Bug#640969: Exits with: ImportError: No module named bpython.cli

2011-09-09 Thread David Paleino
tags 640969 confirmed
thanks

On Fri, 09 Sep 2011 12:31:12 +0900, Mitsubishi Evo II wrote:

 I just upgraded to bpython, and when running it from the command line
 it immediatly exits as follows:
 
 % bpython
 Traceback (most recent call last):
   File /usr/bin/bpython, line 9, in module
 load_entry_point('bpython==0.10.1', 'console_scripts', 'bpython')()
   File /usr/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/pkg_resources.py, line 305, in
 load_entry_point return get_distribution(dist).load_entry_point(group, name)
   File /usr/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/pkg_resources.py, line 2245, in
 load_entry_point return ep.load()
   File /usr/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/pkg_resources.py, line 1955, in load
 entry = __import__(self.module_name, globals(),globals(), ['__name__'])
 ImportError: No module named bpython.cli

Uhm, ok, confirmed, seems like an upgrade problem caused by the switch from
pysupport to dh_python2.

Reinstalling it fixes the problem -- I'll try to fix the upgrade path as well.

Kindly,
David

-- 
 . ''`.   Debian developer | http://wiki.debian.org/DavidPaleino
 : :'  : Linuxer #334216 --|-- http://www.hanskalabs.net/
 `. `'`  GPG: 1392B174 | http://deb.li/dapal
   `-   2BAB C625 4E66 E7B8 450A C3E1 E6AA 9017 1392 B174


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Bug#630517: icu: FTBFS on the kfreebsd-amd64

2011-09-09 Thread Petr Salinger

tags 630517 + patch
user debian-...@lists.debian.org
usertag 630517 + kfreebsd
--

Hi.

Please apply patch bellow to configure.in
and propagate it into configure.

Petr


--- source/configure.in
+++ source/configure.in
@@ -604,7 +604,7 @@
 # Check to see if genccode can generate simple assembly.
 GENCCODE_ASSEMBLY=
 case ${host} in
-*-linux*|i*86-*-*bsd*|i*86-pc-gnu)
+*-linux*|*-kfreebsd*-gnu*|i*86-*-*bsd*|i*86-pc-gnu)
 if test $GCC = yes; then
 # We're using gcc, and the simple -a gcc command line works for 
genccode
 GENCCODE_ASSEMBLY=-a gcc




--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Processed: icu: FTBFS on the kfreebsd-amd64

2011-09-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 tags 630517 + patch
Bug #630517 [src:icu] FTBFS: icu: ../lib/libicudata.a: could not read symbols: 
Archive has no index; run ranlib to add one
Added tag(s) patch.
 user debian-...@lists.debian.org
Setting user to debian-...@lists.debian.org (was petr.salin...@seznam.cz).
 usertag 630517 + kfreebsd
Bug#630517: FTBFS: icu: ../lib/libicudata.a: could not read symbols: Archive 
has no index; run ranlib to add one
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: kfreebsd.
 --
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
630517: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=630517
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#640969: Exits with: ImportError: No module named bpython.cli

2011-09-09 Thread Mitsubishi Evo II
Hi David,
 
* David Paleino da...@debian.org [110909 15:02]:
 
 Uhm, ok, confirmed, seems like an upgrade problem caused by the switch from
 pysupport to dh_python2.

Ahh.

 Reinstalling it fixes the problem -- I'll try to fix the upgrade path as well.

Ok, thanks for the speedy confirmation and workaround.

Cheers,

Evo.








-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#640960: CVE-?????: broken CTCP parsing can be used to crash the core

2011-09-09 Thread Thomas Müller
Hi,

thanks for the notice.
I'll prepare a new package upload tonight.

Thanks,

Thomas

Am Freitag, den 09.09.2011 um 0:58 schrieb Timo Juhani Lindfors:
 Package: quassel
 Version: 0.6.3-2
 Severity: important
 Tags: security
 
 When people send me
 
 0010  75 74 61 73 21 7a 7a 40  31 37 38 2d 33 37 2d 31  |utas!zz@178-37-1|
 0020  30 34 2d 34 32 2e 61 64  73 6c 2e 69 6e 65 74 69  |04-42.adsl.ineti|
 0030  61 2e 70 6c 20 4a 4f 49  4e 20 23 71 75 61 73 73  |a.pl JOIN #quass|
 0040  65 6c 0d 0a 37 36 36 37  30 3a 55 c3 8c a6 5b 7e  |el..76670:U...[~|
 0050  8a 26 3a 6b 75 74 61 73  21 7a 7a 40 31 37 38 2d  |.:kutas!zz@178-|
 0060  33 37 2d 31 30 34 2d 34  32 2e 61 64 73 6c 2e 69  |37-104-42.adsl.i|
 0070  6e 65 74 69 61 2e 70 6c  20 50 52 49 56 4d 53 47  |netia.pl PRIVMSG|
 0080  20 23 71 75 61 73 73 65  6c 20 3a 01 41 43 54 49  | #quassel :.ACTI|
 0090  4f 4e 20 01 01 56 45 52  53 49 4f 4e 01 01 56 45  |ON ..VERSION..VE|
 00a0  52 53 49 4f 4e 01 01 56  45 52 53 49 4f 4e 01 01  |RSION..VERSION..|
 00b0  56 45 52 53 49 4f 4e 01  01 56 45 52 53 49 4f 4e  |VERSION..VERSION|
 00c0  01 01 56 45 52 53 49 4f  4e 01 01 56 45 52 53 49  |..VERSION..VERSI|
 00d0  4f 4e 01 01 56 45 52 53  49 4f 4e 01 01 56 45 52  |ON..VERSION..VER|
 00e0  53 49 4f 4e 01 01 56 45  52 53 49 4f 4e 01 01 56  |SION..VERSION..V|
 00f0  45 52 53 49 4f 4e 01 01  56 45 52 53 49 4f 4e 01  |ERSION..VERSION.|
 0100  01 56 45 52 53 49 4f 4e  01 01 56 45 52 53 49 4f  |.VERSION..VERSIO|
 0110  4e 01 01 56 45 52 53 49  4f 4e 01 01 56 45 52 53  |N..VERSION..VERS|
 0120  49 4f 4e 01 01 56 45 52  53 49 4f 4e 01 01 56 45  |ION..VERSION..VE|
 0130  52 53 49 4f 4e 01 01 56  45 52 53 49 4f 4e 01 01  |RSION..VERSION..|
 0140  56 45 52 53 49 4f 4e 01  01 56 45 52 53 49 4f 4e  |VERSION..VERSION|
 0150  01 01 56 45 52 53 49 4f  4e 01 01 56 45 52 53 49  |..VERSION..VERSI|
 0160  4f 4e 01 01 56 45 52 53  49 4f 4e 01 01 56 45 52  |ON..VERSION..VER|
 0170  53 49 4f 4e 01 01 56 45  52 53 49 4f 4e 01 01 56  |SION..VERSION..V|
 0180  45 52 53 49 4f 4e 01 01  56 45 52 53 49 4f 4e 01  |ERSION..VERSION.|
 0190  01 56 45 52 53 49 4f 4e  01 01 56 45 52 53 49 4f  |.VERSION..VERSIO|
 01a0  4e 01 01 56 45 52 53 49  4f 4e 01 01 56 45 52 53  |N..VERSION..VERS|
 01b0  49 4f 4e 01 01 56 45 52  53 49 4f 4e 01 01 56 45  |ION..VERSION..VE|
 01c0  52 53 49 4f 4e 01 01 56  45 52 53 49 4f 4e 01 01  |RSION..VERSION..|
 01d0  56 45 52 53 49 4f 4e 01  01 0d 0a |VERSION|
 
 quasselcore crashes. The upstream bug report is
 
 http://bugs.quassel-irc.org/issues/1095
 
 Gentoo bug report is
 
 https://bugs.gentoo.org/382313
 
 (there is some mention about requesting a CVE)
 
 Workaround:
 
 1) Settings-Configure Quassel-IRC-Ignore List-New
 2) Strictness: Dynamic
 3) Rule Type: CTCP
 4) Ignore Rule: * VERSION
 5) Scope: Global
 
 
 Where is the Vcs for quassel? I could prepare a fix.
 
 
 -- System Information:
 Debian Release: 6.0.2
   APT prefers stable-updates
   APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable')
 Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
 
 Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 (SMP w/1 CPU core)
 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
 Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
 
 Versions of packages quassel depends on:
 ii  dbus-x111.2.24-4+squeeze1simple interprocess messaging 
 syst
 ii  gawk1:3.1.7.dfsg-5   GNU awk, a pattern scanning and 
 pr
 ii  libc6   2.11.2-10Embedded GNU C Library: Shared 
 lib
 ii  libgcc1 1:4.4.5-8GCC support library
 ii  libphonon4  4:4.6.0really4.4.2-1 the core library of the Phonon 
 mul
 ii  libqt4-dbus 4:4.6.3-4+squeeze1   Qt 4 D-Bus module
 ii  libqt4-network  4:4.6.3-4+squeeze1   Qt 4 network module
 ii  libqt4-script   4:4.6.3-4+squeeze1   Qt 4 script module
 ii  libqt4-sql  4:4.6.3-4+squeeze1   Qt 4 SQL module
 ii  libqt4-sql-sqlite   4:4.6.3-4+squeeze1   Qt 4 SQLite 3 database driver
 ii  libqt4-webkit   4:4.6.3-4+squeeze1   Qt 4 WebKit module
 ii  libqt4-xmlpatterns  4:4.6.3-4+squeeze1   Qt 4 XML patterns module
 ii  libqtcore4  4:4.6.3-4+squeeze1   Qt 4 core module
 ii  libqtgui4   4:4.6.3-4+squeeze1   Qt 4 GUI module
 ii  libstdc++6  4.4.5-8  The GNU Standard C++ Library v3
 ii  phonon  4:4.6.0really4.4.2-1 metapackage for the Phonon 
 multime
 ii  quassel-data0.6.3-2  distributed IRC client - shared 
 da
 
 quassel recommends no packages.
 
 quassel suggests no packages.
 
 -- no debconf information



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#639178: tar: FTBFS(kfreebsd): 56: incremental dump when the parent directory is unreadable FAILED (listed03.at:25)

2011-09-09 Thread Petr Salinger

Hi,

just to make it clear.
The tar works as expected, it just emits extra warning.

Current tar version expects more than POSIX guarantees.
Even inside the tar source src/misc.c is written:

 FIXME: There should be no need to get the absolute file name.
 getcwd is slow, it might fail, and it does not necessarily
 return a canonical name even when it succeeds.  Perhaps we
 can use dev+ino pairs instead of names?  */

Petr



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#640874: leave: debian/rules is not a Makefile

2011-09-09 Thread Josip Rodin
On Thu, Sep 08, 2011 at 04:53:01PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
   And still, this is a Makefile so you can quickly reuse Makefile snippets
   that others have been writing to add support for supplementary targets
   (like get-orig-source) or even to influence the environment (like the
   Makefile snippets that dpkg 1.16.1 is going to provide).
  
  Same can work for pretty much any other similar language.
 
 Except that by standardizing on make we avoid to have to duplicate
 those things for multiple languages!

OTOH, if you actually want to that stuff from e.g. a Python debian/rules
file, you should be able to simply run

make -f /usr/share/common/stuff.mk get-orig-source

? :)

-- 
 2. That which causes joy or happiness.



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#640874: leave: debian/rules is not a Makefile

2011-09-09 Thread Josip Rodin
On Thu, Sep 08, 2011 at 04:18:34PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
 (I don't recall if anyone tried to loop you into that discussion; if that
 didn't happen, that was a flaw in that discussion process to be sure.)

Nope, sorry, I missed that.

-- 
 2. That which causes joy or happiness.



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#640874: leave: debian/rules is not a Makefile

2011-09-09 Thread Josip Rodin

Since my reasoning here didn't seem to leave a particular positive dent with
those tech-ctte members who have responded so far, I would just like to
solicit Ian Jackson's input, given his role in defining and implementing the
debian/rules calling convention originally. In other worse, if I can't
convince the original author of a non-make-dependent API that the API isn't
make-dependent, there is no recourse but to yield :)

Or if my memory serves me wrong and it was instead some other person,
particularly one that isn't intricately involved with Debian or can't be
reached any more, I'm also done.

-- 
 2. That which causes joy or happiness.



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Processed: your mail

2011-09-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 severity 640195 serious
Bug #640195 [paraview] paraview-dev transition
Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'

 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
640195: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=640195
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Processed: your mail

2011-09-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 tag 629942 pending
Bug #629942 [python-ecryptfs] python-ecryptfs: missing dependency on python
Added tag(s) pending.
 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
629942: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=629942
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#565092: marked as done (qgo: ftbfs with gcc-4.5)

2011-09-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 09 Sep 2011 08:49:12 +
with message-id e1r1wls-0006xk...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#565092: fixed in qgo 1.5.4-r3-2.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #565092,
regarding qgo: ftbfs with gcc-4.5
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
565092: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=565092
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: qgo
Version: 1.5.4-r3-1
Severity: normal
Tags: sid
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-gcc-4.5

The package fails to build in a test rebuild on at least amd64 with
gcc-4.5/g++-4.5, but succeeds to build with gcc-4.4/g++-4.4.
For the compiler version used, see:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2010/01/msg00230.html

The full build log can be found at:
http://people.debian.org/~lucas/logs/2010/01/08b/qgo_1.5.4-r3-1_lsid64b.buildlog
The last lines of the build log are cwat the end of this report.

The reason of the build failure is likely in the package (compiler or
linker message found in the build log), if this turns out as a gcc bug,
please reassign to the gcc-4.5 package. If the build ends with a
message confused by earlier errors, bailing out, please
ignore it for now; these compiler errors are filed separately.


[...]
gamedialog.cpp:562:70: error:   initializing argument 2 of 
'QColor::QColor(QRgb, uint)'
gamedialog.cpp:563:70: error: cannot call constructor 'QColor::QColor' directly
gamedialog.cpp:563:70: note: for a function-style cast, remove the redundant 
'::QColor'
gamedialog.cpp:563:70: error: invalid conversion from 'const char*' to 'QRgb'
gamedialog.cpp:563:70: error:   initializing argument 1 of 
'QColor::QColor(QRgb, uint)'
gamedialog.cpp:563:70: error: invalid conversion from 'const char*' to 'uint'
gamedialog.cpp:563:70: error:   initializing argument 2 of 
'QColor::QColor(QRgb, uint)'
gamedialog.cpp:569:71: error: cannot call constructor 'QColor::QColor' directly
gamedialog.cpp:569:71: note: for a function-style cast, remove the redundant 
'::QColor'
gamedialog.cpp:570:70: error: cannot call constructor 'QColor::QColor' directly
gamedialog.cpp:570:70: note: for a function-style cast, remove the redundant 
'::QColor'
gamedialog.cpp:570:70: error: invalid conversion from 'const char*' to 'QRgb'
gamedialog.cpp:570:70: error:   initializing argument 1 of 
'QColor::QColor(QRgb, uint)'
gamedialog.cpp:570:70: error: invalid conversion from 'const char*' to 'uint'
gamedialog.cpp:570:70: error:   initializing argument 2 of 
'QColor::QColor(QRgb, uint)'
gamedialog.cpp:571:70: error: cannot call constructor 'QColor::QColor' directly
gamedialog.cpp:571:70: note: for a function-style cast, remove the redundant 
'::QColor'
gamedialog.cpp:571:70: error: invalid conversion from 'const char*' to 'QRgb'
gamedialog.cpp:571:70: error:   initializing argument 1 of 
'QColor::QColor(QRgb, uint)'
gamedialog.cpp:571:70: error: invalid conversion from 'const char*' to 'uint'
gamedialog.cpp:571:70: error:   initializing argument 2 of 
'QColor::QColor(QRgb, uint)'
make[4]: *** [gamedialog.o] Error 1
make[4]: Leaving directory 
`/build/user-qgo_1.5.4-r3-1-amd64-u0uflc/qgo-1.5.4-r3/src'
make[3]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[3]: Leaving directory 
`/build/user-qgo_1.5.4-r3-1-amd64-u0uflc/qgo-1.5.4-r3/src'
make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory 
`/build/user-qgo_1.5.4-r3-1-amd64-u0uflc/qgo-1.5.4-r3'
make[1]: *** [all] Error 2
make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2
dpkg-buildpackage: error: debian/rules build gave error exit status 2


---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
Source: qgo
Source-Version: 1.5.4-r3-2.1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
qgo, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

qgo_1.5.4-r3-2.1.diff.gz
  to main/q/qgo/qgo_1.5.4-r3-2.1.diff.gz
qgo_1.5.4-r3-2.1.dsc
  to main/q/qgo/qgo_1.5.4-r3-2.1.dsc
qgo_1.5.4-r3-2.1_amd64.deb
  to main/q/qgo/qgo_1.5.4-r3-2.1_amd64.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 565...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Laurent Fousse lfou...@debian.org (supplier of updated qgo package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org)


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.8
Date: 

Bug#628353: octave-symbolic: FTBFS: Inconsistency detected by ld.so: dl-close.c: 737: _dl_close: Assertion `map-l_init_called' failed!

2011-09-09 Thread Colin Watson
On Thu, Sep 08, 2011 at 01:34:14PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
 Thanks to a note from John W. Eaton that the development version doesn't
 suffer from this problem, I tracked down the fix and have prepared a
 suitable patch against the Debian package.  Please consider this to fix
 the octave-symbolic build failure.

Urgh, I missed the existence of debian/in/series.  Updated patch
follows.

