Bug#691307: libpetsc3.2-dbg: PETSC_CHECKS m4 macro fails with PETSC_ARCH=linux-gnu-c-debug

2012-10-24 Thread Markus Mayr
Package: libpetsc3.2-dbg
Version: 3.2.dfsg-5
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable

Dear Maintainer,

Recently, I tried to link PETSC in debugging mode, but unfortunately it failed.

I run my configure script that makes use of the PETSC_CHECKS macro and set the
PETSC_DIR and PETSC_ARCH environment variables:

  ./configure PETSC_DIR=/usr/lib/petscdir/3.2 PETSC_ARCH=linux-gnu-c-debug

Unfortunately, after some time configure told me that it could not compile the
test that checks for PetscPrintf. After taking a look at the log files, I
noticed that this was due to not linking to hdf5 libraries. I added

  -lhdf5

to the PETSC_EXTERNAL_LIBS variable within the /usr/share/aclocal/petsc.m4
macro (which links to /usr/lib/petscdir/3.2/aclocal/petsc.m4) and now
everything is working.

I didn't test the static library from the non-debug package.

Best regards,
Markus Mayr

-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-3-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=de_AT.utf8, LC_CTYPE=de_AT.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages libpetsc3.2-dbg depends on:
ii  libpetsc3.2-dev  3.2.dfsg-5

libpetsc3.2-dbg recommends no packages.

Versions of packages libpetsc3.2-dbg suggests:
pn  petsc-dbg  none

-- no debconf information


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#689951: Package appears to be non-free

2012-10-24 Thread Emmanuel Promayon

Dear Andreas,


I personally would be happy if you would decide for the later because
in addition you get a lot of other information and how people might
deal together with other problems.
After my answer yesterday I subscribed to the CamiTK package only, but 
reading your answer, I just reconsidered and subscribed to debian-med 
mailing-list as it seems the best option to improve my learning curve.



In this case would CamITK remain in *main*!  Considering the fact that
you know all these facts - would you volunteer to do the needed steps?

I am on a tight schedule this week. Do you think it could be ok if:
- I remove the licence offending part of the CamiTK source for the 
moment (the tetgen plugin) today
- I do a better work at the beginning of next week where I could 
reintroduce the tetgen plugin but using the tetgen debian package 
instead and correct the two other bugs properly (#689021 and 690830)


For #690830 there is a patch proposal and there is also a another way 
that I would like to try first (that will probably have better compiler 
specific/multi-arch support).


Thanks again, all your help is really appreciated.

--
Emmanuel Promayon
UJF-Grenoble 1, CNRS, TIMC-IMAG UMR 5525 (équipe GMCAO)
Institut de l'Ingénierie de l'Information de Santé
Faculté de Médecine - 38706 La Tronche cedex - France
Tel. +33/0 456 52 00 03 - Fax. +33/0 456 52 00 55 - B7


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#682616: marked as done (chromium: Chromium keeps crashing with segfaults)

2012-10-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 24 Oct 2012 08:23:06 +0200
with message-id 5087894a.2030...@iuculano.it
and subject line Fixed
has caused the Debian Bug report #682616,
regarding chromium: Chromium keeps crashing with segfaults
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
682616: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=682616
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: chromium
Version: 20.0.1132.57~r145807-1
Severity: important

Dear Maintainer,

   * What led up to the situation? I was browsing with Chromium as normal.
   * What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
 ineffective)? All crashes happened randomly.
   * What was the outcome of this action? Chromium crashes with segfaults.
   * What outcome did you expect instead? Not crash.

Here are the segfaults I gathered from dmesg:

[ 2419.690487] chromium[4043]: segfault at 100 ip 0100 sp
7fff9805d758 error 14 in icon-theme.cache[7f0a5f99d000+41bb000]
[10199.843439] chromium[6900]: segfault at 64 ip 0064 sp
7fff2d271298 error 14 in libspeexdsp.so.1.5.0[7fa88a878000+12000]
[10208.614005] chromium[10473]: segfault at 44 ip 0044 sp
7fff17c798f8 error 14
[12644.372979] chromium[11300]: segfault at 0 ip   (null) sp
7fffe4a5d418 error 14 in SYSV (deleted)[7f40aabba000+4a8000]
[28646.980941] chromium[13056]: segfault at 55 ip 0055 sp
7fffb82272d8 error 14 in ipag.ttf[7f4126af5000+5f3000]
[29006.979059] chromium[20435]: segfault at 45 ip 0045 sp
7fff07b899e8 error 14 in SYSV (deleted)[7f80eb532000+4a8000]

The update came in this morning, then the floodgate opened.



-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (900, 'testing'), (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'unstable'), 
(500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-3-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages chromium depends on:
ii  chromium-inspector  20.0.1132.57~r145807-1
ii  gconf-service   3.2.5-1
ii  libasound2  1.0.25-3
ii  libatk1.0-0 2.4.0-2
ii  libbz2-1.0  1.0.6-3
ii  libc6   2.13-33
ii  libcairo2   1.12.2-2
ii  libcups21.5.3-1
ii  libdbus-1-3 1.6.0-1
ii  libevent-2.0-5  2.0.19-stable-3
ii  libexpat1   2.1.0-1
ii  libflac81.2.1-6
ii  libfontconfig1  2.9.0-6
ii  libfreetype62.4.9-1
ii  libgcc1 1:4.7.1-2
ii  libgconf-2-43.2.5-1
ii  libgcrypt11 1.5.0-3
ii  libgdk-pixbuf2.0-0  2.26.1-1
ii  libglib2.0-02.32.3-1
ii  libgnome-keyring0   3.4.1-1
ii  libgtk2.0-0 2.24.10-1
ii  libjpeg88d-1
ii  libnspr42:4.9.1-1
ii  libnss3 2:3.13.5-1
ii  libnss3-1d  2:3.13.5-1
ii  libpango1.0-0   1.30.0-1
ii  libpng12-0  1.2.49-1
ii  libpulse0   2.0-3
ii  libspeex1   1.2~rc1-6
ii  libstdc++6  4.7.1-2
ii  libudev0175-3.1
ii  libwebp20.1.3-3
ii  libx11-62:1.5.0-1
ii  libxcomposite1  1:0.4.3-2
ii  libxext62:1.3.1-2
ii  libxfixes3  1:5.0-4
ii  libxml2 2.8.0+dfsg1-4
ii  libxrender1 1:0.9.7-1
ii  libxslt1.1  1.1.26-13
ii  libxss1 1:1.2.2-1
ii  xdg-utils   1.1.0~rc1+git20111210-6
ii  zlib1g  1:1.2.7.dfsg-13

chromium recommends no packages.

Versions of packages chromium suggests:
pn  chromium-l10n  none

-- no debconf information
---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
Source: chromium-browser
Source-Version: 22.0.1229.94~r161065-1


Hi,
I think this bug is fixed, feel free to reopen it if necessary.

Cheers,
Giuseppe.



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
---End Message---


Processed: tagging as pending bugs that are closed by packages in NEW

2012-10-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 # Wednesday 24 October  07:03:07 UTC 2012
 # Tagging as pending bugs that are closed by packages in NEW
 # http://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html
 #
 # Source package in NEW: a 
 href=http://packages.qa.debian.org/libav;libav/a
 tags 691088 + pending
Bug #691088 [libavutil51] libavcodec-extra-53: symbol ff_sqrt_tab, version 
LIBAVUTIL_51 not defined in file libavutil.so.51 with link time reference
Added tag(s) pending.
 # Source package in NEW: libnetfilter-acct
 tags 666026 + pending
Bug #666026 [wnpp] ITP: libnetfilter-acct -- nfacct library files
Added tag(s) pending.

End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
666026: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=666026
691088: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=691088
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#689951: Package appears to be non-free

2012-10-24 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Emmanuel,

On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 08:47:33AM +0200, Emmanuel Promayon wrote:
 I personally would be happy if you would decide for the later because
 in addition you get a lot of other information and how people might
 deal together with other problems.
 After my answer yesterday I subscribed to the CamiTK package only,
 but reading your answer, I just reconsidered and subscribed to
 debian-med mailing-list as it seems the best option to improve my
 learning curve.

Fine.  So in future mails I will spare the To: to your address - you
should receive the messages via Bug tracking system and mailing list.
:-)
 
 In this case would CamITK remain in *main*!  Considering the fact that
 you know all these facts - would you volunteer to do the needed steps?
 I am on a tight schedule this week. Do you think it could be ok if:
 - I remove the licence offending part of the CamiTK source for the
 moment (the tetgen plugin) today

If you can remove it upstream this would probably the bes solution.
Please note the following:  The Debian Release team does not accept new
upstream versions for Wheezy in general.  So if the change should be
successfull for propagation to Wheezy please make prfectly sure that
this change is the only one compared to the tarball currently in
testing.  So you culd do something like

   camitk-3.0.2.1.tar.gz

and mention in the upstream changelog something like

  - Just removed parts of code which are not DFSG free (no other
code changes

In the debian/changelog we could refer to the fact mentioned in your
upstream changelog to convince the release team that we do not attempt
to sneak in new upstream code.  Otherwise we would need to backport
the changes to the version inside Debian.
(In case my advise was not clear enough feel free to ask for further
 clarification.)

 - I do a better work at the beginning of next week where I could
 reintroduce the tetgen plugin but using the tetgen debian package
 instead and correct the two other bugs properly (#689021 and 690830)

May be I was not fully clear.  If we drop the tetgen dependency
completely (and if I understood correctly the plugin in queston needs to
be dropped / deactivated as well) then and only than camitk can remain
in Debian main.  If there is some dependency from any non-free component
(be it tetgen or whatever) the package needs to be moved from main to
contrib which is something I would like to avoid.  So the action to let
camitk remain in main is the following:

  1. Remove tetgen fom the upstream tarball (may be also cut the plugin
 in question as well if it does not make any sense without tetgen).
  2. Build a camitk package targeting at main from this source tarball.

To gain full functionality we could gain (for Wheezy+1) optionally with

  3. Create another source tarball camitk-plugins (or
 camitk-plugins-non-dfsg or whatever name).
  4. Build an according Debian package from this plugins tarball linking
 with Debian packaged tetgen targeting at contrib and recommending
 camitk from main
  5. You can Suggests camitk-plugins in the camitk package (but not
 Recommends, which is only allowed inside main)

 For #690830 there is a patch proposal and there is also a another
 way that I would like to try first (that will probably have better
 compiler specific/multi-arch support).

This could be done if you are pretty sure about this and the change is
obviosely simple and straight to get accepted by the release team.
While it is a really good thing to fix this bug we need to make pretty
sure it will not introduce new problems (which is the sense of the
freeze process).

For the time line:  I think doing step 1.+2. from above until end of
October is fine.  Everything else has time because it does not affect
the current release.  Is this doable for you?

 Thanks again, all your help is really appreciated.

Also thanks to you because without your cooperation we would not have
competence and manpower to maintain camitk inside Debian.

Kind regards

  Andreas.

-- 
http://fam-tille.de


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#688197: Where is the upload

2012-10-24 Thread Dominik George
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi,

from your last post, I conclude that the fix is ready to be released.

Could you please upload the fixed version to unstable or, if you are not 
sure of it, provide the source package here for others to test?

- -- 
Cheers,
Nik

PGP-Fingerprint: 8BC7 ABAB C2F2 4D5E 24FC
 FC1C DB0E A4BC E210 7412

Please contact me for a face-to-face meeting
if you wish to exchange signatures with me.

Signature Policy: https://www.dominik-george.de/gpg-policy.txt.asc
Public key:   https://www.dominik-george.de/gpg.asc

X.509 certificate fingerprint for key download:
51:D8:36:36:7E:20:3F:E7:AB:EF:B8:83:25:A6:BB:74:48:03:3D:F0

Please do NOT send HTML mail!
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
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=kbVW
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Processed: Re: [Pkg-octave-devel] Bug#691311: error: feval: function `unimplemented' not found

2012-10-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands:

 severity -1 serious
Bug #691311 [octave] error: feval: function `unimplemented' not found
Severity set to 'serious' from 'normal'
 tags -1 + confirmed
Bug #691311 [octave] error: feval: function `unimplemented' not found
Added tag(s) confirmed.

-- 
691311: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=691311
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#689951: Package appears to be non-free

2012-10-24 Thread Emmanuel Promayon

Hi Andreas,


If you can remove it upstream this would probably the bes solution.
Please note the following:  The Debian Release team does not accept
new upstream versions for Wheezy in general.  So if the change should
be successfull for propagation to Wheezy please make prfectly sure
that this change is the only one compared to the tarball currently in
testing.  So you culd do something like

camitk-3.0.2.1.tar.gz

and mention in the upstream changelog something like

- Just removed parts of code which are not DFSG free (no other code
changes

In the debian/changelog we could refer to the fact mentioned in your
upstream changelog to convince the release team that we do not
attempt to sneak in new upstream code.  Otherwise we would need to
backport the changes to the version inside Debian. (In case my
advise was not clear enough feel free to ask for further
clarification.)



May be I was not fully clear.  If we drop the tetgen dependency
completely (and if I understood correctly the plugin in queston needs
to be dropped / deactivated as well) then and only than camitk can
remain in Debian main.  If there is some dependency from any non-free
component (be it tetgen or whatever) the package needs to be moved
from main to contrib which is something I would like to avoid. So the
action to let camitk remain in main is the following:

1. Remove tetgen fom the upstream tarball (may be also cut the
plugin in question as well if it does not make any sense without
tetgen). 2. Build a camitk package targeting at main from this source
tarball.


Would it not be possible/preferable/easier to convince the release team
to remove the non-free code as a debian package patch?
If not, as at the moment the upstream changelog is not very visible,
should I add a specific news on the web page to explain what happened
between camitk-3.0.2.1.tar.gz and camitk-3.0.2.tar.gz?


To gain full functionality we could gain (for Wheezy+1) optionally
with

3. Create another source tarball camitk-plugins (or
camitk-plugins-non-dfsg or whatever name). 4. Build an according
Debian package from this plugins tarball linking with Debian packaged
tetgen targeting at contrib and recommending camitk from main 5. You
can Suggests camitk-plugins in the camitk package (but not
Recommends, which is only allowed inside main)


That sounds like the perfect idea.


For #690830 there is a patch proposal and there is also a another
way that I would like to try first (that will probably have better
compiler specific/multi-arch support).


This could be done if you are pretty sure about this and the change
is obviosely simple and straight to get accepted by the release
team. While it is a really good thing to fix this bug we need to make
 pretty sure it will not introduce new problems (which is the sense
of the freeze process).

For the time line:  I think doing step 1.+2. from above until end of
October is fine.  Everything else has time because it does not affect
the current release.  Is this doable for you?
Yes, I think there is no problem to do that between now and the end of 
the month.


--
Emmanuel Promayon
UJF-Grenoble 1, CNRS, TIMC-IMAG UMR 5525 (équipe GMCAO)
Institut de l'Ingénierie de l'Information de Santé
Faculté de Médecine - 38706 La Tronche cedex - France
Tel. +33/0 456 52 00 03 - Fax. +33/0 456 52 00 55 - B7


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#689951: Package appears to be non-free

2012-10-24 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi,

On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 10:46:51AM +0200, Emmanuel Promayon wrote:
 1. Remove tetgen fom the upstream tarball (may be also cut the
 plugin in question as well if it does not make any sense without
 tetgen). 2. Build a camitk package targeting at main from this source
 tarball.
 
 Would it not be possible/preferable/easier to convince the release team
 to remove the non-free code as a debian package patch?

