Bug#997516: marked as done (guile-ssh: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: cd debian/build/guile-3.0 && make -j1 check VERBOSE=1 returned exit code 2)

2021-11-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 11 Nov 2021 07:33:41 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#997516: fixed in guile-ssh 0.13.1-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #997516,
regarding guile-ssh: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: cd debian/build/guile-3.0 && 
make -j1 check VERBOSE=1 returned exit code 2
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
997516: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=997516
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: guile-ssh
Version: 0.13.1-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm

Hi,

During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.


Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[5]: Entering directory '/<>/debian/build/guile-3.0/tests'
> PASS: log.scm
> PASS: server.scm
> PASS: session.scm
> PASS: client-server.scm
> PASS: popen.scm
> PASS: shell.scm
> PASS: server-client.scm
> PASS: sssh-ssshd.scm
> PASS: key.scm
> PASS: tunnel.scm
> FAIL: dist.scm
> 
>Guile-SSH 0.13.1: tests/test-suite.log
> 
> 
> # TOTAL: 11
> # PASS:  10
> # SKIP:  0
> # XFAIL: 0
> # FAIL:  1
> # XPASS: 0
> # ERROR: 0
> 
> .. contents:: :depth: 2
> 
> FAIL: dist
> ==
> 
>  Starting test dist
> Group begin: dist
> Test begin:
>   test-name: "make-node"
>   source-file: "tests/dist.scm"
>   source-line: 44
>   source-form: (test-assert "make-node" (begin (set-log-userdata! 
> "make-node") (run-client-test (lambda (server) (start-server/exec server 
> (const #t))) (lambda () (call-with-connected-session/shell (lambda (session) 
> (let ((n (make-node session))) (and n (eq? (node-session n) session)
> Test end:
>   result-kind: pass
>   actual-value: #t
> Test begin:
>   test-name: "split, 1"
>   source-file: "tests/dist.scm"
>   source-line: 57
>   source-form: (test-equal "split, 1" (quote ((a b) (c d) (e f g))) (split 
> (quote (a b c d e f g)) 3))
> Test end:
>   result-kind: pass
>   actual-value: ((a b) (c d) (e f g))
>   expected-value: ((a b) (c d) (e f g))
> Test begin:
>   test-name: "split, 2"
>   source-file: "tests/dist.scm"
>   source-line: 61
>   source-form: (test-equal "split, 2" (quote ((a))) (split (quote (a)) 2))
> Test end:
>   result-kind: pass
>   actual-value: ((a))
>   expected-value: ((a))
> Test begin:
>   test-name: "make-job"
>   source-file: "tests/dist.scm"
>   source-line: 66
>   source-form: (test-assert "make-job" (begin (set-log-userdata! "make-job") 
> (run-client-test (lambda (server) (start-server/exec server (const #f))) 
> (lambda () (call-with-connected-session/shell (lambda (session) (let* ((node 
> (make-node session)) (data (quote (1 2 3))) (proc (quote (lambda (n) (#{1+}# 
> n (j (make-job (quote map) node data proc))) (and (eq? (job-type j) 
> (quote map)) (eq? (job-node j) node) (eq? (job-data j) data) (eq? (job-proc 
> j) proc)
> Test end:
>   result-kind: pass
>   actual-value: #t
> Test begin:
>   test-name: "set-job-node"
>   source-file: "tests/dist.scm"
>   source-line: 85
>   source-form: (test-assert "set-job-node" (begin (set-log-userdata! 
> "set-job-node") (run-client-test (lambda (server) (start-server/exec server 
> (const #t))) (lambda () (call-with-connected-session/shell (lambda (session) 
> (let* ((n1 (make-node session)) (n2 (make-node session)) (data (quote ())) 
> (proc (quote (lambda (n) (#{1+}# n (j1 (make-job (quote map) n1 data 
> proc)) (j2 (set-job-node j1 n2))) (and (not (eq? j1 j2)) (eq? (job-type j1) 
> (job-type j2)) (eq? (job-node j1) n1) (eq? (job-node j2) n2) (eq? (job-data 
> j1) (job-data j2)) (eq? (job-proc j1) (job-proc j2))
> Test end:
>   result-kind: pass
>   actual-value: #t
> Test begin:
>   test-name: "hand-out-job, invalid type"
>   source-file: "tests/dist.scm"
>   source-line: 107
>   source-form: (test-assert "hand-out-job, invalid type" (begin 
> (set-log-userdata! "hand-out-job, invalid type") (catch #t (lambda () 
> (run-client-test (lambda (server) (start-server/exec server (const #t))) 
> (lambda () (call-with-connected-session/shell (lambda (session) (let ((n 
> (make-node session))) (hand-out-job (make-job (quote invalid-job) n (quote 
> ()) (const #t #f) (const #t
> Test end:
>   result-kind: pass
>   actual-value: #t
> Test begin:
>   test-name: "assign-eval"
>   source-file: "tests/dist.scm"
>   source-line: 120
>   source-form: (test-assert "assign-eval" (begin (set-log-userdata! 
> "assign-eval") (run-client-test (lambda 

Processed: 1.1.3 builds

2021-11-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> tags 996364 fixed-upstream
Bug #996364 [src:ruby-recursive-open-struct] ruby-recursive-open-struct: FTBFS 
with ruby3.0: ERROR: Test "ruby3.0" failed: Failure/Error: alias_method 
:modifiable?, :modifiable
Added tag(s) fixed-upstream.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
996364: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=996364
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems



Processed: Re: pynfft: Removal of the python3-*-dbg packages in sid/bookworm

2021-11-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands:

> severity -1 serious
Bug #994335 [src:pynfft] pynfft: Removal of the python3-*-dbg packages in 
sid/bookworm
Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'

-- 
994335: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=994335
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems



Processed: Re: libgpuarray: Removal of the python3-*-dbg packages in sid/bookworm

2021-11-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands:

> severity -1 serious
Bug #994304 [src:libgpuarray] libgpuarray: Removal of the python3-*-dbg 
packages in sid/bookworm
Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'

-- 
994304: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=994304
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems



Bug#998449: marked as done (autopkgtest: dh-golang-autopkgtest FAIL non-zero exit status 2)

2021-11-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 11 Nov 2021 03:18:31 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#998449: fixed in golang-github-containernetworking-plugins 
0.9.1+ds1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #998449,
regarding autopkgtest: dh-golang-autopkgtest FAIL non-zero exit status 2
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
998449: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=998449
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: libpod
Version: 3.4.1+ds1-2
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: regression
X-Debbugs-CC: debian...@lists.debian.org

The libpod autopkgtest curently fails in unstable. I have seen #993532,
but I don't know if it's the same issue.

See the log below, slightly edited for brevity. Unfortunately there is
zero diagnostics output, it just exits non-zero failing the test. Maybe
this is something that could be improved in dh_golang_autopkgtest, I
don't know.

8<8<8<-
autopkgtest [08:39:48]: test dh-golang-autopkgtest: 
/usr/bin/dh_golang_autopkgtest
autopkgtest [08:39:48]: test dh-golang-autopkgtest: [---
[info] Testing github.com/containers/podman...
[info] Source code installed by binary package, overriding dh_auto_configure...
dh build --buildsystem=golang --with=golang,bash-completion 
--builddirectory=_output
   dh_update_autotools_config -O--buildsystem=golang -O--builddirectory=_output
   dh_autoreconf -O--buildsystem=golang -O--builddirectory=_output
   debian/rules override_dh_auto_configure
make[1]: Entering directory 
'/tmp/autopkgtest-lxc.yyi7s1c4/downtmp/autopkgtest_tmp'
mkdir -p "_output"
cp -a /usr/share/gocode/src "_output"
make[1]: Leaving directory 
'/tmp/autopkgtest-lxc.yyi7s1c4/downtmp/autopkgtest_tmp'
   debian/rules override_dh_auto_build
make[1]: Entering directory 
'/tmp/autopkgtest-lxc.yyi7s1c4/downtmp/autopkgtest_tmp'
/usr/bin/make docs docker-docs
make[2]: Entering directory 
'/tmp/autopkgtest-lxc.yyi7s1c4/downtmp/autopkgtest_tmp'
mkdir -p 
"/tmp/autopkgtest-lxc.yyi7s1c4/downtmp/autopkgtest_tmp/debian/tmp/go/src/github.com/containers"
ln -sfn "/tmp/autopkgtest-lxc.yyi7s1c4/downtmp/autopkgtest_tmp" 
"/tmp/autopkgtest-lxc.yyi7s1c4/downtmp/autopkgtest_tmp/debian/tmp/go/src/github.com/containers/podman"
touch .gopathok
if [ ! -x "/usr/bin/go-md2man" ]; then \
env GO111MODULE=off go get -u github.com/cpuguy83/go-md2man; \
fi
mkdir -p docs/build/man
(cd docs; ./dckrman.sh ./build/man/*.1)
make[2]: Leaving directory 
'/tmp/autopkgtest-lxc.yyi7s1c4/downtmp/autopkgtest_tmp'
dh_auto_build -v  --builddirectory=_output -- -tags 
"apparmor,ostree,seccomp,selinux,systemd" \
  -ldflags "-X main.buildInfo=3.4.1+ds1-2"
cd _output && go version
go version go1.17.2 linux/amd64
cd _output && go env
GO111MODULE="off"
GOARCH="amd64"
GOBIN=""
GOCACHE="/tmp/autopkgtest-lxc.yyi7s1c4/downtmp/autopkgtest_tmp/_output/go-build"
GOENV="/tmp/autopkgtest-lxc.yyi7s1c4/downtmp/autopkgtest_tmp/debian/.debhelper/generated/_source/home/.config/go/env"
GOEXE=""
GOEXPERIMENT=""
GOFLAGS=""
GOHOSTARCH="amd64"
GOHOSTOS="linux"
GOINSECURE=""
GOMODCACHE="/tmp/autopkgtest-lxc.yyi7s1c4/downtmp/autopkgtest_tmp/_output/pkg/mod"
GONOPROXY=""
GONOSUMDB=""
GOOS="linux"
GOPATH="/tmp/autopkgtest-lxc.yyi7s1c4/downtmp/autopkgtest_tmp/_output"
GOPRIVATE=""
GOPROXY="off"
GOROOT="/usr/lib/go-1.17"
GOSUMDB="sum.golang.org"
GOTMPDIR=""
GOTOOLDIR="/usr/lib/go-1.17/pkg/tool/linux_amd64"
GOVCS=""
GOVERSION="go1.17.2"
GCCGO="gccgo"
AR="ar"
CC="gcc"
CXX="g++"
CGO_ENABLED="1"
GOMOD=""
CGO_CFLAGS="-g -O2 
-ffile-prefix-map=/tmp/autopkgtest-lxc.yyi7s1c4/downtmp/autopkgtest_tmp=. 
-fstack-protector-strong -Wformat -Werror=format-security"
CGO_CPPFLAGS="-Wdate-time -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2"
CGO_CXXFLAGS="-g -O2 
-ffile-prefix-map=/tmp/autopkgtest-lxc.yyi7s1c4/downtmp/autopkgtest_tmp=. 
-fstack-protector-strong -Wformat -Werror=format-security"
CGO_FFLAGS="-g -O2 
-ffile-prefix-map=/tmp/autopkgtest-lxc.yyi7s1c4/downtmp/autopkgtest_tmp=. 
-fstack-protector-strong"
CGO_LDFLAGS="-Wl,-z,relro"
PKG_CONFIG="pkg-config"
GOGCCFLAGS="-fPIC -m64 -pthread -fmessage-length=0 
-fdebug-prefix-map=/tmp/go-build2850767338=/tmp/go-build 
-gno-record-gcc-switches"
cd _output && go generate -v -tags 
apparmor,ostree,seccomp,selinux,systemd -ldflags "-X 
main.buildInfo=3.4.1+ds1-2" github.com/containers/podman/cmd/podman 
github.com/containers/podman/cmd/podman/common 
github.com/containers/podman/cmd/podman/completion 
github.com/containers/podman/cmd/podman/containers 

Bug#999440: golang-github-containerd-stargz-snapshotter: Build access network

2021-11-10 Thread Shengjing Zhu
Source: golang-github-containerd-stargz-snapshotter
Version: 0.8.0-3
Severity: serious
X-Debbugs-Cc: z...@debian.org

https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=golang-github-containerd-stargz-snapshotter=all=0.8.0-4=1636327998=0

=== RUN   TestLayerConvertFunc
estargz_test.go:37: Get 
"https://github.com/AkihiroSuda/test-oci-archives/releases/download/v20210101/hello-world.tar.gz":
 dial tcp 140.82.121.3:443: connect: network is unreachable
--- FAIL: TestLayerConvertFunc (0.13s)
FAIL
FAILgithub.com/containerd/stargz-snapshotter/nativeconverter/estargz
0.170s
=== RUN   TestLayerConvertFunc
zstdchunked_test.go:40: Get 
"https://github.com/AkihiroSuda/test-oci-archives/releases/download/v20210101/hello-world.tar.gz":
 dial tcp 140.82.121.3:443: connect: network is unreachable
--- FAIL: TestLayerConvertFunc (0.00s)
FAIL



Bug#998358: marked as done (Subject: grepmail: autopkgtest doesn't do anything)

2021-11-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 11 Nov 2021 03:03:29 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#998358: fixed in grepmail 5.3104-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #998358,
regarding Subject: grepmail: autopkgtest doesn't do anything
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
998358: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=998358
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: grepmail
X-Debbugs-Cc: mar...@talau.info, eribe...@debian.org
Version: 5.3104-1
Severity: serious
Justification: RC policy

Dear Marcos, Joao,

I appreciate your attention to the orphaned package grepmail and the
fact that you try to save it from removal from testing, but in the
process you added and autopkgtest that doesn't do anything at all.

I played around with it a tiny bit, and the reason it doesn't run
anything is because dh_auto_test doesn't detect a known framework. Why
dh_auto_test works during building is that during build a Makefile is
generated in one of the steps before testing and dh_auto_test executes
the test target in that. For this to work, the autopkgtest at least
needs more of the Build-Depends, otherwise the test fails. I ran the
following manually in the testbed after checking what code
was actually run during the test on the buildd and it currently fails
all tests:

PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1 "/usr/bin/perl" "-MExtUtils::Command::MM"
"-MTest::Harness" "-e" "undef *Test::Harness::Switches; test_harness(1,
'inc', 'blib/lib', 'blib/arch')" t/*.t

Before fixing this, please ensure you're testing the as-installed
binary instead of the code in the source tree, as the intention of
autopkgtest is to test the package, not the source, as I believe you're
not testing /usr/bin/grepmail

Paul

-- System Information:
Debian Release: bookworm/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 5.14.0-2-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU threads)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8),
LANGUAGE=en_US:en
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled



OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: grepmail
Source-Version: 5.3104-4
Done: Joao Eriberto Mota Filho 

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
grepmail, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 998...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Joao Eriberto Mota Filho  (supplier of updated grepmail 
package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org)


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2021 23:37:30 -0300
Source: grepmail
Architecture: source
Version: 5.3104-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian QA Group 
Changed-By: Joao Eriberto Mota Filho 
Closes: 998358
Changes:
 grepmail (5.3104-4) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * QA upload.
   * debian/tests/control: removed because the current CI test was useless.
 Thanks to Paul Gevers . (Closes: #998358)
Checksums-Sha1:
 2adfc0a91d1a78edf3d1c337080ad20e67763c1d 2004 grepmail_5.3104-4.dsc
 f34e83c9ce6cc846eaef58163c22e32dc4b4c353 6512 grepmail_5.3104-4.debian.tar.xz
 f04f5f76cbbcb2367b5290edfdd8f2461eebfa76 5475 
grepmail_5.3104-4_source.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
 dc8cd5b5e4774462c7409f22b1eb3af71d00e2569d2a024748013d976e58443b 2004 
grepmail_5.3104-4.dsc
 1f6b1a5512520a5c629dc4136e20fbd3495c87c19b9db9d4f5bfa4ab686b2f06 6512 
grepmail_5.3104-4.debian.tar.xz
 0781fbf95633feb9e05088697d9bfd5846edd24e41782993553a8bc49e6b8045 5475 
grepmail_5.3104-4_source.buildinfo
Files:
 e35310e90c4a9bc9afc4e6802c2ab16c 2004 mail optional grepmail_5.3104-4.dsc
 4dd17aafaf4f526bd818d7eeb3e274f8 6512 mail optional 
grepmail_5.3104-4.debian.tar.xz
 42af22472f10d3c2395f71cbde261565 5475 mail optional 
grepmail_5.3104-4_source.buildinfo

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-

iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEENX3LDuyVoBrrofDS3mO5xwTr6e8FAmGMhJcACgkQ3mO5xwTr
6e+ZTBAAlqjVLYb+cTa+61/9Bt7XXH2sz644uL1rksdh/wO/dg8IVPRKw66o6P9Y
cVPc906XN4jlVZvVvBTw0HygdSMNNJCiFaFlHE9ztCsOMzgOjo8+/DqIZslgIBc4

Bug#998358: Subject: grepmail: autopkgtest doesn't do anything

2021-11-10 Thread Eriberto
Em qua., 10 de nov. de 2021 às 18:55, Paul Gevers  escreveu:
>
> Hi Eriberto,
>
> On Tue, 2 Nov 2021 19:57:37 -0300 Eriberto  wrote:
> > ow, Marcos will package the new upstream
> > release and he will fix this mistake. In a final action, he will send
> > a SPU to fix a specific issue.
>
> Please be aware that grepmail will be removed from testing in 7 days if
> the issue isn't fixed. Obviously, the package can come back later too,
> but just so you know.

Thanks Paul.  Marcos is a bit busy these days, so I will fix this issue now.

Regards,

Eriberto



Bug#997942: tomboy-ng: FTBFS with fpc 3.2.2

2021-11-10 Thread David Bannon



On Tue, 2021-11-09 at 22:56 +1100, David Bannon wrote:
> No, sorry, I cannot do a sensible test of my app using FPC and/or
> Lazarus from sid.
> 
> I can install FPC3.2.2 from Sid by using priorities.
> 
> But the Lazarus in Sid is non functional, blocked, because of an
> issue 

OK, I have made this work. Instead of cherry picking just fpc and
lazarus from Sid, I 'updated' my whole Testing (VM) install to Sid and
that worked as expected.

Tests all passed, I will push it up, as a new release (closing this
ticket) as soon as I get a fresh Spanish translation. My translator is
sometimes out of direct contact so not sure how long that will be.

Davo 



Bug#997300: marked as done (ruby-mini-portile2: FTBFS: ERROR: Test "ruby2.7" failed: RuntimeError: Failed to complete configure task)

2021-11-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 11 Nov 2021 01:18:47 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#997300: fixed in ruby-mini-portile2 2.5.0-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #997300,
regarding ruby-mini-portile2: FTBFS: ERROR: Test "ruby2.7" failed: 
RuntimeError: Failed to complete configure task
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
997300: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=997300
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: ruby-mini-portile2
Version: 2.5.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs

Hi,

During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.


Relevant part (hopefully):
> RuntimeError: Failed to complete configure task
> 
> /<>/debian/ruby-mini-portile2/usr/share/rubygems-integration/all/gems/mini_portile2-2.5.0/lib/mini_portile2/mini_portile.rb:405:in
>  `block in execute'
> 
> /<>/debian/ruby-mini-portile2/usr/share/rubygems-integration/all/gems/mini_portile2-2.5.0/lib/mini_portile2/mini_portile.rb:376:in
>  `chdir'
> 
> /<>/debian/ruby-mini-portile2/usr/share/rubygems-integration/all/gems/mini_portile2-2.5.0/lib/mini_portile2/mini_portile.rb:376:in
>  `execute'
> 
> /<>/debian/ruby-mini-portile2/usr/share/rubygems-integration/all/gems/mini_portile2-2.5.0/lib/mini_portile2/mini_portile_cmake.rb:22:in
>  `configure'
> 
> /<>/debian/ruby-mini-portile2/usr/share/rubygems-integration/all/gems/mini_portile2-2.5.0/lib/mini_portile2/mini_portile.rb:153:in
>  `cook'
> /<>/test/test_cmake.rb:25:in `block (2 levels) in before_all'
> /<>/test/helper.rb:56:in `with_custom_git_dir'
> /<>/test/test_cmake.rb:24:in `block in before_all'
> /<>/test/test_cmake.rb:19:in `tap'
> /<>/test/test_cmake.rb:19:in `before_all'
> /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/minitest/hooks/test.rb:74:in `block (2 levels) 
> in with_info_handler'
> /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/minitest/test.rb:195:in `capture_exceptions'
> /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/minitest/hooks/test.rb:72:in `block in 
> with_info_handler'
> /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/minitest/hooks/test.rb:26:in `around_all'
> /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/minitest/hooks/test.rb:70:in `with_info_handler'
> /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/minitest.rb:324:in `run'
> /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/minitest.rb:164:in `block in __run'
> /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/minitest.rb:164:in `map'
> /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/minitest.rb:164:in `__run'
> /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/minitest.rb:141:in `run'
> /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/minitest.rb:68:in `block in autorun'
> 
> 19 runs, 37 assertions, 0 failures, 1 errors, 0 skips
> rake aborted!
> Command failed with status (1): [ruby -w -I"test" 
> /usr/share/rubygems-integration/all/gems/rake-13.0.3/lib/rake/rake_test_loader.rb
>  "test/test_cmake.rb" "test/test_cook.rb" "test/test_download.rb" 
> "test/test_proxy.rb" -v]
> /usr/share/rubygems-integration/all/gems/rake-13.0.3/exe/rake:27:in ` (required)>'
> Tasks: TOP => default
> (See full trace by running task with --trace)
> ERROR: Test "ruby2.7" failed: 


The full build log is available from:
http://qa-logs.debian.net/2021/10/23/ruby-mini-portile2_2.5.0-2_unstable.log

A list of current common problems and possible solutions is available at
http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS . You're welcome to contribute!

