Bug#365353: missing debconf template: xserver-xorg/config/inputdevice/mouse/zaxismapping

[Christian Perrier]

Quoting Adam Borowski ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Package: xserver-xorg
> Version: 1:7.0.15
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package uninstallable
> 
> The debconf question xserver-xorg/config/inputdevice/mouse/zaxismapping
> is needed by xserver-xorg's preinst, yet its template is missing.  Without
> it, installation fails on new installs unless manually preseeded.


I grabbed this template back from the 6.9 branch, along with
translations.

However, I'm not involved in X packages maintenance enough for knowing
whether re-adding it is the way to go.

Please, XSF people, tell me if that is what needs to be done. If so,
I'll apply my pending change.




signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Processed: Reassign from mondo to mindi and add patch tag

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> reassign 365366 mindi
Bug#365366: mondo: fatal error cannot find isolinux.cfg
Bug reassigned from package `mondo' to `mindi'.

> tags 365366 + patch
Bug#365366: mondo: fatal error cannot find isolinux.cfg
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#365404: marked as done (kinput2_3.1-8(unstable/sparc/spontini): FTBFS due to build-dep on libxaw8-dev)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 29 Apr 2006 20:02:18 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#365404: fixed in kinput2 3.1-9
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: kinput2
Version: 3.1-8
Severity: serious

libxaw8-dev is deprecated and going away soon, please use libxaw7-dev
instead.

| Automatic build of kinput2_3.1-8 on spontini by sbuild/sparc 85
| Build started at 20060428-2206
| **

[...]

| ** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
| Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 4.1.16), xutils, x-dev, libice-dev, libsm-dev, 
libx11-dev, libxext-dev, libxmu-dev, libxp-dev, libxpm-dev, libxt-dev, 
libxaw8-dev | libxaw7-dev | libxaw-dev, libcanna1g-dev, libwnn6-dev

[...]

| gcc -c -g -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing-I../include -Iimlib  -I/usr/include
   -Dlinux -D__sparc__ -D_POSIX_C_SOURCE=199309L
-D_POSIX_SOURCE -D_XOPEN_SOURCE -D_BSD_SOURCE 
-D_SVID_SOURCE -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE 
-D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64  
 -DFUNCPROTO=15 -DNARROWPROTOOffConv.c
| OffConv.c:34:26: error: X11/Xaw/Form.h: No such file or directory

A complete build log can be found at
http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?arch=sparc&pkg=kinput2&ver=3.1-8

-- 
James

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: kinput2
Source-Version: 3.1-9

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
kinput2, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

kinput2-canna-wnn_3.1-9_i386.deb
  to pool/main/k/kinput2/kinput2-canna-wnn_3.1-9_i386.deb
kinput2-canna_3.1-9_i386.deb
  to pool/main/k/kinput2/kinput2-canna_3.1-9_i386.deb
kinput2-common_3.1-9_all.deb
  to pool/main/k/kinput2/kinput2-common_3.1-9_all.deb
kinput2-wnn_3.1-9_i386.deb
  to pool/main/k/kinput2/kinput2-wnn_3.1-9_i386.deb
kinput2_3.1-9.diff.gz
  to pool/main/k/kinput2/kinput2_3.1-9.diff.gz
kinput2_3.1-9.dsc
  to pool/main/k/kinput2/kinput2_3.1-9.dsc



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Keita Maehara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated kinput2 package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2006 09:28:13 +0900
Source: kinput2
Binary: kinput2-canna kinput2-canna-wnn kinput2-common kinput2-wnn
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 3.1-9
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Keita Maehara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Keita Maehara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 kinput2-canna - An input server for X11 applications that want Japanese text 
inpu
 kinput2-canna-wnn - An input server for X11 applications that want Japanese 
text inpu
 kinput2-common - Files shared among kinput2 packages
 kinput2-wnn - An input server for X11 applications that want Japanese text inpu
Closes: 365404
Changes: 
 kinput2 (3.1-9) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Removed libxaw8-dev from Build-Depends (closes: Bug#365404).
Files: 
 56979c60db743d5129cd70acb42e22c4 776 x11 optional kinput2_3.1-9.dsc
 0ffa579461122f92e2e11e6e3737d12b 10560 x11 optional kinput2_3.1-9.diff.gz
 23baad0388366d05a7c4a31f288fcf2c 94462 x11 optional 
kinput2-common_3.1-9_all.deb
 8fe25d7f8da952911af89ac8bd4f 98678 x11 optional 
kinput2-canna_3.1-9_i386.deb
 323320443a2367966697571379f96620 118630 x11 optional kinput2-wnn_3.1-9_i386.deb
 8b32400d6745272fc85a776ac46cd809 124258 x11 optional 
kinput2-canna-wnn_3.1-9_i386.deb

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFEVAWWJxItQqZ0o1kRAvZbAJ97jqOpHw34X94AixQTVOb9vQbPQQCgjPTt
ocVAHjcQQW9mNAOZjDc+mAo=
=fJIi
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--- End Message ---

Bug#365332: libdvdread

[Stephen Gran]

This one time, at band camp, Björn Englund said:
> Sat Apr 29 2006, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > we have some problems[0] in Debian with the libdvdread 0.9.5. It seems,
> > that the UDFFindFile (and some others) are no longer exportet. Is this
> > done intenionally or accidently?
> > 
> > If intenionally, how about bumping the soname to reflect this changes?
> > If accidently, how about releasing a fixed tarball (0.9.5a or similar)?
> > 
> UDFFindFile was not (intentionally) exported in 0.9.4 either.
> Just some patch that was floating around and to my knowledge only used
> by one project(dvdbackup). I made a patch for that project to use other
> functions instead of udffindfile. This will work against the cvs version of
> libdvdread which will be 0.9.6. I sent the patch to the author of
> dvdbackup but I don't know if he received it or has applied it.

Hi there.  I am the Debian maintainer of dvdbackup.  It is my impression
that upstream dvdbackup has disappeared.  At the very least, they don't
answer my patches.

I am happy to apply the patch you sent (thanks for that, by the way) but
I do feel a bit like the soname should change when exported symbols are
dropped, even if they were accidentally exported.  If dvdbackup is
definitely the only piece of software using a symbol that was supposed
to be internal, then I agree, I'll just apply the patch and move on.
But it is difficult to be sure, and that's why I mention it.

> Are there any other projects in debian that are using UDFFindFile
> or other functions that aren't exported?

I will attempt to look in the morning and see if I can identify any
others.

> I'm going to release 0.9.6 next week (small fixes for macos/bsd and
> some extra functions to get the information needed by dvdbackup) so
> you could maybe apply the attached patch to dvdbackup in debian then?
> Does this seem ok ?

I will definitely apply the patch and get it uploaded shortly.  It is
just other unidentified software suites I am worried about.

Thanks very much,
-- 
 -
|   ,''`.Stephen Gran |
|  : :' :[EMAIL PROTECTED] |
|  `. `'Debian user, admin, and developer |
|`- http://www.debian.org |
 -


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#365435: libxprintutil-dev: FTBFS: Missing depends on libxt-dev

[Kurt Roeckx]

Package: libxprintutil-dev
Version: 1:1.0.1-1
Severity: serious

Hi,

When building libxprintapputil, I get the following error:
checking for XPRINTAPPUTIL... configure: error: Package requirements (x11 xp 
xprintutil printproto xau) were not met:

Package xt was not found in the pkg-config search path.
Perhaps you should add the directory containing `xt.pc'
to the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable
Package 'xt', required by 'XprintUtil', not found

Consider adjusting the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable if you
installed software in a non-standard prefix.

Alternatively, you may set the environment variables XPRINTAPPUTIL_CFLAGS
and XPRINTAPPUTIL_LIBS to avoid the need to call pkg-config.
See the pkg-config man page for more details.

make: *** [build-stamp] Error 1

Your package seems to require xt, so you'll need to add a
Depends on libxt-dev.


Kurt



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#364871: marked as done (libpfm3: FTBFS on i386: Cannot find headers)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 29 Apr 2006 18:02:07 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#364871: fixed in libpfm3 3.2-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: libpfm3
Version: 3.2-3
Severity: serious

From my pbuilder build log on i386:

...
gcc -Wall -Werror -I/tmp/buildd/libpfm3-3.2/lib/../include -I. -O2 -g 
-D_REENTRANT -DCONFIG_PFMLIB_I386_P6 -c pfmlib_common.c
In file included from pfmlib_common.c:32:
/tmp/buildd/libpfm3-3.2/lib/../include/perfmon/pfmlib.h:30:32: error: 
perfmon3/pfmlib_os.h: No such file or directory
/tmp/buildd/libpfm3-3.2/lib/../include/perfmon/pfmlib.h:31:34: error: 
perfmon3/pfmlib_comp.h: No such file or directory
cc1: warnings being treated as errors
In file included from pfmlib_common.c:32:
/tmp/buildd/libpfm3-3.2/lib/../include/perfmon/pfmlib.h: In function 
'pfmlib_regmask_weight':
/tmp/buildd/libpfm3-3.2/lib/../include/perfmon/pfmlib.h:157: warning: implicit 
declaration of function 'pfmlib_popcnt'
In file included from pfmlib_priv_comp.h:28,
 from pfmlib_priv.h:30,
 from pfmlib_common.c:34:
/tmp/buildd/libpfm3-3.2/lib/../include/perfmon/pfmlib_comp.h:34:39: error: 
perfmon3/pfmlib_comp_i386.h: No such file or directory
make[2]: *** [pfmlib_common.o] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/libpfm3-3.2/lib'
make[1]: *** [all] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/libpfm3-3.2'
make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2
-- 
Daniel Schepler

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: libpfm3
Source-Version: 3.2-4

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
libpfm3, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

libpfm3-dev_3.2-4_i386.deb
  to pool/main/libp/libpfm3/libpfm3-dev_3.2-4_i386.deb
libpfm3_3.2-4.diff.gz
  to pool/main/libp/libpfm3/libpfm3_3.2-4.diff.gz
libpfm3_3.2-4.dsc
  to pool/main/libp/libpfm3/libpfm3_3.2-4.dsc
libpfm3_3.2-4_i386.deb
  to pool/main/libp/libpfm3/libpfm3_3.2-4_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Al Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated libpfm3 package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2006 17:39:34 -0600
Source: libpfm3
Binary: libpfm3 libpfm3-dev
Architecture: source i386
Version: 3.2-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Al Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Al Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 libpfm3- Performance Monitor Unit (PMU) -- run-time libraries
 libpfm3-dev - Performance Monitor Unit (PMU) -- development files
Closes: 364871
Changes: 
 libpfm3 (3.2-4) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Incremental improvements from upstream source
   * Closes: bug#364871 -- FTBFS on i386: Cannot find headers
Files: 
 282d723536129d829e23061e4f14b678 635 - optional libpfm3_3.2-4.dsc
 ac2f0795fced605b38db364dee82f340 51335 - optional libpfm3_3.2-4.diff.gz
 45091f6ad0a55c983ba7dca0b796a731 14200 libs optional libpfm3_3.2-4_i386.deb
 15d6cedaebce6ae206bc90d10ff05900 348336 libdevel optional 
libpfm3-dev_3.2-4_i386.deb

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFEVAmnso6+T7qY4V0RAkaWAJ9BtdhThduy5DyD2Sa8W/FdMgs6uwCeI6o1
KczWkrTuaSArvNcbJ/MtHtk=
=s2cz
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--- End Message ---

Bug#365134: confirmation of severe xdm bug

[Steve Langasek]

On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 03:55:39PM -0700, Ian Bruce wrote:
> I'd like to confirm the seriousness of this bug. I have a pre-Xorg
> X-server, but I thought I would try upgrading xdm to see if that would
> fix some minor problems associated with "/etc/init.d/xdm restart".
> Instead, it broke the X-server completely.

> The original submitter is correct that xdm looks for some executables in
> the wrong places:

> # strings /usr/bin/xdm | grep usr
> /usr/bin/xrdb
> /usr/bin/xterm -ls
> /usr/bin/xterm
> /usr/lib/X11/xdm/chooser
> :0 local /usr/bin/X :0
> /bin:/usr/bin:/usr/bin:/usr/ucb
> /etc:/bin:/usr/bin:/usr/bin:/usr/ucb
> /usr/lib/X11/xdm/libXdmGreet.so

> The file /etc/X11/xdm/Xservers has the same wrong location for the
> X-server binary. I was able to fix this with a few symlinks, but if I
> hadn't seen his report of what the problem was, I wouldn't have had a
> clue.

> # ls -l /usr/bin/X /usr/bin/xrdb 
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 5 2006-04-28 14:48 /usr/bin/X -> X11/X
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 8 2006-04-28 14:48 /usr/bin/xrdb -> X11/xrdb

> In order to fix this reliably, why not give the PATH variable a
> reasonable value, and then let execlp() find the actual location of the
> executables? Either that, or have the xdm package create these same
> symlinks.

> As the original report says, it is also necessary to change the
> references in /etc/init.d/xdm and /etc/X11/default-display-manager from
> "/usr/bin/X11/xdm" to "/usr/bin/xdm". It's hard to see how this problem
> arose, because these files all come from the same package; there's no
> question of a version conflict.

The basic issue here is that xdm is missing a Pre-Depends: on x11-common (>=
1:7.0.0) which is required because it installs files to /usr/lib/X11, and
/usr/lib/X11 is a symlink up until that version.  This is unfortunately
going to be quite a mess to fix, now that this version of xdm has reached
testing, *because* installing this version of x11-common will cause dpkg to
lose track of xdm's files; I think the sanest way to handle this is for
x11-common to bump its conflicts with xdm up to (<= 1:1.0.1-6) as well.

Several of the issues you describe above do not strictly require the
Pre-Depends in order to address them, but the Pre-Depends is necessary to
fix *some* of the problems with this package and happens to also be
sufficient for fixing the others.

-- 
Steve Langasek   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer   to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://www.debian.org/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Processed: retitle 359904 to [CVE-2006-1490] Binary safety issue in html_entity_decode() may leak information

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> retitle 359904 [CVE-2006-1490] Binary safety issue in html_entity_decode() 
> may leak information
Bug#359904: Security: Binary safety issue in html_entity_decode() may leak 
memory
Changed Bug title.

>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#362476: marked as done (yelp: does not display any help files)

[Josselin Mouette]

Le samedi 29 avril 2006 à 14:48 -0700, Debian Bug Tracking System a
écrit :
> > De: Gustavo Noronha Silva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > À: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sujet: fixed by yelp 2.14
> > Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2006 18:40:10 -0300
> > 
> > This was apparently not a bug on scrollkeeper?

This was a bug in scrollkeeper, fixed by the 0.3.14-10.1 NMU.

Regards,
-- 
 .''`.   Josselin Mouette/\./\
: :' :   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
`. `'[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  `-  Debian GNU/Linux -- The power of freedom


signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message	numériquement signée

Bug#365111: marked as done (python-support: update-python-modules broken)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 29 Apr 2006 14:47:10 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#365111: fixed in python-support 0.2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---

Package: python-support
Version: 0.1.1
Severity: grave
Tags: patch


Coin,

The update-python-modules is unsuitable for release and as this package
is already quite advertised in Python Teams papers, it MUST be fixed as
soon as possible before too many packages are broken, thus the severity.

Symlinks for .py files were missing, resulting in import
failures. Cleanup was fixed as well. The following patch as been tested
with the editobj+py2play+soya+slune suite and the
editobj+cerealizer+tofu+soya+balazarbrother suite with success (some of
them are to be uploaded soon n the archive).

Thanks.

--- /usr/sbin/update-python-modules.orig	2006-04-27 21:40:50.629211816 +0200
+++ /usr/sbin/update-python-modules	2006-04-27 21:51:04.288921360 +0200
@@ -64,16 +64,16 @@
   except OSError:
 pass
   if file.endswith('.py'):
-destpath+='c'
-debug("compile "+destpath)
+destpath2=destpath+'c'
+debug("compile "+destpath2)
 if py == "python"+sys.version[:3]:
-  compile(fullpath,destpath)
+  compile(fullpath,destpath2)
 else:
 # D'uh, this one stinks, but it's the only way for non-default
 # versions
-  command = 'import py_compile; py_compile.compile("%s","%s")'%(fullpath,destpath)
+  command = 'import py_compile; py_compile.compile("%s","%s")'%(fullpath,destpath2)
   os.spawnl(os.P_WAIT, '/usr/bin/'+py, py, '-c', command)
-  elif not file.endswith('.pyc'):
+  if not file.endswith('.pyc'):
 debug("link "+destpath)
 if os.path.exists(destpath):
   os.remove(destpath)
@@ -85,7 +85,12 @@
   for py in py_installed:
 destpath=os.path.join(basepath,py,dir,file)
 if file.endswith('.py'):
-  destpath+='c'
+  destpath2=destpath+'c'
+  debug("remove "+destpath2)
+  try:
+os.remove(destpath2)
+  except OSError:
+pass
 if os.path.exists(destpath):
   debug("remove "+destpath)
   os.remove(destpath)

-- 
Marc Dequènes (Duck)


pgpMI3zhRSyhb.pgp
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: python-support
Source-Version: 0.2

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
python-support, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

python-support_0.2.dsc
  to pool/main/p/python-support/python-support_0.2.dsc
python-support_0.2.tar.gz
  to pool/main/p/python-support/python-support_0.2.tar.gz
python-support_0.2_all.deb
  to pool/main/p/python-support/python-support_0.2_all.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated python-support 
package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2006 23:29:40 +0200
Source: python-support
Binary: python-support
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 python-support - automated rebuilding support for python modules
Closes: 348596 363505 365111
Changes: 
 python-support (0.2) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Link the .py files (closes: #365111, #348596, #363505).
   * Support /usr/share/python-support/foo/.version to list the python
 versions for which the package is known to work.
   * Make python-support entirely stateless. We now rely on
 /usr/share/python-support/*/ for directories to install and on
 /usr/share/python-support/*.dirs for directories to bytecompile in
 situ.
   * Improve performance by byte-compiling for non-default python
 versions in a single run.
   * Treat relative paths in arguments as belonging to
 /usr/share/python-support.
   * Support python 2.5.
Files: 
 973f0f6e909d4d28daf61768b9d94fbd 512 python optional python-support_0.2.dsc
 0dae

Bug#361326: marked as done (yelp opens external browser for displaying help files.)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 29 Apr 2006 18:40:10 -0300
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line fixed by yelp 2.14
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: yelp
Version: 2.12.2-4
Severity: normal

If I start yelp and select a help topic (e.g. Desktop->Accessibility
Guide) an external browers is opened (in my case firefox) which
displays the xml file as an xml tree or firefox simply displays an errror
message because it cannot parse the xml file (e.g User Guide).

This behaviour renders yelp completely useless.


Michael


-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (300, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.16.1
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

Versions of packages yelp depends on:
ii  docbook-xml  4.4-4   standard XML documentation system,
ii  gconf2   2.14.0-1GNOME configuration database syste
ii  gnome-doc-utils  0.6.0-1 a collection of documentation util
ii  libbonobo2-0 2.14.0-1Bonobo CORBA interfaces library
ii  libbz2-1.0   1.0.3-2 high-quality block-sorting file co
ii  libc62.3.6-5 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libgcc1  1:4.1.0-1   GCC support library
ii  libgconf2-4  2.14.0-1GNOME configuration database syste
ii  libglade2-0  1:2.5.1-2   library to load .glade files at ru
ii  libglib2.0-0 2.10.1-2The GLib library of C routines
ii  libgnome2-0  2.14.0-2The GNOME 2 library - runtime file
ii  libgnomeui-0 2.14.0-1The GNOME 2 libraries (User Interf
ii  libgnomevfs2-0   2.14.0-2GNOME virtual file-system (runtime
ii  libgtk2.0-0  2.8.16-1The GTK+ graphical user interface 
ii  liborbit21:2.14.0-1  libraries for ORBit2 - a CORBA ORB
ii  libpango1.0-01.12.0-2Layout and rendering of internatio
ii  libpopt0 1.7-5   lib for parsing cmdline parameters
ii  libstdc++6   4.1.0-1 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3
ii  libxml2  2.6.23.dfsg.2-3 GNOME XML library
ii  libxslt1.1   1.1.15-5XSLT processing library - runtime 
ii  libxul0d 1.8.0.1-8   Gecko engine library
ii  xml-core 0.09XML infrastructure and XML catalog
ii  zlib1g   1:1.2.3-11  compression library - runtime

yelp recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
This was apparently not a bug on scrollkeeper?

Thanks,

-- 
Gustavo Noronha Silva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://people.debian.org/~kov/


signature.asc
Description: Esta é uma parte de mensagem	assinada digitalmente
--- End Message ---

Bug#360769: marked as done (yelp: can't display any manual pages - tries to send them to firefox instead)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 29 Apr 2006 18:40:10 -0300
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line fixed by yelp 2.14
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: yelp
Version: 2.12.2-2
Severity: grave

I'm running testing, and just dist-upgraded.  This version of yelp
shows the section titles, but when I click on one, eg, GNU Cash
Manual, it attempts to open the XML file using firefox, which isn't
right at all (firefox doesn't know what to do with GNOME's XML help
files).

   Julian

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
This was apparently not a bug on scrollkeeper?

Thanks,

-- 
Gustavo Noronha Silva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://people.debian.org/~kov/


signature.asc
Description: Esta é uma parte de mensagem	assinada digitalmente
--- End Message ---

Bug#365418: console-tools: new console-screen.sh fails to start on S/390

[Frans Pop]

Package: console-tools
Version: 0.2.3dbs-61
Severity: serious

Upgrade of console-tools (and therefore console-common) fails because
console-screen.sh throws an error when started:

$ ./console-screen.sh start || echo "FAIL $?"
+ '[' -r /etc/console-tools/config ']'
+ . /etc/console-tools/config
++ BLANK_TIME=30
++ BLANK_DPMS=off
++ POWERDOWN_TIME=30
+ '[' -d /etc/console-tools/config.d ']'
+ PATH=/sbin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin
+ SETFONT=/usr/bin/consolechars
+ SETFONT_OPT=
+ CHARSET=/usr/bin/charset
+ VCSTIME=/usr/sbin/vcstime
++ uname -r
++ cut -f 2 -d .
+ '[' 4 = 6 ']'
+ VCSTIME_OPT=
+ '[' -d /dev/vc ']'
+ DEVICE_PREFIX=/dev/tty
+ case "$1" in
+ setup
+ '[' -x /usr/bin/consolechars ']'
+ VT=no
++ fgconsole
+ CONSOLE_TYPE=
+ return
FAIL 1

Replacing:
# If we can't access the console, quit
CONSOLE_TYPE=`fgconsole 2>/dev/null` || return
with:
# If we can't access the console, quit
CONSOLE_TYPE=`fgconsole 2>/dev/null` || return 0
may fix the problem.

