Bug#690291: Amarok randomly stops playing sound when song automatically changes using phonon-backend-gstreamer

2012-10-11 Thread Raphaël HALIMI
Package: phonon-backend-gstreamer
Version: 4:4.6.0.0-2
Severity: critical

When using phonon-backend-gstreamer, Amarok randomly stops playing sound at
song change. In that case, the time counter goes on for 3 seconds, then stops.

It seems completely random : it can happen at every song, or can play several
songs without stopping. Also, it occured only on automatic song change so far,
not on manual song change.

Note that only the sound output stops, all the rest of Amarok's interface is
still responsive; and sometimes, if you wait a couple of minutes or so, the
beginning of the song briefly plays for a second, and then both the sound and
the time counter abruptly jump quite precisely to where the time counter really
should be. In any case, manually changing song or position in the time counter
makes the music play again instantly.

This makes Amarok really unusable for music listening (let alone be used for a
party) thus breaking it severely as a music player. Using phonon-backend-vlc
gets rid of this problem, but it's not a satisfying workaround either, since it
have other problems : the impossibility of manipulating sound output volume -
completely breaking both replaygain and fade - and some crackling at the
beginning of playback. Both problems affect every software based on VLC (I
intend to submit another bug report about these issues if it hasn't been done
already).

Also please note that it doesn't seem to be a hardware-related problem, since
the two computers I use Amarok on (a manually assembled desktop PC, and a
Lenovo ThinkPad X200s laptop) present the same behavior.



-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (900, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-3-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages phonon-backend-gstreamer depends on:
ii  gstreamer0.10-alsa   0.10.36-1
ii  gstreamer0.10-plugins-base   0.10.36-1
ii  libc62.13-35
ii  libgl1-mesa-glx [libgl1] 8.0.4-2
ii  libglib2.0-0 2.32.3-1
ii  libgstreamer-plugins-base0.10-0  0.10.36-1
ii  libgstreamer0.10-0   0.10.36-1
ii  libphonon4   4:4.6.0.0-2
ii  libqt4-opengl4:4.8.2+dfsg-2
ii  libqtcore4   4:4.8.2+dfsg-2
ii  libqtgui44:4.8.2+dfsg-2
ii  libstdc++6   4.7.1-7
ii  multiarch-support2.13-35

Versions of packages phonon-backend-gstreamer recommends:
ii  gstreamer0.10-plugins-good  0.10.31-3

Versions of packages phonon-backend-gstreamer suggests:
ii  gstreamer0.10-plugins-ugly  0.10.19-2+b2

-- no debconf information


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#685351: Bug#687702: gnumed-client: t-p-o candidate on 1.1 maintenance branch available

2012-10-11 Thread Andreas Tille
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 10:29:52PM +0200, Karsten Hilbert wrote:
> > 
> > I'm *way* *more* worried about #685351
> 
> I thought #685351 got fixed ?!?

I commited the "missing sources" to SVN but an upload is pending.  It
needs to be documented in README.sources, uploaded and a bug to release
team needs to be filed to add an unblock request.
 
> > which could lead to remove gnumed
> > completely and it is on my todo list for the weekend.
> 
> Ah, I see. I think we did identify a solution but it had to
> wait for you to return to get implemented.

Well, in principle there was no real need to wait for *me* but obviosely
there was no other volunteer to do the remaining work.

> >  Lets concentrate onto this first.
> 
> Sure.

Kind regards

  Andreas. 

-- 
http://fam-tille.de


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#690152: bsaf: FTBFS: Test org.jdesktop.application.TaskMonitorTest failed

2012-10-11 Thread tony mancill
On 10/10/2012 07:12 PM, Miguel Landaeta wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 04:22:11PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
>> Source: bsaf
>> Version: 1.9-3
>> Severity: serious
>> Tags: wheezy sid
>> User: debian...@lists.debian.org
>> Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20121010 qa-ftbfs
>> Justification: FTBFS in wheezy on amd64
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> During a rebuild of all packages in *wheezy*, your package failed to
>> build on amd64.
> 
> I couldn't reproduce this in wheezy or sid, but I was only using pbuilder to 
> test.

I was able to get the build to fail by setting DISPLAY to something not
accessible to the build machine, but it failed in the first unit test
(different than the failure in the bug report).  After unsetting
DISPLAY, the build is successful.  So I don't think it's the same issue.
 My builds were in a cowbuilder chroot.

tony




signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Bug#690257: marked as done (python-irclib: FTBFS: Could not find suitable distribution for Requirement.parse('hgtools'))

2012-10-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 12 Oct 2012 05:02:30 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#690257: fixed in python-irclib 3.2-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #690257,
regarding python-irclib: FTBFS: Could not find suitable distribution for 
Requirement.parse('hgtools')
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
690257: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=690257
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---

Source: python-irclib
Version: 3.0-0.1
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source

python-irclib FTBFS:
| python setup.py install --no-compile 
--root=/build/python-irclib-E2mXSb/python-irclib-3.0/debian/python-irclib
| Checking .pth file support in .
| /usr/bin/python -E -c pass
| Searching for hgtools
| Reading http://pypi.python.org/simple/hgtools/
| Download error on http://pypi.python.org/simple/hgtools/: [Errno -2] Name or 
service not known -- Some packages may not be found!
| Reading http://pypi.python.org/simple/hgtools/
| Download error on http://pypi.python.org/simple/hgtools/: [Errno -2] Name or 
service not known -- Some packages may not be found!
| Couldn't find index page for 'hgtools' (maybe misspelled?)
| Scanning index of all packages (this may take a while)
| Reading http://pypi.python.org/simple/
| Download error on http://pypi.python.org/simple/: [Errno -2] Name or service 
not known -- Some packages may not be found!
| No local packages or download links found for hgtools
| Traceback (most recent call last):
|   File "setup.py", line 10, in 
| paver.tasks.main()
|   File "paver-minilib.zip/paver/tasks.py", line 816, in main
|   File "paver-minilib.zip/paver/tasks.py", line 797, in _launch_pavement
|   File "paver-minilib.zip/paver/tasks.py", line 741, in _process_commands
|   File "paver-minilib.zip/paver/tasks.py", line 655, in _parse_command_line
|   File "paver-minilib.zip/paver/tasks.py", line 613, in _preparse
|   File "paver-minilib.zip/paver/tasks.py", line 110, in get_task
|   File "paver-minilib.zip/paver/setuputils.py", line 192, in get_task
|   File "paver-minilib.zip/paver/setuputils.py", line 220, in _get_distribution
|   File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/setuptools/dist.py", line 221, in 
__init__
| self.fetch_build_eggs(attrs.pop('setup_requires'))
|   File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/setuptools/dist.py", line 245, in 
fetch_build_eggs
| parse_requirements(requires), installer=self.fetch_build_egg
|   File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/pkg_resources.py", line 576, in 
resolve
| dist = best[req.key] = env.best_match(req, self, installer)
|   File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/pkg_resources.py", line 821, in 
best_match
| return self.obtain(req, installer) # try and download/install
|   File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/pkg_resources.py", line 833, in 
obtain
| return installer(requirement)
|   File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/setuptools/dist.py", line 294, in 
fetch_build_egg
| return cmd.easy_install(req)
|   File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/setuptools/command/easy_install.py", 
line 602, in easy_install
| raise DistutilsError(msg)
| distutils.errors.DistutilsError: Could not find suitable distribution for 
Requirement.parse('hgtools')
| make: *** [install] Error 1
| dpkg-buildpackage: error: fakeroot debian/rules binary gave error exit status 
2

Internet was not accessible during the test build.

--
Jakub Wilk
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: python-irclib
Source-Version: 3.2-1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
python-irclib, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 690...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Daniel Baumann  (supplier of updated python-irclib package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org)


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2012 04:53:35 +
Source: python-irclib
Binary: python-irclib
Architecture: source all
Version: 3.2-1
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Thomas Bläsing 
Changed-By: Daniel Baumann 
Description: 
 python-irclib - IRC client library for Python
Closes: 690257

Bug#690287: libibus-1.0-0 ships libibus-1.0.so.5

2012-10-11 Thread Martin Pitt
Package: libibus-1.0-0
Severity: serious
Version: 1.4.99.20120917-1

The experimental ibus version has a severe packaging bug for the
library: The soname changed from 0 to 5, but the library package is
still called "libibus-1.0-0". It needs to be renamed to libibus-1.0-5
to make the library co-installable with older versions. Right now this
completely breaks packages which depend on libibus-1.0-0, as they are
looking for libibus-1.0.so.0.

Thanks,

Martin
-- 
Martin Pitt| http://www.piware.de
Ubuntu Developer (www.ubuntu.com)  | Debian Developer  (www.debian.org)


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#680825: marked as done (gromacs: FTBFS: mv: cannot stat `/«PKGBUILDDIR»/debian/gromacs-mpich/usr/lib/*.so': No such file or directory)

2012-10-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 11 Oct 2012 21:37:18 -0700
with message-id <20121012043717.gv24...@ofb.net>
and subject line bug #680825 resolved
has caused the Debian Bug report #680825,
regarding gromacs: FTBFS: mv: cannot stat 
`/«PKGBUILDDIR»/debian/gromacs-mpich/usr/lib/*.so': No such file or directory
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
680825: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=680825
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: gromacs
Version: 4.5.5-2
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120708 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64

Hi,

During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.

Relevant part:
> make[4]: Entering directory `/«PKGBUILDDIR»/build/openmpi-dp'
> [100%] Installing mdrun
> -- Install configuration: "Release"
> -- Install component: "libraries"
> -- Install configuration: "Release"
> -- Install component: "mdrun"
> make[4]: Leaving directory `/«PKGBUILDDIR»/build/openmpi-dp'
> [100%] Built target install-mdrun
> make[3]: Leaving directory `/«PKGBUILDDIR»/build/openmpi-dp'
> make[2]: Leaving directory `/«PKGBUILDDIR»/build/openmpi-dp'
> make[1]: Leaving directory `/«PKGBUILDDIR»/build/openmpi-dp'
> dh_installman -pgromacs-openmpi debian/man/mdrun_mpi.openmpi.1
> dh_link -pgromacs-openmpi usr/share/man/man1/mdrun_mpi.openmpi.1.gz 
> usr/share/man/man1/mdrun_mpi_d.openmpi.1.gz
> dh_lintian -pgromacs-openmpi
> dh_testdir
> dh_testroot
> dh_prep -pgromacs-data -pgromacs-dev
> # remove a duplicated file
> rm -f /«PKGBUILDDIR»/debian/gromacs/usr/share/gromacs/tutor/gmxdemo/demo_d
> dh_installdirs -pgromacs-data
> mv /«PKGBUILDDIR»/debian/gromacs/usr/share/gromacs/top \
>  /«PKGBUILDDIR»/debian/gromacs-data/usr/share/gromacs
> mv /«PKGBUILDDIR»/debian/gromacs/usr/share/gromacs/tutor \
>  /«PKGBUILDDIR»/debian/gromacs-data/usr/share/gromacs
> mv /«PKGBUILDDIR»/debian/gromacs/usr/share/gromacs/html \
>  /«PKGBUILDDIR»/debian/gromacs-data/usr/share/doc/gromacs
> mv /«PKGBUILDDIR»/debian/gromacs/usr/share/man \
>  /«PKGBUILDDIR»/debian/gromacs-data/usr/share/man
> # some of the default installation directories for documentation and
> # example shell scripts are not FHS-friendly; move them appropriately
> mv /«PKGBUILDDIR»/debian/gromacs/usr/bin/GMXRC* \
>  /«PKGBUILDDIR»/debian/gromacs/usr/bin/completion* \
>  /«PKGBUILDDIR»/debian/gromacs-data/usr/share/gromacs/shell-specific
> chmod 644 
> /«PKGBUILDDIR»/debian/gromacs-data/usr/share/gromacs/shell-specific/*
> dh_link -pgromacs-data usr/share/doc/gromacs/html 
> usr/share/doc/gromacs-data/html
> dh_link -pgromacs-data usr/share/doc/gromacs/html 
> usr/share/doc/gromacs-dev/html
> # one lintian warning is overridden:
> # - script-not-executable: demo scripts outside of ATH
> dh_lintian -pgromacs-data
> # rename a pair of Perl scripts to drop the .pl extension (Policy 10.4)
> mv /«PKGBUILDDIR»/debian/gromacs/usr/bin/demux.pl 
> /«PKGBUILDDIR»/debian/gromacs/usr/bin/demux
> mv /«PKGBUILDDIR»/debian/gromacs/usr/bin/xplor2gmx.pl 
> /«PKGBUILDDIR»/debian/gromacs/usr/bin/xplor2gmx
> dh_installdirs -pgromacs-dev
> mv /«PKGBUILDDIR»/debian/gromacs/usr/include 
> /«PKGBUILDDIR»/debian/gromacs-dev/usr/include
> # catch normal libraries plus all applicable MPI variants
> mv /«PKGBUILDDIR»/debian/gromacs/usr/lib/*.so 
> /«PKGBUILDDIR»/debian/gromacs/usr/lib/pkgconfig 
> /«PKGBUILDDIR»/debian/gromacs-dev/usr/lib
> mv /«PKGBUILDDIR»/debian/gromacs-mpich/usr/lib/*.so 
> /«PKGBUILDDIR»/debian/gromacs-dev/usr/lib
> mv: cannot stat `/«PKGBUILDDIR»/debian/gromacs-mpich/usr/lib/*.so': No such 
> file or directory
> make: *** [install] Error 1

The full build log is available from:
   http://people.debian.org/~lucas/logs/2012/07/08/gromacs_4.5.5-2_unstable.log

A list of current common problems and possible solutions is available at 
http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS . You're welcome to contribute!

About the archive rebuild: The rebuild was done on EC2 VM instances from
Amazon Web Services, using a clean, minimal and up-to-date chroot. Every
failed build was retried once to eliminate random failures.


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
tags 680825 - wheezy
thanks

cmake 2.8.9 is in testing now, so the gromacs FTBFS no longer occurs with any
release.--- End Message ---


Processed: bug #680825 resolved

2012-10-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> tags 680825 - wheezy
Bug #680825 [src:gromacs] gromacs: FTBFS: mv: cannot stat 
`/«PKGBUILDDIR»/debian/gromacs-mpich/usr/lib/*.so': No such file or directory
Removed tag(s) wheezy.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
680825: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=680825
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Processed: RE: FTBFS on ia64: Segmentation fault

2012-10-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> tags 679174 upstream confirmed
Bug #679174 [src:stockfish] FTBFS on ia64: Segmentation fault
Added tag(s) upstream and confirmed.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
679174: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=679174
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#688713: timidity-daemon: mishandles conffiles

2012-10-11 Thread Guo Yixuan
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

On 10/12/2012 02:36 AM, Sébastien Villemot wrote:
> Control: tags -1 + pending
> 
> Dear Maintainers,
> 
> Andreas Beckmann  writes:
> 
>> Package: timidity-daemon Version: 2.13.2-40 Severity: serious 
>> User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: piuparts
>> 
>> during a test with piuparts I noticed your package mishandles 
>> conffiles. This is violates the policy, see 
>> http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-files.html#s-config-files
>>
>>
>>
>> 
I miserably failed to understand that the maintainer scripts were to do,
>> the only thing I can say for sure is that the conffile 
>> /etc/init.d/timidity is removed during the remove step of the 
>> package (which is wrong, because configuration must be preserved 
>> after remove, and needs to be clened up during purge only.
>> 
>> And that will fail in the following scenario:
>> 
>> install timidity-daemon remove (don't purge!) timidity-daemon 
>> install timidity-daemon
>> 
>> Now /etc/init.d/timidity is missing (as dpkg will not restore 
>> deleted configuration files as that is usually a user choice the 
>> should be preserved).
> 
> I have uploaded to DELAYED/2 a NMU of timidity versioned 
> 2.13.2-40.1 which fixes that bug. The debdiff is attached. Don't 
> hesitate to tell me if I should delay the upload longer.

Thank you for uploading a NMU.

> Guo: Thanks for your contribution. I did not directly upload your 
> patch for two reasons. First it was buggy since it was removing
> the call to "invoke-rc.d timidity stop" in "prerm remove", and
> this call has to stay there.

OK, it indeed needs this. However, I found that dh_installinit already
provided this by default in prerm:

# Automatically added by dh_installinit
if [ -x "/etc/init.d/timidity" ] && [ "$1" = remove ]; then
invoke-rc.d timidity stop || exit $?
fi
# End automatically added section

> Second it was making unnecessary changes related to 
> /etc/timidity/timidity.daemon, which is no longer shipped in the 
> package (it seems to predate squeeze); NMUs have to change the 
> minimal amount of code in order to fix the bug. But indeed, as 
> Andreas has noted, a lot of obsolete stuff could probably be 
> removed from the maintainer scripts.

I see that NMU prefer to be minimal. Maybe my patch will still be
useful in case of a maintainer upload.

Cheers,

Guo Yixuan
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
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=p9pU
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#684535: ping for unblock (hyperestraier: FTBFS on s390x)

2012-10-11 Thread Hideki Yamane
Hi,

 Have you already asked for unblock?


-- 
Regards,

 Hideki Yamane henrich @ debian.or.jp/org
 http://wiki.debian.org/HidekiYamane


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Processed: Re: cairo-dock-core: segfault in cairo_dock_new_dialog() from libgldi.so3 when using log out applet

2012-10-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> tags 676841 pending
Bug #676841 [cairo-dock-core] cairo-dock-core: segfault in 
cairo_dock_new_dialog() from libgldi.so3 when using log out applet
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
676841: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=676841
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Processed: Re: [squeeze] Re: ecm: file conflict with gmp-ecm

2012-10-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> tag 580548 + squeeze-ignore
Bug #580548 {Done: Bart Martens } [ecm] ..find a new name, 
gmp-ecm got there (/usr/bin/ecm) first.
Added tag(s) squeeze-ignore.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
580548: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=580548
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#580548: Re: ecm: file conflict with gmp-ecm

2012-10-11 Thread Philipp Kern
tag 580548 + squeeze-ignore
thanks

On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 03:06:39PM -0700, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Philipp Kern wrote:
> > Interestingly gmp-ecm does conflict with ecm in wheezy, even though the file
> > conflict is solved.
> Oh, excellent.  The Conflicts is even present in squeeze.
> Would you mind tagging 580548 squeeze-ignore to get it off the radar?

Nope, done. ;-)

> Thanks for noticing.

Thanks for caring
Philipp Kern


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#690151: marked as done (claws-mail: CVE-2012-4507)

2012-10-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 11 Oct 2012 22:47:47 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#690151: fixed in claws-mail 3.8.1-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #690151,
regarding claws-mail: CVE-2012-4507
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
690151: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=690151
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: claws-mail
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Justification: user security hole

Please see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=862578 for
details and a patch.

Since we're in freeze, please upload a minimal fix to unstable
and request an unblock.