  * New patch: clear_symbol_table: Clean up top-level variables when exiting
Octave (closes: #628353, LP: #831157).

diff -u octave3.2-3.2.4/debian/patches/series 
octave3.2-3.2.4/debian/patches/series
--- octave3.2-3.2.4/debian/patches/series
+++ octave3.2-3.2.4/debian/patches/series
@@ -14,2 +14,3 @@
 avoid-implicit-conversion
+clear_symbol_table
 
diff -u octave3.2-3.2.4/debian/in/series octave3.2-3.2.4/debian/in/series
--- octave3.2-3.2.4/debian/in/series
+++ octave3.2-3.2.4/debian/in/series
@@ -24,2 +24,3 @@
 avoid-implicit-conversion
+clear_symbol_table
 :]
only in patch2:
unchanged:
--- octave3.2-3.2.4.orig/debian/patches/clear_symbol_table
+++ octave3.2-3.2.4/debian/patches/clear_symbol_table
@@ -0,0 +1,90 @@
+Description: Clean up top-level variables when exiting Octave
+ This fixes this assertion failure:
+ .
+  Inconsistency detected by ld.so: dl-close.c: 736: _dl_close: Assertion
+  `map-l_init_called' failed!
+ .
+ This patch is slightly modified from the upstream commits to add
+ __attribute__ ((visibility (hidden))) to the symbol_table::cleanup
+ method, in order that this patch does not change the externally-visible
+ ABI.  That modification can and should be dropped when moving to a new
+ upstream version containing this fix.
+Origin: upstream, http://hg.savannah.gnu.org/hgweb/octave/rev/692ab4eaf965
+Origin: upstream, http://hg.savannah.gnu.org/hgweb/octave/rev/a5a05b2ebb9d
+Author: Jaroslav Hajek high...@gmail.com
+Bug: http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?34195
+Bug-Debian: http://bugs.debian.org/633719
+Bug-Debian: http://bugs.debian.org/628353
+Bug-Ubuntu: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/831157
+
+Index: b/src/symtab.cc
+===
+--- a/src/symtab.cc
 b/src/symtab.cc
+@@ -1193,6 +1193,39 @@
+ }
+ }
+ 
++void symbol_table::cleanup (void)
++{
++  // Clear variables in top scope.
++  all_instances[xtop_scope]-clear_variables ();
++
++  // Clear function table. This is a hard clear, ignoring mlocked functions.
++  fcn_table.clear ();
++
++  // Clear variables in global scope.
++  // FIXME: are there any?
++  all_instances[xglobal_scope]-clear_variables ();
++
++  // Clear global variables.
++  global_table.clear ();
++
++  // Delete all possibly remaining scopes. 
++  for (all_instances_iterator iter = all_instances.begin (); 
++   iter != all_instances.end (); iter++)
++{
++  scope_id scope = iter-first;
++  if (scope != xglobal_scope  scope != xtop_scope)
++scope_id_cache::free (scope);
++
++  // First zero the table entry to avoid possible duplicate delete.
++  symbol_table *inst = iter-second;
++  iter-second = 0;
++
++  // Now delete the scope. Note that there may be side effects, such as
++  // deleting other scopes.
++  delete inst;
++}
++}
++
+ DEFUN (ignore_function_time_stamp, args, nargout,
+ -*- texinfo -*-\n\
+ @deftypefn {Built-in Function} {@var{val} =} ignore_function_time_stamp ()\n\
+Index: b/src/symtab.h
+===
+--- a/src/symtab.h
 b/src/symtab.h
+@@ -1838,6 +1838,8 @@
+   static void stash_dir_name_for_subfunctions (scope_id scope,
+  const std::string dir_name);
+ 
++  static void cleanup (void) __attribute__ ((visibility (hidden)));
++
+ private:
+ 
+   typedef std::mapstd::string, symbol_record::const_iterator 
table_const_iterator;
+Index: b/src/toplev.cc
+===
+--- a/src/toplev.cc
 b/src/toplev.cc
+@@ -673,6 +673,9 @@
+ {
+   do_octave_atexit ();
+ 
++  // Clean up symbol table.
++  SAFE_CALL (symbol_table::cleanup, ());
++
+   SAFE_CALL (sysdep_cleanup, ())
+ 
+   if (octave_exit)

Thanks,

-- 
Colin Watson   [cjwat...@ubuntu.com]



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#629942: marked as done (python-ecryptfs: missing dependency on python)

2011-09-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 09 Sep 2011 11:52:54 +0200
with message-id 4e69e1f6.9070...@progress-technologies.net
and subject line Re: python-ecryptfs: missing dependency on python
has caused the Debian Bug report #629942,
regarding python-ecryptfs: missing dependency on python
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
629942: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=629942
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: python-ecryptfs
Version: 87-1
Severity: serious

python-ecryptfs contains a python module, but has no dependency on
python (except on i386).

Cheers,
Julien


---End Message---
---BeginMessage---

Version: 0.92-2

--
Address:Daniel Baumann, Donnerbuehlweg 3, CH-3012 Bern
Email:  daniel.baum...@progress-technologies.net
Internet:   http://people.progress-technologies.net/~daniel.baumann/

---End Message---


Bug#640874: leave: debian/rules is not a Makefile

2011-09-09 Thread Steve Langasek
On Thu, Sep 08, 2011 at 04:18:50PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
 Ahem, so I must quote it:
 
 #!/bin/sh -e
 
 tmp=`pwd`/debian/leave
 
 if echo $DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS | grep -vq noopt; then
   optflag=-O2
 fi

 if echo $DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS | grep -vq nostrip; then
   stripflag=-s
 fi

Does not do a word-wise search for the option names, preventing future
compatibility with other options having these options as substrings. 
Whereas the naive implementation using make would DTRT.  So that's strike
one. ;)

   The whole idea that we're changing something in the build-arch handling
   is a nice supporting argument for my idea that we don't have a reason to
   hardcode make - the fact that we control the API means that we are able
   to make this decision, rather than having to adjust to whatever some
   semi-random program does.

  If you ignore all transitions constraints, sure. At the same time, Debian
  decided debian/rules must be a Makefile and you're not adjusting to cope.

 No, Debian did not decide to explicitly ban non-shell rules files at any
 point in time, it was a leftover from a text conversion that never got
 fixed.

I disagree with this interpretation of the history of the requirement
(agreeing instead with Bdale), but if it would put this issue to rest, I
would be happy to vote on it explicitly with the TC to require a makefile. 
The handful of exceptions have definitely caused us far more trouble as a
project than any benefit you get as a maintainer from using a shell script
in place of a makefile.

-- 
Steve Langasek   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer   to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developerhttp://www.debian.org/
slanga...@ubuntu.com vor...@debian.org


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#629942: python-ecryptfs: missing dependency on python

2011-09-09 Thread Julien Cristau
On Fri, Sep  9, 2011 at 11:52:54 +0200, Daniel Baumann wrote:

 Version: 0.92-2
 
There's no such version, fwiw.

Cheers,
Julien



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Processed: your mail

2011-09-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 severity 629416 serious
Bug #629416 [plymouth] plymouth: breaks wheeze upgrade with initramfs failure
Severity set to 'serious' from 'critical'

 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
629416: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=629416
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#556526: hurd - FHS violation: /libexec

2011-09-09 Thread Jérémie Koenig
On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 11:07 AM, Philipp Kern pk...@debian.org wrote:
 On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 03:40:05PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
 Hurd violates the FHS by using /libexec. This name seems to be only used
 by init and /etc/ttys.

 I'm upgrading this to serious on the grounds that this package is only
 useful on the non-release architecture hurd-i386 and it's clearly a
 policy violation that makes the package unsuitable for a release.

There's a patch here: http://lists.archhurd.org/devel/msg00102.html.

The patch moves /libexec/* to /etc. I guess /sbin (or maybe,
/lib/hurd) would be more appropriate. What do you think?

-- 
Jérémie Koenig j...@jk.fr.eu.org
http://jk.fr.eu.org/



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#556526: hurd - FHS violation: /libexec

2011-09-09 Thread Gergely Nagy
Jérémie Koenig j...@jk.fr.eu.org writes:

 On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 11:07 AM, Philipp Kern pk...@debian.org wrote:
 On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 03:40:05PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
 Hurd violates the FHS by using /libexec. This name seems to be only used
 by init and /etc/ttys.

 I'm upgrading this to serious on the grounds that this package is only
 useful on the non-release architecture hurd-i386 and it's clearly a
 policy violation that makes the package unsuitable for a release.

 There's a patch here: http://lists.archhurd.org/devel/msg00102.html.

 The patch moves /libexec/* to /etc. I guess /sbin (or maybe,
 /lib/hurd) would be more appropriate. What do you think?

With my occassional Hurd user hat on, /lib/hurd sounds like the most
appropriate place to put these stuff into, or failing that, /sbin. But
definitely not /etc. Neither init, nor console-run strike me as things
the user would wish to edit.

-- 
|8]



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#640969: marked as done (Exits with: ImportError: No module named bpython.cli)

2011-09-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 09 Sep 2011 11:32:21 +
with message-id e1r1zjl-0002bo...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#640969: fixed in bpython 0.10.1-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #640969,
regarding Exits with: ImportError: No module named bpython.cli
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
640969: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=640969
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: bpython
Version: 0.10.1-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable

Dear Maintainer,

I just upgraded to bpython, and when running it from the command line
it immediatly exits as follows:

% bpython
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File /usr/bin/bpython, line 9, in module
load_entry_point('bpython==0.10.1', 'console_scripts', 'bpython')()
  File /usr/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/pkg_resources.py, line 305, in 
load_entry_point
return get_distribution(dist).load_entry_point(group, name)
  File /usr/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/pkg_resources.py, line 2245, in 
load_entry_point
return ep.load()
  File /usr/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/pkg_resources.py, line 1955, in load
entry = __import__(self.module_name, globals(),globals(), ['__name__'])
ImportError: No module named bpython.cli


-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 
'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 3.0.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_AU.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_AU.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages bpython depends on:
ii  python2.6.7-3   
ii  python-pkg-resources  0.6.16-1  
ii  python-pygments   1.4+dfsg-2
ii  python2.6 2.6.7-4   
ii  python2.7 2.7.2-5   

bpython recommends no packages.

bpython suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information


---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
Source: bpython
Source-Version: 0.10.1-2

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
bpython, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

bpython-gtk_0.10.1-2_all.deb
  to main/b/bpython/bpython-gtk_0.10.1-2_all.deb
bpython-urwid_0.10.1-2_all.deb
  to main/b/bpython/bpython-urwid_0.10.1-2_all.deb
bpython3_0.10.1-2_all.deb
  to main/b/bpython/bpython3_0.10.1-2_all.deb
bpython_0.10.1-2.debian.tar.gz
  to main/b/bpython/bpython_0.10.1-2.debian.tar.gz
bpython_0.10.1-2.dsc
  to main/b/bpython/bpython_0.10.1-2.dsc
bpython_0.10.1-2_all.deb
  to main/b/bpython/bpython_0.10.1-2_all.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 640...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
David Paleino da...@debian.org (supplier of updated bpython package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org)


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2011 13:13:51 +0200
Source: bpython
Binary: bpython bpython3 bpython-gtk bpython-urwid
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.10.1-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: David Paleino da...@debian.org
Changed-By: David Paleino da...@debian.org
Description: 
 bpython- fancy interface to the Python interpreter - Curses frontend
 bpython-gtk - fancy interface to the Python interpreter - GTK+ frontend
 bpython-urwid - fancy interface to the Python interpreter - urwid frontend
 bpython3   - fancy interface to the Python interpreter - Curses frontend
Closes: 640969
Changes: 
 bpython (0.10.1-2) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Huge BUG in the conversion from dh_pysupport to dh_python2:
 in 0.9.7.1-1's (pysupport) postrm, I inconditionally removed
 /usr/lib/python*/*-packages/bpython (which was wrong), and
 this removed also files shipped by 0.10.1-1, thus causing an
 ImportError fixable only by re-installation.
 Added preinst nuking old postrms, so that upgrades are clean
 (Closes: #640969)
Checksums-Sha1: 
 14ecd9cf21d12676ada4bdc81bcef34efbf71980 1245 bpython_0.10.1-2.dsc
 c3fbbeee3d93e159705289f5c2f7e2d11ea282e5 7239 bpython_0.10.1-2.debian.tar.gz
 6f92fa02904d52cc89181d1414272d9b99d98c6d 58612 bpython_0.10.1-2_all.deb
 7a9b87d911fa5aeebd7c9fd8710eff0c694cc3ef 71496 

Processed: notfound 640638 in 1.8.13-4, notfound 633775 in 1.8.13-4

2011-09-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 notfound 640638 1.8.13-4
Bug #640638 {Done: Ondřej Surý ond...@debian.org} [libbotan-1.8.2] 
libbotan-1.8.2: Outdated binary packages in unstable
Bug #633775 {Done: Ondřej Surý ond...@debian.org} [libbotan-1.8.2] 
libbotan-1.8.2 breaks packages that depend on version 1.8.2
There is no source info for the package 'libbotan-1.8.2' at version '1.8.13-4' 
with architecture ''
Unable to make a source version for version '1.8.13-4'
Bug No longer marked as found in versions 1.8.13-4.
Bug No longer marked as found in versions 1.8.13-4.
 notfound 633775 1.8.13-4
Bug #633775 {Done: Ondřej Surý ond...@debian.org} [libbotan-1.8.2] 
libbotan-1.8.2 breaks packages that depend on version 1.8.2
Bug #640638 {Done: Ondřej Surý ond...@debian.org} [libbotan-1.8.2] 
libbotan-1.8.2: Outdated binary packages in unstable
There is no source info for the package 'libbotan-1.8.2' at version '1.8.13-4' 
with architecture ''
Unable to make a source version for version '1.8.13-4'
Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #633775 to the same values 
previously set
Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #640638 to the same values 
previously set
 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
633775: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=633775
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#629567: Intending to NMU emacs23

2011-09-09 Thread Philipp Kern
Hi Rob,

I intend to upload the attached NMU to DELAYED/2-days later today.  I
hope that's ok with you?  It makes emacs23 buildable again in sid and
adjusts the build-dependency on libjpeg to use the right dev package.

Kind regards
Philipp Kern
diff -Nru emacs23-23.3+1/debian/changelog emacs23-23.3+1/debian/changelog
--- emacs23-23.3+1/debian/changelog 2011-04-10 19:40:31.0 +0200
+++ emacs23-23.3+1/debian/changelog 2011-09-09 12:55:51.0 +0200
@@ -1,3 +1,13 @@
+emacs23 (23.3+1-1.1) unstable; urgency=low
+
+  * Non-maintainer upload.
+  * Build-depend on libjpeg-dev instead of libjpeg62-dev.
+(Closes: #633744)
+  * Add multiarch compatibility by passing the right crt-dir
+to configure.  (Closes: #629567)
+
+ -- Philipp Kern pk...@debian.org  Fri, 09 Sep 2011 12:55:18 +0200
+
 emacs23 (23.3+1-1) unstable; urgency=low
 
   * Incorporate new upstream version 23.3.
diff -Nru emacs23-23.3+1/debian/control emacs23-23.3+1/debian/control
--- emacs23-23.3+1/debian/control   2011-04-10 19:41:48.0 +0200
+++ emacs23-23.3+1/debian/control   2011-09-09 13:19:49.0 +0200
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
 Maintainer: Rob Browning r...@defaultvalue.org
 Build-Depends: bsd-mailx | mailx, libncurses5-dev, texinfo, liblockfile-dev, 
librsvg2-dev,
  libgif-dev | libungif4-dev, libtiff4-dev | libtiff-dev, xaw3dg-dev,
- libpng12-dev, libjpeg62-dev, libm17n-dev, libotf-dev,
+ libpng12-dev, libjpeg-dev, libm17n-dev, libotf-dev,
  libgpm-dev [!hurd-i386 !kfreebsd-i386 !kfreebsd-amd64], libdbus-1-dev,
  autoconf, automake, autotools-dev, dpkg-dev ( 1.10.0), quilt (= 0.42),
  debhelper (= 7.0.50~), libxaw7-dev, sharutils, imagemagick, libgtk2.0-dev,
diff -Nru emacs23-23.3+1/debian/control.in emacs23-23.3+1/debian/control.in
--- emacs23-23.3+1/debian/control.in2011-04-10 19:33:31.0 +0200
+++ emacs23-23.3+1/debian/control.in2011-09-09 13:18:37.0 +0200
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
 Maintainer: Rob Browning r...@defaultvalue.org
 Build-Depends: bsd-mailx | mailx, libncurses5-dev, texinfo, liblockfile-dev, 
librsvg2-dev,
  libgif-dev | libungif4-dev, libtiff4-dev | libtiff-dev, xaw3dg-dev,
- libpng12-dev, libjpeg62-dev, libm17n-dev, libotf-dev,
+ libpng12-dev, libjpeg-dev, libm17n-dev, libotf-dev,
  libgpm-dev [!hurd-i386 !kfreebsd-i386 !kfreebsd-amd64], libdbus-1-dev,
  autoconf, automake, autotools-dev, dpkg-dev ( 1.10.0), quilt (= 0.42),
  debhelper (= 7.0.50~), libxaw7-dev, sharutils, imagemagick, libgtk2.0-dev,
diff -Nru emacs23-23.3+1/debian/rules emacs23-23.3+1/debian/rules
--- emacs23-23.3+1/debian/rules 2011-04-10 19:33:31.0 +0200
+++ emacs23-23.3+1/debian/rules 2011-09-09 12:55:14.0 +0200
@@ -446,6 +446,9 @@
 confflags += --with-pop=yes
 confflags += --enable-locallisppath=$(local_lpath)
 
+# multiarch compatibility
+confflags += --with-crt-dir=/usr/lib/$(shell dpkg-architecture 
-qDEB_HOST_MULTIARCH)
+
 # x configure flags
 confflags_x := $(confflags) 
 confflags_x += --with-x=yes


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#554644: marked as done (FTBFS with binutils-gold)

2011-09-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 09 Sep 2011 12:02:33 +
with message-id e1r1zmz-0007gz...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#554644: fixed in gnet 2.0.8-2.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #554644,
regarding FTBFS with binutils-gold
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
554644: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=554644
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Source: gnet
Version: 2.0.8-1
Severity: minor
User: peter.fritzs...@gmx.de
Usertags: no-add-needed

Tried to build your package and it fails to build with GNU binutils-gold. The
important difference is that --no-add-needed is the default behavior of of GNU
binutils-gold. Please provide all needed libraries to the linker when building
your executables.

