date:20120629

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 reassign 679489 python-restkit 4.1.3-1
Bug #679489 [python-restkit,transifex-client] transifex-client and 
python-restkit: error when trying to install together
Bug reassigned from package 'python-restkit,transifex-client' to 
'python-restkit'.
Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #679489 to the same values 
previously set
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #679489 to the same values 
previously set
Bug #679489 [python-restkit] transifex-client and python-restkit: error when 
trying to install together
Marked as found in versions python-restkit/4.1.3-1.
 clone 679489 -1
Bug #679489 [python-restkit] transifex-client and python-restkit: error when 
trying to install together
Bug 679489 cloned as bug 679493
 reassign -1 transifex-client 0.8-1
Bug #679493 [python-restkit] transifex-client and python-restkit: error when 
trying to install together
Bug reassigned from package 'python-restkit' to 'transifex-client'.
No longer marked as found in versions python-restkit/4.1.3-1.
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #679493 to the same values 
previously set
Bug #679493 [transifex-client] transifex-client and python-restkit: error when 
trying to install together
Marked as found in versions transifex-client/0.8-1.
 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
679489: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=679489
679493: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=679493
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Processed: tagging as pending bugs that are closed by packages in NEW

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 # Friday 29 June  08:03:22 UTC 2012
 # Tagging as pending bugs that are closed by packages in NEW
 # http://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html
 #
 # Source package in NEW: libarchive-tar-wrapper-perl
 tags 679470 + pending
Bug #679470 [wnpp] ITP: libarchive-tar-wrapper-perl -- API wrapper around the 
'tar' utility
Added tag(s) pending.
 # Source package in NEW: a 
 href=http://packages.qa.debian.org/at-spi2-atk;at-spi2-atk/a
 tags 678026 + pending
Bug #678026 [libatk-adaptor] libatk-adaptor: insecure tempdir handling
Added tag(s) pending.
 # Source package in NEW: yui3
 tags 554431 + pending
Bug #554431 [wnpp] ITP: yui3 -- Yahoo! User Interface Library Version 3
Added tag(s) pending.

End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
554431: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=554431
678026: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=678026
679470: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=679470
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#679501: eclipse-cdt: Contains non-DFSG compatible files

2012-06-29 Thread Niels Thykier

Source: eclipse-cdt
Version: 8.1.0-2
Severity: serious


Parts of eclipse-linuxtools has been moved to eclipse-cdt;
unfortunately this seems to be including some GDFL files with invariant
sections  (see 4fcd094b.3090...@ktknet.cz).

~Niels



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#678845: svn-buildpackage: svn-inject fails with subversion 1.7

2012-06-29 Thread Stefano Rivera

Hi Peter (2012.06.29_00:17:43_+0200)
 That is svn complaining because, apparently, it is run inside a
 directory that has been deleted.  How would I reproduce your bug - how
 did you invoke svn-inject?  I tried, and could not.  And I can't find
 where svn-bp _would_ delete the cwd while it is still the cwd.

Oh, whoops, meant to attach a complete log.

The command was:
svn-inject -o pycparser_2.07+dfsg-1.dsc svn+ssh://purcell/tmp/test

It works with 1.6 and fails when I upgrade svn to 1.7.

SR

-- 
Stefano Rivera
  http://tumbleweed.org.za/
  H: +27 21 461 1230 C: +27 72 419 8559



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#678484: second aptitude choice

2012-06-29 Thread jidanni

OK, it was the second aptitude choice. All fixed now.

# aptitude full-upgrade
The following NEW packages will be installed:
  libmailutils4{ab} (C: libmailutils2) (for mailutils)
  mailutils-common{ab} (B: libmailutils2) (for mailutils)
The following packages will be upgraded:
  mailutils
1 packages upgraded, 2 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
Need to get 0 B/2,508 kB of archives. After unpacking 3,835 kB will be used.
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
 libmailutils4 : Conflicts: libmailutils2 but 1:2.2+dfsg1-6+b1 is installed.
 mailutils-common : Breaks: libmailutils2 ( 1:2.3) but 1:2.2+dfsg1-6+b1 is 
installed.
open: 2; closed: 1; defer: 0; conflict: 0   
 .The following actions will resolve these dependencies:

 Remove the following packages:
1) mailutils
 Keep the following packages at their current version:
2) libmailutils4 [Not Installed]
3) mailutils-common [Not Installed]

Accept this solution? [Y/n/q/?] n
The following actions will resolve these dependencies:

 Remove the following packages:
1) libmailutils2

Accept this solution? [Y/n/q/?]
The following NEW packages will be installed:
  libmailutils4{a} (D: mailutils) (for mailutils)
  mailutils-common{a} (D: libmailutils4, D: mailutils) (for mailutils)
The following packages will be REMOVED:
  libmailutils2{a} (C: libmailutils4, B: mailutils-common)
The following packages will be upgraded:
  mailutils
1 packages upgraded, 2 newly installed, 1 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
Need to get 0 B/2,508 kB of archives. After unpacking 1,222 kB will be used.
Do you want to continue? [Y/n/?]



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#679447: libcoro-perl often segfaults

2012-06-29 Thread Alessandro Ghedini

On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 06:31:52AM +0400, Dmitry E. Oboukhov wrote:
 found 679447 6.070-1+b1
 thanks
 
 
  I can't reproduce crashes in 6.070-1+b1 :)
 
 sorry for mistake. 6.070-1+b1 crashes, too

Still, I can't reproduce it. The example code you provided doesn't segfault
(with $n = 100, bigger than that my pc freezes), and Corona works fine too.

On amd64 it seems to work fine. Could you please provide a more specific
procedure to reproduce the issue? That is, how are you getting failures so 
reliably?

Cheers

-- 
perl -E '$_=q;$/= @{[@_]};and s;\S+;inidehG ordnasselA;eg;say~~reverse'


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#678484: second aptitude choice

2012-06-29 Thread Norbert Preining

On Fr, 29 Jun 2012, jida...@jidanni.org wrote:
 OK, it was the second aptitude choice. All fixed now.

This is what I told you, you have to use dist-upgrade for that.
Apt normally does not remove if there are other options.

Best wishes

Norbert

Norbert Preiningpreining@{jaist.ac.jp, logic.at, debian.org}
JAIST, Japan TeX Live  Debian Developer
DSA: 0x09C5B094   fp: 14DF 2E6C 0307 BE6D AD76  A9C0 D2BF 4AA3 09C5 B094

BABWORTH
Something which justifies having a really good cry.
--- Douglas Adams, The Meaning of Liff



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#555168: Unclear license situation for (e)glibc locales provided by you

Hello,
you are listed as contact person/author of the following locale:

tg_TJ

This locale comes with a statement

% Distribution and use is free, also
% for commercial purposes.

Thus it does not allow modification; it is unclear, however, if this
statement was meant as a license.

As discussed in
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=555168 this
locale could strictly speaking not be part of Debian which would be a
great loss. (Currently it is allowed pending investigation).

To properly resolve this, I would like to ask you the following
question:

Would you be willing to relicense this locale to a proper license,
e.g. (L)GPL v2 or higher or another free software license of your choice?

If you have any questions regarding this issue, do not hesitate to
contact me (via the reply-to address set).

Thanks for helping to resolve this!

Helge

-- 
  Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de
   Dipl.-Phys.   http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php
64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred
   Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#555168: Unclear license situation for (e)glibc locales provided by you

Hello,
you are listed as contact person/author of the following locale:

tk_TM

This locale comes with a statement

% Distribution and use is free, also
% for commercial purposes.

Thus it does not allow modification; it is unclear, however, if this
statement was meant as a license.

As discussed in
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=555168 this
locale could strictly speaking not be part of Debian which would be a
great loss. (Currently it is allowed pending investigation).

To properly resolve this, I would like to ask you the following
question:

Would you be willing to relicense this locale to a proper license,
e.g. (L)GPL v2 or higher or another free software license of your choice?

If you have any questions regarding this issue, do not hesitate to
contact me (via the reply-to address set).

Thanks for helping to resolve this!

Helge

-- 
  Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de
   Dipl.-Phys.   http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php
64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred
   Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#555168: Unclear license situation for (e)glibc locales provided by you

2012-06-29 Thread Eddy Petrișor

2012/6/27 Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de:
Hello,
you are listed as contact person/author of the following locale:

ro_RO

This locale comes with a statement

% Distribution and use is free, also
% for commercial purposes.

Thus it does not allow modification; it is unclear, however, if this
statement was meant as a license.

As discussed in
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=555168 this
locale could strictly speaking not be part of Debian which would be a
great loss. (Currently it is allowed pending investigation).

To properly resolve this, I would like to ask you the following
question:

Would you be willing to relicense this locale to a proper license,
e.g. (L)GPL v2 or higher or another free software license of your choice?

Yes, of course. GPL/LGPL v2+ is OK. Same for any other copyleft license.

If you have any questions regarding this issue, do not hesitate to
contact me (via the reply-to address set).

Thanks for helping to resolve this!

Helge

--
Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de
Dipl.-Phys. http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php
64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred
Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFP6r2DRsxcY/MYpWoRAuznAJ9j9Jcx4LFov/BCoqfenmJkPeu7iwCffT39
WAfakavcn7LbwSSmW+SHLiU=
=AkQ3
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--
Regards,
EddyP
=
Imagination is more important than knowledge A.Einstein

--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#555168: Unclear license situation for (e)glibc locales provided by you

Hello,
you are listed as contact person/author of the following locale:

tl_PH

This locale comes with a statement

% Distribution and use is free, also
% for commercial purposes.

Thus it does not allow modification; it is unclear, however, if this
statement was meant as a license.

As discussed in
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=555168 this
locale could strictly speaking not be part of Debian which would be a
great loss. (Currently it is allowed pending investigation).

To properly resolve this, I would like to ask you the following
question:

Would you be willing to relicense this locale to a proper license,
e.g. (L)GPL v2 or higher or another free software license of your choice?

If you have any questions regarding this issue, do not hesitate to
contact me (via the reply-to address set).

Thanks for helping to resolve this!

Helge

-- 
  Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de
   Dipl.-Phys.   http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php
64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred
   Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#555168: Unclear license situation for (e)glibc locales provided by you

Hello,
you are listed as contact person/author of the following locale:

tr_CY

This locale comes with a statement

% Distribution and use is free, also
% for commercial purposes.

Thus it does not allow modification; it is unclear, however, if this
statement was meant as a license.

As discussed in
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=555168 this
locale could strictly speaking not be part of Debian which would be a
great loss. (Currently it is allowed pending investigation).

To properly resolve this, I would like to ask you the following
question:

Would you be willing to relicense this locale to a proper license,
e.g. (L)GPL v2 or higher or another free software license of your choice?

If you have any questions regarding this issue, do not hesitate to
contact me (via the reply-to address set).

Thanks for helping to resolve this!

Helge

-- 
  Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de
   Dipl.-Phys.   http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php
64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred
   Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#555168: Unclear license situation for (e)glibc locales provided by you

Hello,
you are listed as contact person/author of the following locale:

tr_TR

This locale comes with a statement

% Distribution and use is free, also
% for commercial purposes.

Thus it does not allow modification; it is unclear, however, if this
statement was meant as a license.

As discussed in
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=555168 this
locale could strictly speaking not be part of Debian which would be a
great loss. (Currently it is allowed pending investigation).

To properly resolve this, I would like to ask you the following
question:

Would you be willing to relicense this locale to a proper license,
e.g. (L)GPL v2 or higher or another free software license of your choice?

If you have any questions regarding this issue, do not hesitate to
contact me (via the reply-to address set).

Thanks for helping to resolve this!

Helge

-- 
  Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de
   Dipl.-Phys.   http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php
64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred
   Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#555168: Unclear license situation for (e)glibc locales provided by you

Hello,
you are listed as contact person/author of the following locale:

tt_RU

This locale comes with a statement

% Distribution and use is free, also
% for commercial purposes.

Thus it does not allow modification; it is unclear, however, if this
statement was meant as a license.

As discussed in
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=555168 this
locale could strictly speaking not be part of Debian which would be a
great loss. (Currently it is allowed pending investigation).

To properly resolve this, I would like to ask you the following
question:

Would you be willing to relicense this locale to a proper license,
e.g. (L)GPL v2 or higher or another free software license of your choice?

If you have any questions regarding this issue, do not hesitate to
contact me (via the reply-to address set).

Thanks for helping to resolve this!

Helge

-- 
  Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de
   Dipl.-Phys.   http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php
64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred
   Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#555168: Unclear license situation for (e)glibc locales provided by you

Hello,
you are listed as contact person/author of the following locale:

tt_RU@iqtelif

This locale comes with a statement

% Distribution and use is free, also
% for commercial purposes.

Thus it does not allow modification; it is unclear, however, if this
statement was meant as a license.

As discussed in
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=555168 this
locale could strictly speaking not be part of Debian which would be a
great loss. (Currently it is allowed pending investigation).

To properly resolve this, I would like to ask you the following
question:

Would you be willing to relicense this locale to a proper license,
e.g. (L)GPL v2 or higher or another free software license of your choice?

If you have any questions regarding this issue, do not hesitate to
contact me (via the reply-to address set).

Thanks for helping to resolve this!

Helge

-- 
  Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de
   Dipl.-Phys.   http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php
64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred
   Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#679501: marked as done (eclipse-cdt: Contains non-DFSG compatible files)

Your message dated Fri, 29 Jun 2012 11:53:21 +0200
with message-id 4fed7b11.4030...@thykier.net
and subject line Re: eclipse-cdt: Contains non-DFSG compatible files
has caused the Debian Bug report #679501,
regarding eclipse-cdt: Contains non-DFSG compatible files
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
679501: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=679501
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Source: eclipse-cdt
Version: 8.1.0-2
Severity: serious


Parts of eclipse-linuxtools has been moved to eclipse-cdt;
unfortunately this seems to be including some GDFL files with invariant
sections  (see 4fcd094b.3090...@ktknet.cz).

~Niels


---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
Source: eclipse-cdt
Source-Version: 8.1.0+dfsg-1

Fixed in eclipse-cdt/8.1.0+dfsg-1


~Niels


---End Message---

Bug#678774: marked as done (plasma-widget-smooth-tasks: FTBFS: Task.h:79:2: error: 'TaskPtr' in namespace 'TaskManager' does not name a type)

Your message dated Fri, 29 Jun 2012 10:04:18 +
with message-id e1sky3m-0001ud...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#678774: fixed in plasma-widget-smooth-tasks 
1flupp0~hg20120610-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #678774,
regarding plasma-widget-smooth-tasks: FTBFS: Task.h:79:2: error: 'TaskPtr' in 
namespace 'TaskManager' does not name a type
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
678774: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=678774
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Source: plasma-widget-smooth-tasks
Version: 0.0~wip20100227-1.1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120624 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64

Hi,

During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.

Relevant part:
 make[3]: Entering directory `/«PKGBUILDDIR»/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu'
 /usr/bin/cmake -E cmake_progress_report 
 /«PKGBUILDDIR»/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/CMakeFiles 4
 [ 14%] Building CXX object 
 applet/CMakeFiles/plasma_applet_smooth-tasks.dir/plasma_applet_smooth-tasks_automoc.o
 cd /«PKGBUILDDIR»/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/applet  /usr/bin/c++   
 -DMAKE_PLASMA_APPLET_SMOOTH_TASKS_LIB -D_BSD_SOURCE -D_XOPEN_SOURCE=500 
 -D_BSD_SOURCE -DQT_NO_STL -DQT_NO_CAST_TO_ASCII -D_REENTRANT 
 -DKDE_DEPRECATED_WARNINGS -DKDE4_CMAKE_TOPLEVEL_DIR_LENGTH=40 
 -Wnon-virtual-dtor -Wno-long-long -ansi -Wundef -Wcast-align 
 -Wchar-subscripts -Wall -W -Wpointer-arith -Wformat-security -fno-exceptions 
 -DQT_NO_EXCEPTIONS -fno-check-new -fno-common -Woverloaded-virtual 
 -fno-threadsafe-statics -fvisibility=hidden -Werror=return-type 
 -fvisibility-inlines-hidden -DNDEBUG -DQT_NO_DEBUG -fPIC 
 -I/«PKGBUILDDIR»/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/applet -I/«PKGBUILDDIR»/applet 
 -I/«PKGBUILDDIR» -I/«PKGBUILDDIR»/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu -I/usr/include/KDE 
 -I/usr/include/qt4/phonon -I/usr/include/qt4/QtXmlPatterns 
 -I/usr/include/qt4/QtXml -I/usr/include/qt4/QtUiTools 
 -I/usr/include/qt4/QtTest -I/usr/include/qt4/QtSvg -I/usr/include/qt4/QtSql 
 -I/usr/include/qt4/QtScriptTools -I/usr/include/qt4/QtScript 
 -I/usr/include/qt4/QtNetwork -I/usr/include/qt4/QtHelp 
 -I/usr/include/qt4/QtDesigner -I/usr/include/qt4/QtDeclarative 
 -I/usr/include/qt4/QtDBus -I/usr/include/qt4/Qt3Support 
 -I/usr/include/qt4/QtGui -I/usr/include/qt4/QtCore -I/usr/include/qt4/Qt 
 -I/usr/share/qt4/mkspecs/default -I/usr/include/qt4-D_GNU_SOURCE 
 -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE -o 
 CMakeFiles/plasma_applet_smooth-tasks.dir/plasma_applet_smooth-tasks_automoc.o
  -c 
 /«PKGBUILDDIR»/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/applet/plasma_applet_smooth-tasks_automoc.cpp
 In file included from /«PKGBUILDDIR»/applet/SmoothTasks/TaskItem.h:25:0,
  from /«PKGBUILDDIR»/applet/SmoothTasks/ToolTipBase.h:25,
  from /«PKGBUILDDIR»/applet/SmoothTasks/DelayedToolTip.h:23,
  from 
 /«PKGBUILDDIR»/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/applet/../../applet/SmoothTasks/PlasmaToolTip.h:23,
  from 
 /«PKGBUILDDIR»/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/applet/moc_PlasmaToolTip.cpp:10,
  from 
 /«PKGBUILDDIR»/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/applet/plasma_applet_smooth-tasks_automoc.cpp:4:
 /«PKGBUILDDIR»/applet/SmoothTasks/Task.h:79:2: error: 'TaskPtr' in namespace 
 'TaskManager' does not name a type
 /«PKGBUILDDIR»/applet/SmoothTasks/Task.h:83:2: error: 'StartupPtr' in 
 namespace 'TaskManager' does not name a type
 make[3]: *** 
 [applet/CMakeFiles/plasma_applet_smooth-tasks.dir/plasma_applet_smooth-tasks_automoc.o]
  Error 1

The full build log is available from:
   
http://people.debian.org/~lucas/logs/2012/06/24/plasma-widget-smooth-tasks_0.0~wip20100227-1.1_unstable.log

A list of current common problems and possible solutions is available at 
http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS . You're welcome to contribute!

About the archive rebuild: The rebuild was done on EC2 VM instances from
Amazon Web Services, using a clean, minimal and up-to-date chroot. Every
failed build was retried once to eliminate random failures.