Cheers,
Moritz
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: claws-mail
Source-Version: 3.8.1-2

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
claws-mail, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 690...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Ricardo Mones  (supplier of updated claws-mail package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org)


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2012 00:04:03 +0200
Source: claws-mail
Binary: claws-mail claws-mail-dbg libclaws-mail-dev claws-mail-plugins 
claws-mail-spamassassin claws-mail-trayicon claws-mail-pgpmime 
claws-mail-pgpinline claws-mail-smime-plugin claws-mail-bogofilter 
claws-mail-i18n claws-mail-doc claws-mail-tools
Architecture: source all amd64
Version: 3.8.1-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Ricardo Mones 
Changed-By: Ricardo Mones 
Description: 
 claws-mail - Fast, lightweight and user-friendly GTK2 based email client
 claws-mail-bogofilter - Bogofilter plugin for Claws Mail
 claws-mail-dbg - Debug symbols for Claws Mail mailer
 claws-mail-doc - User documentation for Claws Mail mailer
 claws-mail-i18n - Locale data for Claws Mail (i18n support)
 claws-mail-pgpinline - PGP/inline plugin for Claws Mail
 claws-mail-pgpmime - PGP/MIME plugin for Claws Mail
 claws-mail-plugins - Installs plugins for the Claws Mail mailer
 claws-mail-smime-plugin - S/MIME signature/encryption handling for Claws Mail
 claws-mail-spamassassin - SpamAssassin plugin for Claws Mail
 claws-mail-tools - Helper and utility scripts for Claws Mail mailer
 claws-mail-trayicon - Notification area plugin for Claws Mail
 libclaws-mail-dev - Development files for Claws Mail plugins
Closes: 690151
Changes: 
 claws-mail (3.8.1-2) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * patches/99_fix_CVE-2012-4507.patch
   - Added fix for CVE-2012-4507 from 3.8.1cvs82 (Closes: #690151),
 raised urgency because of grave bug
   * patches/98_fix_segfault_no_utf_gpgme_strerror.patch,
 patches/97_fix_segfault_parse_parameters.patch,
 patches/96_fix_segfault_viewing_signature_info.patch
   - Backported patches from upstream CVS fixing segfaults discovered
 after 3.8.1 release
Checksums-Sha1: 
 448f68a79762513db56d2c0ea21b36676381443a 2402 claws-mail_3.8.1-2.dsc
 b2f6bf66e751fd90e5d02a5ce951548df6528663 24689 claws-mail_3.8.1-2.debian.tar.gz
 4be696d1e56340404767558fc96c25ddebe38c52 90126 
claws-mail-plugins_3.8.1-2_all.deb
 0b8b96132567bb463d091e059ead5847d4873b40 2109448 
claws-mail-i18n_3.8.1-2_all.deb
 8830b149a9d04c4d2a3729824876311fc39d5377 2000870 claws-mail-doc_3.8.1-2_all.deb
 3d6fb74a82576361dc0f73d5fd7c91a99fbb 233412 
claws-mail-tools_3.8.1-2_all.deb
 de4c4475e39f6eab2e0f450fb281332782c9b096 1697826 claws-mail_3.8.1-2_amd64.deb
 a4651040500b7acb16b28802a4aec855442fe6fb 5358920 
claws-mail-dbg_3.8.1-2_amd64.deb
 c430b18692fe3f1b8985f30ce158b6e78b957c2c 230462 
libclaws-mail-dev_3.8.1-2_amd64.deb
 31e7ac62e44a95695987fe1e51bfcd061a6cc7ed 115760 
claws-mail-spamassassin_3.8.1-2_amd64.deb
 d3d07e4d40fff74e60cb1841e23c23dfd73dd770 102096 
claws-mail-trayicon_3.8.1-2_amd64.deb
 a14978d1a9d18e57c5726920cb7ab22756d61d59 133432 
claws-mail-pgpmime_3.8.1-2_amd64.deb
 5233932ae942f646861ca1edf2dc76534dd632c3 104090 
claws-mail-pgpinline_3.8.1-2_amd64.deb
 af5b1a1465af49b285b720393e5c2f448a6adc65 104392 
claws-mail-smime-plugin_3.8.1-2_amd64.deb
 5b33baf90beaeb58521c402a4a6097c1f904b8d9 108390 
claws-mail-bogofilter_3.8.1-2_amd64.deb
Checksums-Sha256:

Bug#580548: Re: ecm: file conflict with gmp-ecm

2012-10-11 Thread Jonathan Nieder
Philipp Kern wrote:

> Interestingly gmp-ecm does conflict with ecm in wheezy, even though the file
> conflict is solved.

Oh, excellent.  The Conflicts is even present in squeeze.

Would you mind tagging 580548 squeeze-ignore to get it off the radar?
Then I'll file a bug for gmp-ecm to make the conflicts in wheezy
versioned.

Thanks for noticing.
Jonathan


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#687942: marked as done (fprobe-ulog: modifies conffiles (policy 10.7.3): /etc/default/fprobe-ulog)

2012-10-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 11 Oct 2012 22:02:36 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#687942: fixed in fprobe-ulog 1.1-7.3
has caused the Debian Bug report #687942,
regarding fprobe-ulog: modifies conffiles (policy 10.7.3): 
/etc/default/fprobe-ulog
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
687942: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=687942
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: fprobe-ulog
Version: 1.1-7.2
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Control: found -1 fprobe-ulog/1.1-7.2

Hi,

during a test with piuparts I noticed your package modifies conffiles.
This is forbidden by the policy, see
http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-files.html#s-config-files
  "[...] The easy way to achieve this behavior is to make the
   configuration file a conffile. [...] This implies that the default
   version will be part of the package distribution, and must not be
   modified by the maintainer scripts during installation (or at any
   other time)."

debsums reports modification of the following files:

  /etc/default/fprobe-ulog


cheers,

Andreas


fprobe-ulog_1.1-7.2.log.gz
Description: GNU Zip compressed data
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: fprobe-ulog
Source-Version: 1.1-7.3

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
fprobe-ulog, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 687...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Salvatore Bonaccorso  (supplier of updated fprobe-ulog 
package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org)


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 08 Oct 2012 01:07:43 +0200
Source: fprobe-ulog
Binary: fprobe-ulog
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 1.1-7.3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Radu Spineanu 
Changed-By: Salvatore Bonaccorso 
Description: 
 fprobe-ulog - export captured traffic to remote NetFlow Collector (ULOG version
Closes: 687942
Changes: 
 fprobe-ulog (1.1-7.3) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Non-maintainer upload.
   * Fix "modifies conffiles (policy 10.7.3): /etc/default/fprobe-ulog"
 (Closes: #687942).
 - Don't install /etc/default/fprobe-ulog via dh_installinit
 - Read /etc/default/fprobe-ulog in fprobe-ulog.config.
   Read /etc/default/fprobe-ulog into Debconf in fprobe-ulog.config
   if the file exists.
 - Create /etc/default/fprobe-ulog in postinst.
   Create /etc/default/fprobe-ulog if it does not yet exists in
   postinst. If admin furthermore deleted or commented some variables
   but then set them via debconf, (re-)add them to the configuration
   file in postinst.
 - Remove configuration file on purge in postrm script
Checksums-Sha1: 
 51405e1254419c9725a34ddbb35235061a06ab5d 1669 fprobe-ulog_1.1-7.3.dsc
 c34fae3a0744b4a75519cc59ea8a81417472ef4b 9112 fprobe-ulog_1.1-7.3.diff.gz
 b414117c19e8badb7ce62261cd726fc3410ffa70 28692 fprobe-ulog_1.1-7.3_amd64.deb
Checksums-Sha256: 
 a1cc44dacd9d85dddcc7a27967fe6d40ed0c2270d55d292489831536c9dc890e 1669 
fprobe-ulog_1.1-7.3.dsc
 8534bfd326e69b64370f42a0fc6c6e5cf2a385c985b8f21fbf3052e8e47e8b04 9112 
fprobe-ulog_1.1-7.3.diff.gz
 1f36bc542250794a738d4414a5b7bc70ad0a11dbe767edbeff37877032cc1249 28692 
fprobe-ulog_1.1-7.3_amd64.deb
Files: 
 2badc3e9e9eebf5bb6a77c760ee66413 1669 net optional fprobe-ulog_1.1-7.3.dsc
 7815e7b941177f3ad101914df36f04d1 9112 net optional fprobe-ulog_1.1-7.3.diff.gz
 cc3aea1dbc25e3c38d10fa783be9 28692 net optional 
fprobe-ulog_1.1-7.3_amd64.deb

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
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Bug#689859: dpkg: error processing libapache2-svn (--configure)

2012-10-11 Thread Simon Paillard
Control: tag -1 unreproducible 

Hi,

On Sun, Oct 07, 2012 at 12:26:28PM +0200, Charlie wrote:
> Package: libapache2-svn
> Version: 1.6.17dfsg-4
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
> 
> Versions of packages libapache2-svn depends on:
> ii  apache2.2-common  2.2.22-11
> ii  libc6 2.13-35
> ii  libsvn1   1.6.17dfsg-4
> 
> libapache2-svn recommends no packages.
> 
> Versions of packages libapache2-svn suggests:
> pn  db5.1-util  
> 
> -- Configuration Files:
> /etc/apache2/mods-available/authz_svn.load [Errno 2] No such file or 
> directory: u'/etc/apache2/mods-available/authz_svn.load'
> /etc/apache2/mods-available/dav_svn.conf [Errno 2] No such file or directory: 
> u'/etc/apache2/mods-available/dav_svn.conf'
> /etc/apache2/mods-available/dav_svn.load [Errno 2] No such file or directory: 
> u'/etc/apache2/mods-available/dav_svn.load'
> 
> -- no debconf information
> 
> 
> -- whole output
> /etc/apache2/mods-available# apt-get install libapache2-svn
> Reading package lists... Done
> Building dependency tree   
> Reading state information... Done
> libapache2-svn is already the newest version.
> 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
> 1 not fully installed or removed.
> After this operation, 0 B of additional disk space will be used.
> Do you want to continue [Y/n]? y
> Setting up libapache2-svn (1.6.17dfsg-4) ...
> ERROR: Module dav_svn does not exist!
> dpkg: error processing libapache2-svn (--configure):
>  subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
> Errors were encountered while processing:
>  libapache2-svn
> E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)
> 
> reproducable on any system created via xen-create-image with wheezy as target 
> platform.

Not reproducible on a fresh wheezy amd64 pbuilder..

I don't understand the state of your system, since apt says libapache2-svn is
already installed in the newest version ?

-- 
Simon Paillard


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Processed: Re: Bug#689859: dpkg: error processing libapache2-svn (--configure)

2012-10-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands:

> tag -1 unreproducible
Bug #689859 [libapache2-svn] dpkg: error processing libapache2-svn (--configure)
Added tag(s) unreproducible.

-- 
689859: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=689859
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#483217: marked as done (texlive-latex-base: Files by Donald Arseneau: Lacking license statement, or nosell and such)

2012-10-11 Thread Norbert Preining
Hi Frank,

(I bounced your email to the bug and the list, only me got it).

On Do, 11 Okt 2012, Frank Küster wrote:
> > * chapterbib.sty: no license information
> > 
> > there is a README that states:
> > They are all released under a very simple permissive license in
> > the MIT/BSD style:  They may be freely used, transmitted, 
> > reproduced,
> > or modified provided that [the copyright and permission] notice is
> > left intact.
> 
> I didn't notice this, or maybe it wasn't present (in teTeX, CTAN, ...)
> when I first checked.

It might have changed at some point. BUt I don't want to track
down all the stuff through the svn history.

> > % This software is contributed to the public domain.
> 
> When I wrote this, I was under the impression that, since public domain
> doesn't exist in many jurisdictions, the term needs clarification. I

Yeah, but we know we cannot do anything, but we know that
Donald is fine with it and will not change it. So enough of this 
carcass of bug without any future.

Best wishes

Norbert

Norbert Preiningpreining@{jaist.ac.jp, logic.at, debian.org}
JAIST, Japan TeX Live & Debian Developer
DSA: 0x09C5B094   fp: 14DF 2E6C 0307 BE6D AD76  A9C0 D2BF 4AA3 09C5 B094

GLUTT LODGE (n.)
The place where food can be stored after having a tooth
extracted. Some Arabs can go without sustenance for up to six weeks on
a full glutt lodge, hence the expression 'the shit of the dessert'.
--- Douglas Adams, The Meaning of Liff


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#483217: marked as done (texlive-latex-base: Files by Donald Arseneau: Lacking license statement, or nosell and such)

2012-10-11 Thread Frank Kuester
ow...@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System) writes:

> Your message dated Thu, 11 Oct 2012 15:57:58 +0900

Many thanks for this.

> * chapterbib.sty: no license information
> 
> there is a README that states:
> They are all released under a very simple permissive license in
> the MIT/BSD style:  They may be freely used, transmitted, reproduced,
> or modified provided that [the copyright and permission] notice is
> left intact.

I didn't notice this, or maybe it wasn't present (in teTeX, CTAN, ...)
when I first checked.

I have no idea why so many of the files have a license statement inside
that it seems I didn't notice.  Well.

>  +  * relsize.sty: "public domain", nothing else
> % This software is contributed to the public domain.

When I wrote this, I was under the impression that, since public domain
doesn't exist in many jurisdictions, the term needs clarification. I
don't think we need to insist on this, in particular not if Donald is
from the US (which I don't know).

Again, thank you very much,
Frank


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#580548: Re: ecm: file conflict with gmp-ecm

2012-10-11 Thread Philipp Kern
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 10:43:30PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Sun, Sep  9, 2012 at 12:44:11 -0700, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> > Bart Martens wrote:
> > > On Sun, Sep 09, 2012 at 11:56:16AM -0700, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> > >> In January, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> > >>> Bart Martens wrote:
> > * Renamed ecm to ecm-compress and unecm to ecm-uncompress.  Closes: 
> >  #580548.
> > >>> Is this worth fixing in squeeze?
> > >> My feeling is "no" --- it's too risky to be renaming binaries in a
> > >> stable release this late.  Perhaps there could be a Conflicts relation
> > >> to warn people about the bug, though.  What do you think?
> > > I don't mind doing the renaming in squeeze as well.  On the other hand I 
> > > don't
> > > see hundreds of squeeze users complaining about this.  What is the 
> > > opinion of
> > > the Stable Release Managers ?
> > Cc-ing them to find out.
> Not a SRM, but I share the "no" feeling.

In any case a rename would not be acceptable. The alternative would be a policy
violating conflicts.

Interestingly gmp-ecm does conflict with ecm in wheezy, even though the file
conflict is solved.

Kind regards
Philipp Kern


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#659061: marked as done (brasero: segfaults when creating a subfolder)

2012-10-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 11 Oct 2012 21:47:38 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#659061: fixed in brasero 3.4.1-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #659061,
regarding brasero: segfaults when creating a subfolder
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
659061: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=659061
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: brasero
Version: 3.2.0-3
Severity: serious

1. Create a data project
2. Add a folder with some files in it
3. Select a file inside this folder
4. Press on the "new folder" button
5. Enter a name and hit enter
6. Segfault

Backtrace attached.


--- System information. ---
Architecture: amd64
Kernel: Linux 3.1.0-1-amd64

Debian Release: wheezy/sid
990 testing security.debian.org
990 testing mirror.switch.ch
500 unstable mirror.switch.ch
500 oneiric ppa.launchpad.net
150 experimental mirror.switch.ch

--- Package information. ---
Depends (Version) | Installed
-+-=
libatk1.0-0 (>= 1.12.4) | 2.2.0-2
libbrasero-media3-1 (= 3.2.0-3) | 3.2.0-3
libc6 (>= 2.4) | 2.13-24
libcairo-gobject2 (>= 1.10.0) | 1.10.2-6.2
libcairo2 (>= 1.2.4) | 1.10.2-6.2
libfontconfig1 (>= 2.8.0) | 2.8.0-3.1
libfreetype6 (>= 2.2.1) | 2.4.8-1
libgdk-pixbuf2.0-0 (>= 2.22.0) | 2.24.0-2
libglib2.0-0 (>= 2.30.0) | 2.30.2-6
libgstreamer-plugins-base0.10-0 (>= 0.10.12) | 0.10.35-1
libgstreamer0.10-0 (>= 0.10.15) | 0.10.35-1
libgtk-3-0 (>= 3.0.0) | 3.2.3-1
libice6 (>= 1:1.0.0) | 2:1.0.7-2
libnautilus-extension1a (>= 2.91) | 3.2.1-2+b1
libpango1.0-0 (>= 1.14.0) | 1.29.4-2
libsm6 | 2:1.2.0-2
libtotem-plparser17 (>= 2.32) | 2.32.6-2
libtracker-sparql-0.12-0 (>= 0.10.0) | 0.12.9-1+b1
libxml2 (>= 2.7.4) | 2.7.8.dfsg-7
gstreamer0.10-plugins-base (>= 0.10.0) | 0.10.35-1
gnome-icon-theme | 3.2.1.2-1
gvfs | 1.10.1-2
brasero-common (= 3.2.0-3) | 3.2.0-3


Package's Recommends field is empty.

Suggests (Version) | Installed
=-+-===
vcdimager | 0.7.23-5
libdvdcss2 |




GNU gdb (GDB) 7.3-debian
Copyright (C) 2011 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later 
This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it.
There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law.  Type "show copying"
and "show warranty" for details.
This GDB was configured as "x86_64-linux-gnu".
For bug reporting instructions, please see:
...
Reading symbols from /usr/bin/brasero...(no debugging symbols found)...done.
(gdb) run
Starting program: /usr/bin/brasero 
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread 0x7fffe7991700 (LWP 11074)]
[New Thread 0x7fffe6f7c700 (LWP 11075)]
[Thread 0x7fffe6f7c700 (LWP 11075) exited]
[New Thread 0x7fffe6f7c700 (LWP 11076)]
[New Thread 0x7fffd7b4b700 (LWP 11083)]
[New Thread 0x7fffd7145700 (LWP 11086)]
[Thread 0x7fffd7b4b700 (LWP 11083) exited]
[New Thread 0x7fffd7b4b700 (LWP 11087)]
[Thread 0x7fffd7b4b700 (LWP 11087) exited]

Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
g_str_hash (v=0x0) at /tmp/buildd/glib2.0-2.30.2/./glib/gstring.c:142
142 /tmp/buildd/glib2.0-2.30.2/./glib/gstring.c: Datei oder Verzeichnis 
nicht gefunden.
in /tmp/buildd/glib2.0-2.30.2/./glib/gstring.c
(gdb) bt
#0  g_str_hash (v=0x0) at /tmp/buildd/glib2.0-2.30.2/./glib/gstring.c:142
#1  0x73c766e3 in g_hash_table_lookup_node (hash_return=, key=0x0, hash_table=0xde34c0)
at /tmp/buildd/glib2.0-2.30.2/./glib/ghash.c:360
#2  g_hash_table_lookup (hash_table=0xde34c0, key=0x0) at 
/tmp/buildd/glib2.0-2.30.2/./glib/ghash.c:1029
#3  0x77987143 in brasero_data_project_rename_node () from 
/usr/lib/libbrasero-burn3.so.1
#4  0x0043f67f in ?? ()
#5  0x74558804 in g_closure_invoke (closure=0xdd1870, return_value=0x0, 
n_param_values=3, param_values=0x12ac0f0, 
invocation_hint=) at 
/tmp/buildd/glib2.0-2.30.2/./gobject/gclosure.c:774
#6  0x7456a78a in signal_emit_unlocked_R (node=, 
detail=0, instance=0xdcf5a0, emission_return=0x0, 
instance_and_params=0x12ac0f0) at 
/tmp/buildd/glib2.0-2.30.2/./gobject/gsignal.c:3272
#7  0x74573e11 in g_signal_emit_valist (instance=, 
signal_id=, detail=, 
var_args=) at 
/tmp/buildd/glib2.0-2.30.2/./gobject/gsignal.c:3003
#8  0x74573fb2 in g_signal_emit (instance=, 
signal_id=, detail=)
at /tmp/buildd/glib2.0-2.30.2/./gobject/gsignal.c:3060
#9  0x76a4a602 in gtk_cell_renderer_text_editing_done (entry=0x6bd450, 
data=0xdcf5a0)
at /tmp/buildd/gtk+3.