If you reassign this bug to another package, please marking it as 'affects'-ing
this package. See https://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control#affects

If you fail to reproduce this, please provide a build log and diff it with mine
so that we can identify if something relevant changed in the meantime.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: ruby-mini-portile2
Source-Version: 2.5.0-3
Done: Daniel Leidert 

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
ruby-mini-portile2, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 997...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Daniel Leidert  (supplier of updated ruby-mini-portile2 
package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org)


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2021 

Processed: tagging 996529

2021-11-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> # https://github.com/hashicorp/vagrant/pull/12427
> tags 996529 + patch
Bug #996529 [src:vagrant] vagrant: FTBFS with ruby3.0: ERROR: Test "ruby3.0" 
failed:  RuntimeError:
Added tag(s) patch.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
996529: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=996529
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems



Bug#998903: src:libidn: fails to migrate to testing for too long

2021-11-10 Thread Sunil Mohan Adapa

On 11/10/21 16:25, Simon Josefsson wrote:

James Valleroy via "Discussion list for GNU Internationalized Domain
Name library (Libidn)"  writes:


On 11/10/21 6:40 AM, Simon Josefsson wrote:

James, what do you think?  Is the libidn11-java package important for
you to have in Debian?  My perception was that nobody really used it,
and IDNA2003/StringPrep is old technology so it feels strange that new
code is coming around using.  While I am also upstream of this Java
code, I'm not familiar with how Java stuff is packaged/used in Debian,
and maybe there is another way of doing things that is just as easy for
you.


Hello,

(Adding Sunil who did most of the packaging work for libjxmpp-java.)

libjxmpp-java was packaged as a dependency of jitsi-videobridge.
Specifically for Jitsi we need the -core, -jid, and -util-cache modules.

It looks like libidn is only used for jxmpp-stringprep-libidn module.
Possibly we can disable building this module.


Is it not used by anything else?  If so, I agree it makes sense to
disable it, unless you think it is useful elsewhere.  I could add
libidn11-java back if there is real usage of it, but if it is not needed
for anything particular right now, I would prefer if you disable it
until there is real interest in using it.  When/if that occurs, we can
always add libidn11-java and jxmpp-stringprep-libidn back again.
Hopefully, XMPP will be updated to use something newer than StringPrep
meanwhile.



Simon, thank you for offering to build the library again if needed.

My understanding was that one of the three stringprep implementations is 
needed to use the jxmpp library. They are based on libidn, icu4j and 
rocksxmppprecis. Of these, we have only built the stringprep library 
based on libidn and assumed it to be critical.


However, I dug up a bit more in jitsi-xmpp-extenstions and other 
jitsi-videobridge code. To use the jxmpp-stringprep-libidn library one 
needs to import the class and call setup() on it. This does seem to be 
happening anywhere as far as I can tell. In this case, the jxmpp library 
seems to use a fallback implementation. It appears we can drop building 
the library jxmpp-stringprep-libidn although I can't say for sure 
without going through jitsi and all of its dependencies more thoroughly.


When we progress more on the packaging effort we might know better and 
can then request libidn to build libidn11-java again.


James, let us drop building jxmpp-stringprep-libidn for now and drop 
dependency on libidn11-java.


Thanks,

--
Sunil



Bug#997394: marked as done (libjpeg-turbo: FTBFS: dh_auto_configure: error: cd obj-x86_64-linux-gnu && cmake -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=/usr -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=None -DCMAKE_INSTALL_SYSCONFDIR=/etc -DCMAKE

2021-11-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 11 Nov 2021 00:33:29 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#997394: fixed in libjpeg-turbo 1:2.1.1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #997394,
regarding libjpeg-turbo: FTBFS: dh_auto_configure: error: cd 
obj-x86_64-linux-gnu && cmake -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=/usr 
-DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=None -DCMAKE_INSTALL_SYSCONFDIR=/etc 
-DCMAKE_INSTALL_LOCALSTATEDIR=/var -DCMAKE_EXPORT_NO_PACKAGE_REGISTRY=ON 
-DCMAKE_FIND_USE_PACKAGE_REGISTRY=OFF 
-DCMAKE_FIND_PACKAGE_NO_PACKAGE_REGISTRY=ON -DCMAKE_INSTALL_RUNSTATEDIR=/run 
-DCMAKE_SKIP_INSTALL_ALL_DEPENDENCY=ON "-GUnix Makefiles" 
-DCMAKE_VERBOSE_MAKEFILE=ON -DCMAKE_INSTALL_LIBDIR=lib/x86_64-linux-gnu 
--with-build-date=1:2.0.6-4 -DWITH_SIMD=1 
-DCMAKE_INSTALL_LIBDIR=/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu 
-DCMAKE_INSTALL_MANDIR=/usr/share/man/ .. returned exit code 1
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
997394: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=997394
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: libjpeg-turbo
Version: 1:2.0.6-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm

Hi,

During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.


Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering directory '/<>'
> dh_auto_configure -- --with-build-date=1:2.0.6-4 \
>  -DWITH_SIMD=1  \
>  -DCMAKE_INSTALL_LIBDIR=/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu \
>  -DCMAKE_INSTALL_MANDIR=/usr/share/man/
>   cd obj-x86_64-linux-gnu && cmake -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=/usr 
> -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=None -DCMAKE_INSTALL_SYSCONFDIR=/etc 
> -DCMAKE_INSTALL_LOCALSTATEDIR=/var -DCMAKE_EXPORT_NO_PACKAGE_REGISTRY=ON 
> -DCMAKE_FIND_USE_PACKAGE_REGISTRY=OFF 
> -DCMAKE_FIND_PACKAGE_NO_PACKAGE_REGISTRY=ON -DCMAKE_INSTALL_RUNSTATEDIR=/run 
> -DCMAKE_SKIP_INSTALL_ALL_DEPENDENCY=ON "-GUnix Makefiles" 
> -DCMAKE_VERBOSE_MAKEFILE=ON -DCMAKE_INSTALL_LIBDIR=lib/x86_64-linux-gnu 
> --with-build-date=1:2.0.6-4 -DWITH_SIMD=1 
> -DCMAKE_INSTALL_LIBDIR=/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu 
> -DCMAKE_INSTALL_MANDIR=/usr/share/man/ ..
> CMake Error: Unknown argument --with-build-date=1:2.0.6-4
> CMake Error: Run 'cmake --help' for all supported options.
> dh_auto_configure: error: cd obj-x86_64-linux-gnu && cmake 
> -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=/usr -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=None 
> -DCMAKE_INSTALL_SYSCONFDIR=/etc -DCMAKE_INSTALL_LOCALSTATEDIR=/var 
> -DCMAKE_EXPORT_NO_PACKAGE_REGISTRY=ON -DCMAKE_FIND_USE_PACKAGE_REGISTRY=OFF 
> -DCMAKE_FIND_PACKAGE_NO_PACKAGE_REGISTRY=ON -DCMAKE_INSTALL_RUNSTATEDIR=/run 
> -DCMAKE_SKIP_INSTALL_ALL_DEPENDENCY=ON "-GUnix Makefiles" 
> -DCMAKE_VERBOSE_MAKEFILE=ON -DCMAKE_INSTALL_LIBDIR=lib/x86_64-linux-gnu 
> --with-build-date=1:2.0.6-4 -DWITH_SIMD=1 
> -DCMAKE_INSTALL_LIBDIR=/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu 
> -DCMAKE_INSTALL_MANDIR=/usr/share/man/ .. returned exit code 1
> make[1]: *** [debian/rules:49: override_dh_auto_configure] Error 2


The full build log is available from:
http://qa-logs.debian.net/2021/10/23/libjpeg-turbo_2.0.6-4_unstable.log

A list of current common problems and possible solutions is available at
http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS . You're welcome to contribute!

If you reassign this bug to another package, please marking it as 'affects'-ing
this package. See https://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control#affects

If you fail to reproduce this, please provide a build log and diff it with mine
so that we can identify if something relevant changed in the meantime.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: libjpeg-turbo
Source-Version: 1:2.1.1-1
Done: Mike Gabriel 

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
libjpeg-turbo, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 997...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Mike Gabriel  (supplier of updated libjpeg-turbo package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org)


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2021 01:17:59 +0100
Source: libjpeg-turbo
Architecture: source
Version: 1:2.1.1-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: 

Bug#887834: mpd installation fails, cannot open /var/lib/mpd/tag_cache, /run/mpd/pid

2021-11-10 Thread Diederik de Haas
On Fri, 5 Nov 2021 05:55:52 +0100 Florian Schlichting  wrote:
> Hi Ryan (and Max please see below):
> 
> please, for now, delete or comment out the pid_file line

I'm responding to this bug as commenting out the pid_file line was the solution
for me too, but my 'symptoms' are (a bit) different.

For me it wasn't a new install of mpd, but an upgrade:
root@soundserver:~# grep 'upgrade mpd' /var/log/dpkg.log
2021-11-10 21:03:37 upgrade mpd:arm64 0.22.10-1+b1 0.23.3-2

The system upgrade brought a lot of updated and also new packages (pipewire),
but in hindsight it's probably not important. I also installed a new kernel and
therefor rebooted my system.

After reboot I noticed a problem with mpd:
diederik@soundserver:~$ systemctl | grep -i fail
● mpd.service  loaded failed failedMusic Player Daemon
● mpd.socket   loaded failed failedmpd.socket
diederik@soundserver:~$ systemctl status mpd.service
× mpd.service - Music Player Daemon
 Loaded: loaded (/lib/systemd/system/mpd.service; enabled; vendor preset: 
enabled)
 Active: failed (Result: exit-code) since Wed 2021-11-10 23:30:21 CET; 1min 
11s ago
TriggeredBy: × mpd.socket
   Docs: man:mpd(1)
 man:mpd.conf(5)
 file:///usr/share/doc/mpd/html/user.html
Process: 1466 ExecStart=/usr/bin/mpd --no-daemon $MPDCONF (code=exited, 
status=1/FAILURE)
   Main PID: 1466 (code=exited, status=1/FAILURE)
CPU: 1.876s

nov 10 23:30:19 soundserver systemd[1]: Starting Music Player Daemon...
nov 10 23:30:21 soundserver mpd[1466]: Nov 10 23:30 : exception: Tag list 
mismatch, discarding database file
nov 10 23:30:21 soundserver mpd[1466]: Nov 10 23:30 : exception: Failed to 
create pid file "/run/mpd/pid": Permission denied
nov 10 23:30:21 soundserver systemd[1]: mpd.service: Main process exited, 
code=exited, status=1/FAILURE
nov 10 23:30:21 soundserver systemd[1]: mpd.service: Failed with result 
'exit-code'.
nov 10 23:30:21 soundserver systemd[1]: Failed to start Music Player Daemon.
nov 10 23:30:21 soundserver systemd[1]: mpd.service: Consumed 1.876s CPU time.
nov 10 23:30:21 soundserver systemd[1]: mpd.service: Start request repeated too 
quickly.
nov 10 23:30:21 soundserver systemd[1]: mpd.service: Failed with result 
'exit-code'.
nov 10 23:30:21 soundserver systemd[1]: Failed to start Music Player Daemon.

I found https://github.com/MusicPlayerDaemon/MPD/issues/1299 which seem to
indicate that the first exception is expected.
I did a "mpc rescan" both as user (me) and as root, but got
"MPD error: Connection refused", which indicates a premission issue. So I
checked the /run/ directory and saw that there wasn't a 'mpd' subdir.

Then I checked Debian's BTS and found this bug.
After disabling the pidfile-line, mpd did start up successfully (it still
printed the "exception: Tag list mismatch, discarding database file", but it
now did start successfully.

root@soundserver:~# ls -ld /run/mpd
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 60 Nov 10 23:53 /run/mpd
root@soundserver:~# ls -l /run/mpd/
total 0
srw-rw-rw- 1 root root 0 Nov 10 23:53 socket


I'm _assuming_ that it's the same issue, but as my symptoms are somewhat
different, I thought I'd mention mine.
If this is actually a different issue which should be filed separately, let me
know and I'll do that. If you want me to run (some) tests, I can do that too.

Cheers,
  Diederik

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Bug#998224: hplip: HPLIP incorrectly links to obsolete or missing libhpdiscovery.so

2021-11-10 Thread Troy Rollo
Unfortunately the system which exhibited the problem has now been 
updated with a working version after I kludged it to work.


However, what happens is the shared libraries are all linked twice. The 
first time it is linked to libraries in the build tree (and do not have 
links to the old . They are then relinked, I assume as part of 
installing the files for packaging. At that stage, libhpdiscovery.so* 
will not be found in debian/tmp/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu, and it picks 
it up from the local system, if installed, or fails, if not.


If the build picks it up to the local system, and the one in the local 
system is linked to libnetsnmp.so.30, then this dependency propagates 
through the other libraries, resulting in libraries that cannot be 
loaded at all.


I eventually got the build to work by removing all old copies of 
libhpdiscovery.so* from the system library directories, manually copying 
libhpdiscovery.so* from the build tree to the system library 
directories, then freshly extracting the source and rebuilding.


I built using debuild on a live system.

I suspect reproducing will not be straight-forward as it requires a 
system that still has the version of hplip from buster, but has 
otherwise been upgraded to bullseye. I cannot spare the time right now 
to set up a test environment and make the attempt to reproduce this, so 
perhaps this should be closed and left as a record for anybody who 
encounters the problem later.


On 7/11/21 11:30 am, Thorsten Alteholz wrote:

Control: tag -1 moreinfo

Hi Troy,

thanks for your bugreport. Unfortunately I have problems understanding 
what is going on.


How can HPLIP link to a missing libhpdiscovery.so.
I assume you are building the package in a minimal chroot. How can 
there be an old version of libhpdiscovery.so available?


Can you please be a bit more verbose about what you are doing and what 
fails?


Best regards,
Thorsten






smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature


Bug#984199: marked as done (libpappsomspp: ftbfs with GCC-11)

2021-11-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 10 Nov 2021 23:03:50 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#984199: fixed in libpappsomspp 0.8.39-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #984199,
regarding libpappsomspp: ftbfs with GCC-11
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
984199: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=984199
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: src:libpappsomspp
Version: 0.8.15-1
Severity: normal
Tags: sid bookworm
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-gcc-11

[This bug is not targeted to the upcoming bullseye release]

Please keep this issue open in the bug tracker for the package it
was filed for.  If a fix in another package is required, please
file a bug for the other package (or clone), and add a block in this
package. Please keep the issue open until the package can be built in
a follow-up test rebuild.

The package fails to build in a test rebuild on at least amd64 with
gcc-11/g++-11, but succeeds to build with gcc-10/g++-10. The
severity of this report will be raised before the bookworm release,
so nothing has to be done for the bullseye release.

The full build log can be found at:
http://people.debian.org/~doko/logs/20210228/filtered/gcc11/libpappsomspp_0.8.15-1_unstable_gcc11.log
The last lines of the build log are at the end of this report.

To build with GCC 11, either set CC=gcc-11 CXX=g++-11 explicitly,
or install the gcc, g++, gfortran, ... packages from experimental.

  apt-get -t=experimental install g++ 

Common build failures are new warnings resulting in build failures with
-Werror turned on, or new/dropped symbols in Debian symbols files.
For other C/C++ related build failures see the porting guide at
http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-11/porting_to.html

GCC 11 defaults to the GNU++17 standard.  If your package installs
header files in /usr/include, please don't work around C++17 issues
by choosing a lower C++ standard for the package build, but fix these
issues to build with the C++17 standard.

[...]
/<>/src/pappsomspp/processing/tandemwrapper/xtandempresetsaxhandler.cpp:184:72:
 warning: ‘QXmlParseException’ is deprecated [-Wdeprecated-declarations]
  184 | XtandemPresetSaxHandler::fatalError(const QXmlParseException )
  |^
[ 10%] Building CXX object 
src/CMakeFiles/pappsomspp-shared.dir/pappsomspp/massspectrum/massspectrumid.cpp.o
cd /<>/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/src && /usr/bin/c++ -DBOOST_ALL_NO_LIB 
-DBOOST_ATOMIC_DYN_LINK -DBOOST_CHRONO_DYN_LINK -DBOOST_FILESYSTEM_DYN_LINK 
-DBOOST_IOSTREAMS_DYN_LINK -DBOOST_THREAD_DYN_LINK -DQT_CONCURRENT_LIB 
-DQT_CORE_LIB -DQT_GUI_LIB -DQT_NO_DEBUG -DQT_NO_DEBUG_OUTPUT 
-DQT_PRINTSUPPORT_LIB -DQT_SQL_LIB -DQT_SVG_LIB -DQT_WIDGETS_LIB -DQT_XML_LIB 
-DWITHOUT_MZ5 -Dpappsomspp_shared_EXPORTS 
-I/<>/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/src/pappsomspp-shared_autogen/include 
-isystem /usr/include/pwizlite -isystem /usr/include/x86_64-linux-gnu/qt5 
-isystem /usr/include/x86_64-linux-gnu/qt5/QtCore -isystem 
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/qt5/mkspecs/linux-g++ -isystem 
/usr/include/x86_64-linux-gnu/qt5/QtGui -isystem 
/usr/include/x86_64-linux-gnu/qt5/QtXml -isystem 
/usr/include/x86_64-linux-gnu/qt5/QtSvg -isystem 
/usr/include/x86_64-linux-gnu/qt5/QtWidgets -isystem 
/usr/include/x86_64-linux-gnu/qt5/QtPrintSupport -isystem 
/usr/include/x86_64-linux-gnu/qt5/QtSql -isystem /usr/include/x
 86_64-linux-gnu/qt5/QtConcurrent -isystem /usr/include/libalglib -g -O2 
-ffile-prefix-map=/<>=. -fstack-protector-strong -Wformat 
-Werror=format-security -Wdate-time -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -O3 -DNDEBUG -fPIC   
-Wno-unknown-pragmas -Wall -Wextra -fPIC -fPIC -std=gnu++17 -o 
CMakeFiles/pappsomspp-shared.dir/pappsomspp/massspectrum/massspectrumid.cpp.o 
-c /<>/src/pappsomspp/massspectrum/massspectrumid.cpp
In file included from 
/<>/src/pappsomspp/massspectrum/massspectrumid.cpp:25:
/<>/src/pappsomspp/massspectrum/massspectrumid.h:54:38: error: 
‘numeric_limits’ is not a member of ‘std’
   54 |   std::size_t m_spectrumIndex = std::numeric_limits::max();
  |  ^~
/<>/src/pappsomspp/massspectrum/massspectrumid.h:54:64: error: 
expected primary-expression before ‘>’ token
   54 |   std::size_t m_spectrumIndex = std::numeric_limits::max();
  |^
/<>/src/pappsomspp/massspectrum/massspectrumid.h:54:67: error: 
‘::max’ has not been declared
   54 |   std::size_t m_spectrumIndex = std::numeric_limits::max();
  |

Bug#994055: cunit NMU

2021-11-10 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
On Thu, 11 Nov 2021 at 10:49, Paul Gevers  wrote:

> Hi Michael,
>
> On Wed, 10 Nov 2021 16:16:53 +1300 Michael Hudson-Doyle
>  wrote:
> > Hi, thanks for this fix. I think it meets the threshold for NMU (and also
> > the maintainer seems to have been awol since 2015) so I'm uploading it to
> > DELAYED/10.
>
> I was working on this yesterday and uploaded to DELAYED too, because I
> forgot to check the bug history. As I uploaded to DELAYED/2, I decided
> to dcut my upload, but apparently I was able to dcut your upload...
>

Ha.


> Log of processing your commands file /paul-1636580073.commands:
>
> > cancel cunit_2.1-3-dfsg-2.4_source.changes
> Files removed from 10-day: cunit_2.1-3-dfsg-2.4_source.changes
> cunit_2.1-3-dfsg-2.4.dsc cunit_2.1-3-dfsg-2.4.debian.tar.xz
> cunit_2.1-3-dfsg-2.4_source.buildinfo
>
> Could you reupload your changes, or do you want me to upload mine?
>

If you have yours close at hand, feel free to upload them? Otherwise I
think I still have the changes file around...


