Bug#430118: libxml-sax-perl blocks two other packages
Damyan Ivanov wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 - -=| Gerfried Fuchs, 23.08.2007 15:18 |=- Any news on this bugreport? I don't see any reply to Niko's mail since last month, don't forget that it is a RC bug. I gave this a try, but all this XML::SAX is so black magic. I tried to understand what is going on but got so confused that I am no longer sure if I want to get that much into it. Anyway, I imported the sources into pkg-perl's SVN repository so other group members (or even better, the present maintainer) can go further. BTW, the group's SVN is open to all DDs... It still hinders slony1 to transition to testing too, which is a bit of a PITA because the new version uses postgresql-8.2 where the one in testing is still using postgresql-8.1, which AIUI is expected to get removed. Yeah, it is a pity that this package is not in good shape. Let me take a look at it this weekend. Since I put this black magic together (that is, the Debian aspects of it), I should be able to bring this package back from the dark side. Thanks, Ardo -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#328749: package installation fails with teTeX 3.0
Frank K??ster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Ardo van Rangelrooij [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Frank K??ster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Frank K?ster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: tags 328749 patch thanks Hilmar Preusse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Your package fails to install, when one has teTeX 3.0 from experimental installed: Now that teTeX 3.0 is in unstable, this bug is RC. Here is a patch, for explanations please see the Debian TeX Policy in the tex-common package, or ask on debian-tetex-maint. Will you be able to do the upload soon? I can NMU this package - or rather I will NMU it; with a 3-day delay if you don't answer, and without delay if you give me your okay. I'll use the patch already supplied, just the changelog entry will be adjusted and close #33, too. By the way, what would be a suitable Depends version: 3.0-10 or just 3.0 or anything else? If you do not use fmtutil-sys, you don't need a specific versioned Depends - the bug was already a bug with tetex-2.0.2, but then its impact was only minor. Gotcha. Thanks, Ardo -- Ardo van Rangelrooij Debian XML/SGML Group [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://people.debian.org/~ardo/ http://debian-xml-sgml.alioth.debian.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#328749: [xml/sgml-pkgs] Bug#328749: package installation fails with teTeX 3.0
Frank K??ster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Ardo van Rangelrooij [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm done with all the fixes but when installing I'm getting the following message: Warning: fmtutil is being run as root; fmtutil-sys should probably be used instead. If this is done by a Debian package upon installation, upgrade, or removal, please file a bug against that package. How do we handle this? This is exactly the warning about the backward compatibility hack that we introduced. Just ignore it for the time being, but keep in mind that as soon as tetex-3.0 enters testing, you should switch from fmtutil to fmtutil-sys. Gotcha. I've got some more questions regarding xmltex and the way it's packaged for Debian, but I'll get back to you with those later. Thanks for all the help! Thanks, Ardo -- Ardo van Rangelrooij Debian XML/SGML Group [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://people.debian.org/~ardo/ http://debian-xml-sgml.alioth.debian.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#328749: [xml/sgml-pkgs] Bug#328749: package installation fails with teTeX 3.0
Frank K??ster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Ardo van Rangelrooij [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Frank K??ster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Ardo van Rangelrooij [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm done with all the fixes but when installing I'm getting the following message: Warning: fmtutil is being run as root; fmtutil-sys should probably be used instead. If this is done by a Debian package upon installation, upgrade, or removal, please file a bug against that package. How do we handle this? This is exactly the warning about the backward compatibility hack that we introduced. Just ignore it for the time being, but keep in mind that as soon as tetex-3.0 enters testing, you should switch from fmtutil to fmtutil-sys. Gotcha. I've got some more questions regarding xmltex and the way it's packaged for Debian, but I'll get back to you with those later. Have you read the Debian TeX Policy draft, which is included in the tex-common package? Not yet, but I'll definitely do that. Thanks, Ardo -- Ardo van Rangelrooij Debian XML/SGML Group [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://people.debian.org/~ardo/ http://debian-xml-sgml.alioth.debian.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#328749: package installation fails with teTeX 3.0