Processed: severity of 690158 is wishlist

2012-10-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> severity 690158 wishlist
Bug #690158 [ettercap] ettercap: unconditionally sets net.ipv4.ip_forward=0
Severity set to 'wishlist' from 'grave'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
690158: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=690158
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#690158: ettercap: unconditionally sets net.ipv4.ip_forward=0

2012-10-11 Thread Simon Paillard
Control: -1 severity wishlist

On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 06:20:58PM +0300, Teodor wrote:
> Package: ettercap
> Version: 1:0.7.3-2.1
> Severity: grave
> Justification: causes non-serious data loss
> 
> I've just found that running 'ettercap' on gateway system (were ip_forward
> is a must) will unconditionally disable the kernel flag.

Actually is is documented, see man ettercap:

 -u, --unoffensive
Every time ettercap starts, it disables ip forwarding in the kernel and
begins to forward packets itself. This option prevent to do that, so the
responsibility of ip forward‐ ing is left to the kernel.

On top of that, ettercap is designed for man in the middle attacks, disabling
kernel forwarding seems to be a must.

man ettercap:

NAME
   ettercap - multipurpose sniffer/content filter for man in the middle 
attacks


-- 
Simon Paillard


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#690269: pm-utils: pm-hibernate ok on console but fails on xorg

2012-10-11 Thread Richard Genoud
2012/10/11 Richard Genoud :
> I'm going to reboot, and retry a pm-hibernate.
So, Michael, sorry for the time loss, it's working now.
I tried it 3 or 4 times before sending the bug report, but ...

for what it's worth, after hibertnate, I'm seeing this message :
kernel:[   99.724799] do_IRQ: 0.42 No irq handler for vector (irq -1)

feel free to close this bug(?!).
and I'm going to test this pm-hibernate functionality quite close now.

Thanks.
Richard.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#690269: pm-utils: pm-hibernate ok on console but fails on xorg

2012-10-11 Thread Richard Genoud
2012/10/11 Michael Biebl :
> On 11.10.2012 21:51, Richard Genoud wrote:
>> BUT, if I run pm-hibernate from a gnome-terminal (su root), (from xmonad if
>> that matters), the screen doesn't switch off and has colorfull junk.
>> In this case, the system isn't totally off, because if I push the power off
>> button, it swiches off properly (meaning the screen is still giberish but the
>
> Hm, when it switches off properly, how do you get data loss?
maybe I misunderstood the data loss part, but as far as the ram is not
restored after hibernate, it can result in a data loss right ?

cat /proc/fb
0 radeondrmfb

[trying echo "disk" > /sys/power/state under X ...]
it worked.

[trying pm-hibernate...]

ok, I'm just felling stupid right now. both echo "disk" >
/sys/power/state and pm-hibernate are working.

I'm going to reboot, and retry a pm-hibernate.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#580548: Re: ecm: file conflict with gmp-ecm

2012-10-11 Thread Julien Cristau
On Sun, Sep  9, 2012 at 12:44:11 -0700, Jonathan Nieder wrote:

> Bart Martens wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 09, 2012 at 11:56:16AM -0700, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> >> In January, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> >>> Bart Martens wrote:
> 
> * Renamed ecm to ecm-compress and unecm to ecm-uncompress.  Closes: 
>  #580548.
> >>>
> >>> Is this worth fixing in squeeze?
> >>
> >> My feeling is "no" --- it's too risky to be renaming binaries in a
> >> stable release this late.  Perhaps there could be a Conflicts relation
> >> to warn people about the bug, though.  What do you think?
> >
> > I don't mind doing the renaming in squeeze as well.  On the other hand I 
> > don't
> > see hundreds of squeeze users complaining about this.  What is the opinion 
> > of
> > the Stable Release Managers ?
> 
> Cc-ing them to find out.
> 
Not a SRM, but I share the "no" feeling.

Cheers,
Julien


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Processed: forcibly merging 690204 537051

2012-10-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> forcemerge 690204 537051
Bug #690204 [ca-certificates,ca-certificates-java] ca-certificates{, -java}: 
many errors during squeeze->wheezy upgrades, probably related to configuration 
order and update.d/
Bug #537051 [ca-certificates,ca-certificates-java] ca-certificates 20090709: 
installation error
Merged 537051 690204
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
537051: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=537051
690204: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=690204
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#690269: pm-utils: pm-hibernate ok on console but fails on xorg

2012-10-11 Thread Michael Biebl
On 11.10.2012 21:51, Richard Genoud wrote:
> Package: pm-utils
> Version: 1.4.1-9
> Severity: grave
> Justification: causes non-serious data loss
> 
> Dear Maintainer,
> here is the situation:
> running debian sid;
> if from a console (ctrl-atl-F1) I run pm-hibernate, all works as expected
> (image is written to swap, computers shuts down, and on switch on, the image 
> is
> loaded etc... )
> BUT, if I run pm-hibernate from a gnome-terminal (su root), (from xmonad if
> that matters), the screen doesn't switch off and has colorfull junk.
> In this case, the system isn't totally off, because if I push the power off
> button, it swiches off properly (meaning the screen is still giberish but the

Hm, when it switches off properly, how do you get data loss?

Michael


-- 
Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the
universe are pointed away from Earth?



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Bug#690269: pm-utils: pm-hibernate ok on console but fails on xorg

2012-10-11 Thread Michael Biebl
On 11.10.2012 22:26, Richard Genoud wrote:
> 2012/10/11 Michael Biebl :
>> Does it work if you run (as root)
>> echo "mem" > /sys/power/state
> yes, sorry for that, I forgot to mention it, pm-suspend is working all rigth

Actually, my bad, I meant to say: Please try

echo "disk" > /sys/power/state

when running under X.

pm-utils nowadays basically just does that and leaves everything else to
the kernel.

I'm assuming you are using KMS? Check cat /proc/fb.



-- 
Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the
universe are pointed away from Earth?



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Bug#685351: Bug#687702: gnumed-client: t-p-o candidate on 1.1 maintenance branch available

2012-10-11 Thread Karsten Hilbert
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 10:05:48PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:

> > Hi Andreas,
> > 
> > is there anything I can do to help make this happen ?
> > 
> > 687702: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=687702
> 
> I'm *way* *more* worried about #685351

I thought #685351 got fixed ?!?

> which could lead to remove gnumed
> completely and it is on my todo list for the weekend.

Ah, I see. I think we did identify a solution but it had to
wait for you to return to get implemented.

>  Lets concentrate onto this first.

Sure.

> > I guess you haven't gotten through with your backlog of
> > email just yet.
> 
> For #687702 you might like to ask debian-rele...@lists.debian.org about
> their opinion but I doubt that they will consider an inclusion into
> stable release if there are no bugs fixed which are considered "RC".

Of course and I agree with that.

Karsten
-- 
GPG key ID E4071346 @ gpg-keyserver.de
E167 67FD A291 2BEA 73BD  4537 78B9 A9F9 E407 1346


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Processed (with 1 errors): found 537051 in 20120623, found 537051 in -1 20120721

2012-10-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> found 537051 20120623
Bug #537051 [ca-certificates,ca-certificates-java] ca-certificates 20090709: 
installation error
There is no source info for the package 'ca-certificates-java' at version 
'20120623' with architecture ''
Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #537051 to the same values 
previously set
> found 537051 -1 20120721
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
537051: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=537051
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#690269: pm-utils: pm-hibernate ok on console but fails on xorg

2012-10-11 Thread Richard Genoud
2012/10/11 Michael Biebl :
> Does it work if you run (as root)
> echo "mem" > /sys/power/state
yes, sorry for that, I forgot to mention it, pm-suspend is working all rigth
that's only the hibernate part (aka suspend-to-disk) that doesn't work
(I'm willing to do some tests to help, I'm quite confortable with linux)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#690269: pm-utils: pm-hibernate ok on console but fails on xorg

2012-10-11 Thread Michael Biebl
On 11.10.2012 21:51, Richard Genoud wrote:
> Package: pm-utils
> Version: 1.4.1-9
> Severity: grave
> Justification: causes non-serious data loss
> 
> Dear Maintainer,
> here is the situation:
> running debian sid;
> if from a console (ctrl-atl-F1) I run pm-hibernate, all works as expected
> (image is written to swap, computers shuts down, and on switch on, the image 
> is
> loaded etc... )
> BUT, if I run pm-hibernate from a gnome-terminal (su root), (from xmonad if
> that matters), the screen doesn't switch off and has colorfull junk.
> In this case, the system isn't totally off, because if I push the power off
> button, it swiches off properly (meaning the screen is still giberish but the
> kernel is still responding to the acpi off command), and when I start it up, 
> it
> starts from the beginning => pm-hibernate did not work )
> I *seems* that it's video related, so here's some infos about the video card /
> xorg:

Does it work if you run (as root)
echo "mem" > /sys/power/state



-- 
Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the
universe are pointed away from Earth?



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Processed (with 1 errors): merging 690204 537051

2012-10-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> merge 690204 537051
Bug #690204 [ca-certificates,ca-certificates-java] ca-certificates{, -java}: 
many errors during squeeze->wheezy upgrades, probably related to configuration 
order and update.d/
Bug #690204 [ca-certificates,ca-certificates-java] ca-certificates{, -java}: 
many errors during squeeze->wheezy upgrades, probably related to configuration 
order and update.d/
There is no source info for the package 'ca-certificates-java' at version 
'20120623' with architecture ''
Marked as found in versions ca-certificates/20120623; no longer marked as found 
in versions 20120623.
Bug #537051 [ca-certificates,ca-certificates-java] ca-certificates 20090709: 
installation error
There is no source info for the package 'ca-certificates-java' at version 
'20120623' with architecture ''
Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #537051 to the same values 
previously set
Bug #690204 [ca-certificates,ca-certificates-java] ca-certificates{, -java}: 
many errors during squeeze->wheezy upgrades, probably related to configuration 
order and update.d/
There is no source info for the package 'ca-certificates-java' at version 
'20120623' with architecture ''
Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #690204 to the same values 
previously set
Bug #537051 [ca-certificates,ca-certificates-java] ca-certificates 20090709: 
installation error
There is no source info for the package 'ca-certificates-java' at version 
'20120623' with architecture ''
Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #537051 to the same values 
previously set
Unable to complete merge on previous attempt; trying again (retry: 2)
Bug #690204 [ca-certificates,ca-certificates-java] ca-certificates{, -java}: 
many errors during squeeze->wheezy upgrades, probably related to configuration 
order and update.d/
There is no source info for the package 'ca-certificates-java' at version 
'20120623' with architecture ''
Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #690204 to the same values 
previously set
Bug #537051 [ca-certificates,ca-certificates-java] ca-certificates 20090709: 
installation error
There is no source info for the package 'ca-certificates-java' at version 
'20120623' with architecture ''
Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #537051 to the same values 
previously set
Unable to complete merge on previous attempt; trying again (retry: 3)
Bug #690204 [ca-certificates,ca-certificates-java] ca-certificates{, -java}: 
many errors during squeeze->wheezy upgrades, probably related to configuration 
order and update.d/
There is no source info for the package 'ca-certificates-java' at version 
'20120623' with architecture ''
Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #690204 to the same values 
previously set
Bug #537051 [ca-certificates,ca-certificates-java] ca-certificates 20090709: 
installation error
There is no source info for the package 'ca-certificates-java' at version 
'20120623' with architecture ''
Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #537051 to the same values 
previously set
After four attempts, the following changes were unable to be made:
Failed to merge 690204: Not a HASH reference.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
537051: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=537051
690204: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=690204
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Processed: found 537051 in 20120623

2012-10-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> found 537051 20120623
Bug #537051 [ca-certificates,ca-certificates-java] ca-certificates 20090709: 
installation error
There is no source info for the package 'ca-certificates-java' at version 
'20120623' with architecture ''
Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #537051 to the same values 
previously set
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
537051: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=537051
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Processed: tagging 640874

2012-10-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> tags 640874 + patch pending
Bug #640874 [leave] leave: debian/rules is not a Makefile
Added tag(s) pending and patch.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
640874: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=640874
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#640874: leave: debian/rules is not a Makefile

2012-10-11 Thread Sébastien Villemot
Dear Maintainer,

Colin Watson  writes:

> On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 07:45:18PM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:

>> B. The Technical Committee affirms the Debian Policy requirement that
>>debian/rules must be a makefile.  All packages in the archive,
>>including leave, are required to follow this requirement.  This
>>makefile may, as is common practice, delegate implementation of its
>>targets to a script.
>
> I'm reopening this bug and reassigning back to leave for implementation
> of this TC resolution, since it seems to have been lost somewhat.

I have uploaded to DELAYED/5 an NMU of leave versioned 1.12-2.1 which
fixes this issue. I have tried to preserve as much as possible the
structure of the original shell script. The debdiff is attached. Don't
hesitate to tell me if I should delay the upload longer.

Regards,
diff -u leave-1.12/debian/rules leave-1.12/debian/rules
--- leave-1.12/debian/rules
+++ leave-1.12/debian/rules
@@ -1,52 +1,41 @@
-#!/bin/sh -e
+#!/usr/bin/make -f
 
-tmp=`pwd`/debian/leave
+tmp=$(shell pwd)/debian/leave
 
-if echo $DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS | grep -vq noopt; then
-  optflag="-O2"
-fi
-
-if echo $DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS | grep -vq nostrip; then
-  stripflag="-s"
-fi
-
-case "$1" in
-  build)
-test -f leave.c || { echo not in the right dir\!; exit 1; }
-test -f leave || { cc -g $optflag -Wall \
-  -D__COPYRIGHT\(x\)= -D__RCSID\(x\)= \
-  leave.c -o leave
- }
+ifeq (,$(findstring noopt,$(DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS)))
+  optflag=-O2
+endif
+
+ifeq (,$(findstring nostrip,$(DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS)))
+  stripflag=-s
+endif
+
+leave: leave.c
+	cc -g $(optflag) -Wall -D__COPYRIGHT\(x\)= -D__RCSID\(x\)= leave.c -o leave
 # used to have 'pmake CFLAGS="..." leave' here, but why?
-;;
-  clean)
-test -f leave.c || { echo not in the right dir\!; exit 1; }
-test `id -u` -eq 0 || { echo "don't have (pseudo-)root!"; exit 1; }
-rm -f build-stamp leave leave.o leave.cat1 debian/files debian/substvars
-rm -rf $tmp
-;;
-  binary-arch|binary)
-test -f leave || $0 build
-test `id -u` -eq 0 || { echo "don't have (pseudo-)root!"; exit 1; }
-rm -rf $tmp
-install -d -m 755 $tmp/usr/bin $tmp/usr/share/man/man1 \
-  $tmp/DEBIAN $tmp/usr/share/doc/leave
-install $stripflag -m 755 leave $tmp/usr/bin
-gzip -c9 leave.1 > $tmp/usr/share/man/man1/leave.1.gz
-gzip -c9 debian/changelog > $tmp/usr/share/doc/leave/changelog.Debian.gz
-install -m 644 debian/copyright $tmp/usr/share/doc/leave
-dpkg-shlibdeps $tmp/usr/bin/leave
-dpkg-gencontrol -isp -P$tmp
-chown -R root.root $tmp
-chmod -R g-ws $tmp
-dpkg --build $tmp ..
-;;
-  binary-indep)
-# do nothing, successfully!
-exit 0
-;;
-  *)
-echo unknown option: $1
-exit 1
-;;
-esac
+
+build: leave
+
+clean:
+	test -f leave.c || { echo not in the right dir\!; exit 1; }
+	test `id -u` -eq 0 || { echo "don't have (pseudo-)root!"; exit 1; }
+	rm -f build-stamp leave leave.o leave.cat1 debian/files debian/substvars
+	rm -rf $(tmp)
+
+binary-arch binary: build
+	test `id -u` -eq 0 || { echo "don't have (pseudo-)root!"; exit 1; }
+	rm -rf $(tmp)
+	install -d -m 755 $(tmp)/usr/bin $(tmp)/usr/share/man/man1 \
+		$(tmp)/DEBIAN $(tmp)/usr/share/doc/leave
+	install $(stripflag) -m 755 leave $(tmp)/usr/bin
+	gzip -c9 leave.1 > $(tmp)/usr/share/man/man1/leave.1.gz
+	gzip -c9 debian/changelog > $(tmp)/usr/share/doc/leave/changelog.Debian.gz
+	install -m 644 debian/copyright $(tmp)/usr/share/doc/leave
+	dpkg-shlibdeps $(tmp)/usr/bin/leave
+	dpkg-gencontrol -isp -P$(tmp)
+	chown -R root.root $(tmp)
+	chmod -R g-ws $(tmp)
+	dpkg --build $(tmp) ..
+
+binary-indep:
+# do nothing, successfully!
diff -u leave-1.12/debian/changelog leave-1.12/debian/changelog
--- leave-1.12/debian/changelog
+++ leave-1.12/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+leave (1.12-2.1) unstable; urgency=low
+
+  * Non-maintainer upload.
+  * Convert debian/rules to a Makefile (Closes: #640874)
+
+ -- Sébastien Villemot   Thu, 11 Oct 2012 21:23:51 +0200
+
 leave (1.12-2) unstable; urgency=low
 
   * Replaced puts() with printf()+fflush() in order to avoid a newline after

-- 
 .''`.Sébastien Villemot
: :' :Debian Developer
`. `' http://www.dynare.org/sebastien
  `-  GPG Key: 4096R/381A7594


pgpIvTNzX7OFV.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Processed: tagging 537051, tagging 537051, tagging 690204, tagging 690204

2012-10-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> tags 537051 - moreinfo
Bug #537051 [ca-certificates,ca-certificates-java] ca-certificates 20090709: 
installation error
Removed tag(s) moreinfo.
> tags 537051 - unreproducible
Bug #537051 [ca-certificates,ca-certificates-java] ca-certificates 20090709: 
installation error
Removed tag(s) unreproducible.
> tags 690204 - moreinfo
Bug #690204 [ca-certificates,ca-certificates-java] ca-certificates{, -java}: 
many errors during squeeze->wheezy upgrades, probably related to configuration 
order and update.d/
Removed tag(s) moreinfo.
> tags 690204 - unreproducible
Bug #690204 [ca-certificates,ca-certificates-java] ca-certificates{, -java}: 
many errors during squeeze->wheezy upgrades, probably related to configuration 
order and update.d/
Removed tag(s) unreproducible.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
537051: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=537051
690204: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=690204
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#688713: timidity-daemon: mishandles conffiles

2012-10-11 Thread Sébastien Villemot
Geoffrey Thomas  writes:

> On Thu, 11 Oct 2012, Sébastien Villemot wrote:
>
>> I have uploaded to DELAYED/2 a NMU of timidity versioned 2.13.2-40.1
>> which fixes that bug. The debdiff is attached. Don't hesitate to tell me
>> if I should delay the upload longer.
>
> Thanks, but would you mind delaying until early next week? There are a couple
> of wrong patches in the current source package (see #649274), and I was hoping
> to ask for a single freeze exception to deal with that issue too and a couple
> of Ubuntu ones. I know I've been remiss about doing an upload, but if it's
> already past time that an NMU is reasonable, I will make a point of attempting
> to deal with it this weekend -- and if I don't, feel free to let the NMU
> proceed.

Thanks for your reply. I have rescheduled the upload to DELAYED/5, so
that you can make an upload of your own this weekend.