> Sorry for the mess.
>

So long as we get a fixed package I'm not bothered!


Bug#998358: Subject: grepmail: autopkgtest doesn't do anything

2021-11-10 Thread Paul Gevers
Hi Eriberto,

On Tue, 2 Nov 2021 19:57:37 -0300 Eriberto  wrote:
> ow, Marcos will package the new upstream
> release and he will fix this mistake. In a final action, he will send
> a SPU to fix a specific issue.

Please be aware that grepmail will be removed from testing in 7 days if
the issue isn't fixed. Obviously, the package can come back later too,
but just so you know.

Paul



OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Bug#994055: cunit NMU

2021-11-10 Thread Paul Gevers
Hi Michael,

On Wed, 10 Nov 2021 16:16:53 +1300 Michael Hudson-Doyle
 wrote:
> Hi, thanks for this fix. I think it meets the threshold for NMU (and also
> the maintainer seems to have been awol since 2015) so I'm uploading it to
> DELAYED/10.

I was working on this yesterday and uploaded to DELAYED too, because I
forgot to check the bug history. As I uploaded to DELAYED/2, I decided
to dcut my upload, but apparently I was able to dcut your upload...

Log of processing your commands file /paul-1636580073.commands:

> cancel cunit_2.1-3-dfsg-2.4_source.changes
Files removed from 10-day: cunit_2.1-3-dfsg-2.4_source.changes
cunit_2.1-3-dfsg-2.4.dsc cunit_2.1-3-dfsg-2.4.debian.tar.xz
cunit_2.1-3-dfsg-2.4_source.buildinfo

Could you reupload your changes, or do you want me to upload mine?

Sorry for the mess.

Paul



OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Bug#995655: dnsmasq breaks systemd autopkgtest: b'megasearch.net: 192.168.42.1' not found in b'megasearch.net: 207.148.248.143

2021-11-10 Thread Michael Biebl


Control: tags -1 + patch

Hi Simon

On 10.11.21 20:44, Michael Biebl wrote:

Simon,

any news here?
Would you mind if I prepare an NMU with
26bbf5a314d833beaf0f147d24409969f05f3dba ?



I decided to follow the rules in [1] and uploaded a fixed package to 
DELAYED/2. Please holler if you want me to cancel the NMU.


debdiff is attached.

Regards,
Michael


[1] https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/pkgs.en.html#nmu
diff -u dnsmasq-2.86/debian/changelog dnsmasq-2.86/debian/changelog
--- dnsmasq-2.86/debian/changelog
+++ dnsmasq-2.86/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+dnsmasq (2.86-1.1) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+  * Non-maintainer upload.
+  * Fix --address=/#/.. which was lost in 2.86. (closes: #995655)
+
+ -- Michael Biebl   Wed, 10 Nov 2021 22:05:45 +0100
+
 dnsmasq (2.86-1) unstable; urgency=low
 
* Fix debian/changelog format error. (closes: #986626)
only in patch2:
unchanged:
--- dnsmasq-2.86.orig/CHANGELOG
+++ dnsmasq-2.86/CHANGELOG
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+version 2.87
+Allow arbitrary prefix lengths in --rev-server and
+   --domain=,local
+
+   Replace --address=/#/. functionality which got
+   missed in the 2.86 domain search rewrite.
+
+   
 version 2.86
Handle DHCPREBIND requests in the DHCPv6 server code.
Thanks to Aichun Li for spotting this omission, and the initial
only in patch2:
unchanged:
--- dnsmasq-2.86.orig/src/network.c
+++ dnsmasq-2.86/src/network.c
@@ -1623,7 +1623,8 @@
 continue;

if ((serv->flags & SERV_LITERAL_ADDRESS) &&
-  !(serv->flags & (SERV_6ADDR | SERV_4ADDR | SERV_ALL_ZEROS)))
+  !(serv->flags & (SERV_6ADDR | SERV_4ADDR | SERV_ALL_ZEROS)) &&
+  strlen(serv->domain))
 {
   count--;
   if (++locals <= LOCALS_LOGGED)
only in patch2:
unchanged:
--- dnsmasq-2.86.orig/src/option.c
+++ dnsmasq-2.86/src/option.c
@@ -2684,7 +2684,7 @@

if (!arg || !*arg)
  flags = SERV_LITERAL_ADDRESS;
-   else if (option == 'A')
+   else if (option != 'S')
  {
/* # as literal address means return zero address for 4 and 6 */
if (strcmp(arg, "#") == 0)
@@ -2708,11 +2708,18 @@
while (1)
  {
/* server=//1.2.3.4 is special. */
-   if (strlen(domain) == 0 && lastdomain)
- flags |= SERV_FOR_NODOTS;
-   else
- flags &= ~SERV_FOR_NODOTS;
+   if (lastdomain)
+ {
+   if (strlen(domain) == 0)
+ flags |= SERV_FOR_NODOTS;
+   else
+ flags &= ~SERV_FOR_NODOTS;
 
+   /* address=/#/ matches the same as without domain */
+   if (option != 'S' && domain[0] == '#' && domain[1] == 0)
+ domain[0] = 0;
+ }
+   
if (!add_update_server(flags, _addr, _addr, interface, 
domain, ))
  ret_err(gen_err);



OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Processed: Re: dnsmasq breaks systemd autopkgtest: b'megasearch.net: 192.168.42.1' not found in b'megasearch.net: 207.148.248.143

2021-11-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands:

> tags -1 + patch
Bug #995655 [dnsmasq] dnsmasq breaks systemd autopkgtest: b'megasearch.net: 
192.168.42.1' not found in b'megasearch.net: 207.148.248.143
Added tag(s) patch.

-- 
995655: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=995655
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems



Bug#999429: src:guix: fails to migrate to testing for too long: FTBFS on i386

2021-11-10 Thread Paul Gevers
Source: guix
Version: 1.2.0-4
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 1.3.0-2
Tags: sid bookworm
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync

Dear maintainer(s),

The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable for more than 60 days as having a Release Critical bug in
testing [1]. Your package src:guix has been trying to migrate for 62
days [2]. Hence, I am filing this bug.

If a package is out of sync between unstable and testing for a longer
period, this usually means that bugs in the package in testing cannot be
fixed via unstable. Additionally, blocked packages can have impact on
other packages, which makes preparing for the release more difficult.
Finally, it often exposes issues with the package and/or
its (reverse-)dependencies. We expect maintainers to fix issues that
hamper the migration of their package in a timely manner.

This bug will trigger auto-removal when appropriate. As with all new
bugs, there will be at least 30 days before the package is auto-removed.

I have immediately closed this bug with the version in unstable, so if
that version or a later version migrates, this bug will no longer affect
testing. I have also tagged this bug to only affect sid and bookworm, so
it doesn't affect (old-)stable.

If you believe your package is unable to migrate to testing due to
issues beyond your control, don't hesitate to contact the Release Team.

Paul

[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2020/02/msg5.html
[2] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=guix




OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Processed: src:guix: fails to migrate to testing for too long: FTBFS on i386

2021-11-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands:

> close -1 1.3.0-2
Bug #999429 [src:guix] src:guix: fails to migrate to testing for too long: 
FTBFS on i386
Marked as fixed in versions guix/1.3.0-2.
Bug #999429 [src:guix] src:guix: fails to migrate to testing for too long: 
FTBFS on i386
Marked Bug as done

-- 
999429: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=999429
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems



Bug#972146: /usr/share/applications/mono-runtime-common.desktop: should not handle MIME type by executing arbitrary code

2021-11-10 Thread Gabriel Corona
Hi,

Any help needed for this?

Regards,

Gabriel



Processed: golang-github-containernetworking-plugins breaks libpod autopkgtest

2021-11-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> reassign 998449 src:golang-github-containernetworking-plugins,src:libpod
Bug #998449 [src:golang-github-containernetworking-plugin,src:libpod] 
autopkgtest: dh-golang-autopkgtest FAIL non-zero exit status 2
Warning: Unknown package 'src:golang-github-containernetworking-plugin'
Bug reassigned from package 
'src:golang-github-containernetworking-plugin,src:libpod' to 
'src:golang-github-containernetworking-plugins,src:libpod'.
No longer marked as found in versions libpod/3.4.1+ds1-2 and 
golang-github-containernetworking-plugins/0.9.1-1.
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #998449 to the same values 
previously set
> found 998449 golang-github-containernetworking-plugins/0.9.1-1
Bug #998449 [src:golang-github-containernetworking-plugins,src:libpod] 
autopkgtest: dh-golang-autopkgtest FAIL non-zero exit status 2
Marked as found in versions golang-github-containernetworking-plugins/0.9.1-1.
> found 998449 libpod/3.4.1+ds1-2
Bug #998449 [src:golang-github-containernetworking-plugins,src:libpod] 
autopkgtest: dh-golang-autopkgtest FAIL non-zero exit status 2
Marked as found in versions libpod/3.4.1+ds1-2.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
998449: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=998449
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems



Processed: golang-github-containernetworking-plugins breaks libpod autopkgtest

2021-11-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> reassign 998449 src:golang-github-containernetworking-plugin,src:libpod
Bug #998449 [src:libpod] autopkgtest: dh-golang-autopkgtest FAIL non-zero exit 
status 2
Bug reassigned from package 'src:libpod' to 
'src:golang-github-containernetworking-plugin,src:libpod'.
Warning: Unknown package 'src:golang-github-containernetworking-plugin'
Warning: Unknown package 'src:golang-github-containernetworking-plugin'
No longer marked as found in versions libpod/3.4.1+ds1-2.
Warning: Unknown package 'src:golang-github-containernetworking-plugin'
Warning: Unknown package 'src:golang-github-containernetworking-plugin'
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #998449 to the same values 
previously set
Warning: Unknown package 'src:golang-github-containernetworking-plugin'
> found 998449 golang-github-containernetworking-plugins/0.9.1-1
Bug #998449 [src:golang-github-containernetworking-plugin,src:libpod] 
autopkgtest: dh-golang-autopkgtest FAIL non-zero exit status 2
Warning: Unknown package 'src:golang-github-containernetworking-plugin'
Marked as found in versions golang-github-containernetworking-plugins/0.9.1-1.
Warning: Unknown package 'src:golang-github-containernetworking-plugin'
> found 998449 libpod/3.4.1+ds1-2
Bug #998449 [src:golang-github-containernetworking-plugin,src:libpod] 
autopkgtest: dh-golang-autopkgtest FAIL non-zero exit status 2
Warning: Unknown package 'src:golang-github-containernetworking-plugin'
Marked as found in versions libpod/3.4.1+ds1-2.
Warning: Unknown package 'src:golang-github-containernetworking-plugin'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
998449: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=998449
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems



Bug#998449: golang-github-containernetworking-plugins breaks libpod autopkgtest

2021-11-10 Thread Paul Gevers
reassign 998449 src:golang-github-containernetworking-plugin,src:libpod
found 998449 golang-github-containernetworking-plugins/0.9.1-1
found 998449 libpod/3.4.1+ds1-2
thanks

Hi,

I'm seeing this bug as caused by the
golang-github-containernetworking-plugin upload in the excuses of that
package. Hence [1] reassigning to both.

Paul

[1] https://wiki.debian.org/ContinuousIntegration/RegressionEmailInformation



OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Bug#994239: micropython: diff for NMU version 1.17+ds-1.1

2021-11-10 Thread Boyuan Yang
Control: tags 994239 + patch
Control: tags 994239 + pending

Dear maintainer,

I've prepared an NMU for micropython (versioned as 1.17+ds-1.1) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/5. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer.

Regards.

diff -Nru micropython-1.17+ds/debian/changelog micropython-
1.17+ds/debian/changelog
--- micropython-1.17+ds/debian/changelog2021-09-04 02:41:03.0
-0400
+++ micropython-1.17+ds/debian/changelog2021-11-10 15:51:19.0
-0500
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+micropython (1.17+ds-1.1) unstable; urgency=high
+
+  * Non-maintainer upload.
+  * debian/rules: Circumvent FTBFS with gcc 11 using
+-Wno-error=maybe-uninitialized cflag. (Closes: #994239)
+
+ -- Boyuan Yang   Wed, 10 Nov 2021 15:51:19 -0500
+
 micropython (1.17+ds-1) unstable; urgency=medium
 
   * New upstream release
diff -Nru micropython-1.17+ds/debian/rules micropython-1.17+ds/debian/rules
--- micropython-1.17+ds/debian/rules2021-09-04 02:41:03.0 -0400
+++ micropython-1.17+ds/debian/rules2021-11-10 15:51:19.0 -0500
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
 
 export DEB_BUILD_MAINT_OPTIONS = hardening=+all,-format
 
-export DEB_CFLAGS_MAINT_APPEND  = -Wformat -Werror=format-security
+export DEB_CFLAGS_MAINT_APPEND  = -Wformat -Werror=format-security -Wno-
error=maybe-uninitialized
 export DEB_LDFLAGS_MAINT_APPEND =
 
 export BUILD_VERBOSE = 1


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Processed: micropython: diff for NMU version 1.17+ds-1.1

2021-11-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands:

> tags 994239 + patch
Bug #994239 [src:micropython] work around ftbfs with GCC 11
Added tag(s) patch.
> tags 994239 + pending
Bug #994239 [src:micropython] work around ftbfs with GCC 11
Added tag(s) pending.

-- 
994239: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=994239
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems



Bug#998108: Acknowledgement (firefox freezes shortly after start)

2021-11-10 Thread Gennady Kupava
On Wed, 10 Nov 2021 00:59:02 +0100 Christoph Anton Mitterer
 wrote:
> Not sure if this is related, but since a while I've noted even bigger
> than the usual performance problems of firefox...
> 
> Crackling sound is something I've heard for a month now... but since
> about FF93 came out CPU utilisation seems to be much higher.
> I just load simple webpages and may CPU goes up to 70-80°C.
> 
> Anyone else seen this, too?
> 

This is offtopic for the bug, but:

Other way round for me. some version around 92 i see huge speed up, at
least for youtube. seems before that it was sotwareish (typically 1080p
took around 300% cpu) now it is around 130% for all processes. Firefox
for the first time in 6 years on same hw could play 4k on intel.

I spent some time investigating my 300% before, and learned a lot -
that they enabling va-api and etc. slowness/fastness seems depend on
the content you trying, configuration of your hardware, etc etc
discussion would be way out of scope of this bug.



Bug#999422: Deluge fails with ModuleNotFoundError

2021-11-10 Thread Brian Pepple

Package: deluge
Version: 2.0.3-3.1
Severity: grave

When starting Deluge it fails when it attempts to import deluge.libtorrent.

Traceback (most recent call last):

File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/deluge/_libtorrent.py", line 23, in 



  import deluge.libtorrent as lt
ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'deluge.libtorrent'

During handling of the above exception, another exception occurred:
 Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/bin/deluged", line 33, in 

sys.exit(load_entry_point('deluge==2.0.3', 'console_scripts', 
'deluged')())
  File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/deluge/core/daemon_entry.py", 
line 90, in start_daemon

from deluge.core.daemon import is_daemon_running

  File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/deluge/core/daemon.py", line 22, 
in 

from deluge.core.core import Core
  File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/deluge/core/core.py", line 28, 
in 

from deluge._libtorrent import LT_VERSION, lt

  File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/deluge/_libtorrent.py", line 25, 
in 

import libtorrent as lt
ImportError: /lib/arm-linux-gnueabihf/libtorrent-rasterbar.so.10: 
undefined symbol: __atomic_fetch_add_8


OpenPGP_0xCB52D8AAC4292B05.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key


OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Bug#988462: A little more info please?

2021-11-10 Thread Martin


On 2021-11-09 19:26, Chris Carr wrote:
> - please could you explain why it is not suitable for inclusion in
>  bullseye? What is it that I am not seeing or experiencing in my daily
> use of it?

Problem is, that Trac (up to version 1.4) used to be a Python 2 program.
Python 2 is not supported anymore (or only in a very limited way), so
many dependencies for Trac are removed from Debian. It was impossible to
keep Trac with Python 2 in Debian.

Now Trac (>= 1.5) is based on Python 3, but the new code is not yet
considered stable by upstream. I hoped, that there were a Trac release
1.6 just in time for Debian 11, e.g. around 2021-01, but Trac
development happens a little bit slower even than Debians.

> Also, please could you recommend an alternative ticket management
> package that is included in bullseye. Preferably one that will import
> my trac db so I don't have to re-enter 11 years of history.

If Trac works fine for you (it does for me!), just stay with Debian 10,
e.g. in a systemd-nspawn or docker container. That's what we do in my
company: We run a server with Debian 11 and a systemd-nspawn container
of Debian 10 with Trac and PostgreSQL on it.

As soon as Trac 1.6 is released, I'll try to get it into Debian, as well
as some of the plugins, and hopefully it will be part of Debian 12.

Cheers



Bug#995655: dnsmasq breaks systemd autopkgtest: b'megasearch.net: 192.168.42.1' not found in b'megasearch.net: 207.148.248.143

2021-11-10 Thread Michael Biebl
Simon,

any news here?
Would you mind if I prepare an NMU with
26bbf5a314d833beaf0f147d24409969f05f3dba ?

Regards,
Michael


On Sun, 3 Oct 2021 21:32:53 +0200 Michael Biebl 
wrote:
> Control: reassign -1 dnsmasq/2.86-1
> 
> It's a (known) regression in dnsmasq 2.86-1
> 
> CCing what I sent Simon privately a couple of days ago
> 
> > Hi Simon,
> > 
> > as you probably know, the recent update of dnsmasq 2.86 to unstable
broke the systemd autopkgtests, namely test-networkd.py, and more
specifically
> > 
> > ==
> > ERROR: test_resolved_domain_restricted_dns (__main__.DnsmasqClientTest)
> > resolved: domain-restricted DNS servers
> > --
> > Traceback (most recent call last):
> >   File "/tmp/autopkgtest-
lxc.knebmh6r/downtmp/build.00t/src/test/networkd-test.py", line 659, in
test_resolved_domain_restricted_dns
> > out = subprocess.check_output(['resolvectl', 'query',
'search.example.com'])
> >   File "/usr/lib/python3.9/subprocess.py", line 424, in check_output
> > return run(*popenargs, stdout=PIPE, timeout=timeout, check=True,
> >   File "/usr/lib/python3.9/subprocess.py", line 528, in run
> > raise CalledProcessError(retcode, process.args,
> > subprocess.CalledProcessError: Command '['resolvectl', 'query',
'search.example.com']' returned non-zero exit status 1.
> > 
> > --
> > Ran 35 tests in 143.025s
> > 
> > FAILED (errors=1, skipped=2)
> > 
> > 
> > Afaics, this is a regression introduced by
> >
https://thekelleys.org.uk/gitweb/?p=dnsmasq.git;a=commit;h=12a9aa7c628e2d7dcd34949603848a3fb53fce9c
> > 
> > and should be fixed by
> >
https://thekelleys.org.uk/gitweb/?p=dnsmasq.git;a=commit;h=26bbf5a314d833beaf0f147d24409969f05f3dba
> 
> 
> 
> Am 03.10.21 um 19:23 schrieb Paul Gevers:
> > Source: dnsmasq, systemd
> > Control: found -1 dnsmasq/2.86-1
> > Control: found -1 systemd/247.9-1
> > Severity: serious
> > Tags: sid bookworm
> > X-Debbugs-CC: debian...@lists.debian.org
> > User: debian...@lists.debian.org
> > Usertags: breaks needs-update
> > 
> > Dear maintainer(s),
> > 
> > With a recent upload of dnsmasq the autopkgtest of systemd fails in
> > testing when that autopkgtest is run with the binary packages of dnsmasq
> > from unstable. It passes when run with only packages from testing. In
> > tabular form:
> > 
> > pass    fail
> > dnsmasq    from testing    2.86-1
> > systemd    from testing    247.9-1
> > all others from testing    from testing
> > 
> > I copied some of the output at the bottom of this report.



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Bug#997940: marked as done (view3dscene: FTBFS with fpc 3.2.2)

2021-11-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 10 Nov 2021 18:38:33 +0100
with message-id 
and subject line Re: view3dscene: FTBFS with fpc 3.2.2
has caused the Debian Bug report #997940,
regarding view3dscene: FTBFS with fpc 3.2.2
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
997940: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=997940
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: view3dscene
Version: 3.18.0-4
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs bookworm sid

Hi Maintainer

view3dscene fails to build from source since fpc 3.2.2 was uploaded to
unstable.  I've copied what I hope is the relevant part of the log
below.

