20:46:57 -0800 Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by renig.nat.blars.org (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian-7.1) id j2M4kvDD021065; Mon, 21 Mar 2005 20:46:57 -0800 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Blars Blarson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: lshw: ftbfs [sparc] missing wget, tries to fetch over internet durring build X-Mailer: reportbug 1.50 Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2005 20:46:57 -0800 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: lshw Version: 02.03-1 Severity: serious Tags: sid Justification: fails to build from source lshw fails to build from source on sparc and other architectures, duplicated on sparc pbuilder. It is missing a build dependancy on wget, and is trying to fetch http://pciids.sourceforge.net/pci.ids durring the build process. This makes the package unbuildable when the remote system is inaccessable. c++ -g -Wall -Os -I./core/ -DPREFIX=\/usr\ -DSBINDIR=\/usr/sbin\ -DMANDIR=\/usr/share/man\ -DDATADIR=\/usr/share\ -c lshw.cc -o lshw.o c++ -L./core/ -o lshw lshw.o -llshw wget http://pciids.sourceforge.net/pci.ids make[2]: wget: Command not found make[2]: *** [pci.ids] Error 127 make[2]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/lshw-02.03/src' --- Received: (at 300829-done) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Dec 2005 18:16:52 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Dec 24 10:16:52 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from kabuto.elmundo.es ([193.110.128.11] helo=mail.elmundo.es) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EqDwq-0006qw-14; Sat, 24 Dec 2005 10:16:52 -0800 Received: from xanes.el-mundo.int (xanes.elmundo.int [10.5.222.50]) by mail.elmundo.es (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5ADDC34F4D; Sat, 24 Dec 2005 19:16:53 +0100 (CET) Received: by xanes.el-mundo.int (Postfix, from userid 65500) id 425A817315; Sat, 24 Dec 2005 19:16:49 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by xanes.el-mundo.int (Postfix) with ESMTP id 141C517313; Sat, 24 Dec 2005 19:16:49 +0100 (CET) From: David =?iso-8859-1?q?Mart=EDnez_Moreno?= [EMAIL PROTECTED] Organization: Debian To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Bugs closed with version 02.06-3 of lshw. Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2005 19:16:47 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.3 Cc: Ghe Rivero [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary=nextPart3495050.AaJzHcURVk; protocol=application/pgp-signature; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Bogosity: No, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.366930, version=0.10.3 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2 --nextPart3495050.AaJzHcURVk Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Version: 02.06-3 Hello, Ghe, sorry, I forgot to make the final run with -v02.03-1, so I am= =20 closing manually bugs closed with this upload. Thank you for your contribution, Ender. =2D-=20 Network engineer Debian Developer --nextPart3495050.AaJzHcURVk Content-Type:
Bug#300788: marked as done (lshw: FTBFS(amd64/gcc-4.0): Missing Build-Depends on 'wget')
Your message dated Sat, 24 Dec 2005 19:16:47 +0100
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bugs closed with version 02.06-3 of lshw.
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Mar 2005 21:17:08 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Mar 21 13:17:08 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from c223012.adsl.hansenet.de (localhost.localdomain) [213.39.223.12]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DDUGp-0004SK-00; Mon, 21 Mar 2005 13:17:08 -0800
Received: from aj by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.44)
id 1DDUGo-0003oy-GX; Mon, 21 Mar 2005 22:17:06 +0100
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Andreas Jochens [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: lshw: FTBFS(amd64/gcc-4.0): Missing Build-Depends on 'wget'
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2005 22:17:06 +0100
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Package: lshw
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
When building 'lshw' in a clean chroot on amd64 with gcc-4.0,
I get the following error:
c++ -g -Wall -Os -I./core/ -DPREFIX=\/usr\ -DSBINDIR=\/usr/sbin\
-DMANDIR=\/usr/share/man\ -DDATADIR=\/usr/share\ -c lshw.cc -o lshw.o
lshw.cc: In function 'int main(int, char**)':
lshw.cc:119: warning: missing sentinel in function call
c++ -L./core/ -o lshw lshw.o -llshw
wget http://pciids.sourceforge.net/pci.ids
make[2]: wget: Command not found
make[2]: *** [pci.ids] Error 127
Please add the missing Build-Depends on 'wget' to debian/control.
Regards
Andreas Jochens
diff -urN ../tmp-orig/lshw-02.03/debian/control ./debian/control
--- ../tmp-orig/lshw-02.03/debian/control 2005-03-21 21:55:22.764966134
+0100
+++ ./debian/control2005-03-21 21:55:20.920322058 +0100
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
Priority: optional
Maintainer: Ola Lundqvist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Uploaders: Ghe Rivero [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Build-Depends: debhelper ( 3.0.0), docbook-utils, libgtk2.0-dev
+Build-Depends: debhelper ( 3.0.0), docbook-utils, libgtk2.0-dev, wget
Standards-Version: 3.6.1
Package: lshw
diff -urN ../tmp-orig/lshw-02.03/src/core/hw.h ./src/core/hw.h
--- ../tmp-orig/lshw-02.03/src/core/hw.h2005-02-04 14:51:03.0
+0100
+++ ./src/core/hw.h 2005-03-21 20:24:44.0 +0100
@@ -29,7 +29,7 @@
typedef enum { none, iomem, ioport, mem, irq, dma } hwResourceType;
-string hw::strip(const string );
+string strip(const string );
class resource
{
---
Received: (at 300788-done) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Dec 2005 18:16:52 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Dec 24 10:16:52 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from kabuto.elmundo.es ([193.110.128.11] helo=mail.elmundo.es)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1EqDwq-0006qw-14; Sat, 24 Dec 2005 10:16:52 -0800
Received: from xanes.el-mundo.int (xanes.elmundo.int [10.5.222.50])
by mail.elmundo.es (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 5ADDC34F4D; Sat, 24 Dec 2005 19:16:53 +0100 (CET)
Received: by xanes.el-mundo.int (Postfix, from userid 65500)
id 425A817315; Sat, 24 Dec 2005 19:16:49 +0100 (CET)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by xanes.el-mundo.int (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 141C517313; Sat, 24 Dec 2005 19:16:49 +0100 (CET)
From: David =?iso-8859-1?q?Mart=EDnez_Moreno?= [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Organization: Debian
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Bugs closed with version 02.06-3 of lshw.
Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2005 19:16:47 +0100
User-Agent: KMail/1.8.3
Cc: Ghe Rivero [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed;
boundary=nextPart3495050.AaJzHcURVk;
protocol=application/pgp-signature;
micalg=pgp-sha1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Bogosity: No, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.366930, version=0.10.3
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
--nextPart3495050.AaJzHcURVk
Content-Type: text/plain;
Bug#300788: marked as done (lshw: FTBFS(amd64/gcc-4.0): Missing Build-Depends on 'wget')
Your message dated Sat, 24 Dec 2005 19:16:47 +0100
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bugs closed with version 02.06-3 of lshw.