-- 
 .''`.Sébastien Villemot
: :' :Debian Developer
`. `' http://www.dynare.org/sebastien
  `-  GPG Key: 4096R/381A7594


pgpk2nmMTMRVu.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Processed (with 1 errors): merging 690204 537051

2012-10-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> merge 690204 537051
Bug #690204 [ca-certificates,ca-certificates-java] ca-certificates{, -java}: 
many errors during squeeze->wheezy upgrades, probably related to configuration 
order and update.d/
Bug #690204 [ca-certificates,ca-certificates-java] ca-certificates{, -java}: 
many errors during squeeze->wheezy upgrades, probably related to configuration 
order and update.d/
Added tag(s) unreproducible and moreinfo.
Bug #537051 [ca-certificates,ca-certificates-java] ca-certificates 20090709: 
installation error
There is no source info for the package 'ca-certificates-java' at version 
'20120623' with architecture ''
Marked as found in versions ca-certificates/20120623 and 
ca-certificates-java/20120721.
Bug #537051 [ca-certificates,ca-certificates-java] ca-certificates 20090709: 
installation error
There is no source info for the package 'ca-certificates-java' at version 
'20120623' with architecture ''
Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #537051 to the same values 
previously set
Unable to complete merge on previous attempt; trying again (retry: 2)
Bug #537051 [ca-certificates,ca-certificates-java] ca-certificates 20090709: 
installation error
There is no source info for the package 'ca-certificates-java' at version 
'20120623' with architecture ''
Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #537051 to the same values 
previously set
Unable to complete merge on previous attempt; trying again (retry: 3)
Bug #537051 [ca-certificates,ca-certificates-java] ca-certificates 20090709: 
installation error
There is no source info for the package 'ca-certificates-java' at version 
'20120623' with architecture ''
Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #537051 to the same values 
previously set
After four attempts, the following changes were unable to be made:
Failed to merge 690204: Not a HASH reference.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
537051: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=537051
690204: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=690204
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#679409: marked as done (lightdm: Fails to start on boot, invoke-rc.d lightdm start fails)

2012-10-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 11 Oct 2012 19:32:32 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#679409: fixed in lightdm 1.2.2-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #679409,
regarding lightdm: Fails to start on boot, invoke-rc.d lightdm start fails
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
679409: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=679409
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: lightdm
Version: 1.2.2-3
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable

With sysvinit > 2.88dsf-22.1, lightdm fails to start, and invoke-rd.d lightdm
start fails with the message "start: Job failed to start". Using startx does
work, so the issue isn't with X.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-3-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_AU.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_AU.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages lightdm depends on:
ii  adduser3.113+nmu3
ii  consolekit 0.4.5-3
ii  dbus   1.6.2-1
ii  debconf [debconf-2.0]  1.5.44
ii  libc6  2.13-33
ii  libglib2.0-0   2.32.3-1
ii  libpam0g   1.1.3-7.1
ii  libxcb11.8.1-1
ii  libxdmcp6  1:1.1.1-1
ii  lightdm-gtk-greeter1.1.6-2

Versions of packages lightdm recommends:
ii  xserver-xorg  1:7.7+1

Versions of packages lightdm suggests:
ii  accountsservice  0.6.21-5

-- debconf information:
  lightdm/daemon_name: /usr/sbin/lightdm
* shared/default-x-display-manager: lightdm


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: lightdm
Source-Version: 1.2.2-4

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
lightdm, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 679...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Yves-Alexis Perez  (supplier of updated lightdm package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org)


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2012 12:44:37 +0200
Source: lightdm
Binary: lightdm lightdm-vala liblightdm-gobject-1-0 liblightdm-qt-2-0 
liblightdm-gobject-dev liblightdm-qt-dev
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 1.2.2-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Xfce Maintainers 
Changed-By: Yves-Alexis Perez 
Description: 
 liblightdm-gobject-1-0 - simple display manager (gobject library)
 liblightdm-gobject-dev - simple display manager (gobject development files)
 liblightdm-qt-2-0 - simple display manager (Qt library)
 liblightdm-qt-dev - simple display manager (Qt development files)
 lightdm- simple display manager
 lightdm-vala - simple display manager (Vala files)
Closes: 679409 679538 684714
Changes: 
 lightdm (1.2.2-4) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * debian/control:
 - suggests upower.  closes: #679538
 - make lightdm depends on lightdm-gtk-greeter | lightdm-greeter, thanks
   Ralf Jung for the report. closes: #684714
   * debian/lightdm.install:
 - stop installing lightdm upstart script since it's broken. closes: #679409
Checksums-Sha1: 
 6b2740b72b021fc3f7dcd32b791bdc8e1bc0e83a 2554 lightdm_1.2.2-4.dsc
 775907c840d2d3d45208196ef81e12a867f7ea7a 32983 lightdm_1.2.2-4.debian.tar.gz
 4f472a693e18e1a3780079ed2d09c9c3f14467ff 130128 lightdm_1.2.2-4_amd64.deb
 bdcb6c091a80a5c3577d41fd5e2cf3f2af4d50d0 6464 lightdm-vala_1.2.2-4_amd64.deb
 762eb9ea16a1cd79dfc906068ceb7597285955cf 33490 
liblightdm-gobject-1-0_1.2.2-4_amd64.deb
 8397c46b3fc7e0837ca7ecd42d5f2ff2cf95f71f 35202 
liblightdm-qt-2-0_1.2.2-4_amd64.deb
 38aad606cde9d350e8461db60393db937b2b9265 57322 
liblightdm-gobject-dev_1.2.2-4_amd64.deb
 f6e7ec1a3d8c8b614a4607295c2b168016c51418 40766 
liblightdm-qt-dev_1.2.2-4_amd64.deb
Checksums-Sha256: 
 1ca01b1de623a47d8f20cb49413ff9b24e02a0786bab8cfaee869632b2b9bcad 2554 
lightdm_1.2.2-4.dsc
 7b2b9834a745da853986e72f888dea6cc1c9aa6812afad678c0951930c6a54ea 32983 
lightdm_1.2.2-4.debian.tar.gz
 8fb41f0c1b6d15ebfaca6a09e1e55a1eb0a663202e061d14da7c393e

Processed: reassign 537051 to ca-certificates,ca-certificates-java

2012-10-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> reassign 537051 ca-certificates,ca-certificates-java
Bug #537051 [ca-certificates] ca-certificates 20090709: installation error
Bug reassigned from package 'ca-certificates' to 
'ca-certificates,ca-certificates-java'.
No longer marked as found in versions ca-certificates/20090709 and 
ca-certificates/20120212.
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #537051 to the same values 
previously set
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
537051: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=537051
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Processed: affects 537051

2012-10-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> affects 537051 - ca-certificates-java
Bug #537051 [ca-certificates] ca-certificates 20090709: installation error
Removed indication that 537051 affects ca-certificates-java
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
537051: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=537051
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Processed (with 1 errors): severity of 537051 is serious, affects 537051, merging 690204 537051

2012-10-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> severity 537051 serious
Bug #537051 [ca-certificates] ca-certificates 20090709: installation error
Severity set to 'serious' from 'normal'
> affects 537051 + ca-certificates-java
Bug #537051 [ca-certificates] ca-certificates 20090709: installation error
Added indication that 537051 affects ca-certificates-java
> merge 690204 537051
Bug #690204 [ca-certificates,ca-certificates-java] ca-certificates{, -java}: 
many errors during squeeze->wheezy upgrades, probably related to configuration 
order and update.d/
Unable to merge bugs because:
affects of #537051 is 'ca-certificates-java' not ''
package of #537051 is 'ca-certificates' not 
'ca-certificates,ca-certificates-java'
Failed to merge 690204: Did not alter merged bugs
Debbugs::Control::set_merged('transcript', 'GLOB(0x34225c0)', 
'requester', 'Michael Shuler ', 'request_addr', 
'cont...@bugs.debian.org', 'request_msgid', 
'<1349981721-3930-bts-mich...@pbandjelly.org>', 'request_subject', ...) called 
at /usr/local/lib/site_perl/Debbugs/Control/Service.pm line 537
eval {...} called at 
/usr/local/lib/site_perl/Debbugs/Control/Service.pm line 536
Debbugs::Control::Service::control_line('line', 'merge 690204 537051', 
'clonebugs', 'HASH(0x33963f8)', 'limit', 'HASH(0x33958d8)', 
'common_control_options', 'ARRAY(0x3395920)', 'errors', ...) called at 
/usr/lib/debbugs/service line 474

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
537051: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=537051
690204: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=690204
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#689519: libapt-pkg4.12: SIGSEGV when used by apt-get or aptitude

2012-10-11 Thread mtths
Package: libapt-pkg4.12
Followup-For: Bug #689519

Dear Maintainer,

the same bug occurred when running "apt-get update" or "aptitude update" -
strangely this happens since 4. Oct, but today the update works again (without
having done any update by dpkg).
Maybe there was a underlying problem with an archive or decompression (or
Acquire::CompressionTypes::Order @ apt.conf)*? But on the other hand, a similar
installation had no problems...
  
FYI  
Matthias

* Acquire::CompressionTypes::xz "xz";
  Acquire::CompressionTypes::Order { "xz"; "lzma"; "bzip2"; "gz"; };


-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (99, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i586)

Kernel: Linux 3.5.5
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages libapt-pkg4.12 depends on:
ii  libbz2-1.0 1.0.6-4
ii  libc6  2.13-35
ii  libgcc11:4.7.2-2
ii  libstdc++6 4.7.2-2
ii  multiarch-support  2.13-35
ii  zlib1g 1:1.2.7.dfsg-13

libapt-pkg4.12 recommends no packages.

libapt-pkg4.12 suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information

CPU: AMD-K6tm w/ multimedia extensions, stepping 2
RAM: 126760 kB


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#688713: timidity-daemon: mishandles conffiles

2012-10-11 Thread Geoffrey Thomas

On Thu, 11 Oct 2012, Sébastien Villemot wrote:


I have uploaded to DELAYED/2 a NMU of timidity versioned 2.13.2-40.1
which fixes that bug. The debdiff is attached. Don't hesitate to tell me
if I should delay the upload longer.


Thanks, but would you mind delaying until early next week? There are a 
couple of wrong patches in the current source package (see #649274), and I 
was hoping to ask for a single freeze exception to deal with that issue 
too and a couple of Ubuntu ones. I know I've been remiss about doing an 
upload, but if it's already past time that an NMU is reasonable, I will 
make a point of attempting to deal with it this weekend -- and if I don't, 
feel free to let the NMU proceed.


--
Geoffrey Thomas
http://ldpreload.com
geo...@ldpreload.com

Processed: Re: Bug#688713: timidity-daemon: mishandles conffiles

2012-10-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands:

> tags -1 + pending
Bug #688713 [timidity-daemon] timidity-daemon: mishandles conffiles
Added tag(s) pending.

-- 
688713: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=688713
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#688713: timidity-daemon: mishandles conffiles

2012-10-11 Thread Sébastien Villemot
Control: tags -1 + pending

Dear Maintainers,

Andreas Beckmann  writes:

> Package: timidity-daemon
> Version: 2.13.2-40
> Severity: serious
> User: debian...@lists.debian.org
> Usertags: piuparts
>
> during a test with piuparts I noticed your package mishandles conffiles.
> This is violates the policy, see
> http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-files.html#s-config-files
>
> I miserably failed to understand that the maintainer scripts were to do,
> the only thing I can say for sure is that the conffile
> /etc/init.d/timidity is removed during the remove step of the package
> (which is wrong, because configuration must be preserved after remove,
> and needs to be clened up during purge only.
>
> And that will fail in the following scenario:
>
>   install timidity-daemon
>   remove (don't purge!) timidity-daemon
>   install timidity-daemon
>
> Now /etc/init.d/timidity is missing (as dpkg will not restore deleted
> configuration files as that is usually a user choice the should be
> preserved).

I have uploaded to DELAYED/2 a NMU of timidity versioned 2.13.2-40.1
which fixes that bug. The debdiff is attached. Don't hesitate to tell me
if I should delay the upload longer.

Guo: Thanks for your contribution. I did not directly upload your patch
for two reasons. First it was buggy since it was removing the call to
"invoke-rc.d timidity stop" in "prerm remove", and this call has to stay
there. Second it was making unnecessary changes related to
/etc/timidity/timidity.daemon, which is no longer shipped in the package
(it seems to predate squeeze); NMUs have to change the minimal amount of
code in order to fix the bug. But indeed, as Andreas has noted, a lot of
obsolete stuff could probably be removed from the maintainer scripts.
diff -Nru timidity-2.13.2/debian/changelog timidity-2.13.2/debian/changelog
--- timidity-2.13.2/debian/changelog	2011-11-21 17:14:10.0 +0100
+++ timidity-2.13.2/debian/changelog	2012-10-11 20:11:33.0 +0200
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+timidity (2.13.2-40.1) unstable; urgency=low
+
+  * Non-maintainer upload.
+  * No longer remove /etc/init.d/timidity in timidity-daemon's "prerm remove".
+Thanks to Guo Yixuan for digging into this issue. (Closes: #688713)
+
+ -- Sébastien Villemot   Thu, 11 Oct 2012 20:08:58 +0200
+
 timidity (2.13.2-40) unstable; urgency=low
 
   * New maintainer (Closes: #585039).
diff -Nru timidity-2.13.2/debian/timidity-daemon.prerm timidity-2.13.2/debian/timidity-daemon.prerm
--- timidity-2.13.2/debian/timidity-daemon.prerm	2009-09-11 12:44:23.0 +0200
+++ timidity-2.13.2/debian/timidity-daemon.prerm	2012-10-11 20:02:36.0 +0200
@@ -30,7 +30,6 @@
 fi
 fi
 
-rm_conffile timidity-daemon /etc/init.d/timidity
 rm_conffile timidity-daemon /etc/timidity/timidity.daemon
 
 ;;

-- 
 .''`.Sébastien Villemot
: :' :Debian Developer
`. `' http://www.dynare.org/sebastien
  `-  GPG Key: 4096R/381A7594


pgpNS5buQaa7Z.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Processed (with 1 errors): Re: Bug#690204: ca-certificates{, -java}: many errors during squeeze->wheezy upgrades, probably related to configuration order and update.d/

2012-10-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> merge 690204 537051
Bug #690204 [ca-certificates,ca-certificates-java] ca-certificates{, -java}: 
many errors during squeeze->wheezy upgrades, probably related to configuration 
order and update.d/
Unable to merge bugs because:
severity of #537051 is 'normal' not 'serious'
package of #537051 is 'ca-certificates' not 
'ca-certificates,ca-certificates-java'
Failed to merge 690204: Did not alter merged bugs
Debbugs::Control::set_merged('transcript', 'GLOB(0x17e9300)', 
'requester', 'Michael Shuler ', 'request_addr', 
'cont...@bugs.debian.org', 'request_msgid', 
'<50771024.1030...@pbandjelly.org>', 'request_subject', ...) called at 
/usr/local/lib/site_perl/Debbugs/Control/Service.pm line 537
eval {...} called at 
/usr/local/lib/site_perl/Debbugs/Control/Service.pm line 536
Debbugs::Control::Service::control_line('line', undef, 'clonebugs', 
'HASH(0x170f3f8)', 'limit', 'HASH(0x170e8d8)', 'common_control_options', 
'ARRAY(0x170e920)', 'errors', ...) called at /usr/lib/debbugs/service line 474

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
537051: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=537051
690204: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=690204
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#690204: ca-certificates{, -java}: many errors during squeeze->wheezy upgrades, probably related to configuration order and update.d/

2012-10-11 Thread Michael Shuler
merge 690204 537051
thanks

Same errors in the attached log during a squeeze to wheezy dist-upgrade.
However, immediately following the dist-upgrade, re-running
'update-ca-certificates --fresh' completes successfully and sets up the
java keystore properly.

In all cases, the end of the ca-certificates package update is:

  151 added, 0 removed; done.

and the hook for ca-certificates-java begins:

  Running hooks in /etc/ca-certificates/update.d
  updating keystore /etc/ssl/certs/java/cacerts...
  (errors..)

From the lack of update errors after dist-upgrade and the new openjdk is
installed makes me think that ca-certificates-java might need to
pre-depend on a specific version of openjdk-6-jre-headless. (Does this
sound reasonable?)

I would be happy to add something to ca-certificates to delay the update
hooks only when needed.  Perhaps if a suggested patch could be
submitted, since I'm not entirely sure what I would key off to make that
delay happen only when needed.  FWIW, there are no update errors with
ca-certificates when ca-certificates-java is not installed.

-- 
Kind regards,
Michael


squeeze2wheezy_dist-upgrade.log.gz
Description: application/gzip


signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Bug#658139: Patch to add back mime support

2012-10-11 Thread Don Armstrong
The attached patch adds back mime support and fixes the rest of the
issues (#619564, #627027, and #551734) which were related to
evince.mime and evince-gtk.mime. #581441 was fixed in
shared-mime-info/1.0.


Don Armstrong

-- 
There is no form of lead-poisoning which more rapidly and thoroughly
pervades the blood and bones and marrow than that which reaches the
young author through mental contact with type metal.
 -- Oliver Wendell Holmes (Tilton 1947 p67)

http://www.donarmstrong.com  http://rzlab.ucr.edu
Index: debian/evince-gtk.mime
===
--- debian/evince-gtk.mime	(revision 0)
+++ debian/evince-gtk.mime	(working copy)
@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
+application/pdf; evince %s; test=test -n "$DISPLAY"; nametemplate=%s.pdf; priority=5
+application/x-pdf; evince %s; test=test -n "$DISPLAY"; nametemplate=%s.pdf; priority=5
+application/x-bzpdf; evince %s; test=test -n "$DISPLAY"; nametemplate=%s.pdf.bz2; priority=5
+application/x-gzpdf; evince %s; test=test -n "$DISPLAY"; nametemplate=%s.pdf.gz; priority=5
+application/postscript; evince %s; test=test -n "$DISPLAY"; nametemplate=%s.ps; priority=5
+application/x-bzpostscript; evince %s; test=test -n "$DISPLAY"; nametemplate=%s.ps.bz2; priority=5
+application/x-gzpostscript; evince %s; test=test -n "$DISPLAY"; nametemplate=%s.ps.gz; priority=5
+image/x-eps; evince %s; test=test -n "$DISPLAY"; nametemplate=%s.eps; priority=5
+image/x-bzeps; evince %s; test=test -n "$DISPLAY"; nametemplate=%s.eps.bz2; priority=5
+image/x-gzeps; evince %s; test=test -n "$DISPLAY"; nametemplate=%s.eps.gz; priority=5
+application/x-dvi; evince %s; test=test -n "$DISPLAY"; nametemplate=%s.dvi; priority=5
+application/x-gzdvi; evince %s; test=test -n "$DISPLAY"; nametemplate=%s.dvi.gz; priority=5
+application/x-bzdvi; evince %s; test=test -n "$DISPLAY"; nametemplate=%s.dvi.bz2; priority=5
+image/vnd.djvu; evince %s; test=test -n "$DISPLAY"; nametemplate=%s.djvu; priority=5
+application/x-cbr; evince %s; test=test -n "$DISPLAY"; nametemplate=%s.cbr; priority=4
+application/x-cbt; evince %s; test=test -n "$DISPLAY"; nametemplate=%s.cbt; priority=4
+application/x-cbz; evince %s; test=test -n "$DISPLAY"; nametemplate=%s.cbz; priority=4
+application/x-cb7; evince %s; test=test -n "$DISPLAY"; nametemplate=%s.cb7; priority=4
+image/tiff; evince %s; test=test -n "$DISPLAY"; nametemplate=%s.tiff; priority=3
+application/oxps; evince %s; test=test -n "$DISPLAY"; nametemplate=%s.xps; priority=3
+application/vnd.ms-xpsdocument; evince %s; test=test -n "$DISPLAY"; nametemplate=%s.xps; priority=3
Index: debian/changelog
===
--- debian/changelog	(revision 35915)
+++ debian/changelog	(working copy)
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+evince (3.4.0-4) unstable; urgency=low
+
+  * Support the rest of the mime types that evince used to support in
+evince-gtk.mime and evince.mime. Closes: #658139.
+
+ -- Don Armstrong   Thu, 11 Oct 2012 11:02:26 -0700
+
 evince (3.4.0-3) unstable; urgency=low
 