Regards
Graham


fpc -k"-z relro -z now" -dRELEASE -Mobjfpc -Sh -Ci -Sm -Sc -Sg -Si -O2
-Xs -Fu/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/fp-units-3.2.2/castle-game-engine-6.4/
code/view3dscene.lpr
Compiling Release Version
Free Pascal Compiler version 3.2.2+dfsg-3 [2021/10/23] for x86_64
Copyright (c) 1993-2021 by Florian Klaempfl and others
Target OS: Linux for x86-64
Compiling code/view3dscene.lpr
view3dscene.lpr(55,3) Fatal: Can't find unit CastleUtils used by view3dscene
Fatal: Compilation aborted
Error: /usr/bin/ppcx64 returned an error exitcode
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Control: fixed -1 4.0.0-1

detection of units path was wrong for CGE alpha versions. This was fixed in
4.0.0-1.
-- 
Cheers,
Abou Al Montacir


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--- End Message ---


Bug#997565: marked as done (golang-github-xeipuuv-gojsonschema: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: cd obj-x86_64-linux-gnu && go test -vet=off -v -p 4 github.com/xeipuuv/gojsonschema returned exit code 1)

2021-11-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 10 Nov 2021 17:34:34 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#997565: fixed in golang-github-xeipuuv-gojsonschema 1.2.0-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #997565,
regarding golang-github-xeipuuv-gojsonschema: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: cd 
obj-x86_64-linux-gnu && go test -vet=off -v -p 4 
github.com/xeipuuv/gojsonschema returned exit code 1
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
997565: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=997565
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: golang-github-xeipuuv-gojsonschema
Version: 1.2.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm

Hi,

During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.


Relevant part (hopefully):
> dpkg-buildpackage
> -
> 
> Command: dpkg-buildpackage -us -uc -sa -rfakeroot
> dpkg-buildpackage: info: source package golang-github-xeipuuv-gojsonschema
> dpkg-buildpackage: info: source version 1.2.0-1
> dpkg-buildpackage: info: source distribution unstable
> dpkg-buildpackage: info: source changed by Shengjing Zhu 
>  dpkg-source --before-build .
> dpkg-buildpackage: info: host architecture amd64
>  debian/rules clean
> dh clean --buildsystem=golang --with=golang
>dh_auto_clean -O--buildsystem=golang
>dh_autoreconf_clean -O--buildsystem=golang
>dh_clean -O--buildsystem=golang
>  dpkg-source -b .
> dpkg-source: info: using source format '3.0 (quilt)'
> dpkg-source: info: building golang-github-xeipuuv-gojsonschema using existing 
> ./golang-github-xeipuuv-gojsonschema_1.2.0.orig.tar.gz
> dpkg-source: info: building golang-github-xeipuuv-gojsonschema in 
> golang-github-xeipuuv-gojsonschema_1.2.0-1.debian.tar.xz
> dpkg-source: info: building golang-github-xeipuuv-gojsonschema in 
> golang-github-xeipuuv-gojsonschema_1.2.0-1.dsc
>  debian/rules binary
> dh binary --buildsystem=golang --with=golang
>dh_update_autotools_config -O--buildsystem=golang
>dh_autoreconf -O--buildsystem=golang
>dh_auto_configure -O--buildsystem=golang
>dh_auto_build -O--buildsystem=golang
>   cd obj-x86_64-linux-gnu && go install -trimpath -v -p 4 
> github.com/xeipuuv/gojsonschema
> internal/unsafeheader
> internal/goexperiment
> internal/cpu
> runtime/internal/atomic
> internal/abi
> runtime/internal/sys
> runtime/internal/math
> internal/race
> sync/atomic
> unicode/utf8
> unicode
> internal/bytealg
> encoding
> math/bits
> internal/itoa
> unicode/utf16
> math
> internal/nettrace
> container/list
> runtime
> crypto/internal/subtle
> crypto/subtle
> vendor/golang.org/x/crypto/cryptobyte/asn1
> vendor/golang.org/x/crypto/internal/subtle
> internal/reflectlite
> sync
> internal/testlog
> internal/singleflight
> math/rand
> runtime/cgo
> errors
> sort
> io
> strconv
> internal/oserror
> syscall
> bytes
> reflect
> path
> strings
> vendor/golang.org/x/net/dns/dnsmessage
> internal/syscall/unix
> time
> internal/syscall/execenv
> bufio
> encoding/binary
> internal/fmtsort
> internal/poll
> io/fs
> context
> encoding/base64
> hash
> crypto/cipher
> hash/crc32
> crypto
> os
> crypto/elliptic/internal/fiat
> crypto/internal/randutil
> crypto/aes
> crypto/des
> crypto/sha512
> crypto/ed25519/internal/edwards25519/field
> crypto/hmac
> crypto/md5
> fmt
> path/filepath
> io/ioutil
> net
> crypto/ed25519/internal/edwards25519
> crypto/rc4
> crypto/sha1
> crypto/sha256
> encoding/pem
> encoding/json
> github.com/xeipuuv/gojsonpointer
> net/url
> log
> math/big
> github.com/xeipuuv/gojsonreference
> compress/flate
> encoding/hex
> vendor/golang.org/x/crypto/chacha20
> compress/gzip
> vendor/golang.org/x/crypto/poly1305
> vendor/golang.org/x/sys/cpu
> vendor/golang.org/x/crypto/curve25519
> vendor/golang.org/x/crypto/chacha20poly1305
> vendor/golang.org/x/crypto/hkdf
> vendor/golang.org/x/text/transform
> crypto/rand
> crypto/elliptic
> encoding/asn1
> crypto/ed25519
> crypto/rsa
> crypto/dsa
> vendor/golang.org/x/text/unicode/bidi
> vendor/golang.org/x/text/unicode/norm
> vendor/golang.org/x/crypto/cryptobyte
> crypto/x509/pkix
> crypto/ecdsa
> vendor/golang.org/x/text/secure/bidirule
> vendor/golang.org/x/net/http2/hpack
> mime
> vendor/golang.org/x/net/idna
> mime/quotedprintable
> net/http/internal
> crypto/x509
> net/textproto
> net/http/internal/ascii
> regexp/syntax
> vendor/golang.org/x/net/http/httpproxy
> vendor/golang.org/x/net/http/httpguts
> mime/multipart
> net/mail
> text/template/parse
> regexp
> crypto/tls
> text/template
> 

Bug#984372: marked as done (tripwire: ftbfs with GCC-11)

2021-11-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 10 Nov 2021 17:35:31 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#984372: fixed in tripwire 2.4.3.7-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #984372,
regarding tripwire: ftbfs with GCC-11
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
984372: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=984372
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: src:tripwire
Version: 2.4.3.7-3
Severity: normal
Tags: sid bookworm
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-gcc-11

[This bug is not targeted to the upcoming bullseye release]

Please keep this issue open in the bug tracker for the package it
was filed for.  If a fix in another package is required, please
file a bug for the other package (or clone), and add a block in this
package. Please keep the issue open until the package can be built in
a follow-up test rebuild.

The package fails to build in a test rebuild on at least amd64 with
gcc-11/g++-11, but succeeds to build with gcc-10/g++-10. The
severity of this report will be raised before the bookworm release,
so nothing has to be done for the bullseye release.

The full build log can be found at:
http://people.debian.org/~doko/logs/20210228/filtered/gcc11/tripwire_2.4.3.7-3_unstable_gcc11.log
The last lines of the build log are at the end of this report.

To build with GCC 11, either set CC=gcc-11 CXX=g++-11 explicitly,
or install the gcc, g++, gfortran, ... packages from experimental.

  apt-get -t=experimental install g++ 

Common build failures are new warnings resulting in build failures with
-Werror turned on, or new/dropped symbols in Debian symbols files.
For other C/C++ related build failures see the porting guide at
http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-11/porting_to.html

GCC 11 defaults to the GNU++17 standard.  If your package installs
header files in /usr/include, please don't work around C++17 issues
by choosing a lower C++ standard for the package build, but fix these
issues to build with the C++17 standard.

[...]
  404 |   enum class byte : unsigned char;
  |  ^~~~
In file included from pch.h:4,
 from integer.cpp:3:
config.h:85:23: note: ‘typedef unsigned char byte’
   85 | typedef unsigned char byte;
  |   ^~~~
integer.cpp:1438:6: error: no declaration matches ‘void 
Integer::BERDecode(const int*)’
 1438 | void Integer::BERDecode(const byte *input)
  |  ^~~
In file included from integer.cpp:4:
integer.h:169:14: note: candidates are: ‘void 
Integer::BERDecode(BufferedTransformation&)’
  169 | void BERDecode(BufferedTransformation );
  |  ^
integer.h:167:14: note: ‘void Integer::BERDecode(const byte*)’
  167 | void BERDecode(const byte *input);
  |  ^
integer.h:16:7: note: ‘class Integer’ defined here
   16 | class Integer
  |   ^~~
integer.cpp: In member function ‘void 
Integer::BERDecode(BufferedTransformation&)’:
integer.cpp:1459:5: error: reference to ‘byte’ is ambiguous
 1459 | byte b;
  | ^~~~
In file included from /usr/include/c++/11/bits/stl_algobase.h:61,
 from /usr/include/c++/11/bits/char_traits.h:39,
 from /usr/include/c++/11/string:40,
 from cryptlib.h:11,
 from integer.h:4,
 from integer.cpp:4:
/usr/include/c++/11/bits/cpp_type_traits.h:404:30: note: candidates are: ‘enum 
class std::byte’
  404 |   enum class byte : unsigned char;
  |  ^~~~
In file included from pch.h:4,
 from integer.cpp:3:
config.h:85:23: note: ‘typedef unsigned char byte’
   85 | typedef unsigned char byte;
  |   ^~~~
integer.cpp:1460:17: error: ‘b’ was not declared in this scope; did you mean 
‘bt’?
 1460 | if (!bt.Get(b) || b != INTEGER)
  | ^
  | bt
integer.cpp: In member function ‘void 
Integer::Randomize(RandomNumberGenerator&, unsigned int)’:
integer.cpp:1478:29: error: reference to ‘byte’ is ambiguous
 1478 | buf[(unsigned int)0] = (byte)Crop(buf[(unsigned int)0], nbits % 8);
  | ^~~~
In file included from /usr/include/c++/11/bits/stl_algobase.h:61,
 from /usr/include/c++/11/bits/char_traits.h:39,
 from /usr/include/c++/11/string:40,
 from cryptlib.h:11,
 from integer.h:4,
 from integer.cpp:4:

Bug#997225: Vendoring image-spec and runtime-spec seem to be the issue

2021-11-10 Thread Reinhard Tartler
Control: tag -1 patch

On Wed, Nov 10, 2021 at 7:55 AM Shengjing Zhu  wrote:

>
> > > Cloud you backport following commit?
> > >
> > >
> https://github.com/containers/libocispec/commit/8489d9b60105e487564c9966b5748e2a6ea2855b
> > >
>
> This patch updates libocispec/Makefile.am, which is needed to be
> backported.
>
> This patch looks like doing nothing to C part, because the generated source
> is removed in upstream repo. Theses files(which are added in Makefile.am)
> can
> be generated by `make -C libocispec generate`. So please also uncomment
> this
> line in debian/rules.
>
>
>
D'oh, my bad, I've overlooked the Makefile.am parts. So the generator *is*
already
invoked, but the automake system doesn't pick up all files, leading to the
linker failures.

I've implemented your suggestion in
https://salsa.debian.org/debian/crun/-/merge_requests/1/diffs and can
confirm that the package now builds fine.

Dmitry, please let me know if you are comfortable with me NMU'ing the
package with the patch from salsa.


-- 
regards,
Reinhard


Processed: Re: Vendoring image-spec and runtime-spec seem to be the issue

2021-11-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands:

> tag -1 patch
Bug #997225 [src:crun] crun: FTBFS: 
./libocispec/src/runtime_spec_schema_config_schema.c:2661: undefined reference 
to `gen_runtime_spec_schema_config_zos'
Added tag(s) patch.

-- 
997225: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=997225
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems



Bug#988462: Apologies

2021-11-10 Thread Chris Carr
Sorry, the second copy of my previous email was actually sent first, 
from a defunct email account, I had accidentally set the From field 
wrong. Apologies for the duplication.




Bug#998894: marked as done (wlcs FTBFS with GTest 1.11)

2021-11-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 10 Nov 2021 16:48:57 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#998894: fixed in wlcs 1.3.0-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #998894,
regarding wlcs FTBFS with GTest 1.11
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
998894: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=998894
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: wlcs
Version: 1.2.1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs bookworm sid
Forwarded: https://github.com/MirServer/wlcs/issues/205

https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/bookworm/amd64/wlcs.html

...
/src/version_specifier.cpp.o -c /build/wlcs-1.2.1/src/version_specifier.cpp
/build/wlcs-1.2.1/tests/pointer_constraints.cpp:45:5: error: reference to 
'Pointer' is ambiguous
   45 | Pointer cursor = the_server().create_pointer();
  | ^~~
...


wlcs builds with the two commits from the issue linked above applied.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: wlcs
Source-Version: 1.3.0-3
Done: Mike Gabriel 

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
wlcs, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 998...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Mike Gabriel  (supplier of updated wlcs package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org)


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2021 17:03:08 +0100
Source: wlcs
Architecture: source
Version: 1.3.0-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Mir Team 
Changed-By: Mike Gabriel 
Closes: 998894
Changes:
 wlcs (1.3.0-3) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   [ Marius Gripsgard ]
   * debian/patches:
 + Add 0001-cmake-always-set-GTEST_LIBRARY-if-it-isn-t.patch and
   0002-Fix-build-when-using-GTest-1.11.patch. Fix FTBFS (cmake:
   always set GTEST_LIBRARY if it isn't; fix build when using GTest-1.11).
   (Closes: #998894).
 .
   [ Debian Janitor ]
   * debian/upstream/metadata:
 + Set upstream metadata fields: Repository.
 + Remove obsolete field Name from debian/upstream/metadata
   (already present in machine-readable debian/copyright).
 .
   [ Mike Gabriel ]
   * debian/copyright:
 + Update copyright attributions.
Checksums-Sha1:
 c3576e9de2eab4da4c7e8f9e3129ec690b63bebc 2273 wlcs_1.3.0-3.dsc
 a7cd8b77048b19cf12eedbf2998dee4219dc3dd7 14548 wlcs_1.3.0-3.debian.tar.xz
 46f9800743247266b43fcde9e939f6178ebbaaa3 7229 wlcs_1.3.0-3_source.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
 ee6b6ed783c150a246aa82afec5df53ff2fef18a02b002f0205a3f12f1b427da 2273 
wlcs_1.3.0-3.dsc
 93b720ca6413bdf4fdcc2654941a2e37eefca6547e97a16abe532282275091bb 14548 
wlcs_1.3.0-3.debian.tar.xz
 519539ea02ca14b4da23e664d29a6f9c60d087898c01e24d41c00f4348fbd14b 7229 
wlcs_1.3.0-3_source.buildinfo
Files:
 282969b272243f9d83b615cf1f140d4d 2273 devel optional wlcs_1.3.0-3.dsc
 c873449b16618617ba8085b6580eea11 14548 devel optional 
wlcs_1.3.0-3.debian.tar.xz
 4f5e9cf29c385018e3a6a5b22171ac12 7229 devel optional 
wlcs_1.3.0-3_source.buildinfo

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
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=bmNx
-END PGP SIGNATURE End Message ---


Processed: Re: Bug#998854: undefined symbol: _PyUnicode_DecodeUnicodeEscape

2021-11-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands:

> reassign -1 python3-typed-ast
Bug #998854 [python3.9] undefined symbol: _PyUnicode_DecodeUnicodeEscape
Bug reassigned from package 'python3.9' to 'python3-typed-ast'.
No longer marked as found in versions python3.9/3.9.8-1.
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #998854 to the same values 
previously set
> severity -1 serious
Bug #998854 [python3-typed-ast] undefined symbol: _PyUnicode_DecodeUnicodeEscape
Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'

-- 
998854: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=998854
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems



Bug#998414: marked as done (mimeo: autopkgtest regression: test depends on postgresql-14-pgtap which doesn't exist (yet))

2021-11-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 10 Nov 2021 17:05:30 +0100
with message-id 
and subject line Re: Bug#998414: mimeo: autopkgtest regression: test depends on 
postgresql-14-pgtap which doesn't exist (yet)
has caused the Debian Bug report #998414,
regarding mimeo: autopkgtest regression: test depends on postgresql-14-pgtap 
which doesn't exist (yet)
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
998414: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=998414
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: mimeo
Version: 1.5.1-11
X-Debbugs-CC: debian...@lists.debian.org
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: regression

Dear maintainer(s),

With a recent upload of mimeo the autopkgtest of mimeo fails in testing
when that autopkgtest is run with the binary packages of mimeo from
unstable. It passes when run with only packages from testing. In tabular
form:

   passfail
mimeo  from testing1.5.1-11
all others from testingfrom testing

I copied some of the output at the bottom of this report. It seems you
need to fix bug #997762 (in pgtap) first.

Currently this regression is blocking the migration to testing [1]. Can
you please investigate the situation and fix it?

More information about this bug and the reason for filing it can be found on
https://wiki.debian.org/ContinuousIntegration/RegressionEmailInformation

Paul

[1] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=mimeo

https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/amd64/m/mimeo/16383770/log.gz

autopkgtest [22:48:37]:  apt-source mimeo
Get:1 http://deb.debian.org/debian unstable/main mimeo 1.5.1-11 (dsc)
[2,054 B]
Get:2 http://deb.debian.org/debian unstable/main mimeo 1.5.1-11 (tar)
[591 kB]
Get:3 http://deb.debian.org/debian unstable/main mimeo 1.5.1-11 (diff)
[3,400 B]
gpgv: unknown type of key resource 'trustedkeys.kbx'
gpgv: keyblock resource '/tmp/dpkg-verify-sig.2uqyXVyi/trustedkeys.kbx':
General error
gpgv: Signature made Thu 28 Oct 2021 08:44:44 AM UTC
gpgv:using RSA key 5C48FE6157F49179597087C64C5A6BAB12D2A7AE
gpgv: Can't check signature: No public key
dpkg-source: warning: failed to verify signature on ./mimeo_1.5.1-11.dsc
autopkgtest [22:48:38]: testing package mimeo version 1.5.1-11
autopkgtest [22:48:38]: build not needed
autopkgtest [22:48:38]: test prove: preparing testbed
Reading package lists...
Building dependency tree...
Reading state information...
Correcting dependencies...Starting pkgProblemResolver with broken count: 1
Starting 2 pkgProblemResolver with broken count: 1
Investigating (0) autopkgtest-satdep:amd64 < 0 @iU K Nb Ib >
Broken autopkgtest-satdep:amd64 Depends on postgresql-14-pgtap:amd64 <
none @un H >
  Removing autopkgtest-satdep:amd64 because I can't find
postgresql-14-pgtap:amd64
Done
 Done
Starting pkgProblemResolver with broken count: 0
Starting 2 pkgProblemResolver with broken count: 0
Done
The following packages will be REMOVED:
  autopkgtest-satdep
0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 1 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
1 not fully installed or removed.
After this operation, 0 B of additional disk space will be used.
(Reading database ... (Reading database ... 5%
(Reading database ... 10%
(Reading database ... 15%
(Reading database ... 20%
(Reading database ... 25%
(Reading database ... 30%
(Reading database ... 35%
(Reading database ... 40%
(Reading database ... 45%
(Reading database ... 50%
(Reading database ... 55%
(Reading database ... 60%
(Reading database ... 65%
(Reading database ... 70%
(Reading database ... 75%
(Reading database ... 80%
(Reading database ... 85%
(Reading database ... 90%
(Reading database ... 95%
(Reading database ... 100%
(Reading database ... 13121 files and directories currently installed.)
Removing autopkgtest-satdep (0) ...
autopkgtest: WARNING: package postgresql-14-mimeo is not installed
though it should be
autopkgtest: WARNING: Test dependencies are unsatisfiable with using apt
pinning. Retrying with using all packages from unstable
Reading package lists...
Building dependency tree...
Reading state information...
Correcting dependencies...Starting pkgProblemResolver with broken count: 1
Starting 2 pkgProblemResolver with broken count: 1
Investigating (0) autopkgtest-satdep:amd64 < 0 @iU K Nb Ib >
Broken autopkgtest-satdep:amd64 Depends on postgresql-14-pgtap:amd64 <
none @un H >
  Removing autopkgtest-satdep:amd64 because I can't find
postgresql-14-pgtap:amd64
Done
 Done
Starting pkgProblemResolver with broken count: 0
Starting 2 pkgProblemResolver 

Bug#996781: marked as done (luarocks: Installation fails with dpkg error)

2021-11-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 10 Nov 2021 15:34:14 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#996781: fixed in luarocks 3.8.0+dfsg1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #996781,
regarding luarocks: Installation fails with dpkg error
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
996781: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=996781
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: luarocks
Version: 3.7.0+dfsg1-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable

Hi,

thanks for reviving the package. Now I'm getting this when attempting to
install however:

Error: Cannot access repository at /root/.luarocks/lib/luarocks/rocks-5.3
dpkg: error processing package luarocks (--configure):
installed luarocks package post-installation script subprocess returned 
error exit status 1


luarocks.postinst:

mkdir -p /usr/local/lib/luarocks/rocks/
luarocks-admin make_manifest --local-tree  <---

Using local-tree here is probably wrong.

