Bug#509292: rsyslog: random crashes with remote logging
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 9:40 AM, Michael Biebl bi...@debian.org wrote: Then we have the random crashes on the client (tracked as #509292). Juho's rsyslog.conf is at [1]. The only clue so far is, that it is related to multi core machines (= 4 cores). I'm not convinced that it is related to remote logging. Juho, could you strip down your rsyslog.conf step by step (i.e. first remove the remote logging, then the $ActionQueue* directives, then the imklog plugin, then the different rules), which will help us to narrow down this bug. Actually it's Juha... ;) Well anyway, I reverted back to the original version without additional debugging information and I removed remote logging. Let's see if I still get those crashes. Regards, Juha -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#511007: xserver-xorg-core: Segfault starting X server
reassign 511007 xserver-xorg-video-intel 2:2.5.1-1 close 511007 2:2.5.99.2-1 kthxbye On Tue, 2009-01-06 at 16:46 +, Sam Morris wrote: I've been happily using xserver 1.5 for a few days. I rebooted today, and now the X server won't start. This also happens when running 'Xorg -configure', so I don't think it's my config file that's the problem. I'm not sure what caused this crash in the first place, but I've uploaded a new version of the intel driver and it seems to work fine, so... Cheers, Julien -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Processed: Re: Bug#511007: xserver-xorg-core: Segfault starting X server
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: reassign 511007 xserver-xorg-video-intel 2:2.5.1-1 Bug#511007: xserver-xorg-core: Segfault starting X server Bug#511018: libdrm2: X stopped working after latest drm-snapshot upgrade Bug#511231: Fatal X server error after upgrade to 2.4.3+git+20090105+a8c5480-1 Bug reassigned from package `libdrm2' to `xserver-xorg-video-intel'. close 511007 2:2.5.99.2-1 Bug#511007: xserver-xorg-core: Segfault starting X server 'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing. Bug#511018: libdrm2: X stopped working after latest drm-snapshot upgrade Bug#511231: Fatal X server error after upgrade to 2.4.3+git+20090105+a8c5480-1 Bug marked as fixed in version 2:2.5.99.2-1, send any further explanations to Sam Morris s...@robots.org.uk kthxbye Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Processed: found 511493 in 5.2.5-3, found 511493 in 5.0.2-0.1
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26 found 511493 5.2.5-3 Bug#511493: CVE-2008-5557: buffer overflow Bug marked as found in version 5.2.5-3. found 511493 5.0.2-0.1 Bug#511493: CVE-2008-5557: buffer overflow Bug marked as found in version 5.0.2-0.1. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#510902: Missing security updates - version 2.0.0.20 available from upstream
Hi, any news on this one? I consider Iceweasel to be a major desktop application, but the courrent version now lacks a security update since about a month. Or is Debian dropping support for the 2.0 branch of Iceweasel, like Mozilla recently did with the release of 2.0.0.20[1]? If so, I think there should be some official announcement. Have a nice day. hk47 [1] no offical announcemment at hand, so Wikipedia must be enough: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mozilla_Firefox#Release_history http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mozilla_Firefox#cite_note-43 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#509292: rsyslog: random crashes with remote logging
On Wed, 2009-01-14 at 08:40 +0100, Michael Biebl wrote: I don't think the $AllowedSender directive has any influence on the crashes Juho experiences on his rsyslog clients (as he only used those directive on the rsyslog server). Why do you suspect that the $AllowedSender fix might have an influence on this? I don't suspect it has - I was wrong ;) I think I was too-focussed on the quad core issue that I didn't even read the config correctly. I thought the crashes happened on the server. I now need to reevaluate the material - or maybe it is simpler if I just follow what happens now. Then we have the random crashes on the client (tracked as #509292). Juho's rsyslog.conf is at [1]. The only clue so far is, that it is related to multi core machines (= 4 cores). I'm not convinced that it is related to remote logging. Juho, could you strip down your rsyslog.conf step by step (i.e. first remove the remote logging, then the $ActionQueue* directives, then the imklog plugin, then the different rules), which will help us to narrow down this bug. I'd actually start with removing the $ActionQueue* directives, as they cause additional asynchronizity. But the important thing is it first get back to a state where we can (somewhat) reliably reproduce the bug. I think we should see at least 3 aborts in a row before we do any changes. The reason is that we otherwise do not know if the config changed caused the situation to improve or that was just a random non-abort. That's the issue I have run into all time so far... Rainer -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#510919: marked as done ([omake] /usr/bin/ocamldep-omake broken)
Your message dated Wed, 14 Jan 2009 09:02:36 + with message-id e1ln1e0-00085n...@ries.debian.org and subject line Bug#510919: fixed in omake 0.9.8.5-3-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #510919, regarding [omake] /usr/bin/ocamldep-omake broken to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 510919: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=510919 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: omake Version: 0.9.8.5-3-3+b2 Severity: critical --- Please enter the report below this line. --- [ko...@kobook ~]$ ocamldep-omake bash: /usr/bin/ocamldep-omake: cannot execute binary file --- System information. --- Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux 2.6.26-1-686 Debian Release: 5.0 500 unstableserver 500 testing server --- Package information. --- Depends(Version) | Installed -+- libc6 (= 2.7-1) | 2.7-16 libfam0 | 2.7.0-13.3 libncurses5 (= 5.6+20071006-3) | 5.7+20081220-1 libreadline5(= 5.2) | 5.2-3 -- Alexander Markov. e-mail/jabber: apsheron...@gmail.com signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Source: omake Source-Version: 0.9.8.5-3-4 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of omake, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: omake_0.9.8.5-3-4.diff.gz to pool/main/o/omake/omake_0.9.8.5-3-4.diff.gz omake_0.9.8.5-3-4.dsc to pool/main/o/omake/omake_0.9.8.5-3-4.dsc omake_0.9.8.5-3-4_amd64.deb to pool/main/o/omake/omake_0.9.8.5-3-4_amd64.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 510...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Stephane Glondu st...@glondu.net (supplier of updated omake package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 18:19:05 +0100 Source: omake Binary: omake Architecture: source amd64 Version: 0.9.8.5-3-4 Distribution: unstable Urgency: high Maintainer: Stefano Zacchiroli z...@debian.org Changed-By: Stephane Glondu st...@glondu.net Description: omake - build system with automated dependency analysis Closes: 510919 Changes: omake (0.9.8.5-3-4) unstable; urgency=high . * Switch packaging to git * Set Maintainer to d-o-m, add mfurr and myself to Uploaders * Do not install ocamldep-omake, as it is useless (Closes: #510919) * Add NEWS.Debian Checksums-Sha1: 5dc2a510993284f1e04f15cf5ffa9df4fb7de144 1292 omake_0.9.8.5-3-4.dsc 5d2e38a13edffb6eaefe4f2d7f853c1b0aab567a 4811 omake_0.9.8.5-3-4.diff.gz d0132a553c9afabc6c2b19b74403676cac175bf0 2339176 omake_0.9.8.5-3-4_amd64.deb Checksums-Sha256: 553374c7e6109870e971c620218e701b19e20f9ac9a8c6e654ed9ff2eebb519d 1292 omake_0.9.8.5-3-4.dsc 3c78e380d0626bc8f7cdcd2bc24cf2085b97e6cd770c3aa5bc68e2797f79fac6 4811 omake_0.9.8.5-3-4.diff.gz 28e04da872e46e57d4caebbc9366bd011da1d397fdcdc546ed287e37968b91c6 2339176 omake_0.9.8.5-3-4_amd64.deb Files: 631f6bfd3a7086892bf36e31d945ad06 1292 devel optional omake_0.9.8.5-3-4.dsc 3e12fa458d47df0d91b934f0eba3077a 4811 devel optional omake_0.9.8.5-3-4.diff.gz da9e025925ba5a857860ab7e3cdf5b9a 2339176 devel optional omake_0.9.8.5-3-4_amd64.deb -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFJbZrs1cqbBPLEI7wRAmTcAKCQV1pFbAlAunndo2pTGhUU8m/OxQCfRxjA 4fqfxqaRSv0a7cetMFi1vsg= =azfG -END PGP SIGNATURE- ---End Message---
Bug#511756: ghc6 includes a copy of GMP, with GNU docs, with non-free GFDL docs
I have a problem. I found a copy of GMP included with ghc6, with GNU documentation with GFDL docs with invariant sections. The usual thing to do would be to repackage the upstream tarball and slap on a +dfsg1 on the version. However, that would make it necessary to rebuild all haskell libraries since they all have a dependency ghc6 ( 6.8.2+). Argh. Not a transition I'd like to see at this point. Is there some route to just replace ghc6_6.8.2.orig.tar.gz with one that didn't have gmp-4.2.1.tar.gz in it? That shouldn't make anything FTBFS or anything. Other than that, as much as I hate to suggest it, could we use lenny-ignore for #511756? signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#511756: ghc6 includes a copy of GMP, with GNU docs, with non-free GFDL docs
Kari Pahula wrote: The usual thing to do would be to repackage the upstream tarball and slap on a +dfsg1 on the version. However, that would make it necessary to rebuild all haskell libraries since they all have a dependency ghc6 ( 6.8.2+). Just my 2 cents: Maybe, 6.8.2dfsg1? This is ( 6.8.2+) according to dpkg --compare-versions. -- Eugene V. Lyubimkin aka JackYF, JID: jackyf.devel(maildog)gmail.com Ukrainian C++ developer, Debian Maintainer, APT contributor signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#511756: ghc6 includes a copy of GMP, with GNU docs, with non-free GFDL docs
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 11:29:21AM +0200, Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote: Kari Pahula wrote: The usual thing to do would be to repackage the upstream tarball and slap on a +dfsg1 on the version. However, that would make it necessary to rebuild all haskell libraries since they all have a dependency ghc6 ( 6.8.2+). Just my 2 cents: Maybe, 6.8.2dfsg1? This is ( 6.8.2+) according to dpkg --compare-versions. $ dpkg --compare-versions '6.8.2+' '' '6.8.2dfsg1-1' echo check check $ dpkg --compare-versions '6.8.2' '' '6.8.2dfsg1' echo check check $ dpkg --compare-versions '6.8.2-7' '' '6.8.2dfsg1-1' echo check check $ dpkg --compare-versions '+' '' 'dfsg1' echo check check Well, that's a relief! That's what I'll do, then. Thank you very much. That'll still leave a few libraries that have ghc6 ( 6.8.2-999), but those should be fixable with simple binNMUs. Already much more manageable. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#510992: housekeeping
Le mardi 13 janvier 2009 17:25:35, vous avez écrit : tag 510992 patch tag 510992 patch tag 510992 patch tag 510992 patch tag 510992 patch tag 510992 patch tag 510992 patch tag 511002 patch Hi, it seems that you tagged 510992 with patch 7 times… You additionnally need to attach your patch so that other can review it ! Best regards, OdyX -- Didier Raboud, proud Debian user. CH-1802 Corseaux did...@raboud.com signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Bug#507865: openoffice.org-writer: OOo 2.4.x openinig OOo 3 files doesn't show text (2.x implements standard wrong)
Hi there, FYI, there's a purposed patch upstream, at http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=96878 Best regards, -- Marcos Marado -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#507865: openoffice.org-writer: OOo 2.4.x openinig OOo 3 files doesn't show text (2.x implements standard wrong)
On Mon, 2009-01-12 at 00:34 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 08:59:06AM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote: Steve Langasek wrote: This bug appears to be fixed upstream now; has anyone isolated a pointer to the correct changeset that should be applied to the Debian package? where do you see that? The issue doesn't talk about a commit and EIS (eis.services.openoffice.org) doesn't show anything about that TaskId either. (of course it's fixed in 3.0, but that was a given, but we'd need a patch for 2.4) A misinterpretation of a comment in the upstream bug log, apparently. Chris Halls backported the change to OO.o 2.2 just yesterday - we have not tested that it applies to 2.4 yet. -- Tim Retout t...@retout.co.uk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#511779: freespeak: Installation error in 0.3 (0.2 worked fine)
