Bug#955432: closing 955432
close 955432 thanks
Bug#593607: pcmanfm wrongly deleted some files in a failed move operation
On 2010年12月29日 02:42, Julien Cristau wrote: On 12/06/2010 01:56 AM, Andrew Lee wrote: Both newer version of libfm and pcmanfm are bug fixes release from upstream. Would this be an exception, please? Sorry but those have big changes. I'm not sure that it's wise to accept them at this stage of the freeze. I'd prefer targeted fixes. ping? If this doesn't get fixed very soon, we'll have to remove pcmanfm and lxde-common from squeeze, as far as I can tell. I know 0.9.8 version have many changes. Cause upstream fixed this problem and many others. I'd suggest to accept 0.9.8 into squeeze, so that we can benifit from many other distros which are using 0.9.8 version too. -Andrew -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#593607: pcmanfm wrongly deleted some files in a failed move operation
On 2010年12月06日 05:13, Mehdi Dogguy wrote: On 12/01/2010 10:21 AM, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl wrote: Am 01.12.2010 10:13, schrieb Andrew Lee: Thanks Alexander for the reminder. Since there is no response and we are in a freeze status. I assume this has been fixed, and close this bug now. Fine, fine. I also marked the current version in sid as not affected by this bug. Can you please ask the release team for an unblock? I'm not sure we could accept this version since it's a bit large and depends on a newer libfm, which is also large. Both newer version of libfm and pcmanfm are bug fixes release from upstream. Would this be an exception, please? -Andrew -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#600387: pcmanfm: symbol lookup error: pcmanfm: undefined symbol: fm_path_new
Hi, Thanks for reporting. We've noticed this problem and co-work with upstream on it. -Andrew -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#583957: [pcmanfm] segfault while pressing the left panel icon
Hi Eugene, Eugene Apollonsky wrote: Package: pcmanfm Version: 0.9.5-2 Severity: serious I just uploaded pcmanfm 0.9.7-1. Please wait untail you can get it from sid, and re-test this bug. I'd close this bug in a few days if I don't hear any feedback. Thanks, -Andrew -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#580475: lxpanel: data/ui/*.glade files missing in the package so it can't be (re)built
Hi, I cannot reproduce this FTBFS as the package builds fine event run 'fakeroot debian/rules clean' first. However, the .glade files is not available in upstream release tarball, but .ui files are there. Would you mind to explain how to reproduce this step by step? Best regards, -Andrew -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#577336: lxlauncher: FTBFS: Nonexistent build-dependency: libmenu-cache-dev
Thanks for catch this bug. This version won't work with libmenu-cache1. I'd report and push upstream to make a new release. Kindly regards, -Andrew -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#575961: crash during startup
LUK ShunTim wrote: It seems that upgrading lxde-common to 0.5.0-3 in sid does not solve the problem :-(, I still got a seg fault with lxsession (it's started with startx). Please let me know what further testing/information on my side is needed to help to solve it. I guess you probably start lxde session by 'lxsession'. Please make sure you start LXDE by 'startlxde' script. And please report me however the result is. Thanks for reporting and been helping to find the real problem. :) Cheers, -Andrew -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#575961: lxsession crash during startup
Hi Luca, 2010/4/3 luca boncompagni lbo...@gmail.com I installed lxde-common version 0.4.2-3 I think version 0.5.x would fix this problem for you. Please give it a try. Just keep in mind the lxde-common has been blocked by lxpanel to bulid binary packages for kfreebsd-i386 and kfreebsd-amd64. And I just update lxpanel to be able to build on kfreebsd-i386 and kfreebsd-amd64. It would works in a few days if you don't pull the lxde-common 0.5.x from Sid. Kindly regards, -Andrew
Bug#575961: lxsession crash during startup
Hi Luca, LucaB wrote: when i log into my system i get a popup with the following text: Thanks for reporting this problem. May I know what version of lxde-common do you installed on the system? -Andrew -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#575972: lxappearance: segmentation fault on trying to change themes
Hi, TheGZeus wrote: Thanks for reporting this bug. May I know if you have lxde-common 0.5.0 installed? -Andrew -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#573905: libbfd. libbfd-simple.a
Roberto C. Sánchez wrote: Please do not. Please read the whole log for #537744 and then also for #558412. I think this is just a mistake as he uploaded a wrong patch file on his filesystem. He is going to upload the correct one as he mentioned earlier. Cheers for debian wine from mini-DebCamp 2010 Thailand, -Andrew -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#573905: libbfd. libbfd-simple.a
Roberto C. Sánchez wrote: Please do not. Please read the whole log for #537744 and then also for #558412. I think this is just a mistake as he uploaded a wrong patch file on his filesystem. He is going to upload the correct one as he mentioned earlier. Cheers for debian wine from mini-DebCamp 2010 Thailand, -Andrew -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#572154: ssmtp: fails to reinstall
tags 572154 +patch Hi Anibal, Just check statoverride database before updating it. Patch attached from Thailand Mini-DebCamp 2010 BSP: http://wiki.debian.org/DebianThailand/MiniDebCamp2010/BSP Cheers, -Andrew diff -Nru ssmtp-2.64/debian/postinst ssmtp-2.64/debian/postinst --- ssmtp-2.64/debian/postinst 2010-02-09 13:40:43.0 +0700 +++ ssmtp-2.64/debian/postinst 2010-03-14 16:03:18.0 +0700 @@ -53,6 +53,7 @@ touch /etc/ssmtp/ssmtp.conf.tmp chmod 640 /etc/ssmtp/ssmtp.conf.tmp chown root:mail /etc/ssmtp/ssmtp.conf.tmp + dpkg-statoverride --list /usr/sbin/ssmtp /dev/null || \ dpkg-statoverride --update --add root mail 2755 /usr/sbin/ssmtp sed s/^root=.*/root=$root/;s/^mailhub=.*/mailhub=$mailhub/;s/^rewriteDomain=.*/rewriteDomain=$rewritedomain/;s/^hostname=.*/hostname=$hostname/;s/^FromLineOverride=.*/FromLineOverride=$FromOverride/;s/^#FromLineOverride=.*/FromLineOverride=$FromOverride/ /etc/ssmtp/ssmtp.conf /etc/ssmtp/ssmtp.conf.tmp @@ -61,6 +62,7 @@ touch /etc/ssmtp/ssmtp.conf chmod 640 /etc/ssmtp/ssmtp.conf chown root:mail /etc/ssmtp/ssmtp.conf + dpkg-statoverride --list /usr/sbin/ssmtp /dev/null || \ dpkg-statoverride --update --add root mail 2755 /usr/sbin/ssmtp exec 1/etc/ssmtp/ssmtp.conf diff -Nru ssmtp-2.64/debian/postrm ssmtp-2.64/debian/postrm --- ssmtp-2.64/debian/postrm 2009-07-07 09:30:45.0 +0700 +++ ssmtp-2.64/debian/postrm 2010-03-14 16:08:03.0 +0700 @@ -2,6 +2,7 @@ set -e + if test $1 = purge then if test -e /usr/share/debconf/confmodule @@ -20,6 +21,9 @@ then rm -f /usr/doc/ssmtp 2/dev/null || true fi + dpkg-statoverride --list /usr/sbin/ssmtp /dev/null \ + dpkg-statoverride --remove /usr/sbin/ssmtp + fi # Program End
Bug#570971: Cannot read alternative config files anymore
tags 570971 + moreinfo unreproducible - patch thanks Hi Guido, (hi Anibal), The -C option works for me with 2.64-3 + patch from #572154: # cp /etc/ssmtp/ssmtp.conf /etc/ssmtp/ssmtp-1.conf # vi /etc/ssmtp/ssmtp.conf (change mailhub to invaild place) Create a test file contain: -- To:ajq...@debian.org Subject: Test This is a test mail. -- # ssmtp -t test ssmtp: Cannot open invaild:25 # ssmtp -C/etc/ssmtp/ssmtp-1.conf -t test Then I got the mail. Hello from Thailand Mini-DebCamp 2010 BSP: http://wiki.debian.org/DebianThailand/MiniDebCamp2010/BSP Cheers, -Andrew -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#569770: gupnp: needs versioned build-dep on docbook-xsl
