Bug#995200: r-bioc-dropletutils: autopkgtest failures

2021-09-27 Thread Nilesh Patra
# Reduce severity
severity 995200 important
thanks

As per discussion here[1], we ignored these two tests for now, hence decreasing
the severity, so everything migrates timely.

[1]: https://lists.debian.org/debian-r/2021/09/msg00127.html

Nilesh


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Bug#995204: marked as done (r-bioc-metapod: autopkgtest failures)

2021-09-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 28 Sep 2021 11:02:08 +0530
with message-id 
and subject line Re: r-bioc-metapod: autopkgtest failures
has caused the Debian Bug report #995204,
regarding r-bioc-metapod: autopkgtest failures
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
995204: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=995204
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: r-bioc-metapod
Version: 1.0.0+dfsg-2
Severity: serious
X-Debbugs-Cc: sramac...@debian.org

| > test_check("metapod")
| autopkgtest [00:12:43]: ERROR: timed out on command "su -s /bin/bash debci -c 
set -e; export USER=`id -nu`; . /etc/profile >/dev/null 2>&1 || true;  . 
~/.profile >/dev/null 2>&1 || true; 
buildtree="/tmp/autopkgtest-lxc.fq0j71sv/downtmp/build.BVG/src"; mkdir -p -m 
1777 -- "/tmp/autopkgtest-lxc.fq0j71sv/downtmp/run-unit-test-artifacts"; export 
AUTOPKGTEST_ARTIFACTS="/tmp/autopkgtest-lxc.fq0j71sv/downtmp/run-unit-test-artifacts";
 export ADT_ARTIFACTS="$AUTOPKGTEST_ARTIFACTS"; mkdir -p -m 755 
"/tmp/autopkgtest-lxc.fq0j71sv/downtmp/autopkgtest_tmp"; export 
AUTOPKGTEST_TMP="/tmp/autopkgtest-lxc.fq0j71sv/downtmp/autopkgtest_tmp"; export 
ADTTMP="$AUTOPKGTEST_TMP"; export DEBIAN_FRONTEND=noninteractive; export 
LANG=C.UTF-8; export DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=parallel=48; unset LANGUAGE LC_CTYPE 
LC_NUMERIC LC_TIME LC_COLLATE   LC_MONETARY LC_MESSAGES LC_PAPER LC_NAME 
LC_ADDRESS   LC_TELEPHONE LC_MEASUREMENT LC_IDENTIFICATION LC_ALL;rm -f 
/tmp/autopkgtest_script_pid; set -C; echo $$ > /tmp/autopkgtest_script_pid; set 
+C; trap "rm -f /tmp/autopkgtest_script_pid" EXIT INT QUIT PIPE; cd 
"$buildtree"; chmod +x 
/tmp/autopkgtest-lxc.fq0j71sv/downtmp/build.BVG/src/debian/tests/run-unit-test; 
touch /tmp/autopkgtest-lxc.fq0j71sv/downtmp/run-unit-test-stdout 
/tmp/autopkgtest-lxc.fq0j71sv/downtmp/run-unit-test-stderr; 
/tmp/autopkgtest-lxc.fq0j71sv/downtmp/build.BVG/src/debian/tests/run-unit-test 
2> >(tee -a /tmp/autopkgtest-lxc.fq0j71sv/downtmp/run-unit-test-stderr >&2) > 
>(tee -a /tmp/autopkgtest-lxc.fq0j71sv/downtmp/run-unit-test-stdout);" (kind: 
test)

and

| > test_check("metapod")
| terminate called after throwing an instance of 
'__gnu_cxx::recursive_init_error'
|   what():  std::exception
| Aborted

See
https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/amd64/r/r-bioc-metapod/15217942/log.gz

Cheers
-- 
Sebastian Ramacher


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Control: fixed 995204 1.0.0+dfsg-3

amd64 autopkgtest is still in progress, but arm, i386 are passing
already, the problem has been fixed.

https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/arm64/r/r-bioc-metapod/15586577/log.gz

There is a failure in armhf, but that one is unrelated. I'm at it,
please don't file another bug for that one.

Thanks for reporting!

Nilesh


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---


Processed: Re: r-bioc-dropletutils: autopkgtest failures

2021-09-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> # Reduce severity
> severity 995200 important
Bug #995200 [src:r-bioc-dropletutils] r-bioc-dropletutils: autopkgtest failures
Severity set to 'important' from 'serious'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
995200: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=995200
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems



Bug#995220: FTBFS: build broken by typescript update

2021-09-27 Thread Yadd
Package: ts-node
Version: 9.1.1-4
Severity: serious
Tags: sid

ts-node is broken by typescript update. This fix first part of build:

  --- a/src/repl.ts
  +++ b/src/repl.ts
  @@ -98,6 +98,7 @@ export function createRepl (options: Cre
 console.error(error)
   }
 } else {
  +// @ts-ignore
   err = error
 }
   }

but later:

  ./debian/tests/test_modules/typescript-json-schema/bin/typescript-json-schema 
\
  --topRef --refs --validationKeywords allOf \
  --out tsconfig.schema.json tsconfig.json TsConfigSchema
  
/<>/debian/tests/test_modules/typescript-json-schema/dist/typescript-json-schema.js:965
  throw new Error("type " + symbolName + " not found");
  ^
  Error: type TsConfigSchema not found
  at JsonSchemaGenerator.getSchemaForSymbol 
(/<>/debian/tests/test_modules/typescript-json-schema/dist/typescript-json-schema.js:965:19)
  at generateSchema 
(/<>/debian/tests/test_modules/typescript-json-schema/dist/typescript-json-schema.js:1151:26)
  at Object.exec 
(/<>/debian/tests/test_modules/typescript-json-schema/dist/typescript-json-schema.js:1200:22)
  at Object.run 
(/<>/debian/tests/test_modules/typescript-json-schema/dist/typescript-json-schema-cli.js:51:30)
  at Object. 
(/<>/debian/tests/test_modules/typescript-json-schema/bin/typescript-json-schema:3:5)
  [...]



Bug#995208: marked as done (r-bioc-rhdf5filters: autopkgtest regression)

2021-09-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 28 Sep 2021 05:48:21 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#995208: fixed in r-bioc-rhdf5filters 1.4.0+dfsg-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #995208,
regarding r-bioc-rhdf5filters: autopkgtest regression
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
995208: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=995208
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: r-bioc-rhdf5filters
Version: 1.4.0+dfsg-2
Severity: serious
X-Debbugs-Cc: sramac...@debian.org

| E: Unable to locate package r-cran-rhdf5
| pkg-r-autopkgtestFAIL badpkg
| blame: r-bioc-rhdf5filters

See
https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/amd64/r/r-bioc-rhdf5filters/15560573/log.gz

Cheers
-- 
Sebastian Ramacher


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: r-bioc-rhdf5filters
Source-Version: 1.4.0+dfsg-3
Done: Nilesh Patra 

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
r-bioc-rhdf5filters, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 995...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Nilesh Patra  (supplier of updated r-bioc-rhdf5filters 
package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org)


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2021 10:58:01 +0530
Source: r-bioc-rhdf5filters
Architecture: source
Version: 1.4.0+dfsg-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian R Packages Maintainers 
Changed-By: Nilesh Patra 
Closes: 995208
Changes:
 r-bioc-rhdf5filters (1.4.0+dfsg-3) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * Team Upload.
   * d/t/autopkgtest-pkg-r.conf: Fix the name of
 test-depends, r-cran-rhdf5 => r-bioc-rhdf5 (Closes: #995208)
Checksums-Sha1:
 3efd0b76f4dfdd24f9683729ff8062cc39cff89d 2205 
r-bioc-rhdf5filters_1.4.0+dfsg-3.dsc
 9c6bb5f8c478052f4025c69a3ca6922d12b4b8a2 5064 
r-bioc-rhdf5filters_1.4.0+dfsg-3.debian.tar.xz
 0884b82ec6eb695393f3c93cd1092500db83adb9 11018 
r-bioc-rhdf5filters_1.4.0+dfsg-3_amd64.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
 394c941287b5eff9806d95c1eefda1c255997a1d15b420b3f6d447a9105cbb91 2205 
r-bioc-rhdf5filters_1.4.0+dfsg-3.dsc
 1b2b2a9f1b1f8a9becc427b1c95bccddc9eddcd048e2c8c2ef47262e133a59a3 5064 
r-bioc-rhdf5filters_1.4.0+dfsg-3.debian.tar.xz
 223f66e19c383041aef0e9d1ceabfc47c9c2812d550d3b74c8c3a3f4876a860c 11018 
r-bioc-rhdf5filters_1.4.0+dfsg-3_amd64.buildinfo
Files:
 85a4eef34b3593b51a6ba89f6e7eecad 2205 gnu-r optional 
r-bioc-rhdf5filters_1.4.0+dfsg-3.dsc
 1f21b766e700530a9fdd494b7b042d0a 5064 gnu-r optional 
r-bioc-rhdf5filters_1.4.0+dfsg-3.debian.tar.xz
 ef1320f9d8f6edc5800b1e3eafcfb585 11018 gnu-r optional 
r-bioc-rhdf5filters_1.4.0+dfsg-3_amd64.buildinfo

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
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=JM7A
-END PGP SIGNATURE End Message ---


Processed: close and fix

2021-09-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> reopen 995204
Bug #995204 {Done: Nilesh Patra } [src:r-bioc-metapod] 
r-bioc-metapod: autopkgtest failures
Bug reopened
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #995204 to the same values 
previously set
> fixed 995204 1.0.0+dfsg-3
Bug #995204 [src:r-bioc-metapod] r-bioc-metapod: autopkgtest failures
Marked as fixed in versions r-bioc-metapod/1.0.0+dfsg-3.
> close 995204
Bug #995204 [src:r-bioc-metapod] r-bioc-metapod: autopkgtest failures
Marked Bug as done
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
995204: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=995204
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems



Bug#993029: Have we found a fix for this issue yet?

2021-09-27 Thread Abraham Raji
What's the status of this bug right now? Have we notified upstream?

Abraham Raji
-- 
Mea navis aëricumbens anguillis abundat.



Bug#993198: gnome-shell-extension-system-monitor: does not declare compatibility with GNOME Shell 40

2021-09-27 Thread Samuel Henrique
Hello Leo,

> On Fri, Sep 24, 2021 at 10:07 PM Samuel Henrique  wrote:
> > Leo, from my side you're free to push your changes whenever you want.
>
> I will as soon as someone gives me access to the repo ;)
> Just requested access to the Gnome group, but that may take a while.

I gave you permission to that repo (best I can do on my side), and I
set an expiration date of the end of this year, until then you will
end up in the salsa group and inherit permissions so it should be
good.

> > Let's try to coordinate things, feel free to perform changes to the
> > packaging, I will wait until I get your ack to go ahead (if there's
> > any work left to be done).
>
> I'm not a gnome-extension expert, so I'll push my changes so that the
> package is at least gpb-buildable, and you can then maybe check that
> the build makes sense and upload it yourself if you want.

Awesome, I can do that. Alternatively, I can also push your changes
myself, if you push them to your own repo and give me a go ahead.

Thank you!

-- 
Samuel Henrique 



Processed: Re: Bug#995207: chrony: Using 'bindacqdevice' directive causes a SIGSYS error

2021-09-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands:

> tags -1 - upstream + moreinfo
Bug #995207 [chrony] chrony: Using 'bindacqdevice' directive causes a SIGSYS 
error
Removed tag(s) upstream.
Bug #995207 [chrony] chrony: Using 'bindacqdevice' directive causes a SIGSYS 
error
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
> severity -1 important
Bug #995207 [chrony] chrony: Using 'bindacqdevice' directive causes a SIGSYS 
error
Severity set to 'important' from 'critical'

-- 
995207: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=995207
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems



Bug#995207: chrony: Using 'bindacqdevice' directive causes a SIGSYS error

2021-09-27 Thread Vincent Blut
Control: tags -1 - upstream + moreinfo
Control: severity -1 important

Hi,

Le 2021-09-27 17:31, Steve Egbert a écrit :
> Package: chrony
> Version: 4.0-8
> Severity: critical
> Tags: upstream
> X-Debbugs-Cc: s.egb...@sbcglobal.net
> 
> Dear Maintainer,
> 
> 
> Wanted to use the 'bindacqdevice' due to my host having a dynamic IP 
> interface.
> 
> Using that 'bindacqdevice' directive keyword anywhere in my
> /etc/chrony/chrony.conf file results in a signal 31 (according to Linux 
> auditd).
> 
> My guess is that attempts to do a Chrony as a NTP server (disbursing out
> NTP beacons), we need to have an socket open on this dynamic IP interface.
> 
> This is the setting of the systemd resource.
> 
> Removing the 'bindacqdevice' directive, and all works perfectly.
> 
> Was half-expecting to be able to use 'bindacqdevice' configuration directive
> here.