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Mar 2005 21:17:08 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Mar 21 13:17:08 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from c223012.adsl.hansenet.de (localhost.localdomain) [213.39.223.12]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DDUGp-0004SK-00; Mon, 21 Mar 2005 13:17:08 -0800
Received: from aj by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.44)
id 1DDUGo-0003oy-GX; Mon, 21 Mar 2005 22:17:06 +0100
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Andreas Jochens [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: lshw: FTBFS(amd64/gcc-4.0): Missing Build-Depends on 'wget'
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2005 22:17:06 +0100
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Package: lshw
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
When building 'lshw' in a clean chroot on amd64 with gcc-4.0,
I get the following error:
c++ -g -Wall -Os -I./core/ -DPREFIX=\/usr\ -DSBINDIR=\/usr/sbin\
-DMANDIR=\/usr/share/man\ -DDATADIR=\/usr/share\ -c lshw.cc -o lshw.o
lshw.cc: In function 'int main(int, char**)':
lshw.cc:119: warning: missing sentinel in function call
c++ -L./core/ -o lshw lshw.o -llshw
wget http://pciids.sourceforge.net/pci.ids
make[2]: wget: Command not found
make[2]: *** [pci.ids] Error 127
Please add the missing Build-Depends on 'wget' to debian/control.
Regards
Andreas Jochens
diff -urN ../tmp-orig/lshw-02.03/debian/control ./debian/control
--- ../tmp-orig/lshw-02.03/debian/control 2005-03-21 21:55:22.764966134
+0100
+++ ./debian/control2005-03-21 21:55:20.920322058 +0100
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
Priority: optional
Maintainer: Ola Lundqvist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Uploaders: Ghe Rivero [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Build-Depends: debhelper ( 3.0.0), docbook-utils, libgtk2.0-dev
+Build-Depends: debhelper ( 3.0.0), docbook-utils, libgtk2.0-dev, wget
Standards-Version: 3.6.1
Package: lshw
diff -urN ../tmp-orig/lshw-02.03/src/core/hw.h ./src/core/hw.h
--- ../tmp-orig/lshw-02.03/src/core/hw.h2005-02-04 14:51:03.0
+0100
+++ ./src/core/hw.h 2005-03-21 20:24:44.0 +0100
@@ -29,7 +29,7 @@
typedef enum { none, iomem, ioport, mem, irq, dma } hwResourceType;
-string hw::strip(const string );
+string strip(const string );
class resource
{
---
Received: (at 300829-done) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Dec 2005 18:16:52 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Dec 24 10:16:52 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from kabuto.elmundo.es ([193.110.128.11] helo=mail.elmundo.es)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1EqDwq-0006qw-14; Sat, 24 Dec 2005 10:16:52 -0800
Received: from xanes.el-mundo.int (xanes.elmundo.int [10.5.222.50])
by mail.elmundo.es (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 5ADDC34F4D; Sat, 24 Dec 2005 19:16:53 +0100 (CET)
Received: by xanes.el-mundo.int (Postfix, from userid 65500)
id 425A817315; Sat, 24 Dec 2005 19:16:49 +0100 (CET)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by xanes.el-mundo.int (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 141C517313; Sat, 24 Dec 2005 19:16:49 +0100 (CET)
From: David =?iso-8859-1?q?Mart=EDnez_Moreno?= [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Organization: Debian
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Bugs closed with version 02.06-3 of lshw.
Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2005 19:16:47 +0100
User-Agent: KMail/1.8.3
Cc: Ghe Rivero [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed;
boundary=nextPart3495050.AaJzHcURVk;
protocol=application/pgp-signature;
micalg=pgp-sha1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Bogosity: No, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.366930, version=0.10.3
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2
--nextPart3495050.AaJzHcURVk
Bug#296370: additional informations
Hi. I just tested two machines with the same file: http://hope-2000.org/smo/rumpel/unixland.jpg On peoluca: sarge machine i586, with debian stock kernel, it seems working correctly (it loads also files bigger than 100k). peoluca:~# dpkg -l boa debconf libc6 logrotate mime-support +++-=-=-== ii boa 0.94.14rc20-1.2 Lightweight and High Performance WebServer ii debconf 1.4.30.13 Debian configuration management system ii libc6 2.3.5-4 GNU C Library: Shared libraries and Timezone data ii logrotate 3.7-5 Log rotation utility ii mime-support 3.28-1MIME files 'mime.types' 'mailcap', and support p On vladnick: i686, custom kernel, fails: vladnick:~# dpkg -l boa libc6 mime-support logrotate debconf +++-=-=-== ii boa 0.94.14rc20-1.2 Lightweight and High Performance WebServer ii debconf 1.4.58Debian configuration management system ii libc6 2.3.5-7 GNU C Library: Shared libraries and Timezone data ii logrotate 3.7.1-2 Log rotation utility ii mime-support 3.35-1MIME files 'mime.types' 'mailcap', and support p It looks that they are the same version, and that the difference is in its dependencies.. What and where is wrong? Is it a defective library? Or is itsomething in the compilation of the kernel? I hope that this could help to track down the problem. Bye, Vladimir Nicola Chersi -- Bye by Vlad/Nick -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#332631: pppstatus crashes with segfault
on my ibook pppconfig segfaults on start with Segmentation fault Can you reproduce this and/or give more information? I do not have access to hardware to test it on. -- John Hasler [EMAIL PROTECTED] Elmwood, WI USA -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#340103: Bug#344614: ocamlodbc: ftbfs [sparc] undefined reference to `caml_Double_val'
clone 344614 -1 reassign -1 lablgl thanks Hi, Blars Blarson wrote: ocamlodbc failed to build on a sparc buildd, duplicated on my sparc pbuilder. This seems to be the same error as 344463, so is probably in a dependant package. Some other architectures are still failing to build due to what looks like bug 340103, which should probably be reopened. + grep -v DEBUG 'biniki.ml' /tmp/camlpp3893ba make[2]: gtk-config: Command not found /usr/bin/ocamlc -verbose -custom -o biniki -ccopt -fPIC -ccopt -L../unixodbc -I ../unixodbc -ccopt -L/usr/lib/ocaml/3.09.0/lablgtk2 -llablgtk2 ocamlodbc.cma unix.cma str.cma /usr/lib/ocaml/3.09.0/lablgtk2/lablgtk.cma /usr/lib/ocaml/3.09.0/lablgtk2/gtkInit.cmo biniki_messages.cmo biniki_misc.cmo biniki_context.cmo biniki_query_box.cmo biniki_window.cmo biniki.cmo + gcc -Wl,-E -o 'biniki' -I'/usr/lib/ocaml/3.09.0' -fPIC -L../unixodbc -L/usr/lib/ocaml/3.09.0/lablgtk2 -llablgtk2 -lodbc -lodbc /tmp/camlprimd42d28.c '-L../unixodbc' '-L/usr/lib/ocaml/3.09.0' '-llablgtk2' '-lgtk-x11-2.0' '-lgdk-x11-2.0' '-latk-1.0' '-lgdk_pixbuf-2.0' '-lm' '-lpangoxft-1.0' '-lpangox-1.0' '-lpangoft2-1.0' '-lpango-1.0' '-lgobject-2.0' '-lgmodule-2.0' '-ldl' '-lglib-2.0' '-lstr' '-lunix' '-locamlodbc' -lcamlrun -lm -ldl -lcurses -lpthread /usr/lib/ocaml/3.09.0/lablgtk2/liblablgtk2.a(ml_gtktree.o): In function `ml_gtk_tree_view_scroll_to_cell': undefined reference to `caml_Double_val' /usr/lib/ocaml/3.09.0/lablgtk2/liblablgtk2.a(ml_gtktree.o): In function `ml_gtk_tree_view_scroll_to_cell': undefined reference to `caml_Double_val' /usr/lib/ocaml/3.09.0/lablgtk2/liblablgtk2.a(ml_gtklist.o): In function `ml_gtk_clist_moveto': undefined reference to `caml_Double_val' /usr/lib/ocaml/3.09.0/lablgtk2/liblablgtk2.a(ml_gtklist.o): In function `ml_gtk_clist_moveto': undefined reference to `caml_Double_val' /usr/lib/ocaml/3.09.0/lablgtk2/liblablgtk2.a(ml_gtkedit.o): In function `ml_gtk_spin_button_spin': undefined reference to `caml_Double_val' /usr/lib/ocaml/3.09.0/lablgtk2/liblablgtk2.a(ml_gtk.o): more undefined references to `caml_Double_val' follow collect2: ld returned 1 exit status Error while building custom runtime system make[2]: *** [biniki] Error 2 make[2]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/ocamlodbc-2.10/Biniki' make[1]: *** [unixodbc] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/ocamlodbc-2.10/Biniki' make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2 Ok. I first tried to rebuild lablgtk2 but the compilation failed on Error on dynamically loaded library: /usr/lib/ocaml/3.09.0/stublibs/dlllablgl.so: undefined symbol: caml_Double_val Then I tried to rebuild lablgl which went on fine and then I could compile cleanly lablgtk2 and ocamlodbc. So, I'll go for binNMUs soon (only sparc seems to be affected) unless someone objects to it. Cheers, Samuel. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Bug#344614: ocamlodbc: ftbfs [sparc] undefined reference to `caml_Double_val'