This is very simple fix bug open for one month. I'd do a NMU to fix this. Hello from the 2010 Thai BSP: http://wiki.debian.org/DebianThailand/MiniDebCamp2010/BSP Cheers, -Andrew -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#573119: libmenu-cache1: dpkg --unpack failed: package tries to overwrite files of libmenu-cache0
在 2010/3/12 3:35 時，Ralf Treinen trei...@free.fr 寫到： Hello, Here is a list of files that are known to be shared by both packages (according to the Contents file for sid/amd64, which may be slightly out of sync): /usr/lib/libmenu-cache/libexec/menu-cache-gen /usr/lib/libmenu-cache/libexec/menu-cached I'd put soname number into the libexec dir to avoid this problem. And upload it shortly. Thanks, -Andrew -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#560202: lxnm not installable together with lxde
Dear Daniel, Daniel Baumann wrote: Andrew Lee wrote: The lxnm and lxpanel-netstat-plugin are both deprecated. Please feel free to drop it in live-helper's lxde package list. And use wicd or network-manager-gnome instead. i've replaced it with wicd, thanks for the note. Thanks for replaced it with wicd. I'd send RM request for lxnm right away. Best regards, -Andrew -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#560202: lxnm not installable together with lxde
Hi Daniel, Thanks for reassigned this from package 'live-helper' to 'lxnm', so that I noticed this problem. The lxnm and lxpanel-netstat-plugin are both deprecated. Please feel free to drop it in live-helper's lxde package list. And use wicd or network-manager-gnome instead. I'd request RM from squeeze for lxnm soon. Best regards, -Andrew -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#559460: lxde: uninstallable in sid
Hi Laurent, Thanks for reporting this. That was my fualt as I forgot to upload lxinput 0.1.1-2 together with lxde-common 0.4.2-3. I just uploaded lxinput 0.1.1-2 to solve this problem. Please wait a while for the mirror to sync. Best regards, -Andrew Laurent Bonnaud wrote: Package: lxde Version: 0.4.2-3 Severity: serious Hi, here is the problem: r...@irancy:~# apt-get install lxde Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable distribution that some required packages have not yet been created or been moved out of Incoming. The following information may help to resolve the situation: The following packages have unmet dependencies: lxde: Depends: lxinput (= 0.1) but it is not going to be installed E: Broken packages r...@irancy:~# apt-get install lxde lxinput Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable distribution that some required packages have not yet been created or been moved out of Incoming. The following information may help to resolve the situation: The following packages have unmet dependencies: lxinput: Depends: lxde-settings-daemon (= 0.4.1) but it is not going to be installed E: Broken packages r...@irancy:~# apt-get install lxde lxinput lxde-settings-daemon Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable distribution that some required packages have not yet been created or been moved out of Incoming. The following information may help to resolve the situation: The following packages have unmet dependencies: lxde: Depends: lxde-core (= 0.4.2-3) but it is not going to be installed E: Broken packages r...@irancy:~# apt-get install lxde lxinput lxde-settings-daemon lxde-core Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done lxde-core is already the newest version. Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable distribution that some required packages have not yet been created or been moved out of Incoming. The following information may help to resolve the situation: The following packages have unmet dependencies: lxsession: Conflicts: lxde-settings-daemon but 0.4.1-2 is to be installed E: Broken packages -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.31-1-686 (SMP w/1 CPU core) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to en_US.UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Versions of packages lxde depends on: ii gpicview 0.2.1-1+b1 lightweight image viewer ii leafpad 0.8.17-1GTK+ based simple text editor ii lxappearance 0.2.1-2 a new feature-rich GTK+ theme swit ii lxde-core0.4.2-3 Meta-package for the Lightweight X pn lxinput none (no description available) ii lxmusic 0.4.0-1 The minimalist music player for LX ii lxrandr 0.1.1-2+b1 simple monitor config tool for LXD ii lxsession-edit 0.1.1-2 configure what application start u ii lxshortcut 0.1.1-1 easy way
Bug#544297: pcmanfm cannot mount ntf-3g drives and usbsticks
Hi Till, I just uploaded new version of pcmanfm to sid. Would you please confirm if the new version solved this problem? Regards, -Andrew -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#544297: pcmanfm cannot mount ntf-3g drives and usbsticks
Hi Till, I remember there was a similar bugreport long time ago. It was problem from PolicyKit, not from PCManFM. And already put the work-arounds provide from the bug owner in README.Debian. Could you please read through the PolicyKit parts in README.Debian and see if that helps? Kindly regards, -Andrew Till M wrote: Package: pcmanfm Version: 0.5.1+svn20090607-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Cannot get pcmanfm from squeeze to mount any drives ie, ntfs, ntfs-3g or any of my usb sticks formated in both fat and ext2. I just keep getting: org.freedesktop.hal.storage.mount-fixed auth_admin_keep_always -- (action, result) All my media have labels as someone suggested it was a label problem. The problem does not exist when using root though, so I would say it's some permissions problem with hal or something. I've changed my pcman mount rules the same as my lenny laptop but that made no difference. -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.26-2-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_AU.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_AU.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages pcmanfm depends on: ii dbus 1.2.16-2simple interprocess messaging syst ii desktop-file 0.15-2 Utilities for .desktop files ii gamin0.1.10-1File and directory monitoring syst ii hal 0.5.12~git20090406.46dc48-2 Hardware Abstraction Layer ii libc62.9-23 GNU C Library: Shared libraries ii libcairo21.8.8-2 The Cairo 2D vector graphics libra ii libdbus-1-3 1.2.16-2simple interprocess messaging syst ii libdbus-glib 0.82-1 simple interprocess messaging syst ii libgamin0 [l 0.1.10-1Client library for the gamin file ii libglib2.0-0 2.20.4-1The GLib library of C routines ii libgtk2.0-0 2.16.5-1The GTK+ graphical user interface ii libhal-stora 0.5.12~git20090406.46dc48-2 Hardware Abstraction Layer - share ii libhal1 0.5.12~git20090406.46dc48-2 Hardware Abstraction Layer - share ii libpango1.0- 1.24.5-1Layout and rendering of internatio ii libstartup-n 0.10-1 library for program launch feedbac ii libx11-6 2:1.2.2-1 X11 client-side library ii shared-mime- 0.60-2 FreeDesktop.org shared MIME databa Versions of packages pcmanfm recommends: ii gksu2.0.2-2+b1 graphical frontend to su ii gnome-icon-theme2.26.0-1 GNOME Desktop icon theme ii ntfs-3g 1:2009.4.4-1 read-write NTFS driver for FUSE pcmanfm suggests no packages. -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#521238: stardic: Bus error on AMD64
