Bug#753913: irssi: unable to connect to any server
Package: irssi
Version: 0.8.15-5
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Trying to connect to any server whatsoever, I get this:
23:30 -!- Irssi: Looking up chat.freenode.net
23:30 -!- Irssi: Connecting to chat.freenode.net [195.148.124.79] port 6667
23:30 -!- Irssi: Unable to connect server chat.freenode.net port 6667 [Invalid
argument]
Here is the relevant piece of strace log:
socket(PF_INET, SOCK_STREAM, IPPROTO_IP) = 4
fcntl(4, F_SETFL, O_RDONLY|O_NONBLOCK) = 0
setsockopt(4, SOL_SOCKET, SO_REUSEADDR, [1], 4) = 0
setsockopt(4, SOL_SOCKET, SO_KEEPALIVE, [1], 4) = 0
bind(4, {sa_family=AF_INET, sin_port=htons(0),
sin_addr=inet_addr(127.0.1.1)}, 16) = 0
connect(4, {sa_family=AF_INET, sin_port=htons(6667),
sin_addr=inet_addr(82.96.64.4)}, 16) = -1 EINVAL (Invalid argument)
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 7.5
APT prefers stable-updates
APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 3.10.46.3 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Versions of packages irssi depends on:
ii libc6 2.13-38+deb7u1
ii libglib2.0-02.33.12+really2.32.4-5
ii libncurses5 5.9-10
ii libperl5.14 5.14.2-21+deb7u1
ii libssl1.0.0 1.0.1e-2+deb7u11
ii libtinfo5 5.9-10
ii perl5.14.2-21+deb7u1
ii perl-base [perlapi-5.14.2] 5.14.2-21+deb7u1
irssi recommends no packages.
Versions of packages irssi suggests:
ii irssi-scripts 20120326
-- no debconf information
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#698813: Too many levels of symbolic links on upgrade
On Mon, 25 Feb 2013 11:42:14 -0600 Rob Browning r...@defaultvalue.org wrote: Rob Any chance you might have installed some unofficial emacs package Rob that might have tried to use the emacs flavor for itself? Yes, that is quite possible. For a while I maintained my own emacs package while I waited for the Gnome dependencies in the official ones to get sorted out. I also have a number of personal Lisp packages and some of them are a bit old, and may have been created before I had sufficient understanding of the framework. So, in my case at least, the bug can ultimately be blamed on the carbon-based system between chair and keyboard :-P Now to find what happened to the other bloke ... -- Please *no* private copies of mailing list or newsgroup messages. gpg public key: 1024D/C6FF61AD fingerprint: 66DC D68F 5C1B 4D71 2EE5 BD03 8A00 786C C6FF 61AD http://www.gravatar.com/avatar/c66875cda51109f76c6312f4d4743d1e.png -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#698597: [pkg-dhcp-devel] Bug#698597: isc-dhcp: CVE-2012-1667 patch (for Wheezy)
On Sat, 2 Feb 2013 17:57:56 -0500 Michael Gilbert mgilb...@debian.org wrote: Michael So, the issue with the bind embed is that even though the Michael entire thing is built, only a very small part is actually used Michael by dhcp. I don't really have the time to look into whether the Michael vulnerable bind code for this CVE is traversed or not. Someone Michael needs to do that. Why is it embedded in the first place, rather than link to the shared libs built from bind? -- Ian Zimmerman gpg public key: 1024D/C6FF61AD fingerprint: 66DC D68F 5C1B 4D71 2EE5 BD03 8A00 786C C6FF 61AD http://www.gravatar.com/avatar/c66875cda51109f76c6312f4d4743d1e.png Rule 420: All persons more than eight miles high to leave the court. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#698813: Too many levels of symbolic links on upgrade
Antoine Beaupré anar...@koumbit.org: It looks like I may have created the 'emacs23' symlink 4 months ago - I suspect something broke back then and this was the workaround I found. No, it happens to me too and I am certain I never messed with these directories manually. -- Ian Zimmerman gpg public key: 1024D/C6FF61AD fingerprint: 66DC D68F 5C1B 4D71 2EE5 BD03 8A00 786C C6FF 61AD http://www.gravatar.com/avatar/c66875cda51109f76c6312f4d4743d1e.png Rule 420: All persons more than eight miles high to leave the court. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#698813: Too many levels of symbolic links on upgrade