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: clone 344614 -1 Bug#344614: ocamlodbc: ftbfs [sparc] undefined reference to `caml_Double_val' Bug 344614 cloned as bug 344688. reassign -1 lablgl Bug#344688: ocamlodbc: ftbfs [sparc] undefined reference to `caml_Double_val' Bug reassigned from package `ocamlodbc' to `lablgl'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#344690: 3.1r1 netinst is uninstallable with kernel 2.6
package: debian-installer severity: critical version: 3.1r1 Hi, I have tried this image http://cdimage.debian.org/debian-cd/3.1_r1/i386/iso-cd/debian-31r1-i386-netinst.iso with parameters, kernel26 acpi=off noacpi nolacpi However, it gave a error no installable kernel found during Install base system. Cai Qian -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#344654: jnettop - FTBFS: configure: error: can't figure out gethostbyname_r() since localhost doesn't resolve
Something must've broken on the s390 and arm buildds, as this used to work fine. raptor% ping localhost ping: unknown host localhost Bastian Blank wrote: Package: jnettop Version: 0.11.0-2 Severity: serious There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: Automatic build of jnettop_0.11.0-2 on debian01 by sbuild/s390 79 [...] checking if localhost resolves... no configure: error: can't figure out gethostbyname_r() since localhost doesn't resolve make: *** [config.status] Error 1 ** Build finished at 20051208-1736 FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: control
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: package flashplugin-nonfree Ignoring bugs not assigned to: flashplugin-nonfree found 341238 7.0.61-1 Bug#341238: flashplugin-nonfree: Installer cannot install manually downloaded file Bug#305568: Wrong archive filename in postinst; right filename in debconf template Bug marked as found in version 7.0.61-1. found 305568 7.0.61-1 Bug#305568: Wrong archive filename in postinst; right filename in debconf template Bug#341238: flashplugin-nonfree: Installer cannot install manually downloaded file Bug marked as found in version 7.0.61-1. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#344654: marked as done (jnettop - FTBFS: configure: error: can't figure out gethostbyname_r() since localhost doesn't resolve)
Your message dated Sat, 24 Dec 2005 15:09:45 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#344654: jnettop - FTBFS: configure: error: can't figure out gethostbyname_r() since localhost doesn't resolve has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Dec 2005 12:51:09 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Dec 24 04:51:09 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mobilewave.waldi.eu.org ([82.139.201.22]) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Eq8rd-000674-At for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 24 Dec 2005 04:51:09 -0800 Received: by mobilewave.waldi.eu.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 832661854C; Sat, 24 Dec 2005 13:51:03 +0100 (CET) Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2005 13:51:03 +0100 From: Bastian Blank [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: jnettop - FTBFS: configure: error: can't figure out gethostbyname_r() since localhost doesn't resolve Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] References: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: jnettop Version: 0.11.0-2 Severity: serious There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: Automatic build of jnettop_0.11.0-2 on debian01 by sbuild/s390 79 [...] checking if localhost resolves... no configure: error: can't figure out gethostbyname_r() since localhost doesn't resolve make: *** [config.status] Error 1 ** Build finished at 20051208-1736 FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died] --- Received: (at 344654-done) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Dec 2005 20:11:33 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Dec 24 12:11:33 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from sojourner.alienhosting.com ([216.40.217.206]) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EqFjp-0005Ic-AT for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 24 Dec 2005 12:11:33 -0800 Received: from [192.168.1.60] (wvhl22.resnet.neu.edu [155.33.168.216]) (authenticated bits=0) by sojourner.alienhosting.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id jBOKBR2h014970 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 24 Dec 2005 15:11:32 -0500 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2005 15:09:45 -0500 From: Ari Pollak [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Debian Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051017) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Bug#344654: jnettop - FTBFS: configure: error: can't figure out gethostbyname_r() since localhost doesn't resolve References: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Enigmail-Version: 0.93.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 This is a buildd problem, the same test works fine on the other buildds (including elara and debian-31). Bastian Blank wrote: Package: jnettop Version: 0.11.0-2 Severity: serious There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: Automatic build of jnettop_0.11.0-2 on debian01 by sbuild/s390 79 [...] checking if localhost resolves... no configure: error: can't figure out gethostbyname_r() since localhost doesn't resolve make: *** [config.status] Error 1 ** Build finished at 20051208-1736 FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#231923: Private Invite From Sara Please join us
Sara Has invited you to join our dating network http:// -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#344690: marked as done (3.1r1 netinst is uninstallable with kernel 2.6)
