Bug#931519: 931519 resolved

2022-01-28 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel


On 29 January 2022 at 10:38, Paul Wise wrote:
| Control: fixed -1 4.0.3
| 
| On Fri, 2022-01-28 at 20:07 -0600, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| 
| > Per email by Graham from 14 Nov 2020 this has been resolved.
| 
| Resolved upstream in 2020 but not in Debian until 2021.

Correct. Graham (as author) and myself (as uploader) missed this bug report
which answered (but did not close) ages ago.

The package is great and in good shape. Been using it for months. Just wanted
to get the migration blocker for the package taken care of.
 
| > By now we have an even newer version 4.0.3.
| 
| Please use a versioned -done message next time:
| 
| https://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing

Noted, thanks. Still not that fluent with these...

Best, Dirk

-- 
https://dirk.eddelbuettel.com | @eddelbuettel | e...@debian.org



Bug#990345: zookeeper: various security issues

2022-01-28 Thread Christoph Anton Mitterer
Further for the records (for a future upgrade to newer ZK versions):


There will likely need to be a NEWS.Debian entry about the following:

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-3056

In short:
- apparently they've added a check that prevents ZK from starting, when
no snapshots were found in the dataDir

- the workaround is to ONCE set
  snapshot.trust.empty=true

  (the zookeeper.snapshot.trust.empty=true mentioned in most messages
  of the bug does not work, which is mentioned in some later answers)

- start up the server

- remove the setting again
  quoting:
  "It is recommended to remove the property once you have a working
  server, because that check is important to ensure that the system is
  in good shape"


Cheers,
Chris.



Processed: 931519 resolved

2022-01-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> fixed 931519 4.0.3
Bug #931519 {Done: Dirk Eddelbuettel } [wajig] wajig: 
upgradesecurity references testing/updates instead of testing-security
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #931519 to the same values 
previously set
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
931519: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=931519
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems



Processed: Re: 931519 resolved

2022-01-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands:

> fixed -1 4.0.3
Bug #931519 {Done: Dirk Eddelbuettel } [wajig] wajig: 
upgradesecurity references testing/updates instead of testing-security
Marked as fixed in versions wajig/4.0.3.

-- 
931519: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=931519
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems



Bug#931519: 931519 resolved

2022-01-28 Thread Paul Wise
Control: fixed -1 4.0.3

On Fri, 2022-01-28 at 20:07 -0600, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:

> Per email by Graham from 14 Nov 2020 this has been resolved.

Resolved upstream in 2020 but not in Debian until 2021.

> By now we have an even newer version 4.0.3.

Please use a versioned -done message next time:

https://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing

-- 
bye,
pabs

https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Bug#931519: marked as done (wajig: upgradesecurity references testing/updates instead of testing-security)

2022-01-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 28 Jan 2022 20:07:06 -0600
with message-id <25076.41290.269608.599...@rob.eddelbuettel.com>
and subject line 931519 resolved
has caused the Debian Bug report #931519,
regarding wajig: upgradesecurity references testing/updates instead of 
testing-security
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
931519: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=931519
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: wajig
Severity: normal

The wajig upgradesecurity command references testing/updates but with
bullseye that suite has been renamed to testing-security. Please update
the wajig upgradesecurity command.

src/commands.py-def upgradesecurity(args):
src/commands.py-"""Do a security upgrade"""
src/commands.py-sources_list = tempfile.mkstemp(".security", "wajig.", 
"/tmp")[1]
src/commands.py-sources_file = open(sources_list, "w")
src/commands.py-# check dist
src/commands.py-sources_file.write("deb http://security.debian.org/ " +\
src/commands.py:   "testing/updates main contrib 
non-free\n")
src/commands.py-sources_file.close()

https://codesearch.debian.net/search?q=testing%2Fupdates+package%3Awajig

-- 
bye,
pabs

https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---

Per email by Graham from 14 Nov 2020 this has been resolved.

By now we have an even newer version 4.0.3.  This long-fixed bug should not
prevent migration to testing.

Dirk

-- 
https://dirk.eddelbuettel.com | @eddelbuettel | e...@debian.org--- End Message ---


Bug#965431: bfbtester: diff for NMU version 2.0.1-7.2

2022-01-28 Thread Joao Eriberto Mota Filho
Control: tags 965431 + patch
Control: tags 965431 + pending

Dear maintainer,

I've prepared an NMU for bfbtester (versioned as 2.0.1-7.2) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/5. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer or cancel it.

Regards,

Eriberto

diff -u bfbtester-2.0.1/debian/rules bfbtester-2.0.1/debian/rules
--- bfbtester-2.0.1/debian/rules
+++ bfbtester-2.0.1/debian/rules
@@ -1,13 +1,4 @@
 #!/usr/bin/make -f
-  
-DEB_INSTALL_MANPAGES_bfbtester := debian/bfbtester.1
-
-common-configure-impl::
-   cd $(DEB_BUILDDIR); touch aclocal.m4 && touch Makefile.in && \
-   touch src/Makefile.in && touch src/config.h.in && \
-   touch src/bfbt/Makefile && touch configure
-
-include /usr/share/cdbs/1/class/autotools.mk
-include /usr/share/cdbs/1/rules/debhelper.mk
-include /usr/share/cdbs/1/rules/simple-patchsys.mk
 
+%:
+   dh $@
diff -u bfbtester-2.0.1/debian/changelog bfbtester-2.0.1/debian/changelog
--- bfbtester-2.0.1/debian/changelog
+++ bfbtester-2.0.1/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,20 @@
+bfbtester (2.0.1-7.2) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+  * Non-maintainer upload.
+  * Using new DH level format. Consequently:
+  - debian/compat: removed.
+  - debian/control: changed from 'debhelper' to 'debhelper-compat' in
+Build-Depends field and bumped level to 13.
+  - Closes: #965431
+  * Dropped CDBS in favor of the debhelper to allow the build system to use
+DH level greater than 11. Consequently:
+  - debian/control: removed no longer needed cdbs and autotools-dev from
+Build-Depends field.
+  - debian/manpages: created to install the manpage.
+  - debian/rules: changed from CDBS to DH.
+
+ -- Joao Eriberto Mota Filho   Fri, 28 Jan 2022 22:14:01 
-0300
+
 bfbtester (2.0.1-7.1) unstable; urgency=high
 
   * Non-maintainer upload.
diff -u bfbtester-2.0.1/debian/control bfbtester-2.0.1/debian/control
--- bfbtester-2.0.1/debian/control
+++ bfbtester-2.0.1/debian/control
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
 Section: utils
 Priority: optional
 Maintainer: Uwe Hermann 
-Build-Depends: cdbs, debhelper (>= 5), autotools-dev
+Build-Depends: debhelper-compat (= 13)
 Standards-Version: 3.7.2
 
 Package: bfbtester
reverted:
--- bfbtester-2.0.1/debian/compat
+++ bfbtester-2.0.1.orig/debian/compat
@@ -1 +0,0 @@
-5
only in patch2:
unchanged:
--- bfbtester-2.0.1.orig/debian/manpages
+++ bfbtester-2.0.1/debian/manpages
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+debian/bfbtester.1



Processed: bfbtester: diff for NMU version 2.0.1-7.2

2022-01-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands:

> tags 965431 + patch
Bug #965431 [src:bfbtester] bfbtester: Removal of obsolete debhelper compat 5 
and 6 in bookworm
Added tag(s) patch.
> tags 965431 + pending
Bug #965431 [src:bfbtester] bfbtester: Removal of obsolete debhelper compat 5 
and 6 in bookworm
Added tag(s) pending.

-- 
965431: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=965431
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems



Bug#1002548: marked as done (libfli2,indi-fli: both ship /lib/udev/rules.d/99-fli.rules)

2022-01-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 29 Jan 2022 01:19:11 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#1002548: fixed in indi-fli 1.5-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1002548,
regarding libfli2,indi-fli: both ship /lib/udev/rules.d/99-fli.rules
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1002548: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1002548
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: libfli2,indi-fli
Severity: serious
User: trei...@debian.org
Usertags: edos-file-overwrite
Control: found -1 2.0-2
Control: found -1 1.5-1

Hi,

automatic installation tests of packages that share a file and at the
same time do not conflict by their package dependency relationships has
detected the following problem:

  Preparing to unpack .../indi-fli_1.5-1_amd64.deb ...
  Unpacking indi-fli (1.5-1) ...
  dpkg: error processing archive 
/var/cache/apt/archives/indi-fli_1.5-1_amd64.deb (--unpack):
   trying to overwrite '/lib/udev/rules.d/99-fli.rules', which is also in 
package libfli2 2.0-2
  Errors were encountered while processing:
   /var/cache/apt/archives/indi-fli_1.5-1_amd64.deb

This is a serious bug as it makes installation fail, and violates
sections 7.6.1 and 10.1 of the policy. An optimal solution would
consist in only one of the packages installing that file, and renaming
or removing the file in the other package. Depending on the
circumstances you might also consider Replace relations or file
diversions. If the conflicting situation cannot be resolved then, as a
last resort, the two packages have to declare a mutual
Conflict. Please take into account that Replaces, Conflicts and
diversions should only be used when packages provide different
implementations for the same functionality.

Here is a list of files that are known to be shared by both packages
(according to the Contents file for sid/amd64, which may be
slightly out of sync):

  /lib/udev/rules.d/99-fli.rules

This bug is assigned to both packages. If you, the maintainers of
the two packages in question, have agreed on which of the packages will
resolve the problem please reassign the bug to that package. You may
also register in the BTS that the other package is affected by the bug.