After having stopped chronyd, please run the command below when using the
'bindacqdevice' directive and attach the chronyd_debug.txt file.

# strace -o chronyd_debug.txt chronyd -d -F -1

Cheers,
Vincent


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Bug#995208: r-bioc-rhdf5filters: autopkgtest regression

2021-09-27 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
Source: r-bioc-rhdf5filters
Version: 1.4.0+dfsg-2
Severity: serious
X-Debbugs-Cc: sramac...@debian.org

| E: Unable to locate package r-cran-rhdf5
| pkg-r-autopkgtestFAIL badpkg
| blame: r-bioc-rhdf5filters

See
https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/amd64/r/r-bioc-rhdf5filters/15560573/log.gz

Cheers
-- 
Sebastian Ramacher


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Bug#995207: chrony: Using 'bindacqdevice' directive causes a SIGSYS error

2021-09-27 Thread Steve Egbert
Package: chrony
Version: 4.0-8
Severity: critical
Tags: upstream
X-Debbugs-Cc: s.egb...@sbcglobal.net

Dear Maintainer,


Wanted to use the 'bindacqdevice' due to my host having a dynamic IP interface.

Using that 'bindacqdevice' directive keyword anywhere in my
/etc/chrony/chrony.conf file results in a signal 31 (according to Linux auditd).

My guess is that attempts to do a Chrony as a NTP server (disbursing out
NTP beacons), we need to have an socket open on this dynamic IP interface.

This is the setting of the systemd resource.

Removing the 'bindacqdevice' directive, and all works perfectly.

Was half-expecting to be able to use 'bindacqdevice' configuration directive
here.



-- System Information:
Debian Release: 11.0
  APT prefers stable-updates
  APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable-security'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 5.10.46 (SMP w/4 CPU threads)
Kernel taint flags: TAINT_UNSIGNED_MODULE
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE not set
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled

Versions of packages chrony depends on:
ii  adduser  3.118
ii  init-system-helpers  1.60
ii  iproute2 5.10.0-4
ii  libc62.31-13
ii  libcap2  1:2.44-1
ii  libedit2 3.1-20191231-2+b1
ii  libgnutls30  3.7.1-5
ii  libnettle8   3.7.3-1
ii  libseccomp2  2.5.1-1
ii  tzdata   2021a-1
ii  ucf  3.0043

chrony recommends no packages.

Versions of packages chrony suggests:
ii  bind9-dnsutils [dnsutils]  1:9.16.15-1
pn  networkd-dispatcher

-- Configuration Files:
/etc/default/chrony changed:
DAEMON_OPTS="-F 1 -L 0"


-- no debconf information



Bug#995206: r-bioc-altcdfenvs: autopkgtest regression

2021-09-27 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
Source: r-bioc-altcdfenvs
Version: 1:2.54.0-1
Severity: serious
X-Debbugs-Cc: sramac...@debian.org

| E: Unable to locate package r-cran-r-unit
| pkg-r-autopkgtestFAIL badpkg
| blame: r-bioc-altcdfenvs

Cheers
-- 
Sebastian Ramacher


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Bug#995204: r-bioc-metapod: autopkgtest failures

2021-09-27 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
Source: r-bioc-metapod
Version: 1.0.0+dfsg-2
Severity: serious
X-Debbugs-Cc: sramac...@debian.org

| > test_check("metapod")
| autopkgtest [00:12:43]: ERROR: timed out on command "su -s /bin/bash debci -c 
set -e; export USER=`id -nu`; . /etc/profile >/dev/null 2>&1 || true;  . 
~/.profile >/dev/null 2>&1 || true; 
buildtree="/tmp/autopkgtest-lxc.fq0j71sv/downtmp/build.BVG/src"; mkdir -p -m 
1777 -- "/tmp/autopkgtest-lxc.fq0j71sv/downtmp/run-unit-test-artifacts"; export 
AUTOPKGTEST_ARTIFACTS="/tmp/autopkgtest-lxc.fq0j71sv/downtmp/run-unit-test-artifacts";
 export ADT_ARTIFACTS="$AUTOPKGTEST_ARTIFACTS"; mkdir -p -m 755 
"/tmp/autopkgtest-lxc.fq0j71sv/downtmp/autopkgtest_tmp"; export 
AUTOPKGTEST_TMP="/tmp/autopkgtest-lxc.fq0j71sv/downtmp/autopkgtest_tmp"; export 
ADTTMP="$AUTOPKGTEST_TMP"; export DEBIAN_FRONTEND=noninteractive; export 
LANG=C.UTF-8; export DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=parallel=48; unset LANGUAGE LC_CTYPE 
LC_NUMERIC LC_TIME LC_COLLATE   LC_MONETARY LC_MESSAGES LC_PAPER LC_NAME 
LC_ADDRESS   LC_TELEPHONE LC_MEASUREMENT LC_IDENTIFICATION LC_ALL;rm -f 
/tmp/autopkgtest_script_pid; set -C; echo $$ > /tmp/autopkgtest_script_pid; set 
+C; trap "rm -f /tmp/autopkgtest_script_pid" EXIT INT QUIT PIPE; cd 
"$buildtree"; chmod +x 
/tmp/autopkgtest-lxc.fq0j71sv/downtmp/build.BVG/src/debian/tests/run-unit-test; 
touch /tmp/autopkgtest-lxc.fq0j71sv/downtmp/run-unit-test-stdout 
/tmp/autopkgtest-lxc.fq0j71sv/downtmp/run-unit-test-stderr; 
/tmp/autopkgtest-lxc.fq0j71sv/downtmp/build.BVG/src/debian/tests/run-unit-test 
2> >(tee -a /tmp/autopkgtest-lxc.fq0j71sv/downtmp/run-unit-test-stderr >&2) > 
>(tee -a /tmp/autopkgtest-lxc.fq0j71sv/downtmp/run-unit-test-stdout);" (kind: 
test)

and

| > test_check("metapod")
| terminate called after throwing an instance of 
'__gnu_cxx::recursive_init_error'
|   what():  std::exception
| Aborted

See
https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/amd64/r/r-bioc-metapod/15217942/log.gz

Cheers
-- 
Sebastian Ramacher


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Bug#995073: gitlab: yarnpkg fails with error An unexpected error occurred: "Release not found: 2.4.2".

2021-09-27 Thread Pirate Praveen



On 26 September 2021 8:14:08 pm IST, Ondrej Zary  wrote:
>> yarn 3.0 needs nodejs 12. So this was a work around used to force yarn
>> 2.x. Looks like there is no way to install 2.x versions of yarn anymore :(
>>
>> So we will have to update minimum version of nodejs to 12 (already done
>> for latest versions in bullseye) and use yarn set version berry. I guess
>> you will have to use nodejs from official repos or we will have to
>> backport nodejs 12 to buster.
>
>I've built nodejs 12 and added "yarnpng set version berry" before
>"yarnpkg set version 2.4.2".
>It downloaded tons of random crap from somewhere during the "fetch step".
>Is that normal?

Not sure which packages it pulls in that step.

>Otherwise it seems to work.
>Webpack failed, as always...3 kinds of errors this time.
>
>Installing node modules...
>(node:22064) [DEP0005] DeprecationWarning: Buffer() is deprecated due to 
>security and usability issues. Please use the Buffer.alloc(), 
>Buffer.allocUnsafe(), or Buffer.from() methods instead.
>Resolving berry to a url...
>Downloading 
>https://github.com/yarnpkg/berry/raw/master/packages/berry-cli/bin/berry.js...
>Saving it into /var/lib/gitlab/.yarn/releases/yarn-berry.js...
>Updating /var/lib/gitlab/.yarnrc.yml...
>Done!
>➤ YN: Retrieving 
>https://repo.yarnpkg.com/2.4.2/packages/yarnpkg-cli/bin/yarn.js
>➤ YN: Saving the new release in .yarn/releases/yarn-2.4.2.cjs
>➤ YN: Done in 1s 327ms
>➤ YN: ┌ Resolution step
>➤ YN0061: │ document-register-element@npm:1.14.3 is deprecated: V0 is gone and 
>the best V1 polyfill is now @ungap/custom-elements
>➤ YN0061: │ axios@npm:0.20.0 is deprecated: Critical security vulnerability 
>fixed in v0.21.1. For more information, see 
>https://github.com/axios/axios/pull/3410
>➤ YN0061: │ urix@npm:0.1.0 is deprecated: Please see 
>https://github.com/lydell/urix#deprecated
>➤ YN0061: │ smooshpack@npm:0.0.62 is deprecated: Package moved to 
>@codesandbox/sandpack-client
>➤ YN0061: │ resolve-url@npm:0.2.1 is deprecated: 
>https://github.com/lydell/resolve-url#deprecated
>➤ YN0061: │ uuid@npm:3.3.2 is deprecated: Please upgrade  to version 7 or 
>higher.  Older versions may use Math.random() in certain circumstances, which 
>is known to be problematic.  See https://v8.dev/blog/math-random for details.
>➤ YN0061: │ popper.js@npm:1.16.1 is deprecated: You can find the new Popper v2 
>at @popperjs/core, this package is dedicated to the legacy v1
>➤ YN0061: │ querystring@npm:0.2.0 is deprecated: The querystring API is 
>considered Legacy. new code should use the URLSearchParams API instead.
>➤ YN0032: │ fsevents@npm:2.3.2: Implicit dependencies on node-gyp are 
>discouraged
>➤ YN0032: │ fsevents@npm:2.3.2: Implicit dependencies on node-gyp are 
>discouraged
>➤ YN0032: │ evp_bytestokey@npm:1.0.3: Implicit dependencies on node-gyp are 
>discouraged
>➤ YN0002: │ apollo-link-batch@npm:1.1.15 doesn't provide graphql (pf2c3f), 
>requested by apollo-link
>➤ YN0002: │ bootstrap-vue@npm:2.17.3 doesn't provide jquery (p8724c), 
>requested by bootstrap
>➤ YN0002: │ bootstrap-vue@npm:2.17.3 doesn't provide vue (p74d19), requested 
>by portal-vue
>➤ YN0060: │ root-workspace-0b6124@workspace:. provides @babel/core (p8d5b6) 
>with version 0.0.0, which doesn't satisfy what babel-loader requests
>➤ YN0060: │ root-workspace-0b6124@workspace:. provides popper.js (pb3b3d) with 
>version 0.0.0, which doesn't satisfy what bootstrap requests
>➤ YN0060: │ root-workspace-0b6124@workspace:. provides vue (p02edf) with 
>version 0.0.0, which doesn't satisfy what portal-vue requests
>➤ YN0060: │ root-workspace-0b6124@workspace:. provides vue (pa125f) with 
>version 0.0.0, which doesn't satisfy what tiptap requests
>➤ YN0060: │ root-workspace-0b6124@workspace:. provides vue (p6c5ff) with 
>version 0.0.0, which doesn't satisfy what @gitlab/ui requests
>➤ YN0060: │ root-workspace-0b6124@workspace:. provides vue (p4a08d) with 
>version 0.0.0, which doesn't satisfy what @tiptap/vue-2 requests
>➤ YN0060: │ root-workspace-0b6124@workspace:. provides vue (pc6a59) with 
>version 0.0.0, which doesn't satisfy what @toast-ui/vue-editor requests
>➤ YN0060: │ root-workspace-0b6124@workspace:. provides vue (p082e1) with 
>version 0.0.0, which doesn't satisfy what tiptap-extensions requests
>➤ YN0060: │ root-workspace-0b6124@workspace:. provides vue (paa947) with 
>version 0.0.0, which doesn't satisfy what vue-resize requests
>➤ YN0060: │ root-workspace-0b6124@workspace:. provides vue (p1dfac) with 
>version 0.0.0, which doesn't satisfy what vuex requests
>➤ YN0060: │ root-workspace-0b6124@workspace:. provides vue-template-compiler 
>(pb49ea) with version 0.0.0, which doesn't satisfy what tiptap requests
>➤ YN0060: │ root-workspace-0b6124@workspace:. provides vue-template-compiler 
>(p659ff) with version 0.0.0, which doesn't satisfy what tiptap-extensions 
>requests
>➤ YN: │ Some peer dependencies are incorrectly met; run yarn explain 
>peer-requirements  for details, where  is the 