Definitely not.  The release team has the only task to accept or remove
packges created by somebody else (read: maintainer or creator of a
non-maintainer upload).  The release team will not change anything
inside a package.

Moreover:  The problem is in the source of the package and thus you can
not fix it by a patch.  If you prefer it is also possile to create a
source tarball

camitk_3.0.2+dfsg1.orig.tar.gz

which can be created by removing those non-free bits from upstream
camitk-3.0.2.tar.gz.  We would usually do this if no upstream author is
involved and it is perfectly OK as well. In this case you should
document the removal in debian/README.source and write a target
get-orig-source for debian/rules.  I'd regard it less effort to simply
do it inside the upstream source that's why my suggestion.

 If not, as at the moment the upstream changelog is not very visible,
 should I add a specific news on the web page to explain what happened
 between camitk-3.0.2.1.tar.gz and camitk-3.0.2.tar.gz?

That's OK as well.  Just some documentation that no new code is in this
new version is sufficient (I havn't checked the surce when writing my
advise).

 To gain full functionality we could gain (for Wheezy+1) optionally
 with
 
 3. Create another source tarball camitk-plugins (or
 camitk-plugins-non-dfsg or whatever name). 4. Build an according
 Debian package from this plugins tarball linking with Debian packaged
 tetgen targeting at contrib and recommending camitk from main 5. You
 can Suggests camitk-plugins in the camitk package (but not
 Recommends, which is only allowed inside main)
 
 That sounds like the perfect idea.

Nice that you like it.
 
 For the time line:  I think doing step 1.+2. from above until end of
 October is fine.  Everything else has time because it does not affect
 the current release.  Is this doable for you?
 Yes, I think there is no problem to do that between now and the end
 of the month.

Fine.  Just keep on asking if something remains unclear or you might
need any other help.

Kind regards

Andreas. 

-- 
http://fam-tille.de


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#687320: marked as done (grub-efi-amd64: Stuck at grub recovery prompt when USB media reader attached)

2012-10-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 24 Oct 2012 09:47:55 +
with message-id e1tqxz5-0007gc...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#687320: fixed in grub2 1.99-23.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #687320,
regarding grub-efi-amd64: Stuck at grub recovery prompt when USB media reader 
attached
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
687320: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=687320
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: grub-efi-amd64
Version: 1.99-22.1
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system

Dear Maintainer,

With the recent hubbub about UEFI I thought I'd try getting my new system, an
Asus P8H61-M LE/CSM with Core i53450, booting using EFI instead of bios
compatibility mode.

At first I tried to convert my system to uefi boot without reinstalling by
following some guides online, but I was left with a system that wouldn't boot
past just GRUB showing the upper left.

With no clue what I did wrong I decided to try Steve's efi test install cd 1
which installed elilo by default.  This gave me a booting system for a while,
but I was unhappy with elilo so I tried switching over to grub by adding
/boot/efi to fstab and installing grub-efi-amd64.  On rebooting I got invalid
sector size 65535

Figuring that I'd fubared my system again I reinstalled using Steve's 3rd CD.
This left my system booting to the same grub recovery prompt and the invalid
sector size 65535.  At this point I searched for the error and found:
http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?35382
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/975061

So now I can boot my system, either by opening the case and disconnecting my
card reader before power up OR manually setting the prefix and loading/running
the normal module.

I've tried several variations of running grub-install with and without the card
reader attached, rebooting between tries, and I have also tried manually
setting things in devices.map.  So far the only way I can get my system to boot
without intervention is to disconnect the card reader.

This is my first time submitting a bug... please me gentle

Thanks :)



-- Package-specific info:

*** BEGIN /proc/mounts
/dev/disk/by-uuid/aa3909a2-fcc8-4b69-9b32-f6716fdd2e7e / ext4
rw,relatime,errors=remount-ro,data=ordered 0 0
/dev/sda1 /boot/efi vfat
rw,relatime,fmask=0022,dmask=0022,codepage=cp437,iocharset=utf8,shortname=mixed,errors
=remount-ro 0 0
/dev/sdb1 /home xfs rw,relatime,attr2,noquota 0 0
*** END /proc/mounts

*** BEGIN /boot/grub/device.map
(hd0)   /dev/disk/by-id/ata-ST340016A_3HS4JDEX
(hd1)   /dev/disk/by-id/ata-ST3320613AS_9SZ6H6P4
*** END /boot/grub/device.map

*** BEGIN /boot/grub/grub.cfg
#
# DO NOT EDIT THIS FILE
#
# It is automatically generated by grub-mkconfig using templates
# from /etc/grub.d and settings from /etc/default/grub
#

### BEGIN /etc/grub.d/00_header ###
if [ -s $prefix/grubenv ]; then
  load_env
fi
set default=0
if [ ${prev_saved_entry} ]; then
  set saved_entry=${prev_saved_entry}
  save_env saved_entry
  set prev_saved_entry=
  save_env prev_saved_entry
  set boot_once=true
fi

function savedefault {
  if [ -z ${boot_once} ]; then
saved_entry=${chosen}
save_env saved_entry
  fi
}

function load_video {
  insmod efi_gop
  insmod efi_uga
  insmod video_bochs
  insmod video_cirrus
}

insmod part_gpt
insmod ext2
set root='(hd5,gpt2)'
search --no-floppy --fs-uuid --set=root aa3909a2-fcc8-4b69-9b32-f6716fdd2e7e
if loadfont /usr/share/grub/unicode.pf2 ; then
  set gfxmode=1440x900x32
  load_video
  insmod gfxterm
  insmod part_gpt
  insmod ext2
  set root='(hd5,gpt2)'
  search --no-floppy --fs-uuid --set=root aa3909a2-fcc8-4b69-9b32-f6716fdd2e7e
  set locale_dir=($root)/boot/grub/locale
  set lang=en_US
  insmod gettext
fi
terminal_output gfxterm
set timeout=5
### END /etc/grub.d/00_header ###

### BEGIN /etc/grub.d/05_debian_theme ###
insmod part_gpt
insmod ext2
set root='(hd5,gpt2)'
search --no-floppy --fs-uuid --set=root aa3909a2-fcc8-4b69-9b32-f6716fdd2e7e
insmod png
if background_image /usr/share/images/desktop-base/joy-grub.png; then
  set color_normal=white/black
  set color_highlight=black/white
else
  set menu_color_normal=cyan/blue
  set menu_color_highlight=white/blue
fi
### END /etc/grub.d/05_debian_theme ###

### BEGIN /etc/grub.d/10_linux ###
menuentry 'Debian GNU/Linux, with Linux 3.5-trunk-amd64' --class debian --class
gnu-linux --class gnu --class os {
load_video
set gfxpayload=keep
insmod gzio
  

Processed: Fwd: Processed: Re: Bug#691140: graphicsmagick: libmagickcore-dev uses out of date libtiff4-dev

2012-10-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 reassign 691140 libgeotiff-dev
Bug #691140 [libmagickcore-dev] graphicsmagick: libmagickcore-dev uses out of 
date libtiff4-dev
Bug reassigned from package 'libmagickcore-dev' to 'libgeotiff-dev'.
Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #691140 to the same values 
previously set
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #691140 to the same values 
previously set
 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
691140: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=691140
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#682735: questions regarding debian bug #682735

2012-10-24 Thread Jan Dittberner
I have a new package version containing your patch ready. I filed #689588
[1] to ask the Release team whether the change could get a freeze exception.
I got no response so far.


Best Regards
Jan

[1] http://bugs.debian.org/689588

-- 
Jan Dittberner - Debian Developer
GPG-key: 4096R/558FB8DD 2009-05-10
 B2FF 1D95 CE8F 7A22 DF4C  F09B A73E 0055 558F B8DD
http://ddportfolio.debian.net/ - http://people.debian.org/~jandd/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#631968: marked as done (gnome-terminal: fails to start on kFreeBSD)

2012-10-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 24 Oct 2012 12:02:41 +
with message-id e1tqzfv-0003od...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#631968: fixed in glib2.0 2.33.12+really2.32.4-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #631968,
regarding gnome-terminal: fails to start on kFreeBSD
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
631968: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=631968
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: gnome-terminal
Version: 3.0.1-1
Severity: grave
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: kfreebsd

(this bug most likely needs reassigning, but I don't know where, so filing
it on the application that exhibits the symptom)

gnome-terminal aborts on start, with unknown signal:

rmh@dimoni:~$ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/lib/debug/lib/x86_64-kfreebsd-gnu gdb 
gnome-terminal
GNU gdb (GDB) 7.2-debian
Copyright (C) 2010 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later http://gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html
This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it.
There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law.  Type show copying
and show warranty for details.
This GDB was configured as x86_64-kfreebsd-gnu.
For bug reporting instructions, please see:
http://www.gnu.org/software/gdb/bugs/...
Reading symbols from /usr/bin/gnome-terminal...(no debugging symbols 
found)...done.
(gdb) r
Starting program: /usr/bin/gnome-terminal 

Program received signal ?, Unknown signal.
__pthread_sigsuspend () at 
../ports/sysdeps/unix/bsd/bsd4.4/kfreebsd/linuxthreads/pt-sigsuspend.S:24
24  ../ports/sysdeps/unix/bsd/bsd4.4/kfreebsd/linuxthreads/pt-sigsuspend.S: 
El fitxer o directori no existeix.
in 
../ports/sysdeps/unix/bsd/bsd4.4/kfreebsd/linuxthreads/pt-sigsuspend.S
(gdb) bt
#0  __pthread_sigsuspend () at 
../ports/sysdeps/unix/bsd/bsd4.4/kfreebsd/linuxthreads/pt-sigsuspend.S:24
#1  0x000802e433b8 in __pthread_wait_for_restart_signal (self=value 
optimized out) at pthread.c:1274
#2  0x000802e43f8c in suspend (thread=0x688ae0, attr=value optimized out, 
start_routine=value optimized out, arg=value optimized out) at restart.h:34
#3  __pthread_create_2_1 (thread=0x688ae0, attr=value optimized out, 
start_routine=value optimized out, arg=value optimized out) at pthread.c:877
#4  0x000801fa8212 in g_thread_create_posix_impl (thread_func=0x802455c00 
g_thread_create_proxy, arg=0x688ab0, stack_size=value optimized out, 
joinable=value optimized out, bound=0, priority=G_THREAD_PRIORITY_NORMAL, 
thread=0x688ae0, error=0x7fffda68)
at 
/build/buildd-glib2.0_2.28.6-1-kfreebsd-amd64-yDxNka/glib2.0-2.28.6/./gthread/gthread-posix.c:355
#5  0x00080245688d in g_thread_create_full (func=value optimized out, 
data=value optimized out, stack_size=0, joinable=0, bound=0, 
priority=value optimized out, error=0x7fffdac8) at 
/build/buildd-glib2.0_2.28.6-1-kfreebsd-amd64-yDxNka/glib2.0-2.28.6/./glib/gthread.c:1967
#6  0x000802458126 in g_thread_pool_start_thread (pool=0x688c00, error=0x0)
at 
/build/buildd-glib2.0_2.28.6-1-kfreebsd-amd64-yDxNka/glib2.0-2.28.6/./glib/gthreadpool.c:420
#7  0x000802458822 in g_thread_pool_push (pool=value optimized out, 
data=0x655b30, error=0x0)
at 
/build/buildd-glib2.0_2.28.6-1-kfreebsd-amd64-yDxNka/glib2.0-2.28.6/./glib/gthreadpool.c:558
#8  0x0008015ea5ad in g_async_initable_real_init_async (initable=value 
optimized out, io_priority=0, cancellable=0x0, 
callback=0x801660050 bus_get_async_initable_cb, user_data=0x675760)
at 
/build/buildd-glib2.0_2.28.6-1-kfreebsd-amd64-yDxNka/glib2.0-2.28.6/./gio/gasyncinitable.c:285
#9  0x000801661c53 in g_bus_get (bus_type=G_BUS_TYPE_SESSION, 
cancellable=0x0, callback=value optimized out, user_data=value optimized 
out)
at 
/build/buildd-glib2.0_2.28.6-1-kfreebsd-amd64-yDxNka/glib2.0-2.28.6/./gio/gdbusconnection.c:6383
#10 0x00080166e94b in g_bus_own_name (bus_type=G_BUS_TYPE_SESSION, 
name=0x6540a0 org.gnome.Terminal.Display_0_0, 
flags=G_BUS_NAME_OWNER_FLAGS_NONE, 
bus_acquired_handler=0x417d60, name_acquired_handler=0x417cc0, 
name_lost_handler=0x418120, user_data=0x654b00, user_data_free_func=0)
at 
/build/buildd-glib2.0_2.28.6-1-kfreebsd-amd64-yDxNka/glib2.0-2.28.6/./gio/gdbusnameowning.c:622
#11 0x00414fb9 in ?? ()
#12 0x0008030771e9 in __libc_start_main (main=0x414d00, argc=1, 
ubp_av=0x7fffdcf0, init=value optimized out, fini=0x94016030, 
rtld_fini=0, 
stack_end=0x7fffdcd8) at libc-start.c:257
#13 0x0041512c in ?? ()
#14 0x7fffdcd8 in ?? ()
#15 0x001c 

Bug#691311: [Pkg-octave-devel] Bug#691311: Bug#691311: error: feval: function `unimplemented' not found

2012-10-24 Thread Mike Miller
On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 4:32 AM, Sébastien Villemot wrote:
 It appears that octave 3.6.2 does not work with liboctave1 3.6.3, and
 conversely octave 3.6.3 does not work with liboctave1 3.6.2.

I took a look at this and the problem is simply that the load path
contains Octave's version number. No soname incompatibility. And
unless something is changed, this will continue to be the case between
different upstream versions of octave and liboctaveX.

The octave package provides the directories, and liboctinterp.so.1 has
a compiled-in set of paths with its version number that it attempts to
load. You can see these paths with:

$ strings /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/liboctinterp.so.1 | grep /3.6../

If I print the default path from a working 3.6.3:

$ octave -qf --eval disp(path)

then downgrade liboctave1/sid and set that full string to be the path
in the interpreter:

$ octave -qf
octave:1 ls
error: feval: function `unimplemented' not found
octave:1 path (full_path_here);
octave:2 ls

no more error.

-- 
mike


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Processed: Broken su/sudo/whatever - breaks systems - up goes the severity

2012-10-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 severity 658739 grave
Bug #658739 [gnutls26] gnutls26: LDAP+SSL account cannot use setuid binaries 
until gnutls26 is rebuilt with nettle not libgcrypt11
Severity set to 'grave' from 'important'
 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
658739: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=658739
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#625020: [chan-capi-users] Bug#625020: version HEAD no FTBFS

2012-10-24 Thread Armin Schindler
On 19.10.2012 23:13, Geert Stappers wrote:
 
 For the people at chan-capi-users(a)lists.melware.net,
 you find context at http://bugs.debian.org/625020
 
 On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 01:11:13PM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote:
 On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 07:24:16AM +0200, Joerg Dorchain wrote:

 I would not mind a packages from
 ftp://ftp.chan-capi.org/chan-capi/chan_capi-HEAD.tgz , which
 works with the current asterisk in testing.

 Based upon that information, I did remove the won't fix tag

 
 The FTBFS is indeed gone in upstream's HEAD version.
 
 I got a clean debianbuild with the october 19th version of chan-capi.
 