   [ Josselin Mouette ]
Index: debian/evince.mime
===
--- debian/evince.mime	(revision 35915)
+++ debian/evince.mime	(working copy)
@@ -1 +1,21 @@
 application/pdf; evince %s; test=test -n "$DISPLAY"; nametemplate=%s.pdf; priority=5
+application/x-pdf; evince %s; test=test -n "$DISPLAY"; nametemplate=%s.pdf; priority=5
+application/x-bzpdf; evince %s; test=test -n "$DISPLAY"; nametemplate=%s.pdf.bz2; priority=5
+application/x-gzpdf; evince %s; test=test -n "$DISPLAY"; nametemplate=%s.pdf.gz; priority=5
+application/postscript; evince %s; test=test -n "$DISPLAY"; nametemplate=%s.ps; priority=5
+application/x-bzpostscript; evince %s; test=test -n "$DISPLAY"; nametemplate=%s.ps.bz2; priority=5
+application/x-gzpostscript; evince %s; test=test -n "$DISPLAY"; nametemplate=%s.ps.gz; priority=5
+image/x-eps; evince %s; test=test -n "$DISPLAY"; nametemplate=%s.eps; priority=5
+image/x-bzeps; evince %s; test=test -n "$DISPLAY"; nametemplate=%s.eps.bz2; priority=5
+image/x-gzeps; evince %s; test=test -n "$DISPLAY"; nametemplate=%s.eps.gz; priority=5
+application/x-dvi; evince %s; test=test -n "$DISPLAY"; nametemplate=%s.dvi; priority=5
+application/x-gzdvi; evince %s; test=test -n "$DISPLAY"; nametemplate=%s.dvi.gz; priority=5
+application/x-bzdvi; evince %s; test=test -n "$DISPLAY"; nametemplate=%s.dvi.bz2; priority=5
+image/vnd.djvu; evince %s; test=test -n "$DISPLAY"; nametemplate=%s.djvu; priority=5
+application/x-cbr; evince %s; test=test -n "$DISPLAY"; nametemplate=%s.cbr; priority=4
+application/x-cbt; evince %s; test=test -n "$DISPLAY"; nametemplate=%s.cbt; priority=4
+application/x-cbz; evince %s; test=test -n "$DISPLAY"; nametemplate=%s.cbz; priority=4
+application/x-cb7; evince %s; test=test -n "$DISPLAY"; nametemplate=%s.cb7; priority=4
+image/tiff; evince %s; test=test -n "$DISPLAY"; nametemplate=%s.tiff; priority=3
+application/oxps; evi

Bug#690257: python-irclib: FTBFS: Could not find suitable distribution for Requirement.parse('hgtools')

2012-10-11 Thread Jakub Wilk

Source: python-irclib
Version: 3.0-0.1
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source

python-irclib FTBFS:
| python setup.py install --no-compile 
--root=/build/python-irclib-E2mXSb/python-irclib-3.0/debian/python-irclib
| Checking .pth file support in .
| /usr/bin/python -E -c pass
| Searching for hgtools
| Reading http://pypi.python.org/simple/hgtools/
| Download error on http://pypi.python.org/simple/hgtools/: [Errno -2] Name or 
service not known -- Some packages may not be found!
| Reading http://pypi.python.org/simple/hgtools/
| Download error on http://pypi.python.org/simple/hgtools/: [Errno -2] Name or 
service not known -- Some packages may not be found!
| Couldn't find index page for 'hgtools' (maybe misspelled?)
| Scanning index of all packages (this may take a while)
| Reading http://pypi.python.org/simple/
| Download error on http://pypi.python.org/simple/: [Errno -2] Name or service 
not known -- Some packages may not be found!
| No local packages or download links found for hgtools
| Traceback (most recent call last):
|   File "setup.py", line 10, in 
| paver.tasks.main()
|   File "paver-minilib.zip/paver/tasks.py", line 816, in main
|   File "paver-minilib.zip/paver/tasks.py", line 797, in _launch_pavement
|   File "paver-minilib.zip/paver/tasks.py", line 741, in _process_commands
|   File "paver-minilib.zip/paver/tasks.py", line 655, in _parse_command_line
|   File "paver-minilib.zip/paver/tasks.py", line 613, in _preparse
|   File "paver-minilib.zip/paver/tasks.py", line 110, in get_task
|   File "paver-minilib.zip/paver/setuputils.py", line 192, in get_task
|   File "paver-minilib.zip/paver/setuputils.py", line 220, in _get_distribution
|   File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/setuptools/dist.py", line 221, in 
__init__
| self.fetch_build_eggs(attrs.pop('setup_requires'))
|   File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/setuptools/dist.py", line 245, in 
fetch_build_eggs
| parse_requirements(requires), installer=self.fetch_build_egg
|   File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/pkg_resources.py", line 576, in 
resolve
| dist = best[req.key] = env.best_match(req, self, installer)
|   File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/pkg_resources.py", line 821, in 
best_match
| return self.obtain(req, installer) # try and download/install
|   File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/pkg_resources.py", line 833, in 
obtain
| return installer(requirement)
|   File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/setuptools/dist.py", line 294, in 
fetch_build_egg
| return cmd.easy_install(req)
|   File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/setuptools/command/easy_install.py", 
line 602, in easy_install
| raise DistutilsError(msg)
| distutils.errors.DistutilsError: Could not find suitable distribution for 
Requirement.parse('hgtools')
| make: *** [install] Error 1
| dpkg-buildpackage: error: fakeroot debian/rules binary gave error exit status 
2

Internet was not accessible during the test build.

--
Jakub Wilk


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Processed: conserver: diff for NMU version 8.1.18-2.1

2012-10-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> tags 657465 + pending
Bug #657465 [conserver-client] conserver-client: prompting due to modified 
conffiles which where not modified by the user
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
657465: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=657465
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#657465: conserver: diff for NMU version 8.1.18-2.1

2012-10-11 Thread gregor herrmann
tags 657465 + pending
thanks

Dear maintainer,

I've prepared an NMU for conserver (versioned as 8.1.18-2.1) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/2 (with a small change compared to my last
proposal). Please feel free to tell me if I should delay it longer.

Regards.

-- 
 .''`.  Homepage: http://info.comodo.priv.at/ - OpenPGP key 0xBB3A68018649AA06
 : :' : Debian GNU/Linux user, admin, and developer  -  http://www.debian.org/
 `. `'  Member of VIBE!AT & SPI, fellow of the Free Software Foundation Europe
   `-   NP: Beatles
diff -u conserver-8.1.18/debian/changelog conserver-8.1.18/debian/changelog
--- conserver-8.1.18/debian/changelog
+++ conserver-8.1.18/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,17 @@
+conserver (8.1.18-2.1) unstable; urgency=low
+
+  * Non-maintainer upload.
+  * Fix "prompting due to modified conffiles which where not modified by
+the user":
+- don't install the conffile template below /etc but below /usr/share
+- copy it in .postinst if the file in /etc doesn't exist yet
+- read existing values in .config
+- fix replacement in .postinst
+- remove the correct file in .postrm
+(Closes: #657465)
+
+ -- gregor herrmann   Thu, 11 Oct 2012 19:06:36 +0200
+
 conserver (8.1.18-2) unstable; urgency=low
 
   * added lsb-init patch from Bernhard Schmidt (closes: #672468)
diff -u conserver-8.1.18/debian/conserver-client.config conserver-8.1.18/debian/conserver-client.config
--- conserver-8.1.18/debian/conserver-client.config
+++ conserver-8.1.18/debian/conserver-client.config
@@ -2,6 +2,16 @@
 
 . /usr/share/debconf/confmodule
 
+conf=/etc/conserver/console.cf
+
+if [ -r $conf ]; then
+	SERVER=$(perl -ne 'print $1 if /master\s+([^;]+);/' $conf)
+	PORT=$(perl   -ne 'print $1 if /port\s+([^;]+);/'   $conf)
+
+	db_set conserver-client/server "$SERVER"
+	db_set conserver-client/port   "$PORT"
+fi
+
 db_input medium conserver-client/config || true
 db_go
 
diff -u conserver-8.1.18/debian/conserver-client.install conserver-8.1.18/debian/conserver-client.install
--- conserver-8.1.18/debian/conserver-client.install
+++ conserver-8.1.18/debian/conserver-client.install
@@ -1,2 +1,2 @@
-debian/console.cf	/etc/conserver
+debian/console.cf	/usr/share/conserver-client
 console/console		/usr/bin
diff -u conserver-8.1.18/debian/conserver-client.postinst conserver-8.1.18/debian/conserver-client.postinst
--- conserver-8.1.18/debian/conserver-client.postinst
+++ conserver-8.1.18/debian/conserver-client.postinst
@@ -6,14 +6,18 @@
 if [ "$1" = "configure" -a -e /usr/share/debconf/confmodule ]; then
 	. /usr/share/debconf/confmodule
 
+	if [ ! -e $conf ]; then
+		cp /usr/share/conserver-client/console.cf $conf
+	fi
+
 	db_get conserver-client/config
 	if [ "$RET" = "true" ]; then
 
 		touch $conf
 		db_get conserver-client/server
-		perl -pi -e "s/\w+;$/$RET;/ if /^master\s/" $conf
+		perl -pi -e "s/master(?\s+)([^;]+);/master$+{space}$RET;/" $conf
 		db_get conserver-client/port
-		perl -pi -e "s/\w+;$/$RET;/ if /^port\s/" $conf
+		perl -pi -e "s/port(?\s+)([^;]+);/port$+{space}$RET;/" $conf
 	fi
 fi
 
diff -u conserver-8.1.18/debian/conserver-client.postrm conserver-8.1.18/debian/conserver-client.postrm
--- conserver-8.1.18/debian/conserver-client.postrm
+++ conserver-8.1.18/debian/conserver-client.postrm
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
 
 case "$1" in
 purge)
-	rm -f /etc/conserver/console.conf
+	rm -f /etc/conserver/console.cf
 	# try remove the confdirectory (why isn't there a 'prerm purge'?)
 	if [ -d /etc/conserver ]; then
 		rmdir --ignore-fail-on-non-empty /etc/conserver


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Processed: Pending upload will fix these bugs

2012-10-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> tags 674633 + pending
Bug #674633 [libogre-dev] libogre-dev: Uses default versions of libboost-*-dev 
packages
Added tag(s) pending.
> tags 684218 + pending
Bug #684218 [src:ogre] ogre contains non-free font from larabie collection
Added tag(s) pending.
> stop
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
674633: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=674633
684218: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=684218
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#684218: Pending upload will fix these bugs

2012-10-11 Thread Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo
tags 674633 + pending
tags 684218 + pending
stop

Hello,

I am the mantainer of ogre packages for the last couple of years, but
fixing the most important of these bugs requires a sourceful upload,
which I cannot do as a DM.

If some interested DD sees this, please consider sponsoring my upload
to mentors:
https://mentors.debian.net/package/ogre


Cheers.
-- 
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo 


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Processed: Pending upload will fix these bugs

2012-10-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> tags 684219 + pending
Bug #684219 [src:ogre-1.8] ogre-1.8 contains non-free font from larabie 
collection
Added tag(s) pending.
> tags 687013 + pending
Bug #687013 [ogre-1.8] ogre-1.8: crash due to use of broken stack alignment hack
Added tag(s) pending.
> tags 688582 + pending
Bug #688582 [src:ogre-1.8] libogre-dev: Uses default versions of libboost-*-dev 
packages
Added tag(s) pending.
> stop
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
684219: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=684219
687013: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=687013
688582: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=688582
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#684219: Pending upload will fix these bugs

2012-10-11 Thread Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo
tags 684219 + pending
tags 687013 + pending
tags 688582 + pending
stop

Hello,

I am the mantainer of ogre packages for the last couple of years, but
fixing the most important of these bugs requires a sourceful upload,
which I cannot do as a DM.

If some interested DD sees this, please consider sponsoring my upload
to mentors:
https://mentors.debian.net/package/ogre-1.8


Cheers.
-- 
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo 


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#689718: xmame-sdl,xmess-sdl: missing copyright file after upgrade from squeeze

2012-10-11 Thread Emmanuel Kasper
Le 11/10/2012 11:15, Andreas Beckmann a écrit :
>> mame (0.146-4) unstable; urgency=low
>> >* Removes danglink symlink after xmame-sdl,xmame-x,xmame-svga
>> >update.
> That is too late, as the files will be installed over the broken
> symlink. The symlinks must be deleted in preinst and unpackaging the
> updated package will create a directory in place of the (now missing)

hello andreas

actually the link removal *does* appear in preinst though I agree that
my changelog entry could have been more clear

the bug should be fixed for xmame-{sdl,x,svga} but it is still open for
xmess-{sdl,x,svga}


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#688229: Burning data DVD looks successful but mounting fails

2012-10-11 Thread Thomas Schmitt
Hi,

> The log shows some Growisofs message and not the one I have.
> Although, could it be that it is dependent on the libburn version?

The libburn plugin was not used. Only the libisofs one.

A run with growisofs as burn engine would also suffer from the bug
we found in the libisofs plugin.
But the found bug would not cause libisofs or growisofs to abort
after libisofs generated about 50 percent of the image.

GNOME bug 655061 is the same initial bug report as Ubuntu 780117.
Both took a long tail of me-toos which mostly match our found bug.
There we find the hints about direct burning (which fails) and
burning of previously stored ISO images (which succeeds).


> Since when does libburn return if all data was written or not?

Quite some while.
But it depends on whether the size of the track was announced
by the application. I understand Brasero creates its own
struct burn_source implementation. So it depends on whether
  burn-libburn.c:brasero_libburn_src_get_size()
returns non-zero.

Whether this changed in the past is a matter of Brasero history.
It might have been a libburn provided burn_source object in
the past which would have been created by libburn call
  struct burn_source *burn_fd_source_new(int datafd, int subfd, off_t size);
Here it would matter whether size is non-zero, resp. on the
result of fstat(datafd, ...).


> I am not so sure on this one anymore as it is reported against 2.30.3-2
> which does not have the offending patch. I can imaging that it is caused
> by the problem the faulty patch wanted to fix [1]. But thinking about
> this the original reporter wrote, that his medium could be mounted.

I see.
But the follow-up by Simon Wenner was with a higher Brasero
version.


> > I would deem this field more appropriate to rat out Paul Menzel. :))

> Very much more appropriate. ;-) Are you doing that in xorriso?

I do not even know how to get your full name from your computer.
You would have to rat out yourself by xorriso command
  -publisher 'Paul Menzel'


> Interesting. Though I know of no such specifications.

ECMA-119 is the freely available form of ISO 9660 specs.
  http://www.ecma-international.org/publications/files/ECMA-ST/Ecma-119.pdf
The contract between image producers and image readers.
It describes on byte level how an ISO image has to look like.

 
Have a nice day :)

Thomas


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#624923: marked as done (kompozer: FTBFS: nsCSSStyleSheet.cpp:2897:43: error: uninitialized const 'ciComparator' [-fpermissive])

2012-10-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 11 Oct 2012 16:09:32 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#690251: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #624923,
regarding kompozer: FTBFS: nsCSSStyleSheet.cpp:2897:43: error: uninitialized 
const 'ciComparator' [-fpermissive]
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
624923: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=624923
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: kompozer
Version: 1:0.8~b3.dfsg.1-0.1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110502 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64

Hi,

During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.

Relevant part:
> c++ -o nsCSSStyleSheet.o -c -I../../dist/include/system_wrappers -include 
> /build/user-kompozer_0.8~b3.dfsg.1-0.1-amd64-0R9usv/kompozer-0.8~b3.dfsg.1/mozilla/config/gcc_hidden.h
>  -DMOZILLA_INTERNAL_API -DOSTYPE=\"Linux2.6\" -DOSARCH=\"Linux\" 
> -DBUILD_ID=00 -D_IMPL_NS_LAYOUT 
> -I/build/user-kompozer_0.8~b3.dfsg.1-0.1-amd64-0R9usv/kompozer-0.8~b3.dfsg.1/mozilla/layout/style/../../content/base/src
>  
> -I/build/user-kompozer_0.8~b3.dfsg.1-0.1-amd64-0R9usv/kompozer-0.8~b3.dfsg.1/mozilla/layout/style/../../content/html/content/src
>  
> -I/build/user-kompozer_0.8~b3.dfsg.1-0.1-amd64-0R9usv/kompozer-0.8~b3.dfsg.1/mozilla/layout/style/../../content/xbl/src
>   -I../../dist/include/xpcom -I../../dist/include/string 
> -I../../dist/include/dom -I../../dist/include/content 
> -I../../dist/include/gfx -I../../dist/include/widget 
> -I../../dist/include/caps -I../../dist/include/locale 
> -I../../dist/include/unicharutil -I../../dist/include/js 
> -I../../dist/include/necko -I../../dist/include/mimetype 
> -I../../dist/include/webshell -I../../dist/include/docshell 
> -I../../dist/include/htmlparser -I../../dist/include/uconv 
> -I../../dist/include/xuldoc -I../../dist/include/xpconnect 
> -I../../dist/include/view -I../../dist/include/intl -I../../dist/include/pref 
> -I../../dist/include/imglib2 -I../../dist/include/layout -I../../dist/include 
> -I/usr/include/nspr  -I/usr/include -I/usr/include -I../../dist/sdk/include   
>  -fPIC   -fno-rtti -fno-exceptions -Wall -Wconversion -Wpointer-arith 
> -Wcast-align -Woverloaded-virtual -Wsynth -Wno-ctor-dtor-privacy 
> -Wno-non-virtual-dtor -Wno-long-long -pedantic -g -O2 -DDEBIAN -fshort-wchar 
> -pthread -pipe  -DNDEBUG -DTRIMMED -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -g   
> -DMOZILLA_CLIENT -include ../../mozilla-config.h 
> -Wp,-MD,.deps/nsCSSStyleSheet.pp 
> /build/user-kompozer_0.8~b3.dfsg.1-0.1-amd64-0R9usv/kompozer-0.8~b3.dfsg.1/mozilla/layout/style/nsCSSStyleSheet.cpp
> In file included from ../../dist/include/string/nsStringIterator.h:43:0,
>  from ../../dist/include/string/nsAString.h:47,
>  from ../../dist/include/string/nsSubstring.h:43,
>  from ../../dist/include/string/nsString.h:44,
>  from 
> /build/user-kompozer_0.8~b3.dfsg.1-0.1-amd64-0R9usv/kompozer-0.8~b3.dfsg.1/mozilla/layout/style/nsICSSStyleSheet.h:41,
>  from 
> /build/user-kompozer_0.8~b3.dfsg.1-0.1-amd64-0R9usv/kompozer-0.8~b3.dfsg.1/mozilla/layout/style/nsCSSStyleSheet.h:48,
>  from 
> /build/user-kompozer_0.8~b3.dfsg.1-0.1-amd64-0R9usv/kompozer-0.8~b3.dfsg.1/mozilla/layout/style/nsCSSStyleSheet.cpp:41:
> ../../dist/include/string/nsCharTraits.h: In static member function 'static 
> nsCharTraits::char_type nsCharTraits int>::ASCIIToLower(nsCharTraits::char_type)':
> ../../dist/include/string/nsCharTraits.h:280:61: warning: conversion to 
> 'nsCharTraits::char_type' from 'int' may alter its value 
> [-Wconversion]
> ../../dist/include/string/nsCharTraits.h: In static member function 'static 
> nsCharTraits::char_type 
> nsCharTraits::ASCIIToLower(nsCharTraits::char_type)':
> ../../dist/include/string/nsCharTraits.h:535:61: warning: conversion to 
> 'nsCharTraits::char_type' from 'int' may alter its value [-Wconversion]
> In file included from ../../dist/include/string/nsDependentSubstring.h:48:0,
>  from ../../dist/include/string/nsString.h:48,
>  from 
> /build/user-kompozer_0.8~b3.dfsg.1-0.1-amd64-0R9usv/kompozer-0.8~b3.dfsg.1/mozilla/layout/style/nsICSSStyleSheet.h:41,
>  from 
> /build/user-kompozer_0.8~b3.dfsg.1-0.1-amd64-0R9usv/kompozer-0.8~b3.dfsg.1/mozilla/layout/style/nsCSSStyleSheet.h:48,
>  from 
> /build/user-kompozer_0.8~b3.dfsg.1-0.1-amd64-0R9usv/kompozer-0.8~b3.dfsg.1/mozilla/layou

Bug#572072: marked as done (python-apt 0.8 API transition: Please update computer-janitor to new API)

2012-10-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 11 Oct 2012 16:06:59 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#690243: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #572072,
regarding python-apt 0.8 API transition: Please update computer-janitor to new 
API
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
572072: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=572072
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: computer-janitor
User: de...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: python-apt-0-8-api

As part of the python-apt API transition mass bug filing[1],
I would like to ask you to update your package for the new
API.