Regards,
Oliver


Versions of packages luarocks depends on:
ii  liblua5.3-dev  5.3.6-1
ii  lua-any27
ii  lua5.3 5.3.6-1
ii  unzip  6.0-26
ii  wget   1.21.2-2+b1
ii  zip3.0-12

Versions of packages luarocks recommends:
ii  lua-sec  1.0.1-1

luarocks suggests no packages.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: luarocks
Source-Version: 3.8.0+dfsg1-1
Done: Jérémy Lal 

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
luarocks, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 996...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Jérémy Lal  (supplier of updated luarocks package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org)


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2021 15:35:37 +0100
Source: luarocks
Architecture: source
Version: 3.8.0+dfsg1-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Lua Team 
Changed-By: Jérémy Lal 
Closes: 996781
Changes:
 luarocks (3.8.0+dfsg1-1) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * New upstream version 3.8.0+dfsg1
   * Basic test, thanks Chris MacNaughton
   * Support multiple lua versions in /usr/local (Closes:#996781)
   * Lessen configuration flags, luarocks is smarter now.
   * Install /usr/bin/luarocks(-admin)-5.x helpers
Checksums-Sha1:
 17929917b6d4adc56adc27f78e601e989979e597 2041 luarocks_3.8.0+dfsg1-1.dsc
 8ebf242ec38d3245531c647b67c6b35d78122519 188344 
luarocks_3.8.0+dfsg1.orig.tar.xz
 58483f45027bd5182cea5b44bf21d7aa4de0eccf 5348 
luarocks_3.8.0+dfsg1-1.debian.tar.xz
 25e54e8326cc13ab07b77a56c2231f767e69b5f1 7407 
luarocks_3.8.0+dfsg1-1_source.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
 b0a6fecf25a4880641e2abc23c56da0a53dfed99c31db4fd685423c3fd869f57 2041 
luarocks_3.8.0+dfsg1-1.dsc
 6c691772a341d1873d9bcfb63c91ad0ae213df56a002067f1f9619a8f09e0f77 188344 
luarocks_3.8.0+dfsg1.orig.tar.xz
 aff9b9dbb577a262fb9d2b0bfd8d7bad48f4f79bd08c7c5692dad22e309f6956 5348 
luarocks_3.8.0+dfsg1-1.debian.tar.xz
 96d5b680719a9927ebecf123d3c45c0c330c666771a1acdc25a95c931ca71a9b 7407 
luarocks_3.8.0+dfsg1-1_source.buildinfo
Files:
 c948193cc54390c9725d7457c1e4ec48 2041 interpreters optional 
luarocks_3.8.0+dfsg1-1.dsc
 946886190e56c23eeb6ee16a569ec2b8 188344 interpreters optional 
luarocks_3.8.0+dfsg1.orig.tar.xz
 7dc82f475b69bc9c76caf8af7ee970a9 5348 interpreters optional 
luarocks_3.8.0+dfsg1-1.debian.tar.xz
 7d9e5337afb003adfa00267eb2b798c7 7407 interpreters optional 
luarocks_3.8.0+dfsg1-1_source.buildinfo

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
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Bug#996931: marked as done (python3-django needs Breaks for the bullseye lava-server)

2021-11-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 10 Nov 2021 15:22:37 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#996931: fixed in python-django 2:3.2.9-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #996931,
regarding python3-django needs Breaks for the bullseye lava-server
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
996931: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=996931
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: python-django, lava
Control: found -1 python-django/2:3.2.7-4
Control: found -1 lava/2020.12-5
Severity: serious
Tags: sid bookworm
X-Debbugs-CC: debian...@lists.debian.org
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: breaks needs-update

Dear maintainer(s),

With a recent upload of python-django the autopkgtest of lava fails in
testing when that autopkgtest is run with the binary packages of
python-django from unstable. It passes when run with only packages from
testing. In tabular form:

   passfail
python-django  from testing2:3.2.7-4
lava   from testing2020.12-5
versioned deps [0] from testingfrom unstable
all others from testingfrom testing

I copied some of the output at the bottom of this report. The error
message suggests a misconfiguration, but the fact that the test passed
until now suggests that python-django used to be more forgiving which
isn't nice to give up. Currently this regression is blocking the
migration of python-django to testing [1]. Due to the nature of this
issue, I filed this bug report against both packages. Can you please
investigate the situation and reassign the bug to the right package?

More information about this bug and the reason for filing it can be found on
https://wiki.debian.org/ContinuousIntegration/RegressionEmailInformation

Paul

[0] You can see what packages were added from the second line of the log
file quoted below. The migration software adds source package from
unstable to the list if they are needed to install packages from
python-django/2:3.2.7-4. I.e. due to versioned dependencies or
breaks/conflicts.
[1] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=python-django

https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/amd64/l/lava/15232624/log.gz

lava-server manage migrate --noinput --fake-initial
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/bin/lava-server", line 68, in 
main()
  File "/usr/bin/lava-server", line 64, in main
execute_from_command_line([sys.argv[0]] + options.command)
  File
"/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/django/core/management/__init__.py",
line 419, in execute_from_command_line
utility.execute()
  File
"/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/django/core/management/__init__.py",
line 413, in execute
self.fetch_command(subcommand).run_from_argv(self.argv)
  File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/django/core/management/base.py",
line 354, in run_from_argv
self.execute(*args, **cmd_options)
  File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/django/core/management/base.py",
line 398, in execute
output = self.handle(*args, **options)
  File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/django/core/management/base.py",
line 86, in wrapped
saved_locale = translation.get_language()
  File
"/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/django/utils/translation/__init__.py",
line 254, in get_language
return _trans.get_language()
  File
"/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/django/utils/translation/__init__.py",
line 57, in __getattr__
if settings.USE_I18N:
  File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/django/conf/__init__.py", line
82, in __getattr__
self._setup(name)
  File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/django/conf/__init__.py", line
69, in _setup
self._wrapped = Settings(settings_module)
  File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/django/conf/__init__.py", line
190, in __init__
raise ImproperlyConfigured(
django.core.exceptions.ImproperlyConfigured:
PASSWORD_RESET_TIMEOUT_DAYS/PASSWORD_RESET_TIMEOUT are mutually exclusive.



OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: python-django
Source-Version: 2:3.2.9-2
Done: Antonio Terceiro 

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
python-django, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 996...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Antonio 

Bug#983618: marked as done (python3-django 3.2 breaks python3-django-pyscss)

2021-11-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 10 Nov 2021 15:22:37 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#983618: fixed in python-django 2:3.2.9-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #983618,
regarding python3-django 3.2 breaks python3-django-pyscss
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
983618: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=983618
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: python3-zaqar-ui
Version: 9.0.0~rc1-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Control: affects -1 + src:horizon src:zaqar-ui

Hi,

during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed to install. As
per definition of the release team this makes the package too buggy for
a release, thus the severity.

From the attached log (scroll to the bottom...):

  Setting up openstack-dashboard (3:18.6.1-1) ...
  Warning: Could not import Horizon dependencies. This is normal during 
installation.
  RemovedInDjango40Warning: django.utils.translation.ugettext_lazy() is 
deprecated in favor of 
django.utils.translation.gettext_lazy().RemovedInDjango40Warning: 
django.utils.translation.ugettext_lazy() is deprecated in favor of 
django.utils.translation.gettext_lazy().RemovedInDjango40Warning: 
django.utils.translation.ugettext_lazy() is deprecated in favor of 
django.utils.translation.gettext_lazy().RemovedInDjango40Warning: 
django.utils.translation.ugettext_lazy() is deprecated in favor of 
django.utils.translation.gettext_lazy().RemovedInDjango40Warning: 
django.utils.translation.ugettext_lazy() is deprecated in favor of 
django.utils.translation.gettext_lazy().RemovedInDjango40Warning: 
django.utils.translation.ugettext_lazy() is deprecated in favor of 
django.utils.translation.gettext_lazy().RemovedInDjango40Warning: 
django.utils.translation.ugettext_lazy() is deprecated in favor of 
django.utils.translation.gettext_lazy().RemovedInDjango40Warning: 
django.utils.translation.ugettext_lazy() is deprecated in favor of 
django.utils.translation.gettext_lazy().RemovedInDjango40Warning: 
django.utils.translation.ugettext_lazy() is deprecated in favor of 
django.utils.translation.gettext_lazy().RemovedInDjango40Warning: 
django.utils.translation.ugettext_lazy() is deprecated in favor of 
django.utils.translation.gettext_lazy().RemovedInDjango40Warning: 
django.utils.translation.ugettext_lazy() is deprecated in favor of 
django.utils.translation.gettext_lazy().RemovedInDjango40Warning: 
django.utils.translation.ugettext_lazy() is deprecated in favor of 
django.utils.translation.gettext_lazy().RemovedInDjango40Warning: 
django.utils.translation.ugettext_lazy() is deprecated in favor of 
django.utils.translation.gettext_lazy().Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/share/openstack-dashboard/manage.py", line 23, in 
  execute_from_command_line(sys.argv)
File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/django/core/management/__init__.py", 
line 419, in execute_from_command_line
  utility.execute()
File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/django/core/management/__init__.py", 
line 395, in execute
  django.setup()
File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/django/__init__.py", line 24, in setup
  apps.populate(settings.INSTALLED_APPS)
File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/django/apps/registry.py", line 91, in 
populate
  app_config = AppConfig.create(entry)
File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/django/apps/config.py", line 224, in 
create
  import_module(entry)
File "/usr/lib/python3.9/importlib/__init__.py", line 127, in import_module
  return _bootstrap._gcd_import(name[level:], package, level)
File "", line 1030, in _gcd_import
File "", line 1007, in _find_and_load
File "", line 986, in _find_and_load_unlocked
File "", line 680, in _load_unlocked
File "", line 790, in exec_module
File "", line 228, in _call_with_frames_removed
File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/django_pyscss/__init__.py", line 1, in 

  from .compiler import DjangoScssCompiler  # NOQA
File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/django_pyscss/compiler.py", line 6, in 

  from django.utils.six.moves import StringIO
  ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'django.utils.six'
  dpkg: error processing package openstack-dashboard (--configure):
   installed openstack-dashboard package post-installation script subprocess 
returned error exit status 1
  dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of python3-zaqar-ui:
   python3-zaqar-ui depends on openstack-dashboard (>= 3:17.1.0); however:
Package openstack-dashboard is not configured yet.
  

Bug#998542: marked as done (devscripts: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: make -j4 test returned exit code 2)

2021-11-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 10 Nov 2021 15:19:02 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#998542: fixed in devscripts 2.21.5
has caused the Debian Bug report #998542,
regarding devscripts: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: make -j4 test returned exit 
code 2
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
998542: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=998542
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: devscripts
Version: 2.21.4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211104 ftbfs-bookworm

Hi,

During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.


Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[3]: Entering directory '/<>/scripts'
> perl -I ../lib -c bts; \
> 
> perl -I ../lib -c build-rdeps; \
> 
> perl -I ../lib -c chdist; \
> 
> perl -I ../lib -c checkbashisms; \
> 
> checkbashisms syntax OK
> perl -I ../lib -c cvs-debuild; \
> 
> build-rdeps syntax OK
> perl -I ../lib -c dd-list; \
> 
> chdist syntax OK
> cvs-debuild syntax OK
> perl -I ../lib -c deb-why-removed; \
> 
> perl -I ../lib -c debc; \
> 
> dd-list syntax OK
> perl -I ../lib -c debchange; \
> 
> debc syntax OK
> perl -I ../lib -c debcheckout; \
> 
> bts syntax OK
> perl -I ../lib -c debcommit; \
> 
> deb-why-removed syntax OK
> perl -I ../lib -c debdiff; \
> 
> debchange syntax OK
> debcommit syntax OK
> perl -I ../lib -c debi; \
> 
> perl -I ../lib -c debpkg; \
> 
> debpkg syntax OK
> perl -I ../lib -c debrebuild; \
> 
> debdiff syntax OK
> perl -I ../lib -c debsnap; \
> 
> debcheckout syntax OK
> perl -I ../lib -c debuild; \
> 
> debi syntax OK
> perl -I ../lib -c dep3changelog; \
> 
> debsnap syntax OK
> debuild syntax OK
> dep3changelog syntax OK
> perl -I ../lib -c desktop2menu; \
> 
> perl -I ../lib -c dget; \
> 
> perl -I ../lib -c dpkg-depcheck; \
> 
> desktop2menu syntax OK
> perl -I ../lib -c dscverify; \
> 
> dpkg-depcheck syntax OK
> perl -I ../lib -c git-deborig; \
> 
> dget syntax OK
> debrebuild syntax OK
> perl -I ../lib -c grep-excuses; \
> 
> perl -I ../lib -c hardening-check; \
> 
> grep-excuses syntax OK
> perl -I ../lib -c mass-bug; \
> 
> dscverify syntax OK
> perl -I ../lib -c mk-build-deps; \
> 
> mass-bug syntax OK
> perl -I ../lib -c mk-origtargz; \
> 
> hardening-check syntax OK
> perl -I ../lib -c namecheck; \
> 
> git-deborig syntax OK
> perl -I ../lib -c origtargz; \
> 
> namecheck syntax OK
> perl -I ../lib -c plotchangelog; \
> 
> mk-build-deps syntax OK
> perl -I ../lib -c rc-alert; \
> 
> origtargz syntax OK
> perl -I ../lib -c rmadison; \
> 
> plotchangelog syntax OK
> perl -I ../lib -c salsa; \
> 
> rmadison syntax OK
> perl -I ../lib -c svnpath; \
> 
> mk-origtargz syntax OK
> perl -I ../lib -c tagpending; \
> 
> svnpath syntax OK
> perl -I ../lib -c transition-check; \
> 
> rc-alert syntax OK
> perl -I ../lib -c uscan; \
> 
> transition-check syntax OK
> perl -I ../lib -c who-permits-upload; \
> 
> tagpending syntax OK
> bash -n annotate-output
> bash -n archpath
> bash -n cowpoke
> bash -n cvs-debi
> bash -n cvs-debrelease
> bash -n dcmd
> bash -n deb-reversion
> bash -n debclean
> bash -n debrelease
> bash -n debrepro
> bash -n debrsign
> bash -n debsign
> bash -n diff2patches
> bash -n dpkg-genbuilddeps
> bash -n dscextract
> bash -n edit-patch
> bash -n getbuildlog
> bash -n list-unreleased
> bash -n ltnu
> bash -n manpage-alert
> bash -n mergechanges
> bash -n nmudiff
> bash -n pts-subscribe
> bash -n run_bisect
> who-permits-upload syntax OK
> bash -n run_bisect_qemu
> bash -n uupdate
> bash -n what-patch
> bash -n who-uploads
> bash -n whodepends
> bash -n wnpp-alert
> bash -n wnpp-check
> py3versions: no X-Python3-Version in control file, using supported versions
> python3.9 setup.py test
> salsa syntax OK
> uscan syntax OK
> running test
> WARNING: Testing via this command is deprecated and will be removed in a 
> future version. Users looking for a generic test entry point independent of 
> test runner are encouraged to use tox.
> running egg_info
> creating devscripts.egg-info
> writing devscripts.egg-info/PKG-INFO
> writing dependency_links to devscripts.egg-info/dependency_links.txt
> writing top-level names to devscripts.egg-info/top_level.txt
> writing manifest file 'devscripts.egg-info/SOURCES.txt'
> reading manifest file 'devscripts.egg-info/SOURCES.txt'
> writing manifest file 'devscripts.egg-info/SOURCES.txt'
> running build_ext
> testArgs (devscripts.test.test_logger.LoggerTestCase) ... ok
> testCommand (devscripts.test.test_logger.LoggerTestCase) ... ok
> testNoArgs 

Processed: Bug#983618 marked as pending in python-django

2021-11-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands:

> tag -1 pending
Bug #983618 [python3-django] python3-django 3.2 breaks python3-django-pyscss
Added tag(s) pending.

-- 
983618: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=983618
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems



Bug#983618: marked as pending in python-django

2021-11-10 Thread Antonio Terceiro
Control: tag -1 pending

Hello,

Bug #983618 in python-django reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/python-django/-/commit/5d11c2460b21da8c2c832b5808e5070a2803b7e5


Add Breaks: on python-django-pyscss << 2.0.2-10

The issue has been fixed in that version of python-django-pyscss

Closes: #983618


(this message was generated automatically)
-- 
Greetings

https://bugs.debian.org/983618



Bug#998911: node-string-width: file conflict with node-slice-ansi

2021-11-10 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
yep, that, sorry.  I mean it's missing a Replaces.

On Wed, Nov 10, 2021 at 3:24 PM Axel Beckert  wrote:
>
> Hi Mattia,
>
> Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> > Control: reopen -1
> >
> > On Wed, Nov 10, 2021 at 03:01:11PM +0100, Axel Beckert wrote:
> > > I also noticed just now that I got it the wrong way around in that
> > > comment: These headers need to go into node-slice-ansi, not into
> > > node-string-width. But luckily Mattia got it right:
> > >
> > > Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> > > > Without too many checks, I believe node-slice-ansi should have a
> > > > Breaks+Replace: node-string-width (<< 4.2.3+~9.2.2-1)
> >
> > I also noticed that the last upload seems to have added Breaks but not
> > Conflicts.  I don't think that's enough (haven't tested).
>
> I think you mean "Replaces". Breaks and Conflicts are AFAIK "either or".
>
> Regards, Axel
> --
>  ,''`.  |  Axel Beckert , https://people.debian.org/~abe/
> : :' :  |  Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin
> `. `'   |  4096R: 2517 B724 C5F6 CA99 5329  6E61 2FF9 CD59 6126 16B5
>   `-|  1024D: F067 EA27 26B9 C3FC 1486  202E C09E 1D89 9593 0EDE



-- 
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo

GPG Key: 4096R/B9444540 http://goo.gl/I8TMB
more about me: http://mapreri.org
Launchpad User: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri
Ubuntu Wiki page: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MattiaRizzolo



Bug#996931: marked as pending in python-django

2021-11-10 Thread Antonio Terceiro
Control: tag -1 pending

Hello,

Bug #996931 in python-django reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/python-django/-/commit/55f258c3d1234700fd475b006ffabf0b911132e5


Add Breaks: on lava-server << 2021.11

The 2021.11 release will incorporate the needed changes to work with
Django 3.2.

Closes: #996931


(this message was generated automatically)
-- 
Greetings

https://bugs.debian.org/996931



Processed: Bug#996931 marked as pending in python-django

2021-11-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands:

> tag -1 pending
Bug #996931 [python3-django] python3-django needs Breaks for the bullseye 
lava-server
Added tag(s) pending.

-- 
996931: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=996931
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems



Bug#997150: marked as done (bitwise: FTBFS: src/interactive.c:117:17: error: format not a string literal and no format arguments [-Werror=format-security])

2021-11-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 10 Nov 2021 14:48:39 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#997150: fixed in bitwise 0.43-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #997150,
regarding bitwise: FTBFS: src/interactive.c:117:17: error: format not a string 
literal and no format arguments [-Werror=format-security]
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
997150: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=997150
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: bitwise
Version: 0.42-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs

Hi,

During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.


Relevant part (hopefully):
> gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I./inc   -Wdate-time -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2-g -O2 
> -ffile-prefix-map=/<>=. -fstack-protector-strong -Wformat 
> -Werror=format-security -Wall -pedantic -c -o src/cmd.o src/cmd.c
> src/interactive.c: In function ‘update_history_win’:
> src/interactive.c:117:17: error: format not a string literal and no format 
> arguments [-Werror=format-security]
>   117 | mvwprintw(history_win, j, 2, history[history_pos - 
> i].line);
>   | ^
> src/interactive.c: In function ‘set_fields_width’:
> src/interactive.c:176:44: warning: ‘min_field_distance’ may be used 
> uninitialized [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
>   176 | hex_pos = dec_pos + max_dec_digits + min_field_distance - 2;
>   |   ~^~~~
> gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I./inc   -Wdate-time -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2-g -O2 
> -ffile-prefix-map=/<>=. -fstack-protector-strong -Wformat 
> -Werror=format-security -Wall -pedantic -c -o src/stack.o src/stack.c
> gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I./inc   -Wdate-time -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2-g -O2 
> -ffile-prefix-map=/<>=. -fstack-protector-strong -Wformat 
> -Werror=format-security -Wall -pedantic -c -o src/shunting-yard.o 
> src/shunting-yard.c
> gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I./inc   -Wdate-time -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2-g -O2 
> -ffile-prefix-map=/<>=. -fstack-protector-strong -Wformat 
> -Werror=format-security -Wall -pedantic -c -o src/help.o src/help.c
> cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
> make[1]: *** [Makefile:681: src/interactive.o] Error 1


The full build log is available from:
http://qa-logs.debian.net/2021/10/23/bitwise_0.42-1_unstable.log

A list of current common problems and possible solutions is available at
http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS . You're welcome to contribute!