Cheers,

Andreas

PS: for more information about the detection of file overwrite errors
of this kind see https://qa.debian.org/dose/file-overwrites.html


libfli2=2.0-2_indi-fli=1.5-1.log.gz
Description: application/gzip
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: indi-fli
Source-Version: 1.5-2
Done: Thorsten Alteholz 

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
indi-fli, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 1002...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Thorsten Alteholz  (supplier of updated indi-fli package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org)


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2022 22:51:23 +0100
Source: indi-fli
Architecture: source
Version: 1.5-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Astronomy Team 

Changed-By: Thorsten Alteholz 
Closes: 1002548
Changes:
 indi-fli (1.5-2) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * upload source
   * debian/control: move maintainer to debian-astro
   * debian/control: add VCS entries
   * do not install 99-fli.rules here (Closes: #1002548)
Checksums-Sha1:
 b0b60fb963f5b6b15982593385ce4de417398209 2172 indi-fli_1.5-2.dsc
 e3ab0b6258dfde08ee3dfa9c0a55c39be1fbbfe4 1432 indi-fli_1.5-2.debian.tar.xz
 6a14f5961dacf1e4653b5d753428f8ea8fda208e 8206 indi-fli_1.5-2_amd64.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
 80f1a28498bf9039dc353b378f9e1850541dcdbf4dacd546dc8cc59b41a4a2c5 2172 
indi-fli_1.5-2.dsc
 19184e92273a8ece3c13067cfdd72fd214569cf3f36cc8dbaca6647d60313cb2 1432 
indi-fli_1.5-2.debian.tar.xz
 3a8b1de6d2b9ae6ae5a2704e2dd33b16b4047a87c0925033cb8fb6fa8617ff43 8206 
indi-fli_1.5-2_amd64.buildinfo
Files:
 68390f7a7124cf3ebd5855cf8455256d 2172 science optional indi-fli_1.5-2.dsc
 4f11c02cac0348fafe87229e7251b41f 1432 science optional 
indi-fli_1.5-2.debian.tar.xz
 e88d6d3e20a322672367e5e85c460377 8206 science optional 
indi-fli_1.5-2_amd64.buildinfo

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-

Bug#1002213: dmitry: diff for NMU version 1.3a-1.2

2022-01-28 Thread Joao Eriberto Mota Filho
Control: tags 1002213 + patch
Control: tags 1002213 + pending

Dear maintainer,

I've prepared an NMU for dmitry (versioned as 1.3a-1.2) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/5. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer or cancel the upload.

Regards,

Eriberto

diff -u dmitry-1.3a/debian/changelog dmitry-1.3a/debian/changelog
--- dmitry-1.3a/debian/changelog
+++ dmitry-1.3a/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,19 @@
+dmitry (1.3a-1.2) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+  * Non-maintainer upload.
+  * Using new DH level format. Consequently:
+  - debian/compat: removed.
+  - debian/control: changed from 'debhelper' to 'debhelper-compat' in
+Build-Depends field and bumped level to 13.
+  - Closes: #1002213
+  * Dropped CDBS in favor of the debhelper to allow the build system to use
+DH level greater than 11. Consequently:
+  - debian/control: removed no longer needed cdbs and autotools-dev from
+Build-Depends field.
+  - debian/rules: changed from CDBS to DH.
+
+ -- Joao Eriberto Mota Filho   Fri, 28 Jan 2022 21:25:23 
-0300
+
 dmitry (1.3a-1.1) unstable; urgency=medium
 
   * Non-maintainer upload.
reverted:
--- dmitry-1.3a/debian/compat
+++ dmitry-1.3a.orig/debian/compat
@@ -1 +0,0 @@
-5
diff -u dmitry-1.3a/debian/control dmitry-1.3a/debian/control
--- dmitry-1.3a/debian/control
+++ dmitry-1.3a/debian/control
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
 Section: net
 Priority: extra
 Maintainer: Runa Sandvik 
-Build-Depends: cdbs, debhelper (>= 7), autotools-dev
+Build-Depends: debhelper-compat (= 13)
 Standards-Version: 3.8.0
 Homepage: http://www.mor-pah.net/index.php?file=projects/dmitry
 
diff -u dmitry-1.3a/debian/rules dmitry-1.3a/debian/rules
--- dmitry-1.3a/debian/rules
+++ dmitry-1.3a/debian/rules
@@ -5,5 +5,5 @@
 # Workaround for #957142
 export DEB_CFLAGS_MAINT_APPEND = -fcommon
 
-include /usr/share/cdbs/1/rules/debhelper.mk
-include /usr/share/cdbs/1/class/autotools.mk
+%:
+   dh $@



Processed: dmitry: diff for NMU version 1.3a-1.2

2022-01-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands:

> tags 1002213 + patch
Bug #1002213 [src:dmitry] dmitry: FTBFS: dh_clean: error: Compatibility levels 
before 7 are no longer supported (level 5 requested)
Added tag(s) patch.
> tags 1002213 + pending
Bug #1002213 [src:dmitry] dmitry: FTBFS: dh_clean: error: Compatibility levels 
before 7 are no longer supported (level 5 requested)
Added tag(s) pending.

-- 
1002213: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1002213
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems



Bug#997287: marked as done (zeitgeist: FTBFS: where-clause.vala:219.35-219.63: error: The name `pdata' does not exist in the context of `GLib.PtrArray*')

2022-01-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 29 Jan 2022 00:19:33 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#997287: fixed in zeitgeist 1.0.3-7
has caused the Debian Bug report #997287,
regarding zeitgeist: FTBFS: where-clause.vala:219.35-219.63: error: The name 
`pdata' does not exist in the context of `GLib.PtrArray*'
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
997287: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=997287
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: zeitgeist
Version: 1.0.3-6
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs

Hi,

During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.


Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[3]: Entering directory '/<>/libzeitgeist'
> /usr/bin/valac \
>   --target-glib=2.36 --pkg gio-2.0 --pkg gio-unix-2.0 --pkg sqlite3 
> ../config.vapi -C   --vapi zeitgeist-datamodel-2.0.vapi -H 
> zeitgeist-datamodel.h --library zeitgeist-2.0  \
>   data-source.vala errors.vala mimetype.vala enumerations.vala event.vala 
> subject.vala timerange.vala timestamp.vala ontology-uris.vala ontology.vala 
> result-set.vala simple-result-set.vala utils.vala
> event.vala:250.24-250.56: warning: Access to possible `null'. Perform a check 
> or use an unsafe cast.
> path = (info as DesktopAppInfo).filename;
>^
> timestamp.vala:77.32-77.46: warning: `GLib.TimeVal' has been deprecated since 
> 2.62
> timestamp.vala:95.27-95.33: warning: `GLib.TimeVal' has been deprecated since 
> 2.62
> timestamp.vala:95.17-95.23: warning: `GLib.TimeVal' has been deprecated since 
> 2.62
> timestamp.vala:122.27-122.33: warning: `GLib.TimeVal' has been deprecated 
> since 2.62
> timestamp.vala:122.17-122.23: warning: `GLib.TimeVal' has been deprecated 
> since 2.62
> timestamp.vala:139.17-139.23: warning: `GLib.TimeVal' has been deprecated 
> since 2.62
> timestamp.vala:185.17-185.23: warning: `GLib.TimeVal' has been deprecated 
> since 2.62
> timestamp.vala:186.9-186.25: warning: `GLib.Date.set_time_val' has been 
> deprecated since 2.62
> errors.vala:39.5-39.43: warning: Method `Zeitgeist.vala_bug_workaround' never 
> used
> private static void vala_bug_workaround ()
> ^^^
> event.vala:299.5-299.47: warning: Method 
> `Zeitgeist.Event.optimize_variant_allocation' never used
> private Variant optimize_variant_allocation (Variant event_variant) {
> ^^^
> Compilation succeeded - 11 warning(s)
> touch libzeitgeist_datamodel_2_0_la_vala.stamp
> /usr/bin/valac \
>   --target-glib=2.36 --pkg gio-2.0 --pkg gio-unix-2.0 --pkg sqlite3 
> ../config.vapi -C   ./zeitgeist-datamodel-2.0.vapi --vapi 
> zeitgeist-internal.vapi -H zeitgeist-internal.h  \
>   db-reader.vala sql.vala sql-schema.vala table-lookup.vala 
> where-clause.vala
> sql.vala:456.13-457.55: warning: unhandled error `Zeitgeist.EngineError'
> where-clause.vala:219.35-219.63: error: The name `pdata' does not exist in 
> the context of `GLib.PtrArray*'
> Memory.copy(pointers, ((PtrArray *) gptrarr)->pdata,
>   ^
> Compilation failed: 1 error(s), 1 warning(s)
> make[3]: *** [Makefile:1298: libzeitgeist_internal_la_vala.stamp] Error 1


The full build log is available from:
http://qa-logs.debian.net/2021/10/23/zeitgeist_1.0.3-6_unstable.log

A list of current common problems and possible solutions is available at
http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS . You're welcome to contribute!