Your message dated Sat, 24 Dec 2005 21:06:42 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#344690: 3.1r1 netinst is uninstallable with kernel 2.6 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Dec 2005 18:53:10 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Dec 24 10:53:10 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from 82-45-44-242.cable.ubr07.azte.blueyonder.co.uk ([82.45.44.242] helo=localhost.localdomain) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EqEVy-fU-57 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 24 Dec 2005 10:53:10 -0800 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost.localdomain with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) id 1EqEW6-00021c-Mi for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 24 Dec 2005 18:53:18 + Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2005 18:53:18 + (GMT) Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: 3.1r1 netinst is uninstallable with kernel 2.6 From: Cai Qian [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-mailer: Mew/4.2.52 Emacs/21.4.1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE, RCVD_IN_SORBS autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 package: debian-installer severity: critical version: 3.1r1 Hi, I have tried this image http://cdimage.debian.org/debian-cd/3.1_r1/i386/iso-cd/debian-31r1-i386-netinst.iso with parameters, kernel26 acpi=off noacpi nolacpi However, it gave a error no installable kernel found during Install base system. Cai Qian --- Received: (at 344690-done) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Dec 2005 21:06:45 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Dec 24 13:06:45 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from lump.einval.com ([217.147.81.17] helo=mail.einval.com ident=mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EqGbF-0001HB-BV for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 24 Dec 2005 13:06:45 -0800 Received: from sledge.mossbank.org.uk ([10.13.0.5] ident=Debian-exim) by mail.einval.com with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1EqGbC-0005fQ-00; Sat, 24 Dec 2005 21:06:42 + Received: from steve by sledge.mossbank.org.uk with local (Exim 4.51) id 1EqGbC-0004B5-Np; Sat, 24 Dec 2005 21:06:42 + To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Bug#344690: 3.1r1 netinst is uninstallable with kernel 2.6 X-Newsgroups: mossbank.mlist.debian.boot In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Organization: Invalid Argument Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Steve McIntyre [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2005 21:06:42 + X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Cai Qian wrote: package: debian-installer severity: critical version: 3.1r1 Hi, I have tried this image http://cdimage.debian.org/debian-cd/3.1_r1/i386/iso-cd/debian-31r1-i386-netinst.iso with parameters, kernel26 acpi=off noacpi nolacpi However, it gave a error no installable kernel found during Install base system. Yes, there was a bug in the CD build. Netinst version 3.1_r1a fixes it. It's out now on cdimage and should be on the mirrors soon. -- Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.[EMAIL PROTECTED] Into the distance, a ribbon of black Stretched to the point of no turning back -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#147314: Heather Is looking for you
Heather Has invited you to join our dating network http:// -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#344653: electricsheep - FTBFS: cannot find -lX11
On Sat, Dec 24, 2005 at 03:24:57PM +0100, Alexis Sukrieh wrote: tags 344653 + help tags 344653 + confirmed thanks * Bastian Blank ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) disait : There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lX11 collect2: ld returned 1 exit status Indeed, I reproduced that with my pbuilder... I'm a bit confused, because even if I add libx11-6 in my build-dependencies (which provides libX11.so.6) I still get the error. Er, you need the package that provides *libX11.so*, not libX11.so.6. You should be build-depending on libx11-dev, not on libx11-6: you should *never* need to build-depend on runtime lib packages. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#344699: libaws: ftbfs [sparc] file sinfo.ads not found
Package: libaws Version: 2.0p-8 Severity: serious Justification: no longer builds from source libaws failed to build on a sparc buildd, duplicated on my sparc pbuilder. gnatmake ada2wsdl-main -j2 -Pada2wsdl.gpr -XOBJ_DIR=obj-shared \ -o ada2wsdl -largs -L. gnatgcc -c -o /build/buildd/libaws-2.0p/obj-tools/ada2wsdl-main.o -O2 -gnato -gnatn -gnatVa -gnatA /build/buildd/libaws-2.0p/tools/ada2wsdl-main.adb ada2wsdl-main.ads:33:19: file sinfo.ads not found ada2wsdl-main.ads:33:19: A4g.A_Types (spec) depends on Sinfo (spec) ada2wsdl-main.ads:33:19: Ada2wsdl.Main (body) depends on Ada2wsdl.Main (spec) ada2wsdl-main.ads:33:19: Ada2wsdl.Main (spec) depends on Ada2wsdl (spec) ada2wsdl-main.ads:33:19: Ada2wsdl (spec) depends on Asis (spec) ada2wsdl-main.ads:33:19: Asis (spec) depends on A4g.A_Types (spec) ada2wsdl-main.ads:33:19: A4g.A_Types (spec) depends on Types (spec) gnatmake: /build/buildd/libaws-2.0p/tools/ada2wsdl-main.adb compilation error make: *** [debian/tmp/ada2wsdl] Error 4 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#243227: Private Invite From Kristy Please join us
You have been invited to join our dating network by Kristy http:// -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#244158: Vicky wants you to join us
Private Invite Please join this site so that that we can chat live http://www.Vicky Thanks Vicky -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#344653: electricsheep - FTBFS: cannot find -lX11
* Steve Langasek ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) disait : I'm a bit confused, because even if I add libx11-6 in my build-dependencies (which provides libX11.so.6) I still get the error. Er, you need the package that provides *libX11.so*, not libX11.so.6. You should be build-depending on libx11-dev, not on libx11-6: you should *never* need to build-depend on runtime lib packages. My package *did* build-depend on libx11-dev, and I got the FTBS even with that build-dependcy. As I was puzzled, I tried to add libx11-6 in my build dependcy, in order to try. But whatever I did, I get a FTBS in my pbuilder... -- Alexis Sukrieh [EMAIL PROTECTED] 0x1EE5DD34 Debian http://www.debian.org Backup Manager http://www.backup-manager.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#342925: missing ide-generic
On Saturday 24 December 2005 04:32, Frans Pop wrote: On Friday 23 December 2005 14:34, maximilian attems wrote: please try the attached patch, should load ide-generic even if udev didn't yet bring it up: Although my initial report was for Sparc (which I will test tomorrow) The patch does not solve anything for the Sparc: ide-disk still does not get loaded. pgpEh12Fjdlw5.pgp Description: PGP signature
Processed: #321644 is severity: grave, since we have no working mozilla in amd64, and this since August.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Severity 321644 grave Bug#321644: mozilla-browser: mozilla 1.7.10 version crashes almost immediately and all other browsers that use the mozilla core crash with similar frequency Bug#336441: galeon: Crashes on specific actions/page combinations on amd64 Severity set to `grave'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: #321644 is not unreproducible
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 321644 - unreproducible Bug#321644: mozilla-browser: mozilla 1.7.10 version crashes almost immediately and all other browsers that use the mozilla core crash with similar frequency Tags were: upstream unreproducible patch Bug#336441: galeon: Crashes on specific actions/page combinations on amd64 Tags removed: unreproducible thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#344711: linux-image-2.6.14-2-powerpc: Can't install