If you reassign this bug to another package, please marking it as 'affects'-ing
this package. See https://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control#affects

If you fail to reproduce this, please provide a build log and diff it with mine
so that we can identify if something relevant changed in the meantime.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: bitwise
Source-Version: 0.43-1
Done: Ramon Fried 

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
bitwise, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 997...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Ramon Fried  (supplier of updated bitwise package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org)


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2021 14:38:23 +0200
Source: bitwise
Architecture: source
Version: 0.43-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Ramon Fried 
Changed-By: Ramon Fried 
Closes: 997150
Changes:
 bitwise (0.43-1) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * Fixed build warnings Closes: Bug#997150
   * Add support for IPv4 in command line mode.
Checksums-Sha1:
 88ce21a3f60f7e268be6da54fcbdf19c6fe4a506 1580 bitwise_0.43-1.dsc
 90a45c251cd505402b387070ff5fa9b2ace45815 127364 bitwise_0.43.orig.tar.gz
 56aa4556777d5ddad67fb9b7f84e2b1e6a87b38b 2704 bitwise_0.43-1.debian.tar.xz
 233daf91ae580a11508d128323a23c625eebdce3 5592 bitwise_0.43-1_source.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
 8f006b0af83763c9d2fccef4d22265b6d82efb6438c63cee62f4a8cd5d8fbc5f 1580 
bitwise_0.43-1.dsc
 f524f794188a10defc4df673d8cf0b3739f93e58e93aff0cdb8a99fbdcca2ffb 127364 
bitwise_0.43.orig.tar.gz
 

Bug#998911: node-string-width: file conflict with node-slice-ansi

2021-11-10 Thread Axel Beckert
Hi Mattia,

Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> Control: reopen -1
> 
> On Wed, Nov 10, 2021 at 03:01:11PM +0100, Axel Beckert wrote:
> > I also noticed just now that I got it the wrong way around in that
> > comment: These headers need to go into node-slice-ansi, not into
> > node-string-width. But luckily Mattia got it right:
> > 
> > Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> > > Without too many checks, I believe node-slice-ansi should have a
> > > Breaks+Replace: node-string-width (<< 4.2.3+~9.2.2-1)
> 
> I also noticed that the last upload seems to have added Breaks but not
> Conflicts.  I don't think that's enough (haven't tested).

I think you mean "Replaces". Breaks and Conflicts are AFAIK "either or".

Regards, Axel
-- 
 ,''`.  |  Axel Beckert , https://people.debian.org/~abe/
: :' :  |  Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin
`. `'   |  4096R: 2517 B724 C5F6 CA99 5329  6E61 2FF9 CD59 6126 16B5
  `-|  1024D: F067 EA27 26B9 C3FC 1486  202E C09E 1D89 9593 0EDE



Processed: Re: node-string-width: file conflict with node-slice-ansi

2021-11-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands:

> reopen -1
Bug #998911 {Done: Yadd } [node-string-width,node-slice-ansi] 
node-string-width: file conflict with node-slice-ansi
Bug #998886 {Done: Yadd } [node-string-width,node-slice-ansi] 
node-string-width,node-slice-ansi: both ship 
/usr/share/nodejs/is-fullwidth-code-point/*
'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version;
all fixed versions will be cleared, and you may need to re-add them.
Bug reopened
No longer marked as fixed in versions node-slice-ansi/5.0.0+~4.0.0-3 and 
node-string-width/4.2.3+~9.2.2-1.
No longer marked as fixed in versions node-slice-ansi/5.0.0+~4.0.0-3 and 
node-string-width/4.2.3+~9.2.2-1.

-- 
998886: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=998886
998911: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=998911
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems



Bug#998911: node-string-width: file conflict with node-slice-ansi

2021-11-10 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
Control: reopen -1

On Wed, Nov 10, 2021 at 03:01:11PM +0100, Axel Beckert wrote:
> I also noticed just now that I got it the wrong way around in that
> comment: These headers need to go into node-slice-ansi, not into
> node-string-width. But luckily Mattia got it right:
> 
> Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> > Without too many checks, I believe node-slice-ansi should have a
> > Breaks+Replace: node-string-width (<< 4.2.3+~9.2.2-1)

I also noticed that the last upload seems to have added Breaks but not
Conflicts.  I don't think that's enough (haven't tested).

-- 
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo

GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18  4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540  .''`.
More about me:  https://mapreri.org : :'  :
Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri  `. `'`
Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia  `-


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Processed: fixed 998886 in node-string-width/4.2.3+~9.2.2-1

2021-11-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> # Re-add fixed version again as well
> fixed 998886 node-string-width/4.2.3+~9.2.2-1
Bug #998886 {Done: Yadd } [node-string-width,node-slice-ansi] 
node-string-width,node-slice-ansi: both ship 
/usr/share/nodejs/is-fullwidth-code-point/*
Bug #998911 {Done: Yadd } [node-string-width,node-slice-ansi] 
node-string-width: file conflict with node-slice-ansi
Marked as fixed in versions node-string-width/4.2.3+~9.2.2-1.
Marked as fixed in versions node-string-width/4.2.3+~9.2.2-1.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
998886: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=998886
998911: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=998911
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems



Processed: notfound 998886 in node-string-width/4.2.3+~9.2.2-1

2021-11-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> # Missing Breaks and Replaces headers were actually in node-slice-ansi, sorry 
> for the confusion
> notfound 998886 node-string-width/4.2.3+~9.2.2-1
Bug #998886 {Done: Yadd } [node-string-width,node-slice-ansi] 
node-string-width,node-slice-ansi: both ship 
/usr/share/nodejs/is-fullwidth-code-point/*
Bug #998911 {Done: Yadd } [node-string-width,node-slice-ansi] 
node-string-width: file conflict with node-slice-ansi
No longer marked as found in versions node-string-width/4.2.3+~9.2.2-1.
No longer marked as found in versions node-string-width/4.2.3+~9.2.2-1.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
998886: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=998886
998911: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=998911
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems



Bug#999360: libayatana-indicator_0.8.4-3_all-buildd.changes REJECTED

2021-11-10 Thread Aurelien Jarno
Source: libayatana-indicator
Version: 0.8.4-2
Severity: serious

On 2021-11-10 13:49, Debian FTP Masters wrote:
> Version check failed:
> Your upload included the binary package ayatana-indicator-common, version 
> 0.8.4-3, for all,
> however testing already has version 0.9.5-1.
> Uploads to unstable must have a higher version than present in testing.
> 
> Mapping sid to unstable.
> 
> ===
> 
> Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
> your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
> concerns.
> 
> 
> 



Bug#998911: node-string-width: file conflict with node-slice-ansi

2021-11-10 Thread Axel Beckert
Hi Yadd,

Yadd wrote:
> you reopened this bug, however node-string-width is really fixed in
> version 4.2.3+~9.2.2-1 (no more is-fullwidth-code-point). What should I do ?

I mentioned it in my mail which reopened the bug:

| # Missing Breaks and Replaces headers in node-string-width/4.2.3+~9.2.2-1
| found 998886 node-string-width/4.2.3+~9.2.2-1

Sorry that it might have been it a bit hidden. Thought, it would be
clear.

Here's my original error:

[…]
Unpacking node-slice-ansi (5.0.0+~4.0.0-2) ...
dpkg: error processing archive 
/tmp/apt-dpkg-install-PfhX58/103-node-slice-ansi_5.0.0+~4.0.0-2_all.deb 
(--unpack):
 trying to overwrite '/usr/share/nodejs/is-fullwidth-code-point/index.d.ts', 
which is also in package node-string-width 4.2.3+~3.0.0+~9.2.2-1
Preparing to unpack .../104-node-spdx-exceptions_2.3.0-2_all.deb ...
[…] 

Note that 5.0.0+~4.0.0-2 only came in through that dependency in the
newer node-string-width without these files.

So yes, the file conflict is no more present, but this doesn't solve
the issue alone.

I also noticed just now that I got it the wrong way around in that
comment: These headers need to go into node-slice-ansi, not into
node-string-width. But luckily Mattia got it right:

Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> Without too many checks, I believe node-slice-ansi should have a
> Breaks+Replace: node-string-width (<< 4.2.3+~9.2.2-1)

Regards, Axel
-- 
 ,''`.  |  Axel Beckert , https://people.debian.org/~abe/
: :' :  |  Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin
`. `'   |  4096R: 2517 B724 C5F6 CA99 5329  6E61 2FF9 CD59 6126 16B5
  `-|  1024D: F067 EA27 26B9 C3FC 1486  202E C09E 1D89 9593 0EDE



Bug#998911: marked as done (node-string-width: file conflict with node-slice-ansi)

2021-11-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 10 Nov 2021 13:34:59 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#998886: fixed in node-slice-ansi 5.0.0+~4.0.0-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #998886,
regarding node-string-width: file conflict with node-slice-ansi
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
998886: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=998886
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: node-string-width
Version: 4.2.3+~3.0.0+~9.2.2-1
Severity: serious

Unpacking node-slice-ansi (5.0.0+~4.0.0-2) ...
dpkg: error processing archive 
/tmp/apt-dpkg-install-DvqJPE/12-node-slice-ansi_5.0.0+~4.0.0-2_all.deb 
(--unpack):
 trying to overwrite '/usr/share/nodejs/is-fullwidth-code-point/index.d.ts', 
which is also in package node-string-width 4.2.3+~3.0.0+~9.2.2-1
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: node-slice-ansi
Source-Version: 5.0.0+~4.0.0-3
Done: Yadd 

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
node-slice-ansi, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 998...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Yadd  (supplier of updated node-slice-ansi package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org)


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2021 14:17:05 +0100
Source: node-slice-ansi
Architecture: source
Version: 5.0.0+~4.0.0-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Javascript Maintainers 

Changed-By: Yadd 
Closes: 998886
Changes:
 node-slice-ansi (5.0.0+~4.0.0-3) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * Team upload
   * Add Breaks node-string-width < 4.2.3+~9.2.2-1 (Closes: #998886)
Checksums-Sha1: 
 82fb142bb24fb454eb676b5ef4ce15ad74b3b157 2498 
node-slice-ansi_5.0.0+~4.0.0-3.dsc
 acbe219f60a2768e6ce853279ae6dfe6f0435d4a 3372 
node-slice-ansi_5.0.0+~4.0.0-3.debian.tar.xz
Checksums-Sha256: 
 14e9b9b067792ababc3854e21a61076954a6c9032f22d24e4452765b17d96ccb 2498 
node-slice-ansi_5.0.0+~4.0.0-3.dsc
 443955ec47b139016b5c1e28af067dd4d91fc45420d7c9be50e49cdcb626aadb 3372 
node-slice-ansi_5.0.0+~4.0.0-3.debian.tar.xz
Files: 
 64fb356fbf9f52eaf6f9d37600800b48 2498 javascript optional 
node-slice-ansi_5.0.0+~4.0.0-3.dsc
 f06562b7758020e64725c69d60035878 3372 javascript optional 
node-slice-ansi_5.0.0+~4.0.0-3.debian.tar.xz

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
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=tItr
-END PGP SIGNATURE End Message ---


Bug#998886: marked as done (node-string-width,node-slice-ansi: both ship /usr/share/nodejs/is-fullwidth-code-point/*)

2021-11-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 10 Nov 2021 13:34:59 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#998886: fixed in node-slice-ansi 5.0.0+~4.0.0-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #998886,
regarding node-string-width,node-slice-ansi: both ship 
/usr/share/nodejs/is-fullwidth-code-point/*
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
998886: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=998886
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: node-string-width,node-slice-ansi
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Control: found -1 4.2.3+~3.0.0+~9.2.2-1
Control: found -1 5.0.0+~4.0.0-2

Hi,

during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed to install
because it tries to overwrite other packages files.

>From the attached log (scroll to the bottom...):

  Selecting previously unselected package node-slice-ansi.
  Preparing to unpack .../node-slice-ansi_5.0.0+~4.0.0-2_all.deb ...
  Unpacking node-slice-ansi (5.0.0+~4.0.0-2) ...
  dpkg: error processing archive 
/var/cache/apt/archives/node-slice-ansi_5.0.0+~4.0.0-2_all.deb (--unpack):
   trying to overwrite '/usr/share/nodejs/is-fullwidth-code-point/index.d.ts', 
which is also in package node-string-width 4.2.3+~3.0.0+~9.2.2-1
  Errors were encountered while processing:
   /var/cache/apt/archives/node-slice-ansi_5.0.0+~4.0.0-2_all.deb

The following files are in conflict between the two packages:

usr/share/nodejs/is-fullwidth-code-point/index.d.ts
usr/share/nodejs/is-fullwidth-code-point/index.js
usr/share/nodejs/is-fullwidth-code-point/package.json


cheers,

Andreas


node-string-width=4.2.3+~3.0.0+~9.2.2-1_node-slice-ansi=5.0.0+~4.0.0-2.log.gz
Description: application/gzip
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: node-slice-ansi
Source-Version: 5.0.0+~4.0.0-3
Done: Yadd 

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
node-slice-ansi, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 998...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Yadd  (supplier of updated node-slice-ansi package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org)


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2021 14:17:05 +0100
Source: node-slice-ansi
Architecture: source
Version: 5.0.0+~4.0.0-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Javascript Maintainers 

Changed-By: Yadd 
Closes: 998886
Changes:
 node-slice-ansi (5.0.0+~4.0.0-3) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * Team upload
   * Add Breaks node-string-width < 4.2.3+~9.2.2-1 (Closes: #998886)
Checksums-Sha1: 
 82fb142bb24fb454eb676b5ef4ce15ad74b3b157 2498 
node-slice-ansi_5.0.0+~4.0.0-3.dsc
 acbe219f60a2768e6ce853279ae6dfe6f0435d4a 3372 
node-slice-ansi_5.0.0+~4.0.0-3.debian.tar.xz
Checksums-Sha256: 
 14e9b9b067792ababc3854e21a61076954a6c9032f22d24e4452765b17d96ccb 2498 
node-slice-ansi_5.0.0+~4.0.0-3.dsc
 443955ec47b139016b5c1e28af067dd4d91fc45420d7c9be50e49cdcb626aadb 3372 
node-slice-ansi_5.0.0+~4.0.0-3.debian.tar.xz
Files: 
 64fb356fbf9f52eaf6f9d37600800b48 2498 javascript optional 
node-slice-ansi_5.0.0+~4.0.0-3.dsc
 f06562b7758020e64725c69d60035878 3372 javascript optional 
node-slice-ansi_5.0.0+~4.0.0-3.debian.tar.xz

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
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=tItr
-END PGP SIGNATURE End Message ---


Bug#998911: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#998911: node-string-width: file conflict with node-slice-ansi

2021-11-10 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
On Wed, Nov 10, 2021 at 02:13:46PM +0100, Yadd wrote:
> you reopened this bug, however node-string-width is really fixed in
> version 4.2.3+~9.2.2-1 (no more is-fullwidth-code-point). What should I do ?

Without too many checks, I believe node-slice-ansi should have a
Breaks+Replace: node-string-width (<< 4.2.3+~9.2.2-1) though I'm not
sure (please double check!)

-- 
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo

GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18  4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540  .''`.
More about me:  https://mapreri.org : :'  :
Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri  `. `'`
Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia  `-


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Bug#998886: marked as pending in node-slice-ansi

2021-11-10 Thread Yadd
Control: tag -1 pending

Hello,

Bug #998886 in node-slice-ansi reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

https://salsa.debian.org/js-team/node-slice-ansi/-/commit/55b4a3725ace58c24971ca1784421cc5de30e40a


Add Breaks node-string-width < 4.2.3+~9.2.2-1

Closes: #998886


(this message was generated automatically)
-- 
Greetings

https://bugs.debian.org/998886



Processed: Bug#998886 marked as pending in node-slice-ansi

2021-11-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands:

> tag -1 pending
Bug #998886 [node-string-width,node-slice-ansi] 
node-string-width,node-slice-ansi: both ship 
/usr/share/nodejs/is-fullwidth-code-point/*
Bug #998911 [node-string-width,node-slice-ansi] node-string-width: file 
conflict with node-slice-ansi
Added tag(s) pending.
Added tag(s) pending.

-- 
998886: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=998886
998911: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=998911
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems



Bug#998233: marked as done (gcc-doc-defaults: FTBFS with gcc-11 being the default)

2021-11-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 10 Nov 2021 13:18:38 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#998233: fixed in gcc-doc-defaults 5:23
has caused the Debian Bug report #998233,
regarding gcc-doc-defaults: FTBFS with gcc-11 being the default
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
998233: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=998233
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: gcc-doc-defaults
Version: 5:22
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)

   debian/rules override_dh_gencontrol-arch
make[1]: Entering directory '/build/gcc-doc-defaults-22'
# call dh_gencontrol one at a time for *-doc packages
dh_gencontrol -p cpp-doc -- -v5:;  dh_gencontrol -p gcc-doc -- -v5:;  
dh_gencontrol -p gfortran-doc -- -v5:;  dh_gencontrol -p gnat-doc -- 
-v5:10.1.0-2;  dh_gencontrol -p gccgo-doc -- -v5:;
...
   dh_builddeb
dpkg-deb: error: parsing file 'debian/gcc-doc/DEBIAN/control' near line 3 
package 'gcc-doc':
 'Version' field value '5:': nothing after colon in version number
dpkg-deb: error: parsing file 'debian/gfortran-doc/DEBIAN/control' near line 3 
package 'gfortran-doc':
 'Version' field value '5:': nothing after colon in version number
dpkg-deb: error: parsing file 'debian/gccgo-doc/DEBIAN/control' near line 3 
package 'gccgo-doc':
 'Version' field value '5:': nothing after colon in version number
dh_builddeb: error: dpkg-deb --build debian/gfortran-doc .. returned exit code 2
dh_builddeb: error: dpkg-deb --build debian/gcc-doc .. returned exit code 2
dh_builddeb: error: dpkg-deb --build debian/gccgo-doc .. returned exit code 2
dh_builddeb: error: Aborting due to earlier error
make: *** [debian/rules:113: binary] Error 25

There are some versions missing ...


Andreas
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: gcc-doc-defaults
Source-Version: 5:23
Done: Dmitry Baryshkov 

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
gcc-doc-defaults, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 998...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Dmitry Baryshkov  (supplier of updated gcc-doc-defaults 
package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org)


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2021 13:56:26 +0300
Source: gcc-doc-defaults
Architecture: source
Version: 5:23
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian GCC Maintainers 
Changed-By: Dmitry Baryshkov 
Closes: 998233
Changes:
 gcc-doc-defaults (5:23) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * Build using gcc-11 (gnat is still using gnat-10) (Closes: #998233)
Checksums-Sha1:
 62f85bae79bffd14909e89a467b8ceb4286dd614 2394 gcc-doc-defaults_23.dsc
 b85813035ba9b834750afa0d2d66f89b31e236b1 31496 gcc-doc-defaults_23.tar.xz
 f2d5b6e822a6d2f34549a182d2941c020b34b343 6158 
gcc-doc-defaults_23_source.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
 d04672558a164f75587bfe7fddad55d4aa1e7e7bec6ad9293525a6f95ac63c3f 2394 
gcc-doc-defaults_23.dsc
 a7a8c88d0f7cd33ad985ab5f4b9f7773640aad04e3e34ef9b468e2692f752346 31496 
gcc-doc-defaults_23.tar.xz
 b564c10f7c860a1bad212b01886414429175c52b79b317f38ff46d3801a2a7e0 6158 
gcc-doc-defaults_23_source.buildinfo
Files:
 b9906006e815312b371627fbbd66fb47 2394 contrib/doc optional 
gcc-doc-defaults_23.dsc
 6005eaa0298b0aeeece0f1a8c5c00dbc 31496 contrib/doc optional 
gcc-doc-defaults_23.tar.xz
 3507d39c58b30e272ed29b444aa1b2be 6158 contrib/doc optional 
gcc-doc-defaults_23_source.buildinfo

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
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Bug#998911: node-string-width: file conflict with node-slice-ansi

2021-11-10 Thread Yadd
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo

Hi Axel,

you reopened this bug, however node-string-width is really fixed in
version 4.2.3+~9.2.2-1 (no more is-fullwidth-code-point). What should I do ?

