Bug#413506: strange error from make_disc_trees.pl
Hello, On Tue, 06 Mar 2007, Steffen Joeris wrote: Hi mates The original bug seems to be fixed, thanks a lot. However now I get another error, I attached the build log for that one. The problem seems to be in add_packages this time with the call of -gzclose(); You have many strange messages in your build. Please provide the CONF.sh that you're using because it looks like it's borked: patching file tasks/exclude-etch ./build.sh: line 1: ARCHES: command not found This is the first error that should not happen. And you have many reference of bad shell script in the log: ./build.sh: line 1: ARCHES: command not found Using CONF from /home/builder/src/debian-edu/src/build/CD-administrator/CONF-etch-test.sh /bin/sh: line 1: [: too many arguments Cleaning the build directory /bin/sh: line 1: [: too many arguments Please fix your CONF.sh / CONF-etch-test.sh and try again. That file changed a lot with debian-cd 3.0. Use of uninitialized value in string eq at /home/builder/src/debian-edu/src/build/CD-administrator/debian-cd/tools/make_disc_trees.pl line 371. This means that your CONF.sh doesn't provide DISKTYPE. Use of uninitialized value in scalar assignment at /home/builder/src/debian-edu/src/build/CD-administrator/debian-cd/tools/make_disc_trees.pl line 392. Use of uninitialized value in scalar assignment at /home/builder/src/debian-edu/src/build/CD-administrator/debian-cd/tools/make_disc_trees.pl line 393. Use of uninitialized value in subtraction (-) at /home/builder/src/debian-edu/src/build/CD-administrator/debian-cd/tools/make_disc_trees.pl line 397. Use of uninitialized value in concatenation (.) or string at /home/builder/src/debian-edu/src/build/CD-administrator/debian-cd/tools/make_disc_trees.pl line 108. Use of uninitialized value in string eq at /home/builder/src/debian-edu/src/build/CD-administrator/debian-cd/tools/make_disc_trees.pl line 371, INLIST line 1. This is consequences from the previous error. cp: cannot stat `cdrom/2.6/einitrd.gz': No such file or directory Strange... is that debian-edu specific ? Please investigate a bit yourself as what I see here is not a debian-cd problem but a problem of your configuration. Cheers, -- Raphaël Hertzog Premier livre français sur Debian GNU/Linux : http://www.ouaza.com/livre/admin-debian/
Bug#411078: [Mats Bengtsson] Re: bug 411078 is forwarded to http://www.amsn-project.net/forums/viewtopic.php?t=2890
---BeginMessage--- Frank Küster wrote: Dear Mats, the amsn project (http://sourceforge.net/projects/amsn/) is currently checking the license status of all the files they use. Mohammed Adnène Trojette [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Upstream answered: Thanks for noticing, we just added those license files in our SVN version, for the paths listed above and some others you missed. But the quicktimetcl3.1/movie.tcl refers to license.terms but I couldn't find the associated license.terms file, it doesn't even exist in the official zip file provided by http://quicktimetcl.sourceforge.net/ The problematic file movie.tcl seems to be written by you, can you give us a hint? The problem is that the file, e.g. http://quicktimetcl.cvs.sourceforge.net/quicktimetcl/quicktimetcl/movie.tcl?view=markup contains the lines: # Copyright (c) 2004 Mats Bengtsson # # See the file license.terms for information on usage and redistribution # of this file, and for a DISCLAIMER OF ALL WARRANTIES. Removed these lines. However, there is not license.terms in the quicktimetcl project. README says that the complete thing is under the BSD license, which would be fine. But it would be nice if you could indicate more clearly that this also covers movie.tcl. I guess it's best if you include a list of all files (the FSF people call it MANIFEST) and update that list whenever a file is added. A clarified the README file with the line: LICENSE: All software within the quicktimetcl repository is distributed under the BSD license. Hope this is OK for you. In cvs now. /Mats ---End Message--- -- Dr. Frank Küster Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
Bug#411078: bug 411078 is forwarded to http://www.amsn-project.net/forums/viewtopic.php?t=2890
Hi Mats, (I guess it is okay to forward your answer to our BTS archive?) thanks for the quick reply and action! Mats Bengtsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: # Copyright (c) 2004 Mats Bengtsson # # See the file license.terms for information on usage and redistribution # of this file, and for a DISCLAIMER OF ALL WARRANTIES. Removed these lines. Fine. However, there is not license.terms in the quicktimetcl project. README says that the complete thing is under the BSD license, which would be fine. But it would be nice if you could indicate more clearly that this also covers movie.tcl. I guess it's best if you include a list of all files (the FSF people call it MANIFEST) and update that list whenever a file is added. A clarified the README file with the line: LICENSE:All software within the quicktimetcl repository is distributed under the BSD license. Hope this is OK for you. In cvs now. It is okay, but I think you should remember to distribute a copy of the BSD license, with ORGANIZATION replaced by QuickTimeTcl project (or similar) with the next release. Regards, Frank P.S. Mohammed, do you need a sponsor? -- Dr. Frank Küster Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
Bug#413629: 'git http-push' had a few buffer overruns.
Package: git-core Version: 1.5.0.2-1 Severity: grave Tags: security The relevant commits are, as far as I know: commit eecc8367f4eaafc8449fc08c4e33f3f8ac474469 Author: Eygene Ryabinkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu Mar 1 19:09:12 2007 +0300 Another memory overrun in http-push.c Use of strlcpy() are wrong, as the source buffer at these locations may not be NUL-terminated. commit 2c46759db757eb742590e8547cb0c63e8bdb1da1 Author: Eygene Ryabinkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed Feb 28 12:12:02 2007 -0800 http-push.c::lock_remote(): validate all remote refs. Starting from offset 11 might have been good back when it was only used for updating refs/heads/*, but it is used to update info/refs and refs/tags/* as well. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#410403: You're welcome.
You're very welcome. I'm glad to help out. And no apologies necessary. Two week response time? That's speedy. I've patched bugs last year that still aren't incorporated. And thanks for responding. It makes me feel welcome. -Brandon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#411479: The patch doesn't work for me
I am getting the same error. I applied the patch to /usr/lib/iceweasel/iceweasel and it has no effect. Try upgrading to the latest version of iceweasel instead. I'm using 2.0.0.2+dfsg-2, is this not the latest? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#411479: The patch doesn't work for me
On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 01:30:52AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am getting the same error. I applied the patch to /usr/lib/iceweasel/iceweasel and it has no effect. Try upgrading to the latest version of iceweasel instead. I'm using 2.0.0.2+dfsg-2, is this not the latest? If you're trying iceweasel -remote command line, it's likely to fail because of #413162 and friends. On the other hand, you don't need to use the -remote command line, as it is automagically dealt with by iceweasel, so just run iceweasel url, be it already running or not. If you really need -remote, apply the patch from http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=413162;msg=37 It will be applied in 2.0.0.2+dfsg-3 or 2.0.0.3+dfsg-1 (depending on how fast upstream releases 2.0.0.3) Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#406337: marked as done (evolution-common: The user manual contains a copyright notice which renders it non-free)
Your message dated Tue, 06 Mar 2007 10:32:05 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#406337: fixed in evolution 2.6.3-5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ---BeginMessage--- Package: evolution-common Version: 2.6.3-3 Severity: serious This bug might be tagged etch-ignore if there is confirmation from upstream that the licence is GFDL and that this will be fixed. The user manual /usr/share/gnome/help/evolution-2.6/C/evolution-2.6.xml contains the following copyright notice: , | Copyright copy; 2005-2006 Novell, Inc. All rights reserved. No part | of this publication may be reproduced, photocopied, stored on a | retrieval system, or transmitted without the express written consent | of the publisher. ` I see that COPYING-DOCS in the tarball contains GFDL (and it is present in the help directory in SVN trunk) so this might be some kind of mistake. Since this notice totally contradicts with the spirit of GNU FDL it is not clear what the actual license is. Also, debian/copyright says that the documentation is under GFDL and cannot be included in Debian which is kind of false (at least, it is included). -- System Information: Debian Release: 4.0 APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-3-686 Locale: LANG=bg_BG.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=bg_BG.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Source: evolution Source-Version: 2.6.3-5 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of evolution, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: evolution-common_2.6.3-5_all.deb to pool/main/e/evolution/evolution-common_2.6.3-5_all.deb evolution-dbg_2.6.3-5_i386.deb to pool/main/e/evolution/evolution-dbg_2.6.3-5_i386.deb evolution-dev_2.6.3-5_i386.deb to pool/main/e/evolution/evolution-dev_2.6.3-5_i386.deb evolution-plugins-experimental_2.6.3-5_i386.deb to pool/main/e/evolution/evolution-plugins-experimental_2.6.3-5_i386.deb evolution-plugins_2.6.3-5_i386.deb to pool/main/e/evolution/evolution-plugins_2.6.3-5_i386.deb evolution_2.6.3-5.diff.gz to pool/main/e/evolution/evolution_2.6.3-5.diff.gz evolution_2.6.3-5.dsc to pool/main/e/evolution/evolution_2.6.3-5.dsc evolution_2.6.3-5_i386.deb to pool/main/e/evolution/evolution_2.6.3-5_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Oystein Gisnas [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated evolution package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2007 23:02:55 +0100 Source: evolution Binary: evolution-plugins-experimental evolution-plugins evolution-dev evolution-common evolution-dbg evolution Architecture: source i386 all Version: 2.6.3-5 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian Evolution Maintainers pkg-evolution-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org Changed-By: Oystein Gisnas [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: evolution - groupware suite with mail client and organizer evolution-common - architecture independent files for Evolution evolution-dbg - debugging symbols for Evolution evolution-dev - development library files for Evolution evolution-plugins - standard plugins for Evolution evolution-plugins-experimental - experimental plugins for Evolution Closes: 406337 Changes: evolution (2.6.3-5) unstable; urgency=low . * 40_gfdl-user-guide.patch: Correct user guide copyright notice. See http://bugzilla.gnome.org/395566. (closes: #406337) Files: 0baea94a3a5c7526197d2b72017a01a3 1967 gnome optional evolution_2.6.3-5.dsc 1bce2afaee2237e0b27669c4ce07f6f6 36211 gnome optional evolution_2.6.3-5.diff.gz a0067d1df445efb2625d301266aac4bb 10102676 gnome optional evolution-common_2.6.3-5_all.deb 86619acf5ef6676cef7aa619262f6a54 2403826 gnome optional evolution_2.6.3-5_i386.deb 21aee6a3d7f36e5a6734ca68a9f093f4 213428 devel optional evolution-dev_2.6.3-5_i386.deb d30f574798d066957aec17a4f84ae5f2 6137510 gnome extra evolution-dbg_2.6.3-5_i386.deb e03e9d7ace34e34c0fa63a385fc275f0 112982 gnome optional
Bug#413184: [powerpci/mac] partman-md appears to not write back the raid flag to partitions.
I've found some time to confirm for myself that this patch fixes the problem of not being able to set the RAID flag in partman. I've tweaked the patch slighly to tighten it up; the final version is attached. I'll upload this NMU to incoming shortly. Thanks, -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ diff -Nru /tmp/YHHh2qwAgl/parted-1.7.1/debian/changelog /tmp/J973m06W3f/parted-1.7.1/debian/changelog --- /tmp/YHHh2qwAgl/parted-1.7.1/debian/changelog 2007-01-22 02:44:06.0 -0800 +++ /tmp/J973m06W3f/parted-1.7.1/debian/changelog 2007-03-06 01:06:02.0 -0800 @@ -1,3 +1,14 @@ +parted (1.7.1-5.1) unstable; urgency=high + + * Non-maintainer upload. + * High-urgency upload for RC bugfix. + * Patch to ensure changes to RAID/LVM flags on mac partitions are +saved and reloaded correctly, so that debian-installer can use RAID for +install on mac powerpcs; thanks to David Härdeman for the patch. +Closes: #413184. + + -- Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue, 6 Mar 2007 00:51:09 -0800 + parted (1.7.1-5) unstable; urgency=low * ntfs-align.dpatch: Disabled. We found regressions on it. diff -Nru /tmp/YHHh2qwAgl/parted-1.7.1/libparted/labels/mac.c /tmp/J973m06W3f/parted-1.7.1/libparted/labels/mac.c --- /tmp/YHHh2qwAgl/parted-1.7.1/libparted/labels/mac.c 2006-05-25 10:28:55.0 -0700 +++ /tmp/J973m06W3f/parted-1.7.1/libparted/labels/mac.c 2007-03-06 01:06:16.0 -0800 @@ -1260,19 +1260,19 @@ return 1; case PED_PARTITION_LVM: - mac_data-is_lvm = state; if (state) strcpy (mac_data-system_name, Linux_LVM); - else + else if (mac_data-is_lvm) mac_partition_set_system (part, part-fs_type); + mac_data-is_lvm = state; return 1; case PED_PARTITION_RAID: - mac_data-is_raid = state; if (state) strcpy (mac_data-system_name, Linux_RAID); - else + else if (mac_data-is_raid) mac_partition_set_system (part, part-fs_type); + mac_data-is_raid = state; return 1; default:
Bug#413184: marked as done ([powerpci/mac] partman-md appears to not write back the raid flag to partitions.)