 
 The most clean solution to fix this Fails To Build From Source Bug
 would be getting an version number greater as 1.1.5 from upstream.
 (They are now in the loop)
 
 Another solution would be create version something
 like 1.1.5+VCS20121019

chan-capi 1.1.6 is now available.

regards
Armin


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#691340: chrony: Chrony Version 1.24 from wheezy does not work on kernel 3.x

2012-10-24 Thread Sven Geggus
Package: chrony
Version: 1.24-3.1
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks unrelated software

Hello,

there are quite a few packages (kerberos in my case) which are dependant on
a relatively exact time.  I actually could not log in to my freshly
installed kerberized wheezy system due to a mayor clock skew produced by a
malfunctioning chrony daemon.

The Version of chrony currently supplied with wheezy does have a runable
daemon, but this daemon is unable to set the system clock at all.

The reason for this are actually two bugs in debian BTS which have already
been fixed in unstable, but only partially in the the Version which wheezy
ended up with after the feature freeze.

I'm talking about the following bugs:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=628919
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=642209

The state of the wheezy Version is that bug #628919 has been fixed
incompletely. This led to bugreport #642209 which has then been fixed
in unstable only by means of using a newer upstream version.

There are two possible ways to fix the version supplied with wheezy:
1. Migrate to Version 1.26-2 from sid
   (no unsatisfiable dependancies in wheezy)
2. Apply the simple patch supplied in bug report #642209

Regards

Sven

-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 3.6.3-00694-g9017061 (SMP w/4 CPU cores; PREEMPT)
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages chrony depends on:
ii  dpkg  1.16.8
ii  install-info  4.13a.dfsg.1-10
ii  libc6 2.13-35
ii  libncurses5   5.9-10
ii  libreadline5  5.2-12
ii  timelimit 1.8-1
ii  ucf   3.0025+nmu3

Versions of packages chrony recommends:
ii  udev  175-7

chrony suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Processed: Unfuck my syntax

2012-10-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 # Meh
 reassign 667995 python-cups 1.9.48-1
Bug #667995 [cups] cupsd configuration: cupsdAuthorize: Empty Basic password!
Bug reassigned from package 'cups' to 'python-cups'.
No longer marked as found in versions cups/1.5.2-9.
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #667995 to the same values 
previously set
Bug #667995 [python-cups] cupsd configuration: cupsdAuthorize: Empty Basic 
password!
Marked as found in versions python-cups/1.9.48-1.
 severity 667995 serious
Bug #667995 [python-cups] cupsd configuration: cupsdAuthorize: Empty Basic 
password!
Severity set to 'serious' from 'normal'
 affects 667995 cups
Bug #667995 [python-cups] cupsd configuration: cupsdAuthorize: Empty Basic 
password!
Added indication that 667995 affects cups
 affects 667995 system-config-printer
Bug #667995 [python-cups] cupsd configuration: cupsdAuthorize: Empty Basic 
password!
Added indication that 667995 affects system-config-printer
 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
667995: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=667995
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#691346: kfreebsd-amd64 fails to install on LSI MegaRAID SAS 2208

2012-10-24 Thread Tiziano Zito
Package: installation-reports
Severity: critical
Tags: d-i

-- Package-specific info:

Boot method: CD
Image version: debian-wheezy-DI-b3-kfreebsd-amd64-netinst.iso
Date: 201210241200

Machine: IBM System x3650 M4
Partitions: no partitions

Base System Installation Checklist:
[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it

Initial boot:   [E]
Detect network card:[ ]
Configure network:  [ ]
Detect CD:  [ ]
Load installer modules: [ ]
Clock/timezone setup:   [ ]
User/password setup:[ ]
Detect hard drives: [ ]
Partition hard drives:  [ ]
Install base system:[ ]
Install tasks:  [ ]
Install boot loader:[ ]
Overall install:[ ]

Comments/Problems:

On this server the LSI RAID controller LSI MegaRAID SAS 2208/ServeRAID M5110e
is installed. I tried installing kfreebsd-amd64 on it from CD. The
installer GRUB menu works (see attachment boot.png), but right after
that the FreeBSD kernel hangs during boot with an error (see
attachment error.png). After 10/20 seconds another error line gets
printed -- something about hard resetting something -- but it was
too fast for me to take a screenshot, and the system reboots. 
On the very same machine I was able to install the standard 
debian-wheezy-DI-b3-amd64-netinst.iso without any problem. 

On LSI website I found this:
http://kb.lsi.com/KnowledgebaseArticle16687.aspx
which seems to indicate that FreeBSD 9.0 ships an obsolete kernel
module for this controller, and they suggest a procedure how to create
a FreeBSD 9.0 installer with an updated module. My knowledge of
FreeBSD are a bit too limited for me to seriously think about
recompile the kernel and injecting some additional modules, but
maybe someone in the kfreebsd debian team knows how to do it?

I now have the machine up and running with linux debian amd64, so I
can make any needed additional hardware info -- as linux sees it --
available. I can also make the remote control console accessible to
more knowledgeable people for debugging.

Thanks,
Tiziano

PS: I did not know what severity to set, I thought that complete
install failures qualifies for critical, but please downgrade it
if needed.
attachment: boot.pngattachment: error.png

Processed: fixed 684245 fcitx/1:4.2.6.1-1

2012-10-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 fixed 684245 fcitx/1:4.2.6.1-1
Bug #684245 {Done: YunQiang Su wzss...@gmail.com} [fcitx] fcitx: makes 
gnumeric cursor keys edit (and delete) instead of navigate
Marked as fixed in versions fcitx/1:4.2.6.1-1.
 --
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
684245: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=684245
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#682320: marked as done (scite: (background?) save fail, resulting in file content loss)

2012-10-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 24 Oct 2012 15:20:31 +
with message-id e1tr2kx-0001bk...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#682320: fixed in scite 3.0.2-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #682320,
regarding scite: (background?) save fail, resulting in file content loss
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
682320: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=682320
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---


Package: scite
Version: 3.0.2-2
Severity: critical
Tags: patch
Justification: causes serious data loss

Hi,

  It seems that there is a bug in SciTE 3.0.2 that appears when you're trying 
to save a file. The * doesn't disappear, and subsequent saving commands report 
already saved.

  Unfortunately, that's not the case, and the file after this is completely 
empty and has a zero byte size.

  Many features of SciTE are not working anymore when this happens (including 
closing), and if you try to save another file, the result will be the same 
(file content loss).

  It can happen several times a day, and have quite bad consequences for 
users...

  It seems that it may be because of threading, and linked to background saving 
of files.

  The package developpers seem to have a workaround for this: 
putting___
if PLAT_GTK
background.save.size=1000
___
in the global properties file, disabling background saving for files under 10MB

  This should have been also included in 3.0.4, 3.1 and 3.2 versions, I guess.

  Details at: 
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailaid=3466525group_id=2439atid=102439

  Is it possible to at least update the global properties file to avoid that 
too many people lose their work because of this bug? Thanks in advance



-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-3-686-pae (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages scite depends on:
ii libc6 2.13-34
ii libcairo2 1.12.2-2
ii libgcc1 1:4.7.1-5
ii libgdk-pixbuf2.0-0 2.26.1-1
ii libglib2.0-0 2.32.3-1
ii libgtk2.0-0 2.24.10-1
ii libpango1.0-0 1.30.0-1
ii libstdc++6 4.7.1-5

scite recommends no packages.

scite suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information
  ---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
Source: scite
Source-Version: 3.0.2-3

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
scite, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 682...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Michael Vogt m...@debian.org (supplier of updated scite package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org)


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2012 17:02:07 +0200
Source: scite
Binary: scite
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 3.0.2-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Michael Vogt m...@debian.org
Changed-By: Michael Vogt m...@debian.org
Description: 
 scite  - Lightweight GTK-based Programming Editor
Closes: 119604 682320 690429
Changes: 
 scite (3.0.2-3) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   [ Michael Vogt ]
   * add missing man-page (closes: #690429)
 .
   [ Antonio Valentino ]
   * install global configuration files under /etc (closes: #119604)
   * disable background save in order to avoid save failures and data
 loss (closes: #682320)
   * Antonio Valentino added to uploaders
Checksums-Sha1: 
 79367a94ece679e74aa1297cf042950f6614b65c 1146 scite_3.0.2-3.dsc
 98bb1b85b2f9a25245991086a160857abded7b41 15764 scite_3.0.2-3.debian.tar.gz
 0063573c2a19f564cbe0dab9933ab81ac3300bfa 1210616 scite_3.0.2-3_amd64.deb
Checksums-Sha256: 
 a6542ece45ee986c90341b4b2c5169a8c5c5655683bb07374f9ed80be10e1e4c 1146 
scite_3.0.2-3.dsc
 f144d002d6cea19171c10e71f621c4195e15a73947007325fcfac6fb054c 15764 
scite_3.0.2-3.debian.tar.gz
 c0923e6356f03ee4d3d481d3d58100c0472defa5a6ccc2a496d1cfdcd84f290b 1210616 
scite_3.0.2-3_amd64.deb
Files: 
 8a69f857b66b880d7b4b9df3dd686453 1146 editors optional scite_3.0.2-3.dsc
 0433407fcfd1d33ea2080c8c280c24df 15764 editors 

Processed: tagging 690150

2012-10-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 tags 690150 - patch
Bug #690150 [libphone-ui-dev] libphone-ui-dev: missing copyright file after 
upgrade from squeeze
Removed tag(s) patch.
 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
690150: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=690150
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#691071: marked as done (gir1.2-ibus-1.0: Missing call to dh_girepository, Depends field empty)

2012-10-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 24 Oct 2012 15:32:38 +
with message-id e1tr2wg-0004b9...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#691071: fixed in ibus 1.4.99.20120917-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #691071,
regarding gir1.2-ibus-1.0: Missing call to dh_girepository, Depends field empty
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
691071: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=691071
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: gir1.2-ibus-1.0
Version: 1.4.1-7
Severity: serious
Tags: patch

Hi,

The depends field of gir1.2-ibus-1.0 is empty because dh_girepository
has not been called during build.

The gir sequence must be called (--with gir) during build.

See the attached patch.

Cheers

Laurent Bigonville


-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 3.5-trunk-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=fr_BE.utf8, LC_CTYPE=fr_BE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
diff -Nru ibus-1.4.99.20120917/debian/rules ibus-1.4.99.20120917/debian/rules
--- ibus-1.4.99.20120917/debian/rules	2012-10-17 07:09:24.0 +0200
+++ ibus-1.4.99.20120917/debian/rules	2012-10-21 00:41:52.0 +0200
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
 LDFLAGS:=$(shell dpkg-buildflags --get LDFLAGS) -Wl,--as-needed
 
 %:
-	dh  $@ --with python2 --with autoreconf
+	dh  $@ --with python2 --with autoreconf --with gir
 
 override_dh_auto_configure:
 	dh_auto_configure -- \
---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
Source: ibus
Source-Version: 1.4.99.20120917-3

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
ibus, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 691...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Aron Xu a...@debian.org (supplier of updated ibus package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org)


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2012 22:55:06 +0800
Source: ibus
Binary: ibus libibus-1.0-5 libibus-1.0-dev ibus-gtk ibus-gtk3 python-ibus 
ibus-doc gir1.2-ibus-1.0
Architecture: source amd64 all
Version: 1.4.99.20120917-3
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: low
Maintainer: IME Packaging Team pkg-ime-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Changed-By: Aron Xu a...@debian.org
Description: 
 gir1.2-ibus-1.0 - Intelligent Input Bus - introspection data
 ibus   - Intelligent Input Bus - core
 ibus-doc   - Intelligent Input Bus - development documentation
 ibus-gtk   - Intelligent Input Bus - GTK+2 support
 ibus-gtk3  - Intelligent Input Bus - GTK+3 support
 libibus-1.0-5 - Intelligent Input Bus - shared library
 libibus-1.0-dev - Intelligent Input Bus - development file
 python-ibus - Intelligent Input Bus - Python support
Closes: 691071
Changes: 
 ibus (1.4.99.20120917-3) experimental; urgency=low
 .
   * Team upload
   * Call gir with dh sequences (Closes: #691071).
Checksums-Sha1: 
 b155af92e9e7675ade347c969f86db4c0a40e7ee 2397 ibus_1.4.99.20120917-3.dsc
 84fe196d7ce17b148d77e25215209401651f4bb8 15647 
ibus_1.4.99.20120917-3.debian.tar.gz
 3b93e8d32976b2c0b17823941be0566b3f7a86d8 472886 
ibus_1.4.99.20120917-3_amd64.deb
 a3fd50f639fc664ca9e02bb080d61fe633c2b687 297726 
libibus-1.0-5_1.4.99.20120917-3_amd64.deb
 b9e21529ec6f34813d8547a2b3e32a12b6047b6d 350036 
libibus-1.0-dev_1.4.99.20120917-3_amd64.deb
 bda104d5b6ed00385057695d27c4a4ffe0f6220a 178200 
ibus-gtk_1.4.99.20120917-3_amd64.deb
 d7c08961137aa0cf350de63d2fa4093db2903e29 178164 
ibus-gtk3_1.4.99.20120917-3_amd64.deb
 6f99bf700ad5ee60b71b3a132cf3c0b37edec2bd 200038 
python-ibus_1.4.99.20120917-3_all.deb
 ae63cdd1ca847f8dbcf6951eff62c33b257ed502 350290 
ibus-doc_1.4.99.20120917-3_all.deb
 34b0f3da516f9c6a665c90acb6c75ea467bc6e5d 255660 
gir1.2-ibus-1.0_1.4.99.20120917-3_amd64.deb
Checksums-Sha256: 
 924dd5c46dfceb7d272ecdcb88240fa781c5bdcde37ad50a75c9a5d9a209b21b 2397 
ibus_1.4.99.20120917-3.dsc
 12874e9ecf3e0e4a39b3609b7daf98eb53080996a02798361a3917e16761d932 15647 
ibus_1.4.99.20120917-3.debian.tar.gz
 593fbef2b5d0e4416584fca000b9fd20d184f08dd68e07b51bbd3be72b92f976 472886 
ibus_1.4.99.20120917-3_amd64.deb
 

Bug#690150: libphone-ui-dev: missing copyright file after upgrade from squeeze

2012-10-24 Thread gregor herrmann
Control: tag -1 + patch

On Sat, 20 Oct 2012 10:56:06 +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:

 that NMU makes /usr/share/doc/libphone-ui-dev a dangling symlink. The
 correct target would probably be libphone-ui-20110825.

Or libphone-ui-common:

debian/rules:

override_dh_installdocs:
dh_installdocs --link-doc=libphone-ui-common

The packages in debian/control depend either on libphone-ui-common,
or on libphone-ui-20110825 which also has a symlink to
libphone-ui-common and depends on libphone-ui-common.

Not sure if the indirect symlink or the indirect dependency is
less ugly; but from the perceived end result according to d/rules,
I'd go for libphone-ui-common.
 

(Untested) patch attached for review.

