Bug#851066: flashplugin-nonfree: Mismatch between detected and available versions (Download file not available at people.debian.org)
Perhaps, someone should contact the MIA team... https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/MIA -- Best wishes, Bob
Bug#769175: lxde: upgrading lxde causes removal of evince and gnome
control: notfound -1 4+nmu1 control: found -1 5 AFAIK, lxde depends on evince-gtk since v5, not v4+nmu1. --- Best wishes, Bob -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#763360: Bug#754988: transition: libjpeg-turbo
BTW, what a nice bunch of libjpeg source packages we currently have in Debian :) https://packages.qa.debian.org/libj/libjpeg6b.html [1] https://packages.qa.debian.org/libj/libjpeg7.html [2] https://packages.qa.debian.org/libj/libjpeg8.html https://packages.qa.debian.org/libj/libjpeg9.html https://packages.qa.debian.org/libj/libjpeg-turbo.html 2. Removed from unstable in 2012. 1. Removed from unstable on 2014-09-27 (reason: [auto-cruft] obsolete source package): https://ftp-master.debian.org/removals.txt (Shouldn't a source package removal bug had been filed in advance of that? Or maybe it's already been covered by bug #717076 current one?) Best wishes, Bob -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#759927: gr-osmosdr: FTBFS on kfreebsd
Looks like BLADERF_XB_200 etc. had not been defined there. According to the gr-osmosdr/0.1.3-1 build logs: a) kfreebsd-*, FTBFS: -- checking for module 'libbladeRF' -- found libbladeRF, version 0.14.0-0.10.7.47.ebe70c4 b) i386, built OK: -- checking for module 'libbladeRF' -- found libbladeRF, version 0.16.2-git I suppose, it's caused by outdated libbladeRF and should rebuild fine against the freshly uploaded bladerf/0.2014.09~rc2-4 [2]. [1] https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=gr-osmosdrsuite=unstable [2] https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=bladerfsuite=unstable Best wishes, Bob -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#731489: lxsession/0.4.9.2-1.1
Hello, Mateusz! You uploaded a bugfix version of lxsession (0.4.9.2-1.1) to mentors on 2014-06-05: http://mentors.debian.net/package/lxsession but it just stays on mentors since then. Maybe a request for sponsorship will help: http://bugs.debian.org/sponsorship-requests Best wishes, Bob -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#745454: [libgcrypt11] Non free RFC
control: retitle -1 [libgcrypt11] Non free RFC control: unblock 745454 by -1 Apparently, the current issue doesn't depend on GRUB to be fixed :) Best wishes, Bob -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#745454: [libgcrypt11] Non free RFC
control: unblock -1 by 745409 Now it should be right, sorry. Best wishes, Bob -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#753773: consolekit: FTBFS on kfreebsd-any
Source: consolekit Source-Version: 0.4.6-5 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) Dear Maintainer, consolekit FTBFS on 'kfreebsd-any': https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=consolekitsuite=unstable --- In file included from ck-sysdeps-freebsd.c:32:0: /usr/include/kvm.h:82:1: error: unknown type name 'uint64_t' uint64_t kvm_counter_u64_fetch(kvm_t *, u_long); ^ --- Best wishes, Bob -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#750495: syslinux: FTBFS on many arches due to missing gnu-efi build-dependency
control: reopen -1 control: tags -1 patch 2014-06-03 from Daniel Baumann: On 06/03/2014 11:26 PM, Bob Bib wrote: (Is it ever meant to work on non-x86 architectures?) no, it isn't. Then the debian/control should be corrected a little. syslinux/3:6.03~pre1+dfsg-4 has been uploaded to unstable, and this FTBFS issue blocks it from migrating to testing. Best wishes, Bob syslinux_control.diff Description: Binary data
Bug#750495: syslinux: FTBFS on many arches due to missing gnu-efi build-dependency
Source: syslinux Source-Version: 3:6.03~pre1+dfsg-4 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source Dear Maintainer, syslinux FTBFS on many architectures due to missing gnu-efi build-dependency, please check the buildd logs: http://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=syslinuxsuite=unstable http://buildd.debian-ports.org/status/package.php?p=syslinuxsuite=unstable (Is it ever meant to work on non-x86 architectures?) Best wishes, Bob -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#750382: lhasa: FTBFS on many arches due to failed tests
Package: lhasa Version: 0.2.0+git-1 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source Dear Maintainer, lhasa FTBFS due to failed tests on many architectures, please check the logs: http://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=lhasasuite=unstable http://buildd.debian-ports.org/status/package.php?p=lhasasuite=unstable Best wishes, Bob -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#747105: policykit-1: depends on systemd
2014-05-06 from Laurent Bigonville:
ConsoleKit is dead for years
I wouldn't rather call it dead for years --
v0.4.5 relesed 2011-05-02, v0.4.6 released 2013-08-19:
http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/ConsoleKit/
it's time IMVHO to start moving away from ConsoleKit
on linux architectures.