---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
Source: plasma-widget-smooth-tasks
Source-Version: 1flupp0~hg20120610-1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
plasma-widget-smooth-tasks, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP 
archive:

plasma-widget-smooth-tasks_1flupp0~hg20120610-1.debian.tar.gz
  to 
main/p/plasma-widget-smooth-tasks/plasma-widget-smooth-tasks_1flupp0~hg20120610-1.debian.tar.gz
plasma-widget-smooth-tasks_1flupp0~hg20120610-1.dsc
  to

Bug#555168: Unclear license situation for (e)glibc locales provided by you

2012-06-29 Thread Onur Tolga Sehitoglu

On 06/29/2012 12:30 PM, Helge Kreutzmann wrote:
 Hello,
 you are listed as contact person/author of the following locale:

 tr_TR

 This locale comes with a statement

 % Distribution and use is free, also
 % for commercial purposes.

 Thus it does not allow modification; it is unclear, however, if this
 statement was meant as a license.

 As discussed in
 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=555168 this
 locale could strictly speaking not be part of Debian which would be a
 great loss. (Currently it is allowed pending investigation).

 To properly resolve this, I would like to ask you the following
 question:

 Would you be willing to relicense this locale to a proper license,
 e.g. (L)GPL v2 or higher or another free software license of your choice?
Sure,
I put my name to be contacted in case of any problem. I did not
have any intention to put any license restrictions in the first place .
I believe that statement was inherited from  a template of libc at that
moment.
   I am willing to set it to LGPL v2 or any license to be consistent
with the rest of the locale
licenses. You can delete my name as well since I do not maintain it for
a long time. 

  Let me know if I can provide any assistance you might need.
Best regards.

-- 
Onur Tolga Sehitoglu
http://www.ceng.metu.edu.tr/~onur/


 If you have any questions regarding this issue, do not hesitate to
 contact me (via the reply-to address set).

 Thanks for helping to resolve this!

 Helge





-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#483217: texlive-latex-base: 483217: status?

2012-06-29 Thread Arne Wichmann

begin  quotation  from Norbert Preining (in 
20120627143050.ge25...@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at):
 On Mi, 27 Jun 2012, Arne Wichmann wrote:
  Given that, the relevant files should be removed from debian, as they are
  not DFSG-free. Am I wrong there?
 
 Yes you are.

Could you please enlighten me about my misunderstanding?

cu

AW
-- 
[...] If you don't want to be restricted, don't agree to it. If you are
coerced, comply as much as you must to protect yourself, just don't support
it. Noone can free you but yourself. (crag, on Debian Planet)
Arne Wichmann (a...@linux.de)


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#679481: marked as done (racoon: Root network daemon compiled without _FORTIFY_SOURCE)

Your message dated Fri, 29 Jun 2012 10:47:52 +
with message-id e1skyjw-0002w5...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#679481: fixed in ipsec-tools 1:0.8.0-13
has caused the Debian Bug report #679481,
regarding racoon: Root network daemon compiled without _FORTIFY_SOURCE
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
679481: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=679481
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: racoon
Version: 1:0.8.0-12
Severity: serious

Dear Maintainer,

Racoon has a history of network vulnerabilities, running as root on the host.
It is concerning that it is compiled without all hardening options employed.

debian/rules has CFLAGS -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=0, default debian comipile flags
are for this to be set to 2.  This was apparently done to get a 0.8.0 beta
release to comile on i386/i486.  Is this 0 setting needed any more? 

The linitian warnings given are 'hardening-no-fortify-source' which indicates
the program is compiled with strcpy strcat et al, and strncpy, strncat not
being substituted.


-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-2-amd64 (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=en_NZ.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_NZ.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages racoon depends on:
ii  adduser3.113+nmu3
ii  debconf [debconf-2.0]  1.5.44
ii  ipsec-tools1:0.8.0-12
ii  libc6  2.13-33
ii  libcomerr2 1.42.4-3
ii  libgssapi-krb5-2   1.10.1+dfsg-1
ii  libk5crypto3   1.10.1+dfsg-1
ii  libkrb5-3  1.10.1+dfsg-1
ii  libldap-2.4-2  2.4.31-1
ii  libpam0g   1.1.3-7.1
ii  libssl1.0.01.0.1c-3
ii  perl   5.14.2-12

racoon recommends no packages.

racoon suggests no packages.

-- Configuration Files:
/etc/racoon/psk.txt [Errno 13] Permission denied: u'/etc/racoon/psk.txt'
/etc/racoon/racoon-tool.conf changed [not included]

-- debconf information excluded


---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
Source: ipsec-tools
Source-Version: 1:0.8.0-13

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
ipsec-tools, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

ipsec-tools_0.8.0-13.debian.tar.gz
  to main/i/ipsec-tools/ipsec-tools_0.8.0-13.debian.tar.gz
ipsec-tools_0.8.0-13.dsc
  to main/i/ipsec-tools/ipsec-tools_0.8.0-13.dsc
ipsec-tools_0.8.0-13_amd64.deb
  to main/i/ipsec-tools/ipsec-tools_0.8.0-13_amd64.deb
racoon_0.8.0-13_amd64.deb
  to main/i/ipsec-tools/racoon_0.8.0-13_amd64.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 679...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Matthew Grant matthewgra...@gmail.com (supplier of updated ipsec-tools 
package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org)


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2012 22:22:51 +1200
Source: ipsec-tools
Binary: ipsec-tools racoon
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 1:0.8.0-13
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Matthew Grant matthewgra...@gmail.com
Changed-By: Matthew Grant matthewgra...@gmail.com
Description: 
 ipsec-tools - IPsec tools for Linux
 racoon - IPsec IKE keying daemon
Closes: 679481 679483
Changes: 
 ipsec-tools (1:0.8.0-13) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Set CFLAGS _FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 cf 0 (Closes: #679481)
   * Make peer_sertfile dnssec DNSSEC validate on linux (Closes: #679483)
Checksums-Sha1: 
 61cbcf9d70602fad2257edb8e249302c3f5ca192 2040 ipsec-tools_0.8.0-13.dsc
 be99f726337839dab5085084070110311316ec40 66913 
ipsec-tools_0.8.0-13.debian.tar.gz
 35064748e89593914073dd0d820d01886c687c82 102388 ipsec-tools_0.8.0-13_amd64.deb
 fc8697e289f9debc9661c05521b35e3d955f8815 450712 racoon_0.8.0-13_amd64.deb
Checksums-Sha256: 
 1e054e57fed9780f53f4d96f47c1265b7d343623b6c7de18e99fb2974bb2e1b0 2040 
ipsec-tools_0.8.0-13.dsc
 0803781e0310edcfcbc7879b775fa9b9672d489f7ffddd4371861d9cce51db7c 66913 
ipsec-tools_0.8.0-13.debian.tar.gz
 8413de2374199769b221014b5e853d53e67658652f38c703544d6a8b2d497dc4 102388 
ipsec-tools_0.8.0-13_amd64.deb

Bug#679106: cron: multiple /etc/init.d/cron stop may kill unrelated processes

2012-06-29 Thread Christoph Anton Mitterer

Hi Javier.

Sorry for the late reply:

On Wed, 2012-06-27 at 20:36 +0200, Javier Fernandez-Sanguino wrote:
 For its stop argument, cron uses /lib/lsb/init-functions's killproc. I
 believe killproc should remove the pidfile if the processes is killed
 properly.
ok... weird...


 I'm unable to reproduce the behaviour you are seeing. Maybe this is
 associated with your environment.
At least I wouldn't know about anything special with it... it's rather
plain sid, everything updated.


 send the
 output to this bug report (you can use 'script' to capture all the
 output to a file).
attached.



 Please ensure first that the cron daemon is
 started:
Was the case.


As you see there is one special thing, my custom locale en_DE.UTF-8...
but this is not so special as it seems,... it's merely the normal en_US
local but with dates and some other stuff set to the metric / ISO
formats.
But I was sceptical anyway so I tried
unset LANG
/etc/init.d/cron start
/etc/init.d/cron stop
/etc/init.d/cron stop
And the problem occurred again.
/etc/environment is empty, and I tried the whole game also with setting
LANG=C in /etc/default/locale .



If you need further help, do not hesitate to ask.


Cheers,
Chris
root@heisenberg:~# sh -x /etc/init.d/cron stop
+ PATH=/bin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/usr/sbin
+ DESC=cron daemon
+ NAME=cron
+ DAEMON=/usr/sbin/cron
+ PIDFILE=/var/run/crond.pid
+ SCRIPTNAME=/etc/init.d/cron
+ test -f /usr/sbin/cron
+ . /lib/lsb/init-functions
+ run-parts --lsbsysinit --list /lib/lsb/init-functions.d
+ [ -r /lib/lsb/init-functions.d/20-left-info-blocks ]
+ . /lib/lsb/init-functions.d/20-left-info-blocks
+ FANCYTTY=
+ [ -e /etc/lsb-base-logging.sh ]
+ true
+ [ -r /etc/default/cron ]
+ . /etc/default/cron
+ READ_ENV=yes
+ [ yes = yes ]
+ parse_environment
+ [ -r /etc/environment ]
+ [ -s /etc/environment ]
+ continue
+ [ -r /etc/default/locale ]
+ [ -s /etc/default/locale ]
+ egrep ^LANG= /etc/default/locale
+ tail -n1
+ cut -d= -f2
+ value=en_DE.UTF-8
+ [ -n en_DE.UTF-8 ]
+ eval export LANG=en_DE.UTF-8
+ export LANG=en_DE.UTF-8
+ [ -n en_DE.UTF-8 ]
+ [ /etc/default/locale = /etc/environment ]
+ egrep ^LANGUAGE= /etc/default/locale
+ tail -n1
+ cut -d= -f2
+ value=
+ [ -n  ]
+ [ -n  ]
+ egrep ^LC_ALL= /etc/default/locale
+ tail -n1
+ cut -d= -f2
+ value=
+ [ -n  ]
+ [ -n  ]
+ egrep ^LC_CTYPE= /etc/default/locale
+ tail -n1
+ cut -d= -f2
+ value=
+ [ -n  ]
+ [ -n  ]
+ [ -z  -a -e /etc/timezone ]
+ cat /etc/timezone
+ TZ=Europe/Berlin
+ log_daemon_msg Stopping periodic command scheduler cron
+ [ -z Stopping periodic command scheduler ]
+ log_daemon_msg_pre Stopping periodic command scheduler cron
+ log_use_fancy_output
+ TPUT=/usr/bin/tput
+ EXPR=/usr/bin/expr
+ [ -t 1 ]
+ [ xxterm != x ]
+ [ xxterm != xdumb ]
+ [ -x /usr/bin/tput ]
+ [ -x /usr/bin/expr ]
+ /usr/bin/tput hpa 60
+ /usr/bin/tput setaf 1
+ [ -z ]
+ FANCYTTY=1
+ true
+ /bin/echo -n [] 
[] + [ -z cron ]
+ /bin/echo -n Stopping periodic command scheduler: cron
Stopping periodic command scheduler: cron+ log_daemon_msg_post Stopping 
periodic command scheduler cron
+ :
+ killproc -p /var/run/crond.pid /usr/sbin/cron
+ local pidfile sig status base name_param is_term_sig OPTIND
+ pidfile=
+ name_param=
+ is_term_sig=
+ OPTIND=1
+ getopts p: opt
+ pidfile=/var/run/crond.pid
+ getopts p: opt
+ shift 2
+ base=cron
+ [ ! /var/run/crond.pid ]
+ name_param=--pidfile /var/run/crond.pid
+ sed -e s/^-\(.*\)/\1/
+ echo
+ sig=
+ echo
+ sed -e s/^SIG\(.*\)/\1/
+ sig=
+ [  = 15 ]
+ [  = TERM ]
+ status=0
+ [ !  ]
+ [ -n  ]
+ /sbin/start-stop-daemon --stop --retry 5 --quiet --pidfile /var/run/crond.pid
+ [ 0 = 1 ]
+ [ 0 = 0 ]
+ [  ]
+ return 0
+ log_end_msg 0
+ [ -z 0 ]
+ local retval
+ retval=0
+ log_end_msg_pre 0
+ log_use_fancy_output
+ TPUT=/usr/bin/tput
+ EXPR=/usr/bin/expr
+ [ -t 1 ]
+ [ xxterm != x ]
+ [ xxterm != xdumb ]
+ [ -x /usr/bin/tput ]
+ [ -x /usr/bin/expr ]
+ /usr/bin/tput hpa 60
+ /usr/bin/tput setaf 1
+ [ -z 1 ]
+ true
+ true
+ /usr/bin/tput setaf 1
+ RED=
+ /usr/bin/tput setaf 2
+ GREEN=
+ /usr/bin/tput setaf 3
+ YELLOW=
+ /usr/bin/tput op
+ NORMAL=
+ /usr/bin/tput civis
+ /usr/bin/tput sc
+ /usr/bin/tput hpa 0
+ [ 0 -eq 0 ]
+ /bin/echo -ne [ ok 
[ ok + /usr/bin/tput rc
+ /usr/bin/tput cnorm
+ log_use_fancy_output
+ TPUT=/usr/bin/tput
+ EXPR=/usr/bin/expr
+ [ -t 1 ]
+ [ xxterm != x ]
+ [ xxterm != xdumb ]
+ [ -x /usr/bin/tput ]
+ [ -x /usr/bin/expr ]
+ /usr/bin/tput hpa 60
+ /usr/bin/tput setaf 1
+ [ -z 1 ]
+ true
+ true
+ /usr/bin/tput setaf 1
+ RED=
+ /usr/bin/tput setaf 3
+ YELLOW=
+ /usr/bin/tput op
+ NORMAL=
+ [ 0 -eq 0 ]
+ echo .
.
+ log_end_msg_post 0
+ :
+ return 0
+ exit 0
root@heisenberg:~# ls -la /var/run/cron*
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 5 Jun 29 12:49 /var/run/crond.pid
-- 1 root root 0 Jun 29 11:44 /var/run/crond.reboot
root@heisenberg:~# cat /var/run/crond.pid
4211
root@heisenberg:~# /etc/init.d/cron status
[FAIL] cron is not running ... failed!
root@heisenberg:~# ls -la /var/run/cron*
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 5 Jun 29 12:49

Bug#660260: Fwd: GDL seems to use non public symbols from plplot (Debian Wheezy freeze on Saturday)

2012-06-29 Thread Axel Beckert

Hi,

short status update:

Axel Beckert wrote:
  Both plstrl and plP_mmpcx are used in GDL to handle the WIDTH
  keyword to the XYOUTS procedure. That's surely not a vital feature
  of GDL so perhaps you can simply comment it out from the GDL source
  code for Debian packaging while waiting for a proper solution. Such
  patch would basically undo this commit:
  http://gnudatalanguage.cvs.sf.net/viewvc/gnudatalanguage/gdl/src/plotting.cpp?hideattic=0r1=1.127r2=1.128
 
 Ok, with this advice I got at least one incremental build working. Yay!

I've now got a package which builds.

Thanks Sylwester for his support and hints!

 Now I'm trying to get a clean package out of it. :-)

Still some fine-tuning (Lintian warnings, etc.) to do, but I'll likely
make an upload today.

Regards, Axel
-- 
 ,''`.  |  Axel Beckert a...@debian.org, http://people.debian.org/~abe/
: :' :  |  Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin
`. `'   |  1024D: F067 EA27 26B9 C3FC 1486  202E C09E 1D89 9593 0EDE
  `-|  4096R: 2517 B724 C5F6 CA99 5329  6E61 2FF9 CD59 6126 16B5



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#677191: emacsen-common: errors while upgrading to wheezy(some time ago) = wheezy(today)

2012-06-29 Thread Agustin Martin

On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 05:55:14PM +0200, Agustin Martin wrote:
 So, seems that the problem appears when both xemacs21 stuff and emacsen-common
 are ugraded at the same time. Seems that xemacs21 stuff needs something from
 a postinst to become available for byte-compilation, so byte-compilation
 fails and needed postinst is not reached. If in the failing chroot I run
 
 # xemacs21 -vanilla -nw
 
 WARNING:
 Couldn't find obvious defaults for:
 data-directory
 mule-lisp-directory
 lisp-directory
 Perhaps some directories don't exist, or the XEmacs executable,
 /usr/bin/xemacs21
 is in a strange place?
 .
 
 and once xemacs is started I see
 
 (1) (warning/warning) Autoload error in:
 /usr/share/xemacs21/mule-packages/lisp/latin-euro-standards/auto-autoloads: 
 Cannot open load file: cl-macs
 
 I think that emacsen-common  2.0.0 considering the failure of any
 add-on package install or remove script as a fatal error just makes this
 underlying xemacs21 problem evident, but seems to be something wrong in
 xemacs21.
 
 Reading more carefully http://bugs.debian.org/619367 I see that it points 
 to http://bugs.debian.org/391778, where some symlinks are done at
 xemacs21-* postinst. May be those symlinks should be done in appropriate
 preinst if needed, so paths are available even if xemacs21* is not yet
 configured.

I am thinking about a possible alternative, a dirty workaround from the
emacsen-common side, make emacs-install and emacs-package-install 
skip byte compilation for xemacs21 if those symlinks are not set, warning
about this.

emacs-install should be called again from relevant xemacs21* postinsts,
and this last must be done after symlinks are set.

Did not look at emacs-install and emacs-package-install, nor sure how
reasonable / rock solid/ easy is this. Also, I find this a bit weak
regarding possible changes in xemacs21, but ...

Regards,

-- 
Agustin



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Processed: Re: Bug#679106: cron: multiple /etc/init.d/cron stop may kill unrelated processes

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 tag 679106 - moreinfo
Bug #679106 [cron] cron: multiple /etc/init.d/cron stop may kill unrelated 
processes
Removed tag(s) moreinfo.
 stop
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
679106: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=679106
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#679313: marked as done (goobox: FTBFS: syntax error near unexpected token `maximum')

Your message dated Fri, 29 Jun 2012 11:03:26 +
with message-id e1skyz0-0006yj...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#679313: fixed in goobox 3.0.1-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #679313,
regarding goobox: FTBFS: syntax error near unexpected token `maximum'
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
679313: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=679313
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: src:goobox
Version: 3.0.1-1.1
Severity: serious
Tags: sid wheezy
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)

Hi!