More informations can be found at
 
http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS#A2009-11-02Packagesfailingbecausebinutils-gold.2BAC8-indirectlinking

/bin/bash ../../libtool --tag=CC --mode=link cc -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 
-I/usr/lib/glib-2.0/include   -pthread -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 
-I/usr/lib/glib-2.0/include   -g -O2 -g -Wall -O2 -D_REENTRANT 
-DGNET_EXPERIMENTAL -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes 
-Wmissing-declarations  -Wl,-z,defs -Wl,-O1 -Wl,--as-needed -o 
test-xmlrpc-client  test-xmlrpc-client.o libgnetxmlrpc.a 
../../src/libgnet-2.0.la -lresolv -lnsl 
mkdir .libs
cc -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/lib/glib-2.0/include -pthread 
-I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/lib/glib-2.0/include -g -O2 -g -Wall -O2 
-D_REENTRANT -DGNET_EXPERIMENTAL -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes 
-Wmissing-declarations -Wl,-z -Wl,defs -Wl,-O1 -o .libs/test-xmlrpc-client 
test-xmlrpc-client.o  -Wl,--as-needed libgnetxmlrpc.a 
../../src/.libs/libgnet-2.0.so -lresolv -lnsl 
/usr/bin/ld: test-xmlrpc-client.o: in function main:test-xmlrpc-client.c:53: 
error: undefined reference to 'g_free'
/usr/bin/ld: test-xmlrpc-client.o: in function main:test-xmlrpc-client.c:65: 
error: undefined reference to 'g_free'
/usr/bin/ld: libgnetxmlrpc.a(xmlrpc-client.o): in function 
gnet_xmlrpc_client_delete:xmlrpc-client.c:78: error: undefined reference to 
'g_string_free'
/usr/bin/ld: libgnetxmlrpc.a(xmlrpc-client.o): in function 
gnet_xmlrpc_client_new:xmlrpc-client.c:43: error: undefined reference to 
'g_malloc0'
/usr/bin/ld: libgnetxmlrpc.a(xmlrpc-client.o): in function 
gnet_xmlrpc_client_new:xmlrpc-client.c:65: error: undefined reference to 
'g_string_new'
/usr/bin/ld: libgnetxmlrpc.a(xmlrpc-client.o): in function 
gnet_xmlrpc_client_new:xmlrpc-client.c:63: error: undefined reference to 
'g_assertion_message_expr'
/usr/bin/ld: libgnetxmlrpc.a(xmlrpc-client.o): in function 
gnet_xmlrpc_client_call:xmlrpc-client.c:219: error: undefined reference to 
'g_string_new'
/usr/bin/ld: libgnetxmlrpc.a(xmlrpc-client.o): in function 
gnet_xmlrpc_client_call:xmlrpc-client.c:220: error: undefined reference to 
'g_string_new'
/usr/bin/ld: libgnetxmlrpc.a(xmlrpc-client.o): in function 
gnet_xmlrpc_client_call:xmlrpc-client.c:224: error: undefined reference to 
'g_string_append_printf'
/usr/bin/ld: libgnetxmlrpc.a(xmlrpc-client.o): in function 
gnet_xmlrpc_client_call:xmlrpc-client.c:240: error: undefined reference to 
'g_string_append'
/usr/bin/ld: libgnetxmlrpc.a(xmlrpc-client.o): in function 
gnet_xmlrpc_client_call:xmlrpc-client.c:239: error: undefined reference to 
'g_string_append'
/usr/bin/ld: libgnetxmlrpc.a(xmlrpc-client.o): in function 
gnet_xmlrpc_client_call:xmlrpc-client.c:241: error: undefined reference to 
'g_string_append'
/usr/bin/ld: libgnetxmlrpc.a(xmlrpc-client.o): in function 
gnet_xmlrpc_client_call:xmlrpc-client.c:247: error: undefined reference to 
'g_string_append'
/usr/bin/ld: libgnetxmlrpc.a(xmlrpc-client.o): in function 
gnet_xmlrpc_client_call:xmlrpc-client.c:252: error: undefined reference to 
'g_string_append_printf'
/usr/bin/ld: libgnetxmlrpc.a(xmlrpc-client.o): in function 
gnet_xmlrpc_client_call:xmlrpc-client.c:259: error: undefined reference to 
'g_string_append_len'
/usr/bin/ld: libgnetxmlrpc.a(xmlrpc-client.o): in function 
gnet_xmlrpc_client_call:xmlrpc-client.c:262: error: undefined reference to 
'g_string_free'
/usr/bin/ld: libgnetxmlrpc.a(xmlrpc-client.o): in function 
gnet_xmlrpc_client_call:xmlrpc-client.c:265: error: undefined reference to 
'g_string_free'
/usr/bin/ld: libgnetxmlrpc.a(xmlrpc-client.o): in function 
gnet_xmlrpc_client_call:xmlrpc-client.c:93: error: undefined reference to 
'g_string_new'
/usr/bin/ld: libgnetxmlrpc.a(xmlrpc-client.o): in function 
gnet_xmlrpc_client_call:xmlrpc-client.c:134: error: undefined reference to 

Bug#625756: marked as done (electric-fence: FTBFS due to OOM with gcc-4.5)

2011-09-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 09 Sep 2011 12:47:45 +
with message-id e1r20uj-0002yu...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#625756: fixed in electric-fence 2.1.17
has caused the Debian Bug report #625756,
regarding electric-fence: FTBFS due to OOM with gcc-4.5
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
625756: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=625756
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: electric-fence
Version: 2.1.16
Severity: serious

When I build electric-fence from source on amd64/sid with gcc-4.5 or
gcc-4.6, the ./tstheap 3072 call gets to iteration 100 and then starts
allocating massive amounts of memory.  Within less than a minute it goes
through 3.5GB of physical memory and 5GB of swap.  It is then killed by
the OOM killer.  As a consequence, the package fails to build from
source.

I've looked at the code and haven't been able to track down the problem
yet.  The code does work correctly without optimization, but still goes
out of control at -O1.  I suspect this is a consequence of optimizer
improvements.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.39-rc5-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages electric-fence depends on:
ii  libc6 2.13-2 Embedded GNU C Library: Shared lib

electric-fence recommends no packages.

electric-fence suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information

-- 
brian m. carlson / brian with sandals: Houston, Texas, US
+1 832 623 2791 | http://www.crustytoothpaste.net/~bmc | My opinion only
OpenPGP: RSA v4 4096b: 88AC E9B2 9196 305B A994 7552 F1BA 225C 0223 B187


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
Source: electric-fence
Source-Version: 2.1.17

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
electric-fence, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

electric-fence_2.1.17.dsc
  to main/e/electric-fence/electric-fence_2.1.17.dsc
electric-fence_2.1.17.tar.gz
  to main/e/electric-fence/electric-fence_2.1.17.tar.gz
electric-fence_2.1.17_i386.deb
  to main/e/electric-fence/electric-fence_2.1.17_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 625...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Matthew Vernon matt...@debian.org (supplier of updated electric-fence package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org)


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2011 13:32:50 +0100
Source: electric-fence
Binary: electric-fence
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.1.17
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Matthew Vernon matt...@debian.org
Changed-By: Matthew Vernon matt...@debian.org
Description: 
 electric-fence - A malloc(3) debugger
Closes: 625756
Changes: 
 electric-fence (2.1.17) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * patch from Colin Watson to build with -fno-tree-dse as otherwise gcc
 =4.5 mis-optimises AllocateMoreSlots() (Closes: #625756).
Checksums-Sha1: 
 2f51f6025eed2112b28e0601b565ae441825775f 1361 electric-fence_2.1.17.dsc
 bb109848f276e2216e4a2f6e769b7213cc971f78 30754 electric-fence_2.1.17.tar.gz
 e627e811082d72df231e3253c1f22a5f75af042d 22086 electric-fence_2.1.17_i386.deb
Checksums-Sha256: 
 f0466c7957a958643f93dea75ccce802650b189c6b2917c2aa5b626f0c27e819 1361 
electric-fence_2.1.17.dsc
 010a9644d8796e7d344ec4b5a39c27eaa1bf9039c427b500d48262f89f959f3f 30754 
electric-fence_2.1.17.tar.gz
 a42006ccd31c8450973e72cf84d6e02eae20c6d367d3ad4e5c1133d9ca418ab2 22086 
electric-fence_2.1.17_i386.deb
Files: 
 769d71f8c695414acf39663b343d924c 1361 devel extra electric-fence_2.1.17.dsc
 59c9ef2011a56e0e070eb62c5a0fc360 30754 devel extra electric-fence_2.1.17.tar.gz
 6b5091d716bc1246a2cec1fa677685bd 22086 devel extra 
electric-fence_2.1.17_i386.deb

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)

iQIVAwUBTmoH3hL00hyPamPIAQhK7Q/+OBPXQIDUpCii2mhH/WoK+9mKRjLS179C
L2QZEIDDkLQahcDLvilJKNQUcOc4KGF0EPEj0Qk7McSESjEZxWacGLn+3J5E6dBJ

Bug#641015: upower: depends on libimobiledevice2 from experimental [amd64]

2011-09-09 Thread Teodor
Package: upower
Version: 0.9.13-1
Severity: serious
Justification: package cannot be installed or upgraded

Dear Maintainer,

According to the buildd logs, the upower [amd64] package was uploaded
by maintainer directly and it seems that was not build on a clean 'unstable'
chroot because it depends on libimobiledevice2 which cannot be found on sid
but only on experimental.

Thanks


-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 3.0.0-1-686-pae (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages upower depends on:
ii  dbus   1.4.14-1 
ii  libc6  2.13-20  
ii  libdbus-1-31.4.14-1 
ii  libdbus-glib-1-2   0.94-4   
ii  libglib2.0-0   2.28.6-1 
ii  libgudev-1.0-0 172-1
ii  libimobiledevice1  1.0.6-3  
ii  libplist1  1.6-2
ii  libpolkit-gobject-1-0  0.102-1  
ii  libupower-glib10.9.13-1 
ii  libusb-1.0-0   2:1.0.8-5
ii  pm-utils   1.4.1-8  
ii  udev   172-1

Versions of packages upower recommends:
ii  policykit-1  0.102-1

upower suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#625379: libpri: ftbfs with gcc-4.6 -Werror

2011-09-09 Thread Aurelien Jarno
On Tue, May 03, 2011 at 10:33:37AM +, Matthias Klose wrote:
 Package: libpri
 Version: 1.4.11.3-1
 Severity: important
 Tags: wheezy sid
 User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
 Usertags: ftbfs-gcc-4.6 ftbfs-werror
 
 This package builds with -Werror, and GCC 4.6 triggers new warnings
 which will make the package fail to build.  Currently a Debian patch
 just passes
 -Wno-error=unused-but-set-variable and
 -Wno-error=unused-but-set-parameter
 to avoid build failures, but this patch will be reverted with the
 GCC 4.6.1 release, and the severity of the report will be raised.
 
 The full build log can be found at:
 http://people.debian.org/~doko/tmp/werror/libpri_1.4.11.3-1_lsid64.buildlog
 The last lines of the build log are at the end of this report.
 

I have just done an NMU to fix this longstanding issue. Please find the
corresponding patch below:

diff -Nru libpri-1.4.11.3/debian/changelog libpri-1.4.11.3/debian/changelog
--- libpri-1.4.11.3/debian/changelog2010-07-06 09:48:50.0 +0200
+++ libpri-1.4.11.3/debian/changelog2011-09-09 14:57:53.0 +0200
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+libpri (1.4.11.3-1.1) unstable; urgency=low
+
+  * Non-maintainer upload.
+  * Add gcc-4.6-werror to fix FTBFS with gcc-4.6.  Closes: #625379.
+
+ -- Aurelien Jarno aure...@debian.org  Fri, 09 Sep 2011 14:54:45 +0200
+
 libpri (1.4.11.3-1) unstable; urgency=low
 
   * New upstream bugfix release.
diff -Nru libpri-1.4.11.3/debian/patches/gcc-4.6-werror 
libpri-1.4.11.3/debian/patches/gcc-4.6-werror
--- libpri-1.4.11.3/debian/patches/gcc-4.6-werror   1970-01-01 
01:00:00.0 +0100
+++ libpri-1.4.11.3/debian/patches/gcc-4.6-werror   2011-09-09 
14:57:24.0 +0200
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+Remove unused variable
+
+--- libpri-1.4.11.3.orig/q921.c
 libpri-1.4.11.3/q921.c
+@@ -808,10 +808,8 @@ void q921_dump(struct pri *pri, q921_h *
+ 
+   if ((h-u.ft == 3)  (h-u.m3 == 0)  (h-u.m2 == 0)  (h-u.data[0] 
== 0x0f)) {
+   int ri;
+-  int tei;
+ 
+   ri = (h-u.data[1]  8) | h-u.data[2];
+-  tei = (h-u.data[4]  1);
+   /* TEI assignment related */
+   switch (h-u.data[3]) {
+   case Q921_TEI_IDENTITY_REQUEST:
diff -Nru libpri-1.4.11.3/debian/patches/series 
libpri-1.4.11.3/debian/patches/series
--- libpri-1.4.11.3/debian/patches/series   2010-07-06 09:43:55.0 
+0200
+++ libpri-1.4.11.3/debian/patches/series   2011-09-09 14:57:04.0 
+0200
@@ -1 +1,2 @@
 enable-gcc-optimizations
+gcc-4.6-werror

-- 
Aurelien Jarno  GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
aurel...@aurel32.net http://www.aurel32.net



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#625379: marked as done (libpri: ftbfs with gcc-4.6 -Werror)

2011-09-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 09 Sep 2011 13:18:23 +
with message-id e1r20yn-0006eu...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#625379: fixed in libpri 1.4.11.3-1.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #625379,
regarding libpri: ftbfs with gcc-4.6 -Werror
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
625379: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=625379
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: libpri
Version: 1.4.11.3-1
Severity: important
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-gcc-4.6 ftbfs-werror

This package builds with -Werror, and GCC 4.6 triggers new warnings
which will make the package fail to build.  Currently a Debian patch
just passes
-Wno-error=unused-but-set-variable and
-Wno-error=unused-but-set-parameter
to avoid build failures, but this patch will be reverted with the
GCC 4.6.1 release, and the severity of the report will be raised.

The full build log can be found at:
http://people.debian.org/~doko/tmp/werror/libpri_1.4.11.3-1_lsid64.buildlog
The last lines of the build log are at the end of this report.



---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
Source: libpri
Source-Version: 1.4.11.3-1.1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
libpri, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

libpri-dev_1.4.11.3-1.1_amd64.deb
  to main/libp/libpri/libpri-dev_1.4.11.3-1.1_amd64.deb
libpri1.4_1.4.11.3-1.1_amd64.deb
  to main/libp/libpri/libpri1.4_1.4.11.3-1.1_amd64.deb
libpri_1.4.11.3-1.1.debian.tar.gz
  to main/libp/libpri/libpri_1.4.11.3-1.1.debian.tar.gz
libpri_1.4.11.3-1.1.dsc
  to main/libp/libpri/libpri_1.4.11.3-1.1.dsc



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 625...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Aurelien Jarno aure...@debian.org (supplier of updated libpri package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org)


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2011 14:54:45 +0200
Source: libpri
Binary: libpri-dev libpri1.4
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 1.4.11.3-1.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian VoIP Team pkg-voip-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Changed-By: Aurelien Jarno aure...@debian.org
Description: 
 libpri-dev - Primary Rate ISDN specification development files
 libpri1.4  - Primary Rate ISDN specification library
Closes: 625379
Changes: 
 libpri (1.4.11.3-1.1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Non-maintainer upload.
   * Add gcc-4.6-werror to fix FTBFS with gcc-4.6.  Closes: #625379.
Checksums-Sha1: 
 c955481378b7b08a0109b2bf089c8a8953c9cde9 1295 libpri_1.4.11.3-1.1.dsc
 d9aa38856449fb9875c5f1645d1467dbb703ac13 9093 libpri_1.4.11.3-1.1.debian.tar.gz
 5ec423b612c53e43620c03fe30eb60acd3ba1d37 197926 
libpri-dev_1.4.11.3-1.1_amd64.deb
 1020364d462c1c20a4221e3dba81c6cee3676b31 156764 
libpri1.4_1.4.11.3-1.1_amd64.deb
Checksums-Sha256: 
 1cefe35d3b70d9e1b17a5c6e0896e31ce83c41fd7a5d0f22e927d9a86e0919eb 1295 
libpri_1.4.11.3-1.1.dsc
 2bb0b770205761c4f2afc73875e46ce229aecc70abfb8f44d98a2b3af8b5500f 9093 
libpri_1.4.11.3-1.1.debian.tar.gz
 7e493ee64ac6dcb649ace4e1af6d2a014d9bb81bb642ed559c4c5c31f8b5f2d4 197926 
libpri-dev_1.4.11.3-1.1_amd64.deb
 a8a0e71f45368e8bc3be178f3025f4841580be74a2e81741fe13fc50511a 156764 
libpri1.4_1.4.11.3-1.1_amd64.deb
Files: 
 5c5183a5e9b98e888fe2aa586bc5b68c 1295 libs optional libpri_1.4.11.3-1.1.dsc
 45240d00c69059f46127ed7b37dfebcb 9093 libs optional 
libpri_1.4.11.3-1.1.debian.tar.gz
 0941e88d3d15d531807f34bf5030a019 197926 libdevel optional 
libpri-dev_1.4.11.3-1.1_amd64.deb
 a979ca6d00811408512543d0c873e1ce 156764 libs optional 
libpri1.4_1.4.11.3-1.1_amd64.deb

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)

iD4DBQFOag7gw3ao2vG823MRAjBXAKCJgmD7yWLEo3fWuJa2t8NrTXGiPgCVGEs4
HWnncok1UksZrPQsXWC6uQ==
=sxjW
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


---End Message---


Bug#633744: Intending to NMU emacs23

2011-09-09 Thread Rob Browning
Philipp Kern pk...@debian.org writes:

 Hi Rob,

 I intend to upload the attached NMU to DELAYED/2-days later today.  I
 hope that's ok with you?  It makes emacs23 buildable again in sid and
 adjusts the build-dependency on libjpeg to use the right dev package.

That's probably fine.  It's going to be at least some time next week
before I'm back up to speed.

Thanks
-- 
Rob Browning
rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org
GPG as of 2002-11-03 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#639064: ygraph: diff for NMU version 0.16~cvs20090218-1.1

2011-09-09 Thread gregor herrmann
tags 639064 + patch
tags 639064 + pending
thanks

Dear maintainer,

I've prepared an NMU for ygraph (versioned as 0.16~cvs20090218-1.1) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/5. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer.

Regards.

-- 
 .''`.   Homepage: http://info.comodo.priv.at/ - PGP/GPG key ID: 0x8649AA06
 : :' :  Debian GNU/Linux user, admin,  developer - http://www.debian.org/
 `. `'   Member of VIBE!AT  SPI, fellow of Free Software Foundation Europe
   `-NP: Sonstiges: Should auld aquaintaince be forgot
diff -u ygraph-0.16~cvs20090218/debian/changelog ygraph-0.16~cvs20090218/debian/changelog
--- ygraph-0.16~cvs20090218/debian/changelog
+++ ygraph-0.16~cvs20090218/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+ygraph (0.16~cvs20090218-1.1) unstable; urgency=low
+
+  * Non-maintainer upload.
+  * Fix FTBFS: please build-depend on libjpeg-dev, not libjpeg62-dev |
+libjpeg-dev: do as the bug title says (closes: #639064).
+
+ -- gregor herrmann gre...@debian.org  Fri, 09 Sep 2011 15:42:55 +0200
+
 ygraph (0.16~cvs20090218-1) unstable; urgency=medium
 
   * New upstream version 0.16, currently only available in CVS.
diff -u ygraph-0.16~cvs20090218/debian/control ygraph-0.16~cvs20090218/debian/control
--- ygraph-0.16~cvs20090218/debian/control
+++ ygraph-0.16~cvs20090218/debian/control
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
 Section: science
 Priority: optional
 Maintainer: Daniel Kobras kob...@debian.org
-Build-Depends: debhelper (= 7.0.0), autotools-dev, libglib2.0-dev, libgtk2.0-dev, libpopt-dev, libjpeg62-dev | libjpeg-dev, libpng12-0-dev | libpng-dev, libtiff4-dev | libtiff-dev, zlib1g-dev | libz-dev, libbz2-dev, docbook-utils
+Build-Depends: debhelper (= 7.0.0), autotools-dev, libglib2.0-dev, libgtk2.0-dev, libpopt-dev, libjpeg-dev, libpng12-0-dev | libpng-dev, libtiff4-dev | libtiff-dev, zlib1g-dev | libz-dev, libbz2-dev, docbook-utils
 Standards-Version: 3.8.0
 
 Package: ygraph


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Processed: ygraph: diff for NMU version 0.16~cvs20090218-1.1

2011-09-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 tags 639064 + patch
Bug #639064 [src:ygraph] ygraph: FTBFS: please build-depend on libjpeg-dev, not 
libjpeg62-dev | libjpeg-dev
Added tag(s) patch.
 tags 639064 + pending
Bug #639064 [src:ygraph] ygraph: FTBFS: please build-depend on libjpeg-dev, not 
libjpeg62-dev | libjpeg-dev
Added tag(s) pending.
 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
639064: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=639064
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#556318: marked as done (FTBFS with binutils-gold)

2011-09-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 09 Sep 2011 13:48:13 +
with message-id e1r21rf-0002ru...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#556318: fixed in regina-normal 4.90-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #556318,
regarding FTBFS with binutils-gold
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
556318: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=556318
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Source: regina-normal
Version: 4.6-1
Severity: minor
User: peter.fritzs...@gmx.de
Usertags: no-add-needed

Tried to build your package and it fails to build with GNU binutils-gold. The
important difference is that --no-add-needed is the default behavior of of GNU
binutils-gold. Please provide all needed libraries to the linker when building
your executables.