Cheers,
gregor


-- 
 .''`.  Homepage: http://info.comodo.priv.at/ - OpenPGP key 0xBB3A68018649AA06
 : :' : Debian GNU/Linux user, admin, and developer  -  http://www.debian.org/
 `. `'  Member of VIBE!AT  SPI, fellow of the Free Software Foundation Europe
   `-   NP: Various Artists: Katie
diff -Nru libphone-ui-0.0.1+git20110825/debian/changelog libphone-ui-0.0.1+git20110825/debian/changelog
--- libphone-ui-0.0.1+git20110825/debian/changelog	2012-10-14 14:26:07.0 +0200
+++ libphone-ui-0.0.1+git20110825/debian/changelog	2012-10-24 17:38:53.0 +0200
@@ -1,3 +1,14 @@
+libphone-ui (1:0.0.1+git20110825-2.2) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
+
+  * Non-maintainer upload.
+  * Fix missing copyright file after upgrade from squeeze:
+change docdir in libphone-ui-dev.postinst from non-existant
+libphone-ui to libphone-ui-common (same as in debian/rules for new
+installs).
+(Closes: #690150)
+
+ -- gregor herrmann gre...@debian.org  Wed, 24 Oct 2012 17:32:51 +0200
+
 libphone-ui (1:0.0.1+git20110825-2.1) unstable; urgency=low
 
   * Non-maintainer upload.
diff -Nru libphone-ui-0.0.1+git20110825/debian/libphone-ui-dev.postinst libphone-ui-0.0.1+git20110825/debian/libphone-ui-dev.postinst
--- libphone-ui-0.0.1+git20110825/debian/libphone-ui-dev.postinst	2012-10-14 14:24:05.0 +0200
+++ libphone-ui-0.0.1+git20110825/debian/libphone-ui-dev.postinst	2012-10-24 17:37:39.0 +0200
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
 docdir=/usr/share/doc/libphone-ui-dev
 if [ -d $docdir ]  [ ! -L $docdir ]; then
 if rmdir $docdir 2/dev/null; then
-ln -sf libphone-ui $docdir
+ln -sf libphone-ui-common $docdir
 fi
 fi
 


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Processed: Re: Bug#690150: libphone-ui-dev: missing copyright file after upgrade from squeeze

2012-10-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands:

 tag -1 + patch
Bug #690150 [libphone-ui-dev] libphone-ui-dev: missing copyright file after 
upgrade from squeeze
Added tag(s) patch.

-- 
690150: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=690150
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#687398: More information on how to reproduce the `dlopen' issue

2012-10-24 Thread gregor herrmann
On Sun, 30 Sep 2012 18:10:16 -0400, Asheesh Laroia wrote:

 So what I'm going to do is:
 
 * Adjust debian/rules to *not* specify SHARED_TRG
 
 * Right after rhash_shared is built, use 'mv' to rename it to 'rhash'
 
 That's all it should take to fix this, I believe.
 
 I'll prepare a 1-day delayed NMU for that. Maintainer, please feel
 free to remove it; I don't mean to step on your toes, just to move
 this bug along.
 
 I'll attach the debdiff here before doing the upload.

The debdiff arrived some minutes later, but I don't see an upload.
What's the status?

Cheers,
gregor

-- 
 .''`.  Homepage: http://info.comodo.priv.at/ - OpenPGP key 0xBB3A68018649AA06
 : :' : Debian GNU/Linux user, admin, and developer  -  http://www.debian.org/
 `. `'  Member of VIBE!AT  SPI, fellow of the Free Software Foundation Europe
   `-   NP: Various Artists: Katie


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#684852: python-greenlet: diff for NMU version 0.3.1-2.1

2012-10-24 Thread gregor herrmann
On Sat, 13 Oct 2012 12:25:50 +0200, Jelmer Vernooij wrote:

 I've uploaded Laszlo's NMU for python-greenlet (versioned as
 0.3.1-2.1) and uploaded it to DELAYED/5. Please feel free to tell me
 if I should delay it longer.

That's the last entry in the bug log, but I don't see a -2.1 package
in the PTS -- just curious what happened :)
 
Cheers,
gregor

-- 
 .''`.  Homepage: http://info.comodo.priv.at/ - OpenPGP key 0xBB3A68018649AA06
 : :' : Debian GNU/Linux user, admin, and developer  -  http://www.debian.org/
 `. `'  Member of VIBE!AT  SPI, fellow of the Free Software Foundation Europe
   `-   NP: Various Artists: Katie


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Processed: severity of 642136 is serious

2012-10-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 severity 642136 serious
Bug #642136 [network-manager] network-manager: Connecting to a wifi network 
requires org.freedesktop.NM.settings.modify.system privileges
Bug #645815 [network-manager] network-manager-gnome: Should not create 
system-wide connections by default
Bug #646407 [network-manager] Annoying password asking
Bug #654874 [network-manager] network manager won't reconnnect, various errors
Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'
Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'
Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'
Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'
 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
642136: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=642136
645815: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=645815
646407: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=646407
654874: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=654874
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#678890: scim: fail to start scim after latest upgrade

2012-10-24 Thread gregor herrmann
On Wed, 24 Oct 2012 13:40:57 +0900, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote:

  Please fix.
 I attached patch which removed unnecessary patch.

Looks like the patch hasn't made it into the BTS :)

Cheers,
gregor
 
-- 
 .''`.  Homepage: http://info.comodo.priv.at/ - OpenPGP key 0xBB3A68018649AA06
 : :' : Debian GNU/Linux user, admin, and developer  -  http://www.debian.org/
 `. `'  Member of VIBE!AT  SPI, fellow of the Free Software Foundation Europe
   `-   NP: Various Artists: Katie


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#690152: bsaf: FTBFS: Test org.jdesktop.application.TaskMonitorTest failed

2012-10-24 Thread gregor herrmann
On Thu, 11 Oct 2012 22:21:04 -0700, tony mancill wrote:

  During a rebuild of all packages in *wheezy*, your package failed to
  build on amd64.
  I couldn't reproduce this in wheezy or sid, but I was only using pbuilder 
  to test.
 I was able to get the build to fail by setting DISPLAY to something not
 accessible to the build machine, but it failed in the first unit test
 (different than the failure in the bug report).  After unsetting
 DISPLAY, the build is successful.  So I don't think it's the same issue.
  My builds were in a cowbuilder chroot.

It fails for me in cowbuilder (without doing anything) in the first
unit test with a clear error message:

compile-test:
[javac] /tmp/buildd/bsaf-1.9/build.xml:49: warning: 'includeantruntime' was 
not set, defaulting to build.sysclasspath=last; set to false for repeatable 
builds
[javac] Compiling 26 source files to /tmp/buildd/bsaf-1.9/test
[javac] Note: Some input files use or override a deprecated API.
[javac] Note: Recompile with -Xlint:deprecation for details.
[javac] Note: Some input files use unchecked or unsafe operations.
[javac] Note: Recompile with -Xlint:unchecked for details.
 [copy] Copying 28 files to /tmp/buildd/bsaf-1.9/test

check-display:

test:
[junit] Running org.jdesktop.application.AbstractBeanTest
[junit] Testsuite: org.jdesktop.application.AbstractBeanTest
[junit] Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Time elapsed: 0.046 sec
[junit] No protocol specified
[junit] Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Time elapsed: 0.046 sec
[junit] 
[junit] Testcase: fireOnEdtTest(org.jdesktop.application.AbstractBeanTest): 
Caused an ERROR
[junit] Can't connect to X11 window server using ':0' as the value of the 
DISPLAY variable.
[junit] java.lang.InternalError: Can't connect to X11 window server using 
':0' as the value of the DISPLAY variable.
[junit] at sun.awt.X11GraphicsEnvironment.initDisplay(Native Method)
[junit] at 
sun.awt.X11GraphicsEnvironment.access$200(X11GraphicsEnvironment.java:62)
[junit] at 
sun.awt.X11GraphicsEnvironment$1.run(X11GraphicsEnvironment.java:178)
[junit] at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method)
[junit] at 
sun.awt.X11GraphicsEnvironment.clinit(X11GraphicsEnvironment.java:142)
[junit] at java.lang.Class.forName0(Native Method)
[junit] at java.lang.Class.forName(Class.java:186)
[junit] at 
java.awt.GraphicsEnvironment.getLocalGraphicsEnvironment(GraphicsEnvironment.java:82)
[junit] at sun.awt.X11.XToolkit.clinit(XToolkit.java:112)
[junit] at java.lang.Class.forName0(Native Method)
[junit] at java.lang.Class.forName(Class.java:186)
[junit] at java.awt.Toolkit$2.run(Toolkit.java:849)
[junit] at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method)
[junit] at java.awt.Toolkit.getDefaultToolkit(Toolkit.java:841)
[junit] at java.awt.Toolkit.getEventQueue(Toolkit.java:1698)
[junit] at java.awt.EventQueue.isDispatchThread(EventQueue.java:878)
[junit] at 
javax.swing.SwingUtilities.isEventDispatchThread(SwingUtilities.java:1360)
[junit] at 
javax.swing.event.SwingPropertyChangeSupport.firePropertyChange(SwingPropertyChangeSupport.java:90)
[junit] at 
java.beans.PropertyChangeSupport.firePropertyChange(PropertyChangeSupport.java:229)
[junit] at 
org.jdesktop.application.AbstractBean.firePropertyChange(Unknown Source)
[junit] at 
org.jdesktop.application.AbstractBeanTest$TestBean.fire(Unknown Source)
[junit] at 
org.jdesktop.application.AbstractBeanTest.fireOnEdtTest(Unknown Source)
[junit] 
[junit] 

BUILD FAILED
/tmp/buildd/bsaf-1.9/build.xml:68: Test 
org.jdesktop.application.AbstractBeanTest failed


Running the tests under xvfb I get a different failure:
  
  (Side question: why are the tests run at dh_auto_build time and not
  under dh_auto_test?)

[junit] Running org.jdesktop.application.ApplicationTest
[junit] Testsuite: org.jdesktop.application.ApplicationTest
[junit] Tests run: 8, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 0.453 sec
[junit] Tests run: 8, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 0.453 sec
[junit] 
[junit] This test generates logger warnings.  Ignore them.
[junit] Running org.jdesktop.application.BadSessionStateTest
[junit] Testsuite: org.jdesktop.application.BadSessionStateTest
[junit] Oct 24, 2012 4:03:59 PM org.jdesktop.application.LocalStorage getId
[junit] WARNING: unspecified resource Application.id using 
BadSessionStateApplication
[junit] Oct 24, 2012 4:03:59 PM 
org.jdesktop.application.SingleFrameApplication initRootPaneContainer
[junit] WARNING: couldn't restore session [mainFrame.session.xml]
[junit] java.lang.ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException: 0
[junit] at 
com.sun.beans.ObjectHandler.dequeueResult(ObjectHandler.java:189)
[junit] at 

Bug#691311: [Pkg-octave-devel] Bug#691311: Bug#691311: Bug#691311: error: feval: function `unimplemented' not found

2012-10-24 Thread Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso
On 24 October 2012 08:17, Mike Miller mtmil...@ieee.org wrote:
 The octave package provides the directories, and liboctinterp.so.1 has
 a compiled-in set of paths with its version number that it attempts to
 load.

Ah, this is probably not the greatest idea ever. I'm not sure how to
fix it. Provide a build-time option for setting this path? Setting the
path by default to a versionless path?

- Jordi G. H.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#690148: Please give back gcc-mingw-w64 (so it rebuilds using gcc-4.6 4.6.3-12)

2012-10-24 Thread gregor herrmann
Control: tag -1 + patch

On Mon, 15 Oct 2012 20:41:27 +0200, Stephen Kitt wrote:

 On Mon, 15 Oct 2012 14:49:31 +0100, Jonathan Wiltshire j...@debian.org 
 wrote:
  I started looking at this bug yesterday, the fix is easy but I did not
  have time to check all binary packages. Patch to follow if you want it.
 If you've got the patch to hand I'd appreciate it. As you say the fix is
 easy, but I won't have time to work on it this evening...

Something like the attached debdiff maybe?

(Note that I haven't built the binary packages, but I've run the
postinst manually in a chroot after a squeeze → wheezy update of
gcc-mingw32.)


Cheers,
gregor

-- 
 .''`.  Homepage: http://info.comodo.priv.at/ - OpenPGP key 0xBB3A68018649AA06
 : :' : Debian GNU/Linux user, admin, and developer  -  http://www.debian.org/
 `. `'  Member of VIBE!AT  SPI, fellow of the Free Software Foundation Europe
   `-   NP: Various Artists: Katie
diff -Nru gcc-mingw-w64-7/debian/changelog gcc-mingw-w64-7+nmu1/debian/changelog
--- gcc-mingw-w64-7/debian/changelog	2012-08-08 08:21:59.0 +0200
+++ gcc-mingw-w64-7+nmu1/debian/changelog	2012-10-24 18:31:58.0 +0200
@@ -1,3 +1,13 @@
+gcc-mingw-w64 (7+nmu1) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
+
+  * Non-maintainer upload.
+  * Fix missing copyright file after upgrade from squeeze:
+add debian/gcc-mingw32.postinst to handle dir → symlink transition for
+gcc-ming32's docdir.
+(Closes: #690148)
+
+ -- gregor herrmann gre...@debian.org  Wed, 24 Oct 2012 18:15:13 +0200
+
 gcc-mingw-w64 (7) unstable; urgency=low
 
   * When upgrading from versions where /usr/share/doc/gcc-mingw-w64 is a
diff -Nru gcc-mingw-w64-7/debian/gcc-mingw32.postinst gcc-mingw-w64-7+nmu1/debian/gcc-mingw32.postinst
--- gcc-mingw-w64-7/debian/gcc-mingw32.postinst	1970-01-01 01:00:00.0 +0100
+++ gcc-mingw-w64-7+nmu1/debian/gcc-mingw32.postinst	2012-10-24 18:30:52.0 +0200
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+#!/bin/sh
+set -e
+
+# Replace documentation directory with symlink
+if [ -d /usr/share/doc/gcc-mingw32 ]  [ ! -L /usr/share/doc/gcc-mingw32 ]; then
+if rmdir /usr/share/doc/gcc-mingw32 2/dev/null; then
+ln -sf gcc-mingw-w64-base /usr/share/doc/gcc-mingw32
+fi
+fi
+
+#DEBHELPER#
+
+exit 0


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Processed: Re: Bug#690148: Please give back gcc-mingw-w64 (so it rebuilds using gcc-4.6 4.6.3-12)

2012-10-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands:

 tag -1 + patch
Bug #690148 [gcc-mingw32] gcc-mingw32: missing copyright file after upgrade 
from squeeze
Added tag(s) patch.

-- 
690148: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=690148
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#688197: Where is the upload

2012-10-24 Thread Jaldhar H. Vyas

On Wed, 24 Oct 2012, Dominik George wrote:


from your last post, I conclude that the fix is ready to be released.



Yes I am confident this issue is resolved but We still have one huge 
problem, bug #665407.  Upstream provided a fix but it does not seem to 
work.  I have delayed the upload because I am still hoping we can come up 
with some solution though time is running short.




Could you please upload the fixed version to unstable or, if you are not
sure of it, provide the source package here for others to test?



The dovecot package git repository can be found at 
git.debian.org/collab-maint/dovecot


--
Jaldhar H. Vyas jald...@debian.org


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#623578: marked as done (gadfly: build wrong version of the packaging during a binNMU)

2012-10-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 24 Oct 2012 17:32:28 +
with message-id e1tr4oe-0003us...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#623578: fixed in gadfly 1.0.0-15.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #623578,
regarding gadfly: build wrong version of the packaging during a binNMU
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
623578: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=623578
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: gadfly
Version: 1.0.0-14
Severity: serious

gadfly has been binNMU for the python transition, so that the version
should contain +b1. This doesn't work, as the .deb that is built 
corresponds to the source version, for example
python-kjbuckets_1.0.0-14_mips.deb. As a consequence, this package is
rejected by dak.