Your message dated Tue, 06 Mar 2007 11:02:04 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#413184: fixed in parted 1.7.1-5.1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ---BeginMessage--- Package: partman-md Version: 30 Severity: important Well, there seems to be a problem in how partman/partman-md writes back the RAID flag on mac partition tables. When using the 1.7.1-3 parted, it should work, but somehow partman doesn't actually writes the RAID flag back to the partition, and thus partman-md doesn't find the raid partitions. When going in the console, and invoking parted by hand on the partitions, the flags are indeed not there, even though the partitions where marked as raid partitions. Setting them by hand in parted, and then continuing the raid setup stuff, will make it find the partitions without problem. So this bug is indeed in partman and/or partman-md. I had a look at partman-md, but wasn't able to find anything obvious or sligthly less so. Friendly, Sven Luther -- System Information: Debian Release: 4.0 APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: powerpc (ppc) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-2-powerpc Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Source: parted Source-Version: 1.7.1-5.1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of parted, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: libparted1.7-1_1.7.1-5.1_i386.deb to pool/main/p/parted/libparted1.7-1_1.7.1-5.1_i386.deb libparted1.7-dbg_1.7.1-5.1_i386.deb to pool/main/p/parted/libparted1.7-dbg_1.7.1-5.1_i386.deb libparted1.7-dev_1.7.1-5.1_i386.deb to pool/main/p/parted/libparted1.7-dev_1.7.1-5.1_i386.deb libparted1.7-i18n_1.7.1-5.1_all.deb to pool/main/p/parted/libparted1.7-i18n_1.7.1-5.1_all.deb libparted1.7-udeb_1.7.1-5.1_i386.udeb to pool/main/p/parted/libparted1.7-udeb_1.7.1-5.1_i386.udeb parted-doc_1.7.1-5.1_all.deb to pool/main/p/parted/parted-doc_1.7.1-5.1_all.deb parted-udeb_1.7.1-5.1_i386.udeb to pool/main/p/parted/parted-udeb_1.7.1-5.1_i386.udeb parted_1.7.1-5.1.dsc to pool/main/p/parted/parted_1.7.1-5.1.dsc parted_1.7.1-5.1.tar.gz to pool/main/p/parted/parted_1.7.1-5.1.tar.gz parted_1.7.1-5.1_i386.deb to pool/main/p/parted/parted_1.7.1-5.1_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated parted package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2007 00:51:09 -0800 Source: parted Binary: libparted1.7-1 libparted1.7-dbg libparted1.7-dev libparted1.7-i18n parted-udeb parted-doc parted libparted1.7-udeb Architecture: source i386 all Version: 1.7.1-5.1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: high Maintainer: Parted Maintainer Team [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: libparted1.7-1 - The GNU Parted disk partitioning shared library libparted1.7-dbg - The GNU Parted disk partitioning library debug development files libparted1.7-dev - The GNU Parted disk partitioning library development files libparted1.7-i18n - The GNU Parted disk partitioning library i18n support libparted1.7-udeb - The GNU Parted disk partitioning shared library (udeb) parted - The GNU Parted disk partition resizing program parted-doc - The GNU Parted disk partition resizing program documentation parted-udeb - The GNU Parted disk partition resizing program (udeb) Closes: 413184 Changes: parted (1.7.1-5.1) unstable; urgency=high . * Non-maintainer upload. * High-urgency upload for RC bugfix. * Patch to ensure changes to RAID/LVM flags on mac partitions are saved and reloaded correctly, so that debian-installer can use RAID for install on mac powerpcs; thanks to David Härdeman for the patch. Closes: #413184. Files: b76eddee525c9c17adb442eb7a06ac91 982 admin optional parted_1.7.1-5.1.dsc 9afbc1ee04fee0a23d425f40117edb43 1687481 admin optional parted_1.7.1-5.1.tar.gz fbccb3279e6a8bba327adf869f90b865 56268 admin
Bug#413184: [Parted-maintainers] Bug#413184: [powerpci/mac] partman-md appears to not write back the raid flag to partitions.
On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 02:55:11AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: I've found some time to confirm for myself that this patch fixes the problem of not being able to set the RAID flag in partman. I've tweaked the patch slighly to tighten it up; the final version is attached. I'll upload this NMU to incoming shortly. nice catch. I am still curious that this issue if present in libparted was seen from partman and not from parted itself. No wonder i didn't find anything in the partman code himself. Friendly, Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: downgrade priority as initial bug is fixed
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 413506 normal Bug#413506: strange error from make_disc_trees.pl Severity set to `normal' from `serious' thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Setting back to serious
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # we want debian-cd 3.0.1 in etch because it fixes many problems like this # one severity 413506 serious Bug#413506: strange error from make_disc_trees.pl Severity set to `serious' from `normal' thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#413399: marked as done (ibwebadmin: purging the package fails (ucf unavailable))
Your message dated Tue, 06 Mar 2007 12:17:03 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#413399: fixed in ibwebadmin 0.98-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ---BeginMessage--- Package: ibwebadmin Version: 0.98-3 Severity: serious Hello Debian QA Group, There is an error when attempting to purge ibwebadmin: Removing ibwebadmin ... Purging configuration files for ibwebadmin ... /var/lib/dpkg/info/ibwebadmin.postrm: line 15: ucf: command not found dpkg: error processing ibwebadmin (--purge): The postrm script cannot rely on ucf to be available when purging. See Policy 7.2: Note, however, that the `postrm' cannot rely on any non-essential packages to be present during the `purge' phase. Cheers, -- Bill. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Imagine a large blue swirl here. ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Source: ibwebadmin Source-Version: 0.98-4 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of ibwebadmin, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: ibwebadmin_0.98-4.diff.gz to pool/main/i/ibwebadmin/ibwebadmin_0.98-4.diff.gz ibwebadmin_0.98-4.dsc to pool/main/i/ibwebadmin/ibwebadmin_0.98-4.dsc ibwebadmin_0.98-4_all.deb to pool/main/i/ibwebadmin/ibwebadmin_0.98-4_all.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Michael Ablassmeier [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated ibwebadmin package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2007 13:02:00 +0100 Source: ibwebadmin Binary: ibwebadmin Architecture: source all Version: 0.98-4 Distribution: unstable Urgency: high Maintainer: Debian QA Group [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Michael Ablassmeier [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: ibwebadmin - Web-based administration for the Firebird and Interbase database Closes: 413399 Changes: ibwebadmin (0.98-4) unstable; urgency=high . * QA upload. * Rebuild with yada = 0.40 in order to generate postrm with conditional call to ucf (Closes: #413399) Files: af12df86300847f9424e1ae5a21a3542 613 web extra ibwebadmin_0.98-4.dsc 9efb981371923f34dbdf0c7d6ee5a527 8113 web extra ibwebadmin_0.98-4.diff.gz b6cca34faa4ca97de6d204397adb0c2f 468988 web extra ibwebadmin_0.98-4_all.deb -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFF7VphEFV7g4B8rCURAoEhAKCBgWB2O1WeRsoEvR3/16tOrUH/mACgiirr x0LU8nBXcQPk/WxDi7B6fxE= =7ZOZ -END PGP SIGNATURE- ---End Message---
Bug#413398: ident2: diff for NMU version 1.05-1.1
tags 413398 + patch thanks Hi, Attached is the diff for my ident2 1.05-1.1 NMU. bye, - michael diff -u ident2-1.05/debian/changelog ident2-1.05/debian/changelog --- ident2-1.05/debian/changelog +++ ident2-1.05/debian/changelog @@ -1,3 +1,11 @@ +ident2 (1.05-1.1) unstable; urgency=high + + * Non-maintainer upload. + * Conditional call for update-inetd in postrm, thanks andreas +Closes: #413398 + + -- Michael Ablassmeier [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue, 6 Mar 2007 13:21:03 +0100 + ident2 (1.05-1) unstable; urgency=low * New upstream release. (closes: #262939) diff -u ident2-1.05/debian/ident2.postrm ident2-1.05/debian/ident2.postrm --- ident2-1.05/debian/ident2.postrm +++ ident2-1.05/debian/ident2.postrm @@ -5,9 +5,13 @@ set -e if [ $1 = purge ]; then -update-inetd --remove /usr/sbin/ident2 +if which update-inetd /dev/null 21 ; then +update-inetd --remove /usr/sbin/ident2 +fi else -update-inetd --pattern ident2 --disable ident +if which update-inetd /dev/null 21 ; then +update-inetd --pattern ident2 --disable ident +fi fi #DEBHELPER#
Processed: ident2: diff for NMU version 1.05-1.1
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 413398 + patch Bug#413398: ident2: purging the package fails (update-inetd unavailable) Tags were: patch Tags added: patch thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#413398: marked as done (ident2: purging the package fails (update-inetd unavailable))
Your message dated Tue, 06 Mar 2007 12:32:03 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#413398: fixed in ident2 1.05-1.1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ---BeginMessage--- Package: ident2 Version: 1.05-1 Severity: serious Hello Chuan-kai, There is an error when attempting to purge ident2: Removing ident2 ... Purging configuration files for ident2 ... /var/lib/dpkg/info/ident2.postrm: line 8: update-inetd: command not found dpkg: error processing ident2 (--purge): subprocess post-removal script returned error exit status 127 The postrm script cannot rely on update-inetd to be available when purging. See Policy 7.2: Note, however, that the `postrm' cannot rely on any non-essential packages to be present during the `purge' phase. Cheers, -- Bill. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Imagine a large blue swirl here. ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Source: ident2 Source-Version: 1.05-1.1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of ident2, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: ident2_1.05-1.1.diff.gz to pool/main/i/ident2/ident2_1.05-1.1.diff.gz ident2_1.05-1.1.dsc to pool/main/i/ident2/ident2_1.05-1.1.dsc ident2_1.05-1.1_amd64.deb to pool/main/i/ident2/ident2_1.05-1.1_amd64.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Michael Ablassmeier [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated ident2 package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2007 13:21:03 +0100 Source: ident2 Binary: ident2 Architecture: source amd64 Version: 1.05-1.1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: high Maintainer: Chuan-kai Lin [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Michael Ablassmeier [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: ident2 - An advanced ident daemon Closes: 413398 Changes: ident2 (1.05-1.1) unstable; urgency=high . * Non-maintainer upload. * Conditional call for update-inetd in postrm, thanks andreas Closes: #413398 Files: 545d322c9758d8b13f6c79100bc4af5f 558 net extra ident2_1.05-1.1.dsc a669dff6c841a79cd153751f84e3b31b 4574 net extra ident2_1.05-1.1.diff.gz 476de363f2531b8950601d30da56ae23 18294 net extra ident2_1.05-1.1_amd64.deb -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFF7V0rEFV7g4B8rCURAjJqAKC00onFXiO23xx7Qd5KKvhHe/erHQCg2bRM nsiQ3o48gGMirimjyiUrU9U= =XYPP -END PGP SIGNATURE- ---End Message---
Bug#398091: php[45]-xcache for PHP 5.2
Hello Risko, since I needed to have a working xcache for etch I updated you package to upstream version 1.2.0. You can find my work here: http://people.debian.org/~malattia/packages/xcache/ (It was built in a clean etch chroot) Something that the changelog doesn't list is the fact that I added an xcache.ini to be installed in /etc/php[45]/conf.d, it installs with the cache actually disabled but loading the extension. Thanks -- mattia :wq! signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#413254: xfe: diff for NMU version 0.88-3.2
tags 413254 + patch thanks Hi, Attached is the diff for my xfe 0.88-3.2 NMU. bye, - michael diff -u xfe-0.88/debian/changelog xfe-0.88/debian/changelog --- xfe-0.88/debian/changelog +++ xfe-0.88/debian/changelog @@ -1,3 +1,11 @@ +xfe (0.88-3.2) unstable; urgency=high + + * Non-maintainer upload. + * Add patch for conditional ucf call to postrm, thanks Andreas +Closes: #413254 + + -- Michael Ablassmeier [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue, 6 Mar 2007 13:29:59 +0100 + xfe (0.88-3.1) unstable; urgency=low * Non-maintainer upload. diff -u xfe-0.88/debian/postrm xfe-0.88/debian/postrm --- xfe-0.88/debian/postrm +++ xfe-0.88/debian/postrm @@ -21,7 +21,9 @@ case $1 in purge) CONF=/etc/foxrc/XFileExplorer/Xfe - ucf --purge $CONF + if which ucf /dev/null 21 ; then + ucf --purge $CONF + fi rm -f $CONF ;;
Processed: xfe: diff for NMU version 0.88-3.2
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 413254 + patch Bug#413254: xfe: purging the package fails (ucf unavailable) Tags were: patch Tags added: patch thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#392504: kbedic: creating files in /usr/local violates FHS
found 392504 4.0-9 thanks Hi, Packages are not allowed to create files in /usr/local, even through their maintainer scripts. I suggest using /var/cache/bedic instead. * Change the kbedic/download template in such a way that the adminstator be made aware that: - the dictionaries are going to be downloaded in /usr/local; - it is administrators responsibility to maintain the files in /usr/local; - the download option is privided only for convenience; the script will be acting on behalf of the administrator. Before asking, the default answer of this question is always reset to declining the download. Thanks to Sam Hocevar, closes: #392504. I came across this issue when reviewing a translation of these Debconf templates, and I do not believe that this accurately resolves the bug. Violating policy is not solved by warning the user that this package violates policy, but by resolving the violation. I see no reason for this package to be installing anything into /usr/local, even if this is at the user's own risk. For example /var/cache could be a good solution, or even under /usr/share. Check out packages like flashplugin-nonfree or msttcorefonts, which are downloaders but still confirm to the FHS just fine. thanks, Thijs signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Processed: Re: kbedic: creating files in /usr/local violates FHS
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: found 392504 4.0-9 Bug#392504: kbedic: creating files in /usr/local violates FHS Bug marked as found in version 4.0-9. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#413254: marked as done (xfe: purging the package fails (ucf unavailable))
Your message dated Tue, 06 Mar 2007 12:47:03 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#413254: fixed in xfe 0.88-3.2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ---BeginMessage--- Package: xfe Version: 0.88-3.1 Severity: serious Hello Jose, There is an error when attempting to purge xfe: Removing xfe ... Purging configuration files for xfe ... /var/lib/dpkg/info/xfe.postrm: line 24: ucf: command not found dpkg: error processing xfe (--purge): subprocess post-removal script returned error exit status 127 The postrm script cannot rely on ucf to be available when purging. See Policy 7.2: Note, however, that the `postrm' cannot rely on any non-essential packages to be present during the `purge' phase. Cheers, -- Bill. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Imagine a large blue swirl here. ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Source: xfe Source-Version: 0.88-3.2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of xfe, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: xfe_0.88-3.2.diff.gz to pool/main/x/xfe/xfe_0.88-3.2.diff.gz xfe_0.88-3.2.dsc to pool/main/x/xfe/xfe_0.88-3.2.dsc xfe_0.88-3.2_amd64.deb to pool/main/x/xfe/xfe_0.88-3.2_amd64.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Michael Ablassmeier [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated xfe package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2007 13:29:59 +0100 Source: xfe Binary: xfe Architecture: source amd64 Version: 0.88-3.2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: high Maintainer: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Michael Ablassmeier [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: xfe- lightweight file manager for X11 Closes: 413254 Changes: xfe (0.88-3.2) unstable; urgency=high . * Non-maintainer upload. * Add patch for conditional ucf call to postrm, thanks Andreas Closes: #413254 Files: 86cc99f00eb0da0be0013f5208e7fcc3 683 x11 optional xfe_0.88-3.2.dsc a6b1375ff6881e00fc8a83cb9e571399 32539 x11 optional xfe_0.88-3.2.diff.gz 17d0e223f48bd692a29798f552a909d1 881834 x11 optional xfe_0.88-3.2_amd64.deb -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFF7WA0EFV7g4B8rCURAuWYAJ9t5gkFi0BCec7RZYecwqm/VxAgRgCg0fXN dVEF7853014Gf7jqc5T/TDY= =bCr+ -END PGP SIGNATURE- ---End Message---
Bug#404876: NMU for libvisual breaking gnome on non-altivec powerpc machines.