Frank K??ster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Frank K?ster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: tags 328749 patch thanks Hilmar Preusse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Your package fails to install, when one has teTeX 3.0 from experimental installed: Now that teTeX 3.0 is in unstable, this bug is RC. Here is a patch, for explanations please see the Debian TeX Policy in the tex-common package, or ask on debian-tetex-maint. Will you be able to do the upload soon? I can NMU this package - or rather I will NMU it; with a 3-day delay if you don't answer, and without delay if you give me your okay. I'll use the patch already supplied, just the changelog entry will be adjusted and close #33, too. By the way, what would be a suitable Depends version: 3.0-10 or just 3.0 or anything else? Thanks, Ardo -- Ardo van Rangelrooij Debian XML/SGML Group [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://people.debian.org/~ardo/ http://debian-xml-sgml.alioth.debian.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#328749: [xml/sgml-pkgs] Bug#328749: package installation fails with teTeX 3.0
Ardo van Rangelrooij ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Frank K??ster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Ardo van Rangelrooij [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Frank K??ster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Frank K?ster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: tags 328749 patch thanks Hilmar Preusse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Your package fails to install, when one has teTeX 3.0 from experimental installed: Now that teTeX 3.0 is in unstable, this bug is RC. Here is a patch, for explanations please see the Debian TeX Policy in the tex-common package, or ask on debian-tetex-maint. Will you be able to do the upload soon? I can NMU this package - or rather I will NMU it; with a 3-day delay if you don't answer, and without delay if you give me your okay. I'll use the patch already supplied, just the changelog entry will be adjusted and close #33, too. Hi, I'll take care of of both bugs. That's very good. Regarding my patch, I thought about it and there is one change I would rather revert: The change from calling fmtutil to fmtutil-sys. We have temporarily introduced a backward-compatibility hack, so that fmtutil will continue to work for a while. On the other hand, fmtutil-sys is not available in the teTeX version in testing. I suggest to stay with plain fmtutil, let xmltex (and all other packages that needed fixes for teTeX-3.0) migrate to testing, and then I'll remove tetex-base's dummy bug and let itself go into testing. Ok, I'll patch the patch. I'm done with all the fixes but when installing I'm getting the following message: Warning: fmtutil is being run as root; fmtutil-sys should probably be used instead. If this is done by a Debian package upon installation, upgrade, or removal, please file a bug against that package. How do we handle this? Thanks, Ardo -- Ardo van Rangelrooij Debian XML/SGML Group [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://people.debian.org/~ardo/ http://debian-xml-sgml.alioth.debian.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#328749: package installation fails with teTeX 3.0
Frank K??ster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Ardo van Rangelrooij [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Frank K??ster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Frank K?ster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: tags 328749 patch thanks Hilmar Preusse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Your package fails to install, when one has teTeX 3.0 from experimental installed: Now that teTeX 3.0 is in unstable, this bug is RC. Here is a patch, for explanations please see the Debian TeX Policy in the tex-common package, or ask on debian-tetex-maint. Will you be able to do the upload soon? I can NMU this package - or rather I will NMU it; with a 3-day delay if you don't answer, and without delay if you give me your okay. I'll use the patch already supplied, just the changelog entry will be adjusted and close #33, too. Hi, I'll take care of of both bugs. That's very good. Regarding my patch, I thought about it and there is one change I would rather revert: The change from calling fmtutil to fmtutil-sys. We have temporarily introduced a backward-compatibility hack, so that fmtutil will continue to work for a while. On the other hand, fmtutil-sys is not available in the teTeX version in testing. I suggest to stay with plain fmtutil, let xmltex (and all other packages that needed fixes for teTeX-3.0) migrate to testing, and then I'll remove tetex-base's dummy bug and let itself go into testing. Ok, I'll patch the patch. Thanks, Ardo -- Ardo van Rangelrooij Debian XML/SGML Group [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://people.debian.org/~ardo/ http://debian-xml-sgml.alioth.debian.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#328749: package installation fails with teTeX 3.0