Your package failed to build on the buildds:

checking for pkg-config... /usr/bin/pkg-config
checking pkg-config is at least version 0.9.0... yes
checking gnome-doc-utils = 0.3.2... yes
./configure: line 15406: syntax error near unexpected token `maximum'
./configure: line 15406: `GNOME_COMPILE_WARNINGS(maximum)'
make: *** [config.status] Error 2
dpkg-buildpackage: error: debian/rules build-arch gave error exit status 2

Full build log at
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=gooboxarch=i386ver=3.0.1-1.1stamp=1340748790

Regards

Christoph

-- 
9FED 5C6C E206 B70A 5857  70CA 9655 22B9 D49A E731
Debian Developer | Lisp Hacker | CaCert Assurer


---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
Source: goobox
Source-Version: 3.0.1-2

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
goobox, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

goobox_3.0.1-2.debian.tar.gz
  to main/g/goobox/goobox_3.0.1-2.debian.tar.gz
goobox_3.0.1-2.dsc
  to main/g/goobox/goobox_3.0.1-2.dsc
goobox_3.0.1-2_i386.deb
  to main/g/goobox/goobox_3.0.1-2_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 679...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de (supplier of updated goobox package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org)


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2012 10:35:53 +0200
Source: goobox
Binary: goobox
Architecture: source i386
Version: 3.0.1-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de
Changed-By: Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de
Description: 
 goobox - CD player and ripper with GNOME 3 integration
Closes: 679313
Changes: 
 goobox (3.0.1-2) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * Revert broken NMU, closes: #679313.
   * This reopens: #677246. Since no bug report until just before the release
 happend, people requiring this fix will need to backport goobox after the
 release of Wheezy. Sorry.
   * po/fr.po updated from upstream git with msgcat.
   * help/es/es.po updated from upstream git with msgcat.
   * po/es.po updated from upstream git with msgcat.
   * po/pl.po updated from upstream git with msgcat.
   * po/sl.po updated from upstream git with msgcat.
Checksums-Sha1: 
 5dbe8072c5b20056560fc9ecf87031e4b8485d29 1366 goobox_3.0.1-2.dsc
 6c18a3655bcef0178a658fef10fe33ea2a01135f 87288 goobox_3.0.1-2.debian.tar.gz
 7b36c1f9bed58d0925b0c4bcdce759f81b5489e8 373870 goobox_3.0.1-2_i386.deb
Checksums-Sha256: 
 4dd1a259dbe2788c26640ed4d7c5d56bb2a157866b4971b34fff0839e0d093bf 1366 
goobox_3.0.1-2.dsc
 84d8bd44c75ff3b6199ddc3f17d9076fc1216292fcb5c9a0b20c69c948ac0418 87288 
goobox_3.0.1-2.debian.tar.gz
 f6e58ca50a0afad9e19be95d1039cc31c1d39502d30e51ad51c5e5f818f1fb83 373870 
goobox_3.0.1-2_i386.deb
Files: 
 04387027cbedb96f44d01be094b02dde 1366 gnome optional goobox_3.0.1-2.dsc
 172d5413c74f11519f5f7b5a69760b87 87288 gnome optional 
goobox_3.0.1-2.debian.tar.gz
 0a447a7eab0f631a37d626e8290c7311 373870 gnome optional goobox_3.0.1-2_i386.deb

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFP7YcERsxcY/MYpWoRAtkEAJ0eIanl/dGCnqD9k8vArDfyE/EzWwCdHBF/
gbXKSXqMmq8XjIDf4A8msn0=
=83mn
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


---End Message---

Bug#614907: Draft resolution for node+nodejs

2012-06-29 Thread Colin Watson

On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 12:52:39PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
 Sorry this is so long in coming.  Here's the draft resolution for this
 issue, agreed at the last IRC meeting.
 
 I thought about including a statement censuring nodejs upstream for their
 unhelpful behavior around this issue, but we didn't actually discuss that at
 the IRC meeting so I don't know if there's a consensus and don't want to
 hold this up any further.

Situations like the one in this bug really have no terribly satisfactory
answer.  Whatever we do (including nothing!), some users are likely to
end up being inconvenienced.  I don't know how much issuing a censure
would achieve - we can say it all we like, and I might well agree, but
if they were going to pay attention then my suspicion is that we
wouldn't have had this problem in the first place! - but I think it
would be useful to take this situation as an opportunity to remind the
wider free software world about the importance of playing nicely with
the command namespace in the hope of reducing future problems.  If this
were picked up by technical news outlets then it might actually be a
vaguely useful thing to do.

I understand why you didn't want to hold up your resolution text on
anything along these lines.  Still, we can quite reasonably vote on such
a statement independently.

I'd like to suggest a statement under §6.1.5 along the following lines:

  The Technical Committee notes that the namespace of executable
  commands on $PATH is a resource shared among everyone writing software
  for POSIX-compatible systems, and that the combinations of packages
  that users may choose to install on a given system can easily surprise
  the authors of those packages.

  The Committee advises anyone writing widely-deployed software to
  consider its command name carefully at an early stage.  It is a good
  idea to search the web for your proposed name and try to ensure that
  it is unique.  It is likely to be a bad idea to use excessively short
  names or common words.  The conflict between LinuxNode and Node.js
  demonstrates that taking a little time early on can avoid a great deal
  of tedium later.

  The Committee furthermore reminds Debian Developers that they are in
  an excellent position to assist upstream authors with identifying and
  resolving conflicts at an early stage, and that they should do so as
  soon as possible rather than deferring the problem until later and
  thus entrenching the naming conflict.

 === Resolution ===
 The Technical Committee reaffirms the importance of preventing namespace
 collisions for programs in the distribution, while recognizing that
 compatibility with upstreams and with previous Debian releases is also
 important and that sometimes an imperfect balance must be struck between
 these three goals.
 
 The Committee therefore resolves that:
 
 1. The nodejs package shall be changed to provide /usr/bin/nodejs, not
/usr/bin/node.  The package should declare a Breaks: relationship with
any packages in Debian that reference /usr/bin/node.

For consistent tense, I think s/should/shall/.

 2. The nodejs source package shall also provide a nodejs-legacy binary
package at Priority: extra that contains /usr/bin/node as a symlink to
/usr/bin/nodejs.  No package in the archive may depend on or recommend
the nodejs-legacy package, which is provided solely for upstream
compatibility.  This package declares shall also declare a Conflicts:
relationship with the node package.

Typo: probably just This package shall also declare.

Also, my apologies if this has been discussed already as I'm coming to
this discussion very late, but isn't this a fairly rough transition?  If
I were designing this, there would be a period whereby users of the
existing nodejs binary package are upgraded to a system with both nodejs
and nodejs-legacy, to minimise breakage.

If this has been discussed already and refuted for some reason, feel
free to point me at the messages I missed.

 3. The node source package shall rename its binary to /usr/sbin/ax25-node,
and its binary package to ax25-node.
 4. The node source package shall continue to build a transitional 'node'
binary package for compatibility with deployed Debian installations,
which provides /usr/sbin/node as a symlink to /usr/sbin/ax25-node.  This
package shall declare a reciprocal Conflicts: relationship with the
nodejs-legacy package.  Other packages may reference the 'node' package
as a dependency or recommendation, but are encouraged to transition to
'ax25-node'.

By contrast, this is a much smoother transition.

-- 
Colin Watson   [cjwat...@debian.org]



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#671382: v...@debian.org's patch applied: Please test

2012-06-29 Thread Michael van der Kolff

Dear Luigi,

I have applied the patch that v...@debian.org posted.  However, I have
no H323 endpoints to test it against; would you please test against
the svn-buildpackage version, and report your results?

Warmest regards,


Michael



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#679489: marked as done (transifex-client and python-restkit: error when trying to install together)

Your message dated Fri, 29 Jun 2012 11:36:56 +
with message-id e1skzvq-0001c8...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#679489: fixed in transifex-client 0.8-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #679489,
regarding transifex-client and python-restkit: error when trying to install 
together
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
679489: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=679489
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: python-restkit,transifex-client
Version: python-restkit/4.1.3-1
Version: transifex-client/0.8-1
Severity: serious
User: trei...@debian.org
Usertags: edos-file-overwrite

Date: 2012-06-29
Architecture: amd64
Distribution: sid

Hi,

automatic installation tests of packages that share a file and at the
same time do not conflict by their package dependency relationships has
detected the following problem:


WARNING: The following packages cannot be authenticated!
  libexpat1 mime-support python2.7-minimal python2.7 python-minimal python
  python2.6-minimal python2.6 python-http-parser python-pkg-resources
  python-nose python-webob transifex-client python-socketpool python-restkit
Authentication warning overridden.
Can not write log, openpty() failed (/dev/pts not mounted?)
Selecting previously unselected package libexpat1:amd64.
(Reading database ... 10728 files and directories currently installed.)
Unpacking libexpat1:amd64 (from .../libexpat1_2.1.0-1_amd64.deb) ...
Selecting previously unselected package mime-support.
Unpacking mime-support (from .../mime-support_3.52-1_all.deb) ...
Selecting previously unselected package python2.7-minimal.
Unpacking python2.7-minimal (from .../python2.7-minimal_2.7.3-1_amd64.deb) ...
Selecting previously unselected package python2.7.
Unpacking python2.7 (from .../python2.7_2.7.3-1_amd64.deb) ...
Selecting previously unselected package python-minimal.
Unpacking python-minimal (from .../python-minimal_2.7.3~rc2-1_all.deb) ...
Selecting previously unselected package python.
Unpacking python (from .../python_2.7.3~rc2-1_all.deb) ...
Selecting previously unselected package python2.6-minimal.
Unpacking python2.6-minimal (from .../python2.6-minimal_2.6.8-0.2_amd64.deb) ...
Selecting previously unselected package python2.6.
Unpacking python2.6 (from .../python2.6_2.6.8-0.2_amd64.deb) ...
Selecting previously unselected package python-http-parser.
Unpacking python-http-parser (from .../python-http-parser_0.7.5-1_amd64.deb) ...
Selecting previously unselected package python-pkg-resources.
Unpacking python-pkg-resources (from .../python-pkg-resources_0.6.24-1_all.deb) 
...
Selecting previously unselected package python-nose.
Unpacking python-nose (from .../python-nose_1.1.2-3_all.deb) ...
Selecting previously unselected package python-webob.
Unpacking python-webob (from .../python-webob_1.1.1-1_all.deb) ...
Selecting previously unselected package transifex-client.
Unpacking transifex-client (from .../transifex-client_0.8-1_all.deb) ...
Selecting previously unselected package python-socketpool.
Unpacking python-socketpool (from .../python-socketpool_0.4.1-1_all.deb) ...
Selecting previously unselected package python-restkit.
Unpacking python-restkit (from .../python-restkit_4.1.3-1_all.deb) ...
dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/python-restkit_4.1.3-1_all.deb 
(--unpack):
 trying to overwrite '/usr/share/pyshared/tests/__init__.py', which is also in 
package transifex-client 0.8-1
Processing triggers for man-db ...
Errors were encountered while processing:
 /var/cache/apt/archives/python-restkit_4.1.3-1_all.deb
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)


This is a serious bug as it makes installation fail, and violates
sections 7.6.1 and 10.1 of the policy. An optimal solution would
consist in only one of the packages installing that file, and renaming
or removing the file in the other package. Depending on the
circumstances you might also consider Replace relations or file
diversions. If the conflicting situation cannot be resolved then, as a
last resort, the two packages have to declare a mutual
Conflict. Please take into account that Replaces, Conflicts and
diversions should only be used when packages provide different
implementations for the same functionality.

Here is a list of files that are known to be shared by both packages
(according to the Contents file for sid/amd64, which may be
slightly out of sync):

  /usr/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/tests/__init__.py
  /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/tests/__init__.py
  /usr/share/pyshared/tests/__init__.py

This bug has been filed

Processed: RC Bug #679318 (was Re: Bug#679318: flumotion: twisted override bug - one more)

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 tag 679318 +pending
Bug #679318 [flumotion] flumotion: twisted override bug - one more
Added tag(s) pending.
 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
679318: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=679318
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#678902: catalog registration disappeared during upgrade

2012-06-29 Thread Peter Eisentraut

On ons, 2012-06-27 at 12:29 +0200, Helmut Grohne wrote:
 reassign 678902 sgml-base
 found 678902 sgml-base/1.16+nmu2
 retitle 678902 sgml-base needs to Pre-Depend on dpkg 1.16.4
 thanks
 
 On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 12:15:45PM +0200, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
  Helmut could you please comment on #678902 ?
 
 Thanks for bringing this to my attention.
 
 The most likely cause is a problem with dpkg triggers which is fixed in
 dpkg version 1.16.4. See #675613 and its duplicates for further
 information.
 
 Please check your dpkg version.
 
  1) If it is lower that 1.16.4, upgrade dpkg, run update-catalog
 --update-super. Your catalog should be fine now.
 
  2) If it is at least 1.16.4, it was likely upgraded after the last
 trigger run. Run update-catalog --update-super. Your catalog should
 be fine now.
 
 If these steps do not resolve the problem, my conclusion was wrong and
 we need to further debug this.

I had dpkg 1.16.3 at the time, so it looks like you are on the right
track fixing this by requiring a newer dpkg.




-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#676045: marked as done (nautilus-image-manipulator: FTBFS: IOError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: '/sbuild-nonexistent/.nautilus-image-manipulator.ini')

Your message dated Fri, 29 Jun 2012 12:05:26 +
with message-id e1skzx0-0004o8...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#676045: fixed in nautilus-image-manipulator 1.1-1.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #676045,
regarding nautilus-image-manipulator: FTBFS: IOError: [Errno 2] No such file or 
directory: '/sbuild-nonexistent/.nautilus-image-manipulator.ini'
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
676045: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=676045
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Source: nautilus-image-manipulator
Version: 1.1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120604 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64

Hi,

During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.

Relevant part:
 make[1]: Entering directory `/«PKGBUILDDIR»'
 nosetests
 .E.
 ==
 ERROR: TestProfileSettings.TestConfig.test_defaultfileoperations
 --
 Traceback (most recent call last):
   File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/nose/case.py, line 197, in runTest
 self.test(*self.arg)
   File /«PKGBUILDDIR»/tests/TestProfileSettings.py, line 196, in 
 test_defaultfileoperations
 with file(oldconfigfile, 'a'):
 IOError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: 
 '/sbuild-nonexistent/.nautilus-image-manipulator.ini'
 
 --
 Ran 11 tests in 0.120s
 
 FAILED (errors=1)
 make[1]: *** [override_dh_auto_test] Error 1

The full build log is available from:
   
http://people.debian.org/~lucas/logs/2012/06/04/nautilus-image-manipulator_1.1-1_unstable.log

A list of current common problems and possible solutions is available at 
http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS . You're welcome to contribute!

About the archive rebuild: The rebuild was done on EC2 VM instances from
Amazon Web Services, using a clean, minimal and up-to-date chroot. Every
failed build was retried once to eliminate random failures.


---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
Source: nautilus-image-manipulator
Source-Version: 1.1-1.1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
nautilus-image-manipulator, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP 
archive:

nautilus-image-manipulator_1.1-1.1.debian.tar.gz
  to 
main/n/nautilus-image-manipulator/nautilus-image-manipulator_1.1-1.1.debian.tar.gz
nautilus-image-manipulator_1.1-1.1.dsc
  to main/n/nautilus-image-manipulator/nautilus-image-manipulator_1.1-1.1.dsc
nautilus-image-manipulator_1.1-1.1_all.deb
  to 
main/n/nautilus-image-manipulator/nautilus-image-manipulator_1.1-1.1_all.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 676...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Salvatore Bonaccorso car...@debian.org (supplier of updated 
nautilus-image-manipulator package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org)


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2012 19:42:48 +0200
Source: nautilus-image-manipulator
Binary: nautilus-image-manipulator
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.1-1.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Emilien Klein emilien+deb...@klein.st
Changed-By: Salvatore Bonaccorso car...@debian.org
Description: 
 nautilus-image-manipulator - Resize and send images from Nautilus
Closes: 676045
Changes: 
 nautilus-image-manipulator (1.1-1.1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Non-maintainer upload.
   * Set temporary writable $HOME directory during build.
 Fix FTBFS IOError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory:
 '/sbuild-nonexistent/.nautilus-image-manipulator.ini'. (Closes: #676045)
Checksums-Sha1: 
 af004c4bf1ecc48a56e04cd89f5392627067fb2e 2205 
nautilus-image-manipulator_1.1-1.1.dsc
 8e1bbf446c86b63b2182b53c089888e55ec06ed2 5417 
nautilus-image-manipulator_1.1-1.1.debian.tar.gz
 f0b233cb274cf5e0d1d2f7bd39e00e98c55a5332 42020 
nautilus-image-manipulator_1.1-1.1_all.deb
Checksums-Sha256: 
 59970c788a1de6dade432616c41008b4a08b8d42a82b08a79d71bb948045e104 2205 
nautilus-image-manipulator_1.1-1.1.dsc

Bug#679524: Build-Depends on obsolete package ia32-libs-dev

Package: libvdpau
Version: 0.4.1-6
Severity: serious

Hi,

as has long been anounced ia32-libs-dev will not be in wheezy since
32bit support will be replaced by multiarch. Since your package still
Build-Depends on ia32-libs-dev this means it will no longer build from
source.  Please multiarchify your package.

MfG
Goswin

-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-2-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=de_DE (charmap=ISO-8859-1)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#679525: Build-Depends on obsolete package ia32-libs-dev

Package: wine-unstable
Version: 1.3.15-0.1
Severity: serious

Hi,

as has long been anounced ia32-libs-dev will not be in wheezy since
32bit support will be replaced by multiarch. Since your package still
Build-Depends on ia32-libs-dev this means it will no longer build from
source.  Please multiarchify your package.

MfG
Goswin


-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-2-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=de_DE (charmap=ISO-8859-1)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#679526: Build-Depends on obsolete package ia32-libs-dev

Package: zsnes
Version: 1.510+bz2-3
Severity: serious

Hi,

as has long been anounced ia32-libs-dev will not be in wheezy since
32bit support will be replaced by multiarch. Since your package still
Build-Depends on ia32-libs-dev this means it will no longer build from
source.  Please multiarchify your package.

MfG
Goswin


-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-2-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=de_DE (charmap=ISO-8859-1)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#666288: marked as done (uw-imap: FTBFS: install: cannot stat `c-client.a': No such file or directory)

Your message dated Fri, 29 Jun 2012 12:33:44 +
with message-id e1skaoo-0006eh...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#666288: fixed in uw-imap 8:2007f~dfsg-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #666288,
regarding uw-imap: FTBFS: install: cannot stat `c-client.a': No such file or 
directory
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
666288: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=666288
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Source: uw-imap
Version: 8:2007e~dfsg-3.3
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120330 qa-ftbfs qa-ftbfs-buildarch
Justification: FTBFS on amd64

Hi,

During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.

This rebuild was done by building only architecture:any binary packages
(binary-arch target of debian/rules), and using a recent dpkg that uses the
build-arch target if available.
Also, only the Build-Depends were installed, not the Build-Depends-Indep.