Cheers,
Yadd

$ dpkg -l node-string-width && dpkg -L node-string-width
||/ Name  VersionArchitecture Description
+++-=-==--=
ii  node-string-width 4.2.3+~9.2.2-1 all  Get the visual width..
/.
/usr
/usr/share
/usr/share/doc
/usr/share/doc/node-string-width
/usr/share/doc/node-string-width/changelog.Debian.gz
/usr/share/doc/node-string-width/copyright
/usr/share/doc/node-string-width/readme.md
/usr/share/nodejs
/usr/share/nodejs/emoji-regex
/usr/share/nodejs/emoji-regex/RGI_Emoji.d.ts
/usr/share/nodejs/emoji-regex/RGI_Emoji.js
/usr/share/nodejs/emoji-regex/es2015
/usr/share/nodejs/emoji-regex/es2015/RGI_Emoji.d.ts
/usr/share/nodejs/emoji-regex/es2015/RGI_Emoji.js
/usr/share/nodejs/emoji-regex/es2015/index.d.ts
/usr/share/nodejs/emoji-regex/es2015/index.js
/usr/share/nodejs/emoji-regex/es2015/text.d.ts
/usr/share/nodejs/emoji-regex/es2015/text.js
/usr/share/nodejs/emoji-regex/index.d.ts
/usr/share/nodejs/emoji-regex/index.js
/usr/share/nodejs/emoji-regex/package.json
/usr/share/nodejs/emoji-regex/text.d.ts
/usr/share/nodejs/emoji-regex/text.js
/usr/share/nodejs/string-width
/usr/share/nodejs/string-width/index.d.ts
/usr/share/nodejs/string-width/index.js
/usr/share/nodejs/string-width/package.json



Processed: Re: node-string-width: file conflict with node-slice-ansi

2021-11-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands:

> tags -1 + moreinfo
Bug #998911 [node-string-width,node-slice-ansi] node-string-width: file 
conflict with node-slice-ansi
Bug #998886 [node-string-width,node-slice-ansi] 
node-string-width,node-slice-ansi: both ship 
/usr/share/nodejs/is-fullwidth-code-point/*
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
Added tag(s) moreinfo.

-- 
998886: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=998886
998911: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=998911
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems



Processed: Fixed upstream

2021-11-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> forwarded 996323 
> https://github.com/steveklabnik/mono_logger/commit/58b71f0fb830272dd45bdf01c0fe03c478a9e085
Bug #996323 [src:ruby-mono-logger] ruby-mono-logger: FTBFS with ruby3.0: ERROR: 
Test "ruby3.0" failed: ArgumentError: wrong number of arguments (given 2, 
expected 0..1)
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 
'https://github.com/steveklabnik/mono_logger/commit/58b71f0fb830272dd45bdf01c0fe03c478a9e085'.
> tags 996323 fixed-upstream patch
Bug #996323 [src:ruby-mono-logger] ruby-mono-logger: FTBFS with ruby3.0: ERROR: 
Test "ruby3.0" failed: ArgumentError: wrong number of arguments (given 2, 
expected 0..1)
Added tag(s) patch and fixed-upstream.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
996323: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=996323
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems



Processed: Fixed upstream

2021-11-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> forwarded 996320 
> https://github.com/seattlerb/minitest-excludes/commit/7ed688995be9a49c0f6b65bd07eb9cb87053676a
Bug #996320 [src:ruby-minitest-excludes] ruby-minitest-excludes: FTBFS with 
ruby3.0: ERROR: Test "ruby3.0" failed.
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 
'https://github.com/seattlerb/minitest-excludes/commit/7ed688995be9a49c0f6b65bd07eb9cb87053676a'.
> tags 996320 patch fixed-upstream
Bug #996320 [src:ruby-minitest-excludes] ruby-minitest-excludes: FTBFS with 
ruby3.0: ERROR: Test "ruby3.0" failed.
Added tag(s) patch and fixed-upstream.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
996320: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=996320
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems



Processed: 0.16.4 builds

2021-11-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> tags 996296 fixed-upstream
Bug #996296 [src:ruby-ice-cube] ruby-ice-cube: FTBFS with ruby3.0: ERROR: Test 
"ruby3.0" failed:ArgumentError:
Added tag(s) fixed-upstream.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
996296: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=996296
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems



Bug#997225: Vendoring image-spec and runtime-spec seem to be the issue

2021-11-10 Thread Shengjing Zhu
On Wed, Nov 10, 2021 at 07:27:58AM -0500, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> That's not sufficient.
> 
> the commit you point out does two things:
> 
>  - update the submodules for 'image-spec' and 'runtime-spec' (which the
> Debian package currently overrides with the distro-provided copies)
>  -  zos-related changes to the rust bindings (which the Debian package
> doesn't have at all at this point)
> 
> The missing definitions that the linker stumbles over are generated from
> the json files. But I haven't found where that generation exactly happens
> and what change is missing to it.
> 
> Thanks for your swift reply!
> 
> On Tue, Nov 9, 2021 at 8:47 PM Shengjing Zhu  wrote:
> 
> > Cloud you backport following commit?
> >
> > https://github.com/containers/libocispec/commit/8489d9b60105e487564c9966b5748e2a6ea2855b
> >

This patch updates libocispec/Makefile.am, which is needed to be backported.

This patch looks like doing nothing to C part, because the generated source
is removed in upstream repo. Theses files(which are added in Makefile.am) can
be generated by `make -C libocispec generate`. So please also uncomment this
line in debian/rules.

Thanks.



Processed: tagging 984028

2021-11-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> tags 984028 + fixed-in-experimental
Bug #984028 {Done: Kari Pahula } [src:cxxtools] cxxtools: 
ftbfs with GCC-11
Added tag(s) fixed-in-experimental.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
984028: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=984028
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems



Processed: Fixed in the 1.5.1 development version

2021-11-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> tags 984053 fixed-upstream
Bug #984053 [src:etl] etl: ftbfs with GCC-11
Bug #984355 [src:etl] synfig: ftbfs with GCC-11
Bug #984357 [src:etl] synfigstudio: ftbfs with GCC-11
Added tag(s) fixed-upstream.
Added tag(s) fixed-upstream.
Added tag(s) fixed-upstream.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
984053: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=984053
984355: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=984355
984357: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=984357
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems



Bug#997225: Vendoring image-spec and runtime-spec seem to be the issue

2021-11-10 Thread Reinhard Tartler
Looking more into it, here are more observations:

- crun upstream has a git submodule on 'libocispec' (the repo you asked me
to backport). The release tarballs contain a copy of the submodule contents
at the time of the release
- the 'libocispec' submodule contains two additional submodules
'image-spec' and 'runtime-spec'
- the debian package replaces only the two "inner" submodules 'image-spec'
and 'runtime-spec' with sources found in Debian packages, but not the outer
'libocispec', which isn't found in debian
- the Debian packages of 'image-spec' and 'runtime-spec' have been updated
last August, and contain specification for the "zos" platform
- the 'libocispec' repository contains a generator that reads those
specifications and generates code. It seems to me that this is the code
generator that lacks some zos related definition and thus causes the linker
failure
- the 'libocispec' repository has last synced with 'image-spec' and
'runtime-spec' last January, and thus is missing the zos related changes

This is very messy. I can totally understand upstream's stance to just
vendor the specs so that the generator is only used with versions of the
specifications that have actually been tested. I don't think it is a good
use of Debian's developers' time to play this game of catching up.


On Wed, Nov 10, 2021 at 7:27 AM Reinhard Tartler  wrote:

> That's not sufficient.
>
> the commit you point out does two things:
>
>  - update the submodules for 'image-spec' and 'runtime-spec' (which the
> Debian package currently overrides with the distro-provided copies)
>  -  zos-related changes to the rust bindings (which the Debian package
> doesn't have at all at this point)
>
> The missing definitions that the linker stumbles over are generated from
> the json files. But I haven't found where that generation exactly happens
> and what change is missing to it.
>
> Thanks for your swift reply!
>
> On Tue, Nov 9, 2021 at 8:47 PM Shengjing Zhu  wrote:
>
>> Cloud you backport following commit?
>>
>> https://github.com/containers/libocispec/commit/8489d9b60105e487564c9966b5748e2a6ea2855b
>>
>>
>> (Sent on my mobile phone)
>>
>> Reinhard Tartler  于 2021年11月10日周三 07:05写道:
>>
>>> I took a look at the issue and here are my thoughts:
>>>
>>> - the build error is a failure to link some test binaries. excluding
>>> them from the build might be possible with some patching.
>>> - I've upgraded the package to the latest upstream 1.3, and was seeing
>>> exactly the same build failure
>>> - the build failure goes away when not stripping the bundled copies of
>>> runtime-spec and image-spec
>>> - Dimtry had a conversation about this with upstream at
>>> https://github.com/containers/crun/issues/240. It seems to be that
>>> upstream strongly recommends to just use the vendored copies of image-spc
>>> and runtime-spec
>>> -  I've pushed my work to
>>> https://salsa.debian.org/debian/crun/-/merge_requests/1
>>> - I believe the issue was introduced by Shengjing's update in
>>> https://tracker.debian.org/news/1249177/accepted-golang-github-opencontainers-specs-10266g20a2d97-1-source-into-unstable/
>>> -- but that was already months ago. So that may not be true
>>>
>>> With this, I'd like to suggest to move ahead with my merge request and
>>> don't strip image-spec and runtime-spec from the package.
>>>
>>> Any thoughts?
>>>
>>> --
>>> regards,
>>> Reinhard
>>>
>>
>
> --
> regards,
> Reinhard
>


-- 
regards,
Reinhard


Bug#984191: libodb: ftbfs with GCC-11

2021-11-10 Thread Adrian Bunk
Control: forwarded -1 
https://git.codesynthesis.com/cgit/odb/libodb/commit/?id=13dd928ae18ef9610bc820b7b3e65629addea1d2
Control: tags -1 patch

On Wed, Mar 03, 2021 at 04:14:40PM +, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Package: src:libodb
> Version: 2.4.0-1
> Severity: normal
> Tags: sid bookworm
> User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
> Usertags: ftbfs-gcc-11
>...

The attached patch derived extracted from the upstream fix linked above 
fixes the build with gcc 11.

cu
Adrian
diff --git a/odb/details/shared-ptr/base.cxx b/odb/details/shared-ptr/base.cxx
index b95797b..5bfc0af 100644
--- a/odb/details/shared-ptr/base.cxx
+++ b/odb/details/shared-ptr/base.cxx
@@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ namespace odb
 share exclusive = share (2);
 
 const char* not_shared::
-what () const throw ()
+what () const noexcept
 {
   return "object is not shared";
 }
@@ -54,7 +54,11 @@ namespace odb
 }
 
 void*
+#ifdef ODB_CXX11
+operator new (size_t n, odb::details::share s)
+#else
 operator new (size_t n, odb::details::share s) throw (std::bad_alloc)
+#endif
 {
   if (s == odb::details::shared)
   {
@@ -74,7 +78,7 @@ operator new (size_t n, odb::details::share s) throw (std::bad_alloc)
 }
 
 void
-operator delete (void* p, odb::details::share s) throw ()
+operator delete (void* p, odb::details::share s) noexcept
 {
   // This version of operator delete is only called when the c-tor
   // fails. In this case there is no object and we can just free the
diff --git a/odb/details/shared-ptr/base.hxx b/odb/details/shared-ptr/base.hxx
index 4a38945..90053e8 100644
--- a/odb/details/shared-ptr/base.hxx
+++ b/odb/details/shared-ptr/base.hxx
@@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
 #include 
 #include// std::size_t
 
+#include  // ODB_CXX11, noexcept
 #include 
 #include 
 
@@ -34,11 +35,16 @@ namespace odb
   }
 }
 
+#ifdef ODB_CXX11
+LIBODB_EXPORT void*
+operator new (std::size_t, odb::details::share);
+#else
 LIBODB_EXPORT void*
 operator new (std::size_t, odb::details::share) throw (std::bad_alloc);
+#endif
 
 LIBODB_EXPORT void
-operator delete (void*, odb::details::share) throw ();
+operator delete (void*, odb::details::share) noexcept;
 
 namespace odb
 {
@@ -61,17 +67,25 @@ namespace odb
   std::size_t
   _ref_count () const;
 
+#ifdef ODB_CXX11
+  void*
+  operator new (std::size_t);
+
+  void*
+  operator new (std::size_t, share);
+#else
   void*
   operator new (std::size_t) throw (std::bad_alloc);
 
   void*
   operator new (std::size_t, share) throw (std::bad_alloc);
+#endif
 
   void
-  operator delete (void*, share) throw ();
+  operator delete (void*, share) noexcept;
 
   void
-  operator delete (void*) throw ();
+  operator delete (void*) noexcept;
 
   struct refcount_callback
   {
diff --git a/odb/details/shared-ptr/base.ixx b/odb/details/shared-ptr/base.ixx
index 9bf7c94..3ed1339 100644
--- a/odb/details/shared-ptr/base.ixx
+++ b/odb/details/shared-ptr/base.ixx
@@ -63,6 +63,19 @@ namespace odb
   return counter_;
 }
 
+#ifdef ODB_CXX11
+inline void* shared_base::
+operator new (std::size_t n)
+{
+  return ::operator new (n);
+}
+
+inline void* shared_base::
+operator new (std::size_t n, share)
+{
+  return ::operator new (n);
+}
+#else
 inline void* shared_base::
 operator new (std::size_t n) throw (std::bad_alloc)
 {
@@ -74,15 +87,16 @@ namespace odb
 {
   return ::operator new (n);
 }
+#endif
 
 inline void shared_base::
-operator delete (void* p, share) throw ()
+operator delete (void* p, share) noexcept
 {
   ::operator delete (p);
 }
 
 inline void shared_base::
-operator delete (void* p) throw ()
+operator delete (void* p) noexcept
 {
   ::operator delete (p);
 }


Processed: Re: Bug#984191: libodb: ftbfs with GCC-11

2021-11-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands:

> forwarded -1 
> https://git.codesynthesis.com/cgit/odb/libodb/commit/?id=13dd928ae18ef9610bc820b7b3e65629addea1d2
Bug #984191 [src:libodb] libodb: ftbfs with GCC-11
Bug #984189 [src:libodb] libodb-boost: ftbfs with GCC-11
Bug #984192 [src:libodb] libodb-qt: ftbfs with GCC-11
Bug #984193 [src:libodb] libodb-mysql: ftbfs with GCC-11
Bug #984194 [src:libodb] libodb-pgsql: ftbfs with GCC-11
Bug #984197 [src:libodb] libodb-sqlite: ftbfs with GCC-11
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 
'https://git.codesynthesis.com/cgit/odb/libodb/commit/?id=13dd928ae18ef9610bc820b7b3e65629addea1d2'.
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 
'https://git.codesynthesis.com/cgit/odb/libodb/commit/?id=13dd928ae18ef9610bc820b7b3e65629addea1d2'.
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 
'https://git.codesynthesis.com/cgit/odb/libodb/commit/?id=13dd928ae18ef9610bc820b7b3e65629addea1d2'.
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 
'https://git.codesynthesis.com/cgit/odb/libodb/commit/?id=13dd928ae18ef9610bc820b7b3e65629addea1d2'.
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 
'https://git.codesynthesis.com/cgit/odb/libodb/commit/?id=13dd928ae18ef9610bc820b7b3e65629addea1d2'.
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 
'https://git.codesynthesis.com/cgit/odb/libodb/commit/?id=13dd928ae18ef9610bc820b7b3e65629addea1d2'.
> tags -1 patch
Bug #984191 [src:libodb] libodb: ftbfs with GCC-11
Bug #984189 [src:libodb] libodb-boost: ftbfs with GCC-11
Bug #984192 [src:libodb] libodb-qt: ftbfs with GCC-11
Bug #984193 [src:libodb] libodb-mysql: ftbfs with GCC-11
Bug #984194 [src:libodb] libodb-pgsql: ftbfs with GCC-11
Bug #984197 [src:libodb] libodb-sqlite: ftbfs with GCC-11
Added tag(s) patch.
Added tag(s) patch.
Added tag(s) patch.
Added tag(s) patch.
Added tag(s) patch.
Added tag(s) patch.

-- 
984189: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=984189
984191: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=984191
984192: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=984192
984193: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=984193
984194: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=984194
984197: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=984197
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems



Bug#997225: Vendoring image-spec and runtime-spec seem to be the issue

2021-11-10 Thread Reinhard Tartler
That's not sufficient.

the commit you point out does two things:

 - update the submodules for 'image-spec' and 'runtime-spec' (which the
Debian package currently overrides with the distro-provided copies)
 -  zos-related changes to the rust bindings (which the Debian package
doesn't have at all at this point)

The missing definitions that the linker stumbles over are generated from
the json files. But I haven't found where that generation exactly happens
and what change is missing to it.

Thanks for your swift reply!

On Tue, Nov 9, 2021 at 8:47 PM Shengjing Zhu  wrote:

> Cloud you backport following commit?
>
> https://github.com/containers/libocispec/commit/8489d9b60105e487564c9966b5748e2a6ea2855b
>
>
> (Sent on my mobile phone)
>
> Reinhard Tartler  于 2021年11月10日周三 07:05写道:
>
>> I took a look at the issue and here are my thoughts:
>>
>> - the build error is a failure to link some test binaries. excluding them
>> from the build might be possible with some patching.
>> - I've upgraded the package to the latest upstream 1.3, and was seeing
>> exactly the same build failure
>> - the build failure goes away when not stripping the bundled copies of
>> runtime-spec and image-spec
>> - Dimtry had a conversation about this with upstream at
>> https://github.com/containers/crun/issues/240. It seems to be that
>> upstream strongly recommends to just use the vendored copies of image-spc
>> and runtime-spec
>> -  I've pushed my work to
>> https://salsa.debian.org/debian/crun/-/merge_requests/1
>> - I believe the issue was introduced by Shengjing's update in
>> https://tracker.debian.org/news/1249177/accepted-golang-github-opencontainers-specs-10266g20a2d97-1-source-into-unstable/
>> -- but that was already months ago. So that may not be true
>>
>> With this, I'd like to suggest to move ahead with my merge request and
>> don't strip image-spec and runtime-spec from the package.
>>
>> Any thoughts?
>>
>> --
>> regards,
>> Reinhard
>>
>

-- 
regards,
Reinhard


Bug#984027: darkice: diff for NMU version 1.3-0.3

2021-11-10 Thread Adrian Bunk
Control: tags 984027 + patch
Control: tags 984027 + pending

Dear maintainer,

I've prepared an NMU for darkice (versioned as 1.3-0.3) and uploaded
it to DELAYED/15. Please feel free to tell me if I should cancel it.

cu
Adrian
diff -Nru darkice-1.3/debian/changelog darkice-1.3/debian/changelog
--- darkice-1.3/debian/changelog	2017-10-14 12:17:23.0 +0300
+++ darkice-1.3/debian/changelog	2021-11-10 14:16:46.0 +0200
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+darkice (1.3-0.3) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+  * Non-maintainer upload.
+  * Build with -std=gnu++14 to workaround FTBFS with gcc 11.
+(Closes: #984027)
+
+ -- Adrian Bunk   Wed, 10 Nov 2021 14:16:46 +0200
+
 darkice (1.3-0.2) unstable; urgency=medium
 
   * Non-maintainer upload.
diff -Nru darkice-1.3/debian/rules darkice-1.3/debian/rules
--- darkice-1.3/debian/rules	2016-08-05 23:07:25.0 +0300
+++ darkice-1.3/debian/rules	2021-11-10 14:16:46.0 +0200
@@ -5,6 +5,8 @@
 DEB_BUILD_MAINT_OPTIONS := hardening=+all
 include /usr/share/dpkg/default.mk
 
+export DEB_CXXFLAGS_MAINT_APPEND += -std=gnu++14
+
 POLICY_TARGETS := binary binary-arch binary-indep build build-arch	\
 build-indep clean
 .PHONY: $(POLICY_TARGETS)


Processed: darkice: diff for NMU version 1.3-0.3

2021-11-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands:

> tags 984027 + patch
Bug #984027 [src:darkice] darkice: ftbfs with GCC-11
Added tag(s) patch.
> tags 984027 + pending
Bug #984027 [src:darkice] darkice: ftbfs with GCC-11
Added tag(s) pending.

-- 
984027: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=984027
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems



Processed: Re: Bug#998141: opencv breaks auto-multiple-choice autopkgtest

2021-11-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands:

> reassign -1 src:opencv
Bug #998141 [src:opencv, src:auto-multiple-choice] opencv breaks 
auto-multiple-choice autopkgtest
Bug reassigned from package 'src:opencv, src:auto-multiple-choice' to 
'src:opencv'.
No longer marked as found in versions auto-multiple-choice/1.5.1-2 and 
opencv/4.5.4+dfsg-1.
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #998141 to the same values 
previously set

-- 
998141: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=998141
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems



Bug#998141: opencv breaks auto-multiple-choice autopkgtest

2021-11-10 Thread Alexis Bienvenüe
control: reassign -1 src:opencv

On Sun, 31 Oct 2021 22:04:15 +0100 Paul Gevers 
wrote:
> I think that means you must bump the SONAME (if not done upstream,
with
> a Debian specific version), go through NEW, ask for a transition
block
> with the release team and have all reverse dependencies rebuild.

I think these apply to opencv, so I reassign to this package to let
current working version of auto-multiple-choice in testing.

Regards,
Alexis.