Please make sure to adjust your dependencies to require
at least version 0.7.93.2 of python-apt; because older
versions may not provide all needed functions.

The first python-apt upload after the Squeeze release will
drop the old API and will get a 'Breaks' for all packages
which have not been adjusted yet. All not-fixed bugs will 
become release critical then.

[1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2010/02/msg00424.html

-- 
Julian Andres Klode  - Debian Developer, Ubuntu Member

See http://wiki.debian.org/JulianAndresKlode and http://jak-linux.org/.


pgp65KPIHHUKN.pgp
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 1.14.1-1+rm

Dear submitter,

as the package computer-janitor has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports.  We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.

For details on the removal, please see http://bugs.debian.org/690243

The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/.

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Ansgar Burchardt (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)--- End Message ---


Bug#688229: Burning data DVD looks successful but mounting fails

2012-10-11 Thread Paul Menzel
Dear Thomas,


Am Donnerstag, den 11.10.2012, 16:59 +0200 schrieb Thomas Schmitt:

> > 000 001   C   D   0   0   1 001  \0 
> 
> Yes. That is the start of a Primary Volume Descriptor block.
> 
> Please mount the medium and use diff to compare the files in
> the image with their originals on hard disk. Just to be sure.
> (Mounting does not check all blocks in the image for sanity.)

`diff folder/ /mnt/folder` does not return any error the burning worked.

> > Hmm, it encodes the name in there. To all whistle blowers out there: Do
> > not use Brasero without configuring beforehand. ;-)
> 
> (Who told your computer your full name on the first hand ?)
> 
> ECMA-119 says about that field in the PVD:
> 
> "8.4.21 Data Preparer Identifier (BP 447 to 574)
>  This field shall specify an identification of the person or other
>  entity which controls the preparation of the data to be recorded
>  on the Volume Group of which the volume is a member.
> "
> I would rather use it to identify the image generating program.
> (I do so in xorriso. E.g.:
>   "XORRISO-1.2.5 2012.09.15.170346, LIBISOBURN-1.2.5, LIBISOFS-1.2.5, 
> LIBBURN-1.2.5"
> )

Another bug found. :/

> Brasero mentions itself as:
> "8.4.20 Publisher Identifier (BP 319 to 446)
>  This field shall specify an identification of the user who specified
>  what shall be recorded on the Volume Group of which the volume is a
>  member.
> "
> I would deem this field more appropriate to rat out Paul Menzel. :))

Very much more appropriate. ;-) Are you doing that in xorriso?

> mkisofs has a third opinion on that. It advertises itself in:
> "8.4.22 Application Identifier (BP 575 to 702)
>  This field shall specify an identification of the specification of
>  how the data are recorded on the Volume Group of which the volume
>  is a member.
> "

Interesting. Though I know of no such specifications.

> > PS: Thomas, reading the libburnia start page [1], I see you take
> > donations. If some users, benefiting from this patch want to donate
> > something, I would like the libburnia project to have it. So it would be
> > great if you could give me the necessary instructions.
> 
> If you would like to donate, please mail us:
>  mario.danic [at] gmail [dot] com, Cc: scdbackup [at] gmx [dot] net.
> 
> I personally can accept donations only by my german bank account.
> Possibly this is feasible within the EU even with smaller
> amounts. 
> Our project founder Mario Danic has a paypal account, afaik.
> I understand he has to pay money for the web hoster.

I see. Though I guess it should be made easy for people to donate.
Entering an amount and clicking a button would be the best. Though I
will tell them to mail you. (They could also sent you some stuff which
they can pay easily in an online shop.)


Thanks,

Paul


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Bug#688229: Burning data DVD looks successful but mounting fails

2012-10-11 Thread Paul Menzel
Control: forwarded -1 https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=685983


Dear Thomas,


Am Donnerstag, den 11.10.2012, 17:26 +0200 schrieb Paul Menzel:

> Am Donnerstag, den 11.10.2012, 17:08 +0200 schrieb Thomas Schmitt:
> 
> > Paul Menzel wrote in his patch:
> > > Substituting this command with the variable fixes the problem reported in
> > > GNOME Bugzilla bug 655601.
> > 
> > I have to stress that the found bug does _not_ explain the
> > original report of
> >   https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=655601
> > (which is what i call the "50 % bug").
> 
> you seem right. The log shows some Growisofs message and not the one I
> have. Although, could it be that it is dependent on the libburn version?
> Since when does libburn return if all data was written or not?

To be sure and keep a little sanity I created a new report upstream [2].

> > I would explain several of the follow-up comments in this
> > bug report.
> > Especially it would explain
> >   http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=617409
> 
> I am not so sure on this one anymore as it is reported against 2.30.3-2
> which does not have the offending patch. I can imaging that it is caused
> by the problem the faulty patch wanted to fix [1]. But thinking about
> this the original reporter wrote, that his medium could be mounted.

Of course I meant GNOME BTS issue #630651.


Thanks,

Paul


> [1] https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=655601
[2] https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=685983
[3] https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=630651


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Processed: Re: Burning data DVD looks successful but mounting fails

2012-10-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands:

> forwarded -1 https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=685983
Bug #688229 [libbrasero-media3-1] brasero: Burning data DVD looks successful 
but mounting fails with »ISOFS: Unable to identify CD-ROM format.«
Changed Bug forwarded-to-address to 
'https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=685983' from 
'https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=655601'

-- 
688229: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=688229
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#689519: libapt-pkg4.12: SIGSEGV when used by apt-get or aptitude

2012-10-11 Thread David Kalnischkies
Hi Rainer,

On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 3:55 PM, Rainer Poisel  wrote:
> The same applies to aptitude (same method invokation led to a segfault). 
> Please let me know if you need any further information.

Is this still reproducible?
Only with this package or with any command involving any package?
Any special settings or sources?

If it is reproducible please tell us your sources and attach
your /var/lib/dpkg/status file (compressed, it might be >2 MB big).

The file includes details about your installed packages - if you don't
want to expose these details to the general public feel free to send
it directly to me.


Best regards

David Kalnischkies


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#690154: eglibc: FTBFS: gcc-4.4: Internal error: Segmentation fault (program as)

2012-10-11 Thread Jonathan Nieder
Hi Lucas,

Lucas Nussbaum wrote:

> During a rebuild of all packages in *wheezy*, your package failed to
> build on amd64.
>
> Two notes on this bug:
> - the build failed twice in a row (I auto-retry failed builds)
> - the build did not fail with gcc 4.7 from unstable (I was doing a test
>   rebuild for that at the same time)
[...]
>> gcc-4.4 -m32 ../sysdeps/i386/fpu/k_rem_pio2l.c -c [...]
>> gcc-4.4: Internal error: Segmentation fault (program as)

I am not able to reproduce this with gcc-4.4 4.4.7-2 and binutils 2.22-7.1
on amd64, building with

debuild -I -i -b

Any hints?

If you can reproduce this, would it be possible to get the input files
and "as" command line that triggers the segfault as described in
/usr/share/bug/binutils/presubj?

Thanks,
Jonathan


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#688229: Burning data DVD looks successful but mounting fails

2012-10-11 Thread Paul Menzel
Dear Thomas,


Am Donnerstag, den 11.10.2012, 17:08 +0200 schrieb Thomas Schmitt:

> Paul Menzel wrote in his patch:
> > Substituting this command with the variable fixes the problem reported in
> > GNOME Bugzilla bug 655601.
> 
> I have to stress that the found bug does _not_ explain the
> original report of
>   https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=655601
> (which is what i call the "50 % bug").

you seem right. The log shows some Growisofs message and not the one I
have. Although, could it be that it is dependent on the libburn version?
Since when does libburn return if all data was written or not?

> I would explain several of the follow-up comments in this
> bug report.
> Especially it would explain
>   http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=617409

I am not so sure on this one anymore as it is reported against 2.30.3-2
which does not have the offending patch. I can imaging that it is caused
by the problem the faulty patch wanted to fix [1]. But thinking about
this the original reporter wrote, that his medium could be mounted.


Thanks,

Paul


[1] https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=655601


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Bug#688229: Burning data DVD looks successful but mounting fails

2012-10-11 Thread Thomas Schmitt
Hi,

Paul Menzel wrote in his patch:
> Substituting this command with the variable fixes the problem reported in
> GNOME Bugzilla bug 655601.

I have to stress that the found bug does _not_ explain the
original report of
  https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=655601
(which is what i call the "50 % bug").

I would explain several of the follow-up comments in this
bug report.
Especially it would explain
  http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=617409


Have a nice day :)

Thomas


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Processed: Re: Burning data DVD looks successful but mounting fails

2012-10-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands:

> forwarded -1 https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=655601
Bug #688229 [libbrasero-media3-1] brasero: Burning data DVD looks successful 
but mounting fails with »ISOFS: Unable to identify CD-ROM format.«
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 
'https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=655601'.
> tags -1 patch
Bug #688229 [libbrasero-media3-1] brasero: Burning data DVD looks successful 
but mounting fails with »ISOFS: Unable to identify CD-ROM format.«
Added tag(s) patch.
> found -1 2.91.93-1
Bug #688229 [libbrasero-media3-1] brasero: Burning data DVD looks successful 
but mounting fails with »ISOFS: Unable to identify CD-ROM format.«
Marked as found in versions brasero/2.91.93-1.
> affects -1 brasero
Bug #688229 [libbrasero-media3-1] brasero: Burning data DVD looks successful 
but mounting fails with »ISOFS: Unable to identify CD-ROM format.«
Added indication that 688229 affects brasero

-- 
688229: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=688229
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#688229: Burning data DVD looks successful but mounting fails

2012-10-11 Thread Paul Menzel
Control: forwarded -1 https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=655601
Control: tags -1 patch
Control: found -1 2.91.93-1
Control: affects -1 brasero


Am Donnerstag, den 11.10.2012, 15:44 +0200 schrieb Paul Menzel:

> Am Donnerstag, den 11.10.2012, 15:06 +0200 schrieb Thomas Schmitt:
> 
> > > -   while (priv->libburn_src->read_xt (priv->libburn_src, buf, 
> > > sector_size) == sector_size) {
> > > +   while (read_bytes == sector_size) {
> > > I am building it right now.
> > 
> > Crossing fingers ...

[…]

> Thomas, I am going to write the commit message now.

Please find the patch attached.

[…]


Thanks,

Paul
From 17ad074e2ad8e3881afae148594a770f3dd7f228 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Paul Menzel 
Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2012 14:40:06 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Libburnia plugin: Fix while loop in `brasero_libisofs_write_image_to_fd_thread()` (#655601)

In commit 1b8397ee [1]

commit 1b8397ee252df2d554682ca2d694d5937fbf6e39
Author: Philippe Rouquier 
Date:   Tue Oct 5 10:10:17 2010 +0200

Fix for #630651 [2] - Basero creating incomplete image (.ISO) files

distributed since Brasero 2.91.1

$ git tag --contains 1b8397ee252df2d554682ca2d694d5937fbf6e39 | sort | head -n 1
BRASERO_2_91_1

a small bug was introduced by forgetting to substitude a command with a newly introduced variable in the loop condition. This broke the loop reading out the data to be written to the disc.

This small error had a huge impacted as writing images on the fly always failed, because only half of the image was written to the disc. Several bug reports exist for this problem and are most likely due to this problem [3][4][5].

Substituting this command with the variable fixes the problem reported in GNOME Bugzilla bug 655601.

Creating this patch would not have been possible without the invaluable and quick observations and explanations of Thomas Schmitt from the libburnia project [7]. In the end Michael Biebl from the Debian project stepped up to look into this problem and bisected this problem to the above commit. Thomas Schmitt pointed out the error afterward. A big thanks to both of them and everybody else reporting errors and providing logs!

[1] http://git.gnome.org/browse/brasero/commit/?id=1b8397ee252df2d554682ca2d694d5937fbf6e39
[2] https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=630651
[3] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=688229
[4] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=594753
[5] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/brasero/+bug/780117
[6] https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=655601
[7] http://libburnia-project.org/
---
 plugins/libburnia/burn-libisofs.c |2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/plugins/libburnia/burn-libisofs.c b/plugins/libburnia/burn-libisofs.c
index 22cb75e..841468a 100644
--- a/plugins/libburnia/burn-libisofs.c
+++ b/plugins/libburnia/burn-libisofs.c
@@ -199,7 +199,7 @@ brasero_libisofs_write_image_to_fd_thread (BraseroLibisofs *self)
 
 	BRASERO_JOB_LOG (self, "Writing to pipe");
 	read_bytes = priv->libburn_src->read_xt (priv->libburn_src, buf, sector_size);
-	while (priv->libburn_src->read_xt (priv->libburn_src, buf, sector_size) == sector_size) {
+	while (read_bytes == sector_size) {
 		if (priv->cancel)
 			break;
 
-- 
1.7.10.4



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Bug#688229: Burning data DVD looks successful but mounting fails

2012-10-11 Thread Thomas Schmitt
Hi,

> 000 001   C   D   0   0   1 001  \0 

Yes. That is the start of a Primary Volume Descriptor block.

Please mount the medium and use diff to compare the files in
the image with their originals on hard disk. Just to be sure.
(Mounting does not check all blocks in the image for sanity.)


> Hmm, it encodes the name in there. To all whistle blowers out there: Do
> not use Brasero without configuring beforehand. ;-)

(Who told your computer your full name on the first hand ?)

ECMA-119 says about that field in the PVD:

"8.4.21 Data Preparer Identifier (BP 447 to 574)
 This field shall specify an identification of the person or other
 entity which controls the preparation of the data to be recorded
 on the Volume Group of which the volume is a member.
"
I would rather use it to identify the image generating program.
(I do so in xorriso. E.g.:
  "XORRISO-1.2.5 2012.09.15.170346, LIBISOBURN-1.2.5, LIBISOFS-1.2.5, 
LIBBURN-1.2.5"
)

Brasero mentions itself as:
"8.4.20 Publisher Identifier (BP 319 to 446)
 This field shall specify an identification of the user who specified
 what shall be recorded on the Volume Group of which the volume is a
 member.
"
I would deem this field more appropriate to rat out Paul Menzel. :))

mkisofs has a third opinion on that. It advertises itself in:
"8.4.22 Application Identifier (BP 575 to 702)
 This field shall specify an identification of the specification of
 how the data are recorded on the Volume Group of which the volume
 is a member.
"


> PS: Thomas, reading the libburnia start page [1], I see you take
> donations. If some users, benefiting from this patch want to donate
> something, I would like the libburnia project to have it. So it would be
> great if you could give me the necessary instructions.

If you would like to donate, please mail us:
 mario.danic [at] gmail [dot] com, Cc: scdbackup [at] gmx [dot] net.

I personally can accept donations only by my german bank account.
Possibly this is feasible within the EU even with smaller
amounts. 
Our project founder Mario Danic has a paypal account, afaik.
I understand he has to pay money for the web hoster.


Have a nice day :)

Thomas


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#572072: (no subject)

2012-10-11 Thread Julian Andres Klode
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 05:16:45PM -0400, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> For all intents and purposes, computer-janitor is abandonware.
> 
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/computer-janitor/+bug/1050071

Thanks, I requested removal.

-- 
Julian Andres Klode  - Debian Developer, Ubuntu Member

See http://wiki.debian.org/JulianAndresKlode and http://jak-linux.org/.


pgp8JxgImfgel.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Bug#688229: Burning data DVD looks successful but mounting fails

2012-10-11 Thread Paul Menzel
Dear Thomas,


Am Donnerstag, den 11.10.2012, 15:06 +0200 schrieb Thomas Schmitt:

> > -   while (priv->libburn_src->read_xt (priv->libburn_src, buf, 
> > sector_size) == sector_size) {
> > +   while (read_bytes == sector_size) {
> > I am building it right now.
> 
> Crossing fingers ...

That helped. After taking some time to figure out that I had not
actually installed the build patched packages, it *worked* indeed!
Brasero even plays a sound on success.

Mounting the image works and just for completeness here is the ISO9660
header(?).

$ dd if=/tmp/my_emulated_drive bs=2048 skip=16 count=1 | od -c
1+0 Datensätze ein
1+0 Datensätze aus
2048 Bytes (2,0 kB) kopiert, 0,000105318 s, 19,4 MB/s
000 001   C   D   0   0   1 001  \0
020
040   D   a   t   e   n   -   C   D
060   /   D   V   D   (   1   1   O   k   t   1   2   )
100  \0  \0  \0  \0  \0  \0  \0  \0
120 317 271  \0  \0  \0  \0 271 317  \0  \0  \0  \0  \0  \0  \0  \0
140  \0  \0  \0  \0  \0  \0  \0  \0  \0  \0  \0  \0  \0  \0  \0  \0
160  \0  \0  \0  \0  \0  \0  \0  \0 001  \0  \0 001 001  \0  \0 001
200  \0  \b  \b  \0 030  \0  \0  \0  \0  \0  \0 030 030  \0  \0  \0
220  \0  \0  \0  \0  \0  \0  \0 031  \0  \0  \0  \0   "  \0 023  \0
240  \0  \0  \0  \0  \0 023  \0  \b  \0  \0  \0  \0  \b  \0   p  \n
260  \v  \r 032   /  \0 002  \0  \0 001  \0  \0 001 001  \0   D   a
300   t   e   n   -   C   D   /   D   V   D   (   1   1   O
320   k   t   1   2   )
340
*
460   B   R
500   A   S   E   R   O   -   3   .   4   .   1
520
*
660   P   A
700   U   L   M   E   N   Z   E   L
720
*
0001440   2   0   1
0001460   2   1   0   1   1   1   3   2   6   4   7   0   0  \0   2   0
0001500   1   2   1   0   1   1   1   3   2   6   4   7   0   0  \0  \0
0001520  \0  \0  \0  \0  \0  \0  \0  \0  \0  \0  \0  \0  \0  \0  \0  \0
*
0001560  \0 001  \0  \0  \0  \0  \0  \0  \0  \0  \0  \0  \0  \0  \0  \0
0001600  \0  \0  \0  \0  \0  \0  \0  \0  \0  \0  \0  \0  \0  \0  \0  \0
*
0004000

Hmm, it encodes the name in there. To all whistle blowers out there: Do
not use Brasero without configuring beforehand. ;-)

Thomas, I am going to write the commit message now.


Thanks,

Paul


PS: Thomas, reading the libburnia start page [1], I see you take
donations. If some users, benefiting from this patch want to donate
something, I would like the libburnia project to have it. So it would be
great if you could give me the necessary instructions.


[1] http://libburnia-project.org/


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Bug#688123: owncloud: CVE-2012-4753

2012-10-11 Thread Thomas Müller

A member of the Owncloud security team is in contact with MITRE 
in order to close this CVE as it's invalid due to unclear changelog entries.