Relevant part:
  fakeroot debian/rules binary-arch
 sed -e 's/__LIBVER__/2007e/g' -e 's/__LIBFULLVER__/2007e.0/g' -e 
 's/__VER__/2007e/g' debian/control.in.in debian/control.in
 test -x debian/rules
 dh_testroot
 dh_clean -k 
 dh_clean: dh_clean -k is deprecated; use dh_prep instead
 dh_installdirs -A 
 mkdir -p .
 echo sed -e 's/__LIBVER__/2007e/g' -e 's/__LIBFULLVER__/2007e.0/g' -e 
 's/__VER__/2007e/g' debian/control.in.in | diff -u debian/control.in -
 sed -e 's/__LIBVER__/2007e/g' -e 's/__LIBFULLVER__/2007e.0/g' -e 
 's/__VER__/2007e/g' debian/control.in.in | diff -u debian/control.in -
 for file in `find debian -maxdepth 2 -type f -name '*.in' -not -name 
 control.in -not -name control.in.in -not -name POTFILES.in`; do \
   targetfile=`echo $file | sed -e 's/__VER__/2007e/g' -e 
 's/\\.in$//'`; \
   sed -e 's/__LIBVER__/2007e/g' -e 's/__LIBFULLVER__/2007e.0/g' 
 -e 's/__VER__/2007e/g' $file $targetfile; \
   done
 for file in `find debian -maxdepth 2 -type f -name '*._in'`; do \
   targetfile=`echo $file | sed  -e 's/\\._in$//' -e 
 's/__PKG__/uw-imapd/g'`; \
   sed -e 's/__LIBVER__/2007e/g' -e 's/__LIBFULLVER__/2007e.0/g' 
 -e 's/__VER__/2007e/g' -e 's/__PKG__/uw-imapd/g' -e 's/__CERT__/imapd/g' -e 
 's/__PAMSERVICE__/imap/g' -e 's/__DESC__/University of Washington IMAP 
 daemon/g' -e 's/__DAEMONSETS__/imap2:imapd imap3:imapd imaps:imapd/g' $file 
 $targetfile; \
   done
 for file in `find debian -maxdepth 2 -type f -name '*._in'`; do \
   targetfile=`echo $file | sed  -e 's/\\._in$//' -e 
 's/__PKG__/ipopd/g'`; \
   sed -e 's/__LIBVER__/2007e/g' -e 's/__LIBFULLVER__/2007e.0/g' 
 -e 's/__VER__/2007e/g' -e 's/__PKG__/ipopd/g' -e 's/__CERT__/ipop3d/g' -e 
 's/__PAMSERVICE__/pop/g' -e 's/__DESC__/University of Washington POP3 
 daemon/g' -e 's/__DAEMONSETS__/pop2:ipop2d pop3:ipop3d pop3s:ipop3d/g' $file 
 $targetfile; \
   done
 dh_buildinfo
 touch debian/stamp-buildinfo
 mkdir -p debian/tmp/usr/lib
 install -m 0644 c-client.a debian/tmp/usr/lib/libc-client.a
 install: cannot stat `c-client.a': No such file or directory
 make: *** [common-install-arch] Error 1

The full build log is available from:
   
http://people.debian.org/~lucas/logs/2012/03/30/uw-imap_82007e~dfsg-3.3_unstable.log

A list of current common problems and possible solutions is available at 
http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS . You're welcome to contribute!

About the archive rebuild: The rebuild was done on about 50 AMD64 nodes
of the Grid'5000 platform, using a clean chroot.  Internet was not
accessible from the build systems.


---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
Source: uw-imap
Source-Version: 8:2007f~dfsg-1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
uw-imap, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

libc-client2007e-dev_2007f~dfsg-1_amd64.deb
  to main/u/uw-imap/libc-client2007e-dev_2007f~dfsg-1_amd64.deb
libc-client2007e_2007f~dfsg-1_amd64.deb
  to main/u/uw-imap/libc-client2007e_2007f~dfsg-1_amd64.deb
mlock_2007f~dfsg-1_amd64.deb
  to main/u/uw-imap/mlock_2007f~dfsg-1_amd64.deb
uw-imap_2007f~dfsg-1.debian.tar.gz
  to main/u/uw-imap/uw-imap_2007f~dfsg-1.debian.tar.gz
uw-imap_2007f~dfsg-1.dsc
  to main/u/uw-imap/uw-imap_2007f~dfsg-1.dsc
uw-imap_2007f~dfsg.orig.tar.gz
  to main/u/uw-imap/uw-imap_2007f~dfsg.orig.tar.gz
uw-mailutils_2007f~dfsg-1_amd64.deb
  to main/u/uw-imap/uw-mailutils_2007f~dfsg-1_amd64.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for

Bug#678930: marked as done (pdns-server: prompting due to modified conffiles which were not modified by the user)

Your message dated Fri, 29 Jun 2012 12:33:02 +
with message-id e1skani-0006ch...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#678930: fixed in pdns 3.1-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #678930,
regarding pdns-server: prompting due to modified conffiles which were not 
modified by the user
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
678930: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=678930
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: pdns-server
Version: 3.1-3
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts

Hi,

during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed the piuparts
upgrade test because dpkg detected a conffile as being modified and then
prompted the user for an action. As there is no user input, this fails.
But this is not the real problem, the real problem is that this prompt
shows up in the first place, as there was nobody modifying this conffile
at all, the package has just been installed and upgraded...

This is a violation of policy 10.7.3, see
http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-files.html#s10.7.3,
which says [These scripts handling conffiles] must not ask unnecessary
questions (particularly during upgrades), and must otherwise be good
citizens.

http://wiki.debian.org/DpkgConffileHandling should help with figuring
out how to do this properly.

In http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2009/08/msg00675.html and
followups it has been agreed that these bugs are to be filed with
severity serious.

From the attached log (scroll to the bottom...):

  Setting up pdns-server (3.1-3) ...
  Installing new version of config file /etc/init.d/pdns ...
  
  Configuration file `/etc/default/pdns'
   == File on system created by you or by a script.
   == File also in package provided by package maintainer.
 What would you like to do about it ?  Your options are:
  Y or I  : install the package maintainer's version
  N or O  : keep your currently-installed version
D : show the differences between the versions
Z : start a shell to examine the situation
   The default action is to keep your current version.
  *** pdns (Y/I/N/O/D/Z) [default=N] ? dpkg: error processing pdns-server 
(--configure):
   EOF on stdin at conffile prompt
  Errors were encountered while processing:
   pdns-server

This was observed on a dist-upgrade from squeeze to sid.


cheers,

Andreas


pdns-server_3.1-3.log.gz
Description: GNU Zip compressed data
---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
Source: pdns
Source-Version: 3.1-4

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
pdns, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

pdns-backend-geo_3.1-4_amd64.deb
  to main/p/pdns/pdns-backend-geo_3.1-4_amd64.deb
pdns-backend-ldap_3.1-4_amd64.deb
  to main/p/pdns/pdns-backend-ldap_3.1-4_amd64.deb
pdns-backend-lua_3.1-4_amd64.deb
  to main/p/pdns/pdns-backend-lua_3.1-4_amd64.deb
pdns-backend-mysql_3.1-4_amd64.deb
  to main/p/pdns/pdns-backend-mysql_3.1-4_amd64.deb
pdns-backend-pgsql_3.1-4_amd64.deb
  to main/p/pdns/pdns-backend-pgsql_3.1-4_amd64.deb
pdns-backend-pipe_3.1-4_amd64.deb
  to main/p/pdns/pdns-backend-pipe_3.1-4_amd64.deb
pdns-backend-sqlite3_3.1-4_amd64.deb
  to main/p/pdns/pdns-backend-sqlite3_3.1-4_amd64.deb
pdns-backend-sqlite_3.1-4_amd64.deb
  to main/p/pdns/pdns-backend-sqlite_3.1-4_amd64.deb
pdns-server-dbg_3.1-4_amd64.deb
  to main/p/pdns/pdns-server-dbg_3.1-4_amd64.deb
pdns-server_3.1-4_amd64.deb
  to main/p/pdns/pdns-server_3.1-4_amd64.deb
pdns_3.1-4.debian.tar.gz
  to main/p/pdns/pdns_3.1-4.debian.tar.gz
pdns_3.1-4.dsc
  to main/p/pdns/pdns_3.1-4.dsc



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 678...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Marc Haber mh+debian-packa...@zugschlus.de (supplier of updated pdns package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org)


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2012 20:40:27 +0200
Source: pdns
Binary: pdns-server pdns-server-dbg pdns-backend-pipe pdns-backend-ldap 
pdns-backend-geo pdns-backend-mysql pdns-backend-pgsql pdns-backend-sqlite 
pdns-backend-sqlite3 pdns-backend-lua
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 3.1-4
Distribution:

Bug#679526: Build-Depends on obsolete package ia32-libs-dev

2012-06-29 Thread Fabian Greffrath


block 679526 by 638741
thanks

Am 29.06.2012 14:23, schrieb Goswin von Brederlow:

as has long been anounced ia32-libs-dev will not be in wheezy since
32bit support will be replaced by multiarch. Since your package still
Build-Depends on ia32-libs-dev this means it will no longer build from
source.  Please multiarchify your package.


That's easier said than done. This week I tried to install zsnes:i386 
on amd64 and it failed, because one of its dependencies was not yet 
multiarchyfied. I am looking at you, libao!


 - Fabian




--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Processed: Re: Bug#679526: Build-Depends on obsolete package ia32-libs-dev

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 block 679526 by 638741
Bug #679526 [zsnes] Build-Depends on obsolete package ia32-libs-dev
679526 was not blocked by any bugs.
679526 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 679526: 638741
 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
679526: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=679526
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#555168: Unclear license situation for (e)glibc locales provided by you

2012-06-29 Thread Børre Gaup

Bearjadat, geassemánu 29. b. 2012 07.03.15 Christian PERRIER čálii:
 I add to the CC list another mail address I know about Boerre
 Gaup. Also CC'ing Petter Reinholdtsen, ou Debian Wizard for everything
 related to Norway, in case he would have alternate ways to reach Boerre.
 
 Quoting Helge Kreutzmann (deb...@helgefjell.de):
  Hello,
  you are listed as contact person/author of the following locale:
  
  se_NO
  
  This locale comes with a statement
  
  % Distribution and use is free, also
  % for commercial purposes.
  
  Thus it does not allow modification; it is unclear, however, if this
  statement was meant as a license.
  
  As discussed in
  http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=555168 this
  locale could strictly speaking not be part of Debian which would be a
  great loss. (Currently it is allowed pending investigation).
  
  To properly resolve this, I would like to ask you the following
  question:
  
  Would you be willing to relicense this locale to a proper license,
  e.g. (L)GPL v2 or higher or another free software license of your choice?
  

(L)GPL v2 sounds quite all right by me.

  If you have any questions regarding this issue, do not hesitate to
  contact me (via the reply-to address set).
  
  Thanks for helping to resolve this!
  
  Helge



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#679122: marked as done (manpages-de: FTBFS without internet access)

Your message dated Fri, 29 Jun 2012 12:48:54 +
with message-id e1skad4-0008ch...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#679122: fixed in manpages-de 1.1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #679122,
regarding manpages-de: FTBFS without internet access
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
679122: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=679122
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: manpages-de
Version: 1.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

It looks like manpages-de fails to build if english/download-packages.sh can't
download packages from the Internet. This causes manpages-de to fail to build
on Ubuntu or any builder without internet access.

Build log:
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/manpages-de/1.0-1/+build/3561754/+files/buildlog_ubuntu-quantal-i386.manpages-de_1.0-1_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz

Thanks,
Jeremy

- -- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers quantal-updates
  APT policy: (500, 'quantal-updates'), (500, 'quantal-security'),
(500, 'quantal'), (500, 'precise-security'), (100,
'quantal-backports')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 3.5.0-1-generic (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
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=7ASQ
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
Source: manpages-de
Source-Version: 1.1-1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
manpages-de, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

manpages-de-dev_1.1-1_all.deb
  to main/m/manpages-de/manpages-de-dev_1.1-1_all.deb
manpages-de_1.1-1.debian.tar.gz
  to main/m/manpages-de/manpages-de_1.1-1.debian.tar.gz
manpages-de_1.1-1.dsc
  to main/m/manpages-de/manpages-de_1.1-1.dsc
manpages-de_1.1-1_all.deb
  to main/m/manpages-de/manpages-de_1.1-1_all.deb
manpages-de_1.1.orig.tar.bz2
  to main/m/manpages-de/manpages-de_1.1.orig.tar.bz2



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 679...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Tobias Quathamer to...@debian.org (supplier of updated manpages-de package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org)


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2012 14:18:17 +0200
Source: manpages-de
Binary: manpages-de manpages-de-dev
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.1-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Tobias Quathamer to...@debian.org
Changed-By: Tobias Quathamer to...@debian.org
Description: 
 manpages-de - German manpages
 manpages-de-dev - German development manpages
Closes: 679122
Changes: 
 manpages-de (1.1-1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Imported Upstream version 1.1
 - Instead of downloading original manpages, use the locally
   installed manpages on the system. This enables to build on
   machines without internet access.
   Thanks to Jeremy Bicha jbi...@ubuntu.com for the bug report.
   Closes: #679122
   * Add corresponding packages to Build-Depends-Indep to provide the
 original manpages
Checksums-Sha1: 
 424a128ed4458cbdeda3be6752a640349a93ecc2 2076 manpages-de_1.1-1.dsc
 bf2087fd73f3c24b8458dc76b1f1a883e577faf4 1163812 manpages-de_1.1.orig.tar.bz2
 8a2868b8a5acf0e2bdebeca739ea913b22f06db4 10248 manpages-de_1.1-1.debian.tar.gz

Bug#679526: Build-Depends on obsolete package ia32-libs-dev

2012-06-29 Thread Etienne Millon

* Fabian Greffrath fab...@greffrath.com [120629 14:44]:
 That's easier said than done. This week I tried to install
 zsnes:i386 on amd64 and it failed, because one of its dependencies
 was not yet multiarchyfied. I am looking at you, libao!

Hello,

As far as zsnes is concerned, I will upload a package removing
zsnes:amd64. Whether zsnes:i386 will be installable or not will then
only depend on #638741.

Another solution would be to disable libao in zsnes but IIRC the other
sound backends are terrible.

-- 
Etienne Millon



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#679394: marked as done (src:beast-mcmc: package name beast-doc already in use by src:beast)

Your message dated Fri, 29 Jun 2012 13:02:10 +
with message-id e1skapu-0001nz...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#679394: fixed in beast-mcmc 1.6.2-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #679394,
regarding src:beast-mcmc: package name beast-doc already in use by src:beast
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
679394: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=679394
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Source: beast-mcmc
Version: 1.6.2-1
Severity: serious

beast-mcmc builds the binary package beast-doc.  However this is also
built by the beast source package (and already was before beast-mcmc
entered the archive).

Please rename the binary.

Ansgar


---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
Source: beast-mcmc
Source-Version: 1.6.2-2

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
beast-mcmc, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

beast-mcmc-doc_1.6.2-2_all.deb
  to contrib/b/beast-mcmc/beast-mcmc-doc_1.6.2-2_all.deb
beast-mcmc-examples_1.6.2-2_all.deb
  to contrib/b/beast-mcmc/beast-mcmc-examples_1.6.2-2_all.deb
beast-mcmc-lib_1.6.2-2_amd64.deb
  to contrib/b/beast-mcmc/beast-mcmc-lib_1.6.2-2_amd64.deb
beast-mcmc_1.6.2-2.debian.tar.gz
  to contrib/b/beast-mcmc/beast-mcmc_1.6.2-2.debian.tar.gz
beast-mcmc_1.6.2-2.dsc
  to contrib/b/beast-mcmc/beast-mcmc_1.6.2-2.dsc
beast-mcmc_1.6.2-2_all.deb
  to contrib/b/beast-mcmc/beast-mcmc_1.6.2-2_all.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 679...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Andreas Tille ti...@debian.org (supplier of updated beast-mcmc package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org)


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2012 11:24:51 +0200
Source: beast-mcmc
Binary: beast-mcmc beast-mcmc-lib beast-mcmc-examples beast-mcmc-doc
Architecture: source all amd64
Version: 1.6.2-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Med Packaging Team 
debian-med-packag...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Changed-By: Andreas Tille ti...@debian.org
Description: 
 beast-mcmc - Bayesian MCMC phylogenetic inference
 beast-mcmc-doc - Bayesian MCMC phylogenetic inference - documentation
 beast-mcmc-examples - Bayesian MCMC phylogenetic inference - example data
 beast-mcmc-lib - Bayesian MCMC phylogenetic inference
Closes: 679394
Changes: 
 beast-mcmc (1.6.2-2) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * debian/control: rename beast-doc to beast-mcmc-doc
 Closes: #679394
 For consistency reasons also rename beast-examples to
 beast-mcmc-examples
Checksums-Sha1: 
 a359a1dad98ee71e1b3aca1737bfd215cf1c3269 1866 beast-mcmc_1.6.2-2.dsc
 11a6d335f56b15571c33faa7abbebce82fe444c1 19379 beast-mcmc_1.6.2-2.debian.tar.gz
 a8876af50416d87f2de5dbb4b75ba3b5a71637c3 5677406 beast-mcmc_1.6.2-2_all.deb
 6476d06e54926d42e8f71f98a5be3b17124bb32a 33564 beast-mcmc-lib_1.6.2-2_amd64.deb
 66018955e0a81be94d972902b11e23ce339cc601 988716 
beast-mcmc-examples_1.6.2-2_all.deb
 f9c046b2de474b37b1ae63969795b446e20ee55d 3804798 beast-mcmc-doc_1.6.2-2_all.deb
Checksums-Sha256: 
 8ac5313c7a68009b07fbc49e40dfbdbb549c17c73b4a314ff4e8926432b81ed9 1866 
beast-mcmc_1.6.2-2.dsc
 8112c0c66930806f70d6afd181585fb4c09f3c8d28d51a9c0dc362630001070f 19379 
beast-mcmc_1.6.2-2.debian.tar.gz
 c594cff1ab2cd094c15ba4fefae9867a3fe4f578a1fdc8edf6e6ca01a585d764 5677406 
beast-mcmc_1.6.2-2_all.deb
 453388b655454d8108a1cccf03c1d4d640602f250e3dc7f684a696961b45f2cb 33564 
beast-mcmc-lib_1.6.2-2_amd64.deb
 74fcd506868fe84071d5fd60984af1ed224725c52a6c6ad7833b72d15b74db54 988716 
beast-mcmc-examples_1.6.2-2_all.deb
 200df6c9a87d9b6c0ff26cba29af0424597b65b4371221200e893a482210e739 3804798 
beast-mcmc-doc_1.6.2-2_all.deb
Files: 
 cc714b1fc309322c7641f3250f84d995 1866 contrib/science optional 
beast-mcmc_1.6.2-2.dsc
 83fc0317e355a479ab3d3c935d49 19379 contrib/science optional 
beast-mcmc_1.6.2-2.debian.tar.gz
 291d1ce9d36608020fd41e938c62c236 5677406 contrib/science optional 
beast-mcmc_1.6.2-2_all.deb
 e078da37b346fee6bc63671189357465 33564 contrib/science optional 
beast-mcmc-lib_1.6.2-2_amd64.deb
 28d0539ac81e11db169917718b421219 988716 contrib/doc optional 
beast-mcmc-examples_1.6.2-2_all.deb

Processed: Severity should be critical

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 severity 676183 critical
Bug #676183 [bridge-utils] bridge-network-interfaces should not do anything 
before ifupdown is configured
Severity set to 'critical' from 'important'
 affects 676183 resolvconf
Bug #676183 [bridge-utils] bridge-network-interfaces should not do anything 
before ifupdown is configured
Added indication that 676183 affects resolvconf
 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
676183: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=676183
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Processed: gdl pending

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 # Finally!
 tag 669123 + pending
Bug #669123 [gnudatalanguage] GNUdatalanguage not installable in unstable.
Added tag(s) pending.
 tag 660260 + pending
Bug #660260 [src:gnudatalanguage] gnudatalanguage: FTBFS since plplot uses 
-fvisibility=hidden
Bug #669497 [src:gnudatalanguage] gnudatalanguage: FTBFS: 
plotting_xyouts.cpp:260: undefined reference to `plP_mmpcy'
Added tag(s) pending.
Added tag(s) pending.
 kthxbye
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
660260: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=660260
669123: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=669123
669497: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=669497
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#679317: marked as done (tarantool: FTBFS[kfreebsd]: undefined reference to `clock_gettime')

Your message dated Fri, 29 Jun 2012 13:48:15 +
with message-id e1skbyv-00063d...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#679317: fixed in tarantool 1.4.6+20120629-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #679317,
regarding tarantool: FTBFS[kfreebsd]: undefined reference to `clock_gettime'
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
679317: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=679317
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: src:tarantool
Version: 1.4.6+20120626-1
Severity: serious
Tags: sid wheezy
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: kfreebsd
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)

Hi!

