Bug#821463: Info received (Bug#821463:NOT fixed in chromium-browser 50.0.2661.75-2)

[Bryan Cebuliak]

Interestingly   the new  package  chromium (50.0.2661.94-1~deb8u1)
[security] does  not   have  the   Aw   snap!  in   gmailbug, unlike
the  Sid  50.0.2661.94 version.

On 1 May 2016 at 06:28, Bryan Cebuliak <bryan.cebul...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Aw snap! The   bug   persists in the  latest 50.0.2661.94 update.
>
> On 30 April 2016 at 15:12, Debian Bug Tracking System <
> ow...@bugs.debian.org> wrote:
>
>> Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding
>> this Bug report.
>>
>> This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message
>> has been received.
>>
>> Your message is being forwarded to the package maintainers and other
>> interested parties for their attention; they will reply in due course.
>>
>> Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s):
>>  Debian Chromium Maintainers <pkg-chromium-ma...@lists.alioth.debian.org>
>>
>> If you wish to submit further information on this problem, please
>> send it to 821...@bugs.debian.org.
>>
>> Please do not send mail to ow...@bugs.debian.org unless you wish
>> to report a problem with the Bug-tracking system.
>>
>> --
>> 821463: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=821463
>> Debian Bug Tracking System
>> Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
>>
>
>

Bug#821463: Info received (Bug#821463:NOT fixed in chromium-browser 50.0.2661.75-2)

[Bryan Cebuliak]

Aw snap! The   bug   persists in the  latest 50.0.2661.94 update.

On 30 April 2016 at 15:12, Debian Bug Tracking System  wrote:

> Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding
> this Bug report.
>
> This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message
> has been received.
>
> Your message is being forwarded to the package maintainers and other
> interested parties for their attention; they will reply in due course.
>
> Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s):
>  Debian Chromium Maintainers 
>
> If you wish to submit further information on this problem, please
> send it to 821...@bugs.debian.org.
>
> Please do not send mail to ow...@bugs.debian.org unless you wish
> to report a problem with the Bug-tracking system.
>
> --
> 821463: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=821463
> Debian Bug Tracking System
> Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
>

Bug#821463: NOT fixed in chromium-browser 50.0.2661.75-2

[Bryan Cebuliak]

This  bug is not the  same  as bug 821154  and  is  not  yet   fixed.
Still "Aw   snap " when  using   gmail.
The  bug   does  not  appear on chromium (50.0.2661.75-1~deb8u1) [security].

Bug#622280: two workarounds necessary now for gnucash to start

[Bryan Cebuliak]

The problem  with   the  catalogue  only   started  at 1.8.8+1-1  and
 persists to 1.8.8+1-2.

On 1 May 2011 01:02, Rob Browning r...@defaultvalue.org wrote:
 Rob Browning r...@defaultvalue.org writes:

 Bryan Cebuliak bryan.cebul...@gmail.com writes:

 Correct, Jacek. Both guile-1.8-dev  and your  manual  fix  are  needed
  for gnucash to  start with   guile  1.8.8. Should  this  be  a  new
 bug   or  are   developers  onto it?

 I'm not sure, but I think the problem may have been that the catalog
 needs to be updated whenever either the Guile or SLIB packages are
 upgraded, which wasn't possible via guile-X.Y-slib alone, but I'm
 wondering if it might be possible now, via triggers.  I'll have to do
 some investigation.

 Jacek Politowski j...@jp.pl.eu.org writes:

 After migration to guile-1.8 there is slib modules(?) catalogue
 missing ('slibcat' file), which probably should be created by some
 postinst scripts (either slib's or guile's).

 Actually, I forgot to ask.  Was this with 1.8.8+1-1 (or newer), or some
 older version?  As of 1.8.8+1-1, I reinstated the guile-1.8-slib
 package, and it should handle creating the catalog (though gnucash will
 have to depend on it).

 Actually, though, now that I think about it, Gnucash should hold off on
 adding that dependency.  I'm starting to wonder if triggers might allow
 us to drop guile-1.8-slib altogether (again), and just have the main
 guile package handle managing the catalog.

 Thanks
 --
 Rob Browning
 rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org
 GPG as of 2002-11-03 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4




--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#622280: two workarounds necessary now for gnucash to start

[Bryan Cebuliak]

In  the   meantime, Gnucash   maintainers   have  wisely  reverted
Gnucash  2.4.5-2  back to   guile   1.6  for  us  bleeding  users.