Bug#995202: horst FTBFS: error: format not a string literal and no format arguments

2021-09-27 Thread Helmut Grohne
Source: horst
Version: 5.1-2
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs

horst fails to build from source in unstable on amd64 due to ncurses
having become stricter about format strings. A build now ends as
follows:

| cc -g -O2 -ffile-prefix-map=/<>=. -fstack-protector-strong 
-Wformat -Werror=format-security -std=gnu99 -Wall -Wextra -g -I. 
-DVERSION=\"5.1\" -DDO_DEBUG -I/usr/include/libnl3 -Wdate-time 
-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2  -c -o display-main.o display-main.c
| display-main.c: In function ‘print_dump_win’:
| display-main.c:56:2: error: format not a string literal and no format 
arguments [-Werror=format-security]
|56 |  wprintw(dump_win, str);
|   |  ^~~
| display-main.c: In function ‘print_node_list_line’:
| display-main.c:255:40: warning: format ‘%d’ expects argument of type ‘int’, 
but argument 5 has type ‘long unsigned int’ [-Wformat=]
|   255 |  mvwprintw(list_win, line, COL_SIG, "%3d", 
-ewma_read(>phy_sig_avg));
|   |  ~~^   ~~~
|   ||   |
|   |int long unsigned int
|   |  %3ld
| display-main.c: In function ‘update_dump_win’:
| display-main.c:455:21: warning: too many arguments for format 
[-Wformat-extra-args]
|   455 |   wprintw(dump_win, "%-7s", "ARP", ip_sprintf(p->ip_src));
|   | ^~
| display-main.c:481:31: warning: format ‘%llx’ expects argument of type ‘long 
long unsigned int’, but argument 4 has type ‘uint64_t’ {aka ‘long unsigned 
int’} [-Wformat=]
|   481 |wprintw(dump_win, "'%s' %llx", p->wlan_essid,
|   |~~~^
|   |   |
|   |   long long unsigned int
|   |%lx
|   482 | p->wlan_tsf);
|   | ~~~
|   |  |
|   |  uint64_t {aka long unsigned int}
| display-main.c: In function ‘sort_input’:
| display-main.c:129:11: warning: this statement may fall through 
[-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
|   129 |   do_sort = c;
|   |   ^~~
| display-main.c:131:2: note: here
|   131 |  case '\r': case KEY_ENTER:
|   |  ^~~~
| cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
| make[1]: *** [: display-main.o] Error 1
| make[1]: Leaving directory '/<>'
| dh_auto_build: error: make -j1 returned exit code 2
| make: *** [debian/rules:19: build] Error 25
| dpkg-buildpackage: error: debian/rules build subprocess returned exit status 2

Helmut



Bug#995199: r-bioc-ioniser: autopkgtest regression

2021-09-27 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
Source: r-bioc-ioniser
Version: 2.16.0+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
X-Debbugs-Cc: sramac...@debian.org

| ══ Failed tests 

| ── Error (test_Fast5Summary.R:5:1): (code run outside of `test_that()`) 

| Error: there is no package called ‘minionSummaryData’
| Backtrace:
| █
|  1. └─utils::data(s.typhi.rep2, package = "minionSummaryData") 
test_Fast5Summary.R:5:0
|  2.   └─base::find.package(package, lib.loc, verbose = verbose)
| ── Error (test_plotting.R:5:1): (code run outside of `test_that()`) 

| Error: there is no package called ‘minionSummaryData’
| Backtrace:
| █
|  1. └─utils::data(s.typhi.rep2, package = "minionSummaryData") 
test_plotting.R:5:0
|  2.   └─base::find.package(package, lib.loc, verbose = verbose)
|
| [ FAIL 2 | WARN 2 | SKIP 0 | PASS 1 ]
| Error: Test failures

See
https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/amd64/r/r-bioc-ioniser/15560558/log.gz

Cheers
-- 
Sebastian Ramacher


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Bug#995200: r-bioc-dropletutils: autopkgtest failures

2021-09-27 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
Source: r-bioc-dropletutils
Version: 1.12.2+ds-1
Severity: serious
X-Debbugs-Cc: sramac...@debian.org

| ══ Failed tests 

| ── Error (test-read10x.R:129:5): read10xCounts works correctly for HDF5 
counts, version < 3 ──
| Error: BiocParallel errors
|   element index: 1
|   first error: Error in h5checktype(). Argument not of class H5IdComponent.
| Backtrace:
| █
|  1. └─DropletUtils::read10xCounts(tmph5) test-read10x.R:129:4
|  2.   ├─BiocParallel::bplapply(...)
|  3.   └─BiocParallel::bplapply(...)
| ── Error (test-read10x.R:155:5): read10xCounts works correctly for HDF5 
counts, version >= 3 ──
| Error: BiocParallel errors
|   element index: 1
|   first error: Error in h5checktype(). Argument not of class H5IdComponent.
| Backtrace:
| █
|  1. └─DropletUtils::read10xCounts(tmph5) test-read10x.R:155:4
|  2.   ├─BiocParallel::bplapply(...)
|  3.   └─BiocParallel::bplapply(...)
|
| [ FAIL 2 | WARN 4 | SKIP 0 | PASS 970 ]

See
https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/amd64/r/r-bioc-dropletutils/15560540/log.gz

Cheers
-- 
Sebastian Ramacher


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Processed: severity of 995120 is important

2021-09-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> severity 995120 important
Bug #995120 [src:linux] linux-image-5.14.0-1-amd64: Raven Ridge cannot boot 
with secure memory encryption
Severity set to 'important' from 'critical'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
995120: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=995120
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems



Bug#994451: golang-github-containers-common: secomp.json does not include newer syscall used by stable kernel/glibc on arm

2021-09-27 Thread Reinhard Tartler
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Tags: bullseye
Severity: normal
stop

sorry for the abrupt ending of the previous mail.

I'm attaching the debdiffs for the three uploads to this email.

I'm happy to do the 3 uploads at any time. Please let me know what you
think.



On Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 12:08 PM Reinhard Tartler 
wrote:

>
> On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 4:18 AM Bastien Roucariès <
> roucaries.bast...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Package: golang-github-containers-common
>> Version: 0.33.4+ds1-1
>> Severity: critical
>> Tags: upstream
>> Forwarded:
>> https://github.com/containers/common/commit/42d1db16bfc0dbaee5781d230dc2bcbaa0849c6e
>> Control: fixed -1 0.42.1+ds1-1
>>
>> Dear Maintainer,
>>
>> golang-github-containers-common in stable does not include recent syscall
>> used
>> by stable kernel/glibc breaking in my case simple container that do
>> unattended-
>> upgrade on arm
>> particularly syscall=436 that is timer_settime64
>>
>> I believe this should be fixed in a point release.
>>
>
> I agree. I realized that these syscall changes also affect amd64. I was
> able to reproduce the issue
> by running a distribution that ships with glibc 2.34, such as ubuntu
> impish. The testcase would be:
>
> $ podman run --rm -it ubuntu:impish sh -c 'apt update -qq && apt -y
> full-upgrade && apt install -y libc6 jq'
>
> The symptom is described in more detail at
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libpod/+bug/1943049
>
> The problem here is that the issue is not simply dealt with updating the
> secomp.json file, but also some code changes are required
> that allow setting the default return value for some syscalls. This means
> that in order to fix this issue in stable, 3 uploads are needed:
>
> - golang-github-opencontainers-specs
> - golang-github-containers-common
> - libpod
>
> I'm cloning this bug appropriately so that these uploads can be tracked
> separately.
> For now,I've backported and verified the changes. For your convenience,
> I've uploaded the packages I got so far to
> https://people.debian.org/~siretart/bug.994451/
>
>
>> BTW I strongly believe that  seccomp.json is a config file and should be
>> shipped in /etc and 988443  should also be shipped in stable.
>>
>
> I could get convinced if the issue was fixable by just upading the
> seccomp.json policy file.
> Sadly, that's not the case.
>
> Stable Release team, I think this bug should be cloned with those
> instructions:
>
>
> --
> regards,
> Reinhard
>


-- 
regards,
Reinhard


golang-github-opencontainers-specs.debdiff
Description: Binary data


golang-github-opencontainers-specs.debdiff
Description: Binary data


podman.debdiff
Description: Binary data


Bug#995018: closed by Debian FTP Masters (reply to Julien Puydt ) (Bug#995018: fixed in jupyter-server 1.11.0-1)

2021-09-27 Thread Paul Gevers
Hi,

On 27-09-2021 08:36, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
>  jupyter-server (1.11.0-1) unstable; urgency=medium
>  .
>* Declare versioned dep on anyio (Closes: #995018).

That was implemented via *build*-depends. It doesn't seem to have
propagated to the Depends as the tests still fail.

Paul



OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Processed: [bts-link] source package src:hcxtools

2021-09-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> #
> # bts-link upstream status pull for source package src:hcxtools
> # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
> # https://bts-link-team.pages.debian.net/bts-link/
> #
> user debian-bts-l...@lists.debian.org
Setting user to debian-bts-l...@lists.debian.org (was 
debian-bts-l...@lists.debian.org).
> # remote status report for #994790 (http://bugs.debian.org/994790)
> # Bug title: hcxtools: CVE-2021-32286
> #  * https://github.com/ZerBea/hcxtools/issues/155
> #  * remote status changed: (?) -> closed
> #  * closed upstream
> tags 994790 + fixed-upstream
Bug #994790 [src:hcxtools] hcxtools: CVE-2021-32286
Added tag(s) fixed-upstream.
> usertags 994790 + status-closed
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: status-closed.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
994790: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=994790
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems



Processed: [bts-link] source package vdirsyncer

2021-09-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> #
> # bts-link upstream status pull for source package vdirsyncer
> # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
> # https://bts-link-team.pages.debian.net/bts-link/
> #
> user debian-bts-l...@lists.debian.org
Setting user to debian-bts-l...@lists.debian.org (was 
debian-bts-l...@lists.debian.org).
> # remote status report for #994119 (http://bugs.debian.org/994119)
> # Bug title: vdirsyncer: Random cannot import name 'metasync' with python3.9
> #  * https://github.com/pimutils/vdirsyncer/issues/862
> #  * remote status changed: (?) -> closed
> #  * closed upstream
> tags 994119 + fixed-upstream
Bug #994119 [vdirsyncer] vdirsyncer: Random cannot import name 'metasync' with 
python3.9
Added tag(s) fixed-upstream.
> usertags 994119 + status-closed
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: status-closed.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
994119: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=994119
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems



Bug#993478: marked as done (src:fricas: fails to migrate to testing for too long: maintainer built arch:all binaries)

2021-09-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 27 Sep 2021 12:58:57 -0400
with message-id <87sfxq0xbi@transcendence.maguirefamily.org>
and subject line Re: src:fricas: fails to migrate to testing for too long: 
maintainer built arch:all binaries
has caused the Debian Bug report #993478,
regarding src:fricas: fails to migrate to testing for too long: maintainer 
built arch:all binaries
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
993478: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=993478
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: fricas
Version: 1.3.6-6
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 1.3.7-1
Tags: sid bookworm pending
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync

Dear maintainer(s),

As announced [1] last year, the Release Team now considers packages that
are out-of-sync between testing and unstable for more than 60 days as
having a Release Critical bug in testing. Your package src:fricas has
been trying to migrate for 62 days [2]. Hence, I am filing this bug.

If a package is out of sync between unstable and testing for a longer
period, this usually means that bugs in the package in testing cannot be
fixed via unstable. Additionally, blocked packages can have impact on
other packages, which makes preparing for the release more difficult.
Finally, it often exposes issues with the package and/or
its (reverse-)dependencies. We expect maintainers to fix issues that
hamper the migration of their package in a timely manner.

This bug will trigger auto-removal when appropriate. As with all new
bugs, there will be at least 30 days before the package is auto-removed.

I have immediately closed this bug with the version in unstable, so if
that version or a later version migrates, this bug will no longer affect
testing. I have also tagged this bug to only affect sid and bookworm, so
it doesn't affect (old-)stable.

Your package is only really blocked because the arch:all binary
package(s) aren't built on a buildd. Unfortunately the Debian
infrastructure doesn't allow arch:all packages to be properly binNMU'ed.
Hence, I will shortly do a no-changes source-only upload to DELAYED/15,
closing this bug. Please let me know if I should delay or cancel that
upload.