Note that there are other cases as well where "|| return" is used.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: s390
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.4.27-2-s390
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)

Versions of packages console-tools depends on:
pn  console-common (no description available)
ii  debconf [debconf-2.0]  1.5.0 Debian configuration management sy
ii  libc6  2.3.6-7   GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii  libconsole 1:0.2.3dbs-61 Shared libraries for Linux console
ii  sysvinit   2.86.ds1-14   System-V-like init utilities

Versions of packages console-tools recommends:
ii  console-data  20060421   Keymaps, fonts, charset maps, fall

-- no debconf information


pgpHD3UpA6HPH.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Bug#365332: libdvdread

[Björn Englund]

Sat Apr 29 2006, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> we have some problems[0] in Debian with the libdvdread 0.9.5. It seems,
> that the UDFFindFile (and some others) are no longer exportet. Is this
> done intenionally or accidently?
> 
> If intenionally, how about bumping the soname to reflect this changes?
> If accidently, how about releasing a fixed tarball (0.9.5a or similar)?
> 
UDFFindFile was not (intentionally) exported in 0.9.4 either.
Just some patch that was floating around and to my knowledge only used
by one project(dvdbackup). I made a patch for that project to use other
functions instead of udffindfile. This will work against the cvs version of
libdvdread which will be 0.9.6. I sent the patch to the author of
dvdbackup but I don't know if he received it or has applied it.

Are there any other projects in debian that are using UDFFindFile
or other functions that aren't exported?

I'm going to release 0.9.6 next week (small fixes for macos/bsd and
some extra functions to get the information needed by dvdbackup) so
you could maybe apply the attached patch to dvdbackup in debian then?
Does this seem ok ?

/Bj|rn






-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#365409: slapd: segfaults on entry modify

[Steve Langasek]

On Sat, Apr 29, 2006 at 11:24:25PM +0300, Katriel Traum wrote:
> Package: slapd
> Version: 2.2.26-5
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable

> When trying to modify an entry, slapd crashes with the error:
> slapd: /build/buildd/openldap2.2-2.2.26/servers/slapd/mods.c:55: 
> modify_add_values: Assertion `0' failed.

Are you using the BDB backend in /etc/ldap/slapd.conf, as suggested by the
attached debconf values?

What is the full modification you're trying to make?

> Architecture: arm (armv5tel)
> Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
> Kernel: Linux 2.6.16
> Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)

Well, it seems odd to me that anyone would run slapd on an arm system, but
we still need to make sure any binaries we ship actually work.  Is there any
chance you could duplicate your environment on an x86 system, and confirm
whether the problem is reproducible there?  That would certainly help us
know how to try to debug this without asking you to give us your complete
slapd config and directory.

Thanks,
-- 
Steve Langasek   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer   to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://www.debian.org/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#365332: libdvdread

[Björn Englund]

I forgot to attach the patch in the previous email, here it is.

/Bj|rn

--- dvdbackup.c.orig2006-03-02 19:09:52.0 +0100
+++ dvdbackup.c 2006-03-02 20:14:25.0 +0100
@@ -30,6 +30,7 @@
 #include 
 #include 
 #include 
+#include 
 #include 
 #include 
 #include 
@@ -1656,15 +1657,14 @@
 
 
/* DVD Video files */
-   charfilename[MAXNAME];
-   int size;
+   dvd_stat_t statbuf;
 
/*DVD ifo handler*/
ifo_handle_t *  vmg_ifo=NULL;
 
/* The Title Set Info struct*/
title_set_info_t * title_set_info;
-
+   
/*  Open main info file */
vmg_ifo = ifoOpen( _dvd, 0 );
if( !vmg_ifo ) {
@@ -1687,10 +1687,9 @@
 
/* Find VIDEO_TS.IFO is present - must be present since we did a ifo 
open 0*/
 
-   sprintf(filename,"/VIDEO_TS/VIDEO_TS.IFO");
-
-   if ( UDFFindFile(_dvd, filename, &size) != 0 ) {
-   title_set_info->title_set[0].size_ifo = size;
+   
+   if ( DVDFileStat(_dvd, 0, DVD_READ_INFO_FILE, &statbuf) != -1 ) {
+   title_set_info->title_set[0].size_ifo = statbuf.size;
} else {
DVDFreeTitleSetInfo(title_set_info);
return(0);
@@ -1700,20 +1699,18 @@
 
/* Find VIDEO_TS.VOB if present*/
 
-   sprintf(filename,"/VIDEO_TS/VIDEO_TS.VOB");
 
-   if ( UDFFindFile(_dvd, filename, &size) != 0 ) {
-   title_set_info->title_set[0].size_menu = size;
+   if ( DVDFileStat(_dvd, 0, DVD_READ_MENU_VOBS, &statbuf) != -1 ) {
+   title_set_info->title_set[0].size_menu = statbuf.size;
} else {
title_set_info->title_set[0].size_menu = 0 ;
}
 
/* Find VIDEO_TS.BUP if present */
 
-   sprintf(filename,"/VIDEO_TS/VIDEO_TS.BUP");
 
-   if ( UDFFindFile(_dvd, filename, &size) != 0 ) {
-   title_set_info->title_set[0].size_bup = size;
+   if (DVDFileStat(_dvd, 0, DVD_READ_INFO_BACKUP_FILE, &statbuf) != -1) {
+   title_set_info->title_set[0].size_bup = statbuf.size;
} else {
DVDFreeTitleSetInfo(title_set_info);
return(0);
@@ -1745,10 +1742,9 @@
}
 
 
-   sprintf(filename,"/VIDEO_TS/VTS_%02i_0.IFO",counter + 
1);
 
-   if ( UDFFindFile(_dvd, filename, &size) != 0 ) {
-   title_set_info->title_set[counter + 1].size_ifo 
= size;
+   if ( DVDFileStat(_dvd, counter + 1, DVD_READ_INFO_FILE, 
&statbuf) != -1) {
+   title_set_info->title_set[counter+1].size_ifo = 
statbuf.size;
} else {
DVDFreeTitleSetInfo(title_set_info);
return(0);
@@ -1761,10 +1757,9 @@
 
/* Find VTS_XX_0.VOB if present*/
 
-   sprintf(filename,"/VIDEO_TS/VTS_%02i_0.VOB", counter + 
1);
 
-   if ( UDFFindFile(_dvd, filename, &size) != 0 ) {
-   title_set_info->title_set[counter + 
1].size_menu = size;
+   if ( DVDFileStat(_dvd, counter + 1, DVD_READ_MENU_VOBS, 
&statbuf) != -1) {
+   title_set_info->title_set[counter + 
1].size_menu = statbuf.size;
} else {
title_set_info->title_set[counter + 
1].size_menu = 0 ;
}
@@ -1776,13 +1771,12 @@
 
 
/* Find all VTS_XX_[1 to 9].VOB files if they are 
present*/
-
-   for( i = 0; i < 9; ++i ) {
-   sprintf(filename,"/VIDEO_TS/VTS_%02i_%i.VOB", 
counter + 1, i + 1 );
-   if(UDFFindFile(_dvd, filename, &size) == 0 ) {
-   break;
+   i = 0;
+   if ( DVDFileStat(_dvd, counter + 1, 
DVD_READ_TITLE_VOBS, &statbuf) != -1) {
+   for ( i = 0; i < statbuf.nr_parts; ++i) {
+   title_set_info->title_set[counter + 
1].size_vob[i] = statbuf.parts_size[i];
}
-   title_set_info->title_set[counter + 
1].size_vob[i] = size;
+
}
title_set_info->title_set[counter + 
1].number_of_vob_files = i;
 
@@ -1791,10 +1785,9 @@
}
 
 
-   sprintf(filename,"/VIDEO_TS/VTS_%02i_0.BUP", counter + 
1);
 
-   if ( UDFFindFile(_dvd, filename, &size) != 0 ) {
-   title_set_info->title_set[counter +1].size_bup 
= size;
+   if ( DVDFileStat(_dvd, counter + 1, 
DVD_READ_INFO_BACKUP_FILE, &statbuf) != -1) {
+   title_set_info->title_set[counter + 1].size_bup 
= statbuf.size;
} else {
  

Bug#362476: marked as done (yelp: does not display any help files)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 29 Apr 2006 18:40:10 -0300
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line fixed by yelp 2.14
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: yelp
Version: 2.12.2-4
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable

yelp opens with an empty window: below the title "Help Topics" there 
is nothing more. This happens when starting yelp from Desktop/Help (or F1) 
as well as when trying to open the help-page of some application.
(I had the same trouble with version 2.12.2-2)


-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (200, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.15-1-686
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1)

Versions of packages yelp depends on:
ii  docbook-xml  4.4-4   standard XML documentation system,
ii  gconf2   2.14.0-1GNOME configuration database syste
ii  gnome-doc-utils  0.6.0-1 a collection of documentation util
ii  libbonobo2-0 2.14.0-1Bonobo CORBA interfaces library
ii  libbz2-1.0   1.0.3-2 high-quality block-sorting file co
ii  libc62.3.6-3 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libgcc1  1:4.1.0-1   GCC support library
ii  libgconf2-4  2.14.0-1GNOME configuration database syste
ii  libglade2-0  1:2.5.1-2   library to load .glade files at ru
ii  libglib2.0-0 2.10.1-2The GLib library of C routines
ii  libgnome2-0  2.14.0-2The GNOME 2 library - runtime file
ii  libgnomeui-0 2.14.0-1The GNOME 2 libraries (User Interf
ii  libgnomevfs2-0   2.14.0-2GNOME virtual file-system (runtime
ii  libgtk2.0-0  2.8.16-1The GTK+ graphical user interface 
ii  liborbit21:2.14.0-1  libraries for ORBit2 - a CORBA ORB
ii  libpango1.0-01.12.0-2Layout and rendering of internatio
ii  libpopt0 1.7-5   lib for parsing cmdline parameters
ii  libstdc++6   4.1.0-1 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3
ii  libxml2  2.6.23.dfsg.2-3 GNOME XML library
ii  libxslt1.1   1.1.15-5XSLT processing library - runtime 
ii  libxul0d 1.8.0.1-8   Gecko engine library
ii  xml-core 0.09XML infrastructure and XML catalog
ii  zlib1g   1:1.2.3-11  compression library - runtime

yelp recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
This was apparently not a bug on scrollkeeper?

Thanks,

-- 
Gustavo Noronha Silva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://people.debian.org/~kov/


signature.asc
Description: Esta é uma parte de mensagem	assinada digitalmente
--- End Message ---

Bug#365194: Fwd: Re: [NONFREE-DOC] RFC1459, 2810-2813: IRC (Internet Relay Chat).

[Francesco Poli]

On Sat, 29 Apr 2006 01:55:55 +0200 Kurt Roeckx wrote:

> Do I need to get the copyright holder of the documents to
> relicense it under the GPL?  It seems clear to me that it
> already is covered by the GPL, but it shouldn't be a
> problem to get the copyright holder to explicitly state
> that.

Yes, please do.
A clarification would be highly useful, IMHO.

-- 
:-(   This Universe is buggy! Where's the Creator's BTS?   ;-)
..
  Francesco Poli GnuPG Key ID = DD6DFCF4
 Key fingerprint = C979 F34B 27CE 5CD8 DC12  31B5 78F4 279B DD6D FCF4


pgpbXcuOf1v7W.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Processed: Bug#361680: atk1.0: Typo in rules file results in incorrect shlibs file

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> severity 361680 serious
Bug#361680: atk1.0: Typo in rules file results in incorrect shlibs file
Severity set to `serious'.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#365402: marked as done (MPEG-4 patent license issues - libfaad* and H.264 CoDec)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 29 Apr 2006 14:01:52 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#365390: MPEG-4 patent license issues - libfaad* and 
libx264*
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: libavcodec0d
Version:  0.cvs20060329-4
Severity: Serious
Justification: Policy 2.3 - Copyright considerations

This package includes libfaad* and an H.264 CoDec which implement the
MPEG-4 Advanced Audio Coding and Advanced Video Coding. Unfortunately,
these are patent encumbered in at least the USA, and many other
countries. To distribute code implementing any of these patents, a
license is required[1]. This license requires signing an agreement and
the payment of royalties, which hasn't been done AFAIK, and is contrary
to policy. There has been some discussion on the lists about this issue
with no particular conclusion[2]. 
It is therefore my conclusion that these libraries are not distributable
by Debian. Subject to confirmation of this conclusion, the libraries
must be removed from the archive.

Should I forward this to FTP Masters and/or Debian Legal?

Matthew W. S. Bell

(Please don't lynch me).

[1] http://www.vialicensing.com/products/mpeg4audio/standard.html
http://www.mpegla.com/avc/avc-agreement.cfm
[2] http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2006/03/msg00031.html
http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2005/09/msg00012.html



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Sat, Apr 29, 2006 at 07:10:59PM +0100, Matthew William Solloway Bell wrote:

> Justification: Policy 2.3 - Copyright considerations

This has nothing to do with copyright.  This is a question of patent
infringement.  Please do not conflate these two areas of law.

> This package includes libfaad* and libx264* which implement the MPEG-4
> Advanced Audio Coding and Advanced Video Coding. Unfortunately, these
> are patent encumbered in at least the USA, and many other countries. To
> distribute code implementing any of these patents, a license is
> required[1]. This license requires signing an agreement and the payment
> of royalties, which hasn't been done AFAIK, and is contrary to policy.
> There has been some discussion on the lists about this issue with no
> particular conclusion[2].

> Should I forward this to FTP Masters and/or Debian Legal?

You should stop filing multiple release critical bug reports for a legal
issue on which there is no conclusion.  Take this to debian-legal *first*,
and if there is agreement that these packages cannot be distributed by
Debian, *then* file bugs.

It is Debian's de facto policy that software patents are only an obstacle to
inclusion in main if there is both a history of enforcement and a reasonable
belief that the patents are not invalidated by prior art.  Please
demonstrate that this is the case for patents covering use of these codecs.
Note that the existence of voluntary licensees is evidence of neither
enforcement nor validity.

> It is therefore my conclusion that these libraries are not distributable
> by Debian. Subject to confirmation of this conclusion, the libraries
> must be removed from the archive.

A conclusion for which you have provided no support whatsoever.

-- 
Steve Langasek   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer   to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://www.debian.org/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---

Bug#365126: marked as done (wmrack - FTBFS: error: WMRack needs X Windows!!!)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 29 Apr 2006 14:03:41 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#365126: fixed in wmrack 1.3-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: wmrack
Version: 1.3-1
Severity: serious

There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:

> Automatic build of wmrack_1.3-1 on debian-31 by sbuild/s390 85
[...]
> ** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
> Build-Depends: libx11-dev, libxext-dev, libxpm-dev, xutils, debhelper (>= 
> 4.0.0)
> checking for X... no
> configure: error: WMRack needs X Windows!!!
> make: *** [stamp-build] Error 1
> **
> Build finished at 20060426-1850
> FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died]

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: wmrack
Source-Version: 1.3-2

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
wmrack, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

wmrack_1.3-2.diff.gz
  to pool/main/w/wmrack/wmrack_1.3-2.diff.gz
wmrack_1.3-2.dsc
  to pool/main/w/wmrack/wmrack_1.3-2.dsc
wmrack_1.3-2_i386.deb
  to pool/main/w/wmrack/wmrack_1.3-2_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Chris Waters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated wmrack package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2006 12:11:46 -0700
Source: wmrack
Binary: wmrack
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.3-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Chris Waters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Chris Waters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 wmrack - Combined CD Player + Mixer designed for WindowMaker
Closes: 365126
Changes: 
 wmrack (1.3-2) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * changed build-dependency on xutils to libxt-dev because the configure
 script looks for a header in libxt-dev if it can't find xmkmf, and
 xmkmf has been moved to xutils-dev.  I could have changed to
 build-depend on xutils-dev, of course, but this way allows backports
 to sarge.  Thanks to Andreas Metzler for the suggestion. (Closes: #365126).
   * At the advice of Aaron Ucko, I have patched configure (and
 configure.in) to handle the case where X does not need additional
 include or library paths.
Files: 
 97abf2102beece4204c3a8abf8f713c5 716 sound optional wmrack_1.3-2.dsc
 5216894c7cf80d75e756bc151ff8d894 3217 sound optional wmrack_1.3-2.diff.gz
 714100c624583d7532e564c778b274b6 34658 sound optional wmrack_1.3-2_i386.deb

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux)

iQCVAwUBRFO7nDZs0/7rwRsBAQLmvAP/Xmf+NTpoQt8h6dWw3EXF8R114bDXW091
OzBH7gCZvt7JHiYxMh7vO8lNeORQCkLPGjqMb21gqN3MKhLeWthD087IaEaXsASx
VdStmQKAhrn1hOvKIpBv5I5U5I3qr5t9PJiLRIg0DUi82PES0QJTACWa7uNjq9Kn
g5TfZfumt4A=
=79y2
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--- End Message ---

Bug#365389: marked as done (MPEG-4 patent license issues - libfaad* and libx264*)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 29 Apr 2006 14:01:52 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#365390: MPEG-4 patent license issues - libfaad* and 
libx264*
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: vlc
Version: 0.8.4.debian-2
Severity: Serious
Justification: Policy 2.3 - Copyright considerations

This package includes libfaad* and libx264* which implement the MPEG-4
Advanced Audio Coding and Advanced Video Coding. Unfortunately, these
are patent encumbered in at least the USA, and many other countries. To
distribute code implementing any of these patents, a license is
required[1]. This license requires signing an agreement and the payment
of royalties, which hasn't been done AFAIK, and is contrary to policy.
There has been some discussion on the lists about this issue with no
particular conclusion[2].
It is therefore my conclusion that these libraries are not distributable
by Debian. Subject to confirmation of this conclusion, the libraries
must be removed from the archive.

Should I forward this to FTP Masters and/or Debian Legal?

Matthew W. S. Bell

(Please don't lynch me).

[1] http://www.vialicensing.com/products/mpeg4audio/standard.html
http://www.mpegla.com/avc/avc-agreement.cfm
[2] http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2006/03/msg00031.html
http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2005/09/msg00012.html



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Sat, Apr 29, 2006 at 07:10:59PM +0100, Matthew William Solloway Bell wrote:

> Justification: Policy 2.3 - Copyright considerations

This has nothing to do with copyright.  This is a question of patent
infringement.  Please do not conflate these two areas of law.

> This package includes libfaad* and libx264* which implement the MPEG-4
> Advanced Audio Coding and Advanced Video Coding. Unfortunately, these
> are patent encumbered in at least the USA, and many other countries. To
> distribute code implementing any of these patents, a license is
> required[1]. This license requires signing an agreement and the payment
> of royalties, which hasn't been done AFAIK, and is contrary to policy.
> There has been some discussion on the lists about this issue with no
> particular conclusion[2].

> Should I forward this to FTP Masters and/or Debian Legal?

You should stop filing multiple release critical bug reports for a legal
issue on which there is no conclusion.  Take this to debian-legal *first*,
and if there is agreement that these packages cannot be distributed by
Debian, *then* file bugs.

It is Debian's de facto policy that software patents are only an obstacle to
inclusion in main if there is both a history of enforcement and a reasonable
belief that the patents are not invalidated by prior art.  Please
demonstrate that this is the case for patents covering use of these codecs.
Note that the existence of voluntary licensees is evidence of neither
enforcement nor validity.

> It is therefore my conclusion that these libraries are not distributable
> by Debian. Subject to confirmation of this conclusion, the libraries
> must be removed from the archive.

A conclusion for which you have provided no support whatsoever.

-- 
Steve Langasek   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer   to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://www.debian.org/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---

Bug#365390: marked as done (MPEG-4 patent license issues - libfaad* and libx264*)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 29 Apr 2006 14:01:52 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#365390: MPEG-4 patent license issues - libfaad* and 
libx264*
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: libxine1
Version: 1.1.1-1.1
Severity: Serious
Justification: Policy 2.3 - Copyright considerations

This package includes libfaad* and libx264* which implement the MPEG-4
Advanced Audio Coding and Advanced Video Coding. Unfortunately, these
are patent encumbered in at least the USA, and many other countries. To
distribute code implementing any of these patents, a license is
required[1]. This license requires signing an agreement and the payment
of royalties, which hasn't been done AFAIK, and is contrary to policy.
There has been some discussion on the lists about this issue with no
particular conclusion[2].
It is therefore my conclusion that these libraries are not distributable
by Debian. Subject to confirmation of this conclusion, the libraries
must be removed from the archive.

Should I forward this to FTP Masters and/or Debian Legal?

Matthew W. S. Bell

(Please don't lynch me).

[1] http://www.vialicensing.com/products/mpeg4audio/standard.html
http://www.mpegla.com/avc/avc-agreement.cfm
[2] http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2006/03/msg00031.html
http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2005/09/msg00012.html


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Sat, Apr 29, 2006 at 07:10:59PM +0100, Matthew William Solloway Bell wrote:

> Justification: Policy 2.3 - Copyright considerations

This has nothing to do with copyright.  This is a question of patent
infringement.  Please do not conflate these two areas of law.

> This package includes libfaad* and libx264* which implement the MPEG-4
> Advanced Audio Coding and Advanced Video Coding. Unfortunately, these
> are patent encumbered in at least the USA, and many other countries. To
> distribute code implementing any of these patents, a license is
> required[1]. This license requires signing an agreement and the payment
> of royalties, which hasn't been done AFAIK, and is contrary to policy.
> There has been some discussion on the lists about this issue with no
> particular conclusion[2].