On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 05:57:13PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
Hi Sjoerd,
On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 12:02:47PM +0100, Sjoerd Simons wrote:
I've just uploaded an NMU of libvisual to the DELAYED/2-day queue on gluck,
which works around the issue of the altivec detection causing gstreamer to
segv on some powerpc machines without altivec. Which in turn breaks the
gnome
desktop on these machines. The workaround simply completely disables the
altivec detection.
Where is the diff for this NMU, please?
Oh, forgot to attach it, sorry. See attachment
With this workaround #404876 and #407153 can either be closed or downgraded
retitled to please enable/fix altivec detection.
Have you not closed these bugs in the changelog of your NMU?
No, as Loic mentioned in his mail we decided that this bug should be downgraded
instead of being closed as it's just a work-around instead of a real fix.
If you prefer, i can ofcourse upload a new version which does clone the bug and
we can do some magic to open a new one with the same info, stating what
actually should be fixed :)
Sjoerd
PS: Please keep me CC'd in replies
--
Expansion means complexity; and complexity decay.
diff -u libvisual-0.4.0/debian/changelog libvisual-0.4.0/debian/changelog
--- libvisual-0.4.0/debian/changelog
+++ libvisual-0.4.0/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+libvisual (0.4.0-1.1) unstable; urgency=high
+
+ * NMU
+ * Disable altivec detection code, it breaks gstreamer on machines without
+altivec.
+
+ -- Sjoerd Simons [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun, 14 Jan 2007 14:26:45 +0100
+
libvisual (0.4.0-1) unstable; urgency=low
* New upstream release
only in patch2:
unchanged:
--- libvisual-0.4.0.orig/libvisual/lv_cpu.c
+++ libvisual-0.4.0/libvisual/lv_cpu.c
@@ -143,6 +143,7 @@
static void check_os_altivec_support( void )
{
+ return;
#if defined(VISUAL_OS_DARWIN)
int sels[2] = {CTL_HW, HW_VECTORUNIT};
int has_vu = 0;
Bug#404876: NMU for libvisual breaking gnome on non-altivec powerpc machines.
On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 12:24:46PM +0100, Sjoerd Simons wrote: If you prefer, i can ofcourse upload a new version which does clone the bug s/clone/close/ ^ and we can do some magic to open a new one with the same info, stating what actually should be fixed :) Sjoerd -- Do not seek death; death will find you. But seek the road which makes death a fulfillment. -- Dag Hammarskjold -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#413661: libblkid1: leaks memory like crazy
Package: libblkid1 Version: 1.39+1.40-WIP-2006.11.14+dfsg-1 Severity: grave Tags: patch (RMs: I'm unsure if this should be fixed for etch or not, given that I do not know of anything in etch that actually uses this library enough for it to leak. Feel free to downgrade or tag etch-ignore, of course.) nfs-kernel-server 1.0.12 has started using libblkid, and leaks absurd amounts of memory (in the order of several megabytes per minute). Tracing using Omega (which is not yet in Debian, but nevertheless really useful) tracked the leaks down to libblkid. I've attached a diff that fixes the issues for me, and allows me to run nfs-kernel-server with only minor leaks (which I'll take with nfs-utils upstream, as they are not libblkid1 related). -- System Information: Debian Release: 4.0 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.19 Locale: LANG=en_DK.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_DK.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages libblkid1 depends on: ii libc6 2.3.6.ds1-13 GNU C Library: Shared libraries ii libdevmapper1.022:1.02.12-1 The Linux Kernel Device Mapper use ii libselinux1 1.32-3 SELinux shared libraries ii libsepol1 1.14-3 Security Enhanced Linux policy lib libblkid1 recommends no packages. -- debconf-show failed Only in e2fsprogs-patched/debian: BUILD-BF Only in e2fsprogs-patched/debian: BUILD-STD Only in e2fsprogs-patched/debian: comerr-dev Only in e2fsprogs-patched/debian: comerr-dev.postinst.debhelper Only in e2fsprogs-patched/debian: comerr-dev.prerm.debhelper Only in e2fsprogs-patched/debian: e2fsck-static Only in e2fsprogs-patched/debian: e2fslibs Only in e2fsprogs-patched/debian: e2fslibs-dev Only in e2fsprogs-patched/debian: e2fslibs-dev.postinst.debhelper Only in e2fsprogs-patched/debian: e2fslibs-dev.prerm.debhelper Only in e2fsprogs-patched/debian: e2fslibs.postinst.debhelper Only in e2fsprogs-patched/debian: e2fslibs.postrm.debhelper Only in e2fsprogs-patched/debian: e2fslibs.substvars Only in e2fsprogs-patched/debian: e2fsprogs Only in e2fsprogs-patched/debian: e2fsprogs-udeb Only in e2fsprogs-patched/debian: e2fsprogs-udeb.substvars Only in e2fsprogs-patched/debian: e2fsprogs.substvars Only in e2fsprogs-patched/debian: files Only in e2fsprogs-patched/debian: files~ Only in e2fsprogs-patched/debian: libblkid-dev Only in e2fsprogs-patched/debian: libblkid1 Only in e2fsprogs-patched/debian: libblkid1-udeb Only in e2fsprogs-patched/debian: libblkid1-udeb.substvars Only in e2fsprogs-patched/debian: libblkid1.postinst.debhelper Only in e2fsprogs-patched/debian: libblkid1.postrm.debhelper Only in e2fsprogs-patched/debian: libblkid1.substvars Only in e2fsprogs-patched/debian: libcomerr2 Only in e2fsprogs-patched/debian: libcomerr2.postinst.debhelper Only in e2fsprogs-patched/debian: libcomerr2.postrm.debhelper Only in e2fsprogs-patched/debian: libcomerr2.substvars Only in e2fsprogs-patched/debian: libss2 Only in e2fsprogs-patched/debian: libss2.postinst.debhelper Only in e2fsprogs-patched/debian: libss2.postrm.debhelper Only in e2fsprogs-patched/debian: libss2.substvars Only in e2fsprogs-patched/debian: libuuid1 Only in e2fsprogs-patched/debian: libuuid1-udeb Only in e2fsprogs-patched/debian: libuuid1-udeb.substvars Only in e2fsprogs-patched/debian: libuuid1.postinst.debhelper Only in e2fsprogs-patched/debian: libuuid1.postrm.debhelper Only in e2fsprogs-patched/debian: libuuid1.substvars diff -ur e2fsprogs-1.39+1.40-WIP-2006.11.14+dfsg/debian/rules e2fsprogs-patched/debian/rules --- e2fsprogs-1.39+1.40-WIP-2006.11.14+dfsg/debian/rules2006-11-13 02:19:40.0 +0100 +++ e2fsprogs-patched/debian/rules 2007-03-06 13:41:53.0 +0100 @@ -70,7 +70,7 @@ INSTALL_PROGRAM = $(INSTALL) -p -o root -g root -m 0755 ifeq (,$(findstring noopt,$(DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS))) -CCOPTS += -O2 +CCOPTS += -O0 endif ifeq (,$(findstring nostrip,$(DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS))) INSTALL_PROGRAM += -s @@ -356,9 +356,9 @@ -pe2fslibs -puuid-dev -pe2fsck-static ifneq ($(ismips),) - dh_strip -Xlib64ext2fs-nopic.a + #dh_strip -Xlib64ext2fs-nopic.a else - dh_strip + #dh_strip endif dh_compress Only in e2fsprogs-patched/debian: ss-dev Only in e2fsprogs-patched/debian: stampdir Only in e2fsprogs-patched/debian: tmp Only in e2fsprogs-patched/debian: uuid-dev diff -ur e2fsprogs-1.39+1.40-WIP-2006.11.14+dfsg/lib/blkid/devname.c e2fsprogs-patched/lib/blkid/devname.c --- e2fsprogs-1.39+1.40-WIP-2006.11.14+dfsg/lib/blkid/devname.c 2006-09-12 07:25:40.0 +0200 +++ e2fsprogs-patched/lib/blkid/devname.c 2007-03-06 14:00:03.0 +0100 @@ -305,6 +305,7 @@ probe_one(cache, device, dev, BLKID_PRI_DM, only_if_new); try_next: + free(device); next = names-next; } while (next); diff -ur
Processed: Re: Bug#405704: imapproxy: fails to start - breaks install/upgrade
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 405704 grave Bug#405704: imapproxy: fails to start - breaks install/upgrade Severity set to `grave' from `normal' tags 405704 patch Bug#405704: imapproxy: fails to start - breaks install/upgrade There were no tags set. Tags added: patch thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: bug #386469 not fixed in etch
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reopen 386469 Bug#386469: openbsd-inetd: action start failed Bug reopened, originator not changed. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#386469: openbsd-inetd: action start failed
Package: openbsd-inetd Version: 0.20050402-5 Followup-For: Bug #386469 This bug is not fixed, I just got it on two different machines during an upgrade: Setting up openbsd-inetd (0.20050402-5) ... Installing new version of config file /etc/init.d/openbsd-inetd ... Starting internet superserver: inetdinvoke-rc.d: initscript openbsd-inetd, action start failed. dpkg: error processing openbsd-inetd (--configure): subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1 Looks like the deamon is either not stopped properly or started twice. The error seems to come from: start-stop-daemon --start --quiet --pidfile /var/run/inetd.pid --exec /usr/sbin/inetd --; echo $? 1 If I stop inetd manually after this error and restart the upgrade it succeeds. -- System Information: Debian Release: 4.0 APT prefers testing APT policy: (750, 'testing'), (650, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-4-k7 Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Versions of packages openbsd-inetd depends on: ii libc6 2.3.6.ds1-13 GNU C Library: Shared libraries ii libwrap07.6.dbs-13 Wietse Venema's TCP wrappers libra ii lsb-base3.1-23 Linux Standard Base 3.1 init scrip ii tcpd7.6.dbs-13 Wietse Venema's TCP wrapper utilit ii update-inetd4.27-0.4 inetd.conf updater openbsd-inetd recommends no packages. -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: severity of 413429 is grave
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.27 severity 413429 grave Bug#413429: mountd in nfs-kernel-server still broken Severity set to `grave' from `normal' End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: block 413429 with 413661
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.27 block 413429 with 413661 Bug#413429: mountd in nfs-kernel-server still broken Was not blocked by any bugs. Blocking bugs of 413429 added: 413661 End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#413674: fails to attach/find old screens after update
Package: screen Version: 4.0.3-0.3 Severity: grave Justification: causes non-serious data loss -- System Information: Debian Release: 4.0 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-3-686 Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages screen depends on: ii base-passwd 3.5.11 Debian base system master password ii debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.5.12 Debian configuration management sy ii libc6 2.3.6.ds1-13 GNU C Library: Shared libraries ii libncursesw55.5-5Shared libraries for terminal hand ii libpam0g0.79-4 Pluggable Authentication Modules l ii passwd 1:4.0.18.1-7 change and administer password and screen recommends no packages. -- debconf information: screen/old_upgrade_prompt: false So, I tripped over this when I arrived at work, connected to my server through SSH and tried to get my screen up and met a There is no screen to be attached. sign... Here's some information of things I tried, and various info that might be usefull. I've also tried and find other people with the same problem, I've found atleast two where one came into #screen on freenode, just like me and supplied this pastebin. http://pastebin.ca/raw/383517 What I think is the reason is the upgrade from 4.0.3-0.2 to 4.0.3-0.3 that I did yesterday. In my mind, what I suspect will fail it is start a screen (4.0.3-0.2) upgrade to screen 4.0.3-0.3 detach attach (fails) [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ dpkg --status screen Package: screen Status: install ok installed Priority: optional Section: misc Installed-Size: 896 Maintainer: Adam Lazur [EMAIL PROTECTED] Architecture: i386 Version: 4.0.3-0.3 Depends: libc6 (= 2.3.6-6), libncursesw5 (= 5.4-5), libpam0g (= 0.76), base-passwd (= 2.0.3.4), passwd (= 1:4.0.3-10) Pre-Depends: debconf (= 0.5) | debconf-2.0 Conflicts: suidmanager ( 0.52) Conffiles: /etc/screenrc 0f03c578a71c3af3ed4d92a5557e7a5a /etc/init.d/screen-cleanup c0b20a5c34424b377ed33473d6422fb5 Description: a terminal multiplexor with VT100/ANSI terminal emulation screen is a terminal multiplexor that runs several separate screens on a single physical character-based terminal. Each virtual terminal emulates a DEC VT100 plus several ANSI X3.64 and ISO 2022 functions. Screen sessions can be detached and resumed later on a different terminal. . Screen also supports a whole slew of other features. Some of these are: configurable input and output translation, serial port support, configurable logging, multi-user support, and utf8 charset support. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ dpkg -l screen Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold | Status=Not/Installed/Config-files/Unpacked/Failed-config/Half-installed |/ Err?=(none)/Hold/Reinst-required/X=both-problems (Status,Err: uppercase=bad) ||/ Name Version Description +++-=-=-== ii screen4.0.3-0.3 a terminal multiplexor with VT100/ANSI terminal emulation [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ screen -rx -d There is no screen to be attached. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ps -ef | grep rydekull | grep SCREEN rydekull 3045 1 0 Jan09 ?00:08:15 SCREEN rydekull 6360 6302 0 10:18 pts/300:00:00 grep SCREEN [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ls -l /var/run/screen/S-rydekull/ total 0 prw--- 1 rydekull rydekull 0 2007-03-06 09:21 3045.pts-0.munin [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ screen -r 3045.pts-0.munin There is no screen to be resumed matching 3045.pts-0.munin. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ screen -r 3045 There is no screen to be resumed matching 3045. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ screen -d 3045.pts-0.munin There is no screen to be detached matching 3045.pts-0.munin. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ screen -ls No Sockets found in /var/run/screen/S-rydekull. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ls -l /var/run/ | grep screen drwxrwxr-x 14 rootutmp 4096 2006-08-27 16:29 screen [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ps -ef | grep rydekull rydekull 3045 1 0 Jan09 ?00:08:15 SCREEN rydekull 30964 3045 0 Feb13 pts/000:00:00 /bin/bash rydekull 9395 30964 1 Mar01 pts/001:22:46 centericq [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ kill -9 30964 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ps -ef | grep 30964 rydekull 7898 7615 0 10:48 pts/27 00:00:00 grep 30964 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ screen -rx -d There is no screen to be attached. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ Perhaps it's just me, but I think this should work quite alright? Anyone got a clue? found something funny aswell [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ strace -f -o strace-screen.txt screen -rx -d Directory '/var/run/screen' must have mode 777. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ su - Password: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# chmod 777 /var/run/screen/ [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# logout [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ strace