Paul

[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2020/02/msg5.html
[2] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=fricas




OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 1.3.6-6

Greetings, and thank you so much for your report!

I have uploaded several identical versions of the package.  The build
only fails on one host, arm-conova-02, whether building armhf or armel,
and when exercising orthogonal sections of linker code.  The failure is
unreproducible on Debian porterboxes.  All other autobuilders in either
architecture correctly build the package.  The armel and armhf
autobuilders have successfully built 1.3.7-3 at the moment so migration
is imminent.  I will follow up with debian admin and request access to
the offending machine to investigate further, but this is a problem with
the machine, not the package, as far as can be discerned at present.

Take care,
-- 
Camm Maguirec...@maguirefamily.org
==
"The earth is but one country, and mankind its citizens."  --  Baha'u'llah--- End Message ---


Bug#994451: golang-github-containers-common: secomp.json does not include newer syscall used by stable kernel/glibc on arm

2021-09-27 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
Le lun. 27 sept. 2021 à 16:08, Reinhard Tartler  a écrit :
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 4:18 AM Bastien Roucariès 
>  wrote:
>>
>> Package: golang-github-containers-common
>> Version: 0.33.4+ds1-1
>> Severity: critical
>> Tags: upstream
>> Forwarded: 
>> https://github.com/containers/common/commit/42d1db16bfc0dbaee5781d230dc2bcbaa0849c6e
>> Control: fixed -1 0.42.1+ds1-1
>>
>> Dear Maintainer,
>>
>> golang-github-containers-common in stable does not include recent syscall 
>> used
>> by stable kernel/glibc breaking in my case simple container that do 
>> unattended-
>> upgrade on arm
>> particularly syscall=436 that is timer_settime64
>>
>> I believe this should be fixed in a point release.
>
>
> I agree. I realized that these syscall changes also affect amd64. I was able 
> to reproduce the issue
> by running a distribution that ships with glibc 2.34, such as ubuntu impish. 
> The testcase would be:
>
> $ podman run --rm -it ubuntu:impish sh -c 'apt update -qq && apt -y 
> full-upgrade && apt install -y libc6 jq'
>
> The symptom is described in more detail at 
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libpod/+bug/1943049
>
> The problem here is that the issue is not simply dealt with updating the 
> secomp.json file, but also some code changes are required
> that allow setting the default return value for some syscalls. This means 
> that in order to fix this issue in stable, 3 uploads are needed:
>
> - golang-github-opencontainers-specs
> - golang-github-containers-common
> - libpod
>
> I'm cloning this bug appropriately so that these uploads can be tracked 
> separately.
> For now,I've backported and verified the changes. For your convenience, I've 
> uploaded the packages I got so far to
> https://people.debian.org/~siretart/bug.994451/
>
>>
>> BTW I strongly believe that  seccomp.json is a config file and should be
>> shipped in /etc and 988443  should also be shipped in stable.
>
>
> I could get convinced if the issue was fixable by just upading the 
> seccomp.json policy file.
> Sadly, that's not the case.
It seems that recent version of this package allow to change at exec
time the seccomp.json file.
But for this version, you take the point it need rebuilt.

Note that I have fixed this problem by manually using the unstable
version on my stable.

Bastien


> Stable Release team, I think this bug should be cloned with those 
> instructions:
>
>
> --
> regards,
> Reinhard



Bug#994451: golang-github-containers-common: secomp.json does not include newer syscall used by stable kernel/glibc on arm

2021-09-27 Thread Reinhard Tartler
On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 4:18 AM Bastien Roucariès <
roucaries.bast...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Package: golang-github-containers-common
> Version: 0.33.4+ds1-1
> Severity: critical
> Tags: upstream
> Forwarded:
> https://github.com/containers/common/commit/42d1db16bfc0dbaee5781d230dc2bcbaa0849c6e
> Control: fixed -1 0.42.1+ds1-1
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> golang-github-containers-common in stable does not include recent syscall
> used
> by stable kernel/glibc breaking in my case simple container that do
> unattended-
> upgrade on arm
> particularly syscall=436 that is timer_settime64
>
> I believe this should be fixed in a point release.
>

I agree. I realized that these syscall changes also affect amd64. I was
able to reproduce the issue
by running a distribution that ships with glibc 2.34, such as ubuntu
impish. The testcase would be:

$ podman run --rm -it ubuntu:impish sh -c 'apt update -qq && apt -y
full-upgrade && apt install -y libc6 jq'

The symptom is described in more detail at
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libpod/+bug/1943049

The problem here is that the issue is not simply dealt with updating the
secomp.json file, but also some code changes are required
that allow setting the default return value for some syscalls. This means
that in order to fix this issue in stable, 3 uploads are needed:

- golang-github-opencontainers-specs
- golang-github-containers-common
- libpod

I'm cloning this bug appropriately so that these uploads can be tracked
separately.
For now,I've backported and verified the changes. For your convenience,
I've uploaded the packages I got so far to
https://people.debian.org/~siretart/bug.994451/


> BTW I strongly believe that  seccomp.json is a config file and should be
> shipped in /etc and 988443  should also be shipped in stable.
>

I could get convinced if the issue was fixable by just upading the
seccomp.json policy file.
Sadly, that's not the case.

Stable Release team, I think this bug should be cloned with those
instructions:


-- 
regards,
Reinhard


Bug#995187: qtwebengine-opensource-src FTBFS on mips*: unistd_nr_{n32,n64,o32}.h no linger exported by the kernel

2021-09-27 Thread Adrian Bunk
Source: qtwebengine-opensource-src
Version: 5.15.5+dfsg-2
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs

https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=qtwebengine-opensource-src=mips64el=5.15.6%2Bdfsg-1=1632387575=0

...
FAILED: obj/sandbox/linux/seccomp_bpf/syscall_set.o
/usr/bin/g++ -MMD -MF obj/sandbox/linux/seccomp_bpf/syscall_set.o.d 
-DSANDBOX_IMPLEMENTATION -DUSE_UDEV -DUSE_AURA=1 -DUSE_NSS_CERTS=1 
-DUSE_OZONE=1 -DOFFICIAL_BUILD -DTOOLKIT_QT -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 
-D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE -DNO_UNWIND_TABLES 
-D__STDC_CONSTANT_MACROS -D__STDC_FORMAT_MACROS -DNDEBUG -DNVALGRIND 
-DDYNAMIC_ANNOTATIONS_ENABLED=0 -DOPENSSL_NO_ASM -Igen 
-I../../3rdparty/chromium 
-I../../3rdparty/chromium/third_party/perfetto/include 
-Igen/third_party/perfetto/build_config -Igen/third_party/perfetto -Igen -Igen 
-Igen -Igen -I../../3rdparty/chromium/third_party/abseil-cpp 
-I../../3rdparty/chromium/third_party/boringssl/src/include 
-I../../3rdparty/chromium/third_party/protobuf/src -Igen/protoc_out 
-fno-strict-aliasing --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -fstack-protector 
-fno-unwind-tables -fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables -fPIC -pipe -pthread 
-D__SANE_USERSPACE_TYPES__ -mips64r2 -Wa,-mips64r2 -Wall -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE 
-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -Wno-unused-local-typedefs -Wno-maybe-uninitialized 
-Wno-deprecated-declarations -fno-delete-null-pointer-checks -Wno-comments 
-Wno-packed-not-aligned -Wno-dangling-else -Wno-missing-field-initializers 
-Wno-unused-parameter -O2 -fno-ident -fdata-sections -ffunction-sections 
-fno-omit-frame-pointer -g0 -fvisibility=hidden -std=gnu++14 -Wno-narrowing 
-Wno-class-memaccess -Wno-attributes -Wno-class-memaccess 
-Wno-subobject-linkage -Wno-invalid-offsetof -Wno-return-type 
-Wno-deprecated-copy -fno-exceptions -fno-rtti -fvisibility-inlines-hidden -c 
../../3rdparty/chromium/sandbox/linux/bpf_dsl/syscall_set.cc -o 
obj/sandbox/linux/seccomp_bpf/syscall_set.o
In file included from 
../../3rdparty/chromium/sandbox/linux/bpf_dsl/syscall_set.cc:12:
../../3rdparty/chromium/sandbox/linux/bpf_dsl/linux_syscall_ranges.h:47:10: 
fatal error: asm/unistd_nr_n64.h: No such file or directory
   47 | #include   // for __NR_64_Linux and 
__NR_64_Linux_syscalls
  |  ^
compilation terminated.
...


Context:
https://sources.debian.org/src/qtwebengine-opensource-src/5.15.6+dfsg-1/debian/patches/mipsel-linux-5.patch/
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=ccb21774863a



Bug#995185: flint-arb FTBFS on 32bit: gamma_fmpq test fails

2021-09-27 Thread Adrian Bunk
Source: flint-arb
Version: 1:2.21.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs

https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?pkg=flint-arb=1%3A2.21.0-1
(some 32bit ports architectures are building with nocheck)

...
euler_number_fmpzPASS
expPASS
exp_arf_bbPASS
exp_arf_rs_genericPASS
exp_invexpPASS
exp_sum_bs_powtabPASS
exp_tabPASS
exp_taylor_rsPASS
expm1PASS
fac_uiPASS
floorPASS
fmaPASS
gammaPASS
gamma_fmpqmake[3]: *** [../Makefile.subdirs:84: 
../build/arb/test/t-gamma_fmpq_RUN] Aborted
make[3]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs



Processed: retitle 995175 to request-tracker4: CVE-2021-38562

2021-09-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> retitle 995175 request-tracker4: CVE-2021-38562
Bug #995175 [src:request-tracker4] new upstream (5.0.2) [CVE-2021-38562]
Changed Bug title to 'request-tracker4: CVE-2021-38562' from 'new upstream 
(5.0.2) [CVE-2021-38562]'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
995175: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=995175
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems



Processed: cloning 995167, reassign -1 to src:request-tracker4, found -1 in 4.4.3-2

2021-09-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> clone 995167 -1
Bug #995167 [request-tracker5] new upstream (5.0.2) [CVE-2021-38562]
Bug 995167 cloned as bug 995175
> reassign -1 src:request-tracker4 4.4.4+dfsg-2
Bug #995175 [request-tracker5] new upstream (5.0.2) [CVE-2021-38562]
Bug reassigned from package 'request-tracker5' to 'src:request-tracker4'.
No longer marked as found in versions request-tracker5/5.0.1+dfsg-1.
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #995175 to the same values 
previously set
Bug #995175 [src:request-tracker4] new upstream (5.0.2) [CVE-2021-38562]
Marked as found in versions request-tracker4/4.4.4+dfsg-2.
> found -1 4.4.3-2
Bug #995175 [src:request-tracker4] new upstream (5.0.2) [CVE-2021-38562]
Marked as found in versions request-tracker4/4.4.3-2.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
995167: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=995167
995175: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=995175
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems



Bug#995150: openmpi: segfault in mca_io_romio_dist_MPI_File_iwrite_all

2021-09-27 Thread Drew Parsons
Source: openmpi
Followup-For: Bug #995150

Installing libopenmpi3-dbgsym gives a little more detail in the
backtrace

(gdb) bt
#0  0x in ?? ()
#1  0x7fffad13ea84 in MPIOI_File_iwrite_all (fh=, 
offset=offset@entry=0, file_ptr_type=file_ptr_type@entry=101, buf=, count=13, datatype=0x73d27700 , 
myname=0x7fffad17be80  "MPI_FILE_IWRITE_ALL", 
request=0x7fffad54ce90) at 
../../../../../../../ompi/mca/io/romio321/romio/mpi-io/iwrite_all.c:124
#2  0x7fffad13ebd3 in mca_io_romio_dist_MPI_File_iwrite_all (fh=, buf=, count=, datatype=, 
request=)
at ../../../../../../../ompi/mca/io/romio321/romio/mpi-io/iwrite_all.c:58



Bug#995150: openmpi: segfault in mca_io_romio_dist_MPI_File_iwrite_all

2021-09-27 Thread Drew Parsons
Source: openmpi
Followup-For: Bug #995150

gdb on amd64 run locally confirms the segfault, running test_io.py
alone. Refines the problem to MPIOI_File_iwrite_all in
mca_io_romio321.so