If you reassign this bug to another package, please marking it as 'affects'-ing
this package. See https://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control#affects

If you fail to reproduce this, please provide a build log and diff it with mine
so that we can identify if something relevant changed in the meantime.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: zeitgeist
Source-Version: 1.0.3-7
Done: Sudip Mukherjee 

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
zeitgeist, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 997...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Sudip Mukherjee  (supplier of updated zeitgeist 
package)

(This message was generated automatically at 

Bug#1004490: libkcapi: binary-all FTBFS

2022-01-28 Thread Adrian Bunk
Source: libkcapi
Version: 1.3.1-2
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs

https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=libkcapi=all=1.3.1-2=1643387702=0

...
   dh_missing -i
dh_missing: warning: usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libkcapi.la exists in debian/tmp 
but is not installed to anywhere
dh_missing: error: missing files, aborting
The following debhelper tools have reported what they installed (with 
files per package)
 * dh_install: kcapi-tools (3), libkcapi-dev (4), libkcapi-doc (144), 
libkcapi1 (2)
 * dh_installdocs: kcapi-tools (0), libkcapi-dev (0), libkcapi-doc (0), 
libkcapi1 (0)
 * dh_installman: kcapi-tools (3), libkcapi-dev (106), libkcapi-doc 
(0), libkcapi1 (0)
If the missing files are installed by another tool, please file a bug 
against it.
When filing the report, if the tool is not part of debhelper itself, 
please reference the
"Logging helpers and dh_missing" section from the "PROGRAMMING" guide 
for debhelper (10.6.3+).
  (in the debhelper package: /usr/share/doc/debhelper/PROGRAMMING.gz)
Be sure to test with dpkg-buildpackage -A/-B as the results may vary 
when only a subset is built
If the omission is intentional or no other helper can take care of this 
consider adding the
paths to debian/not-installed.

Remember to be careful with paths containing "x86_64-linux-gnu", where 
you might need to
use a wildcard or (assuming compat 13+) e.g. ${DEB_HOST_MULTIARCH} in 
debian/not-installed
to ensure it works on all architectures (see #961104).
make: *** [debian/rules:12: binary-indep] Error 25



Bug#1004409: marked as done (libslurm-dev: slurm/slurm_version.h is missing)

2022-01-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 28 Jan 2022 23:34:02 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#1004409: fixed in slurm-wlm 21.08.5-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1004409,
regarding libslurm-dev: slurm/slurm_version.h is missing
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1004409: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1004409
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: libslurm-dev
Version: 21.08.5-1.1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Control: affects -1 src:mpich

$ cat test.c
#include 
$ gcc -c test.c
In file included from test.c:1:
/usr/include/slurm/slurm.h:55:10: fatal error: slurm/slurm_version.h: No such 
file or directory
   55 | #include 
  |  ^~~
compilation terminated.
$
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: slurm-wlm
Source-Version: 21.08.5-2
Done: Gennaro Oliva 

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
slurm-wlm, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 1004...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Gennaro Oliva  (supplier of updated slurm-wlm package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org)


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2022 23:36:39 +0100
Source: slurm-wlm
Architecture: source
Version: 21.08.5-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian HPC Team 
Changed-By: Gennaro Oliva 
Closes: 984928 1004409
Changes:
 slurm-wlm (21.08.5-2) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * Add slurm_version.h to libslurm-dev (Closes: #1004409)
   * Add retry-getaddrinfo patch (Closes: #984928)
   * Update service files
Checksums-Sha1:
 5a8da3888c50f618def6c9990b68829464d86a94 3738 slurm-wlm_21.08.5-2.dsc
 ced5ef2dbe2bdfdc01317908c54b5514b1e7af75 132636 
slurm-wlm_21.08.5-2.debian.tar.xz
 a17f9cb5d1a394e47d5b40278e8b1eef1ad934e3 21635 
slurm-wlm_21.08.5-2_amd64.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
 50a2bd018ae7e9210231e721f37d5d275019b0a86fa53c587e3f6c2bf2d316e8 3738 
slurm-wlm_21.08.5-2.dsc
 9fcbf38dbf0cc797e772249a8cf924bebe24900fc742b70e17b5082352c1c541 132636 
slurm-wlm_21.08.5-2.debian.tar.xz
 c37673d8331b5a4d23feba1417f85e8f95de633b4266c7f8667bce6d76c5e5a4 21635 
slurm-wlm_21.08.5-2_amd64.buildinfo
Files:
 94b0b11242d636cd214e681a6a194284 3738 admin optional slurm-wlm_21.08.5-2.dsc
 fd2f63cdcef05d7e708232bfc3f2e405 132636 admin optional 
slurm-wlm_21.08.5-2.debian.tar.xz
 f71bfd0e33830287f7f237a66a2f46dd 21635 admin optional 
slurm-wlm_21.08.5-2_amd64.buildinfo

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
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=Lwgu
-END PGP SIGNATURE End Message ---


Bug#998540: marked as done (shared-mime-info: FTBFS: Error: cannot open mo file /<>/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/po/*.gmo)

2022-01-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 29 Jan 2022 00:10:32 +0100
with message-id 
and subject line Re: Bug#998540: shared-mime-info: FTBFS: Error: cannot open mo 
file /<>/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/po/*.gmo
has caused the Debian Bug report #998540,
regarding shared-mime-info: FTBFS: Error: cannot open mo file 
/<>/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/po/*.gmo
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
998540: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=998540
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: shared-mime-info
Version: 2.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211104 ftbfs-bookworm

Hi,

During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.


Relevant part (hopefully):
>  debian/rules build
> dh build --no-parallel
>dh_update_autotools_config -O--no-parallel
>dh_autoreconf -O--no-parallel
>dh_auto_configure -O--no-parallel
>   cd obj-x86_64-linux-gnu && LC_ALL=C.UTF-8 meson .. 
> --wrap-mode=nodownload --buildtype=plain --prefix=/usr --sysconfdir=/etc 
> --localstatedir=/var --libdir=lib/x86_64-linux-gnu
> The Meson build system
> Version: 0.60.1
> Source dir: /<>
> Build dir: /<>/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu
> Build type: native build
> Project name: shared-mime-info
> Project version: 2.0
> C compiler for the host machine: cc (gcc 11.2.0 "cc (Debian 11.2.0-10) 
> 11.2.0")
> C linker for the host machine: cc ld.bfd 2.37
> Host machine cpu family: x86_64
> Host machine cpu: x86_64
> Program itstool found: YES (/usr/bin/itstool)
> Program xmllint found: YES (/usr/bin/xmllint)
> Program xmlto found: YES (/usr/bin/xmlto)
> Program ./xdgmime/src/print-mime-data found: NO
> Program ./xdgmime/src/test-mime-data found: NO
> Program ./xdgmime/src/test-mime found: NO
> ../meson.build:43: WARNING: 
> ***
> *** xdgmime not compiled, test suite cannot run. Check HACKING for info ***
> ***
> 
> Checking for function "fdatasync" : YES 
> Found pkg-config: /usr/bin/pkg-config (0.29.2)
> Run-time dependency libxml-2.0 found: YES 2.9.12
> Run-time dependency glib-2.0 found: YES 2.70.0
> Run-time dependency gio-2.0 found: YES 2.70.0
> Program check_translations.sh found: YES 
> (/<>/po/check_translations.sh)
> Program freedesktop_generate.sh found: YES 
> (/<>/data/freedesktop_generate.sh)
> Configuring config.h using configuration
> Program test_generic_icons.sh found: YES 
> (/<>/tests/test_generic_icons.sh)
> Program test_duplicate_mime_types.sh found: YES 
> (/<>/tests/test_duplicate_mime_types.sh)
> Program test-case-sensitivity.sh found: YES 
> (/<>/tests/test-case-sensitivity.sh)
> Build targets in project: 84
> 
> shared-mime-info 2.0
> 
>   User defined options
> buildtype: plain
> libdir   : lib/x86_64-linux-gnu
> localstatedir: /var
> prefix   : /usr
> sysconfdir   : /etc
> wrap_mode: nodownload
> 
> Found ninja-1.10.1 at /usr/bin/ninja
>dh_auto_build -O--no-parallel
>   cd obj-x86_64-linux-gnu && LC_ALL=C.UTF-8 ninja -j1 -v
> [1/83] msgfmt ../po/af.po -o po/af/LC_MESSAGES/shared-mime-info.mo
> [2/83] msgfmt ../po/ar.po -o po/ar/LC_MESSAGES/shared-mime-info.mo
> [3/83] msgfmt ../po/as.po -o po/as/LC_MESSAGES/shared-mime-info.mo
> [4/83] msgfmt ../po/ast.po -o po/ast/LC_MESSAGES/shared-mime-info.mo
> [5/83] msgfmt ../po/az.po -o po/az/LC_MESSAGES/shared-mime-info.mo
> [6/83] msgfmt ../po/be.po -o po/be/LC_MESSAGES/shared-mime-info.mo
> [7/83] msgfmt ../po/b...@latin.po -o 
> po/be@latin/LC_MESSAGES/shared-mime-info.mo
> [8/83] msgfmt ../po/bg.po -o po/bg/LC_MESSAGES/shared-mime-info.mo
> [9/83] msgfmt ../po/bn_IN.po -o po/bn_IN/LC_MESSAGES/shared-mime-info.mo
> [10/83] msgfmt ../po/ca.po -o po/ca/LC_MESSAGES/shared-mime-info.mo
> [11/83] msgfmt ../po/c...@valencia.po -o 
> po/ca@valencia/LC_MESSAGES/shared-mime-info.mo
> [12/83] msgfmt ../po/cs.po -o po/cs/LC_MESSAGES/shared-mime-info.mo
> [13/83] msgfmt ../po/cy.po -o po/cy/LC_MESSAGES/shared-mime-info.mo
> [14/83] msgfmt ../po/da.po -o po/da/LC_MESSAGES/shared-mime-info.mo
> [15/83] msgfmt ../po/de.po -o po/de/LC_MESSAGES/shared-mime-info.mo
> [16/83] msgfmt ../po/el.po -o po/el/LC_MESSAGES/shared-mime-info.mo
> [17/83] msgfmt ../po/en_GB.po -o po/en_GB/LC_MESSAGES/shared-mime-info.mo
> [18/83] msgfmt ../po/eo.po -o po/eo/LC_MESSAGES/shared-mime-info.mo
> [19/83] msgfmt ../po/es.po -o po/es/LC_MESSAGES/shared-mime-info.mo
> [20/83] msgfmt ../po/et.po 

Bug#996380: marked as done (ruby-safe-yaml: FTBFS with ruby3.0: ERROR: Test "ruby3.0" failed: ArgumentError:)

2022-01-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 28 Jan 2022 22:06:32 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#996380: fixed in ruby-safe-yaml 1.0.5-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #996380,
regarding ruby-safe-yaml: FTBFS with ruby3.0: ERROR: Test "ruby3.0" failed: 
  ArgumentError:
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
996380: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=996380
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: ruby-safe-yaml
Version: 1.0.5-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ruby3.0

Hi,

We are about to enable building against ruby3.0 on unstable. During a test
rebuild, ruby-safe-yaml was found to fail to build in that situation.