Your package failed to build on the kfreebsd-* buildds:

cd 
/build/buildd-tarantool_1.4.6+20120626-1-kfreebsd-amd64-EsdFxn/tarantool-1.4.6+20120626/build-area/mod/box
  /usr/bin/cmake -E cmake_link_script CMakeFiles/tarantool_box.dir/link.txt 
--verbose=1
/usr/bin/c++   -g -O2 -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -Wformat 
-Werror=format-security -g -O2 -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 
-Wformat -Werror=format-security 
-I/build/buildd-tarantool_1.4.6+20120626-1-kfreebsd-amd64-EsdFxn/tarantool-1.4.6+20120626/build-area/third_party/luajit/src
 -D_GNU_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -DCORO_ASM -fno-omit-frame-pointer 
-fno-stack-protector -fexceptions -funwind-tables -fexceptions 
-fobjc-exceptions -fgnu89-inline   -Wl,-z,relro -pthread 
CMakeFiles/tarantool_box.dir/tuple.m.o CMakeFiles/tarantool_box.dir/index.m.o 
CMakeFiles/tarantool_box.dir/tree.m.o CMakeFiles/tarantool_box.dir/space.m.o 
CMakeFiles/tarantool_box.dir/port.m.o CMakeFiles/tarantool_box.dir/request.m.o 
CMakeFiles/tarantool_box.dir/txn.m.o CMakeFiles/tarantool_box.dir/box.m.o 
CMakeFiles/tarantool_box.dir/box.lua.c.o 
CMakeFiles/tarantool_box.dir/box_lua.m.o 
CMakeFiles/tarantool_box.dir/memcached.m.o 
CMakeFiles/tarantool_box.dir/__/__/cfg/tarantool_box_cfg.c.o  -o tarantool_box  
libltbox.a ../../cfg/libcfg.a ../../src/libcore.a ../../src/libev.a 
../../third_party/coro/libcoro.a ../../third_party/gopt/libgopt.a 
../../third_party/libmisc.a -lobjc ../../third_party/luajit/src/libluajit.a 
-lpthread -ldl -lbfd -liberty -lm 
../../src/libev.a(tarantool_ev.c.o): In function `ev_time':
/build/buildd-tarantool_1.4.6+20120626-1-kfreebsd-amd64-EsdFxn/tarantool-1.4.6+20120626/third_party/libev/ev.c:1295:
 undefined reference to `clock_gettime'
../../src/libev.a(tarantool_ev.c.o): In function `get_clock':
/build/buildd-tarantool_1.4.6+20120626-1-kfreebsd-amd64-EsdFxn/tarantool-1.4.6+20120626/third_party/libev/ev.c:1313:
 undefined reference to `clock_gettime'
/build/buildd-tarantool_1.4.6+20120626-1-kfreebsd-amd64-EsdFxn/tarantool-1.4.6+20120626/third_party/libev/ev.c:1313:
 undefined reference to `clock_gettime'
/build/buildd-tarantool_1.4.6+20120626-1-kfreebsd-amd64-EsdFxn/tarantool-1.4.6+20120626/third_party/libev/ev.c:1313:
 undefined reference to `clock_gettime'
/build/buildd-tarantool_1.4.6+20120626-1-kfreebsd-amd64-EsdFxn/tarantool-1.4.6+20120626/third_party/libev/ev.c:1313:
 undefined reference to `clock_gettime'
../../src/libev.a(tarantool_ev.c.o):/build/buildd-tarantool_1.4.6+20120626-1-kfreebsd-amd64-EsdFxn/tarantool-1.4.6+20120626/third_party/libev/ev.c:2240:
 more undefined references to `clock_gettime' follow
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
make[3]: *** [mod/box/tarantool_box] Error 1

Full build log at
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=tarantoolarch=kfreebsd-amd64ver=1.4.6%2B20120626-1stamp=1340804405

Regards

Christoph

If you have further questions please mail debian-...@lists.debian.org

-- 
9FED 5C6C E206 B70A 5857  70CA 9655 22B9 D49A E731
Debian Developer | Lisp Hacker | CaCert Assurer


---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
Source: tarantool
Source-Version: 1.4.6+20120629-1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
tarantool, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

libtarantool-dev_1.4.6+20120629-1_amd64.deb
  to main/t/tarantool/libtarantool-dev_1.4.6+20120629-1_amd64.deb
libtarantool1-dbg_1.4.6+20120629-1_amd64.deb
  to main/t/tarantool/libtarantool1-dbg_1.4.6+20120629-1_amd64.deb
libtarantool1_1.4.6+20120629-1_amd64.deb
  to main/t/tarantool/libtarantool1_1.4.6+20120629-1_amd64.deb
libtarantoolnet1-dbg_1.4.6+20120629-1_amd64.deb
  to main/t/tarantool/libtarantoolnet1-dbg_1.4.6+20120629-1_amd64.deb
libtarantoolnet1_1.4.6+20120629-1_amd64.deb
  to main/t/tarantool/libtarantoolnet1_1.4.6+20120629-1_amd64.deb

Bug#679526: Bug#638741: Bug#679526: Build-Depends on obsolete package ia32-libs-dev

2012-06-29 Thread Ron


Hi,

On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 02:57:08PM +0200, Etienne Millon wrote:
 * Fabian Greffrath fab...@greffrath.com [120629 14:44]:
  That's easier said than done. This week I tried to install
  zsnes:i386 on amd64 and it failed, because one of its dependencies
  was not yet multiarchyfied. I am looking at you, libao!
 
 Hello,
 
 As far as zsnes is concerned, I will upload a package removing
 zsnes:amd64. Whether zsnes:i386 will be installable or not will then
 only depend on #638741.

If zsnes really is i386-only, then that seems like the best answer to me.
It's not really blocked on libao being converted - at least not in the
sense that it will need further changes after it is, or can't change until
it is.

I only took over libao a few weeks ago, and I'm not really any more keen
to relocate all its files on the eve of the freeze than I was to do that
just a couple of weeks before it.  I don't know if anybody else has done
a proper audit of this to be sure there will be no problems with its
plugins - a cursory glance seems to indicate they'll probably be ok, but
I'm far from being certain enough about that to do a beat the freeze
upload making this change.

This one had gone on my worry about m-a for wheezy+1 list - when m-a
itself is hopefully a little more settled and some of its intrinsic
problems might actually have solutions.  I might push one to experimental
in the meantime if there is real call for it - but I think it's way too
late to be experimenting with this in wheezy release candidates now.

 Cheers,
 Ron





-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#679135: Pending fixes for bugs in the libsys-cpu-perl package

2012-06-29 Thread pkg-perl-maintainers

tag 679135 + pending
thanks

Some bugs in the libsys-cpu-perl package are closed in revision
85de6f59f0453cc7293905fc1724117eb988dc7f in branch 'master' by gregor
herrmann

The full diff can be seen at
http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-perl/packages/libsys-cpu-perl.git;a=commitdiff;h=85de6f5

Commit message:

New patch Test-More.patch: rewrite test using Test::More

and mark the cpu_type test as TODO, since /proc/cpuinfo doesn't always
report the requested information.

Closes: #679135




-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Processed: Pending fixes for bugs in the libsys-cpu-perl package

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 tag 679135 + pending
Bug #679135 [src:libsys-cpu-perl] FTBFS on several architectures: Failed 2/4 
subtests
Added tag(s) pending.
 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
679135: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=679135
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#679526: Bug#638741: Bug#679526: Build-Depends on obsolete package ia32-libs-dev

2012-06-29 Thread Fabian Greffrath


Am 29.06.2012 15:57, schrieb Ron:

I only took over libao a few weeks ago, and I'm not really any more keen
to relocate all its files on the eve of the freeze than I was to do that
just a couple of weeks before it.  I don't know if anybody else has done
a proper audit of this to be sure there will be no problems with its
plugins - a cursory glance seems to indicate they'll probably be ok, but
I'm far from being certain enough about that to do a beat the freeze
upload making this change.


It has been applied in libao (1.1.0-1ubuntu2) dated back to Mon, 19 
Dec 2011 12:49:01 -0800.




--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#675495: downgrading the severity of #675495

2012-06-29 Thread Matthias Klose

severity 675495 important
thanks

security support for openjdk in debian has always been a bit flaky. packages in
edgy were not updated anymore, and updates to squeeze come late.  So the
support from Oracle was/is not used by the security team even when the
security updates from Oracle are available.  Certainly the situation doesn't get
better, if Oracle's support is limited to openjdk7 only, however there should be
the possibility to backport the patches to openjdk6, which will get harder, the
more the hotspot version diverges in newer openjdk7 builds.

Now downgrading the severity to let the current, still supported openjdk update
into testing.

openjdk7 would be something nice to have, because it seems to build on kfreebsd
as well (at least when building on a wheezy installation), but there are still
some things not yet ported to 7.



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Processed: downgrading the severity of #675495

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 severity 675495 important
Bug #675495 [openjdk-6] Should not be released with Wheezy
Severity set to 'important' from 'serious'
 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
675495: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=675495
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#679536: wine-bin: fails to install, trying to overwrite other packages files

2012-06-29 Thread Andreas Beckmann

Package: wine-bin
Version: 1.4.1-1.1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts

Hi,

during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed to install
because it tries to overwrite other packages files without declaring a
replaces relation.

See policy 7.6 at
http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-relationships.html#s-replaces

From the attached log (scroll to the bottom...):

  Selecting previously unselected package wine-bin.
  Unpacking wine-bin (from .../wine-bin_1.4.1-1.1_amd64.deb) ...
  dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/wine-bin_1.4.1-1.1_amd64.deb 
(--unpack):
   trying to overwrite '/usr/bin/wine64', which is also in package 
libwine:amd64 1.4.1-1.1
  Errors were encountered while processing:
   /var/cache/apt/archives/wine-bin_1.4.1-1.1_amd64.deb


cheers,

Andreas


wine-bin_1.4.1-1.1.log.gz
Description: GNU Zip compressed data

Processed: this happens on every invocation off exim4

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 severity 678337 serious
Bug #678337 [exim4] exim4: Segfault at start of main()
Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'
 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
678337: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=678337
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#679195: naist-jdic: fails to install: naist-jdic.postinst: /usr/lib/chasen/makemat: not found

2012-06-29 Thread Andreas Beckmann

Package: naist-jdic
Followup-For: Bug #679195

Hi,

the problem is not solved, but an additional error shows up:

  Selecting previously unselected package naist-jdic.
  (Reading database ... 6873 files and directories currently installed.)
  Unpacking naist-jdic (from .../naist-jdic_1%3a0.4.3-3_all.deb) ...
  Setting up naist-jdic (1:0.4.3-3) ...
  Now generating naist-jdic data. This may take a while...
  /var/lib/dpkg/info/naist-jdic.postinst: 1: 
/var/lib/dpkg/info/naist-jdic.postinst: dpkg-architecture: not found
  /var/lib/dpkg/info/naist-jdic.postinst: 25: 
/var/lib/dpkg/info/naist-jdic.postinst: /usr/lib//chasen/makemat: not found
  dpkg: error processing naist-jdic (--configure):
   subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 127
  Errors were encountered while processing:
   naist-jdic

Do you really want ot use dpkg-architecture (which is in dpkg-dev) in a
maintainer script? Or did you want dpkg --print-architecture?

Andreas


naist-jdic_1:0.4.3-3.log.gz
Description: GNU Zip compressed data

Processed: found 679490 in wine64-bin/1.4.01-1, found 679490 in wine64-bin-unstable/1.5.6-1 ..., affects 679536 ...

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 found 679490 wine64-bin/1.4.01-1
Bug #679490 [wine64-bin,wine64-bin-unstable] wine64-bin-unstable and 
wine64-bin: error when trying to install together
The source wine64-bin and version 1.4.01-1 do not appear to match any binary 
packages
Marked as found in versions wine64-bin/1.4.01-1.
 found 679490 wine64-bin-unstable/1.5.6-1
Bug #679490 [wine64-bin,wine64-bin-unstable] wine64-bin-unstable and 
wine64-bin: error when trying to install together
The source wine64-bin-unstable and version 1.5.6-1 do not appear to match any 
binary packages
Marked as found in versions wine64-bin-unstable/1.5.6-1.
 user debian...@lists.debian.org
Setting user to debian...@lists.debian.org (was deb...@abeckmann.de).
 usertags 679490 piuparts
Bug#679490: wine64-bin-unstable and wine64-bin: error when trying to install 
together
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: piuparts.
 affects 679536 + wine
Bug #679536 [wine-bin] wine-bin: fails to install, trying to overwrite other 
packages files
Added indication that 679536 affects wine
 found 679195 1:0.4.3-3
Bug #679195 {Done: Hideki Yamane henr...@debian.org} [naist-jdic] naist-jdic: 
fails to install: naist-jdic.postinst: /usr/lib/chasen/makemat: not found
Marked as found in versions naist-jdic/1:0.4.3-3; no longer marked as fixed in 
versions naist-jdic/1:0.4.3-3 and reopened.
 found 679195 chasen/2.4.5-4
Bug #679195 [naist-jdic] naist-jdic: fails to install: naist-jdic.postinst: 
/usr/lib/chasen/makemat: not found
Marked as found in versions chasen/2.4.5-4.
 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
679195: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=679195
679490: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=679490
679536: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=679536
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#678337: this happens on every invocation off exim4

2012-06-29 Thread Heiko Stübner

severity 678337 serious
thanks

On my tegra2 running wheezy armel this exact error happens on every invocation 
of the exim4 binary, making even installation of exim4-config fail.

Heiko





-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Processed: tagging 679409

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 tags 679409 + unreproducible moreinfo
Bug #679409 [lightdm] lightdm: Fails to start on boot, invoke-rc.d lightdm 
start fails
Added tag(s) unreproducible and moreinfo.
 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
679409: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=679409
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#679135: marked as done (FTBFS on several architectures: Failed 2/4 subtests)

Your message dated Fri, 29 Jun 2012 15:27:06 +
with message-id e1skd6a-0003jt...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#679135: fixed in libsys-cpu-perl 0.52-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #679135,
regarding FTBFS on several architectures: Failed 2/4 subtests
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
679135: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=679135
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Source: libsys-cpu-perl
Version: 0.52-1
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source


libsys-cpu-perl fails to build from source on several architectures,
but built in the past:

t/Sys-CPU.t ..
Failed 2/4 subtests

Test Summary Report
---
t/Sys-CPU.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 4 Failed: 2)
  Failed tests:  3, 5
  Parse errors: Tests out of sequence.  Found (5) but expected (4)
Files=1, Tests=4,  0 wallclock secs ( 0.08 usr  0.02 sys +  0.04 cusr
0.00 csys =  0.14 CPU)
Result: FAIL
Failed 1/1 test programs. 2/4 subtests failed.
make[1]: *** [test_dynamic] Error 255
make[1]: Leaving directory
`/build/buildd-libsys-cpu-perl_0.52-1-sparc-M4I4Va/libsys-cpu-perl-0.52'
dh_auto_test: make -j1 test returned exit code 2
make: *** [build] Error 29

https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=libsys-cpu-perlarch=sparcver=0.52-1stamp=1327008940


---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
Source: libsys-cpu-perl
Source-Version: 0.52-2

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
libsys-cpu-perl, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

libsys-cpu-perl_0.52-2.debian.tar.gz
  to main/libs/libsys-cpu-perl/libsys-cpu-perl_0.52-2.debian.tar.gz
libsys-cpu-perl_0.52-2.dsc
  to main/libs/libsys-cpu-perl/libsys-cpu-perl_0.52-2.dsc
libsys-cpu-perl_0.52-2_amd64.deb
  to main/libs/libsys-cpu-perl/libsys-cpu-perl_0.52-2_amd64.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 679...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
gregor herrmann gre...@debian.org (supplier of updated libsys-cpu-perl 
package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org)


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2012 16:29:11 +0200
Source: libsys-cpu-perl
Binary: libsys-cpu-perl
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 0.52-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Perl Group pkg-perl-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Changed-By: gregor herrmann gre...@debian.org
Description: 
 libsys-cpu-perl - module for getting CPU information
Closes: 679135
Changes: 
 libsys-cpu-perl (0.52-2) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * New patch test-cpu_type.patch: fix test number output.
   * New patch Test-More.patch: rewrite test using Test::More and mark the
 cpu_type test as TODO, since /proc/cpuinfo doesn't always report the
 requested information. (Closes: #679135)
   * debian/rules: override_dh_auto_test to run our own test version.
   * debian/copyright: update to Copyright-Format 1.0.
   * Bump Standards-Version to 3.9.3 (no changes).
   * Use debhelper 9.20120312 to get all hardening flags.
Checksums-Sha1: 
 4ddf82a6d235c75ba841c04e6822264a6fbfa47d 2004 libsys-cpu-perl_0.52-2.dsc
 0f6ed77e9009afb9e4d7ef36c5e890d6d69f4336 2659 
libsys-cpu-perl_0.52-2.debian.tar.gz
 7af540f4d3cbd901b3664de1ef3c311c1769f519 10318 libsys-cpu-perl_0.52-2_amd64.deb
Checksums-Sha256: 
 6a0591ea9296596d96139472e563e6bdd4760394204316ff53fe75dea3d323d7 2004 
libsys-cpu-perl_0.52-2.dsc
 99cf2938bf67592b86ac302169ea2032f607078b6a6deef72e422feb39805f50 2659 
libsys-cpu-perl_0.52-2.debian.tar.gz
 557fbfec63be9ad73cd5a58dbb8f459982ee9c2f65a9782f4ca67f62d39ec251 10318 
libsys-cpu-perl_0.52-2_amd64.deb
Files: 
 14ad8925a714f12fb992956cce108656 2004 perl optional libsys-cpu-perl_0.52-2.dsc
 ec483a2d848d6d663e11ce19a7ffc229 2659 perl optional 
libsys-cpu-perl_0.52-2.debian.tar.gz
 f78a943076e59eb86a0392e16cc96c4d 10318 perl optional 
libsys-cpu-perl_0.52-2_amd64.deb

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)

iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJP7bvkAAoJELs6aAGGSaoG4LwP/25YlqlOSAN8NrdAhm5rgd38
ZCEkc2AtZCkwobtvXK/GBZpOvCNPivGzbQm83FEHYggrBWoxszW9gmVLtAiA04GK
4d5C0fnRuRlddONAAy7Qt4savSd1igeLLnaofKH5YBj8lfmwf29tvTR9NlpcPoPl

Bug#678026: marked as done (libatk-adaptor: insecure tempdir handling)

Your message dated Fri, 29 Jun 2012 15:47:14 +
with message-id e1skdpe-0006ke...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#678026: fixed in at-spi2-atk 2.5.3-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #678026,
regarding libatk-adaptor: insecure tempdir handling
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
678026: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=678026
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: libatk-adaptor
Version: 2.5.2-1
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Justification: user security hole

atk-adaptor/bridge.c::register_application() is a big pile of FAIL.