> Should I forward this to FTP Masters and/or Debian Legal?

You should stop filing multiple release critical bug reports for a legal
issue on which there is no conclusion.  Take this to debian-legal *first*,
and if there is agreement that these packages cannot be distributed by
Debian, *then* file bugs.

It is Debian's de facto policy that software patents are only an obstacle to
inclusion in main if there is both a history of enforcement and a reasonable
belief that the patents are not invalidated by prior art.  Please
demonstrate that this is the case for patents covering use of these codecs.
Note that the existence of voluntary licensees is evidence of neither
enforcement nor validity.

> It is therefore my conclusion that these libraries are not distributable
> by Debian. Subject to confirmation of this conclusion, the libraries
> must be removed from the archive.

A conclusion for which you have provided no support whatsoever.

-- 
Steve Langasek   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer   to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://www.debian.org/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---

Bug#365409: slapd: segfaults on entry modify

[Katriel Traum]

Package: slapd
Version: 2.2.26-5
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable

When trying to modify an entry, slapd crashes with the error:
slapd: /build/buildd/openldap2.2-2.2.26/servers/slapd/mods.c:55: 
modify_add_values: Assertion `0' failed.


-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: arm (armv5tel)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.16
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)

Versions of packages slapd depends on:
ii  coreutils [fileutils]   5.94-1   The GNU core utilities
ii  debconf 1.5.0Debian configuration management sy
ii  libc6   2.3.6-7  GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii  libdb4.24.2.52-24Berkeley v4.2 Database Libraries [
ii  libiodbc2   3.52.4-2 iODBC Driver Manager
ii  libldap-2.2-7   2.2.26-5 OpenLDAP libraries
ii  libltdl31.5.22-2 A system independent dlopen wrappe
ii  libperl5.8  5.8.8-2  Shared Perl library
ii  libsasl22.1.19.dfsg1-0.2 Authentication abstraction library
ii  libslp1 1.2.1-5  OpenSLP libraries
ii  libssl0.9.8 0.9.8a-8 SSL shared libraries
ii  libwrap07.6.dbs-9Wietse Venema's TCP wrappers libra
ii  perl [libmime-base64-pe 5.8.8-2  Larry Wall's Practical Extraction 
ii  psmisc  22.2-1   Utilities that use the proc filesy

Versions of packages slapd recommends:
ii  db4.2-util  4.2.52-24Berkeley v4.2 Database Utilities
ii  libsasl2-modules2.1.19.dfsg1-0.2 Pluggable Authentication Modules f

-- debconf information:
  slapd/internal/adminpw: (password omitted)
* slapd/password1: (password omitted)
* slapd/password2: (password omitted)
* slapd/allow_ldap_v2: false
  slapd/password_mismatch:
  slapd/suffix_change: false
  slapd/fix_directory: true
  slapd/invalid_config: true
* shared/organization: home.net
  slapd/slave_databases_require_updateref:
  slapd/dump_database_destdir: /var/backups/slapd-VERSION
  slapd/upgrade_slapcat_failure:
  slapd/autoconf_modules: true
* slapd/purge_database: false
* slapd/domain: home.net
* slapd/backend: BDB
* slapd/no_configuration: false
  slapd/migrate_ldbm_to_bdb: true
  slapd/move_old_database: true
  slapd/dump_database: when needed
  slapd/upgrade_slapadd_failure:


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#365395: user-mode-linux: UML will not boot from ISO

[Mattia Dongili]

severity 365395 important
thank

On Sat, Apr 29, 2006 at 11:48:16AM -0700, Todd A. Jacobs wrote:
> Package: user-mode-linux
> Version: 2.6.16-1um-1
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable

it's not really unusable, severity is inappropriate IMO.

> I reported on the UML mailing list that I was unable to boot from an ISO
> image, even after various gyrations. Jeff Dike suggested that the binary
> was probably compiled without proper block support (specifically
> CONFIG_BLK_DEV_UBD, although there may be issues with ISO9660 support as
> well).
> 
> Here is the actual error and command-line:
> 
> $ linux mem=64M umid=debian ubd0r=debian-testing-i386-netinst.iso

You're mixing things up. You can't boot from the install image, you need
to extract the initrd from the iso [1] and boot from the initrd
[2]. Then you can proceed and install the system (you'll also have to
manually tell the installer where the cdrom is -you'll be asked during
installation, in my example you can use /dev/ubdb).

[1]: mount -o loop debian-testing-i386-netinst.iso /mnt
 cp /mnt/install/2.6/initrd.gz /anywhere
[2]:  linux ramdisk_size=12000 mem=128M umid=debian initrd=initrd.gz 
root=/dev/ram0 ubd0=rootfs ubd1=debian-testing-i386-netinst.iso 
eth0=tuntap,,,172.20.0.1

As said in the uml-devel ML I have the new package ready here, I'll
upload it tomorrow.

[...]
> Console initialized on /dev/tty0
> Initializing software serial port version 1
>  ubda: unknown partition table
> Kernel panic - not syncing: VFS: Unable to mount root fs on 
> unknown-block(98,0)

In fact you get this same error running:
linux mem=64M umid=debian ubd0r=/dev/zero
The problem here is that netinst.iso doesn't contain a regular
filesystem to boot with. This works with regular PCs because the
bootloader helps this process (loading and running the initrd).

Thanks
-- 
mattia
:wq!


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#334230: libgpcl-dev: headers in wrong directory on alpha, ia64

[Julien Danjou]

On Sat, Apr 29, 2006 at 09:25:12PM +0200, Rafael Laboissiere wrote:
> Yes, could you please do it?

Yes, I just did a binNMU for alpha and ia64.

Cheers,
-- 
Julien Danjou
.''`.  Debian Developer
: :' : http://julien.danjou.info
`. `'  http://people.debian.org/~acid
  `-   9A0D 5FD9 EB42 22F6 8974  C95C A462 B51E C2FE E5CD


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#365404: kinput2_3.1-8(unstable/sparc/spontini): FTBFS due to build-dep on libxaw8-dev

[James Troup]

Package: kinput2
Version: 3.1-8
Severity: serious

libxaw8-dev is deprecated and going away soon, please use libxaw7-dev
instead.

| Automatic build of kinput2_3.1-8 on spontini by sbuild/sparc 85
| Build started at 20060428-2206
| **

[...]

| ** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
| Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 4.1.16), xutils, x-dev, libice-dev, libsm-dev, 
libx11-dev, libxext-dev, libxmu-dev, libxp-dev, libxpm-dev, libxt-dev, 
libxaw8-dev | libxaw7-dev | libxaw-dev, libcanna1g-dev, libwnn6-dev

[...]

| gcc -c -g -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing-I../include -Iimlib  -I/usr/include
   -Dlinux -D__sparc__ -D_POSIX_C_SOURCE=199309L
-D_POSIX_SOURCE -D_XOPEN_SOURCE -D_BSD_SOURCE 
-D_SVID_SOURCE -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE 
-D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64  
 -DFUNCPROTO=15 -DNARROWPROTOOffConv.c
| OffConv.c:34:26: error: X11/Xaw/Form.h: No such file or directory

A complete build log can be found at
http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?arch=sparc&pkg=kinput2&ver=3.1-8

-- 
James


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#364819: gij-4.1: bus error on hppa.

[Matthias Klose]

tags 364819 + unreproducible
thanks

works for me.

Kurt Roeckx writes:
> Package: gij-4.1
> Version: 4.1.0-1
> Severity: serious
> 
> Hi,
> 
> When building ecj-bootstrap on hppa, we get the following error:
> gij-4.1 \
> -classpath build/bootstrap/ecj.jar:/usr/share/ant/lib/ant.jar \
> org.eclipse.jdt.internal.compiler.batch.Main \
> -bootclasspath /usr/share/java/libgcj-4.1.jar \
> build/bin
> make: *** [build/stamp] Bus error
> 
> 
> See:
> http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?&pkg=ecj-bootstrap&ver=3.1.2-4&arch=hppa
> 
> 
> Kurt
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#365405: rgl_0.66-3(unstable/sparc/spontini): FTBFS build-depends on non-existent package

[James Troup]

Package: rgl
Version: 0.66-3
Severity: serious

sbuild automatically selects the first of an or'ed build-depends, so
it needs to be a valid (real) package which is in the archive and
AFAICS libgl-mesa-dev isn't/doesn't.

| Automatic build of rgl_0.66-3 on spontini by sbuild/sparc 85
| Build started at 20060428-1946
| **

[...]

| ** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
| Build-Depends: debhelper (>> 4.1.0), r-base-dev (>= 2.3.0), cdbs, 
libgl-mesa-dev | libgl-dev, libglu-mesa-dev | libglu-dev, libpng12-dev, 
libx11-dev, libxt-dev, x-dev

[...]

| E: Couldn't find package libgl-mesa-dev

A complete build log can be found at
http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?arch=sparc&pkg=rgl&ver=0.66-3

-- 
James


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: Re: Bug#364819: gij-4.1: bus error on hppa.

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tags 364819 + unreproducible
Bug#364819: gij-4.1: bus error on hppa.
There were no tags set.
Tags added: unreproducible

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#365390: MPEG-4 patent license issues - libfaad* and libx264*

[Matthew William Solloway Bell]

I've also posted a bug for vlc; Checking mad and ffmpeg now too.

Matthew W. S. Bell

On Sat, 2006-04-29 at 21:09 +0200, Sebastian Dröge wrote:
> Am Samstag, den 29.04.2006, 19:10 +0100 schrieb Matthew William Solloway
> Bell:
> > Package: libxine1
> > Version: 1.1.1-1.1
> > Severity: Serious
> > Justification: Policy 2.3 - Copyright considerations
> > 
> > This package includes libfaad* and libx264* which implement the MPEG-4
> > Advanced Audio Coding and Advanced Video Coding. Unfortunately, these
> > are patent encumbered in at least the USA, and many other countries. To
> > distribute code implementing any of these patents, a license is
> > required[1]. This license requires signing an agreement and the payment
> > of royalties, which hasn't been done AFAIK, and is contrary to policy.
> 
> FYI the same is also true for mad, most parts of ffmpeg, vlc and
> probably 1000 of other (multimedia related or not) packages...
> 
> And vlc even contains exactly the same code you mention above.
> 
> (I don't want to propose a solution for this problem and I also think
> that something has to be decided. I just wanted to clarify that a
> decision here would also affect many other packages)
> 

Bug#363445: libgtk2.0-dev: Should depend on version of libx11-dev that provides x11.pc

[Steve Langasek]

On Sat, Apr 29, 2006 at 02:12:18PM +0200, Sebastien Bacher wrote:
> Le mercredi 19 avril 2006 à 15:01 +1000, Peter Moulder a écrit :

> > I'd guess that an appropriate versioned Depends would be
> > libx11-dev (>= 2:1.0.0).

> libx11 should update its shlib rather, so libgtk2.0-0 will Depends on a
> new libx11 and -dev which is in sync with lib will be correct too

For a .pc file?  No, it should not.  The shlibs are for *binary* library
dependencies; .pc files have nothing to do with that.

-- 
Steve Langasek   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer   to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://www.debian.org/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#365402: MPEG-4 patent license issues - libfaad* and H.264 CoDec

[Matthew William Solloway Bell]

Package: libavcodec0d
Version:  0.cvs20060329-4
Severity: Serious
Justification: Policy 2.3 - Copyright considerations

This package includes libfaad* and an H.264 CoDec which implement the
MPEG-4 Advanced Audio Coding and Advanced Video Coding. Unfortunately,
these are patent encumbered in at least the USA, and many other
countries. To distribute code implementing any of these patents, a
license is required[1]. This license requires signing an agreement and
the payment of royalties, which hasn't been done AFAIK, and is contrary
to policy. There has been some discussion on the lists about this issue
with no particular conclusion[2]. 
It is therefore my conclusion that these libraries are not distributable
by Debian. Subject to confirmation of this conclusion, the libraries
must be removed from the archive.

Should I forward this to FTP Masters and/or Debian Legal?

Matthew W. S. Bell

(Please don't lynch me).

[1] http://www.vialicensing.com/products/mpeg4audio/standard.html
http://www.mpegla.com/avc/avc-agreement.cfm
[2] http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2006/03/msg00031.html
http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2005/09/msg00012.html




-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#334230: libgpcl-dev: headers in wrong directory on alpha, ia64

[Rafael Laboissiere]

* Julien Danjou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-04-29 20:10]:

> I've just tried to build gpcl on alpha and ia64 boxes, and I got this
> results:
> 
> % dpkg -c libgpcl-dev_2.32-1_ia64.deb |grep '\.h$'
> -rw-r--r-- root/root  4921 2006-04-29 17:56:29 ./usr/include/gpcl/gpc.h
> 
> % dpkg -c libgpcl-dev_2.32-1_alpha.deb |grep '\.h$'
> -rw-r--r-- root/root  4921 2006-04-29 18:29:31 ./usr/include/gpcl/gpc.h
> 
> It seems that the bugs is now solved. Unfortunately, I don't know why.
> 
> Maybe a simple binNMU will be now solve this issue ?

Yes, could you please do it?

Thanks,

-- 
Rafael


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#334230: libgpcl-dev: headers in wrong directory on alpha, ia64

[Steve Langasek]

Hi Julien,

> Maybe a simple binNMU will be now solve this issue ?

Since gpcl is in non-free, the autobuilders won't pick it up for building;
binNMUs are possible here, so if they'll fix the problem, perhaps you could
build and upload them?

-- 
Steve Langasek   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer   to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://www.debian.org/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#365395: user-mode-linux: UML will not boot from ISO

[Todd A. Jacobs]

Package: user-mode-linux
Version: 2.6.16-1um-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable


I reported on the UML mailing list that I was unable to boot from an ISO
image, even after various gyrations. Jeff Dike suggested that the binary
was probably compiled without proper block support (specifically
CONFIG_BLK_DEV_UBD, although there may be issues with ISO9660 support as
well).

Here is the actual error and command-line:

$ linux mem=64M umid=debian ubd0r=debian-testing-i386-netinst.iso

Checking that ptrace can change system call numbers...OK
Checking syscall emulation patch for ptrace...OK
Checking advanced syscall emulation patch for ptrace...OK
Checking PROT_EXEC mmap in /tmp...OK
Checking for the skas3 patch in the host:
  - /proc/mm...not found
  - PTRACE_FAULTINFO...not found
  - PTRACE_LDT...not found
UML running in SKAS0 mode
Linux version 2.6.16 ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc version 4.0.3 (Debian 
4.0.3-1)) #1 Fri Apr 7 19:51:16 CEST 2006
Built 1 zonelists
Kernel command line: mem=64M ubd0r=debian-testing-i386-netinst.iso root=98:0
PID hash table entries: 512 (order: 9, 8192 bytes)
Dentry cache hash table entries: 16384 (order: 4, 65536 bytes)
Inode-cache hash table entries: 8192 (order: 3, 32768 bytes)
Memory: 62036k available
Mount-cache hash table entries: 512
Checking for host processor cmov support...Yes
Checking for host processor xmm support...No
Checking that host ptys support output SIGIO...Yes
Checking that host ptys support SIGIO on close...No, enabling workaround
Checking for /dev/anon on the host...Not available (open failed with errno 
2)
Using 2.6 host AIO
NET: Registered protocol family 16
mconsole (version 2) initialized on /home/tjacobs/.uml/debian/mconsole
ubd: Synchronous mode
VFS: Disk quotas dquot_6.5.1
Dquot-cache hash table entries: 1024 (order 0, 4096 bytes)
Initializing Cryptographic API
io scheduler noop registered
io scheduler anticipatory registered (default)
io scheduler deadline registered
io scheduler cfq registered
RAMDISK driver initialized: 16 RAM disks of 4096K size 1024 blocksize
loop: loaded (max 8 devices)
nbd: registered device at major 43
NET: Registered protocol family 2
IP route cache hash table entries: 1024 (order: 0, 4096 bytes)
TCP established hash table entries: 4096 (order: 2, 16384 bytes)
TCP bind hash table entries: 4096 (order: 2, 16384 bytes)
TCP: Hash tables configured (established 4096 bind 4096)
TCP reno registered
IPv4 over IPv4 tunneling driver
GRE over IPv4 tunneling driver
TCP bic registered
NET: Registered protocol family 1
NET: Registered protocol family 17
Initialized stdio console driver
Console initialized on /dev/tty0
Initializing software serial port version 1
 ubda: unknown partition table
Kernel panic - not syncing: VFS: Unable to mount root fs on 
unknown-block(98,0)
 
EIP: 0073:[] CPU: 0 Not tainted ESP: 007b:b7dcdfa8 EFLAGS: 
00200246
Not tainted
EAX:  EBX: 7f03 ECX: 0013 EDX: 7f03
ESI: 7efe EDI: 0011 EBP: b7dcdfc4 DS: 007b ES: 007b
0892bb48:  [<0806efa0>] show_regs+0xb4/0xb9
0892bb74:  [<0805e014>] panic_exit+0x23/0x3d
0892bb88:  [<0807e405>] notifier_call_chain+0x1a/0x31
0892bba8:  [<08072f13>] panic+0x4f/0xca
0892bbc4:  [<0804985a>] mount_block_root+0xaf/0xc5
0892bc08:  [<0804997a>] mount_root+0x4c/0x54
0892bc2c:  [<08049a30>] prepare_namespace+0xae/0xda
0892bc3c:  [<080593e4>] init+0x5f/0x117
0892bc48:  [<08069473>] run_kernel_thread+0x42/0x4a
0892bcf8:  [<0805e3b7>] new_thread_handler+0x7f/0xa9
0892bd1c:  [] _etext+0xf7e6d406/0x0

 <3>Trying to free free IRQ2
Trying to free free IRQ3

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.15-1-686
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1)

Versions of packages user-mode-linux depends on:
ii  uml-utilities 20060323-3 User-mode Linux (utility programs)

user-mode-linux recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#362424: marked as done (Prebuilt modules built for old Linux and NVIDIA drivers)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 29 Apr 2006 14:45:34 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Done
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---

Package: nvidia-glx
Version: 1.0.8178-3

Hello,

	Yesterday I did a dist-upgrade on my debian/unstable and x.org 
updated to 7.0 (I think), but some dependencies in nvidia drivers are 
broken. At dist-upgrade nvidia-glx package was removed.


I try to re-install again and oppps :-)

[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# apt-get install nvidia-glx
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
or been moved out of Incoming.

Since you only requested a single operation it is extremely likely that
the package is simply not installable and a bug report against
that package should be filed.
The following information may help to resolve the situation:

The following packages have unmet dependencies:
  nvidia-glx: Depends: nvidia-kernel-1.0.8756 but it is not installable
E: Broken packages
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~#

Seems that nvidia-kernel for this version was not uploaded

[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# dpkg -l | grep nvidia

rc  nvidia-glx   1.0.8178-3 NVIDIA 
binary XFree86 4.x driver
ii  nvidia-kernel-2.6.15-1-k71.0.8178+2 NVIDIA 
binary kernel module for Linux 2.6.15
ii  nvidia-kernel-common 20051028+1 NVIDIA 
binary kernel module common files


[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~#


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---

Version: 1.0.8756+1

This should be fixed next dinstall.
--- End Message ---

Bug#365390: MPEG-4 patent license issues - libfaad* and libx264*

[Sebastian Dröge]

Am Samstag, den 29.04.2006, 19:10 +0100 schrieb Matthew William Solloway
Bell:
> Package: libxine1
> Version: 1.1.1-1.1
> Severity: Serious
> Justification: Policy 2.3 - Copyright considerations
> 
> This package includes libfaad* and libx264* which implement the MPEG-4
> Advanced Audio Coding and Advanced Video Coding. Unfortunately, these
> are patent encumbered in at least the USA, and many other countries. To
> distribute code implementing any of these patents, a license is
> required[1]. This license requires signing an agreement and the payment
> of royalties, which hasn't been done AFAIK, and is contrary to policy.

FYI the same is also true for mad, most parts of ffmpeg, vlc and
probably 1000 of other (multimedia related or not) packages...

And vlc even contains exactly the same code you mention above.

(I don't want to propose a solution for this problem and I also think
that something has to be decided. I just wanted to clarify that a
decision here would also affect many other packages)



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#343138: marked as done (tktable: FTBFS/unknown cause)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 29 Apr 2006 11:24:56 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#343138: fixed in tktable 2.9-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: tktable-dev
Version: 2.9-1
Severity: grave
Justification: 8.6: when a package is built which contains any shared 
libraries, it must provide a `shlibs' file for other packages to use

The package doesn't include a .shlibs file.  There is some
disagreement about whether this shared library is meant to be used by
other packages; but it seems that since it is a separate package, that
must be the intent, so the requirement to include a shlibs file holds.
Also, the existence of a nondirectory under /usr/lib/ is indicitive of
the intent to 

Additionally:

  /usr/share/man/man3/ is included in the -dev package, but without
  any manpages.
  
  /usr/bin/ is included in the -dev package without including any
  binaries.
  
  /usr/share/doc/tktable/html/ is included in the -dev package.

  The package name don't match /^lib/.