More informations can be found at
 
http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS#A2009-11-02Packagesfailingbecausebinutils-gold.2BAC8-indirectlinking

/bin/bash ../../../libtool --silent --tag=CXX   --mode=link g++  
-Wnon-virtual-dtor -Wno-long-long -Wundef -ansi -D_XOPEN_SOURCE=500 
-D_BSD_SOURCE -Wcast-align -Wconversion -Wchar-subscripts -Wall -W 
-Wpointer-arith -Wwrite-strings -DNDEBUG -DNO_DEBUG -O2 -g -O2 
-Wformat-security -Wmissing-format-attribute  -fno-check-new -fno-common-o 
regina-kde examplesaction.o main.o reginamain.o reginapref.o reginaiface_skel.o 
../common/libregina-kdecommon.la ../../../engine/libregina-engine.la -lkparts 
-lkabc -lkdeui -lkio -lkdecore -lqt-mt  -lz -lpng -lz -lm -lXext -lX11  -lSM 
-lICE -lpthread -lktexteditor -L/usr/lib -L/usr/share/qt3/lib  -lgmp -lm -lz 
/usr/bin/ld: main.o: in function main:main.cpp:58: error: undefined reference 
to 'DCOPClient::registerAs(QCString const, bool)'
/usr/bin/ld: reginamain.o: in function 
ReginaMain::ReginaMain():reginamain.cpp:71: error: undefined reference to 
'DCOPObject::DCOPObject()'
/usr/bin/ld: reginamain.o: in function 
ReginaMain::ReginaMain():reginamain.cpp:78: error: undefined reference to 
'DCOPObject::setObjId(QCString const)'
/usr/bin/ld: reginamain.o: in function 
ReginaMain::ReginaMain():reginamain.cpp:99: error: undefined reference to 
'DCOPObject::~DCOPObject()'
/usr/bin/ld: reginamain.o: in function 
ReginaMain::ReginaMain():reginamain.cpp:78: error: undefined reference to 
'DCOPObject::setObjId(QCString const)'
/usr/bin/ld: reginamain.o: in function 
ReginaMainInterface::~ReginaMainInterface():reginamain.cpp(.text._ZN19ReginaMainInterfaceD0Ev+0x28):
 error: undefined reference to 'DCOPObject::~DCOPObject()'
/usr/bin/ld: reginamain.o: in function 
ReginaMainInterface::~ReginaMainInterface():reginamain.cpp(.text._ZN19ReginaMainInterfaceD1Ev+0x24):
 error: undefined reference to 'DCOPObject::~DCOPObject()'
/usr/bin/ld: reginamain.o: in function 
ReginaMain::~ReginaMain():reginamain.h:266: error: undefined reference to 
'DCOPObject::~DCOPObject()'
/usr/bin/ld: reginamain.o: in function vtable for 
ReginaMain:reginamain.cpp(.rodata._ZTV10ReginaMain+0x850): error: undefined 
reference to 'DCOPObject::processDynamic(QCString const, QMemArraychar 
const, QCString, QMemArraychar)'
/usr/bin/ld: reginamain.o: in function vtable for 
ReginaMain:reginamain.cpp(.rodata._ZTV10ReginaMain+0x858): error: undefined 
reference to 'DCOPObject::functionsDynamic()'
/usr/bin/ld: reginamain.o: in function vtable for 
ReginaMain:reginamain.cpp(.rodata._ZTV10ReginaMain+0x860): error: undefined 
reference to 'DCOPObject::interfacesDynamic()'
/usr/bin/ld: reginamain.o: in function vtable for 
ReginaMain:reginamain.cpp(.rodata._ZTV10ReginaMain+0x878): error: undefined 
reference to 'DCOPObject::virtual_hook(int, void*)'
/usr/bin/ld: reginamain.o: in function construction vtable for 
ReginaMainInterface-in-ReginaMain:reginamain.cpp(.rodata._ZTC10ReginaMain664_19ReginaMainInterface+0xd8):
 error: undefined reference to 'DCOPObject::processDynamic(QCString const, 
QMemArraychar const, QCString, QMemArraychar)'
/usr/bin/ld: reginamain.o: in function construction vtable for 
ReginaMainInterface-in-ReginaMain:reginamain.cpp(.rodata._ZTC10ReginaMain664_19ReginaMainInterface+0xe0):
 error: undefined reference to 'DCOPObject::functionsDynamic()'
/usr/bin/ld: reginamain.o: in function construction vtable for 
ReginaMainInterface-in-ReginaMain:reginamain.cpp(.rodata._ZTC10ReginaMain664_19ReginaMainInterface+0xe8):
 error: undefined reference to 'DCOPObject::interfacesDynamic()'
/usr/bin/ld: reginamain.o: in function construction vtable for 
ReginaMainInterface-in-ReginaMain:reginamain.cpp(.rodata._ZTC10ReginaMain664_19ReginaMainInterface+0x100):
 error: undefined reference to 

Bug#624882: marked as done (regina-normal: FTBFS: i18nutils.cpp:115:9: error: 'ptrdiff_t' was not declared in this scope)

2011-09-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 09 Sep 2011 13:48:13 +
with message-id e1r21rf-0002rx...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#624882: fixed in regina-normal 4.90-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #624882,
regarding regina-normal: FTBFS: i18nutils.cpp:115:9: error: 'ptrdiff_t' was not 
declared in this scope
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
624882: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=624882
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Source: regina-normal
Version: 4.6-3
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110502 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64

Hi,

During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.

Relevant part:
 /bin/bash ../../libtool --silent --tag=CXX   --mode=compile g++ 
 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../../engine -I../../engine  -I/usr/include/libxml2  
 -D_REENTRANT  -Wnon-virtual-dtor -Wno-long-long -Wundef -ansi 
 -D_XOPEN_SOURCE=500 -D_BSD_SOURCE -Wcast-align -Wconversion -Wchar-subscripts 
 -Wall -W -Wpointer-arith -Wwrite-strings -DNDEBUG -DNO_DEBUG -O2 -g -O2 
 -Wformat-security -Wmissing-format-attribute  -fno-check-new -fno-common  -MT 
 i18nutils.lo -MD -MP -MF .deps/i18nutils.Tpo -c -o i18nutils.lo i18nutils.cpp
 i18nutils.cpp: In member function 'virtual 
 std::basic_streambufchar::int_type 
 regina::i18n::IConvStreamBuffer::overflow(std::basic_streambufchar::int_type)':
 i18nutils.cpp:107:19: warning: conversion to 
 'std::basic_streambufchar::char_type' from 
 'std::basic_streambufchar::int_type' may alter its value [-Wconversion]
 i18nutils.cpp:115:9: error: 'ptrdiff_t' was not declared in this scope
 i18nutils.cpp:115:9: note: suggested alternatives:
 /usr/include/c++/4.6/x86_64-linux-gnu/bits/c++config.h:156:28: note:   
 'std::ptrdiff_t'
 /usr/include/c++/4.6/x86_64-linux-gnu/bits/c++config.h:156:28: note:   
 'std::ptrdiff_t'
 i18nutils.cpp:115:19: error: expected ';' before 'n'
 i18nutils.cpp:116:32: error: 'n' was not declared in this scope
 i18nutils.cpp:148:40: warning: conversion to 'int' from 'long int' may alter 
 its value [-Wconversion]
 i18nutils.cpp:158:40: warning: conversion to 'int' from 'long int' may alter 
 its value [-Wconversion]
 i18nutils.cpp:166:40: warning: conversion to 'int' from 'long int' may alter 
 its value [-Wconversion]
 i18nutils.cpp:173:44: warning: conversion to 'int' from 'long int' may alter 
 its value [-Wconversion]
 make[4]: *** [i18nutils.lo] Error 1

The full build log is available from:
   
http://people.debian.org/~lucas/logs/2011/05/02/regina-normal_4.6-3_lsid64.buildlog

A list of current common problems and possible solutions is available at 
http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS . You're welcome to contribute!

About the archive rebuild: The rebuild was done on about 50 AMD64 nodes
of the Grid'5000 platform, using a clean chroot.  Internet was not
accessible from the build systems.

-- 
| Lucas Nussbaum
| lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net   http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| jabber: lu...@nussbaum.fr GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F |


---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
Source: regina-normal
Source-Version: 4.90-1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
regina-normal, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

regina-normal-dev_4.90-1_amd64.deb
  to main/r/regina-normal/regina-normal-dev_4.90-1_amd64.deb
regina-normal-doc_4.90-1_all.deb
  to main/r/regina-normal/regina-normal-doc_4.90-1_all.deb
regina-normal-mpi_4.90-1_amd64.deb
  to main/r/regina-normal/regina-normal-mpi_4.90-1_amd64.deb
regina-normal_4.90-1.diff.gz
  to main/r/regina-normal/regina-normal_4.90-1.diff.gz
regina-normal_4.90-1.dsc
  to main/r/regina-normal/regina-normal_4.90-1.dsc
regina-normal_4.90-1_amd64.deb
  to main/r/regina-normal/regina-normal_4.90-1_amd64.deb
regina-normal_4.90.orig.tar.gz
  to main/r/regina-normal/regina-normal_4.90.orig.tar.gz



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 624...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Ben Burton b...@debian.org (supplier of updated regina-normal package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org)


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 

Processed (with 1 errors): merging 640966 641018, severity of 640966 is serious

2011-09-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 merge 640966 641018
Bug#640966: linux-image-2.6.32-5-686: Kernel Oops with Google Chrome
Bug#641018: linux-image-2.6.32-5-686: Kernel-OOPS (sometimes) when using lsof
Mismatch - only Bugs in same state can be merged:
Values for `severity' don't match:
 #640966 has `important';
 #641018 has `normal'

 severity 640966 serious
Bug #640966 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.32-5-686: Kernel Oops with Google Chrome
Bug #640973 [linux-2.6] Non-privileged fuser oopses kernel
Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'

Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'

 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
640966: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=640966
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Processed: affects 640966

2011-09-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 affects 640966 release.debian.org
Bug #640966 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.32-5-686: Kernel Oops with Google Chrome
Bug #640973 [linux-2.6] Non-privileged fuser oopses kernel
Added indication that 640966 affects release.debian.org
Added indication that 640973 affects release.debian.org
 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
640966: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=640966
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#640859: freeplane: FTBFS due to invalid JAVA_HOME value

2011-09-09 Thread Eric Lavarde

Hello Miguel,

few questions before I start to look into it:
- your pbuilder chroot is on sid pure?
- do you have JAVA_HOME and/or JAVACMD defined in your environment/chroot?

I'm a bit at loss because it should work without any environment 
variable defined, and surely /bin/java shouldn't be a valid option, but 
it's been a rather long time since I last built so perhaps something 
changed in sid!?


Thanks for the report, we'll fix it ;-)
Eric

On 08/09/11 01:36, Miguel Landaeta wrote:

Package: freeplane
Version: 0.9.0+dfsg-1
Severity: serious

The relevant error message:

[ ... ]
/bin/sh: 1: /bin/java: not found
make: [buildxml-clean] Error 127 (ignored)
test -x debian/rules
dh_testroot
rmdir freemind
rmdir: failed to remove `freemind': Directory not empty
make: [cleanbuilddir] Error 1 (ignored)
You must specify a valid JAVA_HOME or JAVACMD!
make: *** [testsanity] Error 1


-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
   APT prefers unstable
   APT policy: (800, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 3.0.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash




__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.





--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Processed: forcibly merging 640966 641018

2011-09-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 forcemerge 640966 641018
Bug#640966: linux-image-2.6.32-5-686: Kernel Oops with Google Chrome
Bug#641018: linux-image-2.6.32-5-686: Kernel-OOPS (sometimes) when using lsof
Bug#640973: Non-privileged fuser oopses kernel
Forcibly Merged 640966 640973 641018.

 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
641018: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=641018
640973: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=640973
640966: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=640966
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#641018: Kernel-OOPS (sometimes) when using lsof

2011-09-09 Thread Vincent Blut
Package: linux-2.6
Severity: normal

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi,

Same issue here, it appears (to me) only when you call 'lsof' with unprivileged 
user.

Obviously this behavior was introduced by the last security upgrade 
(2.6.32-35squeeze1). 

Dmesg (with the stack trace) is attached. 




- -- System Information:
Debian Release: 6.0.2
  APT prefers stable-updates
  APT policy: (800, 'stable-updates'), (800, 'stable'), (96, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.utf8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAk5qQEkACgkQbO4uEp7kOBPK9gCfVeoCh+/rj+Mb4TwBmFtrqjmX
NbkAnA1hwxxWsgESfbPSFoOgb7oKopqF
=9UhI
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
[ 4704.125330] BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at fff3
[ 4704.125335] IP: [8112f98d] m_stop+0x15/0x4c
[ 4704.125342] PGD 1003067 PUD 1004067 PMD 0 
[ 4704.125346] Oops:  [#11] SMP 
[ 4704.125348] last sysfs file: /sys/devices/virtual/sound/timer/uevent
[ 4704.125352] CPU 0 
[ 4704.125353] Modules linked in: fuse firewire_sbp2 loop snd_ca0106 
snd_seq_midi snd_seq_midi_event snd_rawmidi snd_ac97_codec ac97_bus snd_pcm 
snd_seq snd_timer snd_seq_device radeon arc4 ttm snd ecb soundcore rt2500pci 
drm_kms_helper snd_page_alloc rt2x00pci rt2x00lib led_class pcspkr edac_core 
edac_mce_amd k8temp mac80211 psmouse serio_raw evdev cfg80211 rfkill drm 
i2c_nforce2 i2c_algo_bit eeprom_93cx6 i2c_core button processor ext4 mbcache 
jbd2 crc16 sg sr_mod usbhid hid sd_mod crc_t10dif cdrom ohci_hcd ata_generic 
sata_sil pata_amd sata_nv fan firewire_ohci thermal firewire_core crc_itu_t 
thermal_sys sky2 libata ehci_hcd forcedeth scsi_mod usbcore nls_base [last 
unloaded: scsi_wait_scan]
[ 4704.125398] Pid: 3166, comm: lsof Tainted: G  D2.6.32-5-amd64 #1 
MS-7125
[ 4704.125400] RIP: 0010:[8112f98d]  [8112f98d] 
m_stop+0x15/0x4c
[ 4704.125405] RSP: 0018:880094767e88  EFLAGS: 00010286
[ 4704.125407] RAX: 8131fad0 RBX: 880094767ed8 RCX: 00d07c574067
[ 4704.125410] RDX: ff00 RSI: fff3 RDI: 8800bc205a80
[ 4704.125412] RBP: 88003761b200 R08: 880094767e78 R09: 
[ 4704.125414] R10: 1000 R11: 811516f3 R12: fff3
[ 4704.125417] R13: fff3 R14:  R15: 1000
[ 4704.125420] FS:  7fbcd63a1700() GS:88000180() 
knlGS:
[ 4704.125422] CS:  0010 DS:  ES:  CR0: 80050033
[ 4704.125424] CR2: fff3 CR3: 947a6000 CR4: 06f0
[ 4704.125427] DR0:  DR1:  DR2: 
[ 4704.125429] DR3:  DR6: 0ff0 DR7: 0400
[ 4704.125432] Process lsof (pid: 3166, threadinfo 880094766000, task 
8800374c46a0)
[ 4704.125434] Stack:
[ 4704.125435]  1000 880094767ed8 8800bc205a80 
81105aa9
[ 4704.125439] 0 01b4fc98 880094767f50 01b4ec90 
8800945e1000
[ 4704.125443] 0 8800bc205ab8 8001  
1000
[ 4704.125447] Call Trace:
[ 4704.125451]  [81105aa9] ? seq_read+0x269/0x388
[ 4704.125456]  [810ef510] ? vfs_read+0xa6/0xff
[ 4704.125459]  [810ef625] ? sys_read+0x45/0x6e
[ 4704.125463]  [81010b42] ? system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
[ 4704.125465] Code: 48 89 df e8 e3 c2 f1 ff 31 c0 40 84 ed 49 0f 45 c4 5b 5d 
41 5c c3 55 53 48 83 ec 08 48 85 f6 48 8b 6f 60 74 1a 48 3b 75 10 74 14 48 8b 
1e 48 8d 7b 60 e8 dd 86 f3 ff 48 89 df e8 ac c2 f1 ff 48 
[ 4704.125489] RIP  [8112f98d] m_stop+0x15/0x4c
[ 4704.125493]  RSP 880094767e88
[ 4704.125495] CR2: fff3
[ 4704.125497] ---[ end trace c010ebc4cf0d5b6d ]---


Processed: your mail

2011-09-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 severity 641018 important
Bug #641018 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.32-5-686: Kernel-OOPS (sometimes) when 
using lsof
Bug #640966 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.32-5-686: Kernel Oops with Google Chrome
Bug #640973 [linux-2.6] Non-privileged fuser oopses kernel
Severity set to 'important' from 'serious'

Severity set to 'important' from 'serious'

Severity set to 'important' from 'serious'


End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
641018: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=641018
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#640859: freeplane: FTBFS due to invalid JAVA_HOME value

2011-09-09 Thread Miguel Landaeta
On Fri, Sep 09, 2011 at 04:12:20PM +0200, Eric Lavarde wrote:
 few questions before I start to look into it:
 - your pbuilder chroot is on sid pure?
 - do you have JAVA_HOME and/or JAVACMD defined in your environment/chroot?
 
 I'm a bit at loss because it should work without any environment
 variable defined, and surely /bin/java shouldn't be a valid option,
 but it's been a rather long time since I last built so perhaps
 something changed in sid!?

Hello Eric,

Sorry if I reacted too quickly on this bug.

My pbuilder is clean and up to date.
I didn't define JAVA_HOME explicitly anywhere in my pbuilder.

openjdk-6 (6b23~pre8-2) introduced changes related to multi-arch, so
now /usr/lib/jvm/java-6-openjdk is not a valid JAVA_HOME anymore.
In my workstation (amd64) /usr/lib/jvm/java-6-openjdk-amd64 is a valid path.