For example, see the build logs of the binNMU:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=gadflyarch=mipsver=1.0.0-14%2Bb1stamp=1303380314

-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.38-2-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash


---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
Source: gadfly
Source-Version: 1.0.0-15.1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
gadfly, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 623...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
gregor herrmann gre...@debian.org (supplier of updated gadfly package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org)


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2012 19:10:00 +0200
Source: gadfly
Binary: gadfly python-gadfly python-kjbuckets
Architecture: source all amd64
Version: 1.0.0-15.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Matthias Klose d...@debian.org
Changed-By: gregor herrmann gre...@debian.org
Description: 
 gadfly - Server and interactive shell for Gadfly SQL database
 python-gadfly - SQL database and parser generator for Python
 python-kjbuckets - Set and graph data types for Python
Closes: 623578
Changes: 
 gadfly (1.0.0-15.1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Non-maintainer upload.
   * Fix build wrong version of the packaging during a binNMU:
 - debian/rules: get binary package version from dpkg-parsechangelog
   instead of using ${source:Version}; thanks to Guillem Jover for the
   patch, and to Jakub Wilk for the improvement
 - debian/control: build-depend on dpkg-dev (= 1.16.9)
   (cf. #690823)
 (Closes: #623578)
Checksums-Sha1: 
 0d63016244585db7d5884f22c041c0a812658016 1816 gadfly_1.0.0-15.1.dsc
 cdbc93ea27bee6d20a6656339eed9cafac183e5f 6679 gadfly_1.0.0-15.1.diff.gz
 dee005005832b91f93466c5af95d58878fd7a9c1 178252 
python-gadfly_1.0.0-15.1_all.deb
 5c264eaf3099d5ff21e3c97d1aaeea3a2fa2a2e0 27184 gadfly_1.0.0-15.1_all.deb
 bb39ada8dff9aacf7dc2b1bab0a1611ed5c0d6b0 66170 
python-kjbuckets_1.0.0-15.1_amd64.deb
Checksums-Sha256: 
 33343b88fd6d5178b0b1f74833db442dfeef8a71ead857db24bf63df5d272b8b 1816 
gadfly_1.0.0-15.1.dsc
 64e9ac7c5fb0b68430840dade736f3fa9551b62844cac3093ee95bf22c601530 6679 
gadfly_1.0.0-15.1.diff.gz
 bec1ab8a0c83ab22f9db16a3cbd0820b1b9b2fb5b46312c0a8261e303f6172a3 178252 
python-gadfly_1.0.0-15.1_all.deb
 23d903e1842921b5ee6ad383919aa2181e24f8f4ee3bd5a5dc511f6ada38c78d 27184 
gadfly_1.0.0-15.1_all.deb
 277b1ce27073c7b2b31d6ac33c8d0dc5622d690b5afc664083e761a6250705ac 66170 
python-kjbuckets_1.0.0-15.1_amd64.deb
Files: 
 cbd5318e23b5f279eea63973baef09e7 1816 python optional gadfly_1.0.0-15.1.dsc
 f591630ce1204b85e634b899f0206bcf 6679 python optional gadfly_1.0.0-15.1.diff.gz
 ac33a74d39704c05c8fffe739e198cfd 178252 python optional 
python-gadfly_1.0.0-15.1_all.deb
 8c06161c8b81fb22ee7f73535bc7 27184 interpreters optional 
gadfly_1.0.0-15.1_all.deb
 9c7c39eeaf8175352283b06a6b3fefe9 66170 python optional 
python-kjbuckets_1.0.0-15.1_amd64.deb

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)

iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJQhX4sAAoJELs6aAGGSaoGz0cP/3kKceMEF6D8rS+PG9v7m6D9
JdFLh+hhp6/OBdFzRI9bKkpzoktEM2V6dmnDZF5kPnvroxh036TaYgDEp27CKpMz

Bug#675971: marked as done (Cannot communicate with the vast majority of Mumble servers due to lack of required baseline codec)

2012-10-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 24 Oct 2012 17:32:42 +
with message-id e1tr4os-0003d5...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#675971: fixed in mumble 1.2.3-349-g315b5f5-2.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #675971,
regarding Cannot communicate with the vast majority of Mumble servers due to 
lack of required baseline codec
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
675971: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=675971
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: mumble
Version: 1.2.3-349-g315b5f5-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable

Dear Maintainer,

   * What led up to the situation?
   The maintainer patch which disables CELT

   * What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
 ineffective)?
   Update the package to the most recent version

   * What was the outcome of this action?
   Audio is completely broken since the maintainer-patched client uses an 
incomplete integration of a widely unsupported audio codec (OPUS) and 
completely disables codecs required to communicate with any other released 
version of the software.

   * What outcome did you expect instead?
   A usable VoIP tool.

With disabled CELT, mumble produces horrible audio glitches which are a known 
issue with the current OPUS integration. Furthermore, it means Debian mumble 
clients can no longer sanely communicate with any officially released version. 
In the worst case, it will even break things for other users on a server since 
it shows very incomplete codec support.


-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (700, 'unstable'), (500, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 3.3.4 (SMP w/6 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages mumble depends on:
ii  gconf2 3.2.5-1
ii  libasound2 1.0.25-3
ii  libavahi-client3   0.6.31-1
ii  libavahi-common3   0.6.31-1
ii  libavahi-compat-libdnssd1  0.6.31-1
ii  libc6  2.13-33
ii  libg15daemon-client1   1.9.5.3-8.2
ii  libgcc11:4.7.0-11
ii  libopus0   0.9.14+20120521-2
ii  libprotobuf7   2.4.1-2
ii  libpulse0  2.0-3
ii  libqt4-dbus4:4.8.1-2
ii  libqt4-network 4:4.8.1-2
ii  libqt4-sql 4:4.8.1-2
ii  libqt4-sql-sqlite  4:4.8.1-2
ii  libqt4-svg 4:4.8.1-2
ii  libqt4-xml 4:4.8.1-2
ii  libqtcore4 4:4.8.1-2
ii  libqtgui4  4:4.8.1-2
ii  libsndfile11.0.25-4
ii  libspeechd20.7.1-6.1
ii  libspeex1  1.2~rc1-6
ii  libspeexdsp1   1.2~rc1-6
ii  libssl1.0.01.0.1c-1
ii  libstdc++6 4.7.0-11
ii  libx11-6   2:1.4.99.901-2
ii  libxi6 2:1.6.1-1
ii  lsb-release4.1+Debian6

Versions of packages mumble recommends:
ii  speech-dispatcher  0.7.1-6.1

Versions of packages mumble suggests:
ii  mumble-server  1.2.3-349-g315b5f5-1

-- no debconf information


---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
Source: mumble
Source-Version: 1.2.3-349-g315b5f5-2.1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
mumble, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 675...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Christopher Knadle chris.kna...@coredump.us (supplier of updated mumble 
package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org)


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 04 Oct 2012 11:45:05 -0400
Source: mumble
Binary: mumble mumble-server mumble-dbg
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 1.2.3-349-g315b5f5-2.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Ron Lee r...@debian.org
Changed-By: Christopher Knadle chris.kna...@coredump.us
Description: 
 mumble - Low latency VoIP client
 mumble-dbg - Low latency VoIP client (debugging symbols)
 mumble-server - Low latency VoIP server
Closes: 675971
Changes: 
 mumble (1.2.3-349-g315b5f5-2.1) 

Processed: Re: Bug#690148: Please give back gcc-mingw-w64 (so it rebuilds using gcc-4.6 4.6.3-12)

2012-10-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands:

 tag -1 + pending
Bug #690148 [gcc-mingw32] gcc-mingw32: missing copyright file after upgrade 
from squeeze
Added tag(s) pending.

-- 
690148: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=690148
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#690148: Please give back gcc-mingw-w64 (so it rebuilds using gcc-4.6 4.6.3-12)

2012-10-24 Thread Stephen Kitt
Control: tag -1 + pending

Hi Gregor,

On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 06:49:12PM +0200, gregor herrmann wrote:
 Something like the attached debdiff maybe?
 
 (Note that I haven't built the binary packages, but I've run the
 postinst manually in a chroot after a squeeze → wheezy update of
 gcc-mingw32.)

Sorry, I should have tagged the bug pending! Your patch is exactly
what I submitted for Wheezy approval in http://bugs.debian.org/690810
(tested with binary packages, upgrading from Squeeze and current
Wheezy).

Regards,

Stephen


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#690148: Please give back gcc-mingw-w64 (so it rebuilds using gcc-4.6 4.6.3-12)

2012-10-24 Thread gregor herrmann
On Wed, 24 Oct 2012 19:40:17 +0200, Stephen Kitt wrote:

  Something like the attached debdiff maybe?
 Sorry, I should have tagged the bug pending! Your patch is exactly
 what I submitted for Wheezy approval in http://bugs.debian.org/690810
 (tested with binary packages, upgrading from Squeeze and current
 Wheezy).

Ah, cool, good to see that a fix for this issue is already on its
way.

Cheers,
gregor

-- 
 .''`.  Homepage: http://info.comodo.priv.at/ - OpenPGP key 0xBB3A68018649AA06
 : :' : Debian GNU/Linux user, admin, and developer  -  http://www.debian.org/
 `. `'  Member of VIBE!AT  SPI, fellow of the Free Software Foundation Europe
   `-   NP: Various Artists: Katie


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#687398: More information on how to reproduce the `dlopen' issue

2012-10-24 Thread Asheesh Laroia

On Wed, 24 Oct 2012, gregor herrmann wrote:

The debdiff arrived some minutes later, but I don't see an upload. 
What's the status?


Oh, snap, I neglected to upload the actual NMU. I will do that tonight, 
unless someone (gregoa?) beats me to it.



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#687398: More information on how to reproduce the `dlopen' issue

2012-10-24 Thread gregor herrmann
On Wed, 24 Oct 2012 14:08:11 -0400, Asheesh Laroia wrote:

 The debdiff arrived some minutes later, but I don't see an upload.
 What's the status?
 Oh, snap, I neglected to upload the actual NMU. I will do that
 tonight, unless someone (gregoa?) beats me to it.

I'm happy to leave the honour^Wwork to you as I'm looking at another
RC bug right now :) 


Cheers,
gregor
 
-- 
 .''`.  Homepage: http://info.comodo.priv.at/ - OpenPGP key 0xBB3A68018649AA06
 : :' : Debian GNU/Linux user, admin, and developer  -  http://www.debian.org/
 `. `'  Member of VIBE!AT  SPI, fellow of the Free Software Foundation Europe
   `-   NP: Various Artists: Katie


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Processed: Re: Bug#690147: cyrus-common-2.2: missing copyright file after upgrade from squeeze

2012-10-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands:

 tag -1 + patch
Bug #690147 [cyrus-common-2.2] cyrus-common-2.2: missing copyright file after 
upgrade from squeeze
Added tag(s) patch.

-- 
690147: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=690147
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#690147: cyrus-common-2.2: missing copyright file after upgrade from squeeze

2012-10-24 Thread gregor herrmann
Control: tag -1 + patch

On Wed, 10 Oct 2012 16:00:23 +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:

 Package: cyrus-common-2.2
 Version: 2.4.16-1
 Severity: serious
 User: debian...@lists.debian.org
 Usertags: piuparts

 After the upgrade /usr/share/doc/$package/ is just an empty directory.

 From the attached logfile (scroll to the bottom):
 
   MISSING COPYRIGHT FILE: /usr/share/doc/cyrus-common-2.2/copyright
   drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 40 Oct 10 09:54 /usr/share/doc/cyrus-common-2.2
   total 0
   drwxr-xr-x   2 root root   40 Oct 10 09:54 .
   drwxr-xr-x 120 root root 2560 Oct 10 09:54 ..

I assume that this affects all transitional packages built from this
source package and not only cyrus-common-2.2?

I've prepared a patch now that adds .postinst files for all of them
(replacing the old directory with the new symlink on upgrades).

Reviews welcome!


Cheers,
gregor

-- 
 .''`.  Homepage: http://info.comodo.priv.at/ - OpenPGP key 0xBB3A68018649AA06
 : :' : Debian GNU/Linux user, admin, and developer  -  http://www.debian.org/
 `. `'  Member of VIBE!AT  SPI, fellow of the Free Software Foundation Europe
   `-   NP: Various Artists: Katie
diff -Nru cyrus-imapd-2.4-2.4.16/debian/changelog cyrus-imapd-2.4-2.4.16/debian/changelog
--- cyrus-imapd-2.4-2.4.16/debian/changelog	2012-04-19 14:31:27.0 +0200
+++ cyrus-imapd-2.4-2.4.16/debian/changelog	2012-10-24 20:23:35.0 +0200
@@ -1,3 +1,13 @@
+cyrus-imapd-2.4 (2.4.16-1.1) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
+
+  * Non-maintainer upload.
+  * Fix missing copyright file after upgrade from squeeze:
+add postinst scripts for all transitional packages to handle the 
+directory → symlink transition of their docdirs.
+(Closes: #690147)
+
+ -- gregor herrmann gre...@debian.org  Wed, 24 Oct 2012 18:50:42 +0200
+
 cyrus-imapd-2.4 (2.4.16-1) unstable; urgency=low
 
   * Imported Upstream version 2.4.16
diff -Nru cyrus-imapd-2.4-2.4.16/debian/cyrus-admin-2.2.postinst cyrus-imapd-2.4-2.4.16/debian/cyrus-admin-2.2.postinst
--- cyrus-imapd-2.4-2.4.16/debian/cyrus-admin-2.2.postinst	1970-01-01 01:00:00.0 +0100
+++ cyrus-imapd-2.4-2.4.16/debian/cyrus-admin-2.2.postinst	2012-10-24 20:20:57.0 +0200
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+#!/bin/sh
+
+set -e
+
+# Replace documentation directory with symlink
+docdir=/usr/share/doc/cyrus-admin-2.2
+target=cyrus-common
+
+if [ -d $docdir ]  [ ! -L $docdir ]; then
+	if rmdir $docdir 2/dev/null; then
+		ln -sf $target $docdir
+	fi
+fi
+
+#DEBHELPER#
+
+exit 0
diff -Nru cyrus-imapd-2.4-2.4.16/debian/cyrus-clients-2.2.postinst cyrus-imapd-2.4-2.4.16/debian/cyrus-clients-2.2.postinst
--- cyrus-imapd-2.4-2.4.16/debian/cyrus-clients-2.2.postinst	1970-01-01 01:00:00.0 +0100
+++ cyrus-imapd-2.4-2.4.16/debian/cyrus-clients-2.2.postinst	2012-10-24 20:20:57.0 +0200
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+#!/bin/sh
+
+set -e
+
+# Replace documentation directory with symlink
+docdir=/usr/share/doc/cyrus-clients-2.2
+target=cyrus-common
+
+if [ -d $docdir ]  [ ! -L $docdir ]; then
+	if rmdir $docdir 2/dev/null; then
+		ln -sf $target $docdir
+	fi
+fi
+
+#DEBHELPER#
+
+exit 0
diff -Nru cyrus-imapd-2.4-2.4.16/debian/cyrus-common-2.2.postinst cyrus-imapd-2.4-2.4.16/debian/cyrus-common-2.2.postinst
--- cyrus-imapd-2.4-2.4.16/debian/cyrus-common-2.2.postinst	1970-01-01 01:00:00.0 +0100
+++ cyrus-imapd-2.4-2.4.16/debian/cyrus-common-2.2.postinst	2012-10-24 20:20:57.0 +0200
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+#!/bin/sh
+
+set -e
+
+# Replace documentation directory with symlink
+docdir=/usr/share/doc/cyrus-common-2.2
+target=cyrus-common
+
+if [ -d $docdir ]  [ ! -L $docdir ]; then
+	if rmdir $docdir 2/dev/null; then
+		ln -sf $target $docdir
+	fi
+fi
+
+#DEBHELPER#
+
+exit 0
diff -Nru cyrus-imapd-2.4-2.4.16/debian/cyrus-dev-2.2.postinst cyrus-imapd-2.4-2.4.16/debian/cyrus-dev-2.2.postinst
--- cyrus-imapd-2.4-2.4.16/debian/cyrus-dev-2.2.postinst	1970-01-01 01:00:00.0 +0100
+++ cyrus-imapd-2.4-2.4.16/debian/cyrus-dev-2.2.postinst	2012-10-24 20:20:57.0 +0200
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+#!/bin/sh
+
+set -e
+
+# Replace documentation directory with symlink
+docdir=/usr/share/doc/cyrus-dev-2.2
+target=cyrus-common
+
+if [ -d $docdir ]  [ ! -L $docdir ]; then
+	if rmdir $docdir 2/dev/null; then
+		ln -sf $target $docdir
+	fi
+fi
+
+#DEBHELPER#
+
+exit 0
diff -Nru cyrus-imapd-2.4-2.4.16/debian/cyrus-doc-2.2.postinst cyrus-imapd-2.4-2.4.16/debian/cyrus-doc-2.2.postinst
--- cyrus-imapd-2.4-2.4.16/debian/cyrus-doc-2.2.postinst	1970-01-01 01:00:00.0 +0100
+++ cyrus-imapd-2.4-2.4.16/debian/cyrus-doc-2.2.postinst	2012-10-24 20:20:57.0 +0200
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+#!/bin/sh
+
+set -e
+
+# Replace documentation directory with symlink
+docdir=/usr/share/doc/cyrus-doc-2.2
+target=cyrus-common
+
+if [ -d $docdir ]  [ ! -L $docdir ]; then
+	if rmdir $docdir 2/dev/null; then
+		ln -sf $target $docdir
+	fi
+fi
+
+#DEBHELPER#
+
+exit 0
diff -Nru cyrus-imapd-2.4-2.4.16/debian/cyrus-imapd-2.2.postinst cyrus-imapd-2.4-2.4.16/debian/cyrus-imapd-2.2.postinst
--- 

Bug#688069: liblocale-subcountry-perl: Version checks fail (our $VERSION moved before package Locale::SubCountry)

2012-10-24 Thread gregor herrmann
On Tue, 18 Sep 2012 13:54:35 -0700, Ivan Kohler wrote:

 $ perl -e 'use Locale::SubCountry 54'
 Locale::SubCountry does not define $Locale::SubCountry::VERSION--version 
 check failed at -e line 1.
 