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: tktable
Source-Version: 2.9-2

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
tktable, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

libtktable-dev_2.9-2_i386.deb
  to pool/main/t/tktable/libtktable-dev_2.9-2_i386.deb
libtktable_2.9-2_i386.deb
  to pool/main/t/tktable/libtktable_2.9-2_i386.deb
tktable_2.9-2.diff.gz
  to pool/main/t/tktable/tktable_2.9-2.diff.gz
tktable_2.9-2.dsc
  to pool/main/t/tktable/tktable_2.9-2.dsc



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Lars Steinke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated tktable package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2006 14:10:22 -0500
Source: tktable
Binary: libtktable-dev libtktable
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.9-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Lars Steinke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Lars Steinke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 libtktable - Table extension for Tcl/Tk
 libtktable-dev - Development files for tkTable
Closes: 320551 339056 343138 356062
Changes: 
 tktable (2.9-2) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Sponsored upload.
   * Redo most of the package
 - Justin Pryzby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Wed, 29 Mar 2006 14:10:22
   * Rename the library, since upstream doesn't guarantee any kind of A[BP]I
 compatibility, any new release will probably require rebuilding at least.
   * Reupload and rename tktable-2.9 orig tarball; this used to be a native
 package.
   * Patch tcl.m4 and run autoconf at buildtime; thanks to David Watson
 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for the useful patch.
 Closes: #356062, and maybe #324143 too.
   * Correct manpage typos; Thanks A Costa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
 Closes: #320551
   * Remove README.Debian, since saods9 also depends on tktable.
   * ./debian/control:
 - Build-Conflict with old autoconf.
 - Add myself as an uploader; hopefully I'm progressing through NM
   sufficiently quickly for this to be meaningful.
 - Bump standards-version to 3.6.2; no changes.
 - End the long description with a period, and indent homepage field on a
   new line, as per DevRef 6.2.4.
 - Trim Build-Depends, since {tcl,tk}8.4-dev packages depend on the precise
   versions of the runtime packages.
   * ./debian/copyright: Fully document the copyright holder, including years.
   * Document a P/D license for Debian .diff in ./debian/rules and
 ./debian/copyright; okayed by Lars.
   * Update to debhelper 4 from, uh, 1.
   * ./debian/rules:
 - Remove strange symlinks from /usr/lib/.. to /usr/lib/tktable/..
   Closes: #339056
 - Hack options to ./configure to find tcl includes, fixing probably
   FTBFS;
   Closes: #343138.
 - build-stamp target now touches $@ to avoid recompilations instead of
   causing them.
 - Remove double calls to ./configure in clean target; instead, only
   distclean if Makefile exits (addressing an issue mentioned in #324143).
 - Remove call to strip, this is a

Bug#339056: marked as done (tktable: Library package nonconforming)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 29 Apr 2006 11:24:56 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#339056: fixed in tktable 2.9-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: tktable-dev
Version: 2.9-1
Severity: grave
Justification: 8.6: when a package is built which contains any shared 
libraries, it must provide a `shlibs' file for other packages to use

The package doesn't include a .shlibs file.  There is some
disagreement about whether this shared library is meant to be used by
other packages; but it seems that since it is a separate package, that
must be the intent, so the requirement to include a shlibs file holds.
Also, the existence of a nondirectory under /usr/lib/ is indicitive of
the intent to 

Additionally:

  /usr/share/man/man3/ is included in the -dev package, but without
  any manpages.
  
  /usr/bin/ is included in the -dev package without including any
  binaries.
  
  /usr/share/doc/tktable/html/ is included in the -dev package.

  The package name don't match /^lib/.

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: tktable
Source-Version: 2.9-2

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
tktable, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

libtktable-dev_2.9-2_i386.deb
  to pool/main/t/tktable/libtktable-dev_2.9-2_i386.deb
libtktable_2.9-2_i386.deb
  to pool/main/t/tktable/libtktable_2.9-2_i386.deb
tktable_2.9-2.diff.gz
  to pool/main/t/tktable/tktable_2.9-2.diff.gz
tktable_2.9-2.dsc
  to pool/main/t/tktable/tktable_2.9-2.dsc



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Lars Steinke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated tktable package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2006 14:10:22 -0500
Source: tktable
Binary: libtktable-dev libtktable
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.9-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Lars Steinke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Lars Steinke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 libtktable - Table extension for Tcl/Tk
 libtktable-dev - Development files for tkTable
Closes: 320551 339056 343138 356062
Changes: 
 tktable (2.9-2) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Sponsored upload.
   * Redo most of the package
 - Justin Pryzby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Wed, 29 Mar 2006 14:10:22
   * Rename the library, since upstream doesn't guarantee any kind of A[BP]I
 compatibility, any new release will probably require rebuilding at least.
   * Reupload and rename tktable-2.9 orig tarball; this used to be a native
 package.
   * Patch tcl.m4 and run autoconf at buildtime; thanks to David Watson
 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for the useful patch.
 Closes: #356062, and maybe #324143 too.
   * Correct manpage typos; Thanks A Costa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
 Closes: #320551
   * Remove README.Debian, since saods9 also depends on tktable.
   * ./debian/control:
 - Build-Conflict with old autoconf.
 - Add myself as an uploader; hopefully I'm progressing through NM
   sufficiently quickly for this to be meaningful.
 - Bump standards-version to 3.6.2; no changes.
 - End the long description with a period, and indent homepage field on a
   new line, as per DevRef 6.2.4.
 - Trim Build-Depends, since {tcl,tk}8.4-dev packages depend on the precise
   versions of the runtime packages.
   * ./debian/copyright: Fully document the copyright holder, including years.
   * Document a P/D license for Debian .diff in ./debian/rules and
 ./debian/copyright; okayed by Lars.
   * Update to debhelper 4 from, uh, 1.
   * ./debian/rules:
 - Remove strange symlinks from /usr/lib/.. to /usr/lib/tktable/..
   Closes: #339056
 - Hack options to ./configure to find tcl includes, fixing probably
   FTBFS;
   Closes: #343138.
 - build-stamp target now touches $@ to avoid recompilations instead of
   causing them.
 - Remove double calls to ./configure in clean target; instead, only
   distclean if Makefile exits (addressing an issue mentioned in #324143).
 - Remove call to strip, this is a

Bug#356062: marked as done (tktable: FTBFS: syntax error from broken tcl.m4)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 29 Apr 2006 11:24:54 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#356062: fixed in tktable 2.9-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: tktable
Version: 2.9-1
Severity: serious

From my pbuilder build log:

...
checking system version (for dynamic loading)... ./configure: line 9966: syntax 
error near unexpected token `('
./configure: line 9966: `case `(ac_space=' '; set | grep ac_space) 2>&1` in'
make: *** [clean] Error 2

This error is usually caused by an old broken version of tcl.m4; the current
tcl packages have fixed versions of tcl.m4.
-- 
Daniel Schepler

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: tktable
Source-Version: 2.9-3

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
tktable, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

libtktable-dev_2.9-3_i386.deb
  to pool/main/t/tktable/libtktable-dev_2.9-3_i386.deb
libtktable_2.9-3_i386.deb
  to pool/main/t/tktable/libtktable_2.9-3_i386.deb
tktable_2.9-3.diff.gz
  to pool/main/t/tktable/tktable_2.9-3.diff.gz
tktable_2.9-3.dsc
  to pool/main/t/tktable/tktable_2.9-3.dsc



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Lars Steinke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated tktable package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2006 11:49:14 +0200
Source: tktable
Binary: libtktable-dev libtktable
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.9-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Lars Steinke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Lars Steinke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 libtktable - Table extension for Tcl/Tk
 libtktable-dev - Development files for tkTable
Closes: 356062
Changes: 
 tktable (2.9-3) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Replaced tclconfig/tcl.m4 with updated /usr/lib/tcl8.4/tcl.m4.
 Closes: #356062
Files: 
 63034be646c11609f090452fd7485b0c 688 interpreters optional tktable_2.9-3.dsc
 8b846da1c8323f0da68664569d560dfc 5158 interpreters optional 
tktable_2.9-3.diff.gz
 a8442c464e9c88dfb4351556a441728c 115084 libdevel optional 
libtktable-dev_2.9-3_i386.deb
 8fa58f128bc25260df2d121568e7fb2d 84256 libs optional libtktable_2.9-3_i386.deb

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFEQ2VWzOw49aNnnBYRAhraAKDqyBU9pdyotoUrmKOv1/mIwJOghgCeOFm0
phkPo5+RHuu7koZpqS1xo2c=
=0W3l
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--- End Message ---

Bug#356062: marked as done (tktable: FTBFS: syntax error from broken tcl.m4)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 29 Apr 2006 11:24:56 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#356062: fixed in tktable 2.9-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: tktable
Version: 2.9-1
Severity: serious

From my pbuilder build log:

...
checking system version (for dynamic loading)... ./configure: line 9966: syntax 
error near unexpected token `('
./configure: line 9966: `case `(ac_space=' '; set | grep ac_space) 2>&1` in'
make: *** [clean] Error 2

This error is usually caused by an old broken version of tcl.m4; the current
tcl packages have fixed versions of tcl.m4.
-- 
Daniel Schepler

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: tktable
Source-Version: 2.9-2

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
tktable, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

libtktable-dev_2.9-2_i386.deb
  to pool/main/t/tktable/libtktable-dev_2.9-2_i386.deb
libtktable_2.9-2_i386.deb
  to pool/main/t/tktable/libtktable_2.9-2_i386.deb
tktable_2.9-2.diff.gz
  to pool/main/t/tktable/tktable_2.9-2.diff.gz
tktable_2.9-2.dsc
  to pool/main/t/tktable/tktable_2.9-2.dsc



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Lars Steinke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated tktable package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2006 14:10:22 -0500
Source: tktable
Binary: libtktable-dev libtktable
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.9-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Lars Steinke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Lars Steinke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 libtktable - Table extension for Tcl/Tk
 libtktable-dev - Development files for tkTable
Closes: 320551 339056 343138 356062
Changes: 
 tktable (2.9-2) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Sponsored upload.
   * Redo most of the package
 - Justin Pryzby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Wed, 29 Mar 2006 14:10:22
   * Rename the library, since upstream doesn't guarantee any kind of A[BP]I
 compatibility, any new release will probably require rebuilding at least.
   * Reupload and rename tktable-2.9 orig tarball; this used to be a native
 package.
   * Patch tcl.m4 and run autoconf at buildtime; thanks to David Watson
 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for the useful patch.
 Closes: #356062, and maybe #324143 too.
   * Correct manpage typos; Thanks A Costa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
 Closes: #320551
   * Remove README.Debian, since saods9 also depends on tktable.
   * ./debian/control:
 - Build-Conflict with old autoconf.
 - Add myself as an uploader; hopefully I'm progressing through NM
   sufficiently quickly for this to be meaningful.
 - Bump standards-version to 3.6.2; no changes.
 - End the long description with a period, and indent homepage field on a
   new line, as per DevRef 6.2.4.
 - Trim Build-Depends, since {tcl,tk}8.4-dev packages depend on the precise
   versions of the runtime packages.
   * ./debian/copyright: Fully document the copyright holder, including years.
   * Document a P/D license for Debian .diff in ./debian/rules and
 ./debian/copyright; okayed by Lars.
   * Update to debhelper 4 from, uh, 1.
   * ./debian/rules:
 - Remove strange symlinks from /usr/lib/.. to /usr/lib/tktable/..
   Closes: #339056
 - Hack options to ./configure to find tcl includes, fixing probably
   FTBFS;
   Closes: #343138.
 - build-stamp target now touches $@ to avoid recompilations instead of
   causing them.
 - Remove double calls to ./configure in clean target; instead, only
   distclean if Makefile exits (addressing an issue mentioned in #324143).
 - Remove call to strip, this is already handled by dh_strip, which also
   supports DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=nostrip.
 - dh_installman now installs the manpage, rather than cp -a, and
   dh_installdoc installs the html documentation, rather than mv;
   dh_examples now installs ./demos.
 - Remove obsolete targets 'source' and 'diff'.
   * Add a watchfile.
Files: 
 8abfc07dcf0d03495d479814bbd0a573 688 interpret

Processed: Fixed in NMU of gnome-system-tools 2.14.0-1.1

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tag 309932 + fixed
Bug#309932: boot-admin should not be in unstable
Tags were: upstream
Tags added: fixed

> quit
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#365390: MPEG-4 patent license issues - libfaad* and libx264*

[Matthew William Solloway Bell]

Package: libxine1
Version: 1.1.1-1.1
Severity: Serious
Justification: Policy 2.3 - Copyright considerations

This package includes libfaad* and libx264* which implement the MPEG-4
Advanced Audio Coding and Advanced Video Coding. Unfortunately, these
are patent encumbered in at least the USA, and many other countries. To
distribute code implementing any of these patents, a license is
required[1]. This license requires signing an agreement and the payment
of royalties, which hasn't been done AFAIK, and is contrary to policy.
There has been some discussion on the lists about this issue with no
particular conclusion[2].
It is therefore my conclusion that these libraries are not distributable
by Debian. Subject to confirmation of this conclusion, the libraries
must be removed from the archive.

Should I forward this to FTP Masters and/or Debian Legal?

Matthew W. S. Bell

(Please don't lynch me).

[1] http://www.vialicensing.com/products/mpeg4audio/standard.html
http://www.mpegla.com/avc/avc-agreement.cfm
[2] http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2006/03/msg00031.html
http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2005/09/msg00012.html



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#365126: HELP!! Re: Bug#365126: wmrack - FTBFS: error: WMRack needs X Windows!!!

[Chris Waters]

On Sat, Apr 29, 2006 at 02:03:28PM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> On 2006-04-29 Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Er, no, that's AC_PATH_XTRA.  AC_PATH_X searches for
> > [X11],[X11/Xlib.h],[XrmInitialize ()].
> [...]

> Only in Debian (yet) and only since since autoconf 2.59a-4 (#327655).

Right, and in this case, while upstream (which is me) uses Debian, he
(I) accidentally used autoconf 2.13, which doesn't seem to have the
relevant fix.  And I don't really want to make a new upstream release
just for this.  (Although I am going to put Aaron's patch in the
project patches section for future inclusion.)

So, anyway, I'm pretty sure that Andreas has the right solution.  It
matches everything I know about the problem.  We'll know for sure
after my next upload hits the autobuilders.  :)

-- 
Chris Waters   |  Pneumonoultra-osis is too long
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   |  microscopicsilico-to fit into a single
or [EMAIL PROTECTED] |  volcaniconi-  standalone haiku


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#365388: gcj-4.1: FTBFS on amd64: mv: target `debian/lib32gcj7/emul/ia32-linux/usr/lib/.' is not a directory

[Kurt Roeckx]

Package: gcj-4.1
Version: 4.1.0-2
Severity: serious

Hi,

Your package is failing to build on amd64 with the following
error:
mv stamps/07-install-stamp stamps/07-install-stamp-tmp
dh_installdirs -plib32gcj7 \
usr/lib32
dh_installdirs -plib32gcj7-dev \
usr/lib32
mv debian/tmp/emul/ia32-linux/usr/lib/libg[ic]j.so.* \
debian/lib32gcj7/emul/ia32-linux/usr/lib/.
mv: target `debian/lib32gcj7/emul/ia32-linux/usr/lib/.' is not a directory
make[1]: *** [stamps/08-binary-stamp-java32] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/gcj-4.1-4.1.0'
make: *** [binary-arch] Error 2


Kurt



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#365389: MPEG-4 patent license issues - libfaad* and libx264*

[Matthew William Solloway Bell]

Package: vlc
Version: 0.8.4.debian-2
Severity: Serious
Justification: Policy 2.3 - Copyright considerations

This package includes libfaad* and libx264* which implement the MPEG-4
Advanced Audio Coding and Advanced Video Coding. Unfortunately, these
are patent encumbered in at least the USA, and many other countries. To
distribute code implementing any of these patents, a license is
required[1]. This license requires signing an agreement and the payment
of royalties, which hasn't been done AFAIK, and is contrary to policy.
There has been some discussion on the lists about this issue with no
particular conclusion[2].
It is therefore my conclusion that these libraries are not distributable
by Debian. Subject to confirmation of this conclusion, the libraries
must be removed from the archive.

Should I forward this to FTP Masters and/or Debian Legal?

Matthew W. S. Bell

(Please don't lynch me).

[1] http://www.vialicensing.com/products/mpeg4audio/standard.html
http://www.mpegla.com/avc/avc-agreement.cfm
[2] http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2006/03/msg00031.html
http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2005/09/msg00012.html




-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#334230: libgpcl-dev: headers in wrong directory on alpha, ia64

[Julien Danjou]

Hello,

I've just tried to build gpcl on alpha and ia64 boxes, and I got this
results:

% dpkg -c libgpcl-dev_2.32-1_ia64.deb |grep '\.h$'
-rw-r--r-- root/root  4921 2006-04-29 17:56:29 ./usr/include/gpcl/gpc.h

% dpkg -c libgpcl-dev_2.32-1_alpha.deb |grep '\.h$'
-rw-r--r-- root/root  4921 2006-04-29 18:29:31 ./usr/include/gpcl/gpc.h

It seems that the bugs is now solved. Unfortunately, I don't know why.

Maybe a simple binNMU will be now solve this issue ?

Cheers,
-- 
Julien Danjou
.''`.  Debian Developer
: :' : http://julien.danjou.info
`. `'  http://people.debian.org/~acid
  `-   9A0D 5FD9 EB42 22F6 8974  C95C A462 B51E C2FE E5CD



signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#365386: xprint: FTBFS: Can't exec "aclocal": No such file or directory at /usr/bin/autoreconf line 176.

[Kurt Roeckx]

Package: xprint
Version: 1:1.0.1-1
Severity: serious

Hi,

Your package is failing to build with the following error:
cd build-tree/xorg-server-1.0.1 && \
sh ./autogen.sh --prefix=/usr --mandir=\${prefix}/share/man \
 --infodir=\${prefix}/share/info --sysconfdir=/etc \
 --localstatedir=/var --build=x86_64-linux-gnu 
--disable-static --disable-xorg --disable-dri 
--with-mesa-source=/usr/share/mesa-source --with-fontdir=/usr/share/fonts/X11 
--disable-xtrap --disable-xinerama --disable-dmx --disable-xnest --disable-xvfb 
--enable-xprint --enable-freetype CFLAGS="-Wall -g -O2"
Can't exec "aclocal": No such file or directory at /usr/bin/autoreconf line 
176.Use of uninitialized value in pattern match (m//) at /usr/bin/autoreconf 
line 176.
Can't exec "automake": No such file or directory at /usr/bin/autoreconf line 
177.
Use of uninitialized value in pattern match (m//) at /usr/bin/autoreconf line 
177.
autoreconf: Entering directory `.'
autoreconf: configure.ac: not using Gettext
autoreconf: running: aclocal  --output=aclocal.m4t
Can't exec "aclocal": No such file or directory at 
/usr/share/autoconf/Autom4te/FileUtils.pm line 288.
autoreconf: failed to run aclocal: No such file or directory
make: *** [build-stamp] Error 1


Kurt



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#365191: marked as done ([NONFREE-DOC] Package contains IETF RFC/I-D)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 29 Apr 2006 10:32:07 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#365191: fixed in dhcp3 3.0.3-8
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: dhcp3-common
Severity: serious

Hi!

It seems your package contains non-free RFC/I-Ds:

usr/share/doc/dhcp3-common/doc/rfc1542.txt.gz   net/dhcp3-common
usr/share/doc/dhcp3-common/doc/rfc2131.txt.gz   net/dhcp3-common
usr/share/doc/dhcp3-common/doc/rfc2132.txt.gz   net/dhcp3-common
usr/share/doc/dhcp3-common/doc/rfc2485.txt.gz   net/dhcp3-common
usr/share/doc/dhcp3-common/doc/rfc2489.txt.gz   net/dhcp3-common
usr/share/doc/dhcp3-common/doc/draft-ietf-dhc-authentication-14.txt.gz 
net/dhcp3-common
usr/share/doc/dhcp3-common/doc/draft-ietf-dhc-dhcp-dns-12.txt.gz 
net/dhcp3-common
usr/share/doc/dhcp3-common/doc/draft-ietf-dhc-failover-07.txt.gz 
net/dhcp3-common

The license on RFCs is not DFSG-free, see:

http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=199810
http://release.debian.org/removing-non-free-documentation

Note that your package also contains:

usr/share/doc/dhcp3-common/doc/rfc951.txt.gz

This is released in the US before 1988 without a copyright notice, and
consequently in the public domain, so it is not a problem.

I believe the options are:

1) Remove the file from the package (which may include re-packaging
   the source code).

2) Move the files to a non-free package (which may also include
   re-packaging the source code).

If you disagree with this, because this bug is reported for several
packages at once, it seems better to discuss this on debian-legal, in
this thread:

http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.devel.legal/25993

The severity is serious, because this violates the Debian policy
.

I'm sorry if this report is filed in error, I went over many packages
looking for suspicious filenames, and there may be false positives.

Thanks,
Simon

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: dhcp3
Source-Version: 3.0.3-8

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
dhcp3, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

dhcp3-client_3.0.3-8_i386.deb
  to pool/main/d/dhcp3/dhcp3-client_3.0.3-8_i386.deb
dhcp3-common_3.0.3-8_i386.deb
  to pool/main/d/dhcp3/dhcp3-common_3.0.3-8_i386.deb
dhcp3-dev_3.0.3-8_i386.deb
  to pool/main/d/dhcp3/dhcp3-dev_3.0.3-8_i386.deb
dhcp3-relay_3.0.3-8_i386.deb
  to pool/main/d/dhcp3/dhcp3-relay_3.0.3-8_i386.deb
dhcp3-server_3.0.3-8_i386.deb
  to pool/main/d/dhcp3/dhcp3-server_3.0.3-8_i386.deb
dhcp3_3.0.3-8.diff.gz
  to pool/main/d/dhcp3/dhcp3_3.0.3-8.diff.gz
dhcp3_3.0.3-8.dsc
  to pool/main/d/dhcp3/dhcp3_3.0.3-8.dsc



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Andrew Pollock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated dhcp3 package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2006 19:29:11 -0800
Source: dhcp3
Binary: dhcp3-common dhcp3-relay dhcp3-dev dhcp3-client dhcp3-server
Architecture: source i386
Version: 3.0.3-8
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Eloy A. Paris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Andrew Pollock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 dhcp3-client - DHCP Client
 dhcp3-common - Common files used by all the dhcp3* packages
 dhcp3-dev  - API for accessing and modifying the DHCP server and client state
 dhcp3-relay - DHCP Relay
 dhcp3-server - DHCP server for automatic IP address assignment
Closes: 355279 358055 365191
Changes: 
 dhcp3 (3.0.3-8) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * debian/patches/00list.kfreebsd-i386 copied to 00list.kfreebsd-amd64 to
 address the same FTBFS issue on kfreebsd-amd64 (closes: #355279)
   * Updated Dutch debconf template translation (closes: #358055)
   * debian/dhcp3-common.docs: don't install the RFCs (closes: #365191)
Files: 
 2a51d8515c4958c5edeaf76f4a1d8a56 731 net standard dhcp3_3.0.3-8.dsc
 e57515f6f0fb736a577e2c4bab7afcd0 58734 net standard dhcp3_3.0.3-8.diff.gz
 337f066b2b13287e2472f3e2172e47a9

Bug#354650: fixing bug 354650

[A Mennucc]

hi everybody

as a prospective Release Assistant, I am in charge  of seeing that
this bug 354650 be fixed somehow

I see that this is now considered to be a bug in libgtk1.2 ...
is it really worthy to spend a lot of time debugging it, since
libgtk1.2 is obsolete and not mantained upstream?

so here is a possible line of action: I can (probably) modify
lightspeed to use libgtkgl2.0-dev and GTK2 ; after this, the bug
354650 severity may be set to "normal".