On Wed, 23 Jan 2013 18:29:27 -0800 Ian Zimmerman i...@buug.org wrote: Antoine It looks like I may have created the 'emacs23' symlink 4 months Antoine ago - I suspect something broke back then and this was the Antoine workaround I found. Ian No, it happens to me too and I am certain I never messed with these Ian directories manually. I think I know what the problem is. Look at #695501. The relevant information is indeed there - but there is a subdirectory emacs as well as one for the specific flavor (emacs23 in this case). The machinery looks at the directory and thinks emacs is one of the flavors that must be handled. So it tries to symlink these files from the flavor specific subdirectories of /etc and /usr/share (which is emacs ...) into the generic subdirectory (which is also emacs). Voila. -- Ian Zimmerman gpg public key: 1024D/C6FF61AD fingerprint: 66DC D68F 5C1B 4D71 2EE5 BD03 8A00 786C C6FF 61AD http://www.gravatar.com/avatar/c66875cda51109f76c6312f4d4743d1e.png Rule 420: All persons more than eight miles high to leave the court. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#698813: Too many levels of symbolic links on upgrade
On Wed, 23 Jan 2013 19:09:36 -0800 Ian Zimmerman i...@buug.org wrote: Ian No, it happens to me too and I am certain I never messed with these Ian directories manually. Ian Ian I think I know what the problem is. Look at #695501. Ian Ian The relevant information is indeed there - but there is a Ian subdirectory emacs as well as one for the specific flavor Ian (emacs23 in this case). The machinery looks at the directory and Ian thinks emacs is one of the flavors that must be handled. So it Ian tries to symlink these files from the flavor specific Ian subdirectories of /etc and /usr/share (which is emacs ...) into Ian the generic subdirectory (which is also emacs). Voila. And indeed, removing the offending file i.e. /var/lib/emacsen-common/state/flavor/installed/emacs seems to land things back in sane territory. So the question is, how did that file get there? I am sure I didn't create it. -- Ian Zimmerman gpg public key: 1024D/C6FF61AD fingerprint: 66DC D68F 5C1B 4D71 2EE5 BD03 8A00 786C C6FF 61AD http://www.gravatar.com/avatar/c66875cda51109f76c6312f4d4743d1e.png Rule 420: All persons more than eight miles high to leave the court. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#698813: Too many levels of symbolic links on upgrade
On Wed, 23 Jan 2013 21:17:57 -0600 Rob Browning r...@defaultvalue.org wrote: Ian The relevant information is indeed there - but there is a Ian subdirectory emacs as well as one for the specific flavor Ian (emacs23 in this case). The machinery looks at the directory and Ian thinks emacs is one of the flavors that must be handled. Rob Which machinery do you mean? /usr/lib/emacsen-common/lib.pl, to be precise. -- Ian Zimmerman gpg public key: 1024D/C6FF61AD fingerprint: 66DC D68F 5C1B 4D71 2EE5 BD03 8A00 786C C6FF 61AD http://www.gravatar.com/avatar/c66875cda51109f76c6312f4d4743d1e.png Rule 420: All persons more than eight miles high to leave the court. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#698813: Too many levels of symbolic links on upgrade
On Wed, 23 Jan 2013 22:05:12 -0600 Rob Browning r...@defaultvalue.org wrote: Rob So are you saying that emacsen-common somehow created the Rob problematic symlink? Hell yeah. Sorry if that wasn't clear. The first thing I did before anything else was removing the links by hand (with rm), then I unpacked the emacsen-common deb, then did dpkg-reconfigure --force -- and the bad symlinks reappeared. Looks to me like /usr/lib/emacsen-common/packages/install/emacsen-common is where it happens. It is probably called with $FLAVOR set in turn to each file name in /var/lib/emacsen-common/state/flavor/installed, and as I say in the other subthread, somehow that directory contained a file emacs on my system. -- Ian Zimmerman gpg public key: 1024D/C6FF61AD fingerprint: 66DC D68F 5C1B 4D71 2EE5 BD03 8A00 786C C6FF 61AD http://www.gravatar.com/avatar/c66875cda51109f76c6312f4d4743d1e.png Rule 420: All persons more than eight miles high to leave the court. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#696817: dovecot destroys user ssl configuration
Me too :-P Ob-content: this looks like a rerun of #644121. -- Ian Zimmerman gpg public key: 1024D/C6FF61AD fingerprint: 66DC D68F 5C1B 4D71 2EE5 BD03 8A00 786C C6FF 61AD http://www.gravatar.com/avatar/c66875cda51109f76c6312f4d4743d1e.png Rule 420: All persons more than eight miles high to leave the court. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#692926: i3lock: Doesn't unlock screen in normal pam_unix environment