Cheers,
Julien


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
Source: at-spi2-atk
Source-Version: 2.5.3-1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
at-spi2-atk, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

at-spi2-atk_2.5.3-1.debian.tar.gz
  to main/a/at-spi2-atk/at-spi2-atk_2.5.3-1.debian.tar.gz
at-spi2-atk_2.5.3-1.dsc
  to main/a/at-spi2-atk/at-spi2-atk_2.5.3-1.dsc
at-spi2-atk_2.5.3.orig.tar.xz
  to main/a/at-spi2-atk/at-spi2-atk_2.5.3.orig.tar.xz
libatk-adaptor-data_2.5.3-1_amd64.deb
  to main/a/at-spi2-atk/libatk-adaptor-data_2.5.3-1_amd64.deb
libatk-adaptor-dbg_2.5.3-1_amd64.deb
  to main/a/at-spi2-atk/libatk-adaptor-dbg_2.5.3-1_amd64.deb
libatk-adaptor_2.5.3-1_amd64.deb
  to main/a/at-spi2-atk/libatk-adaptor_2.5.3-1_amd64.deb
libatk-bridge2.0-0-dbg_2.5.3-1_amd64.deb
  to main/a/at-spi2-atk/libatk-bridge2.0-0-dbg_2.5.3-1_amd64.deb
libatk-bridge2.0-0_2.5.3-1_amd64.deb
  to main/a/at-spi2-atk/libatk-bridge2.0-0_2.5.3-1_amd64.deb
libatk-bridge2.0-dev_2.5.3-1_amd64.deb
  to main/a/at-spi2-atk/libatk-bridge2.0-dev_2.5.3-1_amd64.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 678...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Samuel Thibault sthiba...@debian.org (supplier of updated at-spi2-atk package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org)


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2012 23:35:36 -0300
Source: at-spi2-atk
Binary: libatk-adaptor libatk-adaptor-dbg libatk-adaptor-data 
libatk-bridge2.0-0 libatk-bridge2.0-dev libatk-bridge2.0-0-dbg
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 2.5.3-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Accessibility Team debian-accessibil...@lists.debian.org
Changed-By: Samuel Thibault sthiba...@debian.org
Description: 
 libatk-adaptor - AT-SPI 2 toolkit bridge
 libatk-adaptor-data - AT-SPI 2 toolkit bridge - data
 libatk-adaptor-dbg - AT-SPI 2 toolkit bridge - debugging symbols
 libatk-bridge2.0-0 - AT-SPI 2 toolkit bridge - shared library
 libatk-bridge2.0-0-dbg - AT-SPI 2 toolkit bridge - debugging symbols
 libatk-bridge2.0-dev - Development files for the AT-SPI 2 toolkit bridge
Closes: 678026
Changes: 
 at-spi2-atk (2.5.3-1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   [ Samuel Thibault ]
   * control: Fix Homepage URL, thanks DUCK!
   * copyright: Update.
 .
   [ Luke Yelavich ]
   * New upstream release. (Closes: #678026)
   * Add libatk-bridge2.0 series of packages for the newly introduced
 libatk-bridge shared library.
Checksums-Sha1: 
 3640502baa658d9ab058f65f63e77305e667693d 1863 at-spi2-atk_2.5.3-1.dsc
 a0fc241639fd9109081808d9ea4e2eb495c912c7 302960 at-spi2-atk_2.5.3.orig.tar.xz
 a37f07a44c44cf6c8f53d8b0f8c1cdea1da249bc 3515 at-spi2-atk_2.5.3-1.debian.tar.gz
 287723d305e7dd05a52a97acaacb89a3f3d89d90 5696 libatk-adaptor_2.5.3-1_amd64.deb
 d2fc08eeb7fa1a27657e745abc8c18211af9022f 5582 
libatk-adaptor-dbg_2.5.3-1_amd64.deb
 44e805a23f53f0116758577087e4ada5c6fabb2e 21352 
libatk-adaptor-data_2.5.3-1_amd64.deb
 d55e5bd94f78de954f3c73e6d0c7a4693e37ed9a 61538 
libatk-bridge2.0-0_2.5.3-1_amd64.deb
 1242eccda3c03200866571795ce5295257c3bcd7 4180 
libatk-bridge2.0-dev_2.5.3-1_amd64.deb
 5a74a0375bb5b7a5fbc86570bd7ceb7fc327da64 90036 
libatk-bridge2.0-0-dbg_2.5.3-1_amd64.deb
Checksums-Sha256: 
 93710437cce4fc80c510f36029e2ab1266e65cf8aff5b3b446294731c6957b27 1863 
at-spi2-atk_2.5.3-1.dsc
 bdbead509bb87e8939b06385febdadddef3c5e25dce4a0ed39f9a83d36c0c69b 302960 
at-spi2-atk_2.5.3.orig.tar.xz
 d68883486c5b7373e35ca6a29338db44693beb95a3af8e178f5dc10171c9c440 3515 
at-spi2-atk_2.5.3-1.debian.tar.gz

Bug#625828: Pending fixes for bugs in the libipc-sharelite-perl package

2012-06-29 Thread pkg-perl-maintainers

tag 625828 + pending
thanks

Some bugs in the libipc-sharelite-perl package are closed in revision
eea82f6b6d57e4a888e1260f48686b093449f1d8 in branch 'master' by
intrigeri

The full diff can be seen at
http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-perl/packages/libipc-sharelite-perl.git;a=commitdiff;h=eea82f6

Commit message:

New patch: Disable-t-sharelite.t-Closes-625828.patch (Closes: #625828)

According to Ben Hutchings, Mapping the same shared memory twice in one 
process
is stupid, anyway. (Message #99 on bug #679449).




-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Processed: Pending fixes for bugs in the libipc-sharelite-perl package

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 tag 625828 + pending
Bug #625828 [libipc-sharelite-perl] libipc-sharelite-perl: FTBFS on armel: test 
failures
Added tag(s) pending.
 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
625828: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=625828
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Processed: reopening 679489, closing 679493

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 # python-restkit bug:
 reopen 679489
Bug #679489 {Done: Janos Guljas ja...@resenje.org} [python-restkit] 
transifex-client and python-restkit: error when trying to install together
'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version;
all fixed versions will be cleared, and you may need to re-add them.
Bug reopened
No longer marked as fixed in versions transifex-client/0.8-2.
 # transifex-client bug:
 close 679493 0.8-2
Bug #679493 [transifex-client] transifex-client and python-restkit: error when 
trying to install together
Marked as fixed in versions transifex-client/0.8-2.
Bug #679493 [transifex-client] transifex-client and python-restkit: error when 
trying to install together
Marked Bug as done
 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
679489: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=679489
679493: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=679493
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#555168: Unclear license situation for (e)glibc locales provided by you

2012-06-29 Thread Christian PERRIER

Quoting Helge Kreutzmann (deb...@helgefjell.de):
 Hello,
 you are listed as contact person/author of the following locale:
 
 tr_CY
 
 This locale comes with a statement
 
 % Distribution and use is free, also
 % for commercial purposes.

Recai Oktas is also a Debian developer. CC'ing his Debian address.




signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#679526: Build-Depends on obsolete package ia32-libs-dev

Fabian Greffrath fab...@greffrath.com writes:

 block 679526 by 638741
 thanks

 Am 29.06.2012 14:23, schrieb Goswin von Brederlow:
 as has long been anounced ia32-libs-dev will not be in wheezy since
 32bit support will be replaced by multiarch. Since your package still
 Build-Depends on ia32-libs-dev this means it will no longer build from
 source.  Please multiarchify your package.

 That's easier said than done. This week I tried to install zsnes:i386
 on amd64 and it failed, because one of its dependencies was not yet
 multiarchyfied. I am looking at you, libao!

  - Fabian

As mentioned in the bug log for 638741 the zsnes package doesn't have to
wait for libao4. It should only set M-A: foreign and drop the amd64
build. It will then be installable with libao4:i386 if libao4:amd64
isn't installed. Not ideal but ...


As for libao4 and the multiarch patch in the BTS. I took a quick look at
the patch and I consider that incomplete. As is it switches the plugin
dir to the multiarch dir without providing backward compatibility. That
means the patch breaks all plugins for libao4 and they all need to be
multiarchified together with versioned Breaks and Depends. This is
usualy not ideal. Better would be to have libao4 look in both the old
plugin dir as well as the new plugin dir. That way plugins can be
multiarchified over time.

Other than that the patch looks fine.

MfG
Goswin

PS: When you do decide to multiarchify libao4 please file bugs against all
the plugin packages if not already present and user tag them with
user = multiarch-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org, usertag = multiarch.



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#679525: marked as done (Build-Depends on obsolete package ia32-libs-dev)

Your message dated Fri, 29 Jun 2012 12:18:30 -0400
with message-id 
CANTw=MOzqqrTavhsqm=5GLcpTa2HOp=ly1unzhjo+gjqptz...@mail.gmail.com
and subject line Re: [pkg-wine-party] Bug#679525: Build-Depends on obsolete 
package ia32-libs-dev
has caused the Debian Bug report #679525,
regarding Build-Depends on obsolete package ia32-libs-dev
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
679525: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=679525
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: wine-unstable
Version: 1.3.15-0.1
Severity: serious

Hi,

as has long been anounced ia32-libs-dev will not be in wheezy since
32bit support will be replaced by multiarch. Since your package still
Build-Depends on ia32-libs-dev this means it will no longer build from
source.  Please multiarchify your package.

MfG
Goswin


-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-2-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=de_DE (charmap=ISO-8859-1)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash


---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
version: 1.5.0-1

On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 8:22 AM, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
 Package: wine-unstable
 Version: 1.3.15-0.1
 Severity: serious

 Hi,

 as has long been anounced ia32-libs-dev will not be in wheezy since
 32bit support will be replaced by multiarch. Since your package still
 Build-Depends on ia32-libs-dev this means it will no longer build from
 source.  Please multiarchify your package.

This has been fixed for the past couple uploads.  I'm not sure why the
source for 1.3.15 is still lingering around in unstable.

Best wishes,
Mike

---End Message---

Bug#679526: Bug#638741: Bug#679526: Build-Depends on obsolete package ia32-libs-dev

2012-06-29 Thread Ron

On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 04:26:37PM +0200, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
 Am 29.06.2012 15:57, schrieb Ron:
 I only took over libao a few weeks ago, and I'm not really any more keen
 to relocate all its files on the eve of the freeze than I was to do that
 just a couple of weeks before it.  I don't know if anybody else has done
 a proper audit of this to be sure there will be no problems with its
 plugins - a cursory glance seems to indicate they'll probably be ok, but
 I'm far from being certain enough about that to do a beat the freeze
 upload making this change.
 
 It has been applied in libao (1.1.0-1ubuntu2) dated back to Mon, 19
 Dec 2011 12:49:01 -0800.

And has had completely unresponded-to bugs there, like:

libao looks for the wrong plugin directory, when one is using the
 32-bit .so provided on a 64 bit system.

dating back to Sun, 8 Jan 2012 19:57:43 ...





-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#679063: Reopening

2012-06-29 Thread José Manuel Santamaría Lema

reopen 679063
thanks

Hello,

 No, it won't.  You need a Replaces, and probably Breaks, on old
 libmagickcore5 versions in libmagickcore5-extra.  See Policy Â§7.6.
 
 The dependency only guarantees the order of configuration, not of
 unpacking.

indeed, the dependency doesn't solve the problem since I tried to upgrade 
today -extra and the problem is still there. I think adding
Breaks: libmagickcore5 ( 8:6.7.7.10-1)
Replaces: libmagickcore5 ( 8:6.7.7.10-1)
to libmagickcore5-extra would solve the problem (I didn't have time test it) 
and is also the right solution according to policy §7.6.

Thank you for your time.


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Processed: Reopening

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 reopen 679063
Bug #679063 {Done: Bastien RoucariÃ¨s roucaries.bastien+deb...@gmail.com} 
[libmagickcore5-extra] libmagickcore5-extra: file conflict with old 
libmagickcore5
'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version;
all fixed versions will be cleared, and you may need to re-add them.
Bug reopened
No longer marked as fixed in versions imagemagick/8:6.7.7.10-1.
 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
679063: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=679063
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#625828: marked as done (libipc-sharelite-perl: FTBFS on armel: test failures)

Your message dated Fri, 29 Jun 2012 16:28:16 +
with message-id e1ske3m-0003tu...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#625828: fixed in libipc-sharelite-perl 0.17-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #625828,
regarding libipc-sharelite-perl: FTBFS on armel: test failures
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
625828: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=625828
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: libipc-sharelite-perl
Version: 0.17-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian-p...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: perl-5.12-transition

This package failed to build on armel only against Perl 5.12.

 
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=libipc-sharelite-perlarch=armelver=0.17-1%2Bb1stamp=1304522076

# Testing IPC::ShareLite 0.17
t/00-load.t .. ok
t/pod.t .. ok

#   Failed test 'lock'
#   at t/sharelite.t line 75.
#  got: '1366'
# expected: '2000'

#   Failed test 'version inc'
#   at t/sharelite.t line 76.
#  got: '1370'
# expected: '2004'
# Looks like you failed 2 tests of 14.
t/sharelite.t  
Dubious, test returned 2 (wstat 512, 0x200)
Failed 2/14 subtests 
t/unicode-key.t .. ok


Haven't investigated whether this is a regression with Perl 5.12 or
something else. The last time it was built on armel was in March 2009.
-- 
Niko Tyni   nt...@debian.org


---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
Source: libipc-sharelite-perl
Source-Version: 0.17-2

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
libipc-sharelite-perl, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

libipc-sharelite-perl_0.17-2.debian.tar.gz
  to main/libi/libipc-sharelite-perl/libipc-sharelite-perl_0.17-2.debian.tar.gz
libipc-sharelite-perl_0.17-2.dsc
  to main/libi/libipc-sharelite-perl/libipc-sharelite-perl_0.17-2.dsc
libipc-sharelite-perl_0.17-2_amd64.deb
  to main/libi/libipc-sharelite-perl/libipc-sharelite-perl_0.17-2_amd64.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 625...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
intrigeri intrig...@debian.org (supplier of updated libipc-sharelite-perl 
package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org)


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2012 17:27:29 +0200
Source: libipc-sharelite-perl
Binary: libipc-sharelite-perl
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 0.17-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Perl Group pkg-perl-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Changed-By: intrigeri intrig...@debian.org
Description: 
 libipc-sharelite-perl - Perl module that provides a simple interface to shared 
memory
Closes: 625828
Changes: 
 libipc-sharelite-perl (0.17-2) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Team upload.
 .
   [ Ansgar Burchardt ]
   * debian/control: Convert Vcs-* fields to Git.
 .
   [ intrigeri ]
   * Delete Old_changes_in_diffgz.patch, that has never been enabled
 after Sarge.
   * Convert debian/copyright to copyright format 1.0.
   * Don't version dependency on perl, that is satisfied at least since Lenny.
   * New patch: Disable-t-sharelite.t-Closes-625828.patch (Closes: #625828)
   * Bump compatibility level to dh 9.
   * Migrate to tiny dh9 debian/rules.
   * Bumped Standards-Version to 3.9.3, no change required.
Checksums-Sha1: 
 b6b586d075a71d8bb08b48b15db366621af66a4f 2169 libipc-sharelite-perl_0.17-2.dsc
 12383e665b1030e8c77262844b4e449fe05a435d 4517 
libipc-sharelite-perl_0.17-2.debian.tar.gz
 2b4912ca355978d62f412f23e3dc2aef7ae06fa7 27318 
libipc-sharelite-perl_0.17-2_amd64.deb
Checksums-Sha256: 
 8f92a535718d83a4eaa5e2b3c08ceddf379ca5acc75c8b4bb9848fc679334804 2169 
libipc-sharelite-perl_0.17-2.dsc
 caf221f30697e333ca0cb00b926ddf54ef83850f5fb64cbac173eed4b89f9aa8 4517 
libipc-sharelite-perl_0.17-2.debian.tar.gz
 2b2247749526e1b1f14127d3ab53e304a3c8583aeb8c1c48ee5fc9c18ba96468 27318 
libipc-sharelite-perl_0.17-2_amd64.deb
Files: 
 aae05fa0cdcf94845ea7e7b60fb4034b 2169 perl optional 
libipc-sharelite-perl_0.17-2.dsc
 6b0cf493cd9294153a401d31c55c2258 4517 perl optional 
libipc-sharelite-perl_0.17-2.debian.tar.gz
 9909aef60261ed9100fca854cec55be8 27318 perl optional 
libipc-sharelite-perl_0.17-2_amd64.deb

-BEGIN PGP

Bug#678851: controlaula: ships files in /etc/opt: /etc/opt/chrome/policies/managed/controlaula.json

2012-06-29 Thread José Luis Redrejo Rodríguez

severity 678851 normal
retitle 678851 creates empty directory in  /etc/opt/chrome/policies/managed
stop

thanks

Ack, I removed the shipped file but forgot to remove the empty
directory creation. I'll fix it asap, anyway, in the meantime I'm
retitling the bug and changing its severity to reflect the new
circunstances

Kind regards
José L. Redrejo

2012/6/26 Andreas Beckmann deb...@abeckmann.de:
 Package: controlaula
 Version: 1.8.0-2
 Followup-For: Bug #678851

 Hi,

 the updated ackage still ships a directory tree in /etc/opt:

 /etc/opt
 /etc/opt/chrome
 /etc/opt/chrome/policies
 /etc/opt/chrome/policies/managed


 Andreas





--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#634890: [klibc] klibc issues on armhf (not Debian/armel)

2012-06-29 Thread Steve McIntyre

On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 06:59:34PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
On Tue, 19 Jun 2012, Steve McIntyre wrote:

 
 More debugging results:
 
  * If I replace -Os with -O0 to disable optimisation, the crash goes
away too. Suggests (maybe) a compiler bug here...

nasty. :|
 
  * There's a real bug in the ARM assembly version of longjmp in
usr/klibc/arch/arm/setjmp.S: it will always pass back its first
argument as a return value, even if it's 0 (see the man page for
more details). Oddly, the Thumb implementation in the same file
*is* correct!

care to cook up a patch, please?

Sure, no problem:

--- klibc-2.0.old/usr/klibc/arch/arm/setjmp.S   2012-05-29 21:41:34.0 
+
+++ klibc-2.0/usr/klibc/arch/arm/setjmp.S   2012-06-29 16:53:25.0 
+
@@ -41,7 +41,9 @@
 longjmp:
ldmia   r0, {r4, r5, r6, r7, r8, r9, r10, fp, sp, lr}
mov r0, r1
-   BX(lr)
+   bne 1f
+   mov r0, #1
+1: BX(lr)
.size longjmp,.-longjmp
 
 #else /* __thumb__ */


-- 
Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.st...@einval.com
You lock the door
And throw away the key
There's someone in my head but it's not me 




-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#679548: opendkim silently stops when IPv6 addreses are involved

2012-06-29 Thread Olaf Zaplinski

Package: opendkim
Version: 2.0.1+dfsg-1
Severity: grave
Tags: ipv6
Justification: renders package unusable


specifying

PeerList199.192.231.53,2605:eb00:100:1::2085:29b0

lets opendkim stop silently when trying to start teh daemon. This happens also
when disabling PeerList entirely and changing

Socket   inet:8891@127.0.0.1

to

Socket   inet:8891@::1

It seems that opendkim is not IPv6 capable and so unusable when running IPv6 
enabled MTAs.