Package: linux-image-2.6.14-2-powerpc Version: 2.6.14-6 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Configuring hangs on GET mkvmlinuz/bootloaders. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: powerpc (ppc) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.14-2-powerpc Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to fr_FR.UTF-8) Versions of packages linux-image-2.6.14-2-powerpc depends on: ii mkvmlinuz 17 create a kernel to boot a PowerPC ii module-init-tools 3.2.2-1tools for managing Linux kernel mo ii yaird [linux-initramfs-tool] 0.0.12-1 Yet Another mkInitRD linux-image-2.6.14-2-powerpc recommends no packages. -- debconf information: linux-image-2.6.14-2-powerpc/postinst/old-initrd-link-2.6.14-2-powerpc: true linux-image-2.6.14-2-powerpc/prerm/removing-running-kernel-2.6.14-2-powerpc: true linux-image-2.6.14-2-powerpc/postinst/bootloader-error-2.6.14-2-powerpc: linux-image-2.6.14-2-powerpc/postinst/kimage-is-a-directory: linux-image-2.6.14-2-powerpc/postinst/create-kimage-link-2.6.14-2-powerpc: true linux-image-2.6.14-2-powerpc/preinst/bootloader-initrd-2.6.14-2-powerpc: true linux-image-2.6.14-2-powerpc/preinst/lilo-has-ramdisk: linux-image-2.6.14-2-powerpc/preinst/overwriting-modules-2.6.14-2-powerpc: true linux-image-2.6.14-2-powerpc/postinst/old-dir-initrd-link-2.6.14-2-powerpc: true * linux-image-2.6.14-2-powerpc/preinst/already-running-this-2.6.14-2-powerpc: linux-image-2.6.14-2-powerpc/postinst/old-system-map-link-2.6.14-2-powerpc: true linux-image-2.6.14-2-powerpc/postinst/depmod-error-initrd-2.6.14-2-powerpc: false linux-image-2.6.14-2-powerpc/preinst/lilo-initrd-2.6.14-2-powerpc: true linux-image-2.6.14-2-powerpc/preinst/failed-to-move-modules-2.6.14-2-powerpc: linux-image-2.6.14-2-powerpc/preinst/abort-install-2.6.14-2-powerpc: linux-image-2.6.14-2-powerpc/postinst/bootloader-test-error-2.6.14-2-powerpc: linux-image-2.6.14-2-powerpc/preinst/initrd-2.6.14-2-powerpc: linux-image-2.6.14-2-powerpc/preinst/abort-overwrite-2.6.14-2-powerpc: linux-image-2.6.14-2-powerpc/prerm/would-invalidate-boot-loader-2.6.14-2-powerpc: true linux-image-2.6.14-2-powerpc/preinst/elilo-initrd-2.6.14-2-powerpc: true linux-image-2.6.14-2-powerpc/postinst/depmod-error-2.6.14-2-powerpc: false -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#344712: gstreamer0.8-gtk: file conflict with older gstreamer package
Package: gstreamer0.8-gtk Version: 0.8.11-3 Severity: serious Selecting previously deselected package gstreamer0.8-gtk. Unpacking gstreamer0.8-gtk (from .../gstreamer0.8-gtk_0.8.11-3_i386.deb) ... dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/gstreamer0.8-gtk_0.8.11-3_i386.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite `/usr/lib/gstreamer-0.8/libgstgdkpixbuf.so', which is also in package gstreamer0.8-misc This was during an upgrade from 0.8.11-2 to 0.8.11-3. If you need any additional information, please ask. Thanks, -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.14-2-686-smp Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=en_US.ISO-8859-15 (charmap=ISO-8859-15) (ignored: LC_ALL set to en_US.ISO-8859-15) Versions of packages gstreamer0.8-gtk depends on: ii libatk1.0-0 1.10.3-1 The ATK accessibility toolkit ii libc6 2.3.5-9GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libglib2.0-0 2.8.4-2The GLib library of C routines ii libgstreamer0.8-0 0.8.11-2 Core GStreamer libraries, plugins, ii libgtk2.0-0 2.8.9-2The GTK+ graphical user interface ii libpango1.0-0 1.10.1-2 Layout and rendering of internatio ii libxml2 2.6.22-2 GNOME XML library ii zlib1g1:1.2.3-9 compression library - runtime gstreamer0.8-gtk recommends no packages. -- no debconf information -- - | ,''`.Stephen Gran | | : :' :[EMAIL PROTECTED] | | `. `'Debian user, admin, and developer | |`- http://www.debian.org | - signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#344653: electricsheep - FTBFS: cannot find -lX11
This one time, at band camp, Alexis Sukrieh said: * Steve Langasek ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) disait : I'm a bit confused, because even if I add libx11-6 in my build-dependencies (which provides libX11.so.6) I still get the error. Er, you need the package that provides *libX11.so*, not libX11.so.6. You should be build-depending on libx11-dev, not on libx11-6: you should *never* need to build-depend on runtime lib packages. My package *did* build-depend on libx11-dev, and I got the FTBS even with that build-dependcy. As I was puzzled, I tried to add libx11-6 in my build dependcy, in order to try. But whatever I did, I get a FTBS in my pbuilder... This patch fixes it here: Section: x11 Priority: optional Maintainer: Alexis Sukrieh [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Build-Depends: debhelper (= 4.0.0), libjpeg62-dev, libexpat1-dev, libpng12-dev, dpatch, libxv-dev +Build-Depends: debhelper (= 4.0.0), libjpeg62-dev, libexpat1-dev, libpng12-dev, dpatch, libxv-dev, libx11-dev, libxext-dev, x-dev, libxt-dev Standards-Version: 3.6.1 Package: electricsheep The addition of libx11-dev, libxext-dev and x-dev are because the package #includes headers from those packages. I only did a simplistic grep test, so it may be over generous in my dependency (for instance, if a chunk of source is not actually built or used, my test would miss that completely). The addition of libxt-dev is for the configure test for X (it looks for X11/Intrinsic.h from the libxt-dev package) and then fills in the autoconf macro X_LIBS=' -L/usr/X11R6/lib'. Without this bit, linking fails. With it, it succeeds. The fact that /usr/X11R6/lib is in /etc/ld.so.conf and the linker still doesn't look there is a bit mystifying (as I thought that's, er, exactly what that file is for) but that's a seperate problem. Take care, -- - | ,''`.Stephen Gran | | : :' :[EMAIL PROTECTED] | | `. `'Debian user, admin, and developer | |`- http://www.debian.org | - signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#344652: marked as forwarded (libsmbios - FTBFS: architecture specific)
Your message dated Sun, 25 Dec 2005 02:31:02 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] has caused the Debian Bug report #344652, regarding libsmbios - FTBFS: architecture specific to be marked as having been forwarded to the upstream software author(s) [EMAIL PROTECTED] (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) --- Received: (at 344652-forwarded) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Dec 2005 01:31:43 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Dec 24 17:31:43 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from quark.amimatica.com ([213.139.24.154]) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EqKje-00049I-Tm for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 24 Dec 2005 17:31:43 -0800 Received: from [192.168.0.13] (unknown [85.136.0.243]) by quark.amimatica.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6A2223189; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 02:31:08 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2005 02:31:02 +0100 From: =?UTF-8?B?Sm9zw6kgTHVpcyBUYWxsw7Nu?= [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Debian Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051017) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Bastian Blank [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Bug#344652: libsmbios - FTBFS: architecture specific References: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Enigmail-Version: 0.93.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Bastian Blank wrote: Package: libsmbios Version: 0.10.6-1 Severity: serious There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: Automatic build of libsmbios_0.10.6-1 on debian01 by sbuild/s390 79 Hmm I think i'd rather restrict this package to just i386 and (maybe) amd64 architectures?? After all, and know i come to think about it, non-PC architectures don't have SMBIOS... or do they? Michael, what do you think?? (please CC all when replying) [...] COMPILING C++ (shared) : libraries/cmos/CmosRW_LinuxIO.lo libraries/cmos/CmosRW_LinuxIO.cpp:23:20: error: sys/io.h: No such file or directory libraries/cmos/CmosRW_LinuxIO.cpp: In member function 'virtual u8 cmos::CmosRWIo::readByte(u32, u32, u32) const': libraries/cmos/CmosRW_LinuxIO.cpp:56: error: 'iopl' was not declared in this scope libraries/cmos/CmosRW_LinuxIO.cpp:58: error: 'outb_p' was not declared in this scope libraries/cmos/CmosRW_LinuxIO.cpp:59: error: 'inb_p' was not declared in this scope libraries/cmos/CmosRW_LinuxIO.cpp: In member function 'virtual void cmos::CmosRWIo::writeByte(u32, u32, u32, u8) const': libraries/cmos/CmosRW_LinuxIO.cpp:66: error: 'iopl' was not declared in this scope libraries/cmos/CmosRW_LinuxIO.cpp:68: error: 'outb_p' was not declared in this scope make[1]: *** [libraries/cmos/CmosRW_LinuxIO.lo] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/libsmbios-0.10.6' make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2 ** Build finished at 20051223-1721 FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died] Bastian Thanks for the report, Bastian. J.L. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#344726: libdb4.4-java: Crash in Java_com_sleepycat_db_internal_db_1javaJNI_initDbEnvRef0