To reproduce this locally, you need to install ruby-all-dev from experimental
on an unstable system or build chroot.

Relevant part (hopefully):
>   ArgumentError:
> wrong number of arguments (given 0, expected 2)
>   # ./lib/safe_yaml/safe_to_ruby_visitor.rb:14:in `initialize'
>   # ./lib/safe_yaml/psych_resolver.rb:25:in `new'
>   # ./lib/safe_yaml/psych_resolver.rb:25:in `native_resolve'
>   # ./lib/safe_yaml/resolver.rb:12:in `resolve_node'
>   # ./lib/safe_yaml/resolver.rb:55:in `block in resolve_seq'
>   # ./lib/safe_yaml/resolver.rb:55:in `each'
>   # ./lib/safe_yaml/resolver.rb:55:in `inject'
>   # ./lib/safe_yaml/resolver.rb:55:in `resolve_seq'
>   # ./lib/safe_yaml/psych_resolver.rb:17:in `resolve_root'
>   # ./lib/safe_yaml/resolver.rb:16:in `resolve_node'
>   # ./lib/safe_yaml/load.rb:151:in `load'
>   # ./lib/safe_yaml.rb:29:in `safe_load'
>   # ./spec/safe_yaml_spec.rb:7:in `safe_load_round_trip'
>   # ./spec/safe_yaml_spec.rb:725:in `block (4 levels) in '
> 
> Finished in 0.12951 seconds (files took 0.22092 seconds to load)
> 134 examples, 11 failures
> 
> Failed examples:
> 
> rspec ./spec/safe_yaml_spec.rb:318 # Psych safe_load with special whitelisted 
> tags defined will allow objects to be deserialized for whitelisted tags
> rspec ./spec/safe_yaml_spec.rb:330 # Psych safe_load with special whitelisted 
> tags defined will not allow non-whitelisted objects to be embedded within 
> objects with whitelisted tags
> rspec ./spec/safe_yaml_spec.rb:372 # Psych safe_load with special whitelisted 
> tags defined with the :raise_on_unknown_tag option enabled does not raise an 
> exception as long as all tags are whitelisted
> rspec ./spec/safe_yaml_spec.rb:415 # Psych safe_load with special whitelisted 
> tags defined with the :raise_on_unknown_tag option enabled with whitelisted 
> custom class does not raise an exception on the non-specific '!' tag
> rspec ./spec/safe_yaml_spec.rb:458 # Psych safe_load when options are passed 
> direclty to #load which differ from the defaults (or, for example, when 
> certain tags are whitelisted) goes with the default option when it is not 
> overridden
> rspec ./spec/safe_yaml_spec.rb:464 # Psych safe_load when options are passed 
> direclty to #load which differ from the defaults (or, for example, when 
> certain tags are whitelisted) allows the default option to be overridden on a 
> per-call basis
> rspec ./spec/safe_yaml_spec.rb:688 # Psych whitelist! with a Class as its 
> argument successfully deserializes the specified class
> rspec ./spec/safe_yaml_spec.rb:699 # Psych whitelist! with a Class as its 
> argument works for ranges
> rspec ./spec/safe_yaml_spec.rb:704 # Psych whitelist! with a Class as its 
> argument works for regular expressions
> rspec ./spec/safe_yaml_spec.rb:709 # Psych whitelist! with a Class as its 
> argument works for multiple classes
> rspec ./spec/safe_yaml_spec.rb:714 # Psych whitelist! with a Class as its 
> argument works for arbitrary Exception subclasses
> 
> debian/ruby-tests.rb:16:in `block in ': unhandled exception
>   from debian/ruby-tests.rb:14:in `each'
>   from debian/ruby-tests.rb:14:in `'
> ERROR: Test "ruby3.0" failed: 


The full build log is available at
https://people.debian.org/~kanashiro/ruby3.0/round2/builds/3/ruby-safe-yaml/ruby-safe-yaml_1.0.5-1+rebuild1633394716_amd64.build.txt


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: ruby-safe-yaml
Source-Version: 1.0.5-2
Done: Sergio Durigan Junior 

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
ruby-safe-yaml, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting 

Processed: severity of 1000934 is important

2022-01-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> severity 1000934 important
Bug #1000934 [src:clazy] clazy: FTBFS on i386 with llvm-toolchain-13
Severity set to 'important' from 'serious'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
1000934: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1000934
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems



Processed: Re: dulwich: autopkgtest regression: src/debian/tests/testsuite3: 10: -m: not found

2022-01-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands:

> tags -1 patch
Bug #1003017 [src:dulwich] dulwich: autopkgtest regression: 
src/debian/tests/testsuite3: 10: -m: not found
Added tag(s) patch.

-- 
1003017: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1003017
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems



Bug#1003017: dulwich: autopkgtest regression: src/debian/tests/testsuite3: 10: -m: not found

2022-01-28 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna

control: tags -1 patch


for py in $(py3versions -s); do
  echo "= Running tests with $py =="
  if ! $py3 -m unittest dulwich.tests.test_suite; then
rv=1


this should really be
for py3 in $(py3versions -s); do
  echo "= Running tests with $py =="
  if ! $py3 -m unittest dulwich.tests.test_suite; then
rv=1

(the for loop variable is called py and then py3 inside the if statement. I 
presume they should both be called py3

patch here: 
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/582665575/dulwich_0.20.31-1_0.20.31-1ubuntu1.diff.gz

G.
On Sun, 2 Jan 2022 21:08:25 +0100 Paul Gevers  wrote:

Source: dulwich
Version: 0.20.26-1
X-Debbugs-CC: debian...@lists.debian.org
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: regression

Dear maintainer(s),

With a recent upload of dulwich the autopkgtest of dulwich fails in 
testing when that autopkgtest is run with the binary packages of dulwich 
from unstable. It passes when run with only packages from testing. In 
tabular form:


passfail
dulwichfrom testing0.20.26-1
all others from testingfrom testing

I copied some of the output at the bottom of this report.

Currently this regression is blocking the migration to testing [1]. Can 
you please investigate the situation and fix it?


More information about this bug and the reason for filing it can be found on
https://wiki.debian.org/ContinuousIntegration/RegressionEmailInformation

Paul

[1] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=dulwich

https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/amd64/d/dulwich/17999494/log.gz

= Running tests with python3.9 ==
/tmp/autopkgtest-lxc.n4tqfogv/downtmp/build.r97/src/debian/tests/testsuite3: 
10: -m: not found

autopkgtest [23:08:36]: test testsuite3





Bug#1001057: grub2: hold 2.06 in unstable for now

2022-01-28 Thread Paul Gevers

Hi Colin,

On Fri, 3 Dec 2021 11:17:26 + Colin Watson  wrote:

GRUB 2.06 is a pretty big change over 2.04.  I'd like to hold this in
unstable for a while longer to let things shake out before we allow it
to move to testing.


grub2 showed up in my out-of-sync tracking script output. Do you think 
it's about time you could let grub2 into testing? I'm not trying to 
hurry you, take your time, but I was just wondering if you forgot about 
this bug.


Paul


OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Processed: Re: Bug#1004465: libklibc-dev: headers not installed

2022-01-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> found 1004465 2.0.10-1
Bug #1004465 [libklibc-dev] libklibc-dev: headers not installed
Marked as found in versions klibc/2.0.10-1.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
1004465: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1004465
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems



Bug#1004465: libklibc-dev: headers not installed

2022-01-28 Thread Thorsten Glaser
found 1004465 2.0.10-1
thanks

Dixi quod…

>Quite some files are missing:
[…]
>/usr/lib/klibc/include/alloca.h
[…]
>/usr/lib/klibc/include/arpa/inet.h
>   /usr/lib/klibc/include/asm
>   /usr/lib/klibc/include/asm-generic
>/usr/lib/klibc/include/assert.h
[…]

From this pattern, commit 8f680c0688151ce4d50072783a5b6fad7beabc1f
is suspect:

Since debhelper 11, dh_install and dh_installman have automatically
searched for the listed files/directories relative to debian/tmp/
as well as in the top directory.

--- a/debian/libklibc-dev.install
+++ b/debian/libklibc-dev.install
@@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
-debian/tmp/usr/lib/klibc/include/*
+usr/lib/klibc/include/*

My suspiction here is that since usr/lib/klibc/include/* exist
in the top-level directory, the alternative location is not
attempted.

I’d probably just rever that and not rely on such fragile
automatism that reek of bad magic and make the packaging
harder to understand… and easier to break (e.g. if upstream
adds files…)

bye,
//mirabilos
-- 
22:20⎜ The crazy that persists in his craziness becomes a master
22:21⎜ And the distance between the craziness and geniality is
only measured by the success 18:35⎜ "Psychotics are consistently
inconsistent. The essence of sanity is to be inconsistently inconsistent



Bug#1004211: dirty.js: autopkgtest failure on armhf and ppc64el

2022-01-28 Thread Yadd

Control: tags -1 + moreinfo

Hi,

I'm unable to reproduce using a porterbox



Processed: Re: dirty.js: autopkgtest failure on armhf and ppc64el

2022-01-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands:

> tags -1 + moreinfo
Bug #1004211 [src:dirty.js] dirty.js: autopkgtest failure on armhf and ppc64el
Added tag(s) moreinfo.

-- 
1004211: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1004211
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems



Bug#1004464: marked as done (python-django FTBFS: FAIL: test_custom_fields (inspectdb.tests.InspectDBTestCase))

2022-01-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 28 Jan 2022 17:04:31 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#1004464: fixed in python-django 2:4.0.1-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1004464,
regarding python-django FTBFS: FAIL: test_custom_fields 
(inspectdb.tests.InspectDBTestCase)
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1004464: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1004464
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: python-django
Version: 2:3.2.7-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs

https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=python-django=all=2%3A3.2.11-1=1641309500=0

...
==
FAIL: test_custom_fields (inspectdb.tests.InspectDBTestCase)
Introspection of columns with a custom field (#21090)
--
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/lib/python3.10/unittest/case.py", line 59, in testPartExecutor
yield
  File "/usr/lib/python3.10/unittest/case.py", line 591, in run
self._callTestMethod(testMethod)
  File "/usr/lib/python3.10/unittest/case.py", line 549, in _callTestMethod
method()
  File "/<>/tests/inspectdb/tests.py", line 313, in 
test_custom_fields
self.assertIn("text_field = myfields.TextField()", output)
  File "/usr/lib/python3.10/unittest/case.py", line 1112, in assertIn
self.fail(self._formatMessage(msg, standardMsg))
  File "/usr/lib/python3.10/unittest/case.py", line 675, in fail
raise self.failureException(msg)
AssertionError: 'text_field = myfields.TextField()' not found in "# This is an 
auto-generated Django model module.\n# You'll have to do the following manually 
to clean this up:\n#   * Rearrange models' order\n#   * Make sure each model 
has one field with primary_key=True\n#   * Make sure each ForeignKey and 
OneToOneField has `on_delete` set to the desired behavior\n#   * Remove 
`managed = False` lines if you wish to allow Django to create, modify, and 
delete the table\n# Feel free to rename the models, but don't rename db_table 
values or field names.\nfrom django.db import models\n\n\nclass 
InspectdbColumntypes(models.Model):\nid = 
models.TextField(primary_key=True)  # This field type is a guess.\n
big_int_field = models.BigIntegerField()\nbool_field = models.TextField()  
# This field type is a guess.\nnull_bool_field = 
models.TextField(blank=True, null=True)  # This field type is a guess.\n
char_field = models.TextField()  # This field type is a guess.\n
null_char_field = models.TextField(blank=True, null=True)  # This field type is 
a guess.\ndate_field = models.TextField()  # This field type is a guess.\n  
  date_time_field = models.TextField()  # This field type is a guess.\n
decimal_field = models.TextField()  # This field type is a guess.\n
email_field = models.TextField()  # This field type is a guess.\nfile_field 
= models.TextField()  # This field type is a guess.\nfile_path_field = 
models.TextField()  # This field type is a guess.\nfloat_field = 
models.TextField()  # This field type is a guess.\nint_field = 
models.TextField()  # This field type is a guess.\ngen_ip_address_field = 
models.TextField()  # This field type is a guess.\npos_big_int_field = 
models.TextField()  # This field type is a guess.\npos_int_field = 
models.TextField()  # This field type is a guess.\npos_small_int_field = 
models.TextField()  # This field type is a guess.\nslug_field = 
models.TextField()  # This field type is a guess.\nsmall_int_field = 
models.TextField()  # This field type is a guess.\ntext_field = 
models.TextField()  # This field type is a guess.\ntime_field = 
models.TextField()  # This field type is a guess.\nurl_field = 
models.TextField()  # This field type is a guess.\nuuid_field = 
models.TextField()  # This field type is a guess.\n\nclass Meta:\n
managed = False\ndb_table = 'inspectdb_columntypes'\n"

--
Ran 14650 tests in 151.514s

FAILED (failures=1, skipped=1141, expected failures=4)
Destroying test database for alias 'default' 
('file:memorydb_default?mode=memory=shared')...
Destroying test database for alias 'default' 
('file:memorydb_default?mode=memory=shared')...
Destroying test database for alias 'default' 
('file:memorydb_default?mode=memory=shared')...
Destroying test database for alias 'default' 
('file:memorydb_default?mode=memory=shared')...
Destroying test database for alias 

Bug#1004464: marked as done (python-django FTBFS: FAIL: test_custom_fields (inspectdb.tests.InspectDBTestCase))

2022-01-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 28 Jan 2022 17:04:24 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#1004464: fixed in python-django 2:3.2.11-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1004464,
regarding python-django FTBFS: FAIL: test_custom_fields 
(inspectdb.tests.InspectDBTestCase)
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1004464: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1004464
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: python-django
Version: 2:3.2.7-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs

https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=python-django=all=2%3A3.2.11-1=1641309500=0

...
==
FAIL: test_custom_fields (inspectdb.tests.InspectDBTestCase)
Introspection of columns with a custom field (#21090)
--
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/lib/python3.10/unittest/case.py", line 59, in testPartExecutor
yield
  File "/usr/lib/python3.10/unittest/case.py", line 591, in run
self._callTestMethod(testMethod)
  File "/usr/lib/python3.10/unittest/case.py", line 549, in _callTestMethod
method()
  File "/<>/tests/inspectdb/tests.py", line 313, in 
test_custom_fields
self.assertIn("text_field = myfields.TextField()", output)
  File "/usr/lib/python3.10/unittest/case.py", line 1112, in assertIn
self.fail(self._formatMessage(msg, standardMsg))
  File "/usr/lib/python3.10/unittest/case.py", line 675, in fail
raise self.failureException(msg)
AssertionError: 'text_field = myfields.TextField()' not found in "# This is an 
auto-generated Django model module.\n# You'll have to do the following manually 
to clean this up:\n#   * Rearrange models' order\n#   * Make sure each model 
has one field with primary_key=True\n#   * Make sure each ForeignKey and 
OneToOneField has `on_delete` set to the desired behavior\n#   * Remove 
`managed = False` lines if you wish to allow Django to create, modify, and 
delete the table\n# Feel free to rename the models, but don't rename db_table 
values or field names.\nfrom django.db import models\n\n\nclass 
InspectdbColumntypes(models.Model):\nid = 
models.TextField(primary_key=True)  # This field type is a guess.\n
big_int_field = models.BigIntegerField()\nbool_field = models.TextField()  
# This field type is a guess.\nnull_bool_field = 
models.TextField(blank=True, null=True)  # This field type is a guess.\n
char_field = models.TextField()  # This field type is a guess.\n
null_char_field = models.TextField(blank=True, null=True)  # This field type is 
a guess.\ndate_field = models.TextField()  # This field type is a guess.\n  
  date_time_field = models.TextField()  # This field type is a guess.\n
decimal_field = models.TextField()  # This field type is a guess.\n
email_field = models.TextField()  # This field type is a guess.\nfile_field 
= models.TextField()  # This field type is a guess.\nfile_path_field = 
models.TextField()  # This field type is a guess.\nfloat_field = 
models.TextField()  # This field type is a guess.\nint_field = 
models.TextField()  # This field type is a guess.\ngen_ip_address_field = 
models.TextField()  # This field type is a guess.\npos_big_int_field = 
models.TextField()  # This field type is a guess.\npos_int_field = 
models.TextField()  # This field type is a guess.\npos_small_int_field = 
models.TextField()  # This field type is a guess.\nslug_field = 
models.TextField()  # This field type is a guess.\nsmall_int_field = 
models.TextField()  # This field type is a guess.\ntext_field = 
models.TextField()  # This field type is a guess.\ntime_field = 
models.TextField()  # This field type is a guess.\nurl_field = 
models.TextField()  # This field type is a guess.\nuuid_field = 
models.TextField()  # This field type is a guess.\n\nclass Meta:\n
managed = False\ndb_table = 'inspectdb_columntypes'\n"

--
Ran 14650 tests in 151.514s

FAILED (failures=1, skipped=1141, expected failures=4)
Destroying test database for alias 'default' 
('file:memorydb_default?mode=memory=shared')...
Destroying test database for alias 'default' 
('file:memorydb_default?mode=memory=shared')...
Destroying test database for alias 'default' 
('file:memorydb_default?mode=memory=shared')...
Destroying test database for alias 'default' 
('file:memorydb_default?mode=memory=shared')...
Destroying test database for alias 

Bug#1004464: python-django FTBFS: FAIL: test_custom_fields (inspectdb.tests.InspectDBTestCase)

2022-01-28 Thread Chris Lamb
Hi,

>> Just to point out that you specified the 'Version' here as 2:3.2.7,
>> whilst the traceback you linked to:
>> 
>> > https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=python-django=all=2%3A3.2.11-1=1641309500=0
>> 
>> ... refers to a different version: 2:3.2.11.
[..]
> That was intentional:
> The package does FTBFS both on the buildds and in reproducible
> in both unstable and experimental, and the version in testing
> did also FTBFS for me in an unstable chroot.

Ah, I see — thanks for checking so many versions. I've just uploaded a
fix; it was a SQLite compatibility issue.


Regards,

-- 
  ,''`.
 : :'  : Chris Lamb
 `. `'`  la...@debian.org  chris-lamb.co.uk
   `-



Processed: Bug#1004464 marked as pending in python-django

2022-01-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands:

> tag -1 pending
Bug #1004464 [src:python-django] python-django FTBFS: FAIL: test_custom_fields 
(inspectdb.tests.InspectDBTestCase)
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #1004464 to the same tags previously set

-- 
1004464: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1004464
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems



Bug#1004464: marked as pending in python-django

2022-01-28 Thread Chris Lamb
Control: tag -1 pending

Hello,

Bug #1004464 in python-django reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/python-django/-/commit/8080a59ae57921718fa53e4355ea112ba734be17


Fix compatibility with SQLite 3.37+. (Closes: #1004464)


(this message was generated automatically)
-- 
Greetings

https://bugs.debian.org/1004464



Bug#1004464: marked as pending in python-django

2022-01-28 Thread Chris Lamb
Control: tag -1 pending

Hello,

Bug #1004464 in python-django reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/python-django/-/commit/875f902415bc77a246eb23fc8e9e9ad6eaad2762


Fix compatibility with SQLite 3.37+. (Closes: #1004464)


(this message was generated automatically)
-- 
Greetings

https://bugs.debian.org/1004464



Processed: Bug#1004464 marked as pending in python-django

2022-01-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands:

> tag -1 pending
Bug #1004464 [src:python-django] python-django FTBFS: FAIL: test_custom_fields 
(inspectdb.tests.InspectDBTestCase)
Added tag(s) pending.

-- 
1004464: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1004464
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems



Bug#1004477: virt-top fails to start with OCaml 4.13.1

2022-01-28 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Le 28/01/2022 à 13:10, Adrian Bunk a écrit :
> Package: virt-top
> Version: 1.0.9-1.1
> Severity: serious
> X-Debbugs-Cc: Debian OCaml Maintainers 
> 
> $ virt-top
> the file '/usr/bin/virt-top' has not the right magic number: expected 
> Caml1999X030, got Caml1999X028

/usr/bin/virt-top is a bytecode executable, but its package does not
depend on ocaml-base-$ABI.

I've scheduled a binNMU, which should fix the immediate problem. But the
long-term solution is to make virt-top depend on ocaml-base-$ABI so that
the package dependency is statically broken when a new version of ocaml
arrives. (Hence, this bug must stay open until that.)


Cheers,

-- 
Stéphane



Bug#1004464: python-django FTBFS: FAIL: test_custom_fields (inspectdb.tests.InspectDBTestCase)

2022-01-28 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Fri, Jan 28, 2022 at 08:42:44AM -0800, Chris Lamb wrote:
> found 1004464 2:3.2.11-1
> thanks
> 
> Hi Adrian,
> 
> > Version: 2:3.2.7-1
> 
> Just to point out that you specified the 'Version' here as 2:3.2.7,
> whilst the traceback you linked to:
> 
> > https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=python-django=all=2%3A3.2.11-1=1641309500=0
> 
> ... refers to a different version: 2:3.2.11.
> 
> It's not a problem at all — am only mentioning it explicitly in case you
> have a bug in a script (or similar) that might need updating.

That was intentional:
The package does FTBFS both on the buildds and in reproducible
in both unstable and experimental, and the version in testing
did also FTBFS for me in an unstable chroot.

2:3.2.7-1 is the last common ancestor of all these versions.

It might have been clearer to you if I'd have set 3 found versions
for 2:3.2.10-2 2:3.2.11-1 2:4.0.1-1 instead of this shortcut.

> Regards,

cu
Adrian



Bug#1004464: python-django FTBFS: FAIL: test_custom_fields (inspectdb.tests.InspectDBTestCase)

2022-01-28 Thread Chris Lamb
found 1004464 2:3.2.11-1
thanks

Hi Adrian,

> Version: 2:3.2.7-1

Just to point out that you specified the 'Version' here as 2:3.2.7,
whilst the traceback you linked to:

> https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=python-django=all=2%3A3.2.11-1=1641309500=0

... refers to a different version: 2:3.2.11.

It's not a problem at all — am only mentioning it explicitly in case you
have a bug in a script (or similar) that might need updating.


Regards,

-- 
  ,''`.
 : :'  : Chris Lamb
 `. `'`  la...@debian.org  chris-lamb.co.uk
   `-



Processed: Re: Bug#1004464: python-django FTBFS: FAIL: test_custom_fields (inspectdb.tests.InspectDBTestCase)

2022-01-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> found 1004464 2:3.2.11-1
Bug #1004464 [src:python-django] python-django FTBFS: FAIL: test_custom_fields 
(inspectdb.tests.InspectDBTestCase)
The source 'python-django' and version '2:3.2.11-1' do not appear to match any 
binary packages
Marked as found in versions python-django/2:3.2.11-1.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
1004464: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1004464
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems



Bug#1004482: liblog4j1.2-java: CVE-2022-23307 CVE-2022-23305 CVE-2022-23302

2022-01-28 Thread Christoph Anton Mitterer
Package: liblog4j1.2-java
Version: 1.2.17-10
Severity: grave
Tags: security upstream
Justification: user security hole
X-Debbugs-Cc: Debian Security Team 

Hey.

A number of holes was found in the 1.2 branch of log4j.

The following is apparently critical (code injection):
https://www.cvedetails.com/cve/CVE-2022-23307/

https://www.cvedetails.com/cve/CVE-2022-23305/
https://www.cvedetails.com/cve/CVE-2022-23302/


AFAIU there is no support anymore form these from upstream, and seems:
https://lists.apache.org/thread/rg4yyc89vs3dw6kpy3r92xop9loywyhh
there are no plans to fix it.

EGI recommends: "For services where chainsaw is installed but not used apply 
the mitigation
zip -q -d /usr/share/cassandra/lib/log4j*.jar  org/apache/log4j/chainsaw/*"

Not sure if that could be done for the Debian package in a new version?


Is Debian going to do anything about these?


Thanks,
Chris.



-- System Information:
Debian Release: bookworm/sid
  APT prefers unstable-debug
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable-debug'), (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 5.15.0-3-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU threads)
Locale: LANG=en_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE not set
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)



Processed: Re: Bug#1003865: GPG error: http://deb.debian.org/debian sid InRelease: The following signatures were invalid: BADSIG 648ACFD622F3D138 Debian Archive Automatic Signing Key (10/buster)

2022-01-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands:

> reassign -1 apt-cacher-ng
Bug #1003865 {Done: "Adam D. Barratt" } 
[debian-archive-keyring] GPG error: http://deb.debian.org/debian sid InRelease: 
The following signatures were invalid: BADSIG 648ACFD622F3D138 Debian Archive 
Automatic Signing Key (10/buster) 
Bug reassigned from package 'debian-archive-keyring' to 'apt-cacher-ng'.
No longer marked as found in versions debian-archive-keyring/2021.1.1.
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #1003865 to the same values 
previously set

-- 
1003865: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1003865
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems



Bug#733094: 20 GB senseless logfile

2022-01-28 Thread karsten

I have the same problem here with Debian 11 (bullseye).

The only solution seems to be
apt-get purge uvcdynctrl

After that my webcam still works.
So this package can be seen as unusable, harmful and dispensable.
This should not be installed and all dependencies snatched.

Best regards
karsten



Bug#974836: marked as done (openconnect FTBFS on IPV6-only buildds)

2022-01-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 28 Jan 2022 14:39:37 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#974836: fixed in openconnect 8.10-7
has caused the Debian Bug report #974836,
regarding openconnect FTBFS on IPV6-only buildds
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
974836: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=974836
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: openconnect
Version: 8.10-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs

https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=openconnect=i386=8.10-1~bpo10%2B1=1589917131=0
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=openconnect=amd64=8.10-1~bpo10%2B1=1589912458=0
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=openconnect=amd64=8.10-2=1603997003=0

...
FAIL: auth-username-pass


Testing certificate auth... 
warning: skipping unknown option 'cookie-validity'
Parsing plain auth method subconfig using legacy format
note: vhost:default: setting 'plain' as primary authentication method
note: setting 'file' as supplemental config option
listening (TCP) on [::]:443...
listening (UDP) on [::]:443...
ocserv[19194]: main: Starting 1 instances of ocserv-sm
ocserv[19194]: main: not using control unix socket
ocserv[19194]: main: initialized ocserv 1.1.1
ocserv[19214]: sec-mod: reading supplemental config from files
ocserv[19214]: sec-mod: sec-mod initialized (socket: ./ocserv-socket.af571984.0)
Connecting to obtain cookie... Failure: Could not receive cookie from server
ocserv[19194]: main: termination request received; waiting for children to die
FAIL auth-username-pass (exit status: 1)

FAIL: auth-certificate
==

Testing certificate auth... 
warning: skipping unknown option 'cookie-validity'
Parsing plain auth method subconfig using legacy format
note: vhost:default: setting 'certificate+plain' as primary authentication 
method
note: setting 'file' as supplemental config option
listening (TCP) on [::]:443...
listening (UDP) on [::]:443...
ocserv[19199]: main: Starting 1 instances of ocserv-sm
ocserv[19199]: main: not using control unix socket
ocserv[19199]: main: initialized ocserv 1.1.1
ocserv[19215]: sec-mod: reading supplemental config from files
ocserv[19215]: sec-mod: sec-mod initialized (socket: ./ocserv-socket.bee4d321.0)
Connecting to obtain cookie (with key user-key-pkcs1.pem)... Failed to connect 
to host 127.0.0.2
Failed to open HTTPS connection to 127.0.0.2
Failed to obtain WebVPN cookie
Failure: Could not connect with key user-key-pkcs1.pem!
ocserv[19199]: main: termination request received; waiting for children to die
FAIL auth-certificate (exit status: 1)