What do you think?

a.

-- 
Andrea Mennucc
 "E' un mondo difficile. Che vita intensa!" (Tonino Carotone)


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#360646: acknowledged by developer (gone now)

[Jörg Sommer]

Debian Bug Tracking System schrieb am Wed 26. Apr, 22:48 (-0700):
> From: Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: gone now
> Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 22:43:32 -0700
> User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux)
> 
> 
> Version: 1.9.5-1
> 
> Whatever caused this bug, it's clearly gone now, because I built 1.9.5
> on powerpc myself for the recent upload.

I can still reproduce this bug. But I can not build with a clean chroot
-- missing net connection. Because this, I would not force this reports
keeps open.

Regards, Jörg.
-- 
Roesen's Law (http://www.bruhaha.de/laws.html):
Sobald ein Troll, DAU oder Elch im Lauf eines Threads auf heftige Kritik
stößt, argumentiert er mit der Arroganz des Kritikers. Dies kann auch
vorsorglich erfolgen.


pgpEkQ3xUuP0H.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Bug#311188: conffiles in /etc

[Luk Claes]

Hi

I managed to build a list of configuration files in /etc that are
changed/replaced by debian-edu-config. Though not all of them are
conffiles... Note that some of them were conffiles in recent versions
(xfs in testing for instance). A list of the conffiles is also included.

This should at least give us a starting list of things to work on...

Cheers

Luk

PS: Note that I didn't check for packages in contrib or non-free...

-- 
Luk Claes - http://people.debian.org/~luk - GPG key 1024D/9B7C328D
Fingerprint:   D5AF 25FB 316B 53BB 08E7   F999 E544 DE07 9B7C 328D
List of conffiles in /etc affected by debian-edu-config
---
amanda-server: etc/amanda/DailySet1/amanda.conf
amanda-server: etc/amanda/DailySet1/disklist
amanda-common: etc/amandahosts
courier-authdaemon: etc/courier/authdaemonrc
courier-ldap: etc/courier/authldaprc
courier-imap: etc/courier/imapd
devfsd: etc/default/devfsd
ntpdate: etc/default/ntpdate
slapd: etc/default/slapd
nfs-kernel-server: etc/exports
sysklogd: etc/init.d/sysklogd
base-files: etc/issue
kdm: etc/kde3/kdm/Xaccess
libldap2: etc/ldap/ldap.conf
debian-edu-config: etc/ldap/slapd-debian-edu.conf
mime-support: etc/mime.types
munin-node: etc/munin/munin-node.conf
ntp-server: etc/ntp.conf
kdm: etc/pam.d/kdm
libpam-modules: etc/security/group.conf
bash: etc/skel/.bash_profile
procps: etc/sysctl.conf
inetutils-syslogd: etc/syslog.conf
sysklogd: etc/syslog.conf
udev: etc/udev/permissions.rules
List of configuration files in /etc affected by debian-edu-config
-
etc/X11/fs/config
etc/adduser.conf
etc/amanda/DailySet1/amanda.conf
etc/amanda/DailySet1/changer.conf
etc/amanda/DailySet1/disklist
etc/amandahosts
etc/apache/httpd.conf
etc/apt/sources.list
etc/auto.master
etc/bind/db.intern
etc/courier/authdaemonrc
etc/courier/authldaprc
etc/courier/imapd
etc/cron.d/cfengine
etc/default/autofs
etc/default/cfengine2
etc/default/devfsd
etc/default/dhcp3-server
etc/default/ntpdate
etc/default/pcmcia
etc/default/slapd
etc/default/sysstat 
etc/default/update-hostname
etc/environment
etc/exports
etc/hosts.allow
etc/inetd.conf
etc/init.d/sysklogd
etc/inputrc
etc/issue
etc/kde2/kdm/Xaccess
etc/kde2/kdm/Xsetup
etc/kde3/kdm/Xaccess
etc/ldap/ldap.conf
etc/ldap/slapd-debian-edu.conf
etc/libnss-ldap.conf
etc/mime.types
etc/mozilla-firefox/pref/firefox.js
etc/mozilla/prefs.js
etc/munin/munin-node.conf
etc/nsswitch.conf
etc/ntp.conf
etc/pam.d/kdm
etc/pam_ldap.conf
etc/profile
etc/security/group.conf
etc/shorewall/interfaces
etc/shorewall/masq
etc/shorewall/rules
etc/shorewall/zones
etc/skel/.bash_profile
etc/slbackup/slbackup.conf
etc/squid.conf
etc/squid/squid.conf
etc/ssh/sshd_config
etc/sysctl.conf
etc/syslog.conf
etc/udev/permissions.rules
etc/webmin/config
etc/webmin/dhcpd/config
etc/webmin/miniserv.conf
etc/webmin/miniserv.users
etc/webmin/webmin.acl


signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Processed: Fixed in NMU of python-adns 1.0.0-6.1

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tag 351137 + fixed
Bug#351137: Please stop build modules for python2.1/python2.2
Tags were: pending
Tags added: fixed

> quit
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: Fixed in NMU of python-oss 0.0.0.20010624-3.1

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tag 269725 + fixed
Bug#269725: python-oss: README.Debian is about python-ldaptor
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed

> tag 351146 + fixed
Bug#351146: Please stop build modules for python2.1/python2.2
Tags were: pending
Tags added: fixed

> quit
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#362852: Undeclared conflicts: pathname conflict at usr/share/man/man8/sendmail.8.gz between hula-mta, exim4-base

[Marc Haber]

On Sat, Apr 22, 2006 at 03:36:21PM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> [1] The original problem does not exist anymore, woody->sarge is done
> and sarge->won't suffer from it because exim4-base{,-config} are no
> more new, unseen packages of priority important for dselect. Therefore
> these ugly conflicts are imho *cruft* today and I would really like to
> remove them.

Provided that you fix any breakage that might result, please go ahead.

Greetings
Marc

-- 
-
Marc Haber | "I don't trust Computers. They | Mailadresse im Header
Mannheim, Germany  |  lose things."Winona Ryder | Fon: *49 621 72739834
Nordisch by Nature |  How to make an American Quilt | Fax: *49 621 72739835


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: Fixed in NMU of python-orbit 0.3.1-12.1

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tag 351145 + fixed
Bug#351145: Please stop build modules for python2.1/python2.2
Tags were: pending
Tags added: fixed

> quit
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#353984: marked as done (monodevelop: Crash loading MonoDevelop.NUnit add-in)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 29 Apr 2006 09:14:00 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#353984: fixed in monodevelop 0.10-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: monodevelop
Version: 0.9-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable

Starting monodevelop...

** (MonoDevelop:8271): WARNING **: The following assembly referenced 
from /usr/lib/monodevelop/AddIns/NUnit/MonoDevelop.NUnit.dll could not 
be loaded:
 Assembly:   nunit.core(assemblyref_index=11)
 Version:2.2.0.0
 Public Key: 96d09a1eb7f44a77
The assembly was not found in the Global Assembly Cache, a path listed 
in the MONO_PATH environment variable, or in the location of the 
executing assembly (/usr/lib/monodevelop/bin/../AddIns/NUnit).


** (MonoDevelop:8271): WARNING **: The class NUnit.Core.IFilter could 
not be loaded, used in nunit.core, Version=2.2.0.0, Culture=neutral, 
PublicKeyToken=96d09a1eb7f44a77

** ERROR **: file class.c: line 2100 (mono_class_init): assertion 
failed: (class)
aborting...

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (990, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.15-1-686
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15)

Versions of packages monodevelop depends on:
ii  gnome-icon-theme  2.12.1-2   GNOME Desktop icon theme
ii  gnome-terminal [x-terminal-em 2.12.0-2   The GNOME 2 terminal emulator appl
ii  libgconf2.0-cil   2.8.1-1CLI binding for GConf 2.12
ii  libgecko2.0-cil   0.11-1+b1  CLI binding for the GtkMozEmbed li
ii  libglade2.0-cil   2.8.1-1CLI binding for the Glade librarie
ii  libglib2.0-0  2.8.6-1The GLib library of C routines
ii  libglib2.0-cil2.8.1-1CLI binding for the GLib utility l
ii  libgnome2.0-cil   2.8.1-1CLI binding for GNOME 2.12
ii  libgtk2.0-0   2.8.12-1   The GTK+ graphical user interface 
ii  libgtk2.0-cil 2.8.1-1CLI binding for the GTK+ toolkit 2
ii  libgtksourceview1.0-0 1.4.2-2shared libraries for the GTK+ synt
ii  libgtksourceview2.0-cil   0.10-2+b1  CLI binding for the gtksourceview 
ii  mono-classlib-1.0 1.1.13.2-1 Mono class library (1.0)
ii  mono-jit  1.1.13.2-1 fast CLI JIT/AOT compiler for Mono
ii  mono-mcs  1.1.13.2-1 Mono C# compiler
ii  monodoc-base  1.1.13-1   shared MonoDoc binaries
ii  monodoc-manual1.1.13-1   compiled XML documentation from th
ii  pkg-config0.20-1 manage compile and link flags for 

monodevelop recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: monodevelop
Source-Version: 0.10-1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
monodevelop, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

monodevelop-boo_0.10-1_all.deb
  to pool/main/m/monodevelop/monodevelop-boo_0.10-1_all.deb
monodevelop-java_0.10-1_all.deb
  to pool/main/m/monodevelop/monodevelop-java_0.10-1_all.deb
monodevelop-nunit_0.10-1_all.deb
  to pool/main/m/monodevelop/monodevelop-nunit_0.10-1_all.deb
monodevelop-query_0.10-1_all.deb
  to pool/main/m/monodevelop/monodevelop-query_0.10-1_all.deb
monodevelop-versioncontrol_0.10-1_all.deb
  to pool/main/m/monodevelop/monodevelop-versioncontrol_0.10-1_all.deb
monodevelop_0.10-1.diff.gz
  to pool/main/m/monodevelop/monodevelop_0.10-1.diff.gz
monodevelop_0.10-1.dsc
  to pool/main/m/monodevelop/monodevelop_0.10-1.dsc
monodevelop_0.10-1_all.deb
  to pool/main/m/monodevelop/monodevelop_0.10-1_all.deb
monodevelop_0.10.orig.tar.gz
  to pool/main/m/monodevelop/monodevelop_0.10.orig.tar.gz



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Mirco Bauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated monodevelop package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 19 Mar 2006 15:36:34 +0100

Bug#351344: marked as done (Error starting monodevelop with monodevelop-nunit)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 29 Apr 2006 09:14:00 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#351344: fixed in monodevelop 0.10-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: monodevelop-nunit
Version: 0.91

I have just installed mono and monodevelop via apt and run into troubles
Mono version 1.1.12.2-1
Monodevelop 0.9-1

Starting monodevelop without any installed plugin works ok
after installing monodevelop-nunit i got this error:

** (MonoDevelop:8241): WARNING **: The following assembly referenced 
from /usr/lib/monodevelop/AddIns/NUnit/MonoDevelop.NUnit.dll could not be 
loaded:
 Assembly:   nunit.core(assemblyref_index=11)
 Version:2.2.0.0
 Public Key: 96d09a1eb7f44a77
The assembly was not found in the Global Assembly Cache, a path listed in the 
MONO_PATH environment variable, or in the location of the executing assembly 
(/usr/lib/monodevelop/bin/../AddIns/NUnit).


** (MonoDevelop:8241): WARNING **: The class NUnit.Core.IFilter could not be 
loaded, used in nunit.core, Version=2.2.0.0, Culture=neutral, 
PublicKeyToken=96d09a1eb7f44a77

** ERROR **: file class.c: line 2100 (mono_class_init): assertion failed: 
(class)
aborting...

any hint?

thanks anton

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: monodevelop
Source-Version: 0.10-1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
monodevelop, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

monodevelop-boo_0.10-1_all.deb
  to pool/main/m/monodevelop/monodevelop-boo_0.10-1_all.deb
monodevelop-java_0.10-1_all.deb
  to pool/main/m/monodevelop/monodevelop-java_0.10-1_all.deb
monodevelop-nunit_0.10-1_all.deb
  to pool/main/m/monodevelop/monodevelop-nunit_0.10-1_all.deb
monodevelop-query_0.10-1_all.deb
  to pool/main/m/monodevelop/monodevelop-query_0.10-1_all.deb
monodevelop-versioncontrol_0.10-1_all.deb
  to pool/main/m/monodevelop/monodevelop-versioncontrol_0.10-1_all.deb
monodevelop_0.10-1.diff.gz
  to pool/main/m/monodevelop/monodevelop_0.10-1.diff.gz
monodevelop_0.10-1.dsc
  to pool/main/m/monodevelop/monodevelop_0.10-1.dsc
monodevelop_0.10-1_all.deb
  to pool/main/m/monodevelop/monodevelop_0.10-1_all.deb
monodevelop_0.10.orig.tar.gz
  to pool/main/m/monodevelop/monodevelop_0.10.orig.tar.gz



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Mirco Bauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated monodevelop package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 19 Mar 2006 15:36:34 +0100
Source: monodevelop
Binary: monodevelop-versioncontrol monodevelop-nunit monodevelop-java 
monodevelop-boo monodevelop monodevelop-query
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.10-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Mirco Bauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Mirco Bauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 monodevelop - C#/Boo/Java/Nemerle/ILasm Development Environment
 monodevelop-boo - Boo plugin for MonoDevelop
 monodevelop-java - Java plugin for MonoDevelop
 monodevelop-nunit - NUnit plugin for MonoDevelop
 monodevelop-query - MonoQuery plugin for MonoDevelop
 monodevelop-versioncontrol - VersionControl plugin for MonoDevelop
Closes: 286598 342493 343750 343889 351344 353984 360218
Changes: 
 monodevelop (0.10-1) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
* New upstream release
  + Fixed fr.po encoding (Closes: #343889)
  + Shows now a status indicator for library indexing, needed for the
intellisense feature. (Closes: #286598)
  + Doesn't crash anymore when directory names contain "#" (Closes: #342493)
  + Fixes FTBFS because of Mono.Unix namespace change. (Closes: #360218)
Thus using urgency=medium
* Rebuild against libnunit2.2-cil (Closes: #353984, #351344)
* Rebuild against boo 0.7.5.2013 (Closes: #343750)
* debian/patches/01_use_real_nunit.dpatch
  debian/patches/02_fix_mono.unix_api_breakage.dpatch
  debian/patches/remove_unused_icon.dpatch:
  + Removed, already applied upstream.
* debian/control:
  + Added libnunit2.2-cil, libmono-oracle1.0-cil, libmono-bytefx0.7.6.1-cil

Bug#360218: marked as done (monodevelop: FTBFS: Cannot find Mono.Unix.FilePermissions)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 29 Apr 2006 09:14:00 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#360218: fixed in monodevelop 0.10-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: monodevelop
Version: 0.9-1
Severity: serious

From my pbuilder build log:

...
Making all in MonoDevelop.Projects
make[4]: Entering directory 
`/tmp/buildd/monodevelop-0.9/Core/src/MonoDevelop.Projects'
/usr/bin/mcs -langversion:ISO-1 -debug 
-out:../../../build/AddIns/MonoDevelop.Projects.dll -target:library 
/r:System.Drawing.dll /r:Mono.Posix.dll 
/r:../../../build/AddIns/ICSharpCode.SharpRefactory.dll 
/r:../../../build/bin/MonoDevelop.Core.dll 
/r:../../../build/AddIns/MonoDevelop.Documentation.dll 
./MonoDevelop.Projects.Ambience/AbstractAmbience.cs ...
./MonoDevelop.Projects/Combine.cs(20,18): error CS0234: The type or namespace 
name `FilePermissions' does not exist in the namespace `Mono.Unix'. Are you 
missing an assembly reference?
./MonoDevelop.Projects/Combine.cs(20,1): error CS0246: The type or namespace 
name `Mono.Unix.FilePermissions' could not be found. Are you missing a using 
directive or an assembly reference?
Compilation failed: 2 error(s), 0 warnings
make[4]: *** [../../../build/AddIns/MonoDevelop.Projects.dll] Error 1
make[4]: Leaving directory 
`/tmp/buildd/monodevelop-0.9/Core/src/MonoDevelop.Projects'
make[3]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[3]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/monodevelop-0.9/Core/src'
make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/monodevelop-0.9/Core'
make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/monodevelop-0.9'
make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2
-- 
Daniel Schepler

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: monodevelop
Source-Version: 0.10-1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
monodevelop, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

monodevelop-boo_0.10-1_all.deb
  to pool/main/m/monodevelop/monodevelop-boo_0.10-1_all.deb
monodevelop-java_0.10-1_all.deb
  to pool/main/m/monodevelop/monodevelop-java_0.10-1_all.deb
monodevelop-nunit_0.10-1_all.deb
  to pool/main/m/monodevelop/monodevelop-nunit_0.10-1_all.deb
monodevelop-query_0.10-1_all.deb
  to pool/main/m/monodevelop/monodevelop-query_0.10-1_all.deb
monodevelop-versioncontrol_0.10-1_all.deb
  to pool/main/m/monodevelop/monodevelop-versioncontrol_0.10-1_all.deb
monodevelop_0.10-1.diff.gz
  to pool/main/m/monodevelop/monodevelop_0.10-1.diff.gz
monodevelop_0.10-1.dsc
  to pool/main/m/monodevelop/monodevelop_0.10-1.dsc
monodevelop_0.10-1_all.deb
  to pool/main/m/monodevelop/monodevelop_0.10-1_all.deb
monodevelop_0.10.orig.tar.gz
  to pool/main/m/monodevelop/monodevelop_0.10.orig.tar.gz



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Mirco Bauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated monodevelop package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 19 Mar 2006 15:36:34 +0100
Source: monodevelop
Binary: monodevelop-versioncontrol monodevelop-nunit monodevelop-java 
monodevelop-boo monodevelop monodevelop-query
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.10-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Mirco Bauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Mirco Bauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 monodevelop - C#/Boo/Java/Nemerle/ILasm Development Environment
 monodevelop-boo - Boo plugin for MonoDevelop
 monodevelop-java - Java plugin for MonoDevelop
 monodevelop-nunit - NUnit plugin for MonoDevelop
 monodevelop-query - MonoQuery plugin for MonoDevelop
 monodevelop-versioncontrol - VersionControl plugin for MonoDevelop
Closes: 286598 342493 343750 343889 351344 353984 360218
Changes: 
 monodevelop (0.10-1) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
* New upstream release
  + Fixed fr.po encoding (Closes: #343889)
  + Shows now a status indicator for library indexing, needed for the
intellisense feature. (Closes: #286598)
  + Doesn't crash anymore when directory names contain "#" (Closes: #342493)
  + Fixes FTBFS because of Mono.Unix namespace change.

Bug#362492: Bug #362492: xfs: Config file location has changed - postinstall and documentation fails to note this

[Andreas Metzler]

On 2006-04-13 Mike Brodbelt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package: xfs
> Version: 1:1.0.1-4
> Severity: normal

> With previous versions of xfs, the config file used by default was
> /etc/X11/fs/config, however the newly packaged version now defaults to
> using /usr/lib/X11/fs/config.
[...]

Hello,
Afaict this easily fixable, either by patch.1 which requires
re-running automake or by patch.2 which simply hardcodes the path.
cu andreas

-- 
The 'Galactic Cleaning' policy undertaken by Emperor Zhark is a personal
vision of the emperor's, and its inclusion in this work does not constitute
tacit approval by the author or the publisher for any such projects,
howsoever undertaken.(c) Jasper Ffforde
diff -Nur xfs-1.0.1.orig/Makefile.am xfs-1.0.1/Makefile.am
--- xfs-1.0.1.orig/Makefile.am  2006-03-06 01:13:54.0 +
+++ xfs-1.0.1/Makefile.am   2006-04-29 16:03:07.0 +
@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@
 #  TORTIOUS ACTION, ARISING OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE USE OR
 #  PERFORMANCE OF THIS SOFTWARE.
 