Package: i3lock Version: 2.4.1-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Dear Maintainer, * What led up to the situation? I typed i3lock -c 00 in a terminal emulator window. After the screen went black as expected, I typed my password followed by the Enter key. * What was the outcome of this action? On the screen, I get successive indicators verifying and then wrong!. Screen goes black again. In /var/log/auth.log, I see a line saying: unix_chkpwd[1234]: check_pass; user unknown * What outcome did you expect instead? Naturally, I expected the screen to be restored. Notes: 1. I can login normally on a text console and in xdm. 2. i3lock seems to work correctly when the PAM module is pam_rsa (from the libpam-rsa package). It feels like an ABI mismatch with the base PAM package implementing (but not advertising) a different ABI. 3. Marking grave because I think 99% of users use pam_unix, and in that situation the package is unusable. -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 3.4.18-custom (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages i3lock depends on: ii libc6 2.13-35 ii libcairo2 1.12.2-2 ii libev41:4.11-1 ii libpam0g 1.1.3-7.1 ii libx11-6 2:1.5.0-1 ii libxcb-dpms0 1.8.1-2 ii libxcb-image0 0.3.9-1 ii libxcb-keysyms1 0.3.9-1 ii libxcb-shm0 1.8.1-2 ii libxcb-xinerama0 1.8.1-2 ii libxcb1 1.8.1-2 i3lock recommends no packages. i3lock suggests no packages. -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#692926: i3lock: Doesn't unlock screen in normal pam_unix environment
Well, this is embarassing - it turned out my /etc/shadow wasn't readable by group shadow. Sorry for the noise. -- Ian Zimmerman gpg public key: 1024D/C6FF61AD fingerprint: 66DC D68F 5C1B 4D71 2EE5 BD03 8A00 786C C6FF 61AD http://www.gravatar.com/avatar/c66875cda51109f76c6312f4d4743d1e.png Rule 420: All persons more than eight miles high to leave the court. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#676454: util-linux: postinst edits locally modified configuration file
Package: util-linux Version: 2.20.1-5 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 10.7.3 At the end of my latest upgrade from testing: diff --git a/default/rcS b/default/rcS index 1e360e2..a3f63ed 100644 --- a/default/rcS +++ b/default/rcS @@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ SULOGIN=no DELAYLOGIN=no # assume that the BIOS clock is set to UTC time (recommended) -UTC=yes +#UTC=yes # OBSOLETE; see /etc/adjtime and hwclock(8). # be more verbose during the boot process VERBOSE=no and what do you know ... [29+1]~$ fgrep -B5 -A5 OBSOLETE /var/lib/dpkg/info/util-linux.postinst sed -i -e 's:^UTC$:LOCAL:' /etc/adjtime else sed -i -e 's:^LOCAL$:UTC:' /etc/adjtime fi if [ -f /etc/default/rcS ]; then sed -i -e 's:^\(UTC=.*\)$:#\1 # OBSOLETE; see /etc/adjtime and hwclock(8).:' /etc/default/rcS fi fi if [ -x /usr/sbin/update-mime ]; then update-mime Not good. -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 3.3.7-custom (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages util-linux depends on: ii debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.5.43 ii dpkg 1.16.3 ii initscripts2.88dsf-22.1 ii install-info 4.13a.dfsg.1-10 ii libblkid1 2.20.1-5 ii libc6 2.13-32 ii libncurses55.9-7 ii libselinux12.1.9-2 ii libslang2 2.2.4-10 ii libtinfo5 5.9-7 ii libuuid1 2.20.1-5 ii lsb-base 4.1+Debian4 ii tzdata 2012c-1 ii zlib1g 1:1.2.7.dfsg-11 util-linux recommends no packages. Versions of packages util-linux suggests: pn dosfstools 3.0.12-1 pn kbd 1.15.3-9 pn util-linux-locales none -- debconf information excluded -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#644121: dovecot-core: destroys user configuration from dovecot-common
Helmut 4) modify /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf Helmut Can you give any other hint on how to reproduce the problem? It has been a while and I have a tendency to forget moments of pain as quickly as I can ;-) But if I remember right, it wasn't dovecot.conf I was talking about here, but rather the bit files in /etc/dovecot/conf.d/ -- Ian Zimmerman gpg public key: 1024D/C6FF61AD fingerprint: 66DC D68F 5C1B 4D71 2EE5 BD03 8A00 786C C6FF 61AD Rule 420: All persons more than eight miles high to leave the court. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#650556: udev: upgrade removes locally modified conffile