 Sometime after version 1.50, our $VERSION = 1.xx was moved to the top of
 the code, above any package declaration.  It is therefore not declaring
 $Locale::SubCountry::VERSION, and previously-working version checks like
 use Locale::SubCountry 1.42 now throw a fatal error.
 
 The patch below adds a package Locale::SubCountry to the beginning of the
 code.  This seems like typical / best practice for modules, to avoid any
 symbol exports from the intial use statements from polluting the main::
 namespace.

Are you going to upload the fixed package? Or should someone else go
ahead?
 

Cheers,
gregor
 
-- 
 .''`.  Homepage: http://info.comodo.priv.at/ - OpenPGP key 0xBB3A68018649AA06
 : :' : Debian GNU/Linux user, admin, and developer  -  http://www.debian.org/
 `. `'  Member of VIBE!AT  SPI, fellow of the Free Software Foundation Europe
   `-   NP: Ben Weaver: Boxcars


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#690199: Patch

2012-10-24 Thread Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo
Hi Anton,

2012/10/22 Anton Gladky gladky.an...@gmail.com:
 Hello,

 please, consider the following git-patch for package VCS [1],
 which fixes the issue.

Thanks for the patches, I will review and incorporate them soon.

I think that this patch is only part of the story, and that I failed
to document more things in Tools.  I put the stress on the main
library's directories, and forgot about tools, specially because we
only use a couple.

Is this Scintilla code (name of the patch) shared with other packages in Debian?


Cheers.
-- 
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo manuel.montez...@gmail.com


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#690147: cyrus-common-2.2: missing copyright file after upgrade from squeeze

2012-10-24 Thread Andreas Beckmann
On 2012-10-24 20:29, gregor herrmann wrote:
 I assume that this affects all transitional packages built from this
 source package and not only cyrus-common-2.2?

There may be more packages buggy, but are not tested by piuparts if they
(indirectly) depend on other failing packages.

Andreas


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#690147: cyrus-common-2.2: missing copyright file after upgrade from squeeze

2012-10-24 Thread gregor herrmann
On Wed, 24 Oct 2012 22:14:26 +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:

 On 2012-10-24 20:29, gregor herrmann wrote:
  I assume that this affects all transitional packages built from this
  source package and not only cyrus-common-2.2?
 There may be more packages buggy, but are not tested by piuparts if they
 (indirectly) depend on other failing packages.

Thanks, I assumed something like this.

Let's see if one of the 5 uploaders can add some info before we
double-check this for each of the packages :)

Cheers,
gregor

-- 
 .''`.  Homepage: http://info.comodo.priv.at/ - OpenPGP key 0xBB3A68018649AA06
 : :' : Debian GNU/Linux user, admin, and developer  -  http://www.debian.org/
 `. `'  Member of VIBE!AT  SPI, fellow of the Free Software Foundation Europe
   `-   NP: Goldfinger: Don't Say Goodbye


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#690199: Patch

2012-10-24 Thread Anton Gladky
Hi Manuel,

2012/10/24 Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo manuel.montez...@gmail.com:
 I think that this patch is only part of the story, and that I failed
 to document more things in Tools.  I put the stress on the main
 library's directories, and forgot about tools, specially because we
 only use a couple.

I usually use the following command to roughly create a copyright-file:

licensecheck --copyright -r . | /usr/lib/cdbs/licensecheck2dep5 
debian/copyright

 Is this Scintilla code (name of the patch) shared with other packages in 
 Debian?

Sorry, I have no idea.

Cheers,

Anton


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Processed: bug 689831 is forwarded to http://code.google.com/p/gconf-cleaner/issues/detail?id=18

2012-10-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 forwarded 689831 http://code.google.com/p/gconf-cleaner/issues/detail?id=18
Bug #689831 [gconf-cleaner] gconf-cleaner: Impossible to backup configuration
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 
'http://code.google.com/p/gconf-cleaner/issues/detail?id=18'.
 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
689831: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=689831
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#689831: gconf-cleaner: Impossible to backup configuration

2012-10-24 Thread Andrew Starr-Bochicchio
This was reported upstream at:

http://code.google.com/p/gconf-cleaner/issues/detail?id=18

It was also reported in Ubuntu at:

https://bugs.launchpad.net/debian/+source/gconf-cleaner/+bug/764041

The issue seems to be that gconf-cleaner does not support the Schema value:

http://developer.gnome.org/gconf/2.32/gconf-gconf-schema.html#GConfSchema

-- Andrew Starr-Bochicchio

   Ubuntu Developer https://launchpad.net/~andrewsomething
   Debian Maintainer
http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=a.starr.b%40gmail.com
   PGP/GPG Key ID: D53FDCB1


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#690370: Upload rejected

2012-10-24 Thread Anton Gladky
Luca, could you, please, reupload the package with attached
nmu-patch? It should fix the issue.

2 other git-diffs should, probably, be interesting for maintainers to
integrate them into the fife-VCS.

Thanks,

Anton


nmu.debdiff
Description: Binary data


0001-Add-engine-core-util-utf8-utf8-to-copyright-file-Clo.patch
Description: Binary data


0002-Use-packaged-version-of-Glee.patch
Description: Binary data


Bug#633799: getmail causes irrecoverable mail corruption when using mbox

2012-10-24 Thread Christoph Anton Mitterer
Hi.

The getmail developer has released[0] a new upstream version (4.35.0).

It's apparently expected to fix the corruption issue, I haven't been
able to check this, yet.


Could you please package this and get an exception for wheezy?

However, I still think we need to add a warning about the corruption in
the:
- NEWS file
- release notes
but we don't need to add it to the package description/debconf,... if
the fix proves working.


Cheers,
Chris.


[0] http://article.gmane.org/gmane.mail.getmail.announce/140


smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature


Bug#666334: gnustep-back: FTBFS: build-arch doesn't apply patches

2012-10-24 Thread Salvatore Bonaccorso
Control: reopen 666334
Control: found 666334 0.22.0-1
Control: retitle 666334 FTBFS: build-arch problems with patch applying and 
instalation of files genrated only in build-indep target

Hi

(only going to RC bugs for wheezy):

On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 02:37:17PM +0200, Ralf Treinen wrote:
 Control: tags + patch
 
 Hello,
 
 this bug still has to be dealt with in wheezy, since the release team 
 most probably won't accept the new upstream version into wheezy. Here
 is a trivial patch:
 
 
 % debdiff *.dsc
 diff -u gnustep-back-0.20.1/debian/changelog 
 gnustep-back-0.20.1/debian/changelog
 --- gnustep-back-0.20.1/debian/changelog
 +++ gnustep-back-0.20.1/debian/changelog
 @@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
 +gnustep-back (0.20.1-3) unstable; urgency=low
 +
 +  * NMU
 +  * debian/rules: targets build-arch and build-indep, not build, must depend
 +on patch (closes: #666334)
 +
 + -- Ralf Treinen trei...@debian.org  Mon, 30 Jul 2012 14:25:59 +0200
 +
  gnustep-back (0.20.1-2) unstable; urgency=low
  
* Upload to unstable.
 diff -u gnustep-back-0.20.1/debian/rules gnustep-back-0.20.1/debian/rules
 --- gnustep-back-0.20.1/debian/rules
 +++ gnustep-back-0.20.1/debian/rules
 @@ -112,16 +112,16 @@
  
   touch $@
  
 -build: patch build-indep build-arch
 +build: build-indep build-arch
  
 -build-indep: debian/build-indep-stamp
 +build-indep: patch debian/build-indep-stamp
  clean_files += debian/build-indep-stamp
  debian/build-indep-stamp: config
   $(MAKE) -C Documentation messages=yes
  
   touch $@
  
 -build-arch: debian/build-art-stamp debian/build-cairo-stamp
 +build-arch: patch debian/build-art-stamp debian/build-cairo-stamp
  clean_files += debian/build-art-stamp debian/build-cairo-stamp
  debian/build-art-stamp: debian/configure-art-stamp
   dh_testdir

This unfortunately seems not enough to fix the issue: When building
not package FTBFS with:

cut-cut-cut-cut-cut-cut-
Making install for bundle libgnustep-cairo-020...
 Creating 
/build/build-gnustep-back_0.20.1-2.1-amd64-xpAXlq/gnustep-back-0.20.1/debian/gnustep-back0.20-cairo//usr/lib/GNUstep/Bundles...
 Installing bundle directory...
make[1]: Leaving directory 
`/build/build-gnustep-back_0.20.1-2.1-amd64-xpAXlq/gnustep-back-0.20.1/build-cairo/Source'
: # Allow it to be used as a default backend
dh_link -pgnustep-back0.20-cairo \
  
/usr/lib/GNUstep/Bundles/libgnustep-cairo-020.bundle/libgnustep-cairo-020 \
  
/usr/lib/GNUstep/Bundles/libgnustep-cairo-020.bundle/libgnustep-back-020
dh_testdir -a
dh_testroot -a
dh_installchangelogs -a ChangeLog
dh_installdocs -a Documentation/{ANNOUNCE,NEWS,README}
cp: cannot stat `Documentation/ANNOUNCE': No such file or directory
dh_installdocs: cp -a Documentation/ANNOUNCE 
debian/gnustep-back0.20-art/usr/share/doc/gnustep-back0.20-art returned exit 
code 1
make: *** [binary-arch] Error 2
dpkg-buildpackage: error: /usr/bin/fakeroot debian/rules binary-arch gave error 
exit status 2
cut-cut-cut-cut-cut-cut-

This happens also in the experimental version.

@Yavor, so this still affects wheezy. I can try to help and provide a
patch and/or do an NMU (time permitting), in case Ralf cannot do right
now. Please let me know.

Due the above I have, reopened the bug, retitled to reflect that there
seems a more general problem using build-arch/build-indep targets in
debian/rules.

Regards,
Salvatore


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Processed: Re: Bug#666334: gnustep-back: FTBFS: build-arch doesn't apply patches

2012-10-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands:

 reopen 666334
Bug #666334 {Done: Yavor Doganov ya...@gnu.org} [src:gnustep-back] 
gnustep-back: FTBFS: build-arch doesn't apply patches
'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version;
all fixed versions will be cleared, and you may need to re-add them.
Bug reopened
No longer marked as fixed in versions gnustep-back/0.22.0-1.
 found 666334 0.22.0-1
Bug #666334 [src:gnustep-back] gnustep-back: FTBFS: build-arch doesn't apply 
patches
Marked as found in versions gnustep-back/0.22.0-1.
 retitle 666334 FTBFS: build-arch problems with patch applying and instalation 
 of files genrated only in build-indep target
Bug #666334 [src:gnustep-back] gnustep-back: FTBFS: build-arch doesn't apply 
patches
Changed Bug title to 'FTBFS: build-arch problems with patch applying and 
instalation of files genrated only in build-indep target' from 'gnustep-back: 
FTBFS: build-arch doesn't apply patches'

-- 
666334: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=666334
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#691376: schroot: session recovery mounts $device, not $mount-device, for LVM snapshots

2012-10-24 Thread Roger Leigh
Package: schroot
Version: 1.6.3-1
Severity: serious
Tags: security
Justification: Security violation and potential for dataloss

Originally reported here:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/schroot/+bug/1070008

Calling --recover-session on a session using an LVM snapshot, it
remounts using the original LV rather than the snapshot LV.

This is due to this check failing:
sbuild::chroot_block_device_base::set_device():

  /// @todo: This may not be appropriate for derived classes such as
  /// lvm_snapshot, since re-setting the device could overwrite the
  /// mount device.
  chroot_facet_mountable::ptr pmnt
(get_facetchroot_facet_mountable());
#ifdef SBUILD_FEATURE_LVMSNAP
  if (!dynamic_castchroot_lvm_snapshot *(this))
#endif
pmnt-set_mount_device(this-device);

This is due to the use of dynamic_cast in this method.  This is
not in itself wrong, but because this method is called from the
constructor, the dynamic_cast returns null due to the vptr not
yet having any knowledge of the derived class--it will work fine
once the base class is constructed.

This was already commented in several places to refactor to clean
this up, but the presence of this issue will require this to be
done immediately.

I've tagged this security due to the potential for a user to access
the original source chroot.  However, the scope is relatively
limited since the filesystem permissions will prevent them from
doing anything they should not (unless you granted them root
access, in which case they already had the ability to do this).


Regards,
Roger

-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.32.33-kvm-i386-2028-dirty (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages schroot depends on:
ii  libboost-filesystem1.49.0   1.49.0-3.1
ii  libboost-iostreams1.49.01.49.0-3.1
ii  libboost-program-options1.49.0  1.49.0-3.1
ii  libboost-regex1.49.01.49.0-3.1
ii  libboost-system1.49.0   1.49.0-3.1
ii  libc6   2.13-35
ii  libgcc1 1:4.7.1-7
ii  liblockdev1 1.0.3-1.5
ii  libpam0g1.1.3-7.1
ii  libstdc++6  4.7.1-7
ii  libuuid12.20.1-5.2
ii  schroot-common  1.6.3-1

schroot recommends no packages.

Versions of packages schroot suggests:
pn  aufs-modules | unionfs-modules  none
pn  btrfs-tools none
ii  debootstrap 1.0.42
pn  lvm2none
pn  qemu-user-staticnone

-- Configuration Files:
/etc/schroot/schroot.conf changed [not included]

-- no debconf information


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#687403: libio-async-loop-epoll-perl: FTBFS: test failed

2012-10-24 Thread gregor herrmann
Control: reassign -1 libio-async-perl
Control: found -1 0.51-1
# we could also merge it with #680790 but meh.