-configdir = $(libdir)/X11/fs
+configdir = $(sysconfdir)/X11/fs
 
 bin_PROGRAMS = xfs
 
diff -Nur xfs-1.0.1.orig/debian/rules xfs-1.0.1/debian/rules
--- xfs-1.0.1.orig/debian/rules 2006-04-29 15:53:16.0 +
+++ xfs-1.0.1/debian/rules  2006-04-29 16:03:21.0 +
@@ -43,7 +43,8 @@
mkdir obj-$(DEB_BUILD_GNU_TYPE)
cd obj-$(DEB_BUILD_GNU_TYPE) && \
../configure --prefix=/usr --mandir=\$${prefix}/share/man \
---infodir=\$${prefix}/share/info $(confflags) \
+--infodir=\$${prefix}/share/info \
+--sysconfdir=/etc $(confflags) \
 CFLAGS="$(CFLAGS)" 
cd obj-$(DEB_BUILD_GNU_TYPE) && $(MAKE)
 
diff -Nur xfs-1.0.1.orig/difs/main.c xfs-1.0.1/difs/main.c
--- xfs-1.0.1.orig/difs/main.c  2006-03-06 01:13:54.0 +
+++ xfs-1.0.1/difs/main.c   2006-04-29 16:07:41.0 +
@@ -69,9 +69,7 @@
 
 Cache   serverCache;
 
-#ifndef DEFAULT_CONFIG_FILE
-#define DEFAULT_CONFIG_FILE "/usr/lib/X11/fs/config"
-#endif
+#define DEFAULT_CONFIG_FILE "/etc/X11/fs/config"
 
 #defineSERVER_CACHE_SIZE   1   /* for random server cacheables 
*/
 

Bug#359845: marked as done (koffice-l10n: FTBFS: problems with mv invocation)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 29 Apr 2006 09:08:59 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#359845: fixed in koffice-l10n 1.5.0-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: koffice-l10n
Version: 1.4.2-1
Severity: serious

From my pbuilder build log:

...
#Rename language dirs from *l10n* to *i18n*
for i in `ls -1d *l10n*/`; do \
  orig=$i; \
  dest=$(echo $i | sed -e "s/l10n/i18n/"); \
  mv $orig $dest; \
done
mv: target `koffice-i18n-bg-1.4.2/' is not a directory: No such file or 
directory
mv: target `koffice-i18n-ca-1.4.2/' is not a directory: No such file or 
directory
...
mkdir debian/koffice-i18n-engb
cp -aR debian/koffice-i18n-en_GB/* debian/koffice-i18n-engb/
cp: cannot stat `debian/koffice-i18n-en_GB/*': No such file or directory
make: *** [binary-indep] Error 1
-- 
Daniel Schepler

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: koffice-l10n
Source-Version: 1.5.0-1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
koffice-l10n, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

koffice-i18n-af_1.5.0-1_all.deb
  to pool/main/k/koffice-l10n/koffice-i18n-af_1.5.0-1_all.deb
koffice-i18n-ar_1.5.0-1_all.deb
  to pool/main/k/koffice-l10n/koffice-i18n-ar_1.5.0-1_all.deb
koffice-i18n-bg_1.5.0-1_all.deb
  to pool/main/k/koffice-l10n/koffice-i18n-bg_1.5.0-1_all.deb
koffice-i18n-br_1.5.0-1_all.deb
  to pool/main/k/koffice-l10n/koffice-i18n-br_1.5.0-1_all.deb
koffice-i18n-bs_1.5.0-1_all.deb
  to pool/main/k/koffice-l10n/koffice-i18n-bs_1.5.0-1_all.deb
koffice-i18n-ca_1.5.0-1_all.deb
  to pool/main/k/koffice-l10n/koffice-i18n-ca_1.5.0-1_all.deb
koffice-i18n-cs_1.5.0-1_all.deb
  to pool/main/k/koffice-l10n/koffice-i18n-cs_1.5.0-1_all.deb
koffice-i18n-cy_1.5.0-1_all.deb
  to pool/main/k/koffice-l10n/koffice-i18n-cy_1.5.0-1_all.deb
koffice-i18n-da_1.5.0-1_all.deb
  to pool/main/k/koffice-l10n/koffice-i18n-da_1.5.0-1_all.deb
koffice-i18n-de_1.5.0-1_all.deb
  to pool/main/k/koffice-l10n/koffice-i18n-de_1.5.0-1_all.deb
koffice-i18n-el_1.5.0-1_all.deb
  to pool/main/k/koffice-l10n/koffice-i18n-el_1.5.0-1_all.deb
koffice-i18n-engb_1.5.0-1_all.deb
  to pool/main/k/koffice-l10n/koffice-i18n-engb_1.5.0-1_all.deb
koffice-i18n-eo_1.5.0-1_all.deb
  to pool/main/k/koffice-l10n/koffice-i18n-eo_1.5.0-1_all.deb
koffice-i18n-es_1.5.0-1_all.deb
  to pool/main/k/koffice-l10n/koffice-i18n-es_1.5.0-1_all.deb
koffice-i18n-et_1.5.0-1_all.deb
  to pool/main/k/koffice-l10n/koffice-i18n-et_1.5.0-1_all.deb
koffice-i18n-eu_1.5.0-1_all.deb
  to pool/main/k/koffice-l10n/koffice-i18n-eu_1.5.0-1_all.deb
koffice-i18n-fi_1.5.0-1_all.deb
  to pool/main/k/koffice-l10n/koffice-i18n-fi_1.5.0-1_all.deb
koffice-i18n-fr_1.5.0-1_all.deb
  to pool/main/k/koffice-l10n/koffice-i18n-fr_1.5.0-1_all.deb
koffice-i18n-ga_1.5.0-1_all.deb
  to pool/main/k/koffice-l10n/koffice-i18n-ga_1.5.0-1_all.deb
koffice-i18n-he_1.5.0-1_all.deb
  to pool/main/k/koffice-l10n/koffice-i18n-he_1.5.0-1_all.deb
koffice-i18n-hi_1.5.0-1_all.deb
  to pool/main/k/koffice-l10n/koffice-i18n-hi_1.5.0-1_all.deb
koffice-i18n-hu_1.5.0-1_all.deb
  to pool/main/k/koffice-l10n/koffice-i18n-hu_1.5.0-1_all.deb
koffice-i18n-is_1.5.0-1_all.deb
  to pool/main/k/koffice-l10n/koffice-i18n-is_1.5.0-1_all.deb
koffice-i18n-it_1.5.0-1_all.deb
  to pool/main/k/koffice-l10n/koffice-i18n-it_1.5.0-1_all.deb
koffice-i18n-ja_1.5.0-1_all.deb
  to pool/main/k/koffice-l10n/koffice-i18n-ja_1.5.0-1_all.deb
koffice-i18n-lt_1.5.0-1_all.deb
  to pool/main/k/koffice-l10n/koffice-i18n-lt_1.5.0-1_all.deb
koffice-i18n-mk_1.5.0-1_all.deb
  to pool/main/k/koffice-l10n/koffice-i18n-mk_1.5.0-1_all.deb
koffice-i18n-nb_1.5.0-1_all.deb
  to pool/main/k/koffice-l10n/koffice-i18n-nb_1.5.0-1_all.deb
koffice-i18n-nl_1.5.0-1_all.deb
  to pool/main/k/koffice-l10n/koffice-i18n-nl_1.5.0-1_all.deb
koffice-i18n-nn_1.5.0-1_all.deb
  to pool/main/k/koffice-l10n/koffice-i18n-nn_1.5.0-1_all.deb
koffice-i18n-pl_1.5.0-1_all.deb
  to pool/main/k/koffice-l10n/koffice-i18n-pl_1.5.0-1_all.deb
koffice-i18n-pt_1.5.0-1_all.deb
  to pool/main/k/koffice-l10n/koffice-i18n-pt_1.5.0-1_all.deb
koffice-i18n-ptbr_1.5.0-1_all.deb
  to pool/main/k/koffice-l10n/koffice-i18n-ptbr_1.5.0-1_all.deb
koffice-i18n-ro_1.5.0-1_all.deb
  to pool/main/k/koffice-l10n/koffice-i18n-ro_1.5.0-1_all.deb
koffice-i18n-ru_1.5.0-1_all.deb
  to pool/main/k/koffice-l10n/koffice-i18n-ru_1.5.0-1_all.deb
koffice-i18n-se_1.5.0-1_all.deb
  to pool/main/k/koffice-l10n/koffice-i18n-se_1.5.0-1_all.deb
koffice-i18n-sk_1.5.0-1_all.d

Processed: Fixed in NMU of comedilib 0.7.22-2.1

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tag 350550 + fixed
Bug#350550: libcomedi0: incorrect package name and shlibs file
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed

> quit
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#364968: marked as done (fuse-utils: postinst script is not idempotent)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 29 Apr 2006 08:47:11 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#364968: fixed in fuse 2.5.3-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Subject: fuse-utils: postinst script is not idempotent
Package: fuse-utils
Version: 2.5.3-1
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 6.2

*** Please type your report below this line ***

The error below should not occur if the postinst script would be
idempotent.


Se pregăteşte fuse-utils (2.5.3-1) ...
creating fuse device...
udev active, devices will be created in /dev/.static/dev/
creating fuse group...
The group `fuse' already exists as a system group. Exiting...
An override for "/usr/bin/fusermount" already exists, aborting
dpkg: eroare la procesarea fuse-utils (--configure):
 subprocesul post-installation script returnează starea de eroare la ieşire 3
Erori întâlnite în timpul prelucrării:
 fuse-utils
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)
Un pachet a eşuat la instalare.  Încercare de recuperare:
Se pregăteşte fuse-utils (2.5.3-1) ...
creating fuse device...
udev active, devices will be created in /dev/.static/dev/
creating fuse group...
The group `fuse' already exists as a system group. Exiting...
An override for "/usr/bin/fusermount" already exists, aborting
dpkg: eroare la procesarea fuse-utils (--configure):
 subprocesul post-installation script returnează starea de eroare la ieşire 3
Erori întâlnite în timpul prelucrării:
 fuse-utils
Apasaţi Enter pentru a continua



-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.15.6-kandia1
Locale: LANG=ro_RO.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=ro_RO.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

Versions of packages fuse-utils depends on:
ii  adduser   3.86   Add and remove users and groups
ii  libc6 2.3.6-7GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii  makedev   2.3.1-81   creates device files in /dev
ii  sed   4.1.4-7The GNU sed stream editor
ii  ucf   2.009  Update Configuration File: preserv

Versions of packages fuse-utils recommends:
pn  fuse-source(no description available)

-- debconf information:
* fuse-utils/groupcreate: true
* fuse-utils/groupdelete: true
* fuse-utils/group: fuse
  fuse-utils/grouprenamemigrate: true


--
Regards,
EddyP
=
"Imagination is more important than knowledge" A.Einstein
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: fuse
Source-Version: 2.5.3-2

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
fuse, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

fuse-source_2.5.3-2_all.deb
  to pool/main/f/fuse/fuse-source_2.5.3-2_all.deb
fuse-utils_2.5.3-2_i386.deb
  to pool/main/f/fuse/fuse-utils_2.5.3-2_i386.deb
fuse_2.5.3-2.diff.gz
  to pool/main/f/fuse/fuse_2.5.3-2.diff.gz
fuse_2.5.3-2.dsc
  to pool/main/f/fuse/fuse_2.5.3-2.dsc
libfuse-dev_2.5.3-2_i386.deb
  to pool/main/f/fuse/libfuse-dev_2.5.3-2_i386.deb
libfuse2_2.5.3-2_i386.deb
  to pool/main/f/fuse/libfuse2_2.5.3-2_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Bartosz Fenski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated fuse package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2006 17:28:18 +0200
Source: fuse
Binary: libfuse2 libfuse-dev fuse-utils fuse-source
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 2.5.3-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Bartosz Fenski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Bartosz Fenski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 fuse-source - Filesystem in USErspace (source for kernel module)
 fuse-utils - Filesystem in USErspace (utilities)
 libfuse-dev - Filesystem in USErspace (development files)
 libfuse2   - Filesystem in USErspace library
Closes: 364832 364968 365016 365117
Changes: 
 fuse (2.5.3-2) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Doesn't fail on install. (Closes: #365117, #364968, #

Bug#365378: nmapfe: Package upgrade fails

[John Sullivan]

Package: nmapfe
Version: 4.00-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable


Preparing to replace nmapfe 4.00-2 (using .../nmapfe_4.03-2_i386.deb) ...
Unpacking replacement nmapfe ...
dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/nmapfe_4.03-2_i386.deb
(--unpack):
 trying to overwrite `/usr/share/applications/nmapfe.desktop', which is also in
 package nmap
Errors were encountered while processing:
 /var/cache/apt/archives/nmapfe_4.03-2_i386.deb
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.15-1-686
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

Versions of packages nmapfe depends on:
ii  libatk1.0-0   1.11.4-1   The ATK accessibility toolkit
ii  libc6 2.3.6-7GNU C Library: Shared libraries
pn  libcairo2  (no description available)
ii  libfontconfig12.3.2-5.1  generic font configuration library
pn  libglib2.0-0   (no description available)
pn  libgtk2.0-0(no description available)
pn  libpango1.0-0  (no description available)
ii  libx11-6  6.9.0.dfsg.1-6 X Window System protocol client li
ii  libxcursor1   1.1.3-1X cursor management library
ii  libxext6  6.9.0.dfsg.1-6 X Window System miscellaneous exte
ii  libxi66.9.0.dfsg.1-6 X Window System Input extension li
ii  libxinerama1  6.9.0.dfsg.1-6 X Window System multi-head display
ii  libxrandr26.9.0.dfsg.1-6 X Window System Resize, Rotate and
ii  libxrender1   1:0.9.0.2-1X Rendering Extension client libra
ii  nmap  4.00-2 The Network Mapper

nmapfe recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#364832: marked as done (Upgrading fuse-utils fails on dpkg-statoverride --add in postinst)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 29 Apr 2006 08:47:11 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#364832: fixed in fuse 2.5.3-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: fuse-utils
Version: 2.5.3-1

An attempt at upgrading fuse-utils failed with the following error
message:

Setting up fuse-utils (2.5.3-1) ...
creating fuse device...
creating fuse group...
The group `fuse' already exists as a system group. Exiting...
An override for "/usr/bin/fusermount" already exists, aborting
dpkg: error processing fuse-utils (--configure):
 subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 3
Errors were encountered while processing:
 fuse-utils

You might want to add a line like:

if dpkg-statoverride --quiet --list /usr/bin/fusermount; then  
dpkg-statoverride --remove /usr/bin/fusermount; fi

before line 17 of fuse-utils.postinst

Test for the presence of the override first.  Then remove it in case it
needs to be changed.  Finally install the override.

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: fuse
Source-Version: 2.5.3-2

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
fuse, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

fuse-source_2.5.3-2_all.deb
  to pool/main/f/fuse/fuse-source_2.5.3-2_all.deb
fuse-utils_2.5.3-2_i386.deb
  to pool/main/f/fuse/fuse-utils_2.5.3-2_i386.deb
fuse_2.5.3-2.diff.gz
  to pool/main/f/fuse/fuse_2.5.3-2.diff.gz
fuse_2.5.3-2.dsc
  to pool/main/f/fuse/fuse_2.5.3-2.dsc
libfuse-dev_2.5.3-2_i386.deb
  to pool/main/f/fuse/libfuse-dev_2.5.3-2_i386.deb
libfuse2_2.5.3-2_i386.deb
  to pool/main/f/fuse/libfuse2_2.5.3-2_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Bartosz Fenski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated fuse package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2006 17:28:18 +0200
Source: fuse
Binary: libfuse2 libfuse-dev fuse-utils fuse-source
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 2.5.3-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Bartosz Fenski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Bartosz Fenski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 fuse-source - Filesystem in USErspace (source for kernel module)
 fuse-utils - Filesystem in USErspace (utilities)
 libfuse-dev - Filesystem in USErspace (development files)
 libfuse2   - Filesystem in USErspace library
Closes: 364832 364968 365016 365117
Changes: 
 fuse (2.5.3-2) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Doesn't fail on install. (Closes: #365117, #364968, #364832, #365016)
Files: 
 6dbb5d7b326ebb54d9b9dcb3a31139dc 613 libs optional fuse_2.5.3-2.dsc
 91f42233e0561429e3c341c659fc8858 8431 libs optional fuse_2.5.3-2.diff.gz
 844e839b5e20178cb58e592ee5c73999 55890 utils optional 
fuse-utils_2.5.3-2_i386.deb
 b50e34879713a270ef981b2d982922da 92878 libdevel optional 
libfuse-dev_2.5.3-2_i386.deb
 adbf1f0d191dc3892956a282a2d8d02a 49656 libs optional libfuse2_2.5.3-2_i386.deb
 8ca203fc69233f541f370614180b61e9 102860 utils optional 
fuse-source_2.5.3-2_all.deb

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFEU4c8hQui3hP+/EARAtawAJ4sd/pJ5IdEvj4EOOHKzQLiRgmTggCgv29a
xXMnVDjU999BFy+IyNWxm9I=
=WT4D
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--- End Message ---

Bug#365371: CVE-2006-1865: Beagle command line injection

[Stefan Fritsch]

Package: beagle
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Justification: user security hole

CVE-2006-1865
Beagle before 0.2.5 can produce certain insecure command lines to
launch external helper applications while indexing, which allows
attackers to execute arbitrary commands.  NOTE: it is not immediately
clear whether this issue involves argument injection, shell
metacharacters, or other issues.

See:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189282


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#365332: hmmmm

[Daniel Baumann]

Stephen Gran wrote:
> Attached is a diff of the exported symbols between versions 0.9.4-5.1
> and 0.9.5-3.  this should really have had a soname bump, I think,
> judging by the amount of changes.

Well, ack.. but I don't want to bump it async of upstream, so I informed
him in a separate mail.

> What do you want to do here?  Change the soname, revert the upstream
> export changes, something else?  I assume that UDFFindFile was supposed
> to be a private symbol all along, and dvdbackup was stupid for using it.
> I can try to fix that in dvdbackup, but since the changes are fairly big
> in libdvdread, I feel like something should declare the incompatibility
> there as well.

I'll fix the symbol export now, and wait for upstreams answer. Depending
on that, we can look further then.

I was away since yesterday afternoon and have only limited internet
access.. if I come home tomorrow afternoon, I'll prepare a package then,
if otherwise I'll return in the evening/night, I'll do it on monday
morning. Thank you for your help ;)

-- 
Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist
Email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Internet:   http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#363445: marked as done (libgtk2.0-dev: Should depend on version of libx11-dev that provides x11.pc)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 29 Apr 2006 08:02:11 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#363445: fixed in gtk+2.0 2.8.17-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: libgtk2.0-dev
Version: 2.8.17-1
Severity: normal


  $ pkg-config --cflags gdk-2.0
  Package x11 was not found in the pkg-config search path.
  Perhaps you should add the directory containing `x11.pc'
  to the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable
  Package 'x11', required by 'GDK', not found

Note that it doesn't in fact display the necessary -I flags.
Consequently, gtk programs that use pkg-config now fail to compile,
unless the x11.pc file is present.

libx11-dev 6.9.0.dfsg.1-5 does not contain this file;
version 2:1.0.0-6 does contain the file.

I'd guess that an appropriate versioned Depends would be
libx11-dev (>= 2:1.0.0).

pjrm.

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: gtk+2.0
Source-Version: 2.8.17-2

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
gtk+2.0, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

gtk+2.0_2.8.17-2.diff.gz
  to pool/main/g/gtk+2.0/gtk+2.0_2.8.17-2.diff.gz
gtk+2.0_2.8.17-2.dsc
  to pool/main/g/gtk+2.0/gtk+2.0_2.8.17-2.dsc
gtk2-engines-pixbuf_2.8.17-2_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/gtk+2.0/gtk2-engines-pixbuf_2.8.17-2_i386.deb
gtk2.0-examples_2.8.17-2_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/gtk+2.0/gtk2.0-examples_2.8.17-2_i386.deb
libgtk2.0-0-dbg_2.8.17-2_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/gtk+2.0/libgtk2.0-0-dbg_2.8.17-2_i386.deb
libgtk2.0-0_2.8.17-2_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/gtk+2.0/libgtk2.0-0_2.8.17-2_i386.deb
libgtk2.0-bin_2.8.17-2_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/gtk+2.0/libgtk2.0-bin_2.8.17-2_i386.deb
libgtk2.0-common_2.8.17-2_all.deb
  to pool/main/g/gtk+2.0/libgtk2.0-common_2.8.17-2_all.deb
libgtk2.0-dev_2.8.17-2_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/gtk+2.0/libgtk2.0-dev_2.8.17-2_i386.deb
libgtk2.0-doc_2.8.17-2_all.deb
  to pool/main/g/gtk+2.0/libgtk2.0-doc_2.8.17-2_all.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Sebastien Bacher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated gtk+2.0 package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2006 14:17:37 +0200
Source: gtk+2.0
Binary: libgtk2.0-dev libgtk2.0-0-dbg gtk2-engines-pixbuf libgtk2.0-0 
libgtk2.0-doc gtk2.0-examples libgtk2.0-bin libgtk2.0-common
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 2.8.17-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Sebastien Bacher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Sebastien Bacher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 gtk2-engines-pixbuf - Pixbuf-based theme for GTK+ 2.x
 gtk2.0-examples - Examples files for the GTK+ 2.0
 libgtk2.0-0 - The GTK+ graphical user interface library
 libgtk2.0-0-dbg - The GTK+ libraries and debugging symbols
 libgtk2.0-bin - The programs for the GTK+ graphical user interface library
 libgtk2.0-common - Common files for the GTK+ graphical user interface library
 libgtk2.0-dev - Development files for the GTK+ library
 libgtk2.0-doc - Documentation for the GTK+ graphical user interface library
Closes: 363445
Changes: 
 gtk+2.0 (2.8.17-2) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Source upload to fix the non-installable binNMU
   * debian/control.in:
 - update the Build-Depends and Depends on xorg libraries so the
   corresponding packages have the needed .pc installed, suggested
   by Peter Moulder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Closes: #363445)
Files: 
 6c1ca77ca726a07ede5ade9db5314278 2154 libs optional gtk+2.0_2.8.17-2.dsc
 dd871cf1a8038d24d2044a7f4e1c550f 49486 libs optional gtk+2.0_2.8.17-2.diff.gz
 56e69a06a48d444cfa881affc7829bdb 3683358 misc optional 
libgtk2.0-common_2.8.17-2_all.deb
 83bdb6147956e963664ead6a5ba814b9 2483094 doc optional 
libgtk2.0-doc_2.8.17-2_all.deb
 49f29a25d8e63be60dbf0ef4039eca99 2181888 libs optional 
libgtk2.0-0_2.8.17-2_i386.deb
 0ca644f352febcdd06e95939b9b62325 21746 misc optional 
libgtk2.0-bin_2.8.17-2_i386.deb
 da01658e43b029dbace4a9f5a7c6503e 2343626 libdevel optional 
libgtk2.0-dev_2.8.17-2_i386.deb
 8edeee941b7ae4330684c80fb76057b5 3641684 libdevel extra 
libgtk2.0-0-dbg_2.8.17-2_i386.deb

Bug#335719: add patch explanation

[Steffen Joeris]

Hi

Here is the patch for the build-dependency to make sure that your package 
builds from source. The problem is that uudecode is not available which is 
part of the package sharutils.
Here is the change in the control file:


--- control.old 2006-04-29 15:44:19.0 +0200
+++ control 2006-04-29 15:44:29.0 +0200
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
 Section: games
 Priority: optional
 Maintainer: Sam Hocevar (Debian packages) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 4.0.0), libgtk2.0-dev, libsdl1.2-dev
+Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 4.0.0), libgtk2.0-dev, libsdl1.2-dev, sharutils
 Standards-Version: 3.6.2.1

 Package: etw



After that the package builds fine from source.