On 1 May 2011 08:38, Bryan Cebuliak bryan.cebul...@gmail.com wrote:
 The problem  with   the  catalogue  only   started  at 1.8.8+1-1  and
  persists to 1.8.8+1-2.

 On 1 May 2011 01:02, Rob Browning r...@defaultvalue.org wrote:
 Rob Browning r...@defaultvalue.org writes:

 Bryan Cebuliak bryan.cebul...@gmail.com writes:

 Correct, Jacek. Both guile-1.8-dev  and your  manual  fix  are  needed
  for gnucash to  start with   guile  1.8.8. Should  this  be  a  new
 bug   or  are   developers  onto it?

 I'm not sure, but I think the problem may have been that the catalog
 needs to be updated whenever either the Guile or SLIB packages are
 upgraded, which wasn't possible via guile-X.Y-slib alone, but I'm
 wondering if it might be possible now, via triggers.  I'll have to do
 some investigation.

 Jacek Politowski j...@jp.pl.eu.org writes:

 After migration to guile-1.8 there is slib modules(?) catalogue
 missing ('slibcat' file), which probably should be created by some
 postinst scripts (either slib's or guile's).

 Actually, I forgot to ask.  Was this with 1.8.8+1-1 (or newer), or some
 older version?  As of 1.8.8+1-1, I reinstated the guile-1.8-slib
 package, and it should handle creating the catalog (though gnucash will
 have to depend on it).

 Actually, though, now that I think about it, Gnucash should hold off on
 adding that dependency.  I'm starting to wonder if triggers might allow
 us to drop guile-1.8-slib altogether (again), and just have the main
 guile package handle managing the catalog.

 Thanks
 --
 Rob Browning
 rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org
 GPG as of 2002-11-03 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4





--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#622280: two workarounds necessary now for gnucash to start

[Bryan Cebuliak]

Correct, Jacek. Both guile-1.8-dev  and your  manual  fix  are  needed
 for gnucash to  start with   guile  1.8.8. Should  this  be  a  new
bug   or  are   developers  onto it?



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#622280: on update to guile 1.8.8 workaround is failing

[Bryan Cebuliak]

On update to guile 1.8.8 the previous workaround does  not   work and
Gnucash   does  not   start.

$ gnucash
gnc.bin-Message: main: binreloc relocation support was disabled at
configure time.

Backtrace:
In unknown file:
   ?:  0* [primitive-load-path c-interface.scm]
In /usr/share/gnucash/scm/c-interface.scm:
  21:  1* [slib:require hash-table]
In /usr/share/guile/1.8/slib/require.scm:
 141:  2  (cond ((not feature) (set! *catalog* #f)) ((slib:provided?
feature)) ...)
 145:  3  (let* ((path #)) (cond (# #) (# # #) (# # #) ...))
 145:  4* [catalog:get hash-table]
  76:  5* (if (not *catalog*) (let* ((slibcat #)) (cond (# # #)) ...))
  77:  6  (let* ((slibcat #)) (cond (# # #)) (cond (slibcat #)) ...)
  78:  7* (cond ((not #) (slib:load-source #) (set! slibcat #)))
  79:  8* [#procedure #f (pathname . extra)
/usr/share/guile/1.8/slib/mklibcat]
 205:  9  [with-load-pathname /usr/share/guile/1.8/slib/mklibcat ...]
In /usr/share/guile/1.8/slib/guile.init:
...
 152: 10  [dynamic-wind #procedure #f () #procedure #f ()
#procedure #f ()]
In unknown file:
   ?: 11* [#procedure #f ()]
In /usr/share/guile/1.8/slib/require.scm:
 207: 12* [apply #procedure slib:load # #]
In unknown file:
   ?: 13  [slib:load /usr/share/guile/1.8/slib/mklibcat]
...
   ?: 14  [dynamic-wind #procedure #f () #procedure #f ()
#procedure #f ()]
   ?: 15* [#procedure #f ()]
In /usr/share/guile/1.8/slib/guile.init:
 395: 16* (let* ((errinfo #)) (if (and errinfo #) (apply throw errinfo)))
 398: 17  (if (and errinfo (catch # # #)) (apply throw errinfo))
In unknown file:
...
   ?: 18  [throw]

/usr/share/guile/1.8/slib/guile.init:398:17: In procedure open-file in
expression (if (and errinfo #) (apply throw errinfo)):
/usr/share/guile/1.8/slib/guile.init:398:17: Permission denied:
/usr/share/guile/1.8/slibcat