$ gdb python3
(gdb) run -m pytest test_io.py
Starting program: /usr/bin/python3 -m pytest test_io.py
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
Using host libthread_db library
"/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libthread_db.so.1".
[New Thread 0x73f2b640 (LWP 3398120)]
...
Thread 1 "python3" received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
0x in ?? ()
(gdb) bt
#0  0x in ?? ()
#1  0x7fffad13ea84 in MPIOI_File_iwrite_all () from 
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/openmpi/lib/openmpi3/mca_io_romio321.so
#2  0x7fffad13ebd3 in mca_io_romio_dist_MPI_File_iwrite_all () from 
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/openmpi/lib/openmpi3/mca_io_romio321.so
#3  0x7fffad13c4c3 in mca_io_romio321_file_iwrite_all () from 
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/openmpi/lib/openmpi3/mca_io_romio321.so
#4  0x73c86b4c in PMPI_File_iwrite_all () from 
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libmpi.so.40
#5  0x73e80d0c in __pyx_pf_6mpi4py_3MPI_4File_62Iwrite_all 
(__pyx_v_buf=, __pyx_v_self=0x7fffacf8db40) at 
src/mpi4py.MPI.c:159094
#6  __pyx_pw_6mpi4py_3MPI_4File_63Iwrite_all (__pyx_v_self=, __pyx_args=__pyx_args@entry=(,), __pyx_kwds=__pyx_kwds@entry=0x0)
at src/mpi4py.MPI.c:27957
#7  0x0052b141 in method_vectorcall_VARARGS_KEYWORDS (func=, args=0x1461818, nargsf=, kwnames=0x0) at 
../Objects/descrobject.c:346
#8  0x005127fb in _PyObject_VectorcallTstate (kwnames=0x0, 
nargsf=, args=0x1461818, callable=, tstate=0x968fb0)
at ../Include/cpython/abstract.h:118
#9  PyObject_Vectorcall (kwnames=0x0, nargsf=, args=0x1461818, 
callable=) at 
../Include/cpython/abstract.h:127
#10 call_function (kwnames=0x0, oparg=, pp_stack=, tstate=0x968fb0) at ../Python/ceval.c:5075
#11 _PyEval_EvalFrameDefault (tstate=, f=, 
throwflag=) at ../Python/ceval.c:3504
#12 0x005291c3 in _PyEval_EvalFrame (throwflag=0, 
f=Frame 0x1461640, for file /projects/python/build/mpi4py/test/test_io.py, 
line 306, in testIReadIWriteAll 
(self=, 
parent=, 
parent=, 
parent=, parent=None, 
_markers={'mpi4py': True}) at remote 0x7fffb69c0850>, own_markers=[], 
extra_keyword_matches=set(), testsfailed=1, testscollected=28, 
shouldstop=False, shouldfail=False, 
trace=, tags=('collection',)) at remote 0x7fffb69c0910>, 
startdir=, 
_initialpaths=frozenset({}), _bestrelpathcache=<_best...(truncated), 
tstate=0x968fb0) at ../Include/internal/pycore_ceval.h:40




-- System Information:
Debian Release: bookworm/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 5.10.0-8-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU threads)
Kernel taint flags: TAINT_PROPRIETARY_MODULE, TAINT_OOT_MODULE
Locale: LANG=en_AU.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_AU.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), 
LANGUAGE=en_AU:en
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled



Bug#995167: new upstream (5.0.2) [CVE-2021-38562]

2021-09-27 Thread Daniel Baumann

Package: request-tracker5
Version: 5.0.1+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Tags: security

Hi,

upstream has fixed the following issue in 5.0.2:

"In previous versions, RT's native login system is vulnerable to user 
enumeration through a timing side-channel attack. This means an external 
entity could try to find valid usernames by attempting logins and 
comparing the time to evaluate each login attempt for valid and invalid 
usernames. This vulnerability does not allow any access to the RT 
system. This vulnerability is assigned CVE-2021-38562 and is fixed

in this release."

It would be nice if you could upgrade (or cherry-pick) that fix, please 
also mention 'CVE-2021-38562' in the changelog when doing so.


Regards,
Daniel



Processed: Re: Bug#992693: bullseye-pu: package glibc/2.31-13+deb11u1

2021-09-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands:

> tags -1 + confirmed d-i
Bug #992693 [release.debian.org] bullseye-pu: package glibc/2.31-13+deb11u1
Added tag(s) confirmed.
> fixed 994042 2.32-3
Bug #994042 [libc6] libc6: debconf text fallback failed to accept input, had to 
be killed leading to broken dist-upgrade
Marked as fixed in versions glibc/2.32-3.

-- 
992693: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=992693
994042: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=994042
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems



Bug#994457: r-cran-gnm autopkgtest needs to be adapted for lapack 3.10

2021-09-27 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Heather,

thanks a lot for your quick response.  We do not have any deadline since
Debian 11 was "just" released.

Kind regards

 Andreas.


On Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 12:01:20PM +0100, Heather Turner wrote:
> Hi Andreas,
> 
> Thanks for forwarding this bug report and thanks to Sébastien for the 
> detailed and accurate analysis. I will need to submit an update to CRAN, 
> which should be feasible in the next week or two. Is there a deadline that I 
> need to work to?
> 
> Best wishes,
> 
> Heather
> 
> On Mon, Sep 27, 2021, at 10:12 AM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > Control: tags -1 upstream
> > Control: forwarded -1 Heather Turner 
> >
> > Hi Heather,
> >
> > the Debian packaged gnm recieved a bug report about a failing test in
> > connection with the upgrade to lapack 3.10.0 on the machine running the
> > test.  Please read the bug report below.
> >
> > We admit we need your help to solve this issue that might affect
> > other systems as well.
> >
> > Kind regards
> >
> > Andreas.
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 10:59:19AM +0200, Sébastien Villemot wrote:
> >> Package: r-cran-gnm
> >> Version: 1.1-1-2
> >> Severity: serious
> >> Tags: sid bookworm
> >> X-Debbugs-CC: debian...@lists.debian.org
> >> User: debian...@lists.debian.org
> >> Usertags: needs-update
> >> 
> >> Dear Maintainer,
> >> 
> >> Since the upload of lapack 3.10.0-1, the autopkgtest of r-cran-gnm
> >> fails in unstable. See for example:
> >> https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/unstable/amd64/r/r-cran-gnm/15155026/log.gz
> >> 
> >> More precisely, test-biplot.R fails, because some results have the
> >> opposite sign compared to the one which is expected.
> >> 
> >> My understanding is that this comes from the SVD of barleyMatrix in
> >> that test file, which is different between lapack 3.9 and 3.10.
> >> Mathematically, the SVD is not unique, and lapack 3.10 returns a
> >> different (still valid) solution. More precisely, I verified that one
> >> of the right-singular vector of that matrix has the opposite sign in
> >> lapack 3.10. I also verified that the decomposition is correct by
> >> checking that:
> >> 
> >>   max(abs(barleySVD$u %*% diag(barleySVD$d) %*% t(barleySVD$v) - 
> >> barleyMatrix))
> >> 
> >> is a small value (about 2e-14).
> >> 
> >> Also note that the hardcoded expected values already partially differ 
> >> from those of the original research paper mentioned in that test
> >> (Gabriel (1998): Generalised bilinear regression). More precisely, half
> >> of the values were hardcoded with the opposite sign. It seems that now
> >> all values need to be hardcoded with the opposite sign.
> >> 
> >> The testsuite of r-cran-gnm thus needs to be adapted, by being more
> >> tolerant to such sign changes.
> >> 
> >> N.B. : when trying to reproduce the problem, please ensure that your
> >> lapack alternative (as given by “update-alternatives --display
> >> liblapack.so.3-x86_64-linux-gnu) points to /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-
> >> gnu/lapack/liblapack.so.3, and not to the binary provided by either
> >> openblas or atlas (because these two have not yet been recompiled
> >> against lapack 3.10, and thus do not expose the problem).
> >> 
> >> Best regards,
> >> 
> >> -- 
> >> ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀  Sébastien Villemot
> >> ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁  Debian Developer
> >> ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀  https://sebastien.villemot.name
> >> ⠈⠳⣄  https://www.debian.org
> >> 
> >
> >
> >
> >> ___
> >> R-pkg-team mailing list
> >> r-pkg-t...@alioth-lists.debian.net
> >> https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/r-pkg-team
> >
> >
> > -- 
> > http://fam-tille.de
> 

-- 
http://fam-tille.de



Bug#995165: key-mapper: file conflict with unrelated package 'keymapper': /usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/keymapper/__init__.py

2021-09-27 Thread Andreas Beckmann
Package: key-mapper
Version: 1.0.0-2
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts

Hi,

during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed to install
because it tries to overwrite other packages files.

>From the attached log (scroll to the bottom...):

  Selecting previously unselected package key-mapper.
  Preparing to unpack .../92-key-mapper_1.0.0-2_all.deb ...
  Unpacking key-mapper (1.0.0-2) ...
  dpkg: error processing archive 
/tmp/apt-dpkg-install-2ISUCX/92-key-mapper_1.0.0-2_all.deb (--unpack):
   trying to overwrite '/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/keymapper/__init__.py', 
which is also in package keymapper 0.6.2
  Errors were encountered while processing:
   /tmp/apt-dpkg-install-2ISUCX/92-key-mapper_1.0.0-2_all.deb

/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/keymapper/__init__.py is the only file
name used by both packages.

The 'keymapper' package has been in the archive since 2004 (and also has
the better match on the conflicting file name), so 'key-mapper' should
probably rename its (internal?) python module.

Note: Conflicts/Breaks/Replaces are *NOT* a valid solution in this case
where unrelated packages are involved.


cheers,

Andreas


keymapper=0.6.2_key-mapper=1.0.0-2.log.gz
Description: application/gzip


Bug#995164: golang-github-skip2-go-qrcode-dev: missing Breaks+Replaces: go-qrcode (<< 0.0~git20200617.da1b656)

2021-09-27 Thread Andreas Beckmann
Package: golang-github-skip2-go-qrcode-dev
Version: 0.0~git20200617.da1b656-2
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts

Hi,

during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from
'bullseye'.
It installed fine in 'bullseye', then the upgrade to 'bookworm' fails
because it tries to overwrite other packages files without declaring a
Breaks+Replaces relation.

See policy 7.6 at
https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-relationships.html#overwriting-files-and-replacing-packages-replaces

>From the attached log (scroll to the bottom...):

  Preparing to unpack 
.../golang-github-skip2-go-qrcode-dev_0.0~git20200617.da1b656-2_all.deb ...
  Unpacking golang-github-skip2-go-qrcode-dev (0.0~git20200617.da1b656-2) ...
  dpkg: error processing archive 
/var/cache/apt/archives/golang-github-skip2-go-qrcode-dev_0.0~git20200617.da1b656-2_all.deb
 (--unpack):
   trying to overwrite 
'/usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/skip2/go-qrcode/bitset/bitset.go', which is 
also in package go-qrcode 0.0~git20190110.dc11ecd-2+b6
  Errors were encountered while processing:
   
/var/cache/apt/archives/golang-github-skip2-go-qrcode-dev_0.0~git20200617.da1b656-2_all.deb


cheers,

Andreas


go-qrcode=0.0~git20190110.dc11ecd-2+b6_golang-github-skip2-go-qrcode-dev=0.0~git20200617.da1b656-2.log.gz
Description: application/gzip


Bug#995163: golang-github-jessevdk-go-flags-dev: missing Breaks+Replaces: golang-go-flags-dev (<< 1.4.0-3~)

2021-09-27 Thread Andreas Beckmann
Package: golang-github-jessevdk-go-flags-dev
Version: 1.4.0-4
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts

Hi,

during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from
'stable'.
It installed fine in 'stable', then the upgrade to 'sid' fails
because it tries to overwrite other packages files without declaring a
Breaks+Replaces relation.

See policy 7.6 at
https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-relationships.html#overwriting-files-and-replacing-packages-replaces

>From the attached log (scroll to the bottom...):

  Preparing to unpack .../golang-github-jessevdk-go-flags-dev_1.4.0-4_all.deb 
...
  Unpacking golang-github-jessevdk-go-flags-dev (1.4.0-4) ...
  dpkg: error processing archive 
/var/cache/apt/archives/golang-github-jessevdk-go-flags-dev_1.4.0-4_all.deb 
(--unpack):
   trying to overwrite 
'/usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/jessevdk/go-flags/arg.go', which is also in 
package golang-go-flags-dev 1.4.0-2
  Errors were encountered while processing:
   /var/cache/apt/archives/golang-github-jessevdk-go-flags-dev_1.4.0-4_all.deb

The exising Breaks+Replaces are insufficiently versioned: (<< 1.4.0-2~)
they don't cover the last version (1.4.0-2) before the package rename.


cheers,

Andreas


golang-go-flags-dev=1.4.0-2_golang-github-jessevdk-go-flags-dev=1.4.0-4.log.gz
Description: application/gzip


Bug#994457: r-cran-gnm autopkgtest needs to be adapted for lapack 3.10

2021-09-27 Thread Heather Turner
Hi Andreas,

Thanks for forwarding this bug report and thanks to Sébastien for the detailed 
and accurate analysis. I will need to submit an update to CRAN, which should be 
feasible in the next week or two. Is there a deadline that I need to work to?