Package: udev Version: 175-2 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 10.7.3 Dear Maintainer, after upgrading udev to 175-2 the file /etc/modprobe.d/blacklist.conf is gone, even though it has been locally modified. The latest bit of aptitude log is: === [INSTALL, DEPENDENCIES] libffi5 [UPGRADE] libglib2.0-0 2.28.8-1 - 2.30.2-4 [UPGRADE] libglib2.0-data 2.28.8-1 - 2.30.2-4 [UPGRADE] libudev0 172-1 - 175-2 [UPGRADE] udev 172-1 - 175-2 === -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 3.1.0-1-686-pae (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages udev depends on: ii debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.5.41 ii libc6 2.13-21 ii libselinux12.1.0-4 ii libudev0 175-2 ii lsb-base 3.2-28 ii util-linux 2.19.1-5 Versions of packages udev recommends: ii pciutils 1:3.1.7-12 ii usbutils 1:004-2 udev suggests no packages. -- debconf information: udev/new_kernel_needed: false udev/title/upgrade: udev/reboot_needed: udev/sysfs_deprecated_incompatibility: -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#650556: udev: upgrade removes locally modified conffile
Marco Was it renamed or what else? Yes, I think it was renamed to one of those *.dpkg-* names. -- Ian Zimmerman gpg public key: 1024D/C6FF61AD fingerprint: 66DC D68F 5C1B 4D71 2EE5 BD03 8A00 786C C6FF 61AD Rule 420: All persons more than eight miles high to leave the court. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#649463: libpam-rsa: code to hash hostname and username is broken
Package: libpam-rsa
Version: 0.8-9-2.2+b1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Dear Maintainer,
I executed:
# pamrsakp itz matica /var/lib/pam-rsa/ /mnt/auto/sandisk/ sha1 yes
and the output contained this:
writing new private key to '/mnt/auto/sandisk/(stdin)=/(stdin)=.pem.plain'
while I expected something along the lines of
/mnt/auto/sandisk/${matica_hash}/${itz_hash}.pem.plain
Looking at the script, it tries to compute the hash like this:
HOSTHASH=`echo -n ${TARGETHOST} | ${O} dgst -sha1 | cut -b -8`
just what is ${0} supposed to expand to here??
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 3.0.0-1-686-pae (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Versions of packages libpam-rsa depends on:
ii debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.5.40
ii libc6 2.13-21
ii libpam0g 1.1.3-6
ii libssl1.0.01.0.0e-2
libpam-rsa recommends no packages.
libpam-rsa suggests no packages.
-- Configuration Files:
/etc/security/pamrsakp.cnf changed [not included]
-- debconf information:
libpam-rsa/privkey_name_hash: sha1
* libpam-rsa/pubkey_dir: /var/lib/pam-rsa
libpam-rsa/log_auth_result: true
* libpam-rsa/no_configuration: false
* libpam-rsa/privkey_dir: /mnt/auto/sandisk
libpam-rsa/pam_prompt: Please enter your passphrase
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#644121: dovecot-core: destroys user configuration from dovecot-common
Package: dovecot-core
Version: 1:2.0.15-1
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 10.7.3
I was upgrading via aptitude:
[REMOVE, NOT USED] dovecot-common
[INSTALL, DEPENDENCIES] dovecot-core
[UPGRADE] dovecot-imapd 1:2.0.13-1.1 - 1:2.0.15-1
This resulted in all my local configuration in /etc/dovecot/ being
trashed, and overwritten with the shipped dovecot-core versions.
Apparently ucf doesn't handle this situation well (a package being
renamed), so some manual hacks in the postinst are in order to prevent
this from happening.
-- Package-specific info:
dovecot configuration
-
# 2.0.15: /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf
# OS: Linux 2.6.39.1-linode34 i686 Debian wheezy/sid
lda_mailbox_autocreate = yes
listen = *
log_timestamp = %Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%S
mail_location = mbox:~/Mail:INBOX=/var/mail/%u
mail_privileged_group = mail
passdb {
driver = pam
}
postmaster_address = postmaster@localhost
protocols = imap
quota_full_tempfail = yes
ssl_cert = /etc/ssl/certs/ahiker.pem
ssl_key = /etc/ssl/private/ahiker.homeip.net.key
userdb {
driver = passwd
}
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.39.1-linode34 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Versions of packages dovecot-core depends on:
ii adduser 3.113
ii libbz2-1.0 1.0.5-7
ii libc6 2.13-21
ii libpam-runtime 1.1.3-2
ii libpam0g1.1.3-2
ii libssl1.0.0 1.0.0e-2
ii openssl 1.0.0e-2
ii ucf 3.0025+nmu2
ii zlib1g 1:1.2.3.4.dfsg-3
dovecot-core recommends no packages.