I went ahead and committed a change in freemind (and freeplane since it
seems to have the same bug) to switch to default-java that provides a
stable JAVA_HOME path and it points to openjdk-6 in almost all
architectures anyway.

Feel free to revert my changes if you find something wrong.
Cheers,

-- 
Miguel Landaeta, miguel at miguel.cc
secure email with PGP 0x7D8967E9 available at http://keyserver.pgp.com/
Faith means not wanting to know what is true. -- Nietzsche


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#628303: marked as done (libjboss-remoting-java: FTBFS: CoyoteInvoker.java:82: org.jboss.remoting.transport.coyote.CoyoteInvoker is not abstract and does not override abstract method log(org.apache

2011-09-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 09 Sep 2011 14:47:45 +
with message-id e1r22mr-0006t6...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#628303: fixed in libjboss-remoting-java 2.5.3.SP1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #628303,
regarding libjboss-remoting-java: FTBFS: CoyoteInvoker.java:82: 
org.jboss.remoting.transport.coyote.CoyoteInvoker is not abstract and does not 
override abstract method 
log(org.apache.coyote.Request,org.apache.coyote.Response,long) in 
org.apache.coyote.Adapter
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
628303: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=628303
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Source: libjboss-remoting-java
Version: 2.5.2.SP1-2
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110528 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64

Hi,

During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.

Relevant part:
 make[1]: Entering directory 
 `/build/user-libjboss-remoting-java_2.5.2.SP1-2-amd64-0f2SK8/libjboss-remoting-java-2.5.2.SP1'
 make[1]: Nothing to be done for `update-config'.
 make[1]: Leaving directory 
 `/build/user-libjboss-remoting-java_2.5.2.SP1-2-amd64-0f2SK8/libjboss-remoting-java-2.5.2.SP1'
 cd .  /usr/lib/jvm/default-java/bin/java -classpath 
 /usr/share/ant/lib/ant.jar:/usr/share/ant/lib/ant-launcher.jar:/usr/share/java/jboss-common.jar:/usr/share/java/log4j-1.2.jar:/usr/share/java/tomcat-coyote.jar:/usr/share/java/commons-httpclient.jar:/usr/share/java/servlet-api-2.5.jar:/usr/share/java/jboss-serialization.jar:/usr/share/java/jboss-jmx.jar:/usr/share/java/jnpserver.jar:/usr/share/java/concurrent.jar:/usr/lib/jvm/default-java/lib/tools.jar
   -Dant.home=/usr/share/ant org.apache.tools.ant.Main -Dcompile.debug=true 
 -Dcompile.optimize=true   -buildfile debian/build.xml -propertyfile 
 /build/user-libjboss-remoting-java_2.5.2.SP1-2-amd64-0f2SK8/libjboss-remoting-java-2.5.2.SP1/debian/ant.properties
  jar
 Buildfile: 
 /build/user-libjboss-remoting-java_2.5.2.SP1-2-amd64-0f2SK8/libjboss-remoting-java-2.5.2.SP1/debian/build.xml
 
 compile:
 [mkdir] Created dir: 
 /build/user-libjboss-remoting-java_2.5.2.SP1-2-amd64-0f2SK8/libjboss-remoting-java-2.5.2.SP1/class
 [javac] 
 /build/user-libjboss-remoting-java_2.5.2.SP1-2-amd64-0f2SK8/libjboss-remoting-java-2.5.2.SP1/debian/build.xml:13:
  warning: 'includeantruntime' was not set, defaulting to 
 build.sysclasspath=last; set to false for repeatable builds
 [javac] Compiling 269 source files to 
 /build/user-libjboss-remoting-java_2.5.2.SP1-2-amd64-0f2SK8/libjboss-remoting-java-2.5.2.SP1/class
 [javac] 
 /build/user-libjboss-remoting-java_2.5.2.SP1-2-amd64-0f2SK8/libjboss-remoting-java-2.5.2.SP1/src/org/jboss/remoting/transport/coyote/CoyoteInvoker.java:82:
  org.jboss.remoting.transport.coyote.CoyoteInvoker is not abstract and does 
 not override abstract method 
 log(org.apache.coyote.Request,org.apache.coyote.Response,long) in 
 org.apache.coyote.Adapter
 [javac] public class CoyoteInvoker extends WebServerInvoker implements 
 Adapter
 [javac]^
 [javac] Note: Some input files use or override a deprecated API.
 [javac] Note: Recompile with -Xlint:deprecation for details.
 [javac] Note: Some input files use unchecked or unsafe operations.
 [javac] Note: Recompile with -Xlint:unchecked for details.
 [javac] 1 error
 
 BUILD FAILED
 /build/user-libjboss-remoting-java_2.5.2.SP1-2-amd64-0f2SK8/libjboss-remoting-java-2.5.2.SP1/debian/build.xml:13:
  Compile failed; see the compiler error output for details.
 
 Total time: 3 seconds
 make: *** [debian/stamp-ant-build] Error 1

The full build log is available from:
   
http://people.debian.org/~lucas/logs/2011/05/28/libjboss-remoting-java_2.5.2.SP1-2_lsid64.buildlog

A list of current common problems and possible solutions is available at 
http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS . You're welcome to contribute!

About the archive rebuild: The rebuild was done on about 50 AMD64 nodes
of the Grid'5000 platform, using a clean chroot.  Internet was not
accessible from the build systems.

-- 
| Lucas Nussbaum
| lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net   http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| jabber: lu...@nussbaum.fr GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F |


---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
Source: libjboss-remoting-java
Source-Version: 2.5.3.SP1-1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
libjboss-remoting-java, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

libjboss-remoting-java_2.5.3.SP1-1.debian.tar.gz
  to 

Processed: your mail

2011-09-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 block 632861 by 640488
Bug #632861 [libvtkedge-dev] libvtkedge-dev: package needs template (*.txx) 
files
Was not blocked by any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 632861: 640488
 block 634739 by 640488
Bug #634739 [libvtkedge] libvtkedge: Wrong license in description
Was not blocked by any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 634739: 640488
 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
634739: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=634739
632861: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=632861
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#629567: Intending to NMU emacs23

2011-09-09 Thread Sven Joachim
On 2011-09-09 13:54 +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:

 I intend to upload the attached NMU to DELAYED/2-days later today.  I
 hope that's ok with you?  It makes emacs23 buildable again in sid and
 adjusts the build-dependency on libjpeg to use the right dev package.

I haven't tested it, but the attached diff is definitely not
sufficient.  To fix #629567 you need to patch src/s/gnu-linux.h as I
mentioned in http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=629567#10.

Also, emacs23 will still FTBFS on any-i386 unless you include the patch
from http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=620795#38.

If you fix those problems it would be good to test whether the segfault
I experienced in http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=8623 still
occurs.  IIRC I could not reproduce it anymore when building emacs23
with later gcc-4.6 versions, but my memory might be faulty.

Cheers,
   Sven



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#629567: Intending to NMU emacs23

2011-09-09 Thread Philipp Kern
Hi,

On Fri, Sep 09, 2011 at 08:48:59AM -0500, Rob Browning wrote:
 Philipp Kern pk...@debian.org writes:
  I intend to upload the attached NMU to DELAYED/2-days later today.  I
  hope that's ok with you?  It makes emacs23 buildable again in sid and
  adjusts the build-dependency on libjpeg to use the right dev package.
 That's probably fine.  It's going to be at least some time next week
 before I'm back up to speed.

pushed to DELAYED/1-day then.

Thanks
Philipp Kern


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#564968: marked as done (bobot++: ftbfs with gcc-4.5)

2011-09-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 09 Sep 2011 15:32:10 +
with message-id e1r233q-0004x8...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#564968: fixed in bobot++ 1:1.97-10.4
has caused the Debian Bug report #564968,
regarding bobot++: ftbfs with gcc-4.5
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
564968: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=564968
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: bobot++
Version: 1:1.97-10.3
Severity: normal
Tags: sid
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-gcc-4.5

The package fails to build in a test rebuild on at least amd64 with
gcc-4.5/g++-4.5, but succeeds to build with gcc-4.4/g++-4.4.
For the compiler version used, see:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2010/01/msg00230.html

The full build log can be found at:
http://people.debian.org/~lucas/logs/2010/01/08b/bobot++_1:1.97-10.3_lsid64b.buildlog
The last lines of the build log are cwat the end of this report.

The reason of the build failure is likely in the package (compiler or
linker message found in the build log), if this turns out as a gcc bug,
please reassign to the gcc-4.5 package. If the build ends with a
message confused by earlier errors, bailing out, please
ignore it for now; these compiler errors are filed separately.


[...]
g++ -Wall -O2 -DHAVE_STL_CLEAR  -DUSESCRIPTS -DMULTITHREAD  -c Server.C
g++ -Wall -O2 -DHAVE_STL_CLEAR  -DUSESCRIPTS -DMULTITHREAD  -c 
ServerConnection.C
g++ -Wall -O2 -DHAVE_STL_CLEAR  -DUSESCRIPTS -DMULTITHREAD  -c ServerList.C
g++ -Wall -O2 -DHAVE_STL_CLEAR  -DUSESCRIPTS -DMULTITHREAD  -c ServerQueue.C
g++ -Wall -O2 -DHAVE_STL_CLEAR  -DUSESCRIPTS -DMULTITHREAD  -c ServerQueueItem.C
g++ -Wall -O2 -DHAVE_STL_CLEAR  -DUSESCRIPTS -DMULTITHREAD  -c Socket.C
g++ -Wall -O2 -DHAVE_STL_CLEAR  -DUSESCRIPTS -DMULTITHREAD  -c String.C
g++ -Wall -O2 -DHAVE_STL_CLEAR  -DUSESCRIPTS -DMULTITHREAD  -c StringTokenizer.C
g++ -Wall -O2 -DHAVE_STL_CLEAR  -DUSESCRIPTS -DMULTITHREAD  -c ShitEntry.C
g++ -Wall -O2 -DHAVE_STL_CLEAR  -DUSESCRIPTS -DMULTITHREAD  -c ShitList.C
g++ -Wall -O2 -DHAVE_STL_CLEAR  -DUSESCRIPTS -DMULTITHREAD  -c TodoList.C
g++ -Wall -O2 -DHAVE_STL_CLEAR  -DUSESCRIPTS -DMULTITHREAD  -c User.C
g++ -Wall -O2 -DHAVE_STL_CLEAR  -DUSESCRIPTS -DMULTITHREAD  -c UserCommands.C
g++ -Wall -O2 -DHAVE_STL_CLEAR  -DUSESCRIPTS -DMULTITHREAD  -c UserList.C
g++ -Wall -O2 -DHAVE_STL_CLEAR  -DUSESCRIPTS -DMULTITHREAD  -c Utils.C
g++ -Wall -O2 -DHAVE_STL_CLEAR  -DUSESCRIPTS -DMULTITHREAD  -c BotInterp.C
g++ -Wall -O2 -DHAVE_STL_CLEAR  -DUSESCRIPTS -DMULTITHREAD  -c Interp.C
g++ -Wall -O2 -DHAVE_STL_CLEAR  -DUSESCRIPTS -DMULTITHREAD  -c ScriptCommands.C
ScriptCommands.C: In static member function 'static scm_unused_struct* 
ScriptCommands::getServerList()':
ScriptCommands.C:386:23: error: 'Server::Server' cannot appear in a 
constant-expression
ScriptCommands.C:386:31: error: template argument 1 is invalid
ScriptCommands.C:386:31: error: template argument 2 is invalid
ScriptCommands.C:386:43: error: expected initializer before 'it'
ScriptCommands.C:388:11: error: 'it' was not declared in this scope
make[2]: *** [ScriptCommands.o] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory 
`/build/user-bobot++_1.97-10.3-amd64-rrT7Vh/bobot++-1.97/source'
make[1]: *** [all] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory 
`/build/user-bobot++_1.97-10.3-amd64-rrT7Vh/bobot++-1.97'
make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2
dpkg-buildpackage: error: debian/rules build gave error exit status 2


---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
Source: bobot++
Source-Version: 1:1.97-10.4

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
bobot++, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

bobot++_1.97-10.4.diff.gz
  to main/b/bobot++/bobot++_1.97-10.4.diff.gz
bobot++_1.97-10.4.dsc
  to main/b/bobot++/bobot++_1.97-10.4.dsc
bobot++_1.97-10.4_i386.deb
  to main/b/bobot++/bobot++_1.97-10.4_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 564...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
gregor herrmann gre...@debian.org (supplier of updated bobot++ package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org)


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 04 Sep 2011 17:09:43 +0200
Source: bobot++
Binary: 

Bug#641038: icedtea-plugin: uninstallable on amd64/sid due to openjdk update

2011-09-09 Thread brian m. carlson
Package: icedtea-plugin
Version: 1.1-1
Severity: grave

Due to the update to openjdk that Breaks icedtea-web, icedtea-plugin is
uninstallable on amd64/sid.  Because I need a working Java plugin for
various purposes, this prevents me from updating openjdk 6 and 7.
Please fix this as soon as possible.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 3.1.0-rc4-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages icedtea-plugin depends on:
ii  icedtea-netx1.1-1  
ii  libatk1.0-0 2.0.1-2
ii  libc6   2.13-20
ii  libcairo2   1.10.2-6.1 
ii  libfontconfig1  2.8.0-3
ii  libfreetype62.4.6-2
ii  libgcc1 1:4.6.1-9  
ii  libgdk-pixbuf2.0-0  2.24.0-1   
ii  libglib2.0-02.28.6-3   
ii  libgtk2.0-0 2.24.6-1   
ii  libnspr4-0d 4.8.9-1
ii  libpango1.0-0   1.28.4-3   
ii  libstdc++6  4.6.1-9
ii  openjdk-6-jre   6b23~pre8-1
ii  xulrunner-1.9.1 1.9.1.19-3 

icedtea-plugin recommends no packages.

icedtea-plugin suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information

-- 
brian m. carlson / brian with sandals: Houston, Texas, US
+1 832 623 2791 | http://www.crustytoothpaste.net/~bmc | My opinion only
OpenPGP: RSA v4 4096b: 88AC E9B2 9196 305B A994 7552 F1BA 225C 0223 B187


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Processed: Re: Bug#633704: horrible Segmentation fault

2011-09-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 tags 633704 patch
Bug #633704 [uni2ascii] horrible Segmentation fault
Added tag(s) patch.
 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
633704: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=633704
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Processed: Re: linux-image-2.6.32-5-686: kernel oops after upgrade to 2.6.32-35squeeze1

2011-09-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 forcemerge 640966 641040
Bug#640966: linux-image-2.6.32-5-686: Kernel Oops with Google Chrome
Bug#641040: linux-image-2.6.32-5-686: kernel oops after upgrade to 
2.6.32-35squeeze1
Bug#640973: Non-privileged fuser oopses kernel
Bug#641018: linux-image-2.6.32-5-686: Kernel-OOPS (sometimes) when using lsof
Bug#641034: linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64: Kernel Oops with gnome-system-monitor
Forcibly Merged 640966 640973 641018 641034 641040.

 # make it more visible again
 severity 640966 serious
Bug #640966 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.32-5-686: Kernel Oops with Google Chrome
Bug #640973 [linux-2.6] Non-privileged fuser oopses kernel
Bug #641018 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.32-5-686: Kernel-OOPS (sometimes) when 
using lsof
Bug #641034 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64: Kernel Oops with 
gnome-system-monitor
Bug #641040 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.32-5-686: kernel oops after upgrade to 
2.6.32-35squeeze1
Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'

Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'

Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'

Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'

Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'


End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
640966: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=640966
641034: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=641034
641018: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=641018
641040: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=641040
640973: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=640973
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Processed (with 1 errors): your mail

2011-09-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 retitle 640973 linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64: Non-privileged fuser oopses
Bug #640973 [linux-2.6] Non-privileged fuser oopses kernel
Bug #640966 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.32-5-686: Kernel Oops with Google Chrome
Bug #641018 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.32-5-686: Kernel-OOPS (sometimes) when 
using lsof
Bug #641034 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64: Kernel Oops with 
gnome-system-monitor
Bug #641040 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.32-5-686: kernel oops after upgrade to 
2.6.32-35squeeze1
Changed Bug title to 'linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64: Non-privileged fuser 
oopses' from 'Non-privileged fuser oopses kernel'
Changed Bug title to 'linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64: Non-privileged fuser 
oopses' from 'linux-image-2.6.32-5-686: Kernel Oops with Google Chrome'
Changed Bug title to 'linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64: Non-privileged fuser 
oopses' from 'linux-image-2.6.32-5-686: Kernel-OOPS (sometimes) when using lsof'
Changed Bug title to 'linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64: Non-privileged fuser 
oopses' from 'linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64: Kernel Oops with gnome-system-monitor'
Changed Bug title to 'linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64: Non-privileged fuser 
oopses' from 'linux-image-2.6.32-5-686: kernel oops after upgrade to 
2.6.32-35squeeze1'
 kernel
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.

 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
640973: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=640973
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#640195: Processed: your mail

2011-09-09 Thread Anton Gladky
 Bug #640195 [paraview] paraview-dev transition
 Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'

I am not agree with that. Why is that bug serious?
It does not break anything. I would keep it normal.

Anton




On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 9:28 AM, Debian Bug Tracking System
ow...@bugs.debian.org wrote:
 Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 severity 640195 serious
 Bug #640195 [paraview] paraview-dev transition
 Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'

 thanks
 Stopping processing here.

 Please contact me if you need assistance.
 --
 640195: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=640195
 Debian Bug Tracking System
 Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

 --
 debian-science-maintainers mailing list
 debian-science-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org
 http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers




-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#640973: linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64: Non-privileged fuser oopses kernel

2011-09-09 Thread Thomas Shanks
Oh dear... I hit send on the second rename email hours ago, before the
merges, while in a wifi-free area... would not mind if someone undoes this
action or picks a more suitable title.


Processed (with 1 errors): Re:

2011-09-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 retitle 640973 linux-image-2.6.32-5-(amd64|686): kernel oops after
Bug #640973 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64: Non-privileged fuser 
oopses
Bug #640966 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64: Non-privileged fuser 
oopses
Bug #641018 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64: Non-privileged fuser 
oopses
Bug #641034 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64: Non-privileged fuser 
oopses
Bug #641040 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64: Non-privileged fuser 
oopses
Changed Bug title to 'linux-image-2.6.32-5-(amd64|686): kernel oops after' from 
'linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64: Non-privileged fuser oopses'
Changed Bug title to 'linux-image-2.6.32-5-(amd64|686): kernel oops after' from 
'linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64: Non-privileged fuser oopses'
Changed Bug title to 'linux-image-2.6.32-5-(amd64|686): kernel oops after' from 
'linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64: Non-privileged fuser oopses'
Changed Bug title to 'linux-image-2.6.32-5-(amd64|686): kernel oops after' from 
'linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64: Non-privileged fuser oopses'
Changed Bug title to 'linux-image-2.6.32-5-(amd64|686): kernel oops after' from 
'linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64: Non-privileged fuser oopses'
 upgrade to 2.6.32-35squeeze1
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.