LIU Qi wrote: So now this bug is pending for your stardict-dictionary package upload. Let me know if you need help. I am sorry for the late reply. I am getting a little busy these days. I will finish this package in the next two days. Thanks. No problem. Take your time. :) ps: Congratulations to you on being the official DD. Thanks. -Andrew -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#521238: stardic: Bus error on AMD64
tags 521238 + fixed pending thanks LIU Qi wrote: I am getting more and more work on LXDE packages. Would you mind to help to maintain this stardict-dictionary package since it's zh_CN only? ok. I will upload this package in several days. Also I could help to maintain the stardict package if you do not have enough time. Thanks for your asking. I uploaded stardict 3.0.1-6(added a pseudo binary package named stardic to help users transition), but stardict package doesn't content any dictionary data. So now this bug is pending for your stardict-dictionary package upload. Let me know if you need help. Cheers, -Andrew -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#521238: stardic: Bus error on AMD64
Dear Aníbal, Aníbal Monsalve Salazar wrote: On Sat, Jul 18, 2009 at 09:47:28PM +0200, Andrew Lee wrote: On Sat, Jul 18, 2009 at 04:20:13AM +1000, Anibal Monsalve Salazar wrote: Andrew, could you create a pseudo binary package named stardic in your source package stardict in such a way that the users of stardic can upgrade to stardict smoothly? Would you mind to sponsor upload for this, Aníbal? Sure. Don't forget to set the DM flag in debian/control too. Okay. The package can be found on - URL: http://people.linux.org.tw/~andrew/debian/stardict/ - dget http://people.linux.org.tw/~andrew/debian/stardict/stardict_3.0.1-6.dsc Kind regards, -Andrew -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#521238: stardic: Bus error on AMD64
Dear Liu, LIU Qi wrote: I just found that the dictionary from stardic in stardict format could be downloaded. Please refer to this: http://stardict.sourceforge.net/Dictionaries_zh_CN.php (stardict1.3 dictionary(en - zh_CN)) Also there are lots of GPL licensed dictionaries in this webpage. You could package them. Thanks. Cool! That gives you less work! :) I am getting more and more work on LXDE packages. Would you mind to help to maintain this stardict-dictionary package since it's zh_CN only? Feel free to ask me if you need review/recommend of your package. Cheers, -Andrew -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#521238: stardic: Bus error on AMD64
Hi Aníbal, Aníbal Monsalve Salazar wrote: On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 12:42:55PM +0800, LIU Qi wrote: I would like to adopt this package, but as far as I known little people still use this package any more, because in fact the package stardict is the newer version of stardic. I think the package stardic should be removed. Andrew, could you create a pseudo binary package named stardic in your source package stardict in such a way that the users of stardic can upgrade to stardict smoothly? Good idea. But stardict doesn't provide a Chinese-English dictionary by default. I am not familiar with stardic. Does anyone volunteer for dump the dictionary from stardic and convert that to stardict format(please I really need help on this)? I think I can update the stardict package first however it would go into NEW queue for a while. And I'd add these into stardict's debian/control: Package: stardict Provides: stardic Replaces: stardic Conflict: stardic Package: stardic Architecture: all Depends: stardict Description: transiational dummy package which can be safely removed Dummy package to upgrade to the new stardict package. Would you mind to sponsor upload for this, Aníbal? Best regards, -Andrew -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#534731: CVE-2009-2260
Dear security team, My package 'stardict' got CVE-2009-2260 report: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailaid=2814932group_id=80679atid=560632 I am preparing a updated package for unstable based on the patches from RedHat's Bugzilla. I will upload it to unstable within 6 hours. Please let me know how to handle this update for stable after you review my updated package in unstable. Thanks very much, -Andrew -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#534731: stardict broadcasts clipboard context over network
Hi Pavel, I am not sure what's the best way to solve this issue. I guess we can make a GConf schema registration scripts for the package. But it seems to me that only stardict-gnome can be benefit by the script and stardict-gtk doesn't. Does anyone has better soultion than completely disable the netdict plugin in build? -Andrew -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#527065: util-vserver: diff for NMU version 0.30.216~r2772-6.1
Hi Micah, Micah Anderson wrote: Hi Andrew, I appreciate the help with the package, although typically a NMU is done after a patch is not being applied, so sending a patch and doing a 2-day NMU at the same time is a little aggressive. I'm also wondering how you can do this NMU because as far as I can tell you aren't yet a DD :) Sorry for the unclear message. I do not want aggressive. I just reproduce other DD does for NMU. Please let me know the proper way if I did this wrong. I guess you may smelled that I am in NM process so that my AM would sponsor the upload. :) I have been working on a new version of util-vserver to upload, with a newer snapshot, so I was delaying this fix until that was finished. However I can upload this fix to resolve the RC bug. I see. My attention was to solve the RC bug for next point release. It would be great if you accept this NMU for me. In any case, what would be even better than doing NMUs would be if you would join the Alioth team and help with the util-vserver packaging effort, its an open team, although nobody has helped on it so far and I would appreciate the help! Thanks for your invitation. I've sent the request on Alioth. Please update me for the new version of util-vserver with a newer snapshot via alioth. Cheers, -Andrew -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#527065: util-vserver: diff for NMU version 0.30.216~r2772-6.1
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 tags 527065 +patch thanks Dear maintainer, I've prepared an NMU for util-vserver (versioned as 0.30.216~r2772-6.1). And it will be uploaded to DELAYED/02. Please free to tell me if I should delay it longer. Regards. - -Andrew -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkozSMoACgkQnQYz4bYlCYWyrwCgrd4UHY+B9I90mO06rxSDPIxE UIQAni8QNcLu8pJknj1n/NqUPCTAgM9s =to/T -END PGP SIGNATURE- diff -u util-vserver-0.30.216~r2772/debian/util-vserver.postrm util-vserver-0.30.216~r2772/debian/util-vserver.postrm --- util-vserver-0.30.216~r2772/debian/util-vserver.postrm +++ util-vserver-0.30.216~r2772/debian/util-vserver.postrm @@ -25,6 +25,8 @@ rm -f /etc/vservers/.defaults/run.rev rm -rf /var/run/vservers.rev rm -f /etc/vservers/.defaults/vdirbase + rm -f /etc/vservers/.defaults/apps/vunify/hash/00 + rm -rf /var/lib/vservers/.hash ;; *) echo postrm called with unknown argument \`$1' 2 diff -u util-vserver-0.30.216~r2772/debian/changelog util-vserver-0.30.216~r2772/debian/changelog --- util-vserver-0.30.216~r2772/debian/changelog +++ util-vserver-0.30.216~r2772/debian/changelog @@ -1,3 +1,10 @@ +util-vserver (0.30.216~r2772-6.1) unstable; urgency=low + + * Non-maintainer upload. + * Remove owned and unowned files after purge (Closes:#527065) + + -- Andrew Lee and...@linux.org.tw Sat, 13 Jun 2009 14:12:09 +0800 + util-vserver (0.30.216~r2772-6) unstable; urgency=medium * Added patch from Andres Mejia to fix bashisms (Closes: #486060)
