Bug#1028104: libboost-dev: Boost with C++20 uses unavailable std functions.

2023-08-23 Thread Andre Naujoks
For anyone stumbling upon this.

A simple workaround is to '#include ' before '#include 
'

utility is the header that declares std::exchange

this does not look like a C++20 problem but a simple missing include in the 
boost headers.
Maybe this is actually worth a small patch in debian, since its such a simple 
problem to avoid. And I don't think an added include  would break 
anything(?).

best regards
  Andre



Bug#1023204: (no subject)

2022-11-08 Thread Andre Naujoks
Just FYI. This is "fixed" in the current samba-libs version.

Am 5. November 2022 19:05:19 MEZ schrieb Andre Naujoks :
>I am also affected by this. I worked around this by installing the samba-libs 
>package from testing and pinning the version to 2:4.16*
>
>This workaround will go away though, when 2:4.17 migrates to testing as well.
>
>-- 
>To unsubscribe, send mail to 1023204-unsubscr...@bugs.debian.org.


Bug#1023204: (no subject)

2022-11-05 Thread Andre Naujoks
I am also affected by this. I worked around this by installing the 
samba-libs package from testing and pinning the version to 2:4.16*


This workaround will go away though, when 2:4.17 migrates to testing as 
well.




Bug#961707: impressive immediately crashes under python 3

2020-05-28 Thread Andre Naujoks
Package: impressive
Version: 0.13.0~beta1a-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable

Dear Maintainer,

impressive crashes with the following output for me, when used with any PDF:

###

Welcome to Impressive version 0.13.0-beta1a (SVN r285)
pygame 1.9.6
Hello from the pygame community. https://www.pygame.org/contribute.html
Detected screen size: 1920x1080 pixels
PDF renderer: Xpdf/Poppler
OpenGL renderer: Radeon RX 580 Series (POLARIS10, DRM 3.36.0, 5.6.0-2-amd64,
LLVM 10.0.0)

===
OOPS! Impressive crashed!
This shouldn't happen. Please report this incident to the author, including the
full output of the program, particularly the following lines. If possible,
please also send the input files you used.

Impressive version: 0.13.0-beta1a (SVN r285)
Python version: 3.8.3 (default, May 14 2020, 11:03:12)
[GCC 9.3.0]
PyGame version: 1.9.6
PIL version: Pillow 7.0.0
PDF renderer: Xpdf/Poppler
OpenGL vendor: X.Org
OpenGL renderer: Radeon RX 580 Series (POLARIS10, DRM 3.36.0, 5.6.0-2-amd64,
LLVM 10.0.0)
OpenGL version: 4.6 (Compatibility Profile) Mesa 20.0.7
Operating system: Linux 5.6.0-2-amd64 (x86_64)
Linux distribution: Debian GNU/Linux bullseye/sid
Command line: /usr/bin/impressive GiT.pdf
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/bin/impressive", line 6451, in run_main
main()
  File "/usr/bin/impressive", line 6368, in main
RenderPage(Pcurrent, Tcurrent)
  File "/usr/bin/impressive", line 3679, in RenderPage
gl.TexImage2D(gl.TEXTURE_2D, 0, gl.RGB, TexWidth, TexHeight, 0, gl.RGB,
gl.UNSIGNED_BYTE, PageImage(page))
  File "/usr/bin/impressive", line 3599, in PageImage
img = RenderPDF(page, not(ZoomMode), ZoomMode)
  File "/usr/bin/impressive", line 3399, in RenderPDF
img = PDFRenderer.render(SourceFile, RealPage, useres, use_aa)
  File "/usr/bin/impressive", line 3282, in render
try_digits.sort(key=lambda n: abs(n - digits))
AttributeError: 'range' object has no attribute 'sort'



This is a general python3 incompatibility and is already fixed upstream in SVN,
though not released yet AFAICS

The following is the change, that fixes the issue:

--- /a/impressive   2020-05-28 10:01:59.841029102 +0200
+++ /b/impressive   2020-05-28 10:02:10.217064169 +0200
@@ -3278,7 +3278,7 @@
 TempFileName
 ])
 digits = GetFileProp(filename, 'digits', 6)
-try_digits = range(6, 0, -1)
+try_digits = list(range(6, 0, -1))
 try_digits.sort(key=lambda n: abs(n - digits))
 try_digits = [(n, TempFileName + ("-%%0%dd.ppm" % n) % page) for n in
try_digits]
 for digits, imgfile in try_digits:

I don't know how this would be handled, since there is no new release yet, but
the bug is effectively fixed upstream.

Would the patch be carried by debian until a new release is done?



-- System Information:
Debian Release: bullseye/sid
  APT prefers unstable-debug
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable-debug'), (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 5.6.0-2-amd64 (SMP w/12 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=C.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=C.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=C.UTF-8 
(charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled

Versions of packages impressive depends on:
ii  poppler-utils   0.71.0-6
ii  python3 3.8.2-3
ii  python3-pil 7.0.0-4+b1
ii  python3-pygame  1.9.6+dfsg-2+b1

Versions of packages impressive recommends:
ii  ffmpeg 7:4.2.2-1+b1
ii  mplayer2:1.3.0-8+b6
ii  perl   5.30.2-1
ii  xdg-utils  1.1.3-2

Versions of packages impressive suggests:
ii  ghostscript 9.52~dfsg-1
pn  latex-beamer
ii  pdftk   2.02-5+b1
ii  pdftk-java [pdftk]  3.1.1-1

-- no debconf information

-- debsums errors found:
debsums: changed file /usr/share/impressive/impressive.py (from impressive 
package)



Bug#903581: valgrind: can't understand libc6 symbols: ELF section outside all mapped regions

2018-07-12 Thread Andre Naujoks
Hi.

this is the same as bug #903389.

Regards
  Andre



Bug#586273: flashplugin-nonfree: flash website says it's available now

2010-09-15 Thread Andre Naujoks
Hi.

I really can't find the download. I see the link to the labs page, but
there is no download.
At least none that I can find. It looks like someone at Adobe made a
joke/mistake here.

nautsch

Am 15.09.2010 03:20, schrieb Tyler MacDonald:
 Package: flashplugin-nonfree Version: 1:2.8.1 Severity: normal

 Hi,

 I went to the adobe site today and it claims that the 64-bit version
 of 10.1 has been released from labs and is now available for
 download. I haven't tried installing it yet, but I thought I'd let
 you know!

 - Tyler










-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#586273: fixed native amd64 version has being available for a while now

2010-07-21 Thread Andre Naujoks
Hi.

Where exactly do you see a 64 Bit version of the flash player?
I can't find one in the links provided by you.

As far as I know, there is no 64 Bit version for any platform at the moment.
So, yes, you might be missing something

Regards
  Andre Naujoks

Am 20.07.2010 23:02, schrieb Yaroslav Halchenko:
 Just want to complement that according
 http://www.adobe.com/support/security/bulletins/apsb10-14.html and
 http://www.adobe.com/software/flash/about/ version 10.1.53.64 has
 been available since June 25, 2010, so I guess that would be logical
 to return support for amd64? or am I missing something?

 Thanks in advance!





-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org