Frank K??ster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Frank K?ster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: tags 328749 patch thanks Hilmar Preusse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Your package fails to install, when one has teTeX 3.0 from experimental installed: Now that teTeX 3.0 is in unstable, this bug is RC. Here is a patch, for explanations please see the Debian TeX Policy in the tex-common package, or ask on debian-tetex-maint. Will you be able to do the upload soon? I can NMU this package - or rather I will NMU it; with a 3-day delay if you don't answer, and without delay if you give me your okay. I'll use the patch already supplied, just the changelog entry will be adjusted and close #33, too. Hi, I'll take care of of both bugs. Thanks, Ardo -- Ardo van Rangelrooij Debian XML/SGML Group [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://people.debian.org/~ardo/ http://debian-xml-sgml.alioth.debian.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#262395: and yet another minor issue
Don Armstrong ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Yet another minor issue, which I found because I had both xmltex.emft and xmltex.fmt laying about... (probably pathological, but trivial to fix): XMLTEXFMT=$(kpsewhich xmltex.efmt xmltex.fmt) || true PDFXMLTEXFMT=$(kpsewhich pdfxmltex.efmt pdfxmltex.fmt) || true LOGDIR=$(dirname $(kpsewhich xmltex.efmt xmltex.fmt|head -n 1)) || true rm -f $XMLTEXFMT $PDFXMLTEXFMT # remove fmt file logs rm -f $LOGDIR/xmltex.log $LOGDIR/pdfxmltex.log Don Armstrong Don, Many thanks for the patches. I'm building a new package as we speak. Thanks, Ardo -- Ardo van Rangelrooij Debian XML/SGML Group [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://people.debian.org/~ardo/ http://debian-xml-sgml.alioth.debian.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#262395: Bug#306595: tetex-bin: postinst failure with jadetex and xmltex
Roger Leigh ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Don, I tested your latest patch against -9 on sarge/i386 and sid/ppc and it worked without problems both upgrading and installing from scratch with a clean tetex install. Not that this is any guarantee of perfection, but the patch looks clean and I couldn't see any obvious errors. Regards, Roger Hi, I just build -10 and confirm that upgrades from -8 and -9 work ok, as well as a fresh install, as well as purges after each of these. Don, thanks again for the patches. Roger, thanks for testing them. Thanks, Ardo -- Ardo van Rangelrooij Debian XML/SGML Group [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://people.debian.org/~ardo/ http://debian-xml-sgml.alioth.debian.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#262395: Bug#306595: tetex-bin: postinst failure with jadetex and xmltex
Roger Leigh ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Ardo van Rangelrooij [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I just build -10 and confirm that upgrades from -8 and -9 work ok, as well as a fresh install, as well as purges after each of these. Does the woody upgrade need testing? That might indeed not be a bad idea. If you can please do by all means. Thanks, Ardo -- Ardo van Rangelrooij Debian XML/SGML Group [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://people.debian.org/~ardo/ http://debian-xml-sgml.alioth.debian.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#295065: #295065: xsl compilation error
Matthew T. Atkinson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Package: db2latex-xsl Version: 0.8pre1-3 Followup-For: Bug #295065 Hi, I've been following the progress of this bug/fix. I also get the same error: compilation error: file /usr/share/xml/docbook/stylesheet/db2latex/latex/docbook.xsl line 66 element import xsltParseStylesheetTop: ignoring misplaced import element I read that a new package may be ready (on the 13th of Feb) -- is there any news on this new package? I'll be uploading a new package later today or tomorrow. Thanks, Ardo -- Ardo van Rangelrooij Debian XML/SGML Group [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://people.debian.org/~ardo/ http://debian-xml-sgml.alioth.debian.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