Bug#518491: Not fixed
Hi Roman, Roman Mamedov wrote: This bug is not fixed in 0.1.4+svn20090316-1. The other issue is that it still does not have the -T option, as the original submitter mentioned. My guess this would be feature requests and should be forwarded to upstream. Also, while the changes are being made to the help text, it would be nice to add an Y letter to DIRECTOR, and correct the typo in LXTerminal is a terimnal emulator. I have uploaded 0.1.5 into sid, please confirm if it fixed problems above. Thanks for confirming this. -Andrew -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#528644: jigdo-file: jigdo-mirror always reports 'Error - template checksum mismatch'
Package: jigdo-file Version: 0.7.3-2 Severity: grave Dear Maintainer, I am the mirror admin of ftp.tw.d.o. I found jigdo-mirror keep reports 'Error - template checksum mismatch' even the templates checksum are all correct. On our website[0], we encouraged mirror admins as 'Mirroring using jigdo-mirror is recommended'. And provided cd-mirror script[1] to help when setting this up. I am one of the mirror admin who following the information on our website. And I believe I won't be the only one. So this bug may breaks many debian-cd mirrors all over the world. Please consider this as a RC bug and fix in Lenny. Thank you. [0] http://www.debian.org/CD/mirroring/ [1] http://www.acc.umu.se/~maswan/debian-push/cdimage/ Adam Lackorzynski on IRC #debian-mirrors provided a patch to solve this problem. --- jigdo-mirror~ 2009-02-12 23:28:45.606473882 +0100 +++ jigdo-mirror2009-02-12 23:28:56.256487990 +0100 @@ -350,7 +350,7 @@ section=$1;; Filename) image=$2;; Template) templateURI=$2;; -Template-MD5Sum) templateMD5=$2;; +Template-MD5Sum) __templateMD5=$2;; ShortInfo) shift; shortInfo=$*;; Info) shift; info=$*;; esac -Andrew -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#499678: pcmanfm: no copyright information for exo lib
Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: On dim, 2008-09-21 at 11:30 +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: Package: pcmanfm Version: 0.5-2 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 2.3 - 12.5 Additionnaly with the problem of embedding a copy of exo which is bad, there nothing about exo copyright in debian/copyright… And some code (in vfs) is taken from thunar, which is © Benedikt Meurer, and it's not included in debian/copyright either. It seems that the debian/copyright file is really missing a lot of stuff anyway. Good catch! Thank you for this report. I think I should do a grep with keyword taken, and then add informations into debian/copyright file. Cheers, -Andrew -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#498022: first time fixed the security related bug
Hello Nico, This is my first time fixed the security related bug. Thanks for pointed me this is wrong in changelog. I will pay my attation to use CVE id next time in changelog. :) Cheers, -Andrew -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#497005: the data lose you mean is algorithm limitation in jpeg
severity #497005 normal retitle #497005 gpicview not confirms to save images thanks Hi caleb, It's so confused. What exactly data loss you mean? If what you mean is the jpeg has lossy rotation and compression, it's documented in jpeg's faq. It's a limitation in jpeg algorithm. As it can also reproduced in gqview, gimp and any other application which support jpeg roataion, so that I won't considering this is a grave bug. The autosave rotated image options also works fine now. So I think the only problem here is gpicview doesn't ask before saving an image even the ask before saving images is on. -Andrew -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#497408: drop gpicview dependency or fix gpicview
Hi, Thanks for notice this. I am currently working with upstream to get gpicview problems fixed and upload it as soon as possible. -Andrew -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#497005: What do you mean a data loss?
Hello caleb, Do you mean the file changed after rotation is a data loss? Or any data from the image are lost after rotation? -Andrew -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#497006: The lossless rotation is basically based on rotate the blocks of jpeg file
severity #497005 normal severity #497006 normal merge #497005 #497006 retitle gpicview not confirms to save a image when auto_save_rotated is on. thanks Hi caleb, As Paul Liu said, The lossless rotation of jpeg can only be applied on certain image size, not all image size. So I don't see it should be a grave bug. Thank you for you paid so much attentions on this package until now. I will adopt this package in next upload. -Andrew -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#490328: lxde-common: FTBFS: chown: cannot access `debian/lxde-common/usr/share/icons/nuoveXT2/48x48/mimetypes/gnome-m ime-application-x-7z-compressed.png': No such file or directory
Hi Lucas, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386. It seems built fine and installed alrady in buildd. See the buildd logs: http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?pkg=lxde-common I am not sure why it builds failed on your server. could you please help? Maybe try to rebuild it again? -Andrew -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#474861: stardict: nmu patch
Hi Mert, I found foka. He has been really busy. I am merging your changes, and it would be uploaded soon. Cheers, -Andrew -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#474861: stardict: nmu patch
Mert Dirik wrote: I'm also waiting for sponsorship :). Should I search for sponsors or will you find another sponsor for yourself? I have no problem to find sponsors. :) I respect Anthony Fok who is stardict maintainer. Anthony, I'd like to ask sponsor to upload this in 5 days. If you have other changes want to include in this upload, please let us know ASAP. Cheers, -Andrew -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#474861: nmu patch
Hello Mert, Mert Dirik wrote: Here is my proposed nmu diff. I have prepared new package to foka for upload a few weeks ago. Not sure he is still working on my changes or he has been very busy. However the package haven't uploaded yet. If you can upload the package shortly, I think you can go ahead. And please also make the build-depends on libsigc++-2.0-dev (= 2.0.18-2) with the NMU for me. Thanks, -Andrew -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#472829: openbox-session is not a window manager, but a desktop session.
Package: openbox Severity: serious Justification: Policy 11.8.4. This package installs openbox-session as x-window-manager which is violate debian policy 11.8.4. It's not a window manager, but a desktop session. I have read #434497. If you wants to use openbox-session for autostart, please install it as x-session-manager in debian/openbox.postinst. -- System Information: Debian Release: lenny/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.24-1-686 (SMP w/1 CPU core) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#472829: openbox-session is not a window manager, but a desktop session.
tags 472829 +patch
thanks
Nico Golde wrote:
Do I miss anything or is the only thing needed to fix this
bug:
[skip]
Also need following changes:
- provides: x-session-manager
- create x-window-manager link for openbox
- create x-session-manager link for openbox-session
- remove the wrong openbox-session link from x-window-manager
Please see the attached patch.