I'll keep you informed.

THX,

Tom


Am Mittwoch, dem 19.09.2012 um 17:32 schrieb Moritz Muehlenhoff:
> Package: owncloud
> Severity: grave
> Tags: security
> Justification: user security hole
> 
> Hi,
> CVE-2012-4753 is still unfixed in Wheezy:
> http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2012/09/05/17
> 
> It's not clear, which CSRF fixes were fixed in 4.0.5, so please
> contact upstream to identify the specific fixes and introduce 
> them in another tpu upload.
> 
> Cheers,
> Moritz
> 
> ___
> Pkg-owncloud-maintainers mailing list
> pkg-owncloud-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org
> http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-owncloud-maintainers


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#688229: Burning data DVD looks successful but mounting fails

2012-10-11 Thread Thomas Schmitt
Hi,

> -   while (priv->libburn_src->read_xt (priv->libburn_src, buf, 
> sector_size) == sector_size) {
> +   while (read_bytes == sector_size) {
> I am building it right now.


Crossing fingers ...


Have a nice day :)

Thomas


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#688229: Burning data DVD looks successful but mounting fails

2012-10-11 Thread Paul Menzel
Dear Thomas,


Am Donnerstag, den 11.10.2012, 13:19 +0200 schrieb Paul Menzel:

> Am Donnerstag, den 11.10.2012, 11:40 +0200 schrieb Thomas Schmitt:
> 
> > staring at lines 201, 202, and 216 of
> >   http://git.gnome.org/browse/brasero/tree/plugins/libburnia/burn-libisofs.c
> > 
> > i realize that this loop drops every second block !
> > 
> > 
> >   read_bytes = priv->libburn_src->read_xt (priv->libburn_src, buf, 
> > sector_size);
> >   while (priv->libburn_src->read_xt (priv->libburn_src, buf, sector_size) 
> > == sector_size) {
> > 
> >  ... process block that was read by while() statement ...
> > 
> >  read_bytes = priv->libburn_src->read_xt (priv->libburn_src, buf, 
> > sector_size);
> >   }
> > 
> > 
> > This would well explain why block 17 ends up at block 8.
> > 
> > 
> > It is tempting to also claim victory over the 50 % bug, but i
> > cannot yet make up a plausible explanation. With the 50% bug
> >   https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/brasero/+bug/780117
> > it is libisofs which reports 50 % progress, when loop or libburn
> > close the shop.
> > 
> > The many CD complaints in this Ubuntu bug could well be caused
> > by above killer loop, though.
> 
> As already spoilered in my reply to #690207 [1], with the libburn output
> patch attached it confirms that half of the bytes are missing.
> 
> BraseroBurn: (at burn-libburn-common.c:218) BraseroLibburn Premature 
> end of input encountered. Missing: 48709632 bytes
> 
> These are around 47 MB and indeed comparing the sizes yields the
> following.
> 
> $ du -sh folder
> 94M   /home/joey/folder
> $ du -sh /tmp/my_emulated_drive 
> 47M   /tmp/my_emulated_drive
> 
> So all the bugs seem to be the same and Brasero just displays the error
> differently or it is not noticeable with smaller amounts that the
> progress bar stopped earlier.
> 
> I will try to cook up a patch for fixing the loop now.

It looks like it is as simple as the following.

diff --git a/plugins/libburnia/burn-libisofs.c 
b/plugins/libburnia/burn-libisofs.c
index 3c25224..3919281 100644
--- a/plugins/libburnia/burn-libisofs.c
+++ b/plugins/libburnia/burn-libisofs.c
@@ -199,7 +199,7 @@ brasero_libisofs_write_image_to_fd_thread (BraseroLibisofs 
*self)
 
BRASERO_JOB_LOG (self, "Writing to pipe with sector size %i bytes", 
sector_size);
read_bytes = priv->libburn_src->read_xt (priv->libburn_src, buf, 
sector_size);
-   while (priv->libburn_src->read_xt (priv->libburn_src, buf, sector_size) 
== sector_size) {
+   while (read_bytes == sector_size) {
if (priv->cancel)
break;

I am building it right now.


Thanks,

Paul


> [1] http://bugs.debian.org/690207


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Bug#690237: as3compile segfaults on i386, seen when building libjs-swfupload

2012-10-11 Thread Matthias Klose
Package: swftools
Version: 0.9.2+ds1-2
Severity: serious
Tags: sid wheezy

cd Flash && as3compile -M SWFUpload -T 9 -X 300 -Y 300 -r 15 SWFUpload.as -o
../tmp/swfupload.swf
SWFUpload.as:38:3: warning: function main uses forward or outer block variable
references (SWFUpload): switching into compatibility mode
SWFUpload.as:925:3: warning: function GetFile uses forward or outer block
variable references (file): switching into compatibility mode
SWFUpload.as:1295:3: warning: function ReturnUploadStart uses forward or outer
block variable references (message): switching into compatibility mode
SWFUpload.as:1406:3: warning: function BuildRequest uses forward or outer block
variable references (key): switching into compatibility mode
Segmentation fault (core dumped)
make: *** [build] Error 139


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#690236: libjs-swfupload ftbfs in testing/unstable on i386

2012-10-11 Thread Matthias Klose
Package: libjs-swfupload
Version: 2.2.0.1+ds1-2
Severity: serious
Tags: sid wheezy

cd Flash && as3compile -M SWFUpload -T 9 -X 300 -Y 300 -r 15 SWFUpload.as -o
../tmp/swfupload.swf
SWFUpload.as:38:3: warning: function main uses forward or outer block variable
references (SWFUpload): switching into compatibility mode
SWFUpload.as:925:3: warning: function GetFile uses forward or outer block
variable references (file): switching into compatibility mode
SWFUpload.as:1295:3: warning: function ReturnUploadStart uses forward or outer
block variable references (message): switching into compatibility mode
SWFUpload.as:1406:3: warning: function BuildRequest uses forward or outer block
variable references (key): switching into compatibility mode
Segmentation fault (core dumped)
make: *** [build] Error 139


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#682691: marked as done ([mysql-workbench] When quit MySQL Workbench, it get freezed)

2012-10-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 11 Oct 2012 12:02:56 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#682691: fixed in mysql-workbench 5.2.40+dfsg-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #682691,
regarding [mysql-workbench] When quit MySQL Workbench, it get freezed
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
682691: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=682691
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: mysql-workbench
Version: 5.2.40+dfsg-1+b1
Severity: serious

--- Please enter the report below this line. ---
When I click in the menu: File / Exit or hit Ctrl+Q the MySQL Workbench get 
frozen.


--- System information. ---
Architecture: amd64
Kernel:   Linux 3.2.0-3-amd64

Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  500 unstablewww.debian-multimedia.org 
  500 unstableftp.debian.org 
  500 testing www.debian-multimedia.org 
  500 testing ftp.debian.org 
  500 stable  dl.google.com 

--- Package information. ---
Depends (Version) | Installed
=-+-===
libatk1.0-0   (>= 1.12.4) | 2.4.0-2
libatkmm-1.6-1(>= 2.22.1) | 2.22.6-1
libc6(>= 2.4) | 2.13-35
libcairo2  (>= 1.7.2) | 1.12.2-2
libcairomm-1.0-1   (>= 1.6.4) | 1.10.0-1
libctemplate2 | 2.2-3
libfontconfig1 (>= 2.9.0) | 2.9.0-6
libfreetype6   (>= 2.2.1) | 2.4.9-1
libgcc1  (>= 1:4.1.1) | 1:4.7.1-5
libgdk-pixbuf2.0-0(>= 2.22.0) | 2.26.1-1
libgl1-mesa-glx   | 8.0.3-1
 OR libgl1| 
libglib2.0-0  (>= 2.31.8) | 2.32.3-1
libglibmm-2.4-1c2a   (>= 2.31.22) | 2.32.0-1
libgnome-keyring0 (>= 2.22.2) | 3.4.1-1
libgtk2.0-0   (>= 2.24.0) | 2.24.10-1
libgtkmm-2.4-1c2a   (>= 1:2.24.0) | 1:2.24.2-1
liblua5.1-0   | 5.1.5-4
libmysqlclient18   (>= 5.5.24+dfsg-1) | 5.5.24+dfsg-5
libpango1.0-0 (>= 1.18.0) | 1.30.0-1
libpangomm-1.4-1  (>= 2.27.1) | 2.28.4-1
libpcre3(>= 8.10) | 1:8.30-5
libpython2.7 (>= 2.7) | 2.7.3-2
libsigc++-2.0-0c2a (>= 2.0.2) | 2.2.10-0.2
libsqlite3-0   (>= 3.5.9) | 3.7.13-1
libstdc++6   (>= 4.6) | 4.7.1-5
libtinyxml2.6.2   | 2.6.2-1
libuuid1(>= 2.16) | 2.20.1-5.1
libx11-6  | 2:1.5.0-1
libxml2(>= 2.7.4) | 2.8.0+dfsg1-5
libzip2 (>= 0.10) | 0.10.1-1.1
zlib1g   (>= 1:1.1.4) | 1:1.2.7.dfsg-13
python  (>= 2.6.6-7~) | 2.7.3-1
python2.7 | 2.7.3-2
mysql-workbench-data(= 5.2.40+dfsg-1) | 5.2.40+dfsg-1
mysql-client  | 5.5.24+dfsg-5
python-mysql.connector| 0.3.2-1
python-paramiko   | 1.7.7.1-3
python-pysqlite2  | 2.6.3-3
python-pexpect| 2.4-1


Recommends  (Version) | Installed
=-+-===
ttf-bitstream-vera| 1.10-8
mysql-utilities   | 1.0.5-1


Suggests   (Version) | Installed
-+-===
gnome-keyring| 3.4.1-4


-- 
Regards from Pal
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: mysql-workbench
Source-Version: 5.2.40+dfsg-2

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
mysql-workbench, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 682...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Dmitry Smirnov  (supplier of updated mysql-workbench 
package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org)


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: S

Bug#690229: fix google-glog build failure

2012-10-11 Thread Matthias Klose
can be fixed by build-depending on libunwind-dev on i386 too.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#690229: google-glog ftbfs on i386 in unstable

2012-10-11 Thread Matthias Klose
Package: google-glog
Version: 0.3.2-4
Severity: serious

when rebuilding google-glog on i386, the tests fail in

   debian/rules override_dh_auto_test
make[1]: Entering directory `/build/buildd/google-glog-0.3.2'
if [ -f /proc/version ]; then /usr/bin/make check; fi
make[2]: Entering directory `/build/buildd/google-glog-0.3.2'
/usr/bin/make  logging_striplog_test_sh demangle_unittest_sh
signalhandler_unittest_sh
make[3]: Entering directory `/build/buildd/google-glog-0.3.2'
./src/logging_striplog_test.sh
In DBG mode; not checking strings
PASS
./demangle_unittest  # force to create lt-demangle_unittest
Passed 3 tests

PASS
./src/demangle_unittest.sh
PASS
./signalhandler_unittest  # force to create lt-signalhandler_unittest
OK
./src/signalhandler_unittest.sh
Aborted (core dumped)
'main' should appear in the output
make[3]: *** [signalhandler_unittest_sh] Error 1


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#688756: lightdm: no greeter: `Can't launch X server X, not found in path`

2012-10-11 Thread Paul Menzel
Am Donnerstag, den 11.10.2012, 13:31 +0200 schrieb Yves-Alexis Perez:
> On jeu., 2012-10-11 at 13:00 +0200, Paul Menzel wrote:
> > thank you for verifying this. I wonder though why LightDM cannot
> > use /usr/bin/Xorg while GDM is able to. 
> 
> Did you try (put xserver-command=Xorg in lightdm.conf) ?

No, I did not try that. I will try to do so, thanks for the pointer!


Thanks,

Paul


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Bug#688756: Bug#688756: Bug#688756: Bug#688756: lightdm: no greeter: `Can't launch X server X, not found in path`

2012-10-11 Thread Yves-Alexis Perez
On jeu., 2012-10-11 at 13:00 +0200, Paul Menzel wrote:
> thank you for verifying this. I wonder though why LightDM cannot
> use /usr/bin/Xorg while GDM is able to. 

Did you try (put xserver-command=Xorg in lightdm.conf) ?

Regards,
-- 
Yves-Alexis


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Bug#688229: Burning data DVD looks successful but mounting fails

2012-10-11 Thread Paul Menzel
Dear Thomas,


Am Donnerstag, den 11.10.2012, 11:40 +0200 schrieb Thomas Schmitt:

> staring at lines 201, 202, and 216 of
>   http://git.gnome.org/browse/brasero/tree/plugins/libburnia/burn-libisofs.c
> 
> i realize that this loop drops every second block !
> 
> 
>   read_bytes = priv->libburn_src->read_xt (priv->libburn_src, buf, 
> sector_size);
>   while (priv->libburn_src->read_xt (priv->libburn_src, buf, sector_size) == 
> sector_size) {
> 
>  ... process block that was read by while() statement ...
> 
>  read_bytes = priv->libburn_src->read_xt (priv->libburn_src, buf, 
> sector_size);
>   }
> 
> 
> This would well explain why block 17 ends up at block 8.
> 
> 
> It is tempting to also claim victory over the 50 % bug, but i
> cannot yet make up a plausible explanation. With the 50% bug
>   https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/brasero/+bug/780117
> it is libisofs which reports 50 % progress, when loop or libburn
> close the shop.
> 
> The many CD complaints in this Ubuntu bug could well be caused
> by above killer loop, though.

As already spoilered in my reply to #690207 [1], with the libburn output
patch attached it confirms that half of the bytes are missing.

BraseroBurn: (at burn-libburn-common.c:218) BraseroLibburn Premature 
end of input encountered. Missing: 48709632 bytes

These are around 47 MB and indeed comparing the sizes yields the
following.

$ du -sh folder
94M /home/joey/folder
$ du -sh /tmp/my_emulated_drive 
47M /tmp/my_emulated_drive

So all the bugs seem to be the same and Brasero just displays the error
differently or it is not noticeable with smaller amounts that the
progress bar stopped earlier.

I will try to cook up a patch for fixing the loop now.


Thanks,

Paul


[1] http://bugs.debian.org/690207


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Bug#688756: Bug#688756: Bug#688756: Bug#688756: lightdm: no greeter: `Can't launch X server X, not found in path`

2012-10-11 Thread Paul Menzel
Dear Yves-Alexis,


Am Donnerstag, den 11.10.2012, 12:43 +0200 schrieb Yves-Alexis Perez:
> On mar., 2012-09-25 at 16:00 +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> > On mar., 2012-09-25 at 15:44 +0200, Paul Menzel wrote:
> > > > Please find it attached.
> > > 
> > > Alright, reading the error message again, `/usr/bin/X` is not
> > > installed
> > > as it is in `xserver-xorg` `lightdm` only recommends.
> > > 
> > > 1. Is that due to that LightDM can also be used from remote?
> > 
> > Yes, I think so.
> > 
> > > 2. Since GDM can start fine without `/usr/bin/X`, LightDM should also
> > > be
> > > able to?
> > > 
> > > Please proceed as you want with this report. I am sorry for the noise.
> > 
> > Well, even though lightdm might not need a hard dependency on
> > xserver-xorg, I think lightdm-gtk-greeter might need it, so I'm keeping
> > it open for now.
> 
> Ok, X is run by lightdm itself, not the greeter, which has nothing to do
> with this. Recommends: is enough to cover the most common setups and
> still allow for more uncommon ones, so closing.

thank you for verifying this. I wonder though why LightDM cannot
use /usr/bin/Xorg while GDM is able to.


Thanks,

Paul


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Bug#688756: marked as done (lightdm: no greeter: `Can't launch X server X, not found in path`)

2012-10-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 11 Oct 2012 12:43:49 +0200
with message-id <1349952229.3352.59.camel@scapa>
and subject line Re: [Pkg-xfce-devel] Bug#688756: Bug#688756: Bug#688756: 
Bug#688756: lightdm: no greeter: `Can't launch X server X, not found in path`
has caused the Debian Bug report #688756,
regarding lightdm: no greeter: `Can't launch X server X, not found in path`
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
688756: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=688756
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: lightdm
Version: 1.2.2-3
Severity: serious
Justification: Renders package unusable

Dear Debian folks,


installing `lightdm` it runs, but the greeter does not show up. :/ Only
a blinking cursor in the top left corner on VT 7.

Somehow the X server is just closed

$ sudo more /var/log/Xorg.0.log
[…]
[  1126.596] (II) UnloadModule: "evdev"
[  1126.606] Server terminated successfully (0). Closing log file.

and LightDM does not find a X server.

$ sudo service lightdm start
Starting Light Display Manager: lightdm already running.
$ sudo more /var/log/lightdm/lightdm.log
[+0.00s] DEBUG: Logging to /var/log/lightdm/lightdm.log
[+0.00s] DEBUG: Starting Light Display Manager 1.2.2, UID=0 PID=2644
[+0.00s] DEBUG: Loaded configuration from /etc/lightdm/lightdm.conf
[+0.00s] DEBUG: Using D-Bus name org.freedesktop.DisplayManager
[+0.00s] DEBUG: Registered seat module xlocal
[+0.00s] DEBUG: Registered seat module xremote
[+0.00s] DEBUG: Adding default seat
[+0.01s] DEBUG: Starting seat
[+0.01s] DEBUG: Starting new display for greeter
[+0.01s] DEBUG: Starting local X display
[+0.01s] DEBUG: Could not run plymouth --ping: Failed to execute child 
process "plymouth" (No such file or directory)
[+0.01s] DEBUG: Using VT 7
[+0.01s] DEBUG: Activating VT 7
[+0.01s] DEBUG: Logging to /var/log/lightdm/x-0.log
[+0.01s] DEBUG: Can't launch X server X, not found in path
[+0.01s] DEBUG: X server stopped
[+0.01s] DEBUG: Releasing VT 7
[+0.01s] DEBUG: Display server stopped
[+0.01s] DEBUG: Stopping display
[+0.01s] DEBUG: Display stopped
[+0.01s] DEBUG: Stopping X local seat, failed to start a display
[+0.01s] DEBUG: Stopping seat
[+0.01s] DEBUG: Seat stopped
[+0.01s] DEBUG: Acquired bus name org.freedesktop.DisplayManager
[+87.81s] DEBUG: Got signal 15 from process 2841
[+87.81s] DEBUG: Caught Terminated signal, shutting down
[+87.81s] DEBUG: Stopping display manager
[+87.81s] DEBUG: Display manager stopped
[+87.81s] DEBUG: Stopping daemon
[+87.81s] DEBUG: Exiting with return value 0

There is also *no* `/var/log/lightdm/x-0.log`.

Any help would be appreciated.


