Bug#652534: mediatomb-common: Uninstallable due to missing/wrong dependencies
I also see this and I didn't know upstream was dead, it always seemed like a useful project. It appears that downstream is dead as well (Grave bug around three weeks, no response.). If it should be removed from Debian, what's a good and supported alternative? -- Antony -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#635879: msva-perl: restarting kills awesome session
Worst of all, the dialog defaults to Yes, so when it pops up a split second after one types Enter in another window... You get the picture. I uninstalled the package as it was so annoying, but really I feel that the default should be No, at least until other underlying bugs are fixed. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#446405: ardour: Embeds too many libs
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, It's a shame this hasn't been looked at yet. I hope ardour makes it into Lenny. I have been doing a little research into this, and according to http://ardour.org/building, there is: SYSLIBS USE AT YOUR OWN RISK: CANCELS ALL SUPPORT FROM ARDOUR AUTHORS. Use existing system versions of various libraries instead of internal ones (yes|no) I don't know if this works well yet, as I can't build ardour currently due to a bug in scons, but it might be worth considering. Also of course, is it more important to have upstream support or Debian security support? It appears that it will have to be either one or the other. Alternatively, I suppose that the Debian version could use SYSLIBS=yes, and if bugs are reported, Debian would have to replicate them on a SYSLIBS=no version before reporting them to upstream. Antony -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFIPpgpdt451jNP7ekRAnWWAJ9pjpJlrPPVQj3e7TmTPQdoXZiwmQCfUl+z bjoaLVRNMBtE/HXI8hEMY1s= =n3kE -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#446405: ardour: Embeds too many libs
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Daniel James wrote: Hi Antony, It's a shame this hasn't been looked at yet. I hope ardour makes it into Lenny. Various people are working on this - the latest plan is to get a new release of libsndfile upstream, so that Ardour doesn't need to embed a copy. Okay, I missed the discussion on it - too many mailing lists to keep up with. libsndfile isn't the only library that is affected of course, there are several others, is the same activity taking place, to integrate patches with those? is it more important to have upstream support or Debian security support? We're aiming for both :-) Great! Antony -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFIPqWWdt451jNP7ekRAn9/AJ4iDZZZQjQdbqxph82eDJ1zgQdoCgCdGO0W 86t2Igpu753l83WiBzdXFqs= =7VGU -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#446405: ardour: Embeds too many libs
Daniel James wrote: Hi Antony, libsndfile isn't the only library that is affected of course, there are several others Right. is the same activity taking place, to integrate patches with those? Hopefully we can tackle those one-by-one after libsndfile is sorted out. Indeed, please let me know if there is anything I can do to help. Antony -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#422728: [Pkg-ltsp-devel] Bug#422728: ltsp-server-standalone: apt reports a packagecrash if i want to install the ltsp-utils package.
Jonathan Dumke wrote: Package: ltsp-server-standalone Version: 0.99debian12 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable If I want to install the ltsp-utils package additionally to ltsp-server-standalone, apt refuses this wish and says that this packages can't be installes together and I can not checkout why? ltsp-utils is LTSP4. ltsp-server-standalone is LTSP5. The utilities in the former can break the latter. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#399957: zope-cmfforum: Breaks my folder and probably other things
Package: zope-cmfforum Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Hi, Simply having this package installed (on a clean Etch install) causes: Site error This site encountered an error trying to fulfill your request. The errors were: Error Type TypeError Error Value queryCatalog() takes no arguments (3 given) Request made at 2006/11/23 10:17:38.536 Universal ... when I try to access my folder. If this doesn't work, it probably breaks lots of stuff. According to http://www.contentmanagementsoftware.info/plone/CMFForum/ version 1.0.0 is out which may or may not fix the problem. I don't know - I'm going to try ploneboard or plonegossip instead (sadly not in Debian yet). Either way, please don't release this in Etch. It seems to be really old-hat and things have moved on. Is the Debian Zope team active? Could you use some help? Antony -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.17-2-686 Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#367973: Twiki - about to miss a release?
I haven't cc'd the bug 367973 that this comes from - Steve if you want the background please see http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=367973 and http://bugs.debian.org/twiki. Sven Dowideit: its stuff like this that just keeps depressing me into not finishing the work i do packaging twiki for debian. Stuff like what? I think Thijs's point is that you appear to not be doing much, for whatever reason, and twiki is going to miss another release which is a shame and inconvenience for users. There is a 247-day old bug relating to the latest release last February, and you haven't even acknowledged it. your officiousness is a joy, ta. same sort of thing as when just before the last debian release came out, and some one helpfully filed an un-reproducible RC bug, that didn't happen for anyone else, but no debian developer came out to help. you guys really truly don't want help from people outside your klic do you. I'm not really sure what you're complaining about. Please maintain the package or RFA it. If you are maintaining it, it certainly looks like you aren't. -- Antony Gelberg | Open Source Consultancy Wayforth | Software Development 020 7247 1011 | Website Design http://www.wayforth.co.uk | Peace-of-mind Support -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#379177: zope-plonearticle: Site error when adding or editing
Package: zope-plonearticle Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable This is for v3.2.0-2 on a testing (etch) box. I have an out-of-the-box plone-site. When I install plone article (with help from http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=339049), and add an article to my folder, I get: Site error This site encountered an error trying to fulfill your request. The errors were: Error Type TypeError Error Value iteration over non-sequence Request made at 2006/07/22 00:59:42.888 GMT+1 If I go up a level, then down into the article, then click edit, the same occurs. Please advise if you need any more info. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.15.1.20060102 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