FAIL: auth-nonascii
===

Testing certificate auth with non-ASCII passwords... 
warning: skipping unknown option 'cookie-validity'
Parsing plain auth method subconfig using legacy format
note: vhost:default: setting 'certificate+plain' as primary authentication 
method
note: setting 'file' as supplemental config option
listening (TCP) on [::]:443...
listening (UDP) on [::]:443...
ocserv[19205]: main: Starting 1 instances of ocserv-sm
ocserv[19205]: main: not using control unix socket
ocserv[19205]: main: initialized ocserv 1.1.1
ocserv[19216]: sec-mod: reading supplemental config from files
ocserv[19216]: sec-mod: sec-mod initialized (socket: ./ocserv-socket.767477a3.0)
+ echo -n Connecting to obtain cookie (with password charset UTF-8)... 
Connecting to obtain cookie (with password charset UTF-8)... + cat ./pass-UTF-8
+ CERTARGS=-c ./certs/user-key-nonascii-password.p12 --key-password ĂŻ
+ echo test
+ LC_ALL=cs_CZ.UTF-8 LD_PRELOAD=libsocket_wrapper.so ../openconnect -q 
127.0.0.2:443 -u test -c ./certs/user-key-nonascii-password.p12 --key-password 
ĂŻ --servercert=d66b507ae074d03b02eafca40d35f87dd81049d3 --cookieonly 
--passwd-on-stdin
Failed to connect to host 127.0.0.2
Failed to open HTTPS connection to 127.0.0.2
Failed to obtain WebVPN cookie
+ fail 19205 Could not connect with charset UTF-8!
+ PID=19205
+ shift
+ echo Failure: Could not connect with charset UTF-8!
Failure: Could not connect with charset UTF-8!
+ kill 19205
+ test -n ./sockwrap.19193.tmp
+ rm -rf ./sockwrap.19193.tmp
+ exit 1
ocserv[19205]: main: termination request received; waiting for children to die
FAIL auth-nonascii (exit status: 1)

FAIL: cert-fingerprint
==

Testing certificate auth... 
warning: skipping unknown option 'cookie-validity'
Parsing plain auth method subconfig using legacy format
note: vhost:default: setting 'plain' as primary authentication method
note: setting 'file' as supplemental config option

Processed: Bug#974836 marked as pending in openconnect

2022-01-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands:

> tag -1 pending
Bug #974836 [src:openconnect] openconnect FTBFS on IPV6-only buildds
Added tag(s) pending.

-- 
974836: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=974836
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems



Bug#974836: marked as pending in openconnect

2022-01-28 Thread Luca Boccassi
Control: tag -1 pending

Hello,

Bug #974836 in openconnect reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

https://salsa.debian.org/debian/openconnect/-/commit/b0713249f475c540a11e9d9a57595bebe2097f75


Disable build-time tests

Sometimes buildd's environment is broken and lacks ipv4 localhost,
so we cannot run the networked tests that use ocserv

Closes: #974836


(this message was generated automatically)
-- 
Greetings

https://bugs.debian.org/974836



Bug#1004478: marked as done (emscripten: attempts internet communication during build)

2022-01-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 28 Jan 2022 13:33:44 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#1004478: fixed in emscripten 3.1.2~dfsg+~1.39.6-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #1004478,
regarding emscripten: attempts internet communication during build
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1004478: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1004478
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---

Source: emscripten
Version: 3.1.1~dfsg+~1.39.6-5
Severity: serious

Hello, some tests are trying to reach googleapis

test_global_inits (test_other.other) ... skipped 'relies on fastcomp 
EXIT_RUNTIME=0 optimization not implemented/disabled'
ports:INFO: retrieving port: giflib from 
https://storage.googleapis.com/webassembly/emscripten-ports/giflib-5.2.1.tar.gz
test_headless (test_other.other) ... ok (1.28s)
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/urllib3/connection.py", line 169, in 
_new_conn
conn = connection.create_connection(
  File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/urllib3/util/connection.py", line 73, in 
create_connection
for res in socket.getaddrinfo(host, port, family, socket.SOCK_STREAM):
  File "/usr/lib/python3.10/socket.py", line 955, in getaddrinfo
for res in _socket.getaddrinfo(host, port, family, type, proto, flags):
socket.gaierror: [Errno -2] Name or service not known

During handling of the above exception, another exception occurred:

Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/urllib3/connectionpool.py", line 699, in 
urlopen
httplib_response = self._make_request(
  File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/urllib3/connectionpool.py", line 382, in 
_make_request
self._validate_conn(conn)
  File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/urllib3/connectionpool.py", line 1012, 
in _validate_conn
conn.connect()
  File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/urllib3/connection.py", line 353, in 
connect
conn = self._new_conn()
  File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/urllib3/connection.py", line 181, in 
_new_conn
raise NewConnectionError(
urllib3.exceptions.NewConnectionError: : Failed to establish a new connection: [Errno -2] Name or 
service not known

During handling of the above exception, another exception occurred:

Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/requests/adapters.py", line 439, in send
resp = conn.urlopen(
  File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/urllib3/connectionpool.py", line 755, in 
urlopen
retries = retries.increment(
  File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/urllib3/util/retry.py", line 574, in 
increment
raise MaxRetryError(_pool, url, error or ResponseError(cause))
urllib3.exceptions.MaxRetryError: HTTPSConnectionPool(host='storage.googleapis.com', 
port=443): Max retries exceeded with url: 
/webassembly/emscripten-ports/giflib-5.2.1.tar.gz (Caused by 
NewConnectionError(': Failed to establish a new connection: [Errno -2] Name or service 
not known'))

During handling of the above exception, another exception occurred:

Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/<>/emscripten-3.1.1~dfsg+~1.39.6/emcc.py", line 3912, in 

sys.exit(main(sys.argv))
  File "/<>/emscripten-3.1.1~dfsg+~1.39.6/emcc.py", line 3905, in main
ret = run(args)
  File "/<>/emscripten-3.1.1~dfsg+~1.39.6/emcc.py", line 1117, in run
linker_inputs = phase_compile_inputs(options, state, newargs, input_files)
  File "/usr/lib/python3.10/contextlib.py", line 79, in inner
return func(*args, **kwds)
  File "/<>/emscripten-3.1.1~dfsg+~1.39.6/emcc.py", line 2609, in 
phase_compile_inputs
compile_source_file(i, input_file)
  File "/<>/emscripten-3.1.1~dfsg+~1.39.6/emcc.py", line 2589, in 
compile_source_file
cmd = get_clang_command(input_file)
  File "/<>/emscripten-3.1.1~dfsg+~1.39.6/emcc.py", line 2530, in 
get_clang_command
return get_compiler(src_file) + get_cflags(state.orig_args) + compile_args 
+ [src_file]
  File "/<>/emscripten-3.1.1~dfsg+~1.39.6/emcc.py", line 905, in 
get_cflags
ports.add_cflags(cflags, settings)
  File "/<>/emscripten-3.1.1~dfsg+~1.39.6/tools/ports/__init__.py", 
line 364, in add_cflags
port.get(Ports, settings, shared)
  File "/<>/emscripten-3.1.1~dfsg+~1.39.6/tools/ports/giflib.py", 
line 19, in get
ports.fetch_project('giflib', 
f'https://storage.googleapis.com/webassembly/emscripten-ports/giflib-{VERSION}.tar.gz',
 f'giflib-{VERSION}', sha512hash=HASH)
  File "/<>/emscripten-3.1.1~dfsg+~1.39.6/tools/ports/__init__.py", 
line 258, in fetch_project
retrieve()
  File 

Bug#1004478: marked as pending in emscripten

2022-01-28 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Control: tag -1 pending

Hello,

Bug #1004478 in emscripten reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

https://salsa.debian.org/js-team/emscripten/-/commit/c8fac749ecc9faeae9898a2e0766e6668b590513


fix avoid test test_giflib requiring download of Emscripten port; closes: 
bug#1004478, thanks to Gianfranco Costamagna


(this message was generated automatically)
-- 
Greetings

https://bugs.debian.org/1004478



Processed: Bug#1004478 marked as pending in emscripten

2022-01-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands:

> tag -1 pending
Bug #1004478 [src:emscripten] emscripten: attempts internet communication 
during build
Added tag(s) pending.

-- 
1004478: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1004478
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems



Processed: Re: Bug#974836: openconnect FTBFS on IPV6-only buildds

2022-01-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands:

> severity -1 serious
Bug #974836 [src:openconnect] openconnect FTBFS on IPV6-only buildds
Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'

-- 
974836: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=974836
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems



Bug#1004478: emscripten: attempts internet communication during build

2022-01-28 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna

Source: emscripten
Version: 3.1.1~dfsg+~1.39.6-5
Severity: serious

Hello, some tests are trying to reach googleapis

test_global_inits (test_other.other) ... skipped 'relies on fastcomp 
EXIT_RUNTIME=0 optimization not implemented/disabled'
ports:INFO: retrieving port: giflib from 
https://storage.googleapis.com/webassembly/emscripten-ports/giflib-5.2.1.tar.gz
test_headless (test_other.other) ... ok (1.28s)
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/urllib3/connection.py", line 169, in 
_new_conn
conn = connection.create_connection(
  File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/urllib3/util/connection.py", line 73, in 
create_connection
for res in socket.getaddrinfo(host, port, family, socket.SOCK_STREAM):
  File "/usr/lib/python3.10/socket.py", line 955, in getaddrinfo
for res in _socket.getaddrinfo(host, port, family, type, proto, flags):
socket.gaierror: [Errno -2] Name or service not known

During handling of the above exception, another exception occurred:

Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/urllib3/connectionpool.py", line 699, in 
urlopen
httplib_response = self._make_request(
  File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/urllib3/connectionpool.py", line 382, in 
_make_request
self._validate_conn(conn)
  File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/urllib3/connectionpool.py", line 1012, 
in _validate_conn
conn.connect()
  File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/urllib3/connection.py", line 353, in 
connect
conn = self._new_conn()
  File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/urllib3/connection.py", line 181, in 
_new_conn
raise NewConnectionError(
urllib3.exceptions.NewConnectionError: : Failed to establish a new connection: [Errno -2] Name or 
service not known