thanks for suggestion!
http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/ConsoleKit/
ConsoleKit is currently not actively maintained.
The focus has shifted to the built-in seat/user/session
management of Software/systemd called systemd-logind!
$SOURCE/NEWS
Version 0.4.6
==
NOTE: ConsoleKit is no longer actively maintained and this will most
likely be the final release. You are advised to switch to logind
now I would rather call that software deprecated
and its development stalled and discontinued.
policykit is depending against libpam-systemd
(because you need to have a logind session
for the things to work)
OK, so if we have the following changes in policykit-1 (0.105-5):
-Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, ${misc:Depends}, consolekit, dbus
+Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, ${misc:Depends}, libpam-systemd [linux-any],
consolekit [!linux-any], dbus
would you please clarify the Debian changelog entry a little?
e. g.:
- * Enable systemd support on linux architectures
+ * Switch from consolekit to systemd-logind dependency on linux architectures
Best wishes, Bob
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#726270: obconf: FTBFS in sid
Mon, 14 Oct 2013, 8:33 +02:00 from Mateusz Łukasik: Yes, my packages in mentors fix that I wonder why the following page: http://mentors.debian.net/package/obconf contains information about many different uploads of the obconf 1:2.0.4-1 package. Can you clean the unnecessary entries, or maybe it's a mentors site bug? Best wishes, Bob
Bug#722112: lxappearance-obconf: build problems
Tue, 15 Oct 2013, 9:14 +02:00 from Martin Bagge / brother: On 2013-10-15 00:03, Andrej N. Gritsenko wrote: Bob Bib has written on Monday, 14 October, at 21:35: I'm adding gi...@ubuntu.com to recipients, and would ask to release new version of lxappearance-obconf (0.2.1 or 0.3.0 by your choice) so we can release fixed one into debian too. Thank you very much. I was wrong. It should be asked not to Julien Lavergne but to Martin Bagge instead. I'm sorry. (I really should sleep better to not make so many mistakes!) Looks like I will have a productive evening indeed. menu-cache gpicview lxappearance-obconf check. Thanks, what a nice package set! (Especially long-awaited release of gpicview with proper scrolling). Did you really mean menu-cache? There's some 0.5.1 version freshly released on 2013-10-09: http://sourceforge.net/projects/lxde/files/menu-cache/menu-cache%200.5.x/ Best wishes, Bob
Bug#722112: lxappearance-obconf: build problems
Hello! Mon, 14 Oct 2013, 13:27 +03:00 from Andrej N. Gritsenko: I would rather avoid openbox 3.5.2, it has the behavior which many users would consider buggy - it places new windows always in the corner of screen, and old behavior (center of screen) isn't possible anymore. Let stay with 3.5.0 until they implement old behavior again (I hope it will be implemented in the next openbox release, they are working on it already). openbox/3.5.2-3 is currently in unstable, not in NEW queue or experimental... By the way, I've unpacked the source package, and there's some patch there, 'fix_center_window.patch' in 'debian/patches' (I haven't tested it though). Looks like the coordination between the Debian LXDE Maintainers Mateusz Łukasik needs to be improved a little: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=726338 Best wishes, Bob
Bug#726270: obconf: FTBFS in sid
Package: src:obconf Version: 1:2.0.3+20110805+debian-1 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) Dear Maintainer, obconf 1:2.0.3+20110805+debian-1 in sid currently fails to build [1, 2] against the fresh openbox-dev 3.5.2-3 due to some changes in '/usr/include/openbox/3.5/obrender/theme.h'. [1] https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=lxappearance-obconf [2] https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=lxappearance-obconfarch=amd64ver=0.2.0-4%2Bb1stamp=1381154559 Best wishes, Bob
Bug#726270: obconf: FTBFS in sid
The previous buildd links were for another packages, sorry. Here are the right ones: https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=obconf https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=obconfarch=amd64ver=1%3A2.0.3%2B20110805%2Bdebian-1%2Bb1stamp=1381154566 Mateush, your obconf 1:2.0.4-1 at mentors fixes this, I hope? Best wishes, Bob