Thanks,

Paul

-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-3-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages lightdm depends on:
ii  adduser3.113+nmu3
ii  consolekit 0.4.5-3.1
ii  dbus   1.6.0-1
ii  debconf [debconf-2.0]  1.5.46
ii  libc6  2.13-35
ii  libglib2.0-0   2.32.3-1
ii  libpam0g   1.1.3-7.1
ii  libxcb11.8.1-1
ii  libxdmcp6  1:1.1.1-1
ii  lightdm-gtk-greeter1.1.6-2

Versions of packages lightdm recommends:
pn  xserver-xorg  

Versions of packages lightdm suggests:
ii  accountsservice  0.6.21-6

-- debconf information:
  lightdm/daemon_name: /usr/sbin/lightdm
* shared/default-x-display-manager: lightdm


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On mar., 2012-09-25 at 16:00 +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> On mar., 2012-09-25 at 15:44 +0200, Paul Menzel wrote:
> > > Please find it attached.
> > 
> > Alright, reading the error message again, `/usr/bin/X` is not
> > installed
> > as it is in `xserver-xorg` `lightdm` only recommends.
> > 
> > 1. Is that due to that LightDM can also be used from remote?
> 
> Yes, I think so.
> 
> > 2. Since GDM can start fine without `/usr/bin/X`, LightDM should also
> > be
> > able to?
> > 
> > Please proceed as you want with this report. I am sorry for the noise.
> 
> Well, even though lightdm might not need a ha

Processed: Clarify mime requirements

2012-10-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> unarchive 658139
Bug #658139 {Done: Michael Biebl } [evince] missing mime entry
Unarchived Bug 658139
> reopen 658139
Bug #658139 {Done: Michael Biebl } [evince] missing mime entry
'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version;
all fixed versions will be cleared, and you may need to re-add them.
Bug reopened
No longer marked as fixed in versions evince/3.4.0-3.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
658139: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=658139
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#685790: marked as done (release.debian.org: Clarify scope of missing evince mime entry RCness)

2012-10-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 11 Oct 2012 10:48:31 +0100
with message-id <20121011094831.gi6...@halon.org.uk>
and subject line 
has caused the Debian Bug report #685790,
regarding release.debian.org: Clarify scope of missing evince mime entry RCness
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
685790: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=685790
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: serious

As recorded in #681687 The TC has made the following decision:

1. The Technical Committee agrees with Neil McGovern's analysis of
   the situation regarding evince's missing mime type entry.

2. If changes are desirable to our system for dealing with mime
   type entries and desktop files, including changes to policy or
   additional automation, these should be made via the usual
   development and policy amendment processes.

3. We defer to the Release Team's decision that it is now too late
   to deploy such automation in wheezy.

4. We do not disagree with the Release Team's assessment that
   the failure of the evince package to provide a mime type
   entry is a release critical bug.

5. We therefore decline to overrule the Release Team.  The bug
   remains RC against evince.

6. The release team should clarify which mime types the RC-bugginess
   applies to.  We recommend that the starting point should be those
   mime types advertised by evince via the mime system in squeeze.

Accordingly, I'm filing this bug on behalf of the TC to request that
the release team make the clarification requested in point 6.  I will
set this bug to block #658139 (the bug against evince).

Severity justification: priority inheritance from #658139.

Ian.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
658...@bugs.debian.org
Cc: 
Bcc: 
Subject: Clarify mime requirements
Reply-To: 

unarchive 658139
reopen 658139
thanks

Apologies for the delay in replying to this.

I'm happy with point 6 of tech-ctte resolution, that the starting point
should be those mime types advertised by evince via the mime system in
squeeze.

I attach both mime type files as a convience, for evince and evince-gtk.
If there's a reason why any particular mime type is better served by
another application in the default install, I'll be happy to hear it.

Thanks,
Neil
application/pdf; evince %s; test=test -n "$DISPLAY"; nametemplate=%s.pdf; 
priority=5
application/x-pdf; evince %s; test=test -n "$DISPLAY"; nametemplate=%s.pdf; 
priority=5
application/x-bzpdf; evince %s; test=test -n "$DISPLAY"; 
nametemplate=%s.pdf.bz2; priority=5
application/x-gzpdf; evince %s; test=test -n "$DISPLAY"; 
nametemplate=%s.pdf.gz; priority=5
application/postscript; evince %s; test=test -n "$DISPLAY"; nametemplate=%s.ps; 
priority=5
application/x-bzpostscript; evince %s; test=test -n "$DISPLAY"; 
nametemplate=%s.ps.bz2; priority=5
application/x-gzpostscript; evince %s; test=test -n "$DISPLAY"; 
nametemplate=%s.ps.gz; priority=5
image/x-eps; evince %s; test=test -n "$DISPLAY"; nametemplate=%s.eps; priority=5
image/x-bzeps; evince %s; test=test -n "$DISPLAY"; nametemplate=%s.eps.bz2; 
priority=5
image/x-gzeps; evince %s; test=test -n "$DISPLAY"; nametemplate=%s.eps.gz; 
priority=5
application/x-dvi; evince %s; test=test -n "$DISPLAY"; nametemplate=%s.dvi; 
priority=5
application/x-gzdvi; evince %s; test=test -n "$DISPLAY"; 
nametemplate=%s.dvi.gz; priority=5
application/x-bzdvi; evince %s; test=test -n "$DISPLAY"; 
nametemplate=%s.dvi.bz2; priority=5
image/vnd.djvu; evince %s; test=test -n "$DISPLAY"; nametemplate=%s.djvu; 
priority=5
image/tiff; evince %s; test=test -n "$DISPLAY"; nametemplate=%s.tiff; priority=5
application/x-cbr; evince %s; test=test -n "$DISPLAY"; nametemplate=%s.cbr; 
priority=5
application/x-cbt; evince %s; test=test -n "$DISPLAY"; nametemplate=%s.cbt; 
priority=5
application/x-cbz; evince %s; test=test -n "$DISPLAY"; nametemplate=%s.cbz; 
priority=5
application/x-cb7; evince %s; test=test -n "$DISPLAY"; nametemplate=%s.cb7; 
priority=5
application/vnd.sun.xml.impress; evince %s; test=test -n "$DISPLAY"; 
nametemplate=%s.sxd; priority=5
application/vnd.oasis.opendocument.presentation; evince %s; test=test -n 
"$DISPLAY"; nametemplate=%s.odp; priority=5

image/*; evince %s; test=test -n "$DISPLAY"; nametemplate=%s.dummy; priority=5
application/pdf; evince %s; test=test -n "$DISPLAY"; nametemplate=%s.pdf; 
priority=5
application/x-pdf; evince %s; test=test -n "$DISPLAY"; nametemplate=%s.pdf; 
priority=5
application/x-bzpdf; evince %s; 

Bug#688229: Burning data DVD looks successful but mounting fails

2012-10-11 Thread Thomas Schmitt
Hi,

staring at lines 201, 202, and 216 of
  http://git.gnome.org/browse/brasero/tree/plugins/libburnia/burn-libisofs.c

i realize that this loop drops every second block !


  read_bytes = priv->libburn_src->read_xt (priv->libburn_src, buf, sector_size);
  while (priv->libburn_src->read_xt (priv->libburn_src, buf, sector_size) == 
sector_size) {

 ... process block that was read by while() statement ...

 read_bytes = priv->libburn_src->read_xt (priv->libburn_src, buf, 
sector_size);
  }


This would well explain why block 17 ends up at block 8.


It is tempting to also claim victory over the 50 % bug, but i
cannot yet make up a plausible explanation. With the 50% bug
  https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/brasero/+bug/780117
it is libisofs which reports 50 % progress, when loop or libburn
close the shop.

The many CD complaints in this Ubuntu bug could well be caused
by above killer loop, though.


Have a nice day :)

Thomas


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Processed: found 681147 in kuvert/2.0.6, found 688288 in freehdl/0.0.7-1.1, notfound 690148 in 7 ...

2012-10-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> found 681147 kuvert/2.0.6
Bug #681147 [libmilter-dev] libmilter-dev: /u/s/d/libmilter-dev is a symlink to 
sendmail, but ships files in /u/s/d/libmilter-dev
Marked as found in versions kuvert/2.0.6.
> found 688288 freehdl/0.0.7-1.1
Bug #688288 {Done: Andreas Beckmann } [src:guile-1.6] 
guile-1.6: modifies *.la after calling dh_md5sums, resulting in md5sum-mismatch 
lintian error
Marked as found in versions freehdl/0.0.7-1.1.
> notfound 690148 7
Bug #690148 [gcc-mingw32] gcc-mingw32: missing copyright file after upgrade 
from squeeze
There is no source info for the package 'gcc-mingw32' at version '7' with 
architecture ''
Unable to make a source version for version '7'
No longer marked as found in versions gcc-mingw-w64/7.
> found 690148 4.6.3-8+7
Bug #690148 [gcc-mingw32] gcc-mingw32: missing copyright file after upgrade 
from squeeze
Marked as found in versions gcc-mingw-w64/7.
> severity 688299 serious
Bug #688299 [libpolyorb3] libpolyorb3: using diversions in M-A: same packages 
is a bad idea
Severity set to 'serious' from 'normal'
> affects 645713 + gnome-core
Bug #645713 [apt] fails to upgrade a default GNOME desktop installation from 
squeeze → sid
Added indication that 645713 affects gnome-core
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
645713: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=645713
681147: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=681147
688288: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=688288
688299: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=688299
690148: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=690148
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#689718: xmame-sdl,xmess-sdl: missing copyright file after upgrade from squeeze

2012-10-11 Thread Andreas Beckmann
Package: xmame-sdl,xmess-sdl
Followup-For: Bug #689718
Control: found -1 0.146-4

Hi,

the current fix is incorrect.

> mame (0.146-4) unstable; urgency=low
>* Removes danglink symlink after xmame-sdl,xmame-x,xmame-svga
>update.

That is too late, as the files will be installed over the broken
symlink. The symlinks must be deleted in preinst and unpackaging the
updated package will create a directory in place of the (now missing)
symlink.


Andreas


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Processed: Re: xmame-sdl,xmess-sdl: missing copyright file after upgrade from squeeze

2012-10-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands:

> found -1 0.146-4
Bug #689718 {Done: Emmanuel Kasper } [xmame-sdl,xmess-sdl] 
xmame-sdl,xmess-sdl: missing copyright file after upgrade from squeeze
There is no source info for the package 'xmess-sdl' at version '0.146-4' with 
architecture ''
Marked as found in versions mame/0.146-4; no longer marked as fixed in versions 
mame/0.146-4 and reopened.

-- 
689718: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=689718
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#685810: live-tools: fails to upgrade from testing - diversion conflict

2012-10-11 Thread Andreas Beckmann
Package: live-tools
Followup-For: Bug #685810
Control: found -1 3.0.12-1

Hi,

upgrades from testing still (or again) do not work:

  Preparing to replace live-tools 3.0.3-1 (using 
.../live-tools_3.0.12-1_all.deb) ...
  dpkg-divert: error: `diversion of /usr/bin/uptime to 
/usr/bin/uptime.orig.procps by live-tools' clashes with `diversion of 
/usr/bin/uptime to /usr/bin/uptime.procps by live-tools'
  dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/live-tools_3.0.12-1_all.deb 
(--unpack):
   subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit status 2
  Errors were encountered while processing:
   /var/cache/apt/archives/live-tools_3.0.12-1_all.deb


Andreas


live-tools_3.0.12-1.log.gz
Description: GNU Zip compressed data


Processed: Re: live-tools: fails to upgrade from testing - diversion conflict

2012-10-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands:

> found -1 3.0.12-1
Bug #685810 {Done: Daniel Baumann } [live-tools] live-tools: 
fails to upgrade from testing - diversion conflict
Marked as found in versions live-tools/3.0.12-1 and reopened.

-- 
685810: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=685810
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#690205: marked as done (yudit-doc: fails to install: ln: failed to create symbolic link `/usr/share/yudit/doc': No such file or directory)

2012-10-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 11 Oct 2012 08:48:01 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#690205: fixed in yudit 2.9.2-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #690205,
regarding yudit-doc: fails to install: ln: failed to create symbolic link 
`/usr/share/yudit/doc': No such file or directory
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
690205: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=690205
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: yudit-doc
Version: 2.9.2-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts

Hi,

during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed to install. As
per definition of the release team this makes the package too buggy for
a release, thus the severity.

>From the attached log (scroll to the bottom...):

  Selecting previously unselected package yudit-doc.
  (Reading database ... 6733 files and directories currently installed.)
  Unpacking yudit-doc (from .../yudit-doc_2.9.2-1_all.deb) ...
  Setting up yudit-doc (2.9.2-1) ...
  ln: failed to create symbolic link `/usr/share/yudit/doc': No such file or 
directory
  dpkg: error processing yudit-doc (--configure):
   subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
  Errors were encountered while processing:
   yudit-doc


cheers,

Andreas


yudit-doc_2.9.2-1.log.gz
Description: GNU Zip compressed data
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: yudit
Source-Version: 2.9.2-2

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
yudit, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 690...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Hideki Yamane  (supplier of updated yudit package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org)


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2012 16:51:13 +0900
Source: yudit
Binary: yudit yudit-common yudit-doc
Architecture: source amd64 all
Version: 2.9.2-2
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Hideki Yamane 
Changed-By: Hideki Yamane 
Description: 
 yudit  - Unicode text editor (arch-dependent binaries)
 yudit-common - Unicode text editor (arch-independent files)
 yudit-doc  - Unicode text editor (Documentation)
Closes: 690205
Changes: 
 yudit (2.9.2-2) experimental; urgency=low
 .
   * debian/yudit-doc.docs: remove it since duplicate with yudit.docs
   * debian/yudit-doc.{postinst,prerm}: remove them since it's not necessary
 and cause install error (Closes: #690205)
Checksums-Sha1: 
 27ca0eb1ee639a224835a85a1ee2c27289665979 1941 yudit_2.9.2-2.dsc
 0d2d86fb95e5390fa50bb2e38e1b328d2f61461b 9749 yudit_2.9.2-2.debian.tar.gz
 fbc0af8e4b022a3a9c0f44e6f5729903fb19c398 1518152 yudit_2.9.2-2_amd64.deb
 db0ff2be3e2999c6b40cdccbd08ba3176882ee4c 3200818 yudit-common_2.9.2-2_all.deb
 ee44658c81e90dc84bda262391fcc2fa5d0ad219 115340 yudit-doc_2.9.2-2_all.deb
Checksums-Sha256: 
 bf87605f4c09b1b994f8b590359b0832ee196a6dbf011c20b8acdcace2afa867 1941 
yudit_2.9.2-2.dsc
 42783fa5fdb819fc89219e8d38e542ebea80d709f93d7b8515c8c0570d642496 9749 
yudit_2.9.2-2.debian.tar.gz
 b2fb2d5379b873ea08fec09c54b71546a019618cae4fcb52e5e8df128ca5a1c0 1518152 
yudit_2.9.2-2_amd64.deb
 3229748bdd7ab7f8276dd02347d2d24b0420fd5d6509ddd476846c28e49353a0 3200818 
yudit-common_2.9.2-2_all.deb
 ed9b205c77b6500e45bde4a95b5357245b1f4c540311955d1969a58deb7e 115340 
yudit-doc_2.9.2-2_all.deb
Files: 
 67c9ada35b5e34bfb14426d13cdf84c0 1941 editors optional yudit_2.9.2-2.dsc
 c9ae6fabfbf2644428b9995230a5cee5 9749 editors optional 
yudit_2.9.2-2.debian.tar.gz
 117929d640431ea963fce9092469629c 1518152 editors optional 
yudit_2.9.2-2_amd64.deb
 6cc253e797ba462eae50b1063259f49a 3200818 editors optional 
yudit-common_2.9.2-2_all.deb
 0699c31e4fc10eadf17a8b9c8a4a226a 115340 doc optional yudit-doc_2.9.2-2_all.deb

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)

iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJQdnuAAAoJEF0yjQgqqrFAdEUP/iXiPc0mq8WWj46XDrxpRnY0
J2FgcUsDczx+5ZD/hKS/XxYlCw8eYCG+o9gbAh7xgSjraSvy5Rr95APDxseTqKF1
L2b40wO4P588NahgHbMPDpyry+B1K2HdE/pD7GT9etZNK3ziISu81k1UwZZCLfkh
Vh36s9Kft1p9hjNE1/5D59LiiMxeW2TJ4ScRInuJhH0UFWp8En8Y+BNWRCyPi/vq
mOLhGjNs8zz++xTMcxnF+hkuYqBnBZTycXal8B7

Bug#690021: libc0.1: getaddrinfo() might fail with IPv6 DNS record and no IPv6 connection

2012-10-11 Thread Gasha

Hi,

I think, that this bug is the same i found:

How to reproduce:
1) run hobbit/xymon and monitor ipv4 http server (with A record, no  
in DNS).

2) change ipv4 address in /etc/resolv.conf, to only ipv6 address.
3) hobbit/xymon reports lost http service.

distro is i386 / debian-squeeze with some packages from wheezy.

G

On 10/09/2012 09:12 AM, Aurelien Jarno wrote:

Package: libc0.1
Version: 2.13-35
Severity: grave
Tags: d-i upstream patch ipv6
Justification: renders package unusable

On a GNU/kFreeBSD machine without IPv6 connection, but with a DNS server
returning IPv6 addresses, getaddrinfo() might fail to return only IPv4
addresses, causing some applications to fail to connect to some host
using an host name.

This happens when getaddrinfo() is called with service = 0 (aka port),
which is perfectly valid. getaddrinfo() determine the source address
the kernel would use for a given destination address by opening a
SOCK_DGRAM connection with ŧhe same port as the service. A Linux kernel
accepts such a connection with the port 0, while the FreeBSD kernel
doesn't.

A lot of applications are calling getaddrinfo() with the port they are
going to use later, but a few others do not. Among them busybox is
affected, causing wget on IPv6 addresses for non-IPv6 connected machine
to fail, in turn causing the installation to fail:

| $ busybox wget http://ftp.debian.org
| Connecting to ftp.debian.org ([2001:610:1908:b000::148:12]:80)
| wget: can't connect to remote host: No route to host

As more and more Debian mirrors (including the default ftp.debian.org)
have an IPv6 address, it makes GNU/kFreeBSD difficultly installable on
such machines.

The fix is to use port = 1 in such case, as it is done in the FreeBSD
libc. This is what the attached patch does. I'll do an upload of eglibc
in the next days, including this patch.


-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
   APT prefers unstable
   APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: kfreebsd-amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: kFreeBSD 8.3-1-amd64
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages libc6 depends on:
ii  libc-bin  2.13-35
ii  libgcc1   1:4.7.1-7

libc6 recommends no packages.

Versions of packages libc6 suggests:
ii  debconf [debconf-2.0]  1.5.46
ii  glibc-doc  2.13-35
ii  locales2.13-35
ii  locales-all [locales]  2.13-35

-- debconf information excluded
   



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#690212: im-config: postinst deletes conffile (policy 10.7.3): /etc/X11/Xsession.d/80im-config_launch

2012-10-11 Thread Andreas Beckmann
Package: im-config
Version: 0.18
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts

Hi,

during a test with piuparts I noticed your package modifies conffiles.
This is forbidden by the policy, see
http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-files.html#s-config-files

The proper way to remove an obsolete conffile would be
  dpkg-maintscript-helper rm_conffile
although in your case it looks more like a rename to 70im-config_launch,
so
  dpkg-maintscript-helper mv_conffile
would be more appropriate.

debsums reports modification of the following files,
from the attached log (scroll to the bottom...):

  debsums: missing file /etc/X11/Xsession.d/80im-config_launch (from im-config 
package)


Andreas


im-config_0.18.log.gz
Description: GNU Zip compressed data


Bug#690205: yudit-doc: fails to install: ln: failed to create symbolic link `/usr/share/yudit/doc': No such file or directory

2012-10-11 Thread Andreas Beckmann
Package: yudit-doc
Version: 2.9.2-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts

Hi,

during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed to install. As
per definition of the release team this makes the package too buggy for
a release, thus the severity.

>From the attached log (scroll to the bottom...):

  Selecting previously unselected package yudit-doc.
  (Reading database ... 6733 files and directories currently installed.)
  Unpacking yudit-doc (from .../yudit-doc_2.9.2-1_all.deb) ...
  Setting up yudit-doc (2.9.2-1) ...
  ln: failed to create symbolic link `/usr/share/yudit/doc': No such file or 
directory
  dpkg: error processing yudit-doc (--configure):
   subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
  Errors were encountered while processing:
   yudit-doc


cheers,

Andreas


yudit-doc_2.9.2-1.log.gz
Description: GNU Zip compressed data


  1   2   >