-- System Information:
Debian Release: 6.0.5
  APT prefers stable-updates
  APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages opendkim depends on:
ii  adduser3.112+nmu2add and remove users and groups
ii  libc6  2.11.3-3  Embedded GNU C Library: Shared lib
ii  libdb4.8   4.8.30-2  Berkeley v4.8 Database Libraries [
ii  libldap-2.4-2  2.4.23-7.2OpenLDAP libraries
ii  liblua5.1-05.1.4-5   Simple, extensible, embeddable pro
ii  libmilter1.0.1 8.14.3-9.4Sendmail Mail Filter API (Milter)
ii  libopendkim1   2.0.1+dfsg-1  Library for signing and verifying 
ii  libssl0.9.80.9.8o-4squeeze13 SSL shared libraries
ii  libunbound21.4.6-1+squeeze2  library implementing DNS resolutio

opendkim recommends no packages.

opendkim suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#679525: closed by Michael Gilbert mgilb...@debian.org (Re: [pkg-wine-party] Bug#679525: Build-Depends on obsolete package ia32-libs-dev)

ow...@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System) writes:

 This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report
 which was filed against the wine-unstable package:

 #679525: Build-Depends on obsolete package ia32-libs-dev

 It has been closed by Michael Gilbert mgilb...@debian.org.

 Their explanation is attached below along with your original report.
 If this explanation is unsatisfactory and you have not received a
 better one in a separate message then please contact Michael Gilbert 
 mgilb...@debian.org by
 replying to this email.


 -- 
 679525: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=679525
 Debian Bug Tracking System
 Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

 From: Michael Gilbert mgilb...@debian.org
 Subject: Re: [pkg-wine-party] Bug#679525: Build-Depends on obsolete package 
 ia32-libs-dev
 To: 679525-cl...@bugs.debian.org
 Cc: Debian Bug Tracking System sub...@bugs.debian.org
 Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2012 12:18:30 -0400

 version: 1.5.0-1

 On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 8:22 AM, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
 Package: wine-unstable
 Version: 1.3.15-0.1
 Severity: serious

 Hi,

 as has long been anounced ia32-libs-dev will not be in wheezy since
 32bit support will be replaced by multiarch. Since your package still
 Build-Depends on ia32-libs-dev this means it will no longer build from
 source. ÃÂ Please multiarchify your package.

 This has been fixed for the past couple uploads.  I'm not sure why the
 source for 1.3.15 is still lingering around in unstable.

 Best wishes,
 Mike

Package: libwine-unstable
Source: wine-unstable
Version: 1.3.15-0.1
Architecture: amd64

Did you forget to request the removal of packages no longer build by
wine-unstable?

MfG
Goswin




-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#678140: marked as done (Two tiff issues: CVE-2012-2113 / CVE-2012-2088)

Your message dated Fri, 29 Jun 2012 14:05:59 -0400
with message-id 
20120629140557.1961146346.qww314...@jberkenbilt-linux.appiancorp.com
and subject line bug fixed in 4.0.2
has caused the Debian Bug report #678140,
regarding Two tiff issues: CVE-2012-2113 / CVE-2012-2088
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
678140: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=678140
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: tiff
Severity: grave
Tags: security

Two new tiff issues have been repored to Red Hat bugzilla, please see
these bugs for details:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2012-2088
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=810551 (CVE-2012-2113)

Cheers,
Moritz


---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
Version: 4.0.2-1

Of the two security issues reported here, only CVE-2012-2113 is in 4.x,
and it is fixed in version 4.0.2, which I had already uploaded before
seeing this bug report.

-- 
Jay Berkenbilt q...@debian.org

---End Message---

Bug#675842: Retest request.

2012-06-29 Thread Steven Chamberlain

On 26/06/12 18:02, RaÃºl SÃ¡nchez Siles wrote:
   I would greatly appreciate if you could test the build again. I don't have 
 access to a kfreebsd machine and hence I'm unable to test this on time before 
 the freeze.

Hi,

It seems to build OK now on kfreebsd-i386 after this commit fixed the
build-stamp problem:

http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-kde/kde-extras/webkitkde.git;a=commit;h=83adb0b59f231c0b59bd5c87e763cb8095af59bf

Regards,
-- 
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#679548: Please test current version

2012-06-29 Thread Scott Kitterman

I've built test packages of the current version for Squeeze 
http://kitterman.com/dkim/opendkim/.  Please test and see if they resolve your 
issue.

Scott K

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Bug#679554: goobox: FTBS on mipsel, builds on (almost) all archs fine

Package: goobox
Version: 3.0.1-2
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
Severity: serious

Goobox 3.0.1-2 has been built on almost all architectures fine so far (atm
only kfreebsd-386 and s390 are missing). It also build fine on mipsel
in the past; however the current build fails with some strange errors
in nsgmls (reported now as #679552).

https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=gooboxarch=mipselver=3.0.1-2stamp=1340990790file=log

I'm rather clueless here, the man page generation with docbook-to-man,
po4a and nsgmls has never been a source of trouble and is in place 
already for several years (unchanged).

Any help appreciated.

-- 
  Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de
   Dipl.-Phys.   http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php
64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred
   Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#669918: kmail crashes when sending an email

2012-06-29 Thread adrien

Hi,

Since the last testing update of kmail (4:4.4.11.1+l10n-3), I cannot send
emails anymore, on both computer at home and at work.

As saying in this bug report, kmail freeze when saving or sending email.
The problem occurs when I hit send, send withâ¦, and even with ctrl+enter.

I hope a solution wil come up shortlyâ¦

Regards,

Adrien Grellier



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Processed: Setting relationship

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 block 679554 by 679552
Bug #679554 [goobox] goobox: FTBS on mipsel, builds on (almost) all archs fine
679554 was not blocked by any bugs.
679554 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 679554: 679552
 tag 679554 + help
Bug #679554 [goobox] goobox: FTBS on mipsel, builds on (almost) all archs fine
Added tag(s) help.
 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
679554: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=679554
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#639400: Please update for network-manager 0.9

2012-06-29 Thread Laurent Bigonville

Hi Martin,

I had a quick look at the new version of the pkg that you have
proposed and it seems that the changelog (and changes?) from the
1.1.2-2 upload are missing, any idea?

The freeze will happen at the end of the month (in 2 days). I'll upload
the newer version for you if you can check this.

Cheers

Laurent Bigonville



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#679557: xserver-xorg-video-nouveau: Fermi cards need Linux 3.4 for acceleration

2012-06-29 Thread Sven Joachim

Package: xserver-xorg-video-nouveau
Version: 1:1.0.1-1
Severity: serious

Quoting the NEWS.Debian file:

,
| xserver-xorg-video-nouveau (1:0.0.16+git20120529+ace77b6-1) experimental; 
urgency=low
| 
|   Fermi cards (GeForce 4xx/5xx series) now require Linux kernel 3.4 or
|   newer for acceleration, on older kernels they will only run
|   unaccelerated.  Older NVidia cards are not affected.
| 
|  -- Sven Joachim svenj...@gmx.de  Sat, 02 Jun 2012 19:12:43 +0200
`

Since we don't have Linux kernel 3.4 in testing or sid, this makes the
package unfit for release.  See also the thread starting at
http://lists.debian.org/debian-kernel/2012/06/msg00161.html.



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#679561: pegasus-wms FTBFS with new subversion

2012-06-29 Thread peter green


Package: pegasus-wms
Version: 4.0.1+dfsg-6
Severity: serious
Tags: patch

pegasus-wms FTBFS with the new subversion

[exec] g++ -ffor-scope  -Wall -O2 -m64 -ggdb 
-DMACHINE_SPECIFIC=linux -DLINUX -DMAJOR=2  
-DHAS_SVNVERSION=\Unversioned directory\ pegasus-keg.cc -c -o 
pegasus-keg.o

[exec] g++-4.7.real: error: directory: No such file or directory

This bug does not currently affect wheezy but jcristu has said that the 
new subversion may be allowed in and that therefore we should assume 
issues caused by it are rc for wheezy.


The cause is that the new version of subversion returns Unversioned 
directory in response to svnversion . in a non-svn  directory, this 
breaks the build proces due to an inability to handle spaces in this 
field, the attached patch  fixes this by not defining -DHAS_SVNVERSION 
if svnversion . reutrns  Unversioned directory.


Patch is attatched just add it to the quilt series.
Description: fix build with new subversion
 Recent versions of subversion return Unversioned directory in response
 to svnversion . in a non-svn  directory, this breaks the build process
 due to an inability to handle spaces in this field, the attached patch
 fixes this by not defining -DHAS_SVNVERSION if svnversion . reutrns
 Unversioned directory
Author: Peter Michael Green plugw...@p10link.net

---
The information above should follow the Patch Tagging Guidelines, please
checkout http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep3/ to learn about the format. Here
are templates for supplementary fields that you might want to add:

Origin: vendor|upstream|other, url of original patch
Bug: url in upstream bugtracker
Bug-Debian: http://bugs.debian.org/bugnumber
Bug-Ubuntu: https://launchpad.net/bugs/bugnumber
Forwarded: no|not-needed|url proving that it has been forwarded
Reviewed-By: name and email of someone who approved the patch
Last-Update: -MM-DD

--- pegasus-wms-4.0.1+dfsg.orig/src/tools/pegasus-keg/Makefile
+++ pegasus-wms-4.0.1+dfsg/src/tools/pegasus-keg/Makefile
@@ -129,8 +129,10 @@ CONDOR_CXX = $(CONDOR) $(CXX)
 
 SVNVERSION = $(shell svnversion . 2 /dev/null)
 ifneq (,${SVNVERSION})
+ifneq (Unversioned directory,${SVNVERSION})
 CXXFLAGS += -DHAS_SVNVERSION=\${SVNVERSION}\
 endif
+endif
 
 # add large file support
 ifneq (,${LFS_CFLAGS})

Bug#677623: marked as done (driftnet not working on x86_64 system)

Your message dated Fri, 29 Jun 2012 19:07:40 +
with message-id e1skgxc-ym...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#677623: fixed in driftnet 0.1.6+cvs20040426-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #677623,
regarding driftnet not working on x86_64 system
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
677623: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=677623
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: driftnet
Version: 0.1.6-9+b1
Severity: important

When running on x86_64 machine driftnet shows no resoults. It spawns two
additional threas which take all cpu time. Program window shows now resoults,
when colosing it program doesn't end. Trying kill program from the console
[ctrl+c] also doesn't work either (only manula SIGKILL for every program thread
works).
Thinks this problem is arch dependent, also was discuted on RedHat bugtrucker:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=201412
PS. testing,unstable version also suffers the same issue on my machine.



-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers proposed-updates
  APT policy: (500, 'proposed-updates'), (500, 'testing'), (100, 'unstable'), 
(100, 'stable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 3.4.0-2.dmz.2-liquorix-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores; PREEMPT)
Locale: LANG=pl_PL.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=pl_PL.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages driftnet depends on:
ii  libatk1.0-0 2.4.0-2
ii  libc6   2.13-33
ii  libcairo2   1.12.2-2
ii  libfontconfig1  2.9.0-6
ii  libfreetype62.4.9-1
ii  libgif4 4.1.6-9.1
ii  libglib2.0-02.32.3-1
ii  libgtk2.0-0 2.24.10-1
ii  libjpeg62   6b1-3
ii  libpango1.0-0   1.30.0-1
ii  libpcap0.8  1.2.1-3
ii  libpng12-0  1.2.49-1

driftnet recommends no packages.

driftnet suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information


---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
Source: driftnet
Source-Version: 0.1.6+cvs20040426-3

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
driftnet, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

driftnet_0.1.6+cvs20040426-3.debian.tar.gz
  to main/d/driftnet/driftnet_0.1.6+cvs20040426-3.debian.tar.gz
driftnet_0.1.6+cvs20040426-3.dsc
  to main/d/driftnet/driftnet_0.1.6+cvs20040426-3.dsc
driftnet_0.1.6+cvs20040426-3_i386.deb
  to main/d/driftnet/driftnet_0.1.6+cvs20040426-3_i386.deb
driftnet_0.1.6+cvs20040426.orig.tar.bz2
  to main/d/driftnet/driftnet_0.1.6+cvs20040426.orig.tar.bz2



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 677...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
David Suarez david.sephi...@gmail.com (supplier of updated driftnet package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org)


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2012 19:37:20 +0200
Source: driftnet
Binary: driftnet
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.1.6+cvs20040426-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: David Suarez david.sephi...@gmail.com
Changed-By: David Suarez david.sephi...@gmail.com
Description: 
 driftnet   - picks out and displays images from network traffic
Closes: 616451 647949 662304 677623
Changes: 
 driftnet (0.1.6+cvs20040426-3) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Fix some typos in the previous changelog
   * Lowercase the short description of the package
 .
 driftnet (0.1.6+cvs20040426-1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Imported Upstream version 0.1.6+cvs20040426
   * New maintainer (closes: #616451)
   * Fix memstr() implementation to work on 64bit systems (closes: #677623)
   * Make driftnet read from pcap file (closes: #647949)
   * Replace libpng12-dev build-dep with libpng-dev (closes: #662304)
   * Update standards version 3.9.3
   * Update debhelper version 9.0
   * Switch to dpkg-source 3.0 (quilt) format
   * Do not delete temporary files in adjunct mode as specified in help
   * Fix ifndef hiding needed values for non-gtk operation
   * Prevent backtrace due to unneccessary xfree on tmpdir
   * Update man file
Checksums-Sha1: 
 30279b419974dd9b0456a57ec3223880e0048f89 1239 driftnet_0.1.6+cvs20040426-3.dsc
 2c875368b03259b105a022cbbc69bc6b9b73a8f3 38362 
driftnet_0.1.6+cvs20040426.orig.tar.bz2

Bug#678912: marked as done (dicoweb: crash since Django switch from 1.3 to 1.4)

Your message dated Fri, 29 Jun 2012 19:07:20 +
with message-id e1skgxi-xk...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#678912: fixed in dico 2.2-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #678912,
regarding dicoweb: crash since Django switch from 1.3 to 1.4
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
678912: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=678912
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---

Package: dicoweb
Version: 2.2-1
Severity: grave


Coin,

The webui is totally broken with the following error message:
Traceback:
File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/django/core/handlers/base.py  
in get_response
  111. response = callback(request,  
*callback_args, **callback_kwargs)

File /usr/share/dicoweb/views.py in index
  188.   'selects': selects,})
File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/django/shortcuts/__init__.py  
in render_to_response
  20. return HttpResponse(loader.render_to_string(*args,  
**kwargs), **httpresponse_kwargs)
File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/django/template/loader.py in  
render_to_string

  169. t = get_template(template_name)
File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/django/template/loader.py in  
get_template

  145. template, origin = find_template(template_name)
File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/django/template/loader.py in  
find_template

  128. loader = find_template_loader(loader_name)
File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/django/template/loader.py in  
find_template_loader
  101. raise ImproperlyConfigured('Error importing  
template source loader %s: %s' % (loader, e))


Exception Type: ImproperlyConfigured at /
Exception Value: Error importing template source loader  
django.template.loaders.filesystem.load_template_source: 'module'  
object has no attribute 'load_template_source'


More details with the debug mode activated can be found here:
  http://dico.duckcorp.org/

Regards.

--
Marc Dequènes (Duck)


pgpxbnpN19xln.pgp
Description: PGP Digital Signature
---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
Source: dico
Source-Version: 2.2-2

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
dico, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

dico-dev_2.2-2_amd64.deb
  to main/d/dico/dico-dev_2.2-2_amd64.deb
dico-doc_2.2-2_all.deb
  to main/d/dico/dico-doc_2.2-2_all.deb
dico-module-guile_2.2-2_amd64.deb
  to main/d/dico/dico-module-guile_2.2-2_amd64.deb
dico-module-mediawiki_2.2-2_all.deb
  to main/d/dico/dico-module-mediawiki_2.2-2_all.deb
dico-module-python_2.2-2_amd64.deb
  to main/d/dico/dico-module-python_2.2-2_amd64.deb
dico-module-wordnet_2.2-2_amd64.deb
  to main/d/dico/dico-module-wordnet_2.2-2_amd64.deb
dico_2.2-2.debian.tar.gz
  to main/d/dico/dico_2.2-2.debian.tar.gz
dico_2.2-2.dsc
  to main/d/dico/dico_2.2-2.dsc
dico_2.2-2_amd64.deb
  to main/d/dico/dico_2.2-2_amd64.deb
dicod_2.2-2_amd64.deb
  to main/d/dico/dicod_2.2-2_amd64.deb
dicoweb_2.2-2_all.deb
  to main/d/dico/dicoweb_2.2-2_all.deb
libdico1_2.2-2_amd64.deb
  to main/d/dico/libdico1_2.2-2_amd64.deb
python-dicoclient_2.2-2_all.deb
  to main/d/dico/python-dicoclient_2.2-2_all.deb
python-wit_2.2-2_all.deb
  to main/d/dico/python-wit_2.2-2_all.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 678...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
أحمد المحمودي (Ahmed El-Mahmoudy) aelmahmo...@sabily.org (supplier of updated 
dico package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org)


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2012 11:03:01 +0200
Source: dico
Binary: dicod dico libdico1 dico-dev dico-doc dico-module-guile 
dico-module-python dico-module-mediawiki dico-module-wordnet python-wit 
python-dicoclient dicoweb
Architecture: source amd64 all
Version: 2.2-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: أحمد المحمودي (Ahmed El-Mahmoudy) aelmahmo...@sabily.org
Changed-By: أحمد المحمودي (Ahmed El-Mahmoudy) aelmahmo...@sabily.org
Description: 
 dico   - RFC 2229 compliant dictionary client
 dico-dev   - RFC 2229 compliant modular dictionary server (development files)
 dico-doc   - RFC 2229 compliant modular dictionary server

Bug#679526: Bug#638741: Bug#679526: Build-Depends on obsolete package ia32-libs-dev

2012-06-29 Thread Fabian Greffrath

Am Samstag, den 30.06.2012, 01:54 +0930 schrieb Ron:
 And has had completely unresponded-to bugs there, like:
 libao looks for the wrong plugin directory, when one is using the
  32-bit .so provided on a 64 bit system.
 dating back to Sun, 8 Jan 2012 19:57:43 ...