-Andrew
diff -u openbox-3.4.6.1/debian/control openbox-3.4.6.1/debian/control
--- openbox-3.4.6.1/debian/control
+++ openbox-3.4.6.1/debian/control
@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@
Package: openbox
Architecture: any
-Provides: x-window-manager
+Provides: x-window-manager, x-session-manager
Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}
Recommends: openbox-themes
Suggests: obconf, menu, ttf-dejavu, python, libxml2-dev
diff -u openbox-3.4.6.1/debian/openbox.postinst openbox-3.4.6.1/debian/openbox.postinst
--- openbox-3.4.6.1/debian/openbox.postinst
+++ openbox-3.4.6.1/debian/openbox.postinst
@@ -5,9 +5,14 @@
case $1 in
configure)
update-alternatives --install /usr/bin/x-window-manager \
- x-window-manager /usr/bin/openbox-session 90 --slave \
+ x-window-manager /usr/bin/openbox 90 --slave \
/usr/share/man/man1/x-window-manager.1.gz \
x-window-manager.1.gz /usr/share/man/man1/openbox.1.gz
+ update-alternatives --install /usr/bin/x-session-manager \
+x-session-manager /usr/bin/openbox-session 50 --slave \
+/usr/share/man/man1/x-session-manager.1.gz \
+x-session-manager.1.gz /usr/share/man/man1/openbox-session.1.gz
+
if [ -x /usr/bin/update-menus ]; then update-menus; fi
;;
esac
diff -u openbox-3.4.6.1/debian/openbox.prerm openbox-3.4.6.1/debian/openbox.prerm
--- openbox-3.4.6.1/debian/openbox.prerm
+++ openbox-3.4.6.1/debian/openbox.prerm
@@ -3,10 +3,11 @@
set -e
case $1 in
- remove)
- update-alternatives --remove x-window-manager /usr/bin/openbox
- rm -f /var/lib/openbox/debian-menu.xml
- ;;
+remove)
+ update-alternatives --remove x-window-manager /usr/bin/openbox
+ update-alternatives --remove x-session-manager /usr/bin/openbox-session
+ rm -f /var/lib/openbox/debian-menu.xml
+ ;;
esac
#DEBHELPER#
--- openbox-3.4.6.1.orig/debian/openbox.preinst
+++ openbox-3.4.6.1/debian/openbox.preinst
@@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
+#!/bin/sh -e
+
+if [ $1 = upgrade ]; then
+update-alternatives --remove x-window-manager /usr/bin/openbox-session
+fi
+
+#DEBHELPER#
+
+exit 0
Bug#447372: stardict: FTBFS: stardict_espeak.cpp:89: error: at this point in file
Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Strange, I can build the package without problem on my i386 sid even
with pbuilder.
Looks like I accidently enabled espeak in last upload. I think I should
actually disable it in next upload. But it still worth a try with the
attached patch from upstream author.
Could you please apply that attached dpatch and test a again for me?
Cheers,
-Andrew
#! /bin/sh /usr/share/dpatch/dpatch-run
## 05_espeak.dpatch by [EMAIL PROTECTED]
##
## All lines beginning with `## DP:' are a description of the patch.
## DP: No description.
@DPATCH@
diff -urNad stardict-3.0.0~/src/mainwin.cpp stardict-3.0.0/src/mainwin.cpp
--- stardict-3.0.0~/src/mainwin.cpp 2007-09-04 02:42:10.0 +0800
+++ stardict-3.0.0/src/mainwin.cpp 2007-10-23 16:49:30.0 +0800
@@ -2663,9 +2663,6 @@
oTextWin.Create(vbox1);
gtk_paned_pack2(GTK_PANED(hpaned), vbox1, TRUE, FALSE);
- int pos=conf-get_int_at(main_window/hpaned_pos);
- gtk_paned_set_position(GTK_PANED(hpaned), pos);
-
oTransWin.Create(notebook);
}
diff -urNad stardict-3.0.0~/src/stardict.cpp stardict-3.0.0/src/stardict.cpp
--- stardict-3.0.0~/src/stardict.cpp2007-09-04 02:42:10.0 +0800
+++ stardict-3.0.0/src/stardict.cpp 2007-10-23 16:49:30.0 +0800
@@ -362,6 +362,8 @@
gtk_widget_realize(window);
gdk_notify_startup_complete();
}
+ int pos=conf-get_int_at(main_window/hpaned_pos);
+ gtk_paned_set_position(GTK_PANED(oMidWin.hpaned), pos);
if (oLibs.has_dict() || conf-get_bool_at(network/enable_netdict)) {
if (queryword) {
diff -urNad
stardict-3.0.0~/stardict-plugins/stardict-espeak-tts-plugin/stardict_espeak.cpp
stardict-3.0.0/stardict-plugins/stardict-espeak-tts-plugin/stardict_espeak.cpp
---
stardict-3.0.0~/stardict-plugins/stardict-espeak-tts-plugin/stardict_espeak.cpp
2007-09-04 02:42:10.0 +0800
+++
stardict-3.0.0/stardict-plugins/stardict-espeak-tts-plugin/stardict_espeak.cpp
2007-10-23 16:49:30.0 +0800
@@ -86,7 +86,7 @@
bool stardict_tts_plugin_init(StarDictTtsPlugInObject *obj)
{
- espeak_Initialize(AUDIO_OUTPUT_PLAYBACK, 0, NULL);
+ espeak_Initialize(AUDIO_OUTPUT_PLAYBACK, 0, NULL, 0);
std::string res = get_cfg_filename();
if (!g_file_test(res.c_str(), G_FILE_TEST_EXISTS)) {
g_file_set_contents(res.c_str(), [espeak]\nvoice=\n, -1,
NULL);
Bug#358310: (no subject)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 The fix_intltool.dpatch works fine, and already included in upstream. Now this bug is pending for libchewing3 pass the NEW queue. Thanks for everyone who helped on this. - -Andrew -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFElkYunQYz4bYlCYURAulWAKCgHzG/0NXYn4vGnSnKMrIYjccS+ACfcLiy pZ1z1Kcd+yLKxh3dsARLypQ= =VZET -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#358310:
fix_intltool.dpatch Description: Binary data If someone who can reproduce the build loop, please try the attached patch. TIA -Andrew
Bug#358310: Strange build loops in scim-chewing
Dear folks, We have a trouble on building new version of scim-chewing. It builds on my machine both on system and pbuilder, but it fails which has an infinite loop in po/ directory on my sponsor's system, and I cannot reproduce it. We were thinking of the problem is in rules file that rebuilds the build system(with autogen.sh), but later my sponsor found this build loop also reproduced on an original upstream tarball[1]. We also found ubuntu has the same problem in earlier version (0.2.1-2ubuntu3), and they made a quick dirty fix[2] directly to the diff.gz. I think Debian shouldn't get over with a quick dirty fix, so we won't upload without a real fix. I need people to help me figure out what is real need to fix. I am looking for someone who can reproduce the build loop in upstream build system and in the earlier version with a patch which I attached earlier in #358310. [1] http://chewing.csie.net/download/scim/scim-chewing-0.3.0.tar.gz [2] http://people.ubuntu.com/~scott/patches/scim-chewing/scim- chewing_0.2.1-2ubuntu4_unknown.patch Thanks in advance. -Andrew -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#358310: FTBFS: @LIBTOOL_EXPORT_OPTIONS@: No such file or directory