Package: libdb4.4-javaVersion: 4.4.16-3Severity: graveJustification: renders package unusableThere is an optimization bug in gcc 4.0 that causes this library to beunusable.See http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.db.dbxml.general/1766?set_lines=10Stack: [0xbfa8e000,0xbfc8e000), sp=0xbfc89a18, free space=2030kNative frames: (J=compiled Java code, j=interpreted, Vv=VM code, C=native code)C [libdb_java-4.4.so+0x213f0]Java_com_sleepycat_db_internal_db_1javaJNI_initDbEnvRef0+0x20j com.sleepycat.db.internal.db_javaJNI.initDbEnvRef0(JLjava/lang/Object;)J+0jcom.sleepycat.db.internal.db_java.initDbEnvRef0 (Lcom/sleepycat/db/internal/DbEnv;Ljava/lang/Object;)J+5j com.sleepycat.db.internal.DbEnv.initialize()V+3j com.sleepycat.db.internal.DbEnv.init(I)V+10jcom.sleepycat.db.EnvironmentConfig.createEnvironment ()Lcom/sleepycat/db/internal/DbEnv;+18jcom.sleepycat.db.EnvironmentConfig.openEnvironment(Ljava/io/File;)Lcom/sleepycat/db/internal/DbEnv;+1jcom.sleepycat.db.Environment.init(Ljava/io/File;Lcom/sleepycat/db/EnvironmentConfig;)V+6 j com.crowlogic.lime.Archive.init(Ljava/lang/String;)V+36This can be fixed by compiling with -O0, or just compiling db_java_wrap.cwith -O0-- System Information:Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing')Architecture: i386 (i686)Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bashKernel: Linux 2.6.14.3Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Versions of packages libdb4.4-java depends on:ii libc6 2.3.5-9GNU C Library: Shared libraries anlibdb4.4-java recommends no packages.-- no debconf information
Bug#339061: marked as done (FTBFS (alpha): test suite fails: ERROR CODE 0x8b for test/drt1)
Your message dated Sat, 24 Dec 2005 21:25:39 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line FTBFS (alpha): test suite fails: ERROR CODE 0x8b for test/drt1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Nov 2005 19:55:44 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Nov 14 11:55:44 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from smtp06.web.de ([217.72.192.224]) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EbkQZ-0003BM-G5 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 14 Nov 2005 11:55:43 -0800 Received: from [84.59.184.211] (helo=juist) by smtp06.web.de with asmtp (TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (WEB.DE 4.105 #317) id 1EbkQ4-0003g3-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 14 Nov 2005 20:55:12 +0100 Received: from falk by juist with local (Exim 4.54) id 1EbkQ3-0003q0-0g for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 14 Nov 2005 20:55:11 +0100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Falk Hueffner [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: FTBFS (alpha): test suite fails: ERROR CODE 0x8b for test/drt1 X-Mailer: reportbug 3.17 Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2005 20:55:10 +0100 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: felix Severity: serious Justification: no longer builds from source felix fails to build on Alpha and IA64. This is the Alpha log: [...] RUNNING TESTS TRANSLATING FELIX TEST CODE TO C++ .. REGRESSION TESTS and TUTORIAL EXAMPLES PATH=bin:$PATH LD_LIBRARY_PATH=rtl:$LD_LIBRARY_PATH bin/flxg -Ilib test/drt1 .. ERROR CODE 0x8b TESTFILE -- ERROR! test/drt1 ** ** Terminating due to error make[1]: *** [all] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/felix-1.1.1' The IA64 log looks slightly different. Most likely this is a 64-bit problem, since Alpha and IA64 are exactly the two 64-bit architectures in Debian. Full logs at: http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?pkg=felixver=1.1.1-1arch=alphastamp=1131851005file=logas=raw http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?pkg=felixver=1.1.1-1arch=ia64stamp=1131850705file=logas=raw -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: alpha Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.13.2 Locale: LANG=C, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) --- Received: (at 339061-done) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Dec 2005 05:25:40 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Dec 24 21:25:40 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from dsl093-039-086.pdx1.dsl.speakeasy.net ([66.93.39.86] helo=tennyson.dodds.net) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EqOO4-0004di-CD for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 24 Dec 2005 21:25:40 -0800 Received: by tennyson.dodds.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 9CBD77007; Sat, 24 Dec 2005 21:25:39 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2005 21:25:39 -0800 From: Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: FTBFS (alpha): test suite fails: ERROR CODE 0x8b for test/drt1 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=Fig2xvG2VGoz8o/s Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 --Fig2xvG2VGoz8o/s Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable This bug has been fixed in ocaml; felix no longer fails to build. Thanks, --=20 Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ --Fig2xvG2VGoz8o/s Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Bug#223774: Home Loans Are Easy To Get
Guess What ? you have been approved for your next home lone just click the link http://www.mortmen.com/?d=dr_reboot -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: remove freecdb
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: retitle 272127 RM: freecdb (RoM, RoQA, RoUpstream, dead upstream, superseded by tinycdb) Bug#272127: freecdb: does not provide a shared library Changed Bug title. tags 272127 -sarge-ignore Bug#272127: RM: freecdb (RoM, RoQA, RoUpstream, dead upstream, superseded by tinycdb) Tags were: sarge-ignore Tags removed: sarge-ignore severity 272127 normal Bug#272127: RM: freecdb (RoM, RoQA, RoUpstream, dead upstream, superseded by tinycdb) Severity set to `normal'. reassign 272127 ftp.debian.org Bug#272127: RM: freecdb (RoM, RoQA, RoUpstream, dead upstream, superseded by tinycdb) Bug reassigned from package `freecdb' to `ftp.debian.org'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#344730: cduce: FTBFS: build-depends on old version of ocaml
Package: cduce Version: 0.3.92-1 Severity: serious The cduce package build-depends on ocaml-nox-3.08.3 and ocaml-compiler-libs-3.08.3. 3.08.3 is no longer the current version of ocaml in unstable, and as a result cduce fails to build as seen at http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?pkg=cducearch=ia64ver=0.3.92-1stamp=1134798145file=log. Please update cduce to build-depend on ocaml-nox (= 3.09.0) and ocaml-compiler-libs (= 3.09.0), so that in the future rebuilds for new ABIs can be done without the need for source changes. Cheers, -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#328674: Still planning to upload slsc?