Package: freespeak Version: 0.3.0-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable merom:~# LANG=C aptitude full-upgrade Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done Reading extended state information Initializing package states... Done Reading task descriptions... Done The following partially installed packages will be configured: freespeak 0 packages upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. Need to get 0B of archives. After unpacking 0B will be used. Setting up freespeak (0.3.0-1) ... Compiling /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/freespeak/translation.py ... File /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/freespeak/translation.py, line 117 yield ^ SyntaxError: invalid syntax pycentral: pycentral pkginstall: error byte-compiling files (29) pycentral pkginstall: error byte-compiling files (29) dpkg: error processing freespeak (--configure): subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1 Processing triggers for menu ... Errors were encountered while processing: freespeak E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) A package failed to install. Trying to recover: Setting up freespeak (0.3.0-1) ... Compiling /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/freespeak/translation.py ... File /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/freespeak/translation.py, line 117 yield ^ SyntaxError: invalid syntax pycentral: pycentral pkginstall: error byte-compiling files (29) pycentral pkginstall: error byte-compiling files (29) dpkg: error processing freespeak (--configure): subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1 Processing triggers for menu ... Errors were encountered while processing: freespeak Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done Reading extended state information Initializing package states... Done Reading task descriptions... Done -- System Information: Debian Release: 5.0 APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.28 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Versions of packages freespeak depends on: ii gconf22.22.0-1 GNOME configuration database syste ii python2.5.2-3An interactive high-level object-o ii python-central0.6.8 register and build utility for Pyt ii python-dbus 0.82.4-2 simple interprocess messaging syst ii python-gnome2 2.22.0-1 Python bindings for the GNOME desk ii python-gnome2-extras 2.19.1-3 Extra Python bindings for the GNOM ii python-gtk2 2.12.1-6 Python bindings for the GTK+ widge ii python-lxml 2.1.1-2.1 pythonic binding for the libxml2 a ii python-xlib 0.14-2 Interface for Python to the X11 Pr freespeak recommends no packages. freespeak suggests no packages. -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#505271: closed ... fixed in shadow 1:4.1.1-6
Hi Paul, On Thursday 27 November 2008 10:13, Paul Szabo wrote: How long do you expect it will take to in fact fix this bug (which is closed, pretend-fixed, still set to just serious severity)? Would it cause problems if I posted the exploit on Monday 1 Dec? Sorry for the delay incurred in fixing this in Debian stable. An update is now in preparation and will be released shortly. Thank you for reporting the issue to Debian. Thijs pgpKjmczWLz4T.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#511477: iceape: Shouldn't release with Lenny
Hi, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: The problem of dropping Iceape is that it provides a Xulrunner -dev package, iceape-dev, based on Xulrunner 1.8, while Xulrunner in Lenny (the one that uhm, wasn't the rationale for using iceape-dev the xulrunner 1.9 transition? E.g. http://lists.debian.org/debian-openoffice/2008/05/msg8.html. That mail clearly says use iceape-dev... openoffice.org At least 3.0 works with libxul. No idea for 2.4.1... 1. Providing the -dev package from Icedove (which is also based on Xul 1.8) Which also will need a reupload of all those... And how does the remove iceape[-dev] thing correlated with the (deep) freeze we're in and only RC bugs should be fixed? Anyway, I can try to build OOo 2.4.1 using libxul... Regards, Rene -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#507865: openoffice.org-writer: OOo 2.4.x openinig OOo 3 files doesn't show text (2.x implements standard wrong)
tag 507865 + patch thanks Hi, marcos.mar...@sonae.com wrote: FYI, there's a purposed patch upstream, at http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=96878 thanks, but I follow that issue. Grüße/Regards, René -- .''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/ `. `' r...@debian.org | GnuPG-Key ID: 248AEB73 `- Fingerprint: 41FA F208 28D4 7CA5 19BB 7AD9 F859 90B0 248A EB73 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Processed: Re: Bug#507865: openoffice.org-writer: OOo 2.4.x openinig OOo 3 files doesn't show text (2.x implements standard wrong)
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tag 507865 + patch Bug#507865: openoffice.org-writer: OOo 2.4.x openinig OOo 3 files doesn't show text (2.x implements standard wrong) Tags were: upstream Tags added: patch thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#510992: housekeeping
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 12:04, Didier Raboud did...@raboud.com wrote: it seems that you tagged 510992 with patch 7 times… You additionnally need to attach your patch so that other can review it ! Argh, I wanted to tag every single bug in the family with, not one seven times.. Sorry about that. The patch from me is kinda on hold atm as the maintainer is preparing a whole new package with more fixes in it. I still need to find out the exact situation, though. Thanks for catching this! RIchard -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#511742: marked as done (texlive-doc-en: wp-conv has nosell license)
Your message dated Wed, 14 Jan 2009 13:33:24 + with message-id e1ln5s4-00040j...@ries.debian.org and subject line Bug#511742: fixed in texlive-doc 2007.dfsg.2-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #511742, regarding texlive-doc-en: wp-conv has nosell license to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 511742: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=511742 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: texlive-doc-en Version: 2007.dfsg.1-1 Severity: serious Justification: nosell license from index.html: * You may NOT ask money for it except a reasonable cost for media and distribution. from upstream svn log: r11841 | karl | 2009-01-11 02:44:09 +0100 (Sun, 11 Jan 2009) | 1 line rm wp-conv, nosell license should be removed. ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Source: texlive-doc Source-Version: 2007.dfsg.2-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of texlive-doc, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: texlive-doc-base_2007.dfsg.2-1_all.deb to pool/main/t/texlive-doc/texlive-doc-base_2007.dfsg.2-1_all.deb texlive-doc-bg_2007.dfsg.2-1_all.deb to pool/main/t/texlive-doc/texlive-doc-bg_2007.dfsg.2-1_all.deb texlive-doc-cs+sk_2007.dfsg.2-1_all.deb to pool/main/t/texlive-doc/texlive-doc-cs+sk_2007.dfsg.2-1_all.deb texlive-doc-de_2007.dfsg.2-1_all.deb to pool/main/t/texlive-doc/texlive-doc-de_2007.dfsg.2-1_all.deb texlive-doc-el_2007.dfsg.2-1_all.deb to pool/main/t/texlive-doc/texlive-doc-el_2007.dfsg.2-1_all.deb texlive-doc-en_2007.dfsg.2-1_all.deb to pool/main/t/texlive-doc/texlive-doc-en_2007.dfsg.2-1_all.deb texlive-doc-es_2007.dfsg.2-1_all.deb to pool/main/t/texlive-doc/texlive-doc-es_2007.dfsg.2-1_all.deb texlive-doc-fi_2007.dfsg.2-1_all.deb to pool/main/t/texlive-doc/texlive-doc-fi_2007.dfsg.2-1_all.deb texlive-doc-fr_2007.dfsg.2-1_all.deb to pool/main/t/texlive-doc/texlive-doc-fr_2007.dfsg.2-1_all.deb texlive-doc-it_2007.dfsg.2-1_all.deb to pool/main/t/texlive-doc/texlive-doc-it_2007.dfsg.2-1_all.deb texlive-doc-ja_2007.dfsg.2-1_all.deb to pool/main/t/texlive-doc/texlive-doc-ja_2007.dfsg.2-1_all.deb texlive-doc-ko_2007.dfsg.2-1_all.deb to pool/main/t/texlive-doc/texlive-doc-ko_2007.dfsg.2-1_all.deb texlive-doc-mn_2007.dfsg.2-1_all.deb to pool/main/t/texlive-doc/texlive-doc-mn_2007.dfsg.2-1_all.deb texlive-doc-nl_2007.dfsg.2-1_all.deb to pool/main/t/texlive-doc/texlive-doc-nl_2007.dfsg.2-1_all.deb texlive-doc-pl_2007.dfsg.2-1_all.deb to pool/main/t/texlive-doc/texlive-doc-pl_2007.dfsg.2-1_all.deb texlive-doc-pt_2007.dfsg.2-1_all.deb to pool/main/t/texlive-doc/texlive-doc-pt_2007.dfsg.2-1_all.deb texlive-doc-ru_2007.dfsg.2-1_all.deb to pool/main/t/texlive-doc/texlive-doc-ru_2007.dfsg.2-1_all.deb texlive-doc-th_2007.dfsg.2-1_all.deb to pool/main/t/texlive-doc/texlive-doc-th_2007.dfsg.2-1_all.deb texlive-doc-tr_2007.dfsg.2-1_all.deb to pool/main/t/texlive-doc/texlive-doc-tr_2007.dfsg.2-1_all.deb texlive-doc-uk_2007.dfsg.2-1_all.deb to pool/main/t/texlive-doc/texlive-doc-uk_2007.dfsg.2-1_all.deb texlive-doc-vi_2007.dfsg.2-1_all.deb to pool/main/t/texlive-doc/texlive-doc-vi_2007.dfsg.2-1_all.deb texlive-doc-zh_2007.dfsg.2-1_all.deb to pool/main/t/texlive-doc/texlive-doc-zh_2007.dfsg.2-1_all.deb texlive-doc_2007.dfsg.2-1.diff.gz to pool/main/t/texlive-doc/texlive-doc_2007.dfsg.2-1.diff.gz texlive-doc_2007.dfsg.2-1.dsc to pool/main/t/texlive-doc/texlive-doc_2007.dfsg.2-1.dsc texlive-doc_2007.dfsg.2.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/t/texlive-doc/texlive-doc_2007.dfsg.2.orig.tar.gz A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 511...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Norbert Preining prein...@debian.org (supplier of updated texlive-doc package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 00:12:28 +0100 Source: texlive-doc Binary: texlive-doc-base texlive-doc-bg texlive-doc-zh texlive-doc-cs+sk texlive-doc-nl texlive-doc-en texlive-doc-fi texlive-doc-fr texlive-doc-de texlive-doc-el texlive-doc-it texlive-doc-ja texlive-doc-ko texlive-doc-mn texlive-doc-pl texlive-doc-pt texlive-doc-ru texlive-doc-es texlive-doc-th
Bug#511743: marked as done (texlive-latex-extra: geomsty has nocommercial license)
Your message dated Wed, 14 Jan 2009 13:49:06 + with message-id e1ln67g-0005pl...@ries.debian.org and subject line Bug#511743: fixed in texlive-extra 2007.dfsg.14-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #511743, regarding texlive-latex-extra: geomsty has nocommercial license to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 511743: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=511743 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: texlive-latex-extra Version: 2007.dfsg.14-1 Severity: serious Justification: nocommercial license From upstream svn log: r11840 | karl | 2009-01-11 02:42:47 +0100 (Sun, 11 Jan 2009) | 1 line rm geomsty, license nocommercial and really, the file geompsfi contains: % Permission is granted for use and non-profit distribution of this % file provided that this notice is clearly maintained. The right to % distribute this file for profit or as part of any commercial % product is specifically reserved for the author. If you make ... ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Source: texlive-extra Source-Version: 2007.dfsg.14-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of texlive-extra, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: texlive-bibtex-extra_2007.dfsg.14-1_all.deb to pool/main/t/texlive-extra/texlive-bibtex-extra_2007.dfsg.14-1_all.deb texlive-extra_2007.dfsg.14-1.diff.gz to pool/main/t/texlive-extra/texlive-extra_2007.dfsg.14-1.diff.gz texlive-extra_2007.dfsg.14-1.dsc to pool/main/t/texlive-extra/texlive-extra_2007.dfsg.14-1.dsc texlive-extra_2007.dfsg.14.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/t/texlive-extra/texlive-extra_2007.dfsg.14.orig.tar.gz texlive-fonts-extra-doc_2007.dfsg.14-1_all.deb to pool/main/t/texlive-extra/texlive-fonts-extra-doc_2007.dfsg.14-1_all.deb texlive-fonts-extra_2007.dfsg.14-1_all.deb to pool/main/t/texlive-extra/texlive-fonts-extra_2007.dfsg.14-1_all.deb texlive-formats-extra_2007.dfsg.14-1_all.deb to pool/main/t/texlive-extra/texlive-formats-extra_2007.dfsg.14-1_all.deb texlive-games_2007.dfsg.14-1_all.deb to pool/main/t/texlive-extra/texlive-games_2007.dfsg.14-1_all.deb texlive-generic-extra_2007.dfsg.14-1_all.deb to pool/main/t/texlive-extra/texlive-generic-extra_2007.dfsg.14-1_all.deb texlive-humanities-doc_2007.dfsg.14-1_all.deb to pool/main/t/texlive-extra/texlive-humanities-doc_2007.dfsg.14-1_all.deb texlive-humanities_2007.dfsg.14-1_all.deb to pool/main/t/texlive-extra/texlive-humanities_2007.dfsg.14-1_all.deb texlive-latex-extra-doc_2007.dfsg.14-1_all.deb to pool/main/t/texlive-extra/texlive-latex-extra-doc_2007.dfsg.14-1_all.deb texlive-latex-extra_2007.dfsg.14-1_all.deb to pool/main/t/texlive-extra/texlive-latex-extra_2007.dfsg.14-1_all.deb texlive-latex3_2007.dfsg.14-1_all.deb to pool/main/t/texlive-extra/texlive-latex3_2007.dfsg.14-1_all.deb texlive-math-extra_2007.dfsg.14-1_all.deb to pool/main/t/texlive-extra/texlive-math-extra_2007.dfsg.14-1_all.deb texlive-plain-extra_2007.dfsg.14-1_all.deb to pool/main/t/texlive-extra/texlive-plain-extra_2007.dfsg.14-1_all.deb texlive-pstricks-doc_2007.dfsg.14-1_all.deb to pool/main/t/texlive-extra/texlive-pstricks-doc_2007.dfsg.14-1_all.deb texlive-pstricks_2007.dfsg.14-1_all.deb to pool/main/t/texlive-extra/texlive-pstricks_2007.dfsg.14-1_all.deb texlive-publishers-doc_2007.dfsg.14-1_all.deb to pool/main/t/texlive-extra/texlive-publishers-doc_2007.dfsg.14-1_all.deb texlive-publishers_2007.dfsg.14-1_all.deb to pool/main/t/texlive-extra/texlive-publishers_2007.dfsg.14-1_all.deb texlive-science-doc_2007.dfsg.14-1_all.deb to pool/main/t/texlive-extra/texlive-science-doc_2007.dfsg.14-1_all.deb texlive-science_2007.dfsg.14-1_all.deb to pool/main/t/texlive-extra/texlive-science_2007.dfsg.14-1_all.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 511...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Norbert Preining prein...@debian.org (supplier of updated texlive-extra package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 00:13:24 +0100 Source: texlive-extra Binary: texlive-bibtex-extra texlive-formats-extra texlive-generic-extra texlive-math-extra