 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
640973: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=640973
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Processed: retitle 640966 to Oops when unprivileged user reads /proc/pid/maps, regression in fix for CVE-2011-1020

2011-09-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 retitle 640966 Oops when unprivileged user reads /proc/pid/maps, regression 
 in fix for CVE-2011-1020
Bug #640966 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.32-5-(amd64|686): kernel oops after
Bug #640973 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.32-5-(amd64|686): kernel oops after
Bug #641018 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.32-5-(amd64|686): kernel oops after
Bug #641034 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.32-5-(amd64|686): kernel oops after
Bug #641040 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.32-5-(amd64|686): kernel oops after
Changed Bug title to 'Oops when unprivileged user reads /proc/pid/maps, 
regression in fix for CVE-2011-1020' from 'linux-image-2.6.32-5-(amd64|686): 
kernel oops after'
Changed Bug title to 'Oops when unprivileged user reads /proc/pid/maps, 
regression in fix for CVE-2011-1020' from 'linux-image-2.6.32-5-(amd64|686): 
kernel oops after'
Changed Bug title to 'Oops when unprivileged user reads /proc/pid/maps, 
regression in fix for CVE-2011-1020' from 'linux-image-2.6.32-5-(amd64|686): 
kernel oops after'
Changed Bug title to 'Oops when unprivileged user reads /proc/pid/maps, 
regression in fix for CVE-2011-1020' from 'linux-image-2.6.32-5-(amd64|686): 
kernel oops after'
Changed Bug title to 'Oops when unprivileged user reads /proc/pid/maps, 
regression in fix for CVE-2011-1020' from 'linux-image-2.6.32-5-(amd64|686): 
kernel oops after'
 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
640966: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=640966
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Processed: notfound 637031 in 0.9.13-1, notfixed 637031 in 0.9.13-1

2011-09-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 notfound 637031 0.9.13-1
Bug #637031 {Done: Alessio Treglia ales...@debian.org} [libass4] libass4: 
Crash with freetype 2.4.6
Bug No longer marked as found in versions libass/0.9.13-1.
 notfixed 637031 0.9.13-1
Bug #637031 {Done: Alessio Treglia ales...@debian.org} [libass4] libass4: 
Crash with freetype 2.4.6
Bug No longer marked as fixed in versions 0.9.13-1.
 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
637031: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=637031
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#629567: Intending to NMU emacs23

2011-09-09 Thread Philipp Kern
On Fri, Sep 09, 2011 at 05:09:19PM +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
 On 2011-09-09 13:54 +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
  I intend to upload the attached NMU to DELAYED/2-days later today.  I
  hope that's ok with you?  It makes emacs23 buildable again in sid and
  adjusts the build-dependency on libjpeg to use the right dev package.
 I haven't tested it, but the attached diff is definitely not
 sufficient.  To fix #629567 you need to patch src/s/gnu-linux.h as I
 mentioned in http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=629567#10.
 
 Also, emacs23 will still FTBFS on any-i386 unless you include the patch
 from http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=620795#38.

True.  It did build and work just fine on amd64 with the patches I
proposed.  So the attached debdiff builds on both i386 and amd64.

 If you fix those problems it would be good to test whether the segfault
 I experienced in http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=8623 still
 occurs.  IIRC I could not reproduce it anymore when building emacs23
 with later gcc-4.6 versions, but my memory might be faulty.

Doesn't crash for me on amd64.

I put the result into DELAYED/2-days and cut my original build.

Kind regards
Philipp Kern
diff -Nru emacs23-23.3+1/debian/changelog emacs23-23.3+1/debian/changelog
--- emacs23-23.3+1/debian/changelog 2011-04-10 19:40:31.0 +0200
+++ emacs23-23.3+1/debian/changelog 2011-09-09 20:25:37.0 +0200
@@ -1,3 +1,17 @@
+emacs23 (23.3+1-1.1) unstable; urgency=low
+
+  * Non-maintainer upload.
+  * Build-depend on libjpeg-dev instead of libjpeg62-dev.
+(Closes: #633744)
+  * Add multiarch compatibility by passing the right crt-dir
+to configure.  (Closes: #629567)
+  * Also use the correct crt1.o location in gnu-linux.h; thanks
+to Sven Joachim.  (Closes: #629567)
+  * Fix up manged include paths on i386 due to multiarch.
+(Closes: #620795)
+
+ -- Philipp Kern pk...@debian.org  Fri, 09 Sep 2011 20:24:47 +0200
+
 emacs23 (23.3+1-1) unstable; urgency=low
 
   * Incorporate new upstream version 23.3.
diff -Nru emacs23-23.3+1/debian/control emacs23-23.3+1/debian/control
--- emacs23-23.3+1/debian/control   2011-04-10 19:41:48.0 +0200
+++ emacs23-23.3+1/debian/control   2011-09-09 20:40:36.0 +0200
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
 Maintainer: Rob Browning r...@defaultvalue.org
 Build-Depends: bsd-mailx | mailx, libncurses5-dev, texinfo, liblockfile-dev, 
librsvg2-dev,
  libgif-dev | libungif4-dev, libtiff4-dev | libtiff-dev, xaw3dg-dev,
- libpng12-dev, libjpeg62-dev, libm17n-dev, libotf-dev,
+ libpng12-dev, libjpeg-dev, libm17n-dev, libotf-dev,
  libgpm-dev [!hurd-i386 !kfreebsd-i386 !kfreebsd-amd64], libdbus-1-dev,
  autoconf, automake, autotools-dev, dpkg-dev ( 1.10.0), quilt (= 0.42),
  debhelper (= 7.0.50~), libxaw7-dev, sharutils, imagemagick, libgtk2.0-dev,
diff -Nru emacs23-23.3+1/debian/control.in emacs23-23.3+1/debian/control.in
--- emacs23-23.3+1/debian/control.in2011-04-10 19:33:31.0 +0200
+++ emacs23-23.3+1/debian/control.in2011-09-09 13:18:37.0 +0200
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
 Maintainer: Rob Browning r...@defaultvalue.org
 Build-Depends: bsd-mailx | mailx, libncurses5-dev, texinfo, liblockfile-dev, 
librsvg2-dev,
  libgif-dev | libungif4-dev, libtiff4-dev | libtiff-dev, xaw3dg-dev,
- libpng12-dev, libjpeg62-dev, libm17n-dev, libotf-dev,
+ libpng12-dev, libjpeg-dev, libm17n-dev, libotf-dev,
  libgpm-dev [!hurd-i386 !kfreebsd-i386 !kfreebsd-amd64], libdbus-1-dev,
  autoconf, automake, autotools-dev, dpkg-dev ( 1.10.0), quilt (= 0.42),
  debhelper (= 7.0.50~), libxaw7-dev, sharutils, imagemagick, libgtk2.0-dev,
diff -Nru 
emacs23-23.3+1/debian/patches/0014-Cope-with-multiarch-location-of-crt1.o.patch 
emacs23-23.3+1/debian/patches/0014-Cope-with-multiarch-location-of-crt1.o.patch
--- 
emacs23-23.3+1/debian/patches/0014-Cope-with-multiarch-location-of-crt1.o.patch 
1970-01-01 01:00:00.0 +0100
+++ 
emacs23-23.3+1/debian/patches/0014-Cope-with-multiarch-location-of-crt1.o.patch 
2011-09-09 18:59:13.0 +0200
@@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
+Author: Sven Joachim svenj...@gmx.de
+Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2011 08:25:48 +0200
+Bug-Debian: http://bugs.debian.org/629567
+Subject: Cope with multiarch location of crt1.o
+Applied-Upstream: 
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-diffs/2010-04/msg00325.html 
+---
+
+--- emacs23-23.3+1.orig/src/s/gnu-linux.h
 emacs23-23.3+1/src/s/gnu-linux.h
+@@ -168,7 +168,7 @@ along with GNU Emacs.  If not, see http
+ /* Ask GCC where to find libgcc.a.  */
+ #define LIB_GCC `$(CC) $(C_SWITCH_X_SITE) -print-libgcc-file-name`
+ 
+-#define START_FILES pre-crt0.o /usr/lib/crt1.o /usr/lib/crti.o
++#define START_FILES pre-crt0.o $(CRT_DIR)/crt1.o $(CRT_DIR)/crti.o
+ 
+ /* Here is how to find X Windows.  LD_SWITCH_X_SITE_AUX gives an -R option
+says where to find X windows at run time.  */
+@@ -198,7 +198,7 @@ along with GNU Emacs.  If not, see http
+ #define LIBS_DEBUG
+ #undef LIB_GCC
+ #define LIB_GCC
+-#define LIB_STANDARD -lgcc 

Bug#631950: remmina-plugin-nx unable to connect with libssh-4_0.5.0-2

2011-09-09 Thread Christoph Anton Mitterer
Hi Laurent.

It seems this has been fixed in their repo,... can you cherry pick that
patch?

https://red.libssh.org/issues/60


Chris.



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Processed: fixed 465598 in 1.2.6-2

2011-09-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 fixed 465598 1.2.6-2
Bug #465598 {Done: Thijs Kinkhorst th...@debian.org} [libsdl-image1.2] 
libsdl-image1.2: Security update 1.2.5-2etch1 is not installed
Bug Marked as fixed in versions sdl-image1.2/1.2.6-2.
 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
465598: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=465598
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#640960: marked as done (CVE-?????: broken CTCP parsing can be used to crash the core)

2011-09-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 09 Sep 2011 20:47:45 +
with message-id e1r27zf-0002hb...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#640960: fixed in quassel 0.7.3-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #640960,
regarding CVE-?: broken CTCP parsing can be used to crash the core
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
640960: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=640960
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: quassel
Version: 0.6.3-2
Severity: important
Tags: security

When people send me

0010  75 74 61 73 21 7a 7a 40  31 37 38 2d 33 37 2d 31  |utas!zz@178-37-1|
0020  30 34 2d 34 32 2e 61 64  73 6c 2e 69 6e 65 74 69  |04-42.adsl.ineti|
0030  61 2e 70 6c 20 4a 4f 49  4e 20 23 71 75 61 73 73  |a.pl JOIN #quass|
0040  65 6c 0d 0a 37 36 36 37  30 3a 55 c3 8c a6 5b 7e  |el..76670:U...[~|
0050  8a 26 3a 6b 75 74 61 73  21 7a 7a 40 31 37 38 2d  |.:kutas!zz@178-|
0060  33 37 2d 31 30 34 2d 34  32 2e 61 64 73 6c 2e 69  |37-104-42.adsl.i|
0070  6e 65 74 69 61 2e 70 6c  20 50 52 49 56 4d 53 47  |netia.pl PRIVMSG|
0080  20 23 71 75 61 73 73 65  6c 20 3a 01 41 43 54 49  | #quassel :.ACTI|
0090  4f 4e 20 01 01 56 45 52  53 49 4f 4e 01 01 56 45  |ON ..VERSION..VE|
00a0  52 53 49 4f 4e 01 01 56  45 52 53 49 4f 4e 01 01  |RSION..VERSION..|
00b0  56 45 52 53 49 4f 4e 01  01 56 45 52 53 49 4f 4e  |VERSION..VERSION|
00c0  01 01 56 45 52 53 49 4f  4e 01 01 56 45 52 53 49  |..VERSION..VERSI|
00d0  4f 4e 01 01 56 45 52 53  49 4f 4e 01 01 56 45 52  |ON..VERSION..VER|
00e0  53 49 4f 4e 01 01 56 45  52 53 49 4f 4e 01 01 56  |SION..VERSION..V|
00f0  45 52 53 49 4f 4e 01 01  56 45 52 53 49 4f 4e 01  |ERSION..VERSION.|
0100  01 56 45 52 53 49 4f 4e  01 01 56 45 52 53 49 4f  |.VERSION..VERSIO|
0110  4e 01 01 56 45 52 53 49  4f 4e 01 01 56 45 52 53  |N..VERSION..VERS|
0120  49 4f 4e 01 01 56 45 52  53 49 4f 4e 01 01 56 45  |ION..VERSION..VE|
0130  52 53 49 4f 4e 01 01 56  45 52 53 49 4f 4e 01 01  |RSION..VERSION..|
0140  56 45 52 53 49 4f 4e 01  01 56 45 52 53 49 4f 4e  |VERSION..VERSION|
0150  01 01 56 45 52 53 49 4f  4e 01 01 56 45 52 53 49  |..VERSION..VERSI|
0160  4f 4e 01 01 56 45 52 53  49 4f 4e 01 01 56 45 52  |ON..VERSION..VER|
0170  53 49 4f 4e 01 01 56 45  52 53 49 4f 4e 01 01 56  |SION..VERSION..V|
0180  45 52 53 49 4f 4e 01 01  56 45 52 53 49 4f 4e 01  |ERSION..VERSION.|
0190  01 56 45 52 53 49 4f 4e  01 01 56 45 52 53 49 4f  |.VERSION..VERSIO|
01a0  4e 01 01 56 45 52 53 49  4f 4e 01 01 56 45 52 53  |N..VERSION..VERS|
01b0  49 4f 4e 01 01 56 45 52  53 49 4f 4e 01 01 56 45  |ION..VERSION..VE|
01c0  52 53 49 4f 4e 01 01 56  45 52 53 49 4f 4e 01 01  |RSION..VERSION..|
01d0  56 45 52 53 49 4f 4e 01  01 0d 0a |VERSION|

quasselcore crashes. The upstream bug report is

http://bugs.quassel-irc.org/issues/1095

Gentoo bug report is

https://bugs.gentoo.org/382313

(there is some mention about requesting a CVE)

Workaround:

1) Settings-Configure Quassel-IRC-Ignore List-New
2) Strictness: Dynamic
3) Rule Type: CTCP
4) Ignore Rule: * VERSION
5) Scope: Global


Where is the Vcs for quassel? I could prepare a fix.


-- System Information:
Debian Release: 6.0.2
  APT prefers stable-updates
  APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages quassel depends on:
ii  dbus-x111.2.24-4+squeeze1simple interprocess messaging syst
ii  gawk1:3.1.7.dfsg-5   GNU awk, a pattern scanning and pr
ii  libc6   2.11.2-10Embedded GNU C Library: Shared lib
ii  libgcc1 1:4.4.5-8GCC support library
ii  libphonon4  4:4.6.0really4.4.2-1 the core library of the Phonon mul
ii  libqt4-dbus 4:4.6.3-4+squeeze1   Qt 4 D-Bus module
ii  libqt4-network  4:4.6.3-4+squeeze1   Qt 4 network module
ii  libqt4-script   4:4.6.3-4+squeeze1   Qt 4 script module
ii  libqt4-sql  4:4.6.3-4+squeeze1   Qt 4 SQL module
ii  libqt4-sql-sqlite   4:4.6.3-4+squeeze1   Qt 4 SQLite 3 database driver
ii  libqt4-webkit   4:4.6.3-4+squeeze1   Qt 4 WebKit module
ii  libqt4-xmlpatterns  4:4.6.3-4+squeeze1   Qt 4 XML patterns module
ii  libqtcore4  4:4.6.3-4+squeeze1   Qt 4 core module
ii  libqtgui4   4:4.6.3-4+squeeze1   Qt 4 GUI module
ii  libstdc++6  4.4.5-8  The GNU Standard 

Bug#625222: desktop-base: 625222: spacefun plymouth theme needs plymouth-drm

2011-09-09 Thread Yves-Alexis Perez
On ven., 2011-09-09 at 22:24 +0200, Paul Wise wrote:
 It looks like the spacefun plymouth theme needs plymouth-drm for the
 script module[1].
 
 I'm not sure how exactly this could be fixed, but two thoughts come to
 mind.
 
 desktop-base could recommend plymouth-drm to pull the module in but
 allow folks who don't use plymouth to keep it off their systems.

That means plymouth is installed by default on Debian install. Do we
want that on the base installs? Is it possible for Wheezy? What happens
to non-KMS people which have plymouth installed?

Regards,
-- 
Yves-Alexis


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Processed: severity of 636559 is serious

2011-09-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 severity 636559 serious
Bug #636559 [nepenthes] FTBFS with libcurl4-gnutls-dev 7.21.7-1 on alpha
Severity set to 'serious' from 'normal'

 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
636559: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=636559
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#640813: marked as done (java-wrappers: find_java_runtime function is broken for openjdk)

2011-09-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 09 Sep 2011 21:17:07 +
with message-id e1r28rf-0005b9...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#640813: fixed in java-wrappers 0.1.23
has caused the Debian Bug report #640813,
regarding java-wrappers: find_java_runtime function is broken for openjdk
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
640813: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=640813
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: java-wrappers
Version: 0.1.22
Severity: important

miguel@alice:~$ dpkg-query -l openjdk-6-jdk
Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold
| Status=Not/Inst/Conf-files/Unpacked/halF-conf/Half-inst/trig-aWait/Trig-pend
|/ Err?=(none)/Reinst-required (Status,Err: uppercase=bad)
||/ Name   VersionDescription
+++-==-==-
ii  openjdk-6-jre  6b23~pre9-1OpenJDK Java runtime, using Hotspot JIT
miguel@alice:~$ java -version
java version 1.6.0_23
OpenJDK Runtime Environment (IcedTea6 1.11pre) (6b23~pre9-1)
OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (build 20.0-b11, mixed mode)
miguel@alice:~$ . /usr/lib/java-wrappers/java-wrappers.sh
miguel@alice:~$ find_java_runtime openjdk
[warning] -bash: No java runtime was found
miguel@alice:~$


-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (800, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 3.0.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages java-wrappers depends on:
ii  unzip  6.0-5

java-wrappers recommends no packages.

java-wrappers suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information

-- 
Miguel Landaeta, miguel at miguel.cc
secure email with PGP 0x7D8967E9 available at http://keyserver.pgp.com/
Faith means not wanting to know what is true. -- Nietzsche


---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
Source: java-wrappers
Source-Version: 0.1.23

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
java-wrappers, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

java-wrappers_0.1.23.dsc
  to main/j/java-wrappers/java-wrappers_0.1.23.dsc
java-wrappers_0.1.23.tar.gz
  to main/j/java-wrappers/java-wrappers_0.1.23.tar.gz
java-wrappers_0.1.23_all.deb
  to main/j/java-wrappers/java-wrappers_0.1.23_all.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 640...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Vincent Fourmond fourm...@debian.org (supplier of updated java-wrappers 
package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org)


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2011 22:56:25 +0200
Source: java-wrappers
Binary: java-wrappers
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.1.23
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Java Maintainers 
pkg-java-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Changed-By: Vincent Fourmond fourm...@debian.org
Description: 
 java-wrappers - wrappers for java executables
Closes: 640813
Changes: 
 java-wrappers (0.1.23) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * Correctly find the now architecture-dependent openjdk6 flavor (closes:
 #640813)
   * Urgency medium to avoid breaking applications in testing when openjdk6 
migrates
Checksums-Sha1: 
 95ccc5bf79aae328b065251f5196806c8bf899a9 955 java-wrappers_0.1.23.dsc
 5dd2988aba0f503582f6b3f7d5ce4c7300ae0ed0 8899 java-wrappers_0.1.23.tar.gz
 909b0fa738907521b398a5a2d8791ad58f447f58 10608 java-wrappers_0.1.23_all.deb
Checksums-Sha256: 
 e79d2333fb197b918399c9a61c9a5be50b54f2c152f96dd65dd45e152ba125ac 955 
java-wrappers_0.1.23.dsc
 9dfb0657b5fa66301bc1174314dc11957e3e581e31dc3ff35c41aaeeff938bb3 8899 
java-wrappers_0.1.23.tar.gz
 43442a6c79b7bdb1f96fa7227a727638a2904942116935838f5af282e2196ab5 10608 
java-wrappers_0.1.23_all.deb
Files: 
 eb2e0c91c71ed297f1fcaaeaa6aa145a 955 java optional java-wrappers_0.1.23.dsc
 5f6692b3c5e52da82278fcf00b4938af 8899 java optional java-wrappers_0.1.23.tar.gz
 54c879ba8f616c8bdf5c77d94dc607a8 10608 java optional 
java-wrappers_0.1.23_all.deb

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAk5qflcACgkQx/UhwSKygsrvoACfbpFO49P34VW5M9aDLXRDmaTw

Bug#636397: New deja-dup upload in unstable?