Bug#722112: lxappearance-obconf: build problems
control: retitle -1 lxappearance-obconf: build problems Well, we have here a new transition-related build failure, an this time a more real one: https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=lxappearance-obconf https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=lxappearance-obconfarch=amd64ver=0.2.0-4%2Bb1stamp=1381154559 It can't build against the fresh openbox-dev 3.5.2-3 due to some changes in '/usr/include/openbox/3.5/obrender/theme.h'. Fortunately, it looks like fixed upstream: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailaid=3614951group_id=180858atid=894869 http://lxde.git.sourceforge.net/git/gitweb.cgi?p=lxde/lxappearance-obconf;a=commit;h=c8f0cd4270c140ad2b458b45df42ed44f08241ff Best wishes, Bob
Bug#724941: Non free src/idea.c
Package: uif2iso Version: 0.1.7a-1 Severity: serious See http://sources.debian.net/src/uif2iso/0.1.7a-1/src/idea.c?hl=72#L72 Fortunately, it seems to be actually not as terrific as it looks at a first glance. See some related sources: http://sources.debian.net/src/gnupg/1.4.15-1/cipher/idea.c http://sources.debian.net/src/libgcrypt11/1.5.3-2/cipher/idea.c I've checked the latest version, 0.1.7c (bug#700905) from here: http://aluigi.altervista.org/mytoolz.htm and it still contains bad licensing disclaimers; looks like it's preferable to contact the upstream author for clearing the licenses. Best wishes, Bob
Bug#722726: picard: Depends on missing python2
Fri, 4 Oct 2013, 21:18 +02:00 from Niels Thykier: On 2013-10-04 18:27, Bob Bib wrote: Fri, 4 Oct 2013, 15:40 +02:00 from Niels Thykier: Hi Bob (and any one else following this bug), ... Furthermore, it is my understanding that the BTS is /not/ aware of binNMU versions (i.e. the fixed in 1.2-2+b1 is ignored as well). Hi Niels, if BTS ignores binNMU versions, is it a bug or a feature?.. Hey, I think it might be a feature, but honestly not sure. And I'm not sure either. I've found only one bug report in some way related to BTS binNMUs: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=431161 Best wishes, Bob
Bug#722726: picard: Depends on missing python2
Fri, 4 Oct 2013, 15:40 +02:00 from Niels Thykier: Hi Bob (and any one else following this bug), ... Furthermore, it is my understanding that the BTS is /not/ aware of binNMU versions (i.e. the fixed in 1.2-2+b1 is ignored as well). Hi Niels, if BTS ignores binNMU versions, is it a bug or a feature?.. Best wishes, Bob
Bug#722630: picard: unsatisfiable Depends: python2
Package: picard Version: 1.2-1 Severity: serious Dear Maintainer, 'picard' depends on a non-existent 'python2' package; strangely, it's not specified explicitly in 'debian/control'. Is it a debhelper bug or something?.. Best wishes, Bob
Bug#722110: lxlauncher: unsatisfiable libmenu-cache1 (build-)depends
Package: src:lxlauncher Version: 0.2.2-3 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) Dear Maintainer, src:lxpanel build-depends on 'libmenu-cache1-dev', lxpanel depends on 'libmenu-cache1'; meanwhile, current menu-cache/0.5.0 builds only 'libmenu-cache3' 'libmenu-cache-dev'. -- System Information: Debian Release: jessie/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 3.10-2-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages lxlauncher depends on: ii libatk1.0-0 2.8.0-2 ii libc6 2.17-92 ii libcairo2 1.12.14-4 ii libfontconfig12.10.2-2 ii libfreetype6 2.4.9-1.1 ii libgdk-pixbuf2.0-02.28.2-1 ii libglib2.0-0 2.36.4-1 ii libgtk2.0-0 2.24.20-1 ii libmenu-cache10.3.3-1 ii libpango1.0-0 1.32.5-5+b1 ii libstartup-notification0 0.12-3 ii libx11-6 2:1.6.1-1 ii lxmenu-data 0.1.2-2 Versions of packages lxlauncher recommends: ii gnome-icon-theme 3.8.2-2 lxlauncher suggests no packages. -- no debconf information Best wishes, Bob
Bug#722110: lxlauncher: unsatisfiable libmenu-cache1 (build-)depends
src:lxpanel build-depends on 'libmenu-cache1-dev', lxpanel depends on 'libmenu-cache1'; I meant 'lxlauncher' instead of 'lxpanel', sorry.