Bug#413208: libblkid1: leaks memory like crazy
On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 02:08:43PM +0100, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
Only in e2fsprogs-patched/debian: BUILD-BF
Only in e2fsprogs-patched/debian: BUILD-STD
Only in e2fsprogs-patched/debian: comerr-dev
Only in e2fsprogs-patched/debian: comerr-dev.postinst.debhelper
Feh, I attached the wrong patch. Disregarding the debian/rules hunks etc.,
the correct patch becomes:
diff -ur e2fsprogs-1.39+1.40-WIP-2006.11.14+dfsg/lib/blkid/devname.c
e2fsprogs-patched/lib/blkid/devname.c
--- e2fsprogs-1.39+1.40-WIP-2006.11.14+dfsg/lib/blkid/devname.c 2006-09-12
07:25:40.0 +0200
+++ e2fsprogs-patched/lib/blkid/devname.c 2007-03-06 14:00:03.0
+0100
@@ -305,6 +305,7 @@
probe_one(cache, device, dev, BLKID_PRI_DM, only_if_new);
try_next:
+ free(device);
next = names-next;
} while (next);
diff -ur e2fsprogs-1.39+1.40-WIP-2006.11.14+dfsg/lib/blkid/probe.c
e2fsprogs-patched/lib/blkid/probe.c
--- e2fsprogs-1.39+1.40-WIP-2006.11.14+dfsg/lib/blkid/probe.c 2006-09-18
03:12:28.0 +0200
+++ e2fsprogs-patched/lib/blkid/probe.c 2007-03-06 13:55:19.0 +0100
@@ -888,6 +888,10 @@
if (!dev-bid_type) {
if (probe.fd = 0) close(probe.fd);
blkid_free_dev(dev);
+ if (probe.sbbuf)
+ free(probe.sbbuf);
+ if (probe.buf)
+ free(probe.buf);
return NULL;
}
/* Steinar */
--
Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#413679: libquantlib0-dev: static library unusable
Package: libquantlib0-dev Version: 0.3.14-2 Severity: grave The static library of libquantlib0-dev is unusable, as the symlink /usr/lib/libQuantLib.a is broken. It points to: /build/buildd/quantlib-0.3.13/debian/libquantlib-0.3.13/usr/lib/libQuantLib-0.3.13.a -- System Information: Debian Release: 4.0 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-3-xen-amd64 Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages libquantlib0-dev depends on: ii libboost-test-dev 1.33.1-10components for writing and executi ii libboost-test1.33.1 1.33.1-10components for writing and executi ii libc6 2.3.6.ds1-13 GNU C Library: Shared libraries ii libc6-dev 2.3.6.ds1-13 GNU C Library: Development Librari ii libgcc1 1:4.1.1-21 GCC support library ii libquantlib-0.3.14 0.3.14-2 Quantitative Finance Library -- de ii libstdc++6 4.1.1-21 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 libquantlib0-dev recommends no packages. -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#413661: libblkid1: leaks memory like crazy
On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 02:08:43PM +0100, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
Only in e2fsprogs-patched/debian: BUILD-BF
Only in e2fsprogs-patched/debian: BUILD-STD
Only in e2fsprogs-patched/debian: comerr-dev
Only in e2fsprogs-patched/debian: comerr-dev.postinst.debhelper
Feh, I attached the wrong patch. Disregarding the debian/rules hunks etc.,
the correct patch becomes:
diff -ur e2fsprogs-1.39+1.40-WIP-2006.11.14+dfsg/lib/blkid/devname.c
e2fsprogs-patched/lib/blkid/devname.c
--- e2fsprogs-1.39+1.40-WIP-2006.11.14+dfsg/lib/blkid/devname.c 2006-09-12
07:25:40.0 +0200
+++ e2fsprogs-patched/lib/blkid/devname.c 2007-03-06 14:00:03.0
+0100
@@ -305,6 +305,7 @@
probe_one(cache, device, dev, BLKID_PRI_DM, only_if_new);
try_next:
+ free(device);
next = names-next;
} while (next);
diff -ur e2fsprogs-1.39+1.40-WIP-2006.11.14+dfsg/lib/blkid/probe.c
e2fsprogs-patched/lib/blkid/probe.c
--- e2fsprogs-1.39+1.40-WIP-2006.11.14+dfsg/lib/blkid/probe.c 2006-09-18
03:12:28.0 +0200
+++ e2fsprogs-patched/lib/blkid/probe.c 2007-03-06 13:55:19.0 +0100
@@ -888,6 +888,10 @@
if (!dev-bid_type) {
if (probe.fd = 0) close(probe.fd);
blkid_free_dev(dev);
+ if (probe.sbbuf)
+ free(probe.sbbuf);
+ if (probe.buf)
+ free(probe.buf);
return NULL;
}
/* Steinar */
--
Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#413534: odbc-postgresql broken on 64 bit
Sorry, no quoting for context, I seem not to have received the last email to the bug. No fixing SQLGetData will not fix the driver properly. The current version of the driver in debian is broken in all cases where a *SQLLEN is used as a index in the manner that SQLGetData uses it. Among many other things the 8.02.200 driver fixes this, although from some other references I have seen, the new version is significantly more than just 64 bit cleanliness fixes. As such, I fully understand why it can't be added into etch at this time. From what I can tell, an alternative is to use the PostgreSQL driver that is packaged in the unixodbc source. This driver seems to be 64-bit clean, even though it is not shipped in a debian binary package. This is an equally unlikely option to get a working odbc driver for postgresql into Etch though I guess. Even though it is a driver based on the psqlodbc upstream source, this particular version hasn't had any testing. -- Stephen Depooter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#413679: libquantlib0-dev: static library unusable
Salut Aurelien. On 6 March 2007 at 16:11, Aurelien Jarno wrote: | Package: libquantlib0-dev | Version: 0.3.14-2 | Severity: grave | ) | The static library of libquantlib0-dev is unusable, Aboslutely. At 29 mb it is pretty hard to work with :) | as the symlink /usr/lib/libQuantLib.a is broken. It points to: | /build/buildd/quantlib-0.3.13/debian/libquantlib-0.3.13/usr/lib/libQuantLib-0.3.13.a Hm, not here: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ /bin/ls -l /usr/lib/libQuantLib* -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4682172 Jul 31 2006 /usr/lib/libQuantLib-0.3.13.so -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 5681164 Nov 6 07:46 /usr/lib/libQuantLib-0.3.14.so -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 29211560 Feb 20 08:11 /usr/lib/libQuantLib-0.4.0.a -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 6248924 Feb 20 08:11 /usr/lib/libQuantLib-0.4.0.so lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 19 Feb 25 10:01 /usr/lib/libQuantLib.a - libQuantLib-0.4.0.a lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 20 Feb 25 10:01 /usr/lib/libQuantLib.so - libQuantLib-0.4.0.so -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 188560 Jul 31 2006 /usr/lib/libQuantLibFunctions-0.3.13.so -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 147124 Nov 6 07:46 /usr/lib/libQuantLibFunctions-0.3.14.so [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ (0.3.14 is outdated, but 0.4.0 is held hostage in the NEW queue). The stanza below reveals that you use amd64. So this could be a pbuilder (me, x86) versus sbuild (everything else) gotcha. Do you have an idea what it could be? I use -$(MAKE) prefix=$(debtmp)/usr install followed by some work with dh_movefiles to split things off into lib and dev packages, using the for .files usr/bin/quantlib-benchmark usr/bin/quantlib-config usr/bin/quantlib-test-suite usr/include/* usr/lib/libQuantLib.so usr/lib/lib*.a usr/share/aclocal/quantlib.m4 usr/share/man/man1/quantlib-benchmark.1 usr/share/man/man1/quantlib-config.1 usr/share/man/man1/quantlib-test-suite.1 usr/share/doc/libquantlib-0.4.0/examples/test-suite/ usr/share/doc/libquantlib-0.4.0/examples/quantlib.el and this for links usr/share/doc/libquantlib-0.4.0 usr/share/doc/libquantlib0-dev I don't see anyting immediately wrong. Any suggestion from your end? Dirk | | -- System Information: | Debian Release: 4.0 | APT prefers unstable | APT policy: (500, 'unstable') | Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) | Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash | Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-3-xen-amd64 | Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) | | Versions of packages libquantlib0-dev depends on: | ii libboost-test-dev 1.33.1-10components for writing and executi | ii libboost-test1.33.1 1.33.1-10components for writing and executi | ii libc6 2.3.6.ds1-13 GNU C Library: Shared libraries | ii libc6-dev 2.3.6.ds1-13 GNU C Library: Development Librari | ii libgcc1 1:4.1.1-21 GCC support library | ii libquantlib-0.3.14 0.3.14-2 Quantitative Finance Library -- de | ii libstdc++6 4.1.1-21 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 | | libquantlib0-dev recommends no packages. | | -- no debconf information | -- Hell, there are no rules here - we're trying to accomplish something. -- Thomas A. Edison -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Bug#413469: ion3: The package is outdated
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 413469 serious Bug#413469: ion3: The package is outdated Severity set to `serious' from `wishlist' clone 413469 -1 -2 Bug#413469: ion3: The package is outdated Bug 413469 cloned as bugs 413685-413686. reassign -1 ion3-scripts Bug#413685: ion3: The package is outdated Bug reassigned from package `ion3' to `ion3-scripts'. reassign -2 ion3-mod-ionflux Bug#413686: ion3: The package is outdated Bug reassigned from package `ion3' to `ion3-mod-ionflux'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#413687: guml: Doesn't startup with no config directory
Package: guml Version: 0.3-0.1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Just installed it for the first time [EMAIL PROTECTED]:[~] guml Traceback (most recent call last): File /usr/bin/X11/guml, line 143, in ? win = TerminalWindow() File /usr/bin/X11/guml, line 35, in __init__ self.configured_umls = uml.list() File /usr/share/guml/uml.py, line 40, in list for entry in os.listdir(%s/.guml % os.getenv(HOME)): OSError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: '/local/palfrey/.guml' -- System Information: Debian Release: 4.0 APT prefers stable APT policy: (990, 'stable'), (103, 'testing'), (102, 'unstable'), (99, 'experimental'), (97, 'feisty') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-4-686 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Versions of packages guml depends on: ii python-gtk2 2.10.3-2 Python bindings for the GTK+ widge ii python-support 0.6.1automated rebuilding support for p ii python-vte 1:0.14.2-1 Python bindings for the VTE widget ii user-mode-linux 2.6.18-1um-2 User-mode Linux (kernel) guml recommends no packages. -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#409018: nohwcap
retitle 409018 Too many accesses to /etc/ld.so.nohwcap severity 409018 normal tags 409018 moreinfo tags 409018 help reassign 409018 xserver-xorg thanks Hi Erich I am reassigning to the right package here, hopefully. I am happy to be corrected if this bug does not belong to xserver-xorg -- ·''`. If I can't dance to it, it's not my revolution : :' :-- Emma Goldman `. `' Proudly running Debian GNU/Linux (unstable) `- www.amayita.com www.malapecora.com www.chicasduras.com
Bug#413679: libquantlib0-dev: static library unusable
Dirk Eddelbuettel a écrit : Salut Aurelien. On 6 March 2007 at 16:11, Aurelien Jarno wrote: | Package: libquantlib0-dev | Version: 0.3.14-2 | Severity: grave | ) | The static library of libquantlib0-dev is unusable, Aboslutely. At 29 mb it is pretty hard to work with :) | as the symlink /usr/lib/libQuantLib.a is broken. It points to: | /build/buildd/quantlib-0.3.13/debian/libquantlib-0.3.13/usr/lib/libQuantLib-0.3.13.a Hm, not here: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ /bin/ls -l /usr/lib/libQuantLib* -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4682172 Jul 31 2006 /usr/lib/libQuantLib-0.3.13.so -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 5681164 Nov 6 07:46 /usr/lib/libQuantLib-0.3.14.so -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 29211560 Feb 20 08:11 /usr/lib/libQuantLib-0.4.0.a -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 6248924 Feb 20 08:11 /usr/lib/libQuantLib-0.4.0.so lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 19 Feb 25 10:01 /usr/lib/libQuantLib.a - libQuantLib-0.4.0.a lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 20 Feb 25 10:01 /usr/lib/libQuantLib.so - libQuantLib-0.4.0.so -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 188560 Jul 31 2006 /usr/lib/libQuantLibFunctions-0.3.13.so -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 147124 Nov 6 07:46 /usr/lib/libQuantLibFunctions-0.3.14.so [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ (0.3.14 is outdated, but 0.4.0 is held hostage in the NEW queue). Oops my fault. I have got the problem on a testing machine, but as it is not configured to send mail, I have reported a bug from an unstable machine. But the problem is real on testing. The stanza below reveals that you use amd64. So this could be a pbuilder (me, x86) versus sbuild (everything else) gotcha. Do you have an idea what it could be? Looking at the .deb files, it looks like the problem is not limited to amd64, but the problem seems to be present for all architectures. I will have a closer look to the debian/rules file at home this evening. Aurelien -- .''`. Aurelien Jarno | GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73 : :' : Debian developer | Electrical Engineer `. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] `-people.debian.org/~aurel32 | www.aurel32.net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#413698: aptitude: package does not ship any language files (LC_MESSAGES)
Package: aptitude Version: 0.4.4-2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable # apt-get --download-only install aptitude Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree... Done Suggested packages: tasksel Recommended packages: aptitude-doc-en aptitude-doc The following packages will be upgraded: aptitude 1 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 26 not upgraded. Need to get 0B/1498kB of archives. After unpacking 4190kB disk space will be freed. [...] # dpkg -c ~deb/aptitude_0.4.4-2_i386.deb | grep LC drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2007-03-05 08:05 ./usr/share/locale/ku/LC_MESSAGES/ drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2007-03-05 08:05 ./usr/share/locale/ru/LC_MESSAGES/ drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2007-03-05 08:05 ./usr/share/locale/ja/LC_MESSAGES/ drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2007-03-05 08:05 ./usr/share/locale/pl/LC_MESSAGES/ drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2007-03-05 08:05 ./usr/share/locale/tr/LC_MESSAGES/ drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2007-03-05 08:05 ./usr/share/locale/lt/LC_MESSAGES/ drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2007-03-05 08:05 ./usr/share/locale/sv/LC_MESSAGES/ drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2007-03-05 08:05 ./usr/share/locale/da/LC_MESSAGES/ drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2007-03-05 08:05 ./usr/share/locale/cs/LC_MESSAGES/ drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2007-03-05 08:05 ./usr/share/locale/km/LC_MESSAGES/ drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2007-03-05 08:05 ./usr/share/locale/es/LC_MESSAGES/ drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2007-03-05 08:05 ./usr/share/locale/sk/LC_MESSAGES/ drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2007-03-05 08:05 ./usr/share/locale/nn/LC_MESSAGES/ drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2007-03-05 08:05 ./usr/share/locale/ca/LC_MESSAGES/ drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2007-03-05 08:05 ./usr/share/locale/it/LC_MESSAGES/ drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2007-03-05 08:05 ./usr/share/locale/zh_TW/LC_MESSAGES/ drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2007-03-05 08:05 ./usr/share/locale/vi/LC_MESSAGES/ drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2007-03-05 08:05 ./usr/share/locale/tl/LC_MESSAGES/ drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2007-03-05 08:05 ./usr/share/locale/nl/LC_MESSAGES/ drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2007-03-05 08:05 ./usr/share/locale/fi/LC_MESSAGES/ drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2007-03-05 08:05 ./usr/share/locale/ro/LC_MESSAGES/ drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2007-03-05 08:05 ./usr/share/locale/fr/LC_MESSAGES/ drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2007-03-05 08:05 ./usr/share/locale/gl/LC_MESSAGES/ drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2007-03-05 08:05 ./usr/share/locale/ar/LC_MESSAGES/ drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2007-03-05 08:05 ./usr/share/locale/bs/LC_MESSAGES/ drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2007-03-05 08:05 ./usr/share/locale/zh_CN/LC_MESSAGES/ drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2007-03-05 08:05 ./usr/share/locale/nb/LC_MESSAGES/ drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2007-03-05 08:05 ./usr/share/locale/eu/LC_MESSAGES/ drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2007-03-05 08:05 ./usr/share/locale/de/LC_MESSAGES/ drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2007-03-05 08:05 ./usr/share/locale/el/LC_MESSAGES/ drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2007-03-05 08:05 ./usr/share/locale/pt_BR/LC_MESSAGES/ drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2007-03-05 08:05 ./usr/share/locale/hu/LC_MESSAGES/ drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2007-03-05 08:05 ./usr/share/locale/pt/LC_MESSAGES/ regards, -mika- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#413709: wrong permissions on /usr/lib/squid +s files
Package: squid Version: 2.6.5-4 Severity: serious Squid breaks debsums: debsums: can't open squid file /usr/lib/squid/pam_auth (Permission denied) debsums: can't open squid file /usr/lib/squid/getpwnam_auth (Permission denied) Those files are setgid group shadow and thus it makes sense that they are not executable by others. However, that doesn't mean they cannot be readable. Section 10.9. of the policy says: Some setuid programs need to be restricted to particular sets of users, using file permissions. In this case they should be owned by the uid to which they are set-id, and by the group which should be allowed to execute them. They should have mode 4754; again there is no point in making them unreadable to those users who must not be allowed to execute them. I filed this as RC because the policy covers the case. I don't really think it's that critical, so please downgrade if you wish. Or just upload a quick fix (or tell me to NMU it). -- System Information: Debian Release: 4.0 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (750, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (250, 'stable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-4-686 Locale: LANG=en_GB, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages squid depends on: ii adduser 3.102Add and remove users and groups ii coreutils 5.97-5.3 The GNU core utilities ii debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.5.11 Debian configuration management sy ii libc6 2.3.6.ds1-13 GNU C Library: Shared libraries ii libdb4.44.4.20-8 Berkeley v4.4 Database Libraries [ ii libldap22.1.30-13.3 OpenLDAP libraries ii libpam0g0.79-4 Pluggable Authentication Modules l ii logrotate 3.7.1-3 Log rotation utility ii lsb-base3.1-23 Linux Standard Base 3.1 init scrip ii netbase 4.29 Basic TCP/IP networking system ii squid-common2.6.5-4 Internet Object Cache (WWW proxy c squid recommends no packages. -- debconf information excluded -- .''`. martin f. krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED] : :' : proud Debian developer, author, administrator, and user `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~madduck - http://debiansystem.info `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems signature.asc Description: Digital signature (GPG/PGP)
Processed: This bug has a (reversed :-() patch
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 409644 patch Bug#409644: libfuse2: please include a versioned shlibs file There were no tags set. Tags added: patch thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#413211: marked as done (qpxtool - FTBFS: Fails while trying to access home directory)
Your message dated Tue, 06 Mar 2007 18:02:02 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#413211: fixed in qpxtool 0.6.0.9-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ---BeginMessage--- Package: qpxtool Version: 0.6.0.9-1 Severity: serious There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: Automatic build of qpxtool_0.6.0.9-1 on lxdebian.bfinv.de by sbuild/s390 98 [...] * qpxtool binary ready:) * ./build: line 35: cd: /srv/buildd: No such file or directory make[1]: *** [all] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/qpxtool-0.6.0.9' make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2 ** Build finished at 20070303-1223 FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died] ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Source: qpxtool Source-Version: 0.6.0.9-3 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of qpxtool, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: qpxtool_0.6.0.9-3.diff.gz to pool/main/q/qpxtool/qpxtool_0.6.0.9-3.diff.gz qpxtool_0.6.0.9-3.dsc to pool/main/q/qpxtool/qpxtool_0.6.0.9-3.dsc qpxtool_0.6.0.9-3_amd64.deb to pool/main/q/qpxtool/qpxtool_0.6.0.9-3_amd64.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Eduard Bloch [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated qpxtool package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2007 18:30:31 +0100 Source: qpxtool Binary: qpxtool Architecture: source amd64 Version: 0.6.0.9-3 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Daniel Baumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Eduard Bloch [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: qpxtool- CD/DVD quality checker Closes: 413211 Changes: qpxtool (0.6.0.9-3) unstable; urgency=low . * 02-libflags.dpatch, 03-typos.dpatch: dpatch'ified upstream relevant changes from 0.6.0.9-2.1 * 04-CWDA.dpatch: fixes typo in ./build, causing failure in a build environment with invalid $HOME (closes: #413211) Files: f33896a5e24d0b5b64a337144271e8b0 630 otherosfs optional qpxtool_0.6.0.9-3.dsc ae868197c895cfa788c8cf199a080a76 9827 otherosfs optional qpxtool_0.6.0.9-3.diff.gz c1bd7fdd7e22f784407fa4a083b4c9f7 324200 otherosfs optional qpxtool_0.6.0.9-3_amd64.deb -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFF7ahb4QZIHu3wCMURAvpIAJ9jlaz0AmfeV0vMt0F9Cjg9BrlcLACaAuKB RNpjV3WK+wlC6Wwi5sfz+7k= =vlNX -END PGP SIGNATURE- ---End Message---
Bug#413661: libblkid1: leaks memory like crazy
On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 02:08:43PM +0100, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote: Package: libblkid1 Version: 1.39+1.40-WIP-2006.11.14+dfsg-1 Severity: grave Tags: patch (RMs: I'm unsure if this should be fixed for etch or not, given that I do not know of anything in etch that actually uses this library enough for it to leak. Feel free to downgrade or tag etch-ignore, of course.) nfs-kernel-server 1.0.12 has started using libblkid, and leaks absurd amounts of memory (in the order of several megabytes per minute). Tracing using Omega (which is not yet in Debian, but nevertheless really useful) tracked the leaks down to libblkid. I've attached a diff that fixes the issues for me, and allows me to run nfs-kernel-server with only minor leaks (which I'll take with nfs-utils upstream, as they are not libblkid1 related). Yikes, what blkid function is rpc.mountd calling all the time which is causing this kind of memory leakage? Sounds like a bad thing from a power/CPU utilization standpoint (note to self; shut down rpc.mountd when I'm running on batteries on my laptop). I'm also curious why we only discovered the problem this late in the freeze Oh, I see, because nfs-kernel-server 1.0.10 is in testing, and 1.0.12 is in unstable. I assume it's unlikely that nfs-kernel-server 1.0.12 is going to migrate to testing? OK, release managers, the memory leak primarily occurs in the device mapper probing code, and an additional leak when there is a partition which does not have a valid filesystem known to blkid. rpc.mountd is, as far as I know, the first long-lived daemon using blkid, and it's apparently using it in a somewhat interesting way which is the system to constantly reprobe the disk information (if it is leaking megabytes per minute). The patch looks reasonably sane and low risk based on a on-paper examination of the code changes --- but if nfs-kernel-server 1.0.12 isn't going into etch, I'd say it's borderline whether or not we include this patch into the e2fsprogs upload I was about to do. What say ye? - Ted P.S. I really want to look at the sources of nfs-kernel-server 1.0.12 and see what it's *doing* that could be provoking a memory leak of the rate that you are describing. The memory leak is clearly blkid's fault, but the rate at which memory is leaking smells very fishy. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#413661: libblkid1: leaks memory like crazy
On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 10:44:55AM -0500, Theodore Tso wrote: Yikes, what blkid function is rpc.mountd calling all the time which is causing this kind of memory leakage? blkid_probe_all_new() seems to be the one. It happens at every mount and umount, I believe; it's not like it's being called all the time (it leaks much faster on busy systems than on almost idle systems, AFAICS), it's that it leaks so _much_ memory all the time. Oh, I see, because nfs-kernel-server 1.0.10 is in testing, and 1.0.12 is in unstable. I assume it's unlikely that nfs-kernel-server 1.0.12 is going to migrate to testing? I was originally planning to ask for an exception (with associated RM bribes, the diff is quite large), but given 1.0.11's and 1.0.12's track record so far, I think that's quite far-fetched, yes. OK, release managers, the memory leak primarily occurs in the device mapper probing code, and an additional leak when there is a partition which does not have a valid filesystem known to blkid. rpc.mountd is, as far as I know, the first long-lived daemon using blkid, and it's apparently using it in a somewhat interesting way which is the system to constantly reprobe the disk information (if it is leaking megabytes per minute). The patch looks reasonably sane and low risk based on a on-paper examination of the code changes --- but if nfs-kernel-server 1.0.12 isn't going into etch, I'd say it's borderline whether or not we include this patch into the e2fsprogs upload I was about to do. FWIW, I agree with this analysis, possibly except the part about mountd's usage pattern. :-) /* Steinar */ -- Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#413661: libblkid1: leaks memory like crazy
On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 04:54:41PM +0100, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote: On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 10:44:55AM -0500, Theodore Tso wrote: Yikes, what blkid function is rpc.mountd calling all the time which is causing this kind of memory leakage? blkid_probe_all_new() seems to be the one. It happens at every mount and umount, I believe; it's not like it's being called all the time (it leaks much faster on busy systems than on almost idle systems, AFAICS), it's that it leaks so _much_ memory all the time. Well, the amount of memory leaked depends on how many device mapper volumes you have, and how many of them contain unitialized volumes. And I guess this must have been on a system with a lot of mounts and unmounts. - Ted -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#408831: marked as done (udns: Should be removed from etch)
Your message dated Tue, 6 Mar 2007 15:20:34 -0300 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Etch is freezed so udns will not be released on it has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ---BeginMessage--- Package: udns Severity: grave Michael Tokarev, main developer of udns has requested me not to distribute udns with Debian yet. It should not be released with Etch. Please, remove it from unstable for now. Next release will be upload to experimental RSN. -- System Information: Debian Release: 4.0 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-3-vserver-amd64 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- As etch is freezed and packages will not migrate automatically to it, udns can stay on sid for testing. Agney Lopes Roth Ferraz ---End Message---
Processed: Re: Bug#409018: nohwcap
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: retitle 409018 Too many accesses to /etc/ld.so.nohwcap Bug#409018: base: /etc/ld.so.nohwcap missing Changed Bug title. severity 409018 normal Bug#409018: Too many accesses to /etc/ld.so.nohwcap Severity set to `normal' from `critical' tags 409018 moreinfo Bug#409018: Too many accesses to /etc/ld.so.nohwcap There were no tags set. Tags added: moreinfo tags 409018 help Bug#409018: Too many accesses to /etc/ld.so.nohwcap Tags were: moreinfo Tags added: help reassign 409018 xserver-xorg Bug#409018: Too many accesses to /etc/ld.so.nohwcap Bug reassigned from package `base' to `xserver-xorg'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: tagging 406816
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26 tags 406816 sid Bug#406816: libghc6-missingpy-dev: not installable (wants missingh-0.16, but missingh-0.18 is in unstable) Tags were: sid Tags added: sid End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: tagging 409689
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26 tags 409689 sid Bug#409689: FTBFS: Could not find module `MissingH.IO.HVIO' Tags were: sid Tags added: sid End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#413724: rt2500-src: Unable to compile with kernel 2.6.20
Package: rt2500-src Version: rt2500-source Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable rt2500-source version 1:1.1.0-b4-1 fails to compile with kernel 2.6.20 with the following error : /usr/src/modules/rt2500/rt_config.h:58:40: error: linux/config.h: no such file or directory (for information: compilation succeeds with kernel 2.6.18) -- System Information: Debian Release: 4.0 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.18 Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#413674: fails to attach/find old screens after update
Quoting Alexander Rydekull ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): Package: screen Version: 4.0.3-0.3 Severity: grave Justification: causes non-serious data loss I got the following provate mail from another user: == I'm writing to you about today's (well, Monday's) NMU on the 'screen' package, version 4.0.3-0.3. It seems to me that on my several systems (i386 running debian sid), this new version switches from the use of FIFOs to local sockets in /var/run/screen/S-user. Thus, after the upgrade, already ready running screens are not recognized anymore (and cannot be reattached). What a big deal! I want my screen back! :) Well, according to the changelog, being a l10n NMU, I'm not sure this waes really intented, was it? == Actually, I fail to see why this could have been broken by a l10n NMU but this could maybe be a side effect of the triggered recompile (which would mean there's a bad underlying problem). The build I did was done in a supposedly clean chroot, with pbuilderwhat I ignore is how was the previous builds done. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#413674: fails to attach/find old screens after update
Additional information, something that my friend noticed. The file is prw--- 1 rydekull rydekull 0 2007-03-06 09:21 3045.pts-0.munin while it should be srw--- 1 rydekull rydekull 0 2007-03-06 09:21 3045.pts-0.munin In other words, it should be a socket, but it isnt. Why isnt it? /Alexander Rydekull -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#413724: rt2500-src: Unable to compile with kernel 2.6.20
severity 413724 important thanks Antoine Humbert a écrit : Package: rt2500-src Version: rt2500-source Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Kernel 2.6.20 is not present in Debian, I am therefore lowering the severity of this bug. rt2500-source version 1:1.1.0-b4-1 fails to compile with kernel 2.6.20 with the following error : /usr/src/modules/rt2500/rt_config.h:58:40: error: linux/config.h: no such file or directory (for information: compilation succeeds with kernel 2.6.18) Same problem here, I am looking for a fix. -- .''`. Aurelien Jarno | GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73 : :' : Debian developer | Electrical Engineer `. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] `-people.debian.org/~aurel32 | www.aurel32.net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#413698: I have just noticed this as well.
I wondered what happenned to my regular aptitude translated menus. :D -- Raúl Sánchez Siles -Proud Debian user- Linux registered user #416098 pgpPQhkGbSPM3.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#413724: marked as done (rt2500-src: Unable to compile with kernel 2.6.20)
Your message dated Tue, 06 Mar 2007 20:32:06 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#413724: fixed in rt2500 1:1.1.0-b4-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ---BeginMessage--- Package: rt2500-src Version: rt2500-source Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable rt2500-source version 1:1.1.0-b4-1 fails to compile with kernel 2.6.20 with the following error : /usr/src/modules/rt2500/rt_config.h:58:40: error: linux/config.h: no such file or directory (for information: compilation succeeds with kernel 2.6.18) -- System Information: Debian Release: 4.0 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.18 Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Source: rt2500 Source-Version: 1:1.1.0-b4-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of rt2500, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: rt2500-source_1.1.0-b4-2_all.deb to pool/main/r/rt2500/rt2500-source_1.1.0-b4-2_all.deb rt2500_1.1.0-b4-2.diff.gz to pool/main/r/rt2500/rt2500_1.1.0-b4-2.diff.gz rt2500_1.1.0-b4-2.dsc to pool/main/r/rt2500/rt2500_1.1.0-b4-2.dsc rt2500_1.1.0-b4-2_amd64.deb to pool/main/r/rt2500/rt2500_1.1.0-b4-2_amd64.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Aurelien Jarno [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated rt2500 package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2007 20:55:40 +0100 Source: rt2500 Binary: rt2500 rt2500-source Architecture: source all amd64 Version: 1:1.1.0-b4-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian Ralink packages maintainers [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Aurelien Jarno [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: rt2500 - configuration tool for wireless RT2500 network cards rt2500-source - RT2500 wireless network drivers source Closes: 413724 Changes: rt2500 (1:1.1.0-b4-2) unstable; urgency=low . * patches/2.6.19.diff: add a missing part preventing the module to be built on 2.6.19+ kernels (closes: bug#413724). Files: 9a7756176fc6eb3354763c1816c4e647 802 net extra rt2500_1.1.0-b4-2.dsc 62d7d2b5baa0644bec4b3b48450ff04e 13241 net extra rt2500_1.1.0-b4-2.diff.gz c8d74968a73988c1700f46d71080b0c0 199408 net extra rt2500-source_1.1.0-b4-2_all.deb ce84eacebb1f8a0a51f60c8d1a9e9369 114052 net extra rt2500_1.1.0-b4-2_amd64.deb -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFF7cpGw3ao2vG823MRAje+AJsF/sWnUnyPvAelhb0klJuTHWu+OwCfVSEU 8zZZlQnn90SrvAxvMXiOHqM= =7Cl7 -END PGP SIGNATURE- ---End Message---
Bug#413211: qpxtool - FTBFS
found 413211 0.6.0.9-3 thanks There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: Automatic build of qpxtool_0.6.0.9-3 on lxdebian.bfinv.de by sbuild/s390 98 [...] copying qpxtool to /build/buildd/qpxtool-0.6.0.9/debian/qpxtool/usr/bin ./install: line 16: cd: /srv/buildd: No such file or directory make: *** [install] Error 1 ** Build finished at 20070306-1907 FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: qpxtool - FTBFS
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: found 413211 0.6.0.9-3 Bug#413211: qpxtool - FTBFS: Fails while trying to access home directory Bug marked as found in version 0.6.0.9-3. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: severity of 413679 is important
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.27 # does not make the whole package unusable severity 413679 important Bug#413679: libquantlib0-dev: static library unusable Severity set to `important' from `grave' End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: tagging 413709
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.27 tags 413709 etch-ignore Bug#413709: wrong permissions on /usr/lib/squid +s files There were no tags set. Tags added: etch-ignore End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#413661: libblkid1: leaks memory like crazy
severity 413661 important thanks On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 02:08:43PM +0100, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote: (RMs: I'm unsure if this should be fixed for etch or not, given that I do not know of anything in etch that actually uses this library enough for it to leak. Feel free to downgrade or tag etch-ignore, of course.) Indeed, nfs-kernel-server in unstable is the only daemon using the lib; all the other reverse-deps are short-lived utils. So, downgrading. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Bug#413661: libblkid1: leaks memory like crazy
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 413661 important Bug#413661: libblkid1: leaks memory like crazy Severity set to `important' from `grave' thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#413269: Wordpress in etch
Steve Langasek wrote: Security Team, On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 10:27:00PM +, Kai Hendry wrote: As micah suggests I will offer a firm commitment to actually making the security updated packages when the hole comes out, and even drafting the DSA and delivering it to the security team on a silver platter) and if it becomes untenable I will support the removal ^^ We can't sanely remove a package from a stable release. Below is the last email from upstream confirming support. Is this satisfactory? Should this bug be closed? No, I still believe it's not supportable over the course of a stable release and has security issue too frequently. Instead of focusing on each one's pet package we need to look at the big picture. Maintaining security support for a distribution of the size of Debian is already difficult enough. If there's user interest in Wordpress, I recommend to maintain it through volatile. EOD for me. PS: I need to correct my earlier remark. Even Gentoo ceased security support for Wordpress (and they don't even do backports): http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=168529 Cheers, Moritz -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Bug#413674: fails to attach/find old screens after update
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 413674 important Bug#413674: fails to attach/find old screens after update Severity set to `important' from `grave' thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#413674: fails to attach/find old screens after update
severity 413674 important thanks On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 03:21:57PM +0100, Alexander Rydekull wrote: So, I tripped over this when I arrived at work, connected to my server through SSH and tried to get my screen up and met a There is no screen to be attached. sign... Here's some information of things I tried, and various info that might be usefull. I've also tried and find other people with the same problem, I've found atleast two where one came into #screen on freenode, just like me and supplied this pastebin. http://pastebin.ca/raw/383517 What I think is the reason is the upgrade from 4.0.3-0.2 to 4.0.3-0.3 that I did yesterday. In my mind, what I suspect will fail it is start a screen (4.0.3-0.2) upgrade to screen 4.0.3-0.3 detach attach (fails) I can confirm this bug; I can further confirm that the problem is specific to the i386 build of 4.0.3-0.3, and that a rebuild of the package in my environment fixes the problem. I don't know what's particular about Christian's build environment that would cause this problem, but I've triggered a binNMU on i386 so that we can get this fixed in the near term. There is still a bug here certainly, because misbuilds of this sort should be protected against; but there's no longer any reason we should need to treat this as release-critical. Thanks, -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: your mail