Greetings
Steffen


pgpE2OOglBBsu.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Bug#350033: add patch explanation

[Steffen Joeris]

Hi

Well the package still provides a binary without the source which breaks the 
DFSG. I prepared a patch which is a NMU (I attached the URL below).
I repacked the existing fruit_2.1.orig.tar.gz to 
fruit_2.1.0.1dfsg.orig.tar.gz .
I saw that upstream only uses the first two digits for the version number so 
there should never be a problem with a newer upstream release, but just to 
make sure i chose to append a 0.1 if upstream changes his mind :)
I used the same packaging.

My changelog entry looks like:

fruit (2.1.0.1dfsg-0.1) unstable; urgency=low

  * Non-maintainer upload
  * The package provided a binary without source, which broke the DFSG
I had to repack the old orig.tar.gz and bumped the version number to
2.1.0.1dfsg. Upstream only uses the first two digits so there
should never be a versioning problem. (Closes: #350033)

 -- Steffen Joeris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  Sat, 29 Apr 2006 16:12:42 
+0200

Greetings
Steffen


You can find the NMU under
http://developer.skolelinux.org/~white/debs/nmu/fruit/


pgp7EycsdxP6x.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Bug#347176: marked as done (gnome-menus: Should depends on python-glade2)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 29 Apr 2006 07:47:03 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#347176: fixed in gnome-menus 2.14.0-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: gnome-menus
Version: 2.12.0-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable

Hi,

When starting gmenu-simple-editor :

$ gmenu-simple-editor 
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/bin/gmenu-simple-editor", line 28, in ?
GMenuSimpleEditor.main.main (sys.argv[1:])
  File "/usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/GMenuSimpleEditor/main.py", line 26, 
in main
import gtk.glade
ImportError: No module named glade



Christian

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (900, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.15
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15)

Versions of packages gnome-menus depends on:
ii  libc6 2.3.5-11   GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libfam0   2.7.0-8client library to control the FAM 
ii  libglib2.0-0  2.8.5-1The GLib library of C routines
ii  libgnome-menu22.12.0-2   an implementation of the freedeskt
ii  python2.3.5-3An interactive high-level object-o
ii  python-gmenu  2.12.0-2   an implementation of the freedeskt

gnome-menus recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: gnome-menus
Source-Version: 2.14.0-1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
gnome-menus, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

gnome-menus_2.14.0-1.diff.gz
  to pool/main/g/gnome-menus/gnome-menus_2.14.0-1.diff.gz
gnome-menus_2.14.0-1.dsc
  to pool/main/g/gnome-menus/gnome-menus_2.14.0-1.dsc
gnome-menus_2.14.0-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/gnome-menus/gnome-menus_2.14.0-1_i386.deb
gnome-menus_2.14.0.orig.tar.gz
  to pool/main/g/gnome-menus/gnome-menus_2.14.0.orig.tar.gz
libgnome-menu-dev_2.14.0-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/gnome-menus/libgnome-menu-dev_2.14.0-1_i386.deb
libgnome-menu2_2.14.0-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/gnome-menus/libgnome-menu2_2.14.0-1_i386.deb
python-gmenu_2.14.0-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/gnome-menus/python-gmenu_2.14.0-1_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Sebastien Bacher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated gnome-menus package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2006 15:26:42 +0200
Source: gnome-menus
Binary: python-gmenu libgnome-menu2 gnome-menus libgnome-menu-dev
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.14.0-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Sebastien Bacher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Sebastien Bacher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 gnome-menus - an implementation of the freedesktop menu specification for GNOME
 libgnome-menu-dev - an implementation of the freedesktop menu specification 
for GNOME
 libgnome-menu2 - an implementation of the freedesktop menu specification for 
GNOME
 python-gmenu - an implementation of the freedesktop menu specification for 
GNOME
Closes: 347176
Changes: 
 gnome-menus (2.14.0-1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * New upstream version
   * Renamed the patches to use .patch instead of .diff
   * debian/control.in:
 - dropped gnomevfs requirement it doesn't use it
   * debian/libgnome-menu2.shlibs:
 - updated shlibs version
   * debian/patches/06_menus_rename.patch:
 - updated
   * debian/patches/07_relibtoolise.patch:
 - not required
   * debian/watch:
 - updated
 .
   [ J.H.M. Dassen (Ray) ]
   * [patches/07_relibtoolise.diff] Added to do away with unneeded direct
 library dependencies in the gnome-menus package.
 .
   [ Josselin Mouette ]
   * Acknowledge NMU:
 + Add python-glade2 depends for gnome-menus (Closes: #347176).
Files: 
 e4b52360fc06f542808dd39b561ec425 1688 gnome optional gnome-menus_2.14.0-1.dsc
 b1a5510038f9a3a29e06170e99125c24 539850 gnome 

Bug#365286: vtwm: please update for X11R7

[Aaron M. Ucko]

Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> This seems to be missing a corresponding update for the prerm script?

Oops, yeah, I do seem to have overlooked that by mistake.  Here's the
requisite one-liner, for the record:

--- src/vtwm/vtwm-5.4.7.orig/debian/prerm   2006-04-19 17:26:12.0 
-0400
+++ src/vtwm/vtwm-5.4.7/debian/prerm2006-04-29 10:55:02.0 -0400
@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@
 case "$1" in
 upgrade|failed-upgrade) ;;
 remove|deconfigure)
-update-alternatives --remove x-window-manager /usr/bin/X11/vtwm
+update-alternatives --remove x-window-manager /usr/bin/vtwm
 ;;
 esac
 

Thanks for catching that, and happy (belated) birthday. :-)

-- 
Aaron M. Ucko, KB1CJC (amu at alum.mit.edu, ucko at debian.org)
Finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] (NOT a valid e-mail address) for more info.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#364972: Harald Dunkel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

[Geoff Richards]

Hi,

The problem seems to be that dvdread/Makefile.in is not updated
after the patch is applied to dvdread/Makefile.am so the old value
is used to decide the exports.

After fixing that manually dvdbackup seems to be working again.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: add patch which is a nmu

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tags 350033 patch
Bug#350033: binary in orig.tar.gz
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: merging

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> package xserver-xorg
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: xserver-xorg

> severity 365282 grave
Bug#365282: xserver-xorg 7.0.15 fails installation (pre-inst exit status 10)
Severity set to `grave'.

> merge 365282 365353
Bug#365282: xserver-xorg 7.0.15 fails installation (pre-inst exit status 10)
Bug#365353: missing debconf template: 
xserver-xorg/config/inputdevice/mouse/zaxismapping
Merged 365282 365353.

>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#357439: amaya does not start--The program 'amaya' received an X Window System error.

[Michel Dänzer]

On Fri, 2006-04-28 at 21:12 +0100, Regis Boudin wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-04-27 at 18:28 +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > 
> > > -no crash with the nvidia proprietary driver, display is happy.
> > > 
> > > When I tried using gdb to get a backtrace(attached), all I got was a
> > > long list of calls involving wxWidgets, GTK, but not Mesa.
> > 
> > X is asynchronous, so the client receives the error long after it sent
> > out the request causing it. When this happens, GTK should tell you how
> > to make it use a synchronous X connection.
> 
> I know. The previously attached backtrace was obtained with libgl1-mesa-swx11,
> running amaya with the --sync parameter, so there might be a problem there
> too. Doing the same with libgl1-mesa-glx and DRI disabled, I get the
> attached one. Could wxWidgets be doing something bad ?

Possibly; in particular in the previous backtrace, it does look like
either wx or GTK is the culprit. In this case, it looks like it could be
wx and/or libGL and/or the X server.


> > > CCing the XSF in case someone has an idea, 
> > 
> > A Mesa list might have been even better? :)
> 
> Sorry, I didn't find the debian-mesa list :)

There's [EMAIL PROTECTED], but it used to only
allow subscribers to post; not sure if that's still the case. At the
moment, the relevant people are probably reading debian-x.


-- 
Earthling Michel Dänzer  | Debian (powerpc), X and DRI developer
Libre software enthusiast|   http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=daenzer

Processed: add patch for build-depends

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tags 335719 patch
Bug#335719: etw_3.0.cvs20050714-1(m68k/experimental): missing uudecode
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#362087: one link missing

[Flavio Stanchina]

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> this link is also needed in /usr/lib/xorg/modules/linux
> 
>   libfglrxdrm.so -> /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/linux/libfglrxdrm.so

It is required for what?

Please provide an explanation and version information on the packages you
are using. I suspect you're using old or third-party packages that install
the driver (or parts of it) in incorrect places.

-- 
Ciao, Flavio



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#365353: missing debconf template: xserver-xorg/config/inputdevice/mouse/zaxismapping

[Adam Borowski]

Package: xserver-xorg
Version: 1:7.0.15
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package uninstallable

The debconf question xserver-xorg/config/inputdevice/mouse/zaxismapping
is needed by xserver-xorg's preinst, yet its template is missing.  Without
it, installation fails on new installs unless manually preseeded.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.16-1-686
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

Versions of packages xserver-xorg depends on:
ii  debconf   1.5.0  Debian configuration management sy
ii  nvidia-glx [xserver-x 1.0.8756-4 NVIDIA binary XFree86 4.x driver
ii  x11-common1:7.0.15   X Window System (X.Org) infrastruc
ii  xbase-clients 1:7.0.0-5  miscellaneous X clients
ii  xkb-data  0.8-5  X Keyboard Extension (XKB) configu
ii  xserver-xorg-core 1:1.0.2-7  X.Org X server -- core server
ii  xserver-xorg-input-al 1:7.0.15   the X.Org X server -- input driver
ii  xserver-xorg-input-ev 1:1.0.0.5-2X.Org X server -- evdev input driv
ii  xserver-xorg-input-kb 1:1.0.1.3-2X.Org X server -- keyboard input d
ii  xserver-xorg-input-mo 1:1.0.4-2  X.Org X server -- mouse input driv
ii  xserver-xorg-video-al 1:7.0.15   the X.Org X server -- output drive
ii  xserver-xorg-video-ap 1:1.0.1.5-2X.Org X server -- APM display driv
ii  xserver-xorg-video-ar 1:0.5.0.5-2X.Org X server -- ark display driv
ii  xserver-xorg-video-at 1:6.5.8.0-1X.Org X server -- ATI display driv
ii  xserver-xorg-video-ch 1:1.0.1.3-3X.Org X server -- Chips display dr
ii  xserver-xorg-video-ci 1:1.0.0.5-2X.Org X server -- Cirrus display d
ii  xserver-xorg-video-cy 1:1.0.0.5-2X.Org X server -- Cyrix display dr
ii  xserver-xorg-video-du 1:0.1.0.5-2X.Org X server -- dummy display dr
ii  xserver-xorg-video-fb 1:0.1.0.5-2X.Org X server -- fbdev display dr
ii  xserver-xorg-video-gl 1:1.0.1.3-3X.Org X server -- Glint display dr
ii  xserver-xorg-video-i1 1:1.1.0.5-2X.Org X server -- i128 display dri
ii  xserver-xorg-video-i7 1:1.0.0.5-2X.Org X server -- i740 display dri
ii  xserver-xorg-video-i8 1:1.5.1.0-2X.Org X server -- Intel i8xx, i9xx
ii  xserver-xorg-video-im 1:1.0.0.5-2X.Org X server -- IMSTT display dr
ii  xserver-xorg-video-mg 1:1.2.1.3.dfsg.1-2 X.Org X server -- MGA display driv
ii  xserver-xorg-video-ne 1:1.0.0.5-2X.Org X server -- Neomagic display
ii  xserver-xorg-video-ne 1:0.1.4.1-3X.Org X server -- Newport display 
ii  xserver-xorg-video-ns 1:2.7.6.5-2X.Org X server -- NSC display driv
ii  xserver-xorg-video-nv 1:1.0.1.5-2X.Org X server -- NV display drive
ii  xserver-xorg-video-re 1:4.0.1.3.dfsg.1-2 X.Org X server -- Rendition displa
ii  xserver-xorg-video-s3 1:1.8.6.5-2X.Org X server -- S3 ViRGE display
ii  xserver-xorg-video-sa 1:2.0.2.3-4X.Org X server -- Savage display d
ii  xserver-xorg-video-si 1:1.3.1.5-3X.Org X server -- SiliconMotion di
ii  xserver-xorg-video-si 1:0.8.1.3-2X.Org X server -- SiS display driv
ii  xserver-xorg-video-si 1:0.7.1.3-2X.Org X server -- SiS USB display 
ii  xserver-xorg-video-td 1:1.1.1.3-3X.Org X server -- tdfx display dri
ii  xserver-xorg-video-tg 1:1.0.0.5-3X.Org X server -- TGA display driv
ii  xserver-xorg-video-tr 1:1.0.1.2-2X.Org X server -- Trident display 
ii  xserver-xorg-video-ts 1:1.0.0.5-2X.Org X server -- Tseng display dr
ii  xserver-xorg-video-ve 1:1.0.1.3-2X.Org X server -- VESA display dri
ii  xserver-xorg-video-vg 1:4.0.0.5-2X.Org X server -- VGA display driv
ii  xserver-xorg-video-vi 1:0.1.33.2-3   X.Org X server -- VIA display driv
ii  xserver-xorg-video-vm 1:10.11.1.3-2  X.Org X server -- VMware display d
ii  xserver-xorg-video-vo 1:1.0.0.5-2X.Org X server -- Voodoo display d

Versions of packages xserver-xorg recommends:
ii  discover1  1.7.18hardware identification system
ii  laptop-detect  0.12.1attempt to detect a laptop
ii  mdetect0.5.2.1   mouse device autodetection tool
ii  xresprobe  0.4.23debian1 X Resolution Probe

-- debconf information:
  xserver-xorg/multiple_possible_x-drivers:
  xserver-xorg/config/monitor/use_sync_ranges:
  xserver-xorg/config/inputdevice/mouse/port: /dev/input/mice
  xserver-xorg/config/doublequote_in_string_error:
  xserver-xorg/config/monitor/screen-size: 17 inches (430 mm)
  shared/default-x-server: xserver-xorg
  xserver-xorg/autodetect_monitor: true
  xserver-xorg/config/inputdevice/mouse/protocol: ImPS/2
  shared/no_known_x-server:
  xserver-xorg/config/display/default_depth: 24
  xserver-

Bug#365332: hmmmm

[Stephen Gran]

Attached is a diff of the exported symbols between versions 0.9.4-5.1
and 0.9.5-3.  this should really have had a soname bump, I think,
judging by the amount of changes.   I got the diff with the ugly
construct:
diff -u <(objdump -T 
libdvdread-0.9.4/debian/libdvdread3/usr/lib/libdvdread.so.3.0.0 |grep .text | 
awk '{ print $7 }'|sort) <(objdump -T 
libdvdread-0.9.5/debian/libdvdread3/usr/lib/libdvdread.so.3.1.0 |grep .text | 
awk '{ print $7 }'|sort)

after fixing up the build so that it exports UDFFindFile again.

So, as to why your patch didn't work: you're patching Makefile.am, but
not B-D'ing on an automake, so Makefile{,.in} don't get rebuilt to
reflect the changes.  Changing the dpatch to patch Makefile.in (ugly,
hackish, fragile) does the right thing, but is probably not the best way
to go.  If a buildd has automake installed, it will probably break it,
since dpatch is run before the autofoo would rebuild Makefile.in.

What do you want to do here?  Change the soname, revert the upstream
export changes, something else?  I assume that UDFFindFile was supposed
to be a private symbol all along, and dvdbackup was stupid for using it.
I can try to fix that in dvdbackup, but since the changes are fairly big
in libdvdread, I feel like something should declare the incompatibility
there as well.

Thanks,
-- 
 --
|  Stephen Gran  | I must have a prodigious quantity of|
|  [EMAIL PROTECTED] | mind; it takes me as much as a week |
|  http://www.lobefin.net/~steve | sometimes to make it up.   -- Mark  |
|| Twain, "The Innocents Abroad"   |
 --
--- /proc/self/fd/632006-04-29 13:45:04.210095892 +0100
+++ /proc/self/fd/622006-04-29 13:45:04.233092316 +0100
@@ -1,10 +1,13 @@
 
+cmdPrint_CMD
+cmdPrint_mnemonic
 DVDClose
 DVDCloseFile
 DVDDiscID
 DVDFileSeek
 DVDFileSize
-dvdinput_setup
+DVDFinish
+DVDInit
 DVDISOVolumeInfo
 DVDOpen
 DVDOpenFile
@@ -12,8 +15,7 @@
 DVDReadBytes
 DVDUDFCacheLevel
 DVDUDFVolumeInfo
-FreeUDFCache
-GetUDFCacheHandle
+DVDVersion
 ifoClose
 ifoFree_C_ADT
 ifoFree_FP_PGC
@@ -57,19 +59,8 @@
 ifoRead_VTS_ATRT
 ifoRead_VTS_PTT_SRPT
 ifoRead_VTS_TMAPT
-md5_buffer
-md5_finish_ctx
-md5_init_ctx
-md5_process_block
-md5_process_bytes
-md5_read_ctx
-md5_stream
 navPrint_DSI
 navPrint_PCI
 navRead_DSI
 navRead_PCI
-SetUDFCacheHandle
 UDFFindFile
-UDFGetVolumeIdentifier
-UDFGetVolumeSetIdentifier
-UDFReadBlocksRaw

Bug#364830: gnome-control-center: gnome-settings-daemon makes the X server segfault

[Daniel Stone]

On Wed, Apr 26, 2006 at 09:47:28AM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le mercredi 26 avril 2006 à 00:22 +0100, Sam Morris a écrit :
> > When I try to log in to Gnome, the X server segfaults (leaving my
> > console in a very bad state, I have to shell in from another machine
> > to fix it).
> > 
> > Attached is the X server's log file. Noticing that it dies while
> > setting up the keymap, I logged in with just an xterm and ran
> > gnome-settings-daemon, and the server died again.
> > 
> > This happens since the upgrade of libxklavier10 to version 2.2-3.
> > The output of "gconftool -R /desktop/gnome/peripherals/keyboard".
> > is also attached.
> 
> There may be a bug in libxklavier (and *sigh* this wouldn't be the first
> one), but a X server crashing is nevertheless a symptom of a bug in the
> X server.
> 
> Thanks for your report, I'm reassigning it.

Eep.

Could you please attach the output of:
xkbcomp -xkb :0 -
setxkbmap -layout dvorak,gb -model pc105 -option compose:rwin -print | xkbcomp 
-xkb - -
setxkbmap -layout gb -model pc105 -option compose:rwin,altwin:super_win | 
xkbcomp -xkb - -

Also, whether or not either of the following commands take the server down:
setxkbmap -layout dvorak,gb -model pc105 -option compose:rwin
setxkbmap -layout gb -model pc105 -option compose:rwin,altwin:super_win

Cheers,
Daniel


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#364554: mgapdesk: FTBFS: xf86Parser.h: No such file or directory

[Daniel Stone]

On Mon, Apr 24, 2006 at 10:52:41AM +0200, Matej Vela wrote:
> mgapdesk fails to build because it can't find xf86Parser.h.  It used to
> be in xlibs-static-dev, but doesn't seem to be in any of the Xorg 7.0
> packages.
> 
> [...]
> > make[3]: Entering directory 
> > `/home/mvela/deb/mgapdesk/mgapdesk-1.00.7beta/src'
> > gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I/usr/include/gtk-1.2 
> > -I/usr/include/glib-1.2 -I/usr/lib/glib/include -I/usr/X11R6/include-g 
> > -O2 -Wall -c callbacks.c
> > callbacks.c:31:24: error: xf86Parser.h: No such file or directory
> [...]

Correct, we're not shipping libxf86config anymore.  I assume mgapdesk
uses it to generate its own custom config files?


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#363445: libgtk2.0-dev: Should depend on version of libx11-dev that provides x11.pc

[Sebastien Bacher]

Le mercredi 19 avril 2006 à 15:01 +1000, Peter Moulder a écrit :

> I'd guess that an appropriate versioned Depends would be
> libx11-dev (>= 2:1.0.0).

libx11 should update its shlib rather, so libgtk2.0-0 will Depends on a
new libx11 and -dev which is in sync with lib will be correct too

Bug#365126: HELP!! Re: Bug#365126: wmrack - FTBFS: error: WMRack needs X Windows!!!

[Andreas Metzler]

On 2006-04-29 Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 29, 2006 at 08:55:16AM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> > AC_PATH_X searches[1] for [Xt],[X11/Intrinsic.h],[XtMalloc (0)] by
> > default, so this shouldn't have worked[2], as you do not build-depend on
> > libxt-dev. Try purging libxt-dev and rebuild after
> > dpkg-source -x.

> Er, no, that's AC_PATH_XTRA.  AC_PATH_X searches for
> [X11],[X11/Xlib.h],[XrmInitialize ()].
[...]

Only in Debian (yet) and only since since autoconf 2.59a-4 (#327655).

cu and- more detail in my last mil in the original thread on dx -reas

-- 
The 'Galactic Cleaning' policy undertaken by Emperor Zhark is a personal
vision of the emperor's, and its inclusion in this work does not constitute
tacit approval by the author or the publisher for any such projects,
howsoever undertaken.(c) Jasper Ffforde


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#365332: undefined symbol: UDFFindFile

[Stephen Gran]

On Sat, Apr 29, 2006 at 01:48:30PM +0200, Daniel Baumann said:
> Stephen Gran wrote:
> > This version still doesn't export the symbol for some reason.  Dan, can 
> > I be of assistance here in any way?  Let me know if you need me to do
> > some whacking on libdvdread to make it export the symbol again.
> 
> If you could provide a patch, I would be glad to add it. I fear that I
> will not be able to do it before next week.