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#556046: ATA drive root partition does not exist

[Bryan Cebuliak]

Is   this  relevant? Will  test  later unless   someone   else does:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/devmapper/+bug/358654

2009/11/14 Bryan Cebuliak bryan.cebul...@gmail.com

 This  bug may be a duplicate of 556046:
 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=556046

 
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=555702http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=556046

Bug#556046: ATA drive root partition does not exist

[Bryan Cebuliak]

Is  this  relevant? udev creates broken initrd
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=554364

2009/11/16 Bryan Cebuliak bryan.cebul...@gmail.com

 Is   this  relevant? Will  test  later unless   someone   else does:
 https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/devmapper/+bug/358654

 2009/11/14 Bryan Cebuliak bryan.cebul...@gmail.com

 This  bug may be a duplicate of 556046:
 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=556046

  
 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=555702http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=556046

Bug#556046: ATA drive root partition does not exist

[Bryan Cebuliak]

This  bug may be a duplicate of 556046:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=556046

Bug#441363: old gnucash does not start

[Bryan Cebuliak]

 Dear Thomas,
 Yes. The stable upstream Gnucash does not require g-wrap. See:
 http://www.gnucash.org/
 ..To install GnuCash on other platforms, users will need Gnome 2,
 guile, and slib. Neither the currently used swig nor the previously
 used g-wrap packages are needed anymore when compiling from tarball or
 when installing a binary...

 Guile 1.6 does just fine on my Debian Sid partition, as long as guile
 1.8, including its g-wrap dependant, is not installed at the time of
 building gnucash.

 I am happily doing my accounts again. Though, apparently, the
 scheduled transactions can not be read by versions of Gnucash 2.0 or
 less.

 As for SLIB and Guile. It appears to be last year's problem resurfaced
 according to the upstream discussion which you have read here:
 http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=347922
 Seems to be something to do with loading SLIB's  guile.init at the
 appropriate moment, according to Quillian Rutherford.
 Cheers
 Bryan
 On 9/15/07, Thomas Bushnell BSG [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  On Fri, 2007-09-14 at 15:20 +1000, Bryan Cebuliak wrote:
   Current stable gnucash 2.2.1 will  build  properly as  long as guile
   1.8 [and its dependants] is[are] not installed. Guile 1.8 can  be
   installed  later  with  no interference. See:
   http://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/Building
 
  Is this true even if we are using g-wrap?  Part of the problem, AIUI, is
  that Debian's g-wrap requires guile-1.8.
 
  Thomas
 
 
 




-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#441363: Fwd: Bug#441363: old gnucash does not start

[Bryan Cebuliak]

-- Forwarded message --
From: Bryan Cebuliak [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sep 15, 2007 7:47 AM
Subject: Re: Bug#441363: old gnucash does not start
To: Thomas Bushnell BSG [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Dear Thomas,
Yes. The stable upstream Gnucash does not require g-wrap. See:
http://www.gnucash.org/
..To install GnuCash on other platforms, users will need Gnome 2,
guile, and slib. Neither the currently used swig nor the previously
used g-wrap packages are needed anymore when compiling from tarball or
when installing a binary...

Guile 1.6 does just fine on my Debian Sid partition, as long as guile
1.8, including its g-wrap dependant, is not installed at the time of
building gnucash.

I am happily doing my accounts again. Though, apparently, the
scheduled transactions can not be read by versions of Gnucash 2.0 or
less.

As for SLIB and Guile. It appears to be last year's problem resurfaced
according to the upstream discussion which you have read here:
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=347922
Seems to be something to do with loading SLIB's  guile.init at the
appropriate moment, according to Quillian Rutherford.
Cheers
Bryan
On 9/15/07, Thomas Bushnell BSG [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On Fri, 2007-09-14 at 15:20 +1000, Bryan Cebuliak wrote:
  Current stable gnucash 2.2.1 will  build  properly as  long as guile
  1.8 [and its dependants] is[are] not installed. Guile 1.8 can  be
  installed  later  with  no interference. See:
  http://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/Building

 Is this true even if we are using g-wrap?  Part of the problem, AIUI, is
 that Debian's g-wrap requires guile-1.8.

 Thomas






-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#441363: old gnucash does not start

[Bryan Cebuliak]

Current stable gnucash 2.2.1 will  build  properly as  long as guile
1.8 [and its dependants] is[are] not installed. Guile 1.8 can  be
installed  later  with  no interference. See:
http://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/Building



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]