在 2006/5/17 下午 7:02 時，Pierre HABOUZIT 寫到： ping, any progress here ? we have an RC bug that could have been solved 1 month ago rotting, that's not good. Do you have anything coming ? I have been working on several other important issues with upstream authors, and I known they will make a new release soon. So I didn't want to bother my sponsor too much. New libchewing 0.3.0 and scim-chewing 0.3.0 just released three days ago. New package has been prepared yesterday and uploaded to apt.debian.org.tw for experienced users to test. I will send a request to my sponsor if no problem reported from experienced users until this afternoon. Thank you for your concerned and sorry for causing you alarm. -Andrew
Bug#358310: FTBFS: @LIBTOOL_EXPORT_OPTIONS@: No such file or directory
在 2006/4/20 下午 8:16 時，Martin Michlmayr 寫到： * Christoph Berg [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-04-20 13:08]: When adding this patch, it still fails: creating chewing-imengine-setup.la /bin/sed: can't read /usr/lib/libXcursor.la: No such file or directory No, that's just a temporary X.Org problem. Thanks for this hint. I was going to try it with pbuilder, now, seems I don't need to do that. :) I am still working on the broken HanyuPinyin mapping table with upstream author, hopefully we can fix the HanyuPinyin table as well in next upload, shortly. -Andrew
Bug#358310: FTBFS: @LIBTOOL_EXPORT_OPTIONS@: No such file or directory
tag 358310 +patch Thanks Martin Michlmayr wrote: [...] mips-linux-gnu-g++: @LIBTOOL_EXPORT_OPTIONS@: No such file or directory make[3]: *** [chewing.la] Error 1 The attchment is a patch from Hou ZhengPeng [EMAIL PROTECTED] which solve this problem. -Andrew diff -ruNad scim-chewing-0.2.1.orig/configure.ac scim-chewing-0.2.1/configure.ac --- scim-chewing-0.2.1.orig/configure.ac2006-02-28 15:40:43.0 +0800 +++ scim-chewing-0.2.1/configure.ac 2006-02-28 15:42:52.0 +0800 @@ -76,6 +76,7 @@ # libtool option to control which symbols are exported # right now, symbols starting with _ are not exported LIBTOOL_EXPORT_OPTIONS='-export-symbols-regex ^[[^_]].*' +AC_SUBST(LIBTOOL_EXPORT_OPTIONS) # Extra args. AC_ARG_ENABLE(debug,
Bug#328209: [Vserver] Re: Bug#328209: [PATCH] Fix syscall number detection
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 found 328209 0.30.204-5sarge2 tags +patch thanks Ola Lundqvist wrote: I'm aware of this problem. Not really sure that it should be considered grave but as we have a solution to it I do not really bother. I considered it as grave beause util-vserver package in sarge is unuseable on all non-i386 machines(It should be FTBFS, but it compiled on the buildd). The attached patch is a backported from Bertl's delta-0.30.208-fix03-fix04-hack.diff to sarge, it fixs the syscall number detection on no vserver patched kernel. - -Andrew -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDYelwnQYz4bYlCYURAuH3AKDV3WAX9jDVw2HkTxD/xXnl77JTcQCffzKz rrqj2294Tjm48Jt2pJ8vIN8= =AD3H -END PGP SIGNATURE- diff -urN util-vserver-0.30.204.orig/configure util-vserver-0.30.204/configure --- util-vserver-0.30.204.orig/configure2005-02-16 07:14:42.0 +0800 +++ util-vserver-0.30.204/configure 2005-10-28 16:42:17.166831216 +0800 @@ -23746,8 +23746,11 @@ ac_compiler_gnu=$ac_cv_c_compiler_gnu cat conftest.$ac_ext _ACEOF - +#if (ENSC_MARK == alternative) +#include vserver-syscall-def.h +#else #include asm/unistd.h +#endif #ifdef __NR_vserver ensc_syscall_tmp_nr=__NR_vserver; ensc_syscall_tmp_src=ENSC_MARK @@ -23757,6 +23760,8 @@ ensc_syscall_tmp_nr= ensc_syscall_tmp_src= test $ensc_syscall_tmp_nr || \ + eval $($CPP $CPPFLAGS -D ENSC_MARK='alternative' -Ilib conftest.c | $EGREP '^ensc_syscall_tmp_(nr=[1-9][0-9]*;|src=.*)$') + test $ensc_syscall_tmp_nr || \ eval $($CPP $CPPFLAGS -D ENSC_MARK='glibc' conftest.c | $EGREP '^ensc_syscall_tmp_(nr=[1-9][0-9]*;|src=.*)$') test $ensc_syscall_tmp_nr || \ eval $($CPP $CPPFLAGS -D ENSC_MARK='kernel' -I $ensc_cv_path_kernelheaders conftest.c | $EGREP '^ensc_syscall_tmp_(nr=[1-9][0-9]*;|src=.*)$') @@ -23878,7 +23883,7 @@ echo $as_me: failed program was: 5 sed 's/^/| /' conftest.$ac_ext 5 -ensc_cv_test_syscall=traditional +ensc_cv_test_syscall=alternative fi rm -f conftest.err conftest.$ac_objext conftest.$ac_ext diff -urN util-vserver-0.30.204.orig/lib/syscall-wrap.h util-vserver-0.30.204/lib/syscall-wrap.h --- util-vserver-0.30.204.orig/lib/syscall-wrap.h 1970-01-01 08:00:00.0 +0800 +++ util-vserver-0.30.204/lib/syscall-wrap.h2005-10-28 16:40:36.884076512 +0800 @@ -0,0 +1,42 @@ +// $Id: syscall-wrap.h,v 1.2 2005/05/02 21:42:05 ensc Exp $--*- c -*-- + +// Copyright (C) 2005 Enrico Scholz [EMAIL PROTECTED] +// +// This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify +// it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by +// the Free Software Foundation; version 2 of the License. +// +// This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, +// but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of +// MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the +// GNU General Public License for more details. +// +// You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License +// along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software +// Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place - Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307, USA. + + +#ifndef H_UTIL_VSERVER_LIB_SYSCALL_WRAP_H +#define H_UTIL_VSERVER_LIB_SYSCALL_WRAP_H + +#ifdef ENSC_USE_ALTERNATIVE_SYSCALL_MACROS + +# undef _syscall0 +# undef _syscall1 +# undef _syscall2 +# undef _syscall3 +# undef _syscall4 +# undef _syscall5 +# undef _syscall6 +# undef _syscall7 + +# include syscall-alternative.h +# include vserver-syscall-def.h +#else + +# include sys/syscall.h +# include syscall.h +# include unistd.h +#endif + +#endif // H_UTIL_VSERVER_LIB_SYSCALL_WRAP_H diff -urN util-vserver-0.30.204.orig/lib/vserver-internal.h util-vserver-0.30.204/lib/vserver-internal.h --- util-vserver-0.30.204.orig/lib/vserver-internal.h 2004-09-23 05:48:24.0 +0800 +++ util-vserver-0.30.204/lib/vserver-internal.h2005-10-28 16:40:36.886076208 +0800 @@ -225,9 +225,7 @@ return syscall(__NR_vserver, cmd, id, data); } #else -inline static UNUSED ALWAYSINLINE -_syscall3(int, vserver, - uint32_t, cmd, uint32_t, id, void *, data) +#include vserver-syscall-def.h #endif #endif diff -urN util-vserver-0.30.204.orig/lib/vserver-syscall-def.h util-vserver-0.30.204/lib/vserver-syscall-def.h --- util-vserver-0.30.204.orig/lib/vserver-syscall-def.h1970-01-01 08:00:00.0 +0800 +++ util-vserver-0.30.204/lib/vserver-syscall-def.h 2005-10-28 16:40:36.887076056 +0800 @@ -0,0 +1,48 @@ + +#include stdint.h + +#include syscall.h + +#ifdefined(__alpha__) +#define __NR_vserver 428 +#elif defined(__arm__) +#define __NR_vserver 313 +#elif defined(__cris__) +#define __NR_vserver 273 +#elif defined(__frv__)
Bug#329090: util-vserver: barrier not working, but chroot escape does