On Thu, 18 Oct 2012 10:48:37 +0200, gregor herrmann wrote:

   Should this be _CAN_SUBSECOND_ACCURATELY = 0 to turn it off unless
   some loop test explicitly sets it?
  
  Ok, some investigation:
  The tests can either be skipped by
  - either setting _CAN_SUBSECOND_ACCURATELY to 0 in libio-async-perl
  - or in libio-async-loop-epoll-perl
  
  Both patches attached.
 
 Paul, did you have a change to look into this issue?
 
 (FWIW: My intuition is that setting _CAN_SUBSECOND_ACCURATELY to 0 as
 the default would make sense.)

In a quick chat on IRC Paul confirmed this -- thanks.

Cheers,
gregor, preparing an upload
 
-- 
 .''`.  Homepage: http://info.comodo.priv.at/ - OpenPGP key 0xBB3A68018649AA06
 : :' : Debian GNU/Linux user, admin, and developer  -  http://www.debian.org/
 `. `'  Member of VIBE!AT  SPI, fellow of the Free Software Foundation Europe
   `-   NP: Paul Mc Cartney: However Absurd


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Processed: Re: Bug#687403: libio-async-loop-epoll-perl: FTBFS: test failed

2012-10-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands:

 reassign -1 libio-async-perl
Bug #687403 [src:libio-async-loop-epoll-perl] libio-async-loop-epoll-perl: 
FTBFS: test failed
Bug reassigned from package 'src:libio-async-loop-epoll-perl' to 
'libio-async-perl'.
No longer marked as found in versions libio-async-loop-epoll-perl/0.12-1.
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #687403 to the same values 
previously set
 found -1 0.51-1
Bug #687403 [libio-async-perl] libio-async-loop-epoll-perl: FTBFS: test failed
Marked as found in versions libio-async-perl/0.51-1.

-- 
687403: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=687403
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Processed: your mail

2012-10-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 tags 690142 + patch
Bug #690142 [bind9] remote named DoS on recursor (CVE-2012-5166)
Added tag(s) patch.
 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
690142: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=690142
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#687403: Pending fixes for bugs in the libio-async-perl package

2012-10-24 Thread pkg-perl-maintainers
tag 687403 + pending
thanks

Some bugs in the libio-async-perl package are closed in revision
191f3e206e424a8f810fd1b6124f48b620404b8f in branch 'master' by gregor
herrmann

The full diff can be seen at
http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-perl/packages/libio-async-perl.git;a=commitdiff;h=191f3e2

Commit message:

Update subscond.patch: set _CAN_SUBSECOND_ACCURATELY to 0.

Turn of the subsecond tests by default, individual loops can than enable
them. -- Change confirmed by upstream on IRC.

Closes: #687403
Thanks: Paul LeoNerd Evans for confirming this fix.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Processed: Pending fixes for bugs in the libio-async-perl package

2012-10-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 tag 687403 + pending
Bug #687403 [libio-async-perl] libio-async-loop-epoll-perl: FTBFS: test failed
Added tag(s) pending.
 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
687403: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=687403
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Processed: affects 687403

2012-10-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 affects 687403 libio-async-loop-epoll-perl
Bug #687403 [libio-async-perl] libio-async-loop-epoll-perl: FTBFS: test failed
Added indication that 687403 affects libio-async-loop-epoll-perl
 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
687403: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=687403
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#581113: marked as done (infiniband-diags: bashism in /bin/sh script)

2012-10-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 24 Oct 2012 22:02:26 +
with message-id e1tr91u-0008au...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#581113: fixed in infiniband-diags 1.4.4-20090314-1.2
has caused the Debian Bug report #581113,
regarding infiniband-diags: bashism in /bin/sh script
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
581113: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=581113
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: infiniband-diags
Severity: important
Version: 1.4.4-20090314-1
User: debian-rele...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: goal-dash

Hello maintainer,

While performing an archive wide checkbashisms (from the 'devscripts' package)
check I've found your package containing a /bin/sh script making use
of a bashism.

checkbashisms' output:
 possible bashism in ./usr/sbin/set_nodedesc line 8 ($HOST(TYPE|NAME)):
 newname=$HOSTNAME
 possible bashism in ./usr/sbin/set_nodedesc line 11 ('function' is
 useless):
 function usage
 possible bashism in ./usr/sbin/set_nodedesc line 18 ($HOST(TYPE|NAME)):
 echo   Default is to use the hostname: \$HOSTNAME\
 possible bashism in ./usr/sbin/set_nodedesc line 22 ('function' is
 useless):
 function viewall


Not using bash (or a Debian Policy compliant shell interpreter that doesn't
provide such an extra feature) as /bin/sh is likely to lead to errors or
unexpected behaviours. Please be aware that dash is now the default /bin/sh.

Hints about how to fix bashisms can be found at:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DashAsBinSh

If you still don't know how to fix the bashisms don't hesitate to reply to
this email, or tag the bug as 'help'.

Thank you,
Raphael Geissert


---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
Source: infiniband-diags
Source-Version: 1.4.4-20090314-1.2

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
infiniband-diags, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 581...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Michael Gilbert mgilb...@debian.org (supplier of updated infiniband-diags 
package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org)


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2012 17:47:02 -0400
Source: infiniband-diags
Binary: infiniband-diags
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 1.4.4-20090314-1.2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: OFED and Debian Developement and Discussion 
pkg-ofed-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Changed-By: Michael Gilbert mgilb...@debian.org
Description: 
 infiniband-diags - InfiniBand diagnostic programs
Closes: 581113
Changes: 
 infiniband-diags (1.4.4-20090314-1.2) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * Non-maintainer upload.
   * Fix bashisms in scripts/set_nodedesc.sh (closes: #581113).
Checksums-Sha1: 
 62ccce6b30441506483595d96363b2d6e688e48b 2828 
infiniband-diags_1.4.4-20090314-1.2.dsc
 73de12f8f4401caa717e2b60f5d14bda4d44967f 6847 
infiniband-diags_1.4.4-20090314-1.2.debian.tar.gz
 ef628e1127d65a22925f69a5987114a1bffabbf2 180566 
infiniband-diags_1.4.4-20090314-1.2_amd64.deb
Checksums-Sha256: 
 54faece8be0f5342c053a6506235aff0a05bc4b41bcbe24129b8fe9acdf871e8 2828 
infiniband-diags_1.4.4-20090314-1.2.dsc
 d7013fb0f3936b10a772f1d9de30363a551eb07ad911356b93bd9fc3306e8b11 6847 
infiniband-diags_1.4.4-20090314-1.2.debian.tar.gz
 11aaab2c93d95753f8bb19355899a5d489dea185a518472c731596822bcda2b6 180566 
infiniband-diags_1.4.4-20090314-1.2_amd64.deb
Files: 
 cac88f530c20fd668ff0227a50d0da46 2828 net extra 
infiniband-diags_1.4.4-20090314-1.2.dsc
 83d370cf6e19fbc611c09eb98551e03d 6847 net extra 
infiniband-diags_1.4.4-20090314-1.2.debian.tar.gz
 7fe76acf2824b3001a3ed48f1b02f890 180566 net extra 
infiniband-diags_1.4.4-20090314-1.2_amd64.deb

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)

iQQcBAEBCAAGBQJQhb89AAoJELjWss0C1vRzzo4f/0i3wxSG2IszYk2yrPi4Wt5d
gzzhqWW/mmgs/Ltahl9GxCNuvg1CnY933bn70XHSItf4QHS5O92dctMcHATapy7T
iBo8bewzncPjuG9ODYErfzSVzgtjEAmQZV17gUAcuHc/jYRDS5qrsgDoWR5MHsTc
v7x1Q+3c7xuA6RqaBvQMgTHOlT1QPbHIKahl1traQnu71pgWFP+kI97thXIPX1KG
zKnzwTdoK1taBpjMXTaEFriWqRnDVyB+HvnsvDE1Q59polAj0Rqp0WUpFTTIGdQ2
V1p7D0bQJ/ohQTLmwE4UEJYLB0eFXTQM+mBAFSbnDdR8B4aJKX1oyjrQn26EzVXE

Bug#687403: marked as done (libio-async-loop-epoll-perl: FTBFS: test failed)

2012-10-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 24 Oct 2012 22:02:31 +
with message-id e1tr91z-0008dl...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#687403: fixed in libio-async-perl 0.51-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #687403,
regarding libio-async-loop-epoll-perl: FTBFS: test failed
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
687403: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=687403
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Source: libio-async-loop-epoll-perl
Version: 0.12-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120912 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS in wheezy on amd64

Hi,

[ It seems that the fix for #680790 was not applied to
libio-async-loop-epoll-perl ? Or is it only because the fixed
libio-async-perl did not reach testing? ]

During a rebuild of all packages in *wheezy*, your package failed to
build on amd64.

Relevant part:
  debian/rules build
 dh build
dh_testdir
dh_auto_configure
 Created MYMETA.yml and MYMETA.json
 Creating new 'Build' script for 'IO-Async-Loop-Epoll' version '0.12'
dh_auto_build
 Building IO-Async-Loop-Epoll
dh_auto_test
 t/00use.t ... ok
 t/01loop-io.t ... ok
 
 #   Failed test 'One -loop_once(1) sufficient for a single 0.1 second timer'
 #   at /usr/share/perl5/IO/Async/LoopTests.pm line 484.
 #  got: '2'
 # expected: '1'
 # Looks like you failed 1 test of 26.
 t/02loop-timer.t  
 Dubious, test returned 1 (wstat 256, 0x100)
 Failed 1/26 subtests 
 t/03loop-signal.t ... ok
 t/04loop-idle.t . ok
 t/05loop-child.t  ok
 t/06loop-control.t .. ok
 t/99pod.t ... ok
 
 Test Summary Report
 ---
 t/02loop-timer.t  (Wstat: 256 Tests: 26 Failed: 1)
   Failed test:  20
   Non-zero exit status: 1
 Files=8, Tests=105, 16 wallclock secs ( 0.06 usr  0.04 sys +  0.51 cusr  0.15 
 csys =  0.76 CPU)
 Result: FAIL
 Failed 1/8 test programs. 1/105 subtests failed.
 dh_auto_test: perl Build test returned exit code 255
 make: *** [build] Error 255

The full build log is available from:
   
http://people.debian.org/~lucas/logs/2012/09/12/libio-async-loop-epoll-perl_0.12-1_wheezy.log

A list of current common problems and possible solutions is available at 
http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS . You're welcome to contribute!

About the archive rebuild: The rebuild was done on EC2 VM instances from
Amazon Web Services, using a clean, minimal and up-to-date chroot. Every
failed build was retried once to eliminate random failures.
---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
Source: libio-async-perl
Source-Version: 0.51-4

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
libio-async-perl, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 687...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
gregor herrmann gre...@debian.org (supplier of updated libio-async-perl 
package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org)


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2012 23:43:00 +0200
Source: libio-async-perl
Binary: libio-async-perl
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.51-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Perl Group pkg-perl-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Changed-By: gregor herrmann gre...@debian.org
Description: 
 libio-async-perl - module providing asynchronous filehandle I/O
Closes: 687403
Changes: 
 libio-async-perl (0.51-4) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Update subscond.patch: set _CAN_SUBSECOND_ACCURATELY to 0.
 Turn of the subsecond tests by default, individual loops can than enable
 them. -- Change confirmed by upstream on IRC. Thanks to Paul LeoNerd
 Evans for confirming this fix. (Closes: #687403)
Checksums-Sha1: 
 4a7b856d8e1ee46687a56b14bc09dfc7a11ed768 2352 libio-async-perl_0.51-4.dsc
 8d6f1017a78cc8b1746a375851210fa640300d0e 5289 
libio-async-perl_0.51-4.debian.tar.gz
 5f3fd24e9339a831531ac4f0514a76e1d3137e3f 262772 libio-async-perl_0.51-4_all.deb
Checksums-Sha256: 
 242c9e4fbc469d5160c7905c621c161aab8c54af8bedbe14f79d6d3326b5cd2c 2352 
libio-async-perl_0.51-4.dsc
 bbc11645f35bce996d871d323132174c862981a942a003a2cd0078d94e65ab12 5289 

Bug#691306: iptables add 4 rules instead just one in kernel INPUT chain

2012-10-24 Thread Jean-Michel Vourgère
Hint:
If you comment out ::1 localhost in /etc/hosts, the problem disappears.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Processed: your mail

2012-10-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 found 691306 iptables/1.4.14-3
Bug #691306 [iptables] [iptables] iptables add 4 rules instead just one in 
kernel INPUT chain
Marked as found in versions iptables/1.4.14-3.

End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
691306: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=691306
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#691215: X request failed: BadDrawable

2012-10-24 Thread Antonio Terceiro
Antoine Beaupré escreveu:
 On 2012-10-23, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
  git clone git://wiki.reseaulibre.ca/
 
  I killed the git clone after a couple minutes, it's taking too long.
  Can you please provide a tarball with only the presentation files intead
  (.pin + background images)?
 
 Understood.
 
 Should I attach it straight to the bug report or host it somewhere else?

If it's not too big (a few hundred kb), I guess the bug report is OK.
Otherwise you can upload it somewhere and give me an URL (and a
sha1sum?).