Best wishes,

Heather

On Mon, Sep 27, 2021, at 10:12 AM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Control: tags -1 upstream
> Control: forwarded -1 Heather Turner 
>
> Hi Heather,
>
> the Debian packaged gnm recieved a bug report about a failing test in
> connection with the upgrade to lapack 3.10.0 on the machine running the
> test.  Please read the bug report below.
>
> We admit we need your help to solve this issue that might affect
> other systems as well.
>
> Kind regards
>
> Andreas.
>
> On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 10:59:19AM +0200, Sébastien Villemot wrote:
>> Package: r-cran-gnm
>> Version: 1.1-1-2
>> Severity: serious
>> Tags: sid bookworm
>> X-Debbugs-CC: debian...@lists.debian.org
>> User: debian...@lists.debian.org
>> Usertags: needs-update
>> 
>> Dear Maintainer,
>> 
>> Since the upload of lapack 3.10.0-1, the autopkgtest of r-cran-gnm
>> fails in unstable. See for example:
>> https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/unstable/amd64/r/r-cran-gnm/15155026/log.gz
>> 
>> More precisely, test-biplot.R fails, because some results have the
>> opposite sign compared to the one which is expected.
>> 
>> My understanding is that this comes from the SVD of barleyMatrix in
>> that test file, which is different between lapack 3.9 and 3.10.
>> Mathematically, the SVD is not unique, and lapack 3.10 returns a
>> different (still valid) solution. More precisely, I verified that one
>> of the right-singular vector of that matrix has the opposite sign in
>> lapack 3.10. I also verified that the decomposition is correct by
>> checking that:
>> 
>>   max(abs(barleySVD$u %*% diag(barleySVD$d) %*% t(barleySVD$v) - 
>> barleyMatrix))
>> 
>> is a small value (about 2e-14).
>> 
>> Also note that the hardcoded expected values already partially differ 
>> from those of the original research paper mentioned in that test
>> (Gabriel (1998): Generalised bilinear regression). More precisely, half
>> of the values were hardcoded with the opposite sign. It seems that now
>> all values need to be hardcoded with the opposite sign.
>> 
>> The testsuite of r-cran-gnm thus needs to be adapted, by being more
>> tolerant to such sign changes.
>> 
>> N.B. : when trying to reproduce the problem, please ensure that your
>> lapack alternative (as given by “update-alternatives --display
>> liblapack.so.3-x86_64-linux-gnu) points to /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-
>> gnu/lapack/liblapack.so.3, and not to the binary provided by either
>> openblas or atlas (because these two have not yet been recompiled
>> against lapack 3.10, and thus do not expose the problem).
>> 
>> Best regards,
>> 
>> -- 
>> ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀  Sébastien Villemot
>> ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁  Debian Developer
>> ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀  https://sebastien.villemot.name
>> ⠈⠳⣄  https://www.debian.org
>> 
>
>
>
>> ___
>> R-pkg-team mailing list
>> r-pkg-t...@alioth-lists.debian.net
>> https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/r-pkg-team
>
>
> -- 
> http://fam-tille.de



Bug#994786: marked as done (spectral-cube: autopkgtest needs update for new version of radio-beam: warning message changed)

2021-09-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 27 Sep 2021 09:53:05 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#994786: fixed in spectral-cube 0.5.0-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #994786,
regarding spectral-cube: autopkgtest needs update for new version of 
radio-beam: warning message changed
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
994786: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=994786
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: spectral-cube
Version: 0.5.0-3
Severity: serious
X-Debbugs-CC: debian...@lists.debian.org, radio-b...@packages.debian.org
Tags: sid bookworm
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: needs-update
Control: affects -1 src:radio-beam

Dear maintainer(s),

With a recent upload of radio-beam the autopkgtest of spectral-cube
fails in testing when that autopkgtest is run with the binary packages
of radio-beam from unstable. It passes when run with only packages from
testing. In tabular form:

   passfail
radio-beam from testing0.3.3-1
spectral-cube  from testing0.5.0-3
all others from testingfrom testing

I copied some of the output at the bottom of this report. It seems to me
that there was an *addition* warning raised and thus the check fails.

Currently this regression is blocking the migration of radio-beam to
testing [1]. Of course, radio-beam shouldn't just break your autopkgtest
(or even worse, your package), but it seems to me that the change in
radio-beam was intended and your package needs to update to the new
situation.

If this is a real problem in your package (and not only in your
autopkgtest), the right binary package(s) from radio-beam should really
add a versioned Breaks on the unfixed version of (one of your)
package(s). Note: the Breaks is nice even if the issue is only in the
autopkgtest as it helps the migration software to figure out the right
versions to combine in the tests.

More information about this bug and the reason for filing it can be found on
https://wiki.debian.org/ContinuousIntegration/RegressionEmailInformation

Paul

[0] You can see what packages were added from the second line of the log
file quoted below. The migration software adds source package from
unstable to the list if they are needed to install packages from
radio-beam/0.3.3-1. I.e. due to versioned dependencies or breaks/conflicts.
[1] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=radio-beam

https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/amd64/s/spectral-cube/15365768/log.gz

=== FAILURES
===
___ test_parallel_bad_params
___

data_adv =
PosixPath('/tmp/pytest-of-debci/pytest-0/test_parallel_bad_params0/adv.fits')

@pytest.mark.skipif('not scipyOK')
def test_parallel_bad_params(data_adv):

# This function only makes sense for the plain SpectralCube class

cube, data = cube_and_raw(data_adv, use_dask=False)

with pytest.raises(ValueError,
   match=("parallel execution was not requested,
but "
  "multiple cores were: these are
incompatible "
  "options.  Either specify num_cores=1 or "
  "parallel=True")):
cube.spectral_smooth_median(3, num_cores=2, parallel=False,
update_function=update_function)

with warnings.catch_warnings(record=True) as wrn:
cube.spectral_smooth_median(3, num_cores=1, parallel=True,
update_function=update_function)

>   assert ("parallel=True was specified but num_cores=1. "
"Joblib will be used to run the task with a "
"single thread.") in str(wrn[-1].message)
E   assert 'parallel=True was specified but num_cores=1. Joblib will
be used to run the task with a single thread.' in "'datfix' made the
change 'Set MJD-OBS to 50982.687794 from DATE-OBS'."
E+  where "'datfix' made the change 'Set MJD-OBS to 50982.687794
from DATE-OBS'." = str(FITSFixedWarning("'datfix' made the change 'Set
MJD-OBS to 50982.687794 from DATE-OBS'."))
E+where FITSFixedWarning("'datfix' made the change 'Set
MJD-OBS to 50982.687794 from DATE-OBS'.") = .message

/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/spectral_cube/tests/test_spectral_cube.py:2279:
AssertionError



OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: 

Bug#995132: marked as done (libhtml-treebuilder-libxml-perl: autopkgtest regression between 5 September 2021 and 25 September 2021)

2021-09-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 27 Sep 2021 09:49:15 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#995132: fixed in libhtml-treebuilder-libxml-perl 0.26-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #995132,
regarding libhtml-treebuilder-libxml-perl: autopkgtest regression between 5 
September 2021 and 25 September 2021
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
995132: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=995132
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: libhtml-treebuilder-libxml-perl
Version: 0.26-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: regression
X-Debbugs-CC: debian...@lists.debian.org

Dear maintainer(s),

Your package has an autopkgtest, great! However, somewhere between last
month and today it started to fail [1]. Unfortunately our migration
setup didn't catch this because it's either caused by something external
to the archive, or the package that caused it is in not a direct (build)
dependency of your packages. Can you fix the situation?

Paul

[1] https://ci.debian.net/packages/libh/libhtml-treebuilder-libxml-perl/

https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/amd64/libh/libhtml-treebuilder-libxml-perl/15530611/log.gz

not ok 7 - 2 atts on same element # TODO I don't know, this order is
required for xpath spec, or not??
#   Failed (TODO) test '2 atts on same element'
#   at t/HTML-TreeBuilder-XPath.t line 39.
#  got: 'foomyspan'
# expected: 'myspanfoo'
not ok 8 - 2 atts on same element # TODO I don't know, this order is
required for xpath spec, or not??
#   Failed (TODO) test '2 atts on same element'
#   at t/HTML-TreeBuilder-XPath.t line 40.
#  got: 'foomyspan'
# expected: 'myspanfoo'
not ok 9 - 2 atts on same element (unsorted) # TODO I don't know, this
order is required for xpath spec, or not??
#   Failed (TODO) test '2 atts on same element (unsorted)'
#   at t/HTML-TreeBuilder-XPath.t line 41.
#  got: 'foomyspan'
# expected: 'myspanfoo'



OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: libhtml-treebuilder-libxml-perl
Source-Version: 0.26-2
Done: gregor herrmann 

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
libhtml-treebuilder-libxml-perl, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP 
archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 995...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
gregor herrmann  (supplier of updated 
libhtml-treebuilder-libxml-perl package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org)


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2021 11:25:29 +0200
Source: libhtml-treebuilder-libxml-perl
Architecture: source
Version: 0.26-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Perl Group 
Changed-By: gregor herrmann 
Closes: 995132
Changes:
 libhtml-treebuilder-libxml-perl (0.26-2) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * Team upload.
 .
   [ Debian Janitor ]
   * Bump debhelper dependency to >= 9, since that's what is used in
 debian/compat.
   * Bump debhelper from old 9 to 12.
   * Set debhelper-compat version in Build-Depends.
   * Set upstream metadata fields: Bug-Database, Bug-Submit, Repository,
 Repository-Browse.
   * Update standards version to 4.4.1, no changes needed.
   * Update standards version to 4.5.0, no changes needed.
 .
   [ gregor herrmann ]
   * Add patch from upstream merge request: compatibility with newer
 libxml2.
 Thanks to Paul Gevers for the bug report. (Closes: #995132)
   * Use debhelper-compat 13.
   * Declare compliance with Debian Policy 4.6.0.
Checksums-Sha1:
 92868efdd30b6073f6536a25a0a20bab7b3ac3b4 2668 
libhtml-treebuilder-libxml-perl_0.26-2.dsc
 54c09eb6518eda066578a1dac1032ca3d8378b4c 4992 
libhtml-treebuilder-libxml-perl_0.26-2.debian.tar.xz
Checksums-Sha256:
 30ef20f3757acb7354f54090eb16f189d7ad5b290cbe3fe60f01afa83cd19fb4 2668 
libhtml-treebuilder-libxml-perl_0.26-2.dsc
 d496be6334e50ee29ca7e6a774bd4596394e71a51ef663a7491b1ab8df9908db 4992 
libhtml-treebuilder-libxml-perl_0.26-2.debian.tar.xz
Files:
 09444d6f662d92b81bb3f369f0c8890f 2668 perl optional 
libhtml-treebuilder-libxml-perl_0.26-2.dsc
 

Bug#995132: marked as pending in libhtml-treebuilder-libxml-perl

2021-09-27 Thread gregor herrmann
Control: tag -1 pending

Hello,

Bug #995132 in libhtml-treebuilder-libxml-perl reported by you has been fixed 
in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

https://salsa.debian.org/perl-team/modules/packages/libhtml-treebuilder-libxml-perl/-/commit/344bdf6ae1fcafa5934b73090fa8d879eeff961e


Add patch from upstream merge request: compatibility with newer libxml2.

Thanks: Paul Gevers for the bug report.
Closes: #995132


(this message was generated automatically)
-- 
Greetings

https://bugs.debian.org/995132



Processed: Bug#995132 marked as pending in libhtml-treebuilder-libxml-perl

2021-09-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands:

> tag -1 pending
Bug #995132 [src:libhtml-treebuilder-libxml-perl] 
libhtml-treebuilder-libxml-perl: autopkgtest regression between 5 September 
2021 and 25 September 2021
Added tag(s) pending.