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Dear Micah, Thank you for your tests, I have downloaded the testfs-0.11.sh and did the similar tests as yours to help confirm the results. Test #1 Using all debian sarge componants: kernel-source: 2.4.27-10 (debian sarge) util-vserver: 0.30-204-5sarge2 (debian sarge) kernel-patch: 1.9.5.3 (debian sarge) 103, 104, 106, 109, 121, 122 all fail on ext2, not 114 or 124 as your tests show. Conclusion: either the fixes to testfs caused error 114 and 124 to go away, or you have a different kernel-source or kernel-patch applied. Either try again with testfs.sh-0.11 or install the latest sarge kernel source and kernel-patch-vserver as those versions are all that matter here. I am using all deian sarge componats, all the same version as yours, and then did the testfs.sh-0.11 by this way(I've setup a loopback file on /dev/loop0 already), before start the testfs.sh-0.11, I confirmed the barrier has proper setup(I also did this in my other tests later): # ls -lda /var/lib/vservers d- 8 root root 4096 Oct 13 15:37 /var/lib/vservers/ # showattr -d /var/lib/vservers/ - ---BU-- /var/lib/vservers/ # lsattr -d /var/lib/vservers - ---t- /var/lib/vservers # ./testfs.sh-0.11 -l -t -D /dev/loop0 -M /mnt Linux-VServer FS Test [V0.10] Copyright (C) 2005 H.Poetzl Linux 2.4.27-10vserver-confirm i686/0.30.204 VCI: none (unknown) - --- testing ext2 filesystem ... [000]. xattr related tests ... [101]. [102]. [103]* [104]* [106]* [108]. [109]* [112]. [113]. [114]. [115]. [116]. [117]. [118]. [119]. [121]* [122]* [123]. [124]. [199]. - --- testing ext3 filesystem ... [000]. xattr related tests ... [101]. [102]. [103]* [104]* [106]* [108]. [109]* [112]. [113]. [114]. [115]. [116]. [117]. [118]. [119]. [121]* [122]* [123]. [124]. [199]. Same fails as you got, and I guess Bertl forgot to change the version in the script, so the script is still showing [V0.10]. I also tested the exploit: # ./rootesc Exploit seems to work. =) # And then I can be able to access the host, for example, I can see the vserver's config file on host: # ls -ald /etc/vservers /var/lib/vservers/ drwxr-xr-x 4 root root 4096 Sep 22 14:10 /etc/vservers d- 8 root root 4096 Oct 13 15:37 /var/lib/vservers/ Test #2 Using only debian sarge util-vserver: kernel-source: 2.4.31 (upstream) util-vserver: 0.30-204-5sarge2 (debian sarge) kernel-patch: 1.2.10 (upstream) 103, 104, 106, 109, 121, 122 all fail on ext2, the same as failed using all debian sarge componants in test #1. Conclusion: based on the results from this test, and the previous, it is clear that the debian kernel source and the debian kernel patch dont make a difference here Same here, I am using the vanilla kernel 2.4.31(from kernel.org) vserver patch 1.2.10 (upstream) util-vserver: 0.30-204-5sarge2 (debian sarge) ./testfs.sh-0.11 -l -t -D /dev/loop0 -M /mnt Linux-VServer FS Test [V0.10] Copyright (C) 2005 H.Poetzl Linux 2.4.31-vs1.2.10 i686/0.30.204 VCI: none (unknown) - --- testing ext2 filesystem ... [000]. xattr related tests ... [101]. [102]. [103]* [104]* [106]* [108]. [109]* [112]. [113]. [114]. [115]. [116]. [117]. [118]. [119]. [121]* [122]* [123]. [124]. [199]. - --- testing ext3 filesystem ... [000]. xattr related tests ... [101]. [102]. [103]* [104]* [106]* [108]. [109]* [112]. [113]. [114]. [115]. [116]. [117]. [118]. [119]. [121]* [122]* [123]. [124]. [199]. Same result as you got, seems the testfs #1 and #2 shows no difference, but the exploit works on #1's setup, not on #2. # ./rootesc cd ..: Permission denied chmod: Operation not permitted cd ..: Permission denied chmod: Operation not permitted (alternating a few times) then the false: Exploit seems to work. =) (because it always shows this line, actually it failed, but nobody bothered to fix up the exploit bug) Test #3 Using debian sarge componants with upstream util-vserver: kernel-source: 2.4.27-10 (debian sarge) util-vserver: 0.30-208+fix03 (upstream) kernel-patch: 1.9.5.3 (debian sarge) Only test 106 fails... Not 104, 114, 122 or 124. Conclusion: either the fixes to testfs caused 104, 114, 122, 124 to go away or you have a different kernel-source or kernel-patch applied, try with testfs.sh-0.11 to see, or just try with a current sarge kernel and patch since that is all that matters here. In your test #3, you used the 0.30-208+fix03 from upstream, and I am using the one from sid, let's see any difference: I upgrade the util-vserver from sid on sarge(libc6 libc6-dev locales are also to be upgraded). These are the messages I got: Setting up util-vserver (0.30.208-3) ... Installing new version of config file /etc/init.d/rebootmgr ... Installing new version of config file /etc/init.d/vprocunhide ... Installing new version of config file /etc/init.d/vservers-legacy ... /var/lib/vservers: Operation not permitted For the error message, I don't know what is wrong in postinst script, but after I looked at the
Bug#329090: util-vserver: barrier not working, but chroot escape does
Hi Ola,在 2005/10/3 上午 1:54 時，Ola Lundqvist 寫到：How did you tested and found what kind of security problem?I assume you found you couldn't pass the test 109,121 of testfs.sh script, right? Actually I run the rootesc program and saw that it was possible toescape.I think the rootesc program is only working for the bug in 2.4 kernel patches in Debian, for other fails in testfs.sh, I guess probably needs other exploit.I have upgraded to 0.30.208-2, I still got the same fails on i386, but no errors on powerpc after I rebuilt the util-vserver package from source. Ahh now I see. Missed that you used different architectures in yourtesting.Yes, that's why I have another powerpc related bug report.Sorry for the confusion, I will help to test on i386 and powerpc for you.I wonder why it do not fail after your rebuild. Maybe it passonly if I compile on a vserver patched system...Could you please confirm this?Maybe, I should recompile the kernel patch+tools on i386 with a vserver 2.0 patched system, cause I got fails on 2.6.12 and util-vserver 0.30.208-2 from sid still, but all pass with same version from sid on powerpc after a rebuild of util-vserver package.-Andrew
Bug#329090: util-vserver: barrier not working, but chroot escape does
Hi Ola,
在 2005/10/3 上午 3:39 時，Ola Lundqvist 寫到：
Now I have run the entire test suite...
zircone:/srv/vservers/labradorit/root# ./testfs.sh -l -t -D /dev/
loop4 -M /mnt/t
Linux-VServer FS Test [V0.09] Copyright (C) 2005 H.Poetzl
Linux 2.4.27-mppe+ctx+vlan-686-smp i686/0.30.204
VCI: none (unknown)
Sorry, it's my fault again, I didn't mention all the steps.