During handling of the above exception, another exception occurred:

Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/requests/adapters.py", line 439, in send
resp = conn.urlopen(
  File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/urllib3/connectionpool.py", line 755, in 
urlopen
retries = retries.increment(
  File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/urllib3/util/retry.py", line 574, in 
increment
raise MaxRetryError(_pool, url, error or ResponseError(cause))
urllib3.exceptions.MaxRetryError: HTTPSConnectionPool(host='storage.googleapis.com', 
port=443): Max retries exceeded with url: 
/webassembly/emscripten-ports/giflib-5.2.1.tar.gz (Caused by 
NewConnectionError(': Failed to establish a new connection: [Errno -2] Name or service 
not known'))

During handling of the above exception, another exception occurred:

Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/<>/emscripten-3.1.1~dfsg+~1.39.6/emcc.py", line 3912, in 

sys.exit(main(sys.argv))
  File "/<>/emscripten-3.1.1~dfsg+~1.39.6/emcc.py", line 3905, in main
ret = run(args)
  File "/<>/emscripten-3.1.1~dfsg+~1.39.6/emcc.py", line 1117, in run
linker_inputs = phase_compile_inputs(options, state, newargs, input_files)
  File "/usr/lib/python3.10/contextlib.py", line 79, in inner
return func(*args, **kwds)
  File "/<>/emscripten-3.1.1~dfsg+~1.39.6/emcc.py", line 2609, in 
phase_compile_inputs
compile_source_file(i, input_file)
  File "/<>/emscripten-3.1.1~dfsg+~1.39.6/emcc.py", line 2589, in 
compile_source_file
cmd = get_clang_command(input_file)
  File "/<>/emscripten-3.1.1~dfsg+~1.39.6/emcc.py", line 2530, in 
get_clang_command
return get_compiler(src_file) + get_cflags(state.orig_args) + compile_args 
+ [src_file]
  File "/<>/emscripten-3.1.1~dfsg+~1.39.6/emcc.py", line 905, in 
get_cflags
ports.add_cflags(cflags, settings)
  File "/<>/emscripten-3.1.1~dfsg+~1.39.6/tools/ports/__init__.py", 
line 364, in add_cflags
port.get(Ports, settings, shared)
  File "/<>/emscripten-3.1.1~dfsg+~1.39.6/tools/ports/giflib.py", 
line 19, in get
ports.fetch_project('giflib', 
f'https://storage.googleapis.com/webassembly/emscripten-ports/giflib-{VERSION}.tar.gz',
 f'giflib-{VERSION}', sha512hash=HASH)
  File "/<>/emscripten-3.1.1~dfsg+~1.39.6/tools/ports/__init__.py", 
line 258, in fetch_project
retrieve()
  File "/<>/emscripten-3.1.1~dfsg+~1.39.6/tools/ports/__init__.py", 
line 213, in retrieve
response = requests.get(url)
  File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/requests/api.py", line 76, in get
return request('get', url, params=params, **kwargs)
  File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/requests/api.py", line 61, in request
return session.request(method=method, url=url, **kwargs)
  File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/requests/sessions.py", line 542, in 
request
resp = self.send(prep, **send_kwargs)
  File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/requests/sessions.py", line 655, in send
r = adapter.send(request, **kwargs)
  File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/requests/adapters.py", line 516, in send
raise ConnectionError(e, request=request)
requests.exceptions.ConnectionError: 
HTTPSConnectionPool(host='storage.googleapis.com', port=443): Max retries 

Bug#1004477: virt-top fails to start with OCaml 4.13.1

2022-01-28 Thread Adrian Bunk
Package: virt-top
Version: 1.0.9-1.1
Severity: serious
X-Debbugs-Cc: Debian OCaml Maintainers 

$ virt-top
the file '/usr/bin/virt-top' has not the right magic number: expected 
Caml1999X030, got Caml1999X028
$



Processed: Bug#1004311: found in 1.22-2, not found in 1.22-4

2022-01-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> found 1004311 1.22-2
Bug #1004311 {Done: Domenico Andreoli } [pahole] pahole 
segfaults during kernel build
Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #1004311 to the same values 
previously set
> notfound 1004311 1.22-4
Bug #1004311 {Done: Domenico Andreoli } [pahole] pahole 
segfaults during kernel build
Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #1004311 to the same values 
previously set
> --
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
1004311: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1004311
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems



Bug#1004453: marked as done (libcmark-dev generates broken dependencies.)

2022-01-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 28 Jan 2022 09:19:00 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#1004453: fixed in cmark 0.30.2-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #1004453,
regarding libcmark-dev generates broken dependencies.
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1004453: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1004453
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---

Package: libcmark-dev   
Version: 0.9.0-1
Severity: serious

Rebuilding nheko in current sid results in the following dependencies.

 Depends: libc6 (>= 2.33), libcmark0 (>= 0.30.2-4), libcmark0 (<< 0.30.2-4+), libcurl4 (>= 7.16.3), libevent-core-2.1-7 (>= 2.1.8-stable), 
libevent-pthreads-2.1-7 (>= 2.1.8-stable), libfmt8 (>= 8.1.1+ds1), libgcc-s1 (>= 3.0), libglib2.0-0 (>= 2.22.0), libgstreamer-plugins-bad1.0-0 (>= 1.18.5), 
libgstreamer-plugins-base1.0-0 (>= 1.18.0), libgstreamer1.0-0 (>= 1.18.0), liblmdb0 (>= 0.9.7), libolm3 (>= 3.1.3), libqt5core5a (>= 5.15.1), libqt5dbus5 
(>= 5.14.1), libqt5gui5 (>= 5.14.1) | libqt5gui5-gles (>= 5.14.1), libqt5keychain1 (>= 0.7.0), libqt5multimedia5 (>= 5.6.0~beta), libqt5network5 (>= 
5.10), libqt5qml5 (>= 5.14.1), libqt5quick5 (>= 5.9.0~beta) | libqt5quick5-gles (>= 5.9.0~beta), libqt5quickwidgets5 (>= 5.3.0), libqt5svg5 (>= 5.6.0~beta), 
libqt5widgets5 (>= 5.15.1), libspdlog1-fmt8, libssl1.1 (>= 1.1.0), libstdc++6 (>= 11), libxcb-ewmh2 (>= 0.4.1), libxcb1, qml-module-qt-labs-platform, 
qml-module-qt-labs-settings, qml-module-qtgraphicaleffects, qml-module-qtmultimedia, qml-module-qtquick2, qml-module-qtquick-controls2, qml-module-qtquick-layouts, 
qml-module-qtquick-window2, gstreamer1.0-nice, gstreamer1.0-qt5, gstreamer1.0-vaapi

Which are not satisfiable as libcmark0 does not exist in bookworm/sid

This appears to be a result of

https://salsa.debian.org/debian/cmark/-/commit/8be8ebaab1a6d4966b87dfe1eb18710aa20db045

Which seems wrong in several ways and IMO should be reverted.

1. It adds dependencies on a package that doesn't exist.
2. It doesn't seem necessary in the first place, cmark already
   incorporates the upstream version number as part of the
   binary package name.
3. The versioning used is too strict, it would force reverse
   dependencies to be rebuilt every time there was a Debian
   revision to cmark.



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: cmark
Source-Version: 0.30.2-5
Done: Jonas Smedegaard 

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
cmark, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 1004...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Jonas Smedegaard  (supplier of updated cmark package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org)


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2022 10:06:31 +0100
Source: cmark
Architecture: source
Version: 0.30.2-5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Jonas Smedegaard 
Changed-By: Jonas Smedegaard 
Closes: 1004453
Changes:
 cmark (0.30.2-5) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * Revert plain wrong change to shlibs hint file;
 closes: bug#1004453, thanks to Peter Green
Checksums-Sha1:
 56f3a512d7aec5dd643352187b5dcba3198dc047 1930 cmark_0.30.2-5.dsc
 14e21979b684798ebf38ba8ff692fed3f3ad953e 10820 cmark_0.30.2-5.debian.tar.xz
 5f12cac4901c46f2beca27e42c860f105a6a88c1 7999 cmark_0.30.2-5_amd64.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
 6499f123357a065d9bd0350f8321ea4458cf7c5fb69efbfdfe5e2e82cabdd86b 1930 
cmark_0.30.2-5.dsc
 b76a1f8c50a4a819cfe4242c5994ee6d3fa9fba2f82d205e77ef92caf1c86318 10820 
cmark_0.30.2-5.debian.tar.xz
 8add8f37627bbb8a73b834937864b95e0d4739d8ab8964da2fb6c4754bc0fa82 7999 
cmark_0.30.2-5_amd64.buildinfo
Files:
 79aee63b8279f83186d6c5fbca69d85a 1930 text optional cmark_0.30.2-5.dsc
 44eaaee144d7ec6e0e3392d37b53815a 10820 text optional 
cmark_0.30.2-5.debian.tar.xz
 b9fea7649920bf7499296eb53ccde7d4 7999 text optional 
cmark_0.30.2-5_amd64.buildinfo

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-

iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEn+Ppw2aRpp/1PMaELHwxRsGgASEFAmHzspsACgkQLHwxRsGg
ASEWpQ//TkKKjQT5XCaVRY80eXQei1xypplo/iY2QHe75y0aKll0Sdj7dSGMAxBm
uPPA/drRv22yrvfy6GfkLokcYBPY4HSFgy54TB0YEOy6vCebQuKgTuf1kGDGFTEf