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 413269 + etch security Bug#413269: wordpress: Should not ship with Etch There were no tags set. Tags added: etch, security End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: your mail
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 413269 tech-ctte Bug#413269: wordpress: Should not ship with Etch Bug reassigned from package `wordpress' to `tech-ctte'. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#413762: database files being created in the root ('/') directory
Package: onak Version: 0.3.3-1 Severity: serious Hi. After installing this package some database files were being created in the root directory: $ ls -lt / [cut] -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 20480 2007-03-06 18:15 keydb.9.db -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 20480 2007-03-06 18:15 keydb.8.db -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 20480 2007-03-06 18:15 keydb.7.db -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 20480 2007-03-06 18:15 keydb.6.db -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 20480 2007-03-06 18:15 keydb.5.db -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 20480 2007-03-06 18:15 keydb.4.db -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 20480 2007-03-06 18:15 keydb.2.db -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 20480 2007-03-06 18:15 keydb.1.db -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 20480 2007-03-06 18:15 keydb.0.db -rw-r- 1 root root 16384 2007-03-06 18:15 __db.005 -rw-r- 1 root root 368640 2007-03-06 18:15 __db.004 -rw-r- 1 root root 98304 2007-03-06 18:15 __db.003 -rw-r- 1 root root 270336 2007-03-06 18:15 __db.002 -rw-r- 1 root root8192 2007-03-06 18:15 __db.001 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 16384 2007-03-06 18:15 worddb -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 53248 2007-03-06 18:15 keydb.3.db -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 20480 2007-03-06 18:15 keydb.15.db -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 20480 2007-03-06 18:15 keydb.14.db -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 20480 2007-03-06 18:15 keydb.13.db -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 20480 2007-03-06 18:15 keydb.12.db -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 20480 2007-03-06 18:15 keydb.11.db -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 20480 2007-03-06 18:15 keydb.10.db -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 20480 2007-03-06 18:15 id32db [cut] Surely '/' is not the place for none of these. Regards, rjc -- System Information: Debian Release: 4.0 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: powerpc (ppc) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-4-vserver-powerpc Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages onak depends on: ii adduser3.102 Add and remove users and groups ii libc6 2.3.6.ds1-13 GNU C Library: Shared libraries ii libdb4.2 4.2.52+dfsg-1 Berkeley v4.2 Database Libraries [ Versions of packages onak recommends: ii boa [httpd] 0.94.14rc21-0.2 Lightweight and high performance w -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Bug#400720: vlc plugin broken: (no video)
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 400720 important Bug#400720: mozilla-plugin-vlc: vlc plugin broken: (no video) Severity set to `important' from `serious' retitle 400720 mozilla-plugin-vlc: prints no picture for media.smh.com.au videos Bug#400720: mozilla-plugin-vlc: vlc plugin broken: (no video) Changed Bug title. tag 400720 +confirmed Bug#400720: mozilla-plugin-vlc: prints no picture for media.smh.com.au videos Tags were: patch Tags added: confirmed thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#400720: vlc plugin broken: (no video)
severity 400720 important retitle 400720 mozilla-plugin-vlc: prints no picture for media.smh.com.au videos tag 400720 +confirmed thanks On Fri, Mar 02, 2007, Drew Parsons wrote: Whether the source= entry is the cause of the bug, I don't know, but I can confirm that the same video page works normally after I remove mozilla-plugin-vlc (I think totem-mozilla is picking the video up via libtotem-gmp-plugin.so in that case, assuming the video itself is avi or wmv). I hope this test case helps in finally fixing the fix. Thank you for providing so much information, it will sure help me investigate. I downgraded the bug severity because most other web pages work and while I agree it's pretty frustrating, I do not believe it to be a critical problem that a few web pages do not work. Regards, -- Sam. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#413766: ca-certificates: Recent addition of cacert.org may break some installations
Package: ca-certificates Version: 20070303 Severity: critical Justification: breaks unrelated software Hi ! The severity may be a bit severe, but the addition of CAcert.org Class 3 certificate really breaks unrelated software that used the other certificate. The root certificate was located at /usr/share/ca-certificates/cacert.org/cacert.org.crt and is now located at /usr/share/ca-certificates/cacert.org/root.crt. If, for example, Postfix was configured to use /usr/share/ca-certificates/cacert.org/cacert.org.crt or /etc/ssl/certs/cacert.org.pem, both files are now inexistent. For example, on my Postfix installation, since I was requiring TLS to send mails, no mail were sent because of the absence of this certificate. -- System Information: Debian Release: 4.0 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.20-rc4-neo.3 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) Versions of packages ca-certificates depends on: ii debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.5.13 Debian configuration management sy ii openssl 0.9.8e-3 Secure Socket Layer (SSL) binary a ca-certificates recommends no packages. -- debconf information: ca-certificates/enable_crts: brasil.gov.br/brasil.gov.br.crt, cacert.org/class3.crt, cacert.org/root.crt, debconf.org/ca.crt, mozilla/ABAecom_=sub.__Am._Bankers_Assn.=_Root_CA.crt, mozilla/AddTrust_External_Root.crt, mozilla/AddTrust_Low-Value_Services_Root.crt, mozilla/AddTrust_Public_Services_Root.crt, mozilla/AddTrust_Qualified_Certificates_Root.crt, mozilla/America_Online_Root_Certification_Authority_1.crt, mozilla/America_Online_Root_Certification_Authority_2.crt, mozilla/AOL_Time_Warner_Root_Certification_Authority_1.crt, mozilla/AOL_Time_Warner_Root_Certification_Authority_2.crt, mozilla/Baltimore_CyberTrust_Root.crt, mozilla/beTRUSTed_Root_CA-Baltimore_Implementation.crt, mozilla/beTRUSTed_Root_CA.crt, mozilla/beTRUSTed_Root_CA_-_Entrust_Implementation.crt, mozilla/beTRUSTed_Root_CA_-_RSA_Implementation.crt, mozilla/Certum_Root_CA.crt, mozilla/Comodo_AAA_Services_root.crt, mozilla/Comodo_Secure_Services_root.crt, mozilla/Comodo_Trusted_Services_root.crt, mozilla/Digital_Signature_Trust_Co._Global_CA_1.crt, mozilla/Digital_Signature_Trust_Co._Global_CA_2.crt, mozilla/Digital_Signature_Trust_Co._Global_CA_3.crt, mozilla/Digital_Signature_Trust_Co._Global_CA_4.crt, mozilla/Entrust.net_Global_Secure_Personal_CA.crt, mozilla/Entrust.net_Global_Secure_Server_CA.crt, mozilla/Entrust.net_Premium_2048_Secure_Server_CA.crt, mozilla/Entrust.net_Secure_Personal_CA.crt, mozilla/Entrust.net_Secure_Server_CA.crt, mozilla/Equifax_Secure_CA.crt, mozilla/Equifax_Secure_eBusiness_CA_1.crt, mozilla/Equifax_Secure_eBusiness_CA_2.crt, mozilla/Equifax_Secure_Global_eBusiness_CA.crt, mozilla/GeoTrust_Global_CA.crt, mozilla/GlobalSign_Root_CA.crt, mozilla/GTE_CyberTrust_Global_Root.crt, mozilla/GTE_CyberTrust_Root_CA.crt, mozilla/IPS_Chained_CAs_root.crt, mozilla/IPS_CLASE1_root.crt, mozilla/IPS_CLASE3_root.crt, mozilla/IPS_CLASEA1_root.crt, mozilla/IPS_CLASEA3_root.crt, mozilla/IPS_Servidores_root.crt, mozilla/IPS_Timestamping_root.crt, mozilla/QuoVadis_Root_CA.crt, mozilla/RSA_Root_Certificate_1.crt, mozilla/RSA_Security_1024_v3.crt, mozilla/RSA_Security_2048_v3.crt, mozilla/Security_Communication_Root_CA.crt, mozilla/Sonera_Class_1_Root_CA.crt, mozilla/Sonera_Class_2_Root_CA.crt, mozilla/Staat_der_Nederlanden_Root_CA.crt, mozilla/TC_TrustCenter__Germany__Class_2_CA.crt, mozilla/TC_TrustCenter__Germany__Class_3_CA.crt, mozilla/TDC_Internet_Root_CA.crt, mozilla/TDC_OCES_Root_CA.crt, mozilla/Thawte_Personal_Basic_CA.crt, mozilla/Thawte_Personal_Freemail_CA.crt, mozilla/Thawte_Personal_Premium_CA.crt, mozilla/Thawte_Premium_Server_CA.crt, mozilla/Thawte_Server_CA.crt, mozilla/Thawte_Time_Stamping_CA.crt, mozilla/UTN_DATACorp_SGC_Root_CA.crt, mozilla/UTN_USERFirst_Email_Root_CA.crt, mozilla/UTN_USERFirst_Hardware_Root_CA.crt, mozilla/UTN-USER_First-Network_Applications.crt, mozilla/UTN_USERFirst_Object_Root_CA.crt, mozilla/ValiCert_Class_1_VA.crt, mozilla/ValiCert_Class_2_VA.crt, mozilla/Verisign_Class_1_Public_Primary_Certification_Authority.crt, mozilla/Verisign_Class_1_Public_Primary_Certification_Authority_-_G2.crt, mozilla/Verisign_Class_1_Public_Primary_Certification_Authority_-_G3.crt, mozilla/Verisign_Class_1_Public_Primary_OCSP_Responder.crt, mozilla/Verisign_Class_2_Public_Primary_Certification_Authority.crt, mozilla/Verisign_Class_2_Public_Primary_Certification_Authority_-_G2.crt, mozilla/Verisign_Class_2_Public_Primary_Certification_Authority_-_G3.crt, mozilla/Verisign_Class_2_Public_Primary_OCSP_Responder.crt, mozilla/Verisign_Class_3_Public_Primary_Certification_Authority.crt, mozilla/Verisign_Class_3_Public_Primary_Certification_Authority_-_G2.crt,
Bug#403022: mozilla-plugin-vlc: Non-existent vlcintf.xpt file!
severity 403022 normal thanks On Sun, Feb 18, 2007, Kurt Roeckx wrote: found 403022 0.8.6-svn20061012.debian-4 thanks The file doesn't exist, so I'm tagging this as affecting this version. Indeed, but the plugin seems to work quite well now. The xpt file used to be for javascript bindings, but plugins work without it. You may try the following: * open about:plugins, check that the VLC plugin is here * open http://people.videolan.org/~damienf/plugin-0.8.6.html * put http://people.zoy.org/~sam/paperclip.mpg in the MRL field * click Go and play with the controls Regards, -- Sam. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Bug#403022: mozilla-plugin-vlc: Non-existent vlcintf.xpt file!
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 403022 normal Bug#403022: Non-existent vlcintf.xpt file! Severity set to `normal' from `grave' thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: severity of 413766 is important
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.27 # you're using it, it can't be unrelated severity 413766 important Bug#413766: ca-certificates: Recent addition of cacert.org may break some installations Severity set to `important' from `critical' End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Bug#413770: icedove: Typeaheadfind extension not compatible
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 413770 grave Bug#413770: icedove: Typeaheadfind extension not compatible Severity set to `grave' from `normal' thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: reopening 392504
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.27 # clear the bogus fixed info reopen 392504 Bug#392504: kbedic: creating files in /usr/local violates FHS 'reopen' is deprecated when a bug has been closed with a version; use 'found' or 'submitter' as appropriate instead. Bug reopened, originator not changed. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: kbedic: creating files in /usr/local violates FHS
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 392504 etch-ignore Bug#392504: kbedic: creating files in /usr/local violates FHS There were no tags set. Tags added: etch-ignore thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#413429: mountd in nfs-kernel-server still broken
On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 12:53:28PM +0100, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote: Anyhow, I can reproduce this in my side now. I'll try to figure out what's leaking... It's a memory leak (or rather, two distinct memory leaks, but only one of them really hurts) in libblkid; see #413661. (There's also a tiny leak on nfs-utils' side, which I've addressed in 1:1.0.12-3.) There are three ways to fix this: a) Wait for fixed libblkid (should be a few days, hopefully), upon which I'll upload a version of nfs-kernel-server that depends on a fixed version (if it does not take care of that itself, via shlibs) and close this bug. Restart nfs-kernel-server regularly till then :-) b) Apply the patch from #413661 yourself (the version from http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=413661;msg=12 , I guess) and rebuild libblkid locally. c) Downgrade to 1:1.0.10-6, which doesn't depend on libblkid. /* Steinar */ -- Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#392504: kbedic: creating files in /usr/local violates FHS
tags 392504 etch-ignore thanks I agree, this is still a violation of policy; there's no good reason why a Debian package should need to use /usr/local as a download cache. At least with the documentation of the issue, though, I'm willing to ignore this for etch if it's not fixed in time. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#413724: rt2500-src: Unable to compile with kernel 2.6.20
This one time, at band camp, Aurelien Jarno said: rt2500-source version 1:1.1.0-b4-1 fails to compile with kernel 2.6.20 with the following error : /usr/src/modules/rt2500/rt_config.h:58:40: error: linux/config.h: no such file or directory (for information: compilation succeeds with kernel 2.6.18) Same problem here, I am looking for a fix. s/config.h/kconfig.h/, if I remember correctly. -- - | ,''`.Stephen Gran | | : :' :[EMAIL PROTECTED] | | `. `'Debian user, admin, and developer | |`- http://www.debian.org | - signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#404876: NMU for libvisual breaking gnome on non-altivec powerpc machines.