Doing some late-night QA work, and noticed that you were planning to upload this in September. It does need an upload badly. Alternatively, you could orphan it or ask for it to be removed (your choice). It's already been kicked out of 'testing' so it won't be in the next release of Debian unless it's fixed up. It should be transitioned to slang2 with the next upload if possible; see http://wiki.debian.org/EtchSlang2upgrade for some information. Happy holidays. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#344731: libgtk2.0-0: the menus of gtk applications are black
Package: libgtk2.0-0 Version: 2.8.9-2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable After upgrade the libgtk2.0-0 from version 2.6.10-2 to 2.8.9-2, the background of the menus of GTK applications are black. When you move the mouse cursor above the menu items, the application generates this debug messages: (unknown:7661): Gdk-WARNING **: gdk_window_set_back_pixmap(): pixmap must have a colormap (unknown:7661): Gdk-WARNING **: gdk_window_set_back_pixmap(): pixmap must have a colormap (unknown:7661): Gdk-WARNING **: gdk_window_set_back_pixmap(): pixmap must have a colormap The application is this case is gmplayer, but I also checked this with Gimp and Gaim. I found a post from Owen Taylor about this debug messages: http://mail.gnome.org/pipermail/gtk-app-devel-list/2005-August/msg00206.html They say that was fixed in CVS and the email date is 15/Aug. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-k7 Locale: LANG=pt_BR, LC_CTYPE=pt_BR (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Versions of packages libgtk2.0-0 depends on: ii libatk1.0-0 1.10.3-1The ATK accessibility toolkit ii libc62.3.5-9 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libcairo21.0.2-3 The Cairo 2D vector graphics libra ii libfontconfig1 2.3.2-1.1 generic font configuration library ii libglib2.0-0 2.8.4-2 The GLib library of C routines ii libgtk2.0-bin2.8.9-2 The programs for the GTK+ graphica ii libgtk2.0-common 2.8.9-2 Common files for the GTK+ graphica ii libjpeg626b-11 The Independent JPEG Group's JPEG ii libpango1.0-01.10.1-2Layout and rendering of internatio ii libpng12-0 1.2.8rel-5 PNG library - runtime ii libtiff4 3.7.4-1 Tag Image File Format (TIFF) libra ii libx11-6 6.8.2.dfsg.1-11 X Window System protocol client li ii libxcursor1 1.1.3-1 X cursor management library ii libxext6 6.8.2.dfsg.1-11 X Window System miscellaneous exte ii libxi6 6.8.2.dfsg.1-11 X Window System Input extension li ii libxinerama1 6.8.2.dfsg.1-11 X Window System multi-head display ii libxrandr2 6.8.2.dfsg.1-11 X Window System Resize, Rotate and ii libxrender1 1:0.9.0-2 X Rendering Extension client libra Versions of packages libgtk2.0-0 recommends: ii hicolor-icon-theme0.8-3 default fallback theme for FreeDes -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#343216: marked as done (Package not installable in unstable - missing asc-data=1.16.2.0-2+b1)
Your message dated Sat, 24 Dec 2005 22:32:14 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#343216: fixed in asc 1.16.2.0-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Dec 2005 17:59:28 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 13 09:59:28 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from odin.ac.hmc.edu ([134.173.32.75]) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EmEQy-0001zI-O6 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 13 Dec 2005 09:59:28 -0800 Received: from fcc.st.hmc.edu (fcc.ST.HMC.Edu [134.173.58.19]) by odin.ac.hmc.edu (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id jBDHxRDl028852; Tue, 13 Dec 2005 09:59:27 -0800 Received: from millenix by fcc.st.hmc.edu with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1EmEQw-0004kG-00; Tue, 13 Dec 2005 09:59:26 -0800 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Philip Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Package not installable in unstable - missing asc-data=1.16.2.0-2+b1 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Mailer: reportbug 3.18 Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 09:59:26 -0800 Sender: Philip Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: asc Version: 1.16.2.0-2 Severity: important I'm trying to upgrade my system, and finding that there is a version of asc newer than the version of asc-data. Since asc depends on the same version of asc-data(=1.16.2.0-2+b1), the new version is not installable. This has persisted for a few days, so it doesn't seem like mirror slowness. Further, when I looked at http://packages.qa.debian.org/asc, I didn't see a new source version. I've concluded that this looks like a binary-only upload of asc gone awry by missing the versioned dependency. Also, the -2+b1 Debian revision appears to have migrated to testing for m68k, but not for any other architecture. Would that fact make this an RC bug, if asc is indeed not installable in testing? -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.13.3phil1 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Versions of packages asc depends on: ii asc-data 1.16.2.0-2data files for the Advanced Strate ii libaa1 1.4p5-29 ascii art library ii libartsc0 1.4.3-3 aRts sound system C support librar ii libasound2 1.0.10-1 ALSA library ii libaudio2 1.7-3 The Network Audio System (NAS). (s ii libaudiofile0 0.2.6-6 Open-source version of SGI's audio ii libbz2-1.0 1.0.2-11 high-quality block-sorting file co ii libc6 2.3.5-8.1 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libesd-alsa0 [libe 0.2.36-1 Enlightened Sound Daemon (ALSA) - ii libexpat1 1.95.8-3 XML parsing C library - runtime li ii libfreetype6 2.1.10-1 FreeType 2 font engine, shared lib ii libgcc11:4.0.2-5 GCC support library ii libglib2.0-0 2.8.4-2 The GLib library of C routines ii libjpeg62 6b-10 The Independent JPEG Group's JPEG ii libncurses55.5-1 Shared libraries for terminal hand ii libogg01.1.2-1 Ogg Bitstream Library ii libparagui1.0c21.0.4-10 a real crossplatform widget set ba ii libphysfs-1.0-01.0.0-5 filesystem abstraction library for ii libpng12-0 1.2.8rel-5PNG library - runtime ii libsdl-image1.21.2.4-1 image loading library for Simple D ii libsdl-mixer1.21.2.6-1.1 mixer library for Simple DirectMed ii libsdl1.2debian1.2.9-0.0 Simple DirectMedia Layer ii libsigc++-1.2-5c2 1.2.5-5 type-safe Signal Framework for C++ ii libslang2 2.0.5-1 The S-Lang programming library - r ii libsmpeg0 [libsmpe 0.4.5+cvs20030824-1.6 SDL