-- 
995132: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=995132
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems



Processed: tagging 995132

2021-09-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> tags 995132 + sid bookworm ftbfs
Bug #995132 [src:libhtml-treebuilder-libxml-perl] 
libhtml-treebuilder-libxml-perl: autopkgtest regression between 5 September 
2021 and 25 September 2021
Added tag(s) ftbfs, bookworm, and sid.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
995132: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=995132
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems



Bug#981902: marked as done (facterdb: autopkgtest failure)

2021-09-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 27 Sep 2021 09:18:53 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#981902: fixed in facterdb 1.8.0-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #981902,
regarding facterdb: autopkgtest failure
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
981902: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=981902
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: facterdb
Version: 1.6.0-2
Severity: serious

https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/amd64/f/facterdb/10218718/log.gz

...
Failures:

  1) FacterDB.facterdb_fact_files returns the deduplicated combination of 
.default_fact_files and .external_fact_files
 Failure/Error: expect(facterdb_fact_files.count).to 
eq(described_class.default_fact_files.count)

   expected: 1577
got: 1702

   (compared using ==)
 # ./spec/facterdb_spec.rb:153:in `block (3 levels) in '

  2) Default Facts 
../../../../../usr/share/rubygems-integration/all/gems/facterdb-1.6.0/facts/2.2/archlinux-x86_64.facts
 contains an ipaddress fact
 Failure/Error: expect(content['ipaddress']).to not_be_nil.and not_be_empty

  expected: not nil
   got: nil

   ...and:

  expected nil to respond to `empty?`
 # ./spec/facts_spec.rb:105:in `block (4 levels) in '

  3) Default Facts 
../../../../../usr/share/rubygems-integration/all/gems/facterdb-1.6.0/facts/3.2/aix-53-powerpc.facts
 contains an ipaddress fact
 Failure/Error: expect(content['ipaddress']).to not_be_nil.and not_be_empty

  expected: not nil
   got: nil

   ...and:

  expected nil to respond to `empty?`
 # ./spec/facts_spec.rb:105:in `block (4 levels) in '

  4) Default Facts 
../../../../../usr/share/rubygems-integration/all/gems/facterdb-1.6.0/facts/3.2/aix-61-powerpc.facts
 contains an ipaddress fact
 Failure/Error: expect(content['ipaddress']).to not_be_nil.and not_be_empty

  expected: not nil
   got: nil

   ...and:

  expected nil to respond to `empty?`
 # ./spec/facts_spec.rb:105:in `block (4 levels) in '

  5) Default Facts 
../../../../../usr/share/rubygems-integration/all/gems/facterdb-1.6.0/facts/3.2/aix-71-powerpc.facts
 contains an ipaddress fact
 Failure/Error: expect(content['ipaddress']).to not_be_nil.and not_be_empty

  expected: not nil
   got: nil

   ...and:

  expected nil to respond to `empty?`
 # ./spec/facts_spec.rb:105:in `block (4 levels) in '

  6) Default Facts 
../../../../../usr/share/rubygems-integration/all/gems/facterdb-1.6.0/facts/1.7/archlinux-x86_64.facts
 contains an ipaddress fact
 Failure/Error: expect(content['ipaddress']).to not_be_nil.and not_be_empty

  expected: not nil
   got: nil

   ...and:

  expected nil to respond to `empty?`
 # ./spec/facts_spec.rb:105:in `block (4 levels) in '

  7) Default Facts 
../../../../../usr/share/rubygems-integration/all/gems/facterdb-1.6.0/facts/2.1/archlinux-x86_64.facts
 contains an ipaddress fact
 Failure/Error: expect(content['ipaddress']).to not_be_nil.and not_be_empty

  expected: not nil
   got: nil

   ...and:

  expected nil to respond to `empty?`
 # ./spec/facts_spec.rb:105:in `block (4 levels) in '

  8) Default Facts 
../../../../../usr/share/rubygems-integration/all/gems/facterdb-1.6.0/facts/2.3/archlinux-x86_64.facts
 contains an ipaddress fact
 Failure/Error: expect(content['ipaddress']).to not_be_nil.and not_be_empty

  expected: not nil
   got: nil

   ...and:

  expected nil to respond to `empty?`
 # ./spec/facts_spec.rb:105:in `block (4 levels) in '

  9) Default Facts 
../../../../../usr/share/rubygems-integration/all/gems/facterdb-1.6.0/facts/3.0/ubuntu-15.10-x86_64.facts
 contains an ipaddress fact
 Failure/Error: expect(content['ipaddress']).to not_be_nil.and not_be_empty

  expected: not nil
   got: nil

   ...and:

  expected nil to respond to `empty?`
 # ./spec/facts_spec.rb:105:in `block (4 levels) in '

  10) Default Facts 
../../../../../usr/share/rubygems-integration/all/gems/facterdb-1.6.0/facts/3.0/ubuntu-15.10-i386.facts
 contains an ipaddress fact
  Failure/Error: expect(content['ipaddress']).to not_be_nil.and not_be_empty

   expected: not nil
got: nil

...and:

   expected nil to respond to `empty?`
  # ./spec/facts_spec.rb:105:in `block (4 levels) in '

  11) Default Facts 

Processed: bug 995132 is forwarded to https://github.com/tokuhirom/HTML-TreeBuilder-LibXML/issues/16

2021-09-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> forwarded 995132 
> https://github.com/tokuhirom/HTML-TreeBuilder-LibXML/issues/16
Bug #995132 [src:libhtml-treebuilder-libxml-perl] 
libhtml-treebuilder-libxml-perl: autopkgtest regression between 5 September 
2021 and 25 September 2021
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 
'https://github.com/tokuhirom/HTML-TreeBuilder-LibXML/issues/16'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
995132: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=995132
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems



Processed: Re: Bug#994457: r-cran-gnm autopkgtest needs to be adapted for lapack 3.10

2021-09-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands:

> tags -1 upstream
Bug #994457 [r-cran-gnm] r-cran-gnm autopkgtest needs to be adapted for lapack 
3.10
Added tag(s) upstream.
> forwarded -1 Heather Turner 
Bug #994457 [r-cran-gnm] r-cran-gnm autopkgtest needs to be adapted for lapack 
3.10
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'Heather Turner '.

-- 
994457: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=994457
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems



Bug#994457: r-cran-gnm autopkgtest needs to be adapted for lapack 3.10

2021-09-27 Thread Andreas Tille
Control: tags -1 upstream
Control: forwarded -1 Heather Turner 

Hi Heather,

the Debian packaged gnm recieved a bug report about a failing test in
connection with the upgrade to lapack 3.10.0 on the machine running the
test.  Please read the bug report below.

We admit we need your help to solve this issue that might affect
other systems as well.

Kind regards

Andreas.

On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 10:59:19AM +0200, Sébastien Villemot wrote:
> Package: r-cran-gnm
> Version: 1.1-1-2
> Severity: serious
> Tags: sid bookworm
> X-Debbugs-CC: debian...@lists.debian.org
> User: debian...@lists.debian.org
> Usertags: needs-update
> 
> Dear Maintainer,
> 
> Since the upload of lapack 3.10.0-1, the autopkgtest of r-cran-gnm
> fails in unstable. See for example:
> https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/unstable/amd64/r/r-cran-gnm/15155026/log.gz
> 
> More precisely, test-biplot.R fails, because some results have the
> opposite sign compared to the one which is expected.
> 
> My understanding is that this comes from the SVD of barleyMatrix in
> that test file, which is different between lapack 3.9 and 3.10.
> Mathematically, the SVD is not unique, and lapack 3.10 returns a
> different (still valid) solution. More precisely, I verified that one
> of the right-singular vector of that matrix has the opposite sign in
> lapack 3.10. I also verified that the decomposition is correct by
> checking that:
> 
>   max(abs(barleySVD$u %*% diag(barleySVD$d) %*% t(barleySVD$v) - 
> barleyMatrix))
> 
> is a small value (about 2e-14).
> 
> Also note that the hardcoded expected values already partially differ 
> from those of the original research paper mentioned in that test
> (Gabriel (1998): Generalised bilinear regression). More precisely, half
> of the values were hardcoded with the opposite sign. It seems that now
> all values need to be hardcoded with the opposite sign.
> 
> The testsuite of r-cran-gnm thus needs to be adapted, by being more
> tolerant to such sign changes.
> 
> N.B. : when trying to reproduce the problem, please ensure that your
> lapack alternative (as given by “update-alternatives --display
> liblapack.so.3-x86_64-linux-gnu) points to /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-
> gnu/lapack/liblapack.so.3, and not to the binary provided by either
> openblas or atlas (because these two have not yet been recompiled
> against lapack 3.10, and thus do not expose the problem).
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> -- 
> ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀  Sébastien Villemot
> ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁  Debian Developer
> ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀  https://sebastien.villemot.name
> ⠈⠳⣄  https://www.debian.org
> 



> ___
> R-pkg-team mailing list
> r-pkg-t...@alioth-lists.debian.net
> https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/r-pkg-team


-- 
http://fam-tille.de



Bug#993198: gnome-shell-extension-system-monitor: does not declare compatibility with GNOME Shell 40

2021-09-27 Thread Leo "Costela" Antunes
On Fri, Sep 24, 2021 at 10:07 PM Samuel Henrique  wrote:
> Leo, from my side you're free to push your changes whenever you want.

I will as soon as someone gives me access to the repo ;)
Just requested access to the Gnome group, but that may take a while.

> Let's try to coordinate things, feel free to perform changes to the
> packaging, I will wait until I get your ack to go ahead (if there's
> any work left to be done).

I'm not a gnome-extension expert, so I'll push my changes so that the
package is at least gpb-buildable, and you can then maybe check that
the build makes sense and upload it yourself if you want.

Cheers
Leo



Bug#995150: openmpi: segfault in mca_io_romio_dist_MPI_File_iwrite_all

2021-09-27 Thread Drew Parsons
Source: openmpi
Version: 4.1.2~rc1-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS

The new version of openmpi seems to be segfaulting in
mca_io_romio321.so

The segfault is found in nearly all arches in mpi4py tests,
https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=mpi4py
(it causes mpi4py to FTBFS)

The crash is bad enough that most arches are not able to provide a
backtrace, although some arches reference libpthread.so.0 (which
could suggest instability from the libc6 2.32 transition)

ppc64el and ia64 however provide a full backtrace, both pointing at
mca_io_romio321.so (MPIOI_File_iwrite_all)

>From ppc64el
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=mpi4py=ppc64el=3.1.1-8=1632692000=0

testIReadIWrite (test_io.TestIOSelf) ... ok
testIReadIWriteAll (test_io.TestIOSelf) ... [ppc64el-osuosl-01:1381766] *** 
Process received signal ***
[ppc64el-osuosl-01:1381766] Signal: Segmentation fault (11)
[ppc64el-osuosl-01:1381766] Signal code: Address not mapped (1)
[ppc64el-osuosl-01:1381766] Failing at address: (nil)
[ppc64el-osuosl-01:1381766] [ 0] 
linux-vdso64.so.1(__kernel_sigtramp_rt64+0x0)[0x7fff92ec0514]
[ppc64el-osuosl-01:1381766] [ 1] [0x0]
[ppc64el-osuosl-01:1381766] [ 2] 
/usr/lib/powerpc64le-linux-gnu/openmpi/lib/openmpi3/mca_io_romio321.so(mca_io_romio_dist_MPI_File_iwrite_all+0x38)[0x7fff831135e8]
[ppc64el-osuosl-01:1381766] [ 3] 
/usr/lib/powerpc64le-linux-gnu/openmpi/lib/openmpi3/mca_io_romio321.so(mca_io_romio321_file_iwrite_all+0xa8)[0x7fff831100f8]
[ppc64el-osuosl-01:1381766] [ 4] 
/usr/lib/powerpc64le-linux-gnu/libmpi.so.40(PMPI_File_iwrite_all+0x100)[0x7fff9221e890]
[ppc64el-osuosl-01:1381766] [ 5] 
/<>/.pybuild/cpython3_3.9/build/mpi4py/MPI.cpython-39-powerpc64le-linux-gnu.so(+0x12b654)[0x7fff9245b654]
[ppc64el-osuosl-01:1381766] [ 6] /usr/bin/python3.9[0x100f9e84]
[ppc64el-osuosl-01:1381766] [ 7] 
/usr/bin/python3.9(_PyEval_EvalFrameDefault+0xa9c)[0x100d2a6c]
[ppc64el-osuosl-01:1381766] [ 8] 
/usr/bin/python3.9(_PyFunction_Vectorcall+0x20c)[0x100f631c]



Bug#993441: marked as done (kleopatra: Creates unsafe ~/.gnupg when not already present)

2021-09-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 27 Sep 2021 07:03:31 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#993441: fixed in kleopatra 4:21.08.1-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #993441,
regarding kleopatra: Creates unsafe ~/.gnupg when not already present
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
993441: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=993441
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: kleopatra
Version: 4:21.08.0-1
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Justification: user security hole
X-Debbugs-Cc: Debian Security Team 

I had previously 'improved' my gnupg configuration, but that is (now)
deprecated.
So I moved my ~/.gnupg directory to a backup location to start anew.