Versions of packages dovecot-core suggests:
ii dovecot-gssapinone
ii dovecot-imapd 1:2.0.15-1
ii dovecot-ldap none
ii dovecot-lmtpd none
ii dovecot-managesieved none
ii dovecot-mysql none
ii dovecot-pgsql none
ii dovecot-pop3d none
ii dovecot-sieve none
ii dovecot-solr none
ii dovecot-sqlitenone
ii ntp 1:4.2.6.p3+dfsg-1
Versions of packages dovecot-core is related to:
pn dovecot-core [dovecot-common] 1:2.0.15-1
pn dovecot-dbgnone
pn dovecot-devnone
pn dovecot-gssapi none
pn dovecot-imapd 1:2.0.15-1
pn dovecot-ldap none
pn dovecot-lmtpd none
pn dovecot-managesieved none
pn dovecot-mysql none
pn dovecot-pgsql none
pn dovecot-pop3d none
pn dovecot-sieve none
pn dovecot-sqlite none
-- no debconf information
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#512132: xspecs: no upstream pointer in copyright
Package: xspecs Version: 1:1.4-3 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 12.5 In addition, the copyright file must say where the upstream sources (if any) were obtained. It doesn't. This is a problem because there's no way to work around bug 383642 by rebuilding the docs myself. -- System Information: Debian Release: 5.0 APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.28.matica2009011001 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#509767: lxsession-lite: segfaults
Package: lxsession-lite Version: 0.3.6-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable i...@matica:~$ ulimit -c unlimited i...@matica:~$ lxsession Segmentation fault (core dumped) core file is here: http://primate.net/~itz/lxsession-core let me know if i can assist further .. -- System Information: Debian Release: 5.0 APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.26.8matica2008112501 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages lxsession-lite depends on: ii libatk1.0-0 1.22.0-1 The ATK accessibility toolkit ii libc6 2.7-16 GNU C Library: Shared libraries ii libcairo2 1.6.4-7The Cairo 2D vector graphics libra ii libdbus-1-3 1.2.1-4simple interprocess messaging syst ii libglib2.0-0 2.16.6-1 The GLib library of C routines ii libgtk2.0-0 2.12.11-4 The GTK+ graphical user interface ii libpango1.0-0 1.20.5-3 Layout and rendering of internatio ii libxau6 1:1.0.3-3 X11 authorisation library Versions of packages lxsession-lite recommends: pn hal none (no description available) ii openbox [x-window-manager]3.4.7.2-3 standards compliant, fast, light-w ii sawfish [x-window-manager]1:1.3.3-1 a window manager for X11 lxsession-lite suggests no packages. -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#467314: jacal: manpage(s) under /usr/man
Package: jacal Version: 1b9-1 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 12.1 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ls /usr/man/man1 jacal.1.gz [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ dpkg -S /usr/man jacal: /usr/man -- System Information: Debian Release: lenny/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.22-3-686 (SMP w/1 CPU core) Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages jacal depends on: ii guile-1.6 1.6.8-6The GNU extension language and Sch ii slib 3b1-2 Portable Scheme library jacal recommends no packages. -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#357439: amaya does not start
The ovbious next data point would be - do the upstream packages work with Composite enabled? Or have you already done that? -- A true pessimist won't be discouraged by a little success. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#362296: too simple ... now old X11 installations are broken
With the fix by David Nusinow, systems that have not transitioned are broken. Please either look in both places for the encoding directory, or else introduce a versioned depend or conflict with the appropriate version of xfonts-base. Reopening the bug. -- A true pessimist won't be discouraged by a little success. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#362296: x-ttcidfont-conf: now broken for old X11
Package: x-ttcidfont-conf Version: 22 Followup-For: Bug #362296 Your fix made it assume mkfontdir is /usr/bin without checking, so now it breaks on my system (see xutils version below). I think you either need to look in both places for the program, of add a versioned depend / conflict. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.15-8custom1 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Versions of packages x-ttcidfont-conf depends on: ii debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.5.0 Debian configuration management sy ii defoma0.11.8-0.1 Debian Font Manager -- automatic f ii xutils6.9.0.dfsg.1-6 X Window System utility programs x-ttcidfont-conf recommends no packages. -- debconf information: x-ttcidfont-conf/xtt_vl: * x-ttcidfont-conf/tt_backend: freetype * x-ttcidfont-conf/font_path_change2: -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