2011-09-09 Thread Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 10:03 AM, Jérémy Bobbio lu...@debian.org wrote:
 Hi Jose!

 deja-dup still has a RC bug in unstable due to the libnotify 0.7
 transition. Uploading either the package currently in experimental or a
 newer upstream release in unstable would fix this issue.

 Could you make a new deja-dup upload to unstable?

Hi,

I am expecting to upload 19.91 (yes, I know it is the unstable branch,
but should work ok), but I need itstool package first to be uploaded
to Debian (#639788). Once it is done, I will upload it.

Regards,

-- 
José Carlos García Sogo
   js...@debian.org



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#634140: marked as done (libgeotiff-dfsg: Please Build-Depends on libjpeg-dev, not libjpeg62-dev)

2011-09-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 09 Sep 2011 21:32:44 +
with message-id e1r28gm-0008te...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#634140: fixed in libgeotiff-dfsg 1.3.0-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #634140,
regarding libgeotiff-dfsg: Please Build-Depends on libjpeg-dev, not 
libjpeg62-dev
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
634140: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=634140
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Source: libgeotiff-dfsg
Version: 1.2.5-1
Severity: important

Hello Debian GIS Project,

We are transitionning from libjpeg62 to libjpeg8.
As mentionned on debian-devel-announce[1], please update libgeotiff-dfsg to
Build-Depends on libjpeg-dev instead of libjpeg62-dev.

The following Build-Depends was found:

libgeotiff-dfsg :Build-Depends: libjpeg62-dev 

[1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2010/02/msg6.html

Cheers,
-- 
Bill. ballo...@debian.org

Imagine a large red swirl here. 


---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
Source: libgeotiff-dfsg
Source-Version: 1.3.0-1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
libgeotiff-dfsg, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

geotiff-bin_1.3.0-1_i386.deb
  to main/libg/libgeotiff-dfsg/geotiff-bin_1.3.0-1_i386.deb
libgeotiff-dev_1.3.0-1_i386.deb
  to main/libg/libgeotiff-dfsg/libgeotiff-dev_1.3.0-1_i386.deb
libgeotiff-dfsg_1.3.0-1.diff.gz
  to main/libg/libgeotiff-dfsg/libgeotiff-dfsg_1.3.0-1.diff.gz
libgeotiff-dfsg_1.3.0-1.dsc
  to main/libg/libgeotiff-dfsg/libgeotiff-dfsg_1.3.0-1.dsc
libgeotiff-dfsg_1.3.0.orig.tar.gz
  to main/libg/libgeotiff-dfsg/libgeotiff-dfsg_1.3.0.orig.tar.gz
libgeotiff2_1.3.0-1_i386.deb
  to main/libg/libgeotiff-dfsg/libgeotiff2_1.3.0-1_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 634...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Francesco Paolo Lovergine fran...@debian.org (supplier of updated 
libgeotiff-dfsg package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org)


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 05 Sep 2011 13:59:19 +0200
Source: libgeotiff-dfsg
Binary: libgeotiff-dev libgeotiff2 geotiff-bin
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.3.0-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian GIS Project pkg-grass-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Changed-By: Francesco Paolo Lovergine fran...@debian.org
Description: 
 geotiff-bin - the GeoTIFF library -- tools
 libgeotiff-dev - the GeoTIFF library -- development files
 libgeotiff2 - the GeoTIFF library -- run-time files
Closes: 634140
Changes: 
 libgeotiff-dfsg (1.3.0-1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   [ Alan Boudreault ]
   * New upstream release.
   * Updated some debian/* file for the new libgeotiff 1.3.
   * Updated the project homepage in debian/control.
   * Modified the package names with the proper major version in debian/control.
   * Added Alan as Uploader in debian/control.
 .
   [ Francesco Paolo Lovergine ]
   * Now following the new SONAME for libgeotiff as adopted upstream: package
 name changed as consequence
   * Updated to use libjpeg-dev as build-dep.
 (closes: #634140)
   * Now original autoconf helpers file are restored at cleaning time, to
 be nice against SCMs.
   * Added Vcs-* fields in debian/control.
Checksums-Sha1: 
 7cdb3ee9d4d70afee2909aec4f3e5c30138c88ae 1449 libgeotiff-dfsg_1.3.0-1.dsc
 4086dca88279d8d0f2641ac50b4111e8463a2ee5 448665 
libgeotiff-dfsg_1.3.0.orig.tar.gz
 1053a09268dc6c6c65e0020ad813e32fdd4ccc9d 31911 libgeotiff-dfsg_1.3.0-1.diff.gz
 09f87b3c2c3b7a714447cd634b770896d34c3a7b 112946 libgeotiff-dev_1.3.0-1_i386.deb
 ba7c5f31095d5ee230b1d57599b4704316c865e5 71560 libgeotiff2_1.3.0-1_i386.deb
 5462c3a1727a8d539f89fd2a79ae6cfb50c172d2 44648 geotiff-bin_1.3.0-1_i386.deb
Checksums-Sha256: 
 baf44d89f98bd18d9aece2004a593c8eb9ef7cb22d0668e77e58b9d2ec521361 1449 
libgeotiff-dfsg_1.3.0-1.dsc
 2dab0b1e194df3324e9e8963103c957f45563854c8611b42131f74c5bcb03c8d 448665 
libgeotiff-dfsg_1.3.0.orig.tar.gz
 e7eb1a731989853be878abe54de20e436fb569068ffc16aed36ac5b90a89e21c 31911 
libgeotiff-dfsg_1.3.0-1.diff.gz
 144e7b79d4df979f733b1947c15a289dce569f1ecf816c7ba6a6df2d57a50275 112946 
libgeotiff-dev_1.3.0-1_i386.deb
 

Processed: reassign 640560 to libvtk5-dev, forcibly merging 506992 640560

2011-09-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 reassign 640560 libvtk5-dev
Bug #640560 [src:itksnap] itksnap: FTBFS: make[3]: *** No rule to make target 
`/usr/lib64/libpq.so', needed by `InsightSNAP'.  Stop.
Bug reassigned from package 'src:itksnap' to 'libvtk5-dev'.
Bug No longer marked as found in versions itksnap/2.2.0-1.
 forcemerge 506992 640560
Bug#506992: libvtk5-dev: transitive linking and LINK_INTERFACE_LIBRARIES
Bug#640560: itksnap: FTBFS: make[3]: *** No rule to make target 
`/usr/lib64/libpq.so', needed by `InsightSNAP'.  Stop.
Bug#555185: libvtk5-dev: Invalid dependency in 
VTKConfig.cmake/VTKLibraryDepends.cmake
Bug#629815: gofigure2: FTBFS: make[3]: *** No rule to make target 
`/usr/lib/libdl.so', needed by `lib/libvtkRenderingAddOn2.so.0.8'.  Stop.
Bug#630559: libvtk5-dev: linking against VTK using cmake broken because of 
multiarch
Bug#634548: vtkedge: FTBFS: make[3]: *** No rule to make target 
`/usr/lib/libGLU.so', needed by `bin/libVTKEdge.so'.  Stop.
Bug#636869: vmtk: FTBFS on all plateforms:  No rule to make target 
`/usr/lib/libpng.so'
Bug#638692: gdcm: FTBFS: make[3]: *** No rule to make target 
`/usr/lib/libpng.so', needed by `bin/libvtkgdcm.so.2.0.17'.  Stop.
Bug#640383: gofigure2: FTBFS: No rule to make target `/usr/lib/libpng.so', 
needed by `lib/libitkQt.so.0.8'.  Stop.
Bug#640555: gdcm: FTBFS: make[3]: *** No rule to make target 
`/usr/lib64/libpq.so', needed by `bin/libvtkgdcm.so.2.0.17'.  Stop.
Bug#640556: ginkgocadx: FTBFS: make[3]: *** No rule to make target 
`/usr/lib64/libpq.so', needed by `src/cadxcore/libCADxCore.so.2.5.0.0'.  Stop.
Bug#640561: kwwidgets: FTBFS: make[3]: *** No rule to make target 
`/usr/lib/libpng.so', needed by `bin/libKWWidgets.so.1.0.1009.0'.  Stop.
Bug#640566: slicer: FTBFS: make[3]: *** No rule to make target 
`/usr/lib64/libpq.so', needed by `bin/libmimxAdapter.so.3.6.3'.  Stop.
Forcibly Merged 506992 555185 629815 630559 634548 636869 638692 640383 640555 
640556 640560 640561 640566.

 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
634548: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=634548
630559: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=630559
506992: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=506992
640560: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=640560
555185: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=555185
636869: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=636869
640556: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=640556
640561: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=640561
638692: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=638692
640566: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=640566
640383: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=640383
640555: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=640555
629815: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=629815
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#641052: evolution uses insecure connection when storing the sent message to the sent folder

2011-09-09 Thread Yves-Alexis Perez
Package: evolution
Version: 3.0.3-1
Severity: serious

Reporting the security issue myself, see
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.security.oss.general/5833 for more
info.
-- 
Yves-Alexis


-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 3.0.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages evolution depends on:
ii  dbus  1.4.14-1
ii  debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.5.41  
ii  evolution-common  3.0.3-2 
ii  evolution-data-server 3.0.3-1 
ii  gconf22.32.4-1
ii  gnome-icon-theme  3.0.0-4 
ii  libatk1.0-0   2.0.1-2 
ii  libc6 2.13-20 
ii  libcairo-gobject2 1.10.2-6.1  
ii  libcairo2 1.10.2-6.1  
ii  libcamel-1.2-23   3.0.3-1 
ii  libcanberra-gtk3-00.28-1  
ii  libcanberra0  0.28-1  
ii  libebackend-1.2-1 3.0.3-1 
ii  libebook1.2-103.0.3-1 
ii  libecal1.2-8  3.0.3-1 
ii  libedataserver1.2-14  3.0.3-1 
ii  libedataserverui-3.0-03.0.3-1 
ii  libegroupwise1.2-13   3.0.3-1 
ii  libenchant1c2a1.6.0-3 
ii  libevolution  3.0.3-2 
ii  libfontconfig12.8.0-3 
ii  libfreetype6  2.4.6-2 
ii  libgail-3-0   3.0.12-2
ii  libgconf2-4   2.32.4-1
ii  libgdata110.8.1-2 
ii  libgdk-pixbuf2.0-02.24.0-1
ii  libglib2.0-0  2.28.6-1
ii  libgnome-desktop-3-0  3.0.2-2 
ii  libgtk-3-03.0.12-2
ii  libgtkhtml-4.0-0  4.0.2-1 
ii  libgtkhtml-editor-4.0-0   4.0.2-1 
ii  libgweather-3-0   3.0.2-1 
ii  libical0  0.44-3  
ii  libice6   2:1.0.7-2   
ii  libnotify40.7.4-1 
ii  libnspr4-0d   4.8.9-1 
ii  libnss3-1d3.12.11-3   
ii  libpango1.0-0 1.28.4-3
ii  libsm62:1.2.0-2   
ii  libsoup-gnome2.4-12.34.3-1
ii  libsoup2.4-1  2.34.3-1
ii  libsqlite3-0  3.7.7-2 
ii  libstartup-notification0  0.12-1  
ii  libunique-3.0-0   3.0.0-1 
ii  libxml2   2.7.8.dfsg-4
ii  psmisc22.14-1 

Versions of packages evolution recommends:
pn  bogofilter | spamassassin  none 
pn  evolution-plugins  3.0.3-2
pn  evolution-webcal   none 
pn  yelp   none 

Versions of packages evolution suggests:
pn  bug-buddy   none  
pn  evolution-dbg   none  
pn  evolution-exchange  none  
pn  evolution-plugins-experimental  none  
pn  gnupg   1.4.11-3
pn  network-manager none  

-- debconf information excluded



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#636397: New deja-dup upload in unstable?

2011-09-09 Thread Jérémy Bobbio
On Fri, Sep 09, 2011 at 11:30:58PM +0200, Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo wrote:
 I am expecting to upload 19.91 (yes, I know it is the unstable branch,
 but should work ok), but I need itstool package first to be uploaded
 to Debian (#639788). Once it is done, I will upload it.

I'd rather not miss the deadline to have a fixed version of 14.2-1 in
squeeze (wrt. #624598). Is there a chance that this upload will be made
before two weeks?

Otherwise, I think it would be better to simple re-upload the version
currently in experimental to unstable for now.

Cheers,
-- 
Jérémy Bobbio.''`. 
lu...@debian.org: :Ⓐ  :  # apt-get install anarchism
`. `'` 
  `-   


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#641052: [Evolution] Bug#641052: evolution uses insecure connection when storing the sent message to the sent folder

2011-09-09 Thread Yves-Alexis Perez
reassign 641052 src:evolution-data-server3
forwarded 641052 https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=648277
clone 641052 -1
reassign -1 evolution-data-server
thanks

On ven., 2011-09-09 at 23:41 +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
 Reporting the security issue myself, see
 http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.security.oss.general/5833 for more
 info. 

In fact this is more evolution-data-server than evolution itself, and it
seems it's present in eds 2.x too.

Note that it won't always happen, it might depend on how exactly the
accounts are configured and how folders are selected.
-- 
Yves-Alexis


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Processed: Re: [Evolution] Bug#641052: evolution uses insecure connection when storing the sent message to the sent folder

2011-09-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 reassign 641052 src:evolution-data-server3
Bug #641052 [evolution] evolution uses insecure connection when storing the 
sent message to the sent folder
Bug reassigned from package 'evolution' to 'src:evolution-data-server3'.
Bug No longer marked as found in versions evolution/3.0.3-1.
 forwarded 641052 https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=648277
Bug #641052 [src:evolution-data-server3] evolution uses insecure connection 
when storing the sent message to the sent folder
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 
'https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=648277'.
 clone 641052 -1
Bug#641052: evolution uses insecure connection when storing the sent message to 
the sent folder
Bug 641052 cloned as bug 641054.

 reassign -1 evolution-data-server
Bug #641054 [src:evolution-data-server3] evolution uses insecure connection 
when storing the sent message to the sent folder
Bug reassigned from package 'src:evolution-data-server3' to 
'evolution-data-server'.
 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
641054: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=641054
641052: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=641052
-1: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=-1
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#616282: marked as done (tulip: replace doxygen and texlive-* build dependencies with doxygen-latex)

2011-09-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 09 Sep 2011 22:19:35 +
with message-id e1r29q7-0008k4...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#616282: fixed in tulip 3.6.0dfsg-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #616282,
regarding tulip: replace doxygen and texlive-* build dependencies with 
doxygen-latex
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
616282: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=616282
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: src:tulip
Version: 3.1.2-2.3
Severity: minor
User: d...@debian.org
Usertag: doxygen-latex

The package build-depends on doxygen and one or more of the
texlive-* packages, likely it is building some latex/pdf docs
using a doxygen.sty generated by doxygen.  The doxygen.sty
generated by doxygen-1.7.3 now depends on even more macros,
so instead of adding more texlive-* dependencies to doxygen,
or adding the texlive-* packages to the build dependencies of
each source package, a new doxygen-latex package was introduced,
depending on all required packages used by doxygen.sty.
.
If the package builds such documentation, please build-depend
on doxygen-latex.  If not, please close the report as invalid.


---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
Source: tulip
Source-Version: 3.6.0dfsg-2

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
tulip, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

libgzstreamtlp-3.6_3.6.0dfsg-2_amd64.deb
  to main/t/tulip/libgzstreamtlp-3.6_3.6.0dfsg-2_amd64.deb
libogdftlp-3.6_3.6.0dfsg-2_amd64.deb
  to main/t/tulip/libogdftlp-3.6_3.6.0dfsg-2_amd64.deb
libtulip-3.6_3.6.0dfsg-2_amd64.deb
  to main/t/tulip/libtulip-3.6_3.6.0dfsg-2_amd64.deb
libtulip-dev_3.6.0dfsg-2_amd64.deb
  to main/t/tulip/libtulip-dev_3.6.0dfsg-2_amd64.deb
libtulip-ogdf-3.6_3.6.0dfsg-2_amd64.deb
  to main/t/tulip/libtulip-ogdf-3.6_3.6.0dfsg-2_amd64.deb
libtulip-ogl-3.6_3.6.0dfsg-2_amd64.deb
  to main/t/tulip/libtulip-ogl-3.6_3.6.0dfsg-2_amd64.deb
libtulip-qt4-3.6_3.6.0dfsg-2_amd64.deb
  to main/t/tulip/libtulip-qt4-3.6_3.6.0dfsg-2_amd64.deb
tulip-doc_3.6.0dfsg-2_all.deb
  to main/t/tulip/tulip-doc_3.6.0dfsg-2_all.deb
tulip_3.6.0dfsg-2.debian.tar.gz
  to main/t/tulip/tulip_3.6.0dfsg-2.debian.tar.gz
tulip_3.6.0dfsg-2.dsc
  to main/t/tulip/tulip_3.6.0dfsg-2.dsc
tulip_3.6.0dfsg-2_amd64.deb
  to main/t/tulip/tulip_3.6.0dfsg-2_amd64.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 616...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Yann Dirson dir...@debian.org (supplier of updated tulip package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org)


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2011 22:58:34 +0200
Source: tulip
Binary: tulip tulip-doc libtulip-3.6 libtulip-dev libtulip-ogl-3.6 
libtulip-qt4-3.6 libtulip-ogdf-3.6 libogdftlp-3.6 libgzstreamtlp-3.6
Architecture: source amd64 all
Version: 3.6.0dfsg-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Yann Dirson dir...@debian.org
Changed-By: Yann Dirson dir...@debian.org
Description: 
 libgzstreamtlp-3.6 - gzstream shared library, built for Tulip
 libogdftlp-3.6 - Open Graph Drawing Framework shared library, built for Tulip
 libtulip-3.6 - Tulip graph library - core runtime
 libtulip-dev - Tulip graph library - core development files
 libtulip-ogdf-3.6 - Tulip graph library - OGDF runtime
 libtulip-ogl-3.6 - Tulip graph library - OpenGL runtime
 libtulip-qt4-3.6 - Tulip graph library - Qt/OpenGL GUI runtime
 tulip  - System dedicated to the visualization of huge graphs
 tulip-doc  - Documentation for the Tulip graph-visualization system
Closes: 616282 639313
Changes: 
 tulip (3.6.0dfsg-2) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Don't build docs for tulip-doc from build-arch, move java packages,
 docbook-xsl and doxygen to Build-Depend-Indep (where default-jre-headless
 was, already).  Closes: #639313.  Uses debhelper compat level 9 for this,
 but for unknown reason so we do not get multiarch paths.
   * Drop apparently-useless build-dep on texlive-extra-utils (Closes:
 #616282).
   * Cleanup: merge the 2 gzstream-related patches in debian/patches, since
 the second one was obsoleting the first one.
   * Drop long-useless build-dep on sharutils.
   * Remove docs/doxygen/xml on 

Bug#639313: marked as done (tulip: FTBFS: /bin/sh: java: not found)

2011-09-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 09 Sep 2011 22:19:36 +
with message-id e1r29q8-0008ka...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#639313: fixed in tulip 3.6.0dfsg-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #639313,
regarding tulip: FTBFS: /bin/sh: java: not found
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
639313: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=639313
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: src:tulip
Version: 3.6.0dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Tags: sid wheezy
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)

Hi!

