Bug#732861: Openbox should not depend on GNOME or KDE.

2013-12-22 Thread Andrej N. Gritsenko
Package: src:openbox
Version: 3.5.2-5
Severity: serious

The Openbox package now has recommended GNOME and KDE packages.
This behavior violates Debian Policy 7.2:


Recommends
This declares a strong, but not absolute, dependency.

The Recommends field should list packages that would be found together
with this one in all but unusual installations.


This is opposite in case of Openbox - only unusual installations will
have either GNOME or KDE installed together with Openbox.

This issue therefore has severity Serious and should be fixed ASAP.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#722112: lxappearance-obconf: build problems

2013-10-16 Thread Andrej N. Gritsenko
Hello!

Mateusz Łukasik has written on Wednesday, 16 October, at 10:57:
I made NMU patch to fix this bug, because I don't have now permit to  
upload in debian-lxde git repository.

Well, at least you could tell me in IRC about your changes, make commit
patches (as atomic as possible) and I would upload them, I'm there most
of the time, just AFK sometimes. Your attached patch conflicts with the
code in git repository so cannot be applied, and it also adds too many
changes at once. And moreover, we highly avoid including any patches for
LXDE packages but make required fixes in upstream instead. So there will
be next lxappearance-obconf release shortly and as soon it is uploaded
there will be no need in any of your changes except for one in regard of
lxappearance-obconf-dbg. I'm sorry.

Best regards, Andriy.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#722112: lxappearance-obconf: build problems

2013-10-14 Thread Andrej N. Gritsenko
Hello!

Bob Bib has written on Monday, 14 October, at  5:38:
Well, we have here a new transition-related build failure,
an this time a more real one:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=lxappearance-obconf
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=lxappearance-obconfarch=amd64ver=0.2.0-4%2Bb1stamp=1381154559

It can't build against the fresh openbox-dev 3.5.2-3
due to some changes in '/usr/include/openbox/3.5/obrender/theme.h'.

Fortunately, it looks like fixed upstream:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailaid=3614951group_id=180858atid=894869
http://lxde.git.sourceforge.net/git/gitweb.cgi?p=lxde/lxappearance-obconf;a=commit;h=c8f0cd4270c140ad2b458b45df42ed44f08241ff

I would rather avoid openbox 3.5.2, it has the behavior which many
users would consider buggy - it places new windows always in the corner
of screen, and old behavior (center of screen) isn't possible anymore.
Let stay with 3.5.0 until they implement old behavior again (I hope it
will be implemented in the next openbox release, they are working on it
already).

Best regards,
Andriy.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#722112: lxappearance-obconf: build problems

2013-10-14 Thread Andrej N. Gritsenko
Bob Bib has written on Monday, 14 October, at 21:35:
openbox/3.5.2-3 is currently in unstable, not in NEW queue or experimental...
By the way, I've unpacked the source package, and there's some patch there,
'fix_center_window.patch' in 'debian/patches'
(I haven't tested it though).

I haven't tested it too. I hope it contains all the fix, it needs testing
yet I think. I've completely forgotten the fix already came in the debian
package. I'm sorry.

About mentioned build problem with new openbox:

I'm adding gi...@ubuntu.com to recipients, and would ask to release new
version of lxappearance-obconf (0.2.1 or 0.3.0 by your choice) so we can
release fixed one into debian too. Thank you very much.

Best regards!
Andriy.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#722111: libmenu-cache1-dev should be removed from both src:lxappearance and src:lxappearance-obconf

2013-09-12 Thread Andrej N. Gritsenko
The libmenu-cache1-dev should be removed from both lxappearance and
lxappearance-obconf dependencies, sources of both those packages don't
use libmenu-cache at all.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#713328: The issue is fixed.

2013-08-13 Thread Andrej N. Gritsenko
We believe this issue is completely fixed in 1.1.1 version of libfm and
pcmanfm. Those versions will be available shortly in unstable repository
of Debian. If you cannot afford using unstable repository but want to use
stable instead then yet still are two options for you:

1. Download sources from Debian archive site, then build the packages
yourself, then upgrade your packages.

2. Wait until upgrades come into wheezy-backports repository and then
upgrade your packages.

Thank you very much for your patience.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#593607: pcmanfm wrongly deleted some files in a failed move operation

2013-01-06 Thread Andrej N. Gritsenko
Hello!

John Paul Adrian Glaubitz has written on Saturday,  5 January, at 21:10:
 I consider his proposal as the best solution for wheezy.
 May I NMU to unstable?

Since no one has replied to your suggestion yet, I would suggest that
you make an NMU and upload it into DELAYED/10 which will give the
maintainers enough time for review.

This bug is a serious issue and an RC bug and should therefore not be
delayed too long.

And remember that is not a solution but a workaround which breaks one
of functions of pcmanfm and that breakage is another bug. Real fix will
be upgrade to the 1.1.1 version which will be possible only after wheezy
release (via backports).

With best wishes.
Andriy.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#593607: bug #593607: pcmanfm wrongly deleted some files in a failed move operation

2012-11-14 Thread Andrej N. Gritsenko
 Why not to reopen this bug if it hasn't been fixed yet? ;)

In fact, it's fixed in upstream. The reporter confirmed it is fixed.
And all commits for the fix are included in latest stable release of libfm and 
pcmanfm (1.1.0).
If reopening this bug gives a possibility for 1.1.0 to come into Wheezy then 
why not?
But I hardly doubt it is possible to gather all fixes for the subject and apply 
them on ancient libfm 0.1.17.
If you ask me I would never try that, I don't know which side effects will that 
cause,
because changing major number of upstream version sure was for reason,
and the diff between 0.1.17 and 1.1.0 is near 4MB while unpacked libfm tarball 
takes near 7MB.
May be it is still good for everyone to postpone fix to time after Wheezy 
release.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#593607: (no subject)

2012-10-03 Thread Andrej N. Gritsenko
As main developer of pcmanfm in meantime I can say this bug isn't fixed
in any of 0.9.x series and will be fixed in next 1.0.2 release which is
scheduled to late October. Last release of 1.0.x series will be 1.0.3 I
think and that one should be the most featureful and bugfree version of
1.0.x series. 0.9.x series are unstable (there was few tens bugs in the
upstream bug tracker about crashes, freezes, and memory leaks addressed
0.9.x series that are fixed in 1.0.x series) but 1.0.x are stable. It's
too hard to get any of stable version into Wheezy at this stage, sorry.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#593607: bug #593607: pcmanfm wrongly deleted some files in a failed move operation

2012-09-08 Thread Andrej N. Gritsenko
forwarded 593607 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailaid=3565792group_id=156956atid=801864
thank you

This bug was a bit hard to reproduce as it didn't happen when moving just a 
bunch of files.
It also happened when no space left on destination device.
Fixed in upstream by commit f8441418b8c5087b266b60ed0bf02ee1645711f1 few 
moments ago.
Thank you.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org