Processed: notfound 510765 in 1.4.18-1.1
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: notfound 510765 1.4.18-1.1 Bug#510765: liferea-webkit: Liferea should not provide webkit in a stable release Bug no longer marked as found in version 1.4.18-1.1. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#502444: sshd fails at boot-time following reload by /etc/network/if-up.d/openssh-server presumably due to race condition
Thanks Colin, that was really 'sharpish' ! Version 5.1p1-5 works fine, as expected. After compiling it for amd64 and purging/reinstalling, I rebooted several times just to make sure. Let's hope this change will make it into lenny. I wouldn't be too concerned about any performance loss caused by 'restart' rather than reload. I'm curious if upstream/openBSD has anything like debian's /etc/network/if-up.d/openssh-server script, and how they solved this issue. All the best! -- Kevin Price http://www.kevin-price.de/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#511797: bind9: all queries denied since last update
Package: bind9 Version: 1:9.3.4-2etch4 Severity: critical Justification: breaks unrelated software Since th last upgrade made yesterday, I noticed that many packages were not or bad working. For example, horde3 webmail, whois nslookup and dig commands. It's also impossible to browse through internet as the urls aren't resolved anymore. Even reportbug doesn't work by default as it tries to get BTS reports and it cannot resolve it, I had to use --no-query-bts option to send this report. I don't know what to do as there isn't any changelog info concerning this package : it doesn't appear in http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/b/bind9/ there's only the previous bind9_9.3.4-2etch3 (which worked very welle for me) and the one under current is bind9 (1:9.5.0.dfsg.P2-5.1) I would like to know what has changed in the new release which could have broken my system thanks -- System Information: Debian Release: 4.0 APT prefers stable APT policy: (500, 'stable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-6-686 Locale: LANG=fr_FR, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Versions of packages bind9 depends on: ii adduser3.102 Add and remove users and groups ii libbind9-0 1:9.3.4-2etch4BIND9 Shared Library used by BIND ii libc6 2.3.6.ds1-13etch8 GNU C Library: Shared libraries ii libdns22 1:9.3.4-2etch4DNS Shared Library used by BIND ii libisc11 1:9.3.4-2etch4ISC Shared Library used by BIND ii libisccc0 1:9.3.4-2etch4Command Channel Library used by BI ii libisccfg1 1:9.3.4-2etch4Config File Handling Library used ii liblwres9 1:9.3.4-2etch4Lightweight Resolver Library used ii libssl0.9.80.9.8c-4etch4 SSL shared libraries ii lsb-base 3.1-23.2etch1 Linux Standard Base 3.1 init scrip ii netbase4.29 Basic TCP/IP networking system bind9 recommends no packages. -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#511796: whois throw getaddrinfo(whois.crsnic.net): Name or service not known
Package: whois Version: 4.7.20 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable when I run for example whois google.com I get getaddrinfo(whois.crsnic.net): Name or service not known it is the same for any domain tried even for those locally hosted -- System Information: Debian Release: 4.0 APT prefers stable APT policy: (500, 'stable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-6-686 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Versions of packages whois depends on: ii libc6 2.3.6.ds1-13etch8 GNU C Library: Shared libraries ii libidn11 0.6.5-1 GNU libidn library, implementation whois recommends no packages. -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#511708: aptitude: [etch upgrade] TUI consistently blocks after doing one set of operations
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 08:28:21PM +0200, Eddy Petrișor eddy.petri...@gmail.com was heard to say: I just upgraded this system yesterday to Debian Lenny from Debian Etch and since the upgrade I have seen that aptitude's TUI interface blocks after any set of operations that is done with dpkg. When the operation finishes the TUI is unusable and you need to ctrl+C the interface to get the prompt. What architecture are you running on? Is this a single or a multi-core machine? Just for kicks, if you install aptitude-dbg and valgrind, then run valgrind --log-file=/tmp/aptitude.grind, can you still reproduce the problem? (warning: this will be very slow) Daniel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#511796: whois throw getaddrinfo(whois.crsnic.net): Name or service not known
BTS Opened #511797 (critical) in bind9 1:9.3.4-2etch4 by root t...@mediafo... «all queries denied since last update». http://bugs.debian.org/511797 BTS Opened #511796 (grave) in whois 4.7.20 by root t...@mediafo... «whois throw getaddrinfo(whois.crsnic.net): Name or service not known». http://bugs.debian.org/511796 #511796 is likely to be caused by #511797, not a problem in whois. Regards, Steve (I'm not investigating #511797) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#511596: Acknowledgement (empathy: won't connect to (at least) gtalk)
severity #511596 important retitle #511596 Won't connect with network-manager disconnected or stopped thanks I have tracked the problem down to me having network-manager installed, but not using it. I have written my own script to connect to faculty wireless network since I found network-manager to be misbehaving. In any case: empathy_idle_set_presence: NM not connected It is apparent this affects only a small number of users (either you use n-m, or you have it uninstalled): for this reason, I'll take the honor of reducing severity to important. I still don't find it deserves normal, since it DOES affect users. I have n-m installed just-in-case I need something, but I don't find it particularly reliable. Ergo, I use my own script. And then, although I am connected to wlan, just because n-m thinks I'm not, empathy also refuses to connect. Same thing happens if I /etc/init.d/network-manager stop. This was already encountered by some users, but apparently not perceived as important by upstream[1] since it uses network manager only if you have it installed. [1] http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/telepathy/2007-November/001234.html -- Regards, Ivan Vučica OBJECT Networks :: www.objectnetworks.net Cateia Games :: www.cateia.com Zagrebački računalni savez :: www.zrs.hr
Processed: Re: Bug#511596: Acknowledgement (empathy: won't connect to (at least) gtalk)
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: severity #511596 important Bug#511596: empathy: won't connect to (at least) gtalk Severity set to `important' from `grave' retitle #511596 Won't connect with network-manager disconnected or stopped Bug#511596: empathy: won't connect to (at least) gtalk Changed Bug title to `Won't connect with network-manager disconnected or stopped' from `empathy: won't connect to (at least) gtalk'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#511797: bind9: all queries denied since last update
FYI, while there's no changelog up there, here's the reason for the update: http://www.debian.org/security/2009/dsa-1703 Best regards, -- Marcos Marado -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#511817: inline-octave: inline-octave 0.22-3 FTBFS
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Package: inline-octave Version: 0.22-3 Severity: serious Justification: no longer builds from source Hi, the package [1] FTBFS on all architectures. [1] https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/inline-octave/0.22-3ubuntu1 - - -- System Information: Debian Release: lenny/sid APT prefers intrepid-updates APT policy: (500, 'intrepid-updates'), (500, 'intrepid-security'), (500, 'intrepid-backports'), (500, 'intrepid') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.27-9-generic (SMP w/1 CPU core) Locale: LANG=it_IT.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=it_IT.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash - -- Alessio Treglia Homepage: http://www.alessiotreglia.com, IRC: quadrispro, Skype: quadrispro 0FEC 59A5 E18E E04F 6D40 593B 45D4 8C7C DCFC 3FD0 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: http://getfiregpg.org iEYEARECAAYFAkluINwACgkQRdSMfNz8P9C5MACfTzO6RNfWhR6FcrxG1Zebx+Lf Ez8AoIVAFFM466+JD9X2zfJgcFBXekiu =wzca -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#511482: tovid: cannot burn a dvd using makedvd. Nerolinux [...]
Which genisoimage version are you using? dpkg -p genisoimage|grep Version Thanks, -- Marcos Marado -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#511823: librcc: FTBFS: cannot stat `docs/api/html': No such file or directory
Package: librcc Version: 0.2.7-2 Severity: serious Hi, Your package is failing to build with the following error: dh_installchangelogs dh_installdocs cp: cannot stat `docs/api/html': No such file or directory dh_installdocs: command returned error code 256 make: *** [binary-arch] Error 1 Kurt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#511626: hedgewars: FTBFS on amd64: EAccessViolation : Access violation
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 12:04:34AM +, peter green wrote: I have tried and failed to reproduce this locally in both a convetional chroot and pbuilder, is there any chance of a retry on the buildd so we can see if this is a recurring problem or just a one off glitch. It was succesful on one of the buildds (and got uploaded) and failed on the other. And I see no reason why it should fail on the other. I can only assume either the buildd chroot isn't clean or it's some kernel issue. The buildd with the problem is running a 2.6.26 kernel. Kurt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#499036: marked as done (vtun: Can't open pseudo-tty)
Your message dated Wed, 14 Jan 2009 19:32:08 +
with message-id e1lnbte-o5...@ries.debian.org
and subject line Bug#499036: fixed in vtun 3.0.2-1.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #499036,
regarding vtun: Can't open pseudo-tty
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
499036: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=499036
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: vtun
Version: 3.0.2-1
Severity: important
The latest version vtun is not working because of the inability to open the
pseudo-tty. Previous version 3.0.1 on the same
configuration worked perfectly.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux home 2.6.26 #1 PREEMPT Mon Aug 25 22:43:36 EEST 2008 i686
GNU/Linux
Locale: LANG=ru_RU.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=ru_RU.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Versions of packages vtun depends on:
ii debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.5.22Debian configuration management sy
ii libc6 2.7-13GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii liblzo2-2 2.03-1data compression library
ii libssl0.9.80.9.8g-13 SSL shared libraries
ii zlib1g 1:1.2.3.3.dfsg-12 compression library - runtime
vtun recommends no packages.
vtun suggests no packages.