If I then start Kleopatra, but don't do anything with it, that directory
gets created, but with the wrong permissions:
diederik@bagend:~$ stat .gnupg/
  File: .gnupg/
  Size: 4096Blocks: 8  IO Block: 4096   directory
Device: 10304h/66308d   Inode: 12845182Links: 3
Access: (0755/drwxr-xr-x)  Uid: ( 1000/diederik)   Gid: ( 1000/diederik)

Running a gpg command from a Konsole window reports the issue:
diederik@bagend:~$ gpg --list-keys
gpg: WARNING: unsafe permissions on homedir '/home/diederik/.gnupg'


If I uninstall Kleopatra and remove the ~/.gnupg directory (again) and
then do 'gpg --list-keys', I get:
diederik@bagend:~$ gpg --list-keys
gpg: directory '/home/diederik/.gnupg' created
gpg: keybox '/home/diederik/.gnupg/pubring.kbx' created
gpg: /home/diederik/.gnupg/trustdb.gpg: trustdb created
diederik@bagend:~$ stat .gnupg/
  File: .gnupg/
  Size: 4096Blocks: 8  IO Block: 4096   directory
Device: 10304h/66308d   Inode: 12845180Links: 2
Access: (0700/drwx--)  Uid: ( 1000/diederik)   Gid: ( 1000/diederik)

So Kleopatra creates ~/.gnupg with incorrect permissions when the
directory doesn't exist.

Cheers,
  Diederik

-- System Information:
Debian Release: bookworm/sid
  APT prefers unstable-debug
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable-debug'), (500, 'testing-debug'), (500, 
'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (101, 'experimental'), (1, 'experimental-debug')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: arm64

Kernel: Linux 5.10.0-8-amd64 (SMP w/16 CPU threads)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=en_US
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled

Versions of packages kleopatra depends on:
ii  dirmngr2.2.27-2
ii  gnupg  2.2.27-2
ii  gpgsm  2.2.27-2
ii  libassuan0 2.5.5-1
ii  libc6  2.31-17
ii  libgcc-s1  11.2.0-3
ii  libgpg-error0  1.42-3
ii  libgpgme11 1.16.0-1
ii  libgpgmepp61.16.0-1
ii  libkf5codecs5  5.85.0-2
ii  libkf5configcore5  5.85.0-2
ii  libkf5configgui5   5.85.0-2
ii  libkf5configwidgets5   5.85.0-2
ii  libkf5coreaddons5  5.85.0-2
ii  libkf5crash5   5.85.0-2
ii  libkf5dbusaddons5  5.85.0-2
ii  libkf5i18n55.85.0-2
ii  libkf5iconthemes5  5.85.0-2
ii  libkf5itemmodels5  5.85.0-2
ii  libkf5libkleo5 [libkf5libkleo5-21.08]  4:21.08.0-1
ii  libkf5mime5abi1 [libkf5mime5-21.08]21.08.0-1
ii  libkf5notifications5   5.85.0-3
ii  libkf5textwidgets5 5.85.0-2
ii  libkf5widgetsaddons5   5.85.0-2
ii  libkf5windowsystem55.85.0-2
ii  libkf5xmlgui5  5.85.0-3
ii  libqgpgme7 1.16.0-1
ii  libqt5core5a   5.15.2+dfsg-10
ii  libqt5dbus55.15.2+dfsg-10
ii  libqt5gui5 5.15.2+dfsg-10
ii  libqt5network5 5.15.2+dfsg-10
ii  libqt5printsupport55.15.2+dfsg-10
ii  libqt5widgets5 5.15.2+dfsg-10
ii  libstdc++6 11.2.0-3
ii  paperkey   1.6-1
ii  pinentry-qt1.1.1-1

kleopatra recommends no packages.

kleopatra suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: kleopatra
Source-Version: 4:21.08.1-2
Done: Norbert Preining 

We believe 

Bug#995134: marked as done (dkms modules fail to build on 5.14.0, error: ‘TIF_IA32’ undeclared)

2021-09-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 27 Sep 2021 06:33:58 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#995134: fixed in openafs 1.8.8-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #995134,
regarding dkms modules fail to build on 5.14.0, error: ‘TIF_IA32’ undeclared
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
995134: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=995134
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: openafs-modules-dkms
Version: 1.8.6-5
Severity: grave
Justification: Renders package unusable

The openafs dkms modules fail to build on 5.14.0. I've attached
/var/lib/dkms/openafs/1.8.6/build/make.log.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: bookworm/sid
  APT prefers unstable-debug
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable-debug'), (500, 'unstable'), (1, 
'experimental-debug'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 5.14.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU threads)
Kernel taint flags: TAINT_PROPRIETARY_MODULE, TAINT_OOT_MODULE, 
TAINT_UNSIGNED_MODULE
Locale: LANG=en_CA.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_CA.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE not set
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled

Versions of packages openafs-modules-dkms depends on:
ii  dkms   2.8.4-4
ii  libc6-dev  2.32-4
ii  perl   5.32.1-6

Versions of packages openafs-modules-dkms recommends:
ii  openafs-client  1.8.6-5

openafs-modules-dkms suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information

-- 
|)|/  Ryan Kavanagh  | 4E46 9519 ED67 7734 268F
|\|\  https://rak.ac | BD95 8F7B F8FC 4A11 C97A
DKMS make.log for openafs-1.8.6 for kernel 5.14.0-1-amd64 (x86_64)
Sun 26 Sep 17:00:15 EDT 2021
checking for gcc... gcc-10
checking whether the C compiler works... yes
checking for C compiler default output file name... a.out
checking for suffix of executables... 
checking whether we are cross compiling... no
checking for suffix of object files... o
checking whether we are using the GNU C compiler... yes
checking whether gcc-10 accepts -g... yes
checking for gcc-10 option to accept ISO C89... none needed
checking build system type... x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
checking host system type... x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
checking how to run the C preprocessor... gcc-10 -E
checking for grep that handles long lines and -e... /bin/grep
checking for egrep... /bin/grep -E
checking for ANSI C header files... yes
checking for sys/types.h... yes
checking for sys/stat.h... yes
checking for stdlib.h... yes
checking for string.h... yes
checking for memory.h... yes
checking for strings.h... yes
checking for inttypes.h... yes
checking for stdint.h... yes
checking for unistd.h... yes
checking for a BSD-compatible install... /usr/bin/install -c
checking for flex... no
checking for lex... no
checking for pkg-config... /usr/bin/pkg-config
checking pkg-config is at least version 0.9.0... yes
checking for libxslt... no
checking for saxon... no
checking for xalan-j... no
checking for xsltproc... xsltproc
checking for fop... no
checking for dblatex... no
checking for docbook2pdf... no
checking for kindlegen... no
checking for doxygen... no
checking for dot... dot
checking for library containing strerror... none required
checking for pid_t... yes
checking for size_t... yes
checking whether ln -s works... yes
checking for ranlib... ranlib
checking for bison... no
checking for byacc... no
checking if lex is flex... yes
checking whether byte order is known at compile time... yes
checking whether byte ordering is bigendian... no
checking whether printf understands the %z length modifier... yes
checking your OS... linux
checking for ranlib... (cached) ranlib
checking for as... as
checking for mv... mv
checking for rm... rm
checking for ld... ld
checking for cp... cp
checking for gencat... gencat
checking if gcc-10 accepts -march=pentium... no
checking if gcc-10 needs -fno-strength-reduce... yes
checking if gcc-10 needs -fno-strict-aliasing... yes
checking if gcc-10 supports -fno-common... yes
checking if gcc-10 supports -pipe... yes
checking if linux kbuild requires EXTRA_CFLAGS... no
checking if linux kernel module build works... yes
checking operation follow_link in inode_operations... no
checking operation put_link in inode_operations... no
checking operation rename in inode_operations... no
checking for linux/cred.h... yes
checking for linux/config.h... no
checking for linux/exportfs.h... yes
checking for linux/freezer.h... yes
checking for linux/key-type.h... yes
checking for linux/semaphore.h... yes
checking for linux/seq_file.h... yes
checking for linux/sched/signal.h... yes
checking for 

Bug#995018: marked as done (jupyter-server breaks jupyterlab-server autopkgtest: No module named 'anyio.to_thread')

2021-09-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 27 Sep 2021 06:33:51 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#995018: fixed in jupyter-server 1.11.0-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #995018,
regarding jupyter-server breaks jupyterlab-server autopkgtest: No module named 
'anyio.to_thread'
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
995018: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=995018
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: jupyter-server
Control: found -1 jupyter-server/1.10.2-1
Severity: serious
Tags: sid bookworm
X-Debbugs-CC: debian...@lists.debian.org
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: breaks

Dear maintainer(s),

With a recent upload of jupyter-server the autopkgtest of
jupyterlab-server fails in testing when that autopkgtest is run with the
binary packages of jupyter-server from unstable. It passes when run with
only packages from testing. In tabular form:

   passfail
jupyter-server from testing1.10.2-1
jupyterlab-server  from testing2.4.0-1
all others from testingfrom testing

I copied some of the output at the bottom of this report. Seems like a
missing dependency in jupyter-server to me.

Currently this regression is blocking the migration of jupyter-server to
testing [1].

More information about this bug and the reason for filing it can be found on
https://wiki.debian.org/ContinuousIntegration/RegressionEmailInformation

Paul

[1] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=jupyter-server

https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/amd64/j/jupyterlab-server/15485816/log.gz
autopkgtest [05:54:07]: test import: [---
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "", line 1, in 
  File
"/tmp/autopkgtest-lxc.69igrrrk/downtmp/build.edD/src/jupyterlab_server/__init__.py",
line 4, in 
from .app import LabServerApp
  File
"/tmp/autopkgtest-lxc.69igrrrk/downtmp/build.edD/src/jupyterlab_server/app.py",
line 7, in 
from jupyter_server.extension.application import ExtensionApp,
ExtensionAppJinjaMixin
  File
"/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/jupyter_server/extension/application.py", line
21, in 
from jupyter_server.serverapp import ServerApp
  File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/jupyter_server/serverapp.py",
line 80, in 
from jupyter_server.services.contents.filemanager import
AsyncFileContentsManager, FileContentsManager
  File
"/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/jupyter_server/services/contents/filemanager.py",
line 15, in 
from anyio.to_thread import run_sync
ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'anyio.to_thread'
autopkgtest [05:54:07]: test import: ---]



OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: jupyter-server
Source-Version: 1.11.0-1
Done: Julien Puydt 

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
jupyter-server, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 995...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Julien Puydt  (supplier of updated jupyter-server package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org)


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2021 08:11:18 +0200
Source: jupyter-server
Architecture: source
Version: 1.11.0-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Python Team 
Changed-By: Julien Puydt 
Closes: 995018
Changes:
 jupyter-server (1.11.0-1) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * Declare versioned dep on anyio (Closes: #995018).
   * New upstream release.
   * Add lintian overrides.
Checksums-Sha1:
 d70a921ee2ef4d2c0d02e0e210b10471ce0e453e 2447 jupyter-server_1.11.0-1.dsc
 184068f001dc610ddda83bb9e6df53af955014b1 296519 
jupyter-server_1.11.0.orig.tar.gz
 08030c8a51616adf4210e1dc3f2723c615ac9a08 4188 
jupyter-server_1.11.0-1.debian.tar.xz
 38130274953d05f3d919292b2c63237b8494b60a 8770 
jupyter-server_1.11.0-1_source.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
 414c74061bdf201b18fc31e73e76eadd03fe7c530da000602b6e721e70a1e345 2447 
jupyter-server_1.11.0-1.dsc
 9a8eef475986cd57dd1ad3a0daa62c5fee2be01dae93b27575eca2a65ba8178b 296519 
jupyter-server_1.11.0.orig.tar.gz