On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 08:36:19AM +0100, Loïc Minier wrote: On Mon, Mar 05, 2007, Steve Langasek wrote: With this workaround #404876 and #407153 can either be closed or downgraded retitled to please enable/fix altivec detection. Have you not closed these bugs in the changelog of your NMU? I'm the one who proposed not to close the bug as the bug isn't fixed, only hidden, and altivec support is desirable. Perhaps we should clone the bug and close one if you need a RC bug to track this upload. Yes, please. There are two separate bugs here: earlier versions of the package have broken altivec detection that leaves the package unusable on some procs, later versions have no altivec detection at all. The former is RC (at least arguably), the latter is not, so it would be helpful to be able to distinguish between the two. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
Processed: tagging 380226
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26 tags 380226 patch pending Bug#380226: NTFS (partition) not recreated correctly after resize:incorrect start sector There were no tags set. Tags added: patch, pending End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#411293: marked as done (asterisk-chan-capi: Need a mutex for calls to capi_{cmsg,message}2str)
Your message dated Wed, 07 Mar 2007 02:17:02 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#411293: fixed in asterisk-chan-capi 0.7.1-1.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
---BeginMessage---
Package: libcapi20-3
Version: 1:3.9.20060704-2.2
Severity: important
the bufprint routine used by capi_cmsg2str does an unbounded vsprintf
into a 8192 byte buffer, perhaps hoping it's big enough.
It isn't.
Looks like someone needs some vsnprintf like training wheels.
(around line 898 in convert.c)
#4 0xb7c9e811 in raise () from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6
#5 0xb7c9ffb9 in abort () from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6
#6 0xb6bbf21c in bufprint (fmt=0xb6bc061f %02x) at convert.c:910
#7 0xb6bbf63f in protocol_message_2_pars (cmsg=0xb69d4234, level=2) at
convert.c:927
#8 0xb6bbf34c in protocol_message_2_pars (cmsg=0xb69d4234, level=1) at
convert.c:1003
#9 0xb6bbf722 in capi_cmsg2str (cmsg=0xb69d4234) at convert.c:1045
#10 0xb6be4d16 in capidev_loop (data=0x0) at chan_capi.c:4051
#11 0x080ed2c0 in dummy_start (data=0x81e6ee8) at utils.c:545
#12 0xb7f16240 in start_thread () from
/lib/tls/i686/cmov/libpthread.so.0
#13 0xb7d4132e in clone () from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6
(gdb) frame 7
#7 0xb6bbf63f in protocol_message_2_pars (cmsg=0xb69d4234, level=2) at
convert.c:927
927 bufprint( %02x, *m);
(gdb) p p - buf
$1 = 8194
(gdb) p *cmsg
$2 = {ApplId = 1, Command = 2 '\002', Subcommand = 130 '\202',
Messagenumber = 5019, adr = {adrController = 257,
adrPLCI = 257, adrNCCI = 257}, AdditionalInfo = CAPI_COMPOSE,
B1configuration = 0x0, B1protocol = 0,
B2configuration = 0x0, B2protocol = 0, B3configuration = 0x0,
B3protocol = 0, BC = 0xb6b4eb5e \003\200\220�,
BChannelinformation = 0xb6b4eb67 , BProtocol = CAPI_COMPOSE,
CalledPartyNumber = 0xb6b4eb5a ,
CalledPartySubaddress = 0xb6b4eb5c , CallingPartyNumber = 0xb6b4eb5b
, CallingPartySubaddress = 0xb6b4eb5d ,
CIPmask = 0, CIPmask2 = 0, CIPValue = 16, Class = 0, ConnectedNumber =
0x0, ConnectedSubaddress = 0x0, Data32 = 0,
Data64 = 0, DataHandle = 0, DataLength = 0,
FacilityConfirmationParameter = 0x0,
Facilitydataarray = 0xb6b4eb6a , FacilityIndicationParameter = 0x0,
FacilityRequestParameter = 0x0,
FacilityResponseParameters = 0x0, FacilitySelector = 0, Flags = 0,
Function = 0, Globalconfiguration = 0x0,
HLC = 0xb6b4eb63 \002\221\201\004, Info = 0, InfoElement = 0x0,
InfoMask = 0, InfoNumber = 0,
Keypadfacility = 0xb6b4eb68 , LLC = 0xb6b4eb62 , ManuData = 0x0,
ManuID = 0, NCPI = 0x0, Reason = 0,
Reason_B3 = 0, Reject = 0, Useruserdata = 0xb6b4eb69 ,
SendingComplete = 0xb6b4eb6b '�' repeats 127 times,
Data = 0x0, l = 31, p = 14, par = 0xb6bc0bbc
\003\024\016\020\017\021\v)#\004\f(0\0342\001\001,
m = 0xb6b4eb4c \037, buf = '\0' repeats 179 times}
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-jh-1
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1)
Versions of packages libcapi20-3 depends on:
ii libc6 2.3.6.ds1-10 GNU C Library: Shared libraries
libcapi20-3 recommends no packages.
-- no debconf information
---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
Source: asterisk-chan-capi
Source-Version: 0.7.1-1.1
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
asterisk-chan-capi, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
asterisk-chan-capi_0.7.1-1.1.diff.gz
to pool/main/a/asterisk-chan-capi/asterisk-chan-capi_0.7.1-1.1.diff.gz
asterisk-chan-capi_0.7.1-1.1.dsc
to pool/main/a/asterisk-chan-capi/asterisk-chan-capi_0.7.1-1.1.dsc
asterisk-chan-capi_0.7.1-1.1_i386.deb
to pool/main/a/asterisk-chan-capi/asterisk-chan-capi_0.7.1-1.1_i386.deb
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Ben Hutchings [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated asterisk-chan-capi
package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2007 01:58:53 +
Source:
Bug#413174: SEGFAULT when running acm
tags 413174 patch
thanks
Hi Phil,
Running acm under valgrind points to a couple bits of uninitialized memory
as the culprits here. With the attached patch, acm starts up for me and
seems to work properly (or as properly as I guess I can expect without a
joystick).
Let me know if you want me to NMU.
Cheers,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
diff -u acm-5.0/src/dis_if.c acm-5.0/src/dis_if.c
--- acm-5.0/src/dis_if.c
+++ acm-5.0/src/dis_if.c
@@ -21,6 +21,8 @@
#include stdio.h
#include math.h
+#include stdlib.h
+#include string.h
#ifndef WIN32
#include sys/time.h
#endif
@@ -381,7 +383,7 @@
* Allocate storage for the entity table and initialize it.
*/
- entities = (Entity_t *) malloc(sizeof(Entity_t) * MAX_ENTITIES);
+ entities = (Entity_t *) calloc(MAX_ENTITIES, sizeof(Entity_t));
for (i = 0; i MAX_ENTITIES; i++) {
entities[i].local = -1;
}
@@ -943,6 +945,7 @@
dis_pdu pdu;
int i;
+ memset(pdu,0,sizeof(dis_pdu));
if (network_enabled == 0) {
return 0;
}
diff -u acm-5.0/debian/changelog acm-5.0/debian/changelog
--- acm-5.0/debian/changelog
+++ acm-5.0/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,12 @@
+acm (5.0-23.1) unstable; urgency=high
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+ * High-urgency upload for RC bugfix.
+ * Fix several initialization bugs that can trigger crashes on some
+architectures. Closes: #413174.
+
+ -- Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue, 6 Mar 2007 18:05:34 -0800
+
acm (5.0-23) unstable; urgency=low
* Applied patch from Petr Salinger to fix FTBFS on GNU/kFreeBSD
Processed: Re: SEGFAULT when running acm
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 413174 patch Bug#413174: SEGFAULT when running acm There were no tags set. Tags added: patch thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#413208: marked as done (libblkid1: wrong shlibs)
Your message dated Wed, 07 Mar 2007 02:47:03 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#413208: fixed in e2fsprogs 1.39+1.40-WIP-2006.11.14+dfsg-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ---BeginMessage--- Package: libblkid1 Version: 1.39+1.40-WIP-2006.11.14+dfsg-1 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 8.6 libblkid1 in sid exports 3 symbols which aren't in the sarge version, yet its shlibs don't reflect that. The new symbols are blkid_dev_set_search, blkid_dev_has_tag, blkid_probe_all_new. See #413057 for problems caused by this wrong shlibs information. Cheers, Julien -- System Information: Debian Release: 4.0 APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'testing-proposed-updates'), (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-3-686 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages libblkid1 depends on: ii libc6 2.3.6.ds1-11 GNU C Library: Shared libraries ii libdevmapper1.022:1.02.08-1 The Linux Kernel Device Mapper use ii libselinux1 1.32-3 SELinux shared libraries ii libsepol1 1.14-2 Security Enhanced Linux policy lib libblkid1 recommends no packages. -- no debconf information signature.asc Description: Digital signature ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Source: e2fsprogs Source-Version: 1.39+1.40-WIP-2006.11.14+dfsg-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of e2fsprogs, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: comerr-dev_2.1-1.39+1.40-WIP-2006.11.14+dfsg-2_i386.deb to pool/main/e/e2fsprogs/comerr-dev_2.1-1.39+1.40-WIP-2006.11.14+dfsg-2_i386.deb e2fsck-static_1.39+1.40-WIP-2006.11.14+dfsg-2_i386.deb to pool/main/e/e2fsprogs/e2fsck-static_1.39+1.40-WIP-2006.11.14+dfsg-2_i386.deb e2fslibs-dev_1.39+1.40-WIP-2006.11.14+dfsg-2_i386.deb to pool/main/e/e2fsprogs/e2fslibs-dev_1.39+1.40-WIP-2006.11.14+dfsg-2_i386.deb e2fslibs_1.39+1.40-WIP-2006.11.14+dfsg-2_i386.deb to pool/main/e/e2fsprogs/e2fslibs_1.39+1.40-WIP-2006.11.14+dfsg-2_i386.deb e2fsprogs-udeb_1.39+1.40-WIP-2006.11.14+dfsg-2_i386.udeb to pool/main/e/e2fsprogs/e2fsprogs-udeb_1.39+1.40-WIP-2006.11.14+dfsg-2_i386.udeb e2fsprogs_1.39+1.40-WIP-2006.11.14+dfsg-2.diff.gz to pool/main/e/e2fsprogs/e2fsprogs_1.39+1.40-WIP-2006.11.14+dfsg-2.diff.gz e2fsprogs_1.39+1.40-WIP-2006.11.14+dfsg-2.dsc to pool/main/e/e2fsprogs/e2fsprogs_1.39+1.40-WIP-2006.11.14+dfsg-2.dsc e2fsprogs_1.39+1.40-WIP-2006.11.14+dfsg-2_i386.deb to pool/main/e/e2fsprogs/e2fsprogs_1.39+1.40-WIP-2006.11.14+dfsg-2_i386.deb libblkid-dev_1.39+1.40-WIP-2006.11.14+dfsg-2_i386.deb to pool/main/e/e2fsprogs/libblkid-dev_1.39+1.40-WIP-2006.11.14+dfsg-2_i386.deb libblkid1-udeb_1.39+1.40-WIP-2006.11.14+dfsg-2_i386.udeb to pool/main/e/e2fsprogs/libblkid1-udeb_1.39+1.40-WIP-2006.11.14+dfsg-2_i386.udeb libblkid1_1.39+1.40-WIP-2006.11.14+dfsg-2_i386.deb to pool/main/e/e2fsprogs/libblkid1_1.39+1.40-WIP-2006.11.14+dfsg-2_i386.deb libcomerr2_1.39+1.40-WIP-2006.11.14+dfsg-2_i386.deb to pool/main/e/e2fsprogs/libcomerr2_1.39+1.40-WIP-2006.11.14+dfsg-2_i386.deb libss2_1.39+1.40-WIP-2006.11.14+dfsg-2_i386.deb to pool/main/e/e2fsprogs/libss2_1.39+1.40-WIP-2006.11.14+dfsg-2_i386.deb libuuid1-udeb_1.39+1.40-WIP-2006.11.14+dfsg-2_i386.udeb to pool/main/e/e2fsprogs/libuuid1-udeb_1.39+1.40-WIP-2006.11.14+dfsg-2_i386.udeb libuuid1_1.39+1.40-WIP-2006.11.14+dfsg-2_i386.deb to pool/main/e/e2fsprogs/libuuid1_1.39+1.40-WIP-2006.11.14+dfsg-2_i386.deb ss-dev_2.0-1.39+1.40-WIP-2006.11.14+dfsg-2_i386.deb to pool/main/e/e2fsprogs/ss-dev_2.0-1.39+1.40-WIP-2006.11.14+dfsg-2_i386.deb uuid-dev_1.2-1.39+1.40-WIP-2006.11.14+dfsg-2_i386.deb to pool/main/e/e2fsprogs/uuid-dev_1.2-1.39+1.40-WIP-2006.11.14+dfsg-2_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Theodore Y. Ts'o [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated e2fsprogs package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2007
Bug#412387: [#412387] patch doesn't fix the real issue
You wrote: Setting up apt-proxy (1.9.35-0.2) ... Disabling inetd's apt-proxy v1 line. invoke-rc.d: unknown initscript, /etc/init.d/inetd not found. dpkg: error processing apt-proxy (--configure): subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 100 Errors were encountered while processing: apt-proxy It looks like you were attempting to upgrade a package from woody (apt-proxy 1.3.0) - or at least earlier than sarge (1.9.29) - to etch (apt-proxy 1.9.35). Is that the case? Ben. -- Ben Hutchings Any smoothly functioning technology is indistinguishable from a rigged demo. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