Ouch...! /o\




-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#678489: marked as done (mixmaster: Fails to install)

Your message dated Fri, 29 Jun 2012 19:36:13 +
with message-id e1skgzf-0002tc...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#678489: fixed in mixmaster 3.0.0-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #678489,
regarding mixmaster: Fails to install
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
678489: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=678489
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: mixmaster
Version: 3.0.0-4.1
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 3.9

Setting up mixmaster (3.0.0-4.1) ...
dpkg-statoverride: warning: --update given but /var/lib/mixmaster does not exist
dpkg-statoverride: warning: --update given but /var/run/mixmaster does not exist
mkdir: cannot create directory `/var/lib/mixmaster/Mix': No such file or 
directory
dpkg: error processing mixmaster (--configure):
 subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (700, 'testing'), (650, 'unstable'), (600, 'stable'), (550, 
'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 3.1.0-1-686-pae (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages mixmaster depends on:
ii  adduser3.113+nmu3
ii  debconf [debconf-2.0]  1.5.43
ii  libc6  2.13-33
ii  libmailtools-perl  2.08-1
ii  libncurses55.9-8
ii  libpcre3   1:8.30-5
ii  libssl1.0.01.0.1c-3
ii  libtinfo5  5.9-8
ii  libwww-perl6.04-1
ii  zlib1g 1:1.2.7.dfsg-11

Versions of packages mixmaster recommends:
ii  exim4-daemon-heavy [mail-transport-agent]  4.80-3

Versions of packages mixmaster suggests:
ii  mutt  1.5.21-5+b1

-- debconf information:
  mixmaster/stats-update: true


---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
Source: mixmaster
Source-Version: 3.0.0-5

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
mixmaster, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

mixmaster_3.0.0-5.diff.gz
  to main/m/mixmaster/mixmaster_3.0.0-5.diff.gz
mixmaster_3.0.0-5.dsc
  to main/m/mixmaster/mixmaster_3.0.0-5.dsc
mixmaster_3.0.0-5_amd64.deb
  to main/m/mixmaster/mixmaster_3.0.0-5_amd64.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 678...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Colin Tuckley col...@debian.org (supplier of updated mixmaster package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org)


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2012 19:23:47 +0100
Source: mixmaster
Binary: mixmaster
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 3.0.0-5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Colin Tuckley col...@debian.org
Changed-By: Colin Tuckley col...@debian.org
Description: 
 mixmaster  - Anonymous remailer client and server
Closes: 678489
Changes: 
 mixmaster (3.0.0-5) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Ack NMU
   * Fix create of /var/lib/mixmaster (Closes: #678489)
   * Fix create of /var/run/mixmaster when on tmpfs
   * bump standards version to 3.9.3 (no changes required).
   * Add debian/watch file.
Checksums-Sha1: 
 57be69d4274a5e5a12783a53358b109a6501c901 1125 mixmaster_3.0.0-5.dsc
 67b29b3411c21ae3b8ce6b2adb596235d97b8595 31801 mixmaster_3.0.0-5.diff.gz
 046e18682f5258e524dd9d0afbaf06f2f6c641bb 222846 mixmaster_3.0.0-5_amd64.deb
Checksums-Sha256: 
 1f56f55b6e293c743c7c9b1e6278bf7c12d81000981faddda8179be5b2e8aea4 1125 
mixmaster_3.0.0-5.dsc
 97cbd4998a29828bea3890a11ef7bdbcf7391fe47959a38b7e72e7ac49ab0e53 31801 
mixmaster_3.0.0-5.diff.gz
 71c644cf5c5fa1389ff80d567878e843524568fc94a8abaae37c69d67cff4afe 222846 
mixmaster_3.0.0-5_amd64.deb
Files: 
 ff537fc093bd904f20807bfe89341f01 1125 mail optional mixmaster_3.0.0-5.dsc
 c464ed7ba6bdee0f71fdbf38dfaf22df 31801 mail optional mixmaster_3.0.0-5.diff.gz
 2be96c5f683bf1978f03c51cd045d17b 222846 mail optional 
mixmaster_3.0.0-5_amd64.deb

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAk/t+30ACgkQj2OPlhswRc7G8ACaAz7lMzHxw2W9Ny60Z2Hl6Im4
+7QAoKg+M7Rl/oOaGMwKbcqYtwTRc/ne
=59Ms
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


---End Message---

Bug#679557: xserver-xorg-video-nouveau: Fermi cards need Linux 3.4 for acceleration

2012-06-29 Thread Sven Joachim

block 679557 by 679566
thanks

On 2012-06-29 21:08 +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:

 Package: xserver-xorg-video-nouveau
 Version: 1:1.0.1-1
 Severity: serious

 Quoting the NEWS.Debian file:

 ,
 | xserver-xorg-video-nouveau (1:0.0.16+git20120529+ace77b6-1) experimental; 
 urgency=low
 | 
 |   Fermi cards (GeForce 4xx/5xx series) now require Linux kernel 3.4 or
 |   newer for acceleration, on older kernels they will only run
 |   unaccelerated.  Older NVidia cards are not affected.
 | 
 |  -- Sven Joachim svenj...@gmx.de  Sat, 02 Jun 2012 19:12:43 +0200
 `

 Since we don't have Linux kernel 3.4 in testing or sid, this makes the
 package unfit for release.  See also the thread starting at
 http://lists.debian.org/debian-kernel/2012/06/msg00161.html.

Turned into a bug report which is blocking this one.



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Processed: Re: Bug#679557: xserver-xorg-video-nouveau: Fermi cards need Linux 3.4 for acceleration

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 block 679557 by 679566
Bug #679557 [xserver-xorg-video-nouveau] xserver-xorg-video-nouveau: Fermi 
cards need Linux 3.4 for acceleration
679557 was not blocked by any bugs.
679557 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 679557: 679566
 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
679557: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=679557
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Processed: severity of 677610 is serious, tagging 677610

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 severity 677610 serious
Bug #677610 [telepathy-butterfly] telepathy-butterfly uninstalable
Severity set to 'serious' from 'normal'
 tags 677610 + sid wheezy
Bug #677610 [telepathy-butterfly] telepathy-butterfly uninstalable
Added tag(s) sid and wheezy.
 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
677610: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=677610
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#645998: marked as done (freeradius crashes due to segmentation fault)

Your message dated Fri, 29 Jun 2012 21:12:05 +
with message-id e1skiu1-0001c2...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#645998: fixed in freeradius 2.1.12+dfsg-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #645998,
regarding freeradius crashes due to segmentation fault
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
645998: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=645998
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: freeradius
Version: 2.1.10+dfsg-2
Severity: normal

Some times server crashes due to segfault problem. When occurs we can see a 
message
like this(*) in system log (/var/log/syslog).

We follow the instructions at /usr/share/doc/freeradius/bugs.gz and
try to 'hunt' the segfault, because it occurs occassionally. The result
was this (**).

We will provide more information about the configuration and architecture.

Thanks.

(*)
kernel: [622103.849166] freeradius[21529]: segfault at 18752346 ip b7866497
sp bfd16630 error 4 in libfreeradius-radius-2.1.10.so[b7855000+1e000]

(**)
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
rbtree_find (tree=0xabb0380e, Data=0x823af84) at rbtree.c:476
476 rbtree.c: No existe el fichero o el directorio.
 in rbtree.c
(gdb) where
#0  rbtree_find (tree=0xabb0380e, Data=0x823af84) at rbtree.c:476
#1  0xb7fcf979 in rbtree_deletebydata (tree=0xabb0380e, 
data=0x823af84) at rbtree.c:457
#2  0xb7bff31f in eap_handler_free (inst=0x82098f0, handler=0x823af84) 
at mem.c:138
#3  0x08067f7d in request_free (request_ptr=0xbfffef7c) at util.c:235
#4  0x0806c29f in ev_request_free (prequest=0xbfffef7c) at event.c:184
#5  0x0806f23c in cleanup_delay (ctx=0x823af80) at event.c:551
#6  0xb7fd6284 in fr_event_run (el=0x81b8838, when=0xb138) at
#event.c:220
#7  0xb7fd64fe in fr_event_loop (el=0x81b8838) at event.c:399
#8  0x0806c3f6 in radius_event_process () at event.c:3760
#9  0x0806496a in main (argc=2, argv=0xb304) at radiusd.c:406

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 6.0.3
  APT prefers stable-updates
  APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-686-bigmem (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages freeradius depends on:
ii  adduser3.112+nmu2add and remove users and groups
ii  ca-certificates20090814+nmu3squeeze1 Common CA certificates
ii  freeradius-common  2.1.10+dfsg-2 FreeRADIUS common files
ii  libc6  2.11.2-10 Embedded GNU C Library: Shared lib
ii  libfreeradius2 2.1.10+dfsg-2 FreeRADIUS shared library
ii  libgdbm3   1.8.3-9   GNU dbm database routines (runtime
ii  libltdl7   2.2.6b-2  A system independent dlopen wrappe
ii  libpam0g   1.1.1-6.1 Pluggable Authentication Modules l
ii  libperl5.105.10.1-17squeeze2 shared Perl library
ii  libpython2.6   2.6.6-8+b1Shared Python runtime library (ver
ii  libssl0.9.80.9.8o-4squeeze3  SSL shared libraries
ii  lsb-base   3.2-23.2squeeze1  Linux Standard Base 3.2 init scrip
ii  ssl-cert   1.0.28simple debconf wrapper for OpenSSL
ii  zlib1g 1:1.2.3.4.dfsg-3  compression library - runtime

Versions of packages freeradius recommends:
ii  freeradius-utils   2.1.10+dfsg-2 FreeRADIUS client utilities

Versions of packages freeradius suggests:
pn  freeradius-krb5none(no description available)
ii  freeradius-ldap2.1.10+dfsg-2 LDAP module for FreeRADIUS server
ii  freeradius-mysql   2.1.10+dfsg-2 MySQL module for FreeRADIUS server
pn  freeradius-postgresql  none(no description available)

-- Configuration Files:
/etc/freeradius/acct_users [Errno 13] Permission denied: 
u'/etc/freeradius/acct_users'
/etc/freeradius/attrs [Errno 13] Permission denied: u'/etc/freeradius/attrs'
/etc/freeradius/attrs.access_challenge [Errno 13] Permission denied: 
u'/etc/freeradius/attrs.access_challenge'
/etc/freeradius/attrs.access_reject [Errno 13] Permission denied: 
u'/etc/freeradius/attrs.access_reject'
/etc/freeradius/attrs.accounting_response [Errno 13] Permission denied: 
u'/etc/freeradius/attrs.accounting_response'
/etc/freeradius/attrs.pre-proxy [Errno 13] Permission denied: 
u'/etc/freeradius/attrs.pre-proxy'
/etc/freeradius/clients.conf [Errno 13] Permission denied: 
u'/etc/freeradius/clients.conf'
/etc/freeradius/eap.conf [Errno 13] Permission denied:

Bug#674448: marked as done (CVE-2012-2098)

Your message dated Fri, 29 Jun 2012 21:20:15 +
with message-id e1skibv-00021p...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#674448: fixed in libcommons-compress-java 1.4.1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #674448,
regarding CVE-2012-2098
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
674448: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=674448
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: libcommons-compress-java
Version: 1.2-1
Severity: grave
Tags: security

Please see https://commons.apache.org/compress/security.html

Fixed in 1.4.1. This doesn't warrant a DSA, but you could fix
it through a point update for Squeeze 6.0.6.

Cheers,
Moritz


---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
Source: libcommons-compress-java
Source-Version: 1.4.1-1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
libcommons-compress-java, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP 
archive:

libcommons-compress-java_1.4.1-1.debian.tar.gz
  to 
main/libc/libcommons-compress-java/libcommons-compress-java_1.4.1-1.debian.tar.gz
libcommons-compress-java_1.4.1-1.dsc
  to main/libc/libcommons-compress-java/libcommons-compress-java_1.4.1-1.dsc
libcommons-compress-java_1.4.1-1_all.deb
  to main/libc/libcommons-compress-java/libcommons-compress-java_1.4.1-1_all.deb
libcommons-compress-java_1.4.1.orig.tar.gz
  to 
main/libc/libcommons-compress-java/libcommons-compress-java_1.4.1.orig.tar.gz



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 674...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Miguel Landaeta mig...@miguel.cc (supplier of updated 
libcommons-compress-java package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org)


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2012 18:08:36 -0430
Source: libcommons-compress-java
Binary: libcommons-compress-java
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.4.1-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Java Maintainers 
pkg-java-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Changed-By: Miguel Landaeta mig...@miguel.cc
Description: 
 libcommons-compress-java - Java API for working with tar, zip and bzip2 files
Closes: 674448
Changes: 
 libcommons-compress-java (1.4.1-1) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * Team upload.
   * New upstream release. CVE-2012-2098 is fixed. (Closes: #674448).
   * Replace B-D on junit with junit4.
   * Add B-D on libxz-java.
   * Fix clean target to allow twice in a row builds.
Checksums-Sha1: 
 b857e142fdcdc716d816c772ed696f5f50f0e578 2162 
libcommons-compress-java_1.4.1-1.dsc
 9e9542ba94351ad410dcd0fea1ceaf265f54f81c 3228776 
libcommons-compress-java_1.4.1.orig.tar.gz
 82de52fc0c32dadc628941f7b7c285067db69290 3018 
libcommons-compress-java_1.4.1-1.debian.tar.gz
 ecfe0a9febc00da38c04c032963e6ca98bb3f36a 224098 
libcommons-compress-java_1.4.1-1_all.deb
Checksums-Sha256: 
 b50bd9daa0fa0ab871d7097c9b3c7fe514953c607efad9f23bd89381f6213c54 2162 
libcommons-compress-java_1.4.1-1.dsc
 b4f34aa03df917b785479e147381eea86c5c17e9067ddf8c27301ff6cd0aa91c 3228776 
libcommons-compress-java_1.4.1.orig.tar.gz
 4e8addfd04a4ea631e835b05248a036fc8fb29de482e1b8bb60e34331a3f4a91 3018 
libcommons-compress-java_1.4.1-1.debian.tar.gz
 f49ccf8488c9a14ba68d2f103db5b390c908caadebcbb354492bbcad5ee27415 224098 
libcommons-compress-java_1.4.1-1_all.deb
Files: 
 ff3e615d448e8da031a03e431433c9d1 2162 java optional 
libcommons-compress-java_1.4.1-1.dsc
 f26e9d94dd83976d76dfa5e1052abb49 3228776 java optional 
libcommons-compress-java_1.4.1.orig.tar.gz
 002444c53a511a65678557504cf630ae 3018 java optional 
libcommons-compress-java_1.4.1-1.debian.tar.gz
 fd16669272e1ed38f51f96ffb06fa7a5 224098 java optional 
libcommons-compress-java_1.4.1-1_all.deb

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)

iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJP4qYDAAoJECHSBYmXSz6W2yMP/RDq1uP3WKtVRXK2wyrJUTQS
8Iz6pqVxHcZLJMN3S1Z4hUkWsQkyqDsG/oAP4bws9HNOlvSI87TNbzP6r3XYLcQr
FIGMqgd8iKOCvQiLhlWLwUuy+y3rIEcndOlsd5WXmrZUvM5XCQh1MvHxYyyBw0FO
cCQbtL2LFwiVCIPjJ4s//cNWAnz6PXH0IXTAGcJhRHFm60VZz4I/9lJJFgxlVTx9
R2058Uw1UZ7ZwUiHOhlV8Jdcaehm+g1qiJgtEG9H/5QkHLFzf68gXJS6uIzFCqC5
sEde3Y4sfYEuAzMCW2tkh2siypaBFyy2ROa8kr03ZVmsCqx84JLUXDgvjUIvsRzJ
VE+1z3QY7XxZw+WkRGFDJX7hA0PDRv9EPgUbfaG8NnGiGNd3BTxu+E0ypDY01y4L

Bug#678956: marked as done (owncloud: Web File Browser: Duplicating folders)

Your message dated Fri, 29 Jun 2012 21:29:50 +
with message-id e1skilc-0004iu...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#678956: fixed in owncloud 4.0.4debian-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #678956,
regarding owncloud: Web File Browser: Duplicating folders
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
678956: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=678956
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: owncloud
Version: 4.0.3debian-1
Severity: normal

Dear Maintainer,

EXACT STEPS LEADING TO PROBLEM: 
Account exists allready. Upgrade to 4.0.3
1. Log in to your web interface: http://my.site/owncloud/
2. Create a new Directory BugTest
3. Click into the Directory
4. move some File(s) into this place
5. Click Tab Files

EXPECTED OUTCOME: 

You can see just one directory BugTest

ACTUAL OUTCOME: 

You can see this directory twice or more

REPRODUCIBILITY: 

8/10 (for me it happens everytime from update 4.0.2-4.0.3)
Eventually you need to delete the Files in BugTest again to see the bug.

OTHER COMMENTS: 

For me this also happens after recreate the Cache index and upgrade to 4.0.3
again. Sometimes the number of Directories increases with every click on
the Files tab. 4.0.2 without any upgrade is ok.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.38-2-686 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

Versions of packages owncloud depends on:
ii  libjs-jquery  1.7.2+debian-1
ii  libjs-jquery-jplayer  2.1.0-1
ii  libjs-jquery-ui   1.8.ooops.20+dfsg-1
ii  libphp-phpmailer  5.1-1
ii  lighttpd [httpd]  1.4.31-1
ii  owncloud-sqlite   4.0.3debian-1
ii  php-crypt-blowfish1.1.0~RC2-1
ii  php-getid31.9.3-1
ii  php-mdb2  2.5.0b3-2
ii  php-mdb2-schema   0.8.5-1
ii  php-pear  5.4.4-2
ii  php-sabredav  1.6.2-3
ii  php-xml-parser1.3.4-6
ii  php5  5.4.4-2
ii  php5-curl 5.4.4-2
ii  php5-gd   5.4.4-2

Versions of packages owncloud recommends:
ii  exim4  4.80-3
ii  exim4-daemon-heavy [mail-transport-agent]  4.80-3

owncloud suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information


---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
Source: owncloud
Source-Version: 4.0.4debian-1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
owncloud, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

owncloud-mysql_4.0.4debian-1_all.deb
  to main/o/owncloud/owncloud-mysql_4.0.4debian-1_all.deb
owncloud-sqlite_4.0.4debian-1_all.deb
  to main/o/owncloud/owncloud-sqlite_4.0.4debian-1_all.deb
owncloud_4.0.4debian-1.debian.tar.gz
  to main/o/owncloud/owncloud_4.0.4debian-1.debian.tar.gz
owncloud_4.0.4debian-1.dsc
  to main/o/owncloud/owncloud_4.0.4debian-1.dsc
owncloud_4.0.4debian-1_all.deb
  to main/o/owncloud/owncloud_4.0.4debian-1_all.deb
owncloud_4.0.4debian.orig.tar.bz2
  to main/o/owncloud/owncloud_4.0.4debian.orig.tar.bz2



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 678...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Paul van Tilburg pau...@debian.org (supplier of updated owncloud package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org)


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2012 22:14:50 +0200
Source: owncloud
Binary: owncloud owncloud-mysql owncloud-sqlite
Architecture: source all
Version: 4.0.4debian-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: ownCloud for Debian maintainers 
pkg-owncloud-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Changed-By: Paul van Tilburg pau...@debian.org
Description: 
 owncloud   - cloud storage for files, music, contacts, calendars and many more
 owncloud-mysql - meta-package providing MySQL dependencies for ownCloud
 owncloud-sqlite - meta-package providing SQLite dependencies for ownCloud
Closes: 678956
Changes: 
 owncloud (4.0.4debian-1) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * New upstream bugfix release; solve major issues with caching
 (closes: #678956).
   * By own admission, upstream does not

Bug#678760: [patch] Fix FTBFS

2012-06-29 Thread Peter Samuelson

tags 678760 patch
thanks

Trivial patch to fix the FTBFS with libsvn-dev 1.7.  This is one of
those cases, as we see with major new g++ / libstdc++ releases, where
an include has been missing all along, just not previously noticed.
From: Peter Samuelson pet...@p12n.org
Subject: Include needed headers
Origin: other (trivial)
Bug-Debian: http://bugs.debian.org/678760

Explicitly include svn_client.h and svn_version.h, as we use
functionality from them.  svn_version.h in particular used to be
included indirectly by other svn headers, but no longer is.

--- a/svn-1.0.1/svn.c
+++ b/svn-1.0.1/svn.c
@@ -33,6 +33,8 @@
 #include php_svn.h

 #include apr_version.h
+#include svn_version.h
+#include svn_client.h
 #include svn_pools.h
 #include svn_sorts.h
 #include svn_config.h

Processed: [patch] Fix FTBFS