-- 
Antonio Terceiro terce...@debian.org


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#691376: [buildd-tools-devel] Bug#691376: schroot: session recovery mounts $device, not $mount-device, for LVM snapshots

2012-10-24 Thread Roger Leigh
tags 1.6.3-1 + patch pending
thanks

On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 10:23:27PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:

Patch to address this issue.  Note that this is not yet completely
tested for all the other block-device-using chroot types.  **Do
not apply until tested.**

commit 19293f7a7b0943997397ef30465cd11686990a9b
Author: Roger Leigh rle...@debian.org
Date:   Wed Oct 24 23:25:10 2012 +0100

sbuild: Don't call set_mount_device indirectly from ctor

See #691376.

sbuild::chroot_block_device_base::set_device was called from
the chroot_block_device_base ctor, and called
sbuild::chroot_facet_mountable::set_mount_device for all chroot
types except lvm-snapshot.  However, dynamic_cast fails during
construction, leading to the mount device being overwritten, and
--recover-session mounting the source LV rather than the snapshot
LV.  This patch moves the call to set_mount_device to the session
clone operation in sbuild::chroot_facet_session_clonable, which
is where the equivalent operation is done for lvm-snapshot.  This
is done prior to lvm-snapshot to ensure that the snapshot is not
overwritten here either.

diff --git a/sbuild/sbuild-chroot-block-device-base.cc 
b/sbuild/sbuild-chroot-block-device-base.cc
index 2f2f958..86f3af6 100644
--- a/sbuild/sbuild-chroot-block-device-base.cc
+++ b/sbuild/sbuild-chroot-block-device-base.cc
@@ -46,12 +46,8 @@ chroot_block_device_base::chroot_block_device_base ():
 chroot_block_device_base::chroot_block_device_base
 (const chroot_block_device_base rhs):
   chroot(rhs),
-  device()
+  device(rhs.device)
 {
-  /// @todo Required to set mount_device.  Remove once no longer
-  /// needed.
-  if (!rhs.device.empty())
-set_device(rhs.device);
 }
 
 chroot_block_device_base::~chroot_block_device_base ()
@@ -71,16 +67,6 @@ chroot_block_device_base::set_device (std::string const 
device)
 throw error(device, DEVICE_ABS);
 
   this-device = device;
-
-  /// @todo: This may not be appropriate for derived classes such as
-  /// lvm_snapshot, since re-setting the device could overwrite the
-  /// mount device.
-  chroot_facet_mountable::ptr pmnt
-(get_facetchroot_facet_mountable());
-#ifdef SBUILD_FEATURE_LVMSNAP
-  if (!dynamic_castchroot_lvm_snapshot *(this))
-#endif
-pmnt-set_mount_device(this-device);
 }
 
 std::string
diff --git a/sbuild/sbuild-chroot-facet-session-clonable.cc 
b/sbuild/sbuild-chroot-facet-session-clonable.cc
index 408e9ab..1d924ad 100644
--- a/sbuild/sbuild-chroot-facet-session-clonable.cc
+++ b/sbuild/sbuild-chroot-facet-session-clonable.cc
@@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
 #include config.h
 
 #include sbuild-chroot.h
+#include sbuild-chroot-facet-mountable.h
 #include sbuild-chroot-facet-session.h
 #include sbuild-chroot-facet-session-clonable.h
 #include sbuild-chroot-facet-source-clonable.h
@@ -138,6 +139,19 @@ chroot_facet_session_clonable::clone_session_setup 
(chroot::ptr   clone,
  format(Mount Location: %1%) % clone-get_mount_location()
  endl;
 
+  /* Block devices need the mount device name specifying. */
+  /* Note that this will be overridden by LVM snapshot, below, so the
+ order here is important. */
+  std::shared_ptrchroot_block_device_base 
blockdevbase(std::dynamic_pointer_castchroot_block_device_base(clone));
+  if (blockdevbase)
+{
+  chroot_facet_mountable::ptr pmnt
+   (clone-get_facetchroot_facet_mountable());
+  if (pmnt)
+   pmnt-set_mount_device(blockdevbase-get_device());
+}
+
+
 #ifdef SBUILD_FEATURE_LVMSNAP
   /* LVM devices need the snapshot device name specifying. */
   std::shared_ptrchroot_lvm_snapshot 
snapshot(std::dynamic_pointer_castchroot_lvm_snapshot(clone));


-- 
  .''`.  Roger Leigh
 : :' :  Debian GNU/Linuxhttp://people.debian.org/~rleigh/
 `. `'   schroot and sbuild  http://alioth.debian.org/projects/buildd-tools
   `-GPG Public Key  F33D 281D 470A B443 6756 147C 07B3 C8BC 4083 E800


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#686845: sympa: install fails when using sympa with sqlite3

2012-10-24 Thread Emmanuel Bouthenot
Hi,

About these two bugs, there is actually 2 issues. Here is the status:

 1) A new installation with the sqlite backend didn't work and leads
to the bug described in #686846
 2) The upgrade from squeeze? to wheezy of sympa using sqlite backend
fails: sympa is unable to upgrade sqlite schema

About 1) I've already fixed it in my local devel branch.
About 2) I'm currently working on it but it could affect 1)

I'll try upload sympa with these 2 bugs fixed within the following days.


M.

-- 
Emmanuel Bouthenot
  mail: kolter@{openics,debian}.orggpg: 4096R/0x929D42C3
  xmpp: kol...@im.openics.org  irc: kolter@{freenode,oftc}


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Processed: Pending

2012-10-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 tags 691376 + patch pending
Bug #691376 [schroot] schroot: session recovery mounts $device, not 
$mount-device, for LVM snapshots
Added tag(s) pending and patch.
 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
691376: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=691376
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#691306: iptables add 4 rules instead just one in kernel INPUT chain

2012-10-24 Thread Jean-Michel Vourgère
I traced that behavior to host_to_ipaddr function in libxtables/xtables.c

--source hostname will match all the IP addresses of hostname.
Same thing for --destination

The problem is that gethostbyname(localhost) returns two results: 127.0.0.1 
and 127.0.0.1 (yes, the same thing).

So this might be a bug in libc

--source localhost --destination localhost wrongly yields 2x2 = 4 combination 
of addresses


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Bug#691306: Bug #691306: iptables add 4 rules instead just one in kernel INPUT chain

2012-10-24 Thread Jean-Michel Vourgère
Hi libc folks,

iptables --insert --source localhost ...
is currently creating duplicate entries.

I believe this is because of a problem in gethostbyname(localhost) that
returns duplicate answers.

Attached is a tiny test case.

./main
127.0.0.1
120.0.0.1

If I comment out ::1 localhost in my /etc/hosts file, I only get one answer:

./main
127.0.0.1

Has anything like that bent repported/fixed recently?
#include stdio.h
#include netdb.h
#include arpa/inet.h

int main() {
	
	struct hostent *host;
	struct in_addr **addr;

	host = gethostbyname(localhost);

	if (!host
	 || host-h_addrtype != AF_INET
	 || host-h_length != sizeof(struct in_addr))
		return -1;

	for(addr=host-h_addr_list; *addr; ++addr)
		puts(inet_ntoa(**addr));

	return 0;
}


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Bug#451137: aptitude update succeeds despite hash sum mismatch, etc.

2012-10-24 Thread Christoph Anton Mitterer
Hi.

Questions:

a) Did this just affect the command line aptitude update or also the
interactive u (well I guess so)?


b) Is the problem just, that I don't get a proper exit/status, error
message? Or were really (possibly forged) repo files added to the system
and subsequently possibly compromised packages installed?

I mean would have aptitude recognised is later that something is
fishy,... and stopped installation of packages or not?


Cheers,
Chris.


smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature


Bug#672030: Fwd: Re: Cannot build beast with gcc 4.7

2012-10-24 Thread Tim Janik
On 20.10.2012 12:42, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
 Hi Tim,

 I wonder if there is any news on this bug on your side?

Beast 0.7.6 with full support for g++-4.7 has been released now, see our
website: http://beast.testbit.eu/

The full announcement is here:
  https://mail.gnome.org/archives/beast/2012-October/msg0.html

Let me know if you have any further problems and thanks for your efforts.

-- 
Yours sincerely,
Tim Janik

---
http://timj.testbit.eu/ - Free software Author


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#683555: subversion: not working at all SASL context error

2012-10-24 Thread Faidon Liambotis
reassign 683555 libsasl2-2
forcemerge 636534 683555
forwarded 636534 https://bugzilla.cyrusimap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3589
tags 636534 + fixed-upstream
severity 636534 important
thanks

On Thu, Aug 02, 2012 at 01:59:36AM +0900, Norbert Preining wrote:
 due to a broken laptop I had to switch to an old one. After upgrading
 from a about 2 year old system, suddenly my svn is completely
 broken wrt to svn:// URLs. ALl trials (co, up, ...) terminate with
 the same error:
 
 $ svn up
 Updating '.':
 svn: E170001: Unable to connect to a repository at URL 
 'svn://u...@server.org/some/path'
 svn: E170001: Could not create SASL context: generic failure: No such file or 
 directory
 $
 
 The same happens with svn+ssh://... on svn.debian.org

So, I was bitten by this as well. It seems that this bug is breaking
Subversion on upgrades on systems that don't have a correct hostname.

Having a broken hostname is of course bad, but this shouldn't stop
Subversion from working, esp. since it's a regression from squeeze.

It appears that it's not that uncommon: we had two separate bug reports
with multiple reporters in Debian, there's a similar openSUSE¹ bug, a
similar MacPorts bug² etc. It also affects more than Subversion; KMail 
Kontact have been explictly mentioned.

So, I'm bumping the severity to important -- I also considered serious/RC,
but I'll leave that up to the maintainer.

The issue seems to have been fixed upstream with commit
8fc14fd702897e652a38384af2f55e51752e8c15, as mentioned in the upstream
bug report³, so I think it'd be great if this ended up backported into
wheezy.

Thanks,
Faidon

¹: https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=771983
²: https://trac.macports.org/ticket/34861
³: https://bugzilla.cyrusimap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3589


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Processed: Re: Bug#683555: subversion: not working at all SASL context error

2012-10-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 reassign 683555 libsasl2-2
Bug #683555 [subversion] subversion: not working at all SASL context error
Bug reassigned from package 'subversion' to 'libsasl2-2'.
No longer marked as found in versions subversion/1.7.5-1.
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #683555 to the same values 
previously set
 forcemerge 636534 683555
Bug #636534 [libsasl2-2] libsasl2-2: Hostname lookup has to succeed in 2.1.24 
(didn't matter in 2.1.23)
Bug #645435 [libsasl2-2] svn: generic failure with latest libsasl2-2
Bug #683555 [libsasl2-2] subversion: not working at all SASL context error
Severity set to 'normal' from 'serious'
Marked as found in versions cyrus-sasl2/2.1.24~rc1.dfsg1+cvs2011-05-23-4.
Bug #645435 [libsasl2-2] svn: generic failure with latest libsasl2-2
Merged 636534 645435 683555
 forwarded 636534 https://bugzilla.cyrusimap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3589
Bug #636534 [libsasl2-2] libsasl2-2: Hostname lookup has to succeed in 2.1.24 
(didn't matter in 2.1.23)
Bug #645435 [libsasl2-2] svn: generic failure with latest libsasl2-2
Bug #683555 [libsasl2-2] subversion: not working at all SASL context error
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 
'https://bugzilla.cyrusimap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3589'.
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 
'https://bugzilla.cyrusimap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3589'.
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 
'https://bugzilla.cyrusimap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3589'.
 tags 636534 + fixed-upstream
Bug #636534 [libsasl2-2] libsasl2-2: Hostname lookup has to succeed in 2.1.24 
(didn't matter in 2.1.23)
Bug #645435 [libsasl2-2] svn: generic failure with latest libsasl2-2
Bug #683555 [libsasl2-2] subversion: not working at all SASL context error
Added tag(s) fixed-upstream.
Added tag(s) fixed-upstream.
Added tag(s) fixed-upstream.
 severity 636534 important
Bug #636534 [libsasl2-2] libsasl2-2: Hostname lookup has to succeed in 2.1.24 
(didn't matter in 2.1.23)
Bug #645435 [libsasl2-2] svn: generic failure with latest libsasl2-2
Bug #683555 [libsasl2-2] subversion: not working at all SASL context error
Severity set to 'important' from 'normal'
Severity set to 'important' from 'normal'
Severity set to 'important' from 'normal'
 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
636534: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=636534
645435: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=645435
683555: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=683555
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#691394: opendkim: DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) Verifiers may inappropriately convey message trust

2012-10-24 Thread Scott Kitterman
Package: opendkim
Version: 2.0.1+dfsg-1
Severity: grave
Tags: security upstream
Justification: user security hole

See http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/268267, VU#268267

opendkim in squeeze, wheezy, sid offers no method to prevent use of keys
less than 1024 bits.  This is added in the new upstream release, 2.6.8, that
was released just for this issue.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#691394: marked as done (opendkim: DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) Verifiers may inappropriately convey message trust)

2012-10-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 25 Oct 2012 05:47:31 +
with message-id e1trghz-0006ih...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#691394: fixed in opendkim 2.6.8-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #691394,
regarding opendkim: DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) Verifiers may 
inappropriately convey message trust
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
691394: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=691394
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: opendkim
Version: 2.0.1+dfsg-1
Severity: grave
Tags: security upstream
Justification: user security hole

See http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/268267, VU#268267

opendkim in squeeze, wheezy, sid offers no method to prevent use of keys
less than 1024 bits.  This is added in the new upstream release, 2.6.8, that
was released just for this issue.
---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
Source: opendkim
Source-Version: 2.6.8-1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
opendkim, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 691...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Scott Kitterman sc...@kitterman.com (supplier of updated opendkim package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org)


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2012 01:04:27 -0400
Source: opendkim
Binary: opendkim opendkim-tools libopendkim7 libopendkim-dev libvbr2 libvbr-dev
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.6.8-1
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Mike Markley m...@markley.org
Changed-By: Scott Kitterman sc...@kitterman.com
Description: 
 libopendkim-dev - Headers and development libraries for the OpenDKIM library
 libopendkim7 - Library for signing and verifying DomainKeys Identified Mail 
sign
 libvbr-dev - Headers and development libraries for the OpenDKIM VBR library
 libvbr2- Library for RFC 5518 Vouch By Reference (VBR)
 opendkim   - Milter implementation of DomainKeys Identified Mail
 opendkim-tools - Set of command line tools for OpenDKIM
Closes: 691394
Changes: 
 opendkim (2.6.8-1) experimental; urgency=low
 .
   * New upstream security release to add capability to exclude use of
 insecure keys (Closes: #691394, LP: #1071139)
Checksums-Sha1: 
 794583903556c78846607cefc641ab9189a48d49 1397 opendkim_2.6.8-1.dsc
 c15cce7f254190567c4b96508a9d94f68ea806e8 1141247 opendkim_2.6.8.orig.tar.gz
 00efa7109a185afee0845c8b11e51ab9eda5c87c 13100 opendkim_2.6.8-1.diff.gz
 f2ae7f1802b9f887133e55410d7778ef8ac6f35c 177920 opendkim_2.6.8-1_i386.deb
 d78e46bf01b05dcd6dce1a0932f8f74f74b2e5b7 167024 opendkim-tools_2.6.8-1_i386.deb
 92efaabf58081b9629879f625e38a414a2de9fd9 86862 libopendkim7_2.6.8-1_i386.deb
 f91a70d0fcd56afedae063043f363a11a94e7ecd 175036 
libopendkim-dev_2.6.8-1_i386.deb
 355ba5a9ab2ad00740bef1ead0cbc10ee9387184 35256 libvbr2_2.6.8-1_i386.deb
 35ad6c0097cfcf7cb76cfb37dcc9dbbe3050e31d 39022 libvbr-dev_2.6.8-1_i386.deb
Checksums-Sha256: 
 ab24aea2e141cdfbc17f7b3682c414f68d2a099a927268ffa2de328d25190bc8 1397 
opendkim_2.6.8-1.dsc
 1b2e9033842634a1dc891afa10a94ba58c0e7663670e2faf117b27bead541edc 1141247 
opendkim_2.6.8.orig.tar.gz
 caeac4b57869a6b26fd81508994661b44f3cd2e66802ab9c8ac7012ed3f5d72a 13100 
opendkim_2.6.8-1.diff.gz
 7ad14c0191fa3674547d770c2c884ab761bddea633ecdf0e8e3d8e67bf5dfb2d 177920 
opendkim_2.6.8-1_i386.deb
 2181d2405333e534536525dac6cff5a6dfdfd5a8048a3ec362c07548ceeaf604 167024 
opendkim-tools_2.6.8-1_i386.deb
 56da135e9ae6441d079dfd05137290a5e8f163ed3c075422679e3241fa9c257d 86862 
libopendkim7_2.6.8-1_i386.deb
 569dc7061fbf433e5d856ed46bef593181a522912b35a54dea8f8a734e4f76f1 175036 
libopendkim-dev_2.6.8-1_i386.deb
 74f5766975d40c8e0283deda1f8636cc933102ddb3482b5efb4830cf5aee6b72 35256 
libvbr2_2.6.8-1_i386.deb
 ebb4d8dc0db8a3f7748591d6c750affa299115cb0f90f3e01072d12dbbf58d8f 39022 
libvbr-dev_2.6.8-1_i386.deb
Files: 
 dc7640424dd17f41e19ec0969fda169c 1397 mail extra opendkim_2.6.8-1.dsc
 b9f57c0635612f42c5f5173b3a23f097 1141247 mail extra opendkim_2.6.8.orig.tar.gz
 b91c138b7ba9569041d1a95b959f42e9 13100 mail extra opendkim_2.6.8-1.diff.gz
 b2c5e1afada71e51a6339ed5211d79fc 177920 mail extra opendkim_2.6.8-1_i386.deb