Bug#997783: marked as done (silkaj: FTBFS: test -s debian/bash-completion => fails)

2021-11-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 10 Nov 2021 11:20:35 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#997783: fixed in silkaj 0.9.0-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #997783,
regarding silkaj: FTBFS: test -s debian/bash-completion => fails
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
997783: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=997783
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: silkaj
Version: 0.9.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm

Hi,

During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.


Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering directory '/<>'
> PATH="/<>/debian/silkaj/usr/bin:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/games"
>  PYTHONPATH="/<>/debian/silkaj/usr/lib/python3.9/dist-packages" 
> help2man --name "command-line client for Duniter" --no-info --output  
> debian/silkaj.1  silkaj || { 
> PATH="/<>/debian/silkaj/usr/bin:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/games"
>  PYTHONPATH="/<>/debian/silkaj/usr/lib/python3.9/dist-packages"  
> silkaj --help; false; }
> perl -i -pe 's/\?\?(?=1|Test)/ \\\[u011E\]/g' \
>   debian/silkaj.1
> PATH="/<>/debian/silkaj/usr/bin:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/games"
>  PYTHONPATH="/<>/debian/silkaj/usr/lib/python3.9/dist-packages" \
>   _SILKAJ_COMPLETE=source silkaj \
>   > debian/bash-completion || true
> test -s debian/bash-completion
> make[1]: *** [debian/rules:25: execute_after_dh_auto_install] Error 1


The full build log is available from:
http://qa-logs.debian.net/2021/10/23/silkaj_0.9.0-1_unstable.log

A list of current common problems and possible solutions is available at
http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS . You're welcome to contribute!

If you reassign this bug to another package, please marking it as 'affects'-ing
this package. See https://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control#affects

If you fail to reproduce this, please provide a build log and diff it with mine
so that we can identify if something relevant changed in the meantime.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: silkaj
Source-Version: 0.9.0-2
Done: Jonas Smedegaard 

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
silkaj, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 997...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Jonas Smedegaard  (supplier of updated silkaj package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org)


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2021 17:05:47 +0100
Source: silkaj
Architecture: source
Version: 0.9.0-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Cryptocoin Team 
Changed-By: Jonas Smedegaard 
Closes: 997783
Changes:
 silkaj (0.9.0-2) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * update shell completion commands;
 tighten build-dependency on python3-click;
 closes: bug#997783, thanks to Lucas Nussbaum
   * declare compliance with Debian Policy 4.6.0
   * update copyright info:
 + use Reference field (not License-Reference);
   tighten lintian overrides
 + update coverage
Checksums-Sha1:
 435dbed96fbe7332b1797549ad1c5e63bbbf9c57 2262 silkaj_0.9.0-2.dsc
 f123e961ae88af6da0c2c4c18ca95f7e7cab01c7 18948 silkaj_0.9.0-2.debian.tar.xz
 66f14823471673ca882e574d479f1beda6328c8a 7206 silkaj_0.9.0-2_amd64.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
 2c28b5df676de34884e1b90a066f71efbfebcad656c2698ed4db9e6506a88a91 2262 
silkaj_0.9.0-2.dsc
 cf2fe798aaa8a5b8b1e2c90c2f5cf809c461ffe8e2639e01f7846013b5c60176 18948 
silkaj_0.9.0-2.debian.tar.xz
 9d21e0de682d61486343089fbe3fa9365c01d32abff08ebe39e85034cd1d8336 7206 
silkaj_0.9.0-2_amd64.buildinfo
Files:
 4343076cd129085f4daf3681817267aa 2262 utils optional silkaj_0.9.0-2.dsc
 73740c9d62b6cb1f0dd9934ce2b837d3 18948 utils optional 
silkaj_0.9.0-2.debian.tar.xz
 bc1e0819009a15626ac6fd0bfb583457 7206 utils optional 
silkaj_0.9.0-2_amd64.buildinfo

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-

iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEn+Ppw2aRpp/1PMaELHwxRsGgASEFAmGL7tAACgkQLHwxRsGg

Processed: reopening 998886, found 998886 in node-string-width/4.2.3+~9.2.2-1

2021-11-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> reopen 998886
Bug #998886 {Done: Yadd } [node-string-width,node-slice-ansi] 
node-string-width,node-slice-ansi: both ship 
/usr/share/nodejs/is-fullwidth-code-point/*
Bug #998911 {Done: Yadd } [node-string-width,node-slice-ansi] 
node-string-width: file conflict with node-slice-ansi
'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version;
all fixed versions will be cleared, and you may need to re-add them.
Bug reopened
No longer marked as fixed in versions node-string-width/4.2.3+~9.2.2-1.
No longer marked as fixed in versions node-string-width/4.2.3+~9.2.2-1.
> # Missing Breaks and Replaces headers in node-string-width/4.2.3+~9.2.2-1
> found 998886 node-string-width/4.2.3+~9.2.2-1
Bug #998886 [node-string-width,node-slice-ansi] 
node-string-width,node-slice-ansi: both ship 
/usr/share/nodejs/is-fullwidth-code-point/*
Bug #998911 [node-string-width,node-slice-ansi] node-string-width: file 
conflict with node-slice-ansi
Marked as found in versions node-string-width/4.2.3+~9.2.2-1.
Marked as found in versions node-string-width/4.2.3+~9.2.2-1.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
998886: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=998886
998911: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=998911
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems



Bug#997481: marked as done (textdistance: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: pybuild --test --test-pytest -i python{version} -p 3.9 returned exit code 13)

2021-11-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 10 Nov 2021 10:20:48 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#997481: fixed in textdistance 4.2.2-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #997481,
regarding textdistance: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: pybuild --test 
--test-pytest -i python{version} -p 3.9 returned exit code 13
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
997481: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=997481
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: textdistance
Version: 4.2.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm

Hi,

During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.


Relevant part (hopefully):
> dpkg-buildpackage
> -
> 
> Command: dpkg-buildpackage -us -uc -sa -rfakeroot
> dpkg-buildpackage: info: source package textdistance
> dpkg-buildpackage: info: source version 4.2.0-2
> dpkg-buildpackage: info: source distribution unstable
> dpkg-buildpackage: info: source changed by Julian Gilbey 
>  dpkg-source --before-build .
> dpkg-buildpackage: info: host architecture amd64
>  debian/rules clean
> dh clean --buildsystem=pybuild
>dh_auto_clean -O--buildsystem=pybuild
> I: pybuild base:232: python3.9 setup.py clean 
> /usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/setuptools/dist.py:717: UserWarning: Usage of 
> dash-separated 'description-file' will not be supported in future versions. 
> Please use the underscore name 'description_file' instead
>   warnings.warn(
> running clean
> removing '/<>/.pybuild/cpython3_3.9/build' (and everything under 
> it)
> 'build/bdist.linux-x86_64' does not exist -- can't clean it
> 'build/scripts-3.9' does not exist -- can't clean it
>dh_autoreconf_clean -O--buildsystem=pybuild
>dh_clean -O--buildsystem=pybuild
>  dpkg-source -b .
> dpkg-source: info: using source format '3.0 (quilt)'
> dpkg-source: info: building textdistance using existing 
> ./textdistance_4.2.0.orig.tar.gz
> dpkg-source: info: using patch list from debian/patches/series
> dpkg-source: info: building textdistance in textdistance_4.2.0-2.debian.tar.xz
> dpkg-source: info: building textdistance in textdistance_4.2.0-2.dsc
>  debian/rules binary
> dh binary --buildsystem=pybuild
>dh_update_autotools_config -O--buildsystem=pybuild
>dh_autoreconf -O--buildsystem=pybuild
>dh_auto_configure -O--buildsystem=pybuild
> I: pybuild base:232: python3.9 setup.py config 
> /usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/setuptools/dist.py:717: UserWarning: Usage of 
> dash-separated 'description-file' will not be supported in future versions. 
> Please use the underscore name 'description_file' instead
>   warnings.warn(
> running config
>dh_auto_build -O--buildsystem=pybuild
> I: pybuild base:232: /usr/bin/python3 setup.py build 
> /usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/setuptools/dist.py:717: UserWarning: Usage of 
> dash-separated 'description-file' will not be supported in future versions. 
> Please use the underscore name 'description_file' instead
>   warnings.warn(
> running build
> running build_py
> creating /<>/.pybuild/cpython3_3.9/build/textdistance
> copying textdistance/libraries.py -> 
> /<>/.pybuild/cpython3_3.9/build/textdistance
> copying textdistance/__init__.py -> 
> /<>/.pybuild/cpython3_3.9/build/textdistance
> copying textdistance/benchmark.py -> 
> /<>/.pybuild/cpython3_3.9/build/textdistance
> copying textdistance/utils.py -> 
> /<>/.pybuild/cpython3_3.9/build/textdistance
> creating /<>/.pybuild/cpython3_3.9/build/textdistance/algorithms
> copying textdistance/algorithms/simple.py -> 
> /<>/.pybuild/cpython3_3.9/build/textdistance/algorithms
> copying textdistance/algorithms/__init__.py -> 
> /<>/.pybuild/cpython3_3.9/build/textdistance/algorithms
> copying textdistance/algorithms/compression_based.py -> 
> /<>/.pybuild/cpython3_3.9/build/textdistance/algorithms
> copying textdistance/algorithms/token_based.py -> 
> /<>/.pybuild/cpython3_3.9/build/textdistance/algorithms
> copying textdistance/algorithms/phonetic.py -> 
> /<>/.pybuild/cpython3_3.9/build/textdistance/algorithms
> copying textdistance/algorithms/sequence_based.py -> 
> /<>/.pybuild/cpython3_3.9/build/textdistance/algorithms
> copying textdistance/algorithms/vector_based.py -> 
> /<>/.pybuild/cpython3_3.9/build/textdistance/algorithms
> copying textdistance/algorithms/edit_based.py -> 
> /<>/.pybuild/cpython3_3.9/build/textdistance/algorithms
> copying textdistance/algorithms/base.py -> 
> /<>/.pybuild/cpython3_3.9/build/textdistance/algorithms
> copying 

Bug#997335: marked as done (python-fakeredis: FTBFS: unsatisfiable build-dependency: python3-pytest-cov (< 3.0) but 3.0.0-1 is to be installed)

2021-11-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 10 Nov 2021 09:50:10 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#997335: fixed in python-fakeredis 1.6.1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #997335,
regarding python-fakeredis: FTBFS: unsatisfiable build-dependency: 
python3-pytest-cov (< 3.0) but 3.0.0-1 is to be installed
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
997335: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=997335
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: python-fakeredis
Version: 1.4.5-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs

Hi,

During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.


Relevant part (hopefully):
> +--+
> | Install package build dependencies  
>  |
> +--+
> 
> 
> Setup apt archive
> -
> 
> Merged Build-Depends: debhelper-compat (= 13), dh-python, python3-aioredis, 
> python3-all, python3-future, python3-hypothesis, python3-lupa, python3-pytest 
> (>= 4.6.4), python3-pytest-cov (>= 2.7.1), python3-pytest-cov (<< 3.0), 
> python3-pytest-mock, python3-redis, python3-setuptools, python3-six, 
> python3-sortedcontainers, build-essential, fakeroot
> Filtered Build-Depends: debhelper-compat (= 13), dh-python, python3-aioredis, 
> python3-all, python3-future, python3-hypothesis, python3-lupa, python3-pytest 
> (>= 4.6.4), python3-pytest-cov (>= 2.7.1), python3-pytest-cov (<< 3.0), 
> python3-pytest-mock, python3-redis, python3-setuptools, python3-six, 
> python3-sortedcontainers, build-essential, fakeroot
> dpkg-deb: building package 'sbuild-build-depends-main-dummy' in 
> '/<>/apt_archive/sbuild-build-depends-main-dummy.deb'.
> Ign:1 copy:/<>/apt_archive ./ InRelease
> Get:2 copy:/<>/apt_archive ./ Release [957 B]
> Ign:3 copy:/<>/apt_archive ./ Release.gpg
> Get:4 copy:/<>/apt_archive ./ Sources [466 B]
> Get:5 copy:/<>/apt_archive ./ Packages [550 B]
> Fetched 1973 B in 0s (0 B/s)
> Reading package lists...
> Reading package lists...
> 
> Install main build dependencies (apt-based resolver)
> 
> 
> Installing build dependencies
> Reading package lists...
> Building dependency tree...
> Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
> requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
> distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
> or been moved out of Incoming.
> The following information may help to resolve the situation:
> 
> The following packages have unmet dependencies:
>  sbuild-build-depends-main-dummy : Depends: python3-pytest-cov (< 3.0) but 
> 3.0.0-1 is to be installed
> E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages.
> apt-get failed.


The full build log is available from:
http://qa-logs.debian.net/2021/10/23/python-fakeredis_1.4.5-4_unstable.log

A list of current common problems and possible solutions is available at
http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS . You're welcome to contribute!

If you reassign this bug to another package, please marking it as 'affects'-ing
this package. See https://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control#affects

If you fail to reproduce this, please provide a build log and diff it with mine
so that we can identify if something relevant changed in the meantime.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: python-fakeredis
Source-Version: 1.6.1-1
Done: Stefano Rivera 

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
python-fakeredis, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 997...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Stefano Rivera  (supplier of updated python-fakeredis 
package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org)


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2021 01:31:44 -0800
Source: python-fakeredis
Architecture: source
Version: 1.6.1-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Python Team 
Changed-By: Stefano Rivera 

Bug#997335: marked as pending in python-fakeredis

2021-11-10 Thread Stefano Rivera
Control: tag -1 pending

Hello,

Bug #997335 in python-fakeredis reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/python-fakeredis/-/commit/5aae69c1c7dc4ff40cd75914c52ca3546124ac6b


Remove Build-Dep restriction on pytest-cov >= 3. (Closes: #997335)


(this message was generated automatically)
-- 
Greetings

https://bugs.debian.org/997335



Processed: Bug#997335 marked as pending in python-fakeredis

2021-11-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands:

> tag -1 pending
Bug #997335 [src:python-fakeredis] python-fakeredis: FTBFS: unsatisfiable 
build-dependency: python3-pytest-cov (< 3.0) but 3.0.0-1 is to be installed
Added tag(s) pending.

-- 
997335: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=997335
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems



Bug#999348: gtk-d: FTBFS with ldc 1.28.0

2021-11-10 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
Source: gtk-d
Version: 3.9.0-4
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs sid bookworm
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)

| ldc2 -O -g -release -wi -Igenerated/gtkd -Idemos/gtkD/TestWindow -c 
demos/gtkD/TestWindow/TestText.d -ofdemos/gtkD/TestWindow/TestText.o
| demos/gtkD/TestWindow/TestWindow.d(207): Error: import 
`TestWindow.TestEntries` is used as a type
| demos/gtkD/TestWindow/TestWindow.d(212): Error: import `TestWindow.TestStock` 
is used as a type
| demos/gtkD/TestWindow/TestWindow.d(219): Error: import 
`TestWindow.TestScales` is used as a type
| demos/gtkD/TestWindow/TestWindow.d(222): Error: import 
`TestWindow.TestTreeView` is used as a type
| demos/gtkD/TestWindow/TestWindow.d(228): Error: import 
`TestWindow.TestDrawingArea` is used as a type
| demos/gtkD/TestWindow/TestWindow.d(229): Error: import `TestWindow.TestText` 
is used as a type
| demos/gtkD/TestWindow/TestWindow.d(230): Error: import `TestWindow.TestImage` 
is used as a type
| demos/gtkD/TestWindow/TestWindow.d(233): Error: import 
`TestWindow.TestAspectFrame` is used as a type
| demos/gtkD/TestWindow/TestWindow.d(234): Error: import `TestWindow.TestIdle` 
is used as a type
| demos/gtkD/TestWindow/TestWindow.d(949): Error: import `TestWindow.TTextView` 
is used as a type
| make[2]: *** [GNUmakefile:257: demos/gtkD/TestWindow/TestWindow.o] Error 1

https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=gtk-d=amd64=3.9.0-4%2Bb1=1636493509=0

Cheers
-- 
Sebastian Ramacher



Bug#998575: [Pkg-freeipa-devel] Bug#998575: Bug#998575: bind-dyndb-ldap: FTBFS: build-dependency not installable: bind9-libs (= 1:9.16.21-1)

2021-11-10 Thread Timo Aaltonen

On 9.11.2021 10.53, Ondřej Surý wrote:

Hi Timo,


On 5. 11. 2021, at 8:09, Timo Aaltonen  wrote:

On 5.11.2021 1.37, peter green wrote:

  bind9-dev : Depends: bind9-libs (= 1:9.16.21-1) but it is not going to be 
installed

It looks like bind8 no longer builds the bind9-dev package. It's still present 
in
unstable as a cruft package but is uninstallable due to version constraints, 
it's
completely gone from testing.


I don't know what's going on here, but at least the current bind9 packaging is 
not available on salsa, debian/main is on 9.16.22-1 and according to 
d/changelog it was uploaded to unstable on the same day as 9.17.19-1... (which 
has now migrated to testing already)


The 9.17 packaging is available from the isc/9.17 branch which should be up to 
date.


The new bind9 doesn't mention dropping bind9-dev on d/changelog. Ondrej, why 
was it dropped?


We need to figure out what to do with bind-dyndb-ldap in the future.  The BIND 
9 libraries are not
meant for public consumption since 9.14.0. The upstream (which is incidentally 
also me) has declare the libraries
private and the symbols could change even between patch releases. There’s 
absolutely no guarantee
about symbol stability even on stable branch.

Unfortunately, bind-dyndb-ldap is licensed under GPL-2.0 which makes it 
impossible to include
it directly in the src:bind9 package.

I see no easy way from this. I will reintroduce the bind9-dev package, but this 
will make
the bind-dyndb-ldap package to regularly FTBFS anyway and it needs to be fixed 
before
the next stable release.


Ok thanks. I asked about plans to upstream the ldap plugin, but 
apparently "upstream was not interested in it". Would it be possible to 
get merged now? :) (if the license is changed, of course)




--
t



Bug#999342: shadow FTBFS: bd-uninstallable due to conflict on libsepol1-dev

2021-11-10 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
Control: forcemerge 998633 -1
Control: tags = 998633 ftbfs bookworm pending sid

On 2021-11-10 07:58:54 +0100, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> Source: shadow
> Version: 1:4.8.1-1.1
> Severity: serious
> Tags: ftbfs patch
> User: helm...@debian.org
> Usertags: rebootstrap
> 
> shadow fails to build from source in unstable, because the selinux
> people started a transition, bumped soname and in that process moved to
> unversioned -dev packages. The final result is that for now shadow
> exhibits a conflict on libsepol1-dev, but before too long it will miss a
> versioned -dev package. Switching to unversioned ones fixes the issue in
> practice and completes the transition for shadow.

There's #998633 already

Cheers

> 
> Helmut

> diff --minimal -Nru shadow-4.8.1/debian/changelog 
> shadow-4.8.1/debian/changelog
> --- shadow-4.8.1/debian/changelog 2021-10-23 21:04:57.0 +0200
> +++ shadow-4.8.1/debian/changelog 2021-11-10 07:51:53.0 +0100
> @@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
> +shadow (1:4.8.1-1.2) UNRELEASED; urgency=medium
> +
> +  * Non-maintainer upload.
> +  * Fix FTBFS: Use unversioned selinux and semanage dependencies.
> +(Closes: #-1)
> +
> + -- Helmut Grohne   Wed, 10 Nov 2021 07:51:53 +0100
> +
>  shadow (1:4.8.1-1.1) unstable; urgency=medium
>  
>[ Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues ]
> diff --minimal -Nru shadow-4.8.1/debian/control shadow-4.8.1/debian/control
> --- shadow-4.8.1/debian/control   2021-10-23 20:29:33.0 +0200
> +++ shadow-4.8.1/debian/control   2021-11-10 07:51:49.0 +0100
> @@ -12,8 +12,8 @@
> docbook-xsl,
> docbook-xml,
> libxml2-utils,
> -   libselinux1-dev [linux-any],
> -   libsemanage1-dev [linux-any],
> +   libselinux-dev [linux-any],
> +   libsemanage-dev [linux-any],
> itstool,
> bison,
> libaudit-dev [linux-any]


-- 
Sebastian Ramacher


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Processed (with 1 error): Re: Bug#999342: shadow FTBFS: bd-uninstallable due to conflict on libsepol1-dev

2021-11-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands:

> forcemerge 998633 -1
Bug #998633 [src:shadow] shadow: Please switch libsemanage1-dev BD to 
libsemanage-dev
Bug #998633 [src:shadow] shadow: Please switch libsemanage1-dev BD to 
libsemanage-dev
Added tag(s) ftbfs and patch.
Bug #999342 [src:shadow] shadow FTBFS: bd-uninstallable due to conflict on 
libsepol1-dev
998067 was blocked by: 929484 998633 998634
998067 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 998067: 999342
Added tag(s) pending, sid, and bookworm.
Merged 998633 999342
> tags = 998633 ftbfs bookworm pending sid
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.


-- 
998067: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=998067
998633: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=998633
999342: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=999342
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems