Bug#453166: Info received ([PATCH] Fix for FTBFS with new SWIG package)
Just a heads up, I noticed only after building that the test suite fails for the ruby bindings. python and perl are fine though. Somehow an svn_auth_baton is not passed correctly, I'll follow up with logs once I have more time. Greetings, Torsten -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#453371: faulty sed expression makes installation of new config file /etc/init.d/xinetd fail
Package: xinetd Version: 1:2.3.14-4 Severity: serious Tags: patch Installing new version of config file /etc/init.d/xinetd ... sed: -e expression #1, char 1: unknown command: `-' dpkg: error processing xinetd (--configure): subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1 sed -e -i in the postinst should be sed -i -e -- System Information: Debian Release: lenny/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.22-3-amd64 (SMP w/1 CPU core) Locale: LANG=en_GB, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages xinetd depends on: ii libc6 2.7-2 GNU C Library: Shared libraries ii libwrap0 7.6.dbs-14 Wietse Venema's TCP wrappers libra ii netbase 4.30 Basic TCP/IP networking system ii update-inetd 4.27-0.6 inetd.conf updater Versions of packages xinetd recommends: ii logrotate 3.7.1-3Log rotation utility ii sysklogd [system-log-daemon] 1.5-1 System Logging Daemon -- no debconf information -- .''`. martin f. krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED] : :' : proud Debian developer, author, administrator, and user `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~madduck - http://debiansystem.info `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems digital_signature_gpg.asc Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/)
Bug#453376: wammu should depend on notification-daemon
Package: wammu Version: 0.24-1 Severity: critical --- Please enter the report below this line. --- The wammu package since version 0.24 sould depend on notification-daemon. Without notification-daemon installed it crashes on startup: # Wammu Error-File ### --- System information Platform linux2 Python 2.4.4 wxPython 2.6.3.2 Wammu0.24 python-gammu 0.22 Gammu1.13.0 BluetoothPyBluez locales de_DE (ISO8859-15) connection bluephonet device 00:12:62:2D:04:6A modelauto -- Traceback ID --- fa32729d3253781ad70f0977eb280f8b Traceback File /usr/bin/wammu, line 99, in ? Wammu.App.Run() File /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/Wammu/App.py, line 69, in Run app = WammuApp() File /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/wx-2.6-gtk2-unicode/wx/_core.py, line 7700, in __init__ self._BootstrapApp() File /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/wx-2.6-gtk2-unicode/wx/_core.py, line 7352, in _BootstrapApp return _core_.PyApp__BootstrapApp(*args, **kwargs) File /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/Wammu/App.py, line 54, in OnInit frame.PostInit(self) File /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/Wammu/Main.py, line 556, in PostInit self.InitDBUS() File /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/Wammu/Main.py, line 568, in InitDBUS if Wammu.Utils.DBUSServiceAvailable(bus, interface, True): File /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/Wammu/Utils.py, line 470, in DBUSServiceAvailable bus.start_service_by_name(interface) File /var/lib/python-support/python2.4/dbus/bus.py, line 281, in start_service_by_name 'su', (bus_name, flags))) File /var/lib/python-support/python2.4/dbus/connection.py, line 606, in call_blocking reply_message = self.send_message_with_reply_and_block( Exception DBusException: org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.ServiceUnknown: The name org.freedesktop.Notifications was not provided by any .service files --- --- System information. --- Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux 2.6.23.1 Debian Release: lenny/sid 500 testing www.debian-multimedia.org 500 testing ftp.debian.org 500 testing 141.76.2.4 500 testing 141.30.228.4 500 stable ftp.debian.org --- Package information. --- Depends (Version) | Installed ==-+-=== python | 2.4.4-6 python-central (= 0.5.8) | 0.5.15 python-gammu (= 0.21) | 0.22-3 python-wxgtk2.6| 2.6.3.2.2-1 OR python-wxgtk2.8| signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Processed: Re: Bug#452725: assertion fail ../../bfd/elf32-arm.c:3123 building d-i
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 452725 important Bug#452725: assertion fail ../../bfd/elf32-arm.c:3123 building d-i Severity set to `important' from `serious' tags 452725 + fixed-upstream Bug#452725: assertion fail ../../bfd/elf32-arm.c:3123 building d-i Tags were: upstream Tags added: fixed-upstream thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#453231: marked as done (solfege: FTBFS: xvfb-run: error: xauth command not found)
Your message dated Thu, 29 Nov 2007 09:51:12 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#453231: solfege: FTBFS: xvfb-run: error: xauth command not found has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ---BeginMessage--- Package: solfege version: 3.9.3-2 Severity: serious User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20071126 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on i386 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386. Relevant part: config.status: creating topdocs/defs.texi config.status: creating windowsinstaller.iss config.status: creating Makefile config.status: WARNING: Makefile.in seems to ignore the --datarootdir setting config.status: creating lessonfile_editor.py config.status: creating solfege.redhat9.spec config.status: creating solfege.suse9.spec config.status: creating autopackage/default.apspec config.status: creating help/C/solfege.xml config.status: creating config.h configure: configure: Please remember to rerun configure if you change swig versions! configure: configure: xml2po was not found. This is no big deal, but it mean that the configure: translated user manuals will not be updated if you make changes configure: to the english manual. # Add here commands to compile the package. xvfb-run /usr/bin/make skipmanual=yes xvfb-run: error: xauth command not found make: *** [build-stamp] Error 3 dpkg-buildpackage: failure: debian/rules build gave error exit status 2 The full build log is available from: http://people.debian.org/~lucas/logs/2007/11/26 A list of current common problems and possible solutions is available at http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS . You're welcome to contribute! About the archive rebuild: The rebuild was done on about 50 AMD64 nodes of the Grid'5000 platform, using a clean chroot containing a sid i386 environment. Internet was not accessible from the build systems. -- | Lucas Nussbaum | [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ | | jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F | ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- fixed 453231 3.9.3-4 thanks On Tue, Nov 27, 2007 at 09:42:31PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: Package: solfege version: 3.9.3-2 Severity: serious User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20071126 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on i386 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386. Relevant part: config.status: creating topdocs/defs.texi config.status: creating windowsinstaller.iss config.status: creating Makefile config.status: WARNING: Makefile.in seems to ignore the --datarootdir setting config.status: creating lessonfile_editor.py config.status: creating solfege.redhat9.spec config.status: creating solfege.suse9.spec config.status: creating autopackage/default.apspec config.status: creating help/C/solfege.xml config.status: creating config.h configure: configure: Please remember to rerun configure if you change swig versions! configure: configure: xml2po was not found. This is no big deal, but it mean that the configure: translated user manuals will not be updated if you make changes configure: to the english manual. # Add here commands to compile the package. xvfb-run /usr/bin/make skipmanual=yes xvfb-run: error: xauth command not found make: *** [build-stamp] Error 3 dpkg-buildpackage: failure: debian/rules build gave error exit status 2 The full build log is available from: http://people.debian.org/~lucas/logs/2007/11/26 A list of current common problems and possible solutions is available at http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS . You're welcome to contribute! About the archive rebuild: The rebuild was done on about 50 AMD64 nodes of the Grid'5000 platform, using a clean chroot containing a sid i386 environment. Internet was not accessible from the build systems. -- | Lucas Nussbaum | [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ | | jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F | -- Tom Cato Amundsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.solfege.org/ GNU Solfege - free ear traininghttp://www.gnu.org/software/solfege/ ---End Message---
Bug#452725: assertion fail ../../bfd/elf32-arm.c:3123 building d-i
severity 452725 important tags 452725 + fixed-upstream thanks * Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-11-24 20:04]: Package: binutils Version: 2.18.1~cvs20071027-1 Severity: serious When building d-i on ARM, ld produces an assertion while reducing the libraries: Nick Clifton just applied a fix to HEAD and 2.18 branch for this which solves my problem. I'm downgrading this bug because I found out that even with the binutils failure the d-i images appear to be working correctly. Nevertheless, it would be nice to update this package to 2.18 branch soon to fix this for real. -- Martin Michlmayr http://www.cyrius.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Fix for Bug#453376 commited to version control
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 453376 +pending Bug#453376: wammu should depend on notification-daemon There were no tags set. Tags added: pending thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#441493: marked as done (waili - FTBFS: Rangecheck.C:218: error: expected primary-expression before '?' token)
Your message dated Thu, 29 Nov 2007 08:47:22 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#441493: fixed in waili 19990723-18 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ---BeginMessage--- Package: waili Version: 19990723-17 Severity: serious User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20070905 hi, while doing an archive wide package rebuild your package failed to build from source for the following reason: libtool --mode=compile g++ -I/build/user/waili-19990723/include -DSUPPORT_TIFF -Wall -DSUPPORT_TIFF -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -c Proof.C g++ -I/build/user/waili-19990723/include -DSUPPORT_TIFF -Wall -DSUPPORT_TIFF -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -c Proof.C -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/Proof.o g++ -I/build/user/waili-19990723/include -DSUPPORT_TIFF -Wall -DSUPPORT_TIFF -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -c Proof.C -o Proof.o /dev/null 21 libtool --mode=link g++ -o Proof Proof.o -lm /build/user/waili-19990723/lib/libwaili.la -ltiff g++ -o .libs/Proof Proof.o -lm /build/user/waili-19990723/lib/.libs/libwaili.so /usr/lib/libtiff.so creating Proof libtool --mode=compile g++ -I/build/user/waili-19990723/include -DSUPPORT_TIFF -Wall -DSUPPORT_TIFF -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -c Rangecheck.C g++ -I/build/user/waili-19990723/include -DSUPPORT_TIFF -Wall -DSUPPORT_TIFF -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -c Rangecheck.C -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/Rangecheck.o Rangecheck.C: In function 'int main(int, char**)': Rangecheck.C:218: error: expected primary-expression before '?' token Rangecheck.C:218: error: expected `:' before ')' token Rangecheck.C:218: error: expected primary-expression before ')' token Rangecheck.C:273: warning: overflow in implicit constant conversion Rangecheck.C:281: warning: overflow in implicit constant conversion Rangecheck.C:319: warning: format '%Ld' expects type 'long long int', but argument 2 has type 'int' Rangecheck.C:319: warning: format '%Ld' expects type 'long long int', but argument 3 has type 'int' Rangecheck.C:320: warning: format '%Ld' expects type 'long long int', but argument 2 has type 'int' Rangecheck.C:320: warning: format '%Ld' expects type 'long long int', but argument 3 has type 'int' make[2]: *** [Rangecheck.o] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/build/user/waili-19990723/test' make[1]: *** [All] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/user/waili-19990723' make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2 The Full Build log is available and can be viewed at: http://people.debian.org/~lucas/logs/2007/09/05/ bye, - michael ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Source: waili Source-Version: 19990723-18 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of waili, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: libwaili-dev_19990723-18_i386.deb to pool/main/w/waili/libwaili-dev_19990723-18_i386.deb libwaili1c2_19990723-18_i386.deb to pool/main/w/waili/libwaili1c2_19990723-18_i386.deb waili_19990723-18.diff.gz to pool/main/w/waili/waili_19990723-18.diff.gz waili_19990723-18.dsc to pool/main/w/waili/waili_19990723-18.dsc A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. A Mennucc1 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated waili package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2007 08:48:02 +0100 Source: waili Binary: libwaili1c2 libwaili-dev Architecture: source i386 Version: 19990723-18 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: A Mennucc1 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: A Mennucc1 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: libwaili-dev - WAILI is a wavelet transform library (develop. files) libwaili1c2 - WAILI is a wavelet transform library Closes: 441493 Changes: waili (19990723-18) unstable; urgency=low . * Depend on texlive-base instead of tetex. * Bug fix: waili - FTBFS: Rangecheck.C:218: error: expected primary-expression before #39;?#39; token, thanks to Michael Ablassmeier, Sebastian Bober (Closes: #441493). Files: 1262a68488f9e28a603babf4b6eb129e 675 devel optional waili_19990723-18.dsc
Bug#453371: marked as done (faulty sed expression makes installation of new config file /etc/init.d/xinetd fail)
Your message dated Thu, 29 Nov 2007 08:47:23 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#453371: fixed in xinetd 1:2.3.14-5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ---BeginMessage--- Package: xinetd Version: 1:2.3.14-4 Severity: serious Tags: patch Installing new version of config file /etc/init.d/xinetd ... sed: -e expression #1, char 1: unknown command: `-' dpkg: error processing xinetd (--configure): subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1 sed -e -i in the postinst should be sed -i -e -- System Information: Debian Release: lenny/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.22-3-amd64 (SMP w/1 CPU core) Locale: LANG=en_GB, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages xinetd depends on: ii libc6 2.7-2 GNU C Library: Shared libraries ii libwrap0 7.6.dbs-14 Wietse Venema's TCP wrappers libra ii netbase 4.30 Basic TCP/IP networking system ii update-inetd 4.27-0.6 inetd.conf updater Versions of packages xinetd recommends: ii logrotate 3.7.1-3Log rotation utility ii sysklogd [system-log-daemon] 1.5-1 System Logging Daemon -- no debconf information -- .''`. martin f. krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED] : :' : proud Debian developer, author, administrator, and user `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~madduck - http://debiansystem.info `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems digital_signature_gpg.asc Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/) ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Source: xinetd Source-Version: 1:2.3.14-5 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of xinetd, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: xinetd_2.3.14-5.diff.gz to pool/main/x/xinetd/xinetd_2.3.14-5.diff.gz xinetd_2.3.14-5.dsc to pool/main/x/xinetd/xinetd_2.3.14-5.dsc xinetd_2.3.14-5_amd64.deb to pool/main/x/xinetd/xinetd_2.3.14-5_amd64.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Pierre Habouzit [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated xinetd package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2007 09:29:55 +0100 Source: xinetd Binary: xinetd Architecture: source amd64 Version: 1:2.3.14-5 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Pierre Habouzit [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Pierre Habouzit [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: xinetd - replacement for inetd with many enhancements Closes: 453371 Changes: xinetd (1:2.3.14-5) unstable; urgency=medium . * woops fix wrong ordering of the sed arguments, thanks to madduck. (Closes: 453371). Files: 260a20a3afcb0b19a90fa55b33dd6b45 725 net extra xinetd_2.3.14-5.dsc 5e4efce093c483daf8a49f8de7327233 76902 net extra xinetd_2.3.14-5.diff.gz b579aa5d9acb73879b99eb44a9190759 144172 net extra xinetd_2.3.14-5_amd64.deb -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFHTnjMvGr7W6HudhwRAqe3AKCPPOoUutVltA6qwARydqpkt2YbkgCeIvFS 12aa6wydavzE3m+1itvqzKw= =82aT -END PGP SIGNATURE- ---End Message---
Bug#453376: Fix for Bug#453376 commited to version control
tags 453376 +pending thanks Hi, The following change has been committed for this bug, and so the fix will be in the next upload. === Changeset [36] by nijel, 2007-11-29 10:01:25 +0100 (Thu, 29 Nov 2007) * Fix crash on missing notification daemon (Closes: #453376). U trunk/debian/changelog A trunk/debian/patches/00list A trunk/debian/patches/01_fix-notification-daemon.dpatch http://viewsvn.cihar.com/debian-wammu?view=revrevision=36 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: severity of 452901 is normal
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.11 severity 452901 normal Bug#452901: libpam-mount: login fails with permission denied for all users Severity set to `normal' from `critical' End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#453376: marked as done (wammu should depend on notification-daemon)
Your message dated Thu, 29 Nov 2007 09:17:05 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#453376: fixed in wammu 0.24-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ---BeginMessage--- Package: wammu Version: 0.24-1 Severity: critical --- Please enter the report below this line. --- The wammu package since version 0.24 sould depend on notification-daemon. Without notification-daemon installed it crashes on startup: # Wammu Error-File ### --- System information Platform linux2 Python 2.4.4 wxPython 2.6.3.2 Wammu0.24 python-gammu 0.22 Gammu1.13.0 BluetoothPyBluez locales de_DE (ISO8859-15) connection bluephonet device 00:12:62:2D:04:6A modelauto -- Traceback ID --- fa32729d3253781ad70f0977eb280f8b Traceback File /usr/bin/wammu, line 99, in ? Wammu.App.Run() File /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/Wammu/App.py, line 69, in Run app = WammuApp() File /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/wx-2.6-gtk2-unicode/wx/_core.py, line 7700, in __init__ self._BootstrapApp() File /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/wx-2.6-gtk2-unicode/wx/_core.py, line 7352, in _BootstrapApp return _core_.PyApp__BootstrapApp(*args, **kwargs) File /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/Wammu/App.py, line 54, in OnInit frame.PostInit(self) File /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/Wammu/Main.py, line 556, in PostInit self.InitDBUS() File /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/Wammu/Main.py, line 568, in InitDBUS if Wammu.Utils.DBUSServiceAvailable(bus, interface, True): File /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/Wammu/Utils.py, line 470, in DBUSServiceAvailable bus.start_service_by_name(interface) File /var/lib/python-support/python2.4/dbus/bus.py, line 281, in start_service_by_name 'su', (bus_name, flags))) File /var/lib/python-support/python2.4/dbus/connection.py, line 606, in call_blocking reply_message = self.send_message_with_reply_and_block( Exception DBusException: org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.ServiceUnknown: The name org.freedesktop.Notifications was not provided by any .service files --- --- System information. --- Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux 2.6.23.1 Debian Release: lenny/sid 500 testing www.debian-multimedia.org 500 testing ftp.debian.org 500 testing 141.76.2.4 500 testing 141.30.228.4 500 stable ftp.debian.org --- Package information. --- Depends (Version) | Installed ==-+-=== python | 2.4.4-6 python-central (= 0.5.8) | 0.5.15 python-gammu (= 0.21) | 0.22-3 python-wxgtk2.6| 2.6.3.2.2-1 OR python-wxgtk2.8| signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Source: wammu Source-Version: 0.24-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of wammu, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: wammu_0.24-2.diff.gz to pool/main/w/wammu/wammu_0.24-2.diff.gz wammu_0.24-2.dsc to pool/main/w/wammu/wammu_0.24-2.dsc wammu_0.24-2_all.deb to pool/main/w/wammu/wammu_0.24-2_all.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Michal ÄihaÅ [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated wammu package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2007 18:04:10 +0900 Source: wammu Binary: wammu Architecture: source all Version: 0.24-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Michal ÄihaÅ [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Michal ÄihaÅ [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: wammu - Phone manager Closes: 453376 Changes: wammu (0.24-2) unstable; urgency=low . * This package is GPL2 only, so it should be stated in debian/copyright. *
Processed: Re: Bug#453223/Bug#453224: qalculate-{gtk,kde}: FTBFS: unmet b-dep libqalculate-dev(inst 0.9.4-5 ! = wanted 0.9.6)
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 453223 +pending Bug#453223: qalculate-kde: FTBFS: libqalculate-dev(inst 0.9.4-5 ! = wanted 0.9.6) There were no tags set. Tags added: pending tag 453224 +pending Bug#453224: qalculate-gtk: FTBFS: unmet b-dep libqalculate-dev(inst 0.9.4-5 ! = wanted 0.9.6) There were no tags set. Tags added: pending thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#453223: /Bug#453224: qalculate-{gtk,kde}: FTBFS: unmet b-dep libqalculate-dev(inst 0.9.4-5 ! = wanted 0.9.6)
tag 453223 +pending tag 453224 +pending thanks hoi :) On Tue, Nov 27, 2007 at 09:38:52PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: Package: qalculate-gtk version: 0.9.6-1 Severity: serious User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20071126 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on i386 libqalculate 0.9.6-1 which is needed to fulfill the build-dependency is still in the NEW queue. After it is accepted the build problem should be fixed. -- Martin signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Processed: severity of 434373 is serious
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.10 severity 434373 serious Bug#434373: zope-common - logrotate: do not assume all instances are running as zope:zope Severity set to `serious' from `important' End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#453169: ruby-gnome2 should support poppler 0.6.2
Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386. make[3]: Entering directory `/build/user/ruby-gnome2-0.16.0/poppler/src' cc -I. -I/build/user/ruby-gnome2-0.16.0/glib/src -I. -I/usr/lib/ruby/1.8/i486-linux -I.././poppler -DHAVE_RB_DEFINE_ALLOC_FUNC -DHAVE_RB_BLOCK_PROC -DHAVE_OBJECT_ALLOCATE -DHAVE_NODE_ATTRASGN -DHAVE_RB_CAIRO_H -DHAVE_POPPLER_PAGE_RENDER_SELECTION_TO_PIXBUF -DRUBY_POPPLER_COMPILATION -I/usr/local/lib/site_ruby/1.8/i486-linux -fPIC -g -Wall -O2 -Wall -I/usr/include/poppler/glib -I/usr/include/poppler -I/usr/include/gtk-2.0 -I/usr/lib/gtk-2.0/include -I/usr/include/cairo -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/lib/glib-2.0/include -I/usr/include/pango-1.0 -I/usr/include/freetype2 -I/usr/include/libpng12 -I/usr/include/cairo -I/usr/include/freetype2 -I/usr/include/libpng12-c rbpoppler-page.c rbpoppler-page.c: In function 'page_get_text': rbpoppler-page.c:113: error: incompatible type for argument 2 of 'poppler_page_get_text' rbpoppler-page.c:113: error: too few arguments to function 'poppler_page_get_text' rbpoppler-page.c: In function 'page_get_selection_region': rbpoppler-page.c:129: error: incompatible type for argument 3 of 'poppler_page_get_selection_region' rbpoppler-page.c:129: error: too few arguments to function 'poppler_page_get_selection_region' rbpoppler-page.c: In function 'page_render_selection': rbpoppler-page.c:149: error: incompatible type for argument 5 of 'poppler_page_render_selection' rbpoppler-page.c:149: error: too few arguments to function 'poppler_page_render_selection' rbpoppler-page.c: In function 'page_render_selection_to_pixbuf': rbpoppler-page.c:174: error: incompatible type for argument 7 of 'poppler_page_render_selection_to_pixbuf' rbpoppler-page.c:174: error: too few arguments to function 'poppler_page_render_selection_to_pixbuf' make[3]: *** [rbpoppler-page.o] Error 1 This build failure can be seen in a sparc buildd[1], as this issue is due to poppler's API change. Although the new API has been supported in the Ruby-GNOME2's repository, no new supporting versions are released yet. Packaging the Subversion HEAD of Ruby-GNOME2 or applying a patch from the repository will fix this bug. [1] http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?pkg=ruby-gnome2;ver=0.16.0-8;arch=sparc;stamp=1196292434 Many thanks, -nori -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: reassign 434373 to zope2.9
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.10 reassign 434373 zope2.9 Bug#434373: zope-common - logrotate: do not assume all instances are running as zope:zope Bug reassigned from package `zope-common' to `zope2.9'. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#453161: marked as done (libpri: FTBFS: pri_internal.h:263: error: expected declaration specifiers or '...' before 'size_t')
Your message dated Thu, 29 Nov 2007 11:02:03 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#453161: fixed in libpri 1.4.2-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ---BeginMessage--- Package: libpri version: 1.4.1-2 Severity: serious User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20071126 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on i386 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386. Relevant part: make[1]: Entering directory `/build/user/libpri-1.4.1' CC=gcc ./mkdep -Wall -g -O2 -Wall -Werror -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -g `ls *.c` gcc -Wall -g -O2 -Wall -Werror -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -g -c -o copy_string.o copy_string.c gcc -Wall -g -O2 -Wall -Werror -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -g -c -o pri.o pri.c gcc -Wall -g -O2 -Wall -Werror -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -g -c -o q921.o q921.c gcc -Wall -g -O2 -Wall -Werror -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -g -c -o prisched.o prisched.c gcc -Wall -g -O2 -Wall -Werror -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -g -c -o q931.o q931.c In file included from q931.c:27: pri_internal.h:263: error: expected declaration specifiers or '...' before 'size_t' q931.c: In function 'receive_calling_party_number': q931.c:948: error: too many arguments to function 'libpri_copy_string' q931.c: In function 'transmit_keypad_facility': q931.c:1424: error: too many arguments to function 'libpri_copy_string' q931.c: In function 'q931_keypad_facility': q931.c:2491: error: too many arguments to function 'libpri_copy_string' q931.c: In function 'pri_release_finaltimeout': q931.c:2666: error: too many arguments to function 'libpri_copy_string' q931.c: In function 'q931_setup': q931.c:2815: error: too many arguments to function 'libpri_copy_string' q931.c:2818: error: too many arguments to function 'libpri_copy_string' q931.c:2835: error: too many arguments to function 'libpri_copy_string' q931.c:2852: error: too many arguments to function 'libpri_copy_string' q931.c:2858: error: too many arguments to function 'libpri_copy_string' q931.c: In function 'q931_receive': q931.c:3312: error: too many arguments to function 'libpri_copy_string' q931.c:3313: error: too many arguments to function 'libpri_copy_string' q931.c:3314: error: too many arguments to function 'libpri_copy_string' q931.c:3316: error: too many arguments to function 'libpri_copy_string' q931.c:3317: error: too many arguments to function 'libpri_copy_string' q931.c:3318: error: too many arguments to function 'libpri_copy_string' q931.c:3319: error: too many arguments to function 'libpri_copy_string' q931.c:3320: error: too many arguments to function 'libpri_copy_string' q931.c:3321: error: too many arguments to function 'libpri_copy_string' q931.c:3322: error: too many arguments to function 'libpri_copy_string' q931.c:3349: error: too many arguments to function 'libpri_copy_string' q931.c:3379: error: too many arguments to function 'libpri_copy_string' q931.c:3393: error: too many arguments to function 'libpri_copy_string' q931.c:3394: error: too many arguments to function 'libpri_copy_string' q931.c:3480: error: too many arguments to function 'libpri_copy_string' q931.c:3508: error: too many arguments to function 'libpri_copy_string' q931.c:3543: error: too many arguments to function 'libpri_copy_string' q931.c:3571: error: too many arguments to function 'libpri_copy_string' q931.c:3597: error: too many arguments to function 'libpri_copy_string' q931.c:3605: error: too many arguments to function 'libpri_copy_string' q931.c:3606: error: too many arguments to function 'libpri_copy_string' q931.c: In function 'pri_internal_clear': q931.c:3693: error: too many arguments to function 'libpri_copy_string' make[1]: *** [q931.o] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/user/libpri-1.4.1' make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2 dpkg-buildpackage: failure: debian/rules build gave error exit status 2 The full build log is available from: http://people.debian.org/~lucas/logs/2007/11/26 A list of current common problems and possible solutions is available at http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS . You're welcome to contribute! About the archive rebuild: The rebuild was done on about 50 AMD64 nodes of the Grid'5000 platform, using a clean chroot containing a sid i386 environment. Internet was not accessible from the build systems. --
Processed: cloning logrotate bugs
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: clone 434373 -1 -2 Bug#434373: zope-common - logrotate: do not assume all instances are running as zope:zope Bug 434373 cloned as bugs 453396-453397. reassign -1 zope2.10 Bug#453396: zope-common - logrotate: do not assume all instances are running as zope:zope Bug reassigned from package `zope2.9' to `zope2.10'. reassign -2 zope3 Bug#453397: zope-common - logrotate: do not assume all instances are running as zope:zope Bug reassigned from package `zope2.9' to `zope3'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: your mail
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 434373 pending Bug#434373: zope-common - logrotate: do not assume all instances are running as zope:zope There were no tags set. Tags added: pending thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: your mail
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 453397 pending Bug#453397: zope-common - logrotate: do not assume all instances are running as zope:zope There were no tags set. Tags added: pending thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: your mail
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 453396 pending Bug#453396: zope-common - logrotate: do not assume all instances are running as zope:zope There were no tags set. Tags added: pending thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: mixed up bugreports
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 453283 grave Bug#453283: CVE-2007-6061: possible symlink attack Severity set to `grave' from `normal' severity 453280 normal Bug#453280: CVE-2007-6103: remote DoS Severity set to `normal' from `grave' thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: lower severity
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 453283 normal Bug#453283: CVE-2007-6061: possible symlink attack Severity set to `normal' from `grave' thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#452504: pam_mount.conf conversion fails for group names with blanks
converting the plain-text pam-mount.conf to the new XML format (why, oh why) why - throwing out BSD-era code and instead use established libraries. libxml2 is installed anyway as a dependency of many programs. (`rpm -e libxml2 21 | wc -l` alone gives 135 lines on a casual user (kde/gnome in all colors) desktop.) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: your mail
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 453180 pending Bug#453180: plone-site: The package doesn't install at all: no instance created. There were no tags set. Tags added: pending thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#453242: gnustep-base: FTBFS: checking if ffcall trampolines work... no
On 28/11/07 at 23:51 -0500, Hubert Chathi wrote: Hi Lucas, On Tue, 27 Nov 2007 23:44:23 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386. I'm building in an i386 chroot on amd64. Maybe that's part of the problem. It compiles fine on my machine, which is a normal ix86 machine. And it apparently compiles fine under amd64, too. (Although ffcall does seem to have some problems with amd64 -- #451356.) Is building in an i386 chroot on and amd64 a normal configuration that we are supposed to be supporting? I'm not sure. However, the test probably tries to *run* the code, not just compile it. So it probably won't be possible to use the package in an i386 chroot on amd64. i.e. if it only fails in that configuration, should this bug be serious or important? I don't know. However, a better question is probably do we want it fix or not?. Only 2 or 3 packages currently fail to build in an i386 chroot on amd64, so it would be great not to add another one. :) Note that 1.13.0-7 built fine, too. -- | Lucas Nussbaum | [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ | | jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F | -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#453222: marked as done (orpie: FTBFS: `Depends' field, syntax error after reference to package `ocaml-nox')
Your message dated Thu, 29 Nov 2007 13:09:18 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#453222: orpie: FTBFS: `Depends' field, syntax error after reference to package `ocaml-nox' has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ---BeginMessage--- Package: orpie version: 1.5.1-2 Severity: serious User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20071126 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on i386 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386. Relevant part: dh_installcron dh_installman dh_installinfo dh_installchangelogs dh_link dh_strip dh_compress dh_fixperms dh_installdeb dh_shlibdeps dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: debian/orpie/usr/bin/orpie shouldn't be linked with libgslcblas.so.0 (it uses none of its symbols). dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: debian/orpie/usr/bin/orpie-curses-keys shouldn't be linked with libgsl.so.0 (it uses none of its symbols). dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: debian/orpie/usr/bin/orpie-curses-keys shouldn't be linked with libgslcblas.so.0 (it uses none of its symbols). dh_gencontrol dh_md5sums dh_builddeb dpkg-deb: parse error, in file `debian/orpie/DEBIAN/control' near line 6 package `orpie': `Depends' field, syntax error after reference to package `ocaml-nox' dh_builddeb: command returned error code 512 make: *** [binary-arch] Error 1 dpkg-buildpackage: failure: /usr/bin/fakeroot debian/rules binary gave error exit status 2 The full build log is available from: http://people.debian.org/~lucas/logs/2007/11/26 A list of current common problems and possible solutions is available at http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS . You're welcome to contribute! About the archive rebuild: The rebuild was done on about 50 AMD64 nodes of the Grid'5000 platform, using a clean chroot containing a sid i386 environment. Internet was not accessible from the build systems. -- | Lucas Nussbaum | [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ | | jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F | ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Version: 1.5.1-3 On 28/11/07 at 10:15 +, Uwe Steinmann wrote: On Tue, Nov 27, 2007 at 09:35:25PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: Package: orpie version: 1.5.1-2 Ups, I have just uploaded 1.5.1-3 which doesn't have this error, because I fixed it right before upload. Why is the buildd still trying to build 1.5.1-2 instead of 1.5.1-3? That's because it's not a buildd, just a rebuild of all packages. And I was probably lagging a bit behind the archive, for a few hours. Marking the bug as fixed in 1.5.1-3. -- | Lucas Nussbaum | [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ | | jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F | signature.asc Description: Digital signature ---End Message---
Bug#453161: Patch to fix libpri FTBFS
Hi Libc maintainers, Could you please comment on this issue? Thank you! On 29/11/07 at 00:52 +, brian m. carlson wrote: On Thu, Nov 29, 2007 at 01:48:33AM +0200, Faidon Liambotis wrote: I will upload after confirming that this changing sys/time.h is supposed to be OK (I don't believe it is, but the maintainers may disagree for a good reason). According to POSIX, headers are not generally allowed to make symbols from other headers visible (IIRC). But since stddef.h does not actually define any symbols, it might be an exception. Regardless of any other reason that this change might have occurred, it can only improve POSIX compliance, since other systems will almost certainly need this change as well. Lucas, did you have any more of these? There was at least one more. I know because I patched it, too. It's #453165 (and the related bug, #453159). -- | Lucas Nussbaum | [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ | | jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F | signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Processed: reassign 453210 to lablgtk2, severity of 453210 is normal, tagging 453210
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.10 reassign 453210 lablgtk2 Bug#453210: lablgtk2-doc: FTBFS: Unbound type constructor GtkSourceView_types.source_tag_style Bug reassigned from package `lablgtk2-doc' to `lablgtk2'. severity 453210 normal Bug#453210: lablgtk2-doc: FTBFS: Unbound type constructor GtkSourceView_types.source_tag_style Severity set to `normal' from `serious' tags 453210 + pending Bug#453210: lablgtk2-doc: FTBFS: Unbound type constructor GtkSourceView_types.source_tag_style There were no tags set. Tags added: pending End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: severity of 453180 is serious
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.10 severity 453180 serious Bug#453180: plone-site: The package doesn't install at all: no instance created. Severity set to `serious' from `important' End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#453161: Patch to fix libpri FTBFS
Lucas Nussbaum a écrit : Hi Libc maintainers, Could you please comment on this issue? As far as I understand, the patch is correct. If you need a header you have to include it and do not assume it is included by another one. This also improves portability among various OS. Aurelien Thank you! On 29/11/07 at 00:52 +, brian m. carlson wrote: On Thu, Nov 29, 2007 at 01:48:33AM +0200, Faidon Liambotis wrote: I will upload after confirming that this changing sys/time.h is supposed to be OK (I don't believe it is, but the maintainers may disagree for a good reason). According to POSIX, headers are not generally allowed to make symbols from other headers visible (IIRC). But since stddef.h does not actually define any symbols, it might be an exception. Regardless of any other reason that this change might have occurred, it can only improve POSIX compliance, since other systems will almost certainly need this change as well. Lucas, did you have any more of these? There was at least one more. I know because I patched it, too. It's #453165 (and the related bug, #453159). -- .''`. Aurelien Jarno | GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73 : :' : Debian developer | Electrical Engineer `. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] `-people.debian.org/~aurel32 | www.aurel32.net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#453424: klibc - FTBFS: ld: s390:31-bit architecture of input file [...] is incompatible with s390:64-bit output
Package: klibc Version: 1.5.7-3 Severity: serious There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: Automatic build of klibc_1.5.7-3 on debian-31.osdl.marist.edu by sbuild/s390 98 [...] KLIBCCC usr/klibc/__shared_init.o KLIBCLD usr/klibc/libc.so ld: s390:31-bit architecture of input file `/usr/lib/gcc/s390-linux-gnu/4.2.3/libgcc.a(_clzdi2.o)' is incompatible with s390:64-bit output ld: s390:31-bit architecture of input file `/usr/lib/gcc/s390-linux-gnu/4.2.3/libgcc.a(_clz.o)' is incompatible with s390:64-bit output /usr/lib/gcc/s390-linux-gnu/4.2.3/libgcc.a(_clzdi2.o): In function `__clzdi2': (.text+0x9c): undefined reference to `_GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_' make[3]: *** [usr/klibc/libc.so] Error 1 make[2]: *** [all] Error 2 make[1]: *** [klibc] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/klibc-1.5.7' make: *** [debian/stamp-makefile-build] Error 2 dpkg-buildpackage: failure: debian/rules build gave error exit status 2 ** Build finished at 20071127-1624 FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#453422: klibc - silent produces packages with incompatible binaries
Package: klibc Version: 1.5.7-3 Severity: serious The klibc binary package includes 64-bit binaries if built on a powerpc system. Bastian -- Ahead warp factor one, Mr. Sulu. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#453421: doxygen-gui: Library incompatibility
Package: doxygen-gui Version: 1.5.3-20071020-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable doxywizard crashes with the following error: doxywizard: Symbol `_ZTI7QWidget' has different size in shared object, consider re-linking -- System Information: Debian Release: lenny/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.18 (SMP w/1 CPU core) Locale: LANG=pl_PL, LC_CTYPE=pl_PL (charmap=ISO-8859-2) (ignored: LC_ALL set to pl_PL) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Versions of packages doxygen-gui depends on: ii doxygen 1.5.3-20071020-1 Documentation system for C, C++, J ii libc6 2.7-2GNU C Library: Shared libraries ii libgcc1 1:4.2.2-4GCC support library ii libqt3-mt 3:3.3.7-9Qt GUI Library (Threaded runtime v ii libstdc++6 4.2.2-4 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 ii libx11-62:1.0.3-7X11 client-side library ii libxext61:1.0.3-2X11 miscellaneous extension librar doxygen-gui recommends no packages. -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: tagging 452572
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.10 tags 452572 + pending Bug#452572: coq - FTBFS: Error! (unexpected output) There were no tags set. Tags added: pending End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#453430: camelbones: should this package be removed?
Package: camelbones Version: 0.2.3.cvs20040220-2.1 Severity: serious User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: proposed-removal Hi, While reviewing some packages, your package came up as a possible candidate for removal from Debian, because: * Last maintainer upload in 2004. * Low popcon. * RC buggy. * Severely outdated, upstream has 1.0.3 according to http://camelbones.sourceforge.net/. If you think that it should be orphaned instead of being removed from Debian, please reply to this bug and tell so. If you agree, sending the following commands to [EMAIL PROTECTED] should do it (after replacing nn with this bug's number): severity nn normal reassign nn ftp.debian.org retitle nn RM: camelbones -- RoM; outdated, unmaintained, RC buggy thanks For more information, see http://wiki.debian.org/ftpmaster_Removals http://ftp-master.debian.org/removals.txt If you disagree and want to continue to maintain this package, please just close this bug, preferably in an upload also fixing the other issues. Thank you, -- | Lucas Nussbaum | [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ | | jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F | -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Processed: destruction of round-robin functionality is fucking up our mirrors and making Debian suck for many people, hence fixing this is a release-critical wish
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 438179 wishlist Bug#438179: Please provide a way to override RFC3484 Severity set to `wishlist' from `serious' thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#452572: marked as done (coq - FTBFS: Error! (unexpected output))
Your message dated Thu, 29 Nov 2007 15:17:05 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#452572: fixed in coq 8.1.pl2+dfsg-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ---BeginMessage--- Package: coq Version: 8.1.pl2+dfsg-2 Severity: serious There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: Automatic build of coq_8.1.pl2+dfsg-2 on lxdebian.bfinv.de by sbuild/s390 98 [...] 176 tests passed over 189, i.e. 93 % if grep -F 'Error!' test-suite/check.log ; then false; fi output/Cases.v...Error! (unexpected output) output/Coercions.v...Error! (unexpected output) output/Fixpoint.v...Error! (unexpected output) output/Implicit.v...Error! (unexpected output) output/InitSyntax.v...Error! (unexpected output) output/Intuition.v...Error! (unexpected output) output/Nametab.v...Error! (unexpected output) output/Notations.v...Error! (unexpected output) output/RealSyntax.v...Error! (unexpected output) output/Sum.v...Error! (unexpected output) output/Tactics.v...Error! (unexpected output) output/TranspModtype.v...Error! (unexpected output) output/ZSyntax.v...Error! (unexpected output) make[1]: *** [check] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/coq-8.1.pl2+dfsg' make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2 dpkg-buildpackage: failure: debian/rules build gave error exit status 2 ** Build finished at 20071123-1631 FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died] ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Source: coq Source-Version: 8.1.pl2+dfsg-3 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of coq, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: coq-libs_8.1.pl2+dfsg-3_all.deb to pool/main/c/coq/coq-libs_8.1.pl2+dfsg-3_all.deb coq_8.1.pl2+dfsg-3.diff.gz to pool/main/c/coq/coq_8.1.pl2+dfsg-3.diff.gz coq_8.1.pl2+dfsg-3.dsc to pool/main/c/coq/coq_8.1.pl2+dfsg-3.dsc coq_8.1.pl2+dfsg-3_i386.deb to pool/main/c/coq/coq_8.1.pl2+dfsg-3_i386.deb coqide_8.1.pl2+dfsg-3_i386.deb to pool/main/c/coq/coqide_8.1.pl2+dfsg-3_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Samuel Mimram [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated coq package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2007 13:59:01 + Source: coq Binary: coqide coq-libs coq Architecture: source all i386 Version: 8.1.pl2+dfsg-3 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian OCaml Maintainers [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Samuel Mimram [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: coq- proof assistant for higher-order logic (toplevel and compiler) coq-libs - proof assistant for higher-order logic (theories) coqide - proof assistant for higher-order logic (gtk interface) Closes: 435023 452572 Changes: coq (8.1.pl2+dfsg-3) unstable; urgency=low . * Added check.dpatch to remove warnings which made some tests erroneously fail, closes: #452572. * Added a dependency from coq to emacsen-common, closes: #435023. Files: c7853f36ba09fda314dff8382fe6edaf 1064 math optional coq_8.1.pl2+dfsg-3.dsc 4e89bc08cafa98f36c8b244fdbce9613 15444 math optional coq_8.1.pl2+dfsg-3.diff.gz cd3fb9d5b31094ab16f8784774b7b71a 12593120 math optional coq-libs_8.1.pl2+dfsg-3_all.deb bfed0318d8c8b694e59d0a6f287c6a69 7781132 math optional coq_8.1.pl2+dfsg-3_i386.deb ef442f5967908be0062c6c32ceb7d001 4904856 math optional coqide_8.1.pl2+dfsg-3_i386.deb -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFHTtIgIae1O4AJae8RAgKtAJ9Zid67Iy0+gpY9i4kGg++Zzs6V3wCfWmNW mX68kgQS4LWUIkMKmU+gi3s= =jg28 -END PGP SIGNATURE- ---End Message---
Processed: found 452730 in 1.14.7
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.10 # note that this bug is also found in the version in testing found 452730 1.14.7 Bug#452730: changelogs out of sync Bug marked as found in version 1.14.7. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#453161: Patch to fix libpri FTBFS
Aurelien Jarno wrote: As far as I understand, the patch is correct. If you need a header you have to include it and do not assume it is included by another one. This also improves portability among various OS. My concern was that this is breaking various unrelated packages. Lucas said though that this is not affecting many (~10) so it's probably fine. Regards, Faidon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#452730: found 452730 in 1.14.7
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.10 # note that this bug is also found in the version in testing found 452730 1.14.7 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#453128: octave-plplot: doesn't work at all
On Tue, Nov 27, 2007 at 08:26:23AM -0700, Wesley J. Landaker wrote: octave-plplot doesn't work at all, e.g.: octave:1 plot([1:10]) usage: plot (y) plot (x, y, ...) plot (x, y, fmt, ...) plot (x, y, property, value, ...) error: evaluating if command near line 28, column 3 error: called from `__plt__' in file `/usr/share/octave/2.9.17/m/plot/__plt__.m' error: called from `plot' in file `/usr/share/plplot_octave//plot.m' Octave-plplot 5.8.0RC1~3 works fine for me for i386 on testing / unstable. Can you confirm exactly what you are doing? The octave instructions are from upstream and not Debian specific. They are also out of date (as it says at the top of the file). Under Debian the basic commands are in the path. You don't need to add anything to .octaverc. All you need to do is start octave, type toggle_plplot_use to switch from gnuplot plotting (default) to octave plotting, then type the plot commands. You need to make sure you install the required drivers. For interactive display this is likely to be plplot9-driver-xwin. I agree the documentation is out of date and I will correct it upstream. toggle_plplot_use does not use LOADPATH on octave2.9 it uses addpath instead. Andrew -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#453128: octave-plplot: doesn't work at all
severity 453128 important retitle 453128 octave-plplot: usage documentation out of date; hard to setup thanks On Thursday 29 November 2007 09:18:16 Andrew Ross wrote: Can you confirm exactly what you are doing? The octave instructions are from upstream and not Debian specific. They are also out of date (as it says at the top of the file). Under Debian the basic commands are in the path. You don't need to add anything to .octaverc. The error message I showed was exactly what I got when I followed the directions as well as I could. My .octaverc was: addpath(/usr/share/plplot_octave/) I want plplot to be the default, so I followed those directions. I used addpath instead of the LOADPATH that the documentation says to use (mostly talking about INSTALL.octave.gz and USAGE.octave.gz). The documentation makes it very clear that the usual and standard way to use plplot is to set it up in your .octaverc to be the default. It only mentions toggle_plplot_use as an alternate way to do it if you wanted to also be able to keep using gnuplot (which I don't). All you need to do is start octave, type toggle_plplot_use to switch from gnuplot plotting (default) to octave plotting, then type the plot commands. You need to make sure you install the required drivers. For interactive display this is likely to be plplot9-driver-xwin. Okay, I removed my ~/.octaverc and tried it this way, and it seemed to work, so this isn't a grave bug--I've adjusted accordingly. However, it's still very difficult to get it working without better documentation. The way you suggested works, but doesn't make plplot the default, which is the desired effect. (Calling toggle_plplot_use in .octaverc does appears to do it, though). From USAGE.octave.gz, it says: You must add the plplot_octave script installation directory to Octave LOADPATH *before* the standard Octave LOADPATH. The best way to do this is to create a .octaverc file in your home directory. By default LOADPATH =install-directory/share/plplot_octave//: If you also want to use Octave's standard plotting package, gnuplot, you must set LOADPATH as: LOADPATH =install-directory/share/plplot_octave//:\ install-directory/share/octave//: and use the command toggle_plplot_use to switch between the two plot packages. The key is that I want plplot to be the default--which was easy with octave2.1--I don't want to call toggle_plplot_use in my programs. The current documentation makes it sound like this is easy to do, but I still can't make it work with octave2.9 unless I use the toggle_plplot_use method you just suggested. It does work if I put toggle_plplot_use in my .octaverc. That's okay with me, it just doesn't match how it's documented. I agree the documentation is out of date and I will correct it upstream. toggle_plplot_use does not use LOADPATH on octave2.9 it uses addpath instead. I adjusted the severity and retitled the bug, since this is mainly a documentation issue. Anyway, thanks for the help; I'm glad to have this working for myself. But it would be nice if it clearly documented how to get it to work by default, otherwise it's a regression from use with octave2.1, and it may be hard for other users in the future unless it's updated. Thanks! =) -- Wesley J. Landaker [EMAIL PROTECTED] xmpp:[EMAIL PROTECTED] OpenPGP FP: 4135 2A3B 4726 ACC5 9094 0097 F0A9 8A4C 4CD6 E3D2 signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Bug#447373: camelbones: FTBFS: libgnustep-gui0.10-dev
On 16/11/07 at 03:20 +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote: Given the cvs snapshot it is and the number of uploads, it looks to me that it could be orphaned at least, and removed at best (didn't check popcon, though). Well spotted, removal bug filed. -- | Lucas Nussbaum | [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ | | jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F | signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#449429: dak: should this package be removed?
On 05/11/07 at 18:55 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: Package: dak Version: 1.0-8.4 Severity: serious User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: proposed-removal Hi Joerg and James, I have a script that finds packages which are good candidates to be orphaned or removed from Debian, and dak came up. I was wondering what's the status of the dak package. I don't think that it's still in sync with the dak which is used in the Debian infrastructure. Is the dak package still useful as is? Furthermore, the package has a number of unanswered RC bugs, has a low popcon, and has not been in testing for nearly a year. Wouldn't it be better to just remove the dak package from Debian, until someone has time to package the current version? 16:42:12 Ganneff anyway, an upload is planned for this year... -- | Lucas Nussbaum | [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ | | jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F | -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#444724: tmda: should this package be removed?
close 444724 -1 reassign -1 wnpp severity -1 normal retitle -1 O: tmda -- Tagged Message Delivery Agent thanks On 30/09/07 at 16:36 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: Package: tmda Version: 1.0.3-1.1 Severity: serious User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: proposed-removal Hi, While reviewing packages that were not included in Etch, your package came up as a possible candidate for removal from Debian, because: Hi, Since the situation hasn't evolved, I am now orphaning this package. I still plan to request its removal in the near future, but this orphaning could allow someone to adopt the package if appropriate. Please reply to this bug report if you feel that this package shouldn't be removed. Please also reply if you think that this package _should_ be removed, as this will allow to make the process quicker. Thank you, -- | Lucas Nussbaum | [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ | | jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F | -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#444713: prc-tools: should this package be orphaned?
severity 444713 normal reassign 444713 wnpp retitle 444713 O: prc-tools -- GCC, GDB, binutils, etc. for PDAs using the PalmOS thanks Hi, Since the situation didn't improve, and the maintainer never answered this bug report, I'm now orphaning the package, as originally suggested. Thank you, -- | Lucas Nussbaum | [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ | | jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F | -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Bug#444713: prc-tools: should this package be orphaned?
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 444713 normal Bug#444713: prc-tools: should this package be orphaned? Severity set to `normal' from `serious' reassign 444713 wnpp Bug#444713: prc-tools: should this package be orphaned? Bug reassigned from package `prc-tools' to `wnpp'. retitle 444713 O: prc-tools -- GCC, GDB, binutils, etc. for PDAs using the PalmOS Bug#444713: prc-tools: should this package be orphaned? Changed Bug title to `O: prc-tools -- GCC, GDB, binutils, etc. for PDAs using the PalmOS' from `prc-tools: should this package be orphaned?'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#453161: Patch to fix libpri FTBFS
Faidon Liambotis a écrit : Aurelien Jarno wrote: As far as I understand, the patch is correct. If you need a header you have to include it and do not assume it is included by another one. This also improves portability among various OS. My concern was that this is breaking various unrelated packages. Lucas said though that this is not affecting many (~10) so it's probably fine. Well the packages were already broken, it's just they were building in spite of this problem. We are not at the point of release where making 10 packages FTBFS is that critical. -- .''`. Aurelien Jarno | GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73 : :' : Debian developer | Electrical Engineer `. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] `-people.debian.org/~aurel32 | www.aurel32.net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Bug#453128: octave-plplot: doesn't work at all
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 453128 important Bug#453128: octave-plplot: doesn't work at all Severity set to `important' from `grave' retitle 453128 octave-plplot: usage documentation out of date; hard to setup Bug#453128: octave-plplot: doesn't work at all Changed Bug title to `octave-plplot: usage documentation out of date; hard to setup' from `octave-plplot: doesn't work at all'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: your mail
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 429393 pending Bug#429393: zope-common: dzhandle chokes while reinstalling removed dzinstances There were no tags set. Bug#444618: Zope2.9 instance 'plone-site' already exists Tags added: pending tag 431604 pending Bug#431604: dzhandle: handle existing ZEOs gracefully. There were no tags set. Tags added: pending thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#444723: tinysnmp: should this package be removed?
severity 444723 normal reassign 444723 ftp.debian.org retitle 444723 RM: tinysnmp -- RoQA; unmaintained, RC buggy, alternatives available thanks Hi, Since the situation didn't improve, and the maintainer never answered this bug report, I'm now orphaning the package, as originally suggested. Thank you, -- | Lucas Nussbaum | [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ | | jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F | -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#444715: skippy: should this package be removed?
On 15/10/07 at 08:38 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: On 15/10/07 at 11:47 +1000, Niv Sardi wrote: On Sun, 2007-09-30 at 16:13 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: Hi, While reviewing packages that were not included in Etch, your package came up as a possible candidate for removal from Debian, because: * 1 RC bug opened for a long time. This bug is tagged help for a while and nobody has stepped in. Still, you are the maintainer, so you are the one supposed to find a way to fix it ... Have you tried contacting the people who could help you? Like the X.org team, or the upstream author? If the bug only affects a small number of systems, you also have the solution to downgrade its severity until you can figure out exactly what's needed to reproduce it... * useless with X.org, superseded by skippy-xd. It's only superseeded by skippy-xd on systems where composite runs reasonably fast, witch is only a little share of all. Last time I tried skippy, it was very slow. So, on machines where compositing doesn't work reasonably fast, skippy is also probably very slow... If you think that it should be orphaned instead of being removed from Debian, please reply to this bug and tell so. I've been thinking about orphaning/removing skippy, but I still feel that it can be usefull to some. Fine, but please try to fix the problems: the package hasn't migrated to testing for over a year and wasn't included in etch. There's not much point in keeping in Debian if it's broken... Hi Niv, Any news on this issue? Thank you, -- | Lucas Nussbaum | [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ | | jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F | -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#423310: php-image-graph: should this package be orphaned?
On 12/05/07 at 18:41 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: On 11/05/07 at 11:03 -0400, Jeremy T. Bouse wrote: I do not agree with the removal and find the suggestion of it a slap in the face for the time spent trying to work with upstream to get the licensing issues that would allow the fix to be done. Hi Jeremy, The bugs about thoose license issues have been quiet for a very long time (since November 2005). If the situation has evolved, and you expect a change soon, it could be a good idea to document that in the bug logs. Hi Jeremy, Any news on this issue? I'm planning to orphan this package, following the process discussed recently on [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or has there been some progress on this issue? -- | Lucas Nussbaum | [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ | | jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F | -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#423322: Maintainership of SWI-Prolog
On 13/10/07 at 19:25 +0100, Chris Lamb wrote: Lucas Nussbaum wrote: I will be very much grateful for its up-to-date and complete version. Chris, could you give us an update on that? I have half-packaged the latest upstream, just a few of the extra packages (like -xpce, etc.) are now missing. In a few days so I can also try it on amd64 and PPC machines too - they had some build issues before. Hi Chris, Any update on this? -- | Lucas Nussbaum | [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ | | jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F | signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Processed: Re: Bug#444704: ttyrec is not redundant
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 444704 wnpp Bug#444704: ttyrec: should this package be removed? Bug reassigned from package `ttyrec' to `wnpp'. severity 444704 normal Bug#444704: ttyrec: should this package be removed? Severity set to `normal' from `serious' retitle 444704 O: ttyrec -- A tty recorder Bug#444704: ttyrec: should this package be removed? Changed Bug title to `O: ttyrec -- A tty recorder' from `ttyrec: should this package be removed?'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#423353: php-image-canvas: should this package be removed?
On 15/10/07 at 12:21 -0400, Jeremy T. Bouse wrote: Lucas Nussbaum wrote: On 15/10/07 at 08:33 -0400, Jeremy T. Bouse wrote: Lucas Nussbaum wrote: On 11/05/07 at 11:02 -0400, Jeremy T. Bouse wrote: I do not agree with the removal and find the suggestion of it a slap in the face for the time spent trying to work with upstream to get the licensing issues that would allow the fix to be done. Hi Jeremy, The bugs about thoose license issues have been quiet for a very long time (since November 2005). If the situation has evolved, and you expect a change soon, it could be a good idea to document that in the bug logs. Thank you, At this point I'm abandoning all hope that upstream will make any effort to correct the issue. There appears to be no interest in upstreams part to even respond and continually just passes it off as not their problem. Consider any PHP Licensed PEAR module package currently with a bug due to licensing abandoned and ideal candidate for complete removal from the distribution unless someone with more free time on their hands cares to adopt them. I've tried to get responses from upstream but the attempts were useless and a waste of my time. Arg. is there some place (besides -legal@) where coordination could take place about this issue? I don't see where coordinating through d-legal would accomplish any more than what I have. Upstream is not very cooperative and doesn't appear to think there is anything wrong with the licensing or attempting to fix it. Best hope is that those applications using it and wanting to be included within Debian will write a new module, or find one already written, that doesn't have the licensing issues and move to use it instead. Hi Jeremy, Has this issue evolved recently? If no progress is expected, it might be a better idea to remove the package from Debian for now. It can always be re-uploaded if the issue is solved. -- | Lucas Nussbaum | [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ | | jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F | -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#429795: gutenbrowser: should this package be removed?
On 26/10/07 at 10:53 +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: [Lucas Nussbaum] Any update on that? Nope. I've asked upstream a while back, but have not received any feedback yet. Since it has been useless for a long time now, maybe it's better to remove it now, and re-upload to unstable when a fixed version is available? I am beginning to lean to that option, but want to try to spend some time on the new qt4 version in upstream svn before I give up completely. Not sure when I find time for that, though. :/ Thank you for the request, though, to remind me of the issues with this package. Happy hacking, Hi Peter, Any news since a month ago? -- | Lucas Nussbaum | [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ | | jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F | -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Bug#444723: tinysnmp: should this package be removed?
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 444723 normal Bug#444723: tinysnmp: should this package be removed? Severity set to `normal' from `serious' reassign 444723 ftp.debian.org Bug#444723: tinysnmp: should this package be removed? Bug reassigned from package `tinysnmp' to `ftp.debian.org'. retitle 444723 RM: tinysnmp -- RoQA; unmaintained, RC buggy, alternatives available Bug#444723: tinysnmp: should this package be removed? Changed Bug title to `RM: tinysnmp -- RoQA; unmaintained, RC buggy, alternatives available' from `tinysnmp: should this package be removed?'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#444709: phpqladmin: should this package be removed?
clone 444709 -1 reassign -1 wnpp severity -1 normal retitle -1 O: phpqladmin -- LDAP user administration interface thanks Hi, Since the situation hasn't evolved, I am now orphaning this package. I still plan to request its removal in the near future, but this orphaning could allow someone to adopt the package if appropriate. Please reply to this bug report if you feel that this package shouldn't be removed. Please also reply if you think that this package _should_ be removed, as this will allow to make the process quicker. Thank you, -- | Lucas Nussbaum | [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ | | jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F | -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#444704: ttyrec is not redundant
reassign 444704 wnpp severity 444704 normal retitle 444704 O: ttyrec -- A tty recorder thanks Hi, There still seems to be some interest in keeping ttyrec in Debian. But since the maintainer never replied on this thread, I'm now orphaning it. Feel free to adopt it. -- | Lucas Nussbaum | [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ | | jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F | -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#445021: Bug#445020: edict kanjidic: License discrepancy between the Debian package and upstream, upstream's license being non-free
Hi Florian, first of all, many thanks to Noritada-san and Kinoshita-san for bugreport and analysis. Just for the record, currently I'm drafting a letter to upstream. I'm going to ask for a retroactive license change/upgrade to CC by-sa 3.0, so that this problem can hopefully be resolved for Etch as well. However, I feel rather uncomfortable at this as I don't trust my ability to express this correctly, so any help will be greatly appreciated. Furthermore, spare time is a scarce resource at the moment, so please don't hold your breath till I cough up something ... Thank you for trying to contact with the upstream author. Since I am not a native English speaker (nor a lawyer), I also feel insecure about subtleties of expressions, but I'm willing to help you if I can. I think the key points are as follows: * Debian respects software's freeness. * The old license of EDICT used in 2003 was considered to be free in the Debian's meaning. * CC by-sa 2.5 is not considered to be free in the Debian's meaning, but 3.0 may be considered to be free. (ref. http://wiki.creativecommons.org/Version_3#Debian ) * We mistakenly included EDICT's versions distributed under CC by-sa 2.5 in the Debian's stable release since we were unaware of the license change. * We'd like the upstream author to upgrade the license to CC by-sa 3.0. * It would be glad if a retroactive license upgrade to CC by-sa 3.0 is permitted. * It is easy to upgrade a software's license from CC by-sa 2.5 to 3.0; the change is not big for normal developers, although it is important for Debian. P.S. Although correctly addressed to me, your message seems to have failed to reach me. Curiously, I also couldn't receive a copy from BTS; something bothers me. Fortunately, I can read your message via the web interface of BTS. :-) So, please note that private messages can vanish when replying to me... Many thanks, -nori -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Bug#444709: phpqladmin: should this package be removed?
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: clone 444709 -1 Bug#444709: phpqladmin: should this package be removed? Bug 444709 cloned as bug 453453. reassign -1 wnpp Bug#453453: phpqladmin: should this package be removed? Bug reassigned from package `phpqladmin' to `wnpp'. severity -1 normal Bug#453453: phpqladmin: should this package be removed? Severity set to `normal' from `serious' retitle -1 O: phpqladmin -- LDAP user administration interface Bug#453453: phpqladmin: should this package be removed? Changed Bug title to `O: phpqladmin -- LDAP user administration interface' from `phpqladmin: should this package be removed?'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#423354: pnetc: should this package be removed?
severity 423354 normal clone 423354 -1 reassign 423354 ftp.debian.org retitle 423354 RM: pnetc -- RoQA; unmaintained, RC buggy reassign -1 ftp.debian.org retitle -1 RM: pnet-assemblies -- RoQA; unmaintained, RC buggy thanks Hi, I'm proceeding with the removal of both pnetc and pnet-assemblies (both orphaned). Thank you, -- | Lucas Nussbaum | [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ | | jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F | -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Bug#423354: pnetc: should this package be removed?
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 423354 normal Bug#423354: pnetc: should this package be removed? Severity set to `normal' from `serious' clone 423354 -1 Bug#423354: pnetc: should this package be removed? Bug 423354 cloned as bug 453456. reassign 423354 ftp.debian.org Bug#423354: pnetc: should this package be removed? Bug reassigned from package `pnetc' to `ftp.debian.org'. retitle 423354 RM: pnetc -- RoQA; unmaintained, RC buggy Bug#423354: pnetc: should this package be removed? Changed Bug title to `RM: pnetc -- RoQA; unmaintained, RC buggy' from `pnetc: should this package be removed?'. reassign -1 ftp.debian.org Bug#453456: pnetc: should this package be removed? Bug reassigned from package `pnetc' to `ftp.debian.org'. retitle -1 RM: pnet-assemblies -- RoQA; unmaintained, RC buggy Bug#453456: pnetc: should this package be removed? Changed Bug title to `RM: pnet-assemblies -- RoQA; unmaintained, RC buggy' from `pnetc: should this package be removed?'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#453458: t-code: should this package be removed?
Package: t-code Version: 2:2.3.1-2 Severity: serious User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: proposed-removal Hi, While reviewing some packages, your package came up as a possible candidate for removal from Debian, because: * no upload since 2003 * several RC bugs open If you think that it should be orphaned instead of being removed from Debian, please reply to this bug and tell so. If you agree, sending the following commands to [EMAIL PROTECTED] should do it (after replacing nn with this bug's number): severity nn normal reassign nn ftp.debian.org retitle nn RM: packagename -- RoM; reasons thanks For more information, see http://wiki.debian.org/ftpmaster_Removals http://ftp-master.debian.org/removals.txt If you disagree and want to continue to maintain this package, please just close this bug, preferably in an upload also fixing the other issues. Thank you, filippo -- Filippo Giunchedi - http://esaurito.net PGP key: 0x6B79D401 random quote follows: It is easier to change the specification to fit the program than vice versa. -- Alan Perlis signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#434379: works for me
This is not reproducible. I have nvidia kernel module built for both 2.6.22 and 2.6.23 without any problems. Ritesh -- Ritesh Raj Sarraf RESEARCHUT - http://www.researchut.com Necessity is the mother of invention. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Processed: retitle 376442 to phpqladmin: CVE-2006-3301 multiple XSS vulnerabilities
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.11 retitle 376442 phpqladmin: CVE-2006-3301 multiple XSS vulnerabilities Bug#376442: phpqladmin: many cross site scripting problems Changed Bug title to `phpqladmin: CVE-2006-3301 multiple XSS vulnerabilities' from `phpqladmin: many cross site scripting problems'. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#432182: works for me
I'd suggest you always try to stick to the latest nvidia driver release once Randall packages and pushes it. I've been following this path and have not seen issues. Ritesh -- Ritesh Raj Sarraf RESEARCHUT - http://www.researchut.com Necessity is the mother of invention. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Bug#444709: phpqladmin: should this package be removed?
Hi, * Lucas Nussbaum [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-11-29 19:43]: [...] Since the situation hasn't evolved, I am now orphaning this package. I still plan to request its removal in the near future, but this orphaning could allow someone to adopt the package if appropriate. [...] If you plan to adopt this package please also package the new upstream version to fix a security issue in phpqladmin with this: http://security-tracker.debian.net/tracker/CVE-2006-3301 Kind regards Nico -- Nico Golde - http://www.ngolde.de - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - GPG: 0x73647CFF For security reasons, all text in this mail is double-rot13 encrypted. pgpagQo2epXIr.pgp Description: PGP signature
Processed: tagging 453080
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.10 tags 453080 - patch Bug#453080: openoffice.org-spellcheck-de-at: openoffice crashes when loading a document which has de-at spellcheck enabled Tags were: confirmed patch Tags removed: patch End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: tagging 453080
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.10 tags 453080 + pending Bug#453080: openoffice.org-spellcheck-de-at: openoffice crashes when loading a document which has de-at spellcheck enabled Tags were: confirmed Tags added: pending End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#429795: gutenbrowser: should this package be removed?
[Lucas Nussbaum] Any news since a month ago? Yes. I got this reply from Lorn Potter today: I haven't really worked on gutenbrowser lately, but I do have a (very basic) working version that uses qt 4. I will try to update the repository today or this weekend. I hope this new version will be suitable for Debian. Happy hacking, -- Petter Reinholdtsen -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#453477: jde: should this package be orphaned?
Package: jde Version: 2.3.5.1-2 Severity: serious User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: proposed-orphan Hi, While reviewing some packages, your package came up as a package that should maybe be orphaned by its maintainer, because: * old standing RC bugs * no maintainer activity * last upload 2007-05-02 If you think that it should be removed from Debian instead of being orphaned, please reply to this bug and tell so. If you agree that it should be orphaned, sending the following commands to [EMAIL PROTECTED] should do it (after replacing nn with this bug's number): severity nn normal reassign nn wnpp retitle nn O: packagename -- short package description thanks For more information, see http://www.debian.org/doc/developers-reference/ch-pkgs.en.html#s-archive-manip http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/ If you disagree and want to continue to maintain this package, please close this bug, preferably in an upload also fixing the other issues. Thank you, filippo -- Filippo Giunchedi - http://esaurito.net PGP key: 0x6B79D401 random quote follows: Odium turbae sanabit solitudo, taedium solitudinis turba. Solitude will cure our hatred of the crowd, the crowd will cure our disgust with solitude. -- Seneca, De Tranquillitate Animi signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Processed: Re: Bug#446665: mercury: should this package be removed?
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: notfixed 446665 0.11.0.rotd.20040511-5 Bug#446665: mercury: should this package be removed? Bug no longer marked as fixed in version 0.11.0.rotd.20040511-5. found 446665 0.11.0.rotd.20040511-5 Bug#446665: mercury: should this package be removed? Bug marked as found in version 0.11.0.rotd.20040511-5 and reopened. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#446665: mercury: should this package be removed?
notfixed 446665 0.11.0.rotd.20040511-5 found 446665 0.11.0.rotd.20040511-5 thanks On 15/10/07 at 00:38 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: Hi Roy, On 15/10/07 at 11:03 +1300, Roy Ward wrote: * New upstream release available for a long time now I'm working on packaging that - it's still going to take some time (in the order of weeks). If you think that it should be orphaned instead of being removed from Debian, please reply to this bug and tell so. This is confusing - I thought it was already orphaned, which is when I filed an ITA. Ooops, the ITA line on the PTS should be in bold :-) I missed it. I'm perfectly fine with keeping the package in Debian for now, if you are working on packaging the new version. Thank you for the very detailed information. Hi Roy, Have you made some progress on this package? Also, I'm reopening this bug. Feel free to close it when the other RCs are fixed, but it's easier for us to keep track of this issue with this bug. Happy Hacking! -- | Lucas Nussbaum | [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ | | jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F | -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#447443: gcc-snapshot - FTBFS: mv: cannot stat `debian/tmp/usr/lib/gcc-snapshot/include/c++/4.3.0/s390x-linux-gnu/64': No such file or directory
On Sun, Oct 21, 2007 at 11:19:49AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: - check how the libstdc++ 64 multilib build is configured (config.status) It got broken somewhere between 20061022-1 and 20070326-1. 20061022-1: | Adding multilib support to Makefile in ../../../src/libstdc++-v3 | multidirs=64 | with_multisubdir= 20070326-1: | /usr/bin/ld: crtbegin.o: No such file: No such file or directory | collect2: ld returned 1 exit status | Could not link program with -m64, disabling it. | Adding multilib support to Makefile in ../../../src/libgcc | multidirs= | with_multisubdir= It lacks a 64bit build of libgcc, which is AFAIK the first thing which is built. The relevant code was completely reworked somewhere in revision 120429. Bastian -- Another Armenia, Belgium ... the weak innocents who always seem to be located on a natural invasion route. -- Kirk, Errand of Mercy, stardate 3198.4 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: reassign 453080 to myspell-de-at
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.10 reassign 453080 myspell-de-at Bug#453080: openoffice.org-spellcheck-de-at: openoffice crashes when loading a document which has de-at spellcheck enabled Bug reassigned from package `myspell-de-at,hunspell-de-at' to `myspell-de-at'. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#453080: marked as done (openoffice.org-spellcheck-de-at: openoffice crashes when loading a document which has de-at spellcheck enabled)
Your message dated Thu, 29 Nov 2007 20:47:07 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#453080: fixed in igerman98 20070829-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ---BeginMessage--- Package: openoffice.org-spellcheck-de-at Version: 20070829-3 Severity: grave Tags: patch Justification: renders package unusable hi, impress crashes when loading a document which has de-at spellcheck enabeld because the file /usr/lib/openoffice/share/dict/ooo/de_AT.aff is missing. Normally this file lies in /usr/share/myspell/dicts/de_AT.aff and should be symlinked. best regards, Roland -- System Information: Debian Release: lenny/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.22.6 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Source: igerman98 Source-Version: 20070829-4 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of igerman98, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: aspell-de_20070829-4_all.deb to pool/main/i/igerman98/aspell-de_20070829-4_all.deb hunspell-de-at_20070829-4_all.deb to pool/main/i/igerman98/hunspell-de-at_20070829-4_all.deb hunspell-de-ch_20070829-4_all.deb to pool/main/i/igerman98/hunspell-de-ch_20070829-4_all.deb hunspell-de-de_20070829-4_all.deb to pool/main/i/igerman98/hunspell-de-de_20070829-4_all.deb igerman98_20070829-4.diff.gz to pool/main/i/igerman98/igerman98_20070829-4.diff.gz igerman98_20070829-4.dsc to pool/main/i/igerman98/igerman98_20070829-4.dsc ingerman_20070829-4_amd64.deb to pool/main/i/igerman98/ingerman_20070829-4_amd64.deb iswiss_20070829-4_amd64.deb to pool/main/i/igerman98/iswiss_20070829-4_amd64.deb myspell-de-at_20070829-4_all.deb to pool/main/i/igerman98/myspell-de-at_20070829-4_all.deb myspell-de-ch_20070829-4_all.deb to pool/main/i/igerman98/myspell-de-ch_20070829-4_all.deb myspell-de-de_20070829-4_all.deb to pool/main/i/igerman98/myspell-de-de_20070829-4_all.deb rmligs-german_20070829-4_all.deb to pool/main/i/igerman98/rmligs-german_20070829-4_all.deb wngerman_20070829-4_all.deb to pool/main/i/igerman98/wngerman_20070829-4_all.deb wswiss_20070829-4_all.deb to pool/main/i/igerman98/wswiss_20070829-4_all.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Roland Rosenfeld [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated igerman98 package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2007 21:12:06 +0100 Source: igerman98 Binary: hunspell-de-de hunspell-de-ch wswiss myspell-de-de aspell-de rmligs-german wngerman myspell-de-at iswiss ingerman myspell-de-ch hunspell-de-at Architecture: source all amd64 Version: 20070829-4 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Roland Rosenfeld [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Roland Rosenfeld [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: aspell-de - German dictionary for aspell hunspell-de-at - Austrian (German) dictionary for hunspell hunspell-de-ch - Swiss (German) dictionary for hunspell hunspell-de-de - German dictionary for hunspell ingerman - New German orthography dictionary for ispell iswiss - Swiss (German) orthography dictionary for ispell myspell-de-at - Austrian (German) dictionary for myspell myspell-de-ch - Swiss (German) dictionary for myspell myspell-de-de - German dictionary for myspell rmligs-german - remove incorrectly used ligatures from LaTeX documents wngerman - New German orthography wordlist wswiss - Swiss (German) orthography wordlist Closes: 453080 Changes: igerman98 (20070829-4) unstable; urgency=medium . * Apply aspell-support.patch by Kevin Atkinson to 15_aspell, which sets language when calling aspell munch-list, fixes local-data-dir and adds some documentation on aspell. * Install de_AT.aff to myspell-de-at instead of myspell-de-de (Closes: #453080). * Make Homepage a real package header. Files: ce14b0c72faa7ad9702bc420c4b63f7d 914 text optional igerman98_20070829-4.dsc
Bug#447443: gcc-snapshot - FTBFS: mv: cannot stat `debian/tmp/usr/lib/gcc-snapshot/include/c++/4.3.0/s390x-linux-gnu/64': No such file or directory
On Thu, Nov 29, 2007 at 09:36:08PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote: It lacks a 64bit build of libgcc, which is AFAIK the first thing which is built. I forgot that large parts of the multilib support is added by patches. So the following happens: config-ml.in tries to link something with -m64. As this is the libgcc, which emits crtbegin.o for not-main-arch, it fails as the build not yet produced a usable one and disables itself. The test uses the temporary xgcc and is therefor not able to use the old one from /usr/lib/gcc. Bastian -- Women professionals do tend to over-compensate. -- Dr. Elizabeth Dehaver, Where No Man Has Gone Before, stardate 1312.9. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#447443: gcc-snapshot - FTBFS: mv: cannot stat `debian/tmp/usr/lib/gcc-snapshot/include/c++/4.3.0/s390x-linux-gnu/64': No such file or directory
On Thu, Nov 29, 2007 at 10:33:48PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote: I forgot that large parts of the multilib support is added by patches. So the following happens: config-ml.in tries to link something with -m64. As this is the libgcc, which emits crtbegin.o for not-main-arch, it fails as the build not yet produced a usable one and disables itself. The test uses the temporary xgcc and is therefor not able to use the old one from /usr/lib/gcc. It works for powerpc by accident because the patch contains a type. It checks for m64 instead of 64 and therefor never disable the build in case of error. Bastian -- Spock: We suffered 23 casualties in that attack, Captain. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#453169: ruby-gnome2 should support poppler 0.6.2
This is already fixed in ruby-pkg-extras' team svn. Packages will soon follow. -- Arnaud Cornet -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#451445: marked as done (lynkeos.app: FTBFS: Cannot find /usr/lib/GNUstep/System/Makefiles/GNUstep.sh)
Your message dated Thu, 29 Nov 2007 22:32:02 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#451445: fixed in lynkeos.app 1.2-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ---BeginMessage--- Package: lynkeos.app Version: 1.2-1.2 Severity: serious From my pbuilder build log: ... fakeroot debian/rules clean dh_testdir dh_testroot rm -f build-stamp configure-stamp cd Sources rm Lynkeos.png rm: cannot remove `Lynkeos.png': No such file or directory make: [clean] Error 1 (ignored) cd Sources . /usr/lib/GNUstep/System/Makefiles/GNUstep.sh ; \ /usr/bin/make clean distclean /bin/sh: /usr/lib/GNUstep/System/Makefiles/GNUstep.sh: No such file or directory make: *** [clean] Error 1 dpkg-buildpackage: failure: fakeroot debian/rules clean gave error exit status 2 -- Daniel Schepler ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Source: lynkeos.app Source-Version: 1.2-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of lynkeos.app, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: lynkeos.app_1.2-2.diff.gz to pool/main/l/lynkeos.app/lynkeos.app_1.2-2.diff.gz lynkeos.app_1.2-2.dsc to pool/main/l/lynkeos.app/lynkeos.app_1.2-2.dsc lynkeos.app_1.2-2_i386.deb to pool/main/l/lynkeos.app/lynkeos.app_1.2-2_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Yavor Doganov [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated lynkeos.app package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 Format: 1.7 Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2007 16:29:00 +0200 Source: lynkeos.app Binary: lynkeos.app Architecture: source i386 Version: 1.2-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian GNUstep maintainers [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Yavor Doganov [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: lynkeos.app - Tool to process planetary astronomical images for GNUstep Closes: 370268 391260 448739 451445 Changes: lynkeos.app (1.2-2) unstable; urgency=low . * debian/control (Maintainer): Adopting package, set the GNUstep team as maintainer (Closes: #448739). (Uploaders): Add myself. (Section): Changed to `science'. (Build-Depends): Bump debhelper to (= 5), libgnustep-gui-dev to (= 0.12). Replace fftw3-dev with libfftw3-dev. Add dpatch and imagemagick. Drop gnustep-make. (Standards-Version): Bump to 3.7.2 (no changes). (Homepage): Moved to its own field. * Acknowledge NMUs, many thanks to Julien Danjou and Hubert Chan (Closes: #370268, #391260). * debian/compat: Bump level to 5. * debian/dirs: Deleted. * debian/manpages: Likewise. * debian/menu (section): Changed to `Applications/Science/Astronomy'. (longtitle, icon): Added. * debian/rules: Include include /usr/share/dpatch/dpatch.make. (CFLAGS): Do not define. (ADDITIONAL_OBJCFLAGS, ADDITIONAL_CFLAGS): New conditionally defined variables. (configure, configure-stamp): Delete these targets. (build): Depend on the `patch' target. (build-stamp): Remove `configure-stamp' from prerequisites. Use gs_make and do not source GNUstep.sh (Closes: #451445). Honor DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS. Generate the PNG icon and convert it to XPM. (clean): Renamed to `clean-patched'; depend on it and `unpatch'. (clean-patched): Do not delete `configure-stamp' as it is not created. Do not ignore errors. Delete the XPM icon and the manpage symlink as well. (install): Use gs_make, the standard DESTDIR variable and GNUSTEP_INSTALLATION_DOMAIN. Remove the invalid .desktop file and install ours. Do not invoke dh_installdirs. Remove the executable bits of ImageListWindow.gorm. (binary-arch): Do not create the app wrapper. Remove needless dh_installexamples invocation. Use gsdh_gnustep. Create a symlink for the manpage (fixes lintian warning). (.PHONY): Drop configure. * debian/Lynkeos.desktop: Added. * Split the patches from diff.gz in debian/patches and maintain them with dpatch: + 05_ffmpeg_build.dpatch. + 10_plist_icon.dpatch. + 15_manpage.dpatch: New. * debian/patched/00list:
Bug#453507: strigi-daemon segfaults during indexing on i386
Package: strigi-daemon Version: 0.5.7-1 Severity: grave strigi-daemon segfaults quite short after starting the indexing. Here is the last output of strigi-daemon: /usr/lib/strigi/strigila_namespaceharvester.so /usr/lib/strigi/strigita_xbm.so /usr/lib/strigi/strigita_pcx.so /usr/lib/strigi/strigiea_jpeg.so /usr/lib/strigi/strigila_deb.so /usr/lib/strigi/strigila_cpp.so /usr/lib/strigi/strigila_xpm.so /usr/lib/strigi/strigita_gif.so /usr/lib/strigi/strigita_au.so WARNING: field 'source_code.stats.code_line_count' is not defined in any rdfs ontology database. WARNING: field 'source_code.stats.comment_line_count' is not defined in any rdfs ontology database. WARNING: field 'media.sample_format' is not defined in any rdfs ontology database. WARNING: field 'cursor.hot_spot.x' is not defined in any rdfs ontology database. WARNING: field 'cursor.hot_spot.y' is not defined in any rdfs ontology database. WARNING: field 'content.comment' is not defined in any rdfs ontology database. WARNING: field 'content.creation_time' is not defined in any rdfs ontology database. WARNING: field 'photo.camera_manufacturer' is not defined in any rdfs ontology database. WARNING: field 'photo.camera_model' is not defined in any rdfs ontology database. WARNING: field 'image.width' is not defined in any rdfs ontology database. WARNING: field 'image.height' is not defined in any rdfs ontology database. WARNING: field 'photo.orientation' is not defined in any rdfs ontology database. WARNING: field 'photo.flash_used' is not defined in any rdfs ontology database. WARNING: field 'photo.focal_length' is not defined in any rdfs ontology database. WARNING: field 'photo.35mm_equivalent' is not defined in any rdfs ontology database. WARNING: field 'photo.exposure_time' is not defined in any rdfs ontology database. WARNING: field 'photo.aperture' is not defined in any rdfs ontology database. WARNING: field 'photo.exposure_bias' is not defined in any rdfs ontology database. WARNING: field 'photo.white_balance' is not defined in any rdfs ontology database. WARNING: field 'photo.metering_mode' is not defined in any rdfs ontology database. WARNING: field 'image.color_space' is not defined in any rdfs ontology database. WARNING: field 'photo.cdd_width' is not defined in any rdfs ontology database. WARNING: field 'photo.focus_distance' is not defined in any rdfs ontology database. WARNING: field 'photo.exposure_program' is not defined in any rdfs ontology database. WARNING: field 'photo.iso_equivalent' is not defined in any rdfs ontology database. WARNING: field 'compressed.target_quality' is not defined in any rdfs ontology database. WARNING: field 'compressed.compression_algorithm' is not defined in any rdfs ontology database. WARNING: field 'content.thumbnail' is not defined in any rdfs ontology database. WARNING: field 'ole.category' is not defined in any rdfs ontology database. WARNING: field 'ole.presentationtarget' is not defined in any rdfs ontology database. WARNING: field 'ole.manager' is not defined in any rdfs ontology database. WARNING: field 'ole.company' is not defined in any rdfs ontology database. WARNING: field 'TODO.from' is not defined in any rdfs ontology database. WARNING: field 'content.warning' is not defined in any rdfs ontology database. WARNING: field 'document.stats.table_count' is not defined in any rdfs ontology database. WARNING: field 'document.stats.object_count' is not defined in any rdfs ontology database. WARNING: field 'document.stats.image_count' is not defined in any rdfs ontology database. WARNING: field 'chemistry.molecule_count' is not defined in any rdfs ontology database. This should not happen. [1]13065 segmentation fault strigidaemon - since no -dbg package is available I can't really say where the error is, sorry. If you have any questions don't hesitate to ask me, I'll try to help then :) Greetings winnie -- System Information: Debian Release: lenny/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.23 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Versions of packages strigi-daemon depends on: ii dbus1.1.2-1 simple interprocess messaging syst ii dbus-x111.1.2-1 simple interprocess messaging syst ii libbz2-1.0 1.0.3-7 high-quality block-sorting file co ii libc6 2.7-2GNU C Library: Shared libraries ii libdbus-1-3 1.1.2-1 simple interprocess messaging syst ii libgcc1 1:4.2.2-4GCC support library ii libstdc++6 4.2.2-4 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 ii libstreamanalyzer0 0.5.7-1 streamanalyzer library for Strigi ii libstreams0 0.5.7-1 streams library for for Strigi Des ii libxml2
Bug#453509: doesn't start with gcj jvm
Package: eclipse Version: 3.2.2-4 Severity: grave Hi, I had problems launching eclipse. Every time I tried, the java process was using up to 80% of the memory. % eclipse -debug searching for compatible vm... testing /usr/lib/jvm/java-gcj...found Could not create /usr/local/lib/eclipse/.eclipseextension. Please run as root: touch /usr/local/lib/eclipse/.eclipseextension chmod 2775 /usr/local/lib/eclipse/.eclipseextension chown root:staff /usr/local/lib/eclipse/.eclipseextension Start VM: /usr/lib/jvm/java-gcj/bin/java -Djava.library.path=/usr/lib/jni -Dgnu.gcj.precompiled.db.path=/var/lib/gcj-4.2/classmap.db -Dgnu.gcj.runtime.VMClassLoader.library_control=never -Dosgi.locking=none -jar /usr/lib/eclipse/startup.jar -os linux -ws gtk -arch x86_64 -launcher /usr/lib/eclipse/eclipse -name Eclipse -showsplash 600 -exitdata 228007 -install /usr/lib/eclipse -debug -vm /usr/lib/jvm/java-gcj/bin/java -vmargs -Djava.library.path=/usr/lib/jni -Dgnu.gcj.precompiled.db.path=/var/lib/gcj-4.2/classmap.db -Dgnu.gcj.runtime.VMClassLoader.library_control=never -Dosgi.locking=none -jar /usr/lib/eclipse/startup.jar Install location: file:/usr/lib/eclipse/ Configuration file: file:/usr/lib/eclipse/configuration/config.ini loaded Configuration location: file:/home/nox/.eclipse/org.eclipse.platform_3.2.0/configuration/ Configuration file: file:/home/nox/.eclipse/org.eclipse.platform_3.2.0/configuration/config.ini not found or not read Shared configuration location: file:/usr/lib/eclipse/configuration/ Framework located: file:/usr/lib/eclipse/plugins/org.eclipse.osgi_3.2.2.R32x_v20070118.jar Framework classpath: file:/usr/lib/eclipse/plugins/org.eclipse.osgi_3.2.2.R32x_v20070118.jar Splash location: /usr/lib/eclipse/plugins/org.eclipse.platform_3.2.2.r322_v20070117b/splash.bmp runCommand: /usr/lib/eclipse/eclipse-nameEclipse-showsplash600/usr/lib/eclipse/plugins/org.eclipse.platform_3.2.2.r322_v20070117b/splash.bmp Debug options: file:/home/nox/.options not found Time to load bundles: 3 GC Warning: Out of Memory! Returning NIL! Then I tried with the sun jvm with this command : % eclipse -debug -consolelog -vm /usr/lib/jvm/java-6-sun/bin/java and it started correctly. I don't know if it's eclipse that is involved or gcj but i didn't meet any other problem with gcj so... Thanks. -- System Information: Debian Release: lenny/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.22-3-amd64 (SMP w/1 CPU core) Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Versions of packages eclipse depends on: ii eclipse-jdt 3.2.2-4Java Development Tools plug-ins fo ii eclipse-pde 3.2.2-4Plug-in Development Environment to ii eclipse-source3.2.2-4Eclipse source code plug-ins ii zenity2.20.0-2 Display graphical dialog boxes fro Versions of packages eclipse recommends: ii eclipse-gcj 3.2.2-4Native Eclipse run with GCJ -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#452829: marked as done (libgpod-dev: Missing Depends on libffi4-dev)
Your message dated Thu, 29 Nov 2007 22:47:03 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#452829: fixed in libgpod 0.6.0-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ---BeginMessage--- Package: libgpod-dev Version: 0.6.0-2 Severity: serious Hi, Your package ships an libgpod.la which contains: libgpod.la:dependency_libs=' /usr/lib/libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.la -lm /usr/lib/libgmodule-2.0.la -ldl -lffi /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.la /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.la' Which means you need Depends for all the files mentioned in it. You currently have: Depends: libgpod3 (= 0.6.0-2), libgtk2.0-dev, libglib2.0-dev If you have those and libc6-dev, you have everything except -lffi which is part of libffi4-dev. You also don't seem to have a build dependency on it, but libgpod3 does have a Depends on it. Either your missing a build dependency, or more likely, you shouldn't link to -lffi in the first place since you don't seem to be using any symbols from it. Kurt ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Source: libgpod Source-Version: 0.6.0-3 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of libgpod, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: libgpod-common_0.6.0-3_i386.deb to pool/main/libg/libgpod/libgpod-common_0.6.0-3_i386.deb libgpod-dev_0.6.0-3_i386.deb to pool/main/libg/libgpod/libgpod-dev_0.6.0-3_i386.deb libgpod-nogtk-dev_0.6.0-3_i386.deb to pool/main/libg/libgpod/libgpod-nogtk-dev_0.6.0-3_i386.deb libgpod3-nogtk_0.6.0-3_i386.deb to pool/main/libg/libgpod/libgpod3-nogtk_0.6.0-3_i386.deb libgpod3_0.6.0-3_i386.deb to pool/main/libg/libgpod/libgpod3_0.6.0-3_i386.deb libgpod_0.6.0-3.diff.gz to pool/main/libg/libgpod/libgpod_0.6.0-3.diff.gz libgpod_0.6.0-3.dsc to pool/main/libg/libgpod/libgpod_0.6.0-3.dsc python-gpod_0.6.0-3_i386.deb to pool/main/libg/libgpod/python-gpod_0.6.0-3_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated libgpod package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2007 22:29:30 +0100 Source: libgpod Binary: libgpod-common libgpod-dev libgpod3-nogtk python-gpod libgpod3 libgpod-nogtk-dev Architecture: source i386 Version: 0.6.0-3 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: gtkpod Maintainers [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: libgpod-common - a library to read and write songs and artwork to an iPod libgpod-dev - a library to read and write songs and artwork to an iPod libgpod-nogtk-dev - a library to read and write songs and artwork to an iPod libgpod3 - a library to read and write songs and artwork to an iPod libgpod3-nogtk - a library to read and write songs and artwork to an iPod python-gpod - a library to read and write songs and artwork to an iPod Closes: 452829 Changes: libgpod (0.6.0-3) unstable; urgency=medium . * 20_no-superfluous-ffi-dep: Only use PYGOBJECT_LIBS in bindings/python. This avoids a spurious dependency on libffi. Reported by Kurt Roeckx. Closes: #452829 * 10_allow-autoreconf: Make autoreconf work which is needed for 20_no-superfluous-ffi-dep to take effect. * Change priority of the -nogtk variants to extra since they conflict with the full variants and optional packages should not conflict with each other. Pointed out by debcheck. Files: 1e21e8f792bfc0e3bb0220fcea1a548f 1157 libs optional libgpod_0.6.0-3.dsc 1cae4a9cb9770585799446bb39b5e900 6878 libs optional libgpod_0.6.0-3.diff.gz b763608e1a4d61bf748b7d21329c95dc 114260 libdevel extra libgpod-nogtk-dev_0.6.0-3_i386.deb 86fe84e8ea8473b3c5c13bfad9209cfe 92010 libs extra libgpod3-nogtk_0.6.0-3_i386.deb 14880aa1e7601a43a47c98dc92d0c070 222404 libdevel optional libgpod-dev_0.6.0-3_i386.deb e2293081228a2fb82197705a323ba053 196380 libs optional libgpod3_0.6.0-3_i386.deb aa68fafd21200f61e846abc3d72eb617 129998 libs optional libgpod-common_0.6.0-3_i386.deb e7b1af80c9ffdd72cedd0a5ed666d711 543342 python optional python-gpod_0.6.0-3_i386.deb -BEGIN PGP
Bug#447447: marked as done (preferences.app: FTBFS: unmet b-dep libgnustep-gui0.10-dev)
Your message dated Thu, 29 Nov 2007 22:47:04 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#447447: fixed in preferences.app 1.2.100.0-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ---BeginMessage--- Package: preferences.app version: 1.2.100.0-2 Severity: serious User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20071021 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on i386 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386. Relevant part: ** Using build dependencies supplied by package: Build-Depends: debhelper ( 4.1.0), libgnustep-gui0.10-dev, gnustep-make Checking for already installed source dependencies... debhelper: missing Using default version 5.0.58 libgnustep-gui0.10-dev: missing gnustep-make: missing Checking for source dependency conflicts... Reading package lists... Building dependency tree... Reading state information... Package libgnustep-gui0.10-dev is not available, but is referred to by another package. This may mean that the package is missing, has been obsoleted, or is only available from another source E: Package libgnustep-gui0.10-dev has no installation candidate apt-get failed. Package installation failed Trying to reinstall removed packages: Trying to uninstall newly installed packages: Source-dependencies not satisfied; skipping preferences.app The full build log is available from http://people.debian.org/~lucas/logs/2007/10/21 A list of current common problems and possible solutions is available at http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS . You're welcome to contribute! About the archive rebuild: The rebuild was done on about 50 AMD64 nodes of the Grid'5000 platform, using a clean chroot containing a sid i386 environment. Internet was not accessible from the build systems. -- | Lucas Nussbaum | [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ | | jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F | ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Source: preferences.app Source-Version: 1.2.100.0-3 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of preferences.app, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: preferences.app_1.2.100.0-3.diff.gz to pool/main/p/preferences.app/preferences.app_1.2.100.0-3.diff.gz preferences.app_1.2.100.0-3.dsc to pool/main/p/preferences.app/preferences.app_1.2.100.0-3.dsc preferences.app_1.2.100.0-3_i386.deb to pool/main/p/preferences.app/preferences.app_1.2.100.0-3_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Yavor Doganov [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated preferences.app package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 Format: 1.7 Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2007 11:53:41 +0200 Source: preferences.app Binary: preferences.app Architecture: source i386 Version: 1.2.100.0-3 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Gürkan Sengün [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Yavor Doganov [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: preferences.app - GNUstep Preferences application Closes: 447447 Changes: preferences.app (1.2.100.0-3) unstable; urgency=low . [ Gürkan Sengün ] * GNUstep transition. (Closes: #447447) + Updated debian/rules. * Added a desktop file. . [ Yavor Doganov ] * GNUmakefile.preamble: Do not define ADDITIONAL_INSTALL_DIRS. * Modules/Colors/GNUmakefile, Modules/Defaults/GNUmakefile, Modules/Font/GNUmakefile, Modules/Keyboard/GNUmakefile, Modules/Time/GNUmakefile (BUNDLE_INSTALL_DIR): Use $(GNUSTEP_LIBRARY). * debian/control (Build-Depends): Dropped gnustep-make. (Uploaders): Added myself with maintainer's permission. (Homepage): Added. * debian/menu (section): Append Administration, Applications/System is a menu root. Files: 5e0c929755e311e9f00385cedd78d3f8 731 x11 optional preferences.app_1.2.100.0-3.dsc 5b180b1b02fc76bf4133f9488e1b679c 4239 x11 optional preferences.app_1.2.100.0-3.diff.gz 76670d731f7060d8e1324ddfbe43a0a6 243660 x11 optional preferences.app_1.2.100.0-3_i386.deb -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Processed: patch
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 441684 + patch Bug#441684: libdb4.3-ruby: FTBFS: bdb.h:2:21: error: version.h: No such file or directory There were no tags set. Tags added: patch thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#451513: log4cpp: FTBFS: updated timestamp cause failing autotools run
On 16/11/2007, Philipp Kern wrote: Your package failed to auto-build on sparc because of this issue but I could easily reproduce the issue on my machine by calling `debian/rules apply-patches' and then running `./configure make'. A common workaround would be to “touch configure” before running make. More tips are available in the autotools-dev's README.Debian. Philipp, if you confirm that touching the file fixes this, I'll probably NMU it some time after such a confirmation. Cheers, -- Cyril Brulebois pgpSwmYkjrMra.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#441684: patch
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
tags 441684 + patch
thanks
Hi,
upstream ruby removed file version.h . But we already have lots of fixes
based on string RUBY_VERSION_CODE, so it's easier to recreate this
version.h for ruby1.9 package. This patch fix this bug.