You should make a loopback file and run losetup /dev/loop4
loopbackfile before run the testfs.sh script.
The VCI shouldn't be none if you have setup /dev/loop4 correctly, I
did same thing and got same errors when I forgot to setup the /dev/
loop4 after a reboot.
Here is what I did for create a loopback file and the run losetup:
# dd bs=1024k count=1024 if=/dev/zero of=1gb.testfile
# losetup /dev/loop4 1gb.testfs
Note: I have other loopback files running on /dev/loop{0,1,2,3}
already, so I use /dev/loop4 in my case.
Very sorry for made your confused. Could you please test it again?
I think the testfs.sh script will give you information of VCI and do
the real checks on each task after you setup /dev/loop4 correctly.
If the testfs.sh give you fails on 109 and 121, that can confirm this
is bug.
For other fails, you may ask Bertl, cause upstream author knows much
more than me, also much better than I forward your questions to him. :)
I suggest to put or mention these test tasks in util-vserver package
for our users to make sure the vserver patch+tools work properly.
Should I create another report as wistlist or only mentioned here is
enough?
Regards,
-Andrew
Bug#329090: util-vserver: barrier not working, but chroot escape does
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Ola Lundqvist wrote: I do not have access to a 2.6 kernel patched with vserver but I can check on a patched 2.4 kernel with old style patch. Okay, I have a machine running 2.6 kernel patched with vserver 2.0, so what can I help you on 2.6 kernel patched with vserver? I have tried and successed escape from vserver's guest by using the expolits[2], and failed on the test of testfs.sh script[1], could you please do both tests on your 2.4 kernel patched with old style patch to confirm the is really a security problem. [1] http://vserver.13thfloor.at/Stuff/SCRIPT/testfs.sh-0.09 [2] http://vserver.13thfloor.at/Stuff/rootesc.c Regards, - -Andrew -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDOjx8nQYz4bYlCYURArJNAKC+Z05GtpBdyrvA4g8t8GwM0hbq/wCgjA9N a4LSt5deo0o/oFLB1Ta2hnU= =AX4d -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#329090: util-vserver: barrier not working, but chroot escape does
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Ola Lundqvist wrote: Is util-vserver from sid necessary for this or is it just the kernel patch that is needed to fix it? Not sure yet, I have successed passed the test of testfs.sh script on powerpc with util-vserver from sid(applied the fix02 patch myself) and linux-source-2.6.12-6+kernel-patch-vserver-2.0, but never successed on i386. Could you please run the same test as I did on your side to see if you can reproduce the error or not? The upstream author said the test the 109 verifies that barrier was removed correctly, while the test 121 checks that it was set correctly. So I think these are potential security holes in current version of util-vserver in Debian, not only in sarge. - -Andrew -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDN4qHnQYz4bYlCYURAro0AKDVTVqeNMxqZGFdqubzRYdj0XGeJgCfbTov RCtQEjqiYqWhtw/jed0olFg= =kZ9k -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#329087: kernel-patch-vserver: be able to do chroot escape
Package: kernel-patch-vserver Severity: critical Tags: sarge Justification: root security hole Dear maintainer(s), I found the kernel-patch-vserver and util-vserver in sarge can not pass the testfs.sh script[1] which provide by upstream author. After some more tests, upstream author discoveryed this is a security hole. Here is what I did in my test: # ls -lda /var/lib/vservers//.. d- 8 root root 4096 Sep 19 19:46 /var/lib/vservers//../ # showattr -d /var/lib/vservers//.. ---BU-- /var/lib/vservers//.. # lsattr -d /var/lib/vservers//.. ---t- /var/lib/vservers//.. ssh into a guest and then starting the root exploit[2] inside a guest now gives: Exploit seems to work. =) And then I can be able to access the host, can be able to read /etc/shadow and can be able to create /test.txt in the host. [1] http://vserver.13thfloor.at/Stuff/SCRIPT/testfs.sh-0.09 [2] http://vserver.13thfloor.at/Stuff/rootesc.c -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers stable APT policy: (500, 'stable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.4.27-10vserver Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#329090: util-vserver: barrier not working, but chroot escape does
Package: util-vserver Version: 0.30.204-5sarge2 Severity: critical Tags: sarge Justification: root security hole Dear Ola, I found the util-vserver in sarge can not pass the test 109 and 121 of testfs.sh script[1] which provide by upstream author. After more tests, upstream author discoveried this is a security hole. 109 verifies that barrier was removed correctly, while 121 checks that it was set correctly. This bug is kernel-patch-vserver related, I have filed a bug to kernel-patch-vserver that you may have a look. Here is what I did in my tests: # dd bs=1024k count=1024 if=/dev/zero of=1gb.test # losetup /dev/loop4 ./1gb.test # ./testfs.sh -l -t -D /dev/loop4 -M /mnt [1] http://vserver.13thfloor.at/Stuff/SCRIPT/testfs.sh-0.09 PS. I confirmed the kernel-patch-vserver + linux-source-2.6.12 + util-vserver in sid are passed the test of testfs.sh -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers stable APT policy: (500, 'stable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.4.27-10vserver Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Versions of packages util-vserver depends on: ii iproute 20041019-3 Professional tools to control the ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-22 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libgcc1 1:3.4.3-13 GCC support library ii libstdc++5 1:3.3.5-13 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 ii net-tools 1.60-10 The NET-3 networking toolkit util-vserver recommends no packages. -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#300692: scim: Incomplete dependency
Package: scim Version: 1.0.2-2 Severity: serious Tags: patch Justification: Policy 5.6.9. Dear maintainer(s), I knew only one DD for help uploading package is not enought, and I am very appreciate that he has done so much for scim package. I hope more DD will stand up for helping on pkg-ime project. :-) The scim-chewing is listed in Suggests, but doesn't exist in Debian pool yet. The scim-chewing is an intelligent ZhuYin(bopomofo) input method for SCIM which people mostly used in Taiwan. So it is very an very important package for our Debian users. It depends on libchewing package which the new version of im-sdk package depends on it too. Now, the libchewing and scim-chewing are both available on: svn://svn.debian.org/pkg-ime/ Please consider to make this as a RC bug, otherwise it will be impossible to see chewing included in Sarge. Thank you in advance. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.4.27-2-686-smp Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Versions of packages scim depends on: ii libatk1.0-0 1.8.0-4 The ATK accessibility toolkit ii libc62.3.2.ds1-20GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libgcc1 1:3.4.3-6 GCC support library ii libglib2.0-0 2.6.3-1 The GLib library of C routines ii libgtk2.0-0 2.6.2-3 The GTK+ graphical user interface ii libpango1.0-01.8.1-1 Layout and rendering of internatio ii libstdc++5 1:3.3.5-8 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 ii libx11-6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-10 X Window System protocol client li ii xlibs4.3.0.dfsg.1-10 X Keyboard Extension (XKB) configu -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