Your package failed to build on the buildds:

make[5]: Entering directory 
`/build/buildd-tulip_3.6.0dfsg-1-s390-eWhi9U/tulip-3.6.0dfsg/obj-s390-linux-gnu'
cd 
/build/buildd-tulip_3.6.0dfsg-1-s390-eWhi9U/tulip-3.6.0dfsg/obj-s390-linux-gnu/docs/developerHandbook
  java -cp 
/usr/share/java/saxon.jar:/usr/share/java/saxon.jar:/build/buildd-tulip_3.6.0dfsg-1-s390-eWhi9U/tulip-3.6.0dfsg/docs/common:/usr/share/java/xml-resolver.jar
 com.icl.saxon.StyleSheet -x org.apache.xml.resolver.tools.ResolvingXMLReader 
-y org.apache.xml.resolver.tools.ResolvingXMLReader -r 
org.apache.xml.resolver.tools.CatalogResolver -u 
/build/buildd-tulip_3.6.0dfsg-1-s390-eWhi9U/tulip-3.6.0dfsg/docs/developerHandbook/index.docbook
 
/build/buildd-tulip_3.6.0dfsg-1-s390-eWhi9U/tulip-3.6.0dfsg/docs/common/tulip-html.xsl
/bin/sh: java: not found
make[5]: *** [docs/developerHandbook/CMakeFiles/dev_html] Error 127
make[5]: Leaving directory 
`/build/buildd-tulip_3.6.0dfsg-1-s390-eWhi9U/tulip-3.6.0dfsg/obj-s390-linux-gnu'
make[4]: *** [docs/developerHandbook/CMakeFiles/dev_html.dir/all] Error 2

Full build log at
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=tuliparch=s390ver=3.6.0dfsg-1stamp=1314301362

Regards

Christoph

-- 
9FED 5C6C E206 B70A 5857  70CA 9655 22B9 D49A E731
Debian Developer | Lisp Hacker | CaCert Assurer


---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
Source: tulip
Source-Version: 3.6.0dfsg-2

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
tulip, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

libgzstreamtlp-3.6_3.6.0dfsg-2_amd64.deb
  to main/t/tulip/libgzstreamtlp-3.6_3.6.0dfsg-2_amd64.deb
libogdftlp-3.6_3.6.0dfsg-2_amd64.deb
  to main/t/tulip/libogdftlp-3.6_3.6.0dfsg-2_amd64.deb
libtulip-3.6_3.6.0dfsg-2_amd64.deb
  to main/t/tulip/libtulip-3.6_3.6.0dfsg-2_amd64.deb
libtulip-dev_3.6.0dfsg-2_amd64.deb
  to main/t/tulip/libtulip-dev_3.6.0dfsg-2_amd64.deb
libtulip-ogdf-3.6_3.6.0dfsg-2_amd64.deb
  to main/t/tulip/libtulip-ogdf-3.6_3.6.0dfsg-2_amd64.deb
libtulip-ogl-3.6_3.6.0dfsg-2_amd64.deb
  to main/t/tulip/libtulip-ogl-3.6_3.6.0dfsg-2_amd64.deb
libtulip-qt4-3.6_3.6.0dfsg-2_amd64.deb
  to main/t/tulip/libtulip-qt4-3.6_3.6.0dfsg-2_amd64.deb
tulip-doc_3.6.0dfsg-2_all.deb
  to main/t/tulip/tulip-doc_3.6.0dfsg-2_all.deb
tulip_3.6.0dfsg-2.debian.tar.gz
  to main/t/tulip/tulip_3.6.0dfsg-2.debian.tar.gz
tulip_3.6.0dfsg-2.dsc
  to main/t/tulip/tulip_3.6.0dfsg-2.dsc
tulip_3.6.0dfsg-2_amd64.deb
  to main/t/tulip/tulip_3.6.0dfsg-2_amd64.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 639...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Yann Dirson dir...@debian.org (supplier of updated tulip package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org)


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2011 22:58:34 +0200
Source: tulip
Binary: tulip tulip-doc libtulip-3.6 libtulip-dev libtulip-ogl-3.6 
libtulip-qt4-3.6 libtulip-ogdf-3.6 libogdftlp-3.6 libgzstreamtlp-3.6
Architecture: source amd64 all
Version: 3.6.0dfsg-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Yann Dirson dir...@debian.org
Changed-By: Yann Dirson dir...@debian.org
Description: 
 libgzstreamtlp-3.6 - gzstream shared library, built for Tulip
 libogdftlp-3.6 - Open Graph Drawing Framework shared library, built for Tulip
 libtulip-3.6 - Tulip graph library - core runtime
 libtulip-dev - Tulip graph library - core development files
 libtulip-ogdf-3.6 - Tulip graph library - OGDF runtime
 libtulip-ogl-3.6 - Tulip graph library - OpenGL runtime
 libtulip-qt4-3.6 - Tulip graph library - Qt/OpenGL GUI runtime
 tulip  - System dedicated to the visualization of huge graphs
 

Bug#636397: New deja-dup upload in unstable?

2011-09-09 Thread Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo
On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 11:42 PM, Jérémy Bobbio lu...@debian.org wrote:
 On Fri, Sep 09, 2011 at 11:30:58PM +0200, Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo wrote:
 I am expecting to upload 19.91 (yes, I know it is the unstable branch,
 but should work ok), but I need itstool package first to be uploaded
 to Debian (#639788). Once it is done, I will upload it.

 I'd rather not miss the deadline to have a fixed version of 14.2-1 in
 squeeze (wrt. #624598). Is there a chance that this upload will be made
 before two weeks?

I am trying right now, but it seems that generated code from vala has
to be updated in the patch. But running vala -C DuplicityInstance.vala
gives me the following error - I don't know how to solve it:

DuplicityInstance.vala:243.3-243.17: error: The type name
`DataInputStream' could not be found
  DataInputStream reader;
  ^^^
DuplicityInstance.vala:244.3-244.6: error: The type name `File' could
not be found
  File logfile;
  
DuplicityInstance.vala:245.3-245.6: error: The type name `File' could
not be found
  File scriptfile;
  
DuplicityInstance.vala:77.14-77.20: error: The symbol `IOError' could
not be found
  catch (IOError.EXISTS e) {
 ^^^
DuplicityInstance.vala:272.17-272.21: error: The symbol `Posix' could
not be found
Posix.kill((Posix.pid_t)child_pid, Posix.SIGKILL);
^
DuplicityInstance.vala:276.17-276.21: error: The symbol `Posix' could
not be found
Posix.kill((Posix.pid_t)child_pid, Posix.SIGSTOP);
^
DuplicityInstance.vala:280.17-280.21: error: The symbol `Posix' could
not be found
Posix.kill((Posix.pid_t)child_pid, Posix.SIGCONT);
^
DuplicityInstance.vala:334.7-334.17: error: The type name
`InputStream' could not be found
  InputStream stream;
  ^^^
Compilation failed: 8 error(s), 0 warning(s)

 Otherwise, I think it would be better to simple re-upload the version
 currently in experimental to unstable for now.

I am considering that.

Thanks
-- 
José Carlos García Sogo
   js...@debian.org



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#618096: solved in 1.4.7

2011-09-09 Thread Ana Guerrero

Hi,

Both bugs #618096 and #625397, are solved in the latest
upstream release: 1.4.7.

Ana



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#629671: libpuzzle: FTBFS: vector_ops.c:74: undefined reference to `sqrt'

2011-09-09 Thread Ana Guerrero
On Wed, Jun 08, 2011 at 04:13:44PM +0200, Didier Raboud wrote:
 Source: libpuzzle
 Version: 0.9-4
 Severity: serious
 Tags: wheezy sid
 User: debian...@lists.debian.org
 Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110607 qa-ftbfs
 Justification: FTBFS on amd64
 
 Hi,
 
 During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
 amd64.
 
 Relevant part:
  gcc -shared  .libs/puzzle.o .libs/tunables.o .libs/dvec.o .libs/cvec.o 
  .libs/compress.o .libs/vector_ops.o  /usr/lib/libgd.so -L/usr/lib  -Wl,-z 
  -Wl,defs -Wl,--as-needed -Wl,-soname -Wl,libpuzzle.so.1 -o 
  .libs/libpuzzle.so.1.0.0
  .libs/dvec.o: In function `puzzle_autocrop_axis':
  /«BUILDDIR»/libpuzzle-0.9/src/dvec.c:167: undefined reference to `round'
  .libs/dvec.o: In function `puzzle_fill_avglgls':
  /«BUILDDIR»/libpuzzle-0.9/src/dvec.c:380: undefined reference to `round'
  /«BUILDDIR»/libpuzzle-0.9/src/dvec.c:513: undefined reference to `round'
  /«BUILDDIR»/libpuzzle-0.9/src/dvec.c:395: undefined reference to `round'
  /«BUILDDIR»/libpuzzle-0.9/src/dvec.c:398: undefined reference to `round'
  .libs/dvec.o:/«BUILDDIR»/libpuzzle-0.9/src/dvec.c:403: more undefined 
  references to `round' follow
  .libs/vector_ops.o: In function `puzzle_vector_euclidean_length':
  /«BUILDDIR»/libpuzzle-0.9/src/vector_ops.c:74: undefined reference to `sqrt'
  collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
 
 The full build log is available from:

 http://people.debian.org/~lucas/logs/2011/06/07/libpuzzle_0.9-4_lsid64.buildlog
 

Dear PhotoTools Maintainers,

Do you have time for looking at this bug or would like help with a NMU?

Ana




--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#615787: tokyotyrant: ftbfs with gold or ld --no-add-needed

2011-09-09 Thread Ana Guerrero
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 12:53:48AM +, Matthias Klose wrote:
 Package: tokyotyrant
 Version: 1.1.40-4
 Severity: important
 Tags: sid
 User: peter.fritzs...@gmx.de
 Usertags: no-add-needed
 
 The package fails to build in a test rebuild on at least amd64 with
 ld --no-add-needed.  For details, please see:
 http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2011/02/msg00011.html
 http://wiki.debian.org/ToolChain/DSOLinking


Dear maintainers,
This bug has a patch available in the BTS, do you have time to look
at this or do you need help with a NMU?

Ana



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#629671: libpuzzle: FTBFS: vector_ops.c:74: undefined reference to `sqrt'

2011-09-09 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Ana Guerrero a...@debian.org (10/09/2011):
 Dear PhotoTools Maintainers,
 
 Do you have time for looking at this bug or would like help with a
 NMU?

KiBi said ENOTIME for pkg-phototools-related stuff, and I'm sure people
there would appreciate the love you're proposing for that package, so
I'll be bold and suggest you NMU it right away. Thanks!

Mraw,
KiBi.


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Processed: tagging 622063

2011-09-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 # seems patch does fix it! thanks ;)
 tags 622063 + pending
Bug #622063 [src:mailfilter] mailfilter: FTBFS: socket.cc:123:37: error: 
invalid conversion from 'const SSL_METHOD*' to 'SSL_METHOD*'
Added tag(s) pending.
 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
622063: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=622063
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#640960: CVE-?????: broken CTCP parsing can be used to crash the core

2011-09-09 Thread Timo Juhani Lindfors
Hi,

it seems ubuntu people backported the fix against 0.6.1:

https://launchpadlibrarian.net/79454811/quassel_0.6.1-0ubuntu1_0.6.1-0ubuntu1.2.diff.gz

maybe this could help with the squeeze backport?

-Timo



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Processed: tagging 640966

2011-09-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 tags 640966 + pending
Bug #640966 [linux-2.6] Oops when unprivileged user reads /proc/pid/maps, 
regression in fix for CVE-2011-1020
Bug #640973 [linux-2.6] Oops when unprivileged user reads /proc/pid/maps, 
regression in fix for CVE-2011-1020
Bug #641018 [linux-2.6] Oops when unprivileged user reads /proc/pid/maps, 
regression in fix for CVE-2011-1020
Bug #641034 [linux-2.6] Oops when unprivileged user reads /proc/pid/maps, 
regression in fix for CVE-2011-1020
Bug #641040 [linux-2.6] Oops when unprivileged user reads /proc/pid/maps, 
regression in fix for CVE-2011-1020
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #640966 to the same tags previously set
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #640973 to the same tags previously set
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #641018 to the same tags previously set
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #641034 to the same tags previously set
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #641040 to the same tags previously set
 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
640966: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=640966
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#624588: marked as done (regina-normal: FTBFS on armel i386 mips powerpc s390 sparc (tests fail))

2011-09-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 10 Sep 2011 12:03:48 +1000
with message-id bcb42157-a920-456a-a57a-5d6ad7a87...@debian.org
and subject line regina-normal tests passing
has caused the Debian Bug report #624588,
regarding regina-normal: FTBFS on armel i386 mips powerpc s390 sparc (tests 
fail)
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
624588: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=624588
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: regina-normal
Version: 4.6-3
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source

See build logs from
https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=regina-normal

Cheers,
Julien


---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
Version: 4.90-2

As hoped, it looks as though regina-normal's test suite is passing on all 
architectures with the new upstream release and new build infrastructure.

Closing this bug accordingly.

- Ben.


---End Message---


Bug#641072: gnome control center hangs when clicking on bluetooth icon

2011-09-09 Thread Praveen A
Package: gnome-bluetooth
Severity: grave
Version: 3.0.0-1

I cannot use bluetooth with gnome 3. It is working fine on a squeeze
live system. Initial error message is

(gnome-control-center:6819): GLib-GObject-WARNING **: specified class
size for type `BluetoothChooser' is smaller than the parent type's
`GtkVBox' class size

(gnome-control-center:6819): GLib-CRITICAL **: g_once_init_leave:
assertion `initialization_value != 0' failed

(gnome-control-center:6819): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: g_object_new:
assertion `G_TYPE_IS_OBJECT (object_type)' failed

(gnome-control-center:6819): Gtk-CRITICAL **: gtk_box_pack: assertion
`GTK_IS_WIDGET (child)' failed

(gnome-control-center:6819): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: g_object_set:
assertion `G_IS_OBJECT (object)' failed


and back trace without debugging symbols installed (not sure how
useful it is, hope it will give an initial guide). May be others can
see if it can be reproduced.

pravi@savannah:~$ gdb --pid=6819
GNU gdb (GDB) 7.2-debian
Copyright (C) 2010 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later http://gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html
This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it.
There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law.  Type show copying
and show warranty for details.
This GDB was configured as x86_64-linux-gnu.
For bug reporting instructions, please see:
http://www.gnu.org/software/gdb/bugs/.
Attaching to process 6819
Reading symbols from /usr/bin/gnome-control-center...(no debugging
symbols found)...done.
Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libgnome-control-center.so.1...(no
debugging symbols found)...done.
Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libgnome-control-center.so.1
Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libgtk-3.so.0...(no debugging symbols
found)...done.
Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libgtk-3.so.0
Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libgdk-3.so.0...(no debugging symbols
found)...done.
Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libgdk-3.so.0
Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libpangocairo-1.0.so.0...(no debugging
symbols found)...done.
Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libpangocairo-1.0.so.0
Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0...(no debugging
symbols found)...done.
Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0
Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libcairo.so.2...(no debugging symbols
found)...done.
Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libcairo.so.2
Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libpango-1.0.so.0...(no debugging
symbols found)...done.
Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libpango-1.0.so.0
Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libgnome-menu.so.2...(no debugging
symbols found)...done.
Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libgnome-menu.so.2
Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libgio-2.0.so.0...(no debugging symbols
found)...done.
Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libgio-2.0.so.0
Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0...(no debugging
symbols found)...done.
Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libgthread-2.0.so.0...(no debugging
symbols found)...done.
Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libgthread-2.0.so.0
Reading symbols from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0...(no debugging symbols
found)...done.
Loaded symbols for /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
Reading symbols from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpthread.so.0...(no
debugging symbols found)...done.
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread 0x7ffa42195700 (LWP 6822)]
[New Thread 0x7ffa42c43700 (LWP 6821)]
Loaded symbols for /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpthread.so.0
Reading symbols from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6...(no debugging
symbols found)...done.
Loaded symbols for /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6
Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libatk-1.0.so.0...(no debugging symbols
found)...done.
Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libatk-1.0.so.0
Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libcairo-gobject.so.2...(no debugging
symbols found)...done.
Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libcairo-gobject.so.2
Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libpangoft2-1.0.so.0...(no debugging
symbols found)...done.
Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libpangoft2-1.0.so.0
Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libfreetype.so.6...(no debugging symbols
found)...done.
Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libfreetype.so.6
Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libfontconfig.so.1...(no debugging
symbols found)...done.
Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libfontconfig.so.1
Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libgmodule-2.0.so.0...(no debugging
symbols found)...done.
Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libgmodule-2.0.so.0
Reading symbols from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/librt.so.1...(no debugging
symbols found)...done.
Loaded symbols for /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/librt.so.1
Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libgconf-2.so.4...(no debugging symbols
found)...done.
Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libgconf-2.so.4
Reading symbols from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libm.so.6...(no debugging
symbols found)...done.
Loaded symbols for /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libm.so.6
Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libX11.so.6...(no debugging symbols found)...done.
Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libX11.so.6
Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libXcomposite.so.1...(no debugging
symbols