Bug#344688: marked as done (ocamlodbc: ftbfs [sparc] undefined reference to `caml_Double_val')
Your message dated Sat, 24 Dec 2005 23:00:25 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line ocamlodbc: ftbfs [sparc] undefined reference to `caml_Double_val' has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Dec 2005 03:25:55 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Dec 23 19:25:55 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from blars.org ([64.81.35.59] helo=renig.nat.blars.org) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Eq02c-00027T-Tp for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 23 Dec 2005 19:25:55 -0800 Received: from quaff (quaff.nat.blars.org [172.16.2.7]) by renig.nat.blars.org (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3) with ESMTP id jBO3Pq57006406 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 23 Dec 2005 19:25:52 -0800 Received: from quaff.nat.blars.org (quaff [127.0.0.1]) by quaff (8.13.5/8.13.5/Debian-3) with ESMTP id jBO3UbTF011716; Fri, 23 Dec 2005 19:30:38 -0800 Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by quaff.nat.blars.org (8.13.5/8.13.5/Submit) id jBO3Ubul011714; Fri, 23 Dec 2005 19:30:37 -0800 Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2005 19:30:37 -0800 From: Blars Blarson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: ocamlodbc: ftbfs [sparc] undefined reference to `caml_Double_val' Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Reportbug-Version: 3.18 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: ocamlodbc Severity: serious Justification: no longer builds from source ocamlodbc failed to build on a sparc buildd, duplicated on my sparc pbuilder. This seems to be the same error as 344463, so is probably in a dependant package. Some other architectures are still failing to build due to what looks like bug 340103, which should probably be reopened. + grep -v DEBUG 'biniki.ml' /tmp/camlpp3893ba make[2]: gtk-config: Command not found /usr/bin/ocamlc -verbose -custom -o biniki -ccopt -fPIC -ccopt -L../unixodbc -I ../unixodbc -ccopt -L/usr/lib/ocaml/3.09.0/lablgtk2 -llablgtk2 ocamlodbc.cma unix.cma str.cma /usr/lib/ocaml/3.09.0/lablgtk2/lablgtk.cma /usr/lib/ocaml/3.09.0/lablgtk2/gtkInit.cmo biniki_messages.cmo biniki_misc.cmo biniki_context.cmo biniki_query_box.cmo biniki_window.cmo biniki.cmo + gcc -Wl,-E -o 'biniki' -I'/usr/lib/ocaml/3.09.0' -fPIC -L../unixodbc -L/usr/lib/ocaml/3.09.0/lablgtk2 -llablgtk2 -lodbc -lodbc /tmp/camlprimd42d28.c '-L../unixodbc' '-L/usr/lib/ocaml/3.09.0' '-llablgtk2' '-lgtk-x11-2.0' '-lgdk-x11-2.0' '-latk-1.0' '-lgdk_pixbuf-2.0' '-lm' '-lpangoxft-1.0' '-lpangox-1.0' '-lpangoft2-1.0' '-lpango-1.0' '-lgobject-2.0' '-lgmodule-2.0' '-ldl' '-lglib-2.0' '-lstr' '-lunix' '-locamlodbc' -lcamlrun -lm -ldl -lcurses -lpthread /usr/lib/ocaml/3.09.0/lablgtk2/liblablgtk2.a(ml_gtktree.o): In function `ml_gtk_tree_view_scroll_to_cell': undefined reference to `caml_Double_val' /usr/lib/ocaml/3.09.0/lablgtk2/liblablgtk2.a(ml_gtktree.o): In function `ml_gtk_tree_view_scroll_to_cell': undefined reference to `caml_Double_val' /usr/lib/ocaml/3.09.0/lablgtk2/liblablgtk2.a(ml_gtklist.o): In function `ml_gtk_clist_moveto': undefined reference to `caml_Double_val' /usr/lib/ocaml/3.09.0/lablgtk2/liblablgtk2.a(ml_gtklist.o): In function `ml_gtk_clist_moveto': undefined reference to `caml_Double_val' /usr/lib/ocaml/3.09.0/lablgtk2/liblablgtk2.a(ml_gtkedit.o): In function `ml_gtk_spin_button_spin': undefined reference to `caml_Double_val' /usr/lib/ocaml/3.09.0/lablgtk2/liblablgtk2.a(ml_gtk.o): more undefined references to `caml_Double_val' follow collect2: ld returned 1 exit status Error while building custom runtime system make[2]: *** [biniki] Error 2 make[2]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/ocamlodbc-2.10/Biniki' make[1]: *** [unixodbc] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/ocamlodbc-2.10/Biniki' make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2 --- Received: (at 344688-done) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Dec 2005 07:00:26 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Dec 24 23:00:26 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from dsl093-039-086.pdx1.dsl.speakeasy.net
Bug#341675: qt-x11-free build fails
On Sun, Dec 18, 2005 at 06:56:34PM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote: ... and now the problem is a SIGILL that occurs a few instructions later when calling __umoddi3 from libgcc_s.so.2. ... It would be nice if somebody fluent with hppa assembly can tell us if fldw -10(,sp),fr23 is a valid instruction or not. Aurelien, fldw is a valid instruction and is used frequently in libgcc_s.so.2: grundler 507objdump -rD /lib/libgcc_s.so.2 | fgrep fldw | fgrep fr23 | wc -l 36 But there's more than a few calls/branches to __umoddi3. grundler 504objdump -rD /lib/libgcc_s.so.2 | fgrep __umoddi3 | wc -l 43 Can you provide more context around the offending insn? 10 lines of asm before and after the SIGILL instruction? And possibly a register dump just before the SIGILL is issued? It would be interesting to know what %SP is. thanks, grant -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