-- debconf-show failed
-- part of /var/log/syslog:
Sep 12 17:31:31 home vtund[3475]: Connecting to 192.168.1.12
Sep 12 17:31:31 home vtund[3475]: Use SSL-aware challenge/response
Sep 12 17:31:31 home vtund[3475]: Remote Server sends TtL9E1 .
Sep 12 17:31:31 home vtund[3475]: Session ubnets[192.168.1.12] opened
Sep 12 17:31:31 home vtund[3475]: Can't allocate pseudo tty. Bad address(14)
Sep 12 17:31:31 home vtund[3475]: Session ubnets[192.168.1.12] closed
Sep 12 17:31:31 home vtund[3475]: Exit
-- part of strace output:
open(/dev/ptmx, O_RDWR) = 6
statfs(/dev/pts, {f_type=DEVPTS_SUPER_MAGIC, f_bsize=4096, f_blocks=0,
f_bfree=0, f_bavail=0, f_files=0, f_ffree=0, f_fsid={0,
0}, f_namelen=255, f_frsize=4096}) = 0
ioctl(6, SNDCTL_TMR_TIMEBASE or TCGETS, {B38400 opost isig icanon echo ...}) =
0
ioctl(6, TIOCGPTN, [4]) = 0
stat64(/dev/pts/4, {st_mode=S_IFCHR|0620, st_rdev=makedev(136, 4), ...}) = 0
statfs(/dev/pts/4, {f_type=DEVPTS_SUPER_MAGIC, f_bsize=4096, f_blocks=0,
f_bfree=0, f_bavail=0, f_files=0, f_ffree=0, f_fsid={0,
0}, f_namelen=255, f_frsize=4096}) = 0
ioctl(6, TIOCSPTLCK, [0]) = 0
ioctl(6, SNDCTL_TMR_TIMEBASE or TCGETS, {B38400 opost isig icanon echo ...}) =
0
ioctl(6, TIOCGPTN, [4]) = 0
stat64(/dev/pts/4, {st_mode=S_IFCHR|0620, st_rdev=makedev(136, 4), ...}) = 0
open(/dev/pts/4, O_RDWR|O_NOCTTY) = 8
access(NULL, R_OK|W_OK) = -1 EFAULT (Bad address)
At this moment, in /dev/pts/ exist /dev/pts/[0, 1, 2, 3] only, but #4 appears
later, and I am not sure that because of vtun. Then I tried to call vtun again,
and he appealed to /dev/pts/5.
-- /etc/vtund.conf
options {
port 5000;
timeout 60;
ppp /usr/sbin/pppd;
ifconfig /sbin/ifconfig;
route /sbin/route;
firewall /sbin/iptables;
ip/sbin/ip;
}
ubnets {
type tty;
proto tcp;
passwd ubnets;
persist yes;
up {
ppp file /etc/ppp/peers/ubnets.vtun;
};
}
A file with kernel configuration attached.
I have no suggestions about possible solutions to this problem, but to revert
to the previous version vtun.
WBR, Pavel Kolchanov.
config-2.6.26.gz
Description: GNU Zip compressed data
---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
Source: vtun
Source-Version: 3.0.2-1.1
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
vtun, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
vtun_3.0.2-1.1.diff.gz
to pool/main/v/vtun/vtun_3.0.2-1.1.diff.gz
vtun_3.0.2-1.1.dsc
to pool/main/v/vtun/vtun_3.0.2-1.1.dsc
vtun_3.0.2-1.1_powerpc.deb
to pool/main/v/vtun/vtun_3.0.2-1.1_powerpc.deb
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to 499...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Aurélien GÉRÔME a...@debian.org (supplier of updated vtun package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it
Bug#511817: marked as done (inline-octave: inline-octave 0.22-3 FTBFS)
Your message dated Wed, 14 Jan 2009 20:42:22 +0100 with message-id 20090114194222.ga4...@debian and subject line Re: [Pkg-octave-devel] Bug#511817: inline-octave: inline-octave 0.22-3 FTBFS has caused the Debian Bug report #511817, regarding inline-octave: inline-octave 0.22-3 FTBFS to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 511817: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=511817 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Package: inline-octave Version: 0.22-3 Severity: serious Justification: no longer builds from source Hi, the package [1] FTBFS on all architectures. [1] https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/inline-octave/0.22-3ubuntu1 - - -- System Information: Debian Release: lenny/sid APT prefers intrepid-updates APT policy: (500, 'intrepid-updates'), (500, 'intrepid-security'), (500, 'intrepid-backports'), (500, 'intrepid') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.27-9-generic (SMP w/1 CPU core) Locale: LANG=it_IT.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=it_IT.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash - -- Alessio Treglia Homepage: http://www.alessiotreglia.com, IRC: quadrispro, Skype: quadrispro 0FEC 59A5 E18E E04F 6D40 593B 45D4 8C7C DCFC 3FD0 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: http://getfiregpg.org iEYEARECAAYFAkluINwACgkQRdSMfNz8P9C5MACfTzO6RNfWhR6FcrxG1Zebx+Lf Ez8AoIVAFFM466+JD9X2zfJgcFBXekiu =wzca -END PGP SIGNATURE- ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 06:28:59PM +0100, Alessio Treglia wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Package: inline-octave Version: 0.22-3 Severity: serious Justification: no longer builds from source Hi, the package [1] FTBFS on all architectures. No, it doesn't, at least if you don't fiddle blindly with the build-dependencies. Thomas ---End Message---
Bug#511477: iceape: Shouldn't release with Lenny
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 11:51:09AM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote: Hi, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: The problem of dropping Iceape is that it provides a Xulrunner -dev package, iceape-dev, based on Xulrunner 1.8, while Xulrunner in Lenny (the one that uhm, wasn't the rationale for using iceape-dev the xulrunner 1.9 transition? E.g. http://lists.debian.org/debian-openoffice/2008/05/msg8.html. That mail clearly says use iceape-dev... The rationale for still using iceape-dev is that xpcom components would still need to run properly under iceape. For that to be possible, they have to be compiled under gecko 1.8, which only iceape provides. If we remove iceape, we don't care about this compatibility anymore. On the other hand, not all applications necessarily have been updated upstream to properly build against gecko 1.9. Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#511836: non-free ogonek.sty
Package: texlive-lang-polish Version: 2007.dfsg.3-3 Severity: serious File: /usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/ogonek/ogonek.sty Justification: Policy 2.1 #v+ $ grep modify /usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/ogonek/ogonek.sty %% Note: you are not allowed to modify this file. #v- -- Piotr Lewandowski -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#511837: Cannot properly install nVidia proprietary driver in Lenny
Package: xserver-xorg-core Version: 2:1.4.2-10 Severity: critical nVidia proprietary driver (177.82) will be installed correctly, but will warn user that libwfb.so and libglx.so are not symlinks. I should remove that files and make symlinks by hand: $ cd /usr/lib/xorg/modules $ rm -f libwfb.so $ ln -s libnvidia-wfb.so.1 libwfb.so $ cd extensions/ $ rm -f libglx.so $ ln -s libglx.so.177.82 libglx.so But after any future X.org update, I will loose these changes. libglx.so and libwfb.so should probably be symlinks. -- Regards, Krasu. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#511713: eclipse won't start
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 9:46 PM, Aaron Valdes aaronval...@rogers.com wrote: Package: eclipse Version: 3.2.2-6.1 Severity: important When I try to start Eclipse I get this message testing /usr/lib/jvm/java-6-openjdk...found /usr/lib/jvm/java-6-openjdk/bin/java: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib/eclipse/configuration/org.eclipse.osgi/bundles/83/1/.cp/libswt-mozilla-gtk-3236.so: undefined symbol: _ZN4nsID5ParseEPKci I 'm not 100% sure but I think your problem is related to mozilla/libxul. I don't use the 3.2 version of eclipse, but for 3.4 installing libxul-dev had fixed the problem for me. Just some food for thought, Pantelis -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#510560: rtorrent: Patch to resolve bug #506748 leads to crashes
Please, see instructions in the bug#490171 for create backtrace-report of the crashe. -- ... mpd is off . ''`. Dmitry E. Oboukhov : :’ : email: un...@debian.org jabber://un...@uvw.ru `. `~’ GPGKey: 1024D / F8E26537 2006-11-21 `- 1B23 D4F8 8EC0 D902 0555 E438 AB8C 00CF F8E2 6537 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#510560: Info received (rtorrent: Patch to resolve bug #506748 leads to crashes)
Oh sorry, this crash is not segfault. -- ... mpd is off . ''`. Dmitry E. Oboukhov : :’ : email: un...@debian.org jabber://un...@uvw.ru `. `~’ GPGKey: 1024D / F8E26537 2006-11-21 `- 1B23 D4F8 8EC0 D902 0555 E438 AB8C 00CF F8E2 6537 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Processed: tagging 211765
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26etch1 tags 211765 fixed-upstream Bug#211765: xorg-server: material under GLX Public License is not DFSG-free Tags were: lenny-ignore help upstream etch-ignore sarge-ignore Bug#368564: xorg-server: material under GLX Public License is not DFSG-free Tags added: fixed-upstream End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#511836: non-free ogonek.sty
Piotr Lewandowski piotr.lewandow...@gmail.com wrote: Package: texlive-lang-polish Version: 2007.dfsg.3-3 Severity: serious File: /usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/ogonek/ogonek.sty Justification: Policy 2.1 #v+ $ grep modify /usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/ogonek/ogonek.sty %% Note: you are not allowed to modify this file. #v- The same text is in ogonek.dtx - so it's not just a screwed application of the LPPL, it's really non-free. Regards, Frank -- Frank Küster Debian Developer (TeXLive) VCD Aschaffenburg-Miltenberg, ADFC Miltenberg B90/Grüne KV Miltenberg -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Processed: Re: Bug#511837: Cannot properly install nVidia proprietary driver in Lenny
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: reassign 511837 nvidia-glx Bug#511837: Cannot properly install nVidia proprietary driver in Lenny Bug reassigned from package `xserver-xorg-core' to `nvidia-glx'. severity 511837 normal Bug#511837: Cannot properly install nVidia proprietary driver in Lenny Severity set to `normal' from `critical' thank you Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#511837: Cannot properly install nVidia proprietary driver in Lenny
reassign 511837 nvidia-glx severity 511837 normal thank you Dmitry Baryshev wrote: Package: xserver-xorg-core Version: 2:1.4.2-10 Severity: critical nVidia proprietary driver (177.82) will be installed correctly, but will warn user that libwfb.so and libglx.so are not symlinks. I should remove that files and make symlinks by hand: $ cd /usr/lib/xorg/modules $ rm -f libwfb.so $ ln -s libnvidia-wfb.so.1 libwfb.so $ cd extensions/ $ rm -f libglx.so $ ln -s libglx.so.177.82 libglx.so But after any future X.org update, I will loose these changes. libglx.so and libwfb.so should probably be symlinks. Well, what about fixing the nvidia driver instead? dpkg diversions are probably an easy solution here. By the way, this bug report is faar away from being critical... Brice -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#391935: [Pkg-xen-devel] Bug#391935: Bug #391935: Re: The answer from Citrix Xen.org
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 08:24:54PM +, Ian Jackson wrote: Robert Millan writes ([Pkg-xen-devel] Bug#391935: Bug #391935: Re: The answer from Citrix Xen.org): On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 02:15:29PM +0100, Bas Zoetekouw wrote: Actually, I think there were two problems with firefox: the logo issue (that was solved by changing the icon), and the use of the Firefox trademark, which required anyone who wanted to use the name firefox to use only official binaries built by Mozilla. This second issue originately seemed similar to the Xen case. Having followed the situation closely, I can say that the latter was mostly an excuse. Just look at the package in Ubuntu. They make all the changes they need, and they are able to provide security support. The big difference is they keep the non-free logo. I disagree. I was at the time employed by Canonical and I was the person who was at that time responsible for most of the changes which had been made to Ubuntu's Firefox compared to Debian's, so I should know. I don't want to be rude about my previous employer of course, but you shouldn't set much store by the various public pronouncements made at the time. When I talked to the Mozilla folks about it, they made it very clear that relicensing the logo was out of the question. They might have been open to negotiating other things, like which kind of modifications are allowed, etc, but I have no doubt that the logo is the big stumbling block. This leads me to believe that, if we had kept using the non-free logo, our set of Debian-specific changes to the package would have been a non-issue, or at least a minor one. But of course, I can't prove any of that. So make of it what you wish :-) -- Robert Millan The DRM opt-in fallacy: Your data belongs to us. We will decide when (and how) you may access your data; but nobody's threatening your freedom: we still allow you to remove your data and not access it at all. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#511694: [pkg-mono-group] Bug#511694: mono-jit: Runtime Failure on armel: Emits invalid arm instructions on EABI machines
severity 511694 important tags 511694 - patch tags 511694 + upstream fixed-upstream forwarded 511694 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462587 thanks On Tue, 13 Jan 2009 10:50:03 -0500 Stephen Depooter steph...@xandros.com wrote: Subject: mono-jit: Runtime Failure on armel: Emits invalid arm instructions Package: mono-jit Version: 1.9.1+dfsg-5 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Tags: +patch On ARMEL, the mono jit fails at runtime with an illegal instruction exception. Unfortunately, I don't have a log of this happening since I came across it while trying to rebuild mono with both the architecture specific packages as well as the arch all packages. This is an issue that has bneen found and addressed in mono 2.0 upstream. See https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462587 I am attaching a patch I applied to the Debian source package which has implemented the specific fix for this issue. I do think that the mono revision 121457 should also be fixed. http://anonsvn.mono-project.com/viewvc?view=revrevision=121457 Thanks for your investigation in this matter, but the patch you provided is broken, it contains unhandled rejected code blocks. As this issue is only present with non-debian kernels, this doesn't make it RC, thus downgrading to important. I will try to backport the mentioned revisions and upload a -6 revision of mono if I am successful. -- Regards, Mirco 'meebey' Bauer PGP-Key ID: 0xEEF946C8 FOSS Developermee...@meebey.net http://www.meebey.net/ PEAR Developermee...@php.net http://pear.php.net/ Debian Developer mee...@debian.org http://www.debian.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#368559: GLX-covered files now free software
The files discussed in this bug are now free software. You can find details in the recent discussion in #211765. -- Brett Smith Licensing Compliance Engineer, Free Software Foundation -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#511843: bibleref: Please update to newer version, relicensed under DFSG-free license
Package: texlive-humanities Version: 2007.dfsg.14-1 Severity: serious Jan Hauke Rahm i...@jhr-online.de wrote: Thanks for reporting! Hmm, it's kind of sarcastic that working with the bible could be non-free, isn't it? $grep -A 4 modify /usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/bibleref/bibleref.sty %% If you modify this file, you must change its name first. %% You are NOT ALLOWED to distribute this file alone. You are NOT %% ALLOWED to take money for the distribution or use of either this %% file or a changed version, except for a nominal charge for copying %% etc. The version in TeXLive has indeed a non-free license text. Meanwhile, upstream has relicensed the package under the LPPL 1.3, but AFAICS this only applies to the new version. Regards, Frank -- Frank Küster Debian Developer (TeXLive) VCD Aschaffenburg-Miltenberg, ADFC Miltenberg B90/Grüne KV Miltenberg -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#511713: looks like its fixed
I installed this package. libxul-dev eclipse is starting up now :) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#511844: CVE-2008-5262: DevIL iGetHdrHeader() Buffer Overflow Vulnerabilities
Package: devil Severity: grave Tags: security Justification: user security hole Hi, please see http://secunia.com/secunia_research/2008-59/ for details. Cheers, Moritz -- System Information: Debian Release: 5.0 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.26-1-686 (SMP w/1 CPU core) Locale: LANG=C, lc_ctype=de_de.iso-8859...@euro (charmap=ISO-8859-15) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#511846: netatalk: kernel panic after package update to 2.0.3-11+lenny1 amd64
Package: netatalk Version: 2.0.3-11+lenny1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable *** Please type your report below this line *** I'm sorry to tell you that today's package update made my system unbootable. The problem was with the package netatalk which was starting services at boot time. This resulted in a kernel panic. To repair this I booted the system in a single-user mode and removed netatalk and a few packages recommended by it but which I didn't use. -- System Information: Debian Release: 5.0 APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.26-1-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Versions of packages netatalk depends on: ii libc6 2.7-16 GNU C Library: Shared libraries ii libcomerr21.41.3-1 common error description library ii libcups2 1.3.8-1lenny4 Common UNIX Printing System(tm) - ii libdb4.6 4.6.21-11 Berkeley v4.6 Database Libraries [ ii libgnutls26 2.4.2-4the GNU TLS library - runtime libr ii libkrb53 1.6.dfsg.4~beta1-5 MIT Kerberos runtime libraries ii libpam-modules1.0.1-4+b1 Pluggable Authentication Modules f ii libpam0g 1.0.1-4+b1 Pluggable Authentication Modules l ii libwrap0 7.6.q-16 Wietse Venema's TCP wrappers libra ii netbase 4.34 Basic TCP/IP networking system ii perl 5.10.0-19 Larry Wall's Practical Extraction ii zlib1g1:1.2.3.3.dfsg-12 compression library - runtime Versions of packages netatalk recommends: pn db4.2-util none(no description available) ii lsof 4.78.dfsg.1-4 List open files ii procps 1:3.2.7-9 /proc file system utilities pn rc none(no description available) Versions of packages netatalk suggests: pn quota none (no description available) pn tetex-bin none (no description available) pn timeout none (no description available)
Bug#511694: Cleaned up patch
tags 511694 +patch thanks Sorry about that. I didn't notice that I had left the reject files that I had fixed/reverted behind in the patch. Attached is a new patch that only affects the intended files. Feel free to use this, or a new patch of your own work. Ideally the other fix in svn that fixes the use of the flush_icache function should also probably be fixed for code generation correctness, but it involves significantly more work in the changes in the tramp-arm.c file since there has been a lot more changes between the 1.9+patches version packaged in Debian and the released mono 2.0. -- Stephen Depooter steph...@xandros.com fix_armel-eabi_mono_arch_flush_icache_r122416_r122702.dpatch Description: application/shellscript
Processed: Cleaned up patch
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 511694 +patch Bug#511694: mono-jit: Runtime Failure on armel: Emits invalid arm instructions on EABI machines Tags were: patch Tags added: patch thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#511779: freespeak: Installation error in 0.3 (0.2 worked fine)
tag 511779 pending thanks On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 01:46:43PM +0100, Richard Scherping wrote: Compiling /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/freespeak/translation.py ... File /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/freespeak/translation.py, line 117 yield ^ SyntaxError: invalid syntax pycentral: pycentral pkginstall: error byte-compiling files (29) pycentral pkginstall: error byte-compiling files (29) The yield syntax without any argument is not supported in Python 2.4. Next debian release will bump the dependency to 2.5. Thanks for your report. -- http://syx.googlecode.com - Smalltalk YX http://lethalman.blogspot.com - Thoughts about computer technologies http://www.debian.org - The Universal Operating System signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Processed: crash rtorrent by scgi-interface (function: 'fi.get_filename_last')
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: reopen 506748 Bug#506748: crash rtorrent by scgi-interface (function: 'fi.get_filename_last') 'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version; you may need to use 'found' to remove fixed versions. Bug reopened, originator not changed. forcemerge 506748 510560 Bug#506748: crash rtorrent by scgi-interface (function: 'fi.get_filename_last') Bug#510560: rtorrent: Patch to resolve bug #506748 leads to crashes Forcibly Merged 506748 510560. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Processed: tagging 511779
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny1 tags 511779 pending Bug#511779: freespeak: Installation error in 0.3 (0.2 worked fine) There were no tags set. Tags added: pending End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Processed: Re: Bug#511846: netatalk: kernel panic after package update to 2.0.3-11+lenny1 amd64
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: reassign 511846 linux-2.6 Bug#511846: netatalk: kernel panic after package update to 2.0.3-11+lenny1 amd64 Bug reassigned from package `netatalk' to `linux-2.6'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#511846: netatalk: kernel panic after package update to 2.0.3-11+lenny1 amd64
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 reassign 511846 linux-2.6 thanks On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 09:39:43PM +, Vladimir Komendantsky wrote: I'm sorry to tell you that today's package update made my system unbootable. The problem was with the package netatalk which was starting services at boot time. This resulted in a kernel panic. To repair this I booted the system in a single-user mode and removed netatalk and a few packages recommended by it but which I didn't use. Thanks for your bugreport! That recent change to netatalk should not affect how it interacts with the kernel. I suspect that what triggered this bug was not changes to netatalk but instead simply that _any_ package update will restart daemons and (if not loaded already) request the appletalk kernel module to be loaded. Netatalk interacts with the kernel through the Linux module appletalk provided by the Linux kernel, so I believe that kernel panics would be a bug in the Linux kernel package, so reassigning. Kind regards, - Jonas - -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist og Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkluY2oACgkQn7DbMsAkQLjG0gCgnieUeVV0USAB/wh9V6sWPdbk kYwAnjYDCnahFS5rUt5emIkG698za6/L =yH1m -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#511849: antlr: missing build-dependency java-gcj-compat-dev
Package: antlr Version: 2.7.7-6 Severity: serious Tags: patch Justification: no longer builds from source -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 antlr is missing java-gcj-compat-dev in Build-Depends but uses dh_nativejava. The attached patch adds the missing dependency to debian/control. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkluYkAACgkQXZJ0m2XDVK8mggCdEwbU4dnYtrifg2SlXVz3oKTm PoIAniv4KUWclcO5Ol/xfkhDPpYkEtFB =LoFv -END PGP SIGNATURE- diff --git a/debian/control b/debian/control index f512d4f..1166a0e 100644 --- a/debian/control +++ b/debian/control @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ Section: devel Priority: optional Maintainer: Debian Java Maintainers pkg-java-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org Uploaders: Arnaud Vandyck av...@debian.org, John Leuner je...@debian.org, Michael Koch konque...@gmx.de, Barry Hawkins ba...@bytemason.org -Build-Depends: debhelper (= 4), default-jdk-builddep, python, autotools-dev, python-all-dev (= 2.3.5-11), sharutils +Build-Depends: debhelper (= 4), default-jdk-builddep, python, autotools-dev, python-all-dev (= 2.3.5-11), sharutils, java-gcj-compat-dev Build-Depends-Indep: python-support (= 0.3), nant, cli-common-dev (= 0.4.4), mono-mcs (= 1.0) | c-sharp-compiler Standards-Version: 3.7.3 Vcs-Svn: svn://svn.debian.org/svn/pkg-java/trunk/antlr
Bug#511846: netatalk: kernel panic after package update to 2.0.3-11+lenny1 amd64
Netatalk interacts with the kernel through the Linux module appletalk provided by the Linux kernel, so I believe that kernel panics would be a bug in the Linux kernel package, so reassigning. I'd like to point out that the module restart triggered by the update didn't bring the system to a crash. This only happened after I restarted the computer. Regards, Vladimir
Processed: Re: [pkg-mono-group] Bug#511694: mono-jit: Runtime Failure on armel: Emits invalid arm instructions on EABI machines
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: severity 511694 important Bug#511694: mono-jit: Runtime Failure on armel: Emits invalid arm instructions on EABI machines Severity set to `important' from `grave' tags 511694 - patch Bug#511694: mono-jit: Runtime Failure on armel: Emits invalid arm instructions on EABI machines Tags were: patch Tags removed: patch tags 511694 + upstream fixed-upstream Bug#511694: mono-jit: Runtime Failure on armel: Emits invalid arm instructions on EABI machines There were no tags set. Tags added: upstream, fixed-upstream forwarded 511694 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462587 Bug#511694: mono-jit: Runtime Failure on armel: Emits invalid arm instructions on EABI machines Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462587. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#511836: non-free ogonek.sty
On Mi, 14 Jan 2009, Frank Küster wrote: The same text is in ogonek.dtx - so it's not just a screwed application of the LPPL, it's really non-free. That is bad. I have removed it upstream, and next upload to debian will fix that, too. I will also contact the Polish group for relicensing. Best wishes Norbert --- Dr. Norbert Preining prein...@logic.atVienna University of Technology Debian Developer prein...@debian.org Debian TeX Group gpg DSA: 0x09C5B094 fp: 14DF 2E6C 0307 BE6D AD76 A9C0 D2BF 4AA3 09C5 B094 --- BUDE A polite joke reserved for use in the presence of vicars. --- Douglas Adams, The Meaning of Liff -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#511852: xnecview: Error in parameters
Package: xnecview Version: 1.35-5 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Trying to use xnecview with several files I'm getting GW errors like these: Error in parameters: GW 1 11 0.-1. 0.000 0.0 1. 0.000.00667 Error in parameters: GW 2 11 -.7527-1.0753 0.-.7527 1.0753 0. .00717 Error in parameters: GW 3 11 -1.562-1.1562 0.-1.562 1.1562 0. .00771 So I get the sample file logper.nec from xnecview web site, located at: http://wwwhome.cs.utwente.nl/~ptdeboer/ham/xnecview/logper.nec which is refered in the packacge documentation. The .nec file GW cards looks like: GW 1 11 0.-1. 0.000 0.0 1.0.000 .00667 GW 2 11 -.7527-1.0753 0.-.75271.07530..00717 GW 3 11 -1.562-1.1562 0.-1.5621.15620..00771 I can get the files processed by nec2c. Let me know if I can provide other info. Thanks a lot, Fernando, LU2DFM -- System Information: Debian Release: 5.0 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.26-1-amd64 (SMP w/1 CPU core) Locale: LANG=es_AR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=es_AR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Versions of packages xnecview depends on: ii libatk1.0-0 1.22.0-1 The ATK accessibility toolkit ii libc6 2.7-18 GNU C Library: Shared libraries ii libcairo2 1.6.4-7The Cairo 2D vector graphics libra ii libglib2.0-0 2.16.6-1 The GLib library of C routines ii libgtk2.0-0 2.12.11-4 The GTK+ graphical user interface ii libpango1.0-0 1.20.5-3 Layout and rendering of internatio ii libpng12-01.2.27-2 PNG library - runtime xnecview recommends no packages. xnecview suggests no packages. -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#511779: marked as done (freespeak: Installation error in 0.3 (0.2 worked fine))
Your message dated Wed, 14 Jan 2009 22:32:03 + with message-id e1lnehl-000684...@ries.debian.org and subject line Bug#511779: fixed in freespeak 0.3.0-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #511779, regarding freespeak: Installation error in 0.3 (0.2 worked fine) to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 511779: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=511779 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: freespeak Version: 0.3.0-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable merom:~# LANG=C aptitude full-upgrade Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done Reading extended state information Initializing package states... Done Reading task descriptions... Done The following partially installed packages will be configured: freespeak 0 packages upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. Need to get 0B of archives. After unpacking 0B will be used. Setting up freespeak (0.3.0-1) ... Compiling /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/freespeak/translation.py ... File /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/freespeak/translation.py, line 117 yield ^ SyntaxError: invalid syntax pycentral: pycentral pkginstall: error byte-compiling files (29) pycentral pkginstall: error byte-compiling files (29) dpkg: error processing freespeak (--configure): subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1 Processing triggers for menu ... Errors were encountered while processing: freespeak E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) A package failed to install. Trying to recover: Setting up freespeak (0.3.0-1) ... Compiling /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/freespeak/translation.py ... File /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/freespeak/translation.py, line 117 yield ^ SyntaxError: invalid syntax pycentral: pycentral pkginstall: error byte-compiling files (29) pycentral pkginstall: error byte-compiling files (29) dpkg: error processing freespeak (--configure): subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1 Processing triggers for menu ... Errors were encountered while processing: freespeak Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done Reading extended state information Initializing package states... Done Reading task descriptions... Done -- System Information: Debian Release: 5.0 APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.28 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Versions of packages freespeak depends on: ii gconf22.22.0-1 GNOME configuration database syste ii python2.5.2-3An interactive high-level object-o ii python-central0.6.8 register and build utility for Pyt ii python-dbus 0.82.4-2 simple interprocess messaging syst ii python-gnome2 2.22.0-1 Python bindings for the GNOME desk ii python-gnome2-extras 2.19.1-3 Extra Python bindings for the GNOM ii python-gtk2 2.12.1-6 Python bindings for the GTK+ widge ii python-lxml 2.1.1-2.1 pythonic binding for the libxml2 a ii python-xlib 0.14-2 Interface for Python to the X11 Pr freespeak recommends no packages. freespeak suggests no packages. -- no debconf information ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Source: freespeak Source-Version: 0.3.0-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of freespeak, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: freespeak_0.3.0-2.diff.gz to pool/main/f/freespeak/freespeak_0.3.0-2.diff.gz freespeak_0.3.0-2.dsc to pool/main/f/freespeak/freespeak_0.3.0-2.dsc freespeak_0.3.0-2_amd64.deb to pool/main/f/freespeak/freespeak_0.3.0-2_amd64.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 511...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Luca Bruno lethalma...@gmail.com (supplier of updated freespeak package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
Bug#511817: [Pkg-octave-devel] Bug#511817: inline-octave: inline-octave 0.22-3 FTBFS
* Thomas Weber thomas.weber.m...@gmail.com [2009-01-14 20:42]: On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 06:28:59PM +0100, Alessio Treglia wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Package: inline-octave Version: 0.22-3 Severity: serious Justification: no longer builds from source the package [1] FTBFS on all architectures. [1] https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/inline-octave/0.22-3ubuntu1 No, it doesn't, at least if you don't fiddle blindly with the build-dependencies. Thanks for closing this false bug report, Thomas. To the bug reporter: we thank you for your time in reporting the problem but, please, next time try to be sure that the problem actually regards the Debian package and not the Ubuntu one. Debian maintainers are not necessarily concerned by problems in the derived Ubuntu packages. In the present case, the MOTU Developers inadvertently bumped the build-dependency from octave2.1 to octave3.0. This makes me think about what should be done as regards this package post-lenny. It doesn't seem to have any sign of upstream development since ages (well, at least since four years) and octave2.1 will be dropped from squeeze. Should we try to port the package to octave3.0 or simply drop it also? -- Rafael -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#511626: hedgewars: FTBFS on amd64: EAccessViolation : Access violation
Le mercredi 14 janvier 2009 à 19:43 +0100, Kurt Roeckx a écrit : On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 12:04:34AM +, peter green wrote: [...] It was succesful on one of the buildds (and got uploaded) and failed on the other. And I see no reason why it should fail on the other. Is it possible to try a second time on the same buildd to see if the problem is random or systematic? As the debug symbols were not included, the given stack trace is really useless. I can only assume either the buildd chroot isn't clean or it's some kernel issue. The buildd with the problem is running a 2.6.26 kernel. Or it may be a register allocator non deterministic issue. I had such an issue for sparc : one time out of three, the compiler could not rebuild itself. May be this one is similar. Cheers, Mazen, -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#511843: bibleref: Please update to newer version, relicensed under DFSG-free license
On Mi, 14 Jan 2009, Frank Küster wrote: $grep -A 4 modify /usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/bibleref/bibleref.sty %% If you modify this file, you must change its name first. %% You are NOT ALLOWED to distribute this file alone. You are NOT %% ALLOWED to take money for the distribution or use of either this %% file or a changed version, except for a nominal charge for copying %% etc. The version in TeXLive has indeed a non-free license text. Meanwhile, upstream has relicensed the package under the LPPL 1.3, but AFAICS this only applies to the new version. That is a pain. I generally don't want to blacklist anything that has been relicensed in later version. I don't know what to do. Either we add a license statement for the upgraded version and let it be, or we replace the version currently in the orig.tar.gz with the one from TL upstream (I checked, only minimal changes in the sty file), or we blacklist it and re-add it for 2008. Suggestions? Norbert --- Dr. Norbert Preining prein...@logic.atVienna University of Technology Debian Developer prein...@debian.org Debian TeX Group gpg DSA: 0x09C5B094 fp: 14DF 2E6C 0307 BE6D AD76 A9C0 D2BF 4AA3 09C5 B094 --- SLUBBERY (n.) The gooey drips of wax that dribble down the sides of a candle so beloved by Italian restaurants with Chianti bottles instead of wallpaper. --- Douglas Adams, The Meaning of Liff -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#511626: hedgewars: FTBFS on amd64: EAccessViolation : Access violation
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 11:42:46PM +0100, Mazen NEIFER wrote: Le mercredi 14 janvier 2009 à 19:43 +0100, Kurt Roeckx a écrit : On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 12:04:34AM +, peter green wrote: [...] It was succesful on one of the buildds (and got uploaded) and failed on the other. And I see no reason why it should fail on the other. Is it possible to try a second time on the same buildd to see if the problem is random or systematic? As the debug symbols were not included, the given stack trace is really useless. I can only assume either the buildd chroot isn't clean or it's some kernel issue. The buildd with the problem is running a 2.6.26 kernel. Or it may be a register allocator non deterministic issue. I had such an issue for sparc : one time out of three, the compiler could not rebuild itself. May be this one is similar. All failed attempts where on the same buildd host. So I assume it's something related to that host and not the package. I will try and take a closer look in the weekend. Kurt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#511843: bibleref: Please update to newer version, relicensed under DFSG-free license
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 11:47:16PM +0100, Norbert Preining wrote: I don't know what to do. Either we add a license statement for the upgraded version and let it be, or we replace the version currently in the orig.tar.gz with the one from TL upstream (I checked, only minimal changes in the sty file), or we blacklist it and re-add it for 2008. Suggestions? Well, since it seems to be in the interest of the upstream author to have this package relicensed and distributed I'd say: add a comment to README.Debian about a changed version in future versions and don't blacklist bibleref. Sure, this isn't exactly correct but I *think* it's in best interest of all, users as well as author. Hauke signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#499815: marked as done (Overwrites user runlevel configuration)
Your message dated Wed, 14 Jan 2009 23:02:05 + with message-id e1lnekp-eq...@ries.debian.org and subject line Bug#499815: fixed in avahi 0.6.23-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #499815, regarding Overwrites user runlevel configuration to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 499815: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=499815 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: avahi Version: 0.6.23-2 Severity: serious The new avahi versions try to move the start scripts to a later point in the boot process. This is done by first removing all runlevel configuration, then readding it. Thus, the user configuration is removed. This violates Debian policy, common sense and decency. A possible fix would be an extension of the update-rc.d interface. Marc ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Source: avahi Source-Version: 0.6.23-4 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of avahi, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: avahi-autoipd_0.6.23-4_i386.deb to pool/main/a/avahi/avahi-autoipd_0.6.23-4_i386.deb avahi-daemon_0.6.23-4_i386.deb to pool/main/a/avahi/avahi-daemon_0.6.23-4_i386.deb avahi-dbg_0.6.23-4_i386.deb to pool/main/a/avahi/avahi-dbg_0.6.23-4_i386.deb avahi-discover_0.6.23-4_all.deb to pool/main/a/avahi/avahi-discover_0.6.23-4_all.deb avahi-dnsconfd_0.6.23-4_i386.deb to pool/main/a/avahi/avahi-dnsconfd_0.6.23-4_i386.deb avahi-ui-utils_0.6.23-4_i386.deb to pool/main/a/avahi/avahi-ui-utils_0.6.23-4_i386.deb avahi-utils_0.6.23-4_i386.deb to pool/main/a/avahi/avahi-utils_0.6.23-4_i386.deb avahi_0.6.23-4.diff.gz to pool/main/a/avahi/avahi_0.6.23-4.diff.gz avahi_0.6.23-4.dsc to pool/main/a/avahi/avahi_0.6.23-4.dsc libavahi-client-dev_0.6.23-4_i386.deb to pool/main/a/avahi/libavahi-client-dev_0.6.23-4_i386.deb libavahi-client3_0.6.23-4_i386.deb to pool/main/a/avahi/libavahi-client3_0.6.23-4_i386.deb libavahi-common-data_0.6.23-4_i386.deb to pool/main/a/avahi/libavahi-common-data_0.6.23-4_i386.deb libavahi-common-dev_0.6.23-4_i386.deb to pool/main/a/avahi/libavahi-common-dev_0.6.23-4_i386.deb libavahi-common3_0.6.23-4_i386.deb to pool/main/a/avahi/libavahi-common3_0.6.23-4_i386.deb libavahi-compat-howl-dev_0.6.23-4_i386.deb to pool/main/a/avahi/libavahi-compat-howl-dev_0.6.23-4_i386.deb libavahi-compat-howl0_0.6.23-4_i386.deb to pool/main/a/avahi/libavahi-compat-howl0_0.6.23-4_i386.deb libavahi-compat-libdnssd-dev_0.6.23-4_i386.deb to pool/main/a/avahi/libavahi-compat-libdnssd-dev_0.6.23-4_i386.deb libavahi-compat-libdnssd1_0.6.23-4_i386.deb to pool/main/a/avahi/libavahi-compat-libdnssd1_0.6.23-4_i386.deb libavahi-core-dev_0.6.23-4_i386.deb to pool/main/a/avahi/libavahi-core-dev_0.6.23-4_i386.deb libavahi-core5_0.6.23-4_i386.deb to pool/main/a/avahi/libavahi-core5_0.6.23-4_i386.deb libavahi-glib-dev_0.6.23-4_i386.deb to pool/main/a/avahi/libavahi-glib-dev_0.6.23-4_i386.deb libavahi-glib1_0.6.23-4_i386.deb to pool/main/a/avahi/libavahi-glib1_0.6.23-4_i386.deb libavahi-gobject-dev_0.6.23-4_i386.deb to pool/main/a/avahi/libavahi-gobject-dev_0.6.23-4_i386.deb libavahi-gobject0_0.6.23-4_i386.deb to pool/main/a/avahi/libavahi-gobject0_0.6.23-4_i386.deb libavahi-qt3-1_0.6.23-4_i386.deb to pool/main/a/avahi/libavahi-qt3-1_0.6.23-4_i386.deb libavahi-qt3-dev_0.6.23-4_i386.deb to pool/main/a/avahi/libavahi-qt3-dev_0.6.23-4_i386.deb libavahi-qt4-1_0.6.23-4_i386.deb to pool/main/a/avahi/libavahi-qt4-1_0.6.23-4_i386.deb libavahi-qt4-dev_0.6.23-4_i386.deb to pool/main/a/avahi/libavahi-qt4-dev_0.6.23-4_i386.deb libavahi-ui-dev_0.6.23-4_i386.deb to pool/main/a/avahi/libavahi-ui-dev_0.6.23-4_i386.deb libavahi-ui0_0.6.23-4_i386.deb to pool/main/a/avahi/libavahi-ui0_0.6.23-4_i386.deb python-avahi_0.6.23-4_all.deb to pool/main/a/avahi/python-avahi_0.6.23-4_all.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 499...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Michael Biebl bi...@debian.org (supplier of updated avahi package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 23:22:59 +0100 Source: avahi Binary: avahi-daemon
Bug#511796: marked as done (whois throw getaddrinfo(whois.crsnic.net): Name or service not known)
Your message dated Thu, 15 Jan 2009 01:59:34 +0100 with message-id 20090115005934.ga21...@bongo.bofh.it and subject line Re: Bug#511796: whois throw getaddrinfo(whois.crsnic.net): Name or service not known has caused the Debian Bug report #511796, regarding whois throw getaddrinfo(whois.crsnic.net): Name or service not known to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 511796: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=511796 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: whois Version: 4.7.20 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable when I run for example whois google.com I get getaddrinfo(whois.crsnic.net): Name or service not known it is the same for any domain tried even for those locally hosted -- System Information: Debian Release: 4.0 APT prefers stable APT policy: (500, 'stable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-6-686 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Versions of packages whois depends on: ii libc6 2.3.6.ds1-13etch8 GNU C Library: Shared libraries ii libidn11 0.6.5-1 GNU libidn library, implementation whois recommends no packages. -- no debconf information ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- On Jan 14, Steve Cotton steve0...@s.cotton.clara.co.uk wrote: #511796 is likely to be caused by #511797, not a problem in whois. No shit, Sherlock. -- ciao, Marco signature.asc Description: Digital signature ---End Message---
Bug#511836: marked as done (non-free ogonek.sty)
Your message dated Thu, 15 Jan 2009 00:47:22 + with message-id e1lngoi-kp...@ries.debian.org and subject line Bug#511836: fixed in texlive-lang 2007.dfsg.4-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #511836, regarding non-free ogonek.sty to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 511836: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=511836 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: texlive-lang-polish Version: 2007.dfsg.3-3 Severity: serious File: /usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/ogonek/ogonek.sty Justification: Policy 2.1 #v+ $ grep modify /usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/ogonek/ogonek.sty %% Note: you are not allowed to modify this file. #v- -- Piotr Lewandowski ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Source: texlive-lang Source-Version: 2007.dfsg.4-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of texlive-lang, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: texlive-lang-african_2007.dfsg.4-1_all.deb to pool/main/t/texlive-lang/texlive-lang-african_2007.dfsg.4-1_all.deb texlive-lang-all_2007.dfsg.4-1_all.deb to pool/main/t/texlive-lang/texlive-lang-all_2007.dfsg.4-1_all.deb texlive-lang-arab_2007.dfsg.4-1_all.deb to pool/main/t/texlive-lang/texlive-lang-arab_2007.dfsg.4-1_all.deb texlive-lang-armenian_2007.dfsg.4-1_all.deb to pool/main/t/texlive-lang/texlive-lang-armenian_2007.dfsg.4-1_all.deb texlive-lang-croatian_2007.dfsg.4-1_all.deb to pool/main/t/texlive-lang/texlive-lang-croatian_2007.dfsg.4-1_all.deb texlive-lang-cyrillic_2007.dfsg.4-1_all.deb to pool/main/t/texlive-lang/texlive-lang-cyrillic_2007.dfsg.4-1_all.deb texlive-lang-czechslovak_2007.dfsg.4-1_all.deb to pool/main/t/texlive-lang/texlive-lang-czechslovak_2007.dfsg.4-1_all.deb texlive-lang-danish_2007.dfsg.4-1_all.deb to pool/main/t/texlive-lang/texlive-lang-danish_2007.dfsg.4-1_all.deb texlive-lang-dutch_2007.dfsg.4-1_all.deb to pool/main/t/texlive-lang/texlive-lang-dutch_2007.dfsg.4-1_all.deb texlive-lang-finnish_2007.dfsg.4-1_all.deb to pool/main/t/texlive-lang/texlive-lang-finnish_2007.dfsg.4-1_all.deb texlive-lang-french_2007.dfsg.4-1_all.deb to pool/main/t/texlive-lang/texlive-lang-french_2007.dfsg.4-1_all.deb texlive-lang-german_2007.dfsg.4-1_all.deb to pool/main/t/texlive-lang/texlive-lang-german_2007.dfsg.4-1_all.deb texlive-lang-greek_2007.dfsg.4-1_all.deb to pool/main/t/texlive-lang/texlive-lang-greek_2007.dfsg.4-1_all.deb texlive-lang-hebrew_2007.dfsg.4-1_all.deb to pool/main/t/texlive-lang/texlive-lang-hebrew_2007.dfsg.4-1_all.deb texlive-lang-hungarian_2007.dfsg.4-1_all.deb to pool/main/t/texlive-lang/texlive-lang-hungarian_2007.dfsg.4-1_all.deb texlive-lang-italian_2007.dfsg.4-1_all.deb to pool/main/t/texlive-lang/texlive-lang-italian_2007.dfsg.4-1_all.deb texlive-lang-latin_2007.dfsg.4-1_all.deb to pool/main/t/texlive-lang/texlive-lang-latin_2007.dfsg.4-1_all.deb texlive-lang-manju_2007.dfsg.4-1_all.deb to pool/main/t/texlive-lang/texlive-lang-manju_2007.dfsg.4-1_all.deb texlive-lang-mongolian_2007.dfsg.4-1_all.deb to pool/main/t/texlive-lang/texlive-lang-mongolian_2007.dfsg.4-1_all.deb texlive-lang-norwegian_2007.dfsg.4-1_all.deb to pool/main/t/texlive-lang/texlive-lang-norwegian_2007.dfsg.4-1_all.deb texlive-lang-other_2007.dfsg.4-1_all.deb to pool/main/t/texlive-lang/texlive-lang-other_2007.dfsg.4-1_all.deb texlive-lang-polish_2007.dfsg.4-1_all.deb to pool/main/t/texlive-lang/texlive-lang-polish_2007.dfsg.4-1_all.deb texlive-lang-portuguese_2007.dfsg.4-1_all.deb to pool/main/t/texlive-lang/texlive-lang-portuguese_2007.dfsg.4-1_all.deb texlive-lang-spanish_2007.dfsg.4-1_all.deb to pool/main/t/texlive-lang/texlive-lang-spanish_2007.dfsg.4-1_all.deb texlive-lang-swedish_2007.dfsg.4-1_all.deb to pool/main/t/texlive-lang/texlive-lang-swedish_2007.dfsg.4-1_all.deb texlive-lang-tibetan_2007.dfsg.4-1_all.deb to pool/main/t/texlive-lang/texlive-lang-tibetan_2007.dfsg.4-1_all.deb texlive-lang-ukenglish_2007.dfsg.4-1_all.deb to pool/main/t/texlive-lang/texlive-lang-ukenglish_2007.dfsg.4-1_all.deb texlive-lang-vietnamese_2007.dfsg.4-1_all.deb to pool/main/t/texlive-lang/texlive-lang-vietnamese_2007.dfsg.4-1_all.deb texlive-lang_2007.dfsg.4-1.diff.gz to pool/main/t/texlive-lang/texlive-lang_2007.dfsg.4-1.diff.gz texlive-lang_2007.dfsg.4-1.dsc to pool/main/t/texlive-lang/texlive-lang_2007.dfsg.4-1.dsc texlive-lang_2007.dfsg.4.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/t/texlive-lang/texlive-lang_2007.dfsg.4.orig.tar.gz A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you
Bug#511708: aptitude: [etch upgrade] TUI consistently blocks after doing one set of operations
Daniel Burrows a scris: On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 08:28:21PM +0200, Eddy Petrișor eddy.petri...@gmail.com was heard to say: I just upgraded this system yesterday to Debian Lenny from Debian Etch and since the upgrade I have seen that aptitude's TUI interface blocks after any set of operations that is done with dpkg. When the operation finishes the TUI is unusable and you need to ctrl+C the interface to get the prompt. What architecture are you running on? Is this a single or a multi-core Err, I meant to add that info, too, sorry about that. Arch is i386, dual core. machine? Just for kicks, if you install aptitude-dbg and valgrind, then run valgrind --log-file=/tmp/aptitude.grind, can you still reproduce the problem? (warning: this will be very slow) I'll try this tomorrow when I get at work (that's where the machine is). -- Regards, EddyP = Imagination is more important than knowledge A.Einstein signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#511511: marked as done (slurm-llnl: Imporer checking of EVP_VerifyFinal() return value.)
Your message dated Thu, 15 Jan 2009 03:02:11 + with message-id e1lniul-0003tm...@ries.debian.org and subject line Bug#511511: fixed in slurm-llnl 1.3.13-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #511511, regarding slurm-llnl: Imporer checking of EVP_VerifyFinal() return value. to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 511511: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=511511 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: slurm-llnl Severity: serious Tags: security Hi, I've been checking packages to see if they properly check the return value of some of the functions in openssl. In src/plugins/crypto/openssl/crypto_openssl.c there is this piece of code: rc = EVP_VerifyFinal(ectx, (unsigned char *) signature, sig_size, (EVP_PKEY *) key); if (!rc) rc = SLURM_ERROR; else rc = SLURM_SUCCESS; But EVP_VerifyFinal() can also return -1 on errors. A good way to check the value would be something like: if (rc = 0) I have no idea if this code is being used and what the consequences of this might be. Kurt ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Source: slurm-llnl Source-Version: 1.3.13-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of slurm-llnl, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: libpmi0-dev_1.3.13-1_i386.deb to pool/main/s/slurm-llnl/libpmi0-dev_1.3.13-1_i386.deb libpmi0_1.3.13-1_i386.deb to pool/main/s/slurm-llnl/libpmi0_1.3.13-1_i386.deb libslurm13-dev_1.3.13-1_i386.deb to pool/main/s/slurm-llnl/libslurm13-dev_1.3.13-1_i386.deb libslurm13_1.3.13-1_i386.deb to pool/main/s/slurm-llnl/libslurm13_1.3.13-1_i386.deb slurm-llnl-basic-plugins-dev_1.3.13-1_i386.deb to pool/main/s/slurm-llnl/slurm-llnl-basic-plugins-dev_1.3.13-1_i386.deb slurm-llnl-basic-plugins_1.3.13-1_i386.deb to pool/main/s/slurm-llnl/slurm-llnl-basic-plugins_1.3.13-1_i386.deb slurm-llnl-doc_1.3.13-1_all.deb to pool/main/s/slurm-llnl/slurm-llnl-doc_1.3.13-1_all.deb slurm-llnl-slurmdbd_1.3.13-1_i386.deb to pool/main/s/slurm-llnl/slurm-llnl-slurmdbd_1.3.13-1_i386.deb slurm-llnl-sview_1.3.13-1_i386.deb to pool/main/s/slurm-llnl/slurm-llnl-sview_1.3.13-1_i386.deb slurm-llnl_1.3.13-1.diff.gz to pool/main/s/slurm-llnl/slurm-llnl_1.3.13-1.diff.gz slurm-llnl_1.3.13-1.dsc to pool/main/s/slurm-llnl/slurm-llnl_1.3.13-1.dsc slurm-llnl_1.3.13-1_i386.deb to pool/main/s/slurm-llnl/slurm-llnl_1.3.13-1_i386.deb slurm-llnl_1.3.13.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/s/slurm-llnl/slurm-llnl_1.3.13.orig.tar.gz A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 511...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Gennaro Oliva oliv...@na.icar.cnr.it (supplier of updated slurm-llnl package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 09:25:10 +0100 Source: slurm-llnl Binary: slurm-llnl libslurm13 libpmi0 libslurm13-dev libpmi0-dev slurm-llnl-doc slurm-llnl-basic-plugins slurm-llnl-basic-plugins-dev slurm-llnl-sview slurm-llnl-slurmdbd Architecture: source i386 all Version: 1.3.13-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Gennaro Oliva oliv...@na.icar.cnr.it Changed-By: Gennaro Oliva oliv...@na.icar.cnr.it Description: libpmi0- SLURM PMI library implementation libpmi0-dev - SLURM PMI library implementation libslurm13 - Runtime library files for SLURM libslurm13-dev - SLURM development files slurm-llnl - Simple Linux Utility for Resource Management slurm-llnl-basic-plugins - SLURM docmentation slurm-llnl-basic-plugins-dev - SLURM docmentation slurm-llnl-doc - SLURM docmentation slurm-llnl-slurmdbd - Secure enterprise-wide interface to a database for SLURM slurm-llnl-sview - GUI to view and modify SLURM state Closes: 511511 Changes: slurm-llnl (1.3.13-1) unstable; urgency=low . * New upstream release (Closes: #511511) Checksums-Sha1: 9000798b2b8545fd97b66a998bad4579116486a5 1393 slurm-llnl_1.3.13-1.dsc 1251604e8a430776c93b051b2a9d0e9f94b3ad60 6794442 slurm-llnl_1.3.13.orig.tar.gz 82e1b08d17db477023ebf274e6b5b52ad86ba46e 64423 slurm-llnl_1.3.13-1.diff.gz aff0d6367d1612238c126a0e36d0fd2969449fb0 5154952
Bug#510564: Bug correct and patch submitted for upstream (in #511744)
I am not confident of doing force merge to merge 510564 and 511744, I think 511744 should be the lead bug report. It is now assigned to libsmbclient with a patch pending upstream review, but it is only serverity important. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#511708: aptitude: [etch upgrade] TUI consistently blocks after doing one set of operations
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 03:23:55AM +0200, Eddy Petrișor eddy.petri...@gmail.com was heard to say: Daniel Burrows a scris: On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 08:28:21PM +0200, Eddy Petrișor eddy.petri...@gmail.com was heard to say: I just upgraded this system yesterday to Debian Lenny from Debian Etch and since the upgrade I have seen that aptitude's TUI interface blocks after any set of operations that is done with dpkg. When the operation finishes the TUI is unusable and you need to ctrl+C the interface to get the prompt. What architecture are you running on? Is this a single or a multi-core Err, I meant to add that info, too, sorry about that. Arch is i386, dual core. machine? Just for kicks, if you install aptitude-dbg and valgrind, then run valgrind --log-file=/tmp/aptitude.grind, can you still reproduce the problem? (warning: this will be very slow) I'll try this tomorrow when I get at work (that's where the machine is). Something that would be even better if you can manage it would be to use hg bisect. This will be time-consuming, but has the potential to track down exactly what's happening, or at least what change triggered it. The one time I was able to (very briefly) reproduce this I tried running valgrind and gdb, but without getting anywhere. If this is too much work for you that's OK -- these instructions might help other people track it down. Heck, I can even post them on my blog. Can't hurt. (why didn't I do this before? I only thought of using bisect while I was walking to work this morning. D'oh!!) I don't know what version previously worked for you, but etch has 0.4.4-4, so let's try that. # aptitude $ hg clone http://hg.debian.org/hg/aptitude/head aptitude $ cd aptitude $ hg bisect --bad $ hg bisect --good 0.4.4 Testing changeset 1105:083027d51594 (1098 changesets remaining, ~10 tests) 256 files updated, 0 files merged, 78 files removed, 0 files unresolved Then repeat these steps: $ ./autogen.sh ./configure make # ./aptitude (try to reproduce the problem) After each attempt, if you can reproduce it, tell Mercurial that the version is buggy by runnning: $ hg bisect --bad If not, tell Mercurial that it isn't buggy by running: $ hg bisect --good If you can't compile the program, or if it's too broken for you to test it, run: $ hg bisect --skip It should take around 10 tries, more if you're lucky. Then it'll print a changeset out: The first bad revision is: changeset: 1446:d2da6ae09bd3 parent: 1436:9db554d44e20 parent: 1435:78895fdf40d7 user:Christian Perrier bubu...@debian.org date:Sat Apr 12 09:00:07 2008 +0200 summary: Merging changes to fr.po Send me the changeset information Mercurial gives you. Daniel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Processed: Re: Bug#511521: boinc: Does not check the RSA_public_decrypt() return value.
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 511521 + pending Bug#511521: boinc: Does not check the RSA_public_decrypt() return value. Tags were: security Tags added: pending thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#511708: aptitude: [etch upgrade] TUI consistently blocks after doing one set of operations
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 08:47:34PM -0800, Daniel Burrows dburr...@debian.org was heard to say: Something that would be even better if you can manage it would be to use hg bisect. This will be time-consuming, but has the potential to track down exactly what's happening, or at least what change triggered it. The one time I was able to (very briefly) reproduce this I tried running valgrind and gdb, but without getting anywhere. Bah. There have been too many toolchain changes over the last three years. You can do this, but it'll be a real pain. At the very least you need to use g++ 4.2 and pass --disable-werror. Then, there's the fact that the very first revision that bisect picks requires a version of cwidget that no longer exists in Debian... Probably no point in trying to post this to my blog -- hardly anyone would be able to follow the instructions that I'd have to give. Anyway, obviously I would be happy if you could hunt this down, but it's beyond the scope of what I usually ask bug reporters to try, so I'll understand if you don't pursue this approach. Daniel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#511521: boinc: Does not check the RSA_public_decrypt() return value.
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 11:48:00AM -0600, Rene Mayorga wrote: On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 06:29:10PM +0100, Steffen Moeller wrote: Frank S. Thomas wrote: On Tuesday 13 January 2009 16:43:55 Rene Mayorga wrote: I was about to port this fix to 6.2.14-2, are everybody ok with this? FWIW: I'm ok with backporting this to the current version in Lenny. Lenny should not be without it, good point. My comment referred to my preference to use a newer upstream version and keep the Debian packaging bits as simple as possible. The changes are quite simple, I have this on a local branch, and planning to merge it with master. I did not change anything on the Debian packaging, just add a new patch that quilt manage like a breeze. this changes are now merged on master. Cheers. -- Rene Mauricio Mayorga | jabber: rmayo...@jabber.org http://rmayorga.org | -- 08B6 58AB A691 DD56 C30B 8D37 8040 19FA A209 C305 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#511477: iceape: Shouldn't release with Lenny
Rene Engelhard wrote: Anyway, I can try to build OOo 2.4.1 using libxul... That (with a build-dep fix) works. (But I of course won't upload that unless it 's decided that we *will* do the transition for lenny now...) Regards, Rene -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#511342: setting package to devtodo, tagging 470987, tagging 511342
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny1 # via tagpending # # devtodo (0.1.20-4) unstable; urgency=low # # * Check for errors when creating the file to prevent data loss #(Closes: #511342) # * Include copyright information (Closes: #470987) # package devtodo tags 470987 + pending confirmed tags 511342 + pending confirmed -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Processed: setting package to devtodo, tagging 470987, tagging 511342
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny1 # via tagpending # # devtodo (0.1.20-4) unstable; urgency=low # # * Check for errors when creating the file to prevent data loss #(Closes: #511342) # * Include copyright information (Closes: #470987) # package devtodo Ignoring bugs not assigned to: devtodo tags 470987 + pending confirmed Bug#470987: devtodo: debian/copyright is incomplete There were no tags set. Tags added: pending, confirmed tags 511342 + pending confirmed Bug#511342: does not check for file creation errors There were no tags set. Tags added: pending, confirmed End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#511779: Thanks!
freespeak 0.3.0-2 works for me. Thanks for the quick update! Richard -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