It also fix another bug introduced by ruby1.9 upstream changes.
Cheers,
filipe {
@ icewall.org
GPG1024D/A6BA423E
Jabber [EMAIL PROTECTED]
}
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFHT0frmKFbPqa6Qj4RAvcdAJ9kgWCrI5LNBRdhcL7uqvsvXUTkmQCghvdn
Bh6h0zezkyV2MBtXvujnZCQ=
=xSuR
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
diff -Nru libdb4.3-ruby-0.5.8-old/debian/rules libdb4.3-ruby-0.5.8/debian/rules
--- libdb4.3-ruby-0.5.8-old/debian/rules 2007-11-29 23:03:32.0 +
+++ libdb4.3-ruby-0.5.8/debian/rules 2007-11-29 22:56:19.101222182 +
@@ -30,6 +30,7 @@
tar -C build-tree-1.8 -zxf debian/src.tgz
tar -C build-tree-1.9 -zxf debian/src.tgz
+ echo #define RUBY_VERSION_CODE 190 build-tree-1.9/src/version.h
ruby1.8 -C build-tree-1.8 extconf.rb --with-db-version=-4.3
ruby1.9 -C build-tree-1.9 extconf.rb --with-db-version=-4.3
diff -Nru libdb4.3-ruby-0.5.8-old/src/common.c libdb4.3-ruby-0.5.8/src/common.c
--- libdb4.3-ruby-0.5.8-old/src/common.c 2007-11-29 23:03:32.0 +
+++ libdb4.3-ruby-0.5.8/src/common.c 2007-11-29 23:02:28.077215536 +
@@ -1413,7 +1413,11 @@
dbst-type = DB_UNKNOWN;
break;
}
+#if RUBY_VERSION_CODE = 190
+ cl = RCLASS_SUPER(cl);
+#else
cl = RCLASS(cl)-super;
+#endif
}
if (!cl) {
rb_raise(bdb_eFatal, unknown database type);
Bug#453509: doesn't start with gcj jvm
On Thu, Nov 29, 2007 at 11:49:09PM +0100, NoX wrote: Package: eclipse Version: 3.2.2-4 Severity: grave Hi, I had problems launching eclipse. Every time I tried, the java process was using up to 80% of the memory. Please update to glibc 2.7-3 and retry and report back if its better. Cheers, Michael -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#453513: eclipse: does not start with gcj jvm
Package: eclipse Version: 3.2.2-4 Severity: grave Justification: causes non-serious data loss Hi, I had problems launching eclipse. Every time I tried, the java process was using up to 80% of the memory. % eclipse -debug searching for compatible vm... testing /usr/lib/jvm/java-gcj...found Could not create /usr/local/lib/eclipse/.eclipseextension. Please run as root: touch /usr/local/lib/eclipse/.eclipseextension chmod 2775 /usr/local/lib/eclipse/.eclipseextension chown root:staff /usr/local/lib/eclipse/.eclipseextension Start VM: /usr/lib/jvm/java-gcj/bin/java -Djava.library.path=/usr/lib/jni -Dgnu.gcj.precompiled.db.path=/var/lib/gcj-4.2/classmap.db -Dgnu.gcj.runtime.VMClassLoader.library_control=never -Dosgi.locking=none -jar /usr/lib/eclipse/startup.jar -os linux -ws gtk -arch x86_64 -launcher /usr/lib/eclipse/eclipse -name Eclipse -showsplash 600 -exitdata 228007 -install /usr/lib/eclipse -debug -vm /usr/lib/jvm/java-gcj/bin/java -vmargs -Djava.library.path=/usr/lib/jni -Dgnu.gcj.precompiled.db.path=/var/lib/gcj-4.2/classmap.db -Dgnu.gcj.runtime.VMClassLoader.library_control=never -Dosgi.locking=none -jar /usr/lib/eclipse/startup.jar Install location: file:/usr/lib/eclipse/ Configuration file: file:/usr/lib/eclipse/configuration/config.ini loaded Configuration location: file:/home/nox/.eclipse/org.eclipse.platform_3.2.0/configuration/ Configuration file: file:/home/nox/.eclipse/org.eclipse.platform_3.2.0/configuration/config.ini not found or not read Shared configuration location: file:/usr/lib/eclipse/configuration/ Framework located: file:/usr/lib/eclipse/plugins/org.eclipse.osgi_3.2.2.R32x_v20070118.jar Framework classpath: file:/usr/lib/eclipse/plugins/org.eclipse.osgi_3.2.2.R32x_v20070118.jar Splash location: /usr/lib/eclipse/plugins/org.eclipse.platform_3.2.2.r322_v20070117b/splash.bmp runCommand: /usr/lib/eclipse/eclipse-nameEclipse-showsplash600/usr/lib/eclipse/plugins/org.eclipse.platform_3.2.2.r322_v20070117b/splash.bmp Debug options: file:/home/nox/.options not found Time to load bundles: 3 GC Warning: Out of Memory! Returning NIL! Then I tried with the sun jvm with this command : % eclipse -debug -consolelog -vm /usr/lib/jvm/java-6-sun/bin/java and all's going fine... Maybe gcj is the problem but I didn't run any other problem with it. Thanks -- System Information: Debian Release: lenny/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.22-3-amd64 (SMP w/1 CPU core) Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Versions of packages eclipse depends on: ii eclipse-jdt 3.2.2-4Java Development Tools plug-ins fo ii eclipse-pde 3.2.2-4Plug-in Development Environment to ii eclipse-source3.2.2-4Eclipse source code plug-ins ii zenity2.20.0-2 Display graphical dialog boxes fro Versions of packages eclipse recommends: ii eclipse-gcj 3.2.2-4Native Eclipse run with GCJ -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#453242: gnustep-base: FTBFS: checking if ffcall trampolines work... no
On Thu, Nov 29, 2007 at 12:50:56PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: On 28/11/07 at 23:51 -0500, Hubert Chathi wrote: However, the test probably tries to *run* the code, not just compile it. That's right, it is run via the AC_RUN_IFELSE macro, where the condition for cross-compiling is set to have_working_trampoline=yes -- but your configuration is not cross-compiling so the test program is being run. I don't understand the code, but AFAICS it cannot return success in that case. Is there are a reliable way to detect the host cpu in such an environment? i.e. if it only fails in that configuration, should this bug be serious or important? IMHO, Hubert, this is certainly not a release-critical bug. However, a better question is probably do we want it fix or not?. It is worth fixing if GNUstep upstream (or ffcall upstream) consider it a bug. Trampolines are an evil art. If this environment can be detected either by gnustep-base's configure or the trampoline test, it is the way to go. Failing that, the remaining solutions are just to make it build, which is easy -- but not an actual bugfix. Note that 1.13.0-7 built fine, too. Certainly, IIRC upstream indroduced this trampiline configure test in 0.14 precisely because they were receiving many bogus bug reports from Solaris/HP-UX users. GNUstep has always heavily relied on ffcall/ffi so when that's not working the behaviour of the whole framework is unpredictable, and it's very hard to figure out what's going on. So from their (upstream's) point of view, I believe that's a good change. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#453349: Information about splashy FTBFS
On Nov 28, 2007 8:10 PM, brian m. carlson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: __vdso_clock_gettime is a fast version of clock_gettime that lives in the Linux VDSO (linux-vdso.so.1 on amd64), which is a dummy library that is part of the kernel (and mapped by the kernel into every process's address space). Thus, ld will never be able to look it up, since it doesn't exist outside of the kernel binary. This bug will only manifest itself on architectures that have the VDSO, which (TTBOMK) are i386 and amd64. There are two ways around this: either don't link statically, [snip] Splashy 0.3.7 won't be linked statically anymore. This version is in active development and it will be released very soon. Regards, -- )(- Luis Mondesi Maestro Debiano - START ENCRYPTED BLOCK (Triple-ROT13) -- Gur Hohagh [Yvahk] qvfgevohgvba oevatf gur fcvevg bs Hohagh gb gur fbsgjner jbeyq. - END ENCRYPTED BLOCK (Triple-ROT13) --
Bug#446665: mercury: should this package be removed?
Lucas Nussbaum wrote: Have you made some progress on this package? Some, but not enough to submit a package. One bit of news is that gcc-3.3 is going to be the required compiler. I've looking at building Mercury 0.13.1 with several versions of gcc on x86 and amd64, and while projects are fine with a later gcc, Mercury itself won't build under newer versions. The next upstream release (whenever that is) will shift gcc versions to 4.1 or 4.2. If someone reading this can tell me that a version of gcc that old is not acceptable, I'll package a rotd (release of the day), and then gamble that there is a full upstream release before the Lenny release. Also, I'm reopening this bug. Feel free to close it when the other RCs are fixed, but it's easier for us to keep track of this issue with this bug. OK, thanks. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#450443: python-numpy: Patch to fix FTBFS
Package: python-numpy Version: 1:1.0.1-8 Followup-For: Bug #450443 The attached patch solves the packaging bug. Kind regards, - Jonas -- System Information: Debian Release: lenny/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.23-1.0.0jones1-c3-2-desktop (PREEMPT) Locale: LANG=da_DK.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=da_DK.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Versions of packages python-numpy depends on: ii lapack3 [liblapack.so. 3.0.2531a-6.1 library of linear algebra routines ii libc6 2.6.1-1+b1GNU C Library: Shared libraries ii libg2c01:3.4.6-6 Runtime library for GNU Fortran 77 ii libgcc11:4.2.2-3 GCC support library ii python 2.4.4-6 An interactive high-level object-o ii python-central 0.5.15register and build utility for Pyt ii python-numpy-dev 1:1.0.1-8 Numerical Python adds a fast array ii refblas3 [libblas.so.3 1.2-8 Basic Linear Algebra Subroutines 3 python-numpy recommends no packages. -- no debconf information diff -u python-numpy-1.0.3/debian/rules python-numpy-1.0.3/debian/rules --- python-numpy-1.0.3/debian/rules +++ python-numpy-1.0.3/debian/rules @@ -45,8 +45,8 @@ done : # Add unversioned f2py script - [ -f debian/python-numpy/usr/bin/f2py ] \ - || ln -s f2py$(cdbs_python_current_version) debian/python-numpy/usr/bin/f2py + mv $(DEB_DESTDIR)/usr/bin/f2py $(DEB_DESTDIR)/usr/bin/f2py$(cdbs_python_current_version) + ln -s f2py$(cdbs_python_current_version) debian/python-numpy/usr/bin/f2py # : # Add more f2py files # for v in $(cdbs_python_build_versions); do \ diff -u python-numpy-1.0.3/debian/changelog python-numpy-1.0.3/debian/changelog --- python-numpy-1.0.3/debian/changelog +++ python-numpy-1.0.3/debian/changelog @@ -1,3 +1,10 @@ +python-numpy (1:1.0.3-1.0.0jones1) jones; urgency=low + + * Unofficial build based on Debian sid packaging. + * Fix installing both versioned and unversioned f2py. Closes: bug#450443. + + -- Jonas Smedegaard [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri, 30 Nov 2007 02:16:27 +0100 + python-numpy (1:1.0.3-1) unstable; urgency=low * New upstream version.
Bug#449231: Unable to reproduce
I cannot reproduce this on any of my machines. What type of video are you using? Do you get any more details on the segfault? Is there any chance you could produce a stacktrace? Thanks, Barry deFreese -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Bug#453616: gcc-4.1: cross build failure: gcc-4.1-arm-linux-gnu not build
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 453616 gcc-4.1 Bug#453616: gcc-4.1: cross build failure: gcc-4.1-arm-linux-gnu not build Warning: Unknown package 'gcc-4.1-arm-linux-gnu' Bug reassigned from package `gcc-4.1-arm-linux-gnu' to `gcc-4.1'. severity 453616 important Bug#453616: gcc-4.1: cross build failure: gcc-4.1-arm-linux-gnu not build Severity set to `important' from `serious' -- Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#453616: gcc-4.1: cross build failure: gcc-4.1-arm-linux-gnu not build
Package: gcc-4.1-arm-linux-gnu Version: 4.1.2-17 Severity: serious Justification: no longer builds from source I have executed the following: sh$ apt-get source gcc-4.1-arm-linux-gnu sh$ cd gcc-4.1-4.1.2/ sh$ fakeroot sh# dpkg-buildpackage The build reported success, but the package I've originally requested (e.g. gcc-4.1-arm-linux-gnu) wasn't actually build. The package was sourcesd by apt-get from www.emdebian.org. As of that repository, the package I've requested should at least contain ./usr/bin/arm-linux-gnu-gcc-4.1 file. That file is not present anywhere within the finished build tree. -- System Information: Debian Release: lenny/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.22-2-686 (SMP w/1 CPU core) Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Versions of packages gcc-4.1-arm-linux-gnu depends on: ii binutils-arm-linux-gnu2.18-1 The GNU binary utilities, for arm- ii cpp-4.1-arm-linux-gnu 4.1.2-17 The GNU C preprocessor ii gcc-4.1-base 4.1.2-17 The GNU Compiler Collection (base ii libc6 2.6.1-1+b1 GNU C Library: Shared libraries ii libgcc1-arm-cross 1:4.1.1-21 GCC support library Versions of packages gcc-4.1-arm-linux-gnu recommends: ii libc6-dev-arm-cross 2.3.6.ds1-8 GNU C Library: Development Librari pn libmudflap0-dev-arm-crossnone (no description available) -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