OK, I'll try to look at it this weekend.  Just to be clear, UDFFindFile
should be an exported public symbol, so it should presumably also be in
the public headers as well, right?  I'll see if I cna't fix both issues
at the same time.

Take care,
-- 
 --
|  Stephen Gran  | Coming together is a beginning; |
|  [EMAIL PROTECTED] | keeping together is progress;   working |
|  http://www.lobefin.net/~steve | together is success.|
 --


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#365126: HELP!! Re: Bug#365126: wmrack - FTBFS: error: WMRack needs X Windows!!!

[Daniel Stone]

On Sat, Apr 29, 2006 at 08:55:16AM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> AC_PATH_X searches[1] for [Xt],[X11/Intrinsic.h],[XtMalloc (0)] by
> default, so this shouldn't have worked[2], as you do not build-depend on
> libxt-dev. Try purging libxt-dev and rebuild after
> dpkg-source -x.

Er, no, that's AC_PATH_XTRA.  AC_PATH_X searches for
[X11],[X11/Xlib.h],[XrmInitialize ()].

Unfortunately a lot of people use AC_PATH_XTRA when they only need
AC_PATH_X, but this is not one of those cases, AFAICT.

Cheers,
Daniel


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#365102: synfigstudio: Segmentation fault

[Kurt Roeckx]

Hi,

I get a simular error message when starting it, but it ends like
this for me:
synfig(29704): info: dock_book_list.size()=1
synfig(29704): info: dock_book_list.size()=2
synfig(29704): info: dock_book_list.size()=3
synfig(29704): warning: Caught exception when attempting to load settings.


However, I can also make it crash (abort).  If I select to the
file->dialogs->Canvas History  menu, I get:
glibmm-ERROR **:
unhandled exception (type std::exception) in signal handler:
what: St9bad_alloc

aborting...
Aborted (core dumped)


Core was generated by `synfigstudio'.
Program terminated with signal 6, Aborted.
Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libsynfigapp.so.0...Reading symbols
from /usr/lib/debug/usr/lib/libsynfigapp.so.0.0.0...done.
done.
Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libsynfigapp.so.0
Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libsynfig.so.0...done.
Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libsynfig.so.0
Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libIlmImf.so.2...done.
[...]
Reading symbols from
/usr/lib/synfig/modules/libmod_yuv420p.so.0...done.
Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/synfig/modules/libmod_yuv420p.so.0
#0  0x2e60dde0 in raise () from /lib/libc.so.6
#1  0x2e60f290 in abort () from /lib/libc.so.6
#2  0x2dfe430f in g_logv () from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#3  0x2dfe4393 in g_log () from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#4  0x2c789168 in Glib::exception_handlers_invoke ()
   from /usr/lib/libglibmm-2.4.so.1
#5  0x2c78e44a in Glib::SignalProxyNormal::slot0_void_callback ()
   from /usr/lib/libglibmm-2.4.so.1
#6  0x2db73910 in g_closure_invoke () from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#7  0x2db82e8f in g_signal_stop_emission ()
   from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#8  0x2db83fcc in g_signal_emit_valist ()
   from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#9  0x2db84383 in g_signal_emit () from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#10 0x2c40ed4a in gtk_widget_activate ()
   from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#11 0x2c33f488 in gtk_menu_shell_activate_item ()
   from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#12 0x2c33f7ba in gtk_menu_shell_activate_item ()
   from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#13 0x2c330410 in _gtk_marshal_BOOLEAN__BOXED ()
   from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#14 0x2db73910 in g_closure_invoke () from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#15 0x2db82c9d in g_signal_stop_emission ()
   from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#16 0x2db83d0c in g_signal_emit_valist ()
   from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#17 0x2db84383 in g_signal_emit () from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#18 0x2c40ef15 in gtk_widget_activate ()
   from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#19 0x2c32e81b in gtk_propagate_event ()
   from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#20 0x2c32ec97 in gtk_main_do_event ()
   from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#21 0x2c9f42ac in _gdk_events_queue ()
   from /usr/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0
#22 0x2dfdbadd in g_main_context_dispatch ()
   from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#23 0x2dfdeda5 in g_main_context_check ()
   from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#24 0x2dfdf06a in g_main_loop_run () from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#25 0x2c32e082 in gtk_main () from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#26 0x00587098 in main (argc=0, argv=0x7f91d6f8) at main.cpp:86


Also, when starting there is a window with "Navigator,
Info, ..." in the caption.  It seems there are 3 parts to
that form, but the second and the second seems to be 1 or
2 pixels high by default, so is completly covered by the
third, you just see some funny looking buttons
overlapping.  You can drag it to be bigger, and then
things look normal.


Kurt



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: Re: Bug#365332: undefined symbol: UDFFindFile

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> reopen 364972
Bug#364972: symbol lookup error: dvdbackup: undefined symbol: UDFFindFile
Bug reopened, originator not changed.

> reassign 365332 libdvdread3
Bug#365332: undefined symbol: UDFFindFile
Bug reassigned from package `dvdbackup' to `libdvdread3'.

> severity 365332 grave
Bug#365332: undefined symbol: UDFFindFile
Severity set to `grave'.

> merge 365332 364972
Bug#364972: symbol lookup error: dvdbackup: undefined symbol: UDFFindFile
Bug#365332: undefined symbol: UDFFindFile
Merged 364972 365332.

> kthxbye
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#357623: An update, please?

[Alexander Sack - Debian Bugmail]

On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 09:53:55PM -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> Hi there--
> 
> This bug (and its merged fellow) appears to be the only thing keeping
> Thunderbird 1.5 out of etch.  It has now been tagged pending since 19
> March, which is well over a month ago.  Can we expect a version with
> this simple dependency change to go into sid soon?  If there are other
> things delaying the update (e.g. other serious/grave bugs which you
> feel need fixing before the next upload), could you please file them
> with the bts, so that it's clear what the package is really waiting
> on?
> 

Waitin' on 1.5.0.2-1 which is in queue new and which fixes about
20 security issues.

I will wait another day to see if ftpmaster let it in or upload
a package without those changes that need ftpmaster interaction.

Sorry for the delay.


 - Alexander

 p.s. please take care that the bug is listed as To: or CC: when 
  replying to this mail (e.g. /reply-all/). 
-- 
 GPG messages preferred.   |  .''`.  ** Debian GNU/Linux **
 Alexander Sack| : :' :  The  universal
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]   | `. `'  Operating System
 http://www.asoftsite.org  |   `-http://www.debian.org/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#365335: mozilla-firefox-adblock: does not install

[Norbert Tretkowski]

Package: mozilla-firefox-adblock
Severity: grave

Setting up mozilla-firefox-adblock (0.5.2.039-4) ...
/var/lib/dpkg/info/mozilla-firefox-adblock.postinst: line 8: 
update-mozilla-firefox-chrome: command not found
dpkg: error processing mozilla-firefox-adblock (--configure):
 subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 127
Errors were encountered while processing:
 mozilla-firefox-adblock
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#362451: marked as done (gtk+2.0: FTBFS: Needs update to Build-Depends)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 29 Apr 2006 12:03:26 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#362451: gtk+2.0: FTBFS: Needs update to Build-Depends
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: gtk+2.0
Version: 2.8.16-1
Severity: serious

I was trying to rebuild the gnome libraries locally to get rid of the
references to /usr/lib/libXcursor.la, but got stuck at gtk+2.0 because it's
now impossible to satisfy the Build-Depends.  From my pbuilder build log:

...
Installing the build-deps
 -> Attempting to parse the build-deps : pbuilder-satisfydepends,v 1.24 
2006/03/31 00:14:31 dancer Exp $
 -> Considering  debhelper (>> 4.0.0)
   -> Trying debhelper
 -> Considering  gettext
   -> Trying gettext
 -> Considering  pkg-config
   -> Trying pkg-config
 -> Considering  libglib2.0-dev (>= 2.8.5)
   -> Trying libglib2.0-dev
 -> Considering  libpango1.0-dev (>= 1.10.0-2)
   -> Trying libpango1.0-dev
 -> Considering  libatk1.0-dev (>= 1.6.1-2)
   -> Trying libatk1.0-dev
 -> Considering  xlibs-static-pic | xlibs-pic (>= 4.2.1-6)
   -> Trying xlibs-static-pic
   -> Cannot install xlibs-static-pic; apt errors follow:
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
or been moved out of Incoming.
The following information may help to resolve the situation:

The following packages have unmet dependencies:
  xlibs-static-pic: Depends: xlibs-static-dev (= 6.9.0.dfsg.1-6) but it is not 
going to be installed
E: Broken packages
   -> Trying xlibs-pic
   -> Cannot install xlibs-pic; apt errors follow:
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
or been moved out of Incoming.
The following information may help to resolve the situation:

The following packages have unmet dependencies:
  xlibs-pic: Depends: xlibs-static-pic but it is not going to be installed
E: Broken packages
E: Could not satisfy build-dependency.
E: pbuilder-satisfydepends failed.

It seems there is no longer any xlibs-static-pic or xlibs-pic in the XOrg 7.0
packages.
-- 
Daniel Schepler

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Package: gtk+2.0
Version: 2.8.17-1

On Thu, Apr 13, 2006 at 17:16:48 +0200, Sebastien Bacher wrote:
> That's fixed on my local package of 2.8.17, I'm waiting to have the new
> pango package  accepted from NEW to update GTK

Sebastien has since uploaded it and these updates to the build dependencies
are included:
  * debian/control.in:
- clear the Build-Depends on xlibs-static-pic | xlibs-pic, not required
- updated the Build-Depends on libpango1.0-dev so it build with 
  the xorg transitioned version

Ray
-- 
Friends don't send friends HTML email
Declan McCullagh on the "features" of Javascript in email,
http://www.lwn.net/2001/0208/a/htmlprivacy.php3
--- End Message ---

Bug#364972: not fixed yet

[Harald Dunkel]

I get the same problem using

% dpkg -l libdvdread3 dvdbackup
Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold
| Status=Not/Installed/Config-files/Unpacked/Failed-config/Half-installed
|/ Err?=(none)/Hold/Reinst-required/X=both-problems (Status,Err: uppercase=bad)
||/ Name   VersionDescription
+++-==-==-
ii  dvdbackup  0.1.1-5tool to rip DVD's from the command line
ii  libdvdread30.9.5-3library for reading DVDs

Regards

Harri



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#362594: marked as done (xlibs-pic: Can't be installed (depends on xlibs-static-dev (= 6.9.0.dfsg.1-6)))

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 29 Apr 2006 12:03:26 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#362451: gtk+2.0: FTBFS: Needs update to Build-Depends
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: xlibs-pic
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable

Hello,

$ sudo apt-get install xlibs-pic
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
or been moved out of Incoming.

Since you only requested a single operation it is extremely likely that
the package is simply not installable and a bug report against
that package should be filed.
The following information may help to resolve the situation:

The following packages have unmet dependencies:
  xlibs-pic: Depends: xlibs-static-pic but it is not going to be installed
E: Broken packages


$ sudo apt-get install xlibs-static-pic
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
or been moved out of Incoming.

Since you only requested a single operation it is extremely likely that
the package is simply not installable and a bug report against
that package should be filed.
The following information may help to resolve the situation:

The following packages have unmet dependencies:
  xlibs-static-pic: Depends: xlibs-static-dev (= 6.9.0.dfsg.1-6) but 1:7.0.10 
is to be installed
E: Broken packages


$ apt-cache policy xlibs-pic xlibs-static-pic xlibs-static-dev
xlibs-pic:
  Installed: (none)
  Candidate: 6.9.0.dfsg.1-6
  Version table:
 6.9.0.dfsg.1-6 0
500 http://ftp.fr.debian.org unstable/main Packages
xlibs-static-pic:
  Installed: (none)
  Candidate: 6.9.0.dfsg.1-6
  Version table:
 6.9.0.dfsg.1-6 0
500 http://ftp.fr.debian.org unstable/main Packages
xlibs-static-dev:
  Installed: 1:7.0.10
  Candidate: 1:7.0.10
  Version table:
 *** 1:7.0.10 0
500 http://ftp.fr.debian.org unstable/main Packages
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status

libgtk2.0-0 has a build-depends on xlibs-static-pic | xlibs-pic (>= 4.2.1-6)

If the packages xlibs-pic and xlibs-static-pic are now removed with xorg
7.0 feel free to reassign the bug to libgtk2.0-0 and remove the
xlibs-pic and xlibs-static-pic packages from unstable.

Thanks,

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (90, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.16-1-686
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=UTF-8)

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Package: gtk+2.0
Version: 2.8.17-1

On Thu, Apr 13, 2006 at 17:16:48 +0200, Sebastien Bacher wrote:
> That's fixed on my local package of 2.8.17, I'm waiting to have the new
> pango package  accepted from NEW to update GTK

Sebastien has since uploaded it and these updates to the build dependencies
are included:
  * debian/control.in:
- clear the Build-Depends on xlibs-static-pic | xlibs-pic, not required
- updated the Build-Depends on libpango1.0-dev so it build with 
  the xorg transitioned version

Ray
-- 
Friends don't send friends HTML email
Declan McCullagh on the "features" of Javascript in email,
http://www.lwn.net/2001/0208/a/htmlprivacy.php3
--- End Message ---

Bug#365288: xfaces: please update for X11R7

[Hakan Ardo]

Hi,
thanx for the patch, I'll apply it later today.

On 4/29/06, Aaron M. Ucko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Package: xfaces
Version: 3.3-25
Severity: grave
Tags: patch
Justification: renders package unusable

Greetings.

As you may have heard, Debian is in the midst of a transition to
X11R7.  One aspect of this is moving out of the /usr/X11R6 hierarchy;
recent versions of x11-common enforce such a move by conflicting with
existing versions of packages such as xfaces that install into
/usr/X11R6/bin, which is now a symlink to /usr/bin.

Because xfaces uses imake, rebuilding against a recent version of
xutils-dev will get it most of the way there, but it's not quite
sufficient; the attached patch addresses the remaining issues.

Could you please apply it, or authorize an NMU?

Thanks!

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable'), (300, 'unstable'), (300, 
'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.16.9
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

Versions of packages xfaces depends on:
ii  libaudio21.7-8   The Network Audio System (NAS). (s
ii  libc62.3.6-7 GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii  libcompfaceg11:1.5.2-3   Compress/decompress images for mai
ii  libice6  1:1.0.0-3   X11 Inter-Client Exchange library
ii  libsm6   1:1.0.0-4   X11 Session Management library
ii  libx11-6 2:1.0.0-6   X11 client-side library
ii  libxaw7  1:1.0.1-5   X11 Athena Widget library
ii  libxext6 1:1.0.0-4   X11 miscellaneous extension librar
ii  libxmu6  1:1.0.1-3   X11 miscellaneous utility library
ii  libxpm4  1:3.5.4.2-3 X11 pixmap library
ii  libxt6   1:1.0.0-4   X11 toolkit intrinsics library

xfaces recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information






--
Håkan Ardö

Bug#365126: Thanks! (was Re: HELP!! Re: Bug#365126: wmrack...)

[Chris Waters]

On Sat, Apr 29, 2006 at 09:30:51AM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:

> I know now why it has worked previously: You are build-depending on
> xutils, which used to contain xmkmf. [...] In modular xmkmf lives in
> xutils-dev. 

AHA!  That would definitely explain it.  Thanks very much.  I will
make that change (as well as the other change suggested by Aaron Ucko)
ASAP.  Thanks again.

-- 
Chris Waters   |  Pneumonoultra-osis is too long
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   |  microscopicsilico-to fit into a single
or [EMAIL PROTECTED] |  volcaniconi-  standalone haiku


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: problem solved

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> package wmrack
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: wmrack

> tag 365126 - help
Bug#365126: wmrack - FTBFS: error: WMRack needs X Windows!!!
Tags were: help
Tags removed: help

> tag 365126 + pending
Bug#365126: wmrack - FTBFS: error: WMRack needs X Windows!!!
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#365177: marked as done (open-cobol: FTBFS: __gmp_rand has been dropped from -lgmp)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 29 Apr 2006 00:47:08 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#365177: fixed in open-cobol 0.32-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: open-cobol
Version: 0.32-1
Severity: serious

From my pbuilder build log:

...
checking gmp.h usability... yes
checking gmp.h presence... yes
checking for gmp.h... yes
checking for __gmp_rand in -lgmp... no
configure: error: GMP 3 or later is required
make: *** [config.status] Error 1
-- 
Daniel Schepler

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: open-cobol
Source-Version: 0.32-2

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
open-cobol, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

libcob1-dev_0.32-2_i386.deb
  to pool/main/o/open-cobol/libcob1-dev_0.32-2_i386.deb
libcob1_0.32-2_i386.deb
  to pool/main/o/open-cobol/libcob1_0.32-2_i386.deb
open-cobol_0.32-2.diff.gz
  to pool/main/o/open-cobol/open-cobol_0.32-2.diff.gz
open-cobol_0.32-2.dsc
  to pool/main/o/open-cobol/open-cobol_0.32-2.dsc
open-cobol_0.32-2_i386.deb
  to pool/main/o/open-cobol/open-cobol_0.32-2_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Bart Martens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated open-cobol package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 19:11:34 +0200
Source: open-cobol
Binary: libcob1-dev libcob1 open-cobol
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.32-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Bart Martens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Bart Martens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 libcob1- COBOL compiler - runtime library
 libcob1-dev - COBOL compiler - development files
 open-cobol - COBOL compiler
Closes: 365177 365217
Changes: 
 open-cobol (0.32-2) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Changed my e-mail address.
   * debian/control: Added dependencies.  Closes: #365217.  Reported by Andre
 Luiz Rodrigues Ferreira (si0ux) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, thank you.
   * configure.ac, debian/control: Newer version of libgmp.  Closes: #365177.
Files: 
 10e8e080804d05ffe379eacd3992fb5b 671 devel optional open-cobol_0.32-2.dsc
 a20c34118d8fdff9f0edcff5f1757d87 6810 devel optional open-cobol_0.32-2.diff.gz
 3976bdd35ce05bdf267abbc1595964f8 175492 devel optional 
open-cobol_0.32-2_i386.deb
 aaefaa880cbdf4019700bf1569d58f30 38908 libs optional libcob1_0.32-2_i386.deb
 a5d1a754ad353e4f5761b4b0ed454140 50046 libdevel optional 
libcob1-dev_0.32-2_i386.deb

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFEUxcQipBneRiAKDwRAhzZAKCXu6H2d2fv5uRTb3gVxZGmX0vX4QCePhNG
57txiQiCgjzwXjhk8+W6yPo=
=tRen
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--- End Message ---

Bug#365217: marked as done (open-cobol: dependences for install)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 29 Apr 2006 00:47:08 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#365217: fixed in open-cobol 0.32-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: open-cobol
Version: 0.32-1
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks unrelated software


Hi,

I'm installing the open-cobol (in unstable tree) and was necessary to install 
the following
packages for obtain to compile my programs:

libltdl3-dev
libgmp3-dev

Thanks!

Andre Luiz Rodrigues Ferreira (si0ux)
Orlandia - SP - Brazil

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-386
Locale: LANG=pt_BR, LC_CTYPE=pt_BR (charmap=ISO-8859-1)

Versions of packages open-cobol depends on:
ii  libc6 2.3.6-7GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii  libcob1   0.32-1 COBOL compiler - runtime library
ii  libcob1-dev   0.32-1 COBOL compiler - development files
ii  libdb4.3  4.3.29-5   Berkeley v4.3 Database Libraries [
ii  libgmp3c2 4.2.dfsg-1 Multiprecision arithmetic library
ii  libltdl3  1.5.22-4   A system independent dlopen wrappe
ii  libncurses5   5.5-1.1Shared libraries for terminal hand

-- no debconf information

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: open-cobol
Source-Version: 0.32-2

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
open-cobol, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

libcob1-dev_0.32-2_i386.deb
  to pool/main/o/open-cobol/libcob1-dev_0.32-2_i386.deb
libcob1_0.32-2_i386.deb
  to pool/main/o/open-cobol/libcob1_0.32-2_i386.deb
open-cobol_0.32-2.diff.gz
  to pool/main/o/open-cobol/open-cobol_0.32-2.diff.gz
open-cobol_0.32-2.dsc
  to pool/main/o/open-cobol/open-cobol_0.32-2.dsc
open-cobol_0.32-2_i386.deb
  to pool/main/o/open-cobol/open-cobol_0.32-2_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Bart Martens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated open-cobol package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 19:11:34 +0200
Source: open-cobol
Binary: libcob1-dev libcob1 open-cobol
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.32-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Bart Martens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Bart Martens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 libcob1- COBOL compiler - runtime library
 libcob1-dev - COBOL compiler - development files
 open-cobol - COBOL compiler
Closes: 365177 365217
Changes: 
 open-cobol (0.32-2) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Changed my e-mail address.
   * debian/control: Added dependencies.  Closes: #365217.  Reported by Andre
 Luiz Rodrigues Ferreira (si0ux) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, thank you.
   * configure.ac, debian/control: Newer version of libgmp.  Closes: #365177.
Files: 
 10e8e080804d05ffe379eacd3992fb5b 671 devel optional open-cobol_0.32-2.dsc
 a20c34118d8fdff9f0edcff5f1757d87 6810 devel optional open-cobol_0.32-2.diff.gz
 3976bdd35ce05bdf267abbc1595964f8 175492 devel optional 
open-cobol_0.32-2_i386.deb
 aaefaa880cbdf4019700bf1569d58f30 38908 libs optional libcob1_0.32-2_i386.deb
 a5d1a754ad353e4f5761b4b0ed454140 50046 libdevel optional 
libcob1-dev_0.32-2_i386.deb

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFEUxcQipBneRiAKDwRAhzZAKCXu6H2d2fv5uRTb3gVxZGmX0vX4QCePhNG
57txiQiCgjzwXjhk8+W6yPo=
=tRen
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--- End Message ---

Processed: your mail

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tags 365312 + security
Bug#365312: CVE-2006-1990/CVE-2006-1991: Security vulnerabilities in php
There were no tags set.
Tags added: security

> tags 365311 + security
Bug#365311: CVE-2006-1990/CVE-2006-1991: Security vulnerabilities in php
There were no tags set.
Tags added: security

>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]