Bug#722111: lxappearance: unsatisfiable build-depends libmenu-cache1-dev
Package: src:lxappearance Version: 0.5.2-1 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) Dear Maintainer, src:lxappearance build-depends on 'libmenu-cache1-dev'; meanwhile, menu-cache/0.5.0 currently provides only 'libmenu-cache-dev'. Best wishes, Bob
Bug#722112: lxappearance-obconf: unsatisfiable build-depends on libmenu-cache1-dev
Package: src:lxappearance Version: 0.2.0-4 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) Dear Maintainer, src:lxappearance-obconf build-depends on 'libmenu-cache1-dev'; meanwhile, menu-cache/0.5.0 currently provides only 'libmenu-cache-dev'. Best wishes, Bob
Bug#722112: lxappearance-obconf: unsatisfiable build-depends on libmenu-cache1-dev
control: reassign -1 src:lxappearance-obconf 0.2.0-4 Sorry again...
Bug#704019: iceweasel: Iceweasel Crashes upon loading pages using JavaScript
Gene A Grimm: Nearly every page results in immediate crash of Iceweasel between 85-95% of the time ... #4 0xa8c551a7 in ?? () from /usr/lib/flashplugin-nonfree/libflashplayer.so ... #16 0xb6dc9e9f in nsPluginHostImpl::TrySetUpPluginInstance (this=0xaac043a0, aMimeType=0xaac03c18 application/x-shockwave-flash, aURL=0xaacbd950, aOwner=0xaad38470) Please try to disable the flash player plugin and check if the problem persists. Best wishes, Bob
Bug#703468: linux-image-3.2.0-4-amd64 fails to boot on apple iMac
Thu, 28 Mar 2013 16:52:17 +1100 from Geoff Crompton: This time I did take a photo of the screen when it crashes. It's unfortunately a little blurry. The following string is still recognizable: i915_gem_init_ppgtt+0x93/0x16c [i915] Looks like something's bad with Intel graphics driver... Best wishes, Bob
Bug#699889: [Pkg-openssl-devel] Bug#699889: several issues in Security Advisory 5 Feb 2013
Hi Kurt, I've uploaded 0.9.8o-4squeeze14 to squeeze-security openssl/1.0.1e-1 changelog states the following: * New upstream version (Closes: #699889) - Fixes CVE-2013-0169, CVE-2012-2686, CVE-2013-0166 Meanwhile, openssl/0.9.8o-4squeeze14 changelog consist of the following line: * Fix CVE-2013-0166 and CVE-2013-0169 Thus, I have 2 questions: 1) is CVE-2012-2686 also fixed in openssl/0.9.8o-4squeeze14? 2) should bug#699889 be marked as fixed in openssl/0.9.8o-4squeeze14?
Bug#593607: bug #593607: pcmanfm wrongly deleted some files in a failed move operation
control: reopen -1 Why not to reopen this bug if it hasn't been